Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Ladies! You're In the Army Now! Homophobic U-Turns! | HBR News 460

Transcript

Ladies! You're In the Army Now! Homophobic U-Turns! | HBR News 460 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:50
  Yay, thank you. Why do you woman room everything? This is HBr
• 1:11
  News Number. Why am I forgetting this? Four sixty ladies, You're in
• 1:15
  the army now and Homophobic U Turns, where we discuss the news of the
• 1:19
  week and give it the badger treatment. Good afternoon, good morning, good
• 1:30
  evening everyone wherever you may be, and welcome to HBr News. I hope
• 1:37
  you guys are ready for some really crazy news stories this week, and that
• 1:42
  you're laughing at all of this absurdity so that you're not consumed by it.
• 1:45
  I am your host, Brian and I am joined by, as always,
• 1:48
  my lovely co hosts, Hannah Wallen and doctor Ran Rakam. We have a
• 1:52
  great show lighting up for you guys this week, so please be sure to
• 1:55
  continue the conversations both in the chat as well as the comments section on this
• 1:59
  week's news. We're going to be discussing the new motions that apparently have reasonably
• 2:04
  been passed to make women register for selective service, a high level intersectional sues,
• 2:10
  a prison for oppression. You turn signs are homophobic now and more so
• 2:15
  stick around. It's going to be a good time and be sure to join
• 2:19
  us afterwards for the patron only show. So I have this already on display
• 2:24
  here. You guys might know that the day before yesterday was Father's Day.
• 2:28
  Happy Father's Day to any of you fathers that are out there. Happy belated
• 2:30
  Father's Day. And regardless of what the world seems to say, you are
• 2:37
  absolutely necessary. That you are in fact essential. But the Guardian doesn't seem
• 2:44
  to think so. So we had this opinion piece from our friends over at
• 2:46
  the Guardian that I thought we would look at, written by what I assume
• 2:50
  as a man Seamus O'Reilly, and the article is titled my son is suspicious
• 2:54
  of the idea of Father's Day. Why would he want to celebrate the lesser
• 3:00
  of his two parents? Yeah? So what? I already want to strangle
• 3:04
  him, asshole. I've read this article and it's not as bad as the
• 3:12
  as the headline would would suggest. I've even got a round about it.
• 3:16
  But I'm gonna save it for the after show. Yeah, save it for
• 3:20
  the after show. I haven't looked at it, but I know it was
• 3:23
  going around the Twitter verse and people like Phil Mitchell and such have been commenting,
• 3:30
  but I haven't looked at it myself. Has anyone else noticed the legacy
• 3:34
  media actually mentioning Father's Day. Yeah, they normally would. This year,
• 3:38
  they they're mentioning it, and it's not in the context of shitting all over
• 3:44
  it like they usually do. They're just just mentioning it like you would if
• 3:49
  you so much as gave a ship. It's pretty obviously a tarp. Why
• 3:53
  would they do this if it wasn't a tarp? Must be a walk coming.
• 3:59
  Oh what do you know? What do you know? Yeah, that's
• 4:01
  actually a good point for decades. It's men are scumb Children don't need fathers
• 4:05
  destroy the family unit. Suddenly a wild war appears. Now as we love
• 4:11
  fathers, we've always loved fathers, and we've got meat shields to build.
• 4:15
  Give me, give me the baby daddies. Oh what he wanted to raise
• 4:19
  the kids? What? Fuck him? He's the baby daddy now and now
• 4:23
  he's a dead, big daddy. And now you beg the dead too,
• 4:26
  because you couldn't have hard to feed it. But fuck you too. Yeah.
• 4:30
  You may think you hate the media, but you don't hate the media
• 4:32
  enough. But you knew that anyway, So do your best to hate the
• 4:38
  media more today than add another lego brick to your fortress. Of the media
• 4:43
  hate me an army of lego dreadnoughts. Yes, all right, so anyway,
• 4:55
  join us in the patron show. Becoming a member, go to you
• 5:00
  feed the Badger dot com, forward slash subscribe to join us in the discord
• 5:03
  and feed the Badger dot com. Just the tip to send us a message
• 5:09
  during this show. Reminds me, by the way, I should double check
• 5:13
  to make sure we didn't get any messages on the on just the tip.
• 5:17
  So let me open that up before we get into today's stories. And if
• 5:23
  you don't want to wake up one morning, by the way, to find
• 5:24
  that we've been needed from the internet, then you must go to badger feed
• 5:29
  dot com. That is badger feed dot com. Okay, so no new
• 5:33
  messages yet, Uh, that is cool, and I will be on the
• 5:38
  lookout for those. So let us get into the story. All right.
• 5:42
  We're gonna be talking about women in the military. You're in the army now.
• 5:47
  Your mama's a big fat cow, remember that one. Your son up
• 5:51
  a bit, you never get rich. You're in the army now, all
• 5:55
  right, So that's a that's an old I just thought that one just dawned
• 6:01
  on me for some reason. All right, So the kid yes. This
• 6:08
  coming from thetimesnownews dot com. The House of Representatives on Friday past the measure
• 6:15
  to automatically register men age eighteen to twenty six for selective service. The bill
• 6:19
  was part of a National Defense Authorization Act NDAA, which sets US military and
• 6:26
  national security priorties over the next year. So we're getting ready for a draft.
• 6:30
  I don't know why, but all of a sudden this has become worthy
• 6:33
  of mention. We have been getting ready for a draft since Carter. People
• 6:41
  are not understanding this correctly, all right. The selective service registration requirement is
• 6:48
  the first step in the draft. It's not a separate thing from the draft.
• 6:55
  It's the shopping list that you make before you go to the grocery store.
• 6:58
  Right. It's part of the task, part of the thing. So
• 7:03
  when people say the draft hasn't been around for X long, no, that's
• 7:09
  a lie. No, No, I understand this. It's been going on
• 7:13
  as long as there's been a requirement for toister service registration. We have been
• 7:19
  in the first step of the draft. Yeah, for sure. I'm really
• 7:25
  adamant about that because I'm tired of feminists saying there's new drift there's new draft
• 7:30
  all rights. It's I think that there might be something worse here, but
• 7:33
  let me let me read this because everyone seems to be hung up on this
• 7:39
  now, including women. So recent news has reported that the National Defense Authorization
• 7:44
  Act proposes to require women to register for selective service, a move that has
• 7:49
  sparked controversy and debate. This change would amend the Military Service Act or Military
• 7:55
  Selective Service Act to include women in the registration process, making it mandatory for
• 8:00
  all individuals to register between the ages of eighteen and twenty six. The background
• 8:03
  on this is the selected service system was established in nineteen seventeen and since then
• 8:07
  all men between the ages of eighteen and twenty six have been required by law
• 8:13
  to register. However, women have not been included in this process until now.
• 8:16
  The NDAA proposal aims to make the registration process more inclusive and equitable,
• 8:22
  that's one way to put it, allowing the government to draw on the talent
• 8:26
  of unified of a unified nation in times of national emergency. So there's been
• 8:33
  some reactions. A proposal has received mixed reactions from politicians in the public.
• 8:37
  Some Republican Chip Roy of Texas and Senator of Mike Lee of Utah have expressed
• 8:43
  strong opposition, with Representative Roy stating quote you can go straight to Hell over
• 8:46
  my dead body and quote. Others like Donald Trump Junior have also voiced objections,
• 8:52
  saying that Democrats want to draft women to fight wars that nobody wants to
• 8:54
  be in the implications of this If the NDAA proposal becomes law, so it's
• 9:01
  right now, it's I think it recently past the House. It would require
• 9:05
  women to register for selective service, making them eligible for military service in times
• 9:11
  of national emergency. This change would bring the United States in line with several
• 9:16
  other countries including at Eritrea, Israel, Mozambique, North Korea, Meanmar,
• 9:22
  Mali, Morocco, Tunisia, Libya, Malaysia, Peru, Norway, and
• 9:26
  Sweden. In conclusion, the proposal to require women to register for selective service
• 9:33
  is a significant development in the United States, marking a shift towards greater inclusivity
• 9:37
  and equality. This is according to another source that I was looking at.
• 9:41
  While the move has spark controversy, it is essential to consider the potential benefits
• 9:46
  of having a more diverse and representative military force. This is all very flowery,
• 9:48
  langent, but one thing I do want to mention that the story that
• 9:52
  no one seems to be talking about, and it just the wording might be
• 9:56
  tricky here, but I think it's worth mentioning. It says here the House
• 10:00
  of Representatives, so we okay. So women, it sounds like, are
• 10:03
  essentially like, if this goes through, women are going to be required to
• 10:07
  register for selective service when they turned eighteen, the same way that men currently
• 10:13
  already are. But here's what is interesting, because if you're a man and
• 10:16
  you don't register, you could avoid it for a while, but then like
• 10:20
  eventually it's going to catch up to you. They're going to you know,
• 10:22
  you're gonna be fined, You're not going to be able to vote, there's
• 10:26
  like other things you're not going to be able to do unless until you register.
• 10:30
  But it looks like what they're doing here is there is a change maybe
• 10:35
  happening to men. It says the House of Representatives on Friday pass the measure
• 10:37
  to automatically register men ages age eighteen to twenty six for selective Service. So
• 10:45
  it sounds like they're automatically registering men and they're asking or they're essentially making it
• 10:52
  requirement for women. Do you see that if that's true, do you see
• 10:56
  that there's a subtle difference there. And this kind of reminds me of what
• 10:58
  happened in Ukraine because when Russia invaded and the war was going on, Ukraine
• 11:03
  made it to where men but within the age range. I think it's up
• 11:07
  to like forty five now, which is way beyond you know, what you
• 11:11
  would consider to be fighting age, where they basically were automatically conscripted. So
• 11:16
  this isn't like, you know, registering, This is essentially saying you're going
• 11:20
  to be automatically registered, so you're not even gonna have the opportunity to,
• 11:24
  I guess break that law if the wording on this is precise or at least
• 11:28
  sounds like what I'm what I'm thinking. So anyway, I'm not going to
• 11:33
  give my opinion on this right now. I'll let you guys have the floor
• 11:35
  and give your thoughts. There's been a couple of things they've been doing.
• 11:39
  One of them is if you register to vote in the United States in a
• 11:43
  lot of states, I don't know if it's every state, but I know
• 11:46
  Ohio is doing it. You you are automatically registered for selective service, and
• 11:54
  you in every state. You can't register for FASA without registering for selective service.
• 12:03
  You have to show proof. You actually have to give them your draft
• 12:09
  card or a copy of your draft card, or you can't get loans and
• 12:15
  grants and stuff for university attendance. So right now, in the United States,
• 12:22
  an eighteen year old boy a man according to the government. But I'm
• 12:26
  sorry, when I look at eighteen year olds, I do not see men
• 12:28
  and women, especially this generation. They just do not look adult to me,
• 12:35
  and they don't act adult to me. But the government will put a
• 12:39
  gun in your hands and send you to war. And that's the way it
• 12:45
  is. Right. You can't get a university education. You can't get the
• 12:50
  certification you need to be a school teacher. You can't get the certification you
• 12:54
  need to be a massage therapist. You can't get the certification you need to
• 12:58
  be an LPN. Right. You can't get the service cert case certification you
• 13:03
  need for a business to consider you as a candidate for management. No,
• 13:09
  unless you've you've registered to be sent to war. And it's been that way
• 13:15
  for men for a for a long long time, many many years decades.
• 13:22
  We had I want to say, five years during during the twentieth century after
• 13:31
  World War One, where that was not the case where you didn't have to
• 13:33
  register, and that was Nixon had initiated it, and then he resigned and
• 13:41
  Ford put into place what Nixon decided was going to happen, and as soon
• 13:46
  as Carter got elected he undid it. And so there was there were like
• 13:52
  five years of guys that didn't have to register, and then all of a
• 13:56
  sudden, if they were still within that time period where you have to register
• 14:01
  if you're above a certain age or under a certain age, and I can't
• 14:05
  remember what the oldest part of that is, you have like six years I
• 14:09
  think to register. Then then it was too late. They didn't get penalized
• 14:16
  for that because of you being outside of it. But in any case,
• 14:22
  they they were stuck. They all had to go and register, and it
• 14:28
  wasn't automatic at the time, so if they didn't didn't know the change had
• 14:33
  gone back, or if they didn't get get it done quickly enough, they
• 14:39
  were screwed. You know, all your whole rest of your life, you
• 14:43
  don't get to to get an education. So if you decide, like halfway
• 14:48
  to retirement, hey, I want to go into management. In this business,
• 14:52
  But I need to have a master's degree in something to be taken seriously
• 14:58
  for this. Men who were that age, who were in that time period
• 15:03
  that got they got screwed. A bunch of them got screwed out of being
• 15:09
  able to get their education. And there were there were some men that I
• 15:13
  knew that lost job and opportunities because of that that were baby boomers. So
• 15:20
  that was one thing that happened. Another thing that has happened is, you
• 15:24
  know, we we've started hearing this sort of this bullshit about women have been
• 15:33
  fighting for this, you know what change and everything, and I'm gonna I'm
• 15:37
  gonna nip that in the bud too. Right, years and years and years
• 15:41
  ago, when I think the National Coalition for Men started, when they started
• 15:48
  uh suing to change the system so that both sexes had to to to to
• 15:56
  register, the National Organization for Women wrote an amicus brief stating that it discrimination
• 16:03
  against women to not take women as seriously as men and therefore not require women
• 16:11
  to register for the draft. And that's pretty much all they've ever done is
• 16:15
  write an amicus brief, which it's not absolutely nothing, right, But when
• 16:25
  women wanted to kill babies, they marched in the streets, they contacted congressmen,
• 16:33
  they did sit ins, they did phone campaigns, they did letter campaigns,
• 16:37
  they wrote to newspapers, they got on social media when it came around.
• 16:41
  They did news shows where they went and talked about it on the news.
• 16:47
  You know, it's been this whole major effort. They filed lawsuits and
• 16:52
  funded those lawsuits. They did everything they possibly could. They created a network
• 16:59
  of people who would do it illegally, and people who would transport them,
• 17:04
  and people who would make sure that they were protected while they were doing that,
• 17:11
  keep them from getting caught, and so on, people that would help
• 17:14
  with recovery and everything. So they created a whole underground economy around this for
• 17:22
  killing babies. But they wrote a letter to the court about selective service,
• 17:29
  and that's it. That's all they've ever done and played victim of something that
• 17:33
  doesn't harm women at all, but harms men all the time in more than
• 17:40
  one way, more than just the worst way. So that's the logistic end
• 17:48
  of it, right, you look at the fairness end of it. We've
• 17:51
  been talking about this on HBr Talk for a couple of months now. The
• 17:56
  history of how conscription is connected to voting rights, and it's pretty solid.
• 18:06
  You look at the creation of the system under which we have voting rights,
• 18:11
  the parliamentary system, that goes back to the only people who were really subject
• 18:18
  to that decision, to being expected to serve in a military capacity, or
• 18:26
  to pay someone to serve in a military capacity, or pay the king to
• 18:32
  pay someone to serve in a military capacity, got mad because the king wasn't
• 18:36
  consulting them in his decisions on how to use their services, and had a
• 18:41
  war with him. Right, So you have the very first action in the
• 18:48
  creation of the parliamentary system and the creation of the election system in English common
• 18:56
  law, and everything that is affected by or influenced by English common law.
• 19:03
  So every colony that became a nation later on, that all goes back to
• 19:08
  male conscription. And it's been consistent throughout history that voting rights have been tied
• 19:18
  to men's service. Even women's voting rights have been tied to men's service.
• 19:26
  Voting rights are something that men earned with blood and death, and women got
• 19:33
  them with temper tantrums. Right, women got them by appealing to men,
• 19:38
  give this to us. You have it, we have a right to it
• 19:41
  because you have it without ever considering the bloody history of men obtaining it,
• 19:48
  creating it, earning it, making it available to women. So I don't
• 19:56
  have a lot of sympathy for the people who are upset about this. I
• 20:02
  understand that there are a lot of people who don't think women can handle military
• 20:06
  service, but the United States military is fourteen percent women, So apparently women
• 20:12
  can handle military service. They just have to up, toughen up, and
• 20:17
  do it. And maybe men and women don't do identical things. That's okay.
• 20:23
  Maybe men do the things that men are the best at, and maybe
• 20:30
  the military can order women to do the things that women are the best at,
• 20:33
  you know. And to be honest, you can find something for anybody
• 20:38
  that can move. There are things I could do, and I have disabilities
• 20:45
  that keep me from doing a lot of jobs at home, but you can
• 20:48
  bet if our country was attacked, I would be volunteering for USO at least,
• 20:56
  because there are things that even I can do, and if I can
• 21:02
  do it, some eighteen year old that just got out of school who had,
• 21:06
  you know, four years of being an athlete and is fully capable,
• 21:08
  should be able to do quite a bit more. Being female is not a
• 21:12
  handicap it is not a privilege. It is something that you know has been
• 21:21
  treated as both for far too long, and women have been writing on men's
• 21:26
  backs for far too long. And honestly, if if we do not want
• 21:34
  our government to continue exploiting male disposability and killing our sons and our brothers and
• 21:44
  our husbands, our friends and family members, are co workers our neighbors by
• 21:49
  sending them places like Ukraine and Iran, in Iraq and Russia, China,
• 21:56
  wherever they happen to decide that they need to go fight outside the United States
• 22:02
  over something that doesn't involve the United States having been attacked. Then you know,
• 22:07
  we have to take away the idea that it's just going to be men
• 22:14
  doing this. And the only way to do that is for women to have
• 22:18
  to register for selective service too, Admitte. They have to admit that when
• 22:25
  they're forcing young people to go fight wars that the country doesn't support and the
• 22:30
  country doesn't need, that some of those young people are going to be female,
• 22:34
  it'll be too politically embarrassing and they'll have to back off. They'll have
• 22:38
  to be much more careful about it. So even if people don't approve it's
• 22:44
  necessary, you know, unless you approve of sacrificing men for things that don't
• 22:52
  benefit them and their families or their country, then women are going to have
• 22:59
  to step up. We are going to have to be the shield. And
• 23:03
  you know, I hate to say this when I'm too old to be one
• 23:08
  of the women that would be at risk, but that's just a fact.
• 23:12
  This is the only way to protect men and women owe men that. After
• 23:21
  all of the eons men have spent protecting women. Mm hmm. So it's
• 23:29
  been one hundred years of darkness. I'm going to I'm going to reiterate much
• 23:33
  of Ana's excellent points there, but I'm going to do it in the in
• 23:37
  the form of one of those medical leaflets to get from a walk in clinic.
• 23:41
  I'm I'm not a real doctor. None of this is medical advice.
• 23:45
  So it's been one hundred years of darkness since women were given the vote but
• 23:49
  not the draft. One hundred years of lions being led to what are appointed
• 23:56
  to a war by a block of sheep who will never see combat or see
• 24:03
  any of the bloody consequences of the wars for which they vote. It's been
• 24:08
  a century of that. The first thing that happened was a bunch of wars.
• 24:15
  I'm sure that there was a totical winkydink. Though second thing that happened
• 24:21
  was a bunch more was the third thing that the well harpskipt jump. And
• 24:26
  just like that, we're always constantly at war with someone or something. We
• 24:30
  can't move. For all the wars, you couldn't fit a thin fart between
• 24:36
  the ass cheeks of these goddwn was. And we're supposed to chalk all this
• 24:40
  up to a coincidence. I suppose, and I mean maybe it is.
• 24:45
  Lots of things happened in the twentieth century. They can't all have been caused
• 24:49
  by feminism. It's just that it did start with a preceding b doesn't prove
• 24:59
  that caused be but it does prove the bee did not cause a And yet
• 25:04
  so many people are out here going why are women so unhappy? It must
• 25:08
  be because of immigration, because of pornography, because of school shooting, all
• 25:12
  these offshoots, these these symptoms, whatever your pet project is, you all
• 25:18
  are acting like women are unhappy because of these things, when the timeline would
• 25:22
  indicate that, if anything, these things are happening because women are unhappy,
• 25:27
  and and they get to ravage the world without consequence. Personally, I'd be
• 25:33
  interested to see what the next one hundred years will look like if that gap
• 25:37
  is finally closed and our fate can be decided by people with skin in the
• 25:42
  game, and only people with skin in the game. I would prefer it
• 25:47
  if nobody was drafted. But hey, maybe the only way we're going to
• 25:52
  achieve zero draft is by this accelerationist eventuality. Maybe women walk in men's shoes,
• 26:02
  the ones that you know, obliged to walk in as the state forces
• 26:07
  them to sacrifice their lives. Either we end up with a generation of women
• 26:12
  who finally understand personal agency and accountability drilled into them as it is by the
• 26:19
  usual you know, ongoing procedures of boot camp or all that. Very generation
• 26:27
  of women snaps and goes no, no, we're kno going out. We're
• 26:30
  terribly sorry, we were full of shit. We never wanted this. Please
• 26:34
  please put us in Gingham dresses and chain us to the kitchen stuff for the
• 26:40
  love of God. And you know, either way we could bring and begin
• 26:45
  to bring an end to this century of madness. Or you know, none
• 26:52
  of that will happen. The hypocrisy will continue as usual and as normal.
• 26:57
  Women will drafted, but they won't get the harsh treatment that the men get
• 27:04
  because that would be sexist. So they'll just they'll just stand around in boot
• 27:08
  camps taking selfies and pretending they're doing army self where they get photo ops for
• 27:14
  their Instagram. They'll just wander around filming themselves half naked for for for their
• 27:19
  for their ownly fans, and complaining about all the all these army men as
• 27:23
  they glanced at her briefly while while they march from trench to trench try to
• 27:27
  say the countries and yeah, our armed forces will become the same unworkable labyrinth
• 27:33
  of trained spy over and torment that our professional environments have long since become.
• 27:41
  And yeah, we'll we'll, yeah, we'll lose every war before it even
• 27:45
  starts, and the communists will eat us alive and over the end of civilization
• 27:49
  if you know it. Or or we'll just go back to giving women the
• 27:56
  vote without the draft while we continue only drafting men. We'll go right back
• 28:00
  to the platform of the original hipocrisy and play that out to much the same
• 28:06
  conclusion as the previous scenario. There are your options, ladies and gerones.
• 28:11
  Hard times to create strong women or hard times, create weak women or weak
• 28:17
  women. Just go ahead and create more hard times. I will make no
• 28:19
  predictions, folks. No one's played this particular leg of this particular poker game
• 28:26
  before, so I wouldn't bother do it. Make make your own predictions,
• 28:30
  leave them in the covers below, and forgets. The life of share is
• 28:33
  sharing his caring. You like that bit, don't you, Mike? You
• 28:36
  like the sharing and caring thing. I mean I kind of like it too,
• 28:41
  But I got it for my mother, who created hard times for me
• 28:44
  a time. Okay, I'm over sharing. I guess the only thing I
• 28:51
  wanted to say about this is what is a couple of things? Can you
• 28:52
  guys hear me? Yeah? Okay. There was once a story of two
• 28:57
  lawyers and they were both fighting against the government with respects to the draft.
• 29:06
  Oh, Mike can't hear me? Anna? Can you hear me? Yeah?
• 29:07
  I can hear you. I can, am I Low? And the
• 29:12
  listeners here, yeah, you know they should be able to hear me.
• 29:15
  Because Mike can't hear me. You can't hear me. That's just it's weird,
• 29:22
  all right? Maybe leaving come back? Ask ask him to leave and
• 29:26
  come back, maybe leaving come back, or he muted me somehow. I
• 29:30
  don't know, so okay, uh, but yeah, leaving come back and
• 29:33
  then uh, I'll just I'll set you up. Okay. So there was
• 29:38
  a story of two lawyers and they were both working on cases against the government
• 29:45
  with respect to selective service. One of them was using the hypocrisy of essentially
• 29:56
  expecting men to register as a means to moved the draft completely, and the
• 30:02
  other one, I think wanted to include women on it. And the one
• 30:07
  that was trying to remove it completely was Mark Angeloucci, who was murdered,
• 30:12
  according to the FBI, by the other. Of course, because it's the
• 30:17
  FBI, I don't know if I can really trust that, but that's the
• 30:21
  story as we knew it. Mark Angelucci was assassinated by Roy Dan Hollander and
• 30:27
  Roy Dean Hollander also was a suspect in another shooting of a district judge esther
• 30:34
  Sallas and her son and husband, who I believe he did kill in New
• 30:40
  Jersey and then he supposedly took his own life. And it's interesting because Den
• 30:45
  Hollander when this happened, which was god that had to be like years ago,
• 30:52
  like around twenty twenty or something like that. Let me see if I
• 30:56
  can find a date perhaps, Yeah, twenty twenty July eleventh, like literally
• 31:00
  around this time, a little bit later in twenty twenty, and the media
• 31:07
  just my initial reaction was checks calendar still twenty twenty, Yeah makes sense.
• 31:14
  Yeah, yeah, we heard one of our best mates, one of our
• 31:18
  best soldiers, had just been murdered on his doorst then yeah, yeah,
• 31:22
  that's yeah, that's normal. All of that's normal now. And when that
• 31:26
  happened, the media went into a frenzy trying to essentially use this terrible tragedy
• 31:34
  to point the finger at the whole men's movement and say, look at how
• 31:37
  crazy and unhinge they all are. They kill each other, they hate women
• 31:41
  so much that they killed other men because of their hatred. And it seems
• 31:45
  that Mark Angeluci's case was doing well, but because he was murdered and the
• 31:52
  guy who murdered him murdered himself, it just kind of fell by the wayside
• 31:57
  and we stopped talking about the draft. And now it seems to be going
• 32:02
  through, but not in the way that Mark Angelici had hoped, which is
• 32:07
  a bit of a shame because I think that what he wanted was the whole
• 32:08
  thing to be taken out. And this brings me to like my other thought
• 32:15
  on this, I don't think that women can risk or contribute to the same
• 32:22
  degree that men do in the military. I don't think it's possible. I
• 32:25
  don't think it'll ever happen. I've spoken to many veterans, guys that,
• 32:30
  like our followers of this channel, that are in units that are in active
• 32:34
  duty right now, and they're like, they can't work with women because it
• 32:37
  changes the dynamic too much. But not only that, even if we put
• 32:40
  women in different roles that don't involve combat, they're essentially being put in a
• 32:45
  safer place and given the same amount of essentially voting power. And the thing
• 32:52
  about it that's I think that is also really unaddressed is that we're trying to
• 32:59
  find ways to to equalize voting power because the draft exists now ideally it wouldn't
• 33:06
  exist at all. And more ideally, because you can't have a country if
• 33:09
  you don't have an army. You just can't. We need a military full
• 33:13
  stop, like you just can't have a country without it. Look at our
• 33:15
  southern border, look at what's happening in other parts of the world, right,
• 33:19
  But men should not be fighting for a country that hates them. So
• 33:25
  the fact that they're even talking about a draft now and that this is like
• 33:30
  passing through only tells me that they're gearing up for World War three, which
• 33:34
  I know they're doing, Like we know that there are forces at work trying
• 33:38
  to start shit now that the Orange man who didn't start any wars is not
• 33:44
  in office, and it's going to be men's blood that is spilled, and
• 33:46
  it's going to be women's votes that are going to be asked to essentially maintain
• 33:52
  that system. And until women realize that they are the ones that decide whether
• 33:55
  men or live or die, and that's if they're in the military or not,
• 34:00
  then this situation will not improve. Like I to me, and it's
• 34:05
  not I'm not being a white knight or anything. I think that women in
• 34:08
  the military will get more men killed. Then if they're not, they just
• 34:13
  will And so that's not gonna work. So they can't be in the military,
• 34:16
  they can't be fighting with men. If we put them in like you
• 34:19
  know, positions like on computers or in hospitals or whatever, they may be
• 34:22
  in some danger like you know, sometimes hospitals get bombed or whatever. But
• 34:27
  if they're significantly safer than men that are actually like out there in the field,
• 34:32
  and so like those men that are out there in the field, I
• 34:35
  think their vote counts for more, and I think that they're more interested in
• 34:38
  what that vote means than a woman in a computer room somewhere, a woman
• 34:44
  making like, you know, making ammunition in some factory, or a woman
• 34:47
  back home making babies. Like that guy, still, I think his opinion
• 34:53
  on things should matter a lot more because he is literally putting his life on
• 34:58
  the line, and because they are the majority of the voter base, because
• 35:02
  they're more likely to go out and vote, they have to take that shit
• 35:07
  into consideration because they're either putting men in the meat grinder out there on the
• 35:10
  field, or they're putting men in the meat grinder back home, pulling on
• 35:14
  you know, essentially like casting their vote, and it's like they're completely separated
• 35:19
  from the reality of that, and I don't think that's going to change.
• 35:22
  So that's my opinion on that. The really tough part in regard to women
• 35:28
  and voting is men recognize that they have something to lose, and too many
• 35:34
  we don't recognize the men in their society as something to lose. Yeah,
• 35:39
  and that's that's a tragedy in and of itself. That is a twentieth century
• 35:45
  development. It is, it is, and it's a shame there were lots
• 35:51
  of women historically that didn't recognize that. But for it to be a society
• 35:58
  wide issue permeate all levels of the economy, I would say we hear a
• 36:06
  lot about poverty in the United States. We hear a lot about struggle in
• 36:08
  the United States and everything, but in regard to the actual situation of the
• 36:16
  people, I can't say that women in the United States experience true poverty,
• 36:23
  not having you know, looked into what it's like in other countries when poverty
• 36:29
  happens and people starve to death because there is not just a lack of resources
• 36:35
  for them, there's a lack of safety nets, so they don't have either
• 36:38
  way. Where women in the United States, you know, we we have
• 36:43
  all kinds of safety nets that are paid for by men, that are paid
• 36:46
  for with men's taxes, and that are paid for with men's physical support,
• 36:54
  not just money, but actual men's, actual physical labor. And it's women
• 37:05
  in the United States do not understand how much we benefit from men. And
• 37:12
  I got to have arguments with women on Twitter about the whole you know,
• 37:16
  we don't need men, we don't need men, blah blah blah. And
• 37:19
  I tried to explain to them, you know, if there were no men,
• 37:22
  if all the men just were sucked up by aliens into a spaceship and
• 37:27
  carted away tomorrow, the entire infrastructure that we rely on, all of our
• 37:34
  utilities, the maintenance of everything that we use, all of our modern conveniences,
• 37:42
  not just the things that make us comfortable, but the things that we
• 37:45
  rely on to not starve to death, to not freeze, to not roast
• 37:52
  in the heat, to not get attacked by animals. All of that,
• 37:57
  it's all gone. All of it is gone. Are sewer system gone,
• 38:01
  all of our hygienic needs gone, all of it. And yet modern women
• 38:08
  do not understand as as a population. Modern women do not understand that the
• 38:15
  male population is something to lose. Not just like women know that their sons,
• 38:22
  their their their relationship to their son, being able to, you know,
• 38:27
  pat your son on the head if you can reach it. I'm not
• 38:31
  short his right, but being able to pat your son on the head,
• 38:37
  even though he's an adult. Being able to hug and kiss your husband,
• 38:42
  you know, being able to call your brother on the phone, even if
• 38:44
  he's in another another state. Like, that's not what I'm talking about.
• 38:49
  Even though those are important women, women still understand for the most part that
• 38:53
  they will have loss if they lose somebody that's close to them, somebody they
• 38:59
  love, or somebody they rely on directly for paying half the bills in their
• 39:04
  home or something like that. Mm hm. But they have no clue how
• 39:09
  scary life would be without the male population. Absolutely, absolutely, yeah.
• 39:16
  And the reason that I know this is because when you try to talk to
• 39:22
  them about it, it's like, well, the only thing that men need
• 39:24
  to protect us from is other men. Hey, bitch, don't go inside
• 39:30
  of a building mm hm. You know. Don't don't drive your car.
• 39:36
  Oh and by the way, don't drink your coffee, right, don't eat
• 39:39
  any food, don't use your electricity, don't heat your house with gas because
• 39:45
  men get that too. You don't use your phone. You're relying on boys
• 39:52
  from other countries for for some of the components in that. Yeah, right,
• 39:57
  don't don't use anything, don't go anywhere. You don't go outside either,
• 40:04
  because the only reason you're safe outside is because you live in a community
• 40:08
  where the animals don't come in because of the circumstances created by men. Right,
• 40:19
  And since women don't see men as something to lose, the only other
• 40:23
  option is for women to have to confront the fact that if they vote for
• 40:29
  politician that will send our youth to war, they might lose their lives,
• 40:37
  they might die. That's it. That's the only thing that's left. Because
• 40:43
  they're selfish. That's all they care about is themselves. And it's sad.
• 40:47
  It shouldn't be that way, and it shouldn't be that they're willing to sacrifice
• 40:54
  as long as they think maybe the guy that they want to protect won't be
• 41:00
  made to go, or worse, that it's worth it somehow, right,
• 41:05
  But that's just not the case. Historically, the United States almost drafted women
• 41:10
  once before. I can't remember whether it was World War One or World War
• 41:14
  Two. I'm pretty sure it was World War two, somebody told me in
• 41:16
  the last the last time I brought this up. But it was for for
• 41:21
  being nurses during the war and Korean War. No, no, I don't
• 41:25
  know. It was one of the world wars. It was one of the
• 41:28
  worsh But yeah, they almost drafted women, but they got enough women enlisted
• 41:35
  so they didn't have to, right, But this is something that you know,
• 41:39
  I'm I'm adamant on. Yes, you might be right that if the
• 41:49
  United States drafts women and and they have a military that has as many women
• 41:55
  as men, if if it ends up being anywhere near fifty to fifty,
• 42:00
  which I don't think it'll ever be, but if it does end up being
• 42:02
  anywhere near fifty to fifty, and men start relying on women in combat roles,
• 42:08
  that's that's definitely not going to work. And yeah, they'd never they'd
• 42:15
  never do it, like you just you actually just made that point because if
• 42:17
  they if they made everyone register for the draft, when it comes time to
• 42:21
  pull the levers are drafting, they're probably gonna draft as many men as they
• 42:24
  can before they start drafting women. So it's even then it doesn't shake out,
• 42:29
  like why even have this, like you either, And this whole thing,
• 42:31
  by the way, seems to be predicated on the vote, because it's
• 42:36
  like the only the only argument you have for drafting women is well, women
• 42:42
  get the vote and men get the vote, but men have to like put
• 42:45
  their lives on line and women don't. Well, I'm sorry, but like
• 42:47
  there's a problem here we have to rectify because if like there has to be
• 42:53
  a consideration for what is what is the skin in the game as a man,
• 43:02
  and I think it's just really different. Now. I'm not saying that
• 43:07
  the vote has to go for women because it'll never happen, and it's kind
• 43:10
  of a larp in a way, but but it's not something that we can
• 43:14
  just ignore because as as feminism is making women more single with fewer kids and
• 43:22
  more angry at the world and more like bitter, they're more likely even today.
• 43:30
  And I've seen this amongst supposed conservative women too, of which you know,
• 43:34
  I don't think those exist. So you know, I know people are
• 43:37
  going to say in the chat, the conservatid women, but like there are
• 43:40
  no conservative women. There's just different degrees of feminist women. But they would
• 43:45
  all vote to destroy the country just out of spite because cat turd troll them
• 43:50
  on Twitter and said repeal the nineteenth So because they're willing to do that,
• 43:54
  it is it is a self evident problem that we can't ignore that women are
• 44:00
  willing to essentially grab the grab the wheel and drive off a cliff because they're
• 44:05
  mad at you, and it's like we we we should probably considered yeah,
• 44:09
  Felm and Louise. Yeah, while I was thinking more like there was like,
• 44:14
  I don't remember who it was. Women celebrated that movie and just oh,
• 44:17
  dude, I know it's a feminist anthem. It's a feminist anthem,
• 44:22
  that movie. But anyway, so yeah, women will self disrupt and take
• 44:27
  you with them because yeah, they'll they're yeah, because they're mad. So
• 44:30
  I'm gonna leave it there. We gotta move on to the next story.
• 44:34
  But I did get a super chow. I need to read out so the
• 44:37
  top g Meredith g gave us five dollars and says, HBr News for sixty.
• 44:42
  I remember the young women who sued to get into the Citadel, a
• 44:45
  private military college, and it wasn't about the desire to serve and sacrifice for
• 44:50
  her country. It was about access to the boys club. Yeah. Again,
• 44:54
  it's there's like this, you know, I don't know. It's it's
• 44:59
  just women are so separated from the reality that they create that they're living in
• 45:04
  that they can do that. That's why they That's why there is the thing
• 45:07
  called is it why isn't it in the back, that's the woman's brain.
• 45:10
  But go ahead, yeah, you were, you were talking about Mark Angelucci
• 45:15
  and and U right in halling. Yeah. I keep wanting to call him
• 45:20
  Hollinger because I knew people with that name, But that's not the name.
• 45:22
  No, Hollander. Hollander was working with feminists, right. He He had
• 45:30
  two women on whom whose behalf he was suing, and it was that same
• 45:37
  get into the boys club mentality. And he was getting shot down by a
• 45:40
  judge. That's that's the judge whose son he he killed. And he appears
• 45:49
  to have gone off the deep end mentally. And I don't think that that's
• 45:57
  unconnected working with femine and going off the deep end. I mean, like,
• 46:02
  I think that there is something about the feminist mentality that is mentally ill,
• 46:10
  that is entitled. That is, it treats being thwarted as not a
• 46:16
  reason to get good, not a reason to step back and reevaluate and find
• 46:23
  another angle and try again, but as a reason to take revenge on the
• 46:28
  people around you, or treat yourself as a victim of their actions and decisions.
• 46:37
  Hollander looked at the judge, telling him that, well, you did
• 46:44
  it wrong, and I can't rule in your favor because you did it wrong,
• 46:46
  because that's basically what she said to him as well, this is hopeless
• 46:53
  and mister Angelucci is going to win before you do, and there for you're
• 47:00
  not going to get the prestige. And he went off the deep end,
• 47:05
  and you know that. I don't know whether I think that that makes him
• 47:09
  a fed, but there's a pattern that I've noticed with people who conveniently make
• 47:19
  the news after the FBI has been involved with them and aware of them having
• 47:28
  problematic behaviors and issues, so to speak. And he's on that list where
• 47:34
  they go off the deep end do something that everybody is like, what the
• 47:39
  fuck, why would you even go that route in this situation? And they
• 47:46
  kill people as a result, and then the news media uses them against people
• 47:53
  who are are on the wrong side of the political fence right, who are
• 48:00
  for freedoms, or who are complaining about conditions that you know that are wrongfully
• 48:05
  imposed on them or whatever. And this is one of those situations. And
• 48:10
  it seems like there's been several stories where the FBI identifies somebody who has problematic
• 48:20
  behaviors indicative of mental instability and instead of doing something to prevent them from going
• 48:29
  off the deep end and hurting and killing people, they push them into it
• 48:34
  and then use the situation against the political enemies of the state. There's been
• 48:38
  a pattern of that for decades, going back decades, right, So,
• 48:47
  I don't think that Hollander was a FED. I don't believe in any kind
• 48:51
  of conspiracy theory that the man did this and is still alive somewhere or self
• 48:58
  deleted, because he was just such a believer in whatever political bullshit that that
• 49:05
  you want to apply. But I do think that his mental health condition,
• 49:10
  which also made him susceptible to the ideas of feminism and caused him to be
• 49:16
  interested in working with feminists instead of m r as, I think that that
• 49:22
  made him vulnerable to that type of manipulation, and I think that was done
• 49:29
  to him. Well he did, he did get kicked out of a E
• 49:34
  A FM, But he also could have gone on and continue to call himself
• 49:38
  an m r A and find other groups and everything. Yeah, he's said
• 49:44
  he said terrible things about us, called us stupid and everything, and uh,
• 49:50
  the real story there, in my opinion, the real story will be
• 49:57
  found when people start asking what but what did the FBI do when they found
• 50:01
  out that this guy was crazy? Yeah, well we got to he committed
• 50:07
  his crime, right, we we got to move on. But I I
• 50:12
  don't that that was years ago, but it was worth pointing out because the
• 50:15
  story of Mark Angeluci's assassination by Roy Din Hollander has read. It's resurfaced.
• 50:22
  It was it was, it was, no, it was after COVID.
• 50:24
  It was twenty after Yeah, it was, yeah, it was. It
• 50:27
  was July of twenty twenty when he was killed. So and Clarents were still
• 50:32
  alive because I explained to him because it made the news and they found out
• 50:38
  that an MRA was murdered and they had questions. Yeah, they were worried.
• 50:45
  Oh no, it was really it was really it was really terrible.
• 50:47
  Mark was a great guy. But okay, we got to move on.
• 50:50
  So let us know what you guys think about this story in the comments.
• 50:52
  Thank you for the super chow, Meredith. Let us move on. So
• 50:57
  at Autumn cor de Leoni also known as Jonathan c Richardson. So, like
• 51:02
  the real I guess the I'm sorry, the dead name would be Jonathan c
• 51:07
  Richardson. The updated name would be Autumn Cordelioni, because of course it is
• 51:12
  sounds like a cabaret singer. A transgender inmate serving a fifty five year we
• 51:16
  kind of a mobster, yeah, served a fifty five year sentence for killing
• 51:22
  his eleventh month old stepdaughter, has filed a lawsuit against the Branch Failed Correctional
• 51:27
  facility's chaplain. Cordelioni, who identifies as a Muslim woman, so a trans
• 51:32
  Muslim woman, alleges that the chaplain prohibited him from wearing a key jab outside
• 51:37
  his bed area, violating his Fourteenth Amendment rights. Cordelioni argues that male Muslim
• 51:44
  inmates are allowed to wear koofies throughout the facility. Additionally, Cordelioni claims his
• 51:49
  Eighth Amendment rights were violated due to harassment and ridicule from other inmates. The
• 51:53
  chaplain point, let me show you a picture, so you guys get a
• 51:57
  bit of a context on the ridicule. This person's side for it. So
• 52:00
  here's an image. So anyway, I'm gonna leave that up, and you
• 52:05
  guys can at first sight what that is outside the context of warhammer with it.
• 52:16
  Think that's why he has a map of a space hulk Okay, So
• 52:40
  I gotta get I gotta get through this, get through this. But don't
• 52:45
  gonna leave that up. So you guys can just you know, and look
• 52:49
  respect the pronouns. Okay, all right, this is a Muslim woman of
• 52:54
  of transness and that has to be respected, all right. Uh huh okay.
• 53:01
  Courdellioni claims his her Eighth Amendment rights were violated due to harassment and ridicule
• 53:07
  from other inmates. The chaplain pointed out that Cordalioni's listed religious preference was Wiccan,
• 53:14
  to which courters, so, I mean they I mean, but to
• 53:20
  which Courtellioni responded it that he practices a diversity of faiths. The lawsuit seeks
• 53:28
  one hundred and fifty thousand dollars in damages and the right to wear that he
• 53:30
  jabbed throughout the prison. Previously, Cordellioni sued the Indiana Department of Corrections.
• 53:36
  Of course, it's Indiana for not providing sex reassignment surgery represented by the ACLU.
• 53:42
  So the ACLU is representing this person. Okay. Indiana law prohibits using
• 53:46
  taxpayer dollars for such surgeries, which the ACLU argues as a violation of the
• 53:52
  eighth Amendment. Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita criticized the lawsuit, emphasizing that taxpayers
• 54:00
  should not fund gender transition surgeries for prison inmates who murder eleventh month old girls.
• 54:07
  Public records reveal that Richardson expressed the no remorse for this crime, referring
• 54:14
  to his stepdaughter in derogatory terms, and his wife filed for divorce and a
• 54:19
  restraining order following the incident. The Indiana Department of Corrections has not commented on
• 54:23
  the pending litigation. Well, you go, zeer. So just just for
• 54:29
  the record, let's start. Let's start with the most visible thing, right
• 54:34
  that Islam prohibits tattoos. Okay, tattoos are considered a sin, their violation
• 54:40
  of all this creation you are you are messing with the canvas uh and and
• 54:46
  and this is something with Abrahamic religions. You're not supposed to mark your body.
• 54:53
  So it's it's kind of weird for someone with a face tattoo to claim
• 55:00
  to be Muslim. Like, obviously you can convert after you've gotten a tattoo,
• 55:07
  but then you should want to get the tattoo removed. Yeah, but
• 55:09
  I believe that's a crescent moon on the forehead right there, So I think
• 55:13
  that that's yeah, the tattoo still wouldn't matter. It doesn't like you could
• 55:16
  if you got I'm just saying, maybe she's taking steps. If you got
• 55:22
  a tattoo of a fucking crucifix on your back, Jesus would still be mad,
• 55:25
  right if if you had. If Christianity forbids tattoos, right, and
• 55:31
  the same is, you could get a tattoo of the most religious aspects of
• 55:38
  Islam, you could get all of the laws tattooed across your back, it
• 55:42
  would still be a violation. If do not get tattooed, right, then
• 55:45
  you have tattoo of the prophet Mohammed. Well, then then then you have
• 55:57
  the next obvious thing, like witchcraft is uh is punishable by death. So
• 56:05
  that's that's another issue, being being wicked, having wika listed as they're you
• 56:10
  know that, that's that's But the biggest problem is being trans is also punishable
• 56:15
  by death. So the individual may identify as a Muslim woman, but you
• 56:22
  get to be either or because you started out as a man, you can
• 56:27
  either be but Muslim or you can identify as a woman. But you can't
• 56:30
  do both. Because it's not compatible. Well, this is where it gets
• 56:35
  a little bit complicated. Homosexuality is very much frowned upon on pain of death
• 56:42
  in the Muslim world. It's a bit more complicated when it comes to transgender
• 56:46
  stuff. A lot of the time, when they're raping batchabazi and basements across
• 56:52
  Afghanistan, they're justifying it by saying that these boys are not boys, they
• 56:55
  are women because they are playing the women's role. I mean, even all
• 57:00
  the way up to Allah himself. They call him himself, but obviously he
• 57:07
  transcends such human concepts as sex, let alone gender. They don't even have
• 57:12
  a concept gender, only we do in the West. But yeah, to
• 57:17
  call Allah gay is obviously an executable offense, an alarming amount of quis for
• 57:27
  Palistid people are getting away with it where Lawrence Southern weirdly didn't. But to
• 57:30
  call Allah trans is actually less of a violation because a bit like the Christian
• 57:38
  God is said to transcend such things, even though we call him him.
• 57:44
  It's all very complicated, and yeah, yeah, within the weird Sharia law
• 57:49
  systems of various Islamic countries, you can actually be at least transvestical. Whatever
• 58:00
  the adjective is you can even be hired by certain authorities to harass people by
• 58:07
  turning up as a man pretending to be a woman, Like if someone hasn't
• 58:10
  paid it's the thing that happens in Pakistan, if someone hasn't paid the taxes,
• 58:15
  the state department can send a bunch of men just as women to run
• 58:22
  around the shop being obvious, men dressed as women to kind of shame you
• 58:28
  into paying your taxes. And those people don't don't get summarily executed, certainly
• 58:35
  not at the efficient rate at which a man who identifies a man having sex
• 58:40
  with a man who identifies as a man. That's that's what's completely vboten.
• 58:46
  And I'll use that word on ironically in in in the Islamic world, two
• 58:52
  men actually loving each other to all more men actually loving each other, it's
• 59:00
  men can pretend to be women and that's kind of fine. Now this is
• 59:06
  beginning to throw some shade on this whole idea that uh Islam's not a feminist
• 59:10
  religion is like totally the opposite of a feminist is not quite There are there
• 59:17
  are ways in which these things marble into each other that that doesn't result in
• 59:23
  the great deal of yes or no answers. So yet the idea that he
• 59:29
  can be a trans Muslim woman is not as inherently self contradictory as it sounds.
• 59:37
  Certainly not when it comes when it comes to all these countries that are
• 59:42
  trying to pander to everything the Renber flag once and everything the sirren present flag
• 59:46
  once. If you're if you're in a country where they worship gays and they
• 59:51
  worship Muslims, then obviously in any given high security prison, you can say
• 59:58
  I want to change my gen and I want to convert to Islam, and
• 1:00:01
  they'll go, yes, absolutely, yes, we we now worship you as
• 1:00:07
  a fucking total pole. And it's it's all, it's all remarkably complicated,
• 1:00:12
  and I've probably got everything wrong, and just well, let me. If
• 1:00:16
  you're in the United States and you tell Muslims here that you're trans, you
• 1:00:21
  might get away with it. But if you go to Saudi Arabia and you
• 1:00:24
  you tell Muslims there that your trans, You're going to get thrown off of
• 1:00:28
  a building. I mean at this point that they're fully aware of what's happening
• 1:00:34
  in the West. I love them are and they're like they they understand that
• 1:00:38
  all this l g B t Q plus subid what they associate with, that
• 1:00:44
  with the same thing with exactly what they hate the West for being. And
• 1:00:50
  well, there's there's more to it than that. If they decide that being
• 1:00:57
  having gender dysphor you is not cured medically by transitioning or by living as the
• 1:01:06
  opposite sex, then you can't do it. Basically, they have this principle
• 1:01:12
  God created everything as it is, and it goes against God. Changes to
• 1:01:16
  one's body are only allowed under medical circumstances. So if you're gonna be sick
• 1:01:22
  and sick or die because you have this medical issue, then you can treat
• 1:01:27
  it. But you know if like you wouldn't get plastic surgery to not be
• 1:01:32
  ugly, for instance, you wouldn't and if you interpreted it very very strictly
• 1:01:42
  right. And you know the fact that again, this is a conservative standpoint
• 1:01:49
  in Islam. It's not something that Western Muslims might not have the same attitude
• 1:01:55
  because there is a branch of Islam that's progressive in the West. But I
• 1:02:00
  don't know that there is so much in in uh theocracies and Islamic theocracies because
• 1:02:08
  they get punished basically for going against whatever the government's church is, whatever the
• 1:02:15
  government's branch of it is, so that strict interpretation would get you killed for
• 1:02:22
  for saying, yeah, I'm I'm Muslim and I'm a transwoman, or even
• 1:02:28
  so not being Muslim and being a trans woman in Islamic theocracies probably would get
• 1:02:34
  you killed. So for the record, this is this person was born a
• 1:02:39
  woman. So they're they're they're they're taken. Name is Jonathan C. Richardson,
• 1:02:51
  so and there. So this is a transman. Oh I see,
• 1:02:54
  that's what I'm saying. Is a transman that killed, right, that killed
• 1:03:00
  an eleven month old step daughter because and her wife. So this just for
• 1:03:07
  the record, somebody married this person, okay, and then when this person
• 1:03:12
  went on to kill her daughter because obviously she couldn't have children and so that
• 1:03:17
  wasn't her kid, and she has no remorse about it. And a woman
• 1:03:22
  married her and is in the midst of a divorce right now, and a
• 1:03:27
  restraining order. Woman identifies as a man, but now identifies as a Muslim
• 1:03:31
  woman. Oh well, a Muslim woman man. No, a Muslim man
• 1:03:36
  still a man. So a trans Muslim identified, oh yeah, identify as
• 1:03:42
  a Muslim woman. Yeah, you're right, right, Cordelio. So switched
• 1:03:45
  it back, switched it back up. I guess yeah, so this is
• 1:03:49
  this is again, I this is somebody that is mocking somebody's using using them,
• 1:03:55
  Yeah, the religion of intersectional feminism, like they're using it to like
• 1:04:00
  like you know this, yeah, like you activated my trap card. I'm
• 1:04:04
  actually almost the woman and the a c LU is backing her up. Like
• 1:04:14
  can you imagine being a lawyer at the a c l U and you just
• 1:04:16
  like do they do? These guys just want to take on the nuttiest cases
• 1:04:19
  that what do you got for me? Well, here, you're gonna love
• 1:04:23
  this one, you know, this is like we got Yeah, I'm sure
• 1:04:28
  they are. It's hilarious. This is that I've been reading about a little
• 1:04:32
  little bit here and a little bit there for years too. So there's some
• 1:04:34
  people that when they get in they get in prison, they just make a
• 1:04:39
  habit of filing whatever lawsuits they can can come up with the file and they
• 1:04:44
  file over and over again. And our system is set up too because you
• 1:04:49
  do have a right to do process and you have a right to humane treatment
• 1:04:54
  in the prison system. But the prison system kind of gets to interpret what
• 1:05:00
  constitutes humans treatment, so they could exploit you as cheap labor. They can
• 1:05:05
  put you in a cage, they can put you in solitary confinement for twenty
• 1:05:10
  three hours a day, which is considered torture in other countries and is actually
• 1:05:16
  has been abandoned by countries that are considered less first world than we are.
• 1:05:24
  Right, there's all kinds of horrible shit that our prison system does to people
• 1:05:29
  that messes them up mentally and is absolutely wrong. But then you get prisoners
• 1:05:32
  that are in that system that, instead of trying to weather the system and
• 1:05:38
  get the hell out of there as quickly as possible, straighten their shit out
• 1:05:41
  and never have to go back to it. They do this, they find
• 1:05:45
  they look for things, what can I sue over next? What can I
• 1:05:47
  sue over next? Ye? That's well, they'll do their best to fuck
• 1:05:53
  with the guards, they'll do their best to fuck with the administration, and
• 1:05:57
  they try to make it as expensive as humanly possible to keep them there.
• 1:06:01
  And that's what this person is doing, and it doesn't It doesn't usually work
• 1:06:08
  out for them in the end. They usually end up getting the worst treatment
• 1:06:13
  that they can get because of it. And I expect that she's going to
• 1:06:19
  make her life miserable doing this in the lives of everyone else around her,
• 1:06:25
  and then she's going to wonder what the fuck happened, Why, why she
• 1:06:29
  can't get out and why But she really needs to be in a mental institution.
• 1:06:34
  I don't know what you're talking about, Hannah. She looks like a
• 1:06:38
  totally stable and normal human being. So anyway, let us know, you
• 1:06:43
  guys think about that one in the comments. We got to move on to
• 1:06:45
  the next story and let's yeah, let's go ahead and get into it.
• 1:06:50
  So. UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has stated that he is not opposed to
• 1:06:57
  assisted dying in principle, contingent on appropriate safeguards being in place. This discussion
• 1:07:03
  comes ahead of an anticipated vote on the issue in the next parliament. Labor
• 1:07:09
  leader Kier Starmer, whose party leads significantly in polls, has pledged to allocate
• 1:07:13
  time for Commons vote and has expressed personal support for changing the law. Sunac
• 1:07:18
  emphasized that the Conservative manifesto considers assisted dying I like how they put it this
• 1:07:24
  way, just like Canada, a matter of conscience, and will act according
• 1:07:29
  to Parliament's decision. Starmer, speaking with broadcaster Esther Ranson, who has stage
• 1:07:33
  four lung cancer, reiterated his commitment to addressing this issue, highlighting the urgent
• 1:07:40
  need for change to alleviate prolonged suffering. Assisted dying is currently illegal in England,
• 1:07:45
  Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland, with severe penalties for those assisting in
• 1:07:49
  suicide. Severe penalties. There's another word for assisting suicide without you, like
• 1:07:57
  a government involvement. The most recent attempt to legalize it was defeated in twenty
• 1:08:01
  fifteen, but the matter continues to garner support from key political figures, including
• 1:08:08
  Shadow Health Secretary that's what they're called, Shadow Health Secretary West Streeting, who
• 1:08:14
  advocates for careful safeguards No no, no, with like with one hand raised
• 1:08:27
  and like the gnarled fingers, you know, like pointing. Okay, did
• 1:08:35
  you did you read the whole thing? Yeah? I mean I'll just finish
• 1:08:41
  the including Shadow Health Secretary West Treating, who advocates for careful safeguards against portion.
• 1:08:46
  All right, it's really bad. This whole time, I've been struggling
• 1:08:49
  with closing tabs to try to get to that so I could read along with
• 1:08:53
  you, and I couldn't see it. But I want to point something out
• 1:08:58
  here. We are all right in the United States, we have no right
• 1:09:01
  to consider assisted suicide here because our system is telling people that they can't have
• 1:09:11
  pain care if they are in pain and they are not dying right now,
• 1:09:16
  in Canada when they started this whole, yeah, assistant suicide is a good
• 1:09:21
  thing because it helps people who are are not going to survive their illness.
• 1:09:28
  They're terminally ill and the illness is only going to cause them to suffer more
• 1:09:32
  and more until they die. This allows them to die on their own terms,
• 1:09:36
  right, that's what we get got told initially, but now it's being
• 1:09:41
  used to offer people death as an alternative to mental health treatment for depression,
• 1:09:47
  or death as an alternative to physical treatment that is expensive, medical care that
• 1:09:57
  is expensive, and that's that's basically killing people off because they're not worth taking
• 1:10:03
  care of according to the government, not because they're dying and there's nothing that
• 1:10:10
  can be done for them except to keep them comfortable until they die or give
• 1:10:15
  them the chance to die before they lose their facilities. And that's going to
• 1:10:19
  happen here too, right. There is no Oh, that's just a slippery
• 1:10:24
  slope argument because it already happened before it happened in Canada, it happened in
• 1:10:30
  Europe. Right, So it's not a conspiracy theory. It's a thing that
• 1:10:39
  it's a pattern, the thing that has happened in every country where assistant suicide
• 1:10:44
  is a thing. And in our country, we are already telling people,
• 1:10:48
  no, you can't have medical care for your chronic pain. No, we
• 1:10:54
  will not do anything to provide you with relief. Right, if you're not
• 1:10:59
  actively eyeing, you can't have pain medication, but your insurance company won't pay
• 1:11:03
  for anything else that treats the pain either. Right. My mom died because
• 1:11:09
  of this, the surgery that she went in to have a right, she's
• 1:11:15
  she was five foot five when I was a kid, all right, She
• 1:11:18
  was five or four foot ten when she passed away. And that's degenerative disk
• 1:11:25
  disease. It all was her back compressing. She was she couldn't stand up
• 1:11:30
  straight. When she would stand up, she had about probably a fifteen degree
• 1:11:36
  bend in her back that leaned her over, and then on top of the
• 1:11:43
  spine being bent, she had to lean further over in order to avoid a
• 1:11:47
  level of pain. So when she first started down this pathway of back pain.
• 1:11:57
  Initially, her insurance company basically told her, well, yeah, you
• 1:12:00
  could benefit from all these different types of therapy, but they're expensive. We
• 1:12:04
  won't pay for those. She can have all the drugs you want. Well,
• 1:12:08
  she didn't want a lot of drugs. She wanted to work, She
• 1:12:13
  wanted to live her life. She didn't want to be stoned out of her
• 1:12:15
  mind. She didn't want to have her organs trying to process a bunch of
• 1:12:20
  chemicals just so that she could do that. And so she paid out a
• 1:12:25
  pocket for what therapy she could, and she only took what medications that she
• 1:12:30
  had to in order to function. And she did that for years and years,
• 1:12:33
  and over the years those medications became more and more restricted, until pretty
• 1:12:39
  soon they took them all away. And so in her seventies she went into
• 1:12:44
  the hospital to have extensive surgery. The doctor that treated her did he straightened
• 1:12:53
  out her back. He put pins and rods all along her spine from in
• 1:13:00
  between her shoulder blades all the way down to her sacariliac, which is down
• 1:13:03
  your hips, down to her hips right. And she had to have a
• 1:13:11
  wound pump after that to prevent the fluids that would build up in an injury
• 1:13:16
  like that from building up in her body. So when she came out of
• 1:13:21
  surgery like she was in extreme pain, they didn't give her meds for two
• 1:13:27
  hours after that because they had so much red tape to get through to get
• 1:13:31
  them to her. That's what they are doing to people in severe pain in
• 1:13:35
  the United States today. And she just happened to be so desperate to fix
• 1:13:43
  structurally the problems that were causing her pain because they had taken away all of
• 1:13:46
  her pain care, everything that was helping her be able to stand up and
• 1:13:51
  walk it all. And so she took that risk, went into the hospital
• 1:13:59
  and had that surgery during the COVID crisis, and she got sick and she
• 1:14:03
  died. And that's basically assistant suicide right there. We have no business in
• 1:14:15
  the United States considering offering people death as an alternative to medical care. We
• 1:14:26
  don't even offer people medical care. That has to change. We got told
• 1:14:31
  in two thousand and eight and twenty twelve by the ba Obama administration that the
• 1:14:39
  Democrats were solving American health care problems by giving us universal health care, which
• 1:14:45
  basically was ordering us to get medical insurance it did nothing, It solved nothing
• 1:14:54
  and made things worse. In the meantime, the man who decided to take
• 1:15:00
  away everybody's pain care was Barack Obama. He decided that if you have cancer
• 1:15:10
  and you're not dying from it, that the Department of that the DEA,
• 1:15:17
  would harass your doctor, that state attorney generals would harass your doctor and your
• 1:15:25
  pharmacist, and they would back up the insurance company and not wanting to pay
• 1:15:30
  for your care for your pain while you were going through that. If you
• 1:15:33
  have a chronic pain condition that causes your joints to just deteriorate until your bones
• 1:15:40
  are scraping against each other and the only thing that can fix it is surgery,
• 1:15:45
  Barack Obama decided that you should just deal with the pain. If you
• 1:15:53
  are experiencing any kind of inevitable pain that comes from something that you couldn't change,
• 1:16:01
  Barack Obama decided that you should just deal with it, That nothing should
• 1:16:06
  be done to help you because it's just pain, and if you don't like
• 1:16:11
  it. The powers that be today are suggesting that over time, we'll just
• 1:16:17
  incrementally ease our way into telling you, well, okay, well we'll help
• 1:16:21
  you commit suicide. Then if you ever lived under the illusion that government safety
• 1:16:32
  nets exist because people care about you, you should lose it when you see
• 1:16:38
  this. M M all right, Mike, I know you got thoughts on
• 1:16:45
  this right now. Yeah, I remembering that they are still talking to Toohy
• 1:16:50
  Sinak in the context of this story. Your your party, mister Sinnak has
• 1:17:00
  long since already introduced a program of assisted dying. You just had the good
• 1:17:08
  sense to call it something else, something I'm not allowed to specify on this
• 1:17:13
  platform, but by pointing that I've already specified it something safe and effective.
• 1:17:18
  Yeah, And then notice be following a then a bunch of people, the
• 1:17:26
  ones who didn't fully die from the safe and effective, but who did get
• 1:17:30
  horribly sick and diseased unaccountably, and the NHS doctors god bless and just plumb
• 1:17:39
  can't seem to think of what could possibly be causing all of these irreversible sickness
• 1:17:45
  and diseases. Apparently they do have an outside inkling of an idea, but
• 1:17:49
  it's more than their job's worth to ever point it out, so they'll have
• 1:17:53
  no choice but to say, nah, we can't help you, and go
• 1:17:57
  ahead and bounce you over to the fuck off and die ward. Same thing
• 1:18:02
  Trudeau built in Canada, a human abatore. You get one injection on the
• 1:18:10
  way in, one kind of injection on the way in, and you get
• 1:18:14
  another kind of injection on the way out, being told all along the way
• 1:18:19
  woods the daisy, we're killing you slowly. Would you like us to kill
• 1:18:24
  you quickly instead? Oh? Yes, please, benevolent dragon overlord, Oh
• 1:18:31
  merciful pestilence elemental, thank you so very much for asking slash forcing. I
• 1:18:41
  suppose future generations won't even have the slash. We are so very privileged.
• 1:18:48
  So yeah, I'm not surprised that Richie Sonac would gladly go the way of
• 1:18:53
  Trudeau. They all would. They're all licking the lips, waiting to stanned
• 1:19:00
  legs akimbo in admiration of a human avatar of their very own, thrusting their
• 1:19:06
  pelvis in his general direction. They get off on it. They want you
• 1:19:11
  dead. They're not just indifferent about your lives, they actively want you dead.
• 1:19:15
  They're monsters. They're demonic, unhuman baby eating lizard people. And I'm
• 1:19:23
  sick of not saying it. I'm saying it. And fortunately nobody gives a
• 1:19:30
  ship what Richie Sunac has to say. No matter what it is he happens
• 1:19:34
  to say, it is too late. He's only here to herald the collapse
• 1:19:40
  and liquidation of the Conservative Party for decades to come, if not centuries,
• 1:19:45
  and to be the charcoal broiled centerpiece of the feast of zero seas. Richie
• 1:19:53
  Sunak is a dead man walking, walking a dead party, walking into a
• 1:20:00
  dead dog park walking. We don't give a shit how many people you want
• 1:20:08
  dead, Rishie. We're not surprised, and we don't care, because you're
• 1:20:13
  already dead, Sunak. But you will live on forever as a symbol,
• 1:20:19
  a symbol of death, drift on the river, sticks until the end of
• 1:20:27
  time, dreaming of receiving satellite television, but never quite managing to tune in.
• 1:20:31
  And we will laugh. We will all laugh at you from the pit
• 1:20:35
  of fire into which we've all been cast, and we will point and sneer
• 1:20:41
  as Satan lowers us into infinite torments. And it will be worth it.
• 1:20:46
  Narrator's voice, it wasn't worth it, but fuck it. Zero six zero
• 1:20:54
  seats. There you go, all right? I got a super chat from
• 1:20:57
  Albertina Regro just came in. I thought I would it really quick for five
• 1:21:01
  dollars Canadian? Thank you? Albertney says, ever heard of a band called
• 1:21:04
  Frozen Ghosts. There's a song should I see makes me think of old Justin
• 1:21:10
  at least as a protest song against him. No, I have not heard
• 1:21:14
  of this song, and I will. I will endeavor to look into it.
• 1:21:17
  Thank you for the super chat. All right, so we got one
• 1:21:21
  story left. Let us know what you guys think about that in the comment
• 1:21:25
  section. This one, I think I thought it would go a little something,
• 1:21:30
  a little bit lighter, you know, at the end. So this
• 1:21:34
  is from ground News, which I actually think is a pretty decent website because
• 1:21:39
  it it it you look up stories and it tells you, like, you
• 1:21:44
  know, whether it's right center or left wing media that's reporting on it,
• 1:21:47
  and how much. And I'm not I wish I was. I wish I
• 1:21:51
  would, yeah, go to ground News. No I don't. I just
• 1:21:57
  I decided to look into it. Whenever I see advert for something, I'm
• 1:22:00
  always like, Okay, I like this content creative, but I I automatically
• 1:22:04
  hate anything that's advertised to me. And yet oh yeah, how many people
• 1:22:09
  I like and now advertising ground News And I'm like well, I'm not going
• 1:22:13
  to go to ground News because you're still an AD and I hate every ad.
• 1:22:15
  Yeah, I don't like ads either, But like I thought, that
• 1:22:19
  seems handy because sometimes you report on something and people like, you know,
• 1:22:24
  they'll be like, oh, that's not the story, it's this, and
• 1:22:26
  then I have to like look and see, you know, like how it's
• 1:22:28
  being reported on the other side or whatever. So this is helpful. But
• 1:22:31
  hey, by acknowledging ground news is existence, and I guess that counts as
• 1:22:38
  an unpaid advert. But at the same time we're saying, ah, we
• 1:22:41
  don't know. Yeah right, I don't know anyway, So warning sides in
• 1:22:49
  the in the gighborhood. So, as part of the celebration of Pride Month,
• 1:22:53
  community leaders in the area of Silver Lake, California, because of course
• 1:22:57
  it's California, have declared certain traffic signs to be homophobic slash anti LGBTQ.
• 1:23:03
  The offending signs, which read no U turn and no cruising, were deemed
• 1:23:09
  offensive and removed. I'm sure there's a lot a lot of gay jokes in
• 1:23:13
  there that would be very funny. City officials claimed that these signs, which
• 1:23:19
  were put in place over twenty five years ago, were used to target homosexual
• 1:23:24
  men who would roam the streets looking to hook up you, turning tricks,
• 1:23:28
  you might say. Some people have called the sign removal a waste of time
• 1:23:32
  and yet another attempt to look at something in the past through the lens of
• 1:23:35
  modern ideology and deem it problematic. LA City Council member Hugo Soto Martinez,
• 1:23:42
  who helped back the no relation, who helped back the campaign to remove the
• 1:23:45
  signs, was present and stated in a speech quote for me, growing up
• 1:23:50
  in south central Los Angeles, cruising had a very different meaning. It usually
• 1:23:55
  meant folks in their lowriders or their cars, a lot of hip hop music,
• 1:23:59
  just going up and down Crenshaw Boulevard. But here in Silver Lake,
• 1:24:02
  cruising, of course, meant something very different. It meant an opportunity for
• 1:24:06
  the LGBT humanity to try and find human connection and intimacy and to be able
• 1:24:13
  to express themselves in a society at the time that was not very welcoming to
• 1:24:16
  the LGBT community. The last two no U Turn signs remind us of that
• 1:24:23
  troubled past that we have here in this neighborhood. End quote. First,
• 1:24:27
  they came for the Civil War statues, and I didn't say anything because I
• 1:24:30
  didn't support the South. And then they came for the U turn signs.
• 1:24:35
  Joining him was Silver Lake Neighborhood council member and drag queen maybe a girl,
• 1:24:44
  as well as fellow drag queen Pickle. Okay, are we being trolled?
• 1:24:54
  You may think you heard this story from a reputable source who in turn things
• 1:24:59
  today it from a reputable source, But I was sure the original sauce isn't
• 1:25:03
  Babylon Patrol. This is normally the point of the story where that happens.
• 1:25:10
  You get a community note saying this is from a satirical website. It wasn't
• 1:25:13
  supposed to be believable. We're terribly sorry this keeps happening. But and then
• 1:25:18
  we all we all laugh nervously as the walls between reality and satire continue to
• 1:25:26
  close in on us. That's on. You're thinking, Okay, so what's
• 1:25:33
  a U turn supposed to represent in gay parlance? Is it a sexual position?
• 1:25:40
  Nothing to do with the U bend of a toilet? Is it just?
• 1:25:44
  No, It's like it's like going gay, and then saying you know
• 1:25:46
  what, I don't like this. I'm gonna be straight again. It's a
• 1:25:48
  U turn. I'm bending and then unbending is inherently funny. I wispend it
• 1:25:56
  from Futurama was here, but he's fictional. Yeah, so you're thinking,
• 1:26:01
  I don't quite understand the reference. But yeah, fine, whatever you ben
• 1:26:04
  Lol. But someone someone goes no, no, no, no, it's
• 1:26:09
  nothing to do with that. In essence, it's a literal road sign telling
• 1:26:13
  you not to turn in the direction of that CD gay bar in the bad
• 1:26:16
  part of town, and that, in turn is a metaphor for like,
• 1:26:20
  don't turn your life around by doing something impulsive. Turn around. Yeah,
• 1:26:30
  you see that. That seems a bit too convoluted to be funny. And
• 1:26:34
  no, it's not funny. It's you understand, it's not funny. It's
• 1:26:36
  true. It's a true thing that actually happened. Wait what, we're absolutely
• 1:26:44
  sure this is real. There's a video. There's a video. I understand
• 1:26:49
  it is. Back in the day, it was illegal to actually I have
• 1:26:56
  gay hookups here in the United States, and so there's it's it's sort of
• 1:27:01
  like how they try to prevent other things that are illegal, like youth congregating
• 1:27:09
  in certain areas where they know that they are then going to engage in graffiti
• 1:27:14
  painting, or shoplifting or burglarizing, or you know, any escalation of levels
• 1:27:20
  of crime from there. So instead of saying you know, you can't you
• 1:27:29
  can't be unaccompanied and unaccompanied minor in this area, or you can't be from
• 1:27:35
  this apparent group of people, you can't wear this color of clothes in this
• 1:27:40
  area, they just say no loitering, and then they only enforce it if
• 1:27:45
  they think you're in a gang. Right, So the no U turn basically
• 1:27:50
  is it's a moving violation. And if you drive up and down Interstate seventy
• 1:27:56
  five, which is it's the road that goes from it's the highway that goes
• 1:28:00
  from Florida up into Canada and becomes something else in Canada, goes up through
• 1:28:06
  Georgia and Tennessee and Kentucky, Ohio, and right on up into into Canada,
• 1:28:13
  goes up on through Michigan. But in any case, every place where
• 1:28:20
  you can drive in between the southbound lane and the northbound lane, where the
• 1:28:27
  cops can turn around or an ambulance can turn around and so on, that's
• 1:28:30
  not an actual exit, just a little connector between the two sides of the
• 1:28:35
  highway, there's a sign that says no U turn because that's only for emergency
• 1:28:43
  services and state vehicles like lawnmowers and shit to use. It's not for the
• 1:28:47
  regular drivers to use. You're supposed to go on down to the next exit
• 1:28:51
  if you want to turn around, and they make this illegal because pulling out
• 1:28:57
  of there if you're not trained in riskier levels of driving. There's a whole
• 1:29:04
  course of training that, for instance, that people go through to operate the
• 1:29:11
  types of vehicles that are allowed to use that and are allowed to go over
• 1:29:16
  the speed limits and stuff. Then you're considered to be presenting a danger to
• 1:29:21
  the oncoming traffic that you're turning in front of, even if it's two o'clock
• 1:29:28
  in the morning and you know a car only goes past that area every five
• 1:29:31
  minutes. If a cop wants to ticket you for turning there, they will,
• 1:29:36
  and those so those signs kind of exist everywhere, but it sounds like,
• 1:29:44
  according to this story, they were specifically enforced more if the cops thought
• 1:29:50
  that the driver of the vehicle was a gay man looking around to see if
• 1:29:56
  he could find other gay men doing the same thing in hopes of finding somebody
• 1:30:01
  to hook up with. For the night or start dating, and I can
• 1:30:06
  see where they might consider that a bad reminder. But if it's the sign
• 1:30:14
  is there, it's probably there because the pattern of traffic makes engaging in those
• 1:30:20
  actions as a driver bit risky dangerous to the other drivers, right, the
• 1:30:26
  one that'd be hard for it. Like you know, when somebody does a
• 1:30:29
  U turn right, they have turned around, and it's called a U turn
• 1:30:30
  because you're doing a one to eighty. But cruising is a little different if
• 1:30:36
  you're in uh you could be accused of cruising if you're in a downtown area
• 1:30:42
  in a city and you're looking for a parking spot and there isn't one,
• 1:30:45
  and you're just driving around in hopes that somebody who has a parking spot,
• 1:30:49
  who's parked somewhere will leave and you can take their spot, right, Or
• 1:30:54
  if you see somebody heading for their car and you drive back around hoping to
• 1:30:58
  take their spot, you could be accused of cruising for that. Or if
• 1:31:01
  you're looking for an address and you're having trouble finding it, you can get
• 1:31:04
  pulled over and ticketed for cruising if that sign is there. So I have
• 1:31:12
  a suspicion that there were people that just didn't like not being able to do
• 1:31:15
  those things that decided to use this and say, well, because this reminds
• 1:31:21
  us of that bad time when the overzealous government was targeting this group of people.
• 1:31:30
  They wanted those signs removed. And it's not necessarily really about It's not
• 1:31:39
  like people are going to forget that that happened, and it's not necessarily about
• 1:31:43
  getting people to forget that that happened, and in fact, people shouldn't forget
• 1:31:48
  that that happened, right, because it is bad when the government takes something
• 1:31:54
  that is supposed to apply to everybody and says, well, we're going to
• 1:31:57
  apply it more to these people because we don't like them, right, we
• 1:32:00
  don't like even though they're not doing anything to other people, we're going to
• 1:32:06
  apply it more to them because we don't like what they're doing. That's that's
• 1:32:11
  bad. So those should stay up and continue to be talked about instead of
• 1:32:17
  being taken down. Right, But that's what well people do. They try
• 1:32:23
  to remove reminders of things in the past that were painful that we're part of
• 1:32:27
  our cultural development we had to learn as a well, even if they weren't
• 1:32:31
  even if they weren't alive or around for that right right, we had to
• 1:32:35
  learn as a society that that's stupid and you shouldn't do it. And they
• 1:32:39
  don't like that, and and they want to forget that that you know,
• 1:32:43
  that never existed. Well, you know what, it's important that that existed,
• 1:32:48
  because it's important that we don't do it again. It's important to remember
• 1:32:55
  and it's important to understand it. The thing that was wrong about it isn't
• 1:33:00
  that the discrimination was against the wrong group of people. It was that there
• 1:33:03
  was discrimination. And these guys are going to when they erase that, that
• 1:33:10
  will create the ability to then go on and say, well, this group
• 1:33:15
  of people that has victim status has the right to ask for discrimination on their
• 1:33:18
  behalf against other groups of people, because it's not the discrimination that's wrong.
• 1:33:24
  It's who's being discriminated and discriminated against that matters. And you guys aren't a
• 1:33:29
  protected group, so you don't matter. And that's the real reason why they
• 1:33:32
  want to remove those signs that or they want to be able to make U
• 1:33:36
  turns and not get pulled over for cruising. Very wrong, And all of
• 1:33:42
  that makes perfect sense now that you've explained it in terms of signs and how
• 1:33:45
  they're supposed to work. But the story that the legacy media is attempting to
• 1:33:50
  sell us is apparently the Riddler right was leaving these cryptic puzzles all over town
• 1:34:03
  as road signs in a nefarious attempt to degay everyone. Is that that's kind
• 1:34:12
  of yeah, like there there are it's coded homophobic. Apparently he did this
• 1:34:16
  in nineteen ninety seven. For twenty seven years, those signs were not removed.
• 1:34:25
  So were the signs, as it happens, in informationally accurate? Were
• 1:34:31
  they actually placing areas with no U turns permitted? If so, I mean
• 1:34:35
  the riddlers being extra mysterious, there isn't he? Yeah, I think placing
• 1:34:42
  I think the look placing road signs that look and function as road signs in
• 1:34:47
  exactly the places you would expect to find those exact road signs in a nefarious
• 1:34:54
  master plan to degay everyone. Or were the sign it's inaccurate for their locations.
• 1:35:01
  Did they give misdirections to unsuspecting drivers which could result in horrific traffic congestions
• 1:35:10
  and maybe even fatal accidents if left up for so much as one day,
• 1:35:15
  let alone twenty seven years. Because I'm pretty sure that's a crime posting fake
• 1:35:24
  road signs. It's certainly way more illegal than posting cryptic anomalies of typology in
• 1:35:30
  your nefarious odyssey in the Great Degaying of Everyone. Well, it's California.
• 1:35:38
  But what if what if the term you turn and cruising are actually like gay
• 1:35:45
  sex positions, kind of like the you know, dirty Sanchez or the Donkey
• 1:35:49
  punch or the the Cincinnati bow tie and the alligator fuck house. Like what
• 1:35:56
  if it's like that kind of stuff. You know, the cruising sign,
• 1:36:01
  right, so the cruise into your cruising. You remember, we used to
• 1:36:08
  go cruising, So for for people who don't remember, fuel for your vehicle
• 1:36:15
  used to cost like between seventy and ninety cents a gallon once upon a time.
• 1:36:25
  Our parents thought that was expensive because it was even less when they were
• 1:36:28
  younger, except during the seventies when there was you know, political Shenanigan's going
• 1:36:34
  on, but u But in the eighties and nineties it was really cheap,
• 1:36:39
  and so people would just drive around like you didn't try to conserve gas because
• 1:36:44
  it was really cheap, and you just drive past the same area a bunch
• 1:36:48
  of times and wave to each other, and some people would be walking up
• 1:36:50
  and down the street and you wave to them, and you know, you
• 1:36:54
  might get out park and get out and hang out with friends on a street
• 1:36:58
  corner and chit chat and then get back in your car and drive around some
• 1:37:00
  more and go get something to eat, and then drive around some more.
• 1:37:05
  The sign says two times past the same point within six hours is cruising.
• 1:37:14
  We would go two times past the same point, sometimes within six minutes.
• 1:37:18
  Sure, so they would be watching a point for hours and hours. And
• 1:37:25
  if somebody drives past that same point twice within six hours and appears to be
• 1:37:31
  looking around for hookup, they're busted for cruising. I mean, it could
• 1:37:36
  have just been a general way to deter prostitution, and it just so happens
• 1:37:42
  that that includes gay prostitution. If you so work part time and you're scheduled
• 1:37:49
  for a four hour shift somewhere, you might drive two times past the same
• 1:37:55
  point within six hours going to and from work. Yeah, but yeah,
• 1:38:01
  all right, this is this is what California officials are doing while thousands of
• 1:38:09
  child sex slaves are casco cascading over the southern border like a chocolate fucking waterfall,
• 1:38:15
  California is It's another one with chocolate waterfall with it's Some road signs were
• 1:38:26
  discovered in the wrong place, having been in the wrong place for twenty seven
• 1:38:31
  years, and when LA Council representatives were approached for an explanation as to why
• 1:38:38
  the wrong road sides have been up for twenty seven years, they assured us
• 1:38:42
  that a big boy did it and ran away. They're apparently doing the meme
• 1:38:46
  that's one of the oldest memes in the child's playbook, and they think they're
• 1:38:49
  getting away with it because they added a big homophobic boy did it and ran
• 1:38:56
  away. Oh, in that case, so stunning, so brave, so
• 1:38:59
  stunning and brave. You guys are totally doing your jobs properly. You're definitely
• 1:39:03
  not crumpling the infrastructure for twenty seven years because of a clerical error and then
• 1:39:10
  blaming it on a big gay, bug eyed alien boogeyman. Are you They
• 1:39:16
  wouldn't do that, would they? Yeah? They would. Time and a
• 1:39:19
  place for everything, and it's called California. Twenty seven years of bodies piling
• 1:39:27
  up in the street, and they go, we've captured the in cell who
• 1:39:30
  did this, the inflatable looking magachud with the bag on his head. Behold
• 1:39:34
  he is vanquished, and everyone's like, that's nice. Can you start cleaning
• 1:39:39
  away the dead bodies now in the needles and all that. Yeah, yes,
• 1:39:44
  yes we can do that, but only by the power of gay.
• 1:39:49
  Accuracy here, power of gay heels all it cleanses all. Yeah. No,
• 1:39:54
  please put down the power of gay. Don't point that thing at me.
• 1:39:58
  This is for accuracy sake. Although I still say the signs don't really
• 1:40:02
  need to be removed, because it's more important to remember this than to erase
• 1:40:08
  it. The signs according to the the I sort of went back through the
• 1:40:15
  links. According to the original source, the signs that read no cruising and
• 1:40:19
  prohibited U turns in question, like the signs that were actually removed, were
• 1:40:28
  installed in nineteen ninety seven when neighbors complained about gay men hanging out and looking
• 1:40:32
  for dates in certain residential areas close to popular gay bars. So basically,
• 1:40:40
  they're coming out of the gay bar. Oh shit, let's let's harass them.
• 1:40:45
  That's basically what happened. Well, it could have been that they were
• 1:40:48
  creating a bit of a bar. I used to live in Boystown and like
• 1:40:55
  the weekends would get very rowdy and there'd be drag queens, fighting, bully
• 1:41:00
  each other's wigs out, you know. It was every weekend and kind of
• 1:41:05
  like some of the bars I've been to, except instead of biological women,
• 1:41:12
  it was drag queens. Yeah, it was drag queens and women and gay
• 1:41:16
  men, but mostly drag queens and lesbians. Like you know, it was
• 1:41:19
  fucking it was fight club like on the streets. And I think that people
• 1:41:25
  who live there, and most people who lived there were other gay men,
• 1:41:29
  they just didn't want that, you know, it was just too it was
• 1:41:31
  too much of a disruption. Yeah, there are two very basic types of
• 1:41:34
  bars in the world, and I'm not going to say gang straight. There
• 1:41:38
  are bars where people go and hang out and get something to eat and drink
• 1:41:41
  and it's all quiet, sure, and they have music sometimes and they have
• 1:41:45
  other times they just have the jukebox playing, you know, or they like
• 1:41:47
  live music and sometimes it's the jukebox and blah blah blah, and and no
• 1:41:51
  trouble is to be had, and the cops might even forget the bar exist,
• 1:41:56
  right. And the other type people go there and they get drunk and
• 1:42:00
  there are always fights and it's always rowdy. At both bars, people might
• 1:42:04
  do make stupid sexual decisions. You know, people might get a little too
• 1:42:10
  drunk and do stupid things. But at the rowdy type of bar, for
• 1:42:14
  whatever reason, the owner has not found a way to establish an expectation of
• 1:42:21
  peacefulness, and you get that kind of bullshit where people come out and they
• 1:42:27
  behave badly outside the bar, and it gives the bar a bad reputation.
• 1:42:31
  And then the next thing that happens is the people that prefer the other type
• 1:42:35
  of bar don't go there, and the people who aren't welcome at the other
• 1:42:41
  type of bar do go there, and that increases the problem. And so
• 1:42:46
  if it was that type of bar in that neighborhood, I can see why
• 1:42:49
  those signs might have been put up. It's also possible that it was just
• 1:42:54
  that type of prejudice where they're like, oh my god, we don't want
• 1:42:57
  to see men holding hands out here, you know, and so we're going
• 1:43:00
  to put up these signs, which but nineteen ninety seven, And I'm a
• 1:43:04
  little skeptical if it was nineteen If they said nineteen fifty seven, I'd be
• 1:43:08
  like, oh, yeah, they were just harassing them for being gay.
• 1:43:10
  Sure, yeah, I think that in California in the late nineties, I
• 1:43:15
  think it would have to be pretty like over the top, yeah, unless
• 1:43:17
  it was a small community. And if it was a small community, it
• 1:43:20
  might have been a totally different story. Yeah. But but yeah, like
• 1:43:25
  I've been to both types of bars. We we left the Ohio Theater too
• 1:43:29
  one time. My friend and I left the Ohio Theater two one time because
• 1:43:33
  a girl picked up another girl and threw her past us and we're like,
• 1:43:39
  okay, yeah, we don't want any part of that. We're going bye.
• 1:43:43
  You know that was all right, Yeah, all right, I got
• 1:43:45
  a couple of super chats and then we're going to move into the after show.
• 1:43:48
  So Albertnata Retro Games is five dollars Canadian and says, so you know,
• 1:43:53
  most Canucks are not voting for Justin Trudeau. He's lost the popular vote
• 1:43:57
  twice, I believe, just not enough vot voting for the same party.
• 1:44:01
  Well good luck with that, but you know it's just a popular vote twice
• 1:44:05
  if I remember, right, Yeah, he may win again, I'm afraid.
• 1:44:11
  And then Albernada retrog goes two dollars Canadian again and says is one way
• 1:44:15
  signs anti bisexual or non binary stuff, And that's okay, very funny.
• 1:44:20
  All right, So we're gonna get into the Patron Show now and we're gonna
• 1:44:24
  look at this article call and put up on the screen. My son is
• 1:44:29
  suspicious of the idea of Father's Day. Why would he want to celebrate the
• 1:44:32
  lesser of his two parents? Mike says, it's not as bad as it
• 1:44:38
  looks. We will find out. We'll go into the It is the Guardian,
• 1:44:43
  So you know, the bar is low. That's what I'm saying.
• 1:44:45
  The bar is low. But if you want to join us for this on
• 1:44:49
  the Patron Show, you have to become a Badger yourself by going to Feed
• 1:44:54
  the Batchels, dot Comfort Slash subscribe and joining us in the Discord five bucks
• 1:44:59
  a month is all, and you'll be able to watch all the additional content.
• 1:45:02
  You know, you guys might as well get in the Discord server and
• 1:45:06
  and if you want to check out the server for free, it won't give
• 1:45:10
  you complete access, but you'll be able to see what the community is like
• 1:45:13
  and look at a lot of the rooms. Then go to Badgerination dot online
• 1:45:16
  to do that. All right, Well, thank you guys so much for
• 1:45:19
  coming on today's show. If you guys like this video, please hit like
• 1:45:23
  subscribe. If you're not already subscribed, hit the bell for notifications, leave
• 1:45:27
  me a comment, let us know what you guys think about what we discussed
• 1:45:29
  on the show today. Links to the show notes are in the description of
• 1:45:32
  this video. Thank you guys so much for coming on today's episode of HPR
• 1:45:36
  News, and we'll talk to you all in the next one. Yes are
• 1:45:41
  machines, dude, Okay, they are literal machines. They are talking point
• 1:45:46
  machines. They are impossible to fucking deal with, especially if you have,
• 1:45:49
  like especially if you have like a couple of dudes who have good memory.
• 1:45:53
  On top of that, too, Holy shit, you're fucked