Latest / Beyond The Horizon / Mega Edition: Hillary Clinton And Her Epstein Related Talk With Congress (Part 15-16) (11/10/26)

Transcript

Mega Edition: Hillary Clinton And Her Epstein Related Talk With Congress (Part 15-16) (11/10/26) · Beyond The Horizon

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What's up everyone and welcome to another episode of the
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: Epstein Chronicles. In this episode, we're going to pick up
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: where we left off with the Hillary Clinton transcript from
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: her trip to Congress. Lauren Boebert, I will get those
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: and I'll skip that question until she gets cut off
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: by Comer, but an audible woman asked generally if she
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: was aware. Lawyer, generally she's asking if she's aware of
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: specific information about That is in the files that you're
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: all relying on. Please provide the witness with copies of
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: that material. Chairman Comer, if the client doesn't know or
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: has no recollection, she's welcome to state so. Lawyer, we're
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: also welcome to actually see the information that you're taking today. Comer, again,
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: the representative is asking general questions. Clinton, I mean, I
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: expected a lot of interesting questions today, but Pizzagate was
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: not on my list. Boebert, that's okay. We're asking all
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: sorts of things here. Answer, you certainly are. You certainly are. Question,
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: we're just trying to get the truth out of the
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: American people with some clarity. Clinton, well, that would be
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: very helpful. Question, are you aware of any files that
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: were on Anthony Weiner's laptop in a folder that was
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: titled Insurance, Life Insurance, with a zip file titled Frazzle Drip? Lawyer,
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: excuse me, Chairman's ruling. Lawyer, this is way outside of
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: the scope. Another lawyer, is this in the scope? Is
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: this within the scope, Mr. Chairman? Boebert, if the chairman rules,
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: that's not within the scope. I have other questions. Mr. Chairman,
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: based on what you said in the public hearing, is
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: this within the scope? Hillary's lawyer asks, Chairman, we can
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: go off the record for a moment. They come back on. Mr. Chairman,
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: is this within the scope? They go off the record.
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: Now they come back on. Question, Madam Clinton, you've stated
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: that you do not recall meeting Jeffrey Epstein and having
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: no links to him. Have you reviewed any photos, emails,
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: or records from the released Epstein files that might refresh
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: your recollection of any encounter, event, or introduction involving them?
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: Once again, the lawyer jumps in. Excuse me? Before, you
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: were stating that with respect to an interview or with
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: respect to what she has stated here today? Answer, I'm
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: asking in general, has anything that you have viewed since
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: the release of the Epstein files brought any sort of
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: recollection of an encounter with Epstein? Answer, not that I recall. Question,
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: you acknowledge meeting Ghislaine Maxwell on a few occasions in
• 2:31
  Speaker 1: connection with a global initiative. Please describe each meeting in detail. Answer,
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: I did not. Actually, in response to a question which
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: posited that she had come to the Clinton Global Initiative
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: in 2013, I stated I did not have any involvement
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: in that and I didn't recall seeing her there. But
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: I have seen photos that she has been there. And
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: in 2013, she was very active promoting this ocean work
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: that she was doing. And apparently everybody from the UN
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: to CNN to the TED Talk people thought it was
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: worth giving her a platform. Question. Madam Clinton, one of
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: the jobs you did for the CGI was helping and
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: maybe even directing and planning of the annual meetings. Is
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: that correct? Answer. No. The staff plans the annual meeting
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: and they make a report and we offer suggestions. Question.
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: In 2013, Maxwell was recognized ASA committed to Action Leader. Clinton,
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: she made a commitment in 2013, along with hundreds, maybe
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: thousands of other people. Question, so I find it notable
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: that in 2011, Doug Band says that he directed the
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: Clinton Foundation staff to bar Maxwell from receiving an invite
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: to CGI or the Clinton Foundation events. I'd like to
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: know who overruled Doug Band's suggestion to bar Maxwell. Lawyer, objection,
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: based on hearsay, states facts, not in evidence. You can
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: ask the witness if she knows anything about it. Answer,
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: I know nothing about it. Question by the chairman. One moment, Ms. Boebert.
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: The federal rules of evidence don't apply in depositions. Clinton,
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: that's fine. I don't know anything about it. Boebert, okay.
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: And so would you also not have any indication that
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: who she was personally recommended by to receive such an order? Answer,
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: I was secretary of state. I was not involved in
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: the CGI planning or operation agreement. Question, your husband presented
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: that award or is that true? Answer, I have no idea. Question, okay.
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: And then just a couple more questions. So regarding the
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: Epstein files, there are many files where Jeffrey Epstein seems
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: to speak as though he does know you personally. In
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: one file, EFTA 0657115, Mr. Epstein is commenting and he quotes, Hey,
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton is much prettier in person. This was Tuesday,
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: September 20th, 2011. Hillary Clinton, I'm going to object to that.
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: Lawyer jumps in, Congresswoman, can we see the documents because
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: we don't think. Lawyer says, we should get that document.
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: Bober just keeps going. Question, Jeffrey Epstein has also commented
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: that meetings with Hillary are not easily discreet. Has he
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: ever connected someone to meet with you? Answer, not that
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: I'm aware of. Question, okay, I'm going to let my
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: colleagues ask some questions. Maybe I'll be back. Thank you. Speaker,
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: thank you. And we'll let staff. Speaker jumps in, Secretary Clinton.
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: Just to circle back to a few things, you mentioned
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: that your daughter, Chelsea, had a friendly relationship. Is that
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: correct with Ms. Maxwell? Answer, I believe so. Question, and
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: did Chelsea tell you what made that relationship friendly? Answer again,
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: it was through Ted Waite, the longtime friend of ours.
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: That's how I certainly met her. Question, so Chelsea met
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: Ghislaine through Ted Waite as well? Answer, I believe that's right. Question,
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: and I believe that you testified earlier, Ted Waite's been
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: a family friend for 30 years or something to that effect. Answer,
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: early 90s, yes. Question, and having a friend that long,
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: you never discussed Ms. Maxwell with Mr. Waite? Answer, I
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: don't discuss the relationship of my friends. That's up to them. Question,
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: and to be clear, you never discussed Ms. Maxwell's relationship
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: with Mr. Waite? Answer, not that I recall. My memory
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: is that shortly after the wedding on July 31st, 2010,
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: shortly after that, they broke up. And shortly after that,
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: he married somebody else. I know nothing about the relationship.
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: I'm just describing what I believe was the chronology. Question understood.
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: And upon that breakup, as you said, Mr. Waite never
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: said anything to the effect of why they broke up?
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: Answer not to me. He didn't. Question. And circling the
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: 2013 CGI annual conference that's been brought up on a
• 6:39
  Speaker 1: few occasions today. Clinton, yeah, indeed. Question. I believe you
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: said you didn't remember seeing Ms. Maxwell there. Is that correct? Answer.
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: I don't recall seeing her there. Question. and you had
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: no interaction with her at all? Answer, not that I recall. Question,
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: after this 2013 annual conference at CGI, did anyone raise
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: any concerns to you about Ms. Maxwell being there? Answer,
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: not that I recall. Question, separate from the 2013 event,
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: did Mr. Band ever raise concerns about Maxwell to you? Answer,
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: not that I recall. Question, and again, just to clarify,
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: did Mr. Band ever attempt to blacklist Ms. Maxwell? From
• 7:18
  Speaker 1: any Clinton Foundation or CGI event? Answer, not that I
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: know of, but I can't say that I would have known. Question,
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: when did Mr. Band leave the foundation? Answer, I don't know.
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: I don't know. Question, does 2012 sound possible? Answer, I
• 7:33
  Speaker 1: don't know. It was during my time as Secretary of State.
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: I wouldn't have an answer to no. Question, who would
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: have final decisions over the list of individuals or entities
• 7:44
  Speaker 1: that would get recognized at a CGI event? Answer, it
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: was a staff decision. Question, if the staff made the decision,
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: would the board have any input on that? Answer, not
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: that I'm aware of. They might make suggestions as to
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: people that should be contacted or followed up with. But
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: I don't know specifically that I certainly don't know anything
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: about her involvement. Question understood and suggestions. What type of
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: suggestions would they make on individuals or entities? Answer, oh,
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: they might say this person's doing great work on affordable
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: housing or this person. has done some really exciting hygiene work,
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: trying to improve the well-being of people in some countries.
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: It would be things like that. So maybe invite the
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: person because we can maybe introduce this person to somebody
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: who's interested in doing the same kind of work. And
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: maybe they can make a commitment together. Question. Are you
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: aware of President Clinton having lunch or other types of
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: meals with Ms. Maxwell in 2014? Answer. I don't recall
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: knowing that. Question. Have you since been made aware of
• 8:47
  Speaker 1: the fact? Answer, yes, I have been. Question, and was
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: that in preparation for the deposition? Answer, it was. Question,
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: are you aware of any other more recent meetings between
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: Maxwell and any members of your family? Answer, I am not. Question,
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: does the Clinton Foundation often use jets of other individuals
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: for foundation business? Answer, yes. Question, and that's still a
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: common practice today? Answer, I don't know how common it is,
• 9:13
  Speaker 1: but it has been in the past. Question, And were
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: there any other type of aircraft that you were aware
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: of President Clinton traveling on with Epstein? Answer, not that
• 9:22
  Speaker 1: I'm aware of. Question, Secretary Clinton. Do you know who
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: Nicholas Sarkozy is? Answer, I do. The former president of France. Question,
• 9:30
  Speaker 1: and do you recall when he was president of France? Answer,
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: he was president while I was Secretary of State, but
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: I don't know his actual years of term. Question, I'm
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: going to introduce his Majority Exhibit 17. An email from
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: the Department of Justice release of the Epstein-related files. Just
• 9:46
  Speaker 1: give us a second. We'll provide that to you all. Lawyer, also,
• 9:51
  Speaker 1: while we have a break, I think Congressman Perry, we
• 9:54
  Speaker 1: wound up with at least three of your pages here,
• 9:56
  Speaker 1: two pages. So they get back to it. Secretary Clinton,
• 10:02
  Speaker 1: this is an email, the top of the page says,
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: to Olivier Cologne. I will stipulate to you that he
• 10:09
  Speaker 1: was an advisor to President Sarkozy. It's bait-stamped EFTA 019-49592.
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: The original email here is from Mr. Cologne, and he asked,
• 10:19
  Speaker 1: could you organize a discreet meeting between Sarko and Hillary
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: Clinton in New York? If not, who should I ask? Mr.
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: Epstein replies, meetings with Hillary are not easily discreet. When?
• 10:30
  Speaker 1: We started to touch on this earlier. Are you aware
• 10:33
  Speaker 1: of Mr. Epstein or any of his staff reaching out
• 10:36
  Speaker 1: to anyone on your staff to set up a meeting? Answer,
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: I am not aware, and I find it kind of
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: weird because I know Sarkozy. If somebody was seeking a
• 10:44
  Speaker 1: meeting with me and Sarkozy, he would not have needed
• 10:46
  Speaker 1: to go through anybody else. He could have contacted me directly.
• 10:50
  Speaker 1: Question understood. And just to be clear, have you seen
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: this email exchange previously? Answer yes. Question, and that was
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: in preparation for your deposition. Answer yes. Question, but no
• 11:01
  Speaker 1: prior awareness of this email chain? Answer, none whatsoever. Question,
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: did Mr. Epstein or any of his agents attempt to
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: set up any other meetings with you? Answer, not that
• 11:11
  Speaker 1: I know of. but I have no idea what they
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: thought they were trying to do. Question, Secretary Clinton. We've
• 11:17
  Speaker 1: touched on this a little bit, but just to make
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: sure the record is totally clear here. Have you said
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: that you've never been to Mr. Epstein's island? Is that correct? Answer,
• 11:25
  Speaker 1: you know what? I'm so tired of answering that question.
• 11:28
  Speaker 1: If you have one scintilla of evidence to the contrary,
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: put it forward. I've never been on the island, period.
• 11:33
  Speaker 1: I've never been in his homes, his offices, his anything.
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: So I don't know how many times you have to
• 11:38
  Speaker 1: say the same thing over and over and over again.
• 11:40
  Speaker 1: and I'm just struggling with the relevance of all of this,
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: but no, I never have been. Question, and based off
• 11:45
  Speaker 1: that response, that would include, you have never been to Mr.
• 11:48
  Speaker 1: Epstein's Manhattan townhome? Answer, no. His New Mexico ranch, no.
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: His Palm Beach residence, no. His Paris apartment, no. I
• 11:58
  Speaker 1: didn't know he had one. Haven't been there. Also find
• 12:01
  Speaker 1: it very interesting because I went back and looked at
• 12:03
  Speaker 1: the transcripts of all your other depositions, and none of
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: the Republicans asked a single question to any witness about
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein, or any question that would help provide answers
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: for his victims to any of the people you deposed.
• 12:15
  Speaker 1: In fact, the only questions that were asked were asked
• 12:17
  Speaker 1: by the chairman to Attorney General Barr. And what was
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: that about? They weren't about Jeffrey Epstein. They weren't about
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: Glenn Maxwell. They weren't about his victims or survivors. They
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: were General Barr. I may jump in for a couple questions.
• 12:29
  Speaker 1: Were you aware of the involvement of Hillary Clinton and
• 12:32
  Speaker 1: the Clinton campaign in Russian collusion investigation involving Trump? Chairman Comer,
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: this is a deposition, Ms. Clinton. She cuts him off. Well,
• 12:41
  Speaker 1: I'm just saying you have kept me here for four
• 12:43
  Speaker 1: hours asking the same questions over and over again. I've
• 12:46
  Speaker 1: given the same answers over and over again. Comer, Madam Secretary,
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: we will. Clinton, not a single Republican. Comer, if you
• 12:53
  Speaker 1: could give us just a minute, gets cut off again
• 12:55
  Speaker 1: by Hillary Clinton. At any of your depositions, has asked
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: a question about Epstein or Maxwell. And it does seem
• 13:01
  Speaker 1: to me that if the members were truly interested in
• 13:03
  Speaker 1: getting to the truth, you would have asked Barr, Acosta, Wexner.
• 13:07
  Speaker 1: You didn't even show up. Comer, Madam Secretary, I believe
• 13:10
  Speaker 1: we are very close to finishing. Lawyer, or the person
• 13:15
  Speaker 1: asking the questions, Madam Secretary, did Jeffrey Epstein ever request
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: any meeting with your State Department officials? Answer, not that
• 13:22
  Speaker 1: I'm aware of. Lawyer jumps in, that's been asked and answered, Counsel.
• 13:26
  Speaker 1: She said she's never talked to him. She said that repeatedly. Clinton, well,
• 13:30
  Speaker 1: I guess they have to hear it over and over again.
• 13:34
  Speaker 1: Person asking the questions, I think he can rely on
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: your previous answer. Clinton, yeah, whatever. Question, did Maxwell ever
• 13:41
  Speaker 1: request any meeting between you and your State Department officials? Clinton,
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: not that I'm aware of. Question, are you aware of
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: any communication between your State Department staff and Mr. Epstein
• 13:51
  Speaker 1: or Ms. Maxwell? Answer, I am not. Lawyer, yeah, it's
• 13:56
  Speaker 1: the third and final round. She's staying. Next up, asking questions,
• 14:01
  Speaker 1: Nancy Mace. And that's where we're going to pick up
• 14:04
  Speaker 1: in the next episode. All the information that goes with
• 14:07
  Speaker 1: this episode can be found in the description box. What's up, everyone,
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: and welcome to another episode of the Epstein Chronicles. In
• 14:15
  Speaker 1: this episode, we're going to finish off the Hillary Clinton
• 14:17
  Speaker 1: transcript from her trip to Congress. Nancy Mace, this is
• 14:22
  Speaker 1: my third and final round. That's for me, okay? That
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: should make you happy. You stated earlier it was false
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: that Secret Service was dropped from some flights with Clinton
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: and Epstein, correct? Lawyer, no, she didn't say that. Nancy Mace,
• 14:36
  Speaker 1: who said that was false? Lawyer, let the record reflect.
• 14:40
  Speaker 1: Nancy Mace, okay. Lawyer, just for clarification, her husband has
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: never signed off of Secret Service. That means anytime he's
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: traveling or anytime he has gone anywhere, he's not signed
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: off from Secret Service coverage, which means the Secret Service
• 14:54
  Speaker 1: moved with him. Mace, okay, did you know that Secret
• 14:56
  Speaker 1: Service was FOIA'd by FoxNews.com in 2016, asking for this information,
• 15:02
  Speaker 1: and the Secret Service refused to provide it? I have
• 15:05
  Speaker 1: a document here which we can provide to you. Question,
• 15:08
  Speaker 1: is the question that because they refused to provide it? Answer,
• 15:12
  Speaker 1: information to the press about flight logs because on a
• 15:14
  Speaker 1: five-leg trip to Asia in 2016, it says from May
• 15:19
  Speaker 1: 22nd to May 25th, not a single Secret Service agent
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: is listed on the flight logs. And every other flight
• 15:25
  Speaker 1: that he was on, they're listed on the logs. Lawyer,
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: is your question for the Secret Service or is your
• 15:31
  Speaker 1: question for the Secretary? Mace, well, I believe it was
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: stated earlier that it was false. I'm clarifying that the
• 15:37
  Speaker 1: public was forced. Gets cut off by the lawyer. What
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: was stated is false. Can we just make? Can you
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: read back for the record? So that you were actually
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: stating the actual facts? Nancy Mace, okay. I stated earlier
• 15:49
  Speaker 1: this afternoon, while we're burning time, I suppose, with the
• 15:52
  Speaker 1: last final 10 minutes of this, it was about the
• 15:54
  Speaker 1: Secret Service not traveling with Clinton. I asked a question
• 15:57
  Speaker 1: about whether or not they travel with President Clinton at
• 16:00
  Speaker 1: all times. And when I stated that they did not,
• 16:03
  Speaker 1: I heard false. We can get the transcript tomorrow, but
• 16:06
  Speaker 1: this is a Fox News report that all you now
• 16:09
  Speaker 1: have where it states that the Secret Service did not
• 16:11
  Speaker 1: fly with Clinton on all the flight legs with him,
• 16:14
  Speaker 1: so I wanted to clarify the record. Lawyer, to clarify,
• 16:18
  Speaker 1: you're saying that because Fox News reported that, that the
• 16:20
  Speaker 1: Secret Service are lying? Answer, they weren't on the flight
• 16:23
  Speaker 1: logs on five legs to the trip to Asia. Lawyer,
• 16:27
  Speaker 1: just clarify the question then. Comer, I believe what's being
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: asked of Madam Secretary, not for your testimony, misredacted, Lawyer,
• 16:35
  Speaker 1: I'm not seeking to testify. I'm seeking to clarify that
• 16:38
  Speaker 1: she's representing what the secretary said and that she's not
• 16:41
  Speaker 1: representing it accurately. Nancy Mace, okay, we can quibble over
• 16:45
  Speaker 1: something else then. Earlier, I don't know if this got,
• 16:48
  Speaker 1: did this get printed off earlier? This eight page interview
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: with victim 3501144. Lawyer jumps in, this article will be
• 16:57
  Speaker 1: majority 18. Nancy Mace, okay, so I have an exhibit
• 17:01
  Speaker 1: for majority 19. I have it here, the article now. Mace,
• 17:05
  Speaker 1: I don't know if this got printed off. This will
• 17:07
  Speaker 1: be a document that I would like to enter as
• 17:09
  Speaker 1: an exhibit for a majority, I guess. What number are
• 17:11
  Speaker 1: we on? 1-9. Mace, it's with victim 3501.144, and the
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: document would be 032. I asked for it to print
• 17:22
  Speaker 1: off earlier, but I know that we've had issues with printing.
• 17:26
  Speaker 1: So they go off record. They come back on. All right,
• 17:28
  Speaker 1: all right. So this will be majority exhibit number 19.
• 17:32
  Speaker 1: And have you reviewed this document? Have you seen the
• 17:34
  Speaker 1: document before? Clinton, I have never seen this document before. Mace,
• 17:39
  Speaker 1: this is the first time that you've ever seen this document?
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: Earlier in my second round, I was asking questions, and
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: I made mention about Bill Clinton, President Clinton's visit to
• 17:47
  Speaker 1: Epstein's Island, and that a possible cover-up of those visits,
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: and I was called a liar, I believe, by somebody
• 17:54
  Speaker 1: on the other side of this table. Clinton, I don't
• 17:56
  Speaker 1: think I did, do you? Mace, and I would provide
• 17:59
  Speaker 1: this document to go over it with you. This is
• 18:02
  Speaker 1: an interview by the FBI of an Epstein victim. It's 3501.144-032.
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: And on page 8, which I'll give it to you,
• 18:12
  Speaker 1: or I can read it to you, I'll give this back.
• 18:15
  Speaker 1: If you can read the last sentence, would you please
• 18:16
  Speaker 1: read it? Clinton, I'm not interested in reading something. I
• 18:20
  Speaker 1: have no idea what it is. If you want to
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: read it, go right ahead. Nancy makes, okay, I'll read it.
• 18:25
  Speaker 1: I was called a liar over this, so this particular
• 18:27
  Speaker 1: victim stated, on the record, in an interview with the FBI...
• 18:31
  Speaker 1: Epstein wanted blank the name of victim one to say
• 18:33
  Speaker 1: that blank victim number two was a liar and that
• 18:36
  Speaker 1: President Clinton was never on Epstein's Island. So I stated
• 18:39
  Speaker 1: earlier for the record that Epstein directed victims to lie
• 18:43
  Speaker 1: about your husband's visit to Epstein's Island. I was called
• 18:46
  Speaker 1: a liar and this document, lawyer jumps in, if you recall,
• 18:50
  Speaker 1: that is not accurate. The records will reflect that the
• 18:52
  Speaker 1: court reporter can read it back with respect to whether
• 18:55
  Speaker 1: or not President Clinton has ever been on Epstein's Island.
• 18:59
  Speaker 1: If somebody had represented that, That would not be accurate.
• 19:03
  Speaker 1: Nancy Mace, Jeffrey Epstein directed his victim to state a
• 19:05
  Speaker 1: lie about Bill Clinton never being on the island. Now
• 19:09
  Speaker 1: on page 7 for the record, which I know you've
• 19:11
  Speaker 1: never seen, there's a fully redacted paragraph. And that fully
• 19:14
  Speaker 1: redacted paragraph is the unredacted files of the DOJ revealed
• 19:18
  Speaker 1: that President Clinton, it redacts his name, and also discusses
• 19:22
  Speaker 1: notepads that the victims wrote down in phone calls with
• 19:25
  Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein. Because she was told to lie about another victim,
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: and lie about Bill Clinton's visit to Epstein's Island. I
• 19:32
  Speaker 1: don't know why this information is redacted, and also the
• 19:35
  Speaker 1: attachment in this file, by the way, there were notes.
• 19:38
  Speaker 1: You can't see those at the DOJ, they're still redacted,
• 19:41
  Speaker 1: which is the reason we're here today. We want to
• 19:43
  Speaker 1: get to the bottom of this and get the truth. Lawyer,
• 19:48
  Speaker 1: excuse me, was there a question? Mace, I'm making a statement.
• 19:52
  Speaker 1: I want to know if she's ever seen this document before.
• 19:55
  Speaker 1: She was aware. I was called a liar earlier. This
• 19:58
  Speaker 1: victim was told by Jeffrey Epstein to lie to Bill Clinton. Lawyer,
• 20:02
  Speaker 1: she answered that question. Mace, okay, I was just answering
• 20:05
  Speaker 1: the question for the attorney. I have majority exhibit number 20.
• 20:09
  Speaker 1: that I would like to enter into the record. And
• 20:11
  Speaker 1: this is page 88 on a federal case between Virginia
• 20:15
  Speaker 1: Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell. Speaker, can you hold on a second? Uh-huh. Speaker, oh,
• 20:19
  Speaker 1: that's different. Thank you very much. Speaker, it's going to
• 20:22
  Speaker 1: be 20. Congressman Perry, yes, sir. Speaker, could you hold
• 20:26
  Speaker 1: for one second, please? Clinton, no, this is something else
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: coming here. So they're going through it, trying to get
• 20:32
  Speaker 1: to the right page. They finally get the printout. We
• 20:35
  Speaker 1: should be looking at Exhibit 8 right now. Is that right? Answer, correct. Lawyer,
• 20:41
  Speaker 1: and not anything related to the other document? Chairman, for
• 20:44
  Speaker 1: the record it's labeled Exhibit 20, but the actual document
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: states Exhibit 8 on the front. That is correct. Question,
• 20:51
  Speaker 1: that was just a cover page. I had printed off
• 20:53
  Speaker 1: because these documents are hundreds of pages. I'm not an attorney.
• 20:57
  Speaker 1: Someone jumps in, I don't know who it is, Speaker 30,
• 20:59
  Speaker 1: just to be clear it's a single page of some
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: exhibits in a court filing. Mace, that's hundreds of pages long. Comer,
• 21:07
  Speaker 1: there are two pages. Speaker, can you please represent for
• 21:10
  Speaker 1: the record what we're filing this is and what the
• 21:14
  Speaker 1: title of the document is? Mace, this would be Virginia v.
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: Maxwell federal lawsuit filed on the 1st of January, 2024.
• 21:21
  Speaker 1: And it's page 88 of that documentation. What's the filing
• 21:27
  Speaker 1: of the lawsuit? Asked the lawyer. Mace, it's in the filing.
• 21:31
  Speaker 1: So they're just going through all the bullshit, okay? Now
• 21:34
  Speaker 1: they're going back to the questioning and Nancy Mace It's
• 21:37
  Speaker 1: the first shared paragraph. I'm going to ask about it. Speaker,
• 21:40
  Speaker 1: I'm going to ask that these chairmen ask me a
• 21:42
  Speaker 1: question he asked me about in Audible. So they're just
• 21:45
  Speaker 1: fighting now, like usual. Comer, for the record, Counselor and Counselor,
• 21:50
  Speaker 1: the document in the case is U.S. District Court for
• 21:52
  Speaker 1: Southern District of New York in Virginia v. Maxwell, and
• 21:55
  Speaker 1: I believe the Congresswoman has already stated the case number
• 21:58
  Speaker 1: that is listed at the top of the document. This
• 22:02
  Speaker 1: would be the defendant's submission regarding search items... and terms
• 22:06
  Speaker 1: and notice of compliance with court order concerning forensic examination
• 22:10
  Speaker 1: of devices. So now she's finally ready after all this bullshit. Again,
• 22:15
  Speaker 1: another speaker jumps in. Who filed the document? Mace, Ghislaine Maxwell.
• 22:20
  Speaker 1: Speaker 26, Maxwell filed the document. All right, we're cutting
• 22:23
  Speaker 1: out all the bullshit and we're getting right back to it.
• 22:25
  Speaker 1: So they go off the record. Now they come back
• 22:27
  Speaker 1: on Nancy Mace. May I ask you a question? Okay,
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: so court filings in this particular court filing. It lists
• 22:33
  Speaker 1: you among 13 specific witnesses for whom Virginia Roberts was
• 22:37
  Speaker 1: seeking all communications. There are no allegations against you, but
• 22:41
  Speaker 1: why do you believe that you're included on a list
• 22:43
  Speaker 1: with people like Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Emmy Taylor, the Dubins,
• 22:47
  Speaker 1: Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Clinton, and yourself? Lawyer jumps in objection.
• 22:51
  Speaker 1: This calls for speculation. It's a partial document. The witness
• 22:55
  Speaker 1: may answer if she can, but it's a list of
• 22:56
  Speaker 1: names in a search term description. Clinton, I have no idea. Mace,
• 23:01
  Speaker 1: did you know at any point That your communications were
• 23:03
  Speaker 1: sought after in this lawsuit? Answer, so I know nothing
• 23:07
  Speaker 1: about that. Mace, so you were never made aware that
• 23:09
  Speaker 1: your name was mentioned in this lawsuit? Answer, this is
• 23:12
  Speaker 1: the first time that I'm seeing it. Question, no one's
• 23:15
  Speaker 1: ever spoken to you about your name in a lawsuit? Answer,
• 23:18
  Speaker 1: not that I can recall. Question, do you think if someone?
• 23:21
  Speaker 1: Lawyer jumps in again in this lawsuit, excuse me. Mace, yes. Lawyer,
• 23:26
  Speaker 1: a lawsuit or this lawsuit? Mace, this lawsuit. Lawyer, okay, sorry. Question,
• 23:32
  Speaker 1: this lawsuit. Do you think that your staff would tell
• 23:34
  Speaker 1: you if you were named in a lawsuit? Would they
• 23:37
  Speaker 1: brief you on it if you're being named in a
• 23:39
  Speaker 1: public filing or a lawsuit? Answer, I don't know what
• 23:42
  Speaker 1: this means. I have no idea. Mace, your communications were
• 23:45
  Speaker 1: sought by Virginia Roberts in her suit against Ghislaine Maxwell. Clinton,
• 23:50
  Speaker 1: no lawyers that I'm aware of ever contacted me. Mace,
• 23:52
  Speaker 1: no one ever told you? Clinton, no. Question, you were
• 23:56
  Speaker 1: never made aware of that. Answer, not that I recall. Question,
• 23:59
  Speaker 1: did you ever vet the wedding guests of your daughter's wedding?
• 24:01
  Speaker 1: Did you know Glenn Maxwell was coming? Answer, she came
• 24:04
  Speaker 1: as Ted Wade's guest. Question, but you're the former first lady,
• 24:08
  Speaker 1: former senator, former secretary of state. You didn't vet individuals
• 24:12
  Speaker 1: at the event for your daughter? Clinton, this was filed when?
• 24:16
  Speaker 1: Nancy Mace, so it would have been 2024? Clinton, well, yeah,
• 24:21
  Speaker 1: the wedding was in 2010. Nancy Mace, I moved on
• 24:24
  Speaker 1: to another question about the wedding, but I know that
• 24:26
  Speaker 1: the chairman wants to ask some questions, so? Comer, he's
• 24:29
  Speaker 1: got a few more. Then I'll ask the last question. Question.
• 24:34
  Speaker 1: Secretary Clinton, thank you again for being here today. I
• 24:36
  Speaker 1: have one final question for you, and then I'll turn
• 24:38
  Speaker 1: it over to the chairman. Would you say that being
• 24:41
  Speaker 1: associated with powerful or influential individuals would give you someone credibility?
• 24:46
  Speaker 1: And in this case, Mr. Epstein used that credibility around
• 24:50
  Speaker 1: the world. Clinton, I have no idea what he did
• 24:52
  Speaker 1: or didn't do. Question. Understood. Sure. Comer, Madam Secretary, if
• 24:58
  Speaker 1: you're following this, and I'm sure you are in Britain
• 25:00
  Speaker 1: with the arrest of Prince Andrew and former ambassador to
• 25:03
  Speaker 1: the British ambassador of the United States, they were arrested.
• 25:07
  Speaker 1: It's my understanding, not for sex crimes, but for potential
• 25:10
  Speaker 1: treason or potential violation of national security protocol. One of
• 25:14
  Speaker 1: the things that a lot of people, and you may
• 25:16
  Speaker 1: call it a conspiracy theory or whatever, but I believe
• 25:18
  Speaker 1: I've seen it on CNN. I've seen it on Fox.
• 25:21
  Speaker 1: I've seen it in the Washington Post and New York Times.
• 25:24
  Speaker 1: There's a lot of speculation that he may have been
• 25:26
  Speaker 1: an asset. And I know several questions may have been
• 25:28
  Speaker 1: asked today. And you've given a lot of advice for
• 25:31
  Speaker 1: the committee on how we can move forward. And our
• 25:33
  Speaker 1: objective is to get the transparency to the American people
• 25:37
  Speaker 1: and get the truth to the American people. And by
• 25:39
  Speaker 1: the documents being released, the estate documents that we subpoenaed,
• 25:42
  Speaker 1: as well as the DOJ documents, we're already seeing many
• 25:45
  Speaker 1: powerful people, men and women held accountable. So I feel
• 25:49
  Speaker 1: like this investigation is moving in the right direction. But
• 25:52
  Speaker 1: one of the things that we're stumped is, How do
• 25:54
  Speaker 1: we determine whether or not Epstein was a spy? Whether
• 25:57
  Speaker 1: or not Epstein was trading secrets because he had people
• 26:00
  Speaker 1: on the inside, especially in the Obama administration. We're not
• 26:03
  Speaker 1: saying you, but Obama's former counsel that then went on
• 26:07
  Speaker 1: to Goldman Sachs. Where do we go in this investigation
• 26:10
  Speaker 1: to try to determine whether or not he was an asset? Mr. Chairman,
• 26:14
  Speaker 1: I really appreciate that question, says Clinton. And I can't
• 26:18
  Speaker 1: say that about many of the questions, but I really
• 26:20
  Speaker 1: do appreciate that question. And I think it's an absolutely
• 26:23
  Speaker 1: essential question for you to try to examine and find
• 26:26
  Speaker 1: answers for. And I think you said that you had
• 26:29
  Speaker 1: either document requests or maybe even a subpoena to the CIA.
• 26:34
  Speaker 1: I would also include the DNI. I would include any
• 26:37
  Speaker 1: counterintelligence or appropriate unit within the Justice Department. I think
• 26:41
  Speaker 1: you have cast a wide net. And now that, as
• 26:43
  Speaker 1: you described, the government of the UK investigating both Andrew
• 26:47
  Speaker 1: and Mandelson, maybe they would cooperate with your investigation. And
• 26:51
  Speaker 1: maybe you could reach out to the intelligence agencies of
• 26:53
  Speaker 1: other countries that you're looking at. Israel has been mentioned.
• 26:56
  Speaker 1: Perhaps that's one to go to. I don't think Iran
• 26:59
  Speaker 1: is going to cooperate or Russia, but I think you
• 27:01
  Speaker 1: could certainly go to the UK and go to Israel
• 27:04
  Speaker 1: and see if they would be helpful at all. Question.
• 27:07
  Speaker 1: In your experience as Secretary of State, and I know
• 27:09
  Speaker 1: you were First Lady, but you were more active, in
• 27:12
  Speaker 1: my opinion, than most First Ladies in the President Clinton administration.
• 27:16
  Speaker 1: Does he exhibit characteristics? Is there a pattern? that would
• 27:19
  Speaker 1: lead you and your expertise to believe that he was
• 27:21
  Speaker 1: an asset? Answer, well, there certainly is in the files,
• 27:25
  Speaker 1: and I do commend you for getting as much released
• 27:27
  Speaker 1: as you can. I hope that you get it all released.
• 27:30
  Speaker 1: Hints of a relationship with powerful foreign leaders, pictures, emails, meetings.
• 27:34
  Speaker 1: He was clearly somebody who traded off information. Comer, exactly. Clinton,
• 27:40
  Speaker 1: he liked to collect it, and he liked to use it.
• 27:42
  Speaker 1: I don't know any more details than that. So certainly,
• 27:45
  Speaker 1: as I said earlier, the intelligence connection, the money connection,
• 27:48
  Speaker 1: the crimes, Those seem to me to be the three
• 27:50
  Speaker 1: major elements of your investigation. Comer, and obviously as the
• 27:54
  Speaker 1: last question before my questions, he wanted to make the
• 27:57
  Speaker 1: appearance at least that he had friends in high places.
• 28:00
  Speaker 1: And you've seen the emails that have been released, and
• 28:03
  Speaker 1: I know you testified today that you've never met Epstein,
• 28:05
  Speaker 1: but he's implied to people that he was very close
• 28:08
  Speaker 1: to the Clintons. He's implied that he was very close
• 28:11
  Speaker 1: with Donald Trump. He's implied that he was close with
• 28:13
  Speaker 1: a lot of people. Even Wexner denied that he was
• 28:16
  Speaker 1: very close. I don't know how many of us believe that,
• 28:19
  Speaker 1: but it's what he said under oath. And it's just
• 28:21
  Speaker 1: amazing to me. And I think most Americans who are
• 28:24
  Speaker 1: following this, how this guy could have Prince Andrew, a
• 28:27
  Speaker 1: frequent visitor, have people from the Saudi royal family, people
• 28:30
  Speaker 1: at the highest levels in several administrations. And that's why
• 28:33
  Speaker 1: we brought you in. We're just trying to get answers.
• 28:35
  Speaker 1: And again, I think that one of the big questions,
• 28:38
  Speaker 1: and it looks like that's the direction Britain's going is,
• 28:41
  Speaker 1: was he a spy? He was committing treason in any country.
• 28:45
  Speaker 1: So that's why we would welcome any advice if you
• 28:48
  Speaker 1: have any thoughts after this or anything else. Clinton, Chairman,
• 28:52
  Speaker 1: I want to get to the bottom of this to
• 28:54
  Speaker 1: the best of your ability, and I'm more than happy
• 28:56
  Speaker 1: to offer whatever insight I might have, as you say,
• 28:58
  Speaker 1: about the framework of this and also about any further
• 29:01
  Speaker 1: action to take or trafficking to strengthen our response. Comer,
• 29:05
  Speaker 1: and that's one more question. I think we've got a
• 29:08
  Speaker 1: minute or two left. So you obviously stated in your
• 29:11
  Speaker 1: opening statement that you were involved with human trafficking and
• 29:13
  Speaker 1: trying to prevent that. with what you've seen in the files,
• 29:17
  Speaker 1: what Epstein was doing with those girls, recruiting other girls
• 29:20
  Speaker 1: to come in, does that meet the legal definition of
• 29:22
  Speaker 1: human trafficking? Or is it more of prostitution? Because one
• 29:25
  Speaker 1: of the things that we want to do at the
• 29:27
  Speaker 1: end of the investigation, and I think Ms. Mace will
• 29:29
  Speaker 1: play a big role in that, and Ms. Luna and Ms.
• 29:32
  Speaker 1: Simon and all the members in both parties, hopefully is
• 29:35
  Speaker 1: trying to strengthen the human trafficking laws. And some people
• 29:38
  Speaker 1: have suggested based on what they've seen, maybe some of
• 29:41
  Speaker 1: that wouldn't have, the government couldn't have prosecuted him on
• 29:44
  Speaker 1: human trafficking because it didn't meet the definition. Do you
• 29:47
  Speaker 1: have anything to add, Clinton? Well, again, I don't know
• 29:50
  Speaker 1: all the specifics that you have at your disposal, but
• 29:52
  Speaker 1: I've also read in some of the press that he
• 29:54
  Speaker 1: was importing women from other countries. So I think there's
• 29:57
  Speaker 1: a distinction, a distinction probably, between what happened in the U.S.,
• 30:01
  Speaker 1: but also what he was doing in other countries. But really, Mr. Chairman,
• 30:04
  Speaker 1: you have to study this and analyze it and advise
• 30:07
  Speaker 1: other colleagues in the Congress, your colleagues in the administration,
• 30:10
  Speaker 1: about laws that need to be changed and strengthened and
• 30:14
  Speaker 1: resources that should be directed because at the end of
• 30:17
  Speaker 1: the day, girls and women were abused. Whether they were
• 30:20
  Speaker 1: abused through solicitation or prostitution and the lies and the
• 30:23
  Speaker 1: promises that were made to these young women, that in
• 30:26
  Speaker 1: itself is just despicable. But then a system that got
• 30:29
  Speaker 1: close to customs agents, got close to local prosecutors. This
• 30:32
  Speaker 1: man was a master manipulator, a con artist of the
• 30:35
  Speaker 1: ninth degree. And so anything you can do to try
• 30:38
  Speaker 1: to understand how he operated and how he really misled
• 30:41
  Speaker 1: and duped so many people into thinking he was intelligent
• 30:44
  Speaker 1: and was interesting in everything they say about him in
• 30:46
  Speaker 1: the emails that have come out. So that would be
• 30:49
  Speaker 1: great public service to try to really understand this and
• 30:52
  Speaker 1: break it down into different categories that you're looking at. Comer,
• 30:56
  Speaker 1: hopefully we can do that. in a manner that I believe. Okay,
• 30:59
  Speaker 1: they go off the record. Now they come back on.
• 31:02
  Speaker 1: Speaker 34, we can go back on the record. Ma'am,
• 31:05
  Speaker 1: I have just one clarification. It was an email chain
• 31:07
  Speaker 1: that I don't think was actually introduced as an exhibit,
• 31:10
  Speaker 1: so I can point you to it, but it's related
• 31:12
  Speaker 1: to Howard Lutnick and some kind of event at Kenner Fitzgerald.
• 31:16
  Speaker 1: I just wanted to ask our understanding of that email
• 31:18
  Speaker 1: chain is that you were not on it. It was
• 31:21
  Speaker 1: Lutnick to Groff to Epstein, and we don't believe that
• 31:23
  Speaker 1: you were part of the email. Is that the best
• 31:25
  Speaker 1: of your understanding? Answer, that's the best of my understanding. Speaker, okay,
• 31:29
  Speaker 1: is there anything else you'd like to clarify or add
• 31:31
  Speaker 1: before your testimony here today? Clinton, well, I want to
• 31:35
  Speaker 1: underscore how important it is to try to get answers
• 31:38
  Speaker 1: to all the questions that everybody has about what happened
• 31:40
  Speaker 1: and what did what, and try to have some measure
• 31:42
  Speaker 1: of both public awareness and accountability. So I've answered the
• 31:45
  Speaker 1: questions to the best of my ability, and I offer
• 31:48
  Speaker 1: to the committee that if I can be helpful in
• 31:50
  Speaker 1: any way, I would certainly be helpful because I think
• 31:53
  Speaker 1: that these issues are important ones that need to be addressed. Question,
• 31:57
  Speaker 1: and your answers here today were the best of your recollection.
• 31:59
  Speaker 1: Is that right? Answer, that is correct. All right, I
• 32:02
  Speaker 1: think with that, unless you have something else you'd like
• 32:04
  Speaker 1: to add? Clinton, let's ask my lawyers. Anything that you
• 32:08
  Speaker 1: think we should clarify? Question, when do you think we'll
• 32:11
  Speaker 1: have the transcript? Then they go off the record. Yo,
• 32:15
  Speaker 1: of all this stuff that we've went through, that was
• 32:17
  Speaker 1: one of the most painful transcripts we've ever read. The
• 32:21
  Speaker 1: amount of stupidity from both sides of the aisle is staggering.
• 32:25
  Speaker 1: And you already know that your boy is going to
• 32:27
  Speaker 1: have a monologue talking about it. But that's for a
• 32:30
  Speaker 1: different time. As far as this goes, that's going to
• 32:33
  Speaker 1: do it. All the information that goes with this episode
• 32:36
  Speaker 1: can be found in the description box. What's up everyone
• 32:40
  Speaker 1: and welcome to another episode of the Epstein Chronicles. The
• 32:44
  Speaker 1: Congressional Oversight Committee took a field trip to New York
• 32:47
  Speaker 1: yesterday where they spent six hours questioning Hillary Clinton about
• 32:53
  Speaker 1: what she might or might not know About Jeffrey Epstein.
• 32:56
  Speaker 1: And according to the after action reports. That we're getting
• 32:59
  Speaker 1: from people that were involved. It descended into a shit show.
• 33:04
  Speaker 1: Which shouldn't shock anybody. Considering the performative nature. Of this
• 33:08
  Speaker 1: whole entire thing. Since the very beginning. And look. You
• 33:11
  Speaker 1: can say what you want about the Clintons. Hillary and
• 33:14
  Speaker 1: Bill both. But they are political animals. And if anybody
• 33:18
  Speaker 1: thinks that they're going to get outmaneuvered. By people like
• 33:20
  Speaker 1: James Comer. Or Anna Paulina Luna. Has not been paying attention.
• 33:25
  Speaker 1: Because there's a bunch of questions they should have asked
• 33:27
  Speaker 1: her that they didn't even bother asking. At least according
• 33:30
  Speaker 1: to the initial reporting. Now the caveat to that is,
• 33:33
  Speaker 1: we haven't seen the transcripts yet ourselves. So we're just
• 33:35
  Speaker 1: getting the pieces that both sides want to give us.
• 33:40
  Speaker 1: But if this preliminary reporting's true, then they squandered an
• 33:44
  Speaker 1: opportunity once again. And they'll probably do the same thing
• 33:47
  Speaker 1: with Bill Clinton. Because it comes down to this. They
• 33:50
  Speaker 1: don't even know what they're talking about. The people that
• 33:53
  Speaker 1: are supposed to be investigating this story, this scandal, don't
• 33:56
  Speaker 1: even know the basics. So if you don't even know
• 33:58
  Speaker 1: the basics, but you're going to get to the bottom
• 34:01
  Speaker 1: of all of this, you're going to figure out what happened.
• 34:03
  Speaker 1: You're going to hold people accountable. Zero chance that's going
• 34:06
  Speaker 1: to happen. And my guess is today with Bill Clinton,
• 34:10
  Speaker 1: it'll be the same thing. Now, look, I'm not going
• 34:14
  Speaker 1: to go completely ham on the GOP yet until I
• 34:17
  Speaker 1: see the transcripts. But considering the people involved, my guess
• 34:21
  Speaker 1: is it was an absolute clown show. So today, We
• 34:25
  Speaker 1: have an article from AP and the headline, Hillary Clinton
• 34:28
  Speaker 1: testifies she has no information on Epstein's crimes and doesn't
• 34:32
  Speaker 1: recall meeting him. Well, I think that's a lie. But
• 34:36
  Speaker 1: how do you prove it, right? That's the thing. It's
• 34:39
  Speaker 1: going to be very hard to prove anything she says wrong. Unless,
• 34:43
  Speaker 1: of course, you're willing to dig and you're willing to
• 34:45
  Speaker 1: bring other people in for questioning, like Jared Kellogg, who
• 34:51
  Speaker 1: says that the Clintons used to vacation at Zorro Ranch.
• 34:55
  Speaker 1: And I heard that from numerous people when I went
• 34:58
  Speaker 1: to Zorro Ranch myself. So is she lying about that?
• 35:03
  Speaker 1: I guess she could say, we used his property, but
• 35:06
  Speaker 1: we never hung out with him. He wasn't there. And
• 35:09
  Speaker 1: if you want to believe that, cool. Me personally, I
• 35:12
  Speaker 1: have a hard time believing that Hillary Clinton never met
• 35:15
  Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein. This article was authored by Stephen Groves. Former
• 35:22
  Speaker 1: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told members of Congress on
• 35:25
  Speaker 1: Thursday that she had no knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein or
• 35:28
  Speaker 1: Glenn Maxwell's crimes, starting off two days of depositions that
• 35:32
  Speaker 1: will also include former President Bill Clinton. Well, we know
• 35:37
  Speaker 1: that Bill Clinton can't use that excuse because he definitely
• 35:40
  Speaker 1: knew who Jeffrey Epstein was. Definitely had him at the
• 35:43
  Speaker 1: White House 17 times. Definitely shared a hotel suite with
• 35:47
  Speaker 1: him when they were in South Africa. Definitely had a
• 35:51
  Speaker 1: favorite seat On the plane. See where I'm going with this?
• 35:54
  Speaker 1: Kind of hard to believe that Hillary Clinton knew nothing
• 35:57
  Speaker 1: about any of it. I had no idea about their
• 36:01
  Speaker 1: criminal activity. Well, I don't doubt that. I'm not saying
• 36:03
  Speaker 1: that Hillary knew what they were up to, right? But
• 36:06
  Speaker 1: she's a grifter of epic proportions. And if Epstein was
• 36:11
  Speaker 1: ponying up a bunch of money, especially after Bill and
• 36:14
  Speaker 1: Hillary left the White House, when they were broke, right?
• 36:16
  Speaker 1: Trying to collect a bunch of dough. They're going to
• 36:19
  Speaker 1: accept it. Not even a question. Does anyone even question that?
• 36:23
  Speaker 1: I mean, I remember all of that happening in real time. Not,
• 36:27
  Speaker 1: you know, their relationship with Epstein, but the Clintons on
• 36:31
  Speaker 1: the war path, basically trying to raise money. And wouldn't
• 36:35
  Speaker 1: you know it, who provided the seed money to get
• 36:38
  Speaker 1: the Clinton global initiative off the ground? Oh, that's right.
• 36:41
  Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein. That's not me telling you. That's Epstein's own
• 36:45
  Speaker 1: lawyer who said it. The closed-door deposition concluded Thursday after
• 36:50
  Speaker 1: over six hours of Hillary Clinton giving an answer to
• 36:53
  Speaker 1: every question. The depositions in the Clintons' hometown of Chappaqua,
• 36:58
  Speaker 1: a typically quiet hamlet north of New York City, come
• 37:02
  Speaker 1: after months of tense back-and-forth between the former high-powered Democratic
• 37:06
  Speaker 1: couple and the Republican-controlled House Oversight Committee as it investigates Epstein,
• 37:11
  Speaker 1: who killed himself in a New York jail cell in
• 37:14
  Speaker 1: 2019 while awaiting trial. Allegedly. I love when they confidently say,
• 37:20
  Speaker 1: Epstein committed suicide. Oh, okay, cool. And then the next article,
• 37:24
  Speaker 1: they're like, you can't trust the government. Well, which is it?
• 37:27
  Speaker 1: Do you trust the government? Or don't you? I mean,
• 37:30
  Speaker 1: what is this? Rage against some of the machine? Yo,
• 37:33
  Speaker 1: I find it laughable when people are out here talking about, well,
• 37:36
  Speaker 1: the government is bad when the other team's in charge.
• 37:40
  Speaker 1: But when my team's in charge, all of a sudden,
• 37:42
  Speaker 1: they're magnanimous. And they care about people. They want to
• 37:45
  Speaker 1: help people. And they're going to do everything in their
• 37:48
  Speaker 1: power to make sure your life is great. Vote for
• 37:51
  Speaker 1: my team. And then two years later, after an election cycle,
• 37:56
  Speaker 1: all we hear is, you can't trust the government anymore.
• 37:58
  Speaker 1: They're filled with liars and snakes. Breaking news. Every single
• 38:02
  Speaker 1: administration is filled with liars and snakes. Yet the demand
• 38:09
  Speaker 1: for a reckoning over Epstein's abuse of underage girls has
• 38:12
  Speaker 1: become a near unstoppable force on Capitol Hill and beyond. Well,
• 38:17
  Speaker 1: should have dealt with it earlier. It's amazing to me
• 38:21
  Speaker 1: that people are crying about due process. You know who
• 38:23
  Speaker 1: didn't get due process? The people who were abused. They
• 38:26
  Speaker 1: didn't get due process. They weren't treated correctly. There wasn't
• 38:29
  Speaker 1: a real investigation. But go ahead and go off about
• 38:32
  Speaker 1: due process for the people that were involved. It is
• 38:35
  Speaker 1: amazing to me. And it's also amazing to me how
• 38:39
  Speaker 1: these people can be so mad at these young girls
• 38:42
  Speaker 1: who were groomed and coerced into Jeffrey Epstein's Ponzi scheme.
• 38:47
  Speaker 1: than they are at the men that are being named.
• 38:49
  Speaker 1: And it tells you everything you need to know about
• 38:51
  Speaker 1: them and their narrative and what they're trying to pitch.
• 38:55
  Speaker 1: President Donald Trump, a Republican, who has expressed regret that
• 38:58
  Speaker 1: the Clintons are being forced to testify, bowed last year
• 39:01
  Speaker 1: to pressure to release case files on Epstein. No he didn't,
• 39:05
  Speaker 1: he was forced to do it. What do you mean
• 39:06
  Speaker 1: bowed to pressure? The bill was veto proof. So there
• 39:11
  Speaker 1: was nothing Donald Trump could do about it. The Clintons, too,
• 39:15
  Speaker 1: agreed to testify after their offers of sworn statements were
• 39:18
  Speaker 1: rebuffed by the oversight panel and its chairman, Representative James Comer,
• 39:22
  Speaker 1: threatened criminal contempt of Congress charges against them. Meanwhile, no
• 39:28
  Speaker 1: more investigation into Lex Wex. right? No big deal. Jeffrey
• 39:32
  Speaker 1: Epstein's number one ace. No more investigation there. James Comer's
• 39:37
  Speaker 1: a clown. And this whole entire committee? A clown show.
• 39:41
  Speaker 1: And if it wasn't for the discharge petition... they would
• 39:44
  Speaker 1: have done exactly what they were trying to do, muddy
• 39:47
  Speaker 1: the waters, slow things down, and give Donald Trump and
• 39:50
  Speaker 1: the Epstein administration cover. That was the goal. But thankfully,
• 39:55
  Speaker 1: Ro Khanna and Thomas Massey had other ideas. I mean,
• 39:59
  Speaker 1: can you imagine if we were relying on James frickin' Comer?
• 40:04
  Speaker 1: Like every other decent person, Hillary Clinton added in her
• 40:07
  Speaker 1: opening statement, I've been horrified by what I have learned
• 40:10
  Speaker 1: about their crimes. She has previously said that her husband
• 40:14
  Speaker 1: flew with Epstein for charitable trips, but that she did
• 40:16
  Speaker 1: not recall ever meeting Epstein. She also interacted with Maxwell,
• 40:21
  Speaker 1: Epstein's former girlfriend and confidant, at conferences hosted by the
• 40:25
  Speaker 1: Clinton Foundation. I'm sure that's the only time. And I'm
• 40:29
  Speaker 1: sure Jeffrey was never around, never once. Come on, who
• 40:32
  Speaker 1: buys this? Does anyone really believe that Hillary Clinton is
• 40:36
  Speaker 1: telling the truth? Especially about this topic? Let's be real.
• 40:41
  Speaker 1: But the problem is, Hillary Clinton wasn't deeply engaged with
• 40:45
  Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein. Bill Clinton, on the other hand, has a
• 40:49
  Speaker 1: lot to answer for. With Hillary, it's just basic lies. Oh,
• 40:54
  Speaker 1: I was never here. I was never there. But we
• 40:56
  Speaker 1: have people who have come out and told us differently.
• 40:59
  Speaker 1: So it comes down to, who do you believe? And me,
• 41:03
  Speaker 1: I believe Jared Kellogg and the Bryce family, who used
• 41:06
  Speaker 1: to manage Zorro Ranch, that Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton
• 41:11
  Speaker 1: and Chelsea used to go there on vacation. And that's
• 41:14
  Speaker 1: because multiple people corroborated that for me when I was
• 41:17
  Speaker 1: in Zorro Ranch myself. So look, everybody's free to believe
• 41:20
  Speaker 1: whatever they want. Like I always tell you, I'm not
• 41:23
  Speaker 1: here to convince anybody of anything. I'm here to open
• 41:26
  Speaker 1: the door. And if you walk through it, cool. If not, hey,
• 41:29
  Speaker 1: that's great too. But in my opinion, there is no
• 41:34
  Speaker 1: doubt that Hillary Clinton knew Jeffrey Epstein. Were they buddies?
• 41:38
  Speaker 1: Were they, you know, on the phone yapping about This, that,
• 41:41
  Speaker 1: or the other thing? No. But they certainly knew each other. Maxwell,
• 41:47
  Speaker 1: a British socialite? You mean, a child abuser? All-around scumbag?
• 41:52
  Speaker 1: Bipedal serpent? Is that what you mean? Also attended the
• 41:56
  Speaker 1: 2010 wedding of their daughter, Chelsea Clinton. As she exited
• 42:00
  Speaker 1: the event center, where the deposition was held, Hillary Clinton
• 42:04
  Speaker 1: told reporters that Maxwell had come to the wedding as
• 42:06
  Speaker 1: a guest of someone else, and that she had told
• 42:09
  Speaker 1: the committee she only knew Maxwell as an acquaintance. So,
• 42:13
  Speaker 1: according to her, she was a plus one with Ted Waite,
• 42:17
  Speaker 1: who used to be Maxwell's dude. And according to Hillary,
• 42:20
  Speaker 1: that's why Maxwell was at the wedding, because she invited Waite,
• 42:23
  Speaker 1: and Waite brought Maxwell. Now, you can believe that or
• 42:27
  Speaker 1: not believe it, but that's what Hillary Clinton said. Bill Clinton, however,
• 42:33
  Speaker 1: has emerged as a top target for Republicans amid the
• 42:37
  Speaker 1: political struggle over who received the most scrutiny for their
• 42:40
  Speaker 1: ties to Epstein. Several photos of the former president were
• 42:44
  Speaker 1: included in the first tranche of Epstein files released by
• 42:47
  Speaker 1: the Department of Justice in January, including a number of
• 42:51
  Speaker 1: him with women whose faces were redacted. Clinton has not
• 42:56
  Speaker 1: been accused of wrongdoing in his relationship with Epstein. Well,
• 43:00
  Speaker 1: that's true. He hasn't been. Not by anybody who's serious
• 43:03
  Speaker 1: about the case. But he has been accused of enabling.
• 43:08
  Speaker 1: He has been accused of opening doors that Jeffrey Epstein
• 43:11
  Speaker 1: would have never been able to walk through. Comer also
• 43:14
  Speaker 1: pointed to Hillary Clinton's work as Secretary of State to
• 43:17
  Speaker 1: address sex trafficking as another reason to insist on her deposition.
• 43:22
  Speaker 1: Clinton defended her work to address sex trafficking around the world,
• 43:26
  Speaker 1: saying it remained important to help the millions of survivors
• 43:29
  Speaker 1: of sex trafficking. Well, that's something we can all agree on, right? Yet,
• 43:33
  Speaker 1: what has anyone done to help them? I mean, if
• 43:35
  Speaker 1: you were a survivor of human trafficking... and you saw
• 43:39
  Speaker 1: this shit show taking place, would you want to come forward?
• 43:41
  Speaker 1: Would you have anything to say to anybody? I probably
• 43:45
  Speaker 1: would just keep my mouth shut and stay home at
• 43:46
  Speaker 1: this point. You have the President of the United States
• 43:49
  Speaker 1: calling it a hoax? Really? Do you really think that's
• 43:52
  Speaker 1: the kind of environment that fosters people wanting to come
• 43:55
  Speaker 1: forward and talk about what happened to them? The committee's
• 43:59
  Speaker 1: investigation has also sought to understand why the Department of
• 44:03
  Speaker 1: Justice under previous presidential administrations did not seek further charges
• 44:08
  Speaker 1: against Epstein following a 2008 arrangement in which he pleaded
• 44:12
  Speaker 1: guilty to state charges in Florida for soliciting prostitution from
• 44:16
  Speaker 1: an underage girl, but avoided federal charges. Yeah, but there
• 44:21
  Speaker 1: was a big investigation. And Jeffrey Epstein, well, he only
• 44:24
  Speaker 1: solicited one girl. And she was 17. Bunch of idiots.
• 44:31
  Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton accused Comer of running a one-sided investigation that's
• 44:35
  Speaker 1: failed the whole Trump and other Republican officials to account.
• 44:40
  Speaker 1: This institutional failure is designed to protect one political party
• 44:44
  Speaker 1: and one public official, she said. Yet conspiracy theories, especially
• 44:48
  Speaker 1: on the right, have swirled for years around the Clintons
• 44:51
  Speaker 1: and their connections to Epstein and Maxwell, who argue she
• 44:54
  Speaker 1: was wrongfully convicted. Republicans have long wanted to press the
• 44:58
  Speaker 1: Clintons for answers. Well, they should. And what do you
• 45:04
  Speaker 1: mean conspiracy theories? We're still talking like this? Are you
• 45:07
  Speaker 1: guys for real right now? They just never learn. The
• 45:10
  Speaker 1: legacy media never learns. And this is why I turn
• 45:13
  Speaker 1: down every request from the legacy media. They can go
• 45:18
  Speaker 1: find somebody else. I have no desire to talk to them.
• 45:21
  Speaker 1: Bunch of morons. They don't even know what they're talking about.
• 45:25
  Speaker 1: Conspiracy theories. Meanwhile, the whole entire left is engulfed with
• 45:29
  Speaker 1: people eating babies and cannibalism. I'd say that the conspiracy
• 45:33
  Speaker 1: theories are rife, no matter the political side. And that's
• 45:38
  Speaker 1: because there's a lack of information and a lack of
• 45:40
  Speaker 1: context from the government. So if you really want somebody
• 45:44
  Speaker 1: to blame, look no further than the DOJ and Donald Trump.
• 45:50
  Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton said that one Republican lawmaker asked her a
• 45:53
  Speaker 1: line of questions about vile, bogus conspiracy theories. The deposition
• 45:59
  Speaker 1: was also paused after Representative Lauren Boebert sent a photo
• 46:02
  Speaker 1: of Hillary Clinton in the private preceding, To a conservative
• 46:05
  Speaker 1: influencer who posted it on social media, violating the committee's
• 46:09
  Speaker 1: rules for depositions. Yo, dumb and dumber over here. Lauren
• 46:13
  Speaker 1: Boebert and Benny Johnson. Every time I see a tweet
• 46:17
  Speaker 1: from Benny Johnson, it's either straight up BS or some
• 46:21
  Speaker 1: bootlicking nonsense where he's pledging allegiance to the administration. And
• 46:27
  Speaker 1: people follow that. People think that dude's like reliable or something.
• 46:30
  Speaker 1: Shit's crazy to me. And Lauren Boebert. Yeah, let's send
• 46:34
  Speaker 1: a picture. to Benny Johnson. And of course she'll cry
• 46:39
  Speaker 1: when it goes the other way, right? Oh, the decorum, this, that,
• 46:42
  Speaker 1: the other thing. Breaking news, you're all a bunch of clowns,
• 46:45
  Speaker 1: all of you. Every last one of you. Democrats said
• 46:50
  Speaker 1: that the incident underscored how important it was for there
• 46:54
  Speaker 1: to be a clear public record of the deposition. Representative
• 46:57
  Speaker 1: Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the oversight panel, said
• 47:01
  Speaker 1: that Hillary Clinton, after the incident, repeated her longstanding demand
• 47:05
  Speaker 1: that the deposition be made public, and the Democrats called
• 47:08
  Speaker 1: for a video and transcript of the complete proceedings to
• 47:12
  Speaker 1: be released quickly. Comer said that he would work quickly
• 47:15
  Speaker 1: to release a video and transcript of the deposition. Well,
• 47:18
  Speaker 1: isn't that nice of him? You mean you're going to
• 47:21
  Speaker 1: do your job, James Comer the Gomer? That's nice. The
• 47:27
  Speaker 1: purpose of the whole investigation is try to understand many
• 47:30
  Speaker 1: things about Epstein, he told reporters outside the convention center
• 47:34
  Speaker 1: where the depositions were being held. How did he accumulate
• 47:37
  Speaker 1: so much wealth? How was he able to surround himself
• 47:40
  Speaker 1: with some of the most powerful men in the world? Well,
• 47:42
  Speaker 1: that's easy. They're all fellow travelers. That's what these people do.
• 47:46
  Speaker 1: The whole ass financial sector is corrupt. I don't know
• 47:50
  Speaker 1: how many times I got to say it. Finally, people
• 47:53
  Speaker 1: are starting to catch on. I mean, it's wild to
• 47:56
  Speaker 1: me you didn't figure it out earlier when you went
• 47:58
  Speaker 1: and got a loan and they tried to charge you 35%,
• 48:01
  Speaker 1: which is wild as hell. Considering if you're from the
• 48:04
  Speaker 1: neighborhood and you know the right guy, you can go
• 48:07
  Speaker 1: and get that same loan for cheaper on the street.
• 48:11
  Speaker 1: Half a point, one point, maybe one and a half, depending.
• 48:16
  Speaker 1: But if you know the right people, you'll get a
• 48:18
  Speaker 1: cheaper loan on the street. Think about that for a minute.
• 48:21
  Speaker 1: And then think about them all laughing with Jeffrey Epstein
• 48:24
  Speaker 1: as they're breaking bread. doing God knows what. Democrats now
• 48:30
  Speaker 1: being led by a new generation of politicians have prioritized
• 48:33
  Speaker 1: transparency around Epstein over defending the former leaders of their party. Well,
• 48:38
  Speaker 1: that's not really true because yesterday they came out swinging. Oh,
• 48:42
  Speaker 1: it's all tilted. Clinton this, Clinton that. Stop it. Okay?
• 48:46
  Speaker 1: Stop it. Now, Hillary Clinton, not a priority when it
• 48:50
  Speaker 1: comes to these depositions, but Bill Clinton, most certainly. And
• 48:54
  Speaker 1: I don't want to hear shit from people trying to
• 48:56
  Speaker 1: defend Bill Clinton. This man spent a lot of time
• 48:59
  Speaker 1: with Epstein. And it's about time he gets under oath
• 49:03
  Speaker 1: and tells us what he knows, when he knew it,
• 49:05
  Speaker 1: and what he saw. Is that really too much to ask?
• 49:11
  Speaker 1: Garcia also called on Trump to testify in the investigation.
• 49:15
  Speaker 1: He argued that Bill Clinton's appearance sets a precedent that
• 49:18
  Speaker 1: should apply to Trump as well. Bingo, what did I
• 49:20
  Speaker 1: tell you? Didn't I have a whole episode on that
• 49:23
  Speaker 1: weeks ago? Because that was the goal. That's the motivation
• 49:26
  Speaker 1: for the Democrats here. You have to understand everything's done
• 49:30
  Speaker 1: with a political shade. Even when they say it's not,
• 49:33
  Speaker 1: it most certainly is. And the whole entire point here
• 49:36
  Speaker 1: was to set a precedent to get Donald Trump in
• 49:39
  Speaker 1: the hot seat. Comer previously said the committee can't depose
• 49:44
  Speaker 1: Trump because he's a sitting president. Still, Democrats are also
• 49:49
  Speaker 1: coming off an effort this week to confront Trump about
• 49:52
  Speaker 1: his administration's handling of the Epstein files by taking women
• 49:56
  Speaker 1: who survived Epstein's abuse as their guests to Trump's State
• 50:00
  Speaker 1: of the Union address. Garcia and others are also challenging
• 50:04
  Speaker 1: the Department of Justice's assertion that it has met the
• 50:06
  Speaker 1: requirements of a law passed by Congress last year, that
• 50:10
  Speaker 1: mandated the release of many of the case files on Epstein.
• 50:14
  Speaker 1: They didn't follow the law, okay? They did everything but
• 50:18
  Speaker 1: follow the law. And it's crazy to think that they
• 50:23
  Speaker 1: actually believe or they'd actually pitch the narrative that they did.
• 50:28
  Speaker 1: They've done everything but follow the law. Senate Democrat leader
• 50:35
  Speaker 1: Chuck Schumer of New York said his caucus in the
• 50:37
  Speaker 1: coming days would also review unredacted versions of the Epstein
• 50:41
  Speaker 1: case files at a Department of Justice office. Schumer, who
• 50:45
  Speaker 1: demanded that the department release all the files and preserve
• 50:48
  Speaker 1: all materials, said that they will pull on every thread
• 50:51
  Speaker 1: until they reveal this massive cover up. Well, cool. Let's
• 50:55
  Speaker 1: start by talking about the money you received from Jeffrey Epstein, Mr. Schumer,
• 50:59
  Speaker 1: back in the day. How about we just start there?
• 51:02
  Speaker 1: Did you ever have any other contact with him? Ever
• 51:05
  Speaker 1: hang out with him? Ever at his house? These are
• 51:08
  Speaker 1: the questions that have to be asked of everybody. And look,
• 51:10
  Speaker 1: just because we ask questions doesn't mean we think everybody's guilty.
• 51:14
  Speaker 1: At least not me. But we have to figure out
• 51:17
  Speaker 1: what's what. And when you have an investigation that is
• 51:21
  Speaker 1: as massive as this, as complex, everybody has to be
• 51:25
  Speaker 1: talked to. If you've ever received one single dollar from
• 51:28
  Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein and I'm the investigator, we're talking. If you've
• 51:32
  Speaker 1: ever broke bread with them, we're talking. Now that doesn't
• 51:35
  Speaker 1: mean I'm going to try and, you know, hang you
• 51:38
  Speaker 1: by your toes. But I have questions. And I need
• 51:42
  Speaker 1: some answers. And for all these years, we haven't had
• 51:46
  Speaker 1: those answers. So now it's time for people to stop
• 51:49
  Speaker 1: the bullshit, stop the grandstanding, stop the political theater, and
• 51:53
  Speaker 1: it's time to come clean. What did you know? And
• 51:56
  Speaker 1: when did you know it? How about we start there?
• 52:00
  Speaker 1: All right, folks, that's going to do it for this one.
• 52:03
  Speaker 1: So over the next couple of days, I'm going to
• 52:05
  Speaker 1: be posting the OIG report into Jeffrey Epstein's death once again.
• 52:10
  Speaker 1: And I think it's very, very interesting to look at
• 52:12
  Speaker 1: it with a sober eye because we also have all
• 52:16
  Speaker 1: the contemporaneous information now, including the deposition from Michael Thomas
• 52:20
  Speaker 1: that we're going through. And to add to that, we
• 52:23
  Speaker 1: have a lot of new listeners who have never listened
• 52:26
  Speaker 1: to it before. So you can expect that as the
• 52:29
  Speaker 1: Mega Edition over the weekend, as we continue to swim
• 52:32
  Speaker 1: through all this muck, looking for some clarity. All the
• 52:37
  Speaker 1: information that goes with this episode can be found in
• 52:40
  Speaker 1: the description box.