Latest / Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show! / WOKE LUNACY- Pregnancy Is Not A Biological Phenomena

Transcript

WOKE LUNACY- Pregnancy Is Not A Biological Phenomena · Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show!

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: Colin Wright, a new paper published by Springer Nature, argues
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: that pregnancy is not to be defined by biological phenomena,
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: but instead is a genre of political, esthetic and defective experience,
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: involving birth and becoming in a larger sense, and becoming
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: in a larger sense. So I've never given birth. So
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: for the ladies out there that have given birth, what
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: are they? What's the left call to them? Again? Uh? Yes, uh,
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: woke folk have a new term for mother, and it's
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: birthing people. So sorry, So for the birth, I forgot.
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: There's so many words now, but I forgot what they
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: call it? So birth? So for all of the birthing
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: people out there, does this describe your experience giving birth
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: to your children? As? Was? It? A genre of political
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: esthetic and effective experience involving birth and becoming in a
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: larger sense? So is that what you were thinking? So
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: while you were giving birth? Was that what you're thinking?
• 1:08
  Speaker 1: Were were you saying to yourself? Boy? This is really political,
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: esthetic and effective. It's the most batshit paper I've ever read,
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: according to Colin Wright. And there's he's He's read some
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: really crazy ones. Transfeminist pregnancy, reproductive speculation genre and desire.
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: So is this like a transfeminist? So I guess like
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: a man who's says that they're a woman and they're
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: a feminist, but they're a trans feminist. So is this
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: a way for them to pretend that they can give
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: birth or experience giving birth or being a birthing person
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: as they might call them. Carlos Sariego Yale University, Yale, So,
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: as we know, the IVY leagues are the worst apparently
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: the worst uh institutions for education anywhere the world. They're
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: the most ridiculous. They're the place if you want the
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: most confused vision of the world. Yale University abstract and
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: the explosion of abortion pills Postdobs. Anti abortion language identifies
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: women according to their reproductive potential. So woman means an
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: individual with uterus, regardless of any gender identity. Huh So,
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: according to this definition, pregnancy or the potential for pregnancy
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: define womanhood. Well, there are women who are bare and
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: who can't give birth for whatever reason. But there's still
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: biological women though, So this is kind of like a
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: kind of trick. They like to use women without uteruses
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: CIS and trans are excluded. Well, no, they just make
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: shit up nobody thinks that a woman who can't give birth,
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: who can't get pregnant, who is sterile, isn't a woman.
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: They just make all this stuff up Yale University. Folks
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: as transmit with with uteruses are absorbed into the category
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: of women. Do we even need to deal with that?
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: It's so insane? What year was this? By the way,
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: that this is twenty twenty five? All right? I argue
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: that pregnancy is not to be defined by biological phenomena,
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: but instead is a genre of political, esthetic and effective
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: experience and expectation, as a multi dimensional genre of experience,
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: rather than merely a biological datum, just a mere biological datum,
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: pregnancy is an existential experience involving birth and become and
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: becoming in a larger sense, we need a more all
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: encompassing notion of pregnancy to include trans people. Obviously, that's
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: what this total and utter confusion is all about, which
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: is nourished by the capacious social world of conception. What
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: does any of this mean? The capacious social world of conception?
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: What does that mean, Yale University? Does it mean anything?
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: Or is it just a word salad to give false
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: weight to what is just obvious far leftist gibberish for
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: transgender studies, A wider understanding of pregnancy helps to build
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: a transsexual theory of reproduction on feminist grounds. We don't
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: need a new theory of reproduction. We know how it works, right.
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: We're sexually reproducing species, sexually dimorphic. We know how babies
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: are born. We know where babies come from, all right,
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: we know about the birds and the bees already. There's
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: no confusion on this, and we don't need anything on
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: top of it. We just need reality. When I talk
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: about how leftists are not interested in fitting their ideology
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: into the world, they're interested in fitting the world into
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: their ideology, and they're happy to break the world in
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: the process. This is what I'm talking about. This is comedy.
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: This is satire. Does Yale understand? Does Yale University understand?
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: None of this is real? This is just comedy. This
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: is indistinguishable from satire. This is indistinguishable from if somebody
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: wanted to just write an abstract on something insane to
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: make fun of Yale University. Do they understand this? Apparently not.
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: The paper then outlines three arguments rooted in archival research, novels, poetry,
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: and theoretical work for why pregnancy should be divorced from biology.
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: I wonder if it's any of this person's own poetry.
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: Did they write some poetry and then claim that's evidence
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: of something? It presents three case studies involving transition, performance
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: and labor. Who wrote this? Who wrote? Who wrote this? Again?
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: This was a Carlow Sariego. I wonder if they wrote
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: like an epic poem called a butt baby or something,
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: and it's part of their thesis hold on for why
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: pregnancy should be divorced from biology. You can't make this up.
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: I get it's indistinguishable from comedy. Let's see. To make
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: this argument, I introduced three subgenres of transgender pregnancies as
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: case studies from different angles. These subgenres each expand the
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: definition of pregnancy, performance, transition, and labor. It's just whether
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: or not you can actually get pregnant or not and
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: give birth. That's it, and that we know who can
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: do that. I compare Octavia Butler's short story Blood Child
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: with Tory Peters twenty twenty one novel D Transition Baby. Well,
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: I guess that answers all of your questions biologists. I mean,
• 6:49
  Speaker 1: she's comparing a short story with a novel. So that's it.
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: Case closed. I mean, it doesn't get any more scientific
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: than that. Just ask Yale. Anyway. That's all i'm gonna
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: say about that. Please like, share, and subscribe. Subscribing really
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: helps me out. I thank you for that. I will
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: see you next time.