Latest / Daniel and Kelly’s Extraordinary Universe / How do we measure the Higgs boson mass?
Transcript
- 0:08Speaker 1: Hey, Daniel, I have a rude physics question.
- 0:11Speaker 2: Oh no, not another dark matter poop.
- 0:13Speaker 1: Jokeer, I hope, I think we did that one already.
- 0:16Speaker 2: All right then, shoot, all right?
- 0:18Speaker 1: Is the Higgs boson heavier than expected?
- 0:21Speaker 2: Are you asking if physicists think the Higgs is like
- 0:24Speaker 2: too round? That is a bit rude.
- 0:27Speaker 1: I'm talking about it's mass, not its volume.
- 0:31Speaker 2: Maybe the Higgs doesn't just give mass to other particles,
- 0:34Speaker 2: it gives them muscles.
- 0:36Speaker 1: What like the Higgs is the steroids of the universe?
- 0:40Speaker 1: Is that legal?
- 0:41Speaker 2: Lots of physics say yes.
- 0:58Speaker 1: I am more hamm and cartoonist, the author of Oliver's
- 1:01Speaker 1: Great Big Universe.
- 1:02Speaker 2: Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist and a professor
- 1:05Speaker 2: at UC Irvine, and I feel like my density increases every.
- 1:08Speaker 1: Year, density of knowledge or density of chocolate eaten, like
- 1:13Speaker 1: your chocolate cores is getting bigger.
- 1:15Speaker 2: Well, those two things are tightly correlated, so I'd say
- 1:18Speaker 2: yes to.
- 1:18Speaker 1: Be What do you need like chocolate gives you knowledge?
- 1:25Speaker 2: Well, there's definitely a correlation between Nobel Prizes one and
- 1:28Speaker 2: chocolate consumed per capita.
- 1:30Speaker 1: Oh interesting, but which one comes first?
- 1:34Speaker 2: We don't have to get into correlation versus causation when
- 1:37Speaker 2: it comes to chocolate.
- 1:38Speaker 1: I think we do. I mean makes a big difference.
- 1:40Speaker 1: Like if you have to eat a lot of chocolate
- 1:42Speaker 1: after you win the Noble Price, and you kind of
- 1:44Speaker 1: have a lot of work to do.
- 1:45Speaker 2: All right, let me go get some chocolate and then
- 1:47Speaker 2: we'll figure this out.
- 1:47Speaker 1: No, no, no, that's the whole point. You should maybe
- 1:50Speaker 1: figure out what's the causation here.
- 1:53Speaker 2: I can't figure anything out without chocolate. It's my superpower.
- 1:56Speaker 1: Then you're in a paradox. What did you need chocolate
- 1:59Speaker 1: after you win the Nobel Prize? But you can win
- 2:01Speaker 1: the Nobel Prize until unless you eat a lot of chocolate.
- 2:03Speaker 2: What if I opt for a Nobel Price that's not gold,
- 2:05Speaker 2: it's just gold foil around bad chocolate.
- 2:08Speaker 1: That doesn't af fix your paradox, though maybe it may
- 2:12Speaker 1: just means it's impossible. But anyways, Welcome to our podcast,
- 2:15Speaker 1: Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe, a production of iHeartRadio.
- 2:18Speaker 2: In which we dig into the apparent paradox of our universe.
- 2:22Speaker 2: It is both mysterious and bizarre, and yet somehow also understandable.
- 2:27Speaker 2: Working carefully at the cold face of knowledge, we can
- 2:30Speaker 2: hammer away at it and slowly build up an understanding
- 2:33Speaker 2: of how this universe works from its tiny little quantum
- 2:37Speaker 2: particles that weave themselves together to give us this reality
- 2:40Speaker 2: we know and love.
- 2:41Speaker 1: That's right, the universe is deliciously perplexing. It's dark, and
- 2:45Speaker 1: it's velvedly smooth, just like chocolate, which means we can't
- 2:48Speaker 1: get enough of it.
- 2:49Speaker 2: And it is massive. Not only is it very, very large,
- 2:53Speaker 2: but it's also filled with a lot of stuff black
- 2:57Speaker 2: holes and neutron stars and just normal stars and rocky
- 3:01Speaker 2: planets and maybe squishy little beings crawling on their surface.
- 3:04Speaker 1: And thank goodness it has squishy little beings like us,
- 3:07Speaker 1: because we're here to ask questions about it, and we
- 3:09Speaker 1: do that here on the podcast, where we tackle the
- 3:11Speaker 1: big unknowns about how this universe works and why it
- 3:14Speaker 1: is the way it is.
- 3:15Speaker 2: And often on the podcast we're telling you about the
- 3:17Speaker 2: things that we have learned in science. But one of
- 3:19Speaker 2: my favorite kinds of episodes are the ones that dig
- 3:22Speaker 2: into how we figure it out how we know what
- 3:25Speaker 2: we know. Rather than just swallowing the numbers as scientists
- 3:27Speaker 2: give us, we want to unwrap them and figure out
- 3:30Speaker 2: how exactly they measured this or that to be whatever
- 3:33Speaker 2: number it is.
- 3:34Speaker 1: Yeah, because there is a lot to know about the
- 3:35Speaker 1: universe and a lot that science has figured out, and
- 3:37Speaker 1: it's interesting to dig into how it is that we
- 3:39Speaker 1: know these things. Just sometimes the story is maybe even
- 3:43Speaker 1: better than the facts that you've learned.
- 3:45Speaker 2: Experimental science is not just go out there and check
- 3:48Speaker 2: the theoretical predictions. Sometimes the theory doesn't make any predictions,
- 3:52Speaker 2: and it just says, we don't know how heavy this
- 3:54Speaker 2: thing is. Go measure it, and measuring it requires inventing
- 3:57Speaker 2: all sorts of cool and clever tre That's what experimental
- 4:01Speaker 2: science is all about, and we like to celebrate that
- 4:04Speaker 2: here in the podcast. We've had fun episodes about all
- 4:06Speaker 2: of the inventiveness necessary to measure the speed of light,
- 4:10Speaker 2: or to measure the gravitational constant.
- 4:12Speaker 1: Or to measure how much chocolate. Physicists can eat safely.
- 4:16Speaker 2: Data says there is no upper bound.
- 4:20Speaker 1: Really, that doesn't sound like a scientific statement. I think
- 4:23Speaker 1: science is pretty clear there is a limit to how
- 4:25Speaker 1: much chocolate you can eat.
- 4:27Speaker 2: I don't know. I haven't yet collapsed into a black hole,
- 4:29Speaker 2: but that may be in my future.
- 4:31Speaker 1: I guess it's hard to prove a negative or a
- 4:33Speaker 1: maximum m hm.
- 4:34Speaker 2: Really the question is if you eat a lot of
- 4:36Speaker 2: white chocolate, do you turn into a white hole or
- 4:38Speaker 2: a black hole?
- 4:39Speaker 1: So to be on the podcast, we'll be asking the
- 4:41Speaker 1: question how do we measure the Higgs Bosons mass?
- 4:50Speaker 2: Did you say mass or math?
- 4:52Speaker 1: I think I said mass, right, So we do.
- 4:55Speaker 2: Have to use a lot of math to figure out
- 4:57Speaker 2: the Higgs Boson mass.
- 4:58Speaker 1: Of course, exposed on have its own math.
- 5:01Speaker 2: As far as we know, there is just one math.
- 5:03Speaker 2: There is the math. But everything has its own mass,
- 5:07Speaker 2: and it's an interesting puzzle to figure out why some
- 5:09Speaker 2: particles have a lot of it, why some particles don't
- 5:12Speaker 2: seem to have a lot of it, and to learn
- 5:13Speaker 2: about exactly how we measure the mass of these tiny
- 5:17Speaker 2: little particles. You can even just barely see.
- 5:19Speaker 1: Well, some particles don't have any mass, right.
- 5:21Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. Photons have no mass, Gluons have no mass. Gravitons,
- 5:26Speaker 2: if they exist, probably have no mass as well. Mass
- 5:29Speaker 2: isn't even a necessary attribute, like you can be a
- 5:31Speaker 2: thing without having any stuff to you.
- 5:34Speaker 1: Right, Although, as we've talked about many times on the podcast,
- 5:37Speaker 1: the question or the idea of mass is kind of
- 5:39Speaker 1: a tricky one, right, Like there are different kinds of masses,
- 5:42Speaker 1: and also like what you might call mass is not
- 5:45Speaker 1: necessarily the stuff that you have about you.
- 5:47Speaker 2: Yeah, our intuitive understanding of mass is different from the
- 5:51Speaker 2: sort of mathematical physical description of matter at its most microscopic.
- 5:55Speaker 1: Well, this is an interesting question because the Higgs boson
- 5:58Speaker 1: is a pretty big deal in the right. I mean,
- 6:00Speaker 1: it was discovered a few years ago and people were
- 6:03Speaker 1: very excited because apparently it is a very important particle
- 6:06Speaker 1: in the pathion of particles in that it gives mass
- 6:09Speaker 1: to other particles.
- 6:10Speaker 2: Yeah, the Higgs boson is a feature of the Higgs field,
- 6:13Speaker 2: which fills the whole universe. Like other quantum fields, it
- 6:15Speaker 2: can be excited into making a particle, or it can
- 6:18Speaker 2: be chill and relaxed down to its lowest state. But
- 6:21Speaker 2: the Higgs boson, the Higgs particle, the excitation of the
- 6:24Speaker 2: Higgs field, has all sorts of particle like properties. It moves,
- 6:28Speaker 2: it has mass, and the value of its mass is
- 6:31Speaker 2: really important. It's important theoretically and it's important experimentally.
- 6:35Speaker 1: As the big question is how do you measure the
- 6:37Speaker 1: mass of something so important, so crucial to the concept
- 6:40Speaker 1: of mass itself like the Higgs boson, and so, as
- 6:43Speaker 1: usually you were wondering how many people out there had
- 6:45Speaker 1: thought about this question and wondered if they can just
- 6:47Speaker 1: ask the Higgs boson it's mass.
- 6:49Speaker 2: How rude, But thank you very much everybody who volunteers
- 6:52Speaker 2: for this segment of the podcast. If you would like
- 6:54Speaker 2: to participate, please don't be shy and write to me
- 6:57Speaker 2: to questions at Danielanjorge dot com. I am waiting for
- 7:00Speaker 2: your email.
- 7:01Speaker 1: So think about it for a second. How do you
- 7:03Speaker 1: think physicists measure the Higgs bosons mass? Here's what people
- 7:07Speaker 1: had to say.
- 7:08Speaker 3: I know from the episode on where does the Higgs
- 7:11Speaker 3: get its mass that you can look at how it
- 7:16Speaker 3: interacts with the other fields like the top cork and
- 7:20Speaker 3: the strange cork, and maybe with its interacting with its
- 7:24Speaker 3: own field. But I have no idea how you measure it.
- 7:28Speaker 4: I now believe that we can view a boson, and
- 7:35Speaker 4: so therefore I would imagine you could put it in
- 7:40Speaker 4: a particle accelerator and throw something at it, and by
- 7:47Speaker 4: that makes the calculations to measure its mass.
- 7:51Speaker 5: Measuring the mass of the Higgs is going to be
- 7:54Speaker 5: exceedingly difficult. Even an optical system would probably be much
- 8:00Speaker 5: too large to get the mass of the system. I
- 8:04Speaker 5: one could assume that some interplanetary system telescope might actually
- 8:12Speaker 5: be a way to go, if we were able to
- 8:16Speaker 5: figure that out.
- 8:17Speaker 6: If I remember it right, the Higgs boson was discovered
- 8:23Speaker 6: when they could detect a pair of photons that were
- 8:29Speaker 6: emitted in the collider. So maybe its mass would be
- 8:33Speaker 6: equivalent to the energy of those two photoms.
- 8:37Speaker 2: I have no idea.
- 8:38Speaker 5: It could have something to do with its track after
- 8:42Speaker 5: collision analysis it.
- 8:43Speaker 1: Turned all right. I am with the last person here
- 8:46Speaker 1: who said, I have no idea. Sounds like a great title.
- 8:49Speaker 2: For a book. We should write a book like that.
- 8:53Speaker 1: Maybe with Tilight we have No Idea and make it
- 8:55Speaker 1: available for purchase at bookstores and kind of book website.
- 9:01Speaker 1: That would be a good idea.
- 9:03Speaker 2: That would be a very good idea. In fact, if
- 9:05Speaker 2: you went to we have no idea dot com, you
- 9:08Speaker 2: might even be able to find such a book.
- 9:09Speaker 1: That's an amazing idea. But yeah, this is an interesting question.
- 9:12Speaker 1: How do you measure the Higgs bosons mass? If the
- 9:14Speaker 1: Higgs feel is what gives things mass, it's a bit
- 9:17Speaker 1: of a conundrum there, So when don't we start at
- 9:19Speaker 1: the beginning at Daniel? What is the Higgs boson for
- 9:22Speaker 1: people who don't.
- 9:23Speaker 2: Know, So, the Higgs boson is an idea that came
- 9:25Speaker 2: out of the nineteen sixties when people were looking at
- 9:28Speaker 2: the electromagnetic interaction, which is mediated by the photon, and
- 9:33Speaker 2: the weak force, which is mediated by the Z and
- 9:36Speaker 2: the W bosons. So you have these two forces which
- 9:39Speaker 2: seemed pretty different. The weak force is very weak and
- 9:42Speaker 2: it has these three weird bosons that mediate it, and
- 9:45Speaker 2: the electromagnetic force is very strong. It's the one that
- 9:47Speaker 2: we know, you know, makes lightning and magnets and all
- 9:50Speaker 2: sorts of stuff and binds together protons electrons into atoms
- 9:52Speaker 2: and weaves those atoms together into molecules and basically makes
- 9:56Speaker 2: the structure of everything around us. So it's felt like
- 9:59Speaker 2: very different forces, but people had an idea that they
- 10:01Speaker 2: might just click together into one larger idea, which they
- 10:05Speaker 2: call the electroweak force.
- 10:07Speaker 1: Now, what do people know about the weak force or
- 10:09Speaker 1: how do we discover it and what do we think
- 10:12Speaker 1: it was for?
- 10:12Speaker 2: Well, the weak force was discovered several decades ago, and
- 10:15Speaker 2: it was known to be involved in radioactive decay. So,
- 10:18Speaker 2: for example, when a nucleus decays down to a lighter element,
- 10:22Speaker 2: it does so using a process called beta decay. Then
- 10:25Speaker 2: that involves the weak force. So we knew that the
- 10:28Speaker 2: weak force was a thing, and we knew that it
- 10:30Speaker 2: did some stuff and it was different from electromagnetism. We
- 10:33Speaker 2: had postulated the idea that there might be a particle
- 10:36Speaker 2: out there that only feels the weak force, the neutrino,
- 10:39Speaker 2: but it hadn't yet been observed.
- 10:42Speaker 1: Like we knew about radioactive decay, like uranium decays into
- 10:46Speaker 1: a lower mass uranium. But I guess you needed some
- 10:48Speaker 1: kind of mechanism for it to do that, and you
- 10:50Speaker 1: had to sort of invent the force to do that,
- 10:52Speaker 1: or like it only made sense if you had this
- 10:54Speaker 1: new kind of force.
- 10:56Speaker 2: Yeah, you can't explain radioactive decay using just electromagnetism or
- 11:00Speaker 2: just a strong force. You need a new kind of phenomenon.
- 11:03Speaker 2: And that's sort of the history of forces, right. We
- 11:05Speaker 2: see all this stuff out there in the world, and
- 11:08Speaker 2: we tried to describe it using sort of like the
- 11:10Speaker 2: shortest possible list of explanations. But sometimes you have to
- 11:13Speaker 2: add one, you know, like when first time people ever
- 11:15Speaker 2: saw lightning. They're like, hmm, well, you can't explain that
- 11:18Speaker 2: with everything we know, So let's add some into the lists.
- 11:20Speaker 2: Let's say there's a new kind of force electricity, and
- 11:24Speaker 2: people saw magnets and they're like, ooh wow, this is
- 11:26Speaker 2: a cool new thing. So then magnets were added to
- 11:28Speaker 2: the list. Later, we try to shrink that list by
- 11:31Speaker 2: seeing if we can combine those forces. So electricity and
- 11:33Speaker 2: magnetism actually two sides of the same force, now just
- 11:37Speaker 2: one idea electromagnetism. So the weak force was responsible for
- 11:41Speaker 2: a distinct kind of phenomena that we couldn't explain using
- 11:43Speaker 2: other forces. But then people were eager to see if
- 11:46Speaker 2: they could squeeze it together with the other forces.
- 11:48Speaker 1: What made them think that you could squeeze them together, Like,
- 11:51Speaker 1: for example, they didn't try to squish together electromagnetism and gravity,
- 11:55Speaker 1: did they?
- 11:55Speaker 2: Oh? Yes they did. Einstein spent most of his life
- 11:57Speaker 2: trying to accomplish that actually and failing, And so theorists
- 12:01Speaker 2: basically trying to squeeze everything possible together. You know, it's
- 12:03Speaker 2: like we're looking at a bunch of puzzle pieces on
- 12:05Speaker 2: the table and we're like, hm, does this fit with that? Nope?
- 12:07Speaker 2: Does this fit with that? Nope? And electricity and magnetism
- 12:11Speaker 2: almost fit together just perfectly together with the weak force,
- 12:15Speaker 2: like they clicked into place, almost perfectly. There was just
- 12:18Speaker 2: like a little gap missing, and that gap was the
- 12:20Speaker 2: Higgs boson. Oh.
- 12:21Speaker 1: Interesting, So the Higgs field and the Higgs boson was
- 12:25Speaker 1: that missing piece exactly.
- 12:26Speaker 2: That's why they suspected that it existed, because it seemed
- 12:30Speaker 2: very likely that these two forces could click together, but
- 12:32Speaker 2: it didn't quite work. The problem was that photons have
- 12:36Speaker 2: no mass. Their mass lists right, but the W and
- 12:38Speaker 2: Z bosons were very, very massive, and that made it
- 12:41Speaker 2: very very hard to click these two together unless you
- 12:44Speaker 2: had some special thing out there which could give mass
- 12:47Speaker 2: to the W and the Z and not give it
- 12:49Speaker 2: to the photon. And that's what the Higgs does. It
- 12:52Speaker 2: solves this problem of electroweak symmetry. It's called and noo.
- 12:55Speaker 2: They tried to bring in the strong force. They just
- 12:59Speaker 2: decide to the strong force. People basically work on every combination.
- 13:04Speaker 2: If you could bring the strong force together with the
- 13:06Speaker 2: electroweak force, then you've achieved a grand unified theory, something
- 13:10Speaker 2: nobody has been able to make work.
- 13:11Speaker 1: So far mathematically, would you have to call it like
- 13:13Speaker 1: the electro met force. It's not weak, it's not strong.
- 13:17Speaker 1: It's just kind of meant.
- 13:19Speaker 2: Well, you know, there'd be an interesting argument there about
- 13:21Speaker 2: like which names get kept and which names get dropped.
- 13:23Speaker 2: I don't know if you noticed, but when electromagnetism got
- 13:26Speaker 2: merged with the weak force, magnetism got dropped, like the
- 13:29Speaker 2: least influential partner in a law firm that merged with
- 13:32Speaker 2: a bigger firm. Right, it's just gone.
- 13:35Speaker 1: They couldn't just keep phyphonating. I guess I don't know.
- 13:38Speaker 2: I think they could have. It's a bummer to lose magnetism.
- 13:41Speaker 2: I like magnets. I don't know what they would call it.
- 13:43Speaker 2: But the official name right now is the Grand Unified Theory.
- 13:46Speaker 2: You can bring those together, then you have a grand
- 13:48Speaker 2: unified theory. And people have been trying all sorts of ways,
- 13:51Speaker 2: but nobody's been able to make it click.
- 13:52Speaker 1: All right, So then the Higgs boson and the Higgs
- 13:54Speaker 1: field made the electromagnetic force and the weak force click together.
- 13:58Speaker 1: So that's kind of where it came from the idea
- 13:59Speaker 1: for it.
- 14:00Speaker 2: That's right, That's why we thought it had to be
- 14:02Speaker 2: there it or something else which did that job, which
- 14:05Speaker 2: gave mass to the w Z bosons. And also they
- 14:07Speaker 2: were able to add a little piece to the Higgs
- 14:09Speaker 2: force and say, oh, also it interacts with all the
- 14:11Speaker 2: matter particles and gives them mass as well. So it
- 14:14Speaker 2: was a very cute little idea, and then we found
- 14:17Speaker 2: it in twenty twelve, this fantastic triumph of theoretical physics,
- 14:20Speaker 2: to say, you know, there's a pattern out there that's
- 14:23Speaker 2: missing a piece. It would make much more sense if
- 14:25Speaker 2: it existed in the universe, and boom, there it does.
- 14:27Speaker 2: It makes you feel like, wow, math is not just
- 14:30Speaker 2: like describing the universe. Maybe it's dictating how the universe works.
- 14:34Speaker 1: You know, wait, which math? The math are one of
- 14:36Speaker 1: the math?
- 14:38Speaker 2: The math, and in this case it's group theory. This
- 14:40Speaker 2: really weird, abstract kind of math that was invented by
- 14:43Speaker 2: a bunch of French guys in the eighteen hundreds, not
- 14:45Speaker 2: because they were interested in particle physics or really physics
- 14:48Speaker 2: at all. They were just like, huh, look at these
- 14:50Speaker 2: cool symmetries and patterns. Maybe we can describe them mathematically.
- 14:54Speaker 2: And then decades later particle physicists were like Ooh, that
- 14:57Speaker 2: math perfectly described the patterns we're among these particles. Thank
- 15:01Speaker 2: you very much mathematicians for inventing this tool.
- 15:03Speaker 1: All right, So, then the Higgs field and the Higgs
- 15:06Speaker 1: boson is what gives other particles their mass, right, Like,
- 15:09Speaker 1: if the electron has a certain mass with meaning that
- 15:11Speaker 1: it's hard to get it moving and it's hard to
- 15:14Speaker 1: get it to stop, that's inertial mass. That's all due
- 15:17Speaker 1: to the Higgs field.
- 15:18Speaker 2: That's right. As the electron moves through the universe, it
- 15:20Speaker 2: interacts with the Higgs field. That changes how the electron
- 15:24Speaker 2: moves in a way that to us looks like the
- 15:26Speaker 2: electron itself has mass. And there's an argument to me
- 15:29Speaker 2: made to say that the true, the real, the pure
- 15:32Speaker 2: electron has no mass. But what we see isn't the
- 15:35Speaker 2: pure electron. We see this like cloud of an electron
- 15:38Speaker 2: interacting with Higgs bosons, and that's what we call an
- 15:41Speaker 2: electron because that's what we interact with. We see, we
- 15:44Speaker 2: measure in our laboratory, and that object, the sort of
- 15:47Speaker 2: electron interwoven with the Higgs field, that thing has the
- 15:50Speaker 2: mass of an electron.
- 15:52Speaker 1: And that's also how you explain how some particles like
- 15:54Speaker 1: the photon don't have mass. Right, You just figure out
- 15:57Speaker 1: that in the universe some particles interact with the Higgs
- 15:59Speaker 1: fields and then some don't, right, Like the photon doesn't
- 16:02Speaker 1: interact with the Higg fields, and so it doesn't have
- 16:03Speaker 1: this inertial mass.
- 16:05Speaker 2: Right exactly. And on one hand, it answers a deep
- 16:07Speaker 2: question why does the electron have mass? The answer is, oh,
- 16:10Speaker 2: it interacts with the Higgs field, but it doesn't answer
- 16:12Speaker 2: a much deeper question, which is like, well, why does
- 16:14Speaker 2: the muon have more mass? The answer is just, well,
- 16:17Speaker 2: it interacts more with the Higgs boson, sort of like
- 16:19Speaker 2: kicks the question down the road to like, well, why
- 16:22Speaker 2: does the mwon interact with the Higgs boson more than
- 16:24Speaker 2: the electron? We don't know. That's just like a number
- 16:26Speaker 2: out there.
- 16:27Speaker 1: We have to measures, Like, you didn't really answer the question,
- 16:30Speaker 1: you just changed the name of the thing.
- 16:33Speaker 2: Well, we answered the question, but it revealed another deeper question.
- 16:36Speaker 2: It's like we ran the ball down the field another
- 16:38Speaker 2: ten yards somid some progress, we know a little bit
- 16:41Speaker 2: more how to focus, But no, we definitely didn't finally
- 16:43Speaker 2: answer the question.
- 16:45Speaker 1: And so the Higgs field gives mass to other particles, right,
- 16:48Speaker 1: like quarks and electrons and its cousins. Even the neutrina
- 16:52Speaker 1: has a little bit of mass, they think, right, The.
- 16:54Speaker 2: Neutrinos definitely do have a little bit of mass. We
- 16:56Speaker 2: don't know exactly how much they have, but we know
- 16:58Speaker 2: it's very very small. We don't actually know that neutrinos
- 17:02Speaker 2: get their mass from the Higgs. That's one idea that
- 17:05Speaker 2: there are neutrinos and anti neutrinos and they do the
- 17:07Speaker 2: same thing the other particles do and get mass. It's
- 17:10Speaker 2: also possible the neutrino is even weirder. It might be
- 17:13Speaker 2: its own anti particle, and so it might get its
- 17:15Speaker 2: mass in another way. Remember, the Higgs boson is not
- 17:18Speaker 2: the only way to get mass. You can get mass
- 17:20Speaker 2: anytime you have any kind of internal stored energy. For example,
- 17:24Speaker 2: we think dark matter probably doesn't get its mass from
- 17:26Speaker 2: the Higgs field. So neutrinos might do the same things electrons,
- 17:30Speaker 2: or they might do something totally different. Mm.
- 17:33Speaker 1: Interesting. All right, Well, that's the Higgs boson and we
- 17:36Speaker 1: know that it gives other particles mass. But the question
- 17:39Speaker 1: now is who gives the Higgs boison its mass? And
- 17:42Speaker 1: more importantly, for this episode, how do we measure it?
- 17:45Speaker 1: And so let's dig into those questions. But first let's
- 17:48Speaker 1: take a quick break. All right, we're talking about the
- 18:02Speaker 1: Higgs boson. Would you say it's the world's third most
- 18:05Speaker 1: famous particle.
- 18:06Speaker 2: Third most famous? It might be the most famous. I
- 18:09Speaker 2: think it's Michael Jordan of particles.
- 18:10Speaker 1: Really, you think it's more famous than the electron quarks
- 18:14Speaker 1: maybe or photons. Photons are really probably up there. So
- 18:17Speaker 1: I would say it's like photons, electrons, and then maybe
- 18:19Speaker 1: the Higgs boson.
- 18:20Speaker 2: I guess I probably have a skewed view of it,
- 18:22Speaker 2: but I would guess Higgs boson first and then electron.
- 18:26Speaker 1: I guess it is the most popular particle among physicists
- 18:29Speaker 1: who study the Higgs boson. That makes sense.
- 18:33Speaker 2: I would say, I have a massive interest in the
- 18:34Speaker 2: Higgs boson.
- 18:35Speaker 1: Yes, you're heavily biased. All right, Well, we were talking
- 18:39Speaker 1: about how the Higgs field and the Higgs boson gives
- 18:41Speaker 1: mass to other particles. But then now the question is
- 18:44Speaker 1: what gives Higgs boson its mass and how do we
- 18:47Speaker 1: measure it?
- 18:47Speaker 2: Yeah, the Higgs boson is like the barber who shaves
- 18:50Speaker 2: himself for herself. The Higgs actually gives mass to itself. Right,
- 18:56Speaker 2: the Higgs is a really interesting particle because it interacts
- 18:59Speaker 2: with its That's not true for every particle, like the photon,
- 19:03Speaker 2: for example, only interacts with particles that have any electric
- 19:07Speaker 2: charge plus or minus a neutral particle. The photon will
- 19:10Speaker 2: just fly right by, and the photon is neutral electrically,
- 19:14Speaker 2: so it doesn't interact with itself. But the Higgs boson
- 19:17Speaker 2: does interact with itself. Two Higgs bosons coming near each
- 19:20Speaker 2: other will bounce off each other or attract each other sometimes.
- 19:24Speaker 1: WHOA Okay, So I guess that is kind of strange
- 19:27Speaker 1: and different. So the Higgs boson when it's out there
- 19:29Speaker 1: and it sees another Higgs boson, they can ignore each other.
- 19:32Speaker 2: They cannot ignore each other exactly. They're like x's that
- 19:35Speaker 2: are still angry at each other. They always end up entangled.
- 19:38Speaker 1: Are you saying the whole universe is one big, u
- 19:43Speaker 1: sad and dramatic story.
- 19:44Speaker 2: Yeah. And then they go home. They both eat chocolate
- 19:46Speaker 2: to feel better. Now, the Higgs boson flies through the universe,
- 19:49Speaker 2: and like other particles, it feels the Higgs field and
- 19:52Speaker 2: it interacts with the other Higgs bosons. The other manifestations
- 19:55Speaker 2: of the Higgs field and pigs up mass, and so
- 19:58Speaker 2: the interaction of the Higgs fiel with itself gives it mass.
- 20:02Speaker 1: Is that the order you would put it in, like
- 20:04Speaker 1: you have a Higgs boson which is like a little
- 20:06Speaker 1: blip in the field, and then that blip interacts with
- 20:09Speaker 1: the field it's made out of too.
- 20:11Speaker 2: Exactly in just the same way that an electron interacts
- 20:14Speaker 2: or the Higgs field. A Higgs boson also interacts or
- 20:16Speaker 2: the Higgs field, and it has a similar effect on
- 20:19Speaker 2: the Higgs boson as it does on the electron. What
- 20:22Speaker 2: we're measuring when we measure the Higgs boson is actually
- 20:24Speaker 2: this little cloud of a Higgs interacting with other higgses.
- 20:29Speaker 1: So then that means if the Higgs boson has inertial mass,
- 20:31Speaker 1: that means the Higgs boson is not dumb, doesn't go
- 20:36Speaker 1: at the speed of light.
- 20:37Speaker 2: The Higgs boson does not travel at the speed of
- 20:39Speaker 2: light exactly because nothing that has mass can go at
- 20:42Speaker 2: the speed of light. And the Higgs boson mass is
- 20:44Speaker 2: sort of interesting from like a philosophical perspective, like whoa
- 20:46Speaker 2: the thing that has mass gives mass itself. It's like
- 20:49Speaker 2: Santa Claus giving himself a present or something. But it's
- 20:52Speaker 2: also really fascinating theoretically for other reasons, because the Higgs
- 20:56Speaker 2: boson doesn't just get mass from its interactions with itself.
- 20:59Speaker 2: It also who gets mass from interactions with other particles.
- 21:02Speaker 2: Like we know that the Higgs interacts with electrons, and
- 21:05Speaker 2: we know that interacts with top quarks, and so those
- 21:08Speaker 2: interactions give mass to electrons and top quarks, but also
- 21:11Speaker 2: to the Higgs. So the Higgs gets its mass from
- 21:14Speaker 2: interacting with itself and from interacting with the other particles.
- 21:17Speaker 1: Wait, so the mass of the Higgs changes depending on
- 21:20Speaker 1: who's around it. Like, what if there's no electron or
- 21:23Speaker 1: meal on around it, would that mean the Eiggs boson
- 21:25Speaker 1: is lighter?
- 21:26Speaker 2: Question because I said fields, and those fields are everywhere,
- 21:29Speaker 2: or there's always an electron field and there's always a
- 21:31Speaker 2: top quark field. So the Higgs boson interacts with those fields,
- 21:34Speaker 2: whether or not they're actually electrons or top quarks around,
- 21:38Speaker 2: whether those fields are excited enough to make real particles,
- 21:41Speaker 2: it interacts with the fields themselves.
- 21:45Speaker 1: Well, I guess, just for the record, I think it's
- 21:46Speaker 1: okay Santa Claus wants to buy himself a gift. I mean,
- 21:50Speaker 1: the poor guy, I mean allwis only gets one birthday
- 21:54Speaker 1: present a year from missus Sanna. He can buy himself
- 21:57Speaker 1: a little some fum.
- 22:00Speaker 2: Yeah, go ahead, Santa Claus, get yourself some dark chocolate.
- 22:03Speaker 1: That's right, you do you? Although maybe he likes white chocolate.
- 22:07Speaker 2: Yeah, maybe he likes peppermint bark. Who knows. Somebody's got
- 22:09Speaker 2: to like that stuff they keep making it.
- 22:11Speaker 1: Maybe it's the Santa himself.
- 22:14Speaker 2: But there's something of a mystery about the Higgs boson mass,
- 22:16Speaker 2: which is why we're so interested in measuring it, and
- 22:19Speaker 2: that comes from its interactions with these other particles. It's
- 22:21Speaker 2: interactions with matter particles like electrons and top quarks that
- 22:25Speaker 2: makes its mass much much bigger, and when it interacts
- 22:28Speaker 2: with other bosons like w bosons or gluons or whatever,
- 22:31Speaker 2: that makes its mass smaller. And the fascinating thing is
- 22:35Speaker 2: that these two numbers are really really big. They're like
- 22:38Speaker 2: billions of times bigger than the eventual mass of the
- 22:41Speaker 2: Higgs boson, which means these two numbers sort of cancel
- 22:44Speaker 2: each other out almost exactly. It's kind of a mystery
- 22:47Speaker 2: of modern physics.
- 22:48Speaker 1: Mm weird. So the Higgs field is that the only
- 22:52Speaker 1: field that interacts with all the other fields, or do
- 22:54Speaker 1: all fields interact with each other, or is that unique
- 22:57Speaker 1: to the Higgs field. It seems like maybe the Higgs
- 22:59Speaker 1: field is. It's just an everyone's business.
- 23:03Speaker 2: Every particle we discovered so far feels the weak force,
- 23:06Speaker 2: So the Higgs feels the weak force, just like the
- 23:08Speaker 2: neutrinos do, and the W and the C and the quarks.
- 23:11Speaker 2: Everybody feels the weak force. But the Higgs is neutral,
- 23:14Speaker 2: so it doesn't interact with photons directly, for example. But
- 23:17Speaker 2: it's fascinating to me that you do this accounting, Like
- 23:19Speaker 2: the Higgs boson gets a little bit of mass from
- 23:21Speaker 2: interacting with itself, we don't know exactly how much. Then
- 23:24Speaker 2: it gets a huge amount of mass from interacting with
- 23:27Speaker 2: electrons and nuance and stuff. And then it loses a
- 23:29Speaker 2: huge amount of mass from interacting with w's and z's, etc.
- 23:33Speaker 2: And that comes back to almost zero. Like these two
- 23:36Speaker 2: big numbers, the huge addition and the huge subtraction, don't
- 23:39Speaker 2: have to be close to each other. They're two enormous numbers,
- 23:42Speaker 2: and yet they almost balance. Brings the Higgs boson mass
- 23:46Speaker 2: back down to a reasonable value. In another universe, the
- 23:49Speaker 2: Higgs boson could have been like a million times heavier
- 23:52Speaker 2: than it ended up being so heavy we could never
- 23:54Speaker 2: even discover it.
- 23:55Speaker 1: Oh, I guess that's a weird concept for a non
- 23:59Speaker 1: particle to understand, which is like, how do you lose
- 24:03Speaker 1: mass in an interaction?
- 24:04Speaker 2: Like?
- 24:05Speaker 1: What does it mean that, like the Higgs boson loses
- 24:07Speaker 1: mass when it interacts with certain particles, like it gets
- 24:10Speaker 1: lighter and moves faster, it's easier to move around. What
- 24:13Speaker 1: does that mean?
- 24:14Speaker 2: I think intuitively, the way to think about it is
- 24:15Speaker 2: that interacting with some of these fields adds to the
- 24:19Speaker 2: internal stored energy of the effective Higgs boson, and interacting
- 24:23Speaker 2: with other fields decreases the internal stored energy. Adding to
- 24:26Speaker 2: the internal stored energy means getting more mass. Losing internal
- 24:30Speaker 2: stored energy means decreasing your mass. So it's not like
- 24:33Speaker 2: it gets a kick. It actually like sucks away some
- 24:36Speaker 2: of the internal stored energy the interaction with some of
- 24:39Speaker 2: these fields.
- 24:41Speaker 1: But then that's a whole different mechanism for getting mass, right,
- 24:44Speaker 1: which is like having stored energy inside that doesn't come
- 24:48Speaker 1: from the Higgs field, does it?
- 24:49Speaker 2: In this case, it comes from the interaction between the
- 24:51Speaker 2: Higgs field and these other particles. So even the Higgs
- 24:54Speaker 2: field interaction you can think about as internal stored energy.
- 24:58Speaker 2: Like you think about the electron moving through the universe,
- 25:00Speaker 2: what is its mass? You could just say it comes
- 25:02Speaker 2: from the Higgs field, but really what's happening is you're
- 25:05Speaker 2: creating a new object, which is this electron that interacts
- 25:08Speaker 2: with the Higgs field, and that thing has energy which
- 25:10Speaker 2: in the end is coming from the Higgs field, and
- 25:13Speaker 2: it's storing that energy internally in this new thing. This
- 25:15Speaker 2: like cloud of electrons and Higgs is sort of interacting together.
- 25:19Speaker 2: So it's really all the same kind of mechanism. The
- 25:21Speaker 2: Higgs is like an example of how you can have
- 25:24Speaker 2: internal stored energy, but you're right, it's not the only one.
- 25:27Speaker 2: Like other forces can give you internal stored energy, like
- 25:30Speaker 2: the gluons inside the proton give you internal.
- 25:32Speaker 1: Stored energy, and then when those get a lot of
- 25:34Speaker 1: internal stored energy like in the proton, it feels heavier.
- 25:39Speaker 1: Is that also due to the Higgs field or is
- 25:40Speaker 1: that just due to some other unknown mechanism in the universe.
- 25:43Speaker 2: That's just the fundamental nature of mass that we don't
- 25:46Speaker 2: really understand. That internal stored energy has inertia, and you know,
- 25:49Speaker 2: you can change the relationship between those gluons, increasing or
- 25:53Speaker 2: decreasing mass. Right, so if those gluons interact with something
- 25:56Speaker 2: else outside and change their relative energy levels, that can
- 25:59Speaker 2: change the mass of the particle.
- 26:01Speaker 1: Well, I guess the other question I had was, you know,
- 26:03Speaker 1: you said that the Higgs boson doesn't move at the
- 26:05Speaker 1: speed of light, but at the same time it's a
- 26:07Speaker 1: particle that gives other particles mass. Does that mean that
- 26:10Speaker 1: mass is not instantaneous or that there's some kind of
- 26:14Speaker 1: delay in how the universe or how you feel mass
- 26:17Speaker 1: in some particles.
- 26:18Speaker 2: Like if you change the mass of a particle, would
- 26:21Speaker 2: that ripple out at less than the speed of light?
- 26:24Speaker 1: Or like if an electron moves, you know, the inertia
- 26:28Speaker 1: you would feel is somehow delayed because it has to
- 26:31Speaker 1: get it from the Higgs field, which doesn't move at
- 26:32Speaker 1: the speed of light.
- 26:33Speaker 2: Information about any motion is always delayed, even if it
- 26:36Speaker 2: travels at the speed of light. Right, Even like gravitational waves,
- 26:39Speaker 2: which travel at the speed of light are not instantaneous.
- 26:42Speaker 2: So whether or not you travel at the speed of
- 26:44Speaker 2: light or not, you're still not propagating information instantaneously.
- 26:48Speaker 1: M so I guess I mean more of a delay,
- 26:51Speaker 1: like you could see something happen before you feel its mass.
- 26:54Speaker 2: I think we had to pull apart a little bit
- 26:56Speaker 2: here the gravitational and the inertial situation, because this see
- 27:00Speaker 2: something's mass really means to observe it moving. Right. Mass
- 27:04Speaker 2: is all about like what is your inertia? How do
- 27:07Speaker 2: you move through the universe? How do you respond to forces?
- 27:09Speaker 2: And we're not talking about like how your existence changes,
- 27:13Speaker 2: like the curvature of space time and ripples from your acceleration. Right,
- 27:16Speaker 2: we're not talking about gravitational waves. We're just talking about
- 27:19Speaker 2: inertial mass.
- 27:20Speaker 1: Well, I guess that the question is the same. You know,
- 27:22Speaker 1: do you feel inertial mass at a later time that
- 27:24Speaker 1: you would like if a photon bounced off of an electron.
- 27:27Speaker 2: It's a great question. I haven't thought about it before,
- 27:29Speaker 2: but I think that probably what's going on is that
- 27:32Speaker 2: this is all internal to the object we call the electron,
- 27:35Speaker 2: and we don't have enough energy to like break the
- 27:37Speaker 2: electron open and see the Higgs is inside propagating. We
- 27:40Speaker 2: just like wrap that whole thing up into an object
- 27:43Speaker 2: we call the electron. And what we're talking about here
- 27:45Speaker 2: is something that's really going on inside the electron. You'd
- 27:48Speaker 2: be worried about, like how long it takes a Higgs
- 27:49Speaker 2: boson to move from one side of the electron to
- 27:52Speaker 2: the other. But from our point of view on the outside,
- 27:54Speaker 2: the electron is effectively a point particle, so it's not
- 27:57Speaker 2: really an issue like whether the Higgs can get from
- 27:59Speaker 2: one inside of the electron to the other to make
- 28:02Speaker 2: it like a consistent object with a single kind of mass.
- 28:05Speaker 1: It just seems like it's like a force that has
- 28:09Speaker 1: a certain delay to it, you know, like a slower
- 28:11Speaker 1: force than say the electro magnetic force, which communicates with photons,
- 28:15Speaker 1: which are going at the speed of light.
- 28:17Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. Photons do travel at speed of light,
- 28:19Speaker 2: and ripples in the Higgs field travels slower. There are
- 28:23Speaker 2: some particles whose mass changes. Remember, neutrinos don't have a
- 28:27Speaker 2: definite mass when they are created. They are a mixture
- 28:30Speaker 2: of various mass states, so that kind of inertial mass
- 28:34Speaker 2: information might propagate it less than the speed of light.
- 28:37Speaker 1: All right, Well, let's get to the main question of
- 28:39Speaker 1: the episode, which is how do you measure the mass
- 28:41Speaker 1: of the Higgs boson. That was kind of a part
- 28:44Speaker 1: of what the big discovery was in twenty twelve, right,
- 28:46Speaker 1: Like you kind of had to guess what its mass
- 28:48Speaker 1: was to know where to look for it.
- 28:50Speaker 2: Yeah, it's a really interesting bit of scientific history because
- 28:53Speaker 2: when Higgs came up with this idea, his theory work
- 28:56Speaker 2: no matter what the mass to the Higgs was, Like
- 28:58Speaker 2: the Higgs could be very very or super duper honk
- 29:02Speaker 2: and heavy and his theory would still work. And that's cool.
- 29:05Speaker 2: It makes a very powerful theory, but it's also sort
- 29:08Speaker 2: of frustrating from an experimental point of view because he
- 29:10Speaker 2: didn't predict the Higgs mass. If his theory only worked
- 29:13Speaker 2: for one value of the Higgs mass, then he could
- 29:15Speaker 2: have said, go out there, look for it. It has
- 29:18Speaker 2: this value, I predict it, you know, like baby Ruth
- 29:20Speaker 2: calling his shot. But instead he said, well it might
- 29:22Speaker 2: exist and it might have any value. So you got
- 29:25Speaker 2: to look for in all sorts of different ways.
- 29:27Speaker 1: Meaning like the mass would work no matter what the
- 29:30Speaker 1: mass of the Higgs boson is, or would you have
- 29:32Speaker 1: like very different universes if it did have different masses, if.
- 29:36Speaker 2: You know all the particles that are out there in
- 29:38Speaker 2: the universe interacting with the Higgs boson, then you know
- 29:41Speaker 2: what its mass is because its mass comes from interacting
- 29:44Speaker 2: with itself and interacting with all those other particles. If
- 29:47Speaker 2: you don't know the other particles out there in the universe,
- 29:49Speaker 2: you don't know everything that's contributing to the Higgs mass.
- 29:52Speaker 2: And so we didn't know. We didn't know what all
- 29:54Speaker 2: the particles were. We still don't know what all the
- 29:55Speaker 2: particles are. If you measure all the other particles very
- 29:58Speaker 2: very precisely, then you can predict what the Higgs mass
- 30:01Speaker 2: could be. But that's only if you know all the
- 30:03Speaker 2: particles in the universe, and we're pretty sure we don't.
- 30:06Speaker 1: So I guess he just didn't know what the mass
- 30:08Speaker 1: of the Higgs boson was supposed to be, just because
- 30:11Speaker 1: you didn't have all the information about what else is
- 30:13Speaker 1: out there in the universe exactly.
- 30:14Speaker 2: And that's another reason why knowing the mass is exciting,
- 30:17Speaker 2: because it gives you a way to tell, like, is
- 30:19Speaker 2: there something out there we don't know about, something else
- 30:21Speaker 2: interacting with the Higgs field and making it heavier or
- 30:23Speaker 2: making it lighter. What we can do is predict the
- 30:25Speaker 2: value the Higgs field based on all the particles that
- 30:27Speaker 2: we do think are out there. Then we can go
- 30:29Speaker 2: out there and measure the Higgs and say does it
- 30:31Speaker 2: agree with our prediction?
- 30:33Speaker 1: All right, So then we discovered the Higgs boson, and
- 30:35Speaker 1: so what is its mass? And how do we know
- 30:37Speaker 1: what its mass was?
- 30:38Speaker 2: So we measure the mass of particles in a weird unit.
- 30:41Speaker 2: It's called the GeV giggle electron volts one billion electron bolts.
- 30:46Speaker 2: It's actually a pretty convenient unit because the proton weighs
- 30:49Speaker 2: about one GeV. Our electrons are much much lighter than that.
- 30:52Speaker 2: For example, they're like half of an MeV half of
- 30:55Speaker 2: a million electron bolts, and the Higgs boson is about
- 30:59Speaker 2: one hundred and twenty five of these things. It's one
- 31:01Speaker 2: hundred and twenty five point three five plus or minus
- 31:05Speaker 2: point one five GeV.
- 31:07Speaker 1: Wait, the mass of the Higgs boson is one hundred
- 31:10Speaker 1: and twenty five times greater than the mass of a proton.
- 31:13Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly, it's the second heaviest particle we know. It's
- 31:16Speaker 2: lighter only than the top quark, which is about one
- 31:19Speaker 2: hundred and seventy three GeV.
- 31:21Speaker 1: Well, it's kind of weird to think about, right, Like
- 31:23Speaker 1: the electron is thousands of times slighter and yet when
- 31:26Speaker 1: it interacts with the Higgs boson, the Higgs boson is heavier.
- 31:30Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly. The top quark interacts with the higgs boson
- 31:34Speaker 2: like crazy. Those two guys have a party every time
- 31:37Speaker 2: they meet. And that's why the top quark is super
- 31:39Speaker 2: duper heavy.
- 31:40Speaker 1: That's why it's the top because it's it's a fun particle.
- 31:44Speaker 1: It's thet I don't know it likes to party.
- 31:50Speaker 2: But we know the higgs Boson mass very very precisely.
- 31:53Speaker 2: We know it more precisely than the top quark. Even
- 31:55Speaker 2: the top quark we discovered in the nineties and we've
- 31:57Speaker 2: been working to measure it's mass ever since. Then. With
- 32:00Speaker 2: the Higgs boson, we know a precision of one part
- 32:02Speaker 2: in one.
- 32:03Speaker 1: Thousand, all right, So then how do we know the mass?
- 32:05Speaker 1: How do you measure the mass of any particle? You
- 32:07Speaker 1: can't just put it on a scale, right, and you
- 32:09Speaker 1: can't just like drop it from a building to see
- 32:11Speaker 1: how fast it accelerates, exactly.
- 32:14Speaker 2: We can't do any of those kinds of things that
- 32:16Speaker 2: you usually do because these particles last for only a
- 32:19Speaker 2: few moments. You know, we're talking like ten to the
- 32:21Speaker 2: negative twenty three seconds, which means it. Technically, we don't
- 32:24Speaker 2: even see these particles. Nobody's ever seen a Higgs boson.
- 32:28Speaker 2: They never even seen a track of a Higgs boson
- 32:31Speaker 2: left in one of our detectors, because they just don't
- 32:34Speaker 2: last for long enough already, and then it decays into
- 32:36Speaker 2: other stuff. We know the Higgs exists because of patterns
- 32:39Speaker 2: in those particle decays that are consistent with the Higgs
- 32:42Speaker 2: being there and inconsistent with the Higgs not being there.
- 32:45Speaker 2: So then to measure its mass, we have to look
- 32:47Speaker 2: at the patterns of those particles and try to extract
- 32:50Speaker 2: that information the streak that those particles left after the
- 32:53Speaker 2: Higgs boson turned into them. Mmm. Yeah.
- 32:56Speaker 1: We often use the analogy of like studying an accidency.
- 33:00Speaker 1: After the accident, you sort of study the debris and
- 33:02Speaker 1: you kind of figure out, like, oh, this car crash
- 33:06Speaker 1: into that car is here at this point, and they
- 33:07Speaker 1: crash in the corner back corner, and because the fenders
- 33:11Speaker 1: over here, we know how fast they were going. You're
- 33:13Speaker 1: saying like, somewhere between the crash and finding the debris,
- 33:17Speaker 1: like a Higgs boson popped up into the universe and
- 33:20Speaker 1: then it disappeared again.
- 33:21Speaker 2: Yeah, and the car crash analogy is helpful, but it's
- 33:23Speaker 2: also misleading an important way, because when you're looking at
- 33:26Speaker 2: a car crash, you're looking at pieces of the car, right,
- 33:29Speaker 2: the fender is here and the windshield wipers over there.
- 33:32Speaker 2: When you're looking at the results of a particle collision,
- 33:34Speaker 2: you're not looking at like pieces of the Higgs boson.
- 33:36Speaker 2: The Higgs boson doesn't like break in half and you
- 33:39Speaker 2: find bits of it here and bits of it there.
- 33:41Speaker 2: It converts from a Higgs boson into totally different kinds
- 33:44Speaker 2: of matter. So, for example, a Higgs boson can decay
- 33:47Speaker 2: into two bottom quarks, and that doesn't mean that there
- 33:50Speaker 2: are two bottom quarks inside a Higgs boson. It means
- 33:53Speaker 2: that the energy that used to be in the Higgs
- 33:55Speaker 2: field is now in the bottom quark field. The Higgs
- 33:57Speaker 2: is gone. It's not like it's bits are rearranged into
- 33:59Speaker 2: something else. It's gone and that energy is now in
- 34:02Speaker 2: a different field.
- 34:03Speaker 1: Right. Yeah, things trend into energy, but sort of the
- 34:06Speaker 1: analogy is still the same, right, Like all the parts
- 34:08Speaker 1: still have to fit together at the end, Like you
- 34:10Speaker 1: can't just invent energy out of nowhere, like you have
- 34:13Speaker 1: to do some accounting to make sure that all the
- 34:15Speaker 1: bits that you got at the end were part of
- 34:18Speaker 1: the same thing at the beginning, and that is actually
- 34:21Speaker 1: how you find the mass, right like you do the
- 34:23Speaker 1: through accounting.
- 34:24Speaker 2: Exactly through accounting basically a quantum information and energy. Quantum
- 34:28Speaker 2: information is sort of amazing. We talked about the podcast
- 34:30Speaker 2: a few times, and the idea is that quantum information
- 34:33Speaker 2: is not destroyed in the universe, which means that every
- 34:36Speaker 2: past moment in the universe creates a unique present because
- 34:40Speaker 2: as a unique connection, as where there was a one
- 34:42Speaker 2: to one mapping, you can reverse it. You can say,
- 34:44Speaker 2: I'm going to take the present, I'm going to rewind
- 34:46Speaker 2: it figure out what was going on in the past.
- 34:48Speaker 2: And so you can take the particles that the Higgs
- 34:50Speaker 2: boson decayed into, maybe like two bottom quarks that we
- 34:53Speaker 2: see in our detector. You can figure out what the
- 34:55Speaker 2: Higgs boson was doing. Most specifically, you can figure out
- 34:58Speaker 2: its momentum and you can figure out its energy, and
- 35:02Speaker 2: from those two pieces of information you can measure its mass.
- 35:05Speaker 1: I guess, so that means you sort of infer its mass,
- 35:08Speaker 1: right or you deduce its mass from what it's doing
- 35:11Speaker 1: or what do you see its progeny doing.
- 35:13Speaker 2: Yeah, and that makes it sound a little bit indirect,
- 35:15Speaker 2: and the end all measurements are indirect, are all inferences
- 35:18Speaker 2: based on observation. That's when we feel pretty confident in
- 35:21Speaker 2: But yeah, we're measuring the energy of the two particles.
- 35:24Speaker 2: And you know, one of the listeners actually came very
- 35:26Speaker 2: close to answering it. He said, the Higgs was discovered
- 35:29Speaker 2: when they saw a pair of photons, and maybe the
- 35:31Speaker 2: mass is equivalent to the energy of those photons. And
- 35:34Speaker 2: that's almost exactly right. The energy of those photons tells
- 35:38Speaker 2: you a lot, and also their direction and their momentum
- 35:41Speaker 2: tells you the momentum of the Higgs, and with that
- 35:43Speaker 2: information together you can get the mass. Because remember of
- 35:46Speaker 2: energy we're talking about like energy of motion, which is
- 35:48Speaker 2: the momentum, and then energy of mass. And so if
- 35:50Speaker 2: you have the total energy and you know the momentum,
- 35:53Speaker 2: the last little bit has to be the mass.
- 35:56Speaker 1: Sounds like that listener was very enlightened.
- 36:00Speaker 2: Brilliant, brilliant comment.
- 36:01Speaker 1: And so let's shed more light into this measurement of
- 36:04Speaker 1: the Higgs bosons mass. What's hard about that and what
- 36:08Speaker 1: does it mean about our picture of the universe? So
- 36:10Speaker 1: let's stick in to that. But first let's take another
- 36:13Speaker 1: quick break. All right, we're talking about the Higgs bosons.
- 36:28Speaker 1: Higgs boson researchers favorite particle.
- 36:31Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right, or maybe the most famous particle and
- 36:33Speaker 2: maybe our favorite particle because it's the last one we discovered.
- 36:36Speaker 2: And it's not very often that you discover a new
- 36:38Speaker 2: particle from the top quark in the nineties and the
- 36:41Speaker 2: Higgs boson in the early twenty tens and nothing ever since.
- 36:45Speaker 2: So you spent a lot of time studying each one
- 36:47Speaker 2: because they're precious.
- 36:49Speaker 1: So if you discover a new particle, that'll be your
- 36:51Speaker 1: new favorite. I see how fickly your a physicists are.
- 36:54Speaker 2: That's right, The young one is always the baby particle
- 36:57Speaker 2: of the family, and you know you gotta love the baby.
- 36:59Speaker 1: Just fall in the latest trend, the latest hit particle. Well,
- 37:03Speaker 1: we're asking the question of how you measure the mass
- 37:05Speaker 1: of the Higgs boson, and it seems like you do
- 37:07Speaker 1: it at the Large Hadron Collider and any collider can
- 37:10Speaker 1: any collider study the mass of the Higgs or right now,
- 37:13Speaker 1: is the Large Hadron Collider at the only collider that
- 37:15Speaker 1: can do that?
- 37:16Speaker 2: Well, the LAHC doesn't have a monopoly on a per se.
- 37:18Speaker 2: It's just that it's the only one that has enough
- 37:20Speaker 2: energy to make the Higgs boson, and so it's the
- 37:23Speaker 2: only place that it can be studied. So far, we're
- 37:25Speaker 2: working on plans for other colliders, including maybe even a
- 37:28Speaker 2: Muon collider that can make like huge numbers of Higgs bosons,
- 37:32Speaker 2: but you have to make it in order to study it.
- 37:34Speaker 1: And so we were talking about how you collide things
- 37:36Speaker 1: and then you look at the debris, and then you
- 37:39Speaker 1: figure out that in some crashes, like the evidence you
- 37:42Speaker 1: see can only be explained by the Higgs boson, and
- 37:46Speaker 1: from the debris can also sort of infer what its
- 37:49Speaker 1: mass is. And so we got that down pretty good.
- 37:52Speaker 2: We have that down pretty good. There's been a lot
- 37:53Speaker 2: of really really careful studies, and this is not an
- 37:56Speaker 2: easy thing to do. I mean, we're saying the Higgs
- 37:59Speaker 2: boson turns to two photons or two bottom quarks or
- 38:02Speaker 2: sometimes two w bosons, and we're just saying, oh, you
- 38:05Speaker 2: measure those particles, masses and energies. But that's not trivial.
- 38:08Speaker 2: You know, that involves building and calibrating complicated detectors in
- 38:12Speaker 2: order to measure those streaks and extract that information.
- 38:16Speaker 1: Yeah, and also like that it doesn't happen every time
- 38:18Speaker 1: you crash some particles, right, Like, you have to collide
- 38:21Speaker 1: trillions of particles to sort of get one where maybe
- 38:25Speaker 1: a Higgs boson can be seen.
- 38:26Speaker 2: Oh yeah, great point. The Higgs boson is really really rare.
- 38:29Speaker 2: That's why we collide particles so often, millions and millions
- 38:33Speaker 2: of times per second, hoping that maybe like one of
- 38:35Speaker 2: those collisions will give us a Higgs boson. So first
- 38:38Speaker 2: we have to smash in the particles together to get
- 38:40Speaker 2: a sample that's going to have a bunch of Higgs
- 38:42Speaker 2: bosons in them. Then we have to try to isolate
- 38:44Speaker 2: the collisions that we think probably come from the Higgs boson,
- 38:47Speaker 2: but that's not totally possible. Some of those collisions will
- 38:50Speaker 2: always be due to other stuff that just happens to Also,
- 38:53Speaker 2: give two photons that look kind of like a Higgs boson,
- 38:57Speaker 2: or give two w bosons that look kind of like
- 38:59Speaker 2: a Higgs photon. So you can never say this collision
- 39:02Speaker 2: has a Higgs in it or that collision has a
- 39:04Speaker 2: Higgs in it. It's always statistical. You have a set
- 39:06Speaker 2: of collisions you say, we think there's like ten percent
- 39:08Speaker 2: Higgs in here, or there's fourteen percent Higgs in here.
- 39:11Speaker 1: But I guess since the Higgs boson gives all particles
- 39:14Speaker 1: their mass, isn't technically the Higgs boson in all collisions too.
- 39:18Speaker 2: It is, but sort of in a virtual sense. Like
- 39:20Speaker 2: the Higgs field is everywhere, and the Higgs field is
- 39:22Speaker 2: involved in everything, even low energy collisions. But if you
- 39:26Speaker 2: want to study its mass, you have to make a
- 39:27Speaker 2: real Higgs boson. You have to excite the field enough
- 39:30Speaker 2: so that it pops out an actual Higgs boson, a
- 39:33Speaker 2: real one, not a virtual one.
- 39:35Speaker 1: What's the difference?
- 39:36Speaker 2: Virtual particles really just saying another ripple in the fields,
- 39:39Speaker 2: like information wiggling through the field. But that information can
- 39:42Speaker 2: propagate in all sorts of ways that particles don't propagate.
- 39:45Speaker 2: You know, particles, for example, have a specific mass, or
- 39:48Speaker 2: real Higgs boson moving through the Higgs field has a
- 39:51Speaker 2: very specific mass. Virtual particles don't have to follow those rules.
- 39:54Speaker 2: They can have all sorts of weird masses, including like
- 39:56Speaker 2: zero or negative masses. Virtual particles are not really particles,
- 40:01Speaker 2: they're just ripples in the Higgs field. You can sometimes
- 40:03Speaker 2: kind of describe using particle like words.
- 40:07Speaker 1: But I guess, if the Higgs boson is so rare,
- 40:09Speaker 1: is it really what's giving mass to the other particles then,
- 40:13Speaker 1: because I feel like you're saying it's rare and virtual
- 40:16Speaker 1: and you rarely ever see it, but at the same time,
- 40:18Speaker 1: it's affecting us all the time everywhere.
- 40:20Speaker 2: Yeah, because the Higgs field is everywhere. Even if there
- 40:22Speaker 2: are no real Higgs bosons around, the Higgs field fills
- 40:25Speaker 2: the whole universe, and it's constantly interacting with your electrons
- 40:29Speaker 2: and your top quarks. So maybe what you're getting at
- 40:31Speaker 2: is it is possible to detect the Higgs field and
- 40:34Speaker 2: to deduce things about it from its interactions with those particles, right, Like,
- 40:38Speaker 2: by measuring the top quark very precisely and measuring the
- 40:41Speaker 2: w boson very very precisely, we can learn a lot
- 40:43Speaker 2: about the Higgs field, and that's how they make those
- 40:45Speaker 2: predictions of what the Higgs mass sort of has to
- 40:48Speaker 2: be like. Before we found the Higgs boson mass, we
- 40:50Speaker 2: had ideas for what its mass might be based on
- 40:53Speaker 2: these sort of indirect measurements observations of how it's affecting
- 40:56Speaker 2: the other particles.
- 40:58Speaker 1: All right, Well, let's get to what we know about
- 41:00Speaker 1: the mass of the Higgs field. So you said, we
- 41:02Speaker 1: know that it's one hundred and twenty five zero point
- 41:04Speaker 1: thirty five GEVs plus or minus zero point one percent.
- 41:08Speaker 1: What does that mean? Is that more than what we expected?
- 41:11Speaker 1: It seems like it's a lot, because it's one hundred
- 41:13Speaker 1: times more than the mass of the proton. But is
- 41:16Speaker 1: that surprising or is that expected? Is it interesting that
- 41:19Speaker 1: it weighs that much or could it have been any
- 41:21Speaker 1: other mass?
- 41:21Speaker 2: Well, first of all, it's very impressive that it's measured
- 41:24Speaker 2: so precisely. Like, this is really hard. I guess it's
- 41:27Speaker 2: kind of my job so.
- 41:29Speaker 1: This horn, But like this is not hard, Yes, according
- 41:33Speaker 1: to people who had to do it.
- 41:36Speaker 2: It is really hard. You know, like a Higgs boson
- 41:38Speaker 2: decays the two photons. You got to measure those photons
- 41:41Speaker 2: really precisely. You got to come up with all sorts
- 41:42Speaker 2: of clever ways to know, like how can you tell
- 41:45Speaker 2: the difference between photon and dis energy and that energy
- 41:47Speaker 2: and how do you know for sure? Like people spend
- 41:50Speaker 2: weeks and weeks sweating over the details, the tiny little
- 41:54Speaker 2: problems it might crop up in your photon calibration which
- 41:57Speaker 2: gets propagated to your Higgs Boson calibration. And it's all
- 42:01Speaker 2: because this number means a lot, as you were saying earlier,
- 42:04Speaker 2: like the Higgs bison could have been heavier, it could
- 42:06Speaker 2: have been lighter. It was a little bit of a
- 42:08Speaker 2: surprise to some people that it was so light, because remember,
- 42:12Speaker 2: those two numbers have to somehow balance each other out,
- 42:15Speaker 2: like a huge, big random positive number and a huge,
- 42:18Speaker 2: big random negative number somehow almost cancel out to give
- 42:21Speaker 2: this slightly positive number. And there's some folks out there
- 42:24Speaker 2: who were thinking that those numbers are never going to
- 42:26Speaker 2: cancel out, that they were going to give us a
- 42:29Speaker 2: huge number, like something so big we would never see
- 42:31Speaker 2: it in the large Hadron colliner.
- 42:33Speaker 1: So it was lighter than people expected. They thought it
- 42:36Speaker 1: was going to be even more huge.
- 42:38Speaker 2: Yeah, some people thought it was going to be really huge.
- 42:40Speaker 2: Other people have ideas to explain that sort of apparent coincidence.
- 42:43Speaker 2: They say, well, maybe there is a connection between all
- 42:46Speaker 2: the particles that are making the Higgs heavier and all
- 42:48Speaker 2: the particles that are making the Higgs lighter. Maybe there's
- 42:50Speaker 2: like a balance in the universe, a symmetry that says
- 42:53Speaker 2: for every particle that's making the Higgs heavier, there has
- 42:55Speaker 2: to be one making the Higgs lighter, and that's why
- 42:58Speaker 2: these two things cancel each other out. Maybe there are
- 43:00Speaker 2: a whole bunch of other particles out there and then
- 43:03Speaker 2: just sort of like magically balancing everything that we have seen.
- 43:06Speaker 2: And that's a theory called supersymmetry. It says to make
- 43:09Speaker 2: those two different contributions balance and keep the Higgs field
- 43:12Speaker 2: very very light. So for some people when we saw
- 43:15Speaker 2: the Higgs boson mass, was you think it's kind of heavy.
- 43:17Speaker 2: Some people think it's kind of light. Actually, they thought
- 43:20Speaker 2: maybe this is a hint that there are these super
- 43:22Speaker 2: symmetric fields out there.
- 43:24Speaker 1: Could the Higgs boson have had zero mass? Was that
- 43:27Speaker 1: a possibility when you went into it, or did the
- 43:29Speaker 1: Peter Higgs theory say it had to have some mass.
- 43:32Speaker 2: It could have had zero mass. That is a possibility,
- 43:34Speaker 2: But you know, then it would have been pretty easy
- 43:36Speaker 2: to find because it would have been very easy to create,
- 43:40Speaker 2: and early searches for the Higgs bosons in the seventies,
- 43:42Speaker 2: for example, ruled that out pretty quickly. So by the
- 43:45Speaker 2: time we turned on the Large Hadron collider, we already
- 43:47Speaker 2: knew the Higgs Boson had to be heavier than like
- 43:49Speaker 2: one hundred and fifteen or so gv because remember, there
- 43:53Speaker 2: was another collider in the nineties which ran into the
- 43:55Speaker 2: early two thousands called the LP Large Electron possit Tron Collider,
- 44:01Speaker 2: and that one would have found the Higgs boson if
- 44:03Speaker 2: it was up to about one hundred and fourteen GeV.
- 44:06Speaker 1: All right, well, then what does it mean that it
- 44:08Speaker 1: has the mass that it has. What does it mean
- 44:10Speaker 1: for the future, I guess, or our understanding of the
- 44:13Speaker 1: models of the universe.
- 44:14Speaker 2: Right now, it means that there's no specific evidence for
- 44:16Speaker 2: other particles out there. Like if the Higgs boson had
- 44:19Speaker 2: had some very crazy heavy mass, it would mean, oh,
- 44:22Speaker 2: it's getting influenced by another particle out there that's making
- 44:25Speaker 2: it heavier, a particle we haven't seen yet. So in
- 44:27Speaker 2: that way, like making a very precise measurement at the
- 44:29Speaker 2: Higgs Boson mass is a great way to test our understanding,
- 44:32Speaker 2: you know, because these things are all connected. You might
- 44:35Speaker 2: remember that there was a very precise measurement at the
- 44:37Speaker 2: w Boson mass last year. They gave a very weird result,
- 44:40Speaker 2: a result that didn't agree with all of our calculations,
- 44:43Speaker 2: and these are all tightly coupled, the W the top
- 44:45Speaker 2: the Higgs. If you change one of them, it changes
- 44:47Speaker 2: all the other ones. So getting a weird value for
- 44:50Speaker 2: the W mass means maybe there's something else going on
- 44:52Speaker 2: out there. So that's why it's important to get a
- 44:55Speaker 2: very precise measurement. It's like without creating those new particles,
- 44:58Speaker 2: you can be sensitive to their existence, which is a
- 45:00Speaker 2: pretty cool way to explore the universe indirectly. It's also
- 45:04Speaker 2: relevant to the question of whether the Higgs field is stable.
- 45:08Speaker 2: How the Higgs interacts with itself changes how stable the
- 45:12Speaker 2: Higgs field is, and that's connected to the Higgs mass,
- 45:15Speaker 2: But the Higgs boson also, because it couples to itself,
- 45:18Speaker 2: its mass effects whether might collapse, and if Higgs field
- 45:21Speaker 2: collapses it changes the whole structure of the universe and
- 45:24Speaker 2: our whole experience. So measuring the Higgs boson mass tells
- 45:28Speaker 2: us whether or not the Higgs field is likely to
- 45:30Speaker 2: be stable or unstable.
- 45:32Speaker 1: M you say that, it also tells you whether there
- 45:35Speaker 1: are more particles out there. So if you have this
- 45:37Speaker 1: measurement down pretty good, does that mean that you don't
- 45:40Speaker 1: think there are other particles out there yet to discover.
- 45:43Speaker 1: You think we've maybe discovered them all.
- 45:45Speaker 2: Well, if you can where this recent measurement of the
- 45:47Speaker 2: W mass by CDF, the one that says that everything
- 45:49Speaker 2: is out of whack and the things don't agree, then
- 45:52Speaker 2: everything agrees pretty nicely. At the top, the W, and
- 45:54Speaker 2: the Higgs are all consistent with each other, and that
- 45:57Speaker 2: means that there isn't evidence for anything new out there yet.
- 46:00Speaker 2: Other hand, it leaves this question unanswered of why the
- 46:03Speaker 2: top and the W and all that stuff add up
- 46:05Speaker 2: to give a Higgs that's so light, Like I said,
- 46:07Speaker 2: just a coincidence. The masses of these particles are tuned
- 46:10Speaker 2: to one part in ten to the ten, so that
- 46:12Speaker 2: the Higgs boson just happens to come out to be
- 46:14Speaker 2: this very small number. It seems like too big a coincidence,
- 46:17Speaker 2: and so we're looking for another explanation. And another explanation
- 46:21Speaker 2: might be other particles out there that like help balance
- 46:24Speaker 2: the Higgs boson mass, but we just don't know so far.
- 46:27Speaker 1: All right, Well, I guess stay tuned. You have the
- 46:30Speaker 1: large Headron collider. You just upgraded it, right, you're running
- 46:32Speaker 1: that maybe faster than it had been before.
- 46:35Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. We're getting more and more collisions every time,
- 46:38Speaker 2: and more protons in every collision, and we're going to
- 46:41Speaker 2: run it for another ten issue, and we're going to
- 46:43Speaker 2: run it for decades longer and collect huge piles of
- 46:46Speaker 2: events and sift through them for evidence to see if
- 46:48Speaker 2: the Higgs is doing something weird, because we can measure
- 46:51Speaker 2: the higgs boson mass in all sorts of different ways
- 46:53Speaker 2: when it decaysed to photons, or in it decays to
- 46:55Speaker 2: bottom quarks or in the case to w bosons, and
- 46:58Speaker 2: we can also compare those against each other. Does the
- 47:00Speaker 2: Higgs look heavier when it turns into a photon or
- 47:03Speaker 2: when it turns into quarks, or when it turns into w's.
- 47:05Speaker 2: If there's any disagreement there, that's another hint that something
- 47:08Speaker 2: new is going on.
- 47:09Speaker 1: Wait, the mask can change.
- 47:11Speaker 2: The mass should be the same no matter how you
- 47:13Speaker 2: measure it. It should be the same if it turns
- 47:15Speaker 2: into photons, or if it turns into b's orf it
- 47:17Speaker 2: turns into w's. But if there's something else going on,
- 47:20Speaker 2: if it's not the Higgs that we thought it was,
- 47:22Speaker 2: or if there's more than one higgs, or if there
- 47:24Speaker 2: are other particles getting involved. Then you might measure different
- 47:27Speaker 2: masses in those different decay modes, and that would be
- 47:29Speaker 2: a signed this something else going on you don't understand.
- 47:32Speaker 1: Could be that the Higgs boson is actually made out
- 47:34Speaker 1: of white chocolate, not dark travel.
- 47:37Speaker 2: It's been Santus present to himself all this time.
- 47:40Speaker 1: All this time. That's right, it's the clos hypothesis. Should
- 47:45Speaker 1: have been the clouds field. Yeah, the Clawson, there you go,
- 47:49Speaker 1: the Sandton. All right. Well, a lot of interesting questions
- 47:53Speaker 1: talking about and thinking about in this fundamental particle of
- 47:56Speaker 1: the universe. I guess the next time you step on
- 47:58Speaker 1: a scale, think about you're measuring what your mass is,
- 48:01Speaker 1: and think about how many virtual or real Higgs Bosons
- 48:05Speaker 1: are flying all around you and inside of you.
- 48:07Speaker 2: And how this is just one step in our understanding
- 48:10Speaker 2: of the universe. We have this crazy model we put
- 48:13Speaker 2: together on our heads and it makes predictions and it
- 48:15Speaker 2: has blank spaces in it. Then me go out and
- 48:17Speaker 2: confront the actual universe and see if we can get
- 48:20Speaker 2: this model to describe everything that we experience.
- 48:23Speaker 1: So thanks for joining us, see you next time.
- 48:34Speaker 2: Thanks for listening, and remember that Daniel and Jorge explain
- 48:37Speaker 2: the universe is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts
- 48:41Speaker 2: from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever
- 48:46Speaker 2: you listen to your favorite shows.