Latest / The Vault: The Epstein Files / Mega Edition: The 11th Circuit Ruling Against Courtney Wild And The Dissent By Judge Hull (7/29/26)

Transcript

Mega Edition: The 11th Circuit Ruling Against Courtney Wild And The Dissent By Judge Hull (7/29/26) · The Vault: The Epstein Files

0:01
Speaker 1: So we've been talking a lot about the Department of
0:04
Speaker 1: just Us and their nonsensical internal review that was released
0:11
Speaker 1: to the survivors one week ago today. In fact, well,
0:17
Speaker 1: the question obviously became, what would the Eleventh Circuit Court
0:22
Speaker 1: of Appeals think about this new revelation. Well, it looks
0:27
Speaker 1: like the court is not going to consider this new
0:31
Speaker 1: report in the Epstein case, meaning this new information is
0:36
Speaker 1: not going to be added to what's in front of
0:39
Speaker 1: them already and what's on the docket. Now, why that's
0:43
Speaker 1: the case, I'm not too sure. Maybe this article will
0:47
Speaker 1: clear that up for us. But you would think that
0:52
Speaker 1: a court would want to see all of the information
0:56
Speaker 1: and all of the evidence, right, that would probably be
0:59
Speaker 1: a good idea. No, But again, I'm certainly not a lawyer,
1:03
Speaker 1: and I don't really know how all of this stuff works, right,
1:06
Speaker 1: all of the ins and the outs of this nonsense
1:09
Speaker 1: certainly not my field of expertise, shall we say. And
1:15
Speaker 1: I'm just trying to make heads or tails of it
1:16
Speaker 1: with you folks at the same time. Right, So, I'm
1:19
Speaker 1: guessing the court has some sort of motivation behind it.
1:23
Speaker 1: But from the cheap seats over here and from the
1:27
Speaker 1: peanut gallery, I think it's a travesty that this bit
1:30
Speaker 1: of information wouldn't immediately be rushed onto the docket and
1:34
Speaker 1: into the into the court's records. Right, So let's jump
1:40
Speaker 1: into this article and let's see what they have to say,
1:43
Speaker 1: and let's see if we can clear this up and
1:45
Speaker 1: try to understand what in the hell is going on here.
1:50
Speaker 1: This article is from CBS twelve dot com and the
1:55
Speaker 1: headline is court rejects considering new report in Epstein case.
2:01
Speaker 1: The author of this article is Dara kab And remember
2:05
Speaker 1: when we were talking, we knew that the government, the
2:09
Speaker 1: prosecutor's office and the federal government itself, was against this
2:15
Speaker 1: new evidence being submitted. So it looks like their argument
2:19
Speaker 1: won the day. New information released in a US Department
2:25
Speaker 1: of just US report last week shouldn't be considered in
2:28
Speaker 1: a lawsuit by one of Jeffrey Epstein's survivors that seeks
2:32
Speaker 1: to undo a non prosecution agreement that allowed the notorious
2:36
Speaker 1: sex offender to avoid federal charges, and appeals court ruled wednesday.
2:42
Speaker 1: And again, I don't understand how that could even be possible. Right,
2:47
Speaker 1: if you're going to hear this case, shouldn't you have
2:49
Speaker 1: all of the evidence before you. So when we talked,
2:54
Speaker 1: I figured that the court would totally accept this stuff,
2:58
Speaker 1: this evidence, and I figured with this new evidence that
3:01
Speaker 1: there was a better than good chance that the non
3:04
Speaker 1: prosecution agreement gets overturned. Now, with the court not accepting
3:09
Speaker 1: this stuff, I still think there's a good shot that
3:12
Speaker 1: it gets overturned. But this would this nonsense in this
3:15
Speaker 1: report certainly bolsters the argument that the federal government was
3:21
Speaker 1: negligent at best in their pursuit of justice in regards
3:26
Speaker 1: to Jeffrey Epstein. The Full eleventh the Full eleventh US
3:32
Speaker 1: Circuit Court of Appeals is slated to hear arguments on
3:35
Speaker 1: December third in a lawsuit filed a dozen years ago
3:39
Speaker 1: by Courtney Wilde, a Florida woman who, as a teen
3:43
Speaker 1: was among Epstein's numerous underage sexual abuse survivors. I mean,
3:49
Speaker 1: think about it for a second, right, think about if
3:52
Speaker 1: you were Courtney, how you would feel or any of
3:54
Speaker 1: these girls that were abused by Epstein. And this new
3:58
Speaker 1: information comes out about missing emails, all sorts of other nonsense,
4:04
Speaker 1: time gaps, data gaps, you would think that, you know, hey,
4:07
Speaker 1: this is a good deal, right. The Court's going to
4:09
Speaker 1: want to see this this can only bolster my argument.
4:12
Speaker 1: But again, it just goes to show you that all
4:14
Speaker 1: of the different loopholes and the technicalities and the way
4:20
Speaker 1: they navigate the murky water that is the American judicial system.
4:25
Speaker 1: It's rigged, right, it is completely rigged. The government is
4:28
Speaker 1: never held accountable for anything it does. And here we are.
4:34
Speaker 1: Here we are once again scratching our heads and asking
4:37
Speaker 1: ourselves what the hell is going on with these people.
4:42
Speaker 1: Wild's lawyers this week told the court that the report
4:45
Speaker 1: by the Department of just US's Office of Professional Responsibility,
4:50
Speaker 1: two years in the making, sheds new light on the
4:52
Speaker 1: government's handling of Epstein, a wealthy financier pedophile who owned
4:57
Speaker 1: homes in Florida and elsewhere, and who died in a
5:00
Speaker 1: New York jail last year. Yeah, it most certainly does
5:04
Speaker 1: bring some stuff to light. Right, So again, I just
5:08
Speaker 1: don't understand why it would not be accepted by the
5:14
Speaker 1: court or why they wouldn't consider it. There has to
5:17
Speaker 1: be some sort of legal reason, right, There has to
5:20
Speaker 1: be some sort of I don't know, scope of what
5:25
Speaker 1: they're looking for. Maybe that would be my guess, right,
5:28
Speaker 1: But again, I'm certainly not a lawyer, but I will
5:31
Speaker 1: continue to try and navigate these murky waters and figure
5:35
Speaker 1: it all out with you folks, right, because common sense says,
5:40
Speaker 1: and decency says that the court should accept whatever sort
5:44
Speaker 1: of evidence is being provided, at least you would think, right.
5:51
Speaker 1: Whild is fighting a non prosecution agreement struck by former
5:55
Speaker 1: South Florida US attorney Alex Acosta and as Bosses, who
6:00
Speaker 1: over a decade ago, worked with Epstein's lawyers to craft
6:03
Speaker 1: the deal, allowing Epstein to sidestep federal charges. Under the agreement,
6:08
Speaker 1: Epstein pleaded guilty to two state prostitution charges in Florida,
6:12
Speaker 1: including procuring a minor for sex. Again, really and even
6:18
Speaker 1: with say that was the only charge this guy was
6:21
Speaker 1: ever hit with and there was nothing else that ever
6:23
Speaker 1: came out with Epstein. Imagine you have this charge procuring
6:27
Speaker 1: a minor for sex, and people like Leon Black and
6:31
Speaker 1: you know, Jess Staley and all of these other folks
6:35
Speaker 1: who are in so called polite society, they said, they
6:38
Speaker 1: have the audacity to say, I don't know what Jeffrey
6:41
Speaker 1: Epstein was. The dude was slapped with at the very
6:45
Speaker 1: least a procuring a minor for sex charge, Okay, and
6:49
Speaker 1: went to jail for it. So don't tell us you
6:51
Speaker 1: don't know what he was, you bunch of lion bastards.
6:56
Speaker 1: The plea deal also provided immunity from federal prosecutution for Epstein,
7:01
Speaker 1: four other named co conspirators, and any potential co conspirators.
7:06
Speaker 1: And it's so wild every time we read that, I
7:09
Speaker 1: just shake my head and wonder how in the hell
7:12
Speaker 1: anyone could look at that deal and say it's right,
7:16
Speaker 1: say that it passes the sniff test. It does not.
7:22
Speaker 1: It smells to high heaven, And nobody else ever in
7:25
Speaker 1: the history of America. Think about that for a minute.
7:28
Speaker 1: All of the scum baggery we've had go on in
7:30
Speaker 1: our two hundred and fifty plus, no one else has
7:33
Speaker 1: ever caught themselves such a sweetheart deal like the one
7:37
Speaker 1: Epstein caught. And what did he catch it for? He
7:40
Speaker 1: was abusing children, folks. Let that sit in right, Let
7:45
Speaker 1: that sink in for a minute, chew on that, put
7:47
Speaker 1: that in your pipe and smoke it, and then turn
7:51
Speaker 1: your full attention with disgust to the Department of Justice.
7:58
Speaker 1: The full Atlanta based appellate decided to hear arguments in
8:01
Speaker 1: the case after reversing a three judge panels April ruling,
8:06
Speaker 1: The panel concluded that although the facts of the case
8:09
Speaker 1: were beyond scandalous and a national disgrace, the agreement did
8:13
Speaker 1: not violate the federal victim's rights law. Yeah, well, we
8:17
Speaker 1: know how that worked out for the three panel judge,
8:22
Speaker 1: the three judge panel, right. We know that Judge Hull
8:25
Speaker 1: wasn't having it. We know about the amicust briefs, and
8:28
Speaker 1: we know that Judge Hull's response was so fiery that
8:32
Speaker 1: the court decided to hear it with a fully unpaneled bench.
8:39
Speaker 1: And it is a travesty, honestly that it's come to
8:43
Speaker 1: this far. This should have been able to be handled
8:47
Speaker 1: in a lower court. It shouldn't even have been kicked
8:49
Speaker 1: up to an appeals court. What sort of judge can
8:53
Speaker 1: look at this? You know? The thing about it too,
8:56
Speaker 1: is they'll sit there and they'll talk about, oh, this
8:59
Speaker 1: is the law, this is the law, this is this
9:01
Speaker 1: is that. But at the same time they'll let their
9:05
Speaker 1: politics dictate the way they are, the way they make
9:08
Speaker 1: their judgments from the bench, how they read the Constitution,
9:12
Speaker 1: how they read the law. But in cases like this,
9:15
Speaker 1: when it's obvious these people are scumbags, it's obvious the
9:20
Speaker 1: federal government shit the bed. It's obvious the federal government
9:25
Speaker 1: worked on almost on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein against these girls.
9:30
Speaker 1: And you would think, after all these years, with all
9:34
Speaker 1: of this publicity and the spotlight turned on it, that
9:37
Speaker 1: now would be the time to start restoring our faith
9:41
Speaker 1: in the Department of just Us. But instead it seems
9:45
Speaker 1: like we get more bullshit games. Huh. The Eleventh Circuit
9:53
Speaker 1: on the Eleventh Circuit on Wednesday refused Wilde's request to
9:56
Speaker 1: add the two hundred and eighty seven page report to
9:59
Speaker 1: the case record, saying the court's reconsideration of the case
10:02
Speaker 1: was limited too limited to two issues, whether the Victim's
10:07
Speaker 1: Rights Act applies before charges are filed against a defendant,
10:11
Speaker 1: and if so, whether violations of the Act can be
10:15
Speaker 1: enforced with an independent court action. All right, so there's
10:20
Speaker 1: the reasoning behind it. It's the scope. It's the scope
10:24
Speaker 1: of what they're looking at. But I still don't think
10:27
Speaker 1: that's acceptable, to be honest with you, increase your scope.
10:30
Speaker 1: You're a federal court, you're an appellate court, you're one
10:33
Speaker 1: of the highest courts in the land. Do what you
10:36
Speaker 1: gotta do to make sure you have this information, right.
10:40
Speaker 1: I would think that if you're sitting on this panel
10:44
Speaker 1: of judges, you would want everything in front of you.
10:47
Speaker 1: I know I would. I mean, when we're talking about
10:49
Speaker 1: something as serious as the law and possibly sending people
10:53
Speaker 1: to prison for their whole lives, I would think that
10:57
Speaker 1: every single bit of information should be digested by those
11:00
Speaker 1: who are going to render such a decision. That is
11:05
Speaker 1: a great amount of power and a great amount of responsibility.
11:10
Speaker 1: You would want to have everything lined up right, everything
11:14
Speaker 1: in context. But I guess, according to the court, it's
11:20
Speaker 1: not within the scope. Although the court rejected the admission
11:28
Speaker 1: of the report, Wilde's legal team remained upbeat. Well that's
11:33
Speaker 1: a positive, right, if the legal team remained upbeat, and
11:36
Speaker 1: they would know all of this, you know the nuance
11:40
Speaker 1: of all of this way better than I am. Again,
11:42
Speaker 1: I'm certainly no lawyer, folks. I'm just, you know, just
11:45
Speaker 1: a knucklehead who's a commentating on what's going on here.
11:50
Speaker 1: So if her legal team remains upbeat, then at least
11:53
Speaker 1: that's a little bit of silver lining in the cloud here.
11:57
Speaker 1: We're actually pleased that today's ruling the case down to
12:01
Speaker 1: two issues, because we think those are two issues where
12:04
Speaker 1: the statute and the legislative history making it absolutely clear
12:09
Speaker 1: that the survivor should prevail in this case. University of
12:13
Speaker 1: Utah law professor Paul Cassell, who joined Fort Lauderdale attorney
12:17
Speaker 1: Brad Edwards in Wilde's legal battle shortly after our lawsuit
12:22
Speaker 1: was filed twelve years ago, told the New Service of
12:24
Speaker 1: Florida in a phone interview Wednesday. So, I think that
12:29
Speaker 1: they might be onto something there right. If the court
12:33
Speaker 1: is going to just strictly look at that's that particular
12:37
Speaker 1: part of the case and that is the scope and
12:40
Speaker 1: the only thing that matters here for which they are
12:43
Speaker 1: going to make a ruling, then I think the survivors
12:46
Speaker 1: have a strong case no matter what. And I think
12:49
Speaker 1: Courtney has a very strong case here. I don't see
12:52
Speaker 1: how this appellate court could look at this and say
12:56
Speaker 1: that this is all above board and that this should
12:59
Speaker 1: not be overturned. I think that Judge Hull, again, who
13:06
Speaker 1: had the fiery response to her colleagues on the three
13:09
Speaker 1: person panel after they ruled in favor of the government,
13:13
Speaker 1: I think Judge Hull is going to be very critical
13:16
Speaker 1: of everything coming across her desk, for sure, And I
13:19
Speaker 1: am almost positive that she has multiple colleagues that will
13:23
Speaker 1: feel the same way. This is a travesty. The very
13:26
Speaker 1: people who wrote this law wrote amicist briefs telling the
13:31
Speaker 1: court that they were not using the law how it
13:34
Speaker 1: was written. How much more clear is it than that?
13:42
Speaker 1: The report found that Acosta used poor judgment in striking
13:46
Speaker 1: the non prosecution agreement with Epstein's lawyers, showed that the
13:50
Speaker 1: government failed to provide documents to Wild's attorneys, and revealed
13:53
Speaker 1: the Justice Department's views on how Acosta treated Epstein's survivors,
13:58
Speaker 1: an element that plays a critical role in Wilde's lawsuit.
14:02
Speaker 1: For sure, it's a pattern. It just shows a pattern
14:06
Speaker 1: of how these gals were treated and how Courtney was treated. Right,
14:10
Speaker 1: there's no reason that the lawyers should have to wait
14:13
Speaker 1: ten years to know about a gap in emails. Why
14:16
Speaker 1: isn't the government being transparent? And I don't even want
14:19
Speaker 1: to hear about no glitch or no coincidence. Every time
14:22
Speaker 1: I hear the word glitch er coincidence in this case,
14:25
Speaker 1: it makes my skin crawl. At this point, I mean,
14:31
Speaker 1: you know, how much are you how much shit are
14:33
Speaker 1: you going to shovel us and expect us just to
14:36
Speaker 1: accept it and suck it down, because enough is enough
14:40
Speaker 1: at this point. Acosta served for two years as Secretary
14:47
Speaker 1: of Labor and President Donald Trump's administration, but he resigned
14:50
Speaker 1: last year amid criticism of his handling of the Epstein agreement.
14:54
Speaker 1: And again, look, Acosta deserved to resign. He didn't even
14:58
Speaker 1: deserve a place at the table when it comes to
15:01
Speaker 1: being involved in a president's cabinet. But we know that
15:06
Speaker 1: Trump has not shown the greatest judgment when it comes
15:10
Speaker 1: to having Epstein's buddies around them. Dershowitz Manutchin. I mean,
15:14
Speaker 1: you know, so part for the course there, But in
15:17
Speaker 1: a perfect world, Acosta would have never had a seat
15:20
Speaker 1: at the table. With that said, anyone who's just looking
15:25
Speaker 1: to pin this on Acosta, and anybody who thinks it's
15:29
Speaker 1: just Acosta who is making these decisions is doing a
15:33
Speaker 1: disservice to the overall investigation and is not digging deep enough.
15:43
Speaker 1: And addendum to the report revealed a data gap in
15:46
Speaker 1: Acosta's email inbox from May two thousand and seven through
15:50
Speaker 1: April two thousand and eight, the exact time period mister
15:53
Speaker 1: Acosta was most deeply involved in negotiating and approving the
15:58
Speaker 1: Epstein NPA non prosecution agreement. Wild's lawyers wrote in emotion
16:03
Speaker 1: filed this week one it is beyond a coincidence at
16:10
Speaker 1: this point. It is beyond strange. Okay, if you're looking
16:14
Speaker 1: at a building and you see, you know, smoke coming
16:17
Speaker 1: out of a window, chances are there's going to be fire.
16:22
Speaker 1: And that's what we have here. There's a lot of
16:25
Speaker 1: things that don't add up, and there's a lot of
16:28
Speaker 1: things that they would want us to believe as coincidence
16:32
Speaker 1: that I have a very very hard time buying. Government
16:39
Speaker 1: lawyers who opposed inclusion of the report in the lawsuit
16:42
Speaker 1: have raised a whole flurry of other objections against getting
16:45
Speaker 1: to the merits of the issues in the case, Cassel said,
16:49
Speaker 1: And of course the government lawyers are going to be smarmy.
16:51
Speaker 1: They're going harder against the survivors than they did against Epstein.
16:55
Speaker 1: It's a travesty to watch, right. It really is disgusting
16:59
Speaker 1: and disheart and almost discouraging to watch shit like this occur.
17:03
Speaker 1: And then what can you do about it? All we
17:06
Speaker 1: can do about it is vote out all scumbags, all incumbents, really,
17:11
Speaker 1: because when I say scumbag, that's what I mean. And
17:14
Speaker 1: send real people to DC. There has to be some
17:17
Speaker 1: sort of term limits. There has to be a limit
17:19
Speaker 1: on money coming in or actually zero money coming in
17:22
Speaker 1: from out of states for campaigns. There's a whole bunch
17:25
Speaker 1: of shit that we can do, but yet we don't
17:27
Speaker 1: ever push the issue. We just keep sending the same
17:31
Speaker 1: retreads back and back and back and back, and then
17:34
Speaker 1: when shit goes south, we wonder, whoa, whoa, what the hell?
17:37
Speaker 1: What happened? Well, we set the same morons back to DC.
17:40
Speaker 1: What do you think is gonna happen? And that's what
17:42
Speaker 1: we see here. We need to send better quality people
17:45
Speaker 1: with morals to Washington, DC so we can get some
17:49
Speaker 1: quality lawmakers to write some quality laws. Wouldn't that be
17:52
Speaker 1: nice for a change, folks. But if the Eleventh Circuit
17:58
Speaker 1: sides with wild on the alleged violations of the victim
18:01
Speaker 1: rights law, the missing emails and other information in the
18:05
Speaker 1: report are immediately ripe for consideration by the court. So
18:10
Speaker 1: all right, that's promising as well. If they side with
18:15
Speaker 1: Courtney and they feel like the government screwed up, which
18:18
Speaker 1: they should, then these reports and the missing emails and
18:23
Speaker 1: all the other garbage automatically becomes ripe, meaning the court
18:29
Speaker 1: will be interested in it very much so, and we'll
18:34
Speaker 1: probably get to see it be included from that point on.
18:39
Speaker 1: But again that means the Eleventh Circuit has to side
18:42
Speaker 1: with Courtney first, right, So one battle out of time,
18:45
Speaker 1: one step out of time. One thing I've learned in
18:47
Speaker 1: this case is every single time you think that you're
18:50
Speaker 1: ahead in the count, they come back with some sort
18:53
Speaker 1: of curveball and it becomes a full count once again.
18:58
Speaker 1: After more than a decade of mitigation, US District Judge
19:01
Speaker 1: Kenneth Mahra ruled in February twenty nineteen that federal prosecutors
19:07
Speaker 1: broke the law when they struck the plea deal with
19:09
Speaker 1: a multimillionaire. But after Epstein died last year, the federal
19:14
Speaker 1: judge refused to undo the plea agreement or grant other
19:17
Speaker 1: remedies sought by Wild who filed the lawsuits as Jane
19:21
Speaker 1: Doe and another victim. So it's pretty interesting, huh. After
19:27
Speaker 1: this stuff gets in February, it's you know, ruled that
19:34
Speaker 1: the government broke the law when they struck this deal
19:38
Speaker 1: with Epstein, meaning that the NPA was in serious jeopardy.
19:42
Speaker 1: And then Epstein just happens to get arrested and then
19:44
Speaker 1: kills himself. Huh, pretty interesting how that happens. Just another coincidence,
19:48
Speaker 1: I would guess, though, right stops. Don't think it's don't
19:51
Speaker 1: think he got murdered. He could never have gotten murdered,
19:55
Speaker 1: obviously of suicide. Man Bill Barr told us in so
19:58
Speaker 1: no name medical exacts from New York too. Okay, yeah,
20:03
Speaker 1: I'm buying that the Act promise Miss Wilde and other
20:08
Speaker 1: survivors the chance to confer with the prosecutor before any
20:11
Speaker 1: deal was done. That's what Judge Morrow ruled. So if
20:15
Speaker 1: we prevail, what we think should happen is the deal
20:17
Speaker 1: should be invalidated, including the immunity provision, which gives immunity
20:22
Speaker 1: not just to the now deceased Jeffrey Epstein, but his
20:25
Speaker 1: co conspirators. Cassell, a former federal judge, said Wednesday. And
20:30
Speaker 1: it's important, right because it opens up a slew of
20:34
Speaker 1: well documented crimes. Then right now prosecutors are putting together
20:38
Speaker 1: other crimes that might not have been made public or
20:41
Speaker 1: on the books, whatever may have you. But if this
20:44
Speaker 1: NPA goes by the wayside, there's decades of information already
20:48
Speaker 1: compiled that can be automatically weaponized. So it's very crucial
20:53
Speaker 1: that this Eleventh Circuit Court decision comes down on the
20:57
Speaker 1: side of justice. And if it doesn't, I would hope
21:00
Speaker 1: and I would urge the survivors lawyers to push this
21:03
Speaker 1: shit all the way to the Supreme Court. It's that important.
21:08
Speaker 1: After the earlier plea agreement on state charges, Epstein was
21:12
Speaker 1: arrested in July twenty nineteen and charged with federal sex
21:16
Speaker 1: trafficking offenses involving minor girls from Florida and other places.
21:21
Speaker 1: He was found dead in a jail cell a month
21:23
Speaker 1: later in what was deemed the suicide. In addition to Epstein,
21:27
Speaker 1: the agreement provided immunity to four women, Sarah Kellen, Adrianna Ross,
21:33
Speaker 1: Leslie Groff, Nadia Marsonkova, and other unidentified people. So the
21:38
Speaker 1: Core four plus more is what I'm calling all of them. Now.
21:45
Speaker 1: Originally I dubbed the four. I just named the Corps four,
21:48
Speaker 1: but everyone else added in. Now that's the Core four
21:51
Speaker 1: and more because you know where I'm coming from. All
21:56
Speaker 1: of these people need to get a big fat helping
22:00
Speaker 1: of RICO. That needs to happen asap, and this prosecution
22:06
Speaker 1: agreement is certainly an impediment in that occurring, it has
22:09
Speaker 1: to go by the wayside. Wilde is hoping the court
22:14
Speaker 1: will revoke the agreement so she can work with federal
22:17
Speaker 1: prosecutors to go after the conspirators who help Jeffrey Epstein
22:21
Speaker 1: abuse her in Florida, said Cassel, a former federal prosecutor.
22:25
Speaker 1: So we're hoping to get a recision of the immunity
22:27
Speaker 1: provision in the non prosecution agreement. Bam. That would be epic.
22:35
Speaker 1: And I think that it would be nice if the
22:37
Speaker 1: Eleventh Circuit Court would accept all of the evidence that
22:42
Speaker 1: has been compiled. Don't you think that would be uh prudent,
22:46
Speaker 1: even if it means they have to push the hearing
22:49
Speaker 1: back of a week or two or three weeks to
22:52
Speaker 1: get their ducks in a row. I don't understand why
22:55
Speaker 1: the court would have rejected. Still, I get at the scope,
22:57
Speaker 1: and I understand the legal ease of it. What I'm saying,
23:01
Speaker 1: the citizen in me, the taxpayer in me, the pissed off,
23:06
Speaker 1: agitated taxpayer in me, does not understand. However, so we'll
23:13
Speaker 1: see how this plays out. December third is a big day.
23:17
Speaker 1: Circle it on your calendar. I'll be calling in obviously
23:20
Speaker 1: to listen to the proceedings if that's possible. Like it
23:23
Speaker 1: has been in PRESCA and Judge Nathan's courtrooms, I'm guessing
23:29
Speaker 1: it's the same procedure here, So I will definitely be
23:32
Speaker 1: calling in and listening to what goes on when they
23:36
Speaker 1: make the They hear these oral arguments on December third.
23:40
Speaker 1: So there you have it, folks, that answers our question
23:44
Speaker 1: about the Department of Justice report and if the Eleventh
23:49
Speaker 1: Circuit of Appeals was going to bring that onto their
23:56
Speaker 1: plate as well. And the answer that we have received
23:59
Speaker 1: to this point point sounds like a no. If you'd
24:03
Speaker 1: like to contact me, you could do that at Bobby
24:05
Speaker 1: Kapuci at ProtonMail dot com. That's Bobby c ap u
24:10
Speaker 1: c Ci at ProtonMail dot com. You can also find
24:14
Speaker 1: me on Twitter at Bobby Underscore c ap u Cci.
24:20
Speaker 1: All of the links that go at this episode can
24:23
Speaker 1: be found in the description box and add some more
24:26
Speaker 1: context to the whole story today and we're gonna see
24:28
Speaker 1: what Colin Kombocker and Lawn Crime has to say about
24:31
Speaker 1: this whole entire Sword and ordeal. So, like I said,
24:35
Speaker 1: this article is from Law on Crime. The author is
24:38
Speaker 1: Colin Kombocker, and the headline is Judge Penns scathing descent
24:43
Speaker 1: blasting federal court for ruling against Jeffrey Epstein survivors. A
24:49
Speaker 1: federal court sent a clear message to survivors of dead
24:51
Speaker 1: pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, which is best summarized as follows. Sorry,
24:56
Speaker 1: but the law says you don't really matter. Wow. That's
25:00
Speaker 1: powerful stuff in the opening statement, right the first paragraph,
25:03
Speaker 1: basically laying it out on the line what we've all
25:05
Speaker 1: been talking about for months and months and years for
25:08
Speaker 1: some of us, that the victims and the survivors of
25:12
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein, in the eyes of the court, they don't matter.
25:15
Speaker 1: They're just collateral damage. And how many times are we
25:19
Speaker 1: going to see Jeffrey Epstein's people, Jeffrey Epstein himself, etc. Etc.
25:25
Speaker 1: Be able to skate on, skate through justice because of
25:28
Speaker 1: their ties, because of their connections, because of their power,
25:30
Speaker 1: because their lawyers know how to play the game and
25:33
Speaker 1: navigate the two tier justice system. How long are we
25:36
Speaker 1: going to see that before we all stand up at
25:38
Speaker 1: the same time and say enough is enough. In a
25:43
Speaker 1: two to one opinion issued by the US Court of
25:45
Speaker 1: Appeals for the eleventh Circuit Court on Tuesday, survivor Courtney
25:49
Speaker 1: Wilde was denied the opportunity to challenge the government's handling
25:53
Speaker 1: of a controversial sweetheart deal gifted to Epstein in several
25:57
Speaker 1: of his alleged child sex predator co conspirators by the
26:00
Speaker 1: US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida in
26:03
Speaker 1: two thousand seven. I mean, how did the two judges
26:09
Speaker 1: that ruled against Courtney wild and the survivors and basically
26:13
Speaker 1: against the rule of law, how do they look at
26:15
Speaker 1: themselves in the mirror? How did they look at themselves
26:17
Speaker 1: at night? Because anyone with half a brain understands how
26:21
Speaker 1: terrible of a decision this was, And even their colleague
26:25
Speaker 1: that was sitting with them understands how terrible of a
26:28
Speaker 1: decision this was. And again I don't mean to harp
26:31
Speaker 1: on it. I'm certainly not an ageisty by any means,
26:34
Speaker 1: but a ninety year old man has no business sitting
26:37
Speaker 1: on the Court of Appeals. Okay, ninety years old, retire buddy,
26:40
Speaker 1: pack it in. Despite our sympathy for miss Wilde and
26:46
Speaker 1: others like her who suffered unspeakable horror at Epstein's hands,
26:50
Speaker 1: only to be left in the dark, and so it
26:52
Speaker 1: seems affirmatively misled by government lawyers. We find ourselves constrained
26:58
Speaker 1: to deny her petition. Ruing notes, It's not a result
27:01
Speaker 1: we like, but it's the result we think the law requires.
27:04
Speaker 1: Well what does that tell you? Okay, what does that
27:07
Speaker 1: tell you? The law is f't. Okay, the justice system f't.
27:11
Speaker 1: All of it is f It's time for a reboot. Okay,
27:16
Speaker 1: control all delete this m effort because it's not working.
27:19
Speaker 1: The operating system is jacked. Okay, enough is enough. It's
27:22
Speaker 1: time to revisit what our justice system is and what
27:26
Speaker 1: it's supposed to be, and it's time to really search
27:30
Speaker 1: for justice within it instead of finding ways to keep
27:33
Speaker 1: your friends out of trouble. And again, that's why these
27:36
Speaker 1: laws are written the way they are by their friends
27:38
Speaker 1: in Congress and the Senate. Oh yeah, let's make sure
27:40
Speaker 1: we have these laws written so that we know that
27:43
Speaker 1: we ever get in trouble, we have some loopholes to
27:44
Speaker 1: get ourselves out of it. I'm tired of it. I'm
27:48
Speaker 1: sick of it. And it's both sides of the aisle
27:50
Speaker 1: that play this game, all right, Save the partisanship, save
27:53
Speaker 1: the tribalism. It's both sides of the aisle that are
27:56
Speaker 1: at fault here. And unless we get away from the
27:59
Speaker 1: whole true bibilism. Your team, my team, we're never going
28:02
Speaker 1: to be able to hold these people to account, all right,
28:05
Speaker 1: So shelve all of your your political biases, shelve all
28:10
Speaker 1: of your I hate this person because he's rord, and
28:16
Speaker 1: man up. It's time to get focused on what really matters.
28:19
Speaker 1: And what really matters is bringing these people to justice,
28:22
Speaker 1: no matter who they are, no matter who they represent,
28:25
Speaker 1: and no matter what side of the aisle they sit on.
28:29
Speaker 1: And if the justice system and these judges don't do
28:33
Speaker 1: the right thing, then it is up to us, as
28:35
Speaker 1: the populace, as the people, the citizenry, to remove them.
28:42
Speaker 1: The scathing descent, which is as long as the opinion
28:44
Speaker 1: itself from US Circuit Judge Frank M. Hall tears into
28:48
Speaker 1: the majority of its novel interpretation that Crime Victims Rights
28:53
Speaker 1: Act of two thousand and four does not apply unless
28:56
Speaker 1: and until a formal indictment is filed in a court. Yeah,
28:59
Speaker 1: it's just another loophole. It's just another loophole. They know
29:02
Speaker 1: that the government had the goods on Epstein these judges
29:05
Speaker 1: have access to all of that shit, and instead they
29:08
Speaker 1: chose to ignore it. Instead, they chose to make this
29:10
Speaker 1: weak ass, limp wristed interpretation of the law. What a
29:15
Speaker 1: bunch of gross, disgusting excuses for human beings. Hull explains
29:22
Speaker 1: that the plain text of the CVRA actually does not
29:25
Speaker 1: contain any sort of limiting language that negates or otherwise
29:29
Speaker 1: conditions the rights of victims based on whether or not
29:33
Speaker 1: an indictment or court proceeding is ever commenced. The judge
29:37
Speaker 1: titally notes, in fact, the cvra's venue provision in three
29:43
Speaker 1: seven seven to one D expressly provides that if no
29:46
Speaker 1: prosecution is underway, the victims can file suit to assert
29:51
Speaker 1: their Subsection A rights in the district court in the
29:54
Speaker 1: district in which the crime occurred. In filing this lawsuit
29:57
Speaker 1: back in two thousand and eight, the petitioner crime victims
30:00
Speaker 1: did what the CVRA expressly authorized them to do, and
30:05
Speaker 1: of course, the octogenarian on the bench and the Harvard
30:11
Speaker 1: Law School graduate decided that their interpretation of the law
30:15
Speaker 1: is more important than actually what the law says. Like usual,
30:19
Speaker 1: these people, these judges, they are completely and utterly corrupt
30:23
Speaker 1: with power Hall also rubbishes the ruling for using florid
30:29
Speaker 1: language in the place of justice for Epstein's victims. She
30:32
Speaker 1: brutally mocks the majority's use of sad sounding floral prose
30:36
Speaker 1: as little more than reptile's lament wow. The majority also
30:41
Speaker 1: dresses up its flawed statutory analysis with the rhetorical floorish,
30:45
Speaker 1: using language like scandalous, national disgrace and the sad details
30:50
Speaker 1: of this shameful story, while also expressing sincere empathy for
30:54
Speaker 1: the victims. The Majority confesses that it isn't lost on
30:58
Speaker 1: us that our decision leaves Petition and others like her
31:01
Speaker 1: largely empty handed, and we sincerely regret that. In addition
31:05
Speaker 1: to ruminating in sincere regret and sympathy, we as federal
31:08
Speaker 1: judges should also enforce the plain text of the cv RA,
31:13
Speaker 1: which we are bound to do, and ensure that these
31:16
Speaker 1: crime victims have the CVRA rights that Congress has granted them.
31:22
Speaker 1: And what I will say about this dissenting letter, and
31:25
Speaker 1: how how viciously she is dissenting the other judge in
31:31
Speaker 1: the case, what it does. It really gives Bradley Edwards
31:35
Speaker 1: and the lawyers another route to take it higher right
31:39
Speaker 1: to convene the whole entire Eleventh Circuit and get a
31:42
Speaker 1: full ruling on this, because there's more here, and we
31:45
Speaker 1: can't let a ninety year old, a man who probably look,
31:49
Speaker 1: I'm not trying to be an asshole here, Okay, he
31:51
Speaker 1: probably doesn't have all of his faculties still ninety years old.
31:54
Speaker 1: Come on, and a Harvard Lagrad who who knows if
31:58
Speaker 1: he ever benefited from Jeffrey Epps Dean's money. Who the
32:00
Speaker 1: hell knows these Harvard guys. I don't trust any of
32:02
Speaker 1: them at this point. So this is just this is
32:07
Speaker 1: just crazy. This whole entire ruling is crazy. And the fact,
32:12
Speaker 1: the one good fact out of it, though, is that
32:13
Speaker 1: the third judge, Judge Hall, has dissented, and so viciously
32:17
Speaker 1: because it's going to bring forward the full the convening
32:22
Speaker 1: of the full panel of the Eleventh Circuit Court of
32:25
Speaker 1: Appeals to hear this now. The majority's new blanket restriction
32:31
Speaker 1: eviscerates crime victims cv RA rights and makes the Epstein
32:35
Speaker 1: case a poster child for an entirely different justice system
32:39
Speaker 1: for crime victims of wealthy defendants. Hall, Sombrale warns, Y
32:43
Speaker 1: know this, Judge Hall is becoming one of my favorite
32:46
Speaker 1: people on the planet. She's saying right here that there's
32:48
Speaker 1: a two tier justice system and it's gross, it's a
32:51
Speaker 1: miscarriage of justice, and she'll have no part of it.
32:54
Speaker 1: This judge right here gets it. This is the kind
32:56
Speaker 1: of judge that we need sitting on the bench, a
32:59
Speaker 1: judge that looks at the law for what it is
33:01
Speaker 1: and protects those that she is supposed to protect. And
33:05
Speaker 1: that doesn't mean the rich pedophiles, okay. That means the
33:09
Speaker 1: people who were victimized by these rich pedophiles and then
33:13
Speaker 1: came out on the other end stronger as survivors and
33:17
Speaker 1: with the courage to stand up and say, these people
33:20
Speaker 1: did harm to me, and these other two smarmy ass,
33:24
Speaker 1: disgusting ass judges can't see that. The True, a non
33:31
Speaker 1: podcast which began as a left wing crime podcast dedicated
33:35
Speaker 1: to la affair Epstein, offered the following up shot of
33:38
Speaker 1: the Atlanta, Georgia based courts ruling. This means that everybody
33:42
Speaker 1: even remotely involved with Epstein's massive child sex trafficking operation
33:46
Speaker 1: in Florida is immune from prosecution. This means pilots Gylaane,
33:51
Speaker 1: his demonic harum, everyone well that may be the case, right,
33:56
Speaker 1: But this case is not just based in Florida, all right.
33:59
Speaker 1: What everyone needs to understand is that the federal government,
34:02
Speaker 1: when they wield power and they go after you, it's
34:06
Speaker 1: not just in one jurisdiction. Jeffrey Epstein's crimes were committed
34:10
Speaker 1: over state lines. There were interstate crimes, there was money
34:14
Speaker 1: longering crimes. There is a whole other aspect to this case.
34:18
Speaker 1: So I'm not too familiar with the True Anon podcast,
34:21
Speaker 1: to be honest with you, but I think their assertion
34:24
Speaker 1: here falls a little flat. And while that might you
34:28
Speaker 1: know that the battle might be an uphill battle in Florida,
34:31
Speaker 1: as in regards to the immunity deal the rest of
34:36
Speaker 1: the country, in New York, Virgin Islands, New Mexico, et cetera,
34:39
Speaker 1: et cetera, it's game on still. Courtney Wilde is one
34:44
Speaker 1: of dozens of underage women, girls really, the court concedes,
34:48
Speaker 1: who were preyed on and trafficked by Epstein and his
34:50
Speaker 1: friends as part of the global elite child sex ring
34:54
Speaker 1: uncovered by the Federal Bureau of Investigations in the early
34:57
Speaker 1: two thousands. Federal prosecutors, however, for reasons unknown, but Wiley
35:01
Speaker 1: presumed to be related to Epstein's alleged status as an
35:04
Speaker 1: intelligence asset. I mean, really, now we have the legacy
35:08
Speaker 1: media talking about it now, folks. Okay, So all of
35:11
Speaker 1: those people that told you you were crazy when we
35:14
Speaker 1: first started this case and we first started following the
35:17
Speaker 1: breadcrumbs that led us to the fact that he was
35:19
Speaker 1: an intelligence asset. All of those people that mocked you
35:23
Speaker 1: and said you were crazy because they didn't see it
35:25
Speaker 1: on CNN or MSNBC or Fox, well, go give them
35:29
Speaker 1: the bird, okay, because once again they're late to the party.
35:32
Speaker 1: Once again they're part of the problem. Quickly dropped the
35:38
Speaker 1: ball and most of the potential charges. Epstein pleaded guilty
35:41
Speaker 1: to two state prostitution offenses in exchange for all of
35:44
Speaker 1: his unnamed co conspirators, receiving an unprecedented and sweeping grant
35:48
Speaker 1: of immunity from federal prosecution. And we've discussed this as well.
35:52
Speaker 1: Usually the only people that get this sort of plea
35:55
Speaker 1: deal are your family members, right, people that are really
35:57
Speaker 1: close to you if you're caught up in something like this.
36:00
Speaker 1: But if you're Jeffrey Epstein and you're navigating the two
36:02
Speaker 1: tier justice system with Alan I kept my pants on.
36:05
Speaker 1: I kept my underpants on. Dershowitz as as the head
36:08
Speaker 1: honcho in your all star court team, Well, this is
36:12
Speaker 1: the result. This is the result. You get sweeping immunity
36:17
Speaker 1: for all of your co conspirators. You only do thirteen months.
36:22
Speaker 1: You know, isn't life great if you're rich. Meanwhile, don't
36:25
Speaker 1: get busted for so called illegal bookmaking. Don't get busted
36:29
Speaker 1: for that, because they're going to drop one hundred and
36:30
Speaker 1: three counts of RICO on you, hoping that only one sticks.
36:33
Speaker 1: And then even if you're seventy years old, they're gonna
36:35
Speaker 1: send you to prison for nine years because you know
36:38
Speaker 1: you're such a threat to society because of your illegal
36:40
Speaker 1: book making operation that you have to go and do
36:42
Speaker 1: nine years. But Jeffrey Epstein, nah thirteen months for a
36:46
Speaker 1: child sex trafficking ring, for rape, for money laundering, for
36:50
Speaker 1: every count under RICO. You can imagine this guy skates
36:53
Speaker 1: while normal people who are just trying to make ends
36:56
Speaker 1: meet maybe get involved in a book making operation. Oh god,
37:00
Speaker 1: they're booking sports. How horrible, And they get nine years
37:05
Speaker 1: nine years because the RICO count says they had a
37:08
Speaker 1: leadership role. Oh and that I mentioned their last name
37:11
Speaker 1: ends in a vow. So if you're Italian and you're
37:13
Speaker 1: involved in a book making operation, automatically you're part of
37:16
Speaker 1: the mafia. But Jeffrey Epstein, bah, come on, no big deal. Stop.
37:21
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein's rich, he gives money to charity. He couldn't
37:24
Speaker 1: be involved in any of this. You're crazy. Yeah, well
37:27
Speaker 1: guess what who's crazy now? All right? This is a
37:32
Speaker 1: far reaching crime that goes to the very top of society.
37:37
Speaker 1: And anybody who is not paying attention, and anybody who's
37:40
Speaker 1: saying differently, well, they're part of the problem. Epstein himself
37:46
Speaker 1: managed to obtain palatial treatment from law enforcement while serving
37:50
Speaker 1: a thirteen month stint in prison with work release. The
37:53
Speaker 1: survivors of the sex trafficking ring, on the other hand,
37:55
Speaker 1: were kept in the dark and lied to by those
37:58
Speaker 1: same federal prosecutors. I mean, if that doesn't enrage you,
38:03
Speaker 1: I don't know what will. These are the same prosecutors
38:06
Speaker 1: that kept the survivors in the dark, that gave Jeffrey
38:10
Speaker 1: Epstein his little palatial deal, his nice little walk in
38:13
Speaker 1: the park deal. How is any of that okay? How
38:16
Speaker 1: are these prosecutors not under the microscope the court's majority
38:22
Speaker 1: opinion notes emphasis and original, and to be clear, the
38:25
Speaker 1: government's efforts seem to have graduated from passive non disclosure
38:29
Speaker 1: to or at least close to active misrepresentation. In January
38:33
Speaker 1: two thousand and eight, for example, approximately four months after
38:37
Speaker 1: finalizing and executing the non prosecution agreement, the government sent
38:41
Speaker 1: a letter to Wilde stating that Epstein's case was currently
38:44
Speaker 1: under investigation, explaining that this can be a lengthy process,
38:48
Speaker 1: and requesting her continued patients while it conducted a thorough investigation.
38:52
Speaker 1: The government sent an identical letter to another victim in
38:55
Speaker 1: May two thousand and eight, some eight months after inking
38:58
Speaker 1: the NPA. So what more does the court need. It's
39:05
Speaker 1: obvious the government was in the wrong here, it's obvious
39:09
Speaker 1: the government screwed up, and it's obvious that the court
39:12
Speaker 1: refuses to acknowledge that if secrecy was the goal, it
39:18
Speaker 1: appears to have been achieved. There is no indication that
39:21
Speaker 1: any of Epstein's survivors were informed about the NPA or
39:25
Speaker 1: his state charges until after he pleaded guilty. The ruling
39:28
Speaker 1: continues on the day that Epstein entered his guilty plea
39:31
Speaker 1: in June two thousand and eight, some but by no
39:34
Speaker 1: means all victims were notified that the federal investigation of
39:37
Speaker 1: Epstein had concluded. Right. How how is that not not
39:43
Speaker 1: enough for the court to overturn the immunity deal. They're
39:51
Speaker 1: saying right here in the ruling that the prosecution was
39:57
Speaker 1: in the wrong, but yet they still rule in their favor.
40:00
Speaker 1: Typical government nonsense. Wilde was one of those who learned
40:07
Speaker 1: about Epstein's white glove treatment by the George W. Bush
40:10
Speaker 1: Department of Justice well after the case was settled. She
40:14
Speaker 1: sued in July two thousand and eight on the theory
40:16
Speaker 1: that her rights under the CVRA were violated by the
40:19
Speaker 1: DOJ's generous deal. Specifically, wild alleged that her rights and
40:23
Speaker 1: the rights of Epstein's other survivors to confer with the
40:26
Speaker 1: attorney for the government in the case and to be
40:29
Speaker 1: treated with fairness and with respect for their dignity and
40:32
Speaker 1: privacy were tossed to the wayside. The Eleventh Circuit majority's
40:37
Speaker 1: opinion throws up its hands. Rights under the CVA do
40:40
Speaker 1: not attach until criminal proceedings have been initiated against the defendant,
40:44
Speaker 1: either by complaint, information or indictment. In the ruling states
40:48
Speaker 1: because the government never filed charges or otherwise commenced criminal
40:51
Speaker 1: proceedings against Epstein. The CVRA was never triggered. In other words,
40:56
Speaker 1: they knew the loopholes, and we know they utilized the loopholes.
41:00
Speaker 1: And now because those loopholes were navigated, you're sol well.
41:04
Speaker 1: I don't accept that, and neither should you. Anyone who
41:07
Speaker 1: expects the rule of law to be upheld should not
41:10
Speaker 1: accept this sort of scumbaggery. Fix these loopholes, and fix them. Now.
41:18
Speaker 1: Hall's descent adamantly just disagrees with that reading of the statute.
41:22
Speaker 1: The majority concludes the CVRA was never triggered at all,
41:26
Speaker 1: even though the US Attorney's Office prepared a fifty three
41:29
Speaker 1: page indictment against Epstein but later secretly entered into a
41:33
Speaker 1: plea deal granting federal immunity to Epstein and his co
41:36
Speaker 1: conspirators whole accounts. According to the majority, because the office
41:40
Speaker 1: cleverly entered into a sweetheart plea deal with Epstein pre
41:43
Speaker 1: charge and never filed the indictment, the victims never had
41:47
Speaker 1: any CVRA rights in the first place. Again, all because
41:51
Speaker 1: I kept my underpants on. Dershowitz knows how to navigate
41:54
Speaker 1: the loopholes. All because his buddies were the ones who
41:57
Speaker 1: wrote the laws. And if you don't think he had
41:59
Speaker 1: any ada access to them while they were writing the laws,
42:01
Speaker 1: you're wrong. Of course he did, while decidedly full of
42:07
Speaker 1: invective and scorn from the majority's use of purple prose
42:10
Speaker 1: as a poor stand in for affirming survivors' rights since
42:13
Speaker 1: federal law. Most of the dissent contents itself to dissect
42:18
Speaker 1: the legalistic tricks used in the ruling to effectively effectively
42:21
Speaker 1: rewrite the statue at issue. This is exactly what I'm
42:25
Speaker 1: talking about. This is putting the two tier justice system
42:30
Speaker 1: on display for you all to see. Okay, this is
42:33
Speaker 1: what I've been railing about for ever since this podcast
42:36
Speaker 1: has started. You or I would never be able to
42:38
Speaker 1: initiate these loopholes. You or I, our lawyers would probably
42:42
Speaker 1: not even know about them, because we can't afford the
42:44
Speaker 1: type of lawyers that know how to navigate the back room,
42:46
Speaker 1: that can walk into a senator's office and sit down
42:49
Speaker 1: with a senator. We don't have that kind of money,
42:51
Speaker 1: We don't have that kind of power. But if you're
42:52
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein and you've made that money illegally and You've
42:55
Speaker 1: made that money with your sex trafficking ring and your
42:58
Speaker 1: money laundering. Game on, game on, the system's yours. The
43:02
Speaker 1: world's your oyster, Jeffrey Epstein. The rest of us should
43:05
Speaker 1: just eat cake. So how in the holy name of
43:10
Speaker 1: plaintext does the majority add such substantive and temporal restrictions
43:15
Speaker 1: on the victims' rights to confer and be treated fairly
43:19
Speaker 1: and hold that victims have no cvr A rights until
43:23
Speaker 1: after the government files an indictment and commences proceedings, Judge
43:27
Speaker 1: Hole asks, before answering, the majority hacks away at the
43:30
Speaker 1: plane text. Yeah, look, I'll tell you what I hope.
43:35
Speaker 1: I really can't wait to see the full Eleventh Court
43:38
Speaker 1: of Appeals and paneled and getting this case because I
43:42
Speaker 1: have a funny feeling that we're gonna have a different result.
43:44
Speaker 1: You see how fiery this dissent was by Judge Hole,
43:47
Speaker 1: somebody that actually gets it, who knows that these guys
43:51
Speaker 1: are gaming the system, and the fact that Newsom and
43:54
Speaker 1: the ninety year old lawyer guide Let's are letting them
43:58
Speaker 1: gain the system like this. It should not go unchecked,
44:01
Speaker 1: it should not go on challenge, and these people should
44:03
Speaker 1: be put on blast. Judges aren't above the law. Right.
44:07
Speaker 1: Judges are just normal people. They got a regular job
44:09
Speaker 1: just like the rest of us. They might be the
44:12
Speaker 1: word of the law inside of that courtroom, but that
44:14
Speaker 1: doesn't mean they're above reproach. That doesn't mean they're above criticism,
44:18
Speaker 1: and that certainly does not mean they're above scrutiny. So
44:22
Speaker 1: all of these judges in these cases who are giving
44:26
Speaker 1: these favorable rulings to these sex trafficking operations, just know
44:30
Speaker 1: that you are on the radar now as well, because
44:32
Speaker 1: this cannot stand. This cannot stand. We cannot have rulings
44:37
Speaker 1: like this in the United States of America that blatantly
44:42
Speaker 1: disregard the rights of people who have been part of
44:46
Speaker 1: a sex trafficking ring. And it's not like this is
44:50
Speaker 1: conjecture at this point. It's not like there's just a
44:52
Speaker 1: little bit of evidence pointing this way. Everybody knows that
44:56
Speaker 1: this was occurring. All of these judges know it was occurring.
44:59
Speaker 1: But because of the loopholes in the two tier justice
45:01
Speaker 1: system here, we are. Enough is enough. We must demand change.
45:07
Speaker 1: We must demand that are elected officials write laws that
45:11
Speaker 1: are equal to everybody. No more of these stupid ass loopholes,
45:16
Speaker 1: No more of these these little buynotes written within the
45:19
Speaker 1: law to get their friends off. None of it. Enough
45:23
Speaker 1: is enough, all right. We're not ruled by an aristocracy.
45:26
Speaker 1: We're not ruled by of royals in America. I mean,
45:29
Speaker 1: I know they think that they're robber barons and they're
45:31
Speaker 1: ruling over us, but that's not the case. None of
45:34
Speaker 1: us here are subjects. Okay, we are all citizens, and
45:37
Speaker 1: it's about time we start acting like it. If you'd
45:40
Speaker 1: like to contact me, you could do that at Bobby
45:42
Speaker 1: Kapucci at ProtonMail dot com. That's Bobby c ap u
45:47
Speaker 1: Cci at ProtonMail dot com. You can also find me
45:50
Speaker 1: on Twitter at Bobby Underscore c ap u c CI.
45:55
Speaker 1: All Right, everybody until