Latest / V / Crybaby Crenshaw’s Latest Meltdown (Ep.147)

Transcript

Crybaby Crenshaw’s Latest Meltdown (Ep.147) · V

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Good morning and welcome to Bongina Report Early Edition. Dan
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: Crenshaw threatens to kill Tucker Carlson. NSA's secret transgender sex
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: chat room is exposed. Anonymous CIA agents threaten treason. HUD
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: TVs feature AI footage of Trump kissing Elon Musk's feet.
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: The former FDA head becomes chief medical officer for Pfizer.
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: And Representative Annapolina Luna SLAM's Pam Bondi were not releasing
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: Epstein and JFK files. All this on the Bongino Report,
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: early edition. Who would you say are some of the
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: thought leaders of the right?
• 0:54
  Speaker 2: Who has the most cultural sway? Whose voice?
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: Is the largest guiding force in the country. That's not
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: a rhetorical question.
• 1:03
  Speaker 2: Drop a comment.
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: Give me your ideas.
• 1:04
  Speaker 2: Who do you think it is? I think there's several
• 1:07
  Speaker 2: that come to mind, more than one.
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: Tucker Carlson is undoubtedly, however, one of those voices, a
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: sincere thought leader of the political right.
• 1:19
  Speaker 2: Now, he's a writing.
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: Thesis and books philosophizing about the times that we're living in.
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: That's not the kind of thought leader I'm talking about.
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: but he is an incredible communicator with a massive audience.
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: And I think what he did best at Fox News
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: and still today with incredible talent is he's able to
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: take ideas from the new right, which is often very
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: young and the ideas are oftentimes coming from social media
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: and Reddit and X, and he's able to translate those
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: ideas to older audiences. I think he's helped bridge the
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: gap between generations and unite us on the political right.
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: I'll give you an example. My grandmother and grandfather on
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: my mom's side were neocons. My grandmother loved George Bush
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: so much that she named her cat George. And in 2015,
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: they were really wary of President Trump. Didn't quite get
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: him back then. Didn't make a lot of sense.
• 2:16
  Speaker 2: He's bombastic, indifferent.
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: And he was saying that things like, we never should
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: have been in the Iraq war.
• 2:22
  Speaker 2: That was a mistake.
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: That was really radical to hear. back in 2015. And
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: that's understandable. It was watching Tucker Carlson that helped them
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: start to evolve and to identify less with establishment Republicans
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: and more with the populist Trump.
• 2:40
  Speaker 2: Brand of politics.
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: And all this is to say that Tucker has been
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: a massive force within the movement, an indispensable asset. Now,
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: probably a name that doesn't come to mind when I
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: ask you Who is a thought leader of the political
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: right is Dan Crenshaw.
• 3:00
  Speaker 2: Nobody says that.
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: Maybe if I asked you, who's the worst Republican representative
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: in Congress?
• 3:06
  Speaker 2: Some might throw that name out. Who's the most hawkish?
• 3:10
  Speaker 2: Who loves foreign wars the most?
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: Perhaps Dan Crenshaw takes the cake there. But certainly he
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: is not a thought leader of the right.
• 3:19
  Speaker 2: So you'd think that a man like.
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: Dan Crenshaw Maybe he disagrees with Tucker Carlson on certain issues,
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: but he'd have some respect for the contributions that Tucker
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: Carlson made to conservatism and to America over the last
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: few years.
• 3:33
  Speaker 2: And you would be wrong.
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: Here's what Dan Crenshaw said into a hot mic yesterday
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: during an interview with GB News.
• 3:43
  Speaker 3: Have you ever met Tucker?
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: Okay, so if you're listening, it might have been a
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: little hard to hear, especially if you didn't have the
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: subtitles at the bottom, but it was a hot mic,
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: so a little bit difficult to hear, but he said,
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: if I ever meet him, I'll effing kill him, in
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: reference to Tucker Carlson.
• 4:13
  Speaker 4: Why?
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: Why? Because he isn't obsessed with Ukraine like you are,
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: Dan Crenshaw?
• 4:18
  Speaker 5: I don't know.
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: He doesn't want to send billions of more dollars on
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: the taxpayer's dime to a foreign country for a war
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: that we can't win? Here's what Tucker Carlson wrote on
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: X in response. Why don't you come sit for an.
• 4:34
  Speaker 2: Interview and we'll see how you do? I'll send you
• 4:36
  Speaker 2: my address at Dan Crenshaw. That's what Tucker said. He
• 4:39
  Speaker 2: invited him for an interview. And I'd love to see it.
• 4:42
  Speaker 2: But I have a feeling that Mr. Crenshaw.
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: Representative Crenshaw is all talk. He doesn't like interviews where
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: people push back on him. And let's just say I
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: have really good reason for saying that.
• 4:55
  Speaker 2: Trust me on this one.
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: I have a personal reason for saying Tan Crenshaw does
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: not like interviews where there is any remote sense of pushback.
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: He is a prima donna who cannot handle tough questions
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: from journalists.
• 5:09
  Speaker 2: I know that. I can't tell you why.
• 5:11
  Speaker 1: Trust me on this one. I don't think there's going
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: to be a Dan Crenshaw, Tucker Carlson, Sedan interview. Here
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: was Dan Crenshaw in this same GB News interview on
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: why we should fund Ukraine's borders while our borders still
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: are not secure.
• 5:26
  Speaker 3: Just coming back to this $ 100 billion to Ukraine, I
• 5:29
  Speaker 3: know that people like Tucker Carlson would make the argument
• 5:32
  Speaker 3: there's a real opportunity cost there. We could have spent
• 5:34
  Speaker 3: that money on the border or fixing issues in America.
• 5:38
  Speaker 3: What do you make of that argument that all this
• 5:40
  Speaker 3: money could have been spent to help Americans and not Ukrainians?
• 5:44
  Speaker 6: You can walk and.
• 5:44
  Speaker 7: Chew bubble gum at the same time. We spend 75,
• 5:50
  Speaker 7: 80% of our budget on a welfare state in America,
• 5:54
  Speaker 7: on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. I would love to
• 5:57
  Speaker 7: ask Tucker what he thinks that $ 100 billion should be
• 5:59
  Speaker 7: spent on it if he would vote for it as
• 6:01
  Speaker 7: a conservative. Tucker doesn't know what he's talking about. Tucker
• 6:05
  Speaker 7: likes to visit Moscow and talk about how great the
• 6:07
  Speaker 7: grocery stores are. So I don't really take his advice
• 6:09
  Speaker 7: very seriously.
• 6:10
  Speaker 1: I've heard this argument remarkably often. from people in the
• 6:15
  Speaker 1: old right, the neocon, the uniparty right wing of the Republicans.
• 6:21
  Speaker 2: We can walk and chew gum at the same time.
• 6:25
  Speaker 2: Can we?
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: Because we're $ 36 trillion in debt.
• 6:29
  Speaker 2: And Dan Crouch just says, oh, we can afford it.
• 6:32
  Speaker 1: Dude, what?
• 6:33
  Speaker 2: What do you mean we can just afford?
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: We are in a really serious financial situation in this country.
• 6:39
  Speaker 1: This is what Donald Trump is doing with Doge. We're
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: trying to cut back. on the waist, and Dan Crunch
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: is like, we can handle it.
• 6:46
  Speaker 2: And then he attacks the welfare state.
• 6:49
  Speaker 1: And boy, you guys, let me just tell you, as
• 6:51
  Speaker 1: an America First conservative, is that enraging. And I'm going
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: to be straight with you. The entitlement programs need massive reform.
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: As a Gen Z-er, you know, I'm coming from a
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: different place with this one than many of you are
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: who are in the chat, but everyone in my generation
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: understands and is fully aware of that we are going
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: to be paying for older Americans our entire lives, and
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: never are we going to see that money for ourselves.
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: Social Security is going to be insolvent by 2035. So
• 7:18
  Speaker 1: I'm acknowledging that.
• 7:20
  Speaker 2: There are problems.
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: But I'm sorry, Dan Crenshaw. Older people in this country
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: who aren't Gen Z or millennials, who haven't spent their
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: whole lives knowing that they're never going to see these entitlements,
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: those are the people they rely on the entitlements. They
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: need them for their retirement. They're depending on it. Why
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: is the war in Ukraine supposedly, in Dan Crenshaw's eyes,
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: coming before human beings in this country who are counting
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: on those entitlements?
• 7:52
  Speaker 2: And like I said, they need reform.
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: But that Ukraine is going to be the priority over
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: the livelihoods of Americans who have spent their entire lives
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: counting on this is patently insane. This country is financially
• 8:10
  Speaker 1: out of control, entitlements need reform, but that doesn't mean, therefore,
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: we should fund whatever foreign wars Dan Crenshaw is interested in.
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: A war, by the way, that is pitting Russia further
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: and further against the West, a war that never could
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: have been won by Ukraine, a war that ultimately is
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: pretty irrelevant to the United States and the other side
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: of the world. There was no reason for us to
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: be involved as much as we were. And now Dan
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: Crenshaw is mad that we're not sending more money to Ukraine.
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: And he's suggesting that we take away entitlements from people
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: who count on them in this country so we can
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: fund more in Ukraine. It is an insane America-last policy. Really,
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: it's a disregard for humanity, for human life, for real
• 8:54
  Speaker 1: Americans here, and an obsession with the war machine, with
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: the military-industrial complex that, frankly, I have a lot of
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: trouble understanding.
• 9:07
  Speaker 2: We're going to take a quick break.
• 9:08
  Speaker 1: When we come back, I have the most insane story
• 9:11
  Speaker 1: to share with you guys about the NSA and its
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: secret sex chat. I kid you not, it's secret sex chat.
• 9:19
  Speaker 2: And I'm going to read to you exactly what was
• 9:21
  Speaker 2: in this sex chat. Do not go anywhere. We'll be
• 9:24
  Speaker 2: right back.
• 9:24
  Speaker 1: This next story, you guys, I promise you, this is
• 9:27
  Speaker 1: one of the craziest things I have seen in the
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: last few weeks. Is it the National Security Agency or
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: are we going to have to rename it the National
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: Sex Chat Agency?
• 9:36
  Speaker 2: We might have to.
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: I think we're going to have to rename it because
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: the NSA has just been exposed for having a secret
• 9:42
  Speaker 1: transgender sex chat room in which NSA, CIA, and DIA
• 9:46
  Speaker 1: employees discuss genital castration, artificial vaginas, piss fetishes, sex polycules,
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: and gang bangs, all on government time and the taxpayer's dime.
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: This story is wild. So Chris Ruffo and Hannah Grossman
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: obtained logs from this secret chat room from sources within
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: the National Security Agency, one current employee and one former employee.
• 10:12
  Speaker 1: And just before I get into this, Understand that the
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: intelligence community is one of the most powerful parts of
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: the American national security apparatus. And the NSA specifically has
• 10:24
  Speaker 1: been caught illegally surveilling U.S. citizens for years. This is
• 10:28
  Speaker 1: what Edward Snowden exposed to the public. And it has
• 10:33
  Speaker 1: not stopped. Just a couple of years ago, Tucker Carlson said,
• 10:36
  Speaker 1: the NSA, speaking of Tucker Carlson, said that the NSA
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: was spying on his communications, including his encrypted messages, related
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: to him trying to set up an interview with President Putin,
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: surveilling him, allegedly.
• 10:50
  Speaker 2: So it has not stopped. We know it's continuing.
• 10:53
  Speaker 1: We know it continues, especially under FISA Section 702, where
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: you can surveil foreign nationals, but then if they communicate
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: with an American citizen, well, then you can spy on
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: those messages as well, getting around the Constitution.
• 11:05
  Speaker 2: They are completely rogue.
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: So I'm going to read to you guys all of
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: these secret, well, not all of them, but some of them,
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: some of these secret chat room communications from people, mind you,
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: with top-secret security clearances. So one popular chat topic was
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: male-to-female transgender surgery, which involves surgically removing the penis and
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: turning it into an artificial vagina. Somebody said, one male
• 11:27
  Speaker 1: who claimed to have a transgender reconstructive surgery.
• 11:30
  Speaker 2: Said, mine is everything.
• 11:32
  Speaker 1: I found that I like being penetrated, but all the
• 11:35
  Speaker 1: rest is just as important as well. Another intelligence official
• 11:40
  Speaker 1: boasted that genital surgery allowed him to wear leggings or
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: bikinis without having to wear a gaff under it.
• 11:47
  Speaker 2: These employees discussed hair removal.
• 11:50
  Speaker 1: Estrogen injections, the experience of sexual pleasure post-castration. Quote, Getting
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: my butthole zapped by a laser was shocking, said one
• 12:01
  Speaker 1: transgender-identifying Intel employee who spent thousands on hair removal. Another
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: about estrogen treatment said, Look, I just enjoy helping other
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: people experience boobs.
• 12:15
  Speaker 2: One of the weirdest things.
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: That gives me euphoria is when I pee, I don't
• 12:18
  Speaker 1: have to push anything down to make sure it aims right,
• 12:21
  Speaker 1: a Defense Intelligence Agency employee added. Per the NSA sources,
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: the sex chat was legitimized as part of the agency's
• 12:31
  Speaker 1: commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion. And these guys reportedly
• 12:36
  Speaker 1: spent all day recruiting activists and holding meetings with titles
• 12:40
  Speaker 1: like such as privilege, ally awareness, pride, transgender community inclusion.
• 12:45
  Speaker 2: I mean, this is just insanity.
• 12:48
  Speaker 1: And they did so with the full support of NSA leadership,
• 12:52
  Speaker 1: which declared that DEI was not only mission critical, but
• 12:56
  Speaker 1: mission imperative. Chris Ruffo notes that in this case, diversity
• 13:00
  Speaker 1: was not a byword for racialism, but rather a euphemism
• 13:04
  Speaker 1: for sex talk. DEI is just talking about sex with
• 13:08
  Speaker 1: your coworkers. Last January, Chat room members discussed their practice
• 13:13
  Speaker 1: of polyamory, so sexual relationships with multiple people at once.
• 13:17
  Speaker 1: The active source of the NSA claimed to have witnessed
• 13:20
  Speaker 1: hundreds of sexually provocative discussions, which Rufo adds occurred mostly
• 13:24
  Speaker 1: on taxpayer time. And in one chat, an NSA employee
• 13:28
  Speaker 1: insists on using it, the it pronoun, in lieu of
• 13:32
  Speaker 1: he or she pronouns. These are people abusing their power,
• 13:38
  Speaker 1: spying on us. with top secret security clearances, and they
• 13:42
  Speaker 1: want to be called it. And they're talking about polyamory
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: and cutting off their genitalia. How many of you could
• 13:49
  Speaker 1: start talking about sex and fetishes with your coworkers? If
• 13:53
  Speaker 1: I started up a sex chat room here at Bongino,
• 13:57
  Speaker 1: Dan Apollo would fire me. It's not appropriate. So why
• 14:00
  Speaker 1: is it appropriate at the highest levels of government? Our
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: intel agencies appear to be full of creepy left-wing activists
• 14:10
  Speaker 1: who really belong in the gender department at Berkeley, not
• 14:12
  Speaker 1: in our government, and also just straight up mentally ill people.
• 14:16
  Speaker 1: And it makes you feel so unsafe. And I'm glad
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: that Trump's in there. I hope that he roots all
• 14:20
  Speaker 1: this out. At the same time, I think, is it
• 14:23
  Speaker 1: even possible? You have that many people who are enabling
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: and being a part of a sex chat room at
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: the NSA, the CIA, and they're in charge of our security.
• 14:36
  Speaker 1: Can we fire everyone?
• 14:39
  Speaker 2: I mean, this is so entrenched. It runs so deep.
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: I'm almost concerned it's not going to be possible to
• 14:48
  Speaker 1: root out the rot. So pray for this admin. You
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: can't fire, you can fire everyone in the sex chat room, sure,
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: but you won't be able to fix everything. I think
• 14:59
  Speaker 1: that this is going to be probably decades in the making.
• 15:03
  Speaker 1: And we're going to need more than a Trump admin,
• 15:05
  Speaker 1: but another right-wing admin just as committed to rooting out
• 15:09
  Speaker 1: this rot. We are dealing with a leviathan, a bureaucratic monstrosity,
• 15:14
  Speaker 1: the largest human organization of all time. Here's what I mean.
• 15:20
  Speaker 2: Yesterday, CNN ran this article.
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: It's titled, How Trump's Government Cutting Moves Risk Exposing the
• 15:26
  Speaker 1: CIA's Secrets. This is not just a news write-up. I
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: want you guys to pay attention to this. The article
• 15:36
  Speaker 1: is actually, from CNN, a threat. I'm going to read
• 15:41
  Speaker 1: an excerpt of it to you guys. As the CIA
• 15:44
  Speaker 1: weighs staff cuts, current and former intelligence officials say that
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: mass firings could offer a rich recruitment opportunity for foreign
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: intelligence services like China or Russia, who may seek to
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: exploit financially vulnerable or resentful former employees. And the piece
• 15:59
  Speaker 1: goes on, it says, on the CIA's seventh floor, home
• 16:02
  Speaker 1: to top leadership, some officers are also quietly discussing how
• 16:05
  Speaker 1: mass firings and the buyouts already offered to staff risk
• 16:09
  Speaker 1: creating a group of disgruntled former employees who might be
• 16:12
  Speaker 1: motivated to take what they know to a foreign intelligence service.
• 16:16
  Speaker 1: As Molly Hemingway tweets, so quiet that CNN heard it
• 16:20
  Speaker 1: and broadcast it. And just to recap, CNN just stated
• 16:26
  Speaker 1: that Trump should keep everyone employed in the intelligence apparatus,
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: because if he doesn't, former CIA agents will spill U.S.
• 16:34
  Speaker 2: Secrets to our enemies abroad. What do we call that chat?
• 16:37
  Speaker 2: What is that?
• 16:39
  Speaker 1: That is called a threat. Now, why is CNN delivering
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: this threat? Well, as Beth Brelia, I hope I'm saying
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: your last name right, and The Federalist reported, if Trump
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: fires CNN's sources, it will be harder for the media
• 16:54
  Speaker 1: to collude with the intelligence community to craft propaganda to
• 16:56
  Speaker 1: sell to the public. The connection between CNN and the
• 16:59
  Speaker 1: deep state has been too cozy for too long. So
• 17:02
  Speaker 1: of course, CNN is in on this. They stand to
• 17:06
  Speaker 1: lose just as much as these fired former intelligence officials.
• 17:10
  Speaker 1: And just to recap, you guys know the role that
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: CNN played in promoting the Russia collusion hoax. And Beth
• 17:17
  Speaker 1: actually dissected this article and found that CNN attributed information
• 17:20
  Speaker 1: to their anonymous rogue CIA sources 18 times. In other words,
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: they made propaganda assertions 18 times. I'll just read you
• 17:28
  Speaker 1: some of these. A source familiar with the matter told CNN.
• 17:31
  Speaker 1: Some officers. Sources familiar with the matter said. Former intelligence
• 17:35
  Speaker 1: officials said. Said one former.
• 17:37
  Speaker 2: CIA officer speaking hypothetically.
• 17:39
  Speaker 1: One U.S.
• 17:40
  Speaker 2: Official said. Former officials noted.
• 17:41
  Speaker 1: But do you see the game that they're playing? These
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: are career propagandists promoting government propaganda. So that they can
• 17:49
  Speaker 1: continue profiting off of said propaganda. And by the way,
• 17:53
  Speaker 1: this is different. from the Chris Ruffer report, where the
• 17:56
  Speaker 1: whistleblowers provided him with evidence. He's reporting on the chatroom
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: messages that he saw with his own eyes. These CNN reporters,
• 18:05
  Speaker 1: they're just amplifying opinions and threats as fact. All these
• 18:12
  Speaker 1: intel guys who participated in the CNN piece are treasonous weasels.
• 18:17
  Speaker 1: They need to be rooted out. They have no loyalty
• 18:19
  Speaker 1: to this country, clearly. And I hope Trump can find
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: these guys.
• 18:23
  Speaker 2: And fire them.
• 18:25
  Speaker 1: Because that won't only make a country safer, it will
• 18:29
  Speaker 1: be the nail in the coffin for places like CNN. Alright,
• 18:34
  Speaker 1: something strange happened over the weekend that is now going viral.
• 18:38
  Speaker 1: Trump hosted the National Governors Association dinner and reception at
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: the White House Saturday night.
• 18:44
  Speaker 2: And at this event, the U.S.
• 18:45
  Speaker 1: Army chorus performed Do You Hear the People Sing from
• 18:49
  Speaker 1: the musical Les Mis.
• 18:51
  Speaker 2: Take a listen.
• 19:05
  Speaker 1: Okay, so online leftists have interpreted this as an act
• 19:08
  Speaker 1: of protest against a Trump admin on behalf of the army.
• 19:12
  Speaker 2: And it isn't hard to imagine why.
• 19:14
  Speaker 1: These are some of the lyrics from that song they
• 19:17
  Speaker 1: were singing. Do you hear the people sing, singing a
• 19:19
  Speaker 1: song of angry men? It is the music of a
• 19:21
  Speaker 1: people who will not be slaves again. When the beating
• 19:24
  Speaker 1: of your heart echoes the beating of the drums, there
• 19:28
  Speaker 1: is a life about to start when tomorrow comes. So
• 19:31
  Speaker 1: some people, and this really bothers me, are saying that
• 19:33
  Speaker 1: Les Mis is a symbol of revolution. This is not true.
• 19:37
  Speaker 1: Democrat representative Jim McGovern tweeted this. They picked Les Mis,
• 19:42
  Speaker 1: a musical about standing up to tyranny. They protested you,
• 19:45
  Speaker 1: meaning President Trump, at your own event, and you were
• 19:48
  Speaker 1: too stupid to get it.
• 19:49
  Speaker 2: Okay, well, Ms.
• 19:50
  Speaker 1: Jim McGovern, Representative McGovern, is too stupid to get the
• 19:54
  Speaker 1: point of Les Mis. Les Mis is actually a story
• 19:58
  Speaker 1: about how collectivist uprisings, like the June Rebellion, which is
• 20:02
  Speaker 1: what Les Mis is about, can lead to the destruction
• 20:05
  Speaker 1: of individual humanity and moral integrity. It highlights the chaos
• 20:09
  Speaker 1: and violence of these movements, emphasizing how collective ideals can
• 20:13
  Speaker 1: justify really evil things. The protagonist, John Valjean, is a
• 20:17
  Speaker 1: good man because he values personal redemption and compassion over
• 20:22
  Speaker 1: political dogma. That is the message of this novel turned
• 20:25
  Speaker 1: play and movie. The author of Les Mis, Victor Hugo,
• 20:30
  Speaker 1: is critiquing this idea of sacrificing individual lives for abstract
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: political goals because true change really lies in revolutionizing people's hearts,
• 20:41
  Speaker 1: people becoming better people, rather than blind adherence to revolutionary
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: political ideals. But unfortunately, Les Mis has been misconstrued by
• 20:51
  Speaker 1: the culture, by the public, by leftists a lot, as
• 20:54
  Speaker 1: this revolutionary novel, play, and movie, and now everyone is confused,
• 20:58
  Speaker 1: and so colloquially, it has become a symbol of political revolution. Specifically,
• 21:03
  Speaker 1: that song, Do You Hear the People Sing?, has become
• 21:06
  Speaker 1: a symbol of revolution. So it's possible that the director
• 21:10
  Speaker 1: of the U.S. Army Corps did this as an act
• 21:12
  Speaker 1: of defiance.
• 21:13
  Speaker 2: It is possible.
• 21:15
  Speaker 1: The song hasn't been officially perceived that way by the
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: White House, and the White House does approve the set list.
• 21:21
  Speaker 2: So the intent here is unclear.
• 21:23
  Speaker 1: I don't think maybe that she, I hope that she
• 21:25
  Speaker 1: didn't mean it that way, but I'm, Trump does like
• 21:28
  Speaker 1: the song. So it's possible that he was totally fine
• 21:31
  Speaker 1: with it. I'm sensitive to the issue though, because It's
• 21:35
  Speaker 1: being perceived within and outside the government as an act
• 21:38
  Speaker 1: of defiance.
• 21:38
  Speaker 2: And that's a problem.
• 21:41
  Speaker 1: That can be an encouraging thing for people within our
• 21:44
  Speaker 1: government who want to do bad things and hurt this admin.
• 21:47
  Speaker 1: And we know that there's mass insubordination right now.
• 21:49
  Speaker 2: Throughout the government.
• 21:50
  Speaker 1: And we really have to view this as not just
• 21:55
  Speaker 1: insubordination to Trump, but to the American people. We elected
• 21:59
  Speaker 1: Trump and the bureaucracy is fighting the leader that we selected.
• 22:04
  Speaker 1: And on that topic, televisions within the Department of Housing
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: and Urban Development recently displayed AI footage of Trump kissing
• 22:12
  Speaker 1: Elon Musk's feet. And the video display reads, long live
• 22:16
  Speaker 1: the real king, meaning Elon Musk. An unnamed HUD employee
• 22:21
  Speaker 1: who provided Wired with the video that I'm playing right now,
• 22:24
  Speaker 1: claimed that federal workers were forced to manually turn off
• 22:27
  Speaker 1: each television to stop the video from playing. So presumably
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: someone within HUD, within the agency, Put this up on
• 22:34
  Speaker 1: the televisions. Now, again, why would someone in HUD do this? Well,
• 22:37
  Speaker 1: approximately 4,000 HUD employees are expected to be laid off
• 22:41
  Speaker 1: due to cuts.
• 22:42
  Speaker 2: Being implemented by Doge. So they're angry. They're angry at Elon.
• 22:46
  Speaker 2: They're angry at Trump. They're insubordinate.
• 22:49
  Speaker 1: I think whoever is responsible for the video needs to
• 22:52
  Speaker 1: be found and fired. There is a disrespect for President Trump,
• 22:56
  Speaker 1: but also for us. We covered yesterday Jasmine Crockett and
• 23:01
  Speaker 1: Ilhan Omar. saying half the country is stupid and doesn't
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: read or listen to facts, says the people who can't
• 23:07
  Speaker 1: interpret Les Mis, I might add. But this is how
• 23:10
  Speaker 1: they view us. They don't believe in democracy or the
• 23:13
  Speaker 1: will of the people. These are agents of chaos, left-wing
• 23:17
  Speaker 1: social activists mixed with snobby bureaucrats who feel above the
• 23:20
  Speaker 1: law and accountability and election results.
• 23:23
  Speaker 2: They're totally rogue.
• 23:26
  Speaker 1: By the way, here are CNN hosts claiming that it
• 23:29
  Speaker 1: was abusive. for Elon Musk to email all federal workers
• 23:33
  Speaker 1: requesting five bullets of what they accomplished that week. Take
• 23:36
  Speaker 1: a listen.
• 23:51
  Speaker 4: Scott, have you ever gotten an email from someone that said,
• 23:53
  Speaker 4: you better do this or else you're going to resign?
• 23:55
  Speaker 8: Yeah, it's called having a boss.
• 23:56
  Speaker 2: It's called having a boss in the private sector. From
• 23:58
  Speaker 2: someone who's not your boss?
• 24:01
  Speaker 6: Well, the White House is every federal worker's boss. That's
• 24:03
  Speaker 6: number one.
• 24:04
  Speaker 5: Elon Musk is.
• 24:05
  Speaker 2: Not anybody's boss.
• 24:07
  Speaker 4: Scott, how is Elon going to evaluate? I mean, how
• 24:11
  Speaker 4: is he going to evaluate the work of thousands of
• 24:14
  Speaker 4: federal employees when he has no idea what they do?
• 24:15
  Speaker 1: He's not.
• 24:16
  Speaker 6: The test was. Are you even paying attention to your email?
• 24:19
  Speaker 4: Are you even at your terminal? Well, you know, some
• 24:20
  Speaker 4: federal workers, she sent it on a weekend. Some federal
• 24:22
  Speaker 4: workers do not have access to their emails on the weekends.
• 24:25
  Speaker 4: They just don't.
• 24:25
  Speaker 6: Well, did they go to work today? I mean, look,
• 24:27
  Speaker 6: the amount of outrage melting down and sort of outpouring
• 24:32
  Speaker 6: of emotion over this ought to tell you everything you
• 24:34
  Speaker 6: need to know. We had a lady on CNN today,
• 24:36
  Speaker 6: a supposed federal worker, who said she was infuriated by
• 24:41
  Speaker 6: getting this email. She had time to go on CNN,
• 24:43
  Speaker 6: but she didn't have time to send a 30-second email saying, well,
• 24:45
  Speaker 6: here's what I was working on last week. This is
• 24:47
  Speaker 6: what people in the private sector have come to hate
• 24:50
  Speaker 6: about how they view the public sector. And I think
• 24:53
  Speaker 6: there's a great many very dedicated public servants. But you said,
• 24:58
  Speaker 6: you know, it's about control. Yes, it's about control. And
• 25:00
  Speaker 6: it's about finding out who is actually at their job
• 25:03
  Speaker 6: working and who isn't. And do we need all these people?
• 25:07
  Speaker 1: You guys might not know this. Maybe Dan's mentioned it
• 25:10
  Speaker 1: before on his show. I haven't mentioned it on this one, though.
• 25:13
  Speaker 1: The Bonginos just hired a manager at this company. Her
• 25:17
  Speaker 1: name is Jasmine, which is a very nice lady, very
• 25:20
  Speaker 1: kind woman. And when Jasmine was hired, the first thing
• 25:24
  Speaker 1: that Jasmine did is send us all an email saying,
• 25:29
  Speaker 1: give me a list of what you do this week.
• 25:32
  Speaker 2: What's your schedule like? Tell me what your job is.
• 25:34
  Speaker 1: What do you do?
• 25:37
  Speaker 2: Yeah, Michael says harassment.
• 25:38
  Speaker 1: I think we should, Michael says we should file an
• 25:40
  Speaker 1: HR report to Jasmine about Jasmine because that was totally
• 25:43
  Speaker 1: abusive of Jasmine to ask us what we do here
• 25:46
  Speaker 1: at Bongino.
• 25:47
  Speaker 2: No, it's not abusive. She's the manager.
• 25:50
  Speaker 1: Dan Boncino hired her. Okay, so I'm going to tell
• 25:52
  Speaker 1: you what I did this week. So was Michael and
• 25:54
  Speaker 1: Guy and Jeff. This is what we do. This is
• 25:56
  Speaker 1: what employees do.
• 25:58
  Speaker 2: It's not abusive.
• 26:00
  Speaker 5: What?
• 26:00
  Speaker 2: Who acts like?
• 26:02
  Speaker 1: This is what's so crazy to me. It's like, these
• 26:03
  Speaker 1: guys just act completely rogue. They have no accountability whatsoever.
• 26:07
  Speaker 1: All of us in the private sector, this is normal.
• 26:09
  Speaker 1: If your manager asks you, what did you do this week?
• 26:12
  Speaker 2: You tell them.
• 26:14
  Speaker 1: But you have these employees in the federal government who
• 26:17
  Speaker 1: turn up their noses and say, oh, it's abusive to
• 26:20
  Speaker 1: ask what I do here.
• 26:20
  Speaker 2: Don't ask me what I do here. It's like, what
• 26:23
  Speaker 2: do you mean?
• 26:24
  Speaker 1: What do you mean that's not something you'll do? I mean,
• 26:27
  Speaker 1: it's just such a different mindset from these bureaucrats. As
• 26:32
  Speaker 1: somebody who most of us are listening, you probably are
• 26:34
  Speaker 1: coming from a perspective of the private sector.
• 26:37
  Speaker 2: We look at that and we're just like, are these
• 26:39
  Speaker 2: people insane?
• 26:40
  Speaker 1: Like what's happening in the government? How are they even
• 26:44
  Speaker 1: operating with completely unaccountable rogue employees? So these Democrats and
• 26:51
  Speaker 1: bureaucrats are fear-mongering about Elon Musk having too much power
• 26:55
  Speaker 1: in the government.
• 26:56
  Speaker 2: That's really ultimately what a lot of this is about.
• 26:59
  Speaker 1: Corporate capture, billionaire control. And can I just say how
• 27:04
  Speaker 1: incredibly rich that is? This week, we learned that the
• 27:09
  Speaker 1: former head of the FDA under Biden, Patricia Cavazonia, will
• 27:14
  Speaker 1: now be the chief medical officer for Pfizer. more evidence
• 27:20
  Speaker 1: of the corruption within our agencies, specifically within health. It's
• 27:24
  Speaker 1: a screaming conflict of interest. Was Patricia easing approvals to
• 27:28
  Speaker 1: secure that future job at Pfizer? We know that the
• 27:31
  Speaker 1: COVID vax can cause chronic health problems in some that
• 27:34
  Speaker 1: we learned that last week. And that just is added
• 27:38
  Speaker 1: onto the list of potential ailments that the forced jab
• 27:41
  Speaker 1: causes that was expedited with approval by our health agencies.
• 27:47
  Speaker 1: And by the way, we're supposed to heed CNN's fear-mongering
• 27:50
  Speaker 1: warnings about firing federal workers when tens of thousands of
• 27:56
  Speaker 1: federal workers were fired over COVID vaccine hesitancy.
• 27:59
  Speaker 2: I don't think so.
• 28:01
  Speaker 1: The FDA is full of pharma sellouts, not watchdog. Policy
• 28:05
  Speaker 1: is warped. The rules tilt toward big pharma profits, not
• 28:10
  Speaker 1: public safety. And again, they want us to be afraid
• 28:12
  Speaker 1: of RFK Jr. Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker wrote, This on
• 28:16
  Speaker 1: X-Test today. RFK Jr. 's views are dangerous, misguided, and
• 28:20
  Speaker 1: deeply disturbing. Frankly, his policies will hurt people. I will
• 28:23
  Speaker 1: push back on any attempts to disrupt the health and
• 28:26
  Speaker 1: safety of Illinoisans.
• 28:29
  Speaker 4: Illinoisans?
• 28:30
  Speaker 1: I don't know.
• 28:33
  Speaker 2: This is coming from a.
• 28:33
  Speaker 1: Morbidly obese man. Morbidly, morbidly obese man.
• 28:37
  Speaker 6: J.B.
• 28:37
  Speaker 2: Pritzker is not healthy. And now he's insisting that RFK Jr.
• 28:42
  Speaker 2: is a threat to public health? I'm sorry, sir, but
• 28:44
  Speaker 2: I think... You need to sit this one out.
• 28:49
  Speaker 1: Yeah, RFK is one of the healthiest men I've ever
• 28:53
  Speaker 1: seen in his 70s.
• 28:54
  Speaker 2: It's incredible.
• 28:56
  Speaker 1: I'm going to take health advice from him, not you,
• 28:59
  Speaker 1: JB Pritzker.
• 29:01
  Speaker 5: All right.
• 29:02
  Speaker 1: Now, I've been thinking a lot about the incredible speech
• 29:06
  Speaker 1: that JD Vance gave in Munich. As Notre Dame professor
• 29:11
  Speaker 1: Patrick Dunning wrote, Vance was offering... America might once again
• 29:18
  Speaker 1: save Europe from tyranny, but now by telling Europe hard
• 29:21
  Speaker 1: truths about itself. Europe can save itself from internal tyranny
• 29:26
  Speaker 1: not by through ongoing alliance on the U.S., but by
• 29:30
  Speaker 1: counting on its own people. Let me take a listen
• 29:33
  Speaker 1: to this little piece of J.D. 's speech in Munich,
• 29:36
  Speaker 1: just a reminder.
• 29:39
  Speaker 8: The threat that I worry the most about vis-a-vis Europe
• 29:42
  Speaker 8: is not Russia, it's not China, it's not any other
• 29:46
  Speaker 8: external actor. And what I worry about is the threat
• 29:49
  Speaker 8: from within. The retreat of Europe from some of its
• 29:54
  Speaker 8: most fundamental values, values shared with the United States of America.
• 30:01
  Speaker 1: The speech was a clear message that America will no
• 30:03
  Speaker 1: longer sit back and encourage the West's civilizational suicide.
• 30:08
  Speaker 2: Trump's team is.
• 30:09
  Speaker 1: Signaling that they view the defense of free expression as
• 30:11
  Speaker 1: essential to preserving Western civ, and America will once again
• 30:15
  Speaker 1: be a global champion of natural rights.
• 30:18
  Speaker 2: I love it.
• 30:19
  Speaker 1: So much so that I think America needs to fully
• 30:23
  Speaker 1: practice what it preaches.
• 30:27
  Speaker 5: J.D.
• 30:27
  Speaker 1: Vance's mentor, friend and previous financial backer Peter Thiel, is
• 30:32
  Speaker 1: the co-founder of Palantir, a CIA-backed company developing predictive profiling
• 30:38
  Speaker 1: algorithms to identify domestic terrorists from the left and right
• 30:43
  Speaker 1: in the U.S. before they commit any kind of crime. Essentially,
• 30:46
  Speaker 1: it's a way to target political dissidents, thought criminals, before
• 30:50
  Speaker 1: they've committed any actual crime. According to a 2018 Bloomberg report,
• 30:56
  Speaker 1: Palantir knows everything about you It is a data mining
• 31:00
  Speaker 1: company using war on terror tools to track American citizens.
• 31:06
  Speaker 1: Palantir privatizes the government's surveillance initiatives. It successfully circumvents the
• 31:12
  Speaker 1: Constitution while funding its efforts with U.S. tax dollars to
• 31:15
  Speaker 1: be used against U.S. citizens as well as other foreigners.
• 31:20
  Speaker 1: It's New World Order.
• 31:21
  Speaker 2: It's Orwellian. It's terrifying.
• 31:24
  Speaker 1: How can we restore America's role as a beacon of hope?
• 31:29
  Speaker 1: if people like Peter Thiel continue to embed themselves in
• 31:35
  Speaker 1: the political right, going on podcasts, associating with right-wing thought leaders,
• 31:42
  Speaker 1: maintaining Palantir a massive role in the federal government.
• 31:46
  Speaker 2: I didn't hear J.D.
• 31:47
  Speaker 1: Vance criticize Palantir once in that Munich speech.
• 31:49
  Speaker 2: He did a great job.
• 31:50
  Speaker 1: He criticized pro-lifers who have been arrested in the UK
• 31:55
  Speaker 1: for praying silently outside abortion clinics.
• 31:57
  Speaker 2: That's so important. We need to talk about it. But
• 32:01
  Speaker 2: we also need to talk about this.
• 32:02
  Speaker 1: This is less overt than Germany banging on people's doors
• 32:07
  Speaker 1: and stealing their devices because they promoted so-called hate speech online.
• 32:13
  Speaker 2: This is not quite as.
• 32:15
  Speaker 1: Explicit, but it's happening in the background and it needs
• 32:18
  Speaker 1: to be addressed.
• 32:18
  Speaker 2: We need to be consistent.
• 32:22
  Speaker 1: We have to ensure that our own house is in
• 32:23
  Speaker 1: order before we go to Europe and we preach about
• 32:26
  Speaker 1: what's happening there. We have to be willing to call
• 32:28
  Speaker 1: our own out. I want excellence from America. I want
• 32:33
  Speaker 1: authentic promotion of natural rights in this country, of constitutional rights,
• 32:38
  Speaker 1: to privacy, to security. I'm not sure we're getting it.
• 32:45
  Speaker 1: I also want transparency, and this brings me to my
• 32:47
  Speaker 1: next story. Yesterday, Representative Ana Paulina Luna tweeted this. On
• 32:53
  Speaker 1: February 11th and February 19th, House Oversight sent a letter
• 32:57
  Speaker 1: to the DOJ asking for status on releasing the Epstein
• 33:01
  Speaker 1: files as well as JFK, etc. The DOJ has not responded.
• 33:06
  Speaker 1: Reaching out on X because we can't seem to get
• 33:08
  Speaker 1: a response from the Attorney General. At Pambondi, what is
• 33:12
  Speaker 1: the status of the documents? Now, these documents were ordered
• 33:16
  Speaker 1: to be declassified. I believe in extending grace, but transparency
• 33:23
  Speaker 1: is also essential. These documents need to be released. The
• 33:29
  Speaker 1: declassification process, just so we're all clear, it does include
• 33:32
  Speaker 1: a review period, but the review period should be minimal.
• 33:36
  Speaker 2: At this point, the.
• 33:37
  Speaker 1: Contents shouldn't matter, especially in the case of JFK, where
• 33:40
  Speaker 1: virtually everyone involved has already passed away.
• 33:44
  Speaker 2: The documents are.
• 33:47
  Speaker 1: Declassified and they should be made public as soon as possible.
• 33:50
  Speaker 1: A review shouldn't be a mechanism for selectively hiding, omitting,
• 33:54
  Speaker 1: or redacting information. And the longer this process drags on,
• 33:58
  Speaker 1: the more suspect it appears. And to be clear, I'm
• 34:02
  Speaker 1: not claiming that's what's happening. But when declassified documents remain
• 34:05
  Speaker 1: out of reach and even members of Congress can't get
• 34:07
  Speaker 1: a status update from the DOJ, that's a serious problem.
• 34:12
  Speaker 1: Accountability has to apply across the board. This isn't about
• 34:16
  Speaker 1: blind loyalty to a political team. It is about ensuring
• 34:19
  Speaker 1: that this administration upholds the very ideals and promises we
• 34:23
  Speaker 1: elected them to champion. And they're doing a good job.
• 34:28
  Speaker 1: But that doesn't mean that we shouldn't be critical when
• 34:31
  Speaker 1: it's necessary. In this case, I think calling out Pam
• 34:34
  Speaker 1: Bonding and asking, can we just get a status update?
• 34:37
  Speaker 2: What's going on with these documents?
• 34:38
  Speaker 1: That is entirely fair. And I'm really concerned by how
• 34:42
  Speaker 1: long it's taking.
• 34:43
  Speaker 2: It should not take that long. It shouldn't. What do
• 34:46
  Speaker 2: we need to redact? What do we need to hide?
• 34:48
  Speaker 2: What do we need to omit?
• 34:50
  Speaker 1: And why?
• 34:51
  Speaker 2: Why redact?
• 34:52
  Speaker 1: Why omit?
• 34:52
  Speaker 2: Why hide?
• 34:55
  Speaker 1: The reasons for that also are very suspect. Transparency isn't
• 35:00
  Speaker 1: just a talking point. It is a fundamental expectation that
• 35:04
  Speaker 1: needs to be met by this admin. And that's all
• 35:06
  Speaker 1: I have for you guys today. Thank you so much
• 35:08
  Speaker 1: for tuning in, as always, for sticking with me. We
• 35:11
  Speaker 1: have almost 17,000 viewers, which is huge for us. So
• 35:15
  Speaker 1: thank you so much for tuning in.
• 35:16
  Speaker 2: I hope that a lot of you guys will tune
• 35:20
  Speaker 2: into the show.
• 35:21
  Speaker 1: Pay attention to what we're doing. Maybe if you're from Dan,
• 35:24
  Speaker 1: you're a refugee from the Dan Bongino show, you come over,
• 35:26
  Speaker 1: you listen to this one. I'm going to keep delivering
• 35:29
  Speaker 1: really great content.
• 35:30
  Speaker 2: I do my homework. I research a lot. I want
• 35:32
  Speaker 2: to be the best for you guys, especially as.
• 35:35
  Speaker 1: Dan Bongino is leaving and creating this vacuum in all
• 35:38
  Speaker 1: of our lives. So I appreciate you guys sticking with me.
• 35:41
  Speaker 2: Hopefully you'll stay.
• 35:41
  Speaker 1: And just so you know, Dan has some really big
• 35:45
  Speaker 1: news today.
• 35:46
  Speaker 2: At his show at 11 a.m. So make sure to
• 35:48
  Speaker 2: turn into that.
• 35:49
  Speaker 1: We're going to have a lot more details about what
• 35:51
  Speaker 1: Bongino is going to look like today as we look
• 35:55
  Speaker 1: to the future and Dan Bongino steps into this really
• 35:58
  Speaker 1: new and incredible role at the FBI. So tune in
• 36:01
  Speaker 1: for that, and I'll see you guys all on this
• 36:04
  Speaker 1: show tomorrow.
• 36:05
  Speaker 2: The Dan Boncino Show.
• 36:07
  Speaker 5: I think a lot of people are underestimating the Trump
• 36:09
  Speaker 5: effect in this midterm. You've heard it yourself. Act like
• 36:13
  Speaker 5: I'm on the ballot. Why is he saying that? You
• 36:15
  Speaker 5: think he doesn't know what he's doing? That is the
• 36:18
  Speaker 5: X factor. Folks, elections are a math issue.
• 36:22
  Speaker 3: That is it.
• 36:23
  Speaker 5: This is not a football game. If you vote, we
• 36:26
  Speaker 5: will win.
• 36:27
  Speaker 6: It is not complicated.
• 36:29
  Speaker 2: The Dan Boncino Show. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.