Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Them's fightin' words! | HBR News 562

Transcript

Them's fightin' words! | HBR News 562 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: This is HBr News number five sixty two, Them's Fighting Words,
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: where he discussed the news of the week and give
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: it the Badger treatment. Hello everybody, and welcome back to
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: Honey Badger Radio. I hope you guys are doing well
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: this week and that you are laughing at all of
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: this insanity so that you are not consumed by it.
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: I am your host, Brian. I'm joined by, as always,
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: my lovely co host Hannah Wallen and doctor randamerkam Okay.
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: I was just giving us space to jump in with
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: the hell.
• 0:36
  Speaker 2: That means good No, that means goodbye.
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: You say goodbye and I say hello, Hello, Hello. So
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: uh on this week's HBr News show, we're gonna be
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: talking about a couple of follow ups. Johnny Depp is
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: back and he's getting work again. He's gonna be back
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: on the silver screen. Shiloh Hendrix's trial reaches a verdict
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: of sorts. Minnesota is going to be using transgender dolls
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: to confuse slap I mean, teach children and more so,
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: stick around. It's going to be a good time and
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: be sure to have joined us afterwards for the Patron
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: Only show. So I kind of love this, so you know,
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: you guys know that Spain is probably one of, if
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: not the most cooked country in the West, in the
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: Western Hemisphere when it comes to feminism. They were ahead
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: of the ball back during gamer Gate days before that.
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: If anything, it's almost like, you know, they never really
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: like they like they they lost the Civil War to
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: the feminists, I guess, and because of that, you know,
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: there's a lot of very strict controls on speech and
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: behaviors and all this other stuff. If you guys don't know,
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: this guy named Kukurio who used to do artwork for us,
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: was a guy from Spain, and he would constantly talk
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: about all of the problems that the Spanish government is
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: creating for it's citizens. Well, it seems like the citizenry
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: of Spain doesn't actually want this, as there has been
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: a new book that's been released called Get Married and
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: Be Submissive, which is a guidebook for new wives, and
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: it's caused a lot of controversy and basically feminists are
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: trying to get the book banned, including some that work
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: in the government are working to ban said book. We're
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: going to be going through the article here. This is
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: from Express dot co dot uk and they have the
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: article the New Story, and we'll probably discuss this in
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: the Patriot Show. But it is hilarious. I think my
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: favorite thing about this is that most of what the
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: book the book was basically like published by a bishop,
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: and most of what the book talks about is basically
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: quoting Apostle Paul, who is the most hated apostle in
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: the New Testament bar none, especially because he is the
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: most vocally let's say, challenging to women.
• 3:00
  Speaker 2: So anyway, well, look, it should be pointed out that
• 3:05
  Speaker 2: the Arabic translation of Islam is submission. Yes, so read
• 3:11
  Speaker 2: this headline is get married and be Islamic guidebook for you.
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: Get married in Islam.
• 3:17
  Speaker 2: But somehow it becomes a completely different thing when translated
• 3:23
  Speaker 2: into Arabic. It's weird. It's weird. It's just weird, folks.
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: It is weird, it is. But we're gonna be looking
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: at this in the Patron Only show. So if you
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: guys want to join us for that, then please go
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: to feed the Bachelor dot com force last subscribe to
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: become a member and you'll be able to watch all
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: the additional content. And uh yeah, I mean I think
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: there's a lot going on there, lots of activities. It's
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: a good community and there's a lot of good people there.
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: And like I said, I mean if the community as
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: a discord server didn't exist when I met Lindsay, but
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: I did meet Lindsay through the unity of people who
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: are fans of HBr, and I recommend it. I think
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: that they're good people. They're a little on the spectrum,
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: but they're good people regardless. But anyway, what the good spectrum.
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: It's a good spectrum, it's not. It's not the bad one. No, no,
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: not the other spectrum spectrum.
• 4:19
  Speaker 2: Just the spectrum is the good one. The narcissistic spectrum,
• 4:23
  Speaker 2: it is the bad one, but no one ever talks
• 4:26
  Speaker 2: about the bad one. They like, it's the good one. Narcissism.
• 4:30
  Speaker 2: Oh yeah, cluster B is also a spectrum, but when
• 4:33
  Speaker 2: people say the spectrum they mean autism, completely disregarding the
• 4:40
  Speaker 2: cluster B spectrum.
• 4:42
  Speaker 3: You know, it's funny. Every time I do talk about
• 4:45
  Speaker 3: that other spectrum, I get mobbed by people from that
• 4:49
  Speaker 3: spectrum who are angry with me, and they tell me
• 4:52
  Speaker 3: they're not all of that, and then they engage in
• 4:55
  Speaker 3: a bunch of behaviors that demonstrate that actually, yes they are.
• 5:00
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, uh.
• 5:03
  Speaker 1: Anyway, Yeah, and if you don't want to wake up
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: one morning to find that we've been yeeded from the internet,
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: please go to badger feed dot com. That's badgerfeed dot com.
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: That's where our content lives. And with all that out
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: of the way, I think we're ready to get into
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: today's stories. So let us do that, all right. First
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: things first, some good news and a follow up. So
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: there is a new film coming out this fall called Ebenezer.
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: It is an upcoming twenty twenty six Christmas dark fantasy
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: film directed by Ty West, a dramatic and stylized reimagining
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: of Charles Dickens's eighteen forty three novella A Christmas Carol. Yes,
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: another Christmas Carol adaptation, and I'm okay with it because
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: I love that story. But anyway, In Dickinson Dickensonian Dickensean
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: Dickensei in London, the miserly and misanthropic businessman Ebenezer Scrooge
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: played by Johnny Depp, a wealthy Christmas hated loner who
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: despises generosity and human connection, is visited on Christmas Eve
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: by the ghost of his late business partner, Jacob Marley,
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: played by Ian McKellen. Marley warns him of the you
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: guys know the story, I'll I'll just read it anyway,
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: warns him of.
• 6:17
  Speaker 2: The change, for I would have actually accepted a Rastafarian
• 6:22
  Speaker 2: Marley for obvious reasons.
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that would have been funny, right, they should, they
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: should do Christmas Carol. But all of the characters are
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: played by famous musicians, so you could have. Well, we'll
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: get to that anyway. Anyway, Marley warns him of the
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: chains forged by a lifetime of greed and announces that
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: three spirits will haunt him that night. So he experiences
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: the three spirits, the Christmas Past Spirits, played by Andrea
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: Riseborough as the Ghost of Christmas Past, Trammel Tillman plays
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: the Ghost of the Present, and Daisy Ridley plays the
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: Ghost of the Christmas to Come. Yeah, she's playing She's
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: playing death. That's so genius. No, I'm not either, So anyway,
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: you know the story goes So. The film, described with
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: the tagline the name you know the Story you Don't,
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: promises a darker, expanded take on the classic ghost story
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: while retaining its core themes of regret, compassion, and transformation.
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: Except for release in November of this year. But the
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: main reason I'm not bringing this up to hype a movie,
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: even if it is like one of my favorite stories
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: and it gets adapted all the time with you know,
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: in various ways, some more successful than others. But it's
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: really to say, look, I guess enough time has passed
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: that Johnny Depp can get work again, and he is
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: getting it, and this is good like he wasn't. I know,
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: he's like already a pretty well off guy. He's not
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: you know, eating out of trash cans or anything like that.
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: But symbolically, I think this is important because it wasn't
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: even just the Me Too movement, although I do think
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: that this, this whole thing with Amber Heard was kind
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: of like propped up by the people involved with Me
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: Too and Times Up because they needed, like, you know,
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: a scalp, right and Johnny Depp was a really good
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: scalp to get and it did not work, although it
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: did destroy his career for a while, as well as
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: some of the you know, the the ways that it
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: affected his children because of the allegations Amber Heard made.
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: And since I did do a follow up on Amber
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: Heard's half of this equation a few weeks back that
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: you know showed that she was basically sleeping around when
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: Johnny Depp was not, or at least not that we
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: know of. It's also good to note that Johnny Depp
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: is back in business. He's getting work again. The trailer
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: is out now, you can watch it. It looks it
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: looks good. It's Johnny Depp. What do you what do
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: you know? I mean, I thought it was a Tim
• 8:47
  Speaker 1: Burton movie when I saw the trailer, and it's not.
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: I guess maybe that's more of a thing that Gihnny
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: Depp does to movies when he's in them. But anyway,
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: I want to know what you guys think, so I'm
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: gonna hand I give up the floor to whoever wants
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: to speak.
• 9:00
  Speaker 2: You don't need the likes of Calshi to tell me
• 9:02
  Speaker 2: the odds of this movie being woke garbage. Yet more
• 9:08
  Speaker 2: of the same woke garbage everyone's sick of. I'm happy
• 9:12
  Speaker 2: for Johnny Depp, but to be honest, that doesn't mean
• 9:16
  Speaker 2: I'm happy with him. I'm happy that he's found work,
• 9:20
  Speaker 2: that he's got out from under Amberherd's destructive web of lies.
• 9:26
  Speaker 2: It really did cost him tens of millions, you know,
• 9:30
  Speaker 2: if not hundreds of millions in this period where he
• 9:32
  Speaker 2: couldn't find work. Amberhard got off light as fuck with
• 9:37
  Speaker 2: whatever poultry sum. She still hasn't caufed up. But I mean,
• 9:44
  Speaker 2: if the movie turns out to be good, like if
• 9:47
  Speaker 2: it's just telling the story, not just using the story
• 9:52
  Speaker 2: to springboard into the message, then I'll be like, okay, good.
• 9:58
  Speaker 2: But if it turns out to be more of the
• 10:00
  Speaker 2: man hating, white hating, woke slop of which we're already
• 10:04
  Speaker 2: sick and tired, and I suspect it will be, then
• 10:09
  Speaker 2: what scant sympathy I had for Johnny Depp will disappear
• 10:13
  Speaker 2: in a small puff of smoke. I really hope you
• 10:17
  Speaker 2: learned a lesson, Johnny, the lesson not to participate in
• 10:22
  Speaker 2: the demented, guynocentric Hollywood machine that put you through years
• 10:28
  Speaker 2: of hell and almost ruin your ruins your life. I
• 10:31
  Speaker 2: will be really disappointed, Johnny if you turn around and
• 10:35
  Speaker 2: dive right back into that slowry chamber of filth as
• 10:40
  Speaker 2: though nothing has happened. But I'm pretty sure that's what's
• 10:43
  Speaker 2: going to happen. I mean, the movie is at least
• 10:48
  Speaker 2: guaranteed to be a letdown, given all the competition. You've
• 10:53
  Speaker 2: got to compete with Michael Caine and the Muppets. Motherfucker.
• 10:58
  Speaker 2: You can't deal with that. Ship is peak and it
• 11:01
  Speaker 2: always will be. Not to mention that the definitive Disney
• 11:05
  Speaker 2: version from before Disney went evil, the the the eighties
• 11:10
  Speaker 2: one with Scrooge McDuck. It was so good it spawned
• 11:15
  Speaker 2: duck Tails, which itself spawned other spin offs like Dark
• 11:21
  Speaker 2: Winged Dark and all other kinds of that humble TV movie.
• 11:26
  Speaker 2: Mickey's Christmas Carol might be what kicks started the Disney
• 11:29
  Speaker 2: renaissance of the late eighties and early nineties. Why it
• 11:35
  Speaker 2: was called Mickey's Christmas Carol is a mystery to me.
• 11:38
  Speaker 2: Mickey doesn't do ship. He's Bob Cratchy, he doesn't. He's
• 11:40
  Speaker 2: a tertiary character. Mickey never does ship gets all the
• 11:46
  Speaker 2: credit anyway. Sorry, I'm in the weeds. Now with with
• 11:50
  Speaker 2: with my cartoon.
• 11:52
  Speaker 1: Before before you cut us, cut it up and put
• 11:56
  Speaker 1: a bow on it. What is again? See in Dickenzie
• 12:01
  Speaker 1: in London?
• 12:02
  Speaker 2: What is that? That just mop ad It's made eighteenages.
• 12:07
  Speaker 2: It's Victorian Britain.
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: Okay.
• 12:09
  Speaker 2: When we were leading the way in the industrial revelation,
• 12:12
  Speaker 2: when when Britain was the indisputable capital of the world.
• 12:17
  Speaker 1: I didn't know it was named after Charles Dickens, like,
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: or at least people think of it that way.
• 12:22
  Speaker 2: Yeah, Christmas Carol is a Charles Dickens story.
• 12:26
  Speaker 3: I guess it's because he had a particular portrayal of
• 12:31
  Speaker 3: subcultures of that era and you know, neighborhoods of that
• 12:35
  Speaker 3: era and stuff like that, and explored both wealth and
• 12:39
  Speaker 3: poverty in that era. That's probably kind of like there's
• 12:45
  Speaker 3: a difference between America in the nineteen fifties and then
• 12:52
  Speaker 3: television America in the nineteen fifties and movie America in
• 12:57
  Speaker 3: the nineteen fifties, if that makes since.
• 13:02
  Speaker 2: But yeah, and big shoes to fill on this one, guys.
• 13:07
  Speaker 2: It's a It's a great story, arguably one of the
• 13:10
  Speaker 2: greatest stories ever told, and it has been done great
• 13:14
  Speaker 2: justice over the years in many unexpected directions such as
• 13:18
  Speaker 2: Disney and the Muppets. This will be very easy to
• 13:22
  Speaker 2: fuck up, and they almost certainly will fuck it up
• 13:27
  Speaker 2: relatively or just as a standalone. Anyway, That's all I've
• 13:32
  Speaker 2: got for today.
• 13:33
  Speaker 3: Go away, now, there you go. I think it is
• 13:37
  Speaker 3: a good sign that Depp is able to move on
• 13:42
  Speaker 3: and get work, and it's it's actually a good sign,
• 13:47
  Speaker 3: even though, yeah, there is always a chance that this
• 13:51
  Speaker 3: will be woke garbage, but it's a good sign that
• 13:53
  Speaker 3: it's it's not Tim Burton, because you know, everybody would
• 13:58
  Speaker 3: be like, well, he's just helping an old friend. He's
• 14:00
  Speaker 3: not really back in the game. You know, he's just
• 14:03
  Speaker 3: working with an old friend here. But it indisputably his
• 14:09
  Speaker 3: career was not thoroughly wrecked. It's not completely in the doghouse,
• 14:15
  Speaker 3: and he has great potential to come back and continue working.
• 14:20
  Speaker 3: And he should. He should have that potential because he
• 14:26
  Speaker 3: did not do what he was accused of and he
• 14:29
  Speaker 3: was a victim of abuse. But at the same time,
• 14:35
  Speaker 3: you know, it's great that this was his result. But
• 14:43
  Speaker 3: I know lots of guys that I have talked to,
• 14:46
  Speaker 3: some guys I know personally, some guys that I've met
• 14:50
  Speaker 3: on social media or talked to via email because they've
• 14:56
  Speaker 3: run across my blog or statements I've made about a
• 15:01
  Speaker 3: seven years in hell case and stuff like that, and
• 15:04
  Speaker 3: ask me for advice. And there is a pattern of
• 15:10
  Speaker 3: men who go through ordeals of false allegation having difficulty
• 15:15
  Speaker 3: going back to work. And it's not just that it's
• 15:17
  Speaker 3: hard for them to get another job. It's hard for
• 15:21
  Speaker 3: them to work where there are women. And I know
• 15:26
  Speaker 3: a couple of them who can't. They just can't there.
• 15:30
  Speaker 3: They're unable to put themselves in a circumstance where a
• 15:36
  Speaker 3: woman might, after taking issue with them, either boldface falsely
• 15:43
  Speaker 3: accuse them, just write bald face bald face lie or
• 15:48
  Speaker 3: convince herself because women do that too. They lie to
• 15:52
  Speaker 3: themselves more than they lie to you, that that something
• 15:57
  Speaker 3: completely innocuous is nefarious, or something that has nothing to
• 16:03
  Speaker 3: do with them bothers them or should bother them, And
• 16:07
  Speaker 3: that's all that it takes. You end up in a
• 16:09
  Speaker 3: situation where you're facing an allegation when you did nothing wrong,
• 16:16
  Speaker 3: but she thinks you did something, and because she believes
• 16:22
  Speaker 3: what she's saying, you end up having to defend against
• 16:26
  Speaker 3: your version of events versus her version of events rather
• 16:30
  Speaker 3: than straight up no, I was never there. And because
• 16:34
  Speaker 3: of that, you know that possibility existing having to deal
• 16:39
  Speaker 3: with human resources and having to deal with the court
• 16:42
  Speaker 3: system again, and all that. I know guys that are
• 16:45
  Speaker 3: unable to go back to work. One who has worked
• 16:50
  Speaker 3: in a no female environment basically, and one who just
• 16:56
  Speaker 3: is disabled, he has PTSD from his experience and he's
• 17:02
  Speaker 3: still dealing with it. So, you know, I like the
• 17:09
  Speaker 3: idea of recovery, and I know that it's not positive.
• 17:17
  Speaker 3: You know, it's not upbeat, it's not white pill talking
• 17:22
  Speaker 3: about these other men in their experiences. But that is
• 17:25
  Speaker 3: the other side of the coin. And that's why I
• 17:30
  Speaker 3: think that when somebody makes a false complaint to police,
• 17:34
  Speaker 3: they should go to jail. If they make an allegation
• 17:39
  Speaker 3: to human resources and it can be proved that what
• 17:43
  Speaker 3: they said is a lie. The person didn't do what
• 17:46
  Speaker 3: they said the person. What the person did isn't harassment,
• 17:51
  Speaker 3: and it's not you know, they portrayed it as vindictive
• 17:57
  Speaker 3: or malicious, and it's not either of those things. That
• 18:00
  Speaker 3: I should be a firing offense. If you lie about
• 18:02
  Speaker 3: somebody to get them in trouble within an authority figure,
• 18:07
  Speaker 3: there should be a harsh consequence, very harsh, and unfortunately
• 18:13
  Speaker 3: we aren't there yet. It needs to change, it needs
• 18:16
  Speaker 3: to happen, and it's basically my takeaway from this. I'm
• 18:21
  Speaker 3: glad that he's doing better. I wish it could be
• 18:25
  Speaker 3: that way for all men, because it can't everybody that
• 18:31
  Speaker 3: puts them in through what he went through should face
• 18:36
  Speaker 3: a jail sentence for doing that, and it shouldn't be short.
• 18:44
  Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, I guess the only thing I was
• 18:50
  Speaker 1: gonna say to this is that I think that it
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: shows that you can recover, and I think that is
• 18:57
  Speaker 1: good that this has been the case. My thoughts on
• 19:02
  Speaker 1: you know, whether or not the film is going to
• 19:03
  Speaker 1: be any good. I don't know. The guy who directed
• 19:05
  Speaker 1: it is the same guy who directed these other movies
• 19:08
  Speaker 1: that I never saw those ex Pearl and something else.
• 19:11
  Speaker 1: They were like part of a series of films. I
• 19:15
  Speaker 1: don't know if they were any good, but I do
• 19:16
  Speaker 1: know that they were like being talked about for a while.
• 19:19
  Speaker 1: I think they were like horror films or something, but
• 19:21
  Speaker 1: I don't know, so I guess we'll find out. But
• 19:25
  Speaker 1: it doesn't really matter, like I probably won't go to
• 19:27
  Speaker 1: the theater for it or anything like that, even though
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: I like this story. But I'm just like I said,
• 19:32
  Speaker 1: I'm glad that he's able to get work again. I
• 19:36
  Speaker 1: think he deserves to, and I do think that it's
• 19:40
  Speaker 1: I guess you could see it as a symbolic victory,
• 19:42
  Speaker 1: but yeah, sure, there's a lot of guys out there
• 19:44
  Speaker 1: that are not as lucky, and that is unfortunate. And yes,
• 19:48
  Speaker 1: something does have to change, and there should be penalties
• 19:51
  Speaker 1: or false allegations. I think the penalty should be whatever
• 19:55
  Speaker 1: the crime would have been served if the person accused
• 19:59
  Speaker 1: was found guilty. I think that would be fair enough.
• 20:02
  Speaker 3: It should be commensurate with you know, what happened, what
• 20:06
  Speaker 3: happens to the guy, if if random people did to
• 20:11
  Speaker 3: the guy, what the legal system did you know? After
• 20:16
  Speaker 3: in response to the allegation, if it had just been
• 20:18
  Speaker 3: random people doing it, what crimes would they be charged with?
• 20:22
  Speaker 3: You add up the seriousness of those crimes that should
• 20:25
  Speaker 3: be on the accuser. So if they, you know, hassled him,
• 20:29
  Speaker 3: then it's just harassment. But if they arrested him and
• 20:33
  Speaker 3: put him in jail, then it's kidnapping.
• 20:37
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 20:37
  Speaker 3: If they kept him for very long then it then
• 20:40
  Speaker 3: it's uh kidnapping, false imprisoned imprisonment. If they made him
• 20:46
  Speaker 3: pay to get out, which you usually have to do,
• 20:49
  Speaker 3: you usually have to post bail, Uh, that's extortion, right.
• 20:53
  Speaker 3: They can they can look at that and say, all right,
• 20:56
  Speaker 3: this man experienced kidnapping, being wrongly imprisoned and extortion. That's
• 21:07
  Speaker 3: the level of criminality that she should be charged for.
• 21:10
  Speaker 3: And whatever the total sentencing for those crimes would be,
• 21:16
  Speaker 3: that's what she should be sentenced to because she set
• 21:21
  Speaker 3: that in motion on purpose.
• 21:25
  Speaker 1: All right, well, let us know what you guys think
• 21:27
  Speaker 1: about this one of the comments. We're gonna move on
• 21:29
  Speaker 1: to the next story. So we got to talk about
• 21:32
  Speaker 1: the Shiloh Hendrix trial, all right. Phase one of the
• 21:38
  Speaker 1: Shallow Hendrix trial. A woman in Rochester, Minnesota, has been
• 21:42
  Speaker 1: found guilty of one count of disorderly conduct after an
• 21:45
  Speaker 1: incident involving an allegedly autistic black eight year old and
• 21:49
  Speaker 1: a Somali man. On April twenty eight, twenty twenty five,
• 21:53
  Speaker 1: thirty seven year old Shiloh Hendrix was enjoying a day
• 21:56
  Speaker 1: out with her child at Roy Sutherland Playground in soldiers
• 21:59
  Speaker 1: Field Park. During the outing, the eight year old began
• 22:03
  Speaker 1: rummaging around her diaper bag. After chasing him away, she
• 22:07
  Speaker 1: allegedly called him a nigger. This is when thirty three
• 22:10
  Speaker 1: year old Scharmaki bail Omar, I guess he's a Somalian
• 22:16
  Speaker 1: gentleman began filming her. Omar, who was charged in twenty
• 22:20
  Speaker 1: twenty two, with a slew of sexual offenses against a
• 22:23
  Speaker 1: sixteen year old, but later had them dropped in the
• 22:26
  Speaker 1: inter interest of justice. According to the state, began filming
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: and taunting Hendrix. Video of the incident begins with Omar
• 22:33
  Speaker 1: following Hendrix, who was carrying her child, and then he
• 22:36
  Speaker 1: says to her, you call him a nigger the child?
• 22:39
  Speaker 1: Did you call the child the nigga word? Okay, why
• 22:42
  Speaker 1: don't you have the boss who say it right now?
• 22:44
  Speaker 2: Again, by the way, Brian is allowed to say these,
• 22:47
  Speaker 2: I can say it. Brian is all blinds of things.
• 22:50
  Speaker 2: He's he's pot white pot, hispanic pop black.
• 22:56
  Speaker 1: No, I am. I can say all of it. I can.
• 22:58
  Speaker 1: I have complete and free and I have the wild
• 23:02
  Speaker 1: Card of cards. I'm just reading the write up that
• 23:08
  Speaker 1: Mike j gave me. I think this was like a
• 23:10
  Speaker 1: dare and I'm taking him up. I'm taking up on it.
• 23:14
  Speaker 1: At this point, Hendrix calls the man a nigger and
• 23:17
  Speaker 1: walks further away until it is pursued by Omar. The
• 23:21
  Speaker 1: video ends with Hendrix walking away and Omar saying, Okay,
• 23:24
  Speaker 1: we'll see what the Internet has to say about you.
• 23:27
  Speaker 1: During the forty nine seconds A video of the incident,
• 23:30
  Speaker 1: Omar said the word nigger five times, about as many
• 23:33
  Speaker 1: times as I had to say it just now, and
• 23:35
  Speaker 1: Hendrix said it four times. Oh no, we're counting how
• 23:38
  Speaker 1: many times people are saying it. Fast forward to last week,
• 23:41
  Speaker 1: and a jury has reached a split verdict on the case.
• 23:44
  Speaker 1: On the first count of misdemeanor disorderly conduct for calling
• 23:48
  Speaker 1: the eight year old who rummaged through her belongings a nigger,
• 23:51
  Speaker 1: she was found not guilty because there was no evidence
• 23:53
  Speaker 1: of that, but on the second count of misdemeanor disorderly
• 23:56
  Speaker 1: conduct against Omar, she was found guilty and sentenced to probation,
• 24:00
  Speaker 1: two hundred hours of community work service, and a fine
• 24:03
  Speaker 1: of one thousand dollars. Hendrix's attorney, Brian Carlos, has already
• 24:08
  Speaker 1: planned to appeal the case. So I'm gonna play the
• 24:10
  Speaker 1: clip here of the lawyer, and I'm just gonna play
• 24:15
  Speaker 1: the whole thing. Okay, it takes about eight minutes.
• 24:18
  Speaker 2: And it's all important what he's got a lot to say,
• 24:21
  Speaker 2: and he's got a.
• 24:22
  Speaker 1: Lot to say, and it's all gold. So we'll just
• 24:24
  Speaker 1: listen to what he says. Okay, So here we got.
• 24:28
  Speaker 4: I think it's pathetic if they gets said, I think
• 24:31
  Speaker 4: it's sick.
• 24:32
  Speaker 2: I think shocked.
• 24:35
  Speaker 4: I've never had a trial where they keep people. This
• 24:37
  Speaker 4: is a misdemeanor. By the way, until ten thirty at night.
• 24:40
  Speaker 4: Never even heard of that one before. Most courts, most counties,
• 24:44
  Speaker 4: what they do is around four to thirty five o'clock
• 24:46
  Speaker 4: is they say, Okay, we're gonna send the jurors home.
• 24:49
  Speaker 4: They got kids, they got families, they got things to do.
• 24:51
  Speaker 5: No, we're keeping them. I've never heard of that before.
• 24:53
  Speaker 4: So that alone, I know this is a thing. I
• 24:57
  Speaker 4: guess Olmstead County they do this. I thought that was bizarre.
• 25:00
  Speaker 4: But the verdict itself. Let's make something clear here. Let's
• 25:04
  Speaker 4: make something very clear. She's acquitted, not guilty, right, not
• 25:11
  Speaker 4: guilty with the child. The state reads what a five
• 25:15
  Speaker 4: minute victim impact statement about the child.
• 25:19
  Speaker 5: She was acquitted about the child.
• 25:22
  Speaker 4: She's convicted on the count involving the cameraman, who they
• 25:27
  Speaker 4: never called to testify. Keep this in mind, they never
• 25:32
  Speaker 4: called the cameraman to testify. This judge prohibited us from
• 25:38
  Speaker 4: telling the jury that Jamali shired. Jamali had a GoFundMe.
• 25:44
  Speaker 4: Page three hundred and forty thousand dollars He testified that
• 25:49
  Speaker 4: it was done in May last year.
• 25:52
  Speaker 5: Done. That's not true.
• 25:54
  Speaker 4: There's a link on the bottom of the page that
• 25:57
  Speaker 4: goes to another open account.
• 26:00
  Speaker 5: My investigator hit.
• 26:02
  Speaker 4: The link last night donated ten dollars. It's open. You
• 26:06
  Speaker 4: can donate right now. You can donate right now to
• 26:10
  Speaker 4: Shire Jamali's go fund page. Right now, it's open. He
• 26:15
  Speaker 4: testified under oath and perjured himself.
• 26:17
  Speaker 5: He purjured himself over and over and over and over again.
• 26:22
  Speaker 4: This was without any stretch of the imagination. It was
• 26:26
  Speaker 4: like I was fighting the prosecutor and the judge. He
• 26:29
  Speaker 4: was like, I'm taking on two parties at the same time,
• 26:33
  Speaker 4: the judge and the prosecutor. Was very bizarre, very bizarre.
• 26:37
  Speaker 4: GoFundMe huge, worldwide giant. It's like Google, right, this is
• 26:44
  Speaker 4: so big. My investigator was going to testify that this
• 26:49
  Speaker 4: page was shired Jamali's name on it. Five year old,
• 26:55
  Speaker 4: the kid's nine, five year old, three hundred.
• 26:58
  Speaker 5: And forty thousand dollars. He raised.
• 27:01
  Speaker 4: The judge would not let me show it to a jury. Sorry,
• 27:06
  Speaker 4: the judge would not let me show it to the jury. Okay,
• 27:10
  Speaker 4: And if you go through any of you right now
• 27:12
  Speaker 4: can go online, right now, right now, and.
• 27:16
  Speaker 5: You can't authenticate this. You can't lay foundation. This prosecutor
• 27:20
  Speaker 5: is telling the judge, Oh, how do we know this
• 27:23
  Speaker 5: is real? How do we know this is real? Anyone
• 27:25
  Speaker 5: can make this up?
• 27:27
  Speaker 4: You go online right now, today, right now, go on
• 27:30
  Speaker 4: that page unless.
• 27:31
  Speaker 5: They run and take it down. Scroll down.
• 27:34
  Speaker 4: He has an open go fund me, he said on
• 27:37
  Speaker 4: the stand.
• 27:38
  Speaker 5: He does not. He lied and lied and lied and lied.
• 27:42
  Speaker 4: This entire things is shakedown. They ought to be ashamed
• 27:45
  Speaker 4: of themselves. The prosecutor should be assumed of himself. The
• 27:48
  Speaker 4: judge should be ashamed of herself. I had a battle
• 27:51
  Speaker 4: here for four days on a stupid misdemeanor disorderly conduct.
• 27:55
  Speaker 4: This is nuts, this is crazy. Three hundred and forty thousand. Nope,
• 28:01
  Speaker 4: can't show the jury five year old. The kid was nine,
• 28:05
  Speaker 4: his name's on it. Can't authenticate it, still.
• 28:08
  Speaker 5: Open account, So we're gonna appeal it. We will appeal it.
• 28:12
  Speaker 5: We have so many appellate issues. I don't even know
• 28:15
  Speaker 5: where to begin. Judge's screaming at me during the trial.
• 28:19
  Speaker 4: Judges interrupted me every time I want to make a record.
• 28:22
  Speaker 4: Judge says to me, mister Carralis, you keep you keep
• 28:27
  Speaker 4: wanting to make.
• 28:28
  Speaker 5: A record after I rule. This is crazy.
• 28:32
  Speaker 4: Most rulings during a trial by a judge are made
• 28:37
  Speaker 4: during the trial, and then when you take a break,
• 28:41
  Speaker 4: you make a record.
• 28:42
  Speaker 5: Right, you take a break, you make a record.
• 28:44
  Speaker 4: I kept asking, if you're in there and you watch
• 28:47
  Speaker 4: the trial, I kept asking, I need to make a record.
• 28:49
  Speaker 5: I need to make a record.
• 28:51
  Speaker 4: She get upset, running the back, get upset, running the back,
• 28:54
  Speaker 4: your honor.
• 28:54
  Speaker 5: I need to make a record.
• 28:56
  Speaker 4: It started piling up, all these objections, start piling up,
• 28:59
  Speaker 4: your honor, need to make a record. I need to
• 29:01
  Speaker 4: make a record. She'd run in the back. I'm like, judge,
• 29:04
  Speaker 4: we got to make a record. This is this is insane.
• 29:06
  Speaker 4: This isn't law, this is a circus, this is monkey court.
• 29:11
  Speaker 5: This is nuts. Right you make a record.
• 29:14
  Speaker 4: The judge should come out and say, okay, I made
• 29:17
  Speaker 4: my ruling, mister krallis what is your record you like
• 29:19
  Speaker 4: to make?
• 29:20
  Speaker 5: I try to make a record.
• 29:21
  Speaker 4: She interrupts me from the beginning, right from the start.
• 29:24
  Speaker 4: Every time I try to make a record, she interrupted
• 29:27
  Speaker 4: me every single time.
• 29:28
  Speaker 5: Every single time, I'm like, your honor, I'm trying to
• 29:31
  Speaker 5: make a record. That's what we do as lawyers, right.
• 29:34
  Speaker 4: I don't know if the late people or the people
• 29:36
  Speaker 4: in the community understand.
• 29:37
  Speaker 5: It's the way trials work is. Judges make rulings during trial.
• 29:41
  Speaker 4: We don't want to interrupt the trial to make a
• 29:43
  Speaker 4: record every.
• 29:43
  Speaker 5: Time someone objects and there's a ruling.
• 29:46
  Speaker 4: So when there's a break or you go to lunch
• 29:49
  Speaker 4: or at the end of the day, you make a record.
• 29:51
  Speaker 5: She won't let me make a record. If you're in there,
• 29:54
  Speaker 5: you heard it. She talk over me, she interrupt me,
• 29:57
  Speaker 5: won't let me make a record, over and over and
• 30:00
  Speaker 5: over again. Why she didn't want anybody to hear what They.
• 30:04
  Speaker 4: Didn't disclose the name of Shiah Jamali until Monday. If
• 30:08
  Speaker 4: the first day at trial.
• 30:09
  Speaker 5: No, I'm not done, sir.
• 30:10
  Speaker 4: Until the first day at trial, they didn't even disclose
• 30:14
  Speaker 4: his name. Think about that a trial, a jury trial
• 30:19
  Speaker 4: in the.
• 30:19
  Speaker 5: United States of America.
• 30:21
  Speaker 4: I didn't get the name until Monday when we started
• 30:25
  Speaker 4: the trial. Until Monday, and then my investigators do a
• 30:29
  Speaker 4: record check. Then we uncover, oh my god, he's got
• 30:32
  Speaker 4: this GoFundMe three hundred and forty thousand.
• 30:36
  Speaker 1: Mister Crell is a couple of things.
• 30:37
  Speaker 3: Sure, according to the court, you agree to those free
• 30:40
  Speaker 3: trial terms on not getting the witnesses beforehand, and.
• 30:44
  Speaker 5: Did not agree to it. Here's the deal, here's the deal.
• 30:47
  Speaker 4: I thought I was coming down here to try a
• 30:49
  Speaker 4: free speech case.
• 30:51
  Speaker 5: You all saw the video. I thought I was coming.
• 30:54
  Speaker 4: To Rochester to try a free speech case based on
• 30:58
  Speaker 4: the video.
• 30:59
  Speaker 5: Then it took kind of entirely different. It just turned right.
• 31:04
  Speaker 4: Mister Jamali takes the stand. One answer any question I
• 31:08
  Speaker 4: asked him. He sat up there like this, Oh, I
• 31:10
  Speaker 4: don't understand. He looked at his interpret I don't understand.
• 31:13
  Speaker 4: I don't understand, over and over and over again. When
• 31:17
  Speaker 4: the prosecutor asked him a question, he had no problem.
• 31:20
  Speaker 5: Through the interpreter understanding. Never had a problem understanding.
• 31:24
  Speaker 4: Not one time I put the detective on a stand. Detective,
• 31:28
  Speaker 4: did he ever have a tough time understanding?
• 31:31
  Speaker 5: You Never had a tough time understanding.
• 31:33
  Speaker 4: Never had a tough time, not one time. To the detective,
• 31:37
  Speaker 4: have any problems understanding? You're in the jury room or
• 31:40
  Speaker 4: in the trial, you're in the courreom, you're in the
• 31:42
  Speaker 4: court room. You're in the court room. He acted like
• 31:45
  Speaker 4: he didn't understand any.
• 31:47
  Speaker 5: Question I asked him. Every single question was like pulling teeth.
• 31:50
  Speaker 4: It's like, huh oh, it went on and on and on.
• 31:56
  Speaker 5: This is a fraud. This whole thing's a fraud. That
• 31:59
  Speaker 5: cam the cameraman. By the way, let's make something clear.
• 32:03
  Speaker 5: They didn't convict him with the child.
• 32:06
  Speaker 4: Your headlines can be about the child. No, they convicted
• 32:09
  Speaker 4: her on the video with the cameraman. The disorderly conduct
• 32:13
  Speaker 4: is about the cameraman. And from what I understand about
• 32:16
  Speaker 4: the cameraman, he has a goalfund me and his gofund me.
• 32:20
  Speaker 5: Hold on his gofund me is he died. He has
• 32:24
  Speaker 5: a goalfundme that he died. Give money to the cameraman.
• 32:27
  Speaker 4: Who died, and from what I understand, he is well alive.
• 32:32
  Speaker 4: This whole thing is fucking bullshit.
• 32:34
  Speaker 5: This is a fraud. This is a fraud upon the community.
• 32:42
  Speaker 1: So the cameraman, as he's referring to him, he's actually like,
• 32:45
  Speaker 1: I think he like left the country, but he got
• 32:47
  Speaker 1: his money. So yeah, that's basically a summary of the story.
• 32:54
  Speaker 1: So I again see the floor to where everyone wants
• 32:57
  Speaker 1: to say anything.
• 32:58
  Speaker 2: Welcome to two tier policing America. You thought, as long
• 33:05
  Speaker 2: as you still have your guns, you'll always have your
• 33:09
  Speaker 2: free speech.
• 33:09
  Speaker 1: This is the judge. By the way, I'm just putting
• 33:11
  Speaker 1: that this is the judge.
• 33:13
  Speaker 2: Of course, the rule of law is only robust as
• 33:16
  Speaker 2: the judges who are interpreting it. They're often referred to
• 33:21
  Speaker 2: you to euphemistically as activist judges. Yeah, no, all judges
• 33:28
  Speaker 2: are activists judges kind of by design, they're supposed to
• 33:30
  Speaker 2: be like active and whatever. But what we're dealing with
• 33:35
  Speaker 2: is just racist judges, anti white judges. I've never been
• 33:41
  Speaker 2: to law school, but if it's anything like any other school,
• 33:47
  Speaker 2: they are being taught to believe the three main axioms
• 33:53
  Speaker 2: of what we call woke. One women are better than men.
• 33:58
  Speaker 2: Two non white people are better than white people. Three
• 34:02
  Speaker 2: because we believe that we're better than you and you
• 34:06
  Speaker 2: can't help. But notice that these extremists are so extremists
• 34:10
  Speaker 2: that they genuinely think they can change reality by redefining
• 34:14
  Speaker 2: words situationally on the fly. The ordinary blue head prolls
• 34:21
  Speaker 2: will do it with everyday language. A woman is what
• 34:23
  Speaker 2: we say it is, an American is what we say
• 34:26
  Speaker 2: it is. A violent riot is a peaceful processed, and
• 34:31
  Speaker 2: vice versa, whensoever we say so. And the judges do
• 34:38
  Speaker 2: it by interpreting, not just everyday words, but legal words,
• 34:43
  Speaker 2: in this case disorderly conduct. Introducing that term into your
• 34:51
  Speaker 2: legal system was a mistake. I mean, the biggest mistake
• 34:55
  Speaker 2: was flooding the system with corrupt zealots who will play
• 34:58
  Speaker 2: fast and loose with reality. But a term like disorderly
• 35:01
  Speaker 2: conduct is exactly the kind of skeleton key that they
• 35:07
  Speaker 2: will use for whatever nefarious means they can. It's very
• 35:12
  Speaker 2: much the same in the UK, much worse. Even if
• 35:16
  Speaker 2: you're a British native and any cop is you saying
• 35:21
  Speaker 2: a swear word or any derogatory word, or any word
• 35:25
  Speaker 2: they can perceive as stirring up hatred, you're under arrest
• 35:30
  Speaker 2: for disorder. Telling someone to speak English disorder, advocating for
• 35:37
  Speaker 2: functioning borders disorder. Even if you are explicitly calling for order,
• 35:46
  Speaker 2: for peace through harmony, for the law to be enforced
• 35:49
  Speaker 2: without fear or favor, that's the wrong kind of order,
• 35:55
  Speaker 2: and you're under arrest. If order is or any given
• 36:00
  Speaker 2: a bunch of elites say it is, then the law
• 36:04
  Speaker 2: is what any given bunch of elites say is, regardless
• 36:09
  Speaker 2: of what might be written down in actual you know, laws.
• 36:15
  Speaker 2: You could be arrested just for raising an eyebrow, like
• 36:20
  Speaker 2: one eyebrow in silent incredulity, while the fifty IQ shadow
• 36:28
  Speaker 2: beasts are burning everything down around you. And that's not disorder.
• 36:35
  Speaker 2: On the contrary, that is the very order that has
• 36:38
  Speaker 2: been ordered by our masters, by our owners. What do
• 36:48
  Speaker 2: you own the world? How do you own disorder? Somewhere
• 36:55
  Speaker 2: between the sacred silence of sleep disorder? It's harder. Yeah,
• 37:00
  Speaker 2: I don't know what to tell you. I guess you
• 37:04
  Speaker 2: do still have your guns, America? And what was the
• 37:08
  Speaker 2: point in having the guns again? What is the necessity
• 37:12
  Speaker 2: of quote well regulated militias unquote as referenced in your
• 37:18
  Speaker 2: Second Amendment? Isn't it something to do with rising up
• 37:24
  Speaker 2: against Well, I'm not sure I'm at liberty to complete
• 37:30
  Speaker 2: that thought, even though I'm presently in the United States.
• 37:36
  Speaker 2: It doesn't matter. The First Amendment doesn't mean shit anymore,
• 37:41
  Speaker 2: not for me, a visitor, and not even for American citizens.
• 37:47
  Speaker 2: You can be arrested and charged with a crime if
• 37:52
  Speaker 2: you so much as utter the word nigger while you
• 37:55
  Speaker 2: are trying to walk away from a hostile Somalian nigga
• 38:01
  Speaker 2: who is actively trying to ruin your life. God only
• 38:06
  Speaker 2: knows what could happen to you. If you even sarcastically
• 38:09
  Speaker 2: suggest that you guys might want to actually form some
• 38:13
  Speaker 2: of those well regulated militious which we could go ahead
• 38:20
  Speaker 2: and call well ordered malicious. You're under attack from the
• 38:25
  Speaker 2: forces of chaos America. Chaos will call itself order in
• 38:32
  Speaker 2: order to enact chaos. It's chaos. It will do anything,
• 38:39
  Speaker 2: it will say anything in the pursuit of chaos. A
• 38:44
  Speaker 2: quote unquote melting pot is a form of chaos. By
• 38:49
  Speaker 2: the way. It's maximum entropy. When you can't even make
• 38:54
  Speaker 2: out one lump from another lump, when you can't even
• 38:58
  Speaker 2: tell the lumps from the liquid. It's what we call slop,
• 39:03
  Speaker 2: ladies and gentlemen. And you can't unslap slop. You can't
• 39:08
  Speaker 2: reduce entropy in a closed system. You can't break the
• 39:12
  Speaker 2: second law of thermodynamics. Bro It is the most sacrifanct
• 39:18
  Speaker 2: of all laws. You need to open the system. What
• 39:24
  Speaker 2: does that mean. That means you kick open the back door,
• 39:29
  Speaker 2: take the melting pot to the nearest storm drain, and
• 39:34
  Speaker 2: dump that slop back into the sewer from whence it came.
• 39:40
  Speaker 2: If that includes me, so be it. But I'd recommend
• 39:48
  Speaker 2: starting with the Somalians. They appear to be shameless frauds
• 39:56
  Speaker 2: to a man, and indeed to a woman. Just my
• 40:00
  Speaker 2: two cents, I won't give you my third and fourth
• 40:06
  Speaker 2: sense because that could get me arrested. God bless America.
• 40:16
  Speaker 3: So if you want to realize how political this is,
• 40:19
  Speaker 3: like if you don't already realize how political this is,
• 40:24
  Speaker 3: this matter was settled before I was born. It's what
• 40:31
  Speaker 3: they have done to this lady is it's likely going
• 40:35
  Speaker 3: to butt up against Cohen versus California, nineteen seventy one.
• 40:43
  Speaker 3: In that decision, the Supreme Court ruled five to four
• 40:47
  Speaker 3: that the government cannot punish speech simply because it is
• 40:51
  Speaker 3: offensive or vulgar. So unless she was using it in
• 40:57
  Speaker 3: the context of giving the guy a beat down or
• 41:01
  Speaker 3: disrupting his club that was had reserved the park, it's
• 41:09
  Speaker 3: kind of strange that they charged her with anything for
• 41:12
  Speaker 3: any reason. In fact, the fact that the dude was
• 41:15
  Speaker 3: following her with a camera should have gotten him in trouble.
• 41:18
  Speaker 3: Disorderly conduct usually gets charged in cases where people have
• 41:24
  Speaker 3: done something bad enough that they need to be charged
• 41:26
  Speaker 3: with a crime, but they haven't done anything bad enough
• 41:30
  Speaker 3: to get charged with something like assault or destruction of property,
• 41:33
  Speaker 3: things like that. They so they get disorderly conduct. A
• 41:36
  Speaker 3: couple of guys get into a fight in a bar
• 41:39
  Speaker 3: and it's bad enough that the people around them stop
• 41:44
  Speaker 3: having fun and the bouncer has to throw them both out.
• 41:47
  Speaker 3: Or somebody shows up in your neighborhood at three o'clock
• 41:51
  Speaker 3: in the morning and starts loudly doing donuts with their
• 41:53
  Speaker 3: new sports car, you know, something like that. That's disorderly conduct,
• 42:01
  Speaker 3: like using profane language. Only gets charged like that if
• 42:10
  Speaker 3: you start getting in people's faces about it. If it's
• 42:14
  Speaker 3: a nice, peaceful environment and all of a sudden you're
• 42:18
  Speaker 3: you're making a fuss and nobody else was making a fuss,
• 42:23
  Speaker 3: then then you might get disorderly conduct. But to say
• 42:28
  Speaker 3: words to somebody who is chasing you down and heckling you,
• 42:33
  Speaker 3: that's an argument, and people don't usually get disorderly conduct
• 42:37
  Speaker 3: for getting into an argument, especially if they're sober. Being
• 42:41
  Speaker 3: publicly drunk, that can get you if you If it's
• 42:45
  Speaker 3: not enough to charge you with public intoxication, they might
• 42:48
  Speaker 3: charge you with disorderly conduct. You know, if you break
• 42:51
  Speaker 3: into like the the VFW Post and interrupt one of
• 42:57
  Speaker 3: their their fun evenings, or you know, if they're doing
• 43:00
  Speaker 3: some kind of an awards ceremony or a remembrance ceremony
• 43:03
  Speaker 3: and you interrupt that, you probably get it that way too,
• 43:07
  Speaker 3: after they got done beating your ass. But you know,
• 43:12
  Speaker 3: none of this telling someone to leave you alone, and
• 43:19
  Speaker 3: then you know, responding to being baited over and over again,
• 43:24
  Speaker 3: like that's that's not disorderly conduct and it's bullshit that
• 43:29
  Speaker 3: that she got charged with that. And honestly, like I
• 43:33
  Speaker 3: said the guy, I wouldn't follow somebody around with a
• 43:36
  Speaker 3: camera like that. And I'm a photographer and a videographer
• 43:41
  Speaker 3: unless somebody paid me to follow them around like that,
• 43:44
  Speaker 3: Like here, follow me around with a camera. I'm not
• 43:47
  Speaker 3: doing it. It's work. But in any case, you know,
• 43:52
  Speaker 3: I certainly wouldn't do it to some poor random that
• 43:54
  Speaker 3: didn't want to be videographed or photographed. That's just mean.
• 43:59
  Speaker 3: And you know, that's basically what this guy was trying
• 44:01
  Speaker 3: to do. Be mean. His behavior was malicious, hers was not.
• 44:06
  Speaker 3: And I've seen some arguments online, well, this is a
• 44:13
  Speaker 3: men's issue because the kid was a boy, And this
• 44:17
  Speaker 3: is a men's issue because the kid was autistic, and
• 44:20
  Speaker 3: most autistic people were boys. I'm sorry, but a nine
• 44:24
  Speaker 3: year old knows better than to get into other people's stuff,
• 44:27
  Speaker 3: and a person who is autistic doesn't necessarily have an
• 44:35
  Speaker 3: excuse for not knowing better. And as you know, unless
• 44:39
  Speaker 3: somebody is disabled enough that they don't understand the difference
• 44:45
  Speaker 3: between just stuff and other people's stuff, in which case
• 44:50
  Speaker 3: they should have been better watched, it's it's not a
• 44:54
  Speaker 3: men's issue. It's not a autistic issue. It's a keep
• 45:01
  Speaker 3: your hands off other people's shit issue. So I'm not
• 45:06
  Speaker 3: buying that either, especially like debate came from people that
• 45:09
  Speaker 3: didn't follow me, and I don't know that they were
• 45:14
  Speaker 3: actually involved in the men's rights movement at all. Doesn't
• 45:19
  Speaker 3: mean that everybody that is involved does follow me. It's
• 45:22
  Speaker 3: just that I kind of know what reasons most people
• 45:26
  Speaker 3: who follow me follow me, and if you don't, I
• 45:28
  Speaker 3: have no idea where you're actually coming from. So yeah,
• 45:33
  Speaker 3: it's always it's always bullshit when somebody comes along and
• 45:36
  Speaker 3: says this bad behavior is a men's issue because the
• 45:39
  Speaker 3: person who did it is male, or this bad behavior
• 45:42
  Speaker 3: is a men's issue because the person who did it
• 45:45
  Speaker 3: has an issue that's usually a male issue. No, you
• 45:48
  Speaker 3: don't get to have boundary issues just because we're not feminists.
• 45:54
  Speaker 3: We won't defend stuff that people do wrong just because
• 45:57
  Speaker 3: they're male or male adjacent or whatever. So I hope
• 46:02
  Speaker 3: that they do appeal this. It's kind of unusual for
• 46:06
  Speaker 3: disorderly conduct to go this far because a lot of
• 46:09
  Speaker 3: lawyers will just tell you to, you know, deal with it.
• 46:13
  Speaker 3: It's usually off your record in like six months. But
• 46:19
  Speaker 3: but sometimes you do fight it, and sometimes you do
• 46:22
  Speaker 3: appeal if you if you lose the initial fight, and
• 46:25
  Speaker 3: I hope she does. I hope they do appeal, and
• 46:29
  Speaker 3: I hope we hear more about the case. I hope
• 46:32
  Speaker 3: that he's able to go into the courtroom and just
• 46:34
  Speaker 3: tear the shit out of the case and we'll see
• 46:39
  Speaker 3: what happens.
• 46:43
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, I just I'm just gonna show you guys
• 46:46
  Speaker 1: a picture of the judge. Uh. Yeah, this this thing
• 46:51
  Speaker 1: is a sham. We don't we there's no evidence the
• 46:54
  Speaker 1: boy was autistic. There's just a claim that they made.
• 46:57
  Speaker 1: And remember you know when the when Somalians say autistic
• 47:02
  Speaker 1: and then they just mean child, because it seems like
• 47:04
  Speaker 1: there's there's a lot of autistic Somalian kids in Minnesota.
• 47:08
  Speaker 1: They need like several schools that nobody shows up to
• 47:12
  Speaker 1: to make it.
• 47:12
  Speaker 3: Work, even if it's not an excuse. Yeah, but her
• 47:16
  Speaker 3: to have to tolerate him getting into her stuff.
• 47:19
  Speaker 1: I agree, But I don't. I don't like the idea
• 47:22
  Speaker 1: of compounding additional factors that are unproven in order to
• 47:26
  Speaker 1: further like destroy the claim. Because I'm telling you that
• 47:30
  Speaker 1: guy is lying about that kid. I'm telling you lied
• 47:33
  Speaker 1: about the kid.
• 47:34
  Speaker 3: I'd rather absolutely down. Fine, you can. You can lie
• 47:37
  Speaker 3: about the kid all you want. It's not a factor.
• 47:39
  Speaker 3: It doesn't matter.
• 47:41
  Speaker 1: It doesn't matter.
• 47:42
  Speaker 3: It doesn't matter.
• 47:44
  Speaker 1: No, I agree, it doesn't matter.
• 47:45
  Speaker 2: But she was acquitted in the case of calling the
• 47:49
  Speaker 2: kid anything.
• 47:50
  Speaker 1: So because because there was no Yeah, but the narrative
• 47:57
  Speaker 1: that's out there claims that she said things that she
• 48:01
  Speaker 1: didn't say, and the boy in question was things that
• 48:06
  Speaker 1: he there's no proof of, Like they lied about his
• 48:09
  Speaker 1: age for sure, So who's to say that anything else
• 48:12
  Speaker 1: was true? And more than that, I mean, obviously the
• 48:15
  Speaker 1: judge is the problem. That's why I'm highlighting the judge.
• 48:18
  Speaker 1: This hopefully will get appealed and something changes. But this
• 48:21
  Speaker 1: is ridiculous.
• 48:22
  Speaker 3: Okay, I'll tell you what Well used to get shoplifters
• 48:24
  Speaker 3: at their retail establishments where I worked that would come
• 48:27
  Speaker 3: in with a kid, okay, with a stroller quite frequently,
• 48:33
  Speaker 3: and usually the kid seemed a little too old to
• 48:36
  Speaker 3: be riding around in the stroller, and they would stick
• 48:38
  Speaker 3: stick stuff in the bottom of the stroller, like there's
• 48:41
  Speaker 3: usually the part where the kid sits, and then there's
• 48:43
  Speaker 3: a little like shelf underneath, and they'd stick stuff in
• 48:47
  Speaker 3: there in between or among their things and think we
• 48:51
  Speaker 3: would notice. And then when you go to leave with
• 48:55
  Speaker 3: that stuff without paying for it and you stop them,
• 48:57
  Speaker 3: they're like, oh, the kid must have put him in there.
• 49:00
  Speaker 3: I never ever trust that a kid is, you know,
• 49:05
  Speaker 3: anything that they say five as opposed to nine, or
• 49:09
  Speaker 3: autistic to the opposed to not autistic. But the point
• 49:12
  Speaker 3: is there's no excuse for stealing, and on adults will
• 49:17
  Speaker 3: often make this excuse. They'll use their kid. But it's
• 49:21
  Speaker 3: your job to be watching what your child is doing.
• 49:24
  Speaker 3: If this man was in charge of this child and
• 49:26
  Speaker 3: this child was, you know, rifling through this woman's bag,
• 49:30
  Speaker 3: it's the man's fault.
• 49:32
  Speaker 2: Ye.
• 49:33
  Speaker 3: That looks like an individual who was using a child
• 49:37
  Speaker 3: to steal from the people around him, or an individual
• 49:41
  Speaker 3: who was neglecting a child. Either way, every excuse he makes,
• 49:46
  Speaker 3: the point needs to be every excuse he makes, no
• 49:49
  Speaker 3: matter what his excuses are, they're all bad. They're all
• 49:54
  Speaker 3: not helping his case. They're helping hers.
• 50:00
  Speaker 1: Right anyway. My point is that I would rather operate
• 50:07
  Speaker 1: only from what we know and not entertain any of
• 50:12
  Speaker 1: the additional things that are being thrown in there, because
• 50:14
  Speaker 1: I think that's how this guy, who as far as
• 50:17
  Speaker 1: I know, has no relationship to the child at all.
• 50:19
  Speaker 1: It's not his kid, he doesn't know the kid. He
• 50:22
  Speaker 1: just saw an opportunity. I don't know what he was
• 50:24
  Speaker 1: doing in a playground, by the way, considering that he
• 50:27
  Speaker 1: had the guy, the cameraman himself was you know, accused
• 50:32
  Speaker 1: of serious things that I think are probably legitimate, but
• 50:37
  Speaker 1: again I don't know for sure. And he was just
• 50:39
  Speaker 1: using this for leverage, and it worked because he made
• 50:42
  Speaker 1: what like three hundred thousand dollars on a GoFundMe, claimed
• 50:46
  Speaker 1: to be a victim of an encounter that he claims
• 50:48
  Speaker 1: happened to like a child.
• 50:51
  Speaker 3: It didn't happen. It didn't even happen to him. No,
• 50:54
  Speaker 3: it was he was a victim, was the pursuer.
• 50:57
  Speaker 1: Yeah, he put himself in this situation.
• 51:00
  Speaker 3: In this situation now he knew.
• 51:03
  Speaker 1: Yeah, he put himself in this situation on purpose. He
• 51:05
  Speaker 1: filmed it on purpose. He knew that if he can
• 51:08
  Speaker 1: get this woman to like do anything that could be
• 51:11
  Speaker 1: used to incriminate her in any way, he would be
• 51:15
  Speaker 1: able to make money. And he was right. He did
• 51:17
  Speaker 1: and it worked. And the problem, the reason why it
• 51:20
  Speaker 1: worked is because we all go along with it, or at
• 51:22
  Speaker 1: least enough people do that they find this has to be, like,
• 51:25
  Speaker 1: you know, addressed in this way. And he basically took
• 51:27
  Speaker 1: everybody for fools and made a shit ton of money
• 51:30
  Speaker 1: and then he left the country as far as I know,
• 51:34
  Speaker 1: So yeah, it was all. But hopefully this this we'll
• 51:38
  Speaker 1: see where this goes, I guess, and they do an appeal,
• 51:40
  Speaker 1: we probably won't hear anything for like another year, because
• 51:43
  Speaker 1: that's the way these things go. But nonetheless, yeah, it's
• 51:47
  Speaker 1: crap and and yeah, and also, you know, just a
• 51:50
  Speaker 1: quick shout out to the wignats out there that might
• 51:52
  Speaker 1: be watching. The judge is a white woman. What are
• 51:55
  Speaker 1: you all going to do about that? Like, that's the
• 51:57
  Speaker 1: biggest problem. You all have the biggest obstacle to actual
• 52:01
  Speaker 1: like order injustice is fucking woke white women, and you
• 52:07
  Speaker 1: fucking people can't see that because all you're ever focused
• 52:10
  Speaker 1: on is like all of the other elements, because you're
• 52:12
  Speaker 1: afraid of confronting that reality. So good luck, guys, good
• 52:18
  Speaker 1: luck with that. Okay, we got to move on to
• 52:20
  Speaker 1: the next story. Let me see. Oh, I got some
• 52:22
  Speaker 1: super chats and stuff I should read before I do that.
• 52:26
  Speaker 1: So I got a super child from Michael Emrick Windberg,
• 52:32
  Speaker 1: who gives us ten dollars and says Tig went yesterday.
• 52:35
  Speaker 1: He joined Mia, I'm sorry to hear that. I assume
• 52:38
  Speaker 1: Tig is your your pet. And then I got a
• 52:45
  Speaker 1: Rumble ran from Nova fan, who gives us a dollar
• 52:48
  Speaker 1: and says the Shiloh Hendrix trials proof that the Internet
• 52:50
  Speaker 1: is a real place where angry mobs and the legal
• 52:53
  Speaker 1: system affects people's lives. He did not phone the cops.
• 52:57
  Speaker 1: He posted video on the internet. Yeah, that's his whole
• 53:00
  Speaker 1: thing was, I'm going to get the internet to judge you.
• 53:03
  Speaker 1: He appealed to the mob, which sounds like some Somalian
• 53:06
  Speaker 1: shit to do, by the way, But yeah, and it worked.
• 53:10
  Speaker 1: I mean it worked to an extent. He made a
• 53:12
  Speaker 1: lot of money, So there is that. But uh yeah,
• 53:16
  Speaker 1: thank you for the super the rumble rant Nova fan,
• 53:19
  Speaker 1: and then I got a super child from the official
• 53:21
  Speaker 1: reverse Traditionalism channel on YouTube, who, of course, you know,
• 53:26
  Speaker 1: completely goes in another direction and says for twenty dollars
• 53:30
  Speaker 1: philosophy question for doc, why is the burden of proof
• 53:32
  Speaker 1: on me to show that men and women are raped equally?
• 53:35
  Speaker 1: When I'm debating feminists, It would stand a reason that
• 53:37
  Speaker 1: a person who wants to assert a difference exists should
• 53:40
  Speaker 1: have the burden of proof on them, because a difference
• 53:43
  Speaker 1: is the presence of information, and in equality is the
• 53:46
  Speaker 1: absence of information. So asking someone to prove equality is
• 53:51
  Speaker 1: asking them to prove and negative. I don't I just
• 53:53
  Speaker 1: don't know how to reconcile that with the if only
• 53:56
  Speaker 1: to if the only two things we know about men
• 53:58
  Speaker 1: and women is that they have different names, they are
• 54:01
  Speaker 1: already self evidently different logic, you yelled at Roxanne Gay.
• 54:07
  Speaker 2: Well, women cannot be charged with raping men. That's a
• 54:13
  Speaker 2: very important like differentiation. I'm sure there are some American
• 54:17
  Speaker 2: states where where it's a bit more complicated than that,
• 54:21
  Speaker 2: but in my home country, Yeah, there's a reason that
• 54:27
  Speaker 2: that there's never any any scandal about a woman raping
• 54:32
  Speaker 2: a man or a woman raping a child. Despite all
• 54:36
  Speaker 2: of these female teachers raping male students. There's a reason
• 54:42
  Speaker 2: that the papers don't highlight it as female authority figure
• 54:50
  Speaker 2: rapes male It's because legally speaking, there's no such thing.
• 54:56
  Speaker 2: Legally speaking, a woman cannot rape a male, no matter
• 55:00
  Speaker 2: of what she does, no matter how young that male is,
• 55:04
  Speaker 2: no matter what objects that woman uses, it's never rape.
• 55:11
  Speaker 2: It's just sexual assault, which is a much lower charge
• 55:16
  Speaker 2: than anything a man could do. If a man and
• 55:21
  Speaker 2: a woman have consensual sex, he could be charged with
• 55:25
  Speaker 2: rape because the woman decides it wasn't consensual after the fact.
• 55:30
  Speaker 2: But yeah, a woman can shove rocks inside a child
• 55:41
  Speaker 2: and it's not rape because a woman can't be charged
• 55:45
  Speaker 2: with rape no matter what happens, no matter what she
• 55:48
  Speaker 2: does to any man or any child, nothing she could
• 55:54
  Speaker 2: possibly do could get her charged with rape, which is
• 56:01
  Speaker 2: a kind of fucked up situation, a situation I would
• 56:05
  Speaker 2: not wish upon any other country or any other state,
• 56:09
  Speaker 2: because that way lies some absolute nonsense in which a
• 56:16
  Speaker 2: child can get raped over and over again by a
• 56:19
  Speaker 2: woman and his assailant will never be charged with rape,
• 56:26
  Speaker 2: and he will have to live the rest of his
• 56:28
  Speaker 2: life thinking, well, what happened to me was not rape,
• 56:31
  Speaker 2: so I guess it was just fine, and so whatever
• 56:35
  Speaker 2: I do to anyone else is surely not that bad either,
• 56:41
  Speaker 2: And then it perpetuates. But it's only ever the males
• 56:49
  Speaker 2: who get charged for the nightmare that happens. The women
• 56:54
  Speaker 2: will never get charged for the nightmare that happens. They
• 56:58
  Speaker 2: can just do what they like, and they create male monsters,
• 57:04
  Speaker 2: and the male monsters are never the responsibility of the
• 57:07
  Speaker 2: female monsters who created them. They're just it's just this
• 57:12
  Speaker 2: male monstrousness that appeared out of nowhere. Yeah, I think
• 57:20
  Speaker 2: you get what I'm saying.
• 57:21
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, no, I mean in the United States, women
• 57:24
  Speaker 1: can't rape. Well, like, it's not legally.
• 57:27
  Speaker 3: It depends on the wording of the statute at the
• 57:31
  Speaker 3: state level, because the federal law does allow for charging
• 57:38
  Speaker 3: women with rape. The biggest problem is that in order
• 57:42
  Speaker 3: for a woman to get charged with rape, she has
• 57:45
  Speaker 3: to do something it would be unnatural for a woman
• 57:47
  Speaker 3: who was trying to be sexually active with someone. She
• 57:51
  Speaker 3: has to penetrate the victim with an object with well
• 57:55
  Speaker 3: with anything like her finger, anything right. So it's easier
• 58:01
  Speaker 3: for a woman to get charged with rape if she's
• 58:04
  Speaker 3: raping a girl or another woman, whereas if she's raping
• 58:09
  Speaker 3: a dude, she's more likely to use forced development. And
• 58:16
  Speaker 3: what people have to understand about this is that there's
• 58:19
  Speaker 3: an evolution of this word for centuries. Compassion for victims
• 58:24
  Speaker 3: of this crime was originally reserved for the female victim
• 58:31
  Speaker 3: and her family, but not for any male victims. And
• 58:35
  Speaker 3: the reason was mainly because women were not responsible for
• 58:41
  Speaker 3: providing their own resources. So a woman's father would be
• 58:45
  Speaker 3: responsible for her welfare, her needs, her any food she needed,
• 58:51
  Speaker 3: her shelter, her clothing, everything like that until she got married,
• 58:57
  Speaker 3: and then her husband would be respont and depending on
• 59:01
  Speaker 3: the culture, depending on what she was expected to do
• 59:06
  Speaker 3: after she got married, whether she was going to bring
• 59:10
  Speaker 3: money into the household that she moved to or whether
• 59:14
  Speaker 3: she was going to be a net expense on the
• 59:16
  Speaker 3: household that she moved to, like depended on that. That
• 59:20
  Speaker 3: determined whether she brought money with her from home into
• 59:23
  Speaker 3: the household or whether the groom had to pay her
• 59:27
  Speaker 3: father to let her leave the home. But either way,
• 59:31
  Speaker 3: she had a financial value that would be destroyed if
• 59:35
  Speaker 3: she was raped, and so she was a victim because
• 59:41
  Speaker 3: it's an attack, but also her financial value was destroyed.
• 59:48
  Speaker 3: This made her less marriageable or unmarriageable, and if she
• 59:53
  Speaker 3: got pregnant, it was even worse. And quite often it
• 1:00:00
  Speaker 3: was alleged in the context of an affair where you know,
• 1:00:05
  Speaker 3: the woman had sex with somebody and then accused him
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 3: of rape because she could get him to marry her.
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 3: If he married her, he wouldn't be killed for it.
• 1:00:17
  Speaker 3: Ancient rape law that was Those were the types of
• 1:00:21
  Speaker 3: laws there were before laws were written. They were just spoken.
• 1:00:27
  Speaker 3: They were known by the leaders of tribes, not put
• 1:00:33
  Speaker 3: into stone, not put onto papyrus, not not written on paper,
• 1:00:39
  Speaker 3: because there was no writing, and it's been a community violation,
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 3: you could say for that long. It wasn't really until
• 1:00:51
  Speaker 3: the twentieth century that people started giving a shit when
• 1:00:53
  Speaker 3: it happened to ment. Somewhere during the twentieth century, compassion
• 1:00:59
  Speaker 3: for male victims of female perpetrators of rape was invented.
• 1:01:06
  Speaker 3: Before that, nobody cared because it didn't change whether or
• 1:01:10
  Speaker 3: not he could get married. It didn't cost him anything.
• 1:01:15
  Speaker 3: You know, in fact, he might get accused instead and
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 3: have to marry his perpetrator, and of course he was
• 1:01:22
  Speaker 3: expected to be able to defend himself. So it's a
• 1:01:29
  Speaker 3: new thing in all of history, just this past century
• 1:01:37
  Speaker 3: that people even think of men as being able to
• 1:01:39
  Speaker 3: be victims of rape and survive, right, because if another
• 1:01:47
  Speaker 3: man does it, they're both likely to get killed. Now,
• 1:01:51
  Speaker 3: the other thing is modern rape law started evolving in
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 3: English common law around the thirteenth century, and it started
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 3: out with changes to what was considered an adult and
• 1:02:09
  Speaker 3: continued on. It went through time periods where it was
• 1:02:13
  Speaker 3: a capital offense, in other words, the punishment was death,
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 3: and it even even went through times when you didn't
• 1:02:25
  Speaker 3: really need much evidence to be hanged for it or beheaded. Now,
• 1:02:33
  Speaker 3: when they started doing research on it, and I put
• 1:02:37
  Speaker 3: that in scare quotes, one of the first things that
• 1:02:39
  Speaker 3: feminists did, one of the very first things and this
• 1:02:43
  Speaker 3: is the reason why you end up having to argue
• 1:02:45
  Speaker 3: with this with them about this is that they defined
• 1:02:49
  Speaker 3: it to exclude male victims. They took the definition. Then
• 1:02:53
  Speaker 3: Ohio has this definition in law that the victim has
• 1:02:57
  Speaker 3: to be penetrated in order for it to be rape,
• 1:03:02
  Speaker 3: and as a result, when a woman does it, feminist
• 1:03:07
  Speaker 3: research doesn't count it as rape. It's another sexual offense.
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 3: When a male perpetrator does it, then it's counted as rape.
• 1:03:18
  Speaker 3: So they have a whole set of numbers to argue
• 1:03:20
  Speaker 3: with you about. That's why you end up having to
• 1:03:23
  Speaker 3: argue about it because they lie. Why should you have
• 1:03:27
  Speaker 3: to argue because liars are always going to exist. There
• 1:03:32
  Speaker 3: is nothing you can do to make the entire world
• 1:03:36
  Speaker 3: honest all the time, every day, every second, every person,
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 3: every argument, it's not going to happen. So you have
• 1:03:44
  Speaker 3: to be ready to argue with it because there's always
• 1:03:47
  Speaker 3: going to be people who will lie about it. And
• 1:03:50
  Speaker 3: that's why we do our own research. That's why we
• 1:03:55
  Speaker 3: read what they did, read what their definitions are, look
• 1:03:59
  Speaker 3: at what the app actual numbers are, and point out
• 1:04:03
  Speaker 3: to them. The only reason that you say x percent
• 1:04:06
  Speaker 3: of rapists are our men is because when a woman
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 3: does exactly the same thing, forced coitus, forced oral sex,
• 1:04:17
  Speaker 3: it's uh not defined as rape. You don't define it
• 1:04:20
  Speaker 3: as rape. So you define rape to exclude the way
• 1:04:22
  Speaker 3: that women rape, and then you claim that it's not
• 1:04:25
  Speaker 3: rape because you said so, and then you give us
• 1:04:27
  Speaker 3: these numbers. You should be mad, not because you have
• 1:04:31
  Speaker 3: to argue, but because they think that lie is going
• 1:04:35
  Speaker 3: to work. Don't allow it. Don't allow it. Don't let
• 1:04:40
  Speaker 3: them do that. Point it out every single time, because
• 1:04:43
  Speaker 3: it's predatory to say well, it's okay when we do it.
• 1:04:49
  Speaker 3: That's the same thing as saying, well, I want to
• 1:04:50
  Speaker 3: be able to do this, but I want to be
• 1:04:52
  Speaker 3: able to get you in trouble when you do it.
• 1:04:56
  Speaker 3: If they don't want to be able to do it
• 1:04:57
  Speaker 3: without getting in trouble, then they should and be arguing
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 3: that it's not wrong.
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 1: All right, thank you for that. And I think I
• 1:05:09
  Speaker 1: got all of the super commentary out of the way,
• 1:05:13
  Speaker 1: so let's get into the next story. Let us know
• 1:05:15
  Speaker 1: what you guys think about this one of the comments,
• 1:05:18
  Speaker 1: all right. The US Selective Service System is seeking to
• 1:05:23
  Speaker 1: develop a computer based readiness simulation to test and validate
• 1:05:27
  Speaker 1: its upcoming shift to automatic draft registration. This initiative, detailed
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 1: in a recent request for quote with vendor proposals due
• 1:05:36
  Speaker 1: August fourteenth of this year, aims to model the full
• 1:05:40
  Speaker 1: end to end mobilization process, including a registration, selection, notification, delivery, classification,
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 1: medical processing at military entrance processing stations, no shows disqualifications,
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 1: and conscientious objector slash alternative service options under various scenarios
• 1:05:59
  Speaker 1: such as surgeon or high demand conditions. The simulation addresses
• 1:06:03
  Speaker 1: concerns that the new automated system, set to launch on
• 1:06:06
  Speaker 1: or around December nineteenth of twenty twenty six, so at
• 1:06:09
  Speaker 1: the end of the year, may face challenges like outdated
• 1:06:13
  Speaker 1: data bottlenecks, staffing needs, and privacy issues. It will draw
• 1:06:17
  Speaker 1: from other federal databases to register eligible men primarily ages
• 1:06:21
  Speaker 1: eighteen through twenty six, including citizens and certain non citizens,
• 1:06:25
  Speaker 1: without requiring self registration as mandated by the twenty twenty
• 1:06:29
  Speaker 1: six National Defense Authorization Act. This is precautionary contingency planning,
• 1:06:35
  Speaker 1: not the activation of a draft. The US has relied
• 1:06:38
  Speaker 1: on an all volunteer military since nineteen seventy three, and
• 1:06:42
  Speaker 1: no conscription is currently authorized or imminent. The effort focuses
• 1:06:46
  Speaker 1: on ensuring the SSS can efficiently maintain a fair and
• 1:06:51
  Speaker 1: equitable pool in case of a future national emergency requiring
• 1:06:55
  Speaker 1: congressional and presidential approval for a draft. It builds on
• 1:06:59
  Speaker 1: l long standing registration requirements while modernizing processes that have
• 1:07:04
  Speaker 1: seen declining self compliance rates. Critics have raised concerns about
• 1:07:08
  Speaker 1: data privacy equity, don't know why equity was a problem
• 1:07:11
  Speaker 1: and the broader implications of automating what was previously an
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 1: individual civic obligation. The simulation will help identify risks and
• 1:07:19
  Speaker 1: refine procedures before a full national implementation.
• 1:07:26
  Speaker 2: Hey me out right, there is to some degree a
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 2: pervasive necessity to have access to a critical mass of
• 1:07:37
  Speaker 2: fighting age men who can be deployed as canon fodder
• 1:07:43
  Speaker 2: in whatever meat grinder is being established in some far
• 1:07:47
  Speaker 2: away land. There is also a pervasive critical mass of
• 1:07:54
  Speaker 2: fighting age men who are trying to enter the country illegally,
• 1:08:00
  Speaker 2: and maybe those men should have to prove their worth
• 1:08:05
  Speaker 2: in some way. Again, I'm not just talking about the USA.
• 1:08:08
  Speaker 2: This would go for the UK two and the anglers
• 1:08:10
  Speaker 2: fully in general, and indeed Europe. You can probably guess
• 1:08:16
  Speaker 2: what I'm driving at. If you are a fighting age
• 1:08:18
  Speaker 2: man and you want to enter our country illegally, why
• 1:08:25
  Speaker 2: bother with some kind of citizenship test where you answer
• 1:08:29
  Speaker 2: thirty random obscure questions about esoteric cultural trivia. You know
• 1:08:35
  Speaker 2: what would make the perfect test of citizenship One question only,
• 1:08:41
  Speaker 2: are you ready and willing to die for this country?
• 1:08:45
  Speaker 2: If not, fuck off back to Pakistan? If so, can
• 1:08:52
  Speaker 2: I interest you in fighting a war against Fakistan. But
• 1:08:58
  Speaker 2: what if we create battalions of Pakistanis waving red, white
• 1:09:04
  Speaker 2: and blue flags while they charge into battle against other
• 1:09:08
  Speaker 2: Fakistanis waving red, green and black flags. How about that?
• 1:09:14
  Speaker 2: I mean I went into this line of thought rather sarcastically.
• 1:09:17
  Speaker 2: But the more I think about it, why not if
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 2: you want to be a citizen of this country, prove it.
• 1:09:26
  Speaker 2: Fight for it. Now, you might say, but Mike, once
• 1:09:31
  Speaker 2: they're on the battlefield, they'll just defect, They'll just start
• 1:09:35
  Speaker 2: shooting the people on their own side. Yeah, but they'll
• 1:09:39
  Speaker 2: be in the division made of their own people. If
• 1:09:43
  Speaker 2: they're Afghani, they'll be in an Afghani division. If they're Indian,
• 1:09:47
  Speaker 2: they'll be in an Indian division. The Indian division will
• 1:09:51
  Speaker 2: be I mean, it won't be a division, it'll be
• 1:09:54
  Speaker 2: multiple battalions. It will just be a sprawling ocean of operation.
• 1:10:00
  Speaker 2: Get behind the darkies. You would need a nuke to
• 1:10:04
  Speaker 2: get rid of UH, to get rid of that many jeets.
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 2: Oh no, please don't waste all of your nukes on
• 1:10:12
  Speaker 2: the Pooh Army. That would be awful. And again I
• 1:10:17
  Speaker 2: say this as someone with aspirations to migrate to the
• 1:10:22
  Speaker 2: United States, Would I be okay with the draft I
• 1:10:27
  Speaker 2: am proposing. I mean, I'm not exactly fighting age, but
• 1:10:33
  Speaker 2: that's no excuse either, So frankly, hell yes, even if
• 1:10:41
  Speaker 2: it means I have to fight against other Brits. If
• 1:10:46
  Speaker 2: the American citizenship test is, you're British. So to prove
• 1:10:51
  Speaker 2: your loyalty to the United States, you need to be
• 1:10:55
  Speaker 2: like air dropped into the Houses of Parliament with a
• 1:10:58
  Speaker 2: fucking span now and start red missing everyone in the building.
• 1:11:03
  Speaker 2: I'd be like, oh no, that that that that sounds
• 1:11:07
  Speaker 2: that sounds awful. Oh man, I would I would, really.
• 1:11:12
  Speaker 2: I would really have to summon, summon all of my
• 1:11:14
  Speaker 2: courage to commit to such a counterintuitive act. But you
• 1:11:18
  Speaker 2: know what I think, Yeah, I think I could just
• 1:11:22
  Speaker 2: about bring myself to you know, maintain a stiff upper lip,
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 2: close my eyes and think of England and all that.
• 1:11:30
  Speaker 2: As much as it would pain me to brandish an
• 1:11:33
  Speaker 2: industrial chain gun and reduce everyone in the Houses of
• 1:11:36
  Speaker 2: Parliament to a fine meat jelly, I would do it
• 1:11:41
  Speaker 2: for you, America. I would do it for you. Fuck man,
• 1:11:47
  Speaker 2: I'm in so much trouble. I can't go anywhere anymore.
• 1:11:51
  Speaker 2: I don't know why I keep talking. It's bad for
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 2: my health. All right, I'll stop.
• 1:11:58
  Speaker 3: So they want they want to automate this because automated
• 1:12:02
  Speaker 3: systems work so well, right, And I love the way
• 1:12:08
  Speaker 3: that they're they're talking about this. Oh, it's going to
• 1:12:10
  Speaker 3: be more equal, it's going to be more fair, it's
• 1:12:14
  Speaker 3: going to be more even handed. They're going to administerrate it,
• 1:12:21
  Speaker 3: you know, more with more consistency and so on. Bullshit.
• 1:12:27
  Speaker 3: It's never been that way throughout the history of the draft.
• 1:12:32
  Speaker 3: It's never been that way. If they're qualifications you have
• 1:12:36
  Speaker 3: to meet to join the military during peacetime, one of
• 1:12:42
  Speaker 3: the first things to go out the window when they
• 1:12:44
  Speaker 3: start running out of fresh meat to throw into the
• 1:12:47
  Speaker 3: meat grinder, is the more superficial of those qualifications, right
• 1:12:54
  Speaker 3: and before before you say, well, there are people that
• 1:12:57
  Speaker 3: would just not be eligible because they're they're disabled. You
• 1:13:02
  Speaker 3: could almost be blind during the Vietnam War and you
• 1:13:08
  Speaker 3: could still get drafted. You had to be a senator's
• 1:13:13
  Speaker 3: son right to not get drafted, or you had to
• 1:13:16
  Speaker 3: be in a job that was essential. You were an
• 1:13:21
  Speaker 3: essential worker and they couldn't spare you for the war effort.
• 1:13:27
  Speaker 3: And essential workers you know that that wasn't just people
• 1:13:33
  Speaker 3: who were, you know, electricians or things like that where
• 1:13:36
  Speaker 3: you know, you work in the utilities, although that may
• 1:13:39
  Speaker 3: have been included. Educators were included, teachers, school teachers. There
• 1:13:45
  Speaker 3: was a school teacher shortage at that time period. Actually,
• 1:13:50
  Speaker 3: one of the reasons why my dad wasn't drafted because
• 1:13:55
  Speaker 3: the fact that he was almost blind without his glasses
• 1:13:59
  Speaker 3: went from not being a factor, or went from being
• 1:14:02
  Speaker 3: a factor, like a disqualifying factor, to not being a
• 1:14:06
  Speaker 3: disqualifying factor, and he had to prove that he was
• 1:14:10
  Speaker 3: essential and couldn't be sent. There are a lot of
• 1:14:15
  Speaker 3: people that couldn't prove that they were unable to be sent,
• 1:14:19
  Speaker 3: and there are a lot of them that died, And
• 1:14:22
  Speaker 3: if he'd have been sent, he'd have been one of
• 1:14:24
  Speaker 3: them that would have died too, because the first time
• 1:14:26
  Speaker 3: his glasses broke, he would have been a sitting duck.
• 1:14:30
  Speaker 3: But it wouldn't have mattered to the US government. They
• 1:14:32
  Speaker 3: needed fresh meat for the meat grinder. And I learned
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 3: when I started working with people with disabilities, if you're
• 1:14:41
  Speaker 3: in a wheelchair, you still have to register for the draft.
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 3: If you're a dude, if your IQ is so low
• 1:14:48
  Speaker 3: that you don't understand the complexity of go down the
• 1:14:53
  Speaker 3: hallway and knock on the door of apartment six B.
• 1:14:59
  Speaker 3: You have to have somebody tell you first to go
• 1:15:01
  Speaker 3: down the hallway, and then after you get down there,
• 1:15:03
  Speaker 3: see that door over there, knock on it. You still
• 1:15:08
  Speaker 3: have to register for the draft. You still if your
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 3: IQ is solo that you cannot learn to fill out
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 3: the form yourself, you cannot write things down. You still
• 1:15:23
  Speaker 3: have to register. You are breaking the law. If you
• 1:15:27
  Speaker 3: don't register, you're literally breaking the law if you are
• 1:15:29
  Speaker 3: too disabled to perform the tasks involved in registering, so
• 1:15:34
  Speaker 3: your caregiver is responsible for doing it for you. And
• 1:15:37
  Speaker 3: if you are called up, then they will determine whether
• 1:15:41
  Speaker 3: or not you're eligible to actually serve, and they drop
• 1:15:47
  Speaker 3: the IQ requirements down to lower IQ than they allowed
• 1:15:54
  Speaker 3: during peacetime. During the Vietnam War, if you've committed certain crimes,
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 3: you're not eligible to join the military. But guess what
• 1:16:02
  Speaker 3: they did during the Vietnam War. They sent people over
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 3: that were so crazy that they collected ears on a
• 1:16:08
  Speaker 3: string as trophies when they killed people. That's you know,
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 3: that's not a real example, but that I do know
• 1:16:19
  Speaker 3: of an example similar that is but yeah, these standards
• 1:16:28
  Speaker 3: are not set in stone, right, It's not going to
• 1:16:36
  Speaker 3: be handled fairly. They're going to do what they do
• 1:16:39
  Speaker 3: every time there's a war. They're going to take the poor.
• 1:16:44
  Speaker 3: They're going to take people who have made mistakes in
• 1:16:47
  Speaker 3: their lives, you know, low level criminals. And if they
• 1:16:52
  Speaker 3: start running out of bodies, they're going to expand that
• 1:16:57
  Speaker 3: and they're going to end up sending crazy people. This
• 1:17:02
  Speaker 3: is just another step toward activating the draft. I keep
• 1:17:12
  Speaker 3: telling people this, I keep hearing over and over again. Well,
• 1:17:18
  Speaker 3: we don't have a draft right now. We just have
• 1:17:20
  Speaker 3: selective service, right. Well, I'm not grocery shopping right now,
• 1:17:24
  Speaker 3: I'm just making a grocery list. What are we going
• 1:17:28
  Speaker 3: to use that for? If I never go grocery shopping.
• 1:17:32
  Speaker 3: I'm out of potatoes. Hey, everybody down the street, I'm
• 1:17:35
  Speaker 3: out of potatoes. Well, it's not useful, right, It's only
• 1:17:38
  Speaker 3: useful if I decide I'm gonna go buy potatoes, you know.
• 1:17:43
  Speaker 3: And if I automate a list, that means I plan
• 1:17:49
  Speaker 3: on frequently going to the grocery store. I plan on
• 1:17:54
  Speaker 3: being able to go soon. I plan on being able
• 1:18:00
  Speaker 3: to go quickly and not having to think about it
• 1:18:02
  Speaker 3: too much while I'm doing it. Selective service is stage
• 1:18:07
  Speaker 3: one of the draft. It's the shopping list. Stage two
• 1:18:12
  Speaker 3: is when they actually start calling people upright, and then
• 1:18:17
  Speaker 3: stage three is obviously when they send you to the
• 1:18:19
  Speaker 3: to war. That's the consumption stage. They are now consuming
• 1:18:25
  Speaker 3: men and boys. So I just had a big argument
• 1:18:31
  Speaker 3: on X about this night. Motorcyclist keeps bringing it up.
• 1:18:35
  Speaker 3: Two ladies, one of them I think is the other
• 1:18:39
  Speaker 3: one's mother auto correct two point zero and her daughter.
• 1:18:43
  Speaker 3: We're just livid, absolutely livid, because we pointed out in
• 1:18:49
  Speaker 3: a thread under something, Paul said that the draft, the
• 1:18:55
  Speaker 3: existence of the draft, the existence of selective service, may
• 1:19:01
  Speaker 3: conscription directly connected to male voting. If you don't sign
• 1:19:07
  Speaker 3: up to be conscripted, or if you are conscripted and
• 1:19:10
  Speaker 3: you refuse to go, you refuse to serve your felon.
• 1:19:15
  Speaker 3: And once you've been convicted, you lose the right to vote,
• 1:19:19
  Speaker 3: you can lose the right to bear arms. You use
• 1:19:21
  Speaker 3: a whole bunch of rights as a felon. And that
• 1:19:26
  Speaker 3: argument is still going on. She went down so many
• 1:19:31
  Speaker 3: rabbit holes, deflected, made accusations, she dar vote a lot,
• 1:19:38
  Speaker 3: actually went to other men's issues and started saying they
• 1:19:42
  Speaker 3: weren't legitimate. Just a bunch of bullshit brought in a
• 1:19:47
  Speaker 3: whole bunch of churchy people to condemn me to hell
• 1:19:50
  Speaker 3: for all eternity, because that works. It's totally not God's choice.
• 1:19:55
  Speaker 3: It's just you know, some guy on the internet that
• 1:19:57
  Speaker 3: says he's a minister from some church somewhere I've never been.
• 1:20:01
  Speaker 3: And that is how two female soldiers, two female ex
• 1:20:08
  Speaker 3: marines felt about men being drafted. It doesn't matter. You're
• 1:20:12
  Speaker 3: not allowed to be mad about it, your cowards if
• 1:20:17
  Speaker 3: you don't want to be drafted. That's what That's what
• 1:20:19
  Speaker 3: they were saying. And how dare you suggest that it's
• 1:20:24
  Speaker 3: not your obligation to protect women. One of the two
• 1:20:30
  Speaker 3: of them said, any real man would would stand up
• 1:20:32
  Speaker 3: and take a bullet for any woman, which I think
• 1:20:35
  Speaker 3: is bullshit. Right, So yeah, I when it comes down
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 3: to it, I think that this is going to be
• 1:20:49
  Speaker 3: I'm worried that this is preparation for an upcoming, Like
• 1:20:54
  Speaker 3: they already know that they're going to start conscription, and
• 1:21:00
  Speaker 3: that's why they have to tell us, Oh, we're not
• 1:21:02
  Speaker 3: doing it right now, we're just getting ready to be
• 1:21:04
  Speaker 3: able to do it well, I'm not going to shoot
• 1:21:07
  Speaker 3: you right now, I'm just aiming the gun. I'm sorry.
• 1:21:12
  Speaker 3: That's just not good enough. And in the meantime, I
• 1:21:18
  Speaker 3: don't think there should be a draft. I don't think
• 1:21:20
  Speaker 3: there should be conscription. I don't think there should be
• 1:21:22
  Speaker 3: a selective service. And think if we're going to have
• 1:21:25
  Speaker 3: a public school system, a ROTC style program should be
• 1:21:33
  Speaker 3: mandatory in every school for able bodied students, and then
• 1:21:39
  Speaker 3: it should be offered that you can continue training if
• 1:21:44
  Speaker 3: you want and be ready and be part of the militia.
• 1:21:50
  Speaker 3: I don't think that it should be well known exactly
• 1:21:54
  Speaker 3: how well the people of the United States can defend themselves.
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 3: Anybody wanting to invade this country should forever be afraid
• 1:22:05
  Speaker 3: that there's a gun behind every mailbox and every rock
• 1:22:08
  Speaker 3: and every treat not one that's owned by the government,
• 1:22:15
  Speaker 3: but one that's owned by an individual American citizen or
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 3: possibly ten, and they should know what they're doing. If
• 1:22:26
  Speaker 3: we have to have a draft, then I think anybody
• 1:22:30
  Speaker 3: that signs up for it should get two votes. Anybody
• 1:22:33
  Speaker 3: that registers for selective service should get two votes. Everybody
• 1:22:37
  Speaker 3: else you get one. Selective service signers get two, and
• 1:22:42
  Speaker 3: nobody has to sign up for it, but both genders can,
• 1:22:45
  Speaker 3: both sexes can. That might solve a lot of problems.
• 1:22:55
  Speaker 1: All right, well, thank you for that commentary. Let me
• 1:23:00
  Speaker 1: see what I get. I got another super Chow and
• 1:23:03
  Speaker 1: I missed it. I mean it missed it in terms
• 1:23:05
  Speaker 1: of it appearing in the chat. So I'm just gonna
• 1:23:08
  Speaker 1: read it out. Meredith g gives US five and says,
• 1:23:11
  Speaker 1: HBr News five sixty two. Honey for the Badgers. Personally,
• 1:23:14
  Speaker 1: my favorite Christmas Carol is the one with George C.
• 1:23:17
  Speaker 1: Scott as Scrooge nineteen eighty four. My dad has to
• 1:23:20
  Speaker 1: watch the Alistair sim Alistair sim nineteen fifty four. We
• 1:23:25
  Speaker 1: all tend to like the version we grew up with.
• 1:23:29
  Speaker 1: I you know, I maybe an unpopular opinion, but I
• 1:23:32
  Speaker 1: kind of liked the one that Jim Carrey did that
• 1:23:34
  Speaker 1: was like a CGI one by Robert Zamechis. There's a
• 1:23:38
  Speaker 1: little bit of Uncanny Valley, but overall I thought it
• 1:23:41
  Speaker 1: was better than like Polar Express or some of the
• 1:23:44
  Speaker 1: other Roberts A Mecchas one. So I thought that was good.
• 1:23:47
  Speaker 1: And I'm and I don't I'm not saying it's better
• 1:23:48
  Speaker 1: than the Muppets one or the Disney one. But I
• 1:23:52
  Speaker 1: enjoyed the Uh. I enjoyed that one. Also, there was
• 1:23:56
  Speaker 1: a musical one that I used to watch on TV.
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 1: I think it was just called screw Phouge, but I
• 1:24:00
  Speaker 1: don't I think that was from like the sixties and
• 1:24:02
  Speaker 1: the seventies. But I don't know much about it. I
• 1:24:06
  Speaker 1: just know I watched it every year because it was
• 1:24:08
  Speaker 1: on TV, and you know, I was poor, so we
• 1:24:10
  Speaker 1: watched what was on TV. But anyway, thank you for that, Meredith.
• 1:24:15
  Speaker 1: Let me just double check make sure I didn't miss
• 1:24:17
  Speaker 1: any super chats. Here we go. Albatross gave us two
• 1:24:24
  Speaker 1: dollars and said, imagine having to pay one thousand bucks
• 1:24:28
  Speaker 1: to a PDF. Oh that was referring to the Shiloh
• 1:24:30
  Speaker 1: Hendrix thing. Yeah, yeah, that's that's kind of ft. But
• 1:24:36
  Speaker 1: I mean, I guess we'll see again. They're gonna appeal it.
• 1:24:39
  Speaker 1: I hope they do. It needs to be beaten. But
• 1:24:42
  Speaker 1: let us know what you guys think about this one
• 1:24:44
  Speaker 1: in the comments. Time to move on to the next story. Yeah.
• 1:24:48
  Speaker 1: I might not get to all of them, but well
• 1:24:51
  Speaker 1: we'll see. Okay, So my gender Dolls is a therapeutic
• 1:24:57
  Speaker 1: tool developed over sixty years by researchers at the University
• 1:25:02
  Speaker 1: of Minnesota Medical Schools Eli Coleman Institute for Sexual and
• 1:25:06
  Speaker 1: Gender Health. Now look before we continue, these dolls pictured
• 1:25:10
  Speaker 1: are not the dolls in question. I just had this
• 1:25:13
  Speaker 1: as like a placeholder for the conversation. So anyway, these
• 1:25:18
  Speaker 1: paper dolls, designed for use by licensed clinicians and educators
• 1:25:22
  Speaker 1: with children ages four through ten, particularly gender diverse youth,
• 1:25:28
  Speaker 1: according to the article, feature gender neutral characters with swappable
• 1:25:34
  Speaker 1: internal and external genitalia, along with over one hundred interchangeable clothing, hairstyles,
• 1:25:40
  Speaker 1: and accessories. The project aims to help children, help children
• 1:25:45
  Speaker 1: visualize and discuss anatomy, gender identity, and self expression in
• 1:25:49
  Speaker 1: a gender affirming clinical or educational setting. Drawing from focus
• 1:25:54
  Speaker 1: groups where participating families received small payments twenty to sixty dollars,
• 1:25:59
  Speaker 1: It has transitioned from research into a commercial venture by
• 1:26:04
  Speaker 1: My Gender Dolls, with a planned twenty twenty six launch
• 1:26:08
  Speaker 1: and availability to some Minnesota clinicians and educators this fall.
• 1:26:12
  Speaker 1: The University of Minnesota, Minnesota and the News Again, a
• 1:26:16
  Speaker 1: public institution funded by the government, receives approximately fifteen million
• 1:26:21
  Speaker 1: dollars in annual state funding from Governor Tim Walls's administration
• 1:26:26
  Speaker 1: to support its medical school's research capacity. While the university
• 1:26:30
  Speaker 1: states that no public funds directly supported commercialization of the dolls,
• 1:26:35
  Speaker 1: questions remain about the indirect use of taxpayer resources for
• 1:26:39
  Speaker 1: the underlying research and faculty salaries. Walls received an award
• 1:26:45
  Speaker 1: from the Institute in twenty twenty three for his support
• 1:26:48
  Speaker 1: of gender related policies. The initiative has drawn significant criticism
• 1:26:53
  Speaker 1: from those who view it as inappropriate for young children.
• 1:26:58
  Speaker 1: University researchers and officials emphasize its therapeutic intent for licensed
• 1:27:03
  Speaker 1: professionals rather than widespread classroom distribution, and they have pushed
• 1:27:07
  Speaker 1: back against what they call misinformation.
• 1:27:11
  Speaker 2: Yeah, the question of what sort of toys should be
• 1:27:20
  Speaker 2: given to children is something that has been pretty thoroughly
• 1:27:24
  Speaker 2: handled over the centuries, especially in the twentieth century, and
• 1:27:30
  Speaker 2: what is frequently even ubiquitously discovered is when you give
• 1:27:34
  Speaker 2: children the choice of as many options as possible, the
• 1:27:40
  Speaker 2: girls will choose Barbie. And of course feminists complained that
• 1:27:46
  Speaker 2: girls were only choosing Barbie because the only thing available
• 1:27:49
  Speaker 2: was Barbie, even though it wasn't They would complain that
• 1:27:54
  Speaker 2: Barbie represents the impossible, anatomy of unobtainable feminine under more
• 1:28:00
  Speaker 2: and andromorphism. And so Mattel the country, the company that
• 1:28:07
  Speaker 2: produces Barbie, Mattel, decided to introduce he Man. They did
• 1:28:16
  Speaker 2: this by committee, by the way, through an endlessly stringent
• 1:28:19
  Speaker 2: experiment in market research. They presented thousands of different, weird,
• 1:28:24
  Speaker 2: homunculous toys to millions of children. And it turns out
• 1:28:28
  Speaker 2: girls like Barbie's and boys like he Man.
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 4: Yeah, just like a woman.
• 1:28:38
  Speaker 2: Children gravitate towards these aspirational extremes of masculinity and femininity.
• 1:28:45
  Speaker 2: But feminists continued to complain, saying, well, if you only
• 1:28:50
  Speaker 2: present the extreme ends of the spectrum, like Barbie and
• 1:28:53
  Speaker 2: he Man, then of course you're you're excluding the middle.
• 1:29:00
  Speaker 2: What if there was a female version of he Man? Okay, done?
• 1:29:03
  Speaker 2: Behold Sheira. She's he Man's sister. She's basically he Man,
• 1:29:10
  Speaker 2: but she's feminine. And you know what happened. Most girls
• 1:29:16
  Speaker 2: didn't want Sheira. They continued to want Barbie. Boys, on
• 1:29:21
  Speaker 2: the other hand, loved Sheira. It's another he Man, but
• 1:29:26
  Speaker 2: it's a woman.
• 1:29:27
  Speaker 1: Awesome.
• 1:29:28
  Speaker 2: Now we can team up he Man and Sheira against
• 1:29:31
  Speaker 2: the forces of skeleton and Hordak. Because boys like warriors,
• 1:29:40
  Speaker 2: they like male warriors, they like female warriors, girls like
• 1:29:45
  Speaker 2: decadent social butterflies, like Barbie. They like anyone who can
• 1:29:51
  Speaker 2: take pride of place at a pretend tea party, and
• 1:29:54
  Speaker 2: they will do it with Batman, as has also long
• 1:29:58
  Speaker 2: since been as attained, when a boy plays with Batman,
• 1:30:03
  Speaker 2: he becomes Batman. He absorbs the law of the character,
• 1:30:08
  Speaker 2: so as to imagine the fight between good and evil.
• 1:30:11
  Speaker 2: When a girl plays with Batman, Batman becomes the girl.
• 1:30:17
  Speaker 2: He sits down at the tea party and politely eats cake.
• 1:30:23
  Speaker 2: This was not forced upon children at any point. Toy
• 1:30:27
  Speaker 2: companies have been scrambling to make as much money as
• 1:30:30
  Speaker 2: they can by crowd testing as many toys as they
• 1:30:35
  Speaker 2: can think of and just throwing shit at the wall
• 1:30:39
  Speaker 2: until something sticks. It doesn't even matter what gender the
• 1:30:44
  Speaker 2: characters are. It matters what they're doing. The ThunderCats had
• 1:30:49
  Speaker 2: a couple of female characters, but girls didn't care because
• 1:30:54
  Speaker 2: ThunderCats are warriors and that's what boys like, whereas the
• 1:30:59
  Speaker 2: care Bears were pretty much half and half pretty much
• 1:31:05
  Speaker 2: boy isn't good, pretty much a sexual really, But it
• 1:31:08
  Speaker 2: was mostly girls who were into care bears because care
• 1:31:11
  Speaker 2: bears are a bunch of faggots. They're just fuck around
• 1:31:16
  Speaker 2: wishing everyone would love each other. Sorry, this will make
• 1:31:20
  Speaker 2: no sense to anyone zoomer or younger. The care Bears
• 1:31:24
  Speaker 2: were they were, They were like my little my little Pony,
• 1:31:30
  Speaker 2: except they were lost to history, while my little Pony
• 1:31:33
  Speaker 2: got a reboot which opened it up to a whole
• 1:31:36
  Speaker 2: new dimension of degenerative perversion. It's a long sorry, Sorry, sorry,
• 1:31:44
  Speaker 2: I went cartoon autistic again. To return to what the
• 1:31:49
  Speaker 2: story is about. Give Giving children a toy that is,
• 1:31:54
  Speaker 2: build your own doll is something that has been tried before.
• 1:32:00
  Speaker 2: Mister potato Head springs to mind, but you'll notice there
• 1:32:03
  Speaker 2: is also a missus potato Head. Even when you're building
• 1:32:08
  Speaker 2: it from scratch, you still gravitate towards the evident gender
• 1:32:12
  Speaker 2: binary if you happen to be a child. Because children
• 1:32:15
  Speaker 2: know the difference between boys and girls instinctively, without any
• 1:32:20
  Speaker 2: prompting at all. A child as young as three years
• 1:32:23
  Speaker 2: old can tell you well the obvious differences are between
• 1:32:28
  Speaker 2: girls and boys. It's not just their bodies, it's the
• 1:32:32
  Speaker 2: toys they like to play with, it's how they play
• 1:32:35
  Speaker 2: with them. They are genetically evolutionarily hardwired to understand these differences,
• 1:32:43
  Speaker 2: and they will go on to understand these differences for
• 1:32:45
  Speaker 2: the rest of their lives, unless some fucking quack comes
• 1:32:50
  Speaker 2: onto the scene and shows them a deconstructed hermunculus with
• 1:32:54
  Speaker 2: no brain and no genitals, going look, love, what if
• 1:33:00
  Speaker 2: a human is deformed beyond recognition? Then what hey? What
• 1:33:05
  Speaker 2: if it was up to you, a child, to implant
• 1:33:09
  Speaker 2: a person's brains and genitals wherever and however the fuck
• 1:33:12
  Speaker 2: you want? And unsurprisingly, the kids go, U, I don't know,
• 1:33:21
  Speaker 2: I'm not a biologist, and everybody clapped, But yeah, that's
• 1:33:29
  Speaker 2: that's about the long the shot of it. Kids don't
• 1:33:31
  Speaker 2: want to have to reconstruct things they already understand. They
• 1:33:36
  Speaker 2: already understand the difference between girls and boys. It's fucking
• 1:33:41
  Speaker 2: obvious from a very early age to anyone who hasn't
• 1:33:46
  Speaker 2: been brainwashed into the opposite of what is obvious. What
• 1:33:51
  Speaker 2: kids want is to be intrigued by aspects of life
• 1:33:55
  Speaker 2: that they that they don't already understand, and that's stuff
• 1:34:00
  Speaker 2: like how to get along with each other and how
• 1:34:03
  Speaker 2: to fight each other from a female perspective and from
• 1:34:08
  Speaker 2: a male perspective. Girls are free to play with fake guns,
• 1:34:15
  Speaker 2: and boys are free to play with fake babies, but
• 1:34:18
  Speaker 2: they don't. Ninety nine percent of the time they don't.
• 1:34:24
  Speaker 2: They do exactly what nature predicts, They do exactly what
• 1:34:28
  Speaker 2: tradition and common sense predicts, unless a bunch of delusional
• 1:34:34
  Speaker 2: quacks perform a bunch of ludicrous experiments on those children
• 1:34:39
  Speaker 2: and then act like the psychotic confusion they caused in
• 1:34:43
  Speaker 2: those children is actually normal and has been normal all along.
• 1:34:48
  Speaker 2: I'm so often reminded of Baby Albert. You'll know that story.
• 1:34:54
  Speaker 2: It was a study in Johns Hopkins University in nineteen twenty.
• 1:34:58
  Speaker 2: They subjected the.
• 1:34:59
  Speaker 3: Kid, they made a frai of white things.
• 1:35:02
  Speaker 2: You know, they subjected a baby boy to a loud
• 1:35:04
  Speaker 2: noise every time there was a rat nearby or some
• 1:35:08
  Speaker 2: other kind of small mammals. And yeah, and it made
• 1:35:13
  Speaker 2: baby Albert permanently terrified of of rats and other such rudens.
• 1:35:18
  Speaker 2: Is unclear as to whether they were able to decondition
• 1:35:21
  Speaker 2: him from this phobia. Well, at this point, we're dealing
• 1:35:25
  Speaker 2: with millions of humans who have been deconditioned from their
• 1:35:29
  Speaker 2: instinctive pats and recognition. When it comes to gender and sex,
• 1:35:34
  Speaker 2: an absolutely no attempt is being made to decondition them.
• 1:35:38
  Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, every effort is being made
• 1:35:40
  Speaker 2: to make it illegal to decondition them, because that would
• 1:35:45
  Speaker 2: constitute conversion therapy. But instilling a child with a deathly
• 1:35:50
  Speaker 2: aversion to the gender binary in the first place is
• 1:35:53
  Speaker 2: not considered aversion therapy. It's it's like, it's not illegal
• 1:35:59
  Speaker 2: to watchure a child into being terrified of rats, but
• 1:36:03
  Speaker 2: it is illegal to therapize them away from their fear
• 1:36:07
  Speaker 2: of rats. That's where we are, ladies and gentlemen. If
• 1:36:13
  Speaker 2: if I may indeed call you that, it wasn't enough
• 1:36:18
  Speaker 2: to kill children at women's wim. It wasn't enough to
• 1:36:22
  Speaker 2: mutilate children's genitals at women's wim. Now we must torture
• 1:36:28
  Speaker 2: children mentally at the earliest possible age at women's wim. Women. Well,
• 1:36:37
  Speaker 2: weak women create hard times, folks. And you know what,
• 1:36:44
  Speaker 2: maybe strong women create hard times too. Hey, maybe this
• 1:36:52
  Speaker 2: whole weak men create hard times thing was bullshit all along.
• 1:36:55
  Speaker 2: Maybe it's nothing to do with strength. Maybe it's just
• 1:37:00
  Speaker 2: women create hard times, men create good times. And maybe
• 1:37:08
  Speaker 2: that's okay. Maybe that's how yin and yang works. The
• 1:37:12
  Speaker 2: hardship caused by women is what strengthens the resolve of men,
• 1:37:17
  Speaker 2: and without women, maybe men would go too far into
• 1:37:21
  Speaker 2: the light of the Yinn. But what we already know
• 1:37:25
  Speaker 2: for sure is that without men, women will go too far,
• 1:37:32
  Speaker 2: too far into the darkness of the yang, the chaos,
• 1:37:36
  Speaker 2: the entropy, the dare I say, disorder, disorder. When I
• 1:37:45
  Speaker 2: became the Sun, I shone life into the men's heart,
• 1:37:49
  Speaker 2: and I became the.
• 1:37:54
  Speaker 3: There there you go. You know what I'm tired of.
• 1:37:58
  Speaker 3: I'm tired of pretending that the trans kid issue is
• 1:38:05
  Speaker 3: about being transgender, because it's not, and it's not about
• 1:38:09
  Speaker 3: supporting kids. It's not about helping kids understand themselves, all right.
• 1:38:15
  Speaker 3: You know, Mike talked about the fact that kids pretty
• 1:38:18
  Speaker 3: well fit a gender binary nine percent of the time.
• 1:38:24
  Speaker 3: I'm the one percent. I played with trucks when I
• 1:38:26
  Speaker 3: was a kid. I played with toy guns. When I
• 1:38:28
  Speaker 3: was a kid, I climbed everything in sight, including my uncle,
• 1:38:33
  Speaker 3: who was tall h and like I just everything was
• 1:38:39
  Speaker 3: a jungle gym to me. The world was a jungle gym.
• 1:38:41
  Speaker 3: To me. I did the same stuff that little boys
• 1:38:44
  Speaker 3: get hurt doing. I jumped off the roof trying to
• 1:38:46
  Speaker 3: pretend that a blanket or a sheet was a parachute,
• 1:38:50
  Speaker 3: you know. I climbed the UAHF tower that we used
• 1:38:55
  Speaker 3: to get UAHF channels on our TV. This does that
• 1:38:59
  Speaker 3: little weird thing that sticks up from houses and all
• 1:39:02
  Speaker 3: the houses in every neighborhood shown in nineteen seventies TV
• 1:39:05
  Speaker 3: shows for the zoomers who've never seen one. But I
• 1:39:12
  Speaker 3: didn't identify as a boy. I knew I was a girl.
• 1:39:15
  Speaker 3: I was happy to be a girl. On Sunday when
• 1:39:17
  Speaker 3: I went to church with my family, I wore pretty
• 1:39:19
  Speaker 3: dresses and bows and shiny shoes and all that jazz.
• 1:39:23
  Speaker 3: And then when I would come home, I would put
• 1:39:26
  Speaker 3: on radial jeans and go play football with the boys.
• 1:39:32
  Speaker 3: You don't have to identify as a different gender to
• 1:39:37
  Speaker 3: enjoy things that are not stereotypical. And nobody ever tried
• 1:39:41
  Speaker 3: to tell me that I did have to identify as
• 1:39:44
  Speaker 3: a different gender to enjoy things that are stereotypical. Because
• 1:39:48
  Speaker 3: I grew up with teachers who wanted me to be
• 1:39:51
  Speaker 3: successful and happy as an adult. They weren't trying to
• 1:39:56
  Speaker 3: break me and turn me into something they could manipulate
• 1:40:02
  Speaker 3: against the people around me. They were trying to educate
• 1:40:06
  Speaker 3: me in arithmetic and reading in English and science, you
• 1:40:12
  Speaker 3: know a little bit of history, things like that, how
• 1:40:16
  Speaker 3: to write so that people got what I was thinking about,
• 1:40:21
  Speaker 3: how to convey my thoughts. They weren't trying to teach
• 1:40:26
  Speaker 3: me how to obey the government, how to be Plato
• 1:40:32
  Speaker 3: for the people around me, right, none of that. Today.
• 1:40:39
  Speaker 3: What they're doing isn't helping kids realize that they're trans kids.
• 1:40:48
  Speaker 3: They're trying to brainwash, and there's not a benevolent purpose
• 1:40:53
  Speaker 3: for that. They're not freeing trapped souls. They are deliberately
• 1:41:01
  Speaker 3: sowing confusion and discord to make children miserable, scare them
• 1:41:09
  Speaker 3: and make it feel like it's them against the world,
• 1:41:14
  Speaker 3: make them more manipulatable and more confused. That's not benevolent.
• 1:41:23
  Speaker 3: It's malicious. It's abusive, and it's wrong. If they were
• 1:41:30
  Speaker 3: trying to convince the kids that they had profound depression,
• 1:41:37
  Speaker 3: or if they were trying to convince the kids that
• 1:41:39
  Speaker 3: they suffered from crippling anxiety, people would know immediately that
• 1:41:44
  Speaker 3: that's abuse. Gender dysphoria isn't easy to live with. I've
• 1:41:51
  Speaker 3: had people close to me come very close to suicide
• 1:41:56
  Speaker 3: because of it. It's not some thing that you should
• 1:42:00
  Speaker 3: inflict on somebody deliberately any more than bipolar disorder or schizophrenia,
• 1:42:07
  Speaker 3: or crippling anxiety or profound depression. None of that should
• 1:42:14
  Speaker 3: be put on somebody just because you can use them
• 1:42:18
  Speaker 3: better if you make them like that. And if we
• 1:42:24
  Speaker 3: can't have an environment where kids can learn math and
• 1:42:29
  Speaker 3: reading and writing the main language of their country and
• 1:42:37
  Speaker 3: the history of their country and their world, without having
• 1:42:41
  Speaker 3: somebody molest their brain, then we shouldn't have that environment
• 1:42:47
  Speaker 3: at all. There should not be a school system. That's
• 1:42:53
  Speaker 3: why I keep telling people to homeschool their kids. You know,
• 1:42:57
  Speaker 3: as much as I say, if we have to have
• 1:43:00
  Speaker 3: a school system, it should do this or that. Everything
• 1:43:04
  Speaker 3: it does should be beneficial to the kids. It should
• 1:43:08
  Speaker 3: serve their future. This doesn't This does nothing for them.
• 1:43:15
  Speaker 3: It only does things to them, and it shouldn't be allowed.
• 1:43:22
  Speaker 1: All right, Well, thank you for that. Yep, it's true.
• 1:43:26
  Speaker 1: And this is definitely what happens when you basically allow
• 1:43:30
  Speaker 1: the state to raise your kids, which is what it is,
• 1:43:35
  Speaker 1: or what could happen. ZARANX gave us ten dollars super
• 1:43:38
  Speaker 1: chat and says, if one suggested teaching people at the
• 1:43:41
  Speaker 1: age of ten to draw the human form and possibly
• 1:43:44
  Speaker 1: create reverence for such that would be deemed age inappropriate.
• 1:43:50
  Speaker 1: But my gender dolls with interchangeable parts, Yes, I know.
• 1:43:54
  Speaker 1: Well that's the thing. Like they are, they're going full board.
• 1:43:59
  Speaker 1: They always double down usual, and they're doubling down in
• 1:44:01
  Speaker 1: this case. So yeah, that's what we're.
• 1:44:04
  Speaker 3: And their excuse is bullshit. Their exclus is that these
• 1:44:07
  Speaker 3: kids are confused at that age. They don't know who
• 1:44:09
  Speaker 3: to talk to, they don't know what's going on with them,
• 1:44:12
  Speaker 3: and and they don't have a way to express it.
• 1:44:16
  Speaker 3: Like I had a girlfriend when I was seven, I
• 1:44:20
  Speaker 3: knew is I also knew that. You just don't tell
• 1:44:24
  Speaker 3: everybody about that, right, So that's bullshit. They don't have
• 1:44:28
  Speaker 3: to teach kids what it means to be gay or
• 1:44:33
  Speaker 3: straight or bisexual or insert queer ideology name for sexual
• 1:44:39
  Speaker 3: identity here. You don't need to teach kids that. If
• 1:44:44
  Speaker 3: they are developing that organically, nobody has to tell them.
• 1:44:50
  Speaker 3: They will already know. If they have questions, they will
• 1:44:54
  Speaker 3: ask someone they trust. Having it shoved down their throats,
• 1:45:00
  Speaker 3: maybe physically in the classroom, depending on who who's doing it.
• 1:45:05
  Speaker 3: That's not assistance, it's abuse.
• 1:45:12
  Speaker 1: Yep, thank you for the super Chat, and I think
• 1:45:18
  Speaker 1: we're gonna go into the Patron Show now and look
• 1:45:21
  Speaker 1: at this article. Also, we're gonna look at the maybe
• 1:45:25
  Speaker 1: some clips from the interview that Elon Musk did with
• 1:45:29
  Speaker 1: the Economist. I was gonna make that a story, but
• 1:45:31
  Speaker 1: this this sausage has gone too long, so we're gonna
• 1:45:35
  Speaker 1: stop it there. But if if Mike Orhanna we're playing
• 1:45:40
  Speaker 1: on ranting on that, we'll definitely do it in the
• 1:45:41
  Speaker 1: Patron Show, which you guys should stick around for so
• 1:45:44
  Speaker 1: or you know, go to not stick around because this
• 1:45:46
  Speaker 1: show is ending now, but please consider joining us. Go
• 1:45:50
  Speaker 1: to feed the Badger dot com forward slash subscribe, or
• 1:45:54
  Speaker 1: go to Badger Nations online to join the discord server. Everyone.
• 1:45:59
  Speaker 1: Like I said, it's a great with great people and
• 1:46:02
  Speaker 1: hopefully we'll see you guys there. With that said, though,
• 1:46:06
  Speaker 1: I want to thank Mike Jay for the help writing
• 1:46:08
  Speaker 1: doing the write ups for this. I want to thank
• 1:46:10
  Speaker 1: Hannah and Mike for their commentary, and I want to
• 1:46:12
  Speaker 1: thank you guys most of all for watching, because without
• 1:46:15
  Speaker 1: you we would be screaming into the void, which I
• 1:46:18
  Speaker 1: already do plenty of on my own. So I don't
• 1:46:21
  Speaker 1: know if I need any help for that. But anyway,
• 1:46:22
  Speaker 1: with all that said, if you guys liked this video,
• 1:46:24
  Speaker 1: please hit like subscribe. If you're not already subscribed, hit
• 1:46:27
  Speaker 1: the bellf notifications, leave us a comment, let us know
• 1:46:30
  Speaker 1: what you guys think about what we talked about on
• 1:46:31
  Speaker 1: the show today, and share the video because sharing is caring.
• 1:46:34
  Speaker 1: Thanks so much for coming on this episode of HBr
• 1:46:36
  Speaker 1: News and we will see you next Tuesday.
• 1:46:39
  Speaker 2: No