Latest / Merryn Talks Money / The Farmers Are (Rightfully) Angry and UK Inflation Ticks Up
Transcript
- 0:03Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.
- 0:10Speaker 2: I'm going to start this episode of Merin Talks Money
- 0:12Speaker 2: with another reminder of all of your Merrin Talks Money listeners.
- 0:15Speaker 2: I have launched a weekly Merin Talks Money newsletter. It
- 0:18Speaker 2: is the place, the only place, well except for John's
- 0:20Speaker 2: newsletter of course, to get Micro to macrow thoughts on
- 0:23Speaker 2: your money and investments. The second one hits your own
- 0:25Speaker 2: box on Saturday. It's for Bloomberg subscribers only, so be
- 0:28Speaker 2: sure to sign up at Bloomberg dot com slash Newsletters
- 0:32Speaker 2: or check out the link in the show notes, but
- 0:33Speaker 2: you'll take you right to it. Welcome to the Merin
- 0:45Speaker 2: Talks Money Weekly round up, our debrief on the biggest
- 0:48Speaker 2: stories in markets and economics. I'm meresumsepweb Editor at Large
- 0:51Speaker 2: for Bloomberg UK Wealth.
- 0:53Speaker 1: And I'm joined Stepfe, senior reporter and author is the
- 0:55Speaker 1: Money Distilled Newsletter.
- 0:57Speaker 2: Okay'm putting that down as the first John actually remember
- 0:59Speaker 2: to introduce the self. Yes, yes, I'm getting the other
- 1:03Speaker 2: week where he just sits there and wait for me
- 1:04Speaker 2: to do everything. Right. Listen, jump, We've got a few
- 1:07Speaker 2: important things to talk about. I'd say some people would
- 1:10Speaker 2: say that farmers an inherent taxes not the most important
- 1:12Speaker 2: story of the week. I would say it might be
- 1:14Speaker 2: the most important story of the week. So they're very,
- 1:17Speaker 2: very angry. You've written about this.
- 1:19Speaker 1: Why are they so angry, Well, they're angry kids. There's
- 1:21Speaker 1: been asked to be inheritance tax and they won't be
- 1:23Speaker 1: nice to pay it before. And everyone hates inheritance tax
- 1:26Speaker 1: in the first place, for reasons we can talk about
- 1:30Speaker 1: if we want to a bit, probably not, But more importantly,
- 1:33Speaker 1: you know, the issue with farmers, actual farmers, and a
- 1:36Speaker 1: lot of them made this point, is that their land
- 1:39Speaker 1: is worth a lot of money, but it doesn't generate
- 1:41Speaker 1: a very big returnment. In fact, from some of the
- 1:44Speaker 1: figures that they put out, your like, how does anyone
- 1:48Speaker 1: level and this.
- 1:49Speaker 2: Is the making sure less than a one percent return
- 1:52Speaker 2: one cent return on the value of the land.
- 1:54Speaker 1: Yeah, And so basically, if you get chancing editance tax
- 1:57Speaker 1: on that, even though it's at twenty percent, and even
- 1:59Speaker 1: though law or broadly speaking, is over three million pounds, no.
- 2:03Speaker 2: No, no, it is not. It's over three million pounds
- 2:06Speaker 2: if you've got a a wife or a husband who
- 2:09Speaker 2: you can share it with. And I have to say.
- 2:10Speaker 2: Were speaking to a farmer the other day who said
- 2:12Speaker 2: to me, you know, when a government gets to the
- 2:14Speaker 2: point where they're grasping straws like if you're married, it's
- 2:17Speaker 2: more they're really in a whole part of trouble. But
- 2:21Speaker 2: I mean, really three million then is it?
- 2:23Speaker 1: No, it's not human But I mean how many single?
- 2:25Speaker 1: Like I mean, I don't know.
- 2:27Speaker 2: You know, we don't normally make In fact, we very
- 2:30Speaker 2: explicitly have not over the last couple of decades made
- 2:33Speaker 2: policy to suit married people. You know, we have not
- 2:36Speaker 2: made a big thing out of using the tax the
- 2:38Speaker 2: tax system to incentivize marriage. So to now turn around
- 2:42Speaker 2: and said, you know what, farmers get married, it's slightly
- 2:45Speaker 2: weird policy take anyway, that's in a sign I'm not
- 2:48Speaker 2: going to get bogged down.
- 2:49Speaker 1: And to be that one slightly hank just because you know,
- 2:53Speaker 1: there's the found no family days, there's loads of stupid thing.
- 2:56Speaker 2: But another time, another there'll be a whole personal finance
- 3:00Speaker 2: podcast on why you should get married.
- 3:02Speaker 1: We should do that.
- 3:03Speaker 2: Maybe it's nice to be married too, by the way,
- 3:07Speaker 2: it's not just oh yeah right John, yeah.
- 3:09Speaker 1: And also I see why don't people get married it's
- 3:12Speaker 1: like this.
- 3:16Speaker 2: It's not right farmers. Farmers are not making much money.
- 3:21Speaker 2: They've been big because of their subsidies. A big shift
- 3:23Speaker 2: in the way substies are paid away from acreage towards
- 3:25Speaker 2: more you know, sustainable by diversity, blah blah, that kind
- 3:28Speaker 2: of thing. Lots of uncertainty, nasty supermarket. It's very low margins,
- 3:32Speaker 2: rises to minimum wage and I all this stuff eating
- 3:35Speaker 2: away at their income. We see this very low return
- 3:37Speaker 2: on capital. Then you get whacked with a great big
- 3:40Speaker 2: inheritance tax bill and they say, well, it's all fine,
- 3:42Speaker 2: you get ten years to pay it. But if you're
- 3:44Speaker 2: making almost nothing, paying a half a millionquid or eight
- 3:46Speaker 2: hundred thousan pounds or whatever it is from your your
- 3:49Speaker 2: five million pounds form isn't going to happen anyway. So
- 3:52Speaker 2: they end up selling. And there's an argument about how
- 3:55Speaker 2: many people will pay this tax and how many people
- 3:58Speaker 2: will have to sell EXCEP for a number range from
- 4:00Speaker 2: the government saying almost nobody, only a third of farms
- 4:03Speaker 2: will be liable, five hundred farms a year, it's almost nothing,
- 4:06Speaker 2: to other people saying basically it's everybody except for the
- 4:08Speaker 2: hobby farmers. You know, and if five hundred farms a
- 4:11Speaker 2: year are hit by it, and those are the medium
- 4:13Speaker 2: sized farms, because let's not forget that the very very
- 4:15Speaker 2: big ones will have a way to mitigate and also
- 4:18Speaker 2: sell bate to land without destroying their family's livelihood, et cetera, etc.
- 4:21Speaker 2: So up the top probably fine. Down the bottom and
- 4:25Speaker 2: the hobby farmers, etc. The people with other jobs also fine.
- 4:28Speaker 2: Who's not fine? It's the people in the middle again.
- 4:31Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean that's the fundamental problem with inheritance tax
- 4:34Speaker 1: generally as well. The people like this, they are much
- 4:37Speaker 1: lower actual rate than the people who are just getting
- 4:41Speaker 1: caught by it, even amongst townese like me. The practical
- 4:46Speaker 1: issue underlie in this is that the reason inheritance tax
- 4:48Speaker 1: wasn't Charleston farms and wasn't Charleston business properly is because
- 4:52Speaker 1: you want family businesses and small businesses to be able
- 4:55Speaker 1: to go through succession, which is already a vago traumatic
- 4:59Speaker 1: period for all businesses, without also getting hit with our
- 5:03Speaker 1: massive kind of like tax charge which basically boils down
- 5:06Speaker 1: to tax on your lack of luck. And you know,
- 5:13Speaker 1: possibly you know, yeah, with enough planning and enough resources
- 5:17Speaker 1: to devote to plan and you can minimize inheritance tax.
- 5:19Speaker 1: This hasn't done anything to do that, and the government
- 5:22Speaker 1: basically says that it wants to target people like Jenny
- 5:24Speaker 1: Clarkson or Dyson who do own an awful lot of farmland.
- 5:29Speaker 1: And that's you know, at least partly because of its
- 5:32Speaker 1: tax efficiency, which they've.
- 5:34Speaker 2: Both said in the past. Business, you have a large
- 5:38Speaker 2: amount of money, you want to pass it down to
- 5:40Speaker 2: your kids tax free. Why would you not buy farmland
- 5:42Speaker 2: and do that? And then, of course, you know, if
- 5:44Speaker 2: you do leave it to your children tax free, resets
- 5:46Speaker 2: for capital gains tax, doesn't it post IHD or non IHD,
- 5:50Speaker 2: so someone can then flog it on for nothing for
- 5:52Speaker 2: no tax paid immediately afterwards. So it's a great way
- 5:56Speaker 2: to preserve the value of your estate for your's And
- 5:58Speaker 2: I totally see you might say you and I might say,
- 6:02Speaker 2: let's just get rid of inheritance tax. This is a
- 6:04Speaker 2: terrible test tax. It runs lives, doesn't raise very much money,
- 6:07Speaker 2: everyone hates it. Just be done with it. But clearly
- 6:09Speaker 2: the government is not going to say that. But if
- 6:12Speaker 2: you must have inheritance tax, this seems like a really
- 6:16Speaker 2: bad thing to add it on to a really bad
- 6:18Speaker 2: thing to add it on to. If we want family
- 6:22Speaker 2: businesses and farms and other family businesses to have multi
- 6:26Speaker 2: generational lives, which we're always saying we do, we want
- 6:29Speaker 2: to think long term. We want businesses to stay in families,
- 6:31Speaker 2: want them to grow in families, etc. This is exactly
- 6:34Speaker 2: the kind of thing that will prevent that happening. So
- 6:37Speaker 2: this is not just about farms for me. I mean,
- 6:39Speaker 2: I think that the farmers have valid points, and I
- 6:42Speaker 2: think we want to I think anyway, not everyone will
- 6:44Speaker 2: agree that the cultural inheritance of the uk s farming
- 6:47Speaker 2: sector is important as well. Not everyone will agree with that,
- 6:49Speaker 2: and I understand that, But it seems to me this
- 6:51Speaker 2: is about all all.
- 6:52Speaker 1: Sorts of businesses. Yeah. And the thing it's more of that,
- 6:56Speaker 1: it's regardless of your feelings about farmers or otherwise, one
- 6:59Speaker 1: way or the other. The point is this is a
- 7:02Speaker 1: very disruptive change for businesses and the reason that it
- 7:06Speaker 1: wasn't there in the first place is because that was
- 7:08Speaker 1: recognized as being a problem. The way that labors introduced
- 7:11Speaker 1: it has just made that a problem and it hasn't
- 7:14Speaker 1: addressed the things they ostensibly want to capture, which is
- 7:18Speaker 1: that they want to basically stop people from using what
- 7:21Speaker 1: they describe as a loop pole, whereas it's no, it's
- 7:24Speaker 1: just one of the rules and this is one of
- 7:25Speaker 1: the side effects, and that's not going to happen. And
- 7:28Speaker 1: I mean, I thought your idea, which some other people
- 7:31Speaker 1: have echoed as well, that it's long probably did actually,
- 7:35Speaker 1: But you know, as long as it's a going concern,
- 7:38Speaker 1: as long as you're still using it as a farm
- 7:40Speaker 1: or as a business, then the IHT liability should only
- 7:45Speaker 1: kick in as soon as somebody had ourselves the farmland
- 7:48Speaker 1: to use for something else, or they sell their business,
- 7:51Speaker 1: or the business goes public, say, and then at that point,
- 7:54Speaker 1: you know, it could be charged on the business.
- 7:57Speaker 2: And with that reminds me if you wanted to, you
- 7:59Speaker 2: could make it for them. If what you're trying to
- 8:01Speaker 2: do here is encourage longevity of a business, it doesn't
- 8:03Speaker 2: really matter what the rate is on sale. You can
- 8:05Speaker 2: align it with other inheritance tax rates. And the other idea,
- 8:08Speaker 2: by the way, I mean that was our first thought
- 8:10Speaker 2: to the war. You could do is say, okay, you
- 8:11Speaker 2: have to pay inheritance tax, but you don't really have
- 8:13Speaker 2: to pay it unless you say And also the idea
- 8:16Speaker 2: being that that liability arrives on death on the farm
- 8:22Speaker 2: being passed down, but it then declines over the years.
- 8:24Speaker 2: So if you keep the farm for ten years, then
- 8:26Speaker 2: by the end of their ten years liability it's probably gone. Right.
- 8:29Speaker 2: But RSM the accountants, they had another idea about putting
- 8:33Speaker 2: IHD to one side completely and saying, well, likely, why
- 8:36Speaker 2: don't we do it another way and have these assets
- 8:39Speaker 2: attract capital gains tax. So at the moment if you die,
- 8:43Speaker 2: the capital gains on any of your assets are effectively
- 8:46Speaker 2: wiped out for tax purposes, right, which is kind of
- 8:48Speaker 2: a weird glitch in the UK tax system. So how
- 8:51Speaker 2: about this is their idea Instead of the capital gains
- 8:54Speaker 2: liability being wiped out, it remains and in the same
- 8:57Speaker 2: way we've discussed with inheritance tax, it stays with the
- 9:00Speaker 2: farm or business until sale, at which point it's payable.
- 9:04Speaker 1: Yeah. I think that makes an awful lot of sense.
- 9:07Speaker 2: Is basically your delaying tax payment until the money exists.
- 9:10Speaker 2: And this is one of the weird things about about
- 9:12Speaker 2: I actualained this context is the best way to get
- 9:16Speaker 2: in big tax revenues is to charge people tax when
- 9:19Speaker 2: they have money, which is one of the reasons that
- 9:21Speaker 2: we've discussed this before. We don't understand why it is
- 9:24Speaker 2: the buyer who pays stamp duty on the exchange for
- 9:27Speaker 2: property as opposed to the seller who's the one with
- 9:29Speaker 2: the money the seller. And if the purpose of tax
- 9:32Speaker 2: is to raise tax revenue, then charge people when they
- 9:36Speaker 2: have money, not when they don't have money. And that's
- 9:39Speaker 2: the big flaw from the purposes of a revenue collector
- 9:42Speaker 2: in this idea.
- 9:43Speaker 1: This is stupid, stupid idea. The other thing, look, did
- 9:46Speaker 1: want very quickly ask if t is because I am
- 9:51Speaker 1: baffled by the fact that from a financial person's point
- 9:55Speaker 1: of view, the idea that you've got this as that
- 9:58Speaker 1: is somewho w was millions of p owns. But the
- 10:00Speaker 1: yield is sometimes sub one percent? Why don't you sell
- 10:04Speaker 1: it or and put the money in gilts? Is the
- 10:07Speaker 1: way the mainset works. And it's also how can nison
- 10:11Speaker 1: have a yield to one percent? It shouldn't. The yield
- 10:14Speaker 1: should be at least five which means that the capital
- 10:16Speaker 1: value of the line should come down. So what is
- 10:19Speaker 1: the story?
- 10:20Speaker 2: They else, Well, there's a lot of competition for land,
- 10:22Speaker 2: isn't that that's the actual farmers and actual farmers, generational
- 10:26Speaker 2: farm farming families. They don't want to sell their land.
- 10:28Speaker 2: They like being farmers, they like living on that land,
- 10:31Speaker 2: they like their lifestyle. This is what they want to do.
- 10:33Speaker 2: It's what they mean. The families have done for generations, etc.
- 10:36Speaker 2: Why would you not do that just because the land
- 10:38Speaker 2: underneath you has changed in value, right, It doesn't make
- 10:43Speaker 2: sense to farmers to sell the land. They want the land.
- 10:46Speaker 2: And then this competition for land from the lifestyle farmers,
- 10:48Speaker 2: people who want big gardens, people who like to have states,
- 10:50Speaker 2: people who you like to shoot or whatever it is
- 10:53Speaker 2: people like to do on land. You know, land is
- 10:55Speaker 2: something people own for for reasons other than just to
- 10:59Speaker 2: make a yield from. In that sense, it's a luxury
- 11:01Speaker 2: product as well as being a utility product. It's both things,
- 11:06Speaker 2: and that's something that can make the price high. And
- 11:07Speaker 2: then you know, there is argument about whether the tax
- 11:10Speaker 2: relief has pushed up the price of land or not.
- 11:13Speaker 2: I might say it probably has, because it certainly pushed,
- 11:15Speaker 2: as you say, the Clarksons and the Dysons into the
- 11:17Speaker 2: business by land. And there is a conversation about the
- 11:21Speaker 2: extent which the subsidy system changes the price of land.
- 11:25Speaker 2: You know, did the price of land in the UK
- 11:27Speaker 2: start going up when the European agricultural substy system was changed,
- 11:31Speaker 2: such as subdies were paid per acre as opposed to
- 11:34Speaker 2: whatever it was before, which I can't quite remember refred
- 11:36Speaker 2: So there was a change there, and the price of
- 11:39Speaker 2: land did look like it started to move then. And
- 11:42Speaker 2: the other thing to ask is just you know, as
- 11:43Speaker 2: a price of land in the UK is simply a
- 11:45Speaker 2: function of the everything bubble. You look at a graph
- 11:48Speaker 2: of land prices, they definitely do start go up before
- 11:51Speaker 2: interest rates started to fault dramatically, but they go up
- 11:53Speaker 2: a lot faster as we move into the zero interest
- 11:57Speaker 2: rate world, so it's part of the everything bubble at
- 11:59Speaker 2: the same time.
- 12:00Speaker 1: Yeah, between two thousand and two thousand and seven, they
- 12:02Speaker 1: these rocketed and because I guess the other issue is
- 12:05Speaker 1: the commodities bubble was around the then as well, and
- 12:08Speaker 1: they seem to have gone up a lot with the
- 12:09Speaker 1: kind of soft commodities bubble because they didn't die much
- 12:12Speaker 1: in two thousand and eight, which was interesting.
- 12:15Speaker 2: So there's a lot going on here and this this
- 12:18Speaker 2: change to the tax rules seems like a bad thing.
- 12:20Speaker 2: I can't see the government backing down because you know
- 12:25Speaker 2: it looks so bad already, why would they make it worse.
- 12:27Speaker 2: But between us, John, we have just given them a
- 12:29Speaker 2: way out. Rachel Reeves, we've offered you a way out.
- 12:33Speaker 2: Take it, save yourself. Right, What else should we talk about, John?
- 12:36Speaker 2: To wet inflation because this isn't going to do anything
- 12:39Speaker 2: for that.
- 12:39Speaker 1: Yes, it's not going to do anything for that. Well
- 12:42Speaker 1: inflation inflation. Inflation data just came out this week and
- 12:45Speaker 1: it came in a little bit higher than everyone was expecting.
- 12:48Speaker 1: Two point three percent to two point two percent. Is
- 12:53Speaker 1: it's not so much a big deal in itself. It
- 12:55Speaker 1: just points to interest rates staying higher for longer. And
- 13:01Speaker 1: you know the Bank at England it's interest because I
- 13:04Speaker 1: mean Andrew Bailey about six weeks ago, after the FED
- 13:07Speaker 1: had cut interest rates by half a percentage point, he
- 13:09Speaker 1: was kind of like, oh, we we might need to
- 13:11Speaker 1: get more aggressive about this. But he very quickly changed
- 13:14Speaker 1: his tune because you know, the US data keeps coming
- 13:17Speaker 1: in quite nicely and UK inflation is now likely to
- 13:21Speaker 1: be hitting three percent at some point next year, so
- 13:24Speaker 1: it can be very hard for them. They do very
- 13:26Speaker 1: much with interest rates except lower them very gradually, and
- 13:32Speaker 1: I think the biggest impact from that is that the
- 13:34Speaker 1: housing market is probably going to stall again because mortgage
- 13:39Speaker 1: rates are going back up. They dipped to about as
- 13:43Speaker 1: they got almost as low as about three point eight
- 13:44Speaker 1: percent earlier this year for a five year fix. Now
- 13:47Speaker 1: you can't get a five year fix for below four percent.
- 13:51Speaker 1: And I was seeing an email from Ellen c told me.
- 13:55Speaker 2: That this morning.
- 13:56Speaker 1: So yeah, I think that I think they has you know,
- 14:03Speaker 1: been kind of like up beating the UK economy roughly
- 14:06Speaker 1: since everyone was panicking about it back in twenty twenty two.
- 14:09Speaker 1: But Noel job well going back off a but it
- 14:12Speaker 1: just feels as if it's getting you know, everything's looking
- 14:15Speaker 1: as if it will stole. Consumers are getting slapped around by
- 14:18Speaker 1: the government. It's not really uh an environment that feels like,
- 14:24Speaker 1: you know, let's go, let's go for growth.
- 14:26Speaker 2: Yeah, but listen, here's your regular reminder that there is
- 14:28Speaker 2: no correlation oncesoever, between a country's GDP and performance fix
- 14:32Speaker 2: stock market.
- 14:32Speaker 1: True.
- 14:34Speaker 2: Do see, we're not going to talk about the UK
- 14:36Speaker 2: stock market now, but putting a link in the show
- 14:38Speaker 2: notes that you should click on that talks about the
- 14:40Speaker 2: UK stop market and why it might just be a
- 14:42Speaker 2: global safe haven at the moment. Thanks for listening to
- 14:49Speaker 2: this week's Marrion Talks Money debrief. If you like us show, rate, review,
- 14:52Speaker 2: and subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts. Also, if you
- 14:54Speaker 2: short to follow me and John on ex or Twitter
- 14:56Speaker 2: at marinus w and at John Underscore stepic this episode.
- 15:00Speaker 2: It was produced by some Asadi, Production support and sound
- 15:02Speaker 2: design by Moses and Questions and comments on this show
- 15:05Speaker 2: and all our shows are always welcome. Our show email
- 15:08Speaker 2: is Mere Money at Bloomberg dot net. Want to do
- 15:11Speaker 2: some episodes of Marin Talks Money ad free, Become a
- 15:14Speaker 2: Bloomberg dot com subscriber today. Check out our special intro
- 15:17Speaker 2: offer right now at Bloomberg dot com Forward Slash Podcast offer,
- 15:21Speaker 2: or click the link in the show notes that seems easier.
- 15:24Speaker 2: You'll also unlog deep reporting data and analysis from reporters
- 15:27Speaker 2: around the world. If you're already at Bloomberg dot com subscriber,
- 15:30Speaker 2: connect your account within Apple Podcast to listen to this
- 15:32Speaker 2: episode ad free.