Latest / The Epstein Chronicles / Mega Edition: The Palace Knew A lot More About Andrew's Dirty Laundry Than They Let On (6/18/26)

Transcript

Mega Edition: The Palace Knew A lot More About Andrew's Dirty Laundry Than They Let On (6/18/26) · The Epstein Chronicles

0:00
Speaker 1: All right, So we're going to continue pulling on this
0:02
Prince Andrew thread for a while here and in the mornings,
0:05
I guess, because this news is coming in hot and
0:08
heavy right now. So you know, they made it look
0:13
like he was stepping down from his duties, right But
0:15
we discussed it yesterday. He was fired by the Queen
0:18
and the Prince of Wales. So they got together and
0:21
they decided that what was best for the royal family
0:25
was to make Andrew step back out of public life
0:28
and basically face the music, because that's what's happening right now.
0:32
So there was all kinds of rumors and and different
0:38
sources talking about how Andrew was going to get get
0:44
off of all of these charges, how he was never
0:46
gonna have to face the uh, face the music. Well,
0:49
guess what, When you keep the pressure on and you
0:52
keep your foot on the pedal, you continue, you continue
0:54
to accelerate. And that's what we're doing in this case.
0:56
We're accelerating things. We're moving. It's moving faster now than
1:00
I ever thought it was going to. And I'll tell
1:02
you what, it's taking a life of its own. Because
1:04
once one domino falls and these people start ratting on
1:06
each other and turning on each other and snitching on
1:08
each other like always happens in these sort of situations.
1:11
Who knows what we're going to on earth. Furthermore, what
1:15
is on all of those tapes that were taken out
1:18
of Epstein's home? What is all that evidence? They took
1:21
thousands of pictures? Who are the girls in those pictures?
1:23
Is anyone tracking down those girls in the pictures to
1:25
see if they you know, where they are? We haven't
1:30
heard anything about any of that. So that's something that
1:32
I would really like to see more of. And it's
1:35
kind of it's hard for for us to really have
1:39
all the details. If we don't have all of the
1:41
fact all the facts, we don't have all the details, right,
1:44
So all right, so let's jump into this article and
1:46
see what the Daily Beast has to say about Prince
1:51
Andrew and him being forced into retirement. Basically, the headline
1:56
inside a Royal hit, how Pallas fhear of us Epstein probe?
2:00
Whor's the Queen to fire Prince Andrew? Disgraced Royal Prince
2:03
Andrew is preparing to give evidence to the Jeffrey Epstein
2:06
inquiry in the US and courtiers at Buckingham Palace believe
2:09
a demand for testimony may be eminent. Bam, how about that?
2:14
How about that, folks. And see, here's the difference with Andrew.
2:18
He's not dealing with Lisa Bloom. He's not dealing with
2:21
Gloria already. He's dealing with Chuck Cooper. And remember, Chuck
2:25
Cooper is not one of these sensationalists lawyers. Chuck Cooper
2:28
is a real trial attorney. Chuck Cooper is the kind
2:30
of guy that will go balls to the wall and
2:33
bring you down because that's just his m That's the
2:36
see we have in America. For those that you know
2:40
aren't living here, some of these lawyers are rock stars themselves, right.
2:45
These guys are just you know, the type of people
2:47
that they walk into a courtroom and the defense knows
2:50
that they're in for some trouble. And that's what's going
2:53
on with Chuck Cooper. He if he gets if he's
2:55
the one that gets across examined and and ask Andrew questions,
2:59
it's going to be big, huge, gigantic trouble for Andrew.
3:03
Andrew made it clear in his resignation statement that he
3:06
would cooperate with law enforcement as they investigated Epstein. The
3:11
Daily Telegraph reported Thursday that Buckingham Palace is braced for
3:15
US authorities to issue the Duke with a subpoena requesting
3:18
he gives testimony under oath about his friendship with Epstein. Bam,
3:23
how about that, folks rejoice, right, We got to take
3:26
the small victories when we get them in this case,
3:28
because we all know that what we're up against here,
3:31
we're not just up against a couple of rich people,
3:32
We're up against the whole entire elite establishment. Following his statement,
3:38
Andrew would have little choice but to comply. Gloria Alred,
3:43
the celebrity lawyer representing some of Epstein's alleged victims, was
3:46
quick to demand Andrew voluntarily contact US authorities. Now remember
3:51
Alred is not defending Roberts, all right, so just remember
3:57
that Bloom or allread are not involved with Roberts. Was
4:05
quick to demand Andrew voluntary contact. You voluntarily contact used
4:08
authorities without conditions and without delay, asking the question, is
4:12
he insisting that he'd be served with a subpoena to
4:14
testify or is he willing to speak to law enforcement
4:17
without being legally required to do so. Well that that
4:20
is a valid point. Is it is he going to
4:23
talk to them of his own free will or does
4:26
he need to be subpoena That's you know, that's pretty important.
4:30
Now if he get if he if he forces them
4:32
to subpoena him, then once again it just looks bad
4:36
for him. It just keeps looking bad for him. Look,
4:38
I'm no public relations expert. Anybody who knows me in
4:40
my real life knows my fat mouth gets me in
4:42
a lot of trouble. But I'm not a royal right,
4:44
I'm not running around involved in trafficking rings. I just,
4:47
you know, happen to have a fat mouth. Hey Bobby,
4:49
do your work. I run my mouth a lot. That's
4:54
such a that's such the threat of subpoena should be
4:57
hanging over. Andrew goes a long way to explain his
5:00
mystifying decision to give an hour long interview to one
5:03
of the UK's most feared political interviewers. It was widely
5:09
speculated after Andrew did the ill advised sit down that
5:11
he had done it because he suspected he was about
5:14
to be subpoenaed by US authorities. Wow Andrew had hoped,
5:19
according to the theory, to get out ahead of any
5:21
such action. He hoped the interview would allow him to
5:23
win over public opinion before law enforcement closed in Holy Toledo, folks,
5:28
can you imagine, can you imagine just you know, put
5:31
on your your looking into the future glasses right now
5:35
and imagine what it would look like to see this
5:37
guy get in purple walked out of Buckingham Palace. In
5:41
the end, of course, the interview had the opposite effect,
5:43
and by his haughty manner, extraordinary denials, provably false claims,
5:48
unwillingness to regret his friendship with Epstein, and failure to
5:52
express any sympathy for Epstein's victims, Andrew dug his own grave.
5:57
And that's what we talked about as soon as this
5:59
interview happened, right we were talking about it right away, the
6:01
empathy situation and how this was a bad look for him,
6:05
and it was. We were spot on in our analysis.
6:10
We look, there are certain situations where you don't have
6:15
to be some sort of insider to see what's happening.
6:18
If you just have a basic knowledge of what's going
6:20
on in the case, and you've been following a case,
6:22
you could see the writing on the wall, and the
6:24
writing is clear in this case, folks, the writing is
6:27
clear now. If they bring in Andrew and they get
6:32
they subpoena him to testify. I honestly have no idea
6:35
why they wouldn't just slap the whole the Rico title
6:37
on this case. Again, the Rico statute gives them so
6:42
much power to be intrusive. The brutal Ouster when it came,
6:47
was worthy of the name, the nickname the royals used
6:49
for themselves the firm. Late Wednesday afternoon, Prince Andrew issued
6:54
the statement that brought his public life to an end.
6:56
He claimed it was his decision and that he had
6:58
sought the Queen's permission to withdraw from public duties for
7:01
the foreseeable future. But the truth was far from that.
7:06
Royal briefings are making it very clear today that he
7:08
was fired and their termination is permanent. One insider said,
7:13
the bottle of whiskey and the pearl handled revolver were
7:16
laid out for him, and they were laid out for
7:18
him by his mother, one the source told The Daily Beast.
7:21
But behind his mother's brutal sacking, many detect the guiding
7:24
hand of Prince Charles, who has sought to exclude Andrew
7:27
excuse me, but behind his mother's brutal sacking, many detect
7:30
the guiding hand of Prince Charles, who has sought to
7:33
exclude Andrew from the royal family since twenty twelve, and
7:36
who finally sees the opportunity Wednesday. All right, so we
7:39
have some royal blood letting going on as well. And
7:41
I'm the expert on the current royal situation over there.
7:45
I really stopped, you know, having interest in the English
7:49
royalty basically after the Plantagenets. But so there's obviously a
7:54
blood letting going on over there. We know that Charles
7:57
and Andrew have never really been you know, best of buddies,
8:00
I guess, and now he sees his opportunity and he's
8:03
seizing on it. The Queen has been locked in phone
8:07
calls with Charles, who is on tour in New Zealand,
8:09
since the crisis broke. Wright writer Penny J. Junner, who
8:14
has worked closely with Charles on biographies and is a
8:16
trusted confidant of the palace, told The Daily Beast that
8:19
she suspected Charles had played a significant role in the hit,
8:22
saying I imagine there might have been a bit of
8:24
pressure on him to make this announcement, and I suspect
8:27
it might have come from his older brother. Well yeah,
8:30
look one less claimant and rival to the to the crown,
8:34
right even though he's eighth in line. You know how
8:36
these people think once again, it's all about power consolidation.
8:39
And you see with the royal family, let's not give
8:41
them too much credit here, right. What they're doing is
8:43
they're making a move for their public image. There was
8:48
no blowback, and they knew that he was hanging out
8:51
with Epstein and this was and people weren't going crazy
8:53
about it. He'd still be out there in public, in
8:55
the public eye. He'd still be doing his duties. Andrew
8:59
was quickly pulled from a scheduled visit to flood victims
9:02
in northern England as plans for his demise were sealed.
9:05
He was summoned the Buckingham Palace from his home in
9:07
Windsor on Wednesday afternoon, where he was told it was over.
9:11
Andrew was told he would no longer he was no
9:13
longer to have any frontline duties representing the family. He
9:17
was told he was to stand down immediately from his
9:19
two hundred charitable patronages. He was told that he would
9:22
immediately immediately lose his two hundred and fifty thousand dollars
9:26
per Adam Grant. The one crumb of comfort came when
9:30
the Duke was told he would still be welcome at
9:32
family occasions, So expect to see him at Sandringham walking
9:36
to church on Christmas Day. Little Prince got a crew
9:39
on thrown to him, Mommy's favorite little boy. He's still
9:43
going to get to go to church. All, isn't you acute? Meanwhile,
9:49
Virginia Roberts is dealing with a lifetime of mental issues
9:51
because of this sick bastard. Like all well executed hits, Andrew,
9:56
a friend told The Daily Beast, had no idea was
9:59
about to happen. Look, it looks like the mafia. He
10:01
didn't get a chance to take off his pinky ring
10:03
and his rolex before he got in the car to
10:05
get clipped. Indeed, he was planning a trip to the
10:09
Middle East this weekend as part of his business startup program.
10:12
In fact, according to the Queen's biographer Robert Hardman, writing
10:16
in The Daily Mail Today, the Queen and Charles reached
10:18
their decision Tuesday night when Andrew became a subject of
10:21
discussion in a BBC debate between rival politicians Boris Johnson
10:25
and Jeremy Corbyn, who are squaring up for an election
10:28
on December twelfth. Look, I'm not like two hip on
10:30
English politics, but Jeremy Corbyn seems to be a bit
10:33
of an anti Semite to me, and his pronouncing of
10:37
Epstein's name as Epstein is definitely a dog whistle. So
10:41
if you guys are over there in England, I mean,
10:43
I know you guys aren't really huge fans of Boris
10:45
Johnson either, and I guess I don't know too much
10:47
about him, but Jeremy Corbyn looks definitely strikes me as
10:51
somebody who really is not a friend to Jewish people.
10:54
And remember that doesn't mean you have to be a
10:56
friend to you know, think the Jewish government is always
10:59
doing the right thing, but there's no room for painting
11:03
any one group of people as the way some of
11:06
these you know, slick people over here in you know,
11:10
certain parts of the government and our and the American
11:13
government too. Believe me, there's plenty of dog whistlers in
11:15
this American government when it comes to Jewish people. And
11:18
it's sad, right, It's really sad that there's still people
11:21
that act like that. In the year twenty nineteen, we
11:24
should all of us be focused. That doesn't matter what
11:26
color you are, religion, whatever. We should all be focused
11:29
on getting the shackles that the elites put on us
11:32
off of us. It's not about our hating our neighbors,
11:35
all right. It's not about oh, our neighbors this, or
11:37
our neighbors that we were that's so ridiculous. A member
11:43
of the public ask the leaders whether the monarchy was
11:46
fit for purpose. Corbin's sly response was it needs a
11:49
bit of improvement. Got a thunderous response that the monarchy
11:53
should be a bona fide talking point and a general
11:55
election was a huge red flag and our reminder of
11:58
nineteen ninety two when the we apologize to the Prime
12:01
Minister John Major that the breakdown of the marriage between
12:04
the Duke and Duchess of York intruded on the election,
12:07
it seems another such apology, necessitated by the same member
12:11
of the royal family may be necessary this time. I look, England, folks,
12:17
I love you guys over there, but this whole thing
12:20
with the royals just so weird, so weird, unbelievably, just
12:25
twenty four minutes after Andrew's statement had been released, the
12:28
Queen was making a public appearance presenting her old friend,
12:31
Sir David Attenborough with a Lifetime Achievement award. She even
12:36
managed to crack a joke and there was laughter as
12:38
she told the TV legend, Sir David, this award recognizes
12:41
your many talents and one can't help but feel that
12:44
for those of us of a certain generation, we can
12:46
take great pleasure in proving ages no barrier to being
12:49
a positive influence. Look, I'm not gonna pile onto the Queen.
12:52
She's an old lady. She really probably doesn't even have
12:54
control of the palace anymore. You know, these guys are
12:57
all running amok. So I'm I'm not a pile on
13:00
the Queen per se, but the royal family in general.
13:03
I will never understand the whole entire the fixation with
13:08
this royal family. The Queen kept a smile pasted on
13:12
her face throughout, but don't mistake that for any pleasure.
13:15
At Andrew's demise, she will be devastated at the tragedy
13:18
that has befallen her favorite son just a few months
13:21
short of his sixtieth birthday. In a bitter irony. Yesterday
13:24
marked what should have been a joyous day of celebration,
13:26
as it marked the Queen's seventy second wedding anniversary. Hey mom,
13:31
here's a nice anniversary present. I'm caught up in a
13:34
sexual assault scandal that involves underage girls who yet, just
13:39
minutes after one of the sickening decisions, one of the
13:42
most sickening decisions of her career, her Majesty was doing
13:45
exactly what being the perfect royal requires, sublimating her emotions
13:49
to the service of the crown. The contrast with Andrew
13:52
could hardly be greater, and now he has the rest
13:55
of his life to ponder what might have been. Well, guys, go,
14:01
not only is he stepping out of public life, he
14:04
is now basically he's at the point where subpoena is eminent.
14:09
So we're gonna keep our eye on this throughout the
14:11
day and in the coming days, we'll keep posting. Uh
14:14
you know, as as these stories are breaking, I'm gonna
14:17
I'm gonna I'll record episodes as they break so we
14:20
can we can stay on top of this. Right the
14:22
whole entire point of this podcast is to recover this
14:24
in real time, and I'm gonna do my best to
14:26
bring that to you folks. All right, once again, if
14:29
you'd like to contact me, you can do that at
14:31
bo B B Y c ap U C c I
14:35
at ProtonMail dot com. That's Bobby Kapucci at ProtonMail dot com.
14:39
And if you would like the Epstein Chronicles tonight, we
14:44
have two articles for you. The first one is going
14:48
to deal with how the Palace was trying to get
14:51
the one photographer that was at the Prince Philip memorial
14:56
service to not shoot the Queen and Prince Andrew. The
15:02
second is one that's going to deal with Prince Charles
15:06
and how he got pr advice from Jimmy Saville. Now,
15:10
if you're not familiar with Jimmy Saville, well he was
15:14
a notorious pedophile from the UK who was also accused
15:20
and charged with necrophilia. So we got ourselves quite the
15:26
shit show, don't we. Is it just a coincidence that
15:30
all of these royals are associating with people like Jimmy
15:34
Saville and Jeffrey Epstein or is it just in their
15:37
DNA makeup? Now again I ask you, how many of
15:42
you out there have associated with one human trafficker or
15:46
child molester, never mind multiple. Then you add to that
15:52
all of the other scuzballs that Andrew hangs around or
15:55
is hung around, and it tells you everything you need
15:58
to know about him. Now, as far as the picture
16:01
situation goes, well, if the Palace didn't want pictures to
16:05
be taken of Prince Andrew and the Queen, here's an idea.
16:10
Make sure that they're not going to this event together.
16:14
It's a good way to make sure nobody takes pictures.
16:17
But instead, what they'll try and do is manipulate the situation.
16:21
They'll strong arm the photographer. They'll you know, oh, well,
16:25
you can't put those pictures out, just like when Andrew
16:28
is at Balmorl. How the Queen put it out there that, oh,
16:32
pictures aren't allowed to be taken at Balmorl. I mean,
16:36
it's almost to the point where we're gonna need to
16:39
have a series called Epstein and the Queen soon for
16:43
all of the enabling she has done, for all of
16:45
the protection she has given Andrew. But the Palace knew
16:52
this was a bad idea from Jump Street, and still
16:55
the Queen went through with it. So it certainly looks
16:58
to me at this point the Queen has said, effet,
17:01
She's going to do whatever she wants to do with
17:03
her remaining years, and she doesn't care what anyone thinks
17:07
or what the backlash might be. So with that said,
17:12
let's dive into these two relatively short articles and let's
17:16
see what's what. Our first article is from the Daily
17:21
Beast and the author of this article is Tom Syke's headline,
17:27
Buckingham Palace tried to block photography of Prince Andrew escorting
17:31
Queen into Prince Phillip's memorial. Here's an idea again, don't
17:37
let it happen in the first place, and you won't
17:39
have to worry about blocking it or attempting to keep
17:43
information from people. Just don't let it happen. You mean
17:47
to tell me there's nobody that could sit down with
17:49
the Queen and tell her, hey, look, this is a
17:51
bad idea, I guess not. I mean, who's going to
17:54
do it? Charles, the guy that was hanging out with
17:56
Jimmy Savile. So again, it's just a gigantic shit show
18:01
for the monarchy, and honestly, I don't know how they
18:05
see their way through this one, folks. Buckingham Palace tried
18:11
to prevent an official photographer taking a photograph of Prince
18:15
Andrew escorting Queen Elizabeth into Prince Phillip's memorial service last week.
18:21
Why would they do that? Why not just let this
18:24
guy take the picture and be done with it. Did
18:27
they think that they'd be able to keep this private
18:29
or keep it secret or something, because I don't know
18:34
what they're thinking if that's the case. This day and age,
18:38
everybody has cell phone cameras. Everybody's looking for, you know,
18:42
the next scoop, So of course these pictures are going
18:45
to get out there. The decision by the Queen to
18:50
ask Andrew to accompany her into the service was hugely controversial,
18:55
as Andrew has recently settled a court case with a
18:57
woman who accused him of sexually as her. So remember
19:01
let's keep in mind this was the queen's decision. The
19:05
Queen decided to walk in here with Andrew on her
19:08
arm to show him off, like he's some kind of,
19:11
you know, someone to be proud of. You know, like
19:15
when you were younger, you'd come home and you drew
19:18
something from your parents or whatever, and they'd put it
19:20
on the refrigerator with a magnet. That's what Prince Andrew's
19:23
like still to this day in his sixties. Although Andrew
19:28
did not admit guilt, he paid Virginia Roberts a sum
19:31
of money, reportedly in excess of fifteen million dollars. The
19:36
Queen is said to have underwritten part of the settlement
19:39
from her personal fortune, because you know, the Queen made
19:41
her personal fortune out there in the trenches, digging holes
19:45
and building houses and you know, working every day of
19:48
her life. Oh wait, that didn't happen from her personal fortune.
19:52
You mean the money that has been so graciously given
19:56
to her by the people of England and the people
19:59
of the UK. That's what you mean, right, because she
20:01
certainly never had a real job. Oh well, the head
20:04
of state. It's a tough jo. Yeah, right. Come on,
20:07
is there anyone out there right now who's getting ready
20:10
to go to their hourly job doing whatever it is
20:14
that you do that wooden trade places with one of
20:16
these royals in an instant. I know that I would
20:21
imagine being able to do whatever you want all day,
20:24
every day and not worry about it. Because most of us,
20:27
right eighty percent of the time we do what we
20:30
have to do. Only twenty percent of the time, roughly do.
20:33
We get to do what we want to do. But
20:35
if you had this kind of money, this kind of power,
20:38
you could be doing anything in the world. And remember
20:41
what Prince Andrew decided he wanted to do. Although it
20:47
had been widely assumed that Andrew would attend the memorial
20:50
to his father, he was expected to enter Westminster Abbey
20:53
with his children and sit with them. In the event,
20:58
he walked the Queen by the arm to her seat
21:00
before taking a front row seat next to Prince Edward,
21:04
so he was in a place of prominence. We've talked
21:06
about this. The fact that the Palace didn't want to
21:09
photograph him, though, is comical. At this point, what are
21:13
you people thinking? What do you think you're going to hide?
21:16
This isn't the year twelve hundred and seventy six. You
21:21
guys can't blame the great you know, plague on whatever's
21:25
happening or whatever silliness the royals would use in the
21:29
old days to get people scared and fallen into line.
21:32
That's not gonna happen anymore. People have access to information
21:35
now and people are starting to see the royals for
21:38
what they are. And honestly, folks, I am not that
21:43
impressed now the official rote, a photographer tasked with catching
21:49
the event on behalf of all the UK print media,
21:52
has written a first person piece in the Times of
21:55
London in which he describes how Palace officials initially sought
21:59
to prevent him taking the picture of the Queen until
22:02
she was seated. This would have meant there would have
22:05
been no still photographs of the Queen and Andrew as
22:09
she walked to her seat, despite the entire service being
22:12
screened live on TV. So look, the Palace didn't want
22:16
any of these pictures to get out there, right, They
22:19
didn't want the stills out there. It's bad enough it's
22:22
on live video and you know people were screenshotting it
22:25
at home. But the fact that the Palace would think
22:30
that they can control this, that they still have this
22:32
kind of power as laughable breaking news. You were figureheads before,
22:37
you're even more so now. Photographer Richard Pohle wrote that
22:44
he entered a state of high panic upon being told
22:48
by a Buckingham Palace press officer that I could not
22:51
photograph the arrival of the Queen into Westminster Abbey only
22:55
once she was seated, they said, And obviously we know
22:59
what that was for they didn't want these pictures to
23:01
be taken. And they had one person there acting as
23:07
a functionary, a photographer, and this one person was told
23:13
not to take these pictures until they sat down. It's
23:16
did they really think this wasn't going to come out
23:19
Like mister Pole here was just going to keep silent
23:21
and not tell anybody this happened. Paul said. He tried
23:26
to be He tried to diplomatically argue that there had
23:29
been significant interest in how the queen would arrive on
23:32
her own two feet or in a wheelchair or buggy,
23:36
for example, he should be allowed to take pictures of
23:38
her arrival. His arguments fell on deaf years. Look, I
23:43
don't know how many ways I can explain this at
23:45
this point, but I have zero faith in the palace.
23:48
I think the Palace is filled with scoundrels and buffoons,
23:53
and I think that the people of the UK would
23:55
be a lot better off if these people were knocked
23:59
into real just functionary mode. Like the rest of the
24:02
royals throughout Europe, for the most part, their day is
24:05
coming gone. The sun has set on the House of Windsor. However,
24:13
when news filtered through ten minutes before the start of
24:16
the service that Andrew was going to be leading her in.
24:18
He writes, everything changed and he demanded to be allowed
24:22
to photograph what was now the major news event, and
24:26
bolstered his case with the argument that the BBC was
24:29
carrying the whole event live. So they're trying. They have
24:33
a gigantic hole in the boat right in the hull,
24:36
and there's a smaller hole. So what they try and
24:39
do is, all right, let's plug the smaller hole. Meanwhile,
24:42
the rest of the ship is taking on an immense
24:44
amount of water, so they're basically just spinning their wheels here.
24:47
This is being shown live on BBC. What are you
24:50
worried about? Still photographs for the Palace relented, but then,
24:56
to his horror, Pole realized when the congregation stood up
25:00
for the queen's entrance that he couldn't see the Queen
25:02
and Andrew from his official position. He writes, desperation dictated
25:07
I do something quickly. As the choir started, I jumped
25:11
off my footstool and moved quickly to the aisle between
25:14
the rows of seats opposite where the Queen would walk. Suddenly,
25:18
moving from an official position while on a royal roda
25:21
is the most cardinal of sins. Oh, the most cardinal
25:24
of sins. I mean, are these people for real? All
25:29
of their stupid spectacles and their dumb procedures and protocols,
25:35
nobody cares Suddenly, oh excuse me, is most cardinal of sins.
25:41
I brushed past the press officer and could feel a
25:44
hand reach out to try to stop me, but I
25:46
rushed past and crouched in the center of the aisle.
25:48
I got the picture. Well, good for you, and that's
25:51
what he should have done. And all of these royals
25:54
and the functionaries who were trying to stop them from
25:56
taking that picture are clowns. Just made it worse. You
26:01
make it look worse, You make it seem like it's
26:04
this big cover up because you're never transparent. You always
26:08
give us garbage can statements, no transparency, and certainly no
26:13
care for the survivors. In general, all the Palace cares
26:17
about all they have ever cared about, at least when
26:20
it comes to Epstein and Prince Andrew is covering their
26:23
own ass and making sure that they don't look bad.
26:26
That's what they care about, all right, Onto our second
26:31
article for this evening. This second article is from Newsweek,
26:35
and the author of this article is Jack Royston headline.
26:41
Prince Charles got pr advice from celebrity later outed as
26:45
serial pedophile Mommy's little boys be proud, Queen be real proud.
26:56
And I know I mentioned this all the time, but
26:58
the squandered life of these people. Imagine the good they
27:02
could have done, the real good they could have done.
27:04
But instead, no, I'm gonna chill with Jimmy Saville, I'm
27:07
gonna hang out with Jeffrey Epstein. I need to increase
27:11
my own self worth, as if you don't have enough
27:13
Being the Prince of England, Prince Charles unknowingly, oh yeah,
27:20
unknowingly asked a notorious British pedophile for pr advice that
27:25
was passed on to Queen Elizabeth the Second. According to
27:29
letters revealed in a Netflix documentary, the Prince of Welles
27:33
wrote to children's TV presenter Jimmy Saville around the time
27:37
of the Lockerbie bombing, which killed two hundred and seventy people,
27:41
including one hundred and ninety Americans, in December of nineteen
27:45
eighty eight. Now, I remember that when I was a
27:47
kid when that bombing happened, and it was wild, seeing
27:51
like the wreckage and It wasn't something that was you know,
27:55
very commonplace back then, especially a flight leaving England. Now,
28:01
if you were talking about hijacked planes and stuff in
28:03
the eighties and seventies, you were talking about usually in
28:06
the Middle East, right, something to do with the Palestinian
28:10
liberation or organization stuff like that. But this locker bee
28:13
bombing was just bananas. Considering where it originated from and
28:18
what happened, and the fact that Prince Charles would reach
28:23
out to Jimmy Savell got everybody else at your fingertips.
28:27
You're reaching out to a TV presenter, Jimmy Savell for
28:31
what reason. Prince Andrew had at the time been criticized
28:36
for his response to the tragedy, and Charles asked savile
28:41
for pr Oh, So Prince Andrew had been criticized at
28:44
the time. Huh, he was showing his colors even back then. See,
28:47
I don't remember. I don't remember all of that obviously.
28:50
I was eight years old when this happened. And I really,
28:54
like I say all the time, have no interest in
28:56
the royals. I don't have an axe to grind here.
28:58
That's the thing, folks. I don't care one way or
29:00
the other about these people. They were never even on
29:03
my mind or my radar until the Epstein stuff popped off.
29:09
I had zero desire to take a look at the
29:11
modern day British royal family. I really could care less
29:15
about these people. They don't. They mean nothing to me.
29:18
But when you look behind the curtain and you see
29:20
the way they function, and you see the way they
29:23
take for granted the great great riches and wealth given
29:31
to them by the English people, it just makes me
29:34
shake my head. Charles wrote to the now disgraced children's
29:39
entertainer before the truth surface that Savile had abused four
29:44
hundred and fifty victims and engaged in necrophilia. Hell of
29:48
a guy. Necrophilia, some Ted Bundy type shit, you know,
29:53
like these serial killers do. They'll kill somebody, bury the
29:56
body and then go back like two weeks later and
29:59
do disgusting things. And this is the guy that the
30:03
Crown Prince of England was getting advice from. Huh. Let
30:07
me go ahead and write Jimmy Savill, see what he
30:09
has to say about this. The correspondence is being made
30:13
public through new documentary Jimmy Savill, a British horror story,
30:18
released on Netflix on April sixth, which maps out the
30:22
deep foundations the abuse are laid within British society, including
30:27
through the royals. So I'm gonna watch this documentary over
30:30
the next couple of days and we'll talk more about
30:34
Jimmy Savill. I've planned on doing a few episodes on
30:37
this clown anyway at some point, and we're gonna get
30:40
to that real soon now that this documentary is out,
30:42
Because what this guy was up to was heinous, Folks.
30:46
This is one sick, fucking dude, and hopefully him and
30:51
Epstein are burning together in that very bottom layer of
30:54
hell I always talk about. I hope both of these
30:56
clowns are down there burning together. The letters not only
31:01
show how close to monarchy the prolific child abuser Savile
31:05
managed to get, but also exposed Charles's concerns about his brother,
31:09
Prince Andrew and sister in law Sarah Ferguson, Andrew's wife
31:14
at the time. Look, there's always been concerns about grifty Griftington.
31:18
When you're somebody who has great access and you don't
31:22
have some kind of job or you know, wealth, you're
31:26
going to use that access to get wealthy. That's just
31:29
how it goes everyone around you is getting wealthy. Everybody
31:32
around you is selling access, Why not you? And that's
31:36
what Prince Andrew did. He was selling access to himself
31:39
and the royal family, so he can go on those
31:41
cool jets, go on those trips, go down to those islands.
31:49
The prince asked Saville, who died in twenty eleven, for
31:52
advice on reaching the British public after Andrew botched a
31:56
visit to Lockerbie following the bombing, which Libya years later
32:01
accepted responsibility for. On January fourteenth, nineteen eighty nine, Charles wrote,
32:06
perhaps I am wrong, but you are the bloke who
32:09
knows what's going on. What I really need is a
32:11
list of suggestions from you. I so want to get
32:15
to parts of the country that others don't get to reach.
32:19
So he's just admitting he's tone deaf, admitting he can't
32:22
understand a segment of the country and a segment of
32:25
his subjects. And that's sad. You know, all of these
32:30
royals go to like private schools and all they do
32:33
is hang around with other so called elites. If I
32:36
was the king or the Queen, my kid would be
32:38
going to public school. Oh are you going to do that.
32:41
I'd figure out a way to do it. My kid
32:43
would go to public school. That's it, at least for
32:46
a portion of their schooling. It's just like at work, right,
32:50
the best managers and the best directors and presidents, and
32:54
there are the people that have worked their way up
32:56
and have done every single job available. When I started
33:03
at the joint at the hard Rock, I was eighteen
33:05
years old and I was fresh off, you know, going
33:09
to school for technical theater in high school. All of it. Well,
33:14
I had to work my way up. I swept and
33:17
mopped that stage for two years. Folks worked my way
33:20
up away from that, and eventually, well, I became the
33:24
stage manager. And you learn how to do all of
33:28
the jobs on the way up the ladder, right, But
33:30
these royals never do that. They've never had a taste
33:33
of what you go through every day waking up and wondering, man,
33:37
is this going to be the month where we don't
33:39
make ends meet? Is this going to be the month
33:41
when gas is seven dollars and fifty five cents. They've
33:45
never went through any of that, So how can they
33:47
relate to us Saville who wormed his way into the
33:51
highest echelons of British society, using his extensive contacts, replied
33:56
with an action plan to help respond to future disasters,
33:59
including having a special coordinator. The Predator added there must
34:04
be an incident room with several independent phone lines, et cetera.
34:08
The Queen should be informed in advance of any proposed
34:12
action by family members. Oh, Jimmy Savile, the big pr guy,
34:17
You mean to tell me this is the only dude
34:18
you could have reached out to. There's nobody else you
34:21
could have asked for help. Charles replied on January twenty seventh,
34:26
nineteen eighty nine. I attach a copy of my memo
34:29
on disasters, which incorporates your points, and which I showed
34:32
my father. He showed it to Hm, Her Majesty, the Queen.
34:38
It came after Andrew made in sensitive comments on a
34:41
visit to Lockerby, Scotland, where passenger plane PanAm flight at
34:45
one oh three was brought down an archive footage including
34:48
in the documentary. The Duke of York said, I suppose
34:52
that statistically something like this has got to happen at
34:55
some stage. This guy has been making boneheaded comments since
34:58
Jump Street. Why anyone would defend Prince Andrew or try
35:02
and put him at the forefront of anything. It defies logic. Honestly,
35:08
I don't understand how anyone would even think it's a
35:11
good idea. He added, of course, it only affects the
35:15
community in a very small way. Biography Prince Andrew Epstein
35:20
Maxwell in the Palace quoted the Duke saying the disaster
35:23
was much worse for Americans. Charles' letters were shown to
35:26
the documentary by Savile's authorized biographer, Alison Bellamy. She told
35:32
the show, this is Jimmy giving pr advice to the
35:34
Royal family about how to react publicly when there's a
35:38
major incident in Britain. She added, Jimmy's advising them how
35:41
to do it, what they should do, how they should act,
35:44
what they should say should they say anything. Boy, oh boy,
35:48
this is bad news for the Royal family. I mean,
35:50
we all knew about Jimmy Saville, we all knew about
35:52
the connections. But I'm saying the timing here is really bad.
35:56
It's like the dog pile now right Later, on December
36:01
twenty second, nineteen eighty nine, Charles wrote to Saville, I
36:05
wonder if you would ever be prepared to meet my
36:07
sister in law the Duchess of York. I can't help
36:10
feeling that it would be extremely useful to her if
36:13
you could. I feel she could do with some of
36:16
your straightforward common sense, Bellamy said. Jimmy seems to be
36:20
kind of an unofficial chief advisor to the Prince of Wales. Wow.
36:25
So you got the clown Prince of England and his
36:28
official adviser as Epstein, and then you have old chucky
36:31
boy over here, Uncle Chuckles and his confidant. His chief
36:36
advisor is Jimmy Saville. Hell of a family you got there.
36:40
Queenie Clarence House, which represents Charles, declined to comment. Oh,
36:45
I'm sure they did. It's the last thing they need
36:48
right now. Well, there you have it, folks for the
36:50
evening update. You got Prince Andrew and the Queen trying
36:53
to avoid being photographed, and then we have the revelations
36:57
coming out of Prince Charles and his chief advisor Jimmy Savell.
37:03
So I'll let you folks process that for a little while.
37:06
Chew on that for a little while, and I will
37:08
be back in the morning. If you'd like to contact me,
37:12
you can do that at Bobby Kapuchi at ProtonMail dot com.
37:15
That's bo b b Y c ap u Cci at
37:19
ProtonMail dot com. You can also find me on Twitter
37:23
at Bobby Underscore c ap u Cci. The link that
37:29
goes with this episode can be found in the description box.
37:33
All right, every what's up everyone, and welcome back to
37:36
the Epstein Chronicles. Sam McAllister, the producer who was responsible
37:43
for wrangling up the Prince Andrew interview, is now facing
37:47
backlash from her former colleagues at the BBC, as unnamed sources,
37:53
unnamed people working at the BBC have come out and
37:56
said that they're not too happy that she is cashing
38:01
in here. Now. The question is why is BBC so
38:06
worried about what Sam McAllister is doing? Did she or
38:10
did she not wrangle this interview? And if she did, well,
38:14
stop with the sour grapes. It's also been reported that
38:18
there are some in the royal family who aren't too
38:21
happy as well. My response to that is who cares
38:26
at this point? Who really cares what those people think?
38:30
What are you gonna lose access to being able to
38:33
visit Prince Andrew? Ah shucks. So today we have an
38:38
article from the Telegraph and the author of this article
38:42
is Victorio Wood headline BBC anger as ex producer steals
38:48
glory for Emily Maitliss Prince Andrew interview. Sam McAllister catches
38:54
in on scoop with her book, which is now being
38:56
turned into a film, also ruffling some feathers in the
39:00
royal family. Wouldn't it be scales in the royal family?
39:04
Aren't they lizard people? So how would they have feathers?
39:08
Isn't that what some of the conspiracy theorists talk about.
39:11
They're lizard people, so I don't understand the feather comment here?
39:16
All right, All kidding aside, let's dive in. It was
39:19
the scoop of the decade, an extraordinary encounter that brought
39:23
an abrupt end to the Duke of York's royal career.
39:27
But the mastermind behind the Duke's now infamous Newsnight interview
39:31
with Emily Maitlis is facing a backlash at the BBC,
39:35
where senior figures are frustrated that she appears claiming all
39:39
the glory while at the same time exploiting the process
39:43
for financial gain. What what is BBC doing? Doesn't BBC
39:49
exploit everything for financial gain? Every single heartbreaking story there is,
39:54
They have to run it on the front page. Any
39:57
sort of divisive bullshit, they have to run it on
39:59
the front pag. But now that Sam McAllister is trying
40:03
to make a couple of bucks on the back of
40:05
her work. By the way, let's not act like she's
40:08
stealing somebody else's glory here. She's the one who wrangled
40:12
up these interviews. Yes or no, nobody's come out and
40:15
said that she's not. So what's the sour grapes about?
40:19
Are you mad? Because she's getting some glory here and
40:23
the unnamed figures at BBC, Well, go on the record
40:28
and say it. I can't stand all of these anonymous sources.
40:31
Just go on the record and stop being a chump.
40:36
Sam McAllister, the former BBC producer who helped negotiate the
40:40
November twenty nineteen interview, wrote a book detailing her version
40:45
of events, which was recently snapped up by a film
40:48
production company. And why wouldn't it be there's obviously a
40:52
lot of interest in the story. Still, there's obviously a
40:55
lot of interest in Ms McAllister's version of the story.
40:59
So why a company swoop in and buy the rights?
41:02
If I was producing films, I'd want as much content
41:05
like this as I possibly could get. The book was
41:10
serialized in a national newspaper, and McAllister has done a
41:14
myriad of interviews in which she details every meeting, conversation
41:19
and negotiation that preceded the interview. BBC sources are quietly
41:24
seething at what they perceived to be McCallister taking the
41:28
lion's share of credit when the success of the interview
41:32
was considered very much a team effort. So again, the
41:36
whoever over at the BBC, they have to have a
41:39
little bit of the credit, right. They can't go through
41:42
their life knowing somebody else who did a lot of
41:44
work gets the credit. So the big shots, the unnamed sources,
41:48
the seething BBC sources, instead talk to the Telegraph. It's
41:56
typical for media organisms or corporations to do stuff exactly
42:03
like that. They'll cherry pick their favored members of the
42:08
media that write good, wholesome stories about them even when
42:12
they shouldn't, and then they'll have that person in the
42:15
media or that outlet run a puff piece on them.
42:20
And that's basically what's going on here BBC. Some jerk
42:24
off at BBC, some unnamed source reached out to the Telegraph,
42:28
a paper that's been relatively friendly to Glenn Maxwell, by
42:31
the way, and now they're running this story talking about
42:37
how Sam McAllister shouldn't be trying to steal all the glory,
42:41
trying to put her in a light like she's doing
42:43
something wrong by trying to cash in and make a
42:45
few bugs. None dispute that the former producer played a
42:51
critical role in securing the award winning Scoop, but many
42:55
of her colleagues, including Matelists, who won Interview of the
42:58
Year for the program at the British Journalism Awards in
43:01
twenty twenty, are reduced to peripheral figures in various publicity
43:05
interviews and webinars. Well, you know why, because everybody's the
43:10
hero in their own story. Folks. I know that's breaking news,
43:13
but I mean, come on, what is she supposed to say?
43:16
She's trying to sell a book. I was the central
43:19
figure in getting this interview, and no one's disputing that
43:24
she played a critical role in securing them. So why
43:27
even be childish and run to your friends over at
43:30
the Telegraph and Winge and cry. There is irritation and
43:37
upset that the interview and events leading up to it
43:40
have been monetized. One of the main reasons the Duke
43:43
agreed to go on Newsnight was because of the program's
43:46
gravitas and reputation for conducting in depth, hard hitting interviews.
43:51
Sources contend. Sources contend their sources over at the Telegraph,
43:55
I'm guessing are Prince Andrew himself and his circle. They
44:01
have run many, many favorable pieces in the Telegram for
44:05
I mean the Telegraph, for Prince Andrew throughout this whole
44:08
entire thing, and even for Glenne Maxwell. So the Telegraph
44:13
is one of those outlets that I look at kind
44:17
of like here in America, the same way I look
44:18
at something like, you know, garbage ass. Washington Post another
44:24
one of these outlets that really has no desire to
44:27
truly educate. They only want to divide. And furthermore, who
44:32
cares what Prince Andrew understood. Oh well, he chose to
44:36
go with these guys because they wouldn't spill the beans
44:39
on him afterwards. Well, guess what it's about time someone
44:42
spilled the beans on his bitch ass. In this case,
44:47
it has been blown wide open, with every coffin spit
44:51
repeated time and time again. A BBC insider said, there
44:55
is internal disappointment because it is not the done thing
44:58
to expose how you go about these journalistic practices, and
45:03
also because a lot of people who did a considerable
45:06
amount of work on this show are being written out
45:08
of the process in pursuit of one person's career. Former
45:12
colleagues find that disappointing. Here's an idea, write your own book.
45:15
And furthermore, these journalistic practices. What is this a magician shop?
45:20
What are you Phil fucking Dunfee over here? Oh, I
45:23
can't tell you the secrets of my magic trick. Take
45:26
it easy, okay. Nobody cares about your journalistic internal practices.
45:32
We all know your scumbags, we all know how you roll,
45:35
and we all know that you were running cover for
45:37
Epstein and Maxwell and probably Jimmy Saville as well at
45:43
both BBC and Buckingham Palace. There is also a frustration
45:47
that McAllister's version of events is being accepted as fact.
45:51
Oh here we go. So the Palace says jump, and
45:56
the telegraph says, well, how high? And it goes over
46:00
and over and over again. You know, it's pretty funny
46:03
when you see outlets, especially journalistic outlets, like this try
46:07
and whitewash bullshit. You mean to tell me that the
46:12
BBC can't write their own version of events. If you
46:16
take dispute with what Sam McCalister has to say, write
46:19
your own book. Nobody's stopping you. One royal source echoed
46:25
the Queen on the subject, Riley, noting that recollections may vary.
46:29
There are specific critical details which several insiders can test. Oh,
46:34
I'm sure there are. And you notice they say insiders sources.
46:38
They never give you a name, So I'm gonna go
46:41
with maybe the Telegraph's just running bullshit here? How about that?
46:44
I don't even know if I believe them? Who are
46:46
their sources? I have a big problem with the whole
46:50
unnamed sources thing now, when you're talking about unnamed sources
46:55
for national security reasons, that's one thing. But what are
46:58
you so worried about going on the record here? If
47:00
you work at BBC, if you're pissed off at Sam McAllister,
47:04
why try and take shots at her underhanded coward like
47:07
in the media instead of just calling her up and
47:09
addressing it directly. Another said, they certainly do not recognize
47:16
everything that has been stated. Oh, I'm sure so Here's
47:19
the thing. Sam McAllister is went on record saying this
47:22
with her name a book doing a mediator, and unnamed
47:25
sources are saying some of it's not true. So until
47:29
you people go on record and you know, put your
47:31
name behind your bullshit, kind of hard to believe what
47:34
you have to say. McAllister claims the Duke agreed to
47:40
the interview after she taunted him about his Randy Andy nickname.
47:44
Multiple sources can test McAllister's claim that Donald McCabe, the
47:48
Queen's Communication secretary, only fleetingly popped into the interview room
47:52
and left before the camera started rolling, a move she
47:56
brands a missed opportunity. In fact, they say, hey, mister
48:00
McCabe was in the room throughout diligently making notes. Well,
48:04
if that's the case't isn't that even worse? How don't
48:06
you stop the interview? You just let it happen. So,
48:09
mister McCabe, even if he was, there is an absolute
48:13
toolbag way to go. Mister McCabe, you should be fired
48:17
right along with Amanda Thirsk For the Duke. The fallout
48:22
from the interview was catastrophic. It came after Virginia Roberts
48:26
who was widely trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. The convicted sex offender,
48:31
claimed she was flown to London and forced to have
48:33
sex with him when she was seventeen. Quiz by Matelist,
48:37
the Duke failed to express any regret over his friendship
48:41
with Epstein or empathy for his victims not victims survivors.
48:46
What I mean is the telegraph okay, like did the
48:49
whole entire newsroom falling it their head? Why are you
48:52
still calling people victims survivors? Is your first day or
48:56
is it an underhanded, you know, slap towards the survivors.
49:01
There's no reason to still be calling these ladies victims
49:04
after all of these years, and especially after they themselves
49:07
have come out and said that they'd prefer not to
49:10
be called that. He insisted he had no recollection of
49:15
meeting miss Roberts and said he was at Pizza Express
49:18
and woking on the night in question, also revealing that
49:22
he did not sweat due to a peculiar medical condition.
49:25
I mean imagine coming out and saying that in an interview, Well,
49:28
I couldn't have done what you said I did because
49:30
I can't sweat. Oh, I'm also allergic to horses, but
49:33
I just rode one over here. It's the kind of bullshit,
49:36
ludicrous nonsense. This guy has been pitching like he was
49:40
Max Scherzer for the last ten years. Within days, he
49:45
had been effectively sacked as a working member of the
49:47
royal family. Several months later, he was served with court
49:51
papers in a civil sex abuse case that ended with
49:54
him paying Miss Roberts around twelve million pounds without admitting liability.
49:59
Yep again, because everybody who has never done anything like
50:02
this is just going to pay all this money out
50:05
that they don't even have. Bro is broke. If it
50:09
wasn't for his mom and they're drifting, what would he
50:12
be doing for a living? What exactly is his skill set?
50:18
Despite the dramatic consequences, the monetization of the interview was
50:22
not expected, and many at the Palace consider it unedifying.
50:26
Oh okay, that's nice. So in other words, we don't
50:29
want you to make a book, so we're gonna come
50:31
out and say that it's all a cash grab. They're
50:34
so transparent at this point, They're so transparent, They're translucent.
50:38
How can anyone look at the Royal family and not
50:41
just want to mock them and be sarcastic about the
50:44
stupidity that they're getting up to. A friend of the
50:47
Duke told the Telegraph. You notice how the Telegraph knows
50:49
a lot of Prince Andrew's friends, and how they're quick
50:52
to go and talk to the Telegraph. Oh, I wonder
50:54
why the latest exploitation for financial gain of a book
50:58
and now a film of what was and remains a
51:01
very difficult time for the family is unwelcome, not least
51:05
as the account of events leading up to and around
51:07
the interview appear to have elements of dramatic license. So
51:11
this is really ironic, isn't it. They're out here talking
51:15
about how this is unwelcome. You know what else was unwelcome?
51:18
And I'm pretty sure I can speak for people when
51:20
I say this. The fact that Prince Andrew was paling
51:23
around with Jeffrey Epstein, the fact that Prince Andrew was
51:26
at Jeffrey Epstein's house while someone was getting raped, the
51:29
fact that Prince Andrew allegedly was engaged in the abuse himself.
51:35
So you want to talk about unwelcome, all of that's
51:37
unwelcome too. Sorry that the royal family's being put on blast,
51:41
But guess what it's not the year ten ninety nine anymore,
51:44
it's not the year fourteen hundred, and there's no tutors
51:47
coming to chop off anyone's head. So you're gonna have
51:50
to deal with the criticism like everybody else. Put on
51:53
your big boy pants, your big girl pants, and get
51:56
to it. And if you don't want criticism like this,
51:58
here's an idea can deduct yourselves correctly. Recent claims in
52:05
the media surrounding the alleged existence of a shocking photograph
52:08
of the Duke, said to have been captured by a
52:10
photographer working for the BBC on the day of the interview,
52:14
have also been dismissed as nonsense. No one involved is
52:18
said to have seen or heard of such a photograph,
52:20
no one but the people. Huh. So again this is
52:23
a puff piece right here, folks. I want you to
52:25
understand what this article is. This article is trying to
52:28
run cover for the Royals, for BBC and for Prince Andrew.
52:33
That's exactly what it is. And the Telegraph has been
52:36
at it since the beginning. In her book Scoops, McAllister
52:42
repeats a celebratory tweet from Asmi Wren, the Newsnight editor
52:46
who paid full credit to her for securing the world exclusive.
52:50
The producer writes, credit is a tricky issue. Others had
52:53
worked with me and had borne the strains too. I
52:57
wanted to make sure everyone got mentioned every time. After all,
53:00
there was enough credit to go around for everyone. So
53:03
why is everyone crying now because Sam was smart enough
53:06
to cash in on it. I cannot stand sour grapes
53:10
and I really don't like people who hate on other
53:12
people for success. That's the worst shit in the world.
53:15
It's like everybody with an opinion who has never done shit.
53:18
Oh I can do this better, I can do that better,
53:20
I can make this better. Then do it. What are
53:23
you sitting around for? Go and do it and shut
53:25
your yap. A spokesperson for One World, the publisher of
53:32
Scoops set Sam's books, speaks for itself and she shares
53:36
credit in it and in interviews. A BBC spokesman declined
53:40
to comment, noting that once staff have left the BBC,
53:44
they have left. Buckingham Palace declined to comment. Boy, this
53:48
shirt sings to me like sour grapes. Folks, And if
53:52
you do work as far as being a producer a
53:55
field journalist, you should get all the credit in the
53:57
world for that, because guess what you think on Hannity's
54:00
bitch Ass, Tucker Carlson, Rachel Maddow, they're out on the
54:04
ground getting these stories. No, it's these producers that are
54:08
doing the real work. And then your favorite newsreaders, who
54:11
are making as much as athletes, by the way, just
54:13
mimic and parrot what is put in front of them.
54:16
So yeah, Sam McAllister, other field producers, they should get
54:20
some credit. And if they want to make a book,
54:22
God bless And if the people at the BBC and
54:25
the Royal Family don't like it, well you know what
54:28
they can do, right, they can all shut their yaps,
54:33
all right, everybody that's gonna do it for this episode.
54:36
I'll be back later on with a little bit more
54:38
and I hope that all of you have a fantastic Sunday.
54:43
If you'd like to contact me, you can do that
54:44
at Bobby Kapuci at ProtonMail dot com. That's bo Bby
54:49
c apu Cci at ProtonMail dot com. If you like
54:55
to find me on Twitter, you can do that at
54:57
bo bby underscoreap Ucci. The link that we discussed can
55:03
be found in the description box all right, everybody, I'll
55:07
talk to you all later on.