Latest / UK Column Radio / Who benefits from the war against Iran? | Jerm Warfare

Transcript

Who benefits from the war against Iran? | Jerm Warfare · UK Column Radio

0:30
Speaker 1: My name is as a germ warfare, the battle of ideas.
0:34
Speaker 1: Let's get a macro view of what is going on
0:37
Speaker 1: in Iran.
0:40
Speaker 2: Well, actually, I think the world in Iran is the
0:42
Speaker 2: continuation of the war against Syria, and this has been
0:47
Speaker 2: clear since twenty eleven that Syria had to be knocked
0:51
Speaker 2: out or pacified or a puppet government should come in Damascos,
0:57
Speaker 2: so Iran would lose its access the Mediterranean and would
1:01
Speaker 2: access its logistical access and military access also to Libanon
1:06
Speaker 2: and to Gaza. As we may know, in the past
1:09
Speaker 2: forty years, Iran started building an alliance alliances in the
1:13
Speaker 2: vision I would say, between state and non state actors,
1:18
Speaker 2: and they carried out, in my opinion, type of policies
1:23
Speaker 2: and actions against the American dominance and the Israeli dominance
1:28
Speaker 2: over the region, which the Israelis considered it. Of course,
1:32
Speaker 2: it's very dangerous for their aspirations to establish. Especially this
1:39
Speaker 2: has become more clearer, let's say after October seven, when
1:43
Speaker 2: Israeli officials came publicly talking about their aspiration to become
1:48
Speaker 2: a dominant player. And this is what we're talking about,
1:50
Speaker 2: the hegemon. Some people call it the pakshu Daika Empire.
1:54
Speaker 2: Other people call it different names. It doesn't matter the branding.
1:58
Speaker 2: I think what matters is that Israel has a strong
2:01
Speaker 2: aspiration to become the regional hegemon and their main rivalry
2:07
Speaker 2: or main rival in the region is Iran, and Iran
2:11
Speaker 2: has supported Syria in this case Hesbola Hamas, the Unsable
2:16
Speaker 2: Law movement and the PM in Iraq in order to
2:21
Speaker 2: counter this us Israeli let's say, entrenement in the region.
2:26
Speaker 2: And once they were successful in removing Aside from power,
2:31
Speaker 2: it was quite clear that it is only a matter
2:33
Speaker 2: of time they would move this war inside Iran itself.
2:37
Speaker 2: So they tried so the multiple this war is multi layered,
2:41
Speaker 2: you know, like they start with the rhetoric that the
2:44
Speaker 2: media demonization, the psychological operation, the economic warfare, the sanctions,
2:50
Speaker 2: and then they tried to instigate always rebellion or riots
2:55
Speaker 2: inside the country to create the perception to the public
2:59
Speaker 2: of opinion that the people are asking for doing as
3:03
Speaker 2: is to come and save them right from this evil dictator.
3:06
Speaker 2: And this is basically the same script they copied in
3:08
Speaker 2: different places. So it was quite clear that they were
3:12
Speaker 2: planning for war or destabilization of Iran. But in my opinion,
3:19
Speaker 2: when we bring the basket, as we're at the end
3:22
Speaker 2: of the day, observers analysts, right, so we have to
3:25
Speaker 2: have this basket and see what are the pros and
3:27
Speaker 2: cons of going into war against Ivan from the American perspective,
3:31
Speaker 2: and you come to the conclusion that this is objectively speaking,
3:35
Speaker 2: Ivan is a rational actor in the region. They want
3:39
Speaker 2: to cooperate with the Americans in different files in the region.
3:42
Speaker 2: But what they don't what do they don't like, is
3:46
Speaker 2: the presence of the American forces near the borders with Iran.
3:50
Speaker 2: And those are not some defensive pure defensive weaponry or
3:54
Speaker 2: a defensive basis. Those include f thirty fives, those include
3:59
Speaker 2: six things, does include missiles directed at Iran, and also
4:05
Speaker 2: include spying. They're spying on Iran. They're watching what is
4:09
Speaker 2: going on inside the country and waiting for the opportunity
4:12
Speaker 2: to move inside the country. So the Evenians are definitely
4:16
Speaker 2: unhappy with that situation. But then comes the Israeli factor
4:20
Speaker 2: into this equation, and we can see that there is
4:24
Speaker 2: an increasing attempt from the Israeli side. Some people would
4:27
Speaker 2: argue and say they have already done that successfully to
4:31
Speaker 2: hijack the American foreign policy and use the American military
4:36
Speaker 2: power as the stick. The Israelis tried to use the
4:41
Speaker 2: American army as the stick against Iran because Israel itself
4:45
Speaker 2: cannot fight against Iran. There is no chance that Israel
4:49
Speaker 2: could survive this war without new King Iran.
4:53
Speaker 3: So they need this air badge.
4:55
Speaker 2: They need the supply chains, they need the logistics, the intelligence,
4:58
Speaker 2: the satellite and what they also need. Americans have advanced
5:05
Speaker 2: they call it the early detectors of the missiles coming
5:10
Speaker 2: from Iran against Israel. So basically install the Arabia Qatar
5:14
Speaker 2: bahraink with and the UAE. Americans have the technology to
5:21
Speaker 2: detect the ballistic and hypersonic missiles being fired from Iran,
5:26
Speaker 2: send the data to Israel, and American and Israeli air
5:30
Speaker 2: defenses try to intercept them over the Israeli skies. So
5:34
Speaker 2: in this case, the Irvenians have saw that they have
5:37
Speaker 2: seen that the Israelis are basically going to move inside
5:43
Speaker 2: Iran using the American military despite the fact that if
5:47
Speaker 2: you put it pure from the pros and cons perspective,
5:50
Speaker 2: it is not in the interests of the Americans to
5:53
Speaker 2: open and all out war against Ivan in the region.
5:55
Speaker 2: This is not in America's national interest, because America is
6:00
Speaker 2: already overstretched in different places around the world. Its economy is,
6:06
Speaker 2: as we may know, trillions of dollars in debt. And
6:09
Speaker 2: at the same time, the mood inside the United States,
6:12
Speaker 2: especially in the MAGA base, people have voted for Donald
6:15
Speaker 2: Trump because he said no more, forever worse. And then
6:19
Speaker 2: this comes and it's like the last show in the Magabase.
6:23
Speaker 2: It sends the global economy almost to the recession levels,
6:29
Speaker 2: and the Avenians have italiated in a manner in my
6:32
Speaker 2: opinion that the Americans were surprised and now they say, oh,
6:37
Speaker 2: this is unfair that they're hitting qatars or their abiuee.
6:41
Speaker 2: But what the Vnians are doing they are hitting first
6:44
Speaker 2: American bases, and secondly they are retaliating to previously conducted
6:52
Speaker 2: attacks by the Israelis or the Americans against the energy infrastructure.
6:56
Speaker 2: So imagine the Israeli Is bombed the oil depots in Ivan,
7:02
Speaker 2: so the Ivenians retaliated. They didn't initiate this type of
7:05
Speaker 2: attacks against energy infrastructure individuon. They retaliated against these attacks.
7:09
Speaker 2: And then came the most important attack from the Israeli side,
7:14
Speaker 2: and this is more important than assassinating Ali Khamine basically,
7:18
Speaker 2: and that is to strike Evan's gas field. And this
7:22
Speaker 2: is one of the most important and rich gas fields
7:26
Speaker 2: in the world. So what do the Avenyans do. Basically
7:30
Speaker 2: they strike back against the Katai lng field, basically destroying
7:36
Speaker 2: fifteen percent of its capacity for the next five years.
7:41
Speaker 2: So Donald Trump panicked and he went on his social
7:45
Speaker 2: to this truth app whatever they call it, and he said, look,
7:49
Speaker 2: we weren't aware about this attack. We didn't approve it
7:52
Speaker 2: from the Israeli side. They did it by themselves. But
7:54
Speaker 2: this is completely bollocks because the Americans know every single detail,
8:00
Speaker 2: and they have the satellite and they have their own
8:02
Speaker 2: of course forces in Israel, and they know the type
8:05
Speaker 2: of attacks that Israel is carrying gun But the moment
8:09
Speaker 2: that they struck these gas fields in Iran, they didn't
8:13
Speaker 2: anticipate again for the fen time probably that Iran would
8:17
Speaker 2: retaliate in this manner against the Catarcas fields. And this
8:22
Speaker 2: has sent the global markets into complete panic, right and
8:26
Speaker 2: now you can see people like Sacks, who is the
8:31
Speaker 2: they call him the cryptos are of Trump. We have Jokine,
8:36
Speaker 2: we have other people who I'm not saying that they
8:39
Speaker 2: have genuine intentions. All I'm saying is they are now saying, no,
8:43
Speaker 2: we have to declare victory and withdraw. But we have
8:48
Speaker 2: to understand if America declares victory and with those, Iran
8:54
Speaker 2: is not going to stop it's choking or blocking of
8:58
Speaker 2: the Strait of Humus. They have miscalculated so badly with
9:03
Speaker 2: Iran that even if there is a cessation of hostility,
9:08
Speaker 2: Ivenians will not stop blocking the Strait of Hormus against
9:11
Speaker 2: the American and Israeli and other interests, other European and
9:17
Speaker 2: Western interests who have participated in this war of faguation
9:21
Speaker 2: against them, which means once this war is over, we
9:24
Speaker 2: will see continuous sanctions. They have been sanctioning around for
9:30
Speaker 2: forty years and now even It's sanctioning them back so
9:36
Speaker 2: badly that the American the condition of the Iranians to
9:42
Speaker 2: unblock the Strait of Hormus is American forces have to
9:46
Speaker 2: leave the Persian golf countries. And this is the biggest
9:51
Speaker 2: moment in my opinion, after the fall of the Soviet Union.
9:54
Speaker 2: If Americans we throw and I'm not saying they will,
9:57
Speaker 2: but if they withdrew from the Persian Gulf County. Israel
10:01
Speaker 2: will be left alone in the region and they have
10:04
Speaker 2: no means to survive in the Middle East without the Americans.
10:08
Speaker 2: Will the Americans withdraw or not? I suspect that the
10:12
Speaker 2: Americans will withdraw. I think Natanyaho and his team and
10:16
Speaker 2: who he represents, they have hijacked American policy so much
10:21
Speaker 2: that even David Sacks the other day said, Look, there
10:24
Speaker 2: are fears that Israel could nuke Iran. And I'm worried
10:29
Speaker 2: and terrified of this scenario that Israel at a certain point,
10:33
Speaker 2: when they feel that their existence is threatened, they would
10:37
Speaker 2: enact and activate the Sumpson option and they would nuke Iran.
10:40
Speaker 2: And that's why Iran has rejected to give up its
10:45
Speaker 2: enriched uranium basically. And I'm not an expert, I'm not
10:48
Speaker 2: claiming to be an expert on it, but I have
10:50
Speaker 2: read enough to understand why they have been enriching, sometimes
10:55
Speaker 2: to sixty percent of the enrichment level, because they want
10:59
Speaker 2: to have the threshold that if they are nuked, they
11:03
Speaker 2: would have the capacity to have the second strike. So
11:07
Speaker 2: if you strike Iran and nuke Iran, they have the
11:11
Speaker 2: capability to develop.
11:13
Speaker 3: In nuke in the future.
11:15
Speaker 2: And this would take a few months for them, because
11:17
Speaker 2: one tactical nuke or two tactical nukes or even ten
11:20
Speaker 2: will not decimate and eliminate Iran from existence. So Iranians
11:24
Speaker 2: already if the doomsday they come, they would have the
11:29
Speaker 2: capacity and the capability to strike, to have the second strike.
11:33
Speaker 2: I think this is all what is going on in
11:35
Speaker 2: the region, and this is very dangerous and the people
11:37
Speaker 2: should be verified of it.
11:40
Speaker 4: So Covork, whose war is this?
11:43
Speaker 3: Actually?
11:46
Speaker 2: I think, if I want to be very honest with you,
11:50
Speaker 2: this is Israel's war. But who Israel represents? Is Israel
11:57
Speaker 2: like an independent actor who stands behind Israel. Does Israel
12:03
Speaker 2: represent few banking dynasties, does Israel represent a certain ideological fantasies?
12:14
Speaker 2: Because it is difficult to see this war and separate
12:19
Speaker 2: it from ideology. After October seventh, you can see clearly
12:25
Speaker 2: that although Israeli, most of Israeli officials, including his real
12:30
Speaker 2: name is Melakowski, I think Benjamin Natanieo, they started talking
12:35
Speaker 2: about the like they want to prepare the conditions for
12:41
Speaker 2: the second or the coming of Messiah.
12:45
Speaker 4: And I mean, did you see them, did you see
12:47
Speaker 4: them all praying over Trump?
12:49
Speaker 2: This is something in my opinion, just shows how much
12:53
Speaker 2: ideology plays a role in the United States. And I'm
12:55
Speaker 2: not saying religion. I'm saying ideology because this is not
12:58
Speaker 2: a religion, this is a heavesy, this is not Christianity.
13:03
Speaker 2: People need to know that non American Christians are watching
13:08
Speaker 2: this with horror. This is complete, in my opinion, heresy especially.
13:17
Speaker 2: I forgot her name, but she is the woman responsible
13:19
Speaker 2: for Trump's religious affairs, and she recently was just above
13:26
Speaker 2: his shoulder and touching him. And she claims that she's
13:29
Speaker 2: representing God on earth. And you know, in Christianity, this
13:33
Speaker 2: is basically anti Christian. Nobody can represent Jesus Christ on earth.
13:39
Speaker 2: And the way this woman speaks, it's quite clear that
13:42
Speaker 2: there is some psychopathy behind it. This woman is very
13:47
Speaker 2: radical that I would compare her to the isis of
13:51
Speaker 2: Christianity basically, and the Isis of Islam is what they
13:56
Speaker 2: call in Abbi Kawavich. Hawavich means the people who left
14:00
Speaker 2: the true Islam and they have their own interpretation. And
14:03
Speaker 2: she is a hawaverage of Christianity.
14:05
Speaker 1: So in this case, your name Paula.
14:11
Speaker 2: So this woman recently also she forced another woman to
14:16
Speaker 2: resign from this Religious Liberty Committee in the White House,
14:19
Speaker 2: and she was on Attacker Carson Show recently explaining that
14:22
Speaker 2: these people are basically Israel first, Israel first, Israel first,
14:27
Speaker 2: Israel first. All the way you can, you can, you
14:31
Speaker 2: can find. You can take a book and call Donald
14:35
Speaker 2: Trump any name in the book. It's fine, But the
14:38
Speaker 2: moment you criticize Israel, they come after you. So these
14:42
Speaker 2: people are the infiltrators in the Trump administration. And then
14:46
Speaker 2: you have David Koshner, who has no official status in
14:52
Speaker 2: this administration, and then he's acting like the Foreign Minister
14:55
Speaker 2: and the Secretary of State of the United States. And
14:58
Speaker 2: David question of course had close ties to Epstein, had
15:04
Speaker 2: close ties to Gislin. He is basically he has taken
15:10
Speaker 2: the daughter of Donald Trump and converted her to Judaism.
15:15
Speaker 3: It's very strange. We need to ask if.
15:21
Speaker 2: Any of these sons or the grandsons or granddaughters of
15:24
Speaker 2: Donald Trump found probably someone from a different religion, like
15:29
Speaker 2: a Muslim, would he accept it or an anti designist
15:33
Speaker 2: Christian would he accept it? So Jared Qoestionner is definitely
15:37
Speaker 2: part of it, because Jared Questionner is the guy who
15:40
Speaker 2: is like this envisioning the future of Gaza.
15:43
Speaker 3: They're trying to build this.
15:47
Speaker 2: Ai run city in the Gaza Strip over the corps
15:52
Speaker 2: of hundreds of thousands of people. But then you have
15:55
Speaker 2: also the Greater Isseral Project in the region, which is
15:58
Speaker 2: part of the Gaza Palestine Siria Aliban Ivan. It stretches
16:06
Speaker 2: between the Nile to the euphateis But when you put
16:08
Speaker 2: the map in front of you, who is the one
16:11
Speaker 2: player that stands between the Greater Israel Project. It's even
16:16
Speaker 2: there is no state actor in the world, not even China,
16:20
Speaker 2: not even Russia, not even any other power that stands
16:24
Speaker 2: against this Creator Israel project.
16:26
Speaker 3: So if they succeed.
16:28
Speaker 2: In the gym change in Iran and they bring their
16:32
Speaker 2: puppet government, the invest assured what the people call the
16:36
Speaker 2: Pakshu Daika Empire, will stretch between the Nile to the
16:39
Speaker 2: Euphrates easily. There is no military power again can stand
16:43
Speaker 2: against them. But then people come and say, demographically that
16:47
Speaker 2: is impossible. And the Jews are fifteen million, sixteen million,
16:52
Speaker 2: I don't know how many are they in the world.
16:54
Speaker 2: They cannot really all come and settle in all this
16:57
Speaker 2: big territory. Yes, that's why you need puppet governments in
17:03
Speaker 2: these countries who bring their economies, their social structures, their society,
17:09
Speaker 2: their economy, their political class, all under the influence and
17:14
Speaker 2: the leverage and the control of the Zionists. So that's
17:18
Speaker 2: why you have Jolani in power in Damascow's, That's why
17:21
Speaker 2: you have joseph On and the Prime Minister in Lebanon.
17:24
Speaker 2: That's why you have Mahmudabas in the West Bank, and
17:27
Speaker 2: that's why you have Hammad ben Salmani in Sudia Arabia.
17:30
Speaker 2: That's why you have Mohmmad Benzaid in the UAE, and
17:33
Speaker 2: that's why you have the ruling family in Qatar. Those
17:36
Speaker 2: are all in the same bed with the Americans and
17:40
Speaker 2: the Zionists, and they have allowed this to happen against Ivan,
17:44
Speaker 2: first by spending tens of billions of dollars in Syria
17:48
Speaker 2: to destroy the country and bring it under the American umbrella.
17:51
Speaker 2: And then they allowed the Americans to use this territories,
17:54
Speaker 2: their skies and their military basis to wage this attack
17:57
Speaker 2: against these Venians. Once this started, and now the Avnians
18:02
Speaker 2: have retaliated, they have found that they have learned a
18:07
Speaker 2: very very dark lesson that the Americans do not give
18:13
Speaker 2: f about them.
18:15
Speaker 3: All these.
18:17
Speaker 1: There now yeah, sorry, sorry, but what you just said
18:21
Speaker 1: now dovetails with a message are received on my telegram
18:25
Speaker 1: channel today.
18:26
Speaker 4: In fact, the question goes, can.
18:28
Speaker 1: You explain why certain Middle Eastern countries publicly condemn Israel's
18:33
Speaker 1: actions in Palestine yet also allow them to use their airspace?
18:39
Speaker 2: Which one which Arabic country? I mean the sor the Arabia.
18:44
Speaker 2: The UEE is on the side of Israel all the
18:47
Speaker 2: way Qatar is. It's all rhetorical. You know, those are
18:51
Speaker 2: ink and paper that they condemned the massacres against the Palestinians. Okay,
18:58
Speaker 2: what did you do to stop the massacres? Did you
19:02
Speaker 2: use your leverage in the American economy? Since you have
19:05
Speaker 2: invested trillions of dollars in the American economy. This is
19:08
Speaker 2: what the Sordis and the Katavis and the Amebtists have done.
19:13
Speaker 2: Donald Trump came to every single country and he sucked
19:15
Speaker 2: at least eight hundred billion dollars from these people only
19:18
Speaker 2: a few months ago. Why didn't you use that as
19:21
Speaker 2: leverage to tell Donald Trump that this massacre should stop.
19:25
Speaker 2: They didn't do that. In the contrary, they roll the
19:29
Speaker 2: red carpet for him, and they celebrated him, and they
19:32
Speaker 2: called him every nice word in the dictionary. I think
19:35
Speaker 2: in this case we have to understand what they say
19:39
Speaker 2: is not they don't really what they say and what
19:43
Speaker 2: they do are completely different things. And in this case,
19:47
Speaker 2: the Audis and the Amebetis and the vest they don't
19:50
Speaker 2: mind normalizing ties with Israel. All they wanted is that
19:54
Speaker 2: at least they should be some an exit that they
20:00
Speaker 2: could claim to the public that look, we secured this
20:05
Speaker 2: chicken nugget size of territory as a future Palestinian state,
20:10
Speaker 2: and even that Israelis rejected. Like even that, like if
20:14
Speaker 2: they would find a small vitory in Palestine and they say,
20:18
Speaker 2: finally we found you some small place the Palestinians can live,
20:22
Speaker 2: and even that Israelis rejected it. So in this case,
20:27
Speaker 2: I think the lesson they have learned that when Iran
20:31
Speaker 2: started retaliation, retaliating, where the Americans. Where have the Americans
20:38
Speaker 2: installed the air defenses, the TAD missiles, the interceptors, They
20:43
Speaker 2: were all in Israel or around Israel to protect Israel.
20:49
Speaker 2: How many times the Americans tried to protect these countries
20:52
Speaker 2: against Iran? How many times the Americans tried to protect
20:56
Speaker 2: these countries against Israel. Remember Israel bombed Qatar to kill
21:01
Speaker 2: some Hamas members. Right, this was a few months ago.
21:04
Speaker 2: Americans didn't activate their air defenses in Qatar, but now
21:07
Speaker 2: they activate their air defenses when they come under attack
21:10
Speaker 2: from Iran. So what does this tell you about the
21:13
Speaker 2: intentions of the Americans there. I think after this war
21:16
Speaker 2: is over, the Persian golf monarchists, of course, if they
21:21
Speaker 2: are independent, they would rethink about their relationship with the
21:27
Speaker 2: United States. It has proven to be a burden on
21:30
Speaker 2: their security because with it not for this American forces
21:34
Speaker 2: conspiring and planning for attack against the against Iran, these
21:38
Speaker 2: countries would not have come under attack. So the American
21:42
Speaker 2: forces basically are not a source of protection of these countries.
21:46
Speaker 2: They have become a source of paranoia for Iran and
21:51
Speaker 2: hence and eventually a source of a target. It's a
21:56
Speaker 2: target for you, and those are sitting ducks basically in
21:59
Speaker 2: the Persian Gulf. In my opinion, the Spersian golf monarchy
22:03
Speaker 2: is they have no excuse. Brother, they have no excuse
22:07
Speaker 2: if Iran, after forty years of sanctions and all sorts
22:11
Speaker 2: of warfarees against them, they managed to build a nation
22:16
Speaker 2: state and based on state institutions to the extent that
22:19
Speaker 2: you kill their supreme leader and they replace him. You
22:22
Speaker 2: kill their for you kill their national security advisor, they
22:25
Speaker 2: replace him. Kill the elite commanders and they replace them,
22:29
Speaker 2: and then they retaliate in merry calculated manner, which means
22:35
Speaker 2: there is a deep state inside Iran that, however, how
22:40
Speaker 2: much it doesn't matter you kill their their leaders. It's
22:44
Speaker 2: just they give birth to new ones and Irnians if
22:50
Speaker 2: they can do it. What is the excuse of sau
22:53
Speaker 2: the Arabia, which owns more wealth than Iran, to build
22:57
Speaker 2: state institutions in their own country and build an army
23:01
Speaker 2: that they could protect themselves. Why do you need American
23:03
Speaker 2: forces to protect you? And against who? Against who? Basically,
23:09
Speaker 2: if Iran hasn't attacked you, not once all these years
23:16
Speaker 2: and all these decades, and they only did attack you
23:20
Speaker 2: when Americans attack them, what does that tell you about
23:23
Speaker 2: the state of affairs in the region.
23:25
Speaker 3: And why don't you.
23:28
Speaker 2: Rely on yourself and produce these weapons like the Iranians do,
23:32
Speaker 2: like the Cyrilans have done in the past. You have
23:35
Speaker 2: all these massive wealths and all you do is import
23:39
Speaker 2: from your food, from your medication, from your technology, from
23:42
Speaker 2: your infrastructure, from your cars. You basically produce nothing. You're
23:48
Speaker 2: just a consumerist, and the Americans see you as a
23:51
Speaker 2: milking cow.
23:52
Speaker 3: They milk you and.
23:54
Speaker 2: Then when they've over with you, they will throw you
23:56
Speaker 2: just like any other ally they have thrown in in
24:00
Speaker 2: the past. So if Irani emerges victorias from this, there
24:05
Speaker 2: will be massive changes in the Persian golf monarchies.
24:09
Speaker 1: But the counter argument is that Iran does attack, but
24:14
Speaker 1: through proxies.
24:16
Speaker 2: Against who Americans. They do, yes, but against the Persian
24:20
Speaker 2: golf monarchies they have not attacked. They don't have proxies
24:23
Speaker 2: in Sordia, Arabia or the OEE or Qatar. They have
24:27
Speaker 2: their allies in Iraq and they attack against the American interests.
24:31
Speaker 2: They have their allies in Yemen, and the yemen Is
24:34
Speaker 2: were sub they were subjected to how many years five
24:38
Speaker 2: to eight years of genocidal war against them by the Saudis.
24:42
Speaker 2: So all the Arabia attacked Yemen, and the Iranian allies
24:47
Speaker 2: in Liban no attack Israel. Previously, Iranian allies in Syria
24:53
Speaker 2: attacked against Isis neustral and those were the proxies of
24:56
Speaker 2: Saudi Arabian Katar. So in my opinion, Iran, although it
25:02
Speaker 2: has expiation to become the dominant player in the region,
25:06
Speaker 2: they don't have also the demographic means to occupy these
25:10
Speaker 2: countries even if they want to. A Shia country like
25:13
Speaker 2: Iran cannot convince ninety percent majority Sunni people to join
25:20
Speaker 2: its empire. It's impossible. And in a region where if
25:24
Speaker 2: you live in this vision, sectarian identities are very very
25:28
Speaker 2: important for the people more than religion. You can see
25:32
Speaker 2: somebody who is incredibly radicalized for his own religious sect,
25:39
Speaker 2: but he's not even practicing his own religion. So sectarian
25:43
Speaker 2: identities play major role. Like in Syria, were it not
25:48
Speaker 2: for the sectarianism, it wasn't it was impossible for them
25:52
Speaker 2: to topple a sad But because they knew that sectarianism
25:56
Speaker 2: play is an important role, so they made it about
25:59
Speaker 2: sect They started calling Assad like, oh, he's an Alla
26:02
Speaker 2: white regim although the vast majority of the assault government, military,
26:09
Speaker 2: in the government, executive, legislative, and every aspect in the
26:14
Speaker 2: Cyvian society were overwhelmingly When I say occupied, I mean
26:21
Speaker 2: the ones who were doing the job.
26:23
Speaker 3: They were Sunnis.
26:25
Speaker 2: But they made it about sact so they can remove
26:28
Speaker 2: Assad and term the majority of the Sunnas in Cyvi
26:31
Speaker 2: against him. So imagine in such a region, how can you,
26:35
Speaker 2: as Ivan, even if you have expansionist expivations in your
26:39
Speaker 2: neighboring countries, occupy and included into your empire. Basically, so
26:48
Speaker 2: I think events aspivations are regional. They want to become
26:53
Speaker 2: influential and relevant in the region. And this Persian golf
26:58
Speaker 2: monarchy is since they have edded themselves so much with
27:01
Speaker 2: the Americans, they find it existential for them because if
27:05
Speaker 2: Iran emerges victorious, then this ruling families at some point
27:09
Speaker 2: will go. So this is about more the family level
27:13
Speaker 2: of these countries that they want to keep their grip
27:16
Speaker 2: over their countries, rather than Iran's intentions to occupy these
27:21
Speaker 2: countries directly or indirectly. I mean, Iran can occupy Bahrain.
27:25
Speaker 2: The only thing they can do is occupy Bahrain, which
27:28
Speaker 2: is a major of hr country. That's the only place.
27:32
Speaker 4: But it does seem that Iran is alone.
27:38
Speaker 2: So Iran is alone in the sense that Iran is
27:44
Speaker 2: the only party which is now directly retaliating against these
27:50
Speaker 2: sources of fire. They have their ally in Lebanon, Hezbola,
27:55
Speaker 2: which opened a front line against Israel recently. They have
28:01
Speaker 2: the unsable lie in Yemen and they have the PMU
28:03
Speaker 2: in Iraq. But the Ivenians have this Sampson option which
28:09
Speaker 2: I explained in my article, and that is they don't
28:15
Speaker 2: need nuclear power and they don't need to have allies
28:21
Speaker 2: in the sort of America Israel has the US on
28:25
Speaker 2: its back, you know, they don't need some this type
28:28
Speaker 2: of relationship. And the evidence for it is when the
28:33
Speaker 2: Venians and the Russians signed the strategic partnership, the Russians
28:38
Speaker 2: asked if the Venians want to proceed to defensive pact,
28:43
Speaker 2: and the Avenians said no. Venians rejected to have a defensive.
28:48
Speaker 3: Pact with.
28:51
Speaker 2: Russia, with China and with any of the developing countries
28:55
Speaker 2: in the in the Briggs countries for example, but they
28:58
Speaker 2: have had thetual defensive pact with Syria. And this explains
29:05
Speaker 2: you a lot that Iranians want to become and want
29:09
Speaker 2: to stay a regional player in the region, and they
29:11
Speaker 2: don't have this aspivation to be part of or under
29:16
Speaker 2: an international power such as Russia or China in this case,
29:20
Speaker 2: and they have developed a strategy of if we're going down.
29:28
Speaker 2: We take you down with us. If you're going to
29:32
Speaker 2: destroy our Persian heritage and Persian civilization and history, we're
29:38
Speaker 2: going to take you down with us. That's assumption option
29:41
Speaker 2: of Iran, and that is not a nuclear.
29:44
Speaker 3: Program, but rather.
29:47
Speaker 2: The plan to keep the global economy suffering to the
29:51
Speaker 2: extent that we could see a global risett. You remember
29:55
Speaker 2: during COVID this MFS will continuously telling us we need
30:02
Speaker 2: what do they say, we need.
30:03
Speaker 4: A viz that and build back better.
30:05
Speaker 2: Build back better. Yeah, so Ivan is going to build
30:08
Speaker 2: back better for them. I think this is assumption option,
30:14
Speaker 2: and that is you don't need to have a fleet.
30:17
Speaker 2: You don't need to have a strong navy. All you
30:22
Speaker 2: need to have is drones and underwater drones just disrupt
30:29
Speaker 2: the strait of Humus. And this is around twenty percent
30:32
Speaker 2: of the global energy source. Imagine twenty percent of the
30:38
Speaker 2: global energy source is pouse. Now, what's going to happen
30:42
Speaker 2: to the energy prices everywhere? I'm sure your respected audience
30:46
Speaker 2: already know everywhere the prices are askib okating. So what
30:50
Speaker 2: IVAN is doing is they're holding this as a card
30:53
Speaker 2: against the Americans, and that's why they don't need these
30:57
Speaker 2: big alliances of friends. All they need is from the
31:00
Speaker 2: Russia and the Chinese side. Two things air defenses from Russia,
31:06
Speaker 2: satellite jammings from China, and they have got their jamming
31:09
Speaker 2: technologies against the elo masks Internet satellite Internet which they
31:16
Speaker 2: were used to motivate the Rioters a few weeks ago.
31:21
Speaker 2: And at the same time they need the I mean, look,
31:25
Speaker 2: I don't want to fall into the chap of the
31:27
Speaker 2: mainstream media. The mainstream media always says that this bank
31:32
Speaker 2: of targets that Iran is hitting in the Persian Gulf countries,
31:36
Speaker 2: those were data and the data were shared by Russia,
31:41
Speaker 2: and Russia has given them the locations. That could be true,
31:46
Speaker 2: but that would could also be a bullock because what
31:50
Speaker 2: they always try to do is look, these barbaric Islamic countries.
31:54
Speaker 2: They don't know how to manage themselves. They couldn't really
31:57
Speaker 2: be smart enough to locate us. These should be Russians, right,
32:01
Speaker 2: This is how they speak in the press. But they
32:04
Speaker 2: are footage which I saw from the UAE. I mean,
32:09
Speaker 2: they are sending drones into this what they call these
32:14
Speaker 2: tall buildings, what do they call them? I don't know.
32:18
Speaker 2: The sky is something and this drone is going inside
32:22
Speaker 2: the room of a CIA.
32:24
Speaker 3: Yes, skyscrapers, so you have.
32:26
Speaker 2: An Ivenian drone flying all the way, and those those
32:30
Speaker 2: shrones lie so fly so low altitude that the air
32:35
Speaker 2: defenses do not really catch them, and they it goes
32:40
Speaker 2: directing inside the room of a CIA meeting in the
32:43
Speaker 2: UAE in Dubai. So they either have assets in the
32:47
Speaker 2: UAE giving them concrete locations basically, or some other international
32:53
Speaker 2: player is also cooperating with Iran. And in this case,
32:57
Speaker 2: I believe that Russia and China have an interest in
33:00
Speaker 2: keeping Iran strong in the Middle East. They don't want
33:05
Speaker 2: to intervene directly on the side of Iran, but they
33:08
Speaker 2: want to make sure that this work would be as
33:11
Speaker 2: closely as possible for the Americans.
33:13
Speaker 3: That's why I say this is the.
33:17
Speaker 2: Least intelligent decision America could have taken to go to
33:21
Speaker 2: war against Iran of the sort to overstretch, to overexpand
33:26
Speaker 2: to exhaust its resources to destroy the magabase and give
33:31
Speaker 2: the impression to the world to the extent that the
33:35
Speaker 2: Foreign Minister of Brahman wrote an article two days ago yesterday,
33:41
Speaker 2: I think it was in the Foreign Policy and he
33:44
Speaker 2: argued and said America should take back its foreign policy.
33:48
Speaker 2: Like he doesn't say Israel, but from who. So now
33:51
Speaker 2: you have also public opinion in the world that this
33:55
Speaker 2: was Israel's world, this was not America's war, and that
33:57
Speaker 2: Israel has taken America to work. Now you have imagined
34:02
Speaker 2: the most loyal ally of the United States, right, Great Britain.
34:07
Speaker 3: They don't want to come. They don't want to come
34:09
Speaker 3: to this war. They asked the.
34:14
Speaker 2: German defense minister here. They don't want to come in
34:20
Speaker 2: on the side of America in this war. The party
34:23
Speaker 2: here in Germany called the AFT, and this is on
34:26
Speaker 2: the right. And basically I have seen a pattern among
34:30
Speaker 2: these AFT politicians and they have the second strongest party
34:33
Speaker 2: in Germany now continuously talking about the maga mega maga,
34:38
Speaker 2: like we have the maga of make Germany great again.
34:42
Speaker 2: Like everything that Donald Trump has done in the past,
34:45
Speaker 2: they just copied and repeat it. And now the chef,
34:50
Speaker 2: the leader of the party at last, Videl yesterday, I
34:54
Speaker 2: watched the video offer basically says, well, we cannot really
34:59
Speaker 2: activate NATO's Article five or Article six. This is not
35:04
Speaker 2: a defensive word. This is an offensive war. This is
35:06
Speaker 2: a word of choice. America has chosen to go to
35:09
Speaker 2: war against Iran, and they didn't have an exit strategy,
35:13
Speaker 2: so now they're calling us for help. No, I don't
35:16
Speaker 2: think that this is our problem now. So I think
35:20
Speaker 2: there is this when it comes to your own interests
35:23
Speaker 2: and when it comes to your own economies. The least
35:25
Speaker 2: to say, I mean, who's paying the higher prices here?
35:28
Speaker 3: The people? Right, And it was already.
35:31
Speaker 2: The prices have already exploded, my friend, after the Ukraine
35:35
Speaker 2: War because of we cut the energy from Russia. And
35:39
Speaker 2: now with this current crisis, we pay.
35:45
Speaker 3: Two coma for.
35:48
Speaker 2: Euros per liter diesel, And yesterday I watched a video
35:53
Speaker 2: of a member of parliament in Germany. Imagine of two
35:57
Speaker 2: point four euros. The real price of the diesel per
36:02
Speaker 2: liter is it's a ninety cent, So you're paying one
36:08
Speaker 2: and a half hero extra to the government taxes. So
36:13
Speaker 2: the government has already increased taxes so much that you're
36:17
Speaker 2: paying one hundred and twenty percent more under the normal
36:22
Speaker 2: circumstances for what the diesel and the benzine basically costs.
36:26
Speaker 2: And then you have these spike of the global prices
36:29
Speaker 2: and it becomes more expensive. So our growth of these
36:35
Speaker 2: have become thirty five percent more expensive after the Ukraine,
36:39
Speaker 2: and now with this crisis, you go to the supermarket
36:43
Speaker 2: and you say, okay, so where is the limit. How
36:47
Speaker 2: much can we just ordinary people living here afford these prices. Meanwhile,
36:55
Speaker 2: the moment you get your salary, two third of it
36:59
Speaker 2: is gone between taxes and the bills and the event.
37:04
Speaker 2: So they're sending people also below the middle class, which
37:08
Speaker 2: will lead into social tribulences in these countries if this
37:12
Speaker 2: American policy continues. In events, so these governments are also like, no,
37:17
Speaker 2: this time it is too serious for us. Will they
37:21
Speaker 2: act against it? They don't have any means. This is
37:25
Speaker 2: the thing with Germany, for example. Germany doesn't have any
37:30
Speaker 2: capacity to say no to America. They have tens of
37:33
Speaker 2: thousands of soldiers here and the Americans, in my opinion,
37:41
Speaker 2: they have established the type of system after World War
37:44
Speaker 2: Two here and the educational system that the people are
37:49
Speaker 2: naturally feeling closer to the Americans, and they should be.
37:52
Speaker 2: They are in the West at the end of the day.
37:54
Speaker 2: But when it comes to the foreign policy, in my opinion,
37:57
Speaker 2: there has to be a separation of how much this
38:00
Speaker 2: country should go behind the United States in this type
38:03
Speaker 2: of words, that is harming not only ordinary people, because
38:07
Speaker 2: at the end of the day, politicians, some politicians care,
38:11
Speaker 2: some politicians do not care about the people. But if
38:14
Speaker 2: the crisis comes too big and too strong, that would
38:18
Speaker 2: cause a huge surbalance in the country, that would shake
38:21
Speaker 2: the social fabric in the country. That would reflect on
38:24
Speaker 2: the elections next year. Two years later from now, we
38:27
Speaker 2: have elections in Germany. So these politicians also want to
38:31
Speaker 2: stay in power in their position. So that's why I
38:35
Speaker 2: think there is going to be major changes after this
38:39
Speaker 2: event war that people didn't really anticipate. I myself didn't
38:43
Speaker 2: really anticipate it. I have to agree and say that
38:46
Speaker 2: I was wrong. I thought that ivan will as they said,
38:50
Speaker 2: they will swallow the pill, and it's a poisonous pill,
38:55
Speaker 2: but it's a necessary pill that keeps you there and
39:00
Speaker 2: to you in some sort of cold war with the
39:03
Speaker 2: United States instead of opening an.
39:05
Speaker 3: All out world.
39:05
Speaker 2: I think the aven Is were flexible, but then when
39:08
Speaker 2: the war started, they went all in into this that
39:13
Speaker 2: Donald Trump says, we didn't expect them to do that.
39:18
Speaker 2: It's unfair what they're doing, Like excuse me. For the
39:21
Speaker 2: past forty years from the most junior official in Iran
39:26
Speaker 2: to the most senior official in Iran. They're telling you,
39:29
Speaker 2: if you attack us and if there is an extension threat,
39:32
Speaker 2: we will do this one, two, three, four, five, six,
39:36
Speaker 2: like they were telling you. But you said they're bluffing
39:38
Speaker 2: and you said they're paper tigers. Okay, now is the
39:42
Speaker 2: pay time.
39:45
Speaker 1: You said earlier that the UK is massive American alli.
39:51
Speaker 1: But the American political zodecast is that Israel is America's
39:56
Speaker 1: greatest ally. If you and I were Ali skuwok, it
40:01
Speaker 1: would be a mutual benefit, right. There'd be a reason
40:06
Speaker 1: for me to be your friend, and there'd be a
40:08
Speaker 1: reason for you to be my friend. What does the
40:13
Speaker 1: United States gain from having Israel as its greatest ally?
40:20
Speaker 2: I think what the Americans wanted from the Middle East
40:23
Speaker 2: is two things. Between the seventies and the eighties and
40:27
Speaker 2: the nineties. Of course, they needed the steady flow of
40:30
Speaker 2: the oil from the Middle East, so they had the
40:35
Speaker 2: Carter doctrine that America would choose military forced to protect
40:40
Speaker 2: its energy supply from the Middle East. But then the
40:45
Speaker 2: Americans have discovered their energy sector and they are a
40:54
Speaker 2: producer nowadays of not only oil but also liquified natural gas,
40:58
Speaker 2: they're selling to Europe right, and they are self sufficient,
41:02
Speaker 2: so practically they don't need the fuel from the Middle East.
41:07
Speaker 2: But they cannot leave this region in the hands of
41:11
Speaker 2: their rivals, namely China. If they allow things proceed, if
41:19
Speaker 2: they allow things to proceed normally in the region and
41:21
Speaker 2: develop normally without foreign intervention and military basis American military bases,
41:27
Speaker 2: then China will buy most of the fuel from these countries.
41:32
Speaker 2: And what happens to the future of the American intention
41:39
Speaker 2: to revive its economy, its production. Basically, you will need
41:44
Speaker 2: cheaper fuels from these countries or keep your enemies and
41:48
Speaker 2: your rivals away from these markets as much as you can.
41:53
Speaker 2: So there is this intention also to keep China away
41:56
Speaker 2: from these countries. Otherwise the Chinese will come and build
42:00
Speaker 2: them their countries. They will build them in a massive way.
42:04
Speaker 2: They will replace the American AI cities, they will replace
42:07
Speaker 2: their so called smart cities in these countries. So it's
42:11
Speaker 2: a matter of investment and opportunities also in these countries
42:14
Speaker 2: who possess enormous wealth. But for Israel itself, I think
42:19
Speaker 2: the relationship between Israel and the United States has become
42:23
Speaker 2: like the left hand and the right hand, Like, what
42:26
Speaker 2: is the difference now between Israel and the United States.
42:31
Speaker 2: There is this intermarriage of interests, let's say, between them
42:37
Speaker 2: that you don't even see the gray zone between them
42:40
Speaker 2: any longer. You see them working as one. Like whoever
42:44
Speaker 2: comes in presidency, it's the similar policies over and over
42:49
Speaker 2: and over again. So what does that tell us about
42:52
Speaker 2: the democratic system in the United States itself? Whoever you vote,
42:57
Speaker 2: you have a president who makes sure that Israel states
43:01
Speaker 2: dominant in the region. It's a un party, it's a
43:05
Speaker 2: unique it it's a no party.
43:08
Speaker 3: So it's a no party.
43:09
Speaker 2: And this is a in in the In this article
43:12
Speaker 2: of the Empire above Epstein, I published it on on
43:16
Speaker 2: x and my substack. These emails of Epstein also gives
43:20
Speaker 2: you the impression that you have structures above the democratically
43:27
Speaker 2: elected bodies, and those are bureaucratic basically networks, and people
43:33
Speaker 2: of have have established networks of people who have interests
43:42
Speaker 2: among themselves. And those people include, of course, the the oligarsis,
43:46
Speaker 2: the military industrial complex, the Silicon Valley, the people who
43:50
Speaker 2: are in the banking dynasties. You see that there is
43:54
Speaker 2: a network of people that we don't interact with We
43:57
Speaker 2: don't see them on TV outlets giving statements and telling
44:00
Speaker 2: us this is their projects. But then these bodies above,
44:04
Speaker 2: the democratically elected bodies are finailing. First of all, they
44:08
Speaker 2: are building bureaucracies, they're building these bodies below them, and
44:14
Speaker 2: then they're finailing the money into and injecting money and
44:17
Speaker 2: finances into these democratically elected bodies to they extend that
44:20
Speaker 2: you have political culture, like the political elite in the
44:26
Speaker 2: West has become like it's like one It's like one
44:32
Speaker 2: person in New Zealand. The prime minister is saying exactly
44:36
Speaker 2: the same thing as the Prime minister in Britain, and
44:40
Speaker 2: the Prime Minister of Britain is saying exactly the same
44:42
Speaker 2: thing somewhere in Argentina with Javier Milae for example. So
44:46
Speaker 2: on the major things, you see that these powers have
44:49
Speaker 2: agreed on certain headlines and they are financing the democratically
44:55
Speaker 2: elected bodies in this case, and these politicians that these
44:59
Speaker 2: politicians have becomes servants to the non elected bodies above them.
45:04
Speaker 3: That's why we see.
45:06
Speaker 2: Nowadays when a politician like kaya Kala says something and
45:11
Speaker 2: you're like she bimbo, she stupid or is she serving someone?
45:15
Speaker 2: Because It doesn't make sense because I live in Europe
45:20
Speaker 2: and I know that what she says is basically goes
45:23
Speaker 2: against the interests of the people. But we were told
45:25
Speaker 2: that she's put there for the interests of the people,
45:27
Speaker 2: but when she is so, there's a difference between a
45:31
Speaker 2: politician who is lazy and is not serving the interests
45:35
Speaker 2: of the people, but then you have a politician who
45:37
Speaker 2: is doing the opposite of what the interests of the
45:42
Speaker 2: people is. That's why you start asking questions like, so,
45:47
Speaker 2: then what is the use of elections? Why we have elections?
45:51
Speaker 2: If I would elect someone and then the policy is
45:55
Speaker 2: being imposed on the politician that I elected from above.
46:00
Speaker 2: And this has become like when you read the epscene file,
46:04
Speaker 2: you see that there is like a distribution of roles
46:07
Speaker 2: to these people, Like there is a role set for
46:10
Speaker 2: Mark Zuckerberg, there is a role set for Elon Musk,
46:14
Speaker 2: and there is a role set for the other platforms
46:17
Speaker 2: of the social media and Peter til And then you
46:21
Speaker 2: see these people in public criticizing and attacking each other,
46:25
Speaker 2: and then you have the photos of them together sitting
46:28
Speaker 2: with Jeffy Epstein in the same room. So I think
46:31
Speaker 2: that even people like Iero Musk and Peter Til and
46:37
Speaker 2: Sam Altman and many other people who are basically take billionaires.
46:42
Speaker 2: They will put there for a certain purpose and if
46:45
Speaker 2: they go against the interests of the people who put
46:48
Speaker 2: them there, they will lose everything. So I don't think
46:51
Speaker 2: that somebody like Elo Musk is an independent actor in
46:53
Speaker 2: this case, or Peter Til, and their technology is basically
47:00
Speaker 2: Peter tills technology, the AI softwares. They were used in
47:04
Speaker 2: Gaza to massacre thousands and thousands and thousands of civilians.
47:08
Speaker 2: For example, you have the software he developed called the Gospel.
47:14
Speaker 2: There is a software he developed called Daddy is Home.
47:19
Speaker 2: Daddy is Home means that Hama's member doesn't have to
47:25
Speaker 2: be militant because Hamas has political wing, it has education,
47:29
Speaker 2: it has it's pharmaceutical and lots of things. If Daddy
47:34
Speaker 2: is Home, bomb bomb them. This is AI moving, This
47:42
Speaker 2: is AI doing, not humans. And this this belongs to
47:45
Speaker 2: Peter tilS. So Peter Till's software is in the service
47:49
Speaker 2: of Israel in this case.
47:51
Speaker 1: And adding to what you just said, pallenteers mass surveillance
47:56
Speaker 1: tech was used in the initial strike on Israel. I
48:01
Speaker 1: think it was called Project Maven.
48:05
Speaker 3: Against Ivan.
48:05
Speaker 4: You mean yeah, sorry, what did I say?
48:08
Speaker 3: Yeah? Against Israel?
48:10
Speaker 2: I think, I think, I think in this case, for example,
48:15
Speaker 2: this is one example. You brought a second example elon
48:18
Speaker 2: Mask we spoke about Peter Tiel. Elomusk has given seven
48:23
Speaker 2: thousand what his satellite internet is called the it's not
48:30
Speaker 2: the space X. He has his internet provider right through
48:34
Speaker 2: the solid Starling. He has given seven thousand strolling equipment
48:41
Speaker 2: to the Ivenian writers a few weeks ago. He has
48:44
Speaker 2: given the internet to the Ukrainian military, and he has
48:51
Speaker 2: given the internet to the al Kaeda forces in Sybria
48:56
Speaker 2: in November December twenty twenty four, so they would carry
49:01
Speaker 2: on the pr and the propaganda and live stream their battles.
49:07
Speaker 2: I was in severe before the gym change. Who who
49:13
Speaker 2: can live stream and full HD on his smartphone for
49:20
Speaker 2: many hours? It's impossible unless you have a satellite internet.
49:24
Speaker 2: And this is what's given to the Arqaeda forces in
49:28
Speaker 2: the country. So what is the difference between Dan Elomsk
49:33
Speaker 2: and any military contractor basically who's producing weapons. He's giving
49:37
Speaker 2: them the software they need to operate these weapons. So,
49:43
Speaker 2: in my opinion, those are one class of people that
49:48
Speaker 2: it's becoming clear that they don't have our interests at
49:51
Speaker 2: heart the least to say. And X is now becoming
49:55
Speaker 2: the platform of everything, like they say this we chat
49:59
Speaker 2: in sh is the app of everything that you use
50:02
Speaker 2: it for almost everything. And now you know MASK wants
50:06
Speaker 2: to make the X as our also bank. But what
50:11
Speaker 2: if I say something wrong on X? What happens to
50:14
Speaker 2: my bank account? If I put my finances on X.
50:18
Speaker 2: This is the same social credit system, right, It's a
50:21
Speaker 2: type of social credit system that we have ratings on
50:27
Speaker 2: X and the GOG basically and the AI of X
50:33
Speaker 2: it analyzes our posts and then they say if this
50:37
Speaker 2: person is an obedient good boy, or he's doing some
50:41
Speaker 2: controversial stuff, or he's gone really really on the radical side. Right,
50:46
Speaker 2: if you really went on the radical side, they did
50:48
Speaker 2: platform you.
50:50
Speaker 3: And if you were.
50:53
Speaker 2: A critical and influential but still you know, one fit
50:57
Speaker 2: here and one fit there, and playing safe they deboost you,
51:01
Speaker 2: so your WACH is gone. It's basically a social credit system.
51:06
Speaker 2: And then if you put all your finances and your
51:08
Speaker 2: money on X. I would highly advise people not to
51:12
Speaker 2: do that. Don't be putting your money on X banking system.
51:18
Speaker 2: And then don't cry if ILO musk basically cancels you
51:22
Speaker 2: and you lose your finances as well. It's happening a
51:25
Speaker 2: lot to people like now even normal banking are banks
51:30
Speaker 2: are deplatforming people and then what about your money? And
51:35
Speaker 2: the same thing goes by the way to the crypto
51:37
Speaker 2: and people thought that these wallets are safe and you
51:42
Speaker 2: can keep your finances. And then some people who were
51:45
Speaker 2: truly controversial for them, they canceled their accounts. They didn't
51:50
Speaker 2: even give them giving them back their money. So what's
51:53
Speaker 2: the solution for this?
51:54
Speaker 3: I think the.
51:57
Speaker 2: Only solution in my eyes, although this is not a
52:00
Speaker 2: perfect solution because they could come and sabotage it anyways,
52:03
Speaker 2: is for people to have to people to become as
52:08
Speaker 2: independent as possible when it comes to the food and
52:12
Speaker 2: to the water, like survival things, right, you need to
52:16
Speaker 2: be as independent as possible. You cannot really live in
52:19
Speaker 2: an apartment and you buying all the time from groceries,
52:22
Speaker 2: and without the grocer you die. I think that's that's
52:26
Speaker 2: the first step. But still if they want, they could
52:28
Speaker 2: come and take over your land as well. If the
52:31
Speaker 2: doomsday come, they could also take over your lands. That's
52:34
Speaker 2: why people in the United States have.
52:36
Speaker 4: Guns I've got nothing against.
52:42
Speaker 2: I might say if I like having a gun I
52:44
Speaker 2: have in Aleppo back in the day, I was a
52:50
Speaker 2: kid and my parents traveled three months to the United
52:53
Speaker 2: States and they left me with my auntie. And my
52:56
Speaker 2: auntie had a very big farm, probably fifty hectares of land. Uh,
53:03
Speaker 2: it's a it's agricultural farm. And my cousins were of
53:08
Speaker 2: course similar age, and they taught me how to shoot
53:11
Speaker 2: birds and how to hunt a little bit. And I
53:15
Speaker 2: think it is the feeling of having your own foot
53:19
Speaker 2: is different from going and buying from the grocery. Once
53:22
Speaker 2: you it's it's it's the fulfillment and the it's this
53:28
Speaker 2: psychology behind it that is great. But I'm not I'm
53:31
Speaker 2: not for a gun for just you know, shooting people
53:34
Speaker 2: and all these things. But you need to have a
53:36
Speaker 2: gun to protect yourself if you've attacked. I mean I
53:41
Speaker 2: mightst have been attack many many times in the streets
53:44
Speaker 2: of Berlin via di Jolani people, including with objects, you know,
53:51
Speaker 2: and when I ask the police I need to protect myself, Well,
53:55
Speaker 2: we cannot really permit you any anything that we cannot
53:58
Speaker 2: allow you to protect yourself basically, So I think that's
54:03
Speaker 2: also the radical the opposite side of the other spectrum right,
54:07
Speaker 2: which I dislike it, and I feel like people have
54:12
Speaker 2: to have the right to protect themselves. What do you
54:14
Speaker 2: mean if there are people in the streets and you
54:18
Speaker 2: cannot really impose your rules, and they're carrying with them
54:20
Speaker 2: knives and somebody attacks you with a knife, which happened
54:24
Speaker 2: to me, then what and then they close your case?
54:29
Speaker 2: Close the case because there is no evidence that he
54:32
Speaker 2: was carrying a knife. This is what the court says.
54:37
Speaker 2: So what do you want me to do in this
54:39
Speaker 2: case to get stabbed for you to have evidence that.
54:42
Speaker 3: He killed me? You know, this is also absurd law and.
54:47
Speaker 2: Increasingly we're having lawlessness and people with knives in the streets.
54:50
Speaker 2: So in the near future, you know my plans, I
54:56
Speaker 2: think I will be.
54:57
Speaker 3: I will be. I will be in a better position
55:00
Speaker 3: for sure.
55:01
Speaker 1: And by the way, speaking of the near future, you
55:04
Speaker 1: need to come and visit my side of the world.
55:07
Speaker 1: I know that you do want to. I am after Yeah,
55:10
Speaker 1: I live on a farm, so you must come and
55:11
Speaker 1: stay with me.
55:12
Speaker 4: It is great.
55:13
Speaker 3: I would love to.
55:14
Speaker 2: Recently, also our a very good friend here in Germany.
55:17
Speaker 2: She is going back to South Africa. She already has booked.
55:23
Speaker 2: And she was born in South Africa and she lived
55:25
Speaker 2: in Europe in the past twenty years and now she's
55:28
Speaker 2: going back to the farming life. So I think this
55:31
Speaker 2: is the correct approach. Also for other people are too
55:38
Speaker 2: propagandas and told they cannot afford it. It's incorrect. If
55:43
Speaker 2: you can afford your car, if you can't afford your smartphones.
55:46
Speaker 2: We pay lots of money for these things. People start
55:50
Speaker 2: changing their smart phone every year. They have programmed us
55:53
Speaker 2: to believe that those are the essential things. Those are
55:56
Speaker 2: not essential things. The essential thing is for you if
56:01
Speaker 2: a catastrophe comes, you have a potato on the ground
56:04
Speaker 2: that you can eat, or you have a water to drink.
56:07
Speaker 2: That's a priority. But they have made us consumerists to
56:11
Speaker 2: the extent that people care about everything like the clothings
56:16
Speaker 2: and the industries have become too attractive for the people
56:23
Speaker 2: just to spend money. But rest assured, I can say
56:26
Speaker 2: this out of experience. I have three t shirts and
56:31
Speaker 2: three trousers and they cost nothing. Basically, you can live
56:35
Speaker 2: with that. You don't need the new smartphone, you don't
56:38
Speaker 2: need the best car. Could also have all unnecessary things.
56:41
Speaker 2: Just save money as much as you can with a partner.
56:45
Speaker 2: You have a good partner with good wife with you,
56:47
Speaker 2: and put a plan and you can manage it in
56:49
Speaker 2: it just matter of a few years. In a matter
56:51
Speaker 2: of two to three years, you can save enough money
56:53
Speaker 2: to buy a farm.
56:54
Speaker 3: That's for sure.
56:56
Speaker 4: Who benefits the most from this war.
57:02
Speaker 2: So the people who initiated the world, they thought that
57:06
Speaker 2: they could decapitate the leadership and they would create the
57:11
Speaker 2: conditions in the country for the people to rise against
57:15
Speaker 2: the government and top of it. That was the plan,
57:17
Speaker 2: and it failed miserably, and they didn't have Plan B.
57:21
Speaker 2: Quite obvious, they didn't have Plan B. They thought this
57:23
Speaker 2: would work out, and it didn't work out. So if
57:26
Speaker 2: they succeeded. Had they succeeded, this would have been had
57:31
Speaker 2: enormous repercussions on the region. That the region would have
57:35
Speaker 2: been four hundred years a century. If from now you
57:38
Speaker 2: would have seen Israel and the United States are dominating
57:42
Speaker 2: everything in the region, energy, the infrastructure, the tech in
57:47
Speaker 2: the region, the airports, the telecommunication, the water, everything in
57:52
Speaker 2: their hands. But now that things are going against their
57:57
Speaker 2: plan and this plan has failed. I think this will
58:01
Speaker 2: help China the most and even the most. Iran will
58:04
Speaker 2: become very strong and very relevant in the vision, more
58:08
Speaker 2: than what it used to be before the war. Because
58:11
Speaker 2: what they have done, basically, they have killed the people
58:14
Speaker 2: who are showing a strainth They have killed the people
58:17
Speaker 2: who were in the gray zone. This brain which connects
58:22
Speaker 2: the military muscle with the diplomatic approach. They killed Ali Labijani.
58:28
Speaker 2: This guy is a philosopher. This guy is a negotiator.
58:31
Speaker 2: This guy is a diplomat, This guy is is a thinker.
58:35
Speaker 2: Will you kill these people you replace them with radical
58:38
Speaker 2: ideologues or radical militants, and once you do that, the
58:43
Speaker 2: type of retaliation you will be see from Iran is
58:45
Speaker 2: going to be different. So now the restrains are gone.
58:48
Speaker 2: Because Ali Jaminai represented this force between the IOGC and
58:54
Speaker 2: the government. The IOGC wanted to go all the way
58:57
Speaker 2: against the US and Israelis in the vision, and the
59:00
Speaker 2: political class, especially the before Mets, were like, no, let's
59:03
Speaker 2: deal with the Americans. Let's give them another chance and
59:06
Speaker 2: another chance and another chance. And Ali Kraminai was between them,
59:10
Speaker 2: basically trying to find the balance between these two approaches.
59:13
Speaker 2: You kill this person, you make sure that the militants
59:18
Speaker 2: in the IOGC will dominate over the political class in
59:22
Speaker 2: the country. And this is what is happening now. The
59:24
Speaker 2: IOGC now is in charge of the country. And once
59:28
Speaker 2: the IOGC is in charge of the country, you make
59:30
Speaker 2: sure that Ivan becomes more involvedant and more militaristic and
59:34
Speaker 2: more confrontational. So Ivan is definitely the IOGC in Ivan
59:39
Speaker 2: is definitely winner out of this war. And then you
59:42
Speaker 2: have China. I think China is a big winner if
59:46
Speaker 2: Ivan emerges victorious from this. And this would also disrupt
59:52
Speaker 2: America's efforts in the Pacific. In the Far East now
59:56
Speaker 2: that they have imagined. They had to send their TAD
1:00:00
Speaker 2: batteries from South Korea back to the Middle East. Because
1:00:05
Speaker 2: the production of these things, my friend, it's not easy.
1:00:09
Speaker 2: It's not like you one is destroyed and the second
1:00:12
Speaker 2: day we manufacture another one. It takes months, sometimes years.
1:00:15
Speaker 2: So they had to bring equipment from the Far East
1:00:19
Speaker 2: in from Taiwan and install them in the Middle East.
1:00:23
Speaker 2: Means they made that situation. They're volatile for them. So
1:00:28
Speaker 2: China is definitely going to be winner when this is over.
1:00:32
Speaker 2: In the future, Russia is a very interesting player, you know,
1:00:36
Speaker 2: like their media class is closing up with Donald Trump.
1:00:41
Speaker 2: They have these diplomats visiting with Kov and Jerrett Koshner
1:00:44
Speaker 2: all the time, and they show lots of friendship attitude
1:00:48
Speaker 2: towards them. It's not going to work. Americans wanted to,
1:00:53
Speaker 2: in my opinion, to cool down this war in Ukraine
1:00:56
Speaker 2: because they had this war in the Middle East, and
1:01:01
Speaker 2: had they been successful in the Middle East, they would
1:01:03
Speaker 2: have came back to in the second administration. Now that
1:01:07
Speaker 2: Trump administration will be over in two years and they
1:01:10
Speaker 2: would have come back probably in a democratic administration against
1:01:14
Speaker 2: Russia again. Unfortunately, speaking my friend, it's the mentality in
1:01:18
Speaker 2: the United States, the zero sum game. You know, I
1:01:21
Speaker 2: have nothing again. I mean, why would me, as somebody
1:01:25
Speaker 2: sitting here, would hate against America. I don't live in America.
1:01:32
Speaker 2: I don't hate America. I have grown up. I have
1:01:36
Speaker 2: said this multiple times. By the way, my entire upbringing
1:01:39
Speaker 2: was on the American pop music and I grew up
1:01:43
Speaker 2: on MTV. I can count I can count more American
1:01:47
Speaker 2: artists than Americans themselves. I can count more American movies
1:01:50
Speaker 2: than Americans themselves. But at the same time, I can
1:01:55
Speaker 2: see what is right and what is wrong, and what
1:01:59
Speaker 2: I may is doing basically this attitude of subjugating you.
1:02:04
Speaker 2: You know, there is some human feeling and human dignity
1:02:08
Speaker 2: in us that rejects that. And I have had this
1:02:11
Speaker 2: direct experience during the Civil War with American journalists think tankers.
1:02:17
Speaker 2: The moment you speak with them, the arrogance that you
1:02:20
Speaker 2: smell from them, the way they speak to you, like
1:02:23
Speaker 2: they look down to you, like you're like the peasants
1:02:26
Speaker 2: in the middle. Is the Barbari. No, I reject that premise.
1:02:30
Speaker 2: I don't want to American this thinking to prevail that
1:02:36
Speaker 2: we are the second third, fourth class citizens.
1:02:39
Speaker 3: In the world. We flies they could kill one.
1:02:41
Speaker 2: Hundred thousand, two hundred thousand and a million of us
1:02:44
Speaker 2: and then UPSI, UPSI, it was a mistake. No, this
1:02:47
Speaker 2: has to end, in my opinion, and the only way
1:02:51
Speaker 2: to end is what history has told us. And unfortunately
1:02:56
Speaker 2: that is the case all the time. It only comes
1:02:58
Speaker 2: after the military squake, and for this empire, after overstretching
1:03:03
Speaker 2: all around the world. I think this has shown clearly
1:03:07
Speaker 2: for the people to see, because sometimes people theorize we
1:03:10
Speaker 2: can talk about as matter as we want about the
1:03:13
Speaker 2: decay of the American Empire, but if the people do
1:03:15
Speaker 2: not see it with their own eyes and feel it.
1:03:17
Speaker 3: They will not believe you.
1:03:19
Speaker 2: Now in the case of even people can see with
1:03:21
Speaker 2: the objective eyes that this is the limit of the
1:03:24
Speaker 2: American Empire. And from here now on worked you will
1:03:28
Speaker 2: see more retreats for the American especially from the Middle East.
1:03:32
Speaker 2: And this is the place where they hit the head
1:03:36
Speaker 2: to the rock of the Ivenian rock. And now they
1:03:39
Speaker 2: see that they cannot overthrow the Evenian government in this case.
1:03:43
Speaker 2: And this shouldn't be seen but good news. Because we
1:03:47
Speaker 2: want more balanced relationship, more respect. We want also to develop.
1:03:52
Speaker 2: We want also to grow in the Middle East. But
1:03:54
Speaker 2: if you want to tell us that you have, growth
1:03:59
Speaker 2: has to be dependent on us, and you cannot produce,
1:04:03
Speaker 2: you cannot invent, and if you try to, we will
1:04:06
Speaker 2: sanction you. This is the thing that has to change.
1:04:10
Speaker 2: That we deserve to develop our societies and our economies
1:04:14
Speaker 2: on our own terms, not on the terms of the
1:04:17
Speaker 2: petro dollar or the dollar dominance or the blackmail.
1:04:22
Speaker 3: You know that. Look, if you build this port, if you.
1:04:25
Speaker 2: Build this telecommunication, if you build this weapon, we will
1:04:28
Speaker 2: sanction you. But the America doesn't have to to do that,
1:04:32
Speaker 2: you know, But we don't live in a rules based
1:04:34
Speaker 2: international order. So unfortunately that's what we really I really
1:04:39
Speaker 2: aspire to change, and that's why I feel motivated every
1:04:43
Speaker 2: day to try to tell people, you know, what is
1:04:47
Speaker 2: going on in the world and rest assured, many many
1:04:50
Speaker 2: people are waking up, especially in the United States, and
1:04:56
Speaker 2: I really hope that the Americans would do their the
1:05:00
Speaker 2: cleaning the house by themselves. You know, this political class
1:05:04
Speaker 2: has to to be replaced.
1:05:08
Speaker 4: Well, then how can Americans follow your work?
1:05:12
Speaker 2: Oh? Nice? Actually I checked my statistics. Started day, thirty
1:05:16
Speaker 2: percent of the viewers of my Syriana Analysis show are
1:05:20
Speaker 2: basically from the United States, and surprisingly they were the
1:05:25
Speaker 2: vast majority of them over forty five years old. And
1:05:30
Speaker 2: I'm flattened by that that older generation are watching like
1:05:34
Speaker 2: a younger podcasters basically, and basically they can watch. I
1:05:40
Speaker 2: do daily live streamings between Monday to Friday and my
1:05:43
Speaker 2: YouTube channel called Syriana Analysis. I also stream at the
1:05:48
Speaker 2: same time and rumble under the same name Syriana Analysis
1:05:53
Speaker 2: and on my Eggs, substack and the other places. It's
1:05:55
Speaker 2: my personal name.
1:05:56
Speaker 4: Kevo Kalmacian go Voka Musian. Thank you for joining the Anges.
1:06:00
Speaker 3: Thank you so much better