Latest / Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems / Prince Israel Zaar on: The Future of the Future is hear for you to Lead

Transcript

Prince Israel Zaar on: The Future of the Future is hear for you to Lead · Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems

0:01
Speaker 1: The future is what the future is. Humans are living
0:10
Speaker 1: in the presence and hoping for a better future, and
0:17
Speaker 1: the future sometimes is seen in mystical terms, in predictable terms,
0:25
Speaker 1: in deterministic terms. The future sometimes is meant to inspire,
0:31
Speaker 1: to inspire humans to be better, and it gives hope
0:37
Speaker 1: and promises, and the future is that thing. It's like
0:44
Speaker 1: a deity, like a god, like something that humans look
0:49
Speaker 1: up to. Life is lived in the future, and humans
0:54
Speaker 1: see themselves as futuristic pains. And humans live in the present,
0:59
Speaker 1: but they aren't fly working towards the future. And the
1:04
Speaker 1: future becomes the thing, the destination that is reached or
1:08
Speaker 1: sometime never reaches, the place to go humans might never go.
1:14
Speaker 1: It's something to see that humans might not see. It
1:19
Speaker 1: is like a war that humans try to breage, you know.
1:24
Speaker 1: The day today becomes the war, the war that humans
1:29
Speaker 1: must bridge or go through into tomorrow, so that today
1:36
Speaker 1: becomes like a curtain, like a barrier, or like the
1:43
Speaker 1: hope or the bridge to that future. So the future, therefore,
1:48
Speaker 1: it's a thing that is not a thing, but it's
1:50
Speaker 1: a thing because it's made a future never lived. It's
1:57
Speaker 1: not the modern I dream or a segment of the imagination.
2:02
Speaker 1: When humans dream, they think of the future. When human sacrifice,
2:05
Speaker 1: they think of the future. When humans developed, they think
2:08
Speaker 1: of the future. When humans unite their common calls course,
2:14
Speaker 1: they think about the future. When the mother sends a
2:18
Speaker 1: child to school, they think about the future. When a
2:21
Speaker 1: person seeks a new job, the person thinks about the future.
2:26
Speaker 1: When people get married, or fall in love or did
2:29
Speaker 1: one another, they think about the future. When people act.
2:32
Speaker 1: Somebody in office, they think about the future. When somebody
2:36
Speaker 1: starts a business, they think about the future. When people
2:40
Speaker 1: are being in a new city, they think about the future.
2:44
Speaker 1: When people improve in their sciences and technologies, going to space,
2:49
Speaker 1: creating the new GPU, explaining the size, seeking to understand
2:54
Speaker 1: quantum information of Fijian technology, they think about the future.
2:59
Speaker 1: They both think to the outside themselves, with their faith,
3:01
Speaker 1: with the belief, with their God, with their system, they
3:05
Speaker 1: think about the future. People build system to be on
3:08
Speaker 1: the future. So the one thing that humans live for
3:13
Speaker 1: is the future. Sometimes they might see the future through God.
3:19
Speaker 1: They might see the future through their parents. They might
3:21
Speaker 1: see their future true wealth through their business. They might
3:25
Speaker 1: see the future true science and technologies. This future is
3:31
Speaker 1: symbolized too many ways. Some see it as something to
3:39
Speaker 1: fight for, some say as something to conquer or something
3:46
Speaker 1: to dominate, something to control, And their future becomes their destiny,
3:53
Speaker 1: and the question becomes what its destiny is a destiny
3:58
Speaker 1: already predetermined? Is it predestination or the human being itself
4:05
Speaker 1: to find its own destiny? Such becomes the thinking how
4:09
Speaker 1: to conquer or or c or reconcile that press on
4:14
Speaker 1: the future people? This I des invent and create systems
4:19
Speaker 1: either democra like l a democratic system, or the s
4:24
Speaker 1: a system where humans are free. And when to talk
4:28
Speaker 1: about freedom is the freedom to define your future. WHENNA
4:31
Speaker 1: talk about self determination, is self determination to define to
4:34
Speaker 1: ts the determining your future. We talk about self alliances,
4:38
Speaker 1: self reliance for you to shape your own future. We'll
4:42
Speaker 1: talk about individualism is the right of the human being
4:45
Speaker 1: to think for itself and to find its of future.
4:49
Speaker 1: Or talk about free will or choice, It's meant to
4:53
Speaker 1: take the choice towards that future that brings accountability and responsibility.
5:00
Speaker 1: When the human beings six pace the sick pace to
5:02
Speaker 1: live in a better world. The better world is in
5:04
Speaker 1: the future. And when humans sometimes go towards they go
5:08
Speaker 1: to war in the name of preserving the future, for
5:11
Speaker 1: fighting the worlds and enemies of to die if we
5:15
Speaker 1: take it. So, if we take away the future, everything
5:17
Speaker 1: falls apart. The future becomes I think, that is so delicate,
5:21
Speaker 1: so fragile, sophisticated, so ambiguous, so complicated, so complex, And
5:30
Speaker 1: the same time that's simple. The drive to that future
5:35
Speaker 1: becomes the human being. It's ambitions. How much you expect
5:41
Speaker 1: from the future determines how much you work for that future.
5:46
Speaker 1: There's some people who don't care about the future. That
5:49
Speaker 1: some people don't the future doesn't doesn't matter, it's not important,
5:54
Speaker 1: don't worry about So some steps of humans living in
5:58
Speaker 1: God and that's stricken empowered to him, misery on that development,
6:03
Speaker 1: and in a state of being that is not enlightened,
6:09
Speaker 1: and they living in a state of mind that is
6:11
Speaker 1: nothing but primitive, obsolete, sometimes repugnant and cruel and barbaric,
6:17
Speaker 1: because they can destroy the future because the future means
6:20
Speaker 1: nothing to them, and therefore they can take away the
6:23
Speaker 1: futures of others because the future means nothing to them.
6:27
Speaker 1: So therefore, for the safety of society and for the
6:29
Speaker 1: better of humanity, it's upon the systems that be and
6:33
Speaker 1: the authorities that be to always make every human to
6:38
Speaker 1: have a longing for the future. They must make humans
6:42
Speaker 1: to like the future, to want to be in the future.
6:46
Speaker 1: It must give them something to believe in, something to
6:49
Speaker 1: hold aunt, to think about the prosperous future that they
6:53
Speaker 1: might want to live in one day. So the human
6:57
Speaker 1: being is a futuristic type of being. That's why I
7:01
Speaker 1: write somewhere in my work on published work, I talk
7:06
Speaker 1: about the future of the future. I see the different
7:09
Speaker 1: way of seeing the future. Some people see the future
7:13
Speaker 1: for themselves, and it's better to see a future for
7:21
Speaker 1: yourself than no future at all. So, based on futuristic thinking,
7:26
Speaker 1: I see there are three types of people. The first
7:30
Speaker 1: group of people who don't care about the future. The
7:35
Speaker 1: future means nothing to them. These are people who invest
7:39
Speaker 1: less in the future. And because they don't care about
7:42
Speaker 1: the future, you can see in their lives. Their lives
7:46
Speaker 1: are taken care of by others. They depend on others.
7:49
Speaker 1: They don't want to work, they don't want to invest,
7:51
Speaker 1: they don't want to contribute because they see that conviviition
7:55
Speaker 1: as unnecessary. That's the first group of people. For a
8:00
Speaker 1: good group of people sometimes become the leakish to the system,
8:03
Speaker 1: the burden to the people and their liability, and they
8:06
Speaker 1: become the problem to themselves because they don't care about
8:09
Speaker 1: the state of their own being and they surrend their
8:11
Speaker 1: life on faith to others to take care of them.
8:17
Speaker 1: These are adults living as if they are babies, because
8:21
Speaker 1: a baby knows nothing about the future, and the baby
8:23
Speaker 1: doesn'tly care about the future, or the baby cares about
8:26
Speaker 1: it and survivor that cannot come from itself but can
8:29
Speaker 1: come from its parents and guardians and others. So adults
8:33
Speaker 1: who don't care about the future they live in the
8:36
Speaker 1: baby stead of being a reckless style of being. There
8:40
Speaker 1: careless state of being, are unmindful state of being, and
8:45
Speaker 1: they don't care the others. They kipnap people, they come
8:49
Speaker 1: being mas suring or terror They don't care about life
8:53
Speaker 1: because they know the future means nothing to them. The
9:00
Speaker 1: system must make these people believe in the future, and
9:02
Speaker 1: when the soft crime make people believe in themselves and
9:05
Speaker 1: believe in something to look after, give those people the
9:08
Speaker 1: hope of a better future if prevent them from doing crime.
9:13
Speaker 1: When you see a seventeen year old with other ammunition
9:16
Speaker 1: planning to go kidnap and kill people, destroy humans. That
9:22
Speaker 1: those ammunitions show how much that kid does not care
9:25
Speaker 1: about the future. It wants to terminate the future of others.
9:30
Speaker 1: And the question becomes what type of society will let
9:33
Speaker 1: the child do that. What hope did that society not
9:36
Speaker 1: give to the child, What promised that society to fill
9:40
Speaker 1: that child? What happened to the parenting of that child.
9:44
Speaker 1: Because the infusion of hope for the future is given
9:48
Speaker 1: to the kid first by the parents. The parents must
9:51
Speaker 1: make the kid believe in the future the value education, value, work, value,
9:58
Speaker 1: human relationship, development, value, self esteem, value, pride, and value heroism.
10:09
Speaker 1: And parents must make the child want to be something,
10:12
Speaker 1: to believe in themselves, want to be remembered for something.
10:20
Speaker 1: So when society fails on people, and people fail themselves,
10:25
Speaker 1: they live in that first state of the future, that
10:27
Speaker 1: there is no future. That's the first group of people.
10:31
Speaker 1: I call them the futureless people. Some futureless people are
10:38
Speaker 1: by themselves, but some futureless people are first upon by system.
10:45
Speaker 1: Some people that don't believe in the future is because
10:47
Speaker 1: the system failed them catastrophically. The system failed to give
10:52
Speaker 1: them justice and faintness, or treat them equity the equality
10:56
Speaker 1: or respect or dignity the system deprived from them. Their
11:00
Speaker 1: person could a died by racism, sexism, or baker try
11:04
Speaker 1: or the system deprived them by where they were born.
11:07
Speaker 1: Which the system finds some fault in the naturality of
11:11
Speaker 1: a being, that the system punishes that ban for its
11:14
Speaker 1: naturality and takes away from that being his future and
11:18
Speaker 1: its hope. And the more they being tries to be better,
11:23
Speaker 1: the system discriminate upon that being to estm that the
11:28
Speaker 1: being gives up the quitting being being, that the system
11:32
Speaker 1: fails and got no foundation like parenting a family, and
11:38
Speaker 1: that a person that could believe in the future has
11:43
Speaker 1: no person or no one, no relationship, no marriage, no child,
11:51
Speaker 1: no companion, and they exclus to themselves. And these humans
11:56
Speaker 1: therefore turn inward, lay and decide to take giver the
12:00
Speaker 1: features of orders, or to punish the future. So when
12:04
Speaker 1: the system don't treat their own people well, the system
12:09
Speaker 1: is making those people to the featureless. And when people
12:13
Speaker 1: give faith, give give up faith for the future, or
12:20
Speaker 1: don't care about the future, they tend to be self
12:26
Speaker 1: destructive or find it easy to disturb and destroy others.
12:35
Speaker 1: So in the system don't give hope to people to
12:37
Speaker 1: think about the future, of the hope of the future.
12:41
Speaker 1: It's like the system is giving a weapon to destroy
12:44
Speaker 1: themselves and destroy others. Sadism, psychopathy, anti anti social behavior,
12:56
Speaker 1: and hatred and bitterness sometimes comes from peace. People don't
13:00
Speaker 1: have hope for the future. A serial killer cannot be
13:04
Speaker 1: a person with hope for the future. A psychopathic killer
13:09
Speaker 1: or people that destroy others cannot. They take away hope
13:13
Speaker 1: because they have no hope. When you hear that's somebody
13:16
Speaker 1: on the train we stop an innocent Ukrainian beautiful girl
13:21
Speaker 1: to death. You're asking where is hope for the future,
13:27
Speaker 1: because you cannot kill that beautiful lady and go for free.
13:32
Speaker 1: When you hear somebody go to shoot people and here
13:36
Speaker 1: that five people are dead, here people, that people are
13:39
Speaker 1: hurt here, you don't think those people and those people
13:43
Speaker 1: have any expectations for the future. They don't care about
13:48
Speaker 1: the future. The criminal balances between the profect and punishment.
13:57
Speaker 1: Every saying reasonable human, we don't like to commit crime
14:03
Speaker 1: because they will take away their freedom, and their freedom
14:06
Speaker 1: is their future. It would take away their loved ones.
14:10
Speaker 1: Inconciliation and imprisonment takes away everything from the human being,
14:15
Speaker 1: but the human being will hope for the future. We
14:18
Speaker 1: don't want the freedom or their freedoms taken away, but
14:22
Speaker 1: some humans will want their freedoms to be taken away.
14:28
Speaker 1: Some humans will delibility commit crime to go to prison
14:31
Speaker 1: because they see prison as a place to do nothing.
14:37
Speaker 1: Do not contribute to the future, but to let others
14:39
Speaker 1: take care of you, to live a life of stagnation,
14:47
Speaker 1: a life that produces nothing, helps nobody, but consumes everything
14:52
Speaker 1: that the taxpayer is supposed to pay for because the
14:56
Speaker 1: system failed to give those people hope. And systems in
15:01
Speaker 1: themselves create the ideologies of the philosophies than nihilistic in themselves.
15:12
Speaker 1: We should be careful with the policies and the document
15:16
Speaker 1: and the traditions and cultures and religions that we try
15:20
Speaker 1: to promote, because some traditions, culture and religion in themselves
15:26
Speaker 1: are depressing and suicider that humans. We kill themselves, either
15:31
Speaker 1: to be ma tired or to be seen as heroes,
15:35
Speaker 1: and they take away the future. They take away their
15:37
Speaker 1: own future in the promise of a bodyless life. I
15:45
Speaker 1: don't know what type of future is that you kill people.
15:49
Speaker 1: You kill ate humans, take away real dreams, and take
15:52
Speaker 1: with real, real futures, hoping for something somewhere that is
15:58
Speaker 1: nothing far from human imagination, that utopia of peacefulness by
16:06
Speaker 1: killing others, that is in itself featureless. As the first
16:11
Speaker 1: group of people, people who don't care about the future,
16:20
Speaker 1: it is because they are nihilistic, depressive of society and themselves,
16:26
Speaker 1: or self terminating themselves. Or people don't care about the
16:30
Speaker 1: future because to them it doesn't matter no matter what
16:34
Speaker 1: they do, the odds are stuck against them, a system
16:41
Speaker 1: discriminated against them. That's why I see criminality in certain
16:47
Speaker 1: societies are done by a particular group of people. Criminality
16:52
Speaker 1: is almost always done by the most oppressive group in
16:56
Speaker 1: that society. The society the group that society discriminate or
17:01
Speaker 1: oppress or suppress or depresses or staff a neglect or ignore,
17:11
Speaker 1: are exploit, or hate the most are always that group
17:17
Speaker 1: that comment the most petty crime, the most civil unrest
17:21
Speaker 1: and theft and burglary, and violence, and and and petit
17:27
Speaker 1: crimes that that they are ci civil disobedient, create unrest
17:33
Speaker 1: and insecurity in the streets, because those are people that
17:38
Speaker 1: the system in themselves disinfranchises neglects to Those are the
17:45
Speaker 1: two types of people that future those who don't care
17:49
Speaker 1: about the future because they themselves are nihilistic. The question
17:55
Speaker 1: becomes why it can still be traced back to childhood,
18:02
Speaker 1: to their history, their conditions, their circumstances, and their situations.
18:09
Speaker 1: Because every human being is a hopeful being. Human being
18:14
Speaker 1: is born with hope. The air you bray the sun light,
18:17
Speaker 1: a new day is always a new beginning. The question
18:21
Speaker 1: is always to be asked to the system that bey,
18:26
Speaker 1: then how come you create depressive, suicider and criminal minds
18:30
Speaker 1: type of people? How come you create featureless humans? I
18:36
Speaker 1: can't what happened to that system to give. But humans
18:44
Speaker 1: that don't believe in themselves, don't have faith in themselves,
18:49
Speaker 1: don't have faith in humans, don't have faith in the
18:53
Speaker 1: system to have faith in the world, and don't have
18:58
Speaker 1: faith even in their own future. That becomes the burden
19:02
Speaker 1: of the system to answer us question. The job of
19:06
Speaker 1: the system is to create futures for humans. As the
19:12
Speaker 1: first group of humans, humans will don't even think about
19:15
Speaker 1: their own future, and the second group of humans are
19:20
Speaker 1: humans will think of the future. They think of the future.
19:26
Speaker 1: As the second group, they think of the future, their future.
19:32
Speaker 1: They are well been the individualistic future because don't make
19:41
Speaker 1: the class of people. They think of the future of themselves,
19:50
Speaker 1: so they create their own future. They work for their
19:52
Speaker 1: own future, and their future is the future for themselves
19:55
Speaker 1: and their children, or their family or the people they like.
20:03
Speaker 1: I think about the future of their children. They work hard,
20:11
Speaker 1: They believe in work, not in laziness, entitlement and victim hurt.
20:16
Speaker 1: They know that nobody would wait for them. Those are
20:19
Speaker 1: the group of people that are able to forgive the
20:27
Speaker 1: system and take responsibility to shape their own future and
20:35
Speaker 1: help shape the future of others. It's a people that
20:40
Speaker 1: who don't give excuses or blame or why no matter
20:46
Speaker 1: the discrimination and the hardship is to try to build
20:50
Speaker 1: a business, send their children to school. They have hope
20:55
Speaker 1: of a better future, of a better day for themselves.
21:00
Speaker 1: Are those around there who do everything You compromise sometimes
21:08
Speaker 1: for the sake of the future. They want to see
21:11
Speaker 1: it better tomorrow. It's for the system to invest in
21:17
Speaker 1: these people. It's the people who pay their bills, or
21:23
Speaker 1: buy a home, or pay their taxes. We vote, we volunteer,
21:33
Speaker 1: will do everything for the better man of the society
21:38
Speaker 1: because they live in that society. It's a shared future.
21:45
Speaker 1: It's a shared society and share responsibilities and implications and
21:51
Speaker 1: expectations and commitments. This is the society that most developing
22:01
Speaker 1: countries live living. It's a short term life based society.
22:15
Speaker 1: That humans don't think in the projected future, but at
22:20
Speaker 1: least they want to look to the immediate future. That's
22:26
Speaker 1: a second group. They look at the immediate future and
22:30
Speaker 1: they don't worry to the future, find the horizon that
22:35
Speaker 1: might not come or might not be. They want to
22:38
Speaker 1: do the things that take care tomorrow. I want to
22:42
Speaker 1: make sure that tomorrow is peaceful. It's a people that
22:45
Speaker 1: will work very hard, will create wealth, making sure that
22:50
Speaker 1: that wealth is passed on. They will create systems that work.
22:56
Speaker 1: See seek in the stability of those systems. They'll try
22:59
Speaker 1: to create law and order in the streets and try
23:03
Speaker 1: to create a role of law to do everything. Will
23:07
Speaker 1: create all the mechanism of continuity, and this system it's
23:14
Speaker 1: meant to men to make sure that it maintains the
23:18
Speaker 1: status the status wore. So this uh it's second room
23:25
Speaker 1: of the future of thinkers of being. It's the status
23:29
Speaker 1: of future. If things are the same, those who benefits
23:34
Speaker 1: you benefit. Losers are losers or they can do more
23:39
Speaker 1: to be accepted, become the system where to be accepted
23:43
Speaker 1: to a millionaire's club, you need, you need to do
23:48
Speaker 1: a lot, because it's that status call future, and it's
23:53
Speaker 1: the status call future takes care of the future of itself.
23:56
Speaker 1: It's it's a it takes care of its own and
24:02
Speaker 1: that status goes future or that that that individualistic future
24:09
Speaker 1: where you you take care of your future and you
24:15
Speaker 1: can go to war to preserve your future. So you
24:18
Speaker 1: go to war, you can exploit others for yourself. That
24:22
Speaker 1: the status of future is to ambass as much as
24:25
Speaker 1: you can for yourself, Exploit as much from others as
24:29
Speaker 1: you come to yourself. Bend the rules as you will
24:33
Speaker 1: that will benefit you and those you like. Be as
24:36
Speaker 1: corrupt as you want to be if it benefits you,
24:41
Speaker 1: stay in power as long as you you want to
24:43
Speaker 1: stay in power, if it benefits you, aer a lobby
24:47
Speaker 1: for the palacies that they should that advantage you and
24:50
Speaker 1: disadvantage others because it's you, you, you, you, you and
24:55
Speaker 1: those you like. That's the racism, sexism, bigotry, and you
25:02
Speaker 1: need you need polars type of seeing the world or
25:07
Speaker 1: a dominant type of thing that you need to conquer others,
25:11
Speaker 1: you need to redefine race and color, or you need
25:15
Speaker 1: to create some artificiality. All those artificiality are smokescreen to
25:19
Speaker 1: amass everything for you and the people you like, because
25:24
Speaker 1: just you and those you like should have a future.
25:29
Speaker 1: You talk about financial security, economic security, political security, geo
25:34
Speaker 1: political security, military security, so you get a big army,
25:40
Speaker 1: and the big army is to protect your way of
25:43
Speaker 1: life and the partnerships and the blogs that people need
25:46
Speaker 1: to protect your way of life. So it's everything to
25:49
Speaker 1: protect the status quo, that is the status choose future
25:54
Speaker 1: and the future in which humans are today are in
25:59
Speaker 1: their status qus future, the future of the self, the
26:05
Speaker 1: feature of a particular group, a particular civilization, a particular color,
26:12
Speaker 1: a particular gender, and people from sect cult and association
26:18
Speaker 1: organizations and fraternities and sororities. And it is to protect
26:25
Speaker 1: a group call it of a church or a mask
26:28
Speaker 1: or synagogue. It's people see themselves in camps. And this
26:32
Speaker 1: status call future is that only set of futures should
26:37
Speaker 1: be so futures of others. Features are classing and fighting.
26:45
Speaker 1: Features are classing and fighting. Some features are classing and
26:51
Speaker 1: flight fighting to the systems that they create. So the
26:56
Speaker 1: philosophies and ideologies, system of governance and economics and cultures
27:03
Speaker 1: and traditions of fighting. The status calls future has always
27:09
Speaker 1: been the thing that destroys civilizations. Will asks what happened
27:14
Speaker 1: to the anchors of the Marias of the Egyptians because
27:18
Speaker 1: they start to fight themselves. My future is better, so
27:22
Speaker 1: it's only my way or the highway, and this statutes
27:27
Speaker 1: care future reach its epects of its own civilization and
27:33
Speaker 1: it self destroys because it's conflicting ideologies that it can
27:40
Speaker 1: be two party systems. They are fighting one another to
27:42
Speaker 1: stroy one another. Our policies are better, just are not,
27:50
Speaker 1: even though it's for the same system, the same country.
27:52
Speaker 1: That they should put themselves together and look for the
27:54
Speaker 1: future beyond themselves, they don't do that. That's the second future,
28:02
Speaker 1: the status call future, in the individualistic future. It's the
28:08
Speaker 1: future where people are massive a lot of wealth. Some
28:11
Speaker 1: people live in the slums and the ghettos, and it's
28:15
Speaker 1: a system. It's a future that has no future, but
28:21
Speaker 1: it's a future that can sustain itself. It means people
28:25
Speaker 1: live there and live in a bubble. They live in
28:28
Speaker 1: their eco chambers, it. It's just a future that they
28:31
Speaker 1: create for themselves. And they create, They create science and technology.
28:36
Speaker 1: Their self absorbs their future. They create their own entertainment,
28:39
Speaker 1: their own pleasures, and the future is them. They define
28:43
Speaker 1: their own religion. God becomes then heaven is what they
28:47
Speaker 1: decide how they create all this etopia of life and death,
28:53
Speaker 1: and they consume themselves in that system of status quo
28:58
Speaker 1: that they had changed for change. They go to war
29:01
Speaker 1: to preserves change, and they have stratified as society with
29:06
Speaker 1: the halves and the halfs now. Some have superior education,
29:09
Speaker 1: some have inferior education. So believe in poor neighborhoods and
29:14
Speaker 1: some living wealth in neighborhoods, so that they fight their status,
29:18
Speaker 1: you know, the status quare. They create artificial status, they
29:21
Speaker 1: create atticial construct it's not to see the pick up
29:25
Speaker 1: picture is to limit life to them. They blind themselves
29:30
Speaker 1: from the future itself. They create the artificial futures that
29:40
Speaker 1: gives them meaning purpose and they believe in themselves. They
29:44
Speaker 1: worship themselves and they celebrate themselves, but they don't want
29:49
Speaker 1: to think about the future itself. The future, it's a
29:54
Speaker 1: tech group, the feature of the future. The first group
29:59
Speaker 1: has future or don't care about the future. The second
30:03
Speaker 1: group has a future, but the features confined to themselves
30:07
Speaker 1: or those they are like, or their own country, their
30:10
Speaker 1: own race, or their own gender. Their future is a
30:13
Speaker 1: future that it's only for them and not for certain people.
30:17
Speaker 1: That's the status care future. It means everybody should have
30:21
Speaker 1: a future. But some futures are more important than others.
30:26
Speaker 1: Some come come be stratified to have less some systems,
30:31
Speaker 1: like India. Some are actually cast that their futures should
30:36
Speaker 1: be defined. So in some society they got delegation. Some
30:40
Speaker 1: society women should accept a certain future. Some society, she
30:47
Speaker 1: dominate the future sho only come from the man. In
30:52
Speaker 1: some society the future she can only be defined by
30:54
Speaker 1: a particular group and posts on others. It might be
30:57
Speaker 1: between the race, or the color of their skin, or
30:59
Speaker 1: the and that it makes the great construct that those
31:02
Speaker 1: constructs define the future. So the future in the self
31:06
Speaker 1: is limited. Right, the first feature has the future, the
31:15
Speaker 1: second feature is limited. Even some people want to aspire
31:19
Speaker 1: more in that future that status called future. They overkilled
31:24
Speaker 1: that Mattin Luther King even like Jesus Embram Lincoln, or
31:35
Speaker 1: they call them activists. It miss if you don't accept
31:38
Speaker 1: the status quore, the enemy of the status squore. You
31:42
Speaker 1: must write the way the status quo want it, must
31:45
Speaker 1: report news the way the status wore want it, must
31:49
Speaker 1: follow it the ways of the status quore. It means
31:52
Speaker 1: you must accept your ranking in that pecking order order
31:57
Speaker 1: else there is a problem. So stability in that in
32:03
Speaker 1: the prescribed future. It's not stability that everybody is better.
32:10
Speaker 1: The stability in that status called future is that you
32:15
Speaker 1: accept your ranking, your quarter. So they say law and
32:24
Speaker 1: order in the statue called future. That law and order
32:29
Speaker 1: is to impose, is to impose on people and to
32:37
Speaker 1: create fear and terror for people to accept their stratification order.
32:46
Speaker 1: So the future will be giving by a politician. That
32:50
Speaker 1: politician will talk about future. So future given by people,
32:55
Speaker 1: be given by boss. How much you have been paid,
32:58
Speaker 1: who you can get married, where you live. So your
33:03
Speaker 1: features already find as they start to score future, the
33:06
Speaker 1: pecking on the system future, because that features are thei ficure.
33:11
Speaker 1: It might be bubbles in the stock market, inflation going
33:13
Speaker 1: up and down. They create new assets, new consumptions. It's
33:18
Speaker 1: a future that must consume itself, and on the future
33:23
Speaker 1: consume itself. They give those people within that future some
33:29
Speaker 1: reward after life. It might be to a god, to paradise,
33:34
Speaker 1: to heaven, or a placefulness somewhere. That system terminates that
33:41
Speaker 1: future through paradise or trade promise or a matterile or something.
33:47
Speaker 1: So it's a future that's artificially constructed and maintain and
33:54
Speaker 1: pass on from generations to generations. That's the future that
34:00
Speaker 1: has no future, But it's a future within itself that
34:04
Speaker 1: has its own bubbles. In that future, humans fight humans
34:11
Speaker 1: for no reason. Everything is artificially constructed to keep the
34:18
Speaker 1: system going. It means people believe that their colors that
34:22
Speaker 1: they are not just to keep that future going. That
34:30
Speaker 1: feature is not meant to do anything great for the
34:35
Speaker 1: greater whole. That future actually is meant to suppress the
34:41
Speaker 1: future of everything else, of everybody else. It means it's
34:47
Speaker 1: a bubble that it must stay in the bubble called
34:50
Speaker 1: the future. It's a balloon that humans are already in it.
34:58
Speaker 1: Humans are in that system. Are you trying to look
35:03
Speaker 1: out of the window might deflate the system itself. So
35:10
Speaker 1: ask questions you don't follow, then you are disrupting the system.
35:17
Speaker 1: If you're doing a PhD, you must do what they want.
35:20
Speaker 1: If you're citing sources. It's a defined future. It's a
35:28
Speaker 1: defined future. So you in that system you can really affirm,
35:37
Speaker 1: you can worship, you can let belong, your features already
35:45
Speaker 1: defined within that future. It's either for you to accept
35:50
Speaker 1: it or leave it. So in that system that future,
35:54
Speaker 1: truth does not matter. Truth in itself is defined. Everything
36:01
Speaker 1: is defined. Happiness is defined, Truth is defined. Everything that
36:05
Speaker 1: system has definitions. God things are already defined and things
36:10
Speaker 1: already made. The world is already defined. God is defined,
36:17
Speaker 1: Everything is defined. So humans you just accept that the
36:23
Speaker 1: system knows better. And within that system of a defined future,
36:30
Speaker 1: a statistical future, leaders will come up. They might have
36:36
Speaker 1: won their parties for an elections. The ideologies are all designed,
36:43
Speaker 1: just packaged differently because they'll play within the system. That
36:48
Speaker 1: system in itself accepts what changed to be, what changed
36:55
Speaker 1: to come. It may start change come from the system,
37:00
Speaker 1: from certain group of people. It's not from the individual.
37:05
Speaker 1: For that individual to create something new, that newness must
37:13
Speaker 1: be based on the rendition of the system itself. So
37:19
Speaker 1: in they start to cause system, it's fighting progress, it's
37:24
Speaker 1: suppressing progress. That's why in those systems of tasts called systems,
37:30
Speaker 1: they talk about democracy they talk about tyranny, oppression, autocracy,
37:40
Speaker 1: because they talk about communism, socialism, they create all this
37:44
Speaker 1: system that prevents a human being in itself from developing
37:51
Speaker 1: itself individually. The human being must follow the prescription that
37:57
Speaker 1: this system is like the doctor. It must follow particular medication.
38:03
Speaker 1: You cannot seek alternative treatment. That becomes the problem. Oh
38:13
Speaker 1: the statusical future, and that future is self destroyed self.
38:22
Speaker 1: The First World War, the Second World War and all
38:28
Speaker 1: these bombs, nuclear weapons. It's not for the future of
38:35
Speaker 1: that future, it's to destroy it. So the system of
38:38
Speaker 1: the status quo will destroyed self, just like a dinosaur
38:45
Speaker 1: self extinct. That's the future upon which humans are believe it.
38:57
Speaker 1: They talk about progress, gradualism. Years passed with humans in
39:07
Speaker 1: this system, and there's nothing they're doing with their lives.
39:09
Speaker 1: There's no bigger vision. The system is. Don't talk about jobs,
39:14
Speaker 1: don't create jobs that have no meaning, no purpose. And
39:19
Speaker 1: some of the companies they create actually kill humans. The
39:23
Speaker 1: companies they create, they create products that actually are deally
39:27
Speaker 1: for humans in the long run. But these companies are
39:30
Speaker 1: fortunate five from the companies. It's not about the being
39:34
Speaker 1: of the being itself, of which the future should be
39:38
Speaker 1: at about the bean of the being itself. That's the
39:42
Speaker 1: tech future. The turp future is the future for the
39:47
Speaker 1: being of the being itself. There's the future upon which
39:52
Speaker 1: my philosophy is start at the being of the being
39:56
Speaker 1: and the being itself and nothing else that that wish
39:58
Speaker 1: you have come to be can't be, but it can
40:01
Speaker 1: only be the best of yourself, another copy of something
40:03
Speaker 1: that's that must be original, authentical, organic. That's the future.
40:12
Speaker 1: That's the third remo that future. A third future is
40:21
Speaker 1: the future of the future itself. The first group has
40:27
Speaker 1: no future, don't care about the future. The second group
40:31
Speaker 1: thinks just about their own future. That's the society we're living,
40:36
Speaker 1: and there's a human start we have on most of it.
40:39
Speaker 1: And the tech group thinks about the future of that
40:41
Speaker 1: future that we are living. Is it sustainable, is it conducive,
40:49
Speaker 1: is it peaceful? Can be passed on to the children
40:52
Speaker 1: of the world. That's the third future. That's thecond future.
41:00
Speaker 1: Was a unipolar future. That type future is the multi
41:06
Speaker 1: power future, the future of humanity, a sustainable future of humanity,
41:18
Speaker 1: the peaceful future of humanity. That type future is not
41:22
Speaker 1: the future of a state for the system. It's the
41:24
Speaker 1: future for everybody, the future of the future. I wrote
41:33
Speaker 1: a book on it. Most of the time, I haven't
41:35
Speaker 1: published a lot of my stuff. I just write it
41:40
Speaker 1: for the future of the future. A philosophy or the
41:45
Speaker 1: feature of the future. Triangulism is for the feature of
41:48
Speaker 1: the future. Motive uh, Motiversalism is for the future of
41:56
Speaker 1: the future. The motiversalist. So the future of the my
42:01
Speaker 1: being is for the future of that future. Everything I write,
42:04
Speaker 1: everything else else I'm talking to you now is for
42:07
Speaker 1: the future of that future. How do we make the
42:09
Speaker 1: future of the future better for the younger generation, for
42:15
Speaker 1: the future of things, for the future of being, for
42:19
Speaker 1: the positive intelligence of things. Does the future talk about
42:25
Speaker 1: the future of the future? That the being of the
42:29
Speaker 1: being is the being itself for the good of itself,
42:33
Speaker 1: for the good of all humans. That future in which
42:38
Speaker 1: even religion is not seeing in my God, your God.
42:42
Speaker 1: It's the future that they say God is one for everybody.
42:48
Speaker 1: That the world is for everybody, a fair system, a
42:55
Speaker 1: fair world, a peaceful world. It's only nuclear weapons for
42:59
Speaker 1: the future of the future, because the nuclear weapons is
43:02
Speaker 1: to destroy the future of others, the bombing hero himor
43:09
Speaker 1: destroy the future of others. The one Ukraine and Russia
43:15
Speaker 1: is des training the future of others. The one in
43:17
Speaker 1: the middle is is to train the future of others.
43:21
Speaker 1: Slavery destroy the future of artists. Colonization destroy the future
43:28
Speaker 1: of artists. The inquisition destroy the future of artists. Toxic
43:34
Speaker 1: nationalism destroy the future of artists. Dictators destroy the future
43:42
Speaker 1: of artists. Tyrants destroy the future of others. All the
43:48
Speaker 1: wars that humans are fought destroy the future of others.
43:52
Speaker 1: All these chemicers that humans produce like that of humans,
43:56
Speaker 1: destroy the feature of humans. The production that the things
44:00
Speaker 1: we consume destroy the future of humans. Those things that
44:04
Speaker 1: are maid are not made for the future of the future.
44:08
Speaker 1: The planes we have to their crash destroy the feature
44:10
Speaker 1: of humans. The cars have an accident destroy the feature
44:14
Speaker 1: of humans. The social media destroy the future of humans.
44:23
Speaker 1: People commit suicide based on it, people use it to
44:29
Speaker 1: destroy others. That's the system that we're live in. The
44:37
Speaker 1: future of the future is the future where the human
44:39
Speaker 1: being purified. It's its intelligence. The human be sick, to
44:42
Speaker 1: be positive, use his own life for good, for the
44:45
Speaker 1: good of others, the good of everybody. That your life
44:50
Speaker 1: affects others by not because of their race or the
44:53
Speaker 1: gender where you're born, a multi versal way of thinking,
45:00
Speaker 1: that the universe is just one unit of imagination unit
45:04
Speaker 1: unit verse. But it's a martive versa versat way of
45:09
Speaker 1: thinking unit power, malti versa, universa, molti versa. It's a
45:26
Speaker 1: motiversal way of thinking, no universal way of thinking. That
45:35
Speaker 1: the highest the status qure future can go is think
45:38
Speaker 1: about his universe. The future of the future is a
45:43
Speaker 1: motivesal way of thinking. What happened beyond that universe, what
45:48
Speaker 1: happened beyond our earth. When talk about space station is
45:52
Speaker 1: to a particular group of people, that uni race, rature, uni, polar, unia,
46:04
Speaker 1: uni national, that uni being ware of saying things. It's
46:14
Speaker 1: the status qual future and the motivers a feature is
46:19
Speaker 1: the feature of the future. That's why in this world
46:24
Speaker 1: people worship Jesus. It's the future of the future. Matin
46:28
Speaker 1: Muritia can talk about the future of the future, about Lincoln,
46:31
Speaker 1: try to break the future of the future. All the
46:34
Speaker 1: Nobel laureates and all these scientists are innovators that geld
46:38
Speaker 1: all these gadgets, all these new gadgets, and this new
46:42
Speaker 1: rale of AI seeking to better the lives of humans.
46:47
Speaker 1: But they are limited in themselves because within the blueprint
46:51
Speaker 1: of this, it's the better the lives of just a
46:54
Speaker 1: particular set of people, just a particular group of people.
47:00
Speaker 1: So the prescription in my philosophy, I want to know,
47:02
Speaker 1: if you're the future of the future, you know you're limited.
47:05
Speaker 1: If whatever you're doing is limited to a particular group,
47:09
Speaker 1: then you think about the statistical future. If whatever you're
47:13
Speaker 1: doing it's about the whole universe, the whole world, then
47:18
Speaker 1: you think about the future of the future. Coronavirus started somewhere,
47:24
Speaker 1: it affects everybody. It affected everybody, So you cure the
47:29
Speaker 1: chronavi virus helps the future of the future of everybody.
47:34
Speaker 1: That's just an example. If a vaccine is made to
47:39
Speaker 1: disadvantage a particular group, then it's meant for the statistic
47:43
Speaker 1: or future. But if you make a vaccine that heals
47:46
Speaker 1: everybody without discrimination, then that's the feature of the future.
47:51
Speaker 1: And this system that practices racism, sexism and bigger trays
47:55
Speaker 1: for the status called future. Because the feature of the future,
47:59
Speaker 1: you have the reason them says them, and bigotry, because
48:01
Speaker 1: the futures of everybody. The multipolarity vision that I write about,
48:10
Speaker 1: it's a multiverse, a way of thinking. Now, what you're
48:15
Speaker 1: doing is for the good of all. All means all
48:19
Speaker 1: without discrimination. That's the feature of the future. Oppression in
48:27
Speaker 1: one area create a depression in another area. When you
48:33
Speaker 1: seek to take the rights of others, you prevent your
48:37
Speaker 1: own self from expressing your own rights. A prison guard
48:42
Speaker 1: is not that different from a prisoner, even though he's
48:44
Speaker 1: taking care of prisoners. So when you suppress people, you
48:49
Speaker 1: suppress you oppressed. When you oppress people, you suppress your
48:53
Speaker 1: own rights. So a futuristic system system that thinks of
49:02
Speaker 1: the future of the future, how would life be like
49:07
Speaker 1: in a thousand years? How those climate change affects everybody?
49:17
Speaker 1: How does it affect the future of everybody? Those who
49:22
Speaker 1: cares about the future of the future would like to
49:27
Speaker 1: strengthen international institutions to work for everybody. Those with the
49:35
Speaker 1: start to score future, we like institutional systems to work
49:39
Speaker 1: just for themselves. So by so doing, they're preventing the
49:44
Speaker 1: future of others. The status score future actually enemies of
49:52
Speaker 1: the future of the future. What is standing the way
49:56
Speaker 1: of the future of the future is the statuscore future.
50:00
Speaker 1: The statuscore future is fighting the future of the future.
50:06
Speaker 1: The status score features means my way or the highway.
50:10
Speaker 1: The future of the future means it is our way,
50:14
Speaker 1: so let's all of us unite to make it better.
50:19
Speaker 1: Humanity cannot be better in the statustical future. Statuscore future
50:28
Speaker 1: prevent other futures from developing. The future of the future
50:40
Speaker 1: is the beginning of my future, at the beginning of
50:42
Speaker 1: buying philosophy, It's the beginning of by being so that
50:48
Speaker 1: feature of the future. Countries will still be respected because
50:52
Speaker 1: of their contribution in that feature of the future. The
50:56
Speaker 1: country that invents the care to cancer helps the future
51:02
Speaker 1: of all humans. That country will be respected. That person
51:08
Speaker 1: will be venerated. That person still make wealth. That person
51:13
Speaker 1: will be universally richer because the person's product is consumed
51:22
Speaker 1: by everybody with that discrimination and the country therefore we
51:27
Speaker 1: take the pride of it. Pride of it. So the
51:33
Speaker 1: future of the future creates more wealth, more awareness, Humans
51:42
Speaker 1: live healthier and longer. The future of the future takes
51:47
Speaker 1: away all the investments in war machines. The future of
51:51
Speaker 1: the future create positive intelligence. That's what I call positive activity.
51:55
Speaker 1: Your intelligences because your product is necessary. The future feature
52:01
Speaker 1: of the future note will not invent or create planes
52:04
Speaker 1: that crash going the plane crashes, itcures humans. I was
52:11
Speaker 1: all right in my work about balance intelligence the intelligent person,
52:20
Speaker 1: in my philosophy, in my world, to create a product,
52:25
Speaker 1: it must first balance. It must first solve all the
52:28
Speaker 1: negative causalities are the product and break. So a product
52:31
Speaker 1: must be negative causality neutral. Let me say it again,
52:36
Speaker 1: in the future of the future, the product must be
52:39
Speaker 1: negative causality neutral. It means, at base, the negativity of
52:47
Speaker 1: your product is zero. Astriangalism philosophy, you can exponentiate the
52:55
Speaker 1: positive causality of yourself and your product, of your mind,
53:00
Speaker 1: your thinking, of your system. It makes you cannot exponenti
53:04
Speaker 1: itative the negativity of your system. It makes you cannot
53:10
Speaker 1: exponent it negative causality. It can only exponenti it positive causality.
53:17
Speaker 1: That's the system of the or the future of the
53:20
Speaker 1: future I'm talking about it. Miss what you're doing can
53:23
Speaker 1: do good, it cannot do evil, cannot do bad. It
53:27
Speaker 1: means if you have to produce a solda, for example,
53:31
Speaker 1: you already know this solder will cause diabetes, got lot
53:33
Speaker 1: of sugar, so we in that soda to have the
53:37
Speaker 1: cure for that diabetes and sugar. So when I drink
53:40
Speaker 1: the solder. For example, I cannot therefore have sugar diabetes
53:45
Speaker 1: or hyper pressure because within that product itself has securities
53:52
Speaker 1: on problems. Therefore, to produce a plane, it must know
54:01
Speaker 1: the plane is going to crash. So therefore you must
54:05
Speaker 1: solve or the negative causality that a plan not that
54:08
Speaker 1: that that plane can do, before you can invent or
54:15
Speaker 1: produce that plane. Therefore, you have produced even though you
54:19
Speaker 1: have produced a statuscore product, because it kills other humans.
54:24
Speaker 1: It profits you, but it takes the future of other
54:27
Speaker 1: humans because every life taken as an Armstein, Nicola, Tesla
54:32
Speaker 1: or or an Eland mass life destroyed just to be current.
54:37
Speaker 1: When I call Eland mask, it's a very smart human.
54:43
Speaker 1: It's trying to create the future. That's what I'm talking about.
54:49
Speaker 1: Starlink is the future, space as the future. Neural Link
54:52
Speaker 1: is the future. The quantum computing investment and future technology
55:02
Speaker 1: just for the future. Intelligence for the future. But the
55:06
Speaker 1: STATUSO future will destroy the AI will destroy the quantum completed.
55:12
Speaker 1: It will infect them with the statistical intelligence, that is
55:15
Speaker 1: the users for a particular group against certain group. It
55:19
Speaker 1: means when intelligence discriminate, it is for the status or future.
55:25
Speaker 1: When intelligence doesn't discriminate, it's for the future of the future.
55:30
Speaker 1: When investments discriminate is for the status called future. When
55:35
Speaker 1: investment doesn't discriminate, it's for the future of the future.
55:40
Speaker 1: When education discriminate, it's for the status of school future.
55:46
Speaker 1: When education doesn't discriminate, it's for the future of the future.
55:51
Speaker 1: Anything that discriminates is that the statistical future. Everything that
55:56
Speaker 1: doesn't discriminate, anything that doesn't discriminate, it's for the future
55:59
Speaker 1: of the future. That's simple because once you dis won't
56:04
Speaker 1: franchise people, you take away their future. When take away
56:09
Speaker 1: the future of others, you destroyed, you retard the future
56:14
Speaker 1: of the future itself. Because these people you are discriminating upon,
56:20
Speaker 1: you don't know their future. That's what i'm That's what
56:22
Speaker 1: I mean. But you're stolen their future. You have imposed
56:26
Speaker 1: a deductive feature on the You have did classified their future. Racism,
56:36
Speaker 1: declassify the future of others, segregate. You did classify the
56:40
Speaker 1: future of others. Discrimination did classify the future of others.
56:52
Speaker 1: So we are thinking, but within this rhythm of status
56:57
Speaker 1: called future lives people like us that sees the future
57:04
Speaker 1: of the future of every human being. All this future
57:08
Speaker 1: wild dream of living longer. If all of us work together,
57:15
Speaker 1: If science what was science, If science is what science is,
57:19
Speaker 1: science shouldn't be working for the start to school future,
57:21
Speaker 1: but for the future of the future, open source technologists.
57:29
Speaker 1: If vaccines should be for the future of the future,
57:36
Speaker 1: then most humans should be held at the vaccine. For
57:43
Speaker 1: the future of the future to be what it tasts
57:45
Speaker 1: or what should be. People should profit from the eyepiece.
57:53
Speaker 1: It's an innovative future. It's an inventive future. Think about it.
57:59
Speaker 1: There is treat semiconductors. That's where they start to score future.
58:05
Speaker 1: When you restrict Nvidia from selling to certain countries, you
58:10
Speaker 1: don't want those countries to grow, so definitely don't want
58:12
Speaker 1: humanity to grow, so that that's the status quore future.
58:20
Speaker 1: But if in Vidia is selling to those countries, in
58:24
Speaker 1: Vida is an American company in that feature of the future.
58:29
Speaker 1: It makes American important. It makes American respected because American
58:36
Speaker 1: is trying to bet them feed the future of everybody.
58:40
Speaker 1: So make American to be respected by the whole world,
58:43
Speaker 1: not by a particular clique, a particular race, a particular
58:47
Speaker 1: financial organization. It makes American to be American everywhere in
58:51
Speaker 1: the world. If our intelligence if our intelligence to serve
58:58
Speaker 1: the war, it makes us more important because we are
59:03
Speaker 1: contratributing to the future of the future. It's a wealth thinking.
59:10
Speaker 1: But one will restrict our technology for the status called future.
59:17
Speaker 1: Somebody will create that technology for the future of the future.
59:22
Speaker 1: And many people were working together to create the technology
59:25
Speaker 1: of the future of the future than creating the status
59:28
Speaker 1: called technology. It's a wealth thinking. It's a futuristic with thinking.
59:41
Speaker 1: Humans are better working together than working in isolation. Humans
59:48
Speaker 1: are better working together than working in isolation. If we
59:53
Speaker 1: are working together for the good of humanity, for the
59:57
Speaker 1: good of the future of the future, you don't go
1:00:00
Speaker 1: to war. Talk about the future. War is for the
1:00:03
Speaker 1: start to score. Future. War is to demolish and prevent
1:00:09
Speaker 1: and destroy the future of others. Every bomb anywhere that
1:00:14
Speaker 1: kills a child, it's a status score future war. That
1:00:22
Speaker 1: child is a child the universe. That Chae is a
1:00:25
Speaker 1: child of all of us. Armstand as a child of universe.
1:00:30
Speaker 1: Nuclear tests that a child in the universe, as if
1:00:33
Speaker 1: Newti in the child the universe. Those who create technologies
1:00:38
Speaker 1: or ideologies or ideas that help everybody, that's a child
1:00:42
Speaker 1: of the universe. That I call a motiversalist mine motiversalists
1:00:53
Speaker 1: think about the future of the future, whativersalist thinks about
1:00:58
Speaker 1: the multi versatalist think about the future of the future.
1:01:02
Speaker 1: If you're a future of the future type of being,
1:01:05
Speaker 1: then you're a motiversalist being. If you see the world
1:01:11
Speaker 1: that is for everybody, then you're in the motiversalid moltiversalism
1:01:17
Speaker 1: or multiversaliity war that will harness the positive intelligence within
1:01:25
Speaker 1: the human being and the positive good within the human
1:01:28
Speaker 1: being to build a better universe and better world. And
1:01:32
Speaker 1: philosophy is the future of the future philosophy, not just
1:01:36
Speaker 1: start to school philosophy. That's what I talk about, positive intelligence,
1:01:41
Speaker 1: positive humanity. That the human being to anness the good
1:01:44
Speaker 1: in itself for the good of all. That the human
1:01:49
Speaker 1: being sure harness the good within itself for the good
1:01:52
Speaker 1: of all. As the moti versalism and philosophy, the human
1:01:59
Speaker 1: being an alligience in itself for the betterment of the
1:02:03
Speaker 1: future of the future. It means our future might not
1:02:11
Speaker 1: live in the future. That's what I mean by the
1:02:13
Speaker 1: future of the future. Our future of my ownly sustain itself.
1:02:21
Speaker 1: It might not fit in the future of things. If
1:02:24
Speaker 1: it's our future, it miss it's not a future of
1:02:28
Speaker 1: everybody else. If it's our god, and this is not
1:02:32
Speaker 1: a god of everybody else. That's why in my philosophy,
1:02:38
Speaker 1: god is the god of everybody, the omni greatest designer.
1:02:43
Speaker 1: The God in my philosophy is a perkast or parkast letters,
1:02:48
Speaker 1: the greatest own designer, and it's a god of everybody.
1:02:53
Speaker 1: If it's something, it's just for you. It it's not
1:02:56
Speaker 1: for the future of the future. It's very us there.
1:03:03
Speaker 1: If you think this way, then you see yourself in
1:03:08
Speaker 1: the future of things. Because if we don't see ourself
1:03:13
Speaker 1: this way, we cannot harness the good in everybody. H
1:03:20
Speaker 1: just keep discriminating within ourselves and creating these bubbles of
1:03:27
Speaker 1: technologies that goes nowhere doesn't improve anything. I can tell
1:03:35
Speaker 1: you that the most important technology invention, what's the vaccines
1:03:46
Speaker 1: that prevents humans from dying from coronavirus. Coronavirus came here
1:03:53
Speaker 1: to eliminate humanity. We don't know where it came from. Hope,
1:03:58
Speaker 1: that was not the status quo future to destroy the
1:04:01
Speaker 1: future of honists, but those who did everything to supply
1:04:08
Speaker 1: the kids, the mask and everything, the venderson that keep
1:04:13
Speaker 1: us all here. That's an invention on it. That's an
1:04:17
Speaker 1: invention of a century. It helped humans to live, to
1:04:24
Speaker 1: build that future of the future. We should think about it.
1:04:29
Speaker 1: We should create technologists, the last technologies that after the
1:04:34
Speaker 1: better men of all the eight point five eightpen fold
1:04:39
Speaker 1: epens something belonged upon this planet Earth. If you create
1:04:43
Speaker 1: a technology that is universal, you make more money. And
1:04:48
Speaker 1: that good for capitalism? Am I kidding? If you're gonna
1:04:52
Speaker 1: restrict your product us to a few buyers, how capitalistic
1:04:57
Speaker 1: can that be? That's not capitalism, h that's communism. If
1:05:03
Speaker 1: you're a productible soulial to certain people. Miss, you don't
1:05:07
Speaker 1: want to make money, I mess, You don't want to
1:05:09
Speaker 1: create wealth. Shouldn't money wealth mean health? Ask a question again,
1:05:20
Speaker 1: shouldn't money and worth wealth together means health? Your health,
1:05:27
Speaker 1: the health of the economy, the health of humanity, the
1:05:32
Speaker 1: health of the universe, the health of the future, and
1:05:37
Speaker 1: the health of the future of that future. If we
1:05:41
Speaker 1: think about the future of our children without the with
1:05:48
Speaker 1: I think of the future of other children that our
1:05:50
Speaker 1: children are gonna share the same future with, then we
1:05:54
Speaker 1: all thinking of a status called future that has no
1:05:58
Speaker 1: bearing in the future of the future. If they're going
1:06:02
Speaker 1: to be winners and lose us and that type of
1:06:08
Speaker 1: future that is the wealth of seeing things. Then we
1:06:11
Speaker 1: have this, then we are this stranger feature of the
1:06:13
Speaker 1: future itself. It's the future of the future is the
1:06:17
Speaker 1: future of everybody. They start to score futures the feature
1:06:22
Speaker 1: of certain group of people. It's very ironic that the
1:06:27
Speaker 1: start to score future create weapons that kills everybody. Think
1:06:33
Speaker 1: about it. They start to score future creates weapons that
1:06:37
Speaker 1: kills everybody. But but they don't create science that helps everybody.
1:06:44
Speaker 1: They don't create technologies that helps everybody. If technologists are
1:06:48
Speaker 1: help everybody, they're restrict their technology. But if they create
1:06:53
Speaker 1: the things that kills everybody, then everybody must have it. HM.
1:07:01
Speaker 1: How safe terminating can we be to the future? We
1:07:07
Speaker 1: shouldn't think about the future of the future in order
1:07:14
Speaker 1: to be the better thinking being. Think the other and
1:07:23
Speaker 1: asked question. It's a matter of projection, perception, and perspective.
1:07:32
Speaker 1: If you want to see technologies of the future of
1:07:35
Speaker 1: the future, remember MPB measurement, proportionality and balance. We must
1:07:42
Speaker 1: keep that mindfulness of things to create the best of things.
1:07:48
Speaker 1: But if you are creating a future and dying for
1:07:51
Speaker 1: a future and killing a lot of humans in the
1:07:54
Speaker 1: name of wars for the future whom we want that
1:07:58
Speaker 1: future to be sustainable. If you go to Ukraine and
1:08:02
Speaker 1: kill all the people in Ukraine and just when Ukrainian
1:08:06
Speaker 1: is left, for example, under Ukrainian, come against your own future,
1:08:11
Speaker 1: to destroy your own future. That's why I called the
1:08:14
Speaker 1: statusical future is self destroy it past problems to younger generations,
1:08:21
Speaker 1: destroy their future of the future. Give them all these
1:08:24
Speaker 1: terminal philosophies, right, self terminating philosophies, destructive philosophy, suicide philosophies
1:08:33
Speaker 1: of racism, sexism, biggertry, nationalism, that you just self destroy,
1:08:38
Speaker 1: kill others, they kill you back, ham others they have
1:08:40
Speaker 1: you back, So you just back and forth and the
1:08:43
Speaker 1: future of the future is never developed. That's why I
1:08:46
Speaker 1: say humans come here. They have not passed their earth.
1:08:50
Speaker 1: They have not invented anything that make them go be
1:08:54
Speaker 1: on the earth. Because the create technologies are self destroy
1:09:01
Speaker 1: They equalize themselves by killing themselves. That's what humans tell.
1:09:08
Speaker 1: That's what I call the status of future means at
1:09:11
Speaker 1: the end of the day, everybody is equal. What does
1:09:16
Speaker 1: that mean? Everybody's nothing because we equalized by destroying of ourselves.
1:09:29
Speaker 1: Think about the First and Second World wars. Just think
1:09:40
Speaker 1: about the millions of lives destroyed. Why why why should
1:09:52
Speaker 1: our civilizations be packed on the on the wars we
1:09:56
Speaker 1: thought and the wars we want. You just try the
1:10:00
Speaker 1: future by creating futures. Think about how many humans are
1:10:07
Speaker 1: lost every day each time a bomb goes somewhere by
1:10:11
Speaker 1: destroying the future of others to create what future? To
1:10:17
Speaker 1: create the status future? If we do create that statustic future,
1:10:21
Speaker 1: where does it go? Where does it lead own? Some
1:10:26
Speaker 1: bodies sic a revenge to destroy their statuscore future. Think
1:10:30
Speaker 1: about it, you destroy one million humans to create a
1:10:35
Speaker 1: status quore that after ten or twenty thirty years, that
1:10:41
Speaker 1: status squaes is destabilized and a new statute squre is created.
1:10:47
Speaker 1: Then you start to quote kills maybe ten million humans,
1:10:53
Speaker 1: and after twenty thirty years or forty years, that status
1:10:57
Speaker 1: qua is destroyed. Humans are being destroyed. But one word
1:11:02
Speaker 1: stay the same, statusco statustical statusqual a status of future.
1:11:10
Speaker 1: It's unsustainable at which we are standing against is against
1:11:17
Speaker 1: the future of the future. All these systems of to
1:11:20
Speaker 1: day are statuscores a statuscore systems. They are meant to
1:11:26
Speaker 1: prevent the future from the future of the future. I
1:11:30
Speaker 1: mean systems are men are bandits are meant to prevent
1:11:33
Speaker 1: other humans from developing. Assume that those humans will not developed.
1:11:40
Speaker 1: There will be no car, no plan, no medicine, no
1:11:45
Speaker 1: technology or the system of statusquore. It's only our people
1:11:51
Speaker 1: doubt this. Now develop the technology of the future. What
1:11:55
Speaker 1: if your people are not intelligent enough? Aye doesn't matter,
1:12:00
Speaker 1: because who keep the status? Go to war and dominance?
1:12:04
Speaker 1: And what type of world? Therefore are we building? What
1:12:08
Speaker 1: our future one? Are we passing on? We can pass
1:12:13
Speaker 1: the future to humans, but the future past the human
1:12:18
Speaker 1: can sustain their humans. The future of the futures not
1:12:23
Speaker 1: pass through a certain group of humans. The future of
1:12:27
Speaker 1: the futures passed through the future generations to all the
1:12:30
Speaker 1: future generations. It means we came, we burn the world,
1:12:36
Speaker 1: and we pass it on. Where the world we are
1:12:38
Speaker 1: passing today is unfair, it's infected, it's toxic, it's unsustainable.
1:12:46
Speaker 1: So we actually desjoy the future of the future. No
1:12:51
Speaker 1: matter our fancy words and our fancy systems, our fancy places,
1:12:59
Speaker 1: we should we live in for the future of the future.
1:13:03
Speaker 1: If you want to read AI philosophy, read my works.
1:13:11
Speaker 1: My works laid the foundation to build a future of
1:13:17
Speaker 1: the future. And that future of the future America still leads.
1:13:27
Speaker 1: If we want to or just isolated. And what do
1:13:37
Speaker 1: you do in isolation? What do you do? Isolation brings hate, envy,
1:13:49
Speaker 1: Hatred is not a good thigh. Isolation create ignorance, get misinformation, disinformation, propaganda,
1:14:00
Speaker 1: a miseducation it get false illusions and we get out
1:14:08
Speaker 1: of your isolation. There left behind it is becoming obsolete.
1:14:17
Speaker 1: The New way, it's championing the future of the future.
1:14:26
Speaker 1: The New way. It's the future for all humanity. It's
1:14:32
Speaker 1: good for business, it's good for capitalism, it's good for
1:14:38
Speaker 1: the health of the planet. It's the future of the future.
1:14:43
Speaker 1: Can the accept sustainable development? It means based on triangulism philosophy,
1:14:51
Speaker 1: if you want to produce a car, the car shall
1:14:54
Speaker 1: not crush. The plane should not crush. You want to
1:15:00
Speaker 1: produce on a phone, you should know that the kids
1:15:05
Speaker 1: will addict do on it. You should know that from
1:15:06
Speaker 1: m I use the phone for ever. You should create
1:15:09
Speaker 1: the software that does not create a negative causality. I
1:15:14
Speaker 1: usually word create the software that's I create jobs. It
1:15:17
Speaker 1: means you create you're creating good, positive jobs to solve
1:15:22
Speaker 1: real human problems to prolong life and foster humanity by
1:15:28
Speaker 1: making money good, healthy money, positive sustainable wealth. That's why
1:15:37
Speaker 1: the feature of the future creates. The feature of the
1:15:40
Speaker 1: future creates positive sustainable wealth, a negative causality wealth. There's
1:15:50
Speaker 1: always wealth to be made. When before creating something, so
1:15:57
Speaker 1: the future of the future, it says it's super it's
1:16:00
Speaker 1: a beggar. Official of the future is too bake for everybody.
1:16:07
Speaker 1: That's why I said everybody has the intrinstic individualistic gift.
1:16:11
Speaker 1: Use that gift to add to that feature of the future.
1:16:16
Speaker 1: Spend time to perfect your craft, not to clear negative causalities.
1:16:21
Speaker 1: While all this system of oppression, dictatorship and naka, all
1:16:25
Speaker 1: the system have today because they are suppressing humans from
1:16:31
Speaker 1: creating the future of the future. They're subjugating humans from thinking, doubting,
1:16:39
Speaker 1: asking questions. They're preventing humans from teking the best in
1:16:45
Speaker 1: all the humans and the best in themselves. They start
1:16:50
Speaker 1: to score future, she are transcend to the future of
1:16:56
Speaker 1: the future. That's a realm of systems, the futuristic systems
1:17:03
Speaker 1: of governance and structure. We base on the future of
1:17:08
Speaker 1: the future as a way of thinking. That's what we
1:17:14
Speaker 1: advance humanity to pass off the conquers universe and leave
1:17:20
Speaker 1: beyond as a universe into the motive wers arrived. You
1:17:25
Speaker 1: canno advance intelligence by stifling intelligence. You can too advance
1:17:32
Speaker 1: one people as objecating another. The more you hold people down,
1:17:43
Speaker 1: the more you are static, and the less they becomes
1:17:49
Speaker 1: futuristic and viable for sustainable future. Philosopher prints they are intelligences.
1:17:59
Speaker 1: Philosopher is Raizarre from the great city of Las Vegas
1:18:08
Speaker 1: on on the future of the future are humans should
1:18:19
Speaker 1: think beyond themselves? Thank you