Latest / Early Edition with Ryan Bridge / David Cunliffe: Aged Care Ministerial Advisory Group Chair on the report calling for an overview of the system
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: To call for wealthier key Wes to fund more of
- 0:02Speaker 1: our essential aged care services. This has come from the
- 0:06Speaker 1: minister or Advisory Groups reportant to aged care. It reckons
- 0:10Speaker 1: cost will double over the next twenty years. They want
- 0:13Speaker 1: structural reform. David Canliffe, Aged Care Ministerial Advisory Group Chair
- 0:17Speaker 1: joins me this morning. David, good morning, good morning. You're
- 0:20Speaker 1: so you want the rich to pay more for the system.
- 0:23Speaker 1: How's this system funded at the moment.
- 0:26Speaker 2: The moment, the system is part funded by personal contributions
- 0:29Speaker 2: as part funded by the Taxpayer'll that'll continue? We need
- 0:34Speaker 2: both to be putting more money in in order to
- 0:37Speaker 2: make sure the system's there when the current generation, ages
- 0:41Speaker 2: and future generations come through. If we make the system
- 0:44Speaker 2: smarter and better, we can also save money compared to
- 0:49Speaker 2: what it would be if we just kept funding the
- 0:50Speaker 2: current system, about eight hundred and thirty five million dollars
- 0:54Speaker 2: a year cheaper to the taxpayer by twenty thirty seven
- 0:58Speaker 2: thirty eight. That's a it's a dividend worth getting.
- 1:01Speaker 1: When you say the system, what exactly are we talking about?
- 1:03Speaker 1: Are we talking about what hospitals or some kind of
- 1:07Speaker 1: facility where old people go?
- 1:08Speaker 2: What is it yeah, look, great question. Firstly, it's your
- 1:13Speaker 2: home care. So if granny is being looked after a
- 1:17Speaker 2: home and someone's coming in for a few hours a
- 1:18Speaker 2: week to help out, that's what we call the home
- 1:21Speaker 2: care part of the system. When people get more frail,
- 1:24Speaker 2: they move on to residential care or quote resk care
- 1:29Speaker 2: that's being in a home of some kind. And then
- 1:32Speaker 2: if people are really sick, of course they go into hospital. Now,
- 1:36Speaker 2: most hospitals are publicly funded and pretty much free to
- 1:41Speaker 2: the person going in, and there are a lot of
- 1:44Speaker 2: old people in hospital. It's really expensive on the taxpayer
- 1:48Speaker 2: who possibly shouldn't be there, who should either be cared
- 1:51Speaker 2: for at home or could be in residential care.
- 1:55Speaker 1: And why aren't they at home or in residential care
- 1:58Speaker 1: because they can't afford it?
- 2:00Speaker 2: No, because the services aren't there to look after them.
- 2:03Speaker 2: And that's why we need to build a better, more
- 2:06Speaker 2: integrated service with higher levels of care available at home.
- 2:11Speaker 2: Not only is that better for them, because most people
- 2:13Speaker 2: would like to be at home, close to their families,
- 2:15Speaker 2: close their memories, where they've got their stuff, but it's
- 2:18Speaker 2: also a lot cheaper to look after people in their
- 2:21Speaker 2: homes than it is to put them in hospital. So
- 2:23Speaker 2: it's nearly two thousand dollars a night in a hospital.
- 2:25Speaker 1: So the government's not funding enough home care and residential
- 2:29Speaker 1: care to get these older people out of hospital.
- 2:32Speaker 2: At the moment that's correct, that problem is getting worse.
- 2:35Speaker 1: What's the shortfall? What's the how much it would that
- 2:38Speaker 1: cost us?
- 2:40Speaker 2: Well, if we run the clock forward about ten years
- 2:44Speaker 2: and the moment we're paying two and a half billion,
- 2:47Speaker 2: we would be paying nearly five billion dollars by twenty
- 2:53Speaker 2: thirty seven thirty eight if we just pump money into
- 2:55Speaker 2: the current system without fixing it, and it's just to
- 2:58Speaker 2: build beds in resis care and to keep the current
- 3:01Speaker 2: system going. If we redesign it, if we join it
- 3:05Speaker 2: together better, if we remove the bottlenecks and barriers, if
- 3:08Speaker 2: we look after people better in their homes, we can
- 3:11Speaker 2: save eight hundred and thirty five million dollars a year
- 3:16Speaker 2: and bring that tab down to three point seven billion,
- 3:18Speaker 2: not five.
- 3:19Speaker 1: Where Where does the asking wealthier people think come from?
- 3:23Speaker 1: What does that mean that their co payment for home
- 3:25Speaker 1: care or co payment for residential care would go up
- 3:28Speaker 1: if you've got more assets or something.
- 3:31Speaker 2: Yes, partly, but it's a packaged deal. What we're recommending
- 3:34Speaker 2: is the principle that your basic health care is free
- 3:38Speaker 2: should be true and protected all the way across the system. Now,
- 3:41Speaker 2: at the moment it's free in hospital, it's not free
- 3:44Speaker 2: in res care, and it is free at home, but
- 3:47Speaker 2: there's not much of it. So we want to joined
- 3:49Speaker 2: up system where medical care is protected and free right
- 3:53Speaker 2: across the system. But for those who can afford to
- 3:56Speaker 2: contribute to their personal care, their home services, that they
- 4:01Speaker 2: should make a small contribution to that. And of course
- 4:03Speaker 2: at the moment you pay for your residential care if
- 4:06Speaker 2: you go and if your assets are over a certain threshold,
- 4:10Speaker 2: we would change that threshold and make it smoother David Cumnor,
- 4:13Speaker 2: but also bring in a cap so you couldn't pay
- 4:15Speaker 2: for more than five.
- 4:16Speaker 1: Years aged km and a serial advisory group share for.
- 4:19Speaker 2: More from early edition with Ryan Bridge.
- 4:21Speaker 1: Listen live to news Talks.
- 4:23Speaker 2: It'd be from five am weekdays, or follow the podcast
- 4:26Speaker 2: on iHeartRadio