Latest / UK Column Radio / UK Column News Podcast 7th August 2024

Transcript

UK Column News Podcast 7th August 2024 · UK Column Radio

0:09
Speaker 1: Good afternoon. It's Wednesday, the seventh of August twenty twenty four,
0:13
just after one o'clock in the afternoon. Welcome to UK
0:16
column News. I'm Charles Mannett. I'm very pleased to be
0:18
joined by Brian Gerrish in studio today and Vanessa Bailey
0:22
remotely from Damascus. Now today we're going to start with
0:26
an extension of the analysis of the violence we're seeing
0:29
across the United Kingdom, which Brian is going to deal
0:33
with for us.
0:33
Speaker 2: Indeed, and before I do, I'll just say we're wearing
0:36
very similar shirts. For any of our viewers that have
0:39
noticed we are similarly dressed. This is an accidental occurrence
0:44
there we are before those emails come in. Well, let's
0:46
get onto the serious stuff. And I wanted to focus
0:50
on some of the commentary that's now being pushed at
0:53
the public about the recent events of riots and violence
0:58
on the streets. And I'm going to focus with Dreel
1:00
Farage as man I've known known of for a great
1:04
many years. So let's have a listen to what he
1:07
had to say.
1:09
Speaker 3: But it's been a pretty appalling couple of days violence
1:12
on the streets of this country that we haven't seen
1:14
for a very long time. Yes, we had the riots
1:16
in twenty eleven, which were exercises in mass looting, but
1:20
this is very, very different. Let's be clear, thugs setting
1:25
fire a hotels, migrant hotels with people in them, is
1:29
just wrong at every level. I understand the frustrations, I
1:33
understand the anger that is felt by huge numbers of people,
1:36
but we do not support I do not support street
1:39
protest violence or thuggery in any way. And that's why
1:43
for thirty years I fought elections because I believe that
1:48
democracy is the peaceful way to solve problems.
1:55
Speaker 2: Well, I'm going to say straight off, I absolutely agree
1:58
with him with the view that we shouldn't be supporting
2:01
violence on the streets. Whatever side is using that violence,
2:05
it is simply not acceptable. But my immediate criticism with
2:10
Nigel Farrage he's talking democracy when we do not live
2:15
in a democracy, and this is one of the key
2:17
issues where he is not giving the public the true
2:23
facts about what's really happening. Let's listen to a little
2:26
bit more of this same video clip.
2:31
Speaker 3: All this peace and love that we hear from those
2:34
on the left simply isn't true. The Prime Minister has
2:39
misread this completely and utterly. Just to call out the
2:44
actions of the far right is to misunderstand two things. Firstly,
2:49
let's be clear there were masked Muslim extremist mobs, some
2:55
with weapons, going around the streets of Midlands and Northern City.
3:00
Is threatening journalists, journalists literally running away, indeed, in some
3:05
cases people even having their tires on their cars slashed.
3:10
So of course, as with every major conflict in life,
3:14
there is fault, serious fault on both sides. But behind
3:20
the extremes of both. What Starmer doesn't understand, and when
3:24
he says I'm going to stop the far right, we
3:28
doesn't understand is the general feeling of dissatisfaction that has
3:32
been out there in this country growing for years. I
3:36
talked in a general election about societal breakdown. What I
3:41
meant by that were communities being split apart, people not
3:45
even recognizing the centers of some of our towns and
3:49
cities as even being vaguely English anymore. And when it
3:54
comes to the issue of two tier policing, something which
3:57
Kirstarmer denies, I promise you this perception began back at
4:02
the time of Black Lives Matter. Remember Churchill statue being defaced,
4:10
the cenotaph being abused in central London and the police response.
4:15
They knelt down in the street and took the knee
4:18
to a Marxist organization that wants to bring down Western civilization.
4:22
And it goes on and on from there.
4:27
Speaker 2: So let's just have a little think about what Nigel
4:30
Frage had to say. Their complete agreement about the Muslim
4:34
gangs completely wrong, that their violence was on the street.
4:38
So make no misunderstanding, there's no misunderstanding about the opinion
4:43
from the UK column about that. Totally agree with what
4:47
he said. But then he starts to talk about the
4:50
breakdown of society, and the key fault here is that
4:53
he doesn't get to grips with the fact that the
4:56
breakdown of society is the result of an orchestrated attack
5:00
by a number of agencies on the democracy that he's
5:04
talking about or claiming for UK. And once you get
5:08
into the detail of this attack on communities on democracy,
5:13
is totally unrealistic to believe that today, in twenty twenty four,
5:19
we live in a democracy in the United Kingdom. Something
5:23
much more sinister has installed itself in the government. It
5:27
is becoming increasingly dictatorial and Charles. You in a minute
5:31
are going to look at some of the challenges we
5:34
face as laws are changed in order to clamp down
5:37
on anyone who stands up to criticize what the government
5:41
has done. He talks about policing, but policing has been
5:45
under attack by a woke agenda. This has not been accidental.
5:49
This has come through the political party and it has
5:52
come through the policing system itself. And then finally he
5:56
manages to talk about black Black Lives Matter, recognizes a
6:01
Marxist component. This is where he's right, but he doesn't
6:06
understand what he's talking about, because if he understood the
6:09
Marxist attack that had been unleached on this country, he
6:13
would know that the dissatisfaction amongst the public had been
6:17
created through deliberate orchestrated breakdown of our system of democracy, government,
6:24
policing and institutions. But Nigel Farras just skips over these issues.
6:31
It's as though the violence that's unfolded has simply been
6:35
as a result of migration. And I absolutely challenge that
6:40
the violence is symptomatic of people understanding and sensing breakdown
6:46
in their country, and politicians are responsible for this breakdown
6:51
in fact, they've even boasted of it, as did parliamentary
6:55
candidate Danny Krueger. Let's listen to the last part of
6:59
the of the talk by Nigel Farage.
7:04
Speaker 3: Do we want to deal with the symptom that we're
7:07
seeing today or solve the problem? Dealing with the symptom
7:12
will turn us into France where these flare ups, these
7:16
racial tensions between the Muslim community and the French right
7:21
flare up month after month, year after year, leaving big
7:25
parts of Marseille in Paris effectively no go zones. Is
7:29
that what we want or do we want to actually
7:32
solve the problem, And I believe we can solve the problem.
7:37
We need to end massive immigration now to send a
7:41
message to people. We understand. We understand that a ten
7:45
million population increase has put massive pressure on people's lives.
7:51
We need to deal with the young men, undocumented young
7:55
males crossing the English channel. Just today we learn that
7:59
the Labor government are going to close down the hotels,
8:03
close down the ref camps like Weathersfield and Scampton closed down,
8:07
as we learned last week the Biby Stockholm. They're going
8:09
to put all these people now into government and private
8:13
rented accommodation. So if your kids are trying to buy
8:17
a house, trying to rent a house, or trying to
8:20
get into a social housing list, they've now been put
8:23
even further to the back of the queue. Do you
8:26
think that is going to solve any of these tensions,
8:29
any of these problems. I promise you that it won't.
8:33
We have to be clear that whilst we've always been
8:35
open to genuine refugees, no one that crosses the English
8:40
Channel trafficked in a small dinghy will ever get refugee status.
8:44
And thirdly, we absolutely need to get all the police
8:49
chiefs around the whole of the United Kingdom together and
8:52
to say to them start policing even handedly.
9:02
Speaker 2: So let's pull apart that third section there, because do
9:06
we need to stop the mass migration? Absolutely? Where did
9:10
the mass migration come from? Well, the immigrants didn't fight
9:14
their way ashore. The doors were opened and they were
9:17
encouraged to come into this country in increasing numbers. Labor
9:21
followed the policy, the Conservatives followed the policy, and now
9:25
we've got Labour back in power reaping the whirlwind of
9:29
the policies that they put in place for starmer at
9:33
least in the Blair era. So it's the numbers coming
9:37
in and I agree with Farage on this point. It
9:41
needs to stop. But it didn't happen accidentally. It happened
9:45
as a result of policies, and the people who are
9:48
responsible for those policies are still in power and still
9:52
pulling the strings of the government. This is why he
9:56
uses the distracting argument that the immigrants are all come
10:00
in via rubber boats. This is complete nonsense. The number
10:03
of people coming in by boats is a tiny fraction
10:06
of the total numbers who are being invited in through
10:10
the programmed orchestrated government's policy to bring more people into
10:15
the country. And why is the immigration there, Well, it's
10:20
not for the best interests of the indigenous people in UK.
10:23
It's not for the best interests of the migrants who
10:26
are coming in themselves. The policy has been to use
10:30
migration as a weapon to break down the structure of
10:34
UK and the tension, of course now has got to
10:37
such a level that we've seen the violence unleached on
10:40
the streets. So the message from the UK column to
10:44
our audience wherever you are in UK or the States
10:47
or worldwide, the danger that we face is deliberate political
10:53
policy which is attacking the members of individual nation states
10:59
and members of individual communities, and until that issue is
11:04
dealt with, we are not going to solve problems of migration.
11:08
This is an absolutely key point. I'm being pretty forceful
11:12
about this today because too many people want to simply
11:15
focus on the number of people in the country and
11:18
the type of people in the country and say that
11:21
is the cause. That is the cause of the problem.
11:24
This is not the case. We have to look at
11:27
who is causing the problem. Let's listen to somebody else
11:30
stir the pot to help get this tension and aggression
11:35
in the country to increase.
11:40
Speaker 4: Why you believe anti Zionism is anti Semitism.
11:45
Speaker 5: See, it's obvious that in all of history, anti Semitism
11:49
has been a shape shifting virus. Sometimes people hated the
11:52
Jews for their race, sometimes they hated them for their religion.
11:56
In this era and people are the only permissible way
11:59
to hate the Jews hate them for having a state.
12:01
And as I mentioned in the debate, this absolute obsession
12:06
with the single Jewish state in the world, This way
12:10
in which people who never turned out on the streets
12:12
when Bashah Alasad was killing six times a number of
12:15
people who've died in every war involving Israel since nineteen
12:18
forty eight when the Arab armies advanced. If you didn't
12:20
come out on the streets when Bash al Assad killed
12:23
six times that number of people in a decade, but
12:26
you did turn out to attack Israel after October the seventh,
12:29
you're an anti semi.
12:33
Speaker 2: So this man Calle, an eminent journalist, sits in the
12:36
country and he's telling people in the country that we
12:39
daren't criticize a foreign country that at the moment is
12:43
embroiled in some pretty unpleasant violence and wars in the
12:47
Middle East. We mustn't criticize it, or he will accuse
12:52
us of being anti Semitic. So this is a direct
12:55
attack on free speech and what people can think simply
12:59
on the sist that, according to mister Murray, we mustn't
13:04
dare criticize the government of Israel. So what else is
13:08
in his head? Let's have a listen to how he
13:11
would deal with the so called immigration problem.
13:17
Speaker 6: But clearly they've lost control of the streets. Now is
13:21
it time to send in the army at some point?
13:23
Probably yes, But if the army will not be sent in,
13:26
then the public will have to go in and the
13:28
public will have to sort this out themselves, and it.
13:31
Speaker 4: Will be very, very brutal. I don't want them to
13:34
live here. I don't want them here. They came under
13:38
false pretenses, many of them came illegally and continue to
13:42
come illegally, and we don't want them here. And I'm
13:46
perfectly willing to say that because it needs to be said.
13:50
Speaker 6: If I hated Australia, hated the Australian people, hated Australian history,
13:56
hated the Australian way of life, broke into the country illegally,
13:59
and my time trying to undermine Australia.
14:02
Speaker 4: Why should I be in Australia? Why what would I've
14:06
brought the country? What benefit?
14:08
Speaker 6: What moral benefit, what financial benefit, what social benefit?
14:12
Speaker 4: The answer is you'd have brought no benefit.
14:17
Speaker 6: So why just hope that those people are not in
14:21
large enough numbers and keep your fingers crossed and put
14:24
it off for another day. I think we have to
14:27
start saying very clearly, if you don't like it here,
14:31
go and if you don't like it here and you
14:35
intend to make it worse, we will make you go.
14:40
We stripped citizenship from ISIS members, members of ISIS who,
14:45
even if they had British citizenship, we strip their passports.
14:49
We need to start doing the same thing with Hamaz.
14:52
We have Hamas leaders in the UK, Hamas members in
14:55
the UK. I am calling on the Foreign Sectory, the
14:58
Home Secretary that don't for public prosecutions, Attorney General, Prime
15:02
Minister and others to start doing this, to start taking
15:05
the passports away and deporting people who support him. As
15:09
in the UK, is there a willpower of listen?
15:13
Speaker 7: I think that as the situation is changing, actually, I
15:17
think there are things now able to be discussed and
15:21
suggested which we're not able to be suggested or discussed
15:24
even a few years ago.
15:27
Speaker 2: Well, I've got to say, I find the supercilious arrogance
15:30
of this man totally breathtaking. But when he's talking about
15:33
a policy to kick out every immigrant in the country,
15:37
whose policy is his? Is it Israel? Is this the
15:41
deep state? Is this a political agenda for the Labor
15:45
Party or the Conservatives. The problem we have to deal
15:49
with is who created the immigration problem, and once we
15:53
have focused on that, we can start to see how
15:56
we can correct what's actually happening in this country. I'm
16:00
going to say to the audience, think about the issues,
16:04
think about who the real enemy is. Is it the
16:07
people invited into the country or is it the traitors
16:11
who opened the door and without any consultation to the
16:14
wider public of UK, allowed hundreds of thousands, millions of
16:20
people into the country. So I'm going to leave our
16:23
audience to reflect on that. But a little later in
16:25
the news I'm going to be talking about j. Michael
16:29
Waller see, a former CIA operative, talking about the maneuverings
16:34
of the deep state in the US in order to
16:37
interfere with freedoms of speech and political policy. Serious stuff, Charles,
16:45
and you're going to have a look here at the
16:47
rules coming into clamp down even further on anybody who
16:51
stands up to challenge what's actually what's actually happening in UK.
16:55
Speaker 1: Absolutely, thank you, Bian.
16:57
Speaker 5: Yes.
16:58
Speaker 1: In the last few weeks we've spoken about the extension
17:01
really the definition of terrorism and what it may be
17:06
seen to be encompassing, not forgetting, of course, that the
17:09
original definition was really to do with the act of government.
17:13
So that's what we'll return to probably in a few minutes.
17:16
But last week I spoke about Schedule seven of the
17:19
Terrorism Act and I'd just like to make a clarification
17:22
because I spoke specifically about the right to silence, which
17:25
does exist under the Terrorism Act two thousand, but not
17:29
specifically under Schedule seven. And just as a demonstration of
17:34
the breadth and the willingness of the UK column audience
17:37
to help out and get involved, I've spoken to a
17:41
former police officer with accreditation on the Schedule seven side
17:46
of things, which applies explicitly to ports within the UK,
17:50
and it was a fascinating and enlightening conversation. But essentially
17:53
the bottom line is that if you are taken to
17:56
one side under Schedule seven, then you are compelled to
18:00
answer any question put to you. So I've got a
18:03
slide to demonstrate the particular part of the Act here.
18:07
So a person who's questioned under paragraph two or three
18:09
to or three basically meaning that if you're in within
18:11
the confines of a port, then you must give the
18:14
examining officer any information in his possession which the officer requests.
18:18
So you may also be asked for a passport or
18:20
a photograph or an identity document and also to declare
18:24
whether you have any documents, but also to give the
18:27
examining examining officer on request any document which he has
18:31
with him and which is of a kind specified by
18:34
the officer. So just again a further recap as to
18:37
how somebody may be stopped under Schedule seven, and effectively
18:42
this applies, as I say, to ports. But the specific
18:45
point here is that it's to determine whether or not
18:47
that person is or has been concerned with the commission
18:51
preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism. But of course
18:55
it's fairly wide nests and there doesn't need to be
18:56
any specific element of suspicion determine that. Now, statistically, we
19:02
look at the Home Office provision from June of this year,
19:07
and it's enlightening to see that of the two and
19:12
a half thousand people that were pulled to one side
19:15
under Schedule seven, at least fifty nine percent of those
19:18
fifteen hundred and eighty out of that two hundred and
19:21
sorry two thousand, six hundred and eighty nine examinations had
19:24
biometric identifiers taken. Now, it's easy to see how this
19:29
could be exploited, and I'm calling this biometric harvesting. So
19:33
what they mean by that biometric identifyer includes photographs, fingerprints,
19:38
and DNA samples, and last week I talked about this
19:41
being a fishing expedition due to the fact that to
19:44
question or examine somebody under Schedule seven doesn't require any
19:47
specific intelligence. But the two and a half thousand figure
19:52
from the year to March of this year was a
19:55
ninety six percent decrease since the data was first collected
19:58
in twenty twelve, where a staggering sixty three nine hundred
20:02
and two people were examined under Schedule seven. But still
20:06
the Home Office has the gal to say that there
20:08
are a range of safeguards and measures in place to
20:11
ensure appropriate use of the powers, but just to demonstrate
20:15
how public scrutiny may affect itself in a positive sense.
20:19
Due to the increase in public scrutiny of the powers,
20:22
there has been well what they're calling a more targeted approach. Essentially,
20:26
they've not been able to get away with what they
20:27
were doing previously, which was just to pull anybody aside.
20:30
And as I say, with the biometric harvesting in mind,
20:33
this is very significant, but also it increased the rate
20:36
of detention proportionally up to sixty five percent, which has
20:39
resulted in detention now Kirst Armer spoke last week about
20:43
police using existing powers and of course the unchecked rollout
20:47
of facial recognition technology. Now this is a slide from Liberty,
20:53
which had what they're describing as a groundbreaking victory on
20:57
a human rights basis to do with privacy back in
20:59
twenty but that's largely been completely forgotten and ignored, and
21:03
of course police have more and more powers to use
21:07
facial recognition and there's very little that seems to have
21:10
been done to check it. So we'll just look at
21:12
some of the potential pitfalls from the National Cyber Security Center.
21:17
It's actually going back some years. This was written in
21:18
twenty nineteen, but of course it tells us how biometrics
21:22
are attacked. The government are constantly insisting these technological advancements
21:26
and platforms are invulnerable and they will keep us safe
21:29
and secure. But the truth is always or almost always
21:32
the opposite. So under biometric vulnerability they say that all
21:37
modalities are vulnerable, and the points at which the biometric
21:41
system can be attacked and how they can be implemented
21:45
are shown. Most obviously, and what's called a presentation attack,
21:48
which is basically an impostor using what's called an artifact
21:51
to mimic an individual who has been enrolled in the system.
21:55
So when we think back to what Schedule seven enables
21:57
the collection of such a data. So if a finger
22:00
print of an enrolled individual is captured, or indeed, for
22:03
facial recognition, a portrait, then that could be used to
22:07
create an artifact. And we hear about the cooperation of
22:10
the individual, Well, of course they're compelled to cooperate, and
22:14
then without such cooperation it can be much more challenging
22:18
to obtain this. So the point of this is really
22:21
just to state that in using such legislation, and Starmull
22:26
was very clear that he wanted to rather than create
22:29
new laws, he wanted to use existing capabilities. And we
22:33
see here how terrorism, in particular the Terrorism Act in
22:36
Schedule seven, is just another way in which biometric data
22:40
is taken into a system. And of course the other
22:43
question is that the control of this who is it
22:46
that's designed these particular systems. Are they from within or
22:50
without of this country? And indeed where does the data go?
22:55
That's one side of it, because the other is quite rightly,
22:57
as they point out here, the vulnerability of it to
23:01
anybody that's able to hack into any of these things.
23:03
So it's not difficult to see how such data could
23:07
be used against somebody that's been taken as eye for
23:11
a Schedule seven examination.
23:14
Speaker 2: Charles, thank you for that. So let's stress the situation
23:18
here as the violence goes up in UK, as people
23:22
turn on each other, so the government can bring in
23:25
more and more draconian controls which ultimately are targeted each
23:31
and every man, woman and child in this country. This
23:34
is a beliee state. It's in power. It's now starting
23:39
to show itself for what it really is. And the
23:42
more people engage in protest against each other in communities
23:46
or violence on the streets, the more this agenda is
23:50
going to come in. So we're going to once again
23:52
say immigration is a problem. Of course, should mass immigration
23:57
be stopped, absolutely by This has to be stopped by
24:01
targeting the root cause of the problem, which is political doctrine.
24:06
Farage has mentioned the word Marxism. I would say a
24:10
variant of Marxism which has been unleashed through both the
24:14
major political parties, both Labor and Conservatives, and people need
24:19
to see this danger because if they focus on attacking
24:25
and getting annoyed with other members of the community, of
24:28
what color, what race, Then they are going to miss
24:32
the point of what's really coming. This is very, very dangerous.
24:36
And of course the government, whether Conservative or Labor, is
24:39
the same government which is happy to prosecute unlawful wars overseas,
24:46
be it in Ukraine or in the Middle East. So Vanessa,
24:50
let's well, commuty uk column and I'm going to say,
24:54
have you got any good news for the Middle East?
24:56
I rather fear that the news is getting work.
25:00
Speaker 8: Yes, I mean, you know, things are escalating. We were
25:07
talking before I came on about the fact that here
25:11
in Syria, particularly where we've been under an economic blockade
25:16
that has basically stagnated society probably since twenty eighteen until now.
25:24
Any kind of break in that stagnation is relatively welcome
25:29
in a sense that it means things will eventually move
25:33
forward despite the interim escalation violence and pain. And of
25:39
course I also want to add Brian that immigration, yes,
25:43
it's a problem, but when you mentioned the causes, of course,
25:47
for me, the primary cause is our government's near colonialist
25:53
agendas and foreign policy. In other words, the bombing and
25:57
the pillaging of the global cell, including West Asia, including
26:03
Latin American countries, but particularly West Asia, so I think,
26:08
you know, we should probably talk about that a little
26:11
bit more in extra There's an awful lot going on
26:15
in the region, so I've sort of tried to condense
26:19
it as much as I can, so I'll sort of
26:22
whizz through the facts and I'm sure we can extrapolate
26:26
a bit in extra. So last week we talked about
26:30
the cause of the escalation, which is basically the double
26:34
assassination of Hezbollah senior commander Ishmael Hanyir, who was the
26:43
leader of the Hamas organization and also the chief negotiator
26:49
with Israel over the release of the hostages in Gaza
26:54
and any potential cease fires. So that clearly shows how
26:58
interested Israel is bringing forth peace in Palestine. And then
27:06
of course there was the US strike against the Iraqi
27:09
PMF or PMU, the Popular Mobilization Forces that actually comprise
27:13
part of the Iraqi official military. Now there has already
27:20
been a degree of response from the resistance access itself.
27:25
Several US personnel were injured in the Iraq Final Acid
27:30
Air Base attack, which of course you'll remember was also
27:32
attacked after the assassination of custom Solomoni and Abumadi Mohandes
27:41
in twenty twenty under the Trump administration. At the same time,
27:45
and again this is part of the regional maneuvers, US
27:50
troops have actually returned to Kirkuk in Iraq. On the
27:55
next slide, these burn for the first time in Sin
28:00
twenty twenty. Reports are saying that basically they're there to
28:04
occupy the oil rich area of Kirkuk under the pretext
28:09
of fighting ISIS. And yet again that hypocrisy is demonstrated
28:14
by the next slide, where in reality, the Kurdish countries
28:19
who are basically controlled by Israel and the United States
28:24
in northeast Syria, and there they are of course occupying
28:27
and trading Syrian resources, including Surian oil, released ISIS fighters,
28:35
which is nothing more than another US proxy in the region,
28:39
and therefore Iraq is increasing its security on the Syrian
28:43
Iraarqi border. Scent com Chief Michael Carilla is in Israel
28:49
for preparations against Iran and Hasbul retaliation, and of course
28:55
that has included the movement of ships and troop carriers
28:59
into the region. And the following map is just one
29:03
of many that I found on social media. I can't
29:07
sort of vouch for its accuracy, but it does at
29:10
least demonstrate the hardware that the United States is moving
29:15
into the area, both into the Red Sea, into the
29:18
Gulf of Oman, into the Mediterranean, and of course the
29:22
UK has its basis on Cyprus, from which has been
29:27
ferried multiple weapons, and also NATO troops into northern Lebanon
29:33
under the pretext of being able to evacuate citizens in
29:38
the case of war. I'll leave the audience to interpret
29:43
that as they wish. A very recent interview by Judge
29:49
Napolitana with Alistair Crook, who's a former British diplomat who
29:54
knows the region extremely well, worked in Israel, worked in
29:58
the Middle East. Now he makes the point that the US,
30:03
while it denies any for knowledge of the assassination of
30:08
Ismael Hanyir in Tehran, he makes the point that however,
30:15
the ships that are now in for example, the Minion
30:18
in the Red Seed, that didn't happen overnight. This was
30:21
planned and according to him, from the time or even
30:25
be before Natanyahu went to the State. So let's just
30:31
have a quick listen of what he has to say.
30:34
Speaker 9: But again, you know, it's it's telling. I mean, you know,
30:39
you can't just supply these ships to order. I mean
30:42
they must have been given their orders and prepared and
30:45
read it sometime before. Let me out who gave his
30:48
speech all these positions and place, and the head of
30:52
Sentcom is now sitting in the Middle East trying to
30:57
bring together, if you like, an alliance Arab air forces
31:02
that will help the Americans to shoot down the Uranian missiles.
31:07
Speaker 8: Again, there have also been concerted efforts not only by
31:16
sort of what I would describe as US emissaries, including
31:19
Jordan that made an unprecedented visit to Tehran to try
31:24
and persuade the Iranians not to respond to the assassination
31:29
of Ismail Hanir in Tehran. It's worth remembering, of course,
31:34
that Jordan was responsible for the air defense for Israel
31:39
in the previous Iranian retaliation after Israel bonded the embassy
31:44
or the consulate in Damascus. And also worth noting that
31:48
earlier this year it had been discussed that NATO was
31:54
to open an office in Jordan in its first official
31:58
representation in the Least, which is another major move. And
32:02
again I just want to bring in Alastair Kurk where
32:07
he talks about the fact that Israel should deal with
32:09
the situation on their own.
32:12
Speaker 9: The G seven pleading with Iran. Oh, look, you know
32:16
you mustn't do anything. You've got to restrain yourself. They
32:20
never turn around and say to Israel, you ought to
32:23
restrain yourself. You know it's not Iran that provokeders. You
32:28
did this double assassination precisely into provoking a response from Iran.
32:35
So you ought to be sorting it out, not asking
32:37
all the rest of the world west in America to
32:40
come and assist us and help you with what you
32:44
did it you you, you know you made your bed,
32:47
you should lie in it.
32:51
Speaker 8: Totally agree. But of course Israel is incapable of defending
32:55
itself without the help of the US and the UK
32:57
and its regional allies. There have been a number of
33:01
theories circulating about what the response from the resistance access
33:05
will be. This is just one of them. A calculated
33:08
simultaneous strike on Israel. And if we have a quick
33:10
look at the text of the article, which is in
33:15
the cradle on the next slide, please try.
33:20
Speaker 2: Okay, thank you, So they're saying, sorry, there's a really
33:26
annoying fly.
33:28
Speaker 8: Retaliation is all but certain and could happen within hours.
33:31
According to senior US officials, I think this report came
33:34
out a couple of days ago, and of course part
33:38
of the response is this psychological warfare, Israel not knowing
33:43
when the attack will come, in the panic and confusion
33:47
among the settlers and the occupied territories. So basically what
33:52
they're saying Hasbilla General Secretary Hassan Nasrulla has promised a
33:56
painful yet calculated blow to tell Aviv and so on.
34:00
So so basically, this report is saying that the retaliation
34:04
will be a combined retaliation. Other reports are saying no,
34:08
it will be if you like, a tiered retaliation. So again,
34:12
let's just listen to what Alistair Krook has to say
34:16
about the preparation that Iran is making for the retaliation.
34:21
Speaker 9: First of all, there's going to be no one warning. Secondly,
34:25
you know, they're not going to be slow old drones.
34:27
They're going to be high performance, smart missiles, and they're
34:31
going to come from Iran. They're going to come from Hezbola,
34:36
Odd mass and they are going to come from the houses,
34:39
and they are going to come from Iraq. I believe
34:43
missiles have been moved, have been prepositioned. This is why
34:46
we've been in a sort of period of some delay.
34:52
Speaker 8: And last night said Nasrulla, the secretary General of Hezbollah,
34:57
gave an hour long or a bit more speech and
35:01
he basically said our response will come regardless of the consequences. So,
35:05
in other words, what the resistance access is now saying,
35:08
they understand that the war will escalate with this retaliation,
35:14
but they can't keep absorbing Israel's provocations. What is Israeli
35:20
media saying to some degree, I think it's trying to
35:23
be a little bit hopeful on this. So on the
35:26
next slide, basically this was taken from I think it's
35:29
the times of Israel. If we can just move forward
35:32
to the next flow, Iran may rethink Israel attacks plans
35:36
amid intense US diplomatic efforts. There were other reports also
35:42
saying that increased US presence in the area is going
35:46
to deter Iran. I think that's highly unlikely. There has
35:51
also been a lot of social media chatter about apparently
35:55
Russia supplying weapons in a steady flow to Iran in
35:59
the last days. That's actually been denied by high level
36:04
people in Iran itself. But of course there is a
36:08
defense agreement between Russia and Iran, and that's been demonstrated
36:13
by Choigo's visit in the last few days, and this
36:17
is actually part of the retaliation. Hamas has announced Yahya
36:23
al Sinwar the new Politburo chief, so to replace Ishmail Hanie. Now,
36:27
one of the reasons that Israel probably assassinated Ismail Hanie
36:32
was that they wanted Khaled Michal, who was formerly the
36:36
external leader of Hamas, to replace him. Why because Khaled
36:40
Michelle is let's say, at least collaborative with the Zionist entity,
36:48
and so therefore the fact that actually Hamas is elected
36:51
one of the more hardline leaders actually present with the
36:55
military resistance factions in Gaza and probably at the top
37:00
of the Israeli assassination list means basically that's sending a
37:06
very strong message to Israel of the resistance unity not
37:11
only in Palestine but also regionally.
37:17
Speaker 2: Vanessa, what can we say. It's really terrible to listen
37:21
your excellent reports, but it's really tough to listen to
37:24
it because the violence is just escalating and escalating. I'm
37:28
going to say to our audience, if the UK government
37:31
under Keir Starmer, same under the Conservatives, can't call for
37:35
peace in the Middle East or peace in Ukraine. I'm
37:38
going to suggest it's very unlikely they are going to
37:41
call for peace in this country because the fog of
37:44
war and violence allows them to spread their power and
37:49
influence as they wish without the public really being able
37:53
to see what's going on. So we've got to be
37:55
very vigilant about this. Now, can we say to the audience,
37:59
if you like what the UK column is doing, then
38:01
please do support us. It's that five pounds a month
38:05
membership which keeps us going. We want to grow and expand,
38:08
and if you'd like to help us do that and
38:11
you're not a member, please join and subscribe. Pass out
38:16
the material. We are still not up on Facebook. This
38:19
is a form of censorship, but communication doesn't seem to work.
38:23
But please do share our material and also you can
38:27
help us by making a purchase from the shop. And
38:30
the shop is not just for members. Anybody can come
38:33
onto the website and make a purchase and help us
38:37
continue doing what we're doing. I'm also going to say
38:40
if you haven't, if you're watching our news today and
38:43
you haven't already got a copy of your Life in
38:46
their hands, the Agenda twenty one booklet, please do consider
38:50
buying one because we've had so many people tell us
38:53
how really excellent it is. We are going to do
38:56
more of these booklets on different subjects. The next one
38:59
in the pipeline is on the King himself, the Green King,
39:03
and we are working to be able to get these
39:05
booklets sent over the seas. Now on the website is
39:10
this interview, which is Diane mccaddy interviewing Craig Houston, and
39:15
they're talking about Scottish politics, so particularly if you're north
39:19
of the border, you might be interested in that one.
39:22
And then this Thursday at one o'clock we've got Clive
39:25
Karl talking to Nikita's Stark about matters to do with
39:29
health and in particular pregnancy and birth. So health and
39:34
important issue for all of us. Have a look at that,
39:37
and I think this is for you John.
39:38
Speaker 1: Yeah. We've got just a reminder that the Died Suddenly
39:41
Exhibition art exhibition in London, which will take place in November,
39:45
is being run by Jake Fern. So it's concerning the
39:49
excess deaths that we've experienced over the last few years.
39:51
And if that's something you're interested in supporting or indeed
39:55
providing information for, then please get in touch with Jake
39:57
Fern Jake H Fern at your dot co dot UK.
40:02
And then also coming up next month September, the sixth
40:05
and the seventh of September, the Attack on Food and
40:08
Farmer's Symposium being hosted by Children's Health Defense with some
40:13
excellent speakers at HD dot TV Forward Slash Events, So
40:17
do take a look at that because of course it
40:20
is such a critical area of being attacked and to
40:23
be able to look after our own lives.
40:25
Speaker 2: Okay, thank you for that one. Well, we've also got
40:29
the Freedom Music at twenty twenty four festival that's coming
40:33
up the twenty third to twenty sixth of August Hope, Sussex.
40:38
Katie Joe leading that one, but some really good music,
40:42
so four day family event and you can find that
40:44
online for more details. Also a reminder of the UK
40:49
Columns on location events at Bristol venue still to be
40:53
announced that I can assure you it's a quality venue
40:57
and we'll also be announcing some of the speakers in
41:01
the next few days, so stay posted for that. And
41:05
also it gives us pleasure to say to people, yes
41:08
there's peaceful protest planned and this is Wednesday, the fourth
41:12
of September at twelve o'clock in Parliament Square, sleepwalking into
41:16
a dictatorship. I couldn't agree more. So, let's peacefully and
41:21
lawfully unite against the selected, not elected, tyrannical warmongering government.
41:28
Bit of a mouthful there, but the sentiment is absolutely correct.
41:32
Now I'm going to come on to a very interesting person,
41:37
J Michael Waller. I did another interview with this man yesterday.
41:43
He's a former CIA operative and he's a counterinsurgency expert.
41:50
He was talking about what has been going on in
41:54
protests in America, and let's just have a listen to
41:58
this little two minute clip and then I explain more
42:01
as to what was in the interview itself.
42:05
Speaker 10: And then you had agents provocateurs within the crowd. So
42:08
as in any good crowd, if you want to create
42:10
a good impression and you're organized for it, you'll have
42:12
people dispersed in a diamond shaped pattern, so they look
42:18
like they're normal and they're spontaneous, but they're all issuing
42:21
the same chance, and then they get the rest of
42:23
the crowd to issue the same slogans and chance. So
42:26
I could detect that crowd pattern as well as agents provocateurs.
42:29
But they weren't just saying say, patriotic slogans or pro
42:34
Trump slogans. They were saying really militant, provocative slogans to
42:39
get people all riled up, so you could tell that
42:41
those were the provocateurs. And then they were trying to
42:44
lead ordinary people in up toward the capital to go
42:47
in and break the law and commit acts of violence.
42:50
Speaker 2: Right, So, without outputting words in your mouth, Mike, these
42:56
four groups, what were they? Are they sort of accidental provocateurs?
43:04
I have to use that expression coming from smaller groups
43:08
who were better organized and wanted to take control. Or
43:12
do you think that the nature of the four groups
43:15
you identified tends to suggest there was a bigger, more professional,
43:21
controlling power that was targeting that crowd as a whole.
43:27
Speaker 10: It seemed at the time, but it especially seems so
43:30
in retrospect that there was a larger controlling power that
43:36
had its own people create position, but also had others
43:41
who it was able to exploit, For example, the oathkeepers.
43:46
In that article, I referred to a column of men
43:49
dressed in tactical gear coming through in one single regimented march,
43:54
and some of them had punish your skull patches on
43:58
them as a unit identifier. Those were the Oathkeepers, and
44:02
I had heard that at the time from others in
44:04
the crowd, but I didn't put the name in the
44:06
article because I didn't want to be since it's an organization.
44:09
I didn't want to defame an organization unless I knew
44:12
for a fact that it was the Oathkeepers. But indeed,
44:15
looking back at it now, it was, and some of
44:17
them were tried and convicted. So that's an organized conservative
44:25
and right wing militia type group. So it's a legal organization.
44:30
But what we later found was that the Oathkeeper leadership
44:35
were FBI informants. So in this case, you have the
44:40
FBI had penetrated and compromised the leadership of this group
44:44
that attacked the United States capital, knowing in advance that
44:48
it would do so, and no attempt was made to
44:52
stop them from doing so, and indeed every attempt was
44:55
made to ensure that they succeeded. So the FBI could
44:59
have shut this down down in a moment had it
45:01
wanted to, and for some reason the decision was made
45:05
not to do it. That leads to the question why.
45:10
Speaker 3: Exactly if.
45:13
Speaker 2: Well exactly that is the key question. So we're asking
45:17
the question why. What's your answer to who and why?
45:24
Speaker 10: I don't know why. I have opinions about why, but
45:27
really why would the FBI do this?
45:33
Speaker 2: So Michael Waller getting into the detail. There a manipulation
45:36
of the capital riots in America in twenty twenty one
45:42
all around obviously Trump at the time. But what he's
45:45
talking about is government agencies, including the security agencies, manipulating
45:51
the protests in order to turn it violent and also
45:55
to entrap people into committing crimes that they wouldn't wouldn't
46:00
automatically do. Are the same policies being used here in UK?
46:05
In my mind, absolutely yes, and we need to watch
46:09
out for what's happening. But he was also warning about
46:13
what he calls the DEI agenda in the security services
46:17
as in America. If we can just put this slide
46:20
up on screen please, And so what is he talking
46:23
about here that failures the security services and the FBI
46:28
itself as a result of essentially woke agendas being put
46:32
in place and the current acting head of the agency
46:37
at the moment having to defend the agency against criticism
46:41
that it's been this new agenda which has actually undermined
46:45
the ability of the departments to function and indeed protect
46:50
Trump at the rally. This is just pop This next
46:55
one on screen, This is just an image from an
46:57
article that Michael Waller wrote about what happened at the
47:01
Capital Hill attack. And also he's been giving elections about
47:08
the political weaponization of the CIA. This is happening in America,
47:12
it's happening in UK as well. I'm going to say
47:15
that the full interview talking about essentially the subversion of
47:20
our Western democratic states and the security services. This interview
47:25
will go out next Tuesday at one pm and the
47:30
key topics there are Trump assassination, attempt DEI in the
47:35
Secret Services, and more detail about the manipulation of the
47:39
Capital riots in twenty one. So oppressive forces acting in America, Charles,
47:47
You've got more here on what's planned for us in UK.
47:50
Speaker 1: Absolutely, yes, I mean I have heard earlier to what
47:53
Kirstahmer said about using existing police powers, and we constantly
47:58
hear the phrase people are going to face the full
48:00
force of the law. Now what exactly does that mean,
48:04
who's saying it and is there really any weight to it?
48:08
So we just have a quick look at a tweet
48:10
sent out by Diana Johnson. Here we go, retweeting the
48:13
Home Office prison sentences for rioting, violent disorder, inciting racial
48:18
hatred and criminal damage. Now this might seem a little
48:22
bit petty, but since so much government business in the
48:25
field of communications is put onto Twitter, I think looking
48:28
at her Twitter profile bears certain mount of scrutinies. She's
48:33
got there in her bio the Ukrainian flag a rainbow,
48:37
which I'm fairly sure means something other than she just
48:40
likes rainbows. But she goes on as well as saying
48:43
that she's the Policing Minister, she likes Yorkshire tea, cake,
48:46
crime novels, black labradors and the color red. So are
48:50
we really to take such a person seriously?
48:54
Speaker 6: Now?
48:54
Speaker 1: Another Twitter engagement from this is Heidi Alexander, the Justice Minister,
48:59
saying all elements of the criminal justice system stand ready.
49:03
But again do they really? Because of course the Prison
49:06
Service have been reporting for some time that they are
49:09
effectively completely overwhelmed, and we talked about measures to try
49:13
and ease this letting out prisoners. We've just heard reference
49:17
to actually by Nigel Ferrage, former RIF Weathersfield, and this
49:22
is the site which is currently used for a Sylum speaker.
49:24
So we'll just have a quick look at this the
49:26
Special Development Order that enabled the Home Office to be
49:29
able to change the use from mod property to Home
49:33
Office property. But just to draw your attention to the
49:36
fact that some of the documents have not been produced
49:38
for security reasons. We have to work off what has
49:40
been and we've got a fact sheet here. Why do
49:43
we need large sites? And note the use of the
49:46
passive tense. The number of people arriving in the UK
49:49
who require accommodation has reached record levels and has put
49:52
our asylum system under incredible strain, as though the Home
49:56
Office could have absolutely no way in which to a
50:00
affect such strain or record levels. Also, I point out
50:05
that it's costing eight million pounds a day. We go
50:08
on to a little bit of site background and again
50:12
interesting in the light of the current climate with defense
50:14
that it's surplus to defense requirements, telling of course in itself,
50:19
and then why are they using the site well at
50:21
the moment to support asylum seekers who would otherwise be destitute.
50:25
So interesting again to highlight the discrepancy that the Home
50:29
Office has a duty apparently to prevent asylum seekers becoming destitute,
50:33
but not necessarily Native British people who are at risk
50:38
of homelessness. So that's sort of one side of it.
50:41
But the main point here is that the speed with
50:43
which the Home Office was able to requisition the area
50:45
in order to repurpose it for asylum seekers is why
50:48
the Telegraph article suggests that it could actually be used
50:51
as a detention center or indeed other properties that are
50:54
becoming available, but as part of the defense of state
50:57
or elsewhere. Now other measures that they have at their
51:01
disposal leads us into what I'm going to refer to
51:04
as pre crime. I spoke last week about the Serious
51:08
Violence Reduction Order here to do with knife crime, and
51:11
effectively the situation is such, based on previous criminal activity
51:18
or indeed involvement with people who have undertaken criminal activity
51:23
in relation to knife crime, you may have imposed upon
51:26
you an order which means that you are either forbidden
51:29
from doing things or mandated to do certain things, and
51:33
it means you can be searched without suspicion. Now, this
51:35
is one of a raft of powers that police have
51:38
at their disposal. They're not new powers. As the Prime
51:41
Minister says, he wants to continue to use existing powers,
51:45
but of course it's very easy to forget just because
51:47
legislation hasn't yet necessarily had much use that it isn't
51:50
there lurking in the background. So this is just a
51:52
selection serious disruption prevention orders, the violent offender order, criminal
51:57
behavior orders, and serious crime pre orders. Now, unfortunately there's
52:01
not enough time to go into exactly what form these
52:04
all take. But as I say, the point of calling
52:07
it pre crime is that what they're doing is rather
52:10
than where a custodial sentence would effectively white slate clean
52:15
because the debt to society has been paid, these are
52:18
talking about actions in which we're imagining that somebody is
52:22
going to do something, carry out a future action based
52:25
on their past behavior. The other thing I should refer to,
52:28
because we've concentrated on his case for the grace both
52:31
at the earlier bit of this year is that of
52:33
the political prisoner Sam Melia, who is in HMP Hull,
52:36
and it's worth saying that I had a conversation with
52:38
his wife Laura yesterday and to talk about the manipulation
52:42
of statistics. Yes, indeed there may be space in the prisons,
52:45
but from HMP Hull sixteen people were taken in recently
52:50
as a result of violence disorder, which meant six people
52:53
being released due to the governor's discretion. Sam of course
52:56
himself being a political prisoner. Again, they're at the governor
53:00
discretion is not going to be released. So again very
53:04
interesting to note that discrepancy. But in terms of other measures,
53:08
the other person I'd like to bring in now is
53:10
Lord Walney, who you will consider in your mind because
53:14
I've spoken about him a lot. He's advising the government
53:17
on countering extremism and this is what he said to
53:20
Times Radio recently about how to deal with violent disorder.
53:26
Speaker 11: I think I think the British public will will back
53:28
further action from ministers in this emergency to get things
53:33
under control. I think we should cast our mind back
53:37
to the days of that, the days of COVID, where
53:43
actually the public accepted an emergency situation during COVID and
53:50
were prepared to.
53:53
Speaker 10: Back and.
53:56
Speaker 11: Lawmakers prepared to were prepared to support the kind of
54:02
temporary measures to ensure that basically rioters were not able
54:06
to claim they well forgive me that back in COVID,
54:13
they were prepared to back measures that were needed in
54:18
that situation. I think if I think they would take
54:21
a similar approach to keeping rioters off the streets now
54:26
given the scale of damage which has been done to communities.
54:33
Speaker 1: Now, no wonder he was stumbling over his words there.
54:37
So he is in effect bringing to mind this notion
54:40
that under an emergency anything may be done, and that
54:45
is quite the prospect. But also the other thing to
54:47
consider with him is how impartial he may be regarded
54:51
as being, particularly given the ethnic tensions that sort of
54:56
underlie some of the violence in the UK at the moment.
54:59
So I'll just show you his sort of profile from
55:03
the Pinsker Center, which organizes trips for Oxford students out
55:06
to Middle East. And of course they highlight the fact
55:09
that during his time as an MP, Lord Walney served
55:11
as the chair of the Labour Friends of Israel. So
55:14
certainly not without bias. And also I have to ask
55:18
the question is he now considered an extremist? This is
55:22
the new definition which he's had some part in shaping,
55:25
and the government tells us that it's an ideology that
55:29
aims to negate or destroy the fundamental rights and freedoms
55:32
of others. And here he is suggesting lockdown again or
55:35
to undermine, overturn or replace the UK's system of sorry
55:39
liberal parliamentary democracy and democratic rights, or intentionally create a
55:44
permissive environment for others to achieve the results in one
55:48
so he is effectively setting the ball rolling, which is
55:52
exactly what we saw during the period of COVID internment.
55:55
When an idea was floated out there, it was deemed
55:58
to be completely off the charts, that nobody would go
56:00
for it, and then of course they did and look
56:03
what happened. It'd be very interesting to see how this
56:05
particularly developed over the next few weeks.
56:09
Speaker 2: More dictatorial powers. Absolutely, Yeah, Okay, well, let's bring Vanessa
56:14
back in, because despite Douglas Murray claiming that if you're
56:20
anti Zionist, you're anti Semitic, it appears that there are
56:24
people in the Jewish community who are absolutely not happy
56:28
with what's happening around them in their own country.
56:33
Speaker 8: Yeah. And I also think he should remember that the
56:37
Zionist project sold the land from Palestinians and the false pretenses,
56:44
and the nineteen forty seven mandated partition Palestine is considered illegal.
56:53
So coming back to the story that I covered last
56:57
week of the anal rape of a Palestinian prisoner by
57:04
I think it was nine Israeli military soldiers, and this
57:10
was an article in harez So in Israeli media. The
57:14
Sde Tayman doctor who saw the abused Garden detainee, said
57:19
that he couldn't believe an Israeli prison guard could do
57:23
such a thing. Basically, information obtained by Horez shows that
57:28
the garden detainee suffered from a ruptured while, a severe
57:33
injury to his anus, lung damage and broken ribs, and
57:37
he was taken to a hospital for treatment. Now, the
57:42
video that we're going to show now was actually shown
57:46
on Israeli media. It's not particularly graphics, so people don't
57:52
need to worry about that. The quality is not great,
57:56
and the translation from Hebrew to English has been done
58:01
by AI, so I can't verify it. But I've seen
58:06
a number of reports basically talking about what the video
58:09
is saying. But it shows exactly what these soldiers did
58:15
to this prisoner. The quality is not great, as I said,
58:17
so you need to kind of hear at it. So
58:21
let's play that.
58:24
Speaker 12: Late in the evening, the firing camp shook the Eemini
58:27
Hamas detainees are lying on the floor with their hands
58:30
not covered. Here is a group of reserved soldiers from
58:34
Hochman a unit is used to secure the facility.
58:38
Speaker 10: They take the terrorist here.
58:40
Speaker 12: They are here in the corner of the facility. The
58:51
photo includes documentation of the crime attributed to the reserve men,
58:54
a sodomy act among the causes of enos. Hours later,
58:58
the terrorist was taken to the hospital bleeding. His injuries
59:02
were described as complex, but the medical determination is uneclivocal.
59:07
The injuries were caused by the insertion of an.
59:09
Speaker 8: Object, so I don't really need to interpret that opinion
59:17
in Harez today the tip of the iceberg, Israel cannot
59:21
whitewash the horrific abuse of Palestinians by its soldiers. And
59:25
also bearing in mind when we talk about hostages, there
59:28
are now nine thousand estimated prisoners in Israeli jails, just
59:35
in the occupied territories, so I'm not including Raza. So
59:38
again I want to come back to Alistair Kurk and
59:41
I want to talk about this article that he's written
59:44
for Strategic Culture. I recommend everybody reads it. So he
59:48
talks about the nineteen forty eight Ergon Reborn Ogan was
59:52
actually one of the original Zionist terrorist groups that carried
59:57
out the crimes like the bombing of Hotel Camp David,
1:00:02
I think is the name. And he's talking about the
1:00:06
return to this group to ogan with the rise in
1:00:12
the far right extremism in Israel, controlled by the likes
1:00:17
of Smartrech, the Finance minister, and Ben Gavia within Natanyahu's administration.
1:00:23
And I find it very interesting what he talks about here.
1:00:26
So he's talking about internal divisions potentially leading to an
1:00:32
internal war in Israel itself. So let's just play this shortlips.
1:00:38
Speaker 9: So in a sense, what we saw there was, if
1:00:41
you like, a foretaste of Israel going back to something
1:00:45
most have thoughted that left behind in forty eight into militia.
1:00:50
The militia. It was a militia. It was vigilante militia
1:00:55
from the settlements who came down and stormed those two
1:00:59
idf and the police could do nothing to stop them,
1:01:05
and then the Knesset justified it all. So we may
1:01:09
see something of this taking place, akin to a war,
1:01:14
the members of the State of Judea descending in down
1:01:19
in order to fight the State of Israel. That's what
1:01:23
it signaled. So really a key event, hardly noticed in
1:01:29
much of the media, but really important. I think.
1:01:35
Speaker 8: Yeah, I mean, I agree with Alastair on that the
1:01:38
internal divisions in Israel are increasing every single day. And
1:01:43
then of course you've got the riots and the protests
1:01:47
about the inaction by Netanyahu's government referenced the hostages, and
1:01:52
of course the assassination of the chief negotiator for the
1:01:56
opposition or for Hamas does in view the faith that
1:02:01
NATAMIAHU wants to get the hostages released. But this is
1:02:05
also interesting. There have been major protests from the ultra
1:02:10
Orthodox Jews, the Haredi Jews in the occupied territories, who
1:02:17
are saying because of the recent law brought in by
1:02:20
the Kanasse basically stating that they will be enlisted into
1:02:25
the IDF, saying that they will die before enlistening. So
1:02:30
if we just have a quick look at the actual
1:02:33
report itself, So Israel released a statement on the sixth
1:02:37
of August condemning the storming of a military base that
1:02:41
day by ultra Orthodox Jews also known as the Hella Deem,
1:02:45
who were protesting a recent government decision to enlist them
1:02:49
into the Israeli Army. Breaking into IDF bases is a
1:02:53
grieve offensive and against I think, yeah, and against the
1:02:57
law the Israeli Army said, adding that the enlistment of
1:03:00
Foradi Jews into the military is a critical operational need
1:03:05
and we are determined to continue advancing it. Demonstrators from
1:03:09
the ultra Orthodox community stormed the Heel Hasham base in
1:03:14
Israel earlier on the sex of August during a demonstration
1:03:18
against compulsory conscription. Channel twelve News described the situation as
1:03:23
out of control, with rioters outnumbering security forces and dozens
1:03:28
breaking into the base. So you know, we are, in
1:03:32
my opinion, seeing the state of Israel imploding. So what
1:03:39
will come first? The resistance, retaliation or Israel's self immolation.
1:03:48
Speaker 2: Yes, it's serious stuff. But of course none of this
1:03:51
is being reported Vanessa, which is a great shame because
1:03:54
we're just not told alternative opinions from within the Jewish community.
1:03:59
And I believe I have mentioned to the UK column
1:04:02
audience before, I've been trying to engage with the Jewish
1:04:07
community in UK to talk about some of these issues.
1:04:10
But even Jews that want to challenge their own government
1:04:14
are frightened of speaking out. And I find this oppressive
1:04:18
fear is very nasty, it's very pernicious. We should be
1:04:23
able to speak freely about all sorts of topics, because
1:04:26
it's only by talking of the dialogue that we keep
1:04:30
peace in sight. And that's what we need, calm, peaceful
1:04:35
reflection to sort out the problems that we face at
1:04:38
the moment, and in particular the attacks. I'm just going
1:04:42
to end on this one slide. I know we've overrun
1:04:44
the news time a little bit, but I think this
1:04:46
is important. There was a video circulating on social media
1:04:51
showing a group of Muslims attacking a man at a pub,
1:04:54
and that attack was pretty outrageous and horrible. However, the
1:05:00
result of it was that people came forward from within
1:05:03
that multiethnic, multicultural community to apologize and also to say
1:05:10
not in my name. And the comment from the lady
1:05:14
who ran the local pub, involve said that most were
1:05:19
more sensible than not, And I think this is something
1:05:22
for us to reflect on. If you're being sucked into
1:05:25
the anger and the angst and the stress against another
1:05:29
group of people, you are succumbing to the psychological warfare
1:05:34
that's being unleashed against us. So stay calmed, stay peace,
1:05:37
or stay talking to the man or woman next to you,
1:05:41
because if we end up in the camps, we're not
1:05:43
going to be bothered by the color of anybody's skin
1:05:46
next to us. It will be us versus the people
1:05:49
with the key. So I'm going to end there. We're
1:05:52
going to have UK Column Extra in a few minutes
1:05:56
and we will be doing some further analysis on some
1:05:59
of these Jake, So if you're a UK called a
1:06:02
monthly member, please join us for that. Vanessa, thank you
1:06:07
very much, Charles, thank you. We'll see everybody in extra time.
1:06:11
Speaker 8: Bye bay By