Latest / The Feed & The Thread / The Feed & The Thread - March 20, 2026

Transcript

The Feed & The Thread - March 20, 2026 · The Feed & The Thread

• 0:00
  One point six million visits, and a hiring manager said it
• 0:02
  wasn't good enough. Meanwhile, some designers are
• 0:05
  arguing the next user we build for won't even be a person. So
• 0:08
  we're failing the human bar and raising the machine bar at the
• 0:11
  same time. That's today. I'm totally shocked no one is
• 0:14
  complaining about Google Stitch being a Figma killer, so, let's
• 0:17
  get into it.
• 0:22
  Welcome to The Feed and The Thread, brought to you by
• 0:24
  Chicago Camps. There's an open call for speakers for UX Camp
• 0:27
  Summer on May 30th, so now is your chance to get on stage and
• 0:30
  share your ideas! You can use our Proposal Counselor to help
• 0:32
  you get submitted today. The Feed & The Thread is available
• 0:35
  online at feed and thread dot com to submit your feeds, or
• 0:37
  download our app for all the feeds and threads delivered
• 0:40
  right to your pocket.
• 0:48
  Today's Feed lands on a sharp tension: do we design for human
• 0:52
  intuition, or for machines that don't feel anything? Great
• 0:55
  interfaces feel real because our brains predict physics before we
• 0:59
  even think. That's the argument from UX Planet in "The Physics
• 1:02
  of Great UX: Making Digital Interfaces Feel Real." The piece
• 1:06
  suggests we need tools like Lottie Creator to build active
• 1:09
  motion systems that mimic gravity and momentum. But what
• 1:12
  happens when your primary user isn't human at all? Hoang Nguyen
• 1:16
  writes about this at UX Design.cc in "Designers, your
• 1:19
  next user won't be human." This shifts the work from pixel-
• 1:23
  perfect mockups to clean, semantic data structures that AI
• 1:26
  agents can actually parse. So how do we keep these smart
• 1:29
  systems getting better over time? Caroline Glackin at
• 1:32
  Intercom argues for Kaizen in "Kaizen for the AI era: How
• 1:36
  small improvements build smarter support." She shows how
• 1:39
  frontline support reps can spot friction and feed those insights
• 1:42
  back into the AI training loop. Also publishing recently:
• 1:46
  Smashing Magazine, Codrops, and CSS-Tricks. And if you want to
• 1:49
  learn more about designing for agent users, check out Katja
• 1:53
  Forbes' new book, "Machine Customers," available where ever
• 1:56
  the finest books are sold.
• 2:05
  Here's what the community is wrestling with today. Over on
• 2:08
  r/UI_Design, folks are stuck choosing between color
• 2:11
  directions that look good but might fail accessibility checks.
• 2:15
  It forces a tough call between aesthetic preference and strict
• 2:18
  functional requirements. In r/UXDesign, an intern built a
• 2:22
  project with one point six million visits that a manager
• 2:25
  still called unhireable. That disconnect between traffic
• 2:28
  numbers and hiring criteria reveals how much we still value
• 2:31
  polished process over raw impact. Designers in
• 2:34
  r/UI_Design are finding it incredibly hard to build
• 2:37
  interfaces for code-based tools. Creating a friendly experience
• 2:40
  for a developer audience requires speaking a language
• 2:43
  that feels unnatural to most visual designers. The mood
• 2:47
  today suggests the field is questioning whether scale and
• 2:50
  intensity actually equal professional value.
• 3:00
  Chicago Camps is hosting UX Camp Summer on Saturday, May 30th.
• 3:03
  There's an open call for speakers so submit your idea
• 3:05
  today! It's an online event, so you can join from anywhere in
• 3:08
  the world! Tickets are free, thanks to the generosity of the
• 3:11
  community! If it's within your budget, you can purchase a
• 3:13
  general admission ticket for only thirteen dollars and fifty
• 3:16
  cents. Get tickets now at Chicago Camps dot org.
• 3:26
  The piece on designing for non- human users forces us to admit
• 3:29
  that pixel-perfect mockups are becoming obsolete for AI agents.
• 3:32
  Exactly, and that intern story in the thread proves we still
• 3:35
  reward the polish over the raw impact of the data structure
• 3:38
  underneath. That tension is real, but if we keep optimizing
• 3:41
  for human intuition while ignoring how machines parse
• 3:43
  semantic data, we build dead ends. I'm not sure we should
• 3:46
  drop the human element entirely, since even AI agents eventually
• 3:49
  hand off to people who need those physics-based cues. Maybe,
• 3:52
  but the shift is that our primary job is no longer making
• 3:55
  it feel real, it's making the logic clear enough for a machine
• 3:58
  to execute. So the real skill isn't learning to code, it's
• 4:01
  learning to translate human intent into clean structures
• 4:04
  that both sides can actually use. That translation layer is
• 4:07
  where the next generation of senior designers will actually
• 4:10
  earn their keep. And the teams who figure out how to value that
• 4:13
  work over just making things pretty will ship products that
• 4:16
  actually work.
• 4:19
  That's The Feed and The Thread for today. We'll catch you next
• 4:22
  time!