Latest / Daniel and Kelly’s Extraordinary Universe / Is space filled with infinite energy?
Transcript
- 0:08Speaker 1: You know, Jorge, sometimes I wish that particle physics was
- 0:11Speaker 1: more useful, more useful than creating black holes and particle
- 0:16Speaker 1: colliders to threaten the Earth. Yeah, sometimes I wish that
- 0:19Speaker 1: we could unlock the power of physics to do something
- 0:23Speaker 1: good for humanity. He could work on like renewal energies
- 0:27Speaker 1: and stuff like that. Actually, I do have some crazy
- 0:31Speaker 1: ideas about that. Yeah, how crazy are we talking about?
- 0:34Speaker 1: Very crazy? Maybe infinitely crazy? Well, I'm infinitely interested in
- 0:39Speaker 1: infinite energy. Fortunately, we only have a finite time on
- 0:43Speaker 1: today's podcast. I am or Hamming, cartoonists and the creator
- 1:01Speaker 1: of PhD comics. Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm a particle of physicist,
- 1:05Speaker 1: and I'm technically made of an infinite number of particles.
- 1:07Speaker 1: What do you mean there's an infinite amount of you?
- 1:11Speaker 1: How much did you have over Thanksgiving dinner? Is that
- 1:14Speaker 1: too much, Daniel for you to take? That's an infinity
- 1:17Speaker 1: too much for anyone. No, in this sense that we're
- 1:21Speaker 1: all made out of potentially infinite number of fluctuating particles
- 1:24Speaker 1: popping in and out of the vacuum. We're mathematically infinite.
- 1:29Speaker 1: The vacuum of space always full of surprises. I feel
- 1:33Speaker 1: like Yeah, like you never know what it's gonna pop
- 1:35Speaker 1: out or give you or hand you for Christmas. It's
- 1:38Speaker 1: infinitely surprising. So welcome to our podcast Daniel and Jorge
- 1:41Speaker 1: Explain the Universe, a production of I Heart Radio, in
- 1:43Speaker 1: which we examine the infinite with a cold eye. We
- 1:46Speaker 1: don't look away. We try to understand it. We think
- 1:49Speaker 1: about the infinity of space, we think about the infinities
- 1:52Speaker 1: in space, We think about everything there is out there
- 1:55Speaker 1: in the universe, and we talk about it in a
- 1:57Speaker 1: way that we hope makes sense to you. That's right.
- 2:00Speaker 1: We stare down the universe until it tells us what
- 2:04Speaker 1: infinite secrets it has hiding inside of its very own fabric.
- 2:09Speaker 1: That's right because there is an infinite amount of joy
- 2:12Speaker 1: in revealing the truth of the universe. Science is an
- 2:16Speaker 1: amazing project. We just find ourselves, as conscious beings in
- 2:19Speaker 1: this universe trying slowly to chip away at the truth
- 2:23Speaker 1: and figure out how does it all work? What does
- 2:25Speaker 1: it all mean? Doesn't make sense? Is it possible for
- 2:28Speaker 1: humans to make sense of it? Yeah? Because it is
- 2:30Speaker 1: a big universe and it is full of strange phenomena
- 2:33Speaker 1: phenomenon that feels really strange to our everyday experience, like,
- 2:38Speaker 1: for example, the idea of infinite things. We're not used
- 2:41Speaker 1: to infinite things on Earth were used to finite things,
- 2:44Speaker 1: things with a limit, at least that's what our parents
- 2:46Speaker 1: tell us. That's right. I still have not yet eaten
- 2:49Speaker 1: an infinite number of cookies, though it's an ongoing project.
- 2:51Speaker 1: That's right. You can't say you haven't or you won't.
- 2:54Speaker 1: That's right, give me enough time, But you're right. Infinity
- 2:57Speaker 1: is a hard thing to grapple with. It's both like
- 3:00Speaker 1: impossible to hold in your head and also like every
- 3:03Speaker 1: day it's weird to think about the universe being infinite
- 3:06Speaker 1: in extent, but it's not weird to realize that there
- 3:09Speaker 1: are an infinite number of numbers between zero and one,
- 3:13Speaker 1: for example. So it's a pretty weird thing. Yeah, And
- 3:16Speaker 1: not only could the universe be infinite, you could have
- 3:20Speaker 1: infinities inside of it. There might be an infinity of infinities, right.
- 3:25Speaker 1: It might be that everywhere around us there are infinite
- 3:28Speaker 1: particles popping in and out of the vacuum. And when
- 3:30Speaker 1: you dig down deeper into what that means about space,
- 3:33Speaker 1: it might tell you something very strange. So to be
- 3:36Speaker 1: on the podcast will be asking the question, is space
- 3:43Speaker 1: filled with infinite energy? And can I use that to
- 3:47Speaker 1: charge my iPhone? That would be pretty useful, Like a
- 3:50Speaker 1: phone that just charges if you just hold it up
- 3:52Speaker 1: in the air, that would be useful. Daniel, stop writing
- 3:54Speaker 1: papers about the fabric of reality and just get us
- 3:58Speaker 1: that air charger. All right, I'm to move from papers
- 4:01Speaker 1: to patents. That's my plan for the week. Yeah. I mean,
- 4:04Speaker 1: I know Apple has like the iPod air or iMac air.
- 4:07Speaker 1: It just makes like the the air, the iMac vacuum
- 4:12Speaker 1: you go. But I think this touches on something which
- 4:14Speaker 1: is really at the heart of what we're doing with
- 4:16Speaker 1: the whole physics project, which is trying to make sense
- 4:19Speaker 1: of the universe and then wondering is our understanding real
- 4:22Speaker 1: Like we talk about space being filled with the vacuum,
- 4:26Speaker 1: which is filled with these quantum frothing particles, But are
- 4:29Speaker 1: they really there or is that just something in our minds?
- 4:32Speaker 1: Could we do experiments to figure out if they really
- 4:35Speaker 1: are there or if these are just calculations we're doing
- 4:38Speaker 1: in our head. Yeah. So the idea is that there's
- 4:40Speaker 1: a there's a concept right in physics that the universe
- 4:44Speaker 1: is not empty it's filled with fields like quantum fields,
- 4:48Speaker 1: and these fields are not just sitting there or they're
- 4:51Speaker 1: not empty of energy. Yeah, exactly. Because these fields are quantum,
- 4:55Speaker 1: they have a special property that they can never actually
- 4:58Speaker 1: have zero energy in them. And so according to quantum physics,
- 5:03Speaker 1: all of space should be filled with an infinite number
- 5:05Speaker 1: of particles, which should correspond to a real energy, which
- 5:09Speaker 1: technically means an infinite amount of energy in every piece
- 5:13Speaker 1: of space. Yeah, and like they can't just chill, like
- 5:15Speaker 1: they can't just bottom out. They always have to have
- 5:18Speaker 1: like a little bit of like a buzz to them, right. Yeah,
- 5:21Speaker 1: that's kind of the idea, and that's sort of hard
- 5:23Speaker 1: to grapple with. But it turns out this a really
- 5:25Speaker 1: interesting experiment that studies something called the Cassimir effect, which
- 5:29Speaker 1: might be sensitive to whether these particles really are out there.
- 5:32Speaker 1: And this experiment tells us something amazing. Yeah, the Cassimir
- 5:35Speaker 1: effect is a really interesting well just the name, and
- 5:39Speaker 1: I have to say, at first, I thought it was
- 5:41Speaker 1: sort of a reference to the reins of Castimir, and
- 5:44Speaker 1: I thought, oh, that's not going to end well for
- 5:45Speaker 1: this podcast. Are We're gonna end up at the red
- 5:48Speaker 1: wedding at the end of this, I hope not be
- 5:52Speaker 1: gonna be good from Game of Thrones, but not everything
- 5:55Speaker 1: it turns out is a Game of Thrones reference. This
- 5:58Speaker 1: is actually a physics effect for dicted a long time
- 6:00Speaker 1: ago and recently observed. Yeah, it's an idea that's been
- 6:03Speaker 1: around for a long time, like over a fifty years,
- 6:07Speaker 1: seventy years, the Casimir effect. Yeah, and these are beautiful ideas,
- 6:11Speaker 1: the idea to test a crazy theory of physics by
- 6:14Speaker 1: coming up with an experiment that could actually pin it down,
- 6:16Speaker 1: that could corner nature and force it to reveal to
- 6:20Speaker 1: us what's really going on out there in space. Yeah.
- 6:23Speaker 1: So this effect is a little obscure, I think, but
- 6:26Speaker 1: it might sort of reveal that the universe is or
- 6:29Speaker 1: is not filled with infinite energy. So, as usually'll be,
- 6:32Speaker 1: were wondering how many people had even heard of this
- 6:34Speaker 1: experiment or effect, and so Daniel went out there into
- 6:38Speaker 1: the wild to the internet to ask people what is
- 6:41Speaker 1: the Casimir effect? So thanks to everybody who participated with
- 6:44Speaker 1: so much evident joy and enthusiasm. If you would like
- 6:48Speaker 1: to speculate baselessly and without reference materials on future questions
- 6:53Speaker 1: for the podcast, please write to us two questions at
- 6:56Speaker 1: Daniel and Jorge dot com. So before you listen to
- 6:58Speaker 1: these answers, think about it for a second. If so,
- 7:00Speaker 1: gonna ask you, what is the Casimir effect? Not the
- 7:03Speaker 1: range of Casimir? What would you say? Here's what people
- 7:06Speaker 1: had to say. It makes me think of something to
- 7:08Speaker 1: do with sons. So maybe sun flairs or something of
- 7:12Speaker 1: the sort. I have no idea what that could be.
- 7:16Speaker 1: I'm going to guess that Kasimir was a scientist and
- 7:21Speaker 1: he was either casually or actively observing something and noticed
- 7:27Speaker 1: an effect that perhaps had not been noticed before. To
- 7:30Speaker 1: see the customer effect, you put two metallic plates close together.
- 7:37Speaker 1: Then they move even closer together because the number of
- 7:41Speaker 1: particle anti particle or virtual particle antiparticle pairs outside the
- 7:46Speaker 1: place as greater than those between the plates. So the
- 7:51Speaker 1: particles outside exert a non zero net force on the plates,
- 7:56Speaker 1: and they moved closer together. Most named after a guy
- 7:59Speaker 1: named Kasimir. Well, do you think that means we have
- 8:02Speaker 1: no Game of Thrones fans because nobody else thought this
- 8:04Speaker 1: was the reigns of Kastimir. Maybe are fantasy fan and
- 8:08Speaker 1: physics loving audience doesn't overlap. But there were some pretty
- 8:11Speaker 1: good guesses here. I like the it was named after
- 8:13Speaker 1: a guy named Casimir. Interesting that would be normally a
- 8:19Speaker 1: good guess in physics. Yeah exactly. But also a lot
- 8:22Speaker 1: of people just didn't know what it is or had
- 8:25Speaker 1: heard of it before. It doesn't seem to have good
- 8:27Speaker 1: PR Yeah exactly. I think Cassimir and his PR team
- 8:30Speaker 1: definitely needs some like social media tips well step us
- 8:34Speaker 1: through this, Daniel. First of all, Yeah, what is this
- 8:37Speaker 1: idea that space is filled with energy? It's a really
- 8:40Speaker 1: sort of bonkers idea, but it's also totally realistic, which
- 8:44Speaker 1: is my favorite thing about physics. And to get into this,
- 8:47Speaker 1: you have to really understand how quantum physics looks at space,
- 8:52Speaker 1: like what is space? And if you're the kind of
- 8:56Speaker 1: person that thinks, well, space is nothing right, spaces, emptiness, spaces,
- 9:00Speaker 1: the gap between stuff, then remember that modern physics is
- 9:04Speaker 1: a different view of space. There's this sort of general
- 9:07Speaker 1: relativity view of space that tells us how space can
- 9:10Speaker 1: bend and twist and ripple. That's awesome, but we're gonna
- 9:13Speaker 1: put that aside today and we're gonna look at the
- 9:15Speaker 1: quantum physics view of space. The quantum physics view of
- 9:18Speaker 1: space says that space is not emptiness. Space is like
- 9:22Speaker 1: a parking lot. It has all these fields in it
- 9:24Speaker 1: which can be filled with particles or they can be empty.
- 9:28Speaker 1: So you can imagine, for example, all of the universe
- 9:31Speaker 1: being filled with an electron field, and where there are electrons,
- 9:36Speaker 1: that just means that field has a little bit of
- 9:38Speaker 1: energy in it. It's vibrating, and that corresponds to an electron.
- 9:41Speaker 1: Where there aren't electrons, than those fields are empty, they're
- 9:45Speaker 1: not vibrating as much. Yeah, this idea of space is
- 9:47Speaker 1: maybe a little bit closer to what most people think
- 9:50Speaker 1: of space before they learn about relativity. It is sort
- 9:53Speaker 1: of like a big empty warehouse, like a big empty space,
- 9:57Speaker 1: but it's filled with something. Yeah, exactly. And I think
- 10:01Speaker 1: the mental shift you need to make to understand it
- 10:04Speaker 1: from the field point of view is that you don't have,
- 10:07Speaker 1: for example, an electron moving through empty space as a particle,
- 10:11Speaker 1: just like floating through nothing. Instead, you can think of
- 10:14Speaker 1: that electron moving through space is like a wiggle on
- 10:17Speaker 1: a string. That wiggle moves along the string, but it's
- 10:20Speaker 1: really the string that's doing the wiggling. So in this case,
- 10:23Speaker 1: an electron moving through space is a vibration in the
- 10:27Speaker 1: electron field, and that vibration is passing through the field.
- 10:31Speaker 1: I always kind of think about it as like having
- 10:33Speaker 1: a giant room and then like having a giant blanket
- 10:36Speaker 1: over that would be the quantum field, and the electron
- 10:38Speaker 1: is like a little bump in the blanket that you know,
- 10:41Speaker 1: kind of moves around. That sounds pretty cozy. Your theory
- 10:44Speaker 1: of the universe doesn't sound like cold and empty. It
- 10:46Speaker 1: sounds like snuggly and a cold, rainy day. It's called
- 10:48Speaker 1: a cozy effect exactly, the quantum cozy effect, Yeah, exactly.
- 10:53Speaker 1: And so you can imagine that blanket, you know, gets
- 10:55Speaker 1: pushed up when you have a particle under it. And
- 10:57Speaker 1: the cool thing about this way to think about it
- 10:59Speaker 1: is that it's very easy to then have two particles,
- 11:01Speaker 1: because then your quantum field in that spot is now
- 11:04Speaker 1: excited a little bit more, and three particles is just
- 11:07Speaker 1: another excitation in the field. So this actually technically is
- 11:10Speaker 1: very powerful because it allows you to think about the
- 11:13Speaker 1: creation and destruction of individual quantum particles. Whereas the earlier
- 11:17Speaker 1: the old school quantum mechanics followed the path of an
- 11:20Speaker 1: individual particle, and so it was very difficult to calculate
- 11:23Speaker 1: like what happened when it was destroyed, or how do
- 11:25Speaker 1: you follow two or three particles. So the quantum field
- 11:28Speaker 1: approach is the more modern approach, partially because it's just
- 11:31Speaker 1: technically easier to like actually calculate things. Yeah, and there's
- 11:35Speaker 1: not just one field. There's like a bunch of fields
- 11:38Speaker 1: in the universe, right, Like it's not just one blanket
- 11:40Speaker 1: covering my warehouse. It's like a whole bunch of blankets
- 11:43Speaker 1: tacked together. Yeah, every place in space has a field
- 11:46Speaker 1: for every possible particle. So every point in space has
- 11:49Speaker 1: an electron field, and muan field, a cork field, you know,
- 11:52Speaker 1: electromagnetic fields for the photons. All of these different fields
- 11:56Speaker 1: in the same place. And sometimes these fields don't interact
- 12:00Speaker 1: with each other at all. Right, some of these particles
- 12:02Speaker 1: don't interact with each other, and so these fields don't
- 12:04Speaker 1: interact with each other, but sometimes they do. For example,
- 12:08Speaker 1: the electron and the photon do interact with each other, right,
- 12:11Speaker 1: electrons give off photons, So those fields are coupled together.
- 12:14Speaker 1: So it's a bunch of different fields, but some of
- 12:16Speaker 1: them interact with each other. They're tied together by these forces.
- 12:20Speaker 1: Some blankets are to sown a little bit with other blankets. Yeah, exactly.
- 12:24Speaker 1: If you make a wiggle in one, it will spread
- 12:26Speaker 1: that energy out into others, and some of them slash
- 12:28Speaker 1: back and forth. It's pretty cool. And you know, one
- 12:30Speaker 1: of the projects of particle physics is to take this
- 12:33Speaker 1: big stack of nineteen blankets we have and understand them
- 12:36Speaker 1: all is like part of one big blanket that's just
- 12:39Speaker 1: sort of like wiggling together according to one set of rules.
- 12:42Speaker 1: We're trying to unify the whole system of these different
- 12:45Speaker 1: fields and understand them in the context of like one
- 12:47Speaker 1: field that unifies them all. But that's the subject for
- 12:50Speaker 1: a whole different podcast. For today, the thing we need
- 12:52Speaker 1: to think about is what it means when these fields
- 12:55Speaker 1: are emptiest m Yeah. Now, I guess the question is
- 13:00Speaker 1: do quantum physicists think of space is separate from these fields?
- 13:04Speaker 1: Do you know what I mean, like it's space the
- 13:05Speaker 1: empty warehouse and then you put fields in it. Or
- 13:08Speaker 1: do you think of it that you can't have space
- 13:11Speaker 1: without quantum fields. You can't have space without quantum fields. Yeah, exactly.
- 13:15Speaker 1: These fields fill the whole universe. There's no place in
- 13:18Speaker 1: space where you don't have these fields. And you could
- 13:21Speaker 1: ask like does that mean that that's what space is.
- 13:24Speaker 1: I'm not sure. I mean quantum mechanics usually consider space
- 13:28Speaker 1: to be sort of like firm and absolute. It prefers
- 13:31Speaker 1: to deal with sort of flat space rather than like
- 13:33Speaker 1: the curved space or weirdly connected space of general relativity.
- 13:37Speaker 1: It is possible in some context to connect the two,
- 13:39Speaker 1: but we've never achieved like a full connection to understand
- 13:42Speaker 1: quantum mechanics and curved space altogether in all sorts of context,
- 13:46Speaker 1: that would be quantum gravity. So quantum mechanics views space
- 13:50Speaker 1: is sort of like flat and absolute, and then you
- 13:53Speaker 1: have the fields in space. But you can't have any
- 13:55Speaker 1: part of space without those fields, right, right, But you
- 13:58Speaker 1: can't have places where the field is not excited as usual, right,
- 14:03Speaker 1: that's what you call it, like empty or vacuum. Yeah,
- 14:06Speaker 1: you can have a vacuum, and vacuum sort of calls
- 14:08Speaker 1: to mind the idea of emptiness of nothingness, right, or
- 14:11Speaker 1: maybe lowest energy state. And in classical physics, like before
- 14:16Speaker 1: quantum mechanics, that meant zero. Like if you had an
- 14:19Speaker 1: electromagnetic field classically, like a hundred and fifty years ago,
- 14:23Speaker 1: back when Maxwell was doing this stuff, you could turn
- 14:25Speaker 1: it on and you could turn it off, and when
- 14:27Speaker 1: it was off, it was at zero. Quantum fields can't
- 14:31Speaker 1: actually do that. Quantum fields can't settle down to zero energy. Wow,
- 14:35Speaker 1: that's weird. What does that mean? Like, even though nothing
- 14:38Speaker 1: is there or exciting it or you know, happening there,
- 14:42Speaker 1: it still has some kind of potential or some kind
- 14:47Speaker 1: of like motion. What does that mean that it doesn't
- 14:50Speaker 1: have zero energy? That's really the heart of the question.
- 14:52Speaker 1: What does it mean? And you said, for example, nothing
- 14:54Speaker 1: is there? We don't really know if nothing is there,
- 14:57Speaker 1: what it means is that quantum fields in their lowest
- 15:00Speaker 1: possible state are in a state with non zero energy.
- 15:04Speaker 1: This is called the zero point energy. And if you
- 15:07Speaker 1: solve the math for how quantum systems work, they always
- 15:10Speaker 1: have a minimum non zero energy. It's just not possible
- 15:14Speaker 1: to get the quantum field down to zero energy. And
- 15:17Speaker 1: so we don't know what that means. That's the heart
- 15:19Speaker 1: of the question. Doesn't mean that there are like little
- 15:22Speaker 1: virtual particles actually there with real energy. Is it a
- 15:25Speaker 1: weird mathematical artifact that we're just not understanding as it
- 15:28Speaker 1: acclude into something else, like what does this actually mean?
- 15:31Speaker 1: Is the heart of the question. I guess what what
- 15:32Speaker 1: do you mean it can't have zero energy? Like it
- 15:35Speaker 1: it's not likely or it's just like theoretically possible, it
- 15:39Speaker 1: would break some kind of math equation, And what does
- 15:41Speaker 1: it mean? Like, how do you know it can't have
- 15:43Speaker 1: zero energy? Like couldn't it fluctuate and sometimes dip below zero?
- 15:47Speaker 1: So that's a great question. Remember, the quantum mechanics gives
- 15:50Speaker 1: us probability, so it allows fluctuations, but it allows fluctuations
- 15:53Speaker 1: between physically possible solutions, like you might solve an equation
- 15:57Speaker 1: that says, here's nine different things in electron and can
- 16:00Speaker 1: do I don't know exactly which one it's going to
- 16:02Speaker 1: do when I can tell you the probabilities of various ones,
- 16:04Speaker 1: and it might fluctuate between them, but it has to
- 16:07Speaker 1: do one of these things. Doesn't mean the rules are
- 16:09Speaker 1: off and anything can happen. I mean you solve the
- 16:12Speaker 1: quantum mechanics of a system in empty space, these fields
- 16:14Speaker 1: in empty space, you get a bunch of solutions, and
- 16:17Speaker 1: those solutions are quantized, and the solutions are like one particle,
- 16:21Speaker 1: two particles, three particles, four particles. But the zero particle
- 16:24Speaker 1: solution doesn't have zero energy. It has a minimum amount
- 16:28Speaker 1: of energy. When you solve the mathematics, you get a
- 16:31Speaker 1: state with no particles but with energy, right, So, and
- 16:34Speaker 1: somehow this kind of leads to the idea that space
- 16:38Speaker 1: has infinite energy. So let's get into connecting those dots
- 16:43Speaker 1: and let's talk about this interesting Casimir effect. But first
- 16:47Speaker 1: let's take a quick break. All right, we're asking the question, Daniel,
- 17:02Speaker 1: does space have an infinite amount of energy? And I
- 17:07Speaker 1: feel like you're telling me the answer is yes. The
- 17:10Speaker 1: math suggests the answer is yes, And if you think
- 17:13Speaker 1: about the quantum mechanics of it, it sort of makes sense.
- 17:16Speaker 1: Like we know that quantum mechanically, things are always wiggle
- 17:19Speaker 1: in and struggle in and can never really be pinned down.
- 17:22Speaker 1: And so if you take a quantum field, it makes
- 17:24Speaker 1: some sense for it to always have some uncertainty. And
- 17:27Speaker 1: if you had it have exactly zero energy, then you'd
- 17:30Speaker 1: know exactly the value of the quantum field, and that
- 17:34Speaker 1: seems sort of unquantum, you know, just the same way
- 17:37Speaker 1: like you can't have a particle exactly zero energy. You
- 17:41Speaker 1: can't have anything at absolute zero and quantum mechanics, because
- 17:44Speaker 1: then you would know its location and its position. So
- 17:47Speaker 1: quantum mechanics says absolute zero is impossible to reach. And
- 17:50Speaker 1: this is sort of the same idea that there's a
- 17:52Speaker 1: minimum amount of energy that everything has to have, and
- 17:56Speaker 1: so space is filled with fields, then those fields have
- 17:58Speaker 1: to have some energy. It's kind of related. You're telling
- 18:01Speaker 1: me to the idea that the electron can't fall into
- 18:04Speaker 1: the nucleus for example, like it it can't just collapse
- 18:07Speaker 1: into into that center. Yeah, if you solve the quantum
- 18:10Speaker 1: mechanics of the hydrogen atom, you have a proton and
- 18:12Speaker 1: around it is an electron. You get a bunch of solutions,
- 18:15Speaker 1: you get energy levels for the electron, and the minimum
- 18:19Speaker 1: energy level is not at zero. It's not oh, the
- 18:21Speaker 1: electron falls into the nucleus and is captured. Now, that
- 18:24Speaker 1: can actually happen in some other weird states, for example
- 18:27Speaker 1: in the center of a neutron star, or the electron
- 18:29Speaker 1: can be forced into the nucleus and then it turns
- 18:31Speaker 1: the proton into a neutron. But for a normal hydrogen atom,
- 18:35Speaker 1: the electrons lowest energy level is not at zero, and
- 18:38Speaker 1: it's for the same reason, right, it can't collapse into
- 18:41Speaker 1: the nucleus because of the uncertainty principle, because of this
- 18:45Speaker 1: zero point energy in its field. Right, So space is
- 18:48Speaker 1: filled with quantum fields, and quantum fields when they don't
- 18:51Speaker 1: have particles are in a vacuum, and you're telling me
- 18:54Speaker 1: that that vacuum has to have a little bit of energy.
- 18:58Speaker 1: So then how do we connect from that to space
- 19:01Speaker 1: having infinite energy? So the amazing thing is just take
- 19:04Speaker 1: one field. For example, take the photon field, the electromagnetic field.
- 19:07Speaker 1: This can have photons of all different frequency right, frequency,
- 19:12Speaker 1: and the visible spectrum frequency, and the X ray spectrum frequency,
- 19:15Speaker 1: and the infrared spectrum. It can do all sorts of oscillations. Well,
- 19:18Speaker 1: the calculation tells us that the minimum energy in this
- 19:21Speaker 1: field is planks constant times of frequency over two h
- 19:26Speaker 1: omega over two. That's the amount of energy for electromagnetic
- 19:30Speaker 1: field of that frequency. So that's a certain amount of energy.
- 19:33Speaker 1: But there's an infinite number of these frequencies, and so
- 19:37Speaker 1: you can have h omega over two for every value
- 19:40Speaker 1: of omega from zero all the way up to infinity.
- 19:44Speaker 1: So you add up all these little zero point energies
- 19:46Speaker 1: and you get an infinite amount of energy. Not an
- 19:48Speaker 1: infinite amount of energy in the whole universe, an infinite
- 19:51Speaker 1: amount of energy in every piece of space. I see
- 19:55Speaker 1: you tell me, like, any little piece of space has
- 19:58Speaker 1: a minimum amount of of photon energy at one killer herds,
- 20:03Speaker 1: and it has a little bit of a photon energy
- 20:05Speaker 1: at one point one killer herds, and it has a
- 20:07Speaker 1: little bit of energy at one point three killer herds.
- 20:10Speaker 1: So if you add it all up, you're saying that
- 20:12Speaker 1: a little bit of space has an infinite amount of energy. Yeah,
- 20:15Speaker 1: because there's an infinite number of frequencies and each one
- 20:18Speaker 1: has finite energy, and so an infinite some over finite
- 20:22Speaker 1: numbers is infinity. Yeah. All right, Well this sounds almost
- 20:26Speaker 1: too good to be true. I feel like there's some
- 20:28Speaker 1: sort of quantum uncertainty, virtual particle kind of fakery going
- 20:34Speaker 1: on here. Well, i'll tell you what physicists usually do
- 20:37Speaker 1: is they go, hmm, that's weird. Let's just subtract infinity
- 20:41Speaker 1: from everything and ignore it. We've got an infinity, let's
- 20:46Speaker 1: tamp it down. Yeah, because for most purposes, you're only
- 20:49Speaker 1: really interested in relative energy. You're like, can we go
- 20:52Speaker 1: up an energy level and absorb a photon? Can we
- 20:55Speaker 1: go down energy level and give off a photon? Most
- 20:57Speaker 1: of physics only cares about relative energy. About gaining energy,
- 21:01Speaker 1: losing energy, transferring energy. We don't usually care about the
- 21:05Speaker 1: actual absolute value of the energy, So in practice we
- 21:09Speaker 1: can mostly just ignore this. We can ignore an infinite
- 21:12Speaker 1: amount of energy in every little bit of space. Yeah,
- 21:15Speaker 1: and you can convince yourself like, well, maybe it's some
- 21:17Speaker 1: weird quantum thing and we can mostly ignore it and
- 21:19Speaker 1: not worry about it. But you know, if you're looking
- 21:22Speaker 1: to do something useful with physics and you want to
- 21:24Speaker 1: understand the universe that is deepest level, then you can't
- 21:27Speaker 1: just ignore it. You gotta dig into it. You gotta
- 21:29Speaker 1: ask yourself, is there a way we could detect this
- 21:32Speaker 1: if it were real? Could we do an experiment to
- 21:35Speaker 1: figure out if those infinite number of photons are actually there?
- 21:40Speaker 1: I guess maybe my question is is it real or
- 21:43Speaker 1: is it one of these things where there's a little
- 21:45Speaker 1: bit of energy at one killer hurts here, But the
- 21:48Speaker 1: probability of it is, you know, one over infinity or
- 21:51Speaker 1: something like that, and so it all sort of cancels
- 21:53Speaker 1: out to some finite number. You're looking to divide infinity
- 21:56Speaker 1: by infinity to make it reasonable. Yeah, it sounds better
- 21:58Speaker 1: than putting my thumb over It's the same thing mathematically,
- 22:01Speaker 1: but no, each of these frequencies should be there, like,
- 22:05Speaker 1: at minimum, each of these photon frequencies should exist at
- 22:10Speaker 1: h omega over two, and so that's the minimum, right, right,
- 22:13Speaker 1: But what's the probability that they're actually like a real
- 22:16Speaker 1: photon will pop out at that frequency? The field has
- 22:19Speaker 1: that energy according to quantum mechanics, it's there, that's the minimum.
- 22:22Speaker 1: So the probability for it to have at least that
- 22:25Speaker 1: energy is because that's the minimum energy. But nobody knows
- 22:30Speaker 1: is that real. And we have, on one hand, a
- 22:32Speaker 1: fascinating experiment that suggests it might be real, and on
- 22:35Speaker 1: the other hand calculations that suggest that's totally impossible for
- 22:39Speaker 1: it to be real. So it's a real deep controversy
- 22:41Speaker 1: in physics right now. Right. So that's what this Casimir
- 22:45Speaker 1: effect is. It's an experiment that tests this idea that
- 22:48Speaker 1: this is too good to be true, infinite energy everywhere idea. Yeah,
- 22:51Speaker 1: this was an idea that was bubbling up after quantum
- 22:54Speaker 1: mechanics was invented and developed and people were grappling with
- 22:57Speaker 1: the consequences of it, and people first had these kinds
- 23:00Speaker 1: of questions like, hold on a second, are you suggesting
- 23:03Speaker 1: the universe is build with infinite energy. That can't be true,
- 23:06Speaker 1: and so Cassimir thought, well, let's try to figure it out.
- 23:09Speaker 1: Could I conduct an experiment? Could I devise a way
- 23:12Speaker 1: a physical system which would reveal if those photons were
- 23:16Speaker 1: actually there? So he came up with a really clever
- 23:19Speaker 1: idea for a crazy effect, which he called the Cassimir
- 23:22Speaker 1: effect weight. So it is a real person. Cassimir is
- 23:25Speaker 1: a real person. It should have sounded like a Greek
- 23:26Speaker 1: deity or something, you know, or like a Greek nymph
- 23:30Speaker 1: may also be but no, a real physicist. But I
- 23:33Speaker 1: like that you have in your mind. You know, physicists,
- 23:36Speaker 1: nymph It's basically the same category of people. Yeah, they're
- 23:39Speaker 1: all uh, magical beings. Alright. So Cassimir proposed the Casimir effect,
- 23:45Speaker 1: And how do I build one of these things? It's
- 23:47Speaker 1: really hard to build, which is why it was predicted
- 23:50Speaker 1: in and then not actually observed for fifty years. But
- 23:54Speaker 1: the basic idea is to take two mirrors and have
- 23:58Speaker 1: them really really close to each other. You know, we're
- 24:01Speaker 1: talking like micron distances, And why does it need to
- 24:05Speaker 1: be microns? It needs to be micron distances because what
- 24:07Speaker 1: you're trying to do is build a resonant cavity that
- 24:10Speaker 1: blocks out most of the photons from the vacuum. So
- 24:14Speaker 1: the idea is two mirrors back to back will build
- 24:17Speaker 1: something which will enhance photons that have a wavelength that
- 24:21Speaker 1: fits right between those mirrors. It's just the way. It's
- 24:24Speaker 1: sort of like a laser works or any other sort
- 24:26Speaker 1: of resonant cavity. Photons are a wave and they like
- 24:28Speaker 1: to bounce back and forth between these mirrors, and so
- 24:31Speaker 1: photons that fit very nicely between these mirrors, they'll be
- 24:34Speaker 1: enhanced between these mirrors. And every other kind of photon,
- 24:37Speaker 1: the ones that don't fit nicely between the mirrors, so
- 24:40Speaker 1: like the gap between the mirrors is like one and
- 24:42Speaker 1: a half or one point seven wavelengths, they will be suppressed.
- 24:46Speaker 1: So that's what a resonant cavity does. And the idea
- 24:49Speaker 1: here is if those photons in the vacuum are real,
- 24:53Speaker 1: then what you'll do is you'll enhance a specific set
- 24:55Speaker 1: of frequencies, you know, key to this really small distance,
- 24:58Speaker 1: and you'll suppress every anything else. I see. It's like
- 25:02Speaker 1: a resonant cavity. Right, like if there was sound and
- 25:04Speaker 1: noise everywhere, and you stuck a little like flute in
- 25:09Speaker 1: the middle. It would sort of make a particular sound
- 25:12Speaker 1: more prominent exactly, and it will exclude the others. That's
- 25:16Speaker 1: the key. He was trying to suppress some of these
- 25:18Speaker 1: vacuum modes. He was trying to make a situation where
- 25:21Speaker 1: those vacuum modes would disappear. Because what we talked about earlier,
- 25:25Speaker 1: the minimum energy of the vacuum being h and mego
- 25:27Speaker 1: over two. That's if you have like nothing around you,
- 25:30Speaker 1: that's the vacuum solution. But as soon as you put
- 25:33Speaker 1: material in space and you get different solutions, and this
- 25:36Speaker 1: actually suppresses a lot of those modes. So they can't
- 25:39Speaker 1: exist between these mirrors. So what you get is some
- 25:42Speaker 1: energy between the mirrors, but more energy outside the mirrors.
- 25:46Speaker 1: And the difference in that energy, like the fact that
- 25:48Speaker 1: you have more photons and more frequencies outside the mirrors
- 25:52Speaker 1: than between the mirrors, creates effectively a pressure pushing these
- 25:55Speaker 1: mirrors together. I see, you created like a little spot
- 25:58Speaker 1: in space that only like one kind of frequency, and
- 26:01Speaker 1: push this out all the other frequencies, which then kind
- 26:04Speaker 1: of creates pressure inwards, like it wants to collapse. Yeah, exactly.
- 26:09Speaker 1: And so that's the idea. You could build these two mirrors,
- 26:12Speaker 1: and if the vacuum was real, you're creating a situation
- 26:15Speaker 1: where it would actually have a physical effect that you
- 26:18Speaker 1: could measure, Like you could put two mirrors near each other,
- 26:21Speaker 1: and you could actually measure the force between them. You
- 26:24Speaker 1: could see them getting pulled together. It's almost like you
- 26:27Speaker 1: have a lake and you like try to separate some
- 26:30Speaker 1: water out, like carva space in the lake by separating
- 26:34Speaker 1: out the water. But then now you have all this
- 26:35Speaker 1: water trying to come in, which creates pressure on the
- 26:37Speaker 1: walls of your little chamber. Yeah, only if there really
- 26:41Speaker 1: is water in the lake, right, if you're trying to
- 26:43Speaker 1: tell whether there's like invisible water in the lake, this
- 26:46Speaker 1: is the way to do it. Right, figure out some
- 26:48Speaker 1: way to keep the invisible water out of some portion
- 26:51Speaker 1: of lake, and measure is their force now on my chamber.
- 26:54Speaker 1: And so that's the idea behind the castome effect, Like
- 26:57Speaker 1: block the vacuum photons from this little sliver of the
- 27:00Speaker 1: universe and see if all the other photons out there
- 27:03Speaker 1: try to squeeze it back. All right, So you build
- 27:06Speaker 1: these two mirrors, you put them in front of each other,
- 27:08Speaker 1: and then you would you measure the forces on them.
- 27:10Speaker 1: You measure the forces on them, and this is obviously
- 27:12Speaker 1: a very difficult experiment, Like first of all, making two
- 27:16Speaker 1: mirrors that are super duper flat so you can bring
- 27:18Speaker 1: them in parallel to each other with very very small distances.
- 27:22Speaker 1: Even that it's hard. Then you have to isolate it
- 27:24Speaker 1: to make sure there are no like residual electrostatic charges,
- 27:27Speaker 1: because the force of those charges would overwhelm the force
- 27:30Speaker 1: of the castomere effect or gravity or anything else. Right,
- 27:33Speaker 1: So you have to do a lot of really just
- 27:35Speaker 1: careful experimental work. So people try for a long time
- 27:38Speaker 1: to build this and make it work, and nobody could
- 27:40Speaker 1: get it to work, Like it's just too difficult to
- 27:43Speaker 1: see this force. It's expected to be very very small effect. Yeah,
- 27:46Speaker 1: like what kind of forces already talking about, like Pico Newton's. Yeah,
- 27:51Speaker 1: if you had two mirrors with the area of a
- 27:53Speaker 1: centimeter squared, and you brought them within a micron of
- 27:56Speaker 1: each other, the prediction is that it would have an
- 27:58Speaker 1: attractive castomer for so it pulled together like tend the
- 28:02Speaker 1: minus seven Newton's which is about the weight of a
- 28:06Speaker 1: water droplet. That's you know, like half a millimeter in diameter,
- 28:10Speaker 1: So it's a very small effect. It sounds small, but
- 28:13Speaker 1: it sounds dual for you. This does, man, I mean
- 28:16Speaker 1: you have measured crazy small you know, differences and gravitational waves.
- 28:22Speaker 1: You've taken a picture of a black hole really far away.
- 28:24Speaker 1: What makes this especially hard it's keeping those two plates parallel.
- 28:28Speaker 1: Because as soon as they're not parallel anymore, it's not
- 28:30Speaker 1: a great resident cavity. And so people actually tried there
- 28:33Speaker 1: for a while and didn't work. And then there was
- 28:35Speaker 1: an innovation. Some guy at Los Almos, Steve Lamereaux, came
- 28:38Speaker 1: up with this idea. He said, let's not try it
- 28:40Speaker 1: with two plates. That's use one plate and a sphere.
- 28:43Speaker 1: And it turns out that a plate and a sphere
- 28:46Speaker 1: also has a Casimer effect. The calculation is a little
- 28:48Speaker 1: bit different, but it still is dependent on the sort
- 28:51Speaker 1: of the gap between the sphere and the plate. But
- 28:54Speaker 1: a sphere and then a plate aren't just much easier
- 28:56Speaker 1: to control. You can like bring this little sphere very
- 28:59Speaker 1: very close to a very flat surface much more easily
- 29:02Speaker 1: than you can keep two plates exactly parallel. I see,
- 29:06Speaker 1: you can build a sphere out of something and then
- 29:08Speaker 1: you hold it close to a mirror again or these
- 29:11Speaker 1: mirrors to these are mirrors, so you have like a
- 29:14Speaker 1: mirrored sphere, it's a nano sphere, and you bring it
- 29:17Speaker 1: really close to a surface. And this guy was able
- 29:19Speaker 1: to get it within like ten nanometers. That's like, you know,
- 29:22Speaker 1: a hundred times the width of a hydrogen atom. So
- 29:26Speaker 1: this is pretty close. And he had this technique where
- 29:28Speaker 1: he had it sort of on the end of a
- 29:29Speaker 1: stick and then he's showing a laser on the back
- 29:32Speaker 1: of the mirror, and then he could see very small
- 29:35Speaker 1: changes in the location of the sphere based on how
- 29:38Speaker 1: the laser bounced off of it. So if the sphere
- 29:40Speaker 1: moves a little bit, the laser bounces off at a
- 29:42Speaker 1: different angle. Wow, sounds pretty tough, but I guess my
- 29:46Speaker 1: question is how do you know it worked or didn't work?
- 29:48Speaker 1: Like if I was trying to build something and measure
- 29:50Speaker 1: some invisible water somewhere that I thought was everywhere, how
- 29:53Speaker 1: would I know I measured it or didn't measure it.
- 29:56Speaker 1: It's a difficult experiment and you have to do a
- 29:59Speaker 1: lot of work to sort of rule out alternative explanations. Right,
- 30:02Speaker 1: you have to rule out is this just an effect
- 30:04Speaker 1: of gravity, and so you can calculate, like how big
- 30:07Speaker 1: would the gravitational effect be? And see, well, we see
- 30:09Speaker 1: something which can't be explained by gravity because the dependence
- 30:13Speaker 1: on the distance is different and the overall strength of
- 30:15Speaker 1: it is different. And you ensure that it's isolated from electrostatics,
- 30:19Speaker 1: and you have all sorts of controls to verify that.
- 30:21Speaker 1: So you rule out all other explanations and essentially what
- 30:24Speaker 1: you're seeing is a force that you don't have another
- 30:27Speaker 1: explanation for. And you can do calculations that say how
- 30:31Speaker 1: strong should this force be? How strong should the Casimir
- 30:34Speaker 1: effect be? And when you do those calculations, you predict
- 30:37Speaker 1: a force exactly of the strength that these guys measured. Wait,
- 30:41Speaker 1: so this has actually been done and they have measured
- 30:43Speaker 1: this effect. This has been done, and in seven they
- 30:46Speaker 1: measured the Casimir effect. It is real. Well, they did
- 30:50Speaker 1: measure this invisible water trying to push in. Yes, exactly,
- 30:54Speaker 1: so your faith and physicists was well founded. They figured
- 30:57Speaker 1: this out. Only took fifty years, but he did it.
- 31:00Speaker 1: And this guy measured this thing, and he's gone on
- 31:02Speaker 1: to do all sorts of elaborate extensions on it. Making
- 31:05Speaker 1: it smaller and closer. It's really pretty impressive. It's just
- 31:08Speaker 1: like really cool experimental virtuosity. All right, So that means
- 31:13Speaker 1: a Cassimer effect is real. You can measure it, which
- 31:17Speaker 1: would imply that space is filled with infinite energy. But
- 31:23Speaker 1: there is a hitch that makes absolutely no sense that. Alright,
- 31:30Speaker 1: let's get into whether or not that that makes sense
- 31:33Speaker 1: and whether or not it is infinitely possible to have
- 31:36Speaker 1: infinite energy in space. But first let's take a quick break. Alright,
- 31:51Speaker 1: we're talking about the Casimer effect and whether space has
- 31:55Speaker 1: an infinite amount of energy, which experiments say that it should.
- 32:00Speaker 1: That everywhere you look, everywhere you are, there is an
- 32:03Speaker 1: infinite amount of energy right there underneath the surface. They're
- 32:06Speaker 1: just boiling their bubbling there. But there's another big theory
- 32:11Speaker 1: in physics that says this is impossible. That's right, And
- 32:16Speaker 1: this is one of my favorite parts of physics. When
- 32:18Speaker 1: you find something in the mathematics that's weird, that seems nonsensical,
- 32:22Speaker 1: when you're like, well, that just can't be true, and
- 32:25Speaker 1: then experimental physicists go out and say, actually, that's exactly
- 32:28Speaker 1: what happens, and so you got to revise your sense
- 32:31Speaker 1: of like, what can make sense? What could be true
- 32:33Speaker 1: about the universe? I love when, like the experiments tell
- 32:37Speaker 1: us that the universe is just different from the way
- 32:39Speaker 1: we could possibly hold in our heads. That's like an
- 32:42Speaker 1: invitation to revise your whole context for how the universe works.
- 32:46Speaker 1: Those are the best moments when you're wrong. There's what
- 32:48Speaker 1: you're saying. Yes, that's when you learn things when you're wrong.
- 32:52Speaker 1: And then the experimentalists come back with this idea and
- 32:55Speaker 1: other theorists, the gravitational folks are like, hold on a second.
- 32:58Speaker 1: You should have checked with us, because we could have
- 33:00Speaker 1: told you before you discovered this thing that it was impossible.
- 33:04Speaker 1: You should not have look for it because now that
- 33:08Speaker 1: our theories are wrong. Yeah, and here's the problem. We've
- 33:11Speaker 1: been talking about space from the quantum mechanical point of view, right,
- 33:14Speaker 1: these fields fluctuating and how much energy they have. But
- 33:17Speaker 1: as we talked about earlier, there's another view of space,
- 33:19Speaker 1: and that comes from gravity and Einstein's theory of general relativity.
- 33:23Speaker 1: This beautiful, elegant theory that tells us that gravity is
- 33:27Speaker 1: not an attractive force between particles, but instead an effect
- 33:31Speaker 1: of motion through curved space. Is this beautiful theory because
- 33:34Speaker 1: it tells us that space is not just a flat backdrop.
- 33:38Speaker 1: There's a dance between energy and space, that the stuff
- 33:41Speaker 1: in space tells space how to curve, and that curvature
- 33:45Speaker 1: space tells stuff how to move. So it's this awesome,
- 33:48Speaker 1: wonderful theory. But that's the key bit. The key bit
- 33:51Speaker 1: is that stuff in space, energy or mass, tells space
- 33:56Speaker 1: how to curve. Just like if you have a really
- 33:59Speaker 1: dense collection of stuff, like the Sun, it will bend
- 34:01Speaker 1: the space around it, changing the path of things that
- 34:04Speaker 1: move near it, such as the Earth. So a lot
- 34:07Speaker 1: of energy will bend space, right, It's kind of like,
- 34:10Speaker 1: you know, if energy is the same as mass and
- 34:13Speaker 1: mass and energy create gravity or distored space, or you know,
- 34:18Speaker 1: pull other masses and other energies, then that means that
- 34:22Speaker 1: if there's infinite energy everywhere, it should just be I'll
- 34:25Speaker 1: be pulling, you know, squeezing space everywhere an infinite amount. Yeah, exactly.
- 34:29Speaker 1: There's a problem with having infinite energy into all of
- 34:32Speaker 1: space is that it should make everything be basically a singularity. Right,
- 34:37Speaker 1: you just have infinite curvature everywhere in space. The whole
- 34:41Speaker 1: universe is basically a singularity inside a black hole, and
- 34:45Speaker 1: that's not what we see, right. We don't see space
- 34:47Speaker 1: being infinitely curved. It doesn't really make any sense. One guy,
- 34:51Speaker 1: just after the Customer effect came out, sat down to
- 34:53Speaker 1: do this calculation and say, is it possible. Is there
- 34:56Speaker 1: a way to like actually solve general relativity and have
- 34:59Speaker 1: an infinite amount of energy? You know, maybe everything is
- 35:01Speaker 1: just like tightly balanced. But he did the calculation and
- 35:03Speaker 1: he found that if this were true, if there was
- 35:06Speaker 1: this much energy, then the whole universe would be so
- 35:08Speaker 1: curled up it would be smaller than the moon. Well,
- 35:12Speaker 1: isn't that a theory also that we are sort of
- 35:14Speaker 1: living in a singularity inside of a black hole, that
- 35:16Speaker 1: maybe our universe is inside some other universe is black hole,
- 35:20Speaker 1: And then like a plausible thing, there are some theories that,
- 35:23Speaker 1: you know, perhaps our universe is a connection to other
- 35:26Speaker 1: universes and that at the core of black holes there
- 35:29Speaker 1: are singularities which can connect us to them, or perhaps
- 35:32Speaker 1: even our entire universe is inside another universe. But you know,
- 35:36Speaker 1: we don't see locally crazy infinite curvature. If that were true,
- 35:40Speaker 1: if we were inside a singularity itself, not just like
- 35:43Speaker 1: inside the event horizon. Of a huge black hole. If
- 35:46Speaker 1: we were actually inside a singularity, space would have infinite curvature,
- 35:51Speaker 1: and that would have real consequences for how things moved. Right,
- 35:54Speaker 1: we can measure their local curvature or space because we
- 35:57Speaker 1: see how things move and curve and we do not
- 36:00Speaker 1: see infinite curvature. So we're pretty confident that we're not
- 36:04Speaker 1: living in a singularity. Right. But you know, I feel
- 36:07Speaker 1: like this tells you that there's infinite energy in an
- 36:10Speaker 1: infinite amount of places everywhere. So wouldn't all those effects
- 36:13Speaker 1: kind of cancel out, you know, like everywhere is a singularity.
- 36:17Speaker 1: Wouldn't that flatten out in a way? Yeah? And it's
- 36:19Speaker 1: a little bit more complicated because the way that general
- 36:22Speaker 1: relativity works is it's not just like mass curve space,
- 36:26Speaker 1: and it's not exactly just that like any energy density
- 36:29Speaker 1: curves space, including mass. There's this thing called the stress
- 36:33Speaker 1: energy tensor which tells space how to curve, and it's
- 36:36Speaker 1: so it's sensitive not just to the amount of energy
- 36:39Speaker 1: and the amount of mass, but sort of like the
- 36:40Speaker 1: arrangement of it. So you can have, for example, angular
- 36:43Speaker 1: momentum contributes to it, and and all sorts of complicated effects.
- 36:46Speaker 1: And we don't need to go through the calculation here,
- 36:48Speaker 1: but it does lead to infinite curvature rather than equal
- 36:51Speaker 1: balance all through space. There is a difference. It's not
- 36:55Speaker 1: just relative energy. The absolute energy is actually important for
- 36:58Speaker 1: general relativity. Alright. So it seems that we have a
- 37:02Speaker 1: kind of a big problem because a real experiment, like
- 37:05Speaker 1: an actual thing we can measure, tells us or suggests
- 37:09Speaker 1: that there is infinite energy everywhere, but our theory of
- 37:13Speaker 1: the universe says that's not possible. So, like, who do
- 37:16Speaker 1: you believe what you can see with your eyes or
- 37:20Speaker 1: what your the theory tells you? We just really don't know.
- 37:22Speaker 1: This is like a big open question in physics, you know,
- 37:25Speaker 1: and remember that quantum mechanics and general relativity are sort
- 37:29Speaker 1: of the two pillars of physics and don't really agree
- 37:32Speaker 1: on a lot of stuff. You know, they don't agree
- 37:34Speaker 1: about what does the singularity look like inside a black hole?
- 37:37Speaker 1: But most of the places they disagree are really hard
- 37:40Speaker 1: to get to, really hard to explore, like the heart
- 37:43Speaker 1: of a black hole. So this is an opportunity to
- 37:46Speaker 1: help try to resolve this question. Is quantum mechanics view
- 37:49Speaker 1: of the universe correct? Or is general relativity correct. It's
- 37:53Speaker 1: an opportunity to resolve this question in a place where
- 37:55Speaker 1: we can actually do experiments. In our lab. We can
- 37:58Speaker 1: see these two things conflict. Quantum mechanics says, no, the
- 38:02Speaker 1: universe is filled with energy in every space, and look,
- 38:05Speaker 1: I'm right, here's an experiment that proves it. General relativity
- 38:08Speaker 1: says that's nuts and it can't possibly be right. Otherwise
- 38:12Speaker 1: things would be crazy. And so what do we do.
- 38:14Speaker 1: We try to come up with another theory of theory
- 38:16Speaker 1: that unifies these two, that explains what we see and
- 38:19Speaker 1: make sense of it. We don't have that theory today,
- 38:22Speaker 1: but this is like a great clue that tells us
- 38:26Speaker 1: if you're gonna build that theory, you have to somehow
- 38:28Speaker 1: explain the Casimer effect. You can't just subtract the way
- 38:31Speaker 1: that infinity and also you have to subtract away that
- 38:34Speaker 1: infinity so that you don't curve space too much. I see. So,
- 38:37Speaker 1: like you know, we measured this effect. It's real, it's real,
- 38:41Speaker 1: But it may not mean that space is filled with
- 38:45Speaker 1: infinite energy. It might be that our theory, which you know,
- 38:48Speaker 1: ties that experiment to this idea of infinite energy, could
- 38:51Speaker 1: be wrong. Yeah, exactly now, It's interesting because the predictions
- 38:55Speaker 1: for the Casimir effect, when you start from that quantum theory,
- 38:58Speaker 1: they predict the effect at a level that you see it,
- 39:01Speaker 1: So that's pretty convincing. Now, there are some other attempts
- 39:05Speaker 1: to explain these Cassimir effect experiments without using quantum zero
- 39:10Speaker 1: point energy. For example, people say maybe it's just a
- 39:14Speaker 1: misunderstanding of the Vanderwall's force, and people have done some
- 39:17Speaker 1: calculations to suggest that, you know, relativistic corrections, small corrections
- 39:22Speaker 1: to the way we think about the Vanderwall's force might
- 39:25Speaker 1: account for the Cassimir effect. It's like an attempt to
- 39:28Speaker 1: describe it using other physics that doesn't break general relativity
- 39:33Speaker 1: so far. Those calculations, though they're cool, and they do
- 39:36Speaker 1: suggest and effect is there, don't agree with what we've
- 39:39Speaker 1: measured so far, so they can't really explain the experiments.
- 39:42Speaker 1: That doesn't really solve the problem yet. But you know,
- 39:45Speaker 1: this is like active research. Is somebody out there right
- 39:48Speaker 1: now like improving those calculations trying to describe what we
- 39:51Speaker 1: see out there without including quantum infinite photons. I like,
- 39:56Speaker 1: what we measure may not be in effect of quantum physics,
- 39:59Speaker 1: but just something else. Yeah, it could be something else exactly,
- 40:03Speaker 1: And that's the struggle, Like do you come up with
- 40:05Speaker 1: another theory to explain this real experimental effect that doesn't
- 40:08Speaker 1: break general relativity or you try to figure out like, hey,
- 40:11Speaker 1: maybe general relativity is wrong, and you know, we need
- 40:14Speaker 1: another theory that includes quantum effects and somehow doesn't bend
- 40:18Speaker 1: space in the universe. Right, Well, it seems to me
- 40:20Speaker 1: like the consequences of this question are huge, right, Like
- 40:24Speaker 1: this could determine whether quantum physics is right or relativity
- 40:28Speaker 1: is right, and it seems really important almost like you
- 40:32Speaker 1: know how we talk about the center of black holes
- 40:34Speaker 1: being really important because they would settle this question. But
- 40:37Speaker 1: it doesn't seem like physics is very focused on this
- 40:40Speaker 1: little effect here, you know. And I feel like there's
- 40:42Speaker 1: more attention paid to black holes and there is to
- 40:44Speaker 1: the Cassimere effect. Well, black holes are sexier than like
- 40:47Speaker 1: tiny microspheres next to tiny microplates, you know. But this
- 40:51Speaker 1: is a really active area of research, and you're totally right,
- 40:54Speaker 1: is a huge opportunity. It's much more exciting than black
- 40:57Speaker 1: holes because it's real and we can test it and
- 40:59Speaker 1: we can explore it. But it's also very very difficult,
- 41:02Speaker 1: sort of in the way the black holes are. Like
- 41:04Speaker 1: these Casimir effect calculations, they are hard. We don't know
- 41:08Speaker 1: how to do them for lots of configurations. Like it's
- 41:10Speaker 1: an open question right now. If you build a mirror
- 41:14Speaker 1: that was a sphere and you had photons bouncing around
- 41:17Speaker 1: inside that sphere, would that have a Casimir effect? Would
- 41:20Speaker 1: implode the sphere or would explode the sphere? Like there
- 41:23Speaker 1: is du calculations that get different numbers. So it's a
- 41:26Speaker 1: really sort of technically very difficult area to make progress in,
- 41:30Speaker 1: both experimentally and theoretically. But I think inside physics it's
- 41:34Speaker 1: widely recognized as an amazing opportunity to maybe clear up
- 41:38Speaker 1: this question of quantum mechanics versus general relativity. Yeah, and
- 41:42Speaker 1: their press folks should definitely get on social media. Yeah,
- 41:45Speaker 1: because you know, as we heard from our listeners, almost
- 41:48Speaker 1: nobody had heard of it. Yeah. And you know what,
- 41:49Speaker 1: they should have gotten in touch with a Game of
- 41:51Speaker 1: Thrones folks and made it the reins of Casimir instead.
- 41:54Speaker 1: That would have been a great cross marketing opportunity. Yes,
- 41:57Speaker 1: you can picture it. Its wedding and relativity us in
- 42:00Speaker 1: thinking that, you know, it's a happy event and then
- 42:03Speaker 1: quantum mechanics pulls a knife. No, I was thinking that
- 42:06Speaker 1: the Jester could do some trick with a Cassimir effect
- 42:09Speaker 1: and too thin plates or something, you know, after dinner entertainment.
- 42:12Speaker 1: But yeah, you know, go down that road if through
- 42:14Speaker 1: its being slitcheder what it is, game of Thrones. I mean,
- 42:17Speaker 1: somebody has to meet their demise. It's either going to
- 42:21Speaker 1: be general relativity or quantum mechanics. Somebody will perish. When
- 42:25Speaker 1: you play the game of physics, you're either right or
- 42:27Speaker 1: you're wrong. Yeah, or you're quantum mechanicalized. All right, Well,
- 42:33Speaker 1: I hear the reigns of customer playing. I feel like
- 42:35Speaker 1: I think we are near the end the here of
- 42:37Speaker 1: our episode where we learned that the space might have
- 42:40Speaker 1: an infinite amount of energy and there's an experiment to
- 42:42Speaker 1: prove it absolutely. And this Casimir effect is super fascinating.
- 42:46Speaker 1: You could also, since it's real, help us build super
- 42:49Speaker 1: tiny electronics with actual moving little parts at the nanoscale.
- 42:54Speaker 1: Some people suggested that we might be able to use
- 42:56Speaker 1: the Casimir effect and in a repulsive way to keep
- 42:59Speaker 1: worm holes open to keep them from collapsing if it's real.
- 43:03Speaker 1: So not only is it a fascinating question which might
- 43:06Speaker 1: reveal the ultimate nature of reality. It also could help
- 43:09Speaker 1: us travel the universe. Wow, that is definitely more interesting
- 43:13Speaker 1: than black hole and less deadly. All right, well, once
- 43:17Speaker 1: again we learned that there's more to the universe, and
- 43:20Speaker 1: we realized that there might be energy kind of in
- 43:24Speaker 1: the error in the space between us, between our particles.
- 43:27Speaker 1: And this might even be an infinite amount of energy,
- 43:29Speaker 1: which means there's potential for anything in this universe. That's right,
- 43:33Speaker 1: But don't let your iPhone batteries go to zero just yet.
- 43:36Speaker 1: We haven't perfected vacuum charging. Yeah, just wave it around
- 43:39Speaker 1: in the air and see if that works. Do your
- 43:42Speaker 1: own customer experiment at home. All right, Well, we hope
- 43:44Speaker 1: you enjoyed that. Thanks for joining us, See you next time.
- 43:55Speaker 1: Thanks for listening, and remember that Daniel and Jorge explained.
- 43:58Speaker 1: The Universe is a production of Heart Radio. For more
- 44:01Speaker 1: podcasts for my Heart Radio and visit the I Heart Radio,
- 44:04Speaker 1: Apple Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.