Latest / Turley Talks / Ep. 3477 Trump Just DROPPED The HAMMER Sending SHOCKWAVES Throughout DC!!!

Transcript

Ep. 3477 Trump Just DROPPED The HAMMER Sending SHOCKWAVES Throughout DC!!! · Turley Talks

0:00
[SPEAKER_02]: The liberal globalist order is on its brink and awakening a new conservative age.
0:06
[SPEAKER_02]: Dr. Steve Turley joined me every day as we discover answers to today's toughest challenges and explore the re-bondalization of conservative civilization.
0:18
[SPEAKER_02]: This is Turley Talks.
0:22
[SPEAKER_04]: We're back with the Fox News alert.
0:23
[SPEAKER_04]: We're just learning, glaring the FBI agents have raided the Maryland home.
0:27
[SPEAKER_04]: A former Trump national security adviser, John Bolton, and happened at seven a.m.
0:32
[SPEAKER_04]: this morning.
0:33
[SPEAKER_00]: Shortly after the raid began FBI director, Cash Patel posting on X. Quote, no one is above the law.
0:40
[SPEAKER_00]: FBI agents on a mission.
0:42
[SPEAKER_04]: They've been spent joins us now with more on this brinking news.
0:45
[SPEAKER_04]: Hey, David.
0:46
[SPEAKER_01]: Hey, guys, not much we can say at this point, but information will continue to develop.
0:51
[SPEAKER_01]: As you mentioned about seven o'clock this morning, FBI agents rated ambassador Bolton's home, notable were being told by two government sources that they are looking for classified documents as part of a potential leak investigation.
1:06
[SPEAKER_01]: We're told that ambassador Bolton is not in custody.
1:10
[SPEAKER_01]: He's not under arrest.
1:11
[SPEAKER_01]: But it is notable they are at his Maryland home right now.
1:15
[SPEAKER_01]: We don't know how many agents are there waiting to get a picture of the scene coming in right now.
1:21
[SPEAKER_01]: But we're told Ambassador Bolton who was just on TV on another network a couple days ago talking about the Russia Putin Trump summit is now under FBI investigation now.
1:32
[SPEAKER_01]: I want to be clear.
1:33
[SPEAKER_02]: The hunters have now officially become the hunted.
1:37
[SPEAKER_02]: President Trump has just dropped the hammer and it's sending shock waves throughout DC this morning.
1:44
[SPEAKER_02]: He's begun rating the homes of the deep state's most pernicious and vial snakes.
1:50
[SPEAKER_02]: This is not just another political investigation.
1:53
[SPEAKER_02]: This is the moment.
1:56
[SPEAKER_02]: When one of Washington's most notorious deep state operators finally faces the consequences of his actions.
2:03
[SPEAKER_02]: And if you're thinking this sounds too good to be true, buckle up.
2:06
[SPEAKER_02]: Because we're about to see exactly why this raid represents a seismic ship.
2:11
[SPEAKER_02]: and how justice works in America.
2:13
[SPEAKER_02]: We're going deep today folks.
2:15
[SPEAKER_02]: This is going to be a comprehensive breakdown of how John Bolton's decades of foreign policy disasters.
2:22
[SPEAKER_02]: His betrayal of President Trump and his criminal mishandling of classified information finally caught up with them.
2:30
[SPEAKER_02]: And you know, the best part of it all.
2:32
[SPEAKER_02]: It's all because of you.
2:36
[SPEAKER_02]: You are not going to want to miss this.
2:38
[SPEAKER_02]: Greetings, everyone.
2:39
[SPEAKER_02]: It is live stream, Friday.
2:42
[SPEAKER_02]: I am your host, Dr. Steve.
2:43
[SPEAKER_02]: Your major professor here to help you make sense of all the madness as the radical left desperately tries to stop the unstoppable, the inevitable rise.
2:53
[SPEAKER_02]: of a new conservative age all over the world that you are making happen so if you want to front row seat on how you are changing the world in ways you never even imagine.
3:03
[SPEAKER_02]: make sure to smack that bell.
3:05
[SPEAKER_02]: There it is.
3:06
[SPEAKER_02]: Make sure to smack that bell and subscribe button boom boom.
3:10
[SPEAKER_02]: There you go.
3:11
[SPEAKER_02]: As always, we got a jam pack show today.
3:13
[SPEAKER_02]: Our super chats are up.
3:14
[SPEAKER_02]: So feel free to send in your comments or questions and be my privilege to read them and answer them during this live stream.
3:22
[SPEAKER_02]: Also, do you remember Biden's debate disaster when he blurred it out?
3:27
[SPEAKER_02]: Well, we finally beat
3:29
[SPEAKER_02]: Medicare.
3:31
[SPEAKER_02]: Well, it's true, as Trump said, you beat it to death.
3:34
[SPEAKER_02]: Medicare touches the lives of millions of Americans, but just like about everything the government touches, it's a mess.
3:41
[SPEAKER_02]: And mistakes could cost thousands between confusing rules and penalties, thousands of different plans.
3:47
[SPEAKER_02]: I need to know, wonder, so many people are spending more than they need to because they're stuck in the wrong plan.
3:53
[SPEAKER_02]: So that's why I want to introduce you to a genuinely helpful company, chapter.
3:58
[SPEAKER_02]: chapter gives you personalized Medicare advice, and they actually work for you, not the government, not big insurance.
4:05
[SPEAKER_02]: They search every plan available, even those that other agents skip, and by doing this, they save people in average, get this of eleven hundred dollars per year.
4:14
[SPEAKER_02]: And sometimes more.
4:15
[SPEAKER_02]: In fact, chapter was able to save one couple, Joe and his wife.
4:18
[SPEAKER_02]: three thousand dollars every year.
4:21
[SPEAKER_02]: Chatter's advice is completely free to my audience.
4:24
[SPEAKER_02]: No fees, no pressure.
4:26
[SPEAKER_02]: Just honest help for Patriots.
4:28
[SPEAKER_02]: So if you're already on Medicare or about to be, I can't recommend Chatter enough.
4:33
[SPEAKER_02]: Give them a call at nine one nine seven two seven one nine zero three to make sure your Medicare works for you.
4:39
[SPEAKER_02]: That's nine one nine seven two seven one nine
4:42
[SPEAKER_02]: zero three most people wish they call them sooner.
4:45
[SPEAKER_02]: Make sure you do it right now nine one nine seven two seven one nine zero three.
4:53
[SPEAKER_02]: At approximately seventy M this morning.
4:58
[SPEAKER_02]: The world changed.
5:01
[SPEAKER_02]: The world that is comprised of the liberal globalists swamp creatures, who up until seven a.m.
5:08
[SPEAKER_02]: this morning, thought they could literally get away with pretty much anything.
5:15
[SPEAKER_02]: They thought they could get away even getting caught using the FBI to spy on a Republican presidential candidate and nothing in the world would ever happen to them.
5:25
[SPEAKER_02]: They could overtly weaponize entire intelligence agencies to deliberately interfere in the Democrat integrity of an election, literally banana republic tactics.
5:36
[SPEAKER_02]: Nothing would even come close to happening to.
5:40
[SPEAKER_02]: No consequences, no accountability, nothing.
5:43
[SPEAKER_02]: They could go on CNN, MSNBC, spew lie after lie, deliberately, declassified information to the legacy media, which is a felony, of course.
5:55
[SPEAKER_02]: But they can do it with total and complete impunity and immunity.
6:02
[SPEAKER_02]: That world as of seven a.m.
6:05
[SPEAKER_02]: this morning has come to an end.
6:13
[SPEAKER_02]: The sun didn't just dawn on a new day.
6:20
[SPEAKER_02]: It's dawned on a new world.
6:25
[SPEAKER_02]: a world where these deep state swamp creatures are now officially being brought to justice.
6:37
[SPEAKER_02]: A world where truly no one is above the law.
6:47
[SPEAKER_02]: At seven a.m.
6:48
[SPEAKER_02]: this morning, the FBI kicked down the door of a three million dollar Bethesda home
6:55
[SPEAKER_02]: owned by one of Trump's most vile and vocal opponents, the man considered one of the most loyal members of the deep state establishment.
7:05
[SPEAKER_02]: John Bolton, the warm-mongering neoconservative who spent decades pushing America into endless foreign conflicts, only to turn around and stab Donald Trump in the back, the moment it became profitable.
7:19
[SPEAKER_02]: The raid was ordered by none other than FBI Director Cash Patel who just posted as you heard a cryptic message sent shockwaves through Washington.
7:29
[SPEAKER_02]: No one is above the law.
7:31
[SPEAKER_02]: FBI agents are on a mission.
7:35
[SPEAKER_02]: When federal agents descended on Bolton's a three million dollar mansion Bethesda, they weren't just serving a warrant.
7:45
[SPEAKER_02]: They were delivering a message that sending shock waves through the Washington establishment.
7:54
[SPEAKER_02]: The timing of this operation reveals, frankly, the strategic brilliance of the Trump administration's approach to justice.
8:03
[SPEAKER_02]: We're now learning that this was not some hastily orchestrated political revenge plot.
8:09
[SPEAKER_02]: This was the culmination of years
8:14
[SPEAKER_02]: years of carefully constructed legal case that had been building upon itself for months upon months, which for a brief interim was systematically dismantled by the Biden administration for political reasons.
8:32
[SPEAKER_02]: But now has been restored to its right for place in the American justice system under President Donald J. Trump.
8:42
[SPEAKER_02]: And so what we're seeing here is something that is absolutely astonishing.
8:48
[SPEAKER_02]: We're seeing, we're seeing basically the culmination of something that Bolton did back in twenty twenty.
8:58
[SPEAKER_02]: The investigation centers on classified documents from Bolton's twenty twenty tell all memoir.
9:05
[SPEAKER_02]: The room where it all happened.
9:09
[SPEAKER_02]: And it was a book that was meant to bring down the Trump presidency.
9:13
[SPEAKER_02]: It was meant to disparage an impune Trump during his first term in sabotage his reelection.
9:20
[SPEAKER_02]: But as it turns out, an glorious moment of poetic justice, the book wasn't just a betrayal of presidential confidentiality.
9:30
[SPEAKER_02]: He didn't just stab Trump in the back.
9:34
[SPEAKER_02]: The book ended up revealing
9:37
[SPEAKER_02]: a potentially criminal violation of national security law that could have endangered American intelligence sources in methods around the world.
9:48
[SPEAKER_02]: Now, based on the sources that I found, John Bolton's twenty-twenty memoir, The Room Where It Happened contains several categories of classified information that federal prosecutors determined were improperly disclosed without authorization.
10:06
[SPEAKER_02]: So apparently, Bolton detailed US intelligence collection capabilities against foreign governments can't do that.
10:13
[SPEAKER_02]: He published content, a private conversation between President Trump and foreign leaders, including sensitive discussions about military and intelligence cooperation.
10:23
[SPEAKER_02]: Can't do that.
10:25
[SPEAKER_02]: He released information about ongoing diplomatic negotiations that could be compromised by public disclosure.
10:32
[SPEAKER_02]: can't do that either.
10:34
[SPEAKER_02]: He revealed intelligent sources and methods that could be used by foreign services to identify American assets.
10:42
[SPEAKER_02]: Definitely can't do that.
10:43
[SPEAKER_02]: And he published material characterized as exceptionally restricted the most sensitive level of classified information.
10:55
[SPEAKER_02]: Now, what Bolton was supposed to do
10:59
[SPEAKER_02]: is he was supposed to submit a complete manuscript for pre-publication review by national security officials.
11:08
[SPEAKER_02]: He was then supposed to wait for clearance before publishing any version of the book.
11:14
[SPEAKER_02]: And if necessary, remove any classified information identified during the review process.
11:21
[SPEAKER_02]: But of course, that would only apply to people who are not above the law like John Bolton thinks he is.
11:29
[SPEAKER_02]: Those rules don't apply to the swamp creatures that write the rules for everyone else, but exempt themselves.
11:38
[SPEAKER_02]: So what actually happened is that Bolton submitted only a partial manuscript for review.
11:45
[SPEAKER_02]: That's very important to remember in all the legacy media spin you're going to hear in the next few days.
11:54
[SPEAKER_02]: Bolton did submit a manuscript for a review, but it was only partial.
11:58
[SPEAKER_02]: It was not the complete thing.
12:00
[SPEAKER_02]: He continued writing and revising after receiving initial feedback.
12:07
[SPEAKER_02]: He published material that had never been approved for release.
12:13
[SPEAKER_02]: And he proceeded with the publication despite explicit warnings from the Trump administration officials that the book contained classified information
12:24
[SPEAKER_02]: So during Trump's first administration federal judges did in fact determine that Bolton likely published classified materials and exposed his country to harm.
12:37
[SPEAKER_02]: The Justice Department opened up a probe and their investigation found at least six major categories of classified material.
12:49
[SPEAKER_02]: that remained in the published book, despite Bolton signed agreements acknowledging that unauthorized disclosure constituted a federal crime.
13:02
[SPEAKER_02]: Now again, what is so key to get it here, especially given how the legacy media is already trying to spin this?
13:10
[SPEAKER_02]: I mean, it's just, it's basically CNN and MSNBC in a bunch of newspapers, nobody reads anymore.
13:18
[SPEAKER_02]: This, yes, this is a book that was critical of Trump.
13:22
[SPEAKER_02]: That's what they're going to say.
13:23
[SPEAKER_02]: Using order, karate just doesn't like books written about them that are critical.
13:28
[SPEAKER_02]: Gang, books critical of Trump are a dime a dozen.
13:32
[SPEAKER_02]: They're published every single freaking day.
13:34
[SPEAKER_02]: As CNN and MSNBC are in tire, New York Times, LA, they're in tire industries dedicated to being critical of Trump.
13:44
[SPEAKER_02]: There are all kinds of self-proported tell-alls.
13:50
[SPEAKER_02]: There's all kinds of tabloid rumors about, right?
13:55
[SPEAKER_02]: That's not what this is about.
13:58
[SPEAKER_02]: This is not about a book, critical of Trump.
14:03
[SPEAKER_02]: Instead, there is a very real criminal element to this book, the criminal issue.
14:11
[SPEAKER_02]: was Bolton's decision to publish highly sensitive national security information without proper vetting, without proper authorization, potentially compromising American intelligence sources and methods, and to make it even worse for reported two million dollar book advance.
14:34
[SPEAKER_02]: This is why the FBI rate occurred this morning.
14:37
[SPEAKER_02]: It's about enforcing classification law that protects national security, not about the political content of criticisms and getting paid to reveal those national security secrets to boot.
14:53
[SPEAKER_02]: But there's something, there's something even more pernicious going on here.
15:01
[SPEAKER_02]: No, it makes all of this even worse is that despite the Justice Department's findings back in twenty-twenty, the incoming Biden administration buried the investigation.
15:21
[SPEAKER_02]: Bolton's investigation was shattered by the Biden administration for what sources now described as purely political reasons.
15:29
[SPEAKER_02]: The Biden administration's decision to abandon this investigation back in June of twenty twenty one was payback.
15:38
[SPEAKER_02]: They literally were paying back Bolton for his support in his role in effectively sabotaging Trump effectively but temporarily.
15:48
[SPEAKER_02]: So this shuddering of a perfectly valid Justice Department investigation represented yet again.
15:55
[SPEAKER_02]: a fundamental breakdown in the rule of law that was the chief attribute of the Biden administration.
16:02
[SPEAKER_02]: I don't say Joe Biden because he, you know, he was sleeping half the time.
16:06
[SPEAKER_02]: It was, it was the inner circle.
16:09
[SPEAKER_02]: It was the snakes, the slithorings surrounding him, the worm tongues surrounding.
16:16
[SPEAKER_02]: Rather than allowing federal prosecutors to pursue legitimate criminal charges against Bolton for his clear violations of classification law.
16:24
[SPEAKER_02]: The Biden Justice Department prioritized political considerations over national security, effectively telling every future government official that classification laws don't apply to those with the right political connections.
16:41
[SPEAKER_02]: Now, obviously, this decision undermines the entire intelligence community's ability to function effectively.
16:47
[SPEAKER_02]: And it sent a very, very dangerous message to foreign adversaries about America's commitment to protecting its most sensitive secrets.
16:56
[SPEAKER_02]: And again, just to underscore how pernicious this all was Bolton's memoir earned him a reported two million dollar advance from Simon and Schuster.
17:05
[SPEAKER_02]: So this wasn't just publishing classified information highly sensitive national security information without proper vetting and authorization.
17:13
[SPEAKER_02]: He did it for money.
17:16
[SPEAKER_02]: He was paid millions of dollars in doing this.
17:21
[SPEAKER_02]: And the Biden administration was perfectly cool with that.
17:24
[SPEAKER_02]: Obviously, it only happens to be the Biden family business model.
17:30
[SPEAKER_02]: Hello, Hunter Brisma, the big guy.
17:37
[SPEAKER_02]: Bolton and Biden both represent the rot.
17:42
[SPEAKER_02]: The corrosive corruption.
17:45
[SPEAKER_02]: that permeates the permanent political class, and that's why the probe was dropped.
17:54
[SPEAKER_02]: Because Bolt was one of the gang.
17:56
[SPEAKER_02]: He was part of the club.
17:57
[SPEAKER_02]: A club that operates under the assumption that they write the rules for everyone else while at the same time, exempting themselves from any and all accountability.
18:12
[SPEAKER_02]: That was the world.
18:15
[SPEAKER_02]: of the John Bolton's that have infested Washington DC for decades career bureaucrats and corrupt politicians who literally live above the law while forcing the rest of us to comply with the rules they write for everyone else.
18:33
[SPEAKER_02]: That is the way our capital city has operated for years.
18:39
[SPEAKER_02]: That is until you
18:45
[SPEAKER_02]: came into the picture.
18:49
[SPEAKER_02]: You.
18:52
[SPEAKER_02]: You did something that changed all of that.
18:58
[SPEAKER_02]: You.
19:01
[SPEAKER_02]: You rose up and changed our nation like never before.
19:08
[SPEAKER_02]: You became the swamps worse nightmare.
19:15
[SPEAKER_02]: And that is where this story takes a stunning turn.
19:21
[SPEAKER_02]: But the real irony in all of this is that while corrupt bureaucrats like John Bolton have been weaponizing the system against patriots, there's actually never been a better time for freedom-loving Americans to take control of their financial future.
19:34
[SPEAKER_02]: In fact,
19:36
[SPEAKER_02]: If you've been wanting to get into crypto investing, like Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, right?
19:41
[SPEAKER_02]: But you've always been turned off or intimidated by the volatility, well, meet your night in shining armor.
19:48
[SPEAKER_02]: Block Trust IRA has a super AI system that Bitcoin magazine has named the number one crypto technology platform in the entire world.
19:59
[SPEAKER_02]: That's among fifteen hundred global competitors.
20:03
[SPEAKER_02]: And what that super AI does, you're going to love this.
20:06
[SPEAKER_02]: It works twenty-four-seven to analyze global market data and predicts with uncanny accuracy the highs and lows of crypto volatility.
20:16
[SPEAKER_02]: So block trust IRA then sells at the highs and then buys again at the lows which mitigates the volatility all the while you stand and making credible games.
20:28
[SPEAKER_02]: So that's why I'm a proud client of Block Trust IRA.
20:30
[SPEAKER_02]: I've got my own account with the, again, I got it to I absolutely love them.
20:35
[SPEAKER_02]: They're mission perfectly aligned with President Trump's make America great again agenda smashing down the barriers between loyal patriots and the financial freedom.
20:43
[SPEAKER_02]: They deserve helping true Americans build impressive wealth and Trump's historic economic boom.
20:49
[SPEAKER_02]: So whether you're a
20:50
[SPEAKER_02]: teacher or a truck driver or a small business owner or retiree, this is your chance to get into the crypto market with AI mitigating your volatility risk.
21:00
[SPEAKER_02]: So what are you waiting for?
21:01
[SPEAKER_02]: Click on that link below or visit turlytalkscrypto.com and find out how they can help you join the Trump financial revolution.
21:09
[SPEAKER_02]: It's finally giving forgotten Americans access to the greatest crypto wealth opportunity in history in the best part for limited time.
21:17
[SPEAKER_02]: They're offering my viewers actually up to twenty five hundred dollars
21:20
[SPEAKER_02]: in bonus crypto when you open up an account with them.
21:23
[SPEAKER_02]: Get it's amazing.
21:24
[SPEAKER_02]: I love them again.
21:25
[SPEAKER_02]: I have an account with them.
21:27
[SPEAKER_02]: I'm a client as it were.
21:28
[SPEAKER_02]: Don't wait on this.
21:29
[SPEAKER_02]: You're gonna love it.
21:30
[SPEAKER_02]: Crypto created eighty thousand new millionaires last year.
21:33
[SPEAKER_02]: Hey, why not you next?
21:35
[SPEAKER_02]: This is the golden age, isn't it?
21:37
[SPEAKER_02]: Visit turletoxcrypto.com.
21:39
[SPEAKER_02]: That's turletoxcrypto.com.
21:45
[SPEAKER_02]: On November fifth, twenty twenty four.
21:50
[SPEAKER_02]: You, along with your fellow patriots, tens of millions of you all across the nation, rose up.
21:57
[SPEAKER_02]: I love that picture.
21:59
[SPEAKER_02]: Rose up and said enough, enough of the lies, enough of the freaking corruption, enough of the arrogant, unaccountability.
22:18
[SPEAKER_02]: We together,
22:20
[SPEAKER_02]: tens of millions of us are taking our nation back.
22:27
[SPEAKER_02]: We are wrenching it from the clutches of this corrupt political class.
22:33
[SPEAKER_02]: And we are going to restore our nation to a nation of decency, honor, and virtue.
22:44
[SPEAKER_02]: Cash pretels handling of this investigation really represents everything Patriots have been hoping for in federal law enforcement for years.
22:55
[SPEAKER_02]: Competent, principled, absolutely fearless in the face of Washington's corrupt establishment.
23:02
[SPEAKER_02]: Cash didn't just authorize this raid.
23:05
[SPEAKER_02]: He orchestrated it.
23:08
[SPEAKER_02]: He orchestrated as part of a broader strategy to restore accountability to the intelligence community that is operated without meaningful oversight for far too long systematically abusing its power to advance political agendas rather than protecting American national security.
23:27
[SPEAKER_02]: What makes cash as approach particularly effective is his deep understanding of how the intelligence apparatus actually works, which he gained through years of experience inside the system, witnessing firsthand how figures like John Bolton, manipulated classified information and intelligence processes for personal and political advantage.
23:47
[SPEAKER_02]: We have to remember that unlike previous FBI directors like James Komi for example,
23:52
[SPEAKER_02]: who came from outside the national security world and relied on briefings from the same establishment figures they should have been investigating.
24:02
[SPEAKER_02]: Cash by contrast, he spent years as a House Intelligence Committee staffer, Federal Prosecutor, National Security Council official, all of that gave him unique insight into the methods these operators used to avoid accountability.
24:21
[SPEAKER_02]: Cash's background is both a federal prosecutor and the National Security expert gives him unique credibility in pursuing cases like this.
24:29
[SPEAKER_02]: He understands the legal standards required for the successful prosecutions of classification violations and more importantly, he understands the intelligence community's traditional methods of avoiding accountability through claims of
24:44
[SPEAKER_02]: of executive privilege, national security exceptions, or political interference.
24:51
[SPEAKER_02]: This is just a witch hunt.
24:52
[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, right.
24:54
[SPEAKER_02]: When Cash publicly stated his commitment to rigorous constitutional accountability, he wasn't making empty political promises.
25:02
[SPEAKER_02]: And I think the deep state is finally realizing that now.
25:06
[SPEAKER_02]: He was announcing a fundamental shift in how federal law enforcement approaches elite misconduct.
25:16
[SPEAKER_02]: Now, that said, I know, I know.
25:20
[SPEAKER_02]: Believe me, you have told me loud and clear, I know we've all been frankly running out of patience with this.
25:28
[SPEAKER_02]: We've always sat on our channel over these lessons since January, twenty.
25:35
[SPEAKER_02]: The crushing of the administrative state.
25:38
[SPEAKER_02]: the absolute permanent destruction of the administrative state involves two overall verticals, two overall phases as it were.
25:48
[SPEAKER_02]: the first involves dismantling the deep state by doging all the departments.
25:53
[SPEAKER_02]: And then the second involves the indictments of the criminal elements that have thus far operated with impunity.
26:00
[SPEAKER_02]: So dismantling and indictments are the one two punches as of where the left right that promised to floor the administrative state permanently.
26:09
[SPEAKER_02]: So we've seen the doging right we've seen
26:12
[SPEAKER_02]: the dismantling phase.
26:14
[SPEAKER_02]: So we've seen USAID, shudder its windows, closed its doors permanently.
26:18
[SPEAKER_02]: We've seen the corporation of public broadcasting, which is behind PBS, go defunged.
26:23
[SPEAKER_02]: We've seen the Department of Education abolished all that kind of stuff.
26:27
[SPEAKER_02]: So that's the the dojoing or the dismantling of the administrative state.
26:32
[SPEAKER_02]: But we have all been asking for the last six and a half months.
26:37
[SPEAKER_02]: Where the heck are the indictments?
26:40
[SPEAKER_02]: We've got the doging, but where's the indictments?
26:45
[SPEAKER_02]: That is what we've all been running out of patience for with for sure.
26:50
[SPEAKER_02]: No question.
26:53
[SPEAKER_02]: But as of seven a.m.
27:00
[SPEAKER_02]: this morning,
27:03
[SPEAKER_02]: I think we can now all see that that next phase, the indictment phase has begun.
27:15
[SPEAKER_02]: I think the timing of this raid
27:19
[SPEAKER_02]: demonstrates cash betel strategic acumen and understanding of both legal procedure and political dynamics.
27:28
[SPEAKER_02]: It's not just the fact that it's happening against the backdrop of revelations that Adam Schiff is under investigation.
27:36
[SPEAKER_02]: James Colmy is under investigation.
27:39
[SPEAKER_02]: Colmer is under investigation.
27:41
[SPEAKER_02]: Latisha James is under three investigations reported on that yesterday.
27:46
[SPEAKER_02]: It's not just that this
27:48
[SPEAKER_02]: home rate is happening against the backdrop of that.
27:52
[SPEAKER_02]: It's also just the methodological strategy that cash is using rather rushing into politically charged prosecutions that might be dismissed as partisan revenge plausibly so.
28:06
[SPEAKER_02]: And by the way, not that anyone would really blame Trump for doing that, given what they did to him.
28:14
[SPEAKER_02]: Regardless,
28:16
[SPEAKER_02]: Cash took the high road.
28:18
[SPEAKER_02]: He spent months building what appears to be bulletproof cases and establishing clear legal precedence that will withstand judicial scrutiny.
28:29
[SPEAKER_02]: So here's my name, say, Jonathan Terrell, a law professor George Washington University on how Bolton may actually be looking at up to twenty years in prison as of this morning.
28:42
[SPEAKER_02]: Check this out.
28:43
[SPEAKER_03]: reading here because these are longstanding allegations that the book indicated or reference classified material that he may have acquired when he was in the administration.
28:54
[SPEAKER_03]: We're not clear as to what that is, but it would suggest that it could be national defense information.
29:00
[SPEAKER_03]: The reason that's important is that creates a heightened potential penalty.
29:06
[SPEAKER_03]: So you can have penalties that range from five to twenty years, twenty years tends to be the senses for concealing information, obstructing justice, simply having classified information can weigh in at about ten years and they're often multiple counts because each of those documents can be charged separately.
29:30
[SPEAKER_03]: So there is a strange history here.
29:33
[SPEAKER_03]: So you had these allegations coming out as early as the first Trump administration.
29:38
[SPEAKER_03]: Then there was an allegation that the Biden administration essentially scuttled further look at this case.
29:45
[SPEAKER_03]: And now we have this new development.
29:48
[SPEAKER_03]: But we really don't know if there's something that has occurred most recently, whether they uncovered something that they believe is sort of evergreen that this is still a viable criminal case.
30:03
[SPEAKER_02]: Okay, so the key again here is that Bolton's memoir, the room where it happened, contain what federal judges have already determined to be improperly disclosed classified information spanning multiple categories of sensitive intelligence.
30:16
[SPEAKER_02]: Again, the specifics we don't really have,
30:20
[SPEAKER_02]: But we do have the fixed point in history back in the Justice Department's original twenty twenty investigation conducted by career federal prosecutors with expertise in classification law.
30:34
[SPEAKER_02]: They identified at least six major categories of classified material that remain in the published book despite Bolton's legal obligation to submit all materials for pre-publication review.
30:47
[SPEAKER_02]: Again, these categories included information characterizes exceptionally restricted, which is a kind of intelligence that could jeopardize sources and methods if disclosed to unauthorized recipients and to make patterns even worse, bolt and got paid millions to do it.
31:05
[SPEAKER_02]: He got paid millions to disclose this sensitive and classified information.
31:10
[SPEAKER_02]: He personally profited off of disclosing classified material.
31:15
[SPEAKER_02]: Now, Bolton's defense strategy and what you're going to hear in the legacy media guarantee is that, well, I think it ironically reveals both his arrogance and his fundamental misunderstanding of classification law.
31:35
[SPEAKER_02]: His attorneys have been claiming that a senior career official in the NSC's pre-publication review process had conducted a four-month review of the book.
31:51
[SPEAKER_02]: and concluded that the book contained no classified information.
31:54
[SPEAKER_02]: So guaranteed that is what you're going to hear on CNN and MSNBC.
31:59
[SPEAKER_02]: That sorry guys, national security agencies, official reviewed this book for four months.
32:09
[SPEAKER_02]: and concluded the book contained no classified information.
32:12
[SPEAKER_02]: And his story, this is just political retribution, this is Trump, you know, getting revenge on his enemy's blah, blah, blah, blah.
32:18
[SPEAKER_02]: But this defense, which, after remember, this defense ignores the fact that Bolton had submitted only a partial manuscript for review, remember we talked about that earlier.
32:29
[SPEAKER_02]: He submitted only a partial manuscript for review.
32:34
[SPEAKER_02]: He continued writing and revising the book after receiving feedback and he published material that had never been approved for release.
32:44
[SPEAKER_02]: Bottom line.
32:46
[SPEAKER_02]: Full stop.
32:47
[SPEAKER_02]: It's Katana Jackson would say.
32:50
[SPEAKER_02]: He published material that had never been approved for release.
32:54
[SPEAKER_02]: He did not submit the full manuscript.
32:58
[SPEAKER_02]: and even more damaging to his case, but published the book despite receiving explicit official warnings from the Trump administration officials that it contained classified information that could not be legally disclosed.
33:14
[SPEAKER_02]: So it's not like he wasn't warned.
33:19
[SPEAKER_02]: But what may boldens actors particularly damaging to American national security is the precedent that they set for future officials.
33:27
[SPEAKER_02]: If high ranking national security advisors can publish classified information for personal profit without facing any criminal consequences whatsoever.
33:40
[SPEAKER_02]: The entire classification system becomes meaningless.
33:46
[SPEAKER_02]: That is,
33:49
[SPEAKER_02]: until seven AM this morning.
33:55
[SPEAKER_02]: This morning, the Trump administration's investigation of Bolton sent an unmistakable message to the whole of the swamp that the days of protected status for establishment figures are definitively over.
34:17
[SPEAKER_02]: You're going to get rated
34:20
[SPEAKER_02]: You're going to get indicted and you're going to get prosecuted.
34:27
[SPEAKER_02]: The same legal standards that apply to every other American will now apply to former national security officials regardless of their political connections, media relationships, or ideological alignment with intelligence community preferences.
34:46
[SPEAKER_02]: The American people deserve to know the full extent of this corruption and they deserve to see comprehensive accountability for the officials who've abused their positions for decades.
35:00
[SPEAKER_02]: Make no mistake.
35:02
[SPEAKER_02]: Bolton's prosecution will provide a road map for future cases that expose the systematic abuse of government power by establishment figures who consider themselves above the law.
35:15
[SPEAKER_02]: After all, the intelligence community's protection of Bolton during the body years illustrates just how deeply this corruption runs throughout the entire federal bureaucracy, former CIA director John Brennan, former director of National Intelligence James Clapper, dozens of other former intelligence officials.
35:35
[SPEAKER_02]: FBI, Colmy and all, they all publicly defended Bolton's right to publish classified information while simultaneously participating in disinformation campaigns of their own deliberately designed as sabotage a presidency.
35:52
[SPEAKER_02]: The entire system has been infected.
35:57
[SPEAKER_02]: And so looking ahead, I think today's
36:01
[SPEAKER_02]: Raid of Bolton's home means that we can expect to see additional prosecutions of intelligence community figures, who participated in politically motivated investigations, foreign policy officials who lead classified information to influence American elections, hello, Adam Chef, and media figures who knowingly spread this information on behalf of government sources.
36:29
[SPEAKER_02]: the precedence established by Bolton's case.
36:33
[SPEAKER_02]: Promise to provide the legal foundation for these future prosecutions.
36:39
[SPEAKER_02]: While deterring similar violations by current officials who might otherwise be tempted to abuse their positions.
36:47
[SPEAKER_02]: It's increasingly looking as if Bolton's prosecution will be the first domino to fall in the complete dismantling of the intelligence community's corruption.
37:02
[SPEAKER_02]: The swamp we can safely say is now finally being drained.
37:11
[SPEAKER_02]: And it's even more satisfying than we could have ever imagined.
37:15
[SPEAKER_02]: We might even say,
37:18
[SPEAKER_02]: It's morning again in America.
37:24
[SPEAKER_02]: Over to you.
37:25
[SPEAKER_02]: Over to you.
37:25
[SPEAKER_02]: I want to hear what you have to say if you're just joining us.
37:27
[SPEAKER_02]: I'd love to hear your thoughts on all of this.
37:29
[SPEAKER_02]: Let us know what you think by the sending us a super chat or by clicking on the link below.
37:32
[SPEAKER_02]: And joining our courageous patriarch club.
37:35
[SPEAKER_02]: We're for just one monthly fee.
37:36
[SPEAKER_02]: I'll feature your comments on our broadcasts and you can ask me as many questions as you like.
37:41
[SPEAKER_02]: I'll be happy to answer them here on this live stream either way super chats or courageous pages club.
37:46
[SPEAKER_02]: Whatever you like.
37:47
[SPEAKER_02]: Also, if you are a homer, a homer, are you a homer?
37:52
[SPEAKER_02]: If you are a home owner like me, you need to listen to this.
37:56
[SPEAKER_02]: When was the last time you checked on your home title?
38:00
[SPEAKER_02]: That's the legal proof you've shown your house.
38:03
[SPEAKER_02]: Well, if you're like me, the answer to that is never.
38:05
[SPEAKER_02]: The problem is that in today's AI and cyber world, scammers are stealing home titles and your equities to the target.
38:11
[SPEAKER_02]: So it works like this, criminals forge your signature on one document.
38:15
[SPEAKER_02]: They use a fake notary stamp.
38:17
[SPEAKER_02]: They pay just a small fee with your county and boom, that's it.
38:21
[SPEAKER_02]: Your home title's been transferred out of your name.
38:24
[SPEAKER_02]: And then they take out loans using your equity.
38:27
[SPEAKER_02]: They even some even sell your property and you won't know what's happened until you get collection notices or for closure notices.
38:32
[SPEAKER_02]: So that's why you need to stop what you're doing right now.
38:35
[SPEAKER_02]: Find out today if you've already been a victim.
38:38
[SPEAKER_02]: Just use promo code trolleytalks at home title lock.com.
38:42
[SPEAKER_02]: Charlie talks is all one word and you can see if your title is still in your name.
38:47
[SPEAKER_02]: You also end that process.
38:48
[SPEAKER_02]: You get a free title history report plus a free fourteen day trial of their million dollar triple lock protections twenty four seven monitoring of your title urgent alerts to any changes and a fraud should happen.
39:00
[SPEAKER_02]: They'll spend up to one million dollars to fix it.
39:02
[SPEAKER_02]: Go to home title lock dot com right now.
39:04
[SPEAKER_02]: Use promo code.
39:05
[SPEAKER_02]: Charlie talks that's home title lock dot com promo code.
39:11
[SPEAKER_02]: early talks.
39:11
[SPEAKER_02]: All right.
39:12
[SPEAKER_02]: All right.
39:13
[SPEAKER_02]: A new day has dawned seven a.m.
39:17
[SPEAKER_02]: What do you guys think?
39:17
[SPEAKER_02]: Let's hear it.
39:19
[SPEAKER_02]: Voldemort.
39:20
[SPEAKER_02]: Thank you for the super chat.
39:22
[SPEAKER_02]: Steve, you're the true hero to Russia's legacy.
39:24
[SPEAKER_02]: Keep up the great work.
39:25
[SPEAKER_02]: God bless you, Voldemort.
39:27
[SPEAKER_02]: He who must not be named God bless you for that.
39:31
[SPEAKER_02]: I do not deserve that.
39:33
[SPEAKER_02]: I am not worthy of that.
39:34
[SPEAKER_02]: I met Rush.
39:35
[SPEAKER_02]: You may know this back in ninety six.
39:38
[SPEAKER_02]: When he used to do his TV show a bunch of us went up at college.
39:42
[SPEAKER_02]: We were at college at the time and we went up and saw Rush and a taping of the show.
39:48
[SPEAKER_02]: We were down the hall from Sally Chessie Raphaels.
39:50
[SPEAKER_02]: That's a very funny story.
39:51
[SPEAKER_02]: We're all there in our suits and then you have kind of a strange sort of
39:56
[SPEAKER_02]: You know, riff rap that go to Sally Jesse Raphael shows and Rush couldn't have been kinder.
40:02
[SPEAKER_02]: You couldn't have been sweeter.
40:03
[SPEAKER_02]: He met with all of us chat with us.
40:05
[SPEAKER_02]: We got his autograph.
40:06
[SPEAKER_02]: He was unbelievable.
40:07
[SPEAKER_02]: And I miss him.
40:08
[SPEAKER_02]: I miss him dearly.
40:10
[SPEAKER_02]: Whenever I hear his voice, you know, you just get that warm feeling of just because when you heard Rush talk, you've just felt like everything was going to be okay.
40:18
[SPEAKER_02]: And, you know, to the extent that I'm able to carry on that legacy, you know, it's just, it's my honor.
40:24
[SPEAKER_02]: So thank you.
40:24
[SPEAKER_02]: Thank you, Voldemort.
40:28
[SPEAKER_02]: Rothcore, Dr. Steve March, ten to sixteen the worst week for Democrats March, seventeen to twenty actual worst week for the March, twenty for the worst week for the worst week.
40:37
[SPEAKER_02]: Twenty worst weeks for Democrats later August, eighteen to twenty for worst week for Democrat yet.
40:43
[SPEAKER_02]: On the losing twenty twenty six of twenty eight.
40:45
[SPEAKER_02]: When will the worst week for Democrats actually be the worst week for Democrats?
40:49
[SPEAKER_02]: I know many of us are here enjoying it.
40:50
[SPEAKER_02]: But it's really started to get kind of sad though.
40:52
[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, not tired of winning, right?
40:54
[SPEAKER_02]: Not tired of winning.
40:56
[SPEAKER_02]: Oh boy, I don't know, twenty, twenty, six, the way the midterm's shaping up right now.
41:02
[SPEAKER_02]: That's going to be a kick in the solar plexus for them.
41:04
[SPEAKER_02]: That's for sure.
41:06
[SPEAKER_02]: They're falling apart there.
41:08
[SPEAKER_02]: The voter registration crisis that even the New York Times is talking about.
41:11
[SPEAKER_02]: And that's probably the single most predictive indicator for how an election is going to turn out is voter registration trends and Republicans are crushing Democrats like two to one, three to one.
41:23
[SPEAKER_02]: It's been a what four point five million voter swing to Republicans since twenty twenty.
41:30
[SPEAKER_02]: And then of course, twenty eight.
41:32
[SPEAKER_02]: It'll be a disaster.
41:33
[SPEAKER_02]: Gavin Newsom is already turning out to be an absolute disaster.
41:38
[SPEAKER_02]: I don't know.
41:39
[SPEAKER_02]: Maybe the Minneapolis, it's at the Somali Socialist and Minneapolis.
41:45
[SPEAKER_02]: Maybe he becomes their major poster child and presidential candidate.
41:50
[SPEAKER_02]: That would probably be the where that would be the day.
41:52
[SPEAKER_02]: We realize a third party is going to come about.
41:54
[SPEAKER_02]: There is going to be a party to replace the Democrats and they'll go the way of the wigs.
41:59
[SPEAKER_02]: But yeah, things stand right now.
42:01
[SPEAKER_02]: We're crushing it.
42:02
[SPEAKER_02]: And we're crushing it at every freaking level.
42:04
[SPEAKER_02]: It's awesome.
42:08
[SPEAKER_02]: Willow tool would Trump ever push for both Ukraine and Russia to be part of a nation thus rewarding any future conflicts with Putin and the Russians.
42:16
[SPEAKER_02]: And at the same time offering Ukraine some protection to be part of, do you mean NATO?
42:23
[SPEAKER_02]: Oh, I think you meant NATO.
42:25
[SPEAKER_02]: There you go.
42:27
[SPEAKER_02]: Could Ukraine and Russia both become part of NATO.
42:30
[SPEAKER_02]: Now, it's funny.
42:31
[SPEAKER_02]: I have seen that idea floated around.
42:33
[SPEAKER_02]: That one thing we could do is we can offer Russia, NATO membership.
42:38
[SPEAKER_02]: And then and then it just completely pulls the rug out from under the the central concern.
42:46
[SPEAKER_02]: I mean he could that's it's very clever.
42:50
[SPEAKER_02]: There's nothing to say though that two NATO nations can't go at it.
42:56
[SPEAKER_02]: As I understand it.
43:00
[SPEAKER_02]: But that said.
43:03
[SPEAKER_02]: I don't know about that.
43:04
[SPEAKER_02]: I think Russia so distrusts NATO right now.
43:08
[SPEAKER_02]: They so distrust the West rightly so.
43:12
[SPEAKER_02]: I mean, you know, for good or bad, I'm not saying Russia's angels in this, but the West has betrayed Russia over and over and over again.
43:20
[SPEAKER_02]: It's never missed a chance to betray Russia.
43:25
[SPEAKER_02]: and certainly Russia's reciprocated.
43:27
[SPEAKER_02]: So I just the bad blood there is so strong.
43:30
[SPEAKER_02]: But it is, I love the way you're thinking.
43:32
[SPEAKER_02]: It's a brilliant sort of counterintuitive
43:35
[SPEAKER_02]: measure that would, at least on the surface seem to resolve the issue.
43:41
[SPEAKER_02]: But I don't think NATO would agree to it either.
43:45
[SPEAKER_02]: I mean, NATO is there to be an anti-Russian force.
43:50
[SPEAKER_02]: So NATO itself would have to be completely realigned in terms of its mission goals, vision, and so on, rationale.
44:00
[SPEAKER_02]: So we'll have to say, great.
44:01
[SPEAKER_02]: I love it, though.
44:04
[SPEAKER_02]: Maximilian, if the mandatory politics about liberating oneself from un-choes and bonds, why can't liberate myself from emancipatory politics?
44:13
[SPEAKER_02]: Well said, Maximilian, so if you don't know, if you guys don't know, Maximilian's using very technical language here, political and analytical language.
44:24
[SPEAKER_02]: So emancipatory politics is the politics of globalism.
44:27
[SPEAKER_02]: So what globalism in effect is is a one size fits all political and economic system that's supposed to be superimposed upon the world.
44:35
[SPEAKER_02]: The problem is is that unique and peculiar cultures, customs, traditions, religions sort of get in the way of that project of imposing this one size fits all political and economic.
44:50
[SPEAKER_02]: system.
44:51
[SPEAKER_02]: And so globalist systems entails them to call the mandatory politics where they recast those culture's customs and traditions as inherently racist, bigoted, phobic, and the light.
45:07
[SPEAKER_02]: And therefore now they think they have the high ground in seeking to liberate populations from their customs and their religions and their patriarchal traditions and so on.
45:22
[SPEAKER_02]: But what Maximilian is identifying is sort of the key
45:29
[SPEAKER_02]: The Achilles heel in liberalism as a whole emancipatory, I mean emancipatory politics is just a fancy way of talking about the political system that is liberalism.
45:41
[SPEAKER_02]: He's identifying the Achilles heel, the inherent contradiction.
45:46
[SPEAKER_02]: There's a few inherent in liberalism, which is liberalism says we want you to be free.
45:53
[SPEAKER_02]: We want you to be free from all oppressive structures.
45:57
[SPEAKER_02]: And then the joke is, okay, but can I be free from liberalism?
46:01
[SPEAKER_02]: When liberalism's telling me it's okay for a transathlete.
46:07
[SPEAKER_02]: to spike a volleyball into the face of the girl on the other side of the net, or a trans athlete swimmer to come in first place by twenty seconds.
46:20
[SPEAKER_02]: If I, as a female athlete, if I find that oppressive, can I be liberated from that?
46:25
[SPEAKER_02]: Can I be emancipated?
46:26
[SPEAKER_02]: And of course the answer is no.
46:28
[SPEAKER_02]: And so that's why,
46:31
[SPEAKER_02]: That's why in the Russian tradition, if you look at the history of Russian conservatism in the twentieth century, very interesting studies.
46:37
[SPEAKER_02]: John Anderson, if I recall, is one of the, I get that right.
46:41
[SPEAKER_02]: John Anderson, not, I think John Anderson's the Australian Robinson, Robert, I forget.
46:48
[SPEAKER_02]: There's a Russian scholar, if you just look up like the history of Russian conservatism
46:56
[SPEAKER_02]: He does a very good study showing how Russians back in the early nineties were calling liberalism liberal totalitarianism.
47:07
[SPEAKER_02]: They recognize that liberalism says you're free to do anything you want except be unliberal or illiberal or anti-liberal.
47:14
[SPEAKER_02]: You're not free to do that.
47:16
[SPEAKER_02]: And it's an inherent contradiction.
47:18
[SPEAKER_02]: It shows you the inherent futility in this notion that liberation is the ultimate end in and of itself, because inevitably you're going to be liberating emancipating people.
47:33
[SPEAKER_02]: from the very source of true emancipation.
47:37
[SPEAKER_02]: You're going to be emancipating people from things that from which they should not be emancipated from faith, family, freedom.
47:43
[SPEAKER_02]: And those faith, family, provide the basis for true freedom, for true liberty, for true emancipation.
47:50
[SPEAKER_02]: Because it's not just being emancipated from, it's also being emancipated to something positive, something that's true, good and beautiful.
47:59
[SPEAKER_02]: And when you're, when you're constantly, uh, freeing people from their traditions is a truly good and beautiful, you end up undermining the very foundations of freedom itself and hence you become just another totalitarian system.
48:13
[SPEAKER_02]: So brilliant, maximum, you're always brilliant.
48:16
[SPEAKER_02]: You know that.
48:16
[SPEAKER_02]: You've got, you are, uh, when I grow up, I'm going to be just like you.
48:22
[SPEAKER_02]: Davorals, cracker barrel changed its logo, the guys online, even the Fox News Facebook account or St.
48:27
[SPEAKER_02]: Cracker barrel has gone woke.
48:29
[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, it looks like it's their Bud Light moment.
48:31
[SPEAKER_02]: It seems like they've just gone lame.
48:33
[SPEAKER_02]: The Dominion making everything woke is a real problem.
48:37
[SPEAKER_02]: But our freedom people are starting to have a problem calling everything woke.
48:41
[SPEAKER_02]: Do we not risk diminishing the meaning of the word woke in the same way that Dominion is cheapened through overuse the word racist, right?
48:48
[SPEAKER_02]: It's a great question, Davoros.
48:52
[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, I mean, sure.
48:53
[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, you can end up diluting the meaning of a word through it to overuse, absolutely kind of sky is falling, crying wolf kind of, you know, fableish application there.
49:10
[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, I guess I think the reason why people like Chris Rufo and others are starting to zero in cracker barrels because it exemplifies all of the same dynamics as the Bud Light Fiasco.
49:25
[SPEAKER_02]: So you got a CEO, you know, an executive coming in again, you know, just this white liberal woman.
49:39
[SPEAKER_02]: Oh my gosh, that's too funny.
49:41
[SPEAKER_02]: Oh, Josh has too much time on his hands.
49:43
[SPEAKER_02]: That's right.
49:44
[SPEAKER_02]: Well, we all know which one we prefer there.
49:46
[SPEAKER_02]: That's right.
49:47
[SPEAKER_02]: I've also seen they want to bring back the logo, the man on the porch and they're making it Trump with a shotgun or something like that.
49:54
[SPEAKER_02]: So they're all in the rocking chair on the porch.
49:58
[SPEAKER_02]: It's exemplifying the same pattern.
50:00
[SPEAKER_02]: It's a white liberal woman, you know, executive.
50:04
[SPEAKER_02]: We don't even know why she's in executive in the first place.
50:08
[SPEAKER_02]: It's obviously not because of competence, because of what we call bioleninism.
50:13
[SPEAKER_02]: When people are promoted, not for competence, but because they check the right identity boxes, and therefore competence becomes the first victim in that.
50:21
[SPEAKER_02]: And so bioleninism systems always are guaranteed.
50:24
[SPEAKER_02]: to implode under the weight of their own incompetency, their own competency crisis.
50:30
[SPEAKER_02]: So you've got this CEO coming in, then she's making all these changes because she's claiming it's all what they've been doing is all outdated and we have to get with the times and we don't believe in this stuff anymore.
50:42
[SPEAKER_02]: We want to be bold and progressive and new
50:46
[SPEAKER_02]: and woke.
50:47
[SPEAKER_02]: And so, well, there should be not using word woke.
50:50
[SPEAKER_02]: And that everybody's behind it.
50:52
[SPEAKER_02]: We're getting all this great feedback.
50:54
[SPEAKER_02]: It's literally, she's playing the very playbook that the Bud Light marketing CEO played.
51:01
[SPEAKER_02]: And it was a disaster and it had already been a disaster for Cracker Barrel.
51:04
[SPEAKER_02]: Again, we don't have to even say anything.
51:05
[SPEAKER_02]: We don't have to even use the word woe.
51:07
[SPEAKER_02]: They've lost billions in market cap just the following day after after the new logos was run the exact opposite, of course, American Eagle with the Sydney Sweeney campaign that gained billions in market valuation.
51:22
[SPEAKER_02]: Because we
51:24
[SPEAKER_02]: because it's very interesting, there was a Harvard study on marketing that found that conservative marketing was on the rise, that appealing to traditional, nationalist, populist values,
51:40
[SPEAKER_02]: was on the rise because they called it aspirational marketing that marketing that appeals to the best of us and the best of our ideals and so forth is what consumers are really attracted to not not being lectured to of how racist and bigoted and sexist we are.
52:03
[SPEAKER_02]: Brian, good to hear from you, my friends.
52:05
[SPEAKER_02]: Are anything to be made of the judge, granted the environmental successes in their alligator, I'll get our allies lost.
52:10
[SPEAKER_02]: Now, I think it'll be, it'll be, it'll be overturned.
52:13
[SPEAKER_02]: I don't think we have to worry about that.
52:15
[SPEAKER_02]: The appellate process has been pretty darn kind to us of light.
52:18
[SPEAKER_02]: I mean, we just found that out with the whole Latisha James, what is this name?
52:22
[SPEAKER_02]: And Goron, Judge and Goron case that just more or less got kicked out yesterday, a throw-out.
52:29
[SPEAKER_02]: I don't think so.
52:30
[SPEAKER_02]: Again, these are just these temporary, at least it's not a nationwide injunction.
52:35
[SPEAKER_02]: And I have to see was it a Florida?
52:38
[SPEAKER_02]: Court either way, it'll get overturned.
52:41
[SPEAKER_02]: I don't have any, I don't expect any delays there, especially if it's a federal, you know, because of the supremacy clause, if this is a federal agent detention facility, they'll be able to remove that injunction.
53:02
[SPEAKER_02]: Allen just saw on X and Obama appointed judge.
53:06
[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, has ordered alligator arbitrage clothes and dismantled within sixty days.
53:09
[SPEAKER_02]: I know it won't happen.
53:10
[SPEAKER_02]: Good for you, but it is.
53:12
[SPEAKER_02]: But to the point that Skoda is going to have to take discipline measures, it may be, yeah, a single judge can't turn around and shut down federal operations.
53:22
[SPEAKER_02]: If it's a state judge.
53:25
[SPEAKER_02]: So I don't think we have to worry about that at all.
53:30
[SPEAKER_02]: Maximilian is there any proof that Carl popper's open society's real possible or even desirable.
53:35
[SPEAKER_02]: Well, certainly George Soros would hope that it is.
53:39
[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, again, I see, I see the open, how do I put this?
53:45
[SPEAKER_02]: I see the open society.
53:49
[SPEAKER_02]: as a, again, as a veneer.
53:52
[SPEAKER_02]: So it's open societies are basically, you know, rather they claim to be radically democrat democratic societies with full transparency and how government operates.
54:04
[SPEAKER_02]: But they're dedicated to eradicating culture, custom tradition.
54:09
[SPEAKER_02]: It's a one-size-fits-all political and economic system, superimposed upon all cultures, totally respective of their customs and their traditions.
54:19
[SPEAKER_02]: If politics is downstream from culture, open society concept flips that, it inverts that, and makes culture now subservient to this one-size-fits-all.
54:31
[SPEAKER_02]: ideological abstracted politics and economics.
54:35
[SPEAKER_02]: And so to me, it's just all of the nearer for a very small collective elite to centralize power and affluence in the end.
54:46
[SPEAKER_02]: And this is just the way that they think they can sell it.
54:49
[SPEAKER_02]: That kind of centralization to the world.
54:52
[SPEAKER_02]: Because I think in many ways open societies is ultimately connected to a de facto one world government.
54:59
[SPEAKER_02]: to oversee the full to protect the open societies.
55:06
[SPEAKER_02]: And we find to it tends today to be so connected with environmental apocalypticism that you're not allowed
55:14
[SPEAKER_02]: to vote who you want in, because your vote could literally destroy the planet.
55:18
[SPEAKER_02]: If you want to bring in these evil populists, then now all of a sudden, your vote is a threat to human survival.
55:26
[SPEAKER_02]: That's the way they think.
55:27
[SPEAKER_02]: So they see themselves perfectly justified in overturning elections through color revolutions and so on.
55:36
[SPEAKER_02]: Lord of Stungberg.
55:39
[SPEAKER_02]: While they were attacking Trump, his team was seeing where the shots was coming from, would you agree?
55:44
[SPEAKER_02]: While they were attacking Trump, his team was seeing where the shots were coming for, yeah, I mean, I think you're being metaphorical, right?
55:53
[SPEAKER_02]: We're not talking about Butler, but yeah, no, that's right.
55:57
[SPEAKER_02]: This is what they're so horrified by.
56:01
[SPEAKER_02]: They're horrified by the fact that
56:04
[SPEAKER_02]: You know, this was, this was, I mean, I hate to say it, but in a sense, you know, this is a, do or be done.
56:12
[SPEAKER_02]: How's that?
56:13
[SPEAKER_02]: I'll say it that way.
56:14
[SPEAKER_02]: I mean, you know, they came on out.
56:16
[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, I mean, especially like Comer, Comi and Clapper, James Comer, Brennan, they all came out.
56:25
[SPEAKER_02]: You know, I mean, Adam's shift, you name it.
56:29
[SPEAKER_02]: They all came out and they were, they public, Hillary Clinton, they all publicly.
56:35
[SPEAKER_02]: They are trying to take this guy down.
56:39
[SPEAKER_02]: Now, the reason why they showed their cards in this is because the legacy media was rewarding every politician that was showing their card.
56:48
[SPEAKER_02]: The legacy media and the Democrats and the establishment general, the Mitt Romney's, the Paul Ryan's at the time, the John McCain.
56:56
[SPEAKER_02]: They were all united in trying to get written John Boltones.
57:00
[SPEAKER_02]: They were all united in trying to get rid of Trump.
57:02
[SPEAKER_02]: That was their mission.
57:03
[SPEAKER_02]: Trump was an existential threat to their world.
57:07
[SPEAKER_02]: the world that they had built where they make the rules and they're not accountable to anybody.
57:11
[SPEAKER_02]: So it's a world of power and affluence we simply have never seen before because it's done at a global scale.
57:18
[SPEAKER_02]: So they showed their bonafines for all the world to see via the media because the media was rewarding that.
57:26
[SPEAKER_02]: They were saying that's virtuous.
57:27
[SPEAKER_02]: Look at how brave these guys are.
57:29
[SPEAKER_02]: Look at what kind of patriots these guys are.
57:33
[SPEAKER_02]: And so you bat everybody.
57:35
[SPEAKER_02]: So there is this undercurrent.
57:38
[SPEAKER_02]: deep state undercurrent that's going on that's pretty dark and cd that's the Epstein realm that's the Epstein sort of level but then you have the surface level it's very real that's that's where they do come out into the sunlight I guess these are the vampires that can deal with the sun and they show their cards for everybody's say mixing on my metaphors but you get the point and and now now what we seem to be doing is we're we're kind of
58:08
[SPEAKER_02]: They're, we're hitting them at both levels.
58:10
[SPEAKER_02]: We'll have to see what happens with the whole Epstein thing, but we're certainly hitting them at that surface level.
58:15
[SPEAKER_02]: Everybody came out and showed their cards.
58:18
[SPEAKER_02]: Now we're going to take you out.
58:19
[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah.
58:20
[SPEAKER_02]: I mean, we've got all the evidence.
58:21
[SPEAKER_02]: We've got you.
58:22
[SPEAKER_02]: We've got you incriminating yourself on, you know, on television, on CNN and MSNBC.
58:30
[SPEAKER_02]: Bahakad, more bipartisan internet censorship bills like the one from Marsha Blackburn are popping up under the guys who's saving the kids.
58:39
[SPEAKER_02]: I'm against letting miners access adult content, but mostly this is a backdoor salt and free speech and a way to de-platforming artist creators and independent political pundits the establishment.
58:48
[SPEAKER_02]: Like how real is this threat becoming here in the US.
58:51
[SPEAKER_02]: It's a good question.
58:52
[SPEAKER_02]: I don't really know.
58:53
[SPEAKER_02]: I don't
58:59
[SPEAKER_02]: I think we have to get used to not seeing threats all the time.
59:02
[SPEAKER_02]: I do.
59:03
[SPEAKER_02]: I think we have to kind of as much as I love Alex Jones.
59:07
[SPEAKER_02]: I think we do have to sort of exercise the sky is falling, kind of chicken little element here.
59:13
[SPEAKER_02]: I'm not accusing you of that even though I kind of am subtly.
59:19
[SPEAKER_02]: But I don't mean to.
59:20
[SPEAKER_02]: I just think we're winning so much.
59:22
[SPEAKER_02]: Let's, let's focus on the winning.
59:24
[SPEAKER_02]: If there is something really serious, like with the concern about Pam Bond, the in Epstein and the Miss handling of that, well, we'll make it.
59:33
[SPEAKER_02]: We'll make it very, very clear.
59:35
[SPEAKER_02]: Before any kind of bill that can silence us, we'll make it very clear.
59:38
[SPEAKER_02]: We will not be silence.
59:40
[SPEAKER_02]: We will find ways of bypassing that certainly Elon is on our side with that.
59:45
[SPEAKER_02]: He seems to be more and more ditching this whole stupid notion of the America party, which is one of the dumbest.
59:54
[SPEAKER_02]: In pulse of moments of his life seems to me so I think I just I'm not seeing anything that Giving us giving me warning flags, but we'll see keep us up to date on it
1:00:10
[SPEAKER_02]: Bob, how does it feel to be treated?
1:00:13
[SPEAKER_02]: Oh, a question to John Bolton, how does it feel to be treated like Donald Trump has been?
1:00:18
[SPEAKER_02]: It is one of the most delicious examples of ironic justice or poetic justice imaginable that a swamp creature like Bolton who is accusing Trump at the time with the Mara logo raid.
1:00:34
[SPEAKER_02]: that he improperly used or improperly handling classified information, which is a contradiction in terms when you're the president.
1:00:47
[SPEAKER_02]: You're the only person on the planet where that rule does not apply.
1:00:50
[SPEAKER_02]: because you're the person who does have ultimate classification authority.
1:00:54
[SPEAKER_02]: The president has ultimate planary classification authority cannot be guilty of mishandling classified information by definition.
1:01:03
[SPEAKER_02]: He is the president.
1:01:06
[SPEAKER_02]: The opposite would be then that unelected intelligence bureaucrats, career bureaucrats, have ultimate authority over intelligence classification, and therefore can weaponize that to silence any duly elected political authorities that they don't like, like they tried, just like they tried to do with Trump.
1:01:30
[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, the irony is that Bolton is now in the very position that he claimed Trump was in, but he for him because he wasn't president.
1:01:38
[SPEAKER_02]: He doesn't have plenary authority.
1:01:40
[SPEAKER_02]: He shot where these were charges that were never were even remotely valid.
1:01:45
[SPEAKER_02]: But again, you can't tell MSNBC that.
1:01:47
[SPEAKER_02]: You can't tell the newer times that because they've already pre-convicted them.
1:01:52
[SPEAKER_02]: They just need to find a crime.
1:01:56
[SPEAKER_02]: T.C.
1:01:57
[SPEAKER_02]: Suffolk.
1:01:58
[SPEAKER_02]: I watched Promethean updates hosted by Barbara and Susan.
1:02:02
[SPEAKER_02]: We're reference to in your live chat lots of crossover.
1:02:05
[SPEAKER_02]: Please check them out possible collab.
1:02:07
[SPEAKER_02]: I will.
1:02:08
[SPEAKER_02]: I'll make a note of that.
1:02:09
[SPEAKER_02]: I do like they focus obviously a lot on what's going on in Britain.
1:02:14
[SPEAKER_02]: So yeah, Barbara and Susan will have to hook up.
1:02:17
[SPEAKER_02]: Thank you for that, T.C.
1:02:18
[SPEAKER_02]: Suffolk.
1:02:22
[SPEAKER_02]: Cody, uh, twenty ones or two Obama has been coming out a little from under his rock recently.
1:02:28
[SPEAKER_02]: How much power does he still have in the Democrat party?
1:02:31
[SPEAKER_02]: Um, not much.
1:02:34
[SPEAKER_02]: Not much.
1:02:35
[SPEAKER_02]: He, he still has, he still has power in the apparatus in the power structure.
1:02:42
[SPEAKER_02]: Uh, he got rid of Joe as I understand it.
1:02:44
[SPEAKER_02]: That was, that was Barack Barack at rid of Joe.
1:02:47
[SPEAKER_02]: But Barack did not want Kamala.
1:02:50
[SPEAKER_02]: That's the word on the street.
1:02:52
[SPEAKER_02]: And yet, she showed that she could circumvent him.
1:02:58
[SPEAKER_02]: So he has nowhere near the power, say, for example, Trump.
1:03:04
[SPEAKER_02]: If Trump wants something, he gets it in the party.
1:03:07
[SPEAKER_02]: And if somebody tries to circumvent him, that person gets crushed real fast.
1:03:12
[SPEAKER_02]: That's just pure role political power for right or for wrong.
1:03:15
[SPEAKER_02]: It's just pure power.
1:03:16
[SPEAKER_02]: So, because that's what politics is, and the end is power.
1:03:19
[SPEAKER_02]: So, I just don't think Obama has that much power.
1:03:22
[SPEAKER_02]: Again, he has a lot of power in the globe.
1:03:25
[SPEAKER_02]: Well, I don't even know how much power he has.
1:03:29
[SPEAKER_02]: He has a lot of glitz and glam in the globalist circles that he runs, the Davos like circles.
1:03:41
[SPEAKER_02]: And he still has some power inside the Democrat apparatus, but the Democrat apparatus right now barely has any power.
1:03:51
[SPEAKER_02]: They can't control M. Donnie.
1:03:53
[SPEAKER_02]: They did not want M. Donnie.
1:03:54
[SPEAKER_02]: They certainly didn't want.
1:03:55
[SPEAKER_02]: Well, they're doing their best.
1:03:56
[SPEAKER_02]: It looks like they're going to sink this Somalia and socialist.
1:03:59
[SPEAKER_02]: We'll have to see the Democrat party there in.
1:04:05
[SPEAKER_02]: Minnesota withdrew there.
1:04:06
[SPEAKER_02]: I don't know if you heard they just withdrew their supportive him because they said they're they're looked like there were some irregularities in the primary process.
1:04:14
[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, right now.
1:04:15
[SPEAKER_02]: They just they just saw the polling national polling and it was a disaster.
1:04:20
[SPEAKER_02]: So I they just don't just I don't think the Democrats have a lot of power inside the apparatus itself.
1:04:26
[SPEAKER_02]: It's just a dying party at this point.
1:04:31
[SPEAKER_02]: Cody, let's all take a moment to enjoy how lucky we are to be living in an era where the likes of Obama, Woodward Fauci, et cetera, of all living long enough to see their legacies completely destroyed.
1:04:44
[SPEAKER_02]: Amen to that.
1:04:47
[SPEAKER_02]: That gets some applause across the nation, across the world.
1:04:51
[SPEAKER_02]: Amen to that.
1:04:53
[SPEAKER_02]: That is a brilliant observation, Cody.
1:04:57
[SPEAKER_02]: It is amazing for them to see their
1:05:01
[SPEAKER_02]: legacies collapse.
1:05:04
[SPEAKER_02]: It is.
1:05:04
[SPEAKER_02]: Again, this is what they were panicked about.
1:05:07
[SPEAKER_02]: This is what they were so worried about.
1:05:08
[SPEAKER_02]: The bushes, the Obama's, the Clintons, they were all seeing the world they helped create both parties, right?
1:05:19
[SPEAKER_02]: The duopoly, the uniparty, the world they helped create collapse.
1:05:26
[SPEAKER_02]: And then that means they might be held accountable.
1:05:30
[SPEAKER_02]: You know, we don't know how to live in a world we didn't create.
1:05:35
[SPEAKER_02]: And so yeah, they're freaking out and make no mistake as of right now as we speak.
1:05:40
[SPEAKER_02]: They are freaking out.
1:05:41
[SPEAKER_02]: They are lawyer, lawyer ring up as we as I heard Adam Schiff is big time.
1:05:47
[SPEAKER_02]: The shift is hitting the fan.
1:05:50
[SPEAKER_02]: He is lowering up big time.
1:05:51
[SPEAKER_02]: They're all lowering up because they know the world that they built is no longer there to protect them.
1:06:02
[SPEAKER_02]: Magga, twenty forever, Dr. Steve Trump posted he's going to do an EO to eliminate mail-in voting and electronic machines.
1:06:10
[SPEAKER_02]: Can it be that simple or would it need Congress's help to codify?
1:06:13
[SPEAKER_02]: I don't think it's going to need Congress's help.
1:06:16
[SPEAKER_02]: The only thing I'm seeing is that the Supreme Court might knock it down because all planary authority for elections constitutionally resides
1:06:30
[SPEAKER_02]: in the state legislature.
1:06:31
[SPEAKER_02]: So not even the governor in individual states has authority over elections.
1:06:36
[SPEAKER_02]: It is the state legislature is not necessarily the federal or our executive branch.
1:06:43
[SPEAKER_02]: But there are basic, this is where the voting rights act is coming in.
1:06:51
[SPEAKER_02]: It looks like it's going to get overturned by the way, it's been abused of late.
1:06:55
[SPEAKER_02]: But there are some properly basic protocols that all elections have to abide by, Fourteenth Amendment and so on.
1:07:03
[SPEAKER_02]: You're not allowed to deny people their due process and being able to.
1:07:07
[SPEAKER_02]: to be able to have their vote count and so on.
1:07:13
[SPEAKER_02]: So yeah, well, that's the only one I know of that might get in the way of this, that the Supreme Court might come in and say, look, if
1:07:25
[SPEAKER_02]: If Washington wants like it does, state of Washington wants to do, it's election entirely by mail and ballot.
1:07:31
[SPEAKER_02]: That's, that's it's steel.
1:07:32
[SPEAKER_02]: Now, the argument against that, and this is what Texas is arguing, Florida's arguing, is that that disenfranchises Floridians and Texans.
1:07:45
[SPEAKER_02]: because they can show that mail-in voting is the most insecure form of the voting.
1:07:51
[SPEAKER_02]: And so that has the potential of diluting their legally cast valid votes with legally cast but potentially invalid votes with the mail-in voting.
1:08:05
[SPEAKER_02]: So it is going to be an interesting thing to
1:08:10
[SPEAKER_02]: to play out.
1:08:12
[SPEAKER_02]: I'm just, again, I'm just glad Trump is fearless and he has, you know, people might, again, like, in past conservative administrations, you know, you might have somebody in a cabinet meeting saying, maybe we should do something like that.
1:08:24
[SPEAKER_02]: And it'll just get shot down.
1:08:25
[SPEAKER_02]: Oh, no, no, no, the Supreme Court will never let it happen.
1:08:29
[SPEAKER_02]: though just bury it.
1:08:30
[SPEAKER_02]: Whereas Trump is like, now let's, let's see what happens.
1:08:32
[SPEAKER_02]: Let's do it because it's the right thing to do.
1:08:35
[SPEAKER_02]: I don't care what the Supreme Court does.
1:08:37
[SPEAKER_02]: Whatever Supreme Court that they're going to do, we need to do what, what's right and good for the American people.
1:08:44
[SPEAKER_02]: That's what I just love about Trump.
1:08:49
[SPEAKER_02]: Travelmaker Jason, do you think DJT will remove the Federal Reserve Governor before the September Fed meeting?
1:08:56
[SPEAKER_02]: If he doesn't, do you think we might see a much larger rate cut than the predicted twenty five basis points?
1:09:01
[SPEAKER_02]: So it looks like I don't know.
1:09:04
[SPEAKER_02]: I'm trying to get it.
1:09:05
[SPEAKER_02]: I'm looking at the whole thing at Jackson Hole, the latest meeting, the Fed there.
1:09:11
[SPEAKER_02]: I mean, so you had two governors descent from Jerome Powell.
1:09:19
[SPEAKER_02]: That's they're almost always unanimous as I understand it.
1:09:23
[SPEAKER_02]: It is incredibly rare to have governors descent and and they did have one resigned if I recall and Trump replaced or or him.
1:09:36
[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, I expect the rate to be cut.
1:09:39
[SPEAKER_02]: That's what I'm getting the sense of everyone is talking about.
1:09:42
[SPEAKER_02]: We're going to get a rate cut, but I don't know by how much, I don't know the base point.
1:09:47
[SPEAKER_02]: And I don't know if Trump is going to remove the Federal Reserve Governor before September Fed meeting.
1:09:55
[SPEAKER_02]: You're not talking about Jerome Powell.
1:09:58
[SPEAKER_02]: You may be talking about one particular Federal Reserve Governor.
1:10:02
[SPEAKER_02]: So we'll have to say.
1:10:07
[SPEAKER_02]: Bismo, Funnians forever, people, state, woke as dead wall, mainstream outlets, march on the same movies, music, publishing, liberal academia, et cetera, has society so greatly split that we can win, but it doesn't reform anything.
1:10:19
[SPEAKER_02]: Great question, great question.
1:10:21
[SPEAKER_02]: I don't think so because in the end, the momentum, in the end, the momentum goes where the dollars go.
1:10:31
[SPEAKER_02]: And, you know,
1:10:33
[SPEAKER_02]: For right or wrong, the dollars are going to be controlled at least to an extent by the people.
1:10:41
[SPEAKER_02]: I know you can't compare mass billionaires and so forth, but what we saw with the parallel economy starting in really on January, January, six, twenty twenty one.
1:10:57
[SPEAKER_02]: where more and more conservative voices were being silenced as being insurrectionists in the like.
1:11:05
[SPEAKER_02]: And even Trump himself was being canceled and they were being, you know, de-platformed and de-banked and so forth.
1:11:13
[SPEAKER_02]: What we found is
1:11:15
[SPEAKER_02]: We can actually create an economy.
1:11:17
[SPEAKER_02]: We can create universities and colleges.
1:11:20
[SPEAKER_02]: We can create channels and broadcasting companies and we can create music and movies that are not woke and then they become incredibly lucrative.
1:11:34
[SPEAKER_02]: Like public square, public square is great company.
1:11:38
[SPEAKER_02]: Michael Cipher, the CEO, their youngest public CEO, I believe in the country, or was it the time public square went public?
1:11:50
[SPEAKER_02]: You know, they just, they redefined how you do online business.
1:11:57
[SPEAKER_02]: And it has nothing to do with closeness.
1:11:59
[SPEAKER_02]: So you have
1:12:00
[SPEAKER_02]: red balloon dot work that finds patriots all across the country jobs in companies that are totally anti-woke and finds employees for companies that they know will not be woke when they come on in.
1:12:21
[SPEAKER_02]: So we just created this parallel economy.
1:12:24
[SPEAKER_02]: We found Brexit at an international level, created an entire parallel international economic order to push back against the welcoming, increasing wokeness of G seven.
1:12:36
[SPEAKER_02]: And these just became very effective.
1:12:38
[SPEAKER_02]: They decoupled themselves overwhelmingly from
1:12:43
[SPEAKER_02]: the larger woke world, the, the, the, the woke institutions at two point two.
1:12:49
[SPEAKER_02]: Elon Musk became a, you know, the richest man in the country or in the world became a champion of this parallel economy and then mainstreamed it by acquiring acts.
1:13:01
[SPEAKER_02]: So it just seems to me, they can stay as woke as they want.
1:13:07
[SPEAKER_02]: We will live and we will support businesses that laugh at this dead wokeness.
1:13:15
[SPEAKER_02]: And then what you're noticing is even, you know, more and more fox, even see then they're all just coming out and just saying, you know, enough with it.
1:13:23
[SPEAKER_02]: I mean, this woke stuff is done.
1:13:25
[SPEAKER_02]: It's a losing battle.
1:13:27
[SPEAKER_02]: Nobody wants it.
1:13:28
[SPEAKER_02]: It's an eighty twenty doom loop.
1:13:31
[SPEAKER_02]: And, you know, the more you double down on it, the less people take you seriously.
1:13:36
[SPEAKER_02]: And that's just not a movement that has any sustainability.
1:13:39
[SPEAKER_02]: That's the way I see it.
1:13:44
[SPEAKER_02]: Molly, I second Larry Benton Collins question, when will Bill Barr be investigators per the recent revelations coming forward?
1:13:51
[SPEAKER_02]: He's been among the worst of the traders among the rhinos.
1:13:54
[SPEAKER_02]: Thank you.
1:13:54
[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, no, I'm with him, Molly.
1:13:55
[SPEAKER_02]: And to keep in mind, John Bolton, I think technically, was a Republican.
1:13:59
[SPEAKER_02]: As was Bill Barr.
1:14:00
[SPEAKER_02]: So no, I mean, they're coming after establishment swamp creatures.
1:14:03
[SPEAKER_02]: They don't care what party you're in because they know in the end your loyalty to the swamp, not to the people.
1:14:08
[SPEAKER_02]: So we'll have to see.
1:14:09
[SPEAKER_02]: I don't have any inside information on Bill Barr, but he's definitely one of them.
1:14:13
[SPEAKER_02]: He's one of the worst.
1:14:16
[SPEAKER_02]: interesting, though, that bill bar just publicly testified that there was nothing incriminating about Trump in the Epstein files.
1:14:25
[SPEAKER_02]: That was very interesting.
1:14:26
[SPEAKER_02]: And I'm wondering that was, that was his attempt to try to buy back some good grace with, with Trump, we'll have to see.
1:14:34
[SPEAKER_02]: Brian, my dear friend, when all said and done, how many states do you actually think will withdraw their election maps?
1:14:40
[SPEAKER_02]: I get that we have many more states than what the Democrats do, but I wonder how many will follow.
1:14:44
[SPEAKER_02]: They're sure.
1:14:45
[SPEAKER_02]: We'll have to see.
1:14:47
[SPEAKER_02]: To me, it'll come down to Trump.
1:14:48
[SPEAKER_02]: You know, Trump's got the power.
1:14:50
[SPEAKER_02]: Remember, Texas didn't want to do it, Brian.
1:14:53
[SPEAKER_02]: Texas just a couple of months ago.
1:14:55
[SPEAKER_02]: because you have wishy-washy bush-white Republicans that have taken over Texas politics over the last three decades.
1:15:01
[SPEAKER_02]: So, so they didn't want to upset the Apple card as it were with mid-decade redistricting, but Trump dropped the hammer on him.
1:15:13
[SPEAKER_02]: So, you need to do this.
1:15:15
[SPEAKER_02]: We're seeing the same thing in Missouri, same to what Ohio has to do it by law apparently.
1:15:20
[SPEAKER_02]: We're seeing the same thing in Florida, in your neck of the woods, the Sanctus appears to be fully on board with that.
1:15:27
[SPEAKER_02]: You may end up only having like two or three Democrat representatives, which is two or three too much, but that's cool.
1:15:35
[SPEAKER_02]: Especially with Miami Day, just going so deep red, it's so incredible.
1:15:39
[SPEAKER_02]: How many states altogether?
1:15:41
[SPEAKER_02]: I would say right now about half a dozen.
1:15:44
[SPEAKER_02]: I think we're safe to say.
1:15:48
[SPEAKER_02]: But it may be more.
1:15:48
[SPEAKER_02]: It just depends how much Trump, I think, is pressuring the red states to do it.
1:15:58
[SPEAKER_02]: I think they need to go all out.
1:16:01
[SPEAKER_02]: Again, the Supreme Court may be overturning the district that was drawn up in Louisiana.
1:16:09
[SPEAKER_02]: That was the occasion for this lawsuit.
1:16:14
[SPEAKER_02]: where just a group of citizens got together and said, you know what?
1:16:17
[SPEAKER_02]: We think this is reverse discrimination.
1:16:19
[SPEAKER_02]: You just draw up a congressional district that deliberately deliberately excludes white people.
1:16:25
[SPEAKER_02]: I think this is like discrimination and violation of four teeth men and men at all.
1:16:31
[SPEAKER_02]: So the VRA may get overturned by the way it's been abused with this whole notion of vote dilution.
1:16:37
[SPEAKER_02]: And if that happens,
1:16:40
[SPEAKER_02]: All bets are off.
1:16:41
[SPEAKER_02]: They're saying, you know, Democrats, that and just in that act alone can lose up to twenty five seats.
1:16:47
[SPEAKER_02]: So because all of a sudden you have twenty five districts that are overnight unconstitutional have to be redrawn.
1:16:54
[SPEAKER_02]: And they're as I understand, they're disproportionately in red states, southern states, Midwestern states, because that's where they've been pushing for these VRA redrawn districts.
1:17:06
[SPEAKER_02]: And so anyway, so just for the redistricting efforts, mid decade redistricting efforts, probably about a half dozen states, I think in the end, we'll do it by twenty twenty six red states, probably net us upwards of fourteen to twenty seats.
1:17:25
[SPEAKER_02]: We'll see what happens in California.
1:17:27
[SPEAKER_02]: That's an uphill battle and the Trump administration is already saying that they're going to sue over that because they're they're claim they're violating their state constitution which they are.
1:17:35
[SPEAKER_02]: And by bypassing the redistricting commission which is embedded in the state constitution.
1:17:41
[SPEAKER_02]: So it does a matter if it passes in a referendum or things like that.
1:17:44
[SPEAKER_02]: So anyway, a lot of, you've got those redistribute half dozen probably.
1:17:49
[SPEAKER_02]: And then if the Supreme Court overturns the VRA, all bets are off there, you've got possibly another twenty twenty five seats coming out of that.
1:17:58
[SPEAKER_02]: And then if you do get, if they're successfully get the, the new census that the majority of the American people want.
1:18:05
[SPEAKER_02]: So Mark Mitchell, Ross Mussen, found that it has overwhelming support when people find out illegal migrants,
1:18:13
[SPEAKER_02]: were illegal aliens were counted in the twenty twenty cents as they get leather they don't want that and what illegal people shouldn't be here to to affect the constitution of their country and so you put all that together and it could be a perfect storm of a republican juggernaut for the foreseeable future in the house.
1:18:40
[SPEAKER_02]: Franz Paul, good morning, Dr. Steve, in the Civilization of this era, how do we standardize the system of value, rather, who quantifies the value of things?
1:18:49
[SPEAKER_02]: That's a phenomenal question.
1:18:51
[SPEAKER_02]: I mean, there is going to be a certain, there is going to be a certain cultural relativization there.
1:19:00
[SPEAKER_02]: And so value is going to be civilizational, value is going to be inherent to a culture.
1:19:08
[SPEAKER_02]: So a Christian culture is going to value things differently than a Buddhist culture and a Confucian culture is going to value things differently than an Islamic culture.
1:19:19
[SPEAKER_02]: But because we're human and because we, you know, in the classical sense, we're creating the image of God.
1:19:27
[SPEAKER_02]: Because we have logical, ethical, and aesthetic, emotional, appetitive capacities that are distinctive to our humanity.
1:19:44
[SPEAKER_02]: There are at least some formal overlaps there.
1:19:47
[SPEAKER_02]: We all want the good.
1:19:48
[SPEAKER_02]: We all want the true.
1:19:50
[SPEAKER_02]: We all want the beautiful.
1:19:52
[SPEAKER_02]: And so what we found in wisdom traditions and virtue traditions and aesthetic traditions, there is a lot of overlap, very significant.
1:20:01
[SPEAKER_02]: There's a lot of divergence as well.
1:20:04
[SPEAKER_02]: But when you're talking about grand civilizations, there is tremendous overlap because like Jordan Peterson says, there's an infinite way of doing it.
1:20:14
[SPEAKER_02]: There are infinite ways of doing human society, but only about a handful work.
1:20:19
[SPEAKER_02]: Only about a handful work and only about a handful or stable and only about a handful can last a thousand years.
1:20:25
[SPEAKER_02]: Only about a handful can deal with millions upon millions of people.
1:20:28
[SPEAKER_02]: We're not talking, you know, small indigenous tribal ethics and values and so on.
1:20:33
[SPEAKER_02]: Talking about civilizational values.
1:20:35
[SPEAKER_02]: Only about a handful works and it turns out that they're the great, like the seven great world religions.
1:20:41
[SPEAKER_02]: They correspond to, because all civilization is rooted ultimately in religion.
1:20:48
[SPEAKER_02]: And so I think what you do is you have this very interesting sort of universalist particularist play.
1:20:58
[SPEAKER_02]: Where values, the fact that we have values is itself universal.
1:21:03
[SPEAKER_02]: But how those values are defined and are given their true good and beautiful expression are always going to be very culturally worked out.
1:21:15
[SPEAKER_02]: They're always going to be very culturally specific, but because we're human, because we all have to have values, there's going to be some very interesting, I mean, I use the word venn diagram, but every time I do that, I hear that cackle in my head of
1:21:30
[SPEAKER_02]: Come on, I love that guy, Greg.
1:21:34
[SPEAKER_02]: I can't stand it anyway.
1:21:36
[SPEAKER_02]: I mean, I used to teach logic with vended diagrams, but there's going to be the vended diagram overlap.
1:21:41
[SPEAKER_02]: And that is going to be the point of commonality in what an emerging discipline that's known as Theo politics.
1:21:49
[SPEAKER_02]: So our geopolitics is increasingly being defined.
1:21:52
[SPEAKER_02]: by Theo politics.
1:21:53
[SPEAKER_02]: You saw it with Putin coming to Alaska and how he met with the Archbishop of the Alaska Northodox church.
1:22:01
[SPEAKER_02]: I don't know if you saw that and presented him some icons from the Patriarch of Moscow and the Archbishop of Alaska is part of an autonomous Orthodox church but they're both Orthodox and so that point of commonality
1:22:18
[SPEAKER_02]: became a very important bridge for our two nations.
1:22:23
[SPEAKER_02]: Again, two different Orthodox churches but with some Orthodox, with Orthodox overlap in terms of Orthodox identity.
1:22:33
[SPEAKER_02]: So there's going to be a lot of sacred identity value identity that has a lot of overlap that we and it already is.
1:22:40
[SPEAKER_02]: that we can find commonality with Confucianism and orthodoxy with the Chinese Russian alliance Hinduism and orthodoxy with the Russian India alliance obviously Russia in Islam with like a Chechnya Russia Federation Union that kind of stuff.
1:22:58
[SPEAKER_02]: So that's what you use zero in on the fact that as humans we must have values that's universal.
1:23:06
[SPEAKER_02]: Even if you said, I know we don't need values.
1:23:09
[SPEAKER_02]: I would smile and say, well, you value the fact we don't need values.
1:23:12
[SPEAKER_02]: So values are universal by nature.
1:23:16
[SPEAKER_02]: Or the pursuit of value is universal by nature.
1:23:19
[SPEAKER_02]: But the pursuit of value becomes values in the multiplicity sort of way in which values get culturally worked out.
1:23:28
[SPEAKER_02]: But there is nevertheless still some objective overlap where they can all meet.
1:23:34
[SPEAKER_02]: I mean, sometimes you're going to hit
1:23:36
[SPEAKER_02]: You're gonna hit value supremacists who were basically trying to eradicate you kind of like an ISIS or something.
1:23:43
[SPEAKER_02]: But then that's generally where the world rises up and takes them out.
1:23:47
[SPEAKER_02]: That's not, you know, we're not interested in anything like that.
1:23:54
[SPEAKER_02]: Chris, Adam, hey, Dr. Steve, just wanted to shed some line what's going on in here in California.
1:23:59
[SPEAKER_02]: City of Lodi has a population that I said, right, Lodi, Lodi, six and nine thousand leans Republican, they release a map to split our city into three districts.
1:24:08
[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, yeah, that's what's going on there.
1:24:10
[SPEAKER_02]: And it's deeper than that, too, as I understand, Chris.
1:24:15
[SPEAKER_02]: What they're also doing is they're disenfranchising Latino voters.
1:24:20
[SPEAKER_02]: Latino voters in California have been as they are across the country have been going increasingly Republican.
1:24:28
[SPEAKER_02]: And now they want to try to split up
1:24:31
[SPEAKER_02]: and dilute the Latino vote as well.
1:24:35
[SPEAKER_02]: So this is ironically, this is going to, Rich Barris has been doing some work on this, demographic work and polling work on this.
1:24:43
[SPEAKER_02]: This is already looking like it's going to experience a massive blowback.
1:24:48
[SPEAKER_02]: where they think they think they are creating new blue districts.
1:24:55
[SPEAKER_02]: But they may actually just increase the defection among particularly Latinos.
1:25:03
[SPEAKER_02]: And if the super majority of Latinos go red, California Democrat parties cooked, it's gone.
1:25:11
[SPEAKER_02]: It's gone.
1:25:12
[SPEAKER_02]: And they know it.
1:25:12
[SPEAKER_02]: And that's why they're just using this as an excuse.
1:25:16
[SPEAKER_02]: Make no mistake.
1:25:17
[SPEAKER_02]: Gavin Newsom knows that Latinos are going maga.
1:25:21
[SPEAKER_02]: They know that.
1:25:22
[SPEAKER_02]: Latinos are some of the most border security concern voters on the planet.
1:25:28
[SPEAKER_02]: It's the complete opposite of the way the legacy media tries to portray them.
1:25:32
[SPEAKER_02]: They lie about everything else.
1:25:33
[SPEAKER_02]: Of course they're going to be lying about Latinos.
1:25:36
[SPEAKER_02]: So Hispanics are one of the most conservative.
1:25:41
[SPEAKER_02]: socially conservative demographics in the country.
1:25:44
[SPEAKER_02]: They love border security.
1:25:46
[SPEAKER_02]: They love populism and they love Trump.
1:25:51
[SPEAKER_02]: And the more everyday that passes in the Golden Age, the more Latinos are becoming Republicans.
1:25:59
[SPEAKER_02]: The more Latinos are becoming full-blown, nationalist populists.
1:26:04
[SPEAKER_02]: They are all for mass deportation, probably more than most most other demographics.
1:26:11
[SPEAKER_02]: And California knows that.
1:26:13
[SPEAKER_02]: California also has ignored it.
1:26:15
[SPEAKER_02]: Number of Latinos.
1:26:17
[SPEAKER_02]: And they know
1:26:19
[SPEAKER_02]: that if Latinos go full Republican, their shop, they know that.
1:26:24
[SPEAKER_02]: And that is why I think Gavin Newsom is doing what he's doing.
1:26:27
[SPEAKER_02]: He's just using Texas as an excuse.
1:26:29
[SPEAKER_02]: This is for the survival of the Democrat party in California.
1:26:33
[SPEAKER_02]: Because the entire Democrat party in the nation knows that they lose California, it is permanently over for them.
1:26:41
[SPEAKER_02]: You might as well just start another party.
1:26:45
[SPEAKER_02]: Allen with Bolton being rated is a time to start cancelling passports and sticking out airport to make sure they don't sneak off.
1:26:52
[SPEAKER_02]: I've a feeling flight risks.
1:26:54
[SPEAKER_02]: They're pulling the Texas Democrat thing in other countries.
1:26:58
[SPEAKER_02]: I've a feeling Bolton is going to turn into a song bird.
1:27:00
[SPEAKER_02]: We know that he has no scruples and he just wants to save his family.
1:27:04
[SPEAKER_02]: I agree with you thousand percent.
1:27:05
[SPEAKER_02]: I think this is what's freaking.
1:27:06
[SPEAKER_02]: I went, I meant to get into that this morning and in my notes, I forgot to.
1:27:13
[SPEAKER_02]: But yes, there is the belief that Bolton is going to sing like a canary.
1:27:19
[SPEAKER_02]: And that's really what has the deep state freaking out.
1:27:22
[SPEAKER_02]: Because Bolton's had his finger print, he's got his finger prints on everything in the swamp.
1:27:30
[SPEAKER_02]: And he may be the number one figure that they needed is career bureaucrat swamp creature.
1:27:39
[SPEAKER_02]: He may be the number one figure that they needed to start singing, offer him immunity, whatever they need to do, to bring down everybody else.
1:27:49
[SPEAKER_02]: And he's just the guy who did, like you said, he's got no values, so why not?
1:27:53
[SPEAKER_02]: Or his only values to save his own hide.
1:27:59
[SPEAKER_02]: William, we'll do.
1:28:02
[SPEAKER_02]: Hmm.
1:28:03
[SPEAKER_02]: Let me try some of my fine coffee of mine.
1:28:05
[SPEAKER_02]: This is from my the unemployed philosophical guild cut.
1:28:10
[SPEAKER_02]: My daughter's got me this one Christmas.
1:28:12
[SPEAKER_02]: It's all the great artists from the age and philosophers in the like.
1:28:17
[SPEAKER_02]: I love it.
1:28:20
[SPEAKER_02]: Hmm.
1:28:21
[SPEAKER_02]: William, I told, uh, Dr. Steve, good A. M.
1:28:25
[SPEAKER_02]: is off the beaten path today, but wanted to get your opinion on this.
1:28:28
[SPEAKER_02]: I think sports prone college may just have a deep problem with betting that they cannot control.
1:28:33
[SPEAKER_02]: They realize so much money from legal gambling establishment that may be infecting the game.
1:28:38
[SPEAKER_02]: I fear that they've opened up a proverbial Pandora's box.
1:28:41
[SPEAKER_02]: I could get into specific cases, but I wanted your thoughts.
1:28:44
[SPEAKER_02]: Thank you, Will.
1:28:45
[SPEAKER_02]: Great question, Will.
1:28:47
[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, I mean, betting, I mean, yeah, I mean, especially with on with the network society and the internet, I mean, now betting is just, I mean, betting is every, I mean, I, I thought there was, there were bets on how long Trump and Putin's handshake would be on the tarmac there.
1:29:04
[SPEAKER_02]: So yeah, yeah, I don't know it may be a genie that she's out of the bottle, she can't put back.
1:29:11
[SPEAKER_02]: I don't know enough about it.
1:29:12
[SPEAKER_02]: I do like I do stock market of course and I do crypto and all, but I mean, so I just technically that's gambling, but I don't do like sports betting or I'm never actually done sports betting to my knowledge or any art take betting like that.
1:29:28
[SPEAKER_02]: I know there's guys like Robert Barnes were like brilliant, you know, statisticians and data and they and they know the odds of things.
1:29:35
[SPEAKER_02]: They're really, really good.
1:29:37
[SPEAKER_02]: at betting, but I know I see the lure of it for sure, being able to put in a little money and then see a lot come back and you did the excitement of that.
1:29:49
[SPEAKER_02]: That's that's hard to beat.
1:29:52
[SPEAKER_02]: How it actually affects sports I'd have to see.
1:29:55
[SPEAKER_02]: You would actually have to give me some of those examples and then we can see what the historical precedent is for that.
1:30:03
[SPEAKER_02]: And that's it.
1:30:04
[SPEAKER_02]: All right, guys.
1:30:05
[SPEAKER_02]: Great hearing from all of you.
1:30:06
[SPEAKER_02]: Again, I'll plenty of stuff more videos all weekend because the world never sleeps in the golden age.
1:30:12
[SPEAKER_02]: So keep your eyes abreast of what's new here on the channel.
1:30:15
[SPEAKER_02]: As always, if you're brand new, make sure to smack that bell and subscribe button for breaking news and analysis you're not going to hear anywhere out there.
1:30:22
[SPEAKER_02]: You go out there or the smack that bell and subscribe button.
1:30:25
[SPEAKER_02]: Love seeing you guys.
1:30:27
[SPEAKER_02]: Love your comments, questions, and like have a wonderful, wonderful weekend.
1:30:32
[SPEAKER_02]: And God bless you all.
1:30:34
[SPEAKER_02]: Thank you so much.
1:30:35
[SPEAKER_02]: Thanks so much for listening this episode of The Turly Talks Podcast.
1:30:39
[SPEAKER_02]: Don't forget to subscribe, leave us a five star review, and share this episode with your friends.
1:30:44
[SPEAKER_02]: Help us defeat the fake news media and rank us the number one news and commentary podcast all over the world.
1:30:52
[SPEAKER_02]: Come back again tomorrow for another episode celebrating the rise of a new conservative age.