Latest / The Vault: The Epstein Files / Inside The OIG Interview: The Warden's Statement Detailing The Death Of Jeffrey Epstein (Part 24) (4/23/26)

Transcript

Inside The OIG Interview: The Warden's Statement Detailing The Death Of Jeffrey Epstein (Part 24) (4/23/26) · The Vault: The Epstein Files

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
• 0:02
  Epstein Chronicles. In this episode, we're going to pick up
• 0:05
  where we left off with the interview that was given
• 0:09
  by the warden of MCC to the OIG investigators question,
• 0:13
  all right, so we're literally less than half a page left,
• 0:17
  but this next one is just going to be I'm
• 0:19
  going to have you just kind of read it along
• 0:21
  with me because it's so long. He was also an
• 0:24
  inmate who had risk factors for assault by other inmates
• 0:28
  and did require careful selection for appropriate cell mates. Although
• 0:32
  these issues were noted, well documented and communicated, a failure
• 0:36
  still occurred by allowing inmate Epstein to be placed in
• 0:39
  the cell alone. Although feasible for an inmate to effectuate
• 0:43
  suicide while housed with the cell mate, the odds of
• 0:46
  this occurring are significantly lowered when housed with another inmate.
• 0:51
  The report continues, its apparent various staff at the institution
• 0:55
  made a point of ensuring inmate Epstein had an assigned
• 0:58
  cell mate. The captain personally instructed the lieutenants individually. A
• 1:02
  mass email was distributed by Psychology, and it's apparent that
• 1:06
  some Shoe officers were aware, although many people acknowledge this
• 1:11
  an important fact. Ultimately, the final staff responsible for not
• 1:16
  or did not ensure the requirement was met. Including vital
• 1:20
  directives such as cellmate requirement and a mass email does
• 1:24
  not ensure. Indiscernible directives such as cellmate requirement and a
• 1:28
  mass email does not ensure those who truly need that
• 1:32
  information due in fact, receive it timely. In this case,
• 1:36
  inmate Epstein was actually placed with a cell mat when
• 1:39
  removed from psychological observation. After that moment, It's clear there
• 1:44
  was no additional written directive or a fel safe system
• 1:47
  established to ensure that inmate Epstein would have had a
• 1:51
  cell mat going forward. So I guess, first and foremost,
• 1:54
  do you believe probably the primary reason why Epstein was
• 1:57
  able to take his own life was because he'd have
• 2:00
  a cell mate, on top of the fact that they
• 2:02
  weren't conducting rounds in the shoe and counts. Answer? I
• 2:07
  can't speak on that mindset. Only I can speak on
• 2:10
  is he killed himself? Question? But what I'm asking is
• 2:14
  would it have certainly helped prevent his death by one
• 2:17
  having an inmate and two having rounds and counts conducted? Answer? Oh,
• 2:23
  if people did their job. Question right answer, you know,
• 2:28
  and he gets cut off by the investigator like obviously,
• 2:31
  if he killed himself, he did it. But the way
• 2:33
  that the government can better ensure that that doesn't happen
• 2:37
  is by ensuring that when it's mandated that someone has
• 2:40
  a cell mate, that they have a cell mate, and
• 2:43
  when they do their job, like you just said, they
• 2:46
  conduct rounds and counts. Is that what you believe would
• 2:49
  have helped keep them alive today if you know from
• 2:51
  the government perspective. Answer, I mean again, I'm going to
• 2:55
  have to just say I can't say what would have
• 2:58
  kept them alive, but I will say, you know, if
• 3:00
  people made their rounds, did their jobs, followed instructions that
• 3:03
  they were given, then it might have could have minimized,
• 3:07
  you know, the risk. But I can't talk to you
• 3:11
  know if he would have done it or not done it,
• 3:14
  if that would have stopped them. Question now, as far
• 3:17
  as this last sentence that they wrote after that moment,
• 3:20
  it's clear that there was no additional written directive or
• 3:23
  a fell safe system established to ensure inmate Epstein would
• 3:27
  have a cell mate going forward. What do you think
• 3:30
  could have been done and who should have done it? Answer,
• 3:34
  so directives and the information was conveyed to people verbally
• 3:38
  documented on forms on what you're supposed to do. There
• 3:41
  were signs up. Question now, what signs do you know
• 3:45
  that were up? Answer no, I mean the one you
• 3:48
  read to me about the sign about doing the thirty
• 3:50
  minute checks. Question Oh, I think this is specifically talking
• 3:55
  about the cellmate requirement. Answer no, I mean indiscernible cell
• 3:59
  ma requirement. It was put out by the captain. Directives
• 4:03
  were given, staff was spoken to. You know, it's kind
• 4:05
  of boiled down to people not doing their job. I mean,
• 4:09
  if I tell you you have to do something, it's
• 4:12
  given to you in writing. What more do you want? Question? Well,
• 4:16
  that's kind of my question because the BOP is the
• 4:19
  one who wrote that finding. So I'm curious myself what
• 4:23
  you think that could have been done? Answer? I mean
• 4:27
  that's somebody's opinion. You know, that's a Monday morning quarterback
• 4:31
  that came in and make an opinion. I don't know
• 4:34
  what their ulterior motive is for making it. Question can
• 4:38
  you think of anything that wasn't done? Can you think
• 4:40
  of anything like, oh, if this could have helped or
• 4:43
  maybe he should have done that. As far as the
• 4:45
  cellmate requirement. Answer, I can't think of anything they should
• 4:49
  have done. Question No, okay, the other investigator asked a question.
• 4:55
  I know it's bound to based on once everything comes up.
• 4:58
  These are questions that they're going to have. So I
• 5:00
  got asked, I know you mentioned that you couldn't have
• 5:03
  secondary selection, like another replacement for rays because inmates keep moving.
• 5:08
  But is it possible that a list should have been
• 5:10
  created that you know, should have told the shoe officers, hey, listen,
• 5:15
  if Rayes ever gets removed, here's a list of maybe
• 5:18
  possible five inmates that could you could choose from. Answer,
• 5:23
  But I mean, under you know, different inmates, we can
• 5:25
  do that. But he was a high profile inmate. I
• 5:28
  would have had to get the name and run it
• 5:30
  up to the department to see if it was okay,
• 5:32
  it wasn't just him. I was going to arbitrarily say, listen,
• 5:37
  I need you to you know, we're going to put
• 5:39
  this guy. I was just like with the other ones,
• 5:42
  sent it up to the department. So again it would
• 5:46
  have been based on who was there question and because
• 5:50
  of that extreme detail that had to go into selection,
• 5:54
  I think that redacted as asking should have there been
• 5:57
  a list of names that the higher up signed off
• 5:59
  on in case every one was removed, they went to court,
• 6:02
  they didn't come back, they were transferred things like that.
• 6:07
  Answer like, that's what they list as a failsafe, like
• 6:10
  as a precautionary measure. Question. And that's why I think
• 6:13
  he's saying, like a list of five people versus one
• 6:16
  or two. So if this person is not there, what
• 6:19
  about this one? That one is not there either, but
• 6:22
  maybe this guy you know that type of thing, or
• 6:25
  did you just stand by a hunch answer? I just yeah,
• 6:29
  I just feel like, you know, it wasn't I can't know.
• 6:34
  I mean again, I'm operating in hindsight. I mean at
• 6:37
  the time, you know that's what was done. Question. Yeah,
• 6:41
  and we are absolutely asking you to operate in hindsight.
• 6:44
  Answer right. Question saying like Monday morning quarterbacking yourself and
• 6:48
  your own institution. I get it, but like Monday morning
• 6:51
  quarterbacking the situation? What do you think they you know,
• 6:54
  they're referring to this as the BOP and we're not
• 6:59
  experts were coming in, but BOP is saying this. I'm
• 7:03
  just saying, what do they mean by this? And what
• 7:06
  are some things that could have been done. Answer right,
• 7:09
  But those are individuals that are coming in looking at
• 7:13
  a situation that weren't deeply involved in it. You know,
• 7:16
  they weren't the ones that were told, hey, okay, I'm
• 7:19
  talking to my boss and it's going to go all
• 7:21
  the way up the department. That wasn't privy to them.
• 7:26
  That was a need to know basis. But unfortunately, everyone
• 7:29
  who is going to eventually look at this case, says
• 7:31
  the other investigator is going to be doing the same
• 7:34
  exact thing as they are. Answer no, But what I'm
• 7:38
  saying is if we're looking at assessing the situation on
• 7:41
  what happened in real time, That's what I'm talking about.
• 7:44
  So in real time now, if they had known that, hey,
• 7:47
  you know what, these names had to go up and
• 7:50
  be you know, vetted at the same time, maybe it
• 7:52
  would have been a different thought process. The word answers
• 7:57
  and was a possible question and was possible? And maybe
• 8:01
  you discuss this, was it possible that hey, listen, the
• 8:04
  shoe officers could have replaced Did they have the ability
• 8:07
  to replace Reyes if they wanted to, or did they
• 8:09
  have to come up the chain of command for the
• 8:12
  chin of command to tell them who the new inmate,
• 8:14
  he gets cut off by the warden. They were instructed, hey,
• 8:17
  let us know when where he's to have a cell
• 8:21
  mate at all times, and to notify let someone know
• 8:24
  because again due to the individual that he was, you
• 8:27
  just don't want to throw anybody question. Okay, but doesn't
• 8:30
  that kind of hinder them from taking action. Let's say
• 8:33
  at the point on that day you are not in
• 8:36
  the institution, Captain redacted, was there? I understand there was
• 8:41
  an acting warden there, you had the executive staff there.
• 8:44
  Just because the warden is not there, it doesn't mean
• 8:46
  the institution doesn't run. That's why you have, you know,
• 8:49
  people acting on your behalf, you know, so that they
• 8:52
  can make these decisions. Question. So, maybe what Redacted you're
• 8:56
  trying to ask is would somebody, since it sounds like
• 8:59
  you would have to go over your head to even
• 9:01
  make that decision, has to go to the regional director level.
• 9:05
  Would the associate warden have the ability to go to
• 9:07
  the regional director or would have they known to go
• 9:11
  to the regional director? Answer? So, let's say that did happen, right,
• 9:16
  they would have no I'm saying as far as finding
• 9:19
  out that hey needed a sell mate so even though
• 9:22
  I'm off that day, I'm still working because I got
• 9:25
  the government phone and they're going to call me and
• 9:27
  tell me, hey, this is what we got going on.
• 9:29
  He needs a cell mate. And then I would be like, okay,
• 9:32
  let's see what we have so we can send it up. Question.
• 9:37
  So basically you were always available. Someone was always available
• 9:40
  that if the proper notification was being made up, they
• 9:44
  could send it up the chain. A newer inmate could
• 9:46
  have been assigned. Answer. That's why I carried it. That's
• 9:50
  why I had indiscernible so to I get calls all
• 9:54
  hours of the night even if I'm off, I'm not off.
• 9:57
  If there's an issue, an emergency, I'm called Yeah. Question okay.
• 10:01
  And if someone does ask should the shoe officers have
• 10:04
  been given the ability? Your answer to that would have been,
• 10:07
  you have that phone with you. Someone should have made
• 10:10
  the notification, so someone in the hire of command answer,
• 10:15
  someone in the higher command. They'd contact me. So it
• 10:18
  was not like I'm off on paper because I am
• 10:21
  using my leave, but I'm still on duty because you
• 10:23
  can call me on my phone. Question. My last two
• 10:27
  questions based on your conversation, and after this, based on
• 10:30
  your conversations and this after action report that we just
• 10:34
  reviewed those topics. What are the failures of the BOP
• 10:38
  that allowed Epstein to die? Answer I'm not. I mean,
• 10:42
  that's I think I can't. You know, I'm speculating and
• 10:46
  I'm giving personal opinions and I'm not. He gets cut
• 10:50
  off again. I'm not asking you to say why he
• 10:53
  killed himself or if he could have. What I'm saying is,
• 10:56
  what are the failures of the BOP. Hayes jump He
• 11:00
  killed himself because he ain't stupid. He said to himself,
• 11:03
  holy shit, I'm going to spend the rest of my
• 11:05
  life in prison. Question Yeah, yeah, and I'm not. I'm
• 11:11
  not absolutely not asking as far as what his mental
• 11:14
  state could have been or if he could have had
• 11:16
  the ability. But are the failures as you see them
• 11:20
  after we reviewed all of this that you believe what
• 11:23
  did the BOP do wrong in this instance unless you
• 11:27
  don't think that they did anything wrong? Answer? No, I'm
• 11:30
  not saying they did anything wrong. But again, these are
• 11:33
  things that are that you're going to find. I mean,
• 11:35
  right now I can look at it and say we're
• 11:38
  looking at people not making rounds and all that, but
• 11:41
  there's still an investigation going on, So I don't want
• 11:43
  to sit here and speculate and say he gets cut off. No,
• 11:48
  but we are the ones doing the investigation, and you're
• 11:51
  the leader of the organization that you know of the place.
• 11:54
  That's why this is very relevant question for you to
• 11:57
  answer because you know this was the facility that you oversaw.
• 12:01
  So we're just I'm simply asking, is what do you
• 12:04
  think the problems are as you see them after you
• 12:07
  just heard everything we talked about for it seems like
• 12:09
  the fat last five hours answer. No, I mean, if
• 12:13
  we could talk, I mean, you're not counting you didn't
• 12:16
  make your rounds in that unit to check on an inmate.
• 12:18
  I mean that is that is the basics right there.
• 12:22
  You know, we can talk about all the other stuff,
• 12:24
  but basic is you did not go and make those rounds.
• 12:29
  Question and would you also, though, add to the fact
• 12:31
  that they didn't replace reyis like they were supposed to
• 12:34
  answer yes, question Okay, what actions could the BOP have
• 12:38
  taken to possibly prevent Epstein's death, Because it just sounds
• 12:42
  like they quote the answer would be conduct your rounds,
• 12:44
  conduct your counts, do your job. Get reyis Hayes Pipes
• 12:50
  in ninety nine out of one hundred times it wouldn't
• 12:52
  have happened. Question. Right, So, but in this case, it
• 12:56
  does seem like a lot of this was a result of,
• 12:59
  like you keep on saying, people not doing their jobs.
• 13:02
  But I mean, in all fairness, we've had since Epstein
• 13:05
  died and before, we've had almost sixty suicides. So it's
• 13:09
  the same reoccurring theme, you know, people not making their
• 13:12
  rounds and doing what they're supposed to do. Question, And
• 13:16
  is that the same thing that's happening with them they're
• 13:18
  not doing their rounds or accounts. Answer? I mean, and
• 13:21
  nine times out of ten, every time you look into something,
• 13:24
  it's a matter of them doing checks, you know, not counting.
• 13:27
  You know, so it's normal things. Question. Are these other
• 13:31
  instances where we find out that they didn't have cell mates? Answer?
• 13:34
  A single cell? You know, I mean you have access
• 13:37
  to the data. I mean, you look at it, you
• 13:39
  look at the members of a single cell inmate. But
• 13:42
  there is instances where, you know, sometimes you do have
• 13:45
  to put somebody in a single cell. Question. Sure, answer,
• 13:48
  But you know there's other suicides and they don't stop,
• 13:51
  you know, some of it. You know, staff had no
• 13:53
  control over it and some staff had control over it.
• 13:57
  Question and I do apologize. I said that was last question,
• 14:00
  but I guess I should ask in Monday morning quarterbacking yourself.
• 14:04
  Is there anything that you should have done differently as
• 14:06
  the mcc warden answer as far as what this situation? Question? Yeah,
• 14:12
  just anything that you feel like, oh, you know, like
• 14:14
  I should have done this better, or I could have
• 14:16
  done this better, that type of thing. Answer I can't question.
• 14:20
  Just for the record, let me just okay, anything else
• 14:23
  you have? Answer no, Hayes, that's it. Question anything that
• 14:30
  you wanted to add to anything, Warden, anything that was said,
• 14:34
  anything that we missed or you wanted to add. Answer no, No,
• 14:38
  that's it. Question Is there anything you think we missed
• 14:41
  talking about? Answer no, not that I can think of.
• 14:46
  Question No, Yeah, no, we got you. Hayes jumps in
• 14:49
  like I was impressed that you did that. He couldn't
• 14:51
  go through this. I would have been to the bathroom,
• 14:54
  like I got to do this. I got to do this.
• 14:56
  I mean I got to make a phone call. I
• 14:57
  want to take a nap. He just sat there and
• 14:59
  answered all the questions. He's not even sweating under his armpits.
• 15:05
  Question and thank you very much for your cooperation. I
• 15:08
  appreciate you. The recording is showing that this is five
• 15:12
  hours and fifteen minutes, so this was an epic, epic interview.
• 15:16
  It's currently seven eighteen pm on Wednesday, October twenty seventh,
• 15:19
  twenty twenty one. This is Senior Special Agent redacted, and
• 15:23
  I'm turning off the recorder. All right, folks, Well, there
• 15:26
  you have it, the OIG interview with the Warden from
• 15:29
  mcc all. The information that goes with this episode can
• 15:34
  be found in the description box