Latest / Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems / Prince Israel Zaar on: There is a Way to Absorb Contrary View Points

Transcript

Prince Israel Zaar on: There is a Way to Absorb Contrary View Points · Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems

• 0:01
  Speaker 1: The state of the human war is in crisis. Humans
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: needs to accept their responsibility that the peace and security
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: of the world depends on the humans themselves. The amplifiers
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: of division and height to social media and to politics,
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: and to the economy, and the gap between the rich
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: and the poor, the educational god, the gap of reliable
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: information and sources to reliable information. Humans are inundated with
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: a lot of information. And most of this information is garbage.
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: It's not informative, it's not educative, it's not healthy, it's
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: not safe, it's not friendly, does not improve the life
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: of the human being, does not make the human being
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: happy and satisfied with itself. The information chambers today are
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: actually creating an information gap. Humans are exposed to so
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: much content, so much hyperbolic content within the windows and
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: nuances guise to hate to make the human being feel
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: unhappy with the stead of event, and it's just finger pointing.
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: You know. Humans are living TODs if they're in the
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: course of law, constantly cross examining nonfactual information as if
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: it's true. And the new media is gradually overtaking the
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: mainstream media. Because the new media at least gives you
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: variety there's so much variety on what you choose from.
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: You got news from so many angers. You have information
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: beyond politics for many angers, and sometimes even though the
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: information is not true in itself, but it's enough information
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: the social media that you can if you're interested, you
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: can you can browse true many websites, you know, many
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: news organizations local, national, international, to at least come out
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: with something if you like to be informed. So the
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: advantage of today's media is that it is good information
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: out there and new technologies in science, and heroes doing
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: great work and good parenting, and on people doing their job.
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: You know, you got information on learning something about dificial intelligence,
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: where the world is going, you know what new is discovered,
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: what new is made. You got religious person, You got
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: information about faith spirituality and you like gott to do
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: itself person, You got information on how things are made,
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: how things are done. So the social media, you know,
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: provides many sources of information, just depends on what you're
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: looking for. But based on the likes and clicks, the
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: hysteria got two point five million or ten million, one million,
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: like what you say. It's creating a world that real content,
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: real information. It's been overlooked and people go for the clicks,
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: and so she becomes the problem. So she becomes the
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: problem that what is being hurt the most. It's actually
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: not helpful the most. So the algorithms to stay relevant
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: to the help of AI. On the contrary, and unfortunately,
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: it amplifies what people want to hear, and it has
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: segregated humans into their echo chambers. And once humans get
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: segregated in the in the echo chambers, fractual information is
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: dead and conspiracy and propaganda becomes the thing. So the
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: information age today especides the politic as saying, is driven
• 6:15
  Speaker 1: by misinformation, disinformation, propaganda, conspiracy, and miseducation. Where he has
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: the most cliques and has the most likes. So to
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: be liked today on the social media, to have a
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: lot of cliques, it must push the envelope. It must
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: go beyond yourself to throw those baits, take things to
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: the extrain and casl like humanity and watch and see
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: how many likes, how many clicks your god. And that's
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: what we cannot there. We cannot go out there to
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: gaslight the people, to divide the people, to mislead the people.
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: We can give people information, educative information. That's seeks to
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: open your mind. That's sex to make you think, to
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: doubt and ask questions, that seeks to make your self reflect,
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: that seeks to motivate an inspire year to be the
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: best person they want to be, to achieve your best
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: self in order to serve humanity better. This life is
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: not a movie. It's not a Hollywood script, it's not
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: a drama on stage. It's a reality that you are living.
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: If you come to this world today, the AI world today,
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: the large language language models today, where information is at
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: the tip of a clique. Everything you think in this
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: world today that can improve your intelligence or your knowledge,
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: you can be enlightened if you go to Churcheypity, a
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: matter Ai, a Germini o'clock. If you can have access
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: to a clerk or Dipsy or many other language models,
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: you can ask every question. I get the answer. And
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: it's very shameful at the mainstream media are doing everything
• 9:27
  Speaker 1: to sabotize the new language models because you can actually
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: ask information and gave fractual information without spain or constant
• 9:42
  Speaker 1: bias hearing you in the face. You go on the
• 9:48
  Speaker 1: mainstream media, you do your best that they must be
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: listening to. When you go there, you see this elit
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: ignorance of arrogance of intelligence. That's a commendatortal word, ignorance
• 10:09
  Speaker 1: of arrogance of intelligence, as they're actually saying something that
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: you know is factually not true. But to them only
• 10:24
  Speaker 1: they can brainwash you. They assume that they have the
• 10:28
  Speaker 1: right and authority to lie to you. The misrepresents information,
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: and they purposefully give you the news that they are
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: paid to give to you, and the facet that year
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: you must the fact to subscribe to it. They have
• 10:47
  Speaker 1: this elit arrogance that the garbage that they're giving to
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: you a mystic can the fact checked. There is something
• 10:56
  Speaker 1: that you're missing if you're not listening to them. They
• 11:01
  Speaker 1: have this entitlement that no matter the nonsense that they're
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: given to you, that you must consume because it's coming
• 11:12
  Speaker 1: from them. They have that divine authority of knowledge that
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: even though they are not that they refuse to report
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: actuality is that is happening all over the world because
• 11:29
  Speaker 1: they are scared of being silent or being unemployed. They're
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: paid to speak. The main media is paid to speak,
• 11:45
  Speaker 1: like paid to ply. They're not free thinkers, they're not
• 11:53
  Speaker 1: free speakers. They're no power of the debate, and don't
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: be wondering why say that their ratings is going down,
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: because they care about those ratings. We are philosophers, we
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: are informers. You might not like what I'm saying. That's
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: some people like us. We are different. We make you think,
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: we make you doubt, We make you ask questions to
• 12:24
  Speaker 1: be better. The things we are worried about, we are
• 12:27
  Speaker 1: not worried about. We are sufficient in ourselves, are decreating ourselves,
• 12:33
  Speaker 1: and secured in ourselves. We like what we do. We
• 12:37
  Speaker 1: believe in ourselves. We are the people of novelty. We
• 12:42
  Speaker 1: create newness. We create content that does not exist. We
• 12:48
  Speaker 1: don't create redundance. Say we are new me talking to
• 12:57
  Speaker 1: you is now, or like the mainstream to improve their following.
• 13:10
  Speaker 1: They's it difficult for them to do that. To assume
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: that you're the god of knowledge when you for a
• 13:24
  Speaker 1: short time after time, assume that you have that power
• 13:30
  Speaker 1: to fact check others while you're lying by fact checking.
• 13:40
  Speaker 1: To be so blind folded to a narcissistic way of
• 13:46
  Speaker 1: seeing yourself in the information chamber, sometimes people get so
• 13:56
  Speaker 1: shortsighted that humans have a choice. Humans do. It means
• 14:07
  Speaker 1: if I go sometime to New York Times. Don't look
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: for information. I will go to the Washington Post, Washington Journal,
• 14:22
  Speaker 1: New York Posts. I'll try to see an n SMBC,
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: Fox News. I'm trying to Haffington Post, Actions, act cheers,
• 14:37
  Speaker 1: they're here the daily paste, and look at news is around.
• 14:48
  Speaker 1: I tried to go into National, the Sky News, the
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: Bob say what is happening in Europe? I got to
• 14:55
  Speaker 1: what is happening in Hong Kong and Singapore. I got
• 14:58
  Speaker 1: to see um to see what the up in China.
• 15:02
  Speaker 1: I go to YouTube to just look for news everywhere,
• 15:08
  Speaker 1: and I'm always attracted at opposite voices. Opposite voices attracts
• 15:16
  Speaker 1: me a lot. It means I want to see what
• 15:19
  Speaker 1: is it's not on the mainstream. I want to see
• 15:23
  Speaker 1: where the mainstream is scared of. And then I see
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: the limitations of those people themselves. When there own eco chambers,
• 15:33
  Speaker 1: you must somebody must get into an echo chamber in
• 15:37
  Speaker 1: order to know what the echo chamber is thinking about.
• 15:43
  Speaker 1: It must not enslave and shock at yourself with limited
• 15:50
  Speaker 1: knowledge of the world of yourself. As a philosopher, when
• 15:59
  Speaker 1: I write a this is, I must ask ai to
• 16:07
  Speaker 1: give the counterpositive toward appriten. Go check my writings out.
• 16:15
  Speaker 1: Go to my website AI philosopher dot com. Go to
• 16:24
  Speaker 1: AI philosopher dot com and check it out. I cross
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: checked myself as a philosopher. Sometimes we are provocative to
• 16:39
  Speaker 1: make people think. I write what the writer is original,
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: is organic, is authentic as I'm talking to you now,
• 16:48
  Speaker 1: but I make sure in my writings I give you
• 16:53
  Speaker 1: the other side. For example, if I tell you how
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: great our country is, how great things are going, I
• 17:04
  Speaker 1: will give you the counter argument to that, because that
• 17:10
  Speaker 1: creates a balance in your mind. Because my intention is
• 17:14
  Speaker 1: to inform you, not to gaslight to you, not to
• 17:22
  Speaker 1: make you have a weapon to use against others, not
• 17:26
  Speaker 1: to make you take a drug to hurry you, not
• 17:30
  Speaker 1: to make you addicted to something. If you can be
• 17:34
  Speaker 1: addicted to philosophical knowledge or or inspirational thinking or motivational speaking,
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: then you are the right place. When you give information
• 17:52
  Speaker 1: to humans, tell them to find print, let them not
• 17:58
  Speaker 1: define print that I'm not. I'm not meant to inform you,
• 18:02
  Speaker 1: to educate you. I'm just talking to you because i
• 18:05
  Speaker 1: want my ratings to go up, or that I've been
• 18:09
  Speaker 1: paid to play, or I'm playing to be paid. Just
• 18:20
  Speaker 1: give the fine print because you are free to die
• 18:26
  Speaker 1: because you still have a following a Niche don't play
• 18:32
  Speaker 1: the both side. Reason when the people the person knows
• 18:37
  Speaker 1: that we have already taken a side while you're speaking.
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: Look at the wars we have having the media contributes to.
• 18:47
  Speaker 1: They failed to report the news that's cared to report
• 18:50
  Speaker 1: the news they're paid to play. It's better for me
• 19:01
  Speaker 1: to go listen to a podcast somewhere. Listen to somebody
• 19:11
  Speaker 1: to the best of their knowledge, saying what they think
• 19:13
  Speaker 1: is true, without having the authority that what they're saying
• 19:21
  Speaker 1: it's true. See, the main media will call any other
• 19:26
  Speaker 1: channel a conspiracy theory. Ah, they make fun of podcasts
• 19:36
  Speaker 1: because podcasts you flip the pages of news. They're not
• 19:43
  Speaker 1: telling that you must listen to them. It's the means
• 19:47
  Speaker 1: to media telling you that if you don't listen to them,
• 19:49
  Speaker 1: they ignorant, they are not educated. You are something else
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: if you don't listen to them, and we do try
• 19:56
  Speaker 1: to listen to them. Day. That goes back with I
• 20:01
  Speaker 1: me trying to see what is on the mainstream media.
• 20:03
  Speaker 1: Was on BBS, SKY News or CNN of Fox New
• 20:09
  Speaker 1: or SMBSA. I want to see what is on the
• 20:12
  Speaker 1: New York Post, on the New York Times, on the
• 20:20
  Speaker 1: Washington Post, on the Washington JOHNA. I want to see
• 20:25
  Speaker 1: what is on Bloomberg. I'm going for the MPR and
• 20:31
  Speaker 1: I go for the newspapers, the websites. I go to X,
• 20:39
  Speaker 1: to Instagram. This is some varieties. I go to YouTube
• 20:47
  Speaker 1: to look for news everywhere on planner Earth. That is me.
• 20:54
  Speaker 1: You cannot lie to me because AI has made it possible.
• 20:59
  Speaker 1: Nothing but light. Politicians used to use the mainstream media,
• 21:07
  Speaker 1: and now they have infiltrated the system into the podcast world.
• 21:12
  Speaker 1: Because the goal is to corrupt the mind of the people.
• 21:17
  Speaker 1: Do not tell the truth, to lie to the people.
• 21:22
  Speaker 1: That's what it's all about, because the people don't have
• 21:26
  Speaker 1: the right now as a human being, have the right
• 21:31
  Speaker 1: to now us. Why should Galileo suffer for us? I
• 21:42
  Speaker 1: should sookrate this die for us. I should play to
• 21:47
  Speaker 1: Aristotle ixist. I should die as Isaac Newton montesquie Johans votaire.
• 22:05
  Speaker 1: Why should they suffer for us? Why should Spinosa suffer
• 22:11
  Speaker 1: for us? Why should Jesus Christ be crucified the cross
• 22:16
  Speaker 1: for us? On Matinuta King, I'm Bram Lincoln. Why should
• 22:28
  Speaker 1: scientists and inventors are innovators and not be lawried? Why
• 22:36
  Speaker 1: should they? Right? There is a sign that if ignorance
• 22:42
  Speaker 1: is placed, then it's valletible wise, that you are paining
• 22:49
  Speaker 1: wise and pound foolish. If information doesn't matter where do
• 22:59
  Speaker 1: you live? What makes you happy than learning something new,
• 23:09
  Speaker 1: improving your mind, your knowledge, your word being. Isn't that
• 23:13
  Speaker 1: what a good citizen is all about? When you go
• 23:21
  Speaker 1: to the mainstream the criticized till it prompter by using
• 23:30
  Speaker 1: tell a prompter, I speaking to you. I've never read
• 23:35
  Speaker 1: a script before speaking to you. I don't follow in
• 23:40
  Speaker 1: a script because talking to you, I'll spend like four hours.
• 23:47
  Speaker 1: If you can watch my media fate, I'll spend like
• 23:51
  Speaker 1: four hours sometime five hours, six hours just trying to
• 23:55
  Speaker 1: recycle news everywhere in the world before I come a
• 24:00
  Speaker 1: podcast for ten ten minutes so I can write something
• 24:03
  Speaker 1: for a page, because you have to write to be
• 24:10
  Speaker 1: motivated to think. He listened to me, says something new
• 24:18
  Speaker 1: all the time. But the core of it, what should
• 24:24
  Speaker 1: make you happy is the new nourishment of knowledge. You
• 24:32
  Speaker 1: have the right to now and people like to now.
• 24:37
  Speaker 1: This subscribe to so many things. They want to read
• 24:39
  Speaker 1: a new book. People are trying to get information about
• 24:42
  Speaker 1: something that can better their lives, that can bring their
• 24:46
  Speaker 1: happiness and meaning for them to find purpose. I can
• 24:50
  Speaker 1: let them create a business, to generate wealth, to have
• 24:53
  Speaker 1: a job. Four a new form of medicine of treating
• 25:00
  Speaker 1: their disorder, solving their problems, uniting their families, resolving their
• 25:13
  Speaker 1: marital dispute. People like to entertain themselves, something positive, something
• 25:23
  Speaker 1: that makes them laugh. You must not make a joke
• 25:27
  Speaker 1: by insulting another person. You must not say people thinks
• 25:33
  Speaker 1: things skin by insulting them. Your gatings must not must
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: must not be based on hurting other people's feelings. It
• 25:51
  Speaker 1: must not be a let nice your host that your
• 25:55
  Speaker 1: glory is the pain of another person. You must not
• 26:00
  Speaker 1: be the person on the extreme right now your happiness
• 26:04
  Speaker 1: for your ratings is how much you divide America. It
• 26:11
  Speaker 1: must not be the person on the extreme left, where
• 26:18
  Speaker 1: your ratings is based on how you destroy American values.
• 26:30
  Speaker 1: The board ends must not be working against itself. Left
• 26:36
  Speaker 1: and right doesn't mean right or wrong. It means balance,
• 26:45
  Speaker 1: but that's not what it is. It means you go
• 26:49
  Speaker 1: to your left, You get the same information. You come
• 26:55
  Speaker 1: to right, you get the same information. Then you decide
• 27:00
  Speaker 1: for yourself and me. It's both sides, both information giving
• 27:06
  Speaker 1: to you. It's meant to help you. If I get
• 27:13
  Speaker 1: information under what they call the right media, I go
• 27:18
  Speaker 1: to Fox. It's not there's not a day past. What
• 27:23
  Speaker 1: I mean mean what happens on Fox and or the
• 27:30
  Speaker 1: right leaning podcast Information Chambers, and a day cannot pass
• 27:37
  Speaker 1: immediately what I mean going to the left. If there
• 27:39
  Speaker 1: is something called the left, because American must be divided
• 27:43
  Speaker 1: for some other people to feel happy, I go to
• 27:48
  Speaker 1: the left and now do my best to get every
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: whatever they're saying. It means I can't hold my nose
• 27:54
  Speaker 1: trays to listen to information I'm not supposed to listener.
• 28:04
  Speaker 1: It's not a secret that I support Israel. My name
• 28:10
  Speaker 1: is Israel, so it's not a secret that I support Israel.
• 28:20
  Speaker 1: But the day cannot pass what I'm going around the
• 28:24
  Speaker 1: world to listen to what haters of Israel I say.
• 28:32
  Speaker 1: I must listen to the hatred against Israel because I
• 28:37
  Speaker 1: love Israel. My love for my country, for America, I
• 28:47
  Speaker 1: cannot be contested. Some people will say I love American,
• 28:53
  Speaker 1: mon anybody else you must profess that self love something
• 29:00
  Speaker 1: for your country before you can defend before you can
• 29:04
  Speaker 1: defend it with objectivity, with objectivity not sevility. I must
• 29:24
  Speaker 1: know who hate Israel in adert to defend Israel. I
• 29:30
  Speaker 1: must know who hates America in adert to defend America.
• 29:36
  Speaker 1: It means I cannot be biased to get information to
• 29:40
  Speaker 1: the facts that does don't make sense. I studied law.
• 29:50
  Speaker 1: I studied law. Therefore, to defend a client, I must
• 29:57
  Speaker 1: seek to know the information that the others had got
• 29:59
  Speaker 1: against me. Against my client, I cannot go to court
• 30:05
  Speaker 1: mainly with the information I'm given to me by my client.
• 30:10
  Speaker 1: The judge will not be happy because he knows there's
• 30:15
  Speaker 1: something wrong. You're in court because you're in an adversary system.
• 30:23
  Speaker 1: It means you're in court because nobody buys what you
• 30:26
  Speaker 1: west side. You are coming to define what you hold
• 30:31
  Speaker 1: to be self evidence. That's truth. That's what I Americanized
• 30:35
  Speaker 1: all about. It's a debate. When I used to be
• 30:45
  Speaker 1: in college. If I go to a school and there
• 30:51
  Speaker 1: is no debate club, I we create one. That's why
• 31:02
  Speaker 1: I faired offended. I fairly hurt when Charlie Kirk was killed.
• 31:12
  Speaker 1: When Charlie Kirk was killed. I fell offended, I fear hurt.
• 31:19
  Speaker 1: I am still now. I feel for the wife and
• 31:28
  Speaker 1: the children. I don't live not to see their father.
• 31:38
  Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk did not go some with guns, with threat
• 31:43
  Speaker 1: with violence. They did what an American constitution asked us
• 31:50
  Speaker 1: to do. Go back to read the Federari's papers, then
• 31:57
  Speaker 1: Bram Lincoln debate, HM. Listen to Douglas. Douglas if I
• 32:12
  Speaker 1: pronouncial named properly, go back to those the debates of
• 32:17
  Speaker 1: the American founder, our founding fathers. Listen to them. Jefferson Adams,
• 32:29
  Speaker 1: listen to them. Listen to Blur and Hamilton what letter
• 32:36
  Speaker 1: they do? Listen to Ted Cruise. He came to defend Kimmel,
• 32:52
  Speaker 1: who insult Tad Cross all the time that he likes
• 32:56
  Speaker 1: the guy. That's what America is all about. M hm. Teed.
• 33:00
  Speaker 1: Chris came out and said, no, that's not right. It
• 33:04
  Speaker 1: doesn't mean that he does not love the president or
• 33:08
  Speaker 1: does not love the country. That's what they got tough. Laugh.
• 33:18
  Speaker 1: Think about parenting, three types of parenting and let's say fair.
• 33:26
  Speaker 1: Let's say fair parenting. Do what you like, change my
• 33:31
  Speaker 1: gender if you likes your ears or switch your hands.
• 33:35
  Speaker 1: If you like, augment your body, if you like be
• 33:40
  Speaker 1: a genius, if you like experiment everything, if you want
• 33:45
  Speaker 1: be a criminal, if you want be a pastor, if
• 33:48
  Speaker 1: you want just do what you want in sort the
• 33:53
  Speaker 1: parent if you want as let's say, fair parenting. We
• 33:59
  Speaker 1: always know that in that system the best of the
• 34:03
  Speaker 1: human beings not realized, because they might not there might
• 34:08
  Speaker 1: not be any life left to say that. The flight
• 34:12
  Speaker 1: does not, a fly that doesn't listen follows the cops
• 34:16
  Speaker 1: to the grave. The power of self restrain, the power
• 34:24
  Speaker 1: self resp self reflection, the power self respect, that power
• 34:35
  Speaker 1: of measurement, proportionality and balance, the power of empathy and sympathy,
• 34:44
  Speaker 1: the power of when in the crown to know it hurts,
• 34:49
  Speaker 1: or when the other person's show, to know how it feels.
• 34:53
  Speaker 1: That's not not an initiate system of parenting or in
• 34:58
  Speaker 1: the system of government. We know that the libertarian they
• 35:04
  Speaker 1: save economics to the extreme create virtual capitalism, something different
• 35:14
  Speaker 1: from Adam Smith capitalism. So in parenting you gotta less
• 35:26
  Speaker 1: safe fire parenting. You've got the authoritarian parent, a dictatorial parent,
• 35:31
  Speaker 1: a tyrannicar parent, an oppressive parent, just like a system
• 35:38
  Speaker 1: that suffers from oppression, dictatorship, and tyranny. You create the
• 35:43
  Speaker 1: quickest set of people and the most informed, and you
• 35:48
  Speaker 1: cared crue people. Most dictators come from tyrannical systems. So
• 35:54
  Speaker 1: an authoritarian parent equally credit kid that is that is aggressive,
• 36:03
  Speaker 1: that that rejects everything that's combative and is becoming a
• 36:12
  Speaker 1: psychopathus so so bad. And the third part of parenting
• 36:17
  Speaker 1: we now is all authoritative, always separate authoritarian authoritarian think
• 36:25
  Speaker 1: about authoritarian governments around the world, authoritative think about irresponsible democracy.
• 36:37
  Speaker 1: An authoritative parent is like a conservative parent as a
• 36:44
  Speaker 1: parents that assumed that the kids need to have rights
• 36:50
  Speaker 1: and freedoms. That saved the kid's life and save society.
• 36:56
  Speaker 1: And an unauthoritative parents perhaps ain't like a law enforcement
• 37:02
  Speaker 1: officer or like the courts, like a leader. When things
• 37:08
  Speaker 1: go wrong, you are free to do the right thing.
• 37:15
  Speaker 1: That's an authoritative parent. Now you're my child, you're not
• 37:20
  Speaker 1: my friend. To be my friend, it must be good
• 37:25
  Speaker 1: to yourself. It must be the best of yourself. An
• 37:29
  Speaker 1: authoritative parent lost and care for the child. They know
• 37:34
  Speaker 1: what the child needs. At that level. They get tough,
• 37:37
  Speaker 1: love of respect, They do everything for the child to
• 37:42
  Speaker 1: develop its individualism. It's intrinsic individuality. They teach their kids
• 37:48
  Speaker 1: self alliance, independence, self determination, self control, self made self help.
• 37:55
  Speaker 1: It's tough. The one they kiss to be the the
• 37:58
  Speaker 1: best of itself, but their kids becomes the pride of
• 38:01
  Speaker 1: the family, the pride of a nation, and the pride
• 38:04
  Speaker 1: of a world. Most great people in life come from
• 38:10
  Speaker 1: authoritative parents. It may there must be an authority, not
• 38:14
  Speaker 1: an abusive authority. It mays a kid must know my
• 38:18
  Speaker 1: mom and dadgess at home. The authority prevent them from
• 38:23
  Speaker 1: doing something. And if those kids don't have those authority
• 38:27
  Speaker 1: at home, when they see the police or law enforcement,
• 38:32
  Speaker 1: that gets careed, they must need the authority for there
• 38:36
  Speaker 1: to be ordered. Law and order come from a society
• 38:43
  Speaker 1: driven my authoritative parents and kids that came from authoritative homes.
• 38:54
  Speaker 1: Most scientists, inventors, ladies. You don't see any great person,
• 38:59
  Speaker 1: the richest per, or the most powerful person without a
• 39:04
  Speaker 1: person with authority in their lives. Somebody must better to
• 39:08
  Speaker 1: tell you to sit down, to listen as you die.
• 39:13
  Speaker 1: Under a person's death. Most of the criminality in society
• 39:19
  Speaker 1: comes from lacy for parenting. The parents know very less
• 39:25
  Speaker 1: and the expect very less from their children. But society
• 39:28
  Speaker 1: expect more from everybody. So if your parent knows less
• 39:33
  Speaker 1: and expect very less from you, society expects more from you.
• 39:39
  Speaker 1: And since you cannot give way, don't have relayship fair parenting.
• 39:46
  Speaker 1: The kids are not their best. Doing what you like
• 39:52
  Speaker 1: means being a criminal. Doing what you like means hurting somebody.
• 39:59
  Speaker 1: Doing what you're like means not being sensitive. Doing what
• 40:04
  Speaker 1: you like means being narcissistic apathetic. Doing what you like
• 40:10
  Speaker 1: means being inhuman means means being crue, means being racist
• 40:15
  Speaker 1: or sexist, or means being going to war. Destrain the
• 40:19
  Speaker 1: word that it doesn't matter, it's what you like. That's
• 40:25
  Speaker 1: not what we wants society to be, because society can
• 40:30
  Speaker 1: be better. Linking back to the field of information, we
• 40:43
  Speaker 1: cannot just listen to the information we like. This a
• 40:48
  Speaker 1: less affair. Does you have the right the right to speech?
• 40:58
  Speaker 1: They don't need to inform me that they have free speech.
• 41:02
  Speaker 1: Just the fact that you're a human being with your mouth,
• 41:07
  Speaker 1: you have the right to speak. You don't need a
• 41:08
  Speaker 1: law to tell you how the right to speak. The
• 41:12
  Speaker 1: birds doesn't know anything that is the right to speak.
• 41:15
  Speaker 1: The right to speech is mostly an American thing. As
• 41:20
  Speaker 1: an American thing to the history of the right to
• 41:24
  Speaker 1: speak comes because some people who have slaves, some people
• 41:30
  Speaker 1: who have slaves. So the right to free speech was
• 41:35
  Speaker 1: the right giving to slaves, not to the person with authority,
• 41:42
  Speaker 1: with the person with power, not to the slave owner.
• 41:46
  Speaker 1: The slave, how already had the right to speak. Martin
• 41:53
  Speaker 1: Lutakian did not die for the slave owner. A Bromncoln
• 41:58
  Speaker 1: did not die for the slave owner. William Wilberforschool in England,
• 42:05
  Speaker 1: and all and others people fighting for the abolition of slavery,
• 42:12
  Speaker 1: the abolitionists, they were not fighting for the slave owners.
• 42:18
  Speaker 1: They were fighting for the rights of their slaves. Again,
• 42:22
  Speaker 1: is the misinformation a misappropriation of what right is? It
• 42:30
  Speaker 1: cannot be the person in power talking about right. It
• 42:35
  Speaker 1: means it's a right to hate wh you think. The
• 42:40
  Speaker 1: right to free speech was meant for the slaves and
• 42:45
  Speaker 1: those without power. The right to free speech was meant
• 42:49
  Speaker 1: for women because they couldn't speak. The right to free
• 42:56
  Speaker 1: speech were meant for those who had been opprised and
• 42:59
  Speaker 1: the big family, the only educated, the ignorant, the farmers,
• 43:06
  Speaker 1: the poor farmers, the poor vendors, the poor workers were
• 43:14
  Speaker 1: not paid well in the days of the Conugies and
• 43:19
  Speaker 1: the Rockefellers. They give that age. He need the right
• 43:28
  Speaker 1: of the unions to be paid well, the rights for
• 43:33
  Speaker 1: good working conditions, right for clean air, the right not
• 43:41
  Speaker 1: to be robbed, to be safe for your property. That's
• 43:48
  Speaker 1: what the right meant. That would right means that right
• 43:58
  Speaker 1: cannot be taken from you. And it's the right to
• 44:01
  Speaker 1: do the right thing. It means you cannot oppress somebody's
• 44:05
  Speaker 1: peach for protesting for the right thing. That's what the
• 44:12
  Speaker 1: right means, right to do right. It's not right to
• 44:18
  Speaker 1: abuse somebody. That's I got the movement to fight for
• 44:23
  Speaker 1: the abuse. It's not right to oppress somebody, as I
• 44:29
  Speaker 1: got the movement fighting against oppression, against gyranny, against dictatorship,
• 44:35
  Speaker 1: against cruelty. It don't have the right to be crue
• 44:39
  Speaker 1: against somebody. That's why you have the humane societies. It
• 44:47
  Speaker 1: don't have the right to subject somebody to enslave somebody.
• 44:52
  Speaker 1: That's why you got the abolishest right to do what
• 44:57
  Speaker 1: is right. Mm hmm. It cannot be a oppressor talking
• 45:03
  Speaker 1: about right, it means your right is to keep uppressing people.
• 45:08
  Speaker 1: You cannot be the person with power talking about all
• 45:12
  Speaker 1: rights are equal? What rights do you mean an equal?
• 45:26
  Speaker 1: It means if I cannot, if I can protest against oppression.
• 45:31
  Speaker 1: In your logic, it means the oppressor needs to need
• 45:35
  Speaker 1: to need to protest for me protesting against oppression, that's
• 45:45
  Speaker 1: when it's dangerous. Then my generalized fights for their rise
• 45:54
  Speaker 1: because their rights are been taken away. Racist has created
• 46:02
  Speaker 1: two class sense of people. They're free and all free
• 46:09
  Speaker 1: don't free? Fight to be free, to be treated with dignity,
• 46:17
  Speaker 1: that is right. That's why they're called it right, because
• 46:20
  Speaker 1: cheating people with dignity is the right thing to do.
• 46:27
  Speaker 1: The mageneralized people are fighting to be treated fairly. That's
• 46:33
  Speaker 1: the right. They're fighting to be treated fairly. To be
• 46:40
  Speaker 1: treated fairly is right. That's why it's the right right.
• 46:47
  Speaker 1: That's why. Now what right exists? Fighting for your right
• 46:52
  Speaker 1: it means fighting for what is right, which means what
• 46:55
  Speaker 1: the right right to everybody. It's just a universal fundamentor fairness.
• 47:03
  Speaker 1: It means it's a natural right to be treated with fairness.
• 47:08
  Speaker 1: The concept of right back to the days of the philosophers.
• 47:17
  Speaker 1: I read the philosophers, does think John Locke or convict. Example,
• 47:25
  Speaker 1: we can go to Nizche, go back to vote to deca,
• 47:38
  Speaker 1: to the Western philosophers, to Persian philosophers, Asian philosophers, Egyptian philosophers.
• 47:51
  Speaker 1: We philosophers always talk about right. The philosophers don't something
• 47:56
  Speaker 1: that the truth, the fact that's drive society. Right, truth, fact, right, truth, fact,
• 48:10
  Speaker 1: that's what builds society. And that's what it's missing in
• 48:15
  Speaker 1: the media. That's why I started by saying this too
• 48:19
  Speaker 1: much information. It's not about right, it's not about truth,
• 48:26
  Speaker 1: it's not about fact. And as a philosopher, we want
• 48:34
  Speaker 1: to talk about right, truth and fact. It's not the right,
• 48:41
  Speaker 1: truth and fact that the media talk about. Don't misunderstand
• 48:46
  Speaker 1: my right a natural right. It's a right that is
• 48:52
  Speaker 1: in doubt in every human being. Somebody is fighting about
• 48:57
  Speaker 1: a natural right because somebody is taking why you're born
• 49:02
  Speaker 1: not to be poor, that's a right because they are resources.
• 49:10
  Speaker 1: But well, blame humans for being poor when the resources
• 49:14
  Speaker 1: that is natural for everybody, A group of people has
• 49:21
  Speaker 1: decided upon themselves that they have some type of inalienable
• 49:27
  Speaker 1: rights separate from that or others to on those resources.
• 49:33
  Speaker 1: And when you do, some people will left out. And
• 49:44
  Speaker 1: when those who are left out, They are disenfranchised, They imaginalize,
• 49:49
  Speaker 1: they're our pressed. They think they don't matter. Elitism, for example,
• 49:59
  Speaker 1: in the self is classification and stratification. They call an
• 50:05
  Speaker 1: elite education. Why can the system accept that, because that's
• 50:13
  Speaker 1: a hierarchy, the system creating itself. When you create that hierarchy,
• 50:18
  Speaker 1: some people be taking advantage of. How can you then
• 50:24
  Speaker 1: therefore blame those people for protesting that they're being abused
• 50:33
  Speaker 1: and they're being cheated, that they're not being paid. While
• 50:41
  Speaker 1: if I go to Fox for example, Foctions for example,
• 50:45
  Speaker 1: remember all these guys on on the mainstrain, they're all millionnaires.
• 50:50
  Speaker 1: Remember that we go to the mainstrain, know that they
• 50:54
  Speaker 1: are millionnaires, they're elite. I start by saying, nothing wrong
• 50:59
  Speaker 1: with being a leader and being a millionnaire. I am one.
• 51:08
  Speaker 1: I have more than that. I am born a prince.
• 51:15
  Speaker 1: Not being born a prince, I have born an artists.
• 51:21
  Speaker 1: So that's not the point. My point is, if I
• 51:32
  Speaker 1: choose to go to Fox, for example, I should be
• 51:37
  Speaker 1: informed about what is happening in the world, because that's
• 51:38
  Speaker 1: why it myself in news outlet. It must keep your
• 51:42
  Speaker 1: biases aside and first gives me information unless you're not
• 51:47
  Speaker 1: a news outlet, you take away news from the outlet.
• 51:50
  Speaker 1: It means you must first give me refine information. It
• 51:54
  Speaker 1: means you must give me water to drink first. That's
• 52:00
  Speaker 1: informative speech. Who learn in public speaking? It's informative. You
• 52:06
  Speaker 1: must inform me first. That's the right. That's the right right.
• 52:14
  Speaker 1: I have the right to be informed when I go
• 52:19
  Speaker 1: to to see another elite nails before you start to
• 52:24
  Speaker 1: brainwash me first. I have the right to be informed.
• 52:27
  Speaker 1: That's the right. Right. I need to fight for that right.
• 52:33
  Speaker 1: I fight for that right because we live in a society.
• 52:35
  Speaker 1: That right means something different. Right means victim hurt. Right
• 52:42
  Speaker 1: means entitlement. That's what right has come to me. It
• 52:48
  Speaker 1: means thin skin. It means have the right to gaslight
• 52:53
  Speaker 1: to you. You have the right to listen to have
• 52:56
  Speaker 1: the right to lie to you. You have the right
• 52:58
  Speaker 1: to have the right to gaslight to you. I don't
• 53:02
  Speaker 1: have the right to protest. I have the right to
• 53:05
  Speaker 1: lie to you. We don't have the right to say
• 53:07
  Speaker 1: now I have the right to mislead you. I don't
• 53:12
  Speaker 1: have the right to say now I have the right
• 53:15
  Speaker 1: to misinform you. I have the right to say, now
• 53:21
  Speaker 1: I have the right to to self. You your conspiracy
• 53:25
  Speaker 1: and this infinant propaganda. I don't have the right to object.
• 53:31
  Speaker 1: If you object that, then I'm entitled to be a victim.
• 53:39
  Speaker 1: So we create a system of laziness to seek information
• 53:45
  Speaker 1: and entitlement to mislead people. I'm victim here to cry
• 53:51
  Speaker 1: foul the people saying that you're lying or that you're
• 53:55
  Speaker 1: not right. We have created a society of information where
• 54:02
  Speaker 1: right truth and fact. It's not natural, it's not philosophical,
• 54:13
  Speaker 1: it's not theoretical. It's not theological. It's not scientific. It's
• 54:23
  Speaker 1: not rooted on the scientific method. It's not rooted in logic,
• 54:31
  Speaker 1: it's not rooted in divinity of spredetuality. It's not in reality.
• 54:43
  Speaker 1: What leads today, it's laziness to the truth, entitlemental eye
• 54:53
  Speaker 1: about the truth, and victim hurd to complain. And why
• 55:01
  Speaker 1: when people object to what you say? America was founded?
• 55:12
  Speaker 1: So Curtis died for the truth with philosophers always ask
• 55:19
  Speaker 1: for that. What becomes the being to live in alife,
• 55:25
  Speaker 1: light upon and die without knowing is in truth. The treasure.
• 55:33
  Speaker 1: Seeking the truth is different from proving proving the truth.
• 55:36
  Speaker 1: Seeking the truth is enough, you're sick to know it.
• 55:42
  Speaker 1: That's what enlightenment is all about. Look at our population today.
• 55:49
  Speaker 1: Everyone has a cell phone. Just ask that person what
• 55:53
  Speaker 1: is happening in their neighborhood, in their neighborhood. Think about it.
• 56:02
  Speaker 1: People today don't think even to care to know what
• 56:05
  Speaker 1: is happening in the neighborhood. Local news. It means just
• 56:11
  Speaker 1: your surrounding. They're entice to this echo chambers of people
• 56:21
  Speaker 1: become addicted to themselves. I can addict it to yourself. Oh,
• 56:30
  Speaker 1: we know. Humans have flowed addicted to that which is cared.
• 56:35
  Speaker 1: They're good in here. It's the way of thinking. The
• 56:45
  Speaker 1: right we talk about to day. It's not the right right,
• 56:55
  Speaker 1: it's the legal right, the legal right. See the legal
• 57:06
  Speaker 1: right and the legal truth is different from truth itself.
• 57:15
  Speaker 1: For example, take the guy who killed our beloved Charlie Kirk.
• 57:24
  Speaker 1: We all saw it. Unless the media was lying to us,
• 57:29
  Speaker 1: I mean, unless our eyes are lying to us. That's
• 57:31
  Speaker 1: what I mean. We saw the gunman on the roof,
• 57:35
  Speaker 1: We saw the bullet came out, and we saw this
• 57:39
  Speaker 1: great guy fell, and we discovered that he'll not go
• 57:44
  Speaker 1: back home. We discovered that he didn't Hark, the kids
• 57:49
  Speaker 1: and the wife. We know that he's not here today.
• 57:52
  Speaker 1: I don't see him anywhere. I know he got his funeral.
• 57:56
  Speaker 1: I saw him being buried, so it means he died.
• 58:03
  Speaker 1: I'm connecting this fact. That's how logic is being connected.
• 58:09
  Speaker 1: But if you go not there for for conspiracy somewhere,
• 58:13
  Speaker 1: don't tell that he didn't die, it was not buried,
• 58:16
  Speaker 1: or it was just a a lie. That's how it goes.
• 58:21
  Speaker 1: That madaur Ki did not die. It's their life is
• 58:24
  Speaker 1: just a lie. That Jeff kid did not die. It's
• 58:28
  Speaker 1: a lie. Was not shot, that's still lie. That was
• 58:34
  Speaker 1: not shot by the ear, that's de a lie. That
• 58:38
  Speaker 1: Reagan was not shot. Everything's just as conspiracy. That's where
• 58:43
  Speaker 1: we are today. Think about it. The escalator stopped in
• 58:48
  Speaker 1: front of our eyes, watching our beloved first lady and
• 58:55
  Speaker 1: our president, all of us saw it. It stopped because
• 59:01
  Speaker 1: because of a mechanical error, because of a scientific error.
• 59:07
  Speaker 1: But what happened there is an escalator, git it miss?
• 59:14
  Speaker 1: This is conspiracy for that and the gate miss a conspiracy,
• 59:18
  Speaker 1: And then think about it. You be the person finding
• 59:23
  Speaker 1: that rubbish. What does it do to the iq of humans?
• 59:32
  Speaker 1: The escalator gate is where Americans find themselves. Remember that
• 59:39
  Speaker 1: why there's real information there in the world. China just
• 59:47
  Speaker 1: breaking your record today in tipsy exploration. Ohah wait last week,
• 59:59
  Speaker 1: h just add the breakth through on AI and chips
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 1: are sent chips will weare just the only part on
• 1:00:16
  Speaker 1: Silicon's photography January chip making to bypass inn VideA so
• 1:00:27
  Speaker 1: that they can stop second vent any assumption assumptions to
• 1:00:30
  Speaker 1: create independence. If you contend here an assumption I could
• 1:00:35
  Speaker 1: act saint chips I sent nine nineteen C nine fifteen
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 1: pr A fright nine fifty DT nine sixty nine seventy
• 1:01:01
  Speaker 1: you might not know what that means. Usually now you're
• 1:01:05
  Speaker 1: going to concern here what is happening in Gaza, Consentsia,
• 1:01:15
  Speaker 1: Just what is happening in Sudan, in Cameroon, in Nigeria,
• 1:01:26
  Speaker 1: in the Power in Japan, in Singapore, in South Korea
• 1:01:32
  Speaker 1: and China, in Taiwan, in India, in Afghanistan, in France,
• 1:01:41
  Speaker 1: in Hungary and Finland, in Ukraine. You have that right
• 1:01:50
  Speaker 1: because the world is yours. The wall of information is
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 1: power going to system and the media don't want to inform.
• 1:02:06
  Speaker 1: You ask yourself why and when you don't want to
• 1:02:11
  Speaker 1: go out there to seek information. Ask yourself, why is
• 1:02:20
  Speaker 1: it true that if ignored as this place thens falletable.
• 1:02:23
  Speaker 1: Wise we'll talk about right. Ask yourself, what right are
• 1:02:31
  Speaker 1: we talking about? Because even the guy that killed that
• 1:02:41
  Speaker 1: murdered or assassinated Charlie Kirk, we all know the guy,
• 1:02:48
  Speaker 1: but you see, we can still not know that because
• 1:02:54
  Speaker 1: your court need to prove what we already know. That's
• 1:02:57
  Speaker 1: the leaguer right we're talking about. So you're talking about
• 1:03:01
  Speaker 1: about right, is it legal right? Because the legal right
• 1:03:04
  Speaker 1: therefore can be bad. If that guy has the best lawyers,
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 1: there can be a mistrier, there can be a procedural error,
• 1:03:17
  Speaker 1: and that guy can walk free. It doesn't mean that
• 1:03:22
  Speaker 1: he didn't do it. It meant because this established type
• 1:03:26
  Speaker 1: of right said that even though he did it, the
• 1:03:31
  Speaker 1: procedure to prove that he did it, it's contaminated. So
• 1:03:37
  Speaker 1: therefore need to throw the case out of court. So
• 1:03:40
  Speaker 1: if you do not get confided on talking about right,
• 1:03:43
  Speaker 1: that type of right is the right of the powerful,
• 1:03:48
  Speaker 1: because the poor person will not have a lawyer, and
• 1:03:52
  Speaker 1: that type of right system those with that power always
• 1:03:58
  Speaker 1: been abused because they don't have the right to have
• 1:04:02
  Speaker 1: a good lawyer. The same goes with troath truth when
• 1:04:10
  Speaker 1: somebody said it's true. True should be truth in its
• 1:04:14
  Speaker 1: naturality or in its artificiality. Find the scientific method. If
• 1:04:22
  Speaker 1: you stay in the sun, you're gonna get burned because
• 1:04:27
  Speaker 1: his son is hot. That's naturally true because you can
• 1:04:34
  Speaker 1: feel it. But the scientific metal truth equally. Like I
• 1:04:40
  Speaker 1: need to prove truth in the court of law, like
• 1:04:44
  Speaker 1: you need to prove right in the court of law,
• 1:04:47
  Speaker 1: you need to prove truth equally in the field of
• 1:04:49
  Speaker 1: science to the scientific method. So even though you stand
• 1:04:53
  Speaker 1: in the sun and it's hard, it's not true. Let's
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 1: being proven by science that scientific truth equally. It's in
• 1:05:08
  Speaker 1: seat of truth that if you don't have power again,
• 1:05:12
  Speaker 1: truth will not be truth. What do I mean by that?
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 1: So if somebody can corrupt the system, they can therefore
• 1:05:21
  Speaker 1: corrupt the scientific research. And then therefore if we depends
• 1:05:25
  Speaker 1: on the scientific research, research of which of which we should,
• 1:05:30
  Speaker 1: but it can be corrupted, and therefore the truth that
• 1:05:34
  Speaker 1: the science tell us is fact proven proof is infected.
• 1:05:42
  Speaker 1: Just as a guy that killed Charlie Kirk might go
• 1:05:45
  Speaker 1: free if there's a procedural error. So you've been in
• 1:05:51
  Speaker 1: the sun, I'm being burned by the sun. If the
• 1:05:55
  Speaker 1: scientific method still cannot prove that to be true, or
• 1:05:58
  Speaker 1: it's infected to prove that it's not true, then truth
• 1:06:01
  Speaker 1: would be that if he's standing the sun, the son's
• 1:06:03
  Speaker 1: gonna burn you, that if he's staying the son, the
• 1:06:07
  Speaker 1: son wanna burn you. Even though you're standing the son,
• 1:06:09
  Speaker 1: the sun is burning you. It's not true scientifically, even
• 1:06:15
  Speaker 1: though it's true naturally because you are feeling the heat.
• 1:06:19
  Speaker 1: But scientific scientifically it was supposed to be true. But
• 1:06:24
  Speaker 1: the people, their research is flawed because maybe if if
• 1:06:31
  Speaker 1: you prove that, if it's staying the here, they're gonna
• 1:06:34
  Speaker 1: burn you, then maybe they're gonna be the responsibility of
• 1:06:39
  Speaker 1: the government or somebody to make sure that you're not burned.
• 1:06:42
  Speaker 1: So maybe the government need to invest they be housing
• 1:06:47
  Speaker 1: in cooling systems. So since they don't want to do that,
• 1:06:51
  Speaker 1: for example, I'm just trying to create logical to see
• 1:06:58
  Speaker 1: why the truth might not be necessary. Because if their
• 1:07:02
  Speaker 1: truth is necessary, some people spend something on it. If
• 1:07:07
  Speaker 1: it's true that there is crying, then we need the
• 1:07:11
  Speaker 1: government to do more. But since we don't want the government,
• 1:07:16
  Speaker 1: since we have a cared for limited government, then we
• 1:07:20
  Speaker 1: can't say there is no crime. So logic sometimes it
• 1:07:24
  Speaker 1: spins your heart if you need to, if you need
• 1:07:28
  Speaker 1: to seek to know what it is all about, so
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 1: you see the truth they are talking about. Therefore, depends
• 1:07:36
  Speaker 1: on the set of expert. It means the people don't
• 1:07:39
  Speaker 1: know the truth. That's why you see CNN. We need
• 1:07:43
  Speaker 1: expert to can't tell you about what you're already now.
• 1:07:47
  Speaker 1: I'm just using CNN for example, because I cannot go
• 1:07:51
  Speaker 1: a day without going to CNN because you seek it intelligent,
• 1:07:57
  Speaker 1: academic base information. If they could let the person speak,
• 1:08:09
  Speaker 1: but if the person they bring to speak on CNN
• 1:08:11
  Speaker 1: for example, to give you the facts, if the fax
• 1:08:15
  Speaker 1: does not go with the corporate or the lobbies of
• 1:08:17
  Speaker 1: people buying you know, the media, you pay to speak.
• 1:08:22
  Speaker 1: So the person that paid to speak the most, that
• 1:08:26
  Speaker 1: the person that paid to speak the most, we actually
• 1:08:31
  Speaker 1: speak the most on the media. Therefore, and then the
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 1: person that's actually saying the truth we speak less. Again,
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 1: I'm you're using CNN for an example. I just call
• 1:08:47
  Speaker 1: in CNN. I'm helping the media. I call him Fox News.
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 1: I'm helping the media. The means I'm calling their names
• 1:08:57
  Speaker 1: because we expect to get important because they are the
• 1:09:02
  Speaker 1: mainstream media with the follower you see for example, in writing.
• 1:09:12
  Speaker 1: In ACA writing, you choose a side. I teach the
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 1: kids that take for example, if a libra said Fox
• 1:09:27
  Speaker 1: News is terrible, fox News is not goot fire. Okay, okay,
• 1:09:35
  Speaker 1: give me the facts and let me be the George.
• 1:09:40
  Speaker 1: Don't tell me Fox your is terrible. And you know
• 1:09:44
  Speaker 1: my brother asks why, and then don't give me any reasons. Right,
• 1:09:56
  Speaker 1: that's what is happening, And mister just gaslight. I just say,
• 1:10:00
  Speaker 1: somebody is terrible. Okay, tell me why. In ASA writing,
• 1:10:09
  Speaker 1: you must teach a kid how to speak. I'll tell
• 1:10:13
  Speaker 1: the kid. You can just say somebody is wrong. So
• 1:10:21
  Speaker 1: if you tell me that Fox is Fox News, a
• 1:10:23
  Speaker 1: b C. That Fox is not good news, of which
• 1:10:27
  Speaker 1: I think it is, tell me why. Normally, as a
• 1:10:33
  Speaker 1: writing I'm expected of you to have three parts. In
• 1:10:39
  Speaker 1: the most simplified terms of it, you introduced to me,
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 1: what will you be talking about why I think Fox
• 1:10:48
  Speaker 1: News is not good? And then that's the introduction. In
• 1:10:53
  Speaker 1: the body of your ESSI you will give me the
• 1:10:56
  Speaker 1: reasons why. That's the first part of the body of
• 1:10:59
  Speaker 1: your essay. You give me the reasons why. If you
• 1:11:03
  Speaker 1: give me the reasons why and you conclude, then that's
• 1:11:07
  Speaker 1: not an essay. You did not inform me because you
• 1:11:12
  Speaker 1: did not challenge my brain. You just fit me in
• 1:11:17
  Speaker 1: an echo chamber of those who don't like Fox News.
• 1:11:21
  Speaker 1: So if you tell me that Fox News is not good,
• 1:11:24
  Speaker 1: of which I think it is, you introduce me to that.
• 1:11:31
  Speaker 1: I don't want to go into scholastic writing about an
• 1:11:35
  Speaker 1: abstract and review and literature about it and backgroundly job
• 1:11:39
  Speaker 1: about it. Now, I'm going to do a basic, basic
• 1:11:43
  Speaker 1: elementary how information is retained. So if you tell me
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 1: Fox is not good source of information, of which I
• 1:11:56
  Speaker 1: think it is, I keep repeating that. I just stay
• 1:12:01
  Speaker 1: on it so that and this will still focus. That's
• 1:12:05
  Speaker 1: why I try hosted there. Then good. I'm happy to
• 1:12:09
  Speaker 1: know about that. It's good for mis healthy. You tell
• 1:12:13
  Speaker 1: me why I think Fox is not good. But you
• 1:12:17
  Speaker 1: have the obligation, the responsibility, the expectation, the commitment and
• 1:12:24
  Speaker 1: the investment to tell me why Fox is good too.
• 1:12:32
  Speaker 1: Miss must create balance. When seeing try to do that balance,
• 1:12:39
  Speaker 1: it's not informing, it's not in to get here the
• 1:12:43
  Speaker 1: balance in itself. It's just a ritual it's just okay,
• 1:12:50
  Speaker 1: we spoke about the other side of it. They know that.
• 1:12:54
  Speaker 1: That's why the writings is suffering. Have the gods fox
• 1:13:01
  Speaker 1: if he chose to be to take it down that
• 1:13:06
  Speaker 1: I would just I'm just a defender of this. So
• 1:13:09
  Speaker 1: everybody knows that. So you're not trying to objective. You
• 1:13:15
  Speaker 1: don't go to the social today, to any news organization
• 1:13:18
  Speaker 1: today and look for objectivity. Objectivity is a branding because
• 1:13:25
  Speaker 1: they're paid to apply. Socartists was objective? He got killed?
• 1:13:34
  Speaker 1: What the Muther king was? They got killed? Jesus was
• 1:13:41
  Speaker 1: they got killed. See, even Charlie Kirk tried to be
• 1:13:48
  Speaker 1: objective to what he believes in. He got killed because
• 1:13:54
  Speaker 1: both sides don't want that truth, honesty and fairness. It's
• 1:14:06
  Speaker 1: a type of society again. Fairness. I've spoken about truth,
• 1:14:11
  Speaker 1: it doesn't matter. I talk about right, it doesn't matter.
• 1:14:15
  Speaker 1: I talk about fairness. Fairness is a natural right. It's
• 1:14:20
  Speaker 1: just natural that if you see a human being one
• 1:14:25
  Speaker 1: is blue, one is green, you cannot hit the human being.
• 1:14:30
  Speaker 1: Put the human being is green, you cannot hit that
• 1:14:35
  Speaker 1: human being because the human being is blue. It's just
• 1:14:39
  Speaker 1: not right, it's not fair, and it's not truth. It's
• 1:14:45
  Speaker 1: not just. It's not because there is nothing being wrong
• 1:14:54
  Speaker 1: by being white. There's nothing wrong by being black, about
• 1:15:01
  Speaker 1: being blue green. You cover even to the the white human.
• 1:15:08
  Speaker 1: There is no white human again because we know the
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 1: color white. There is no black human because we know
• 1:15:16
  Speaker 1: the color black. Again, the human being husband brain washed.
• 1:15:23
  Speaker 1: A new type of white was invented, and a new
• 1:15:27
  Speaker 1: type of black. What it was invented in impost on people. Remember,
• 1:15:35
  Speaker 1: wouldn't be silly to see a person fighting that the
• 1:15:37
  Speaker 1: person is white or the person fighting the person's black.
• 1:15:42
  Speaker 1: You'll be asking what part of their brain? What happened
• 1:15:44
  Speaker 1: to the brain? Because then be brain washed. That's it
• 1:15:51
  Speaker 1: dip so much that the truth that they are not
• 1:15:54
  Speaker 1: white will be offensive. The truth that they are not
• 1:15:59
  Speaker 1: black would be offensive because actually, again, that naturality of
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 1: right truth has been taken away. I means the naturality
• 1:16:17
  Speaker 1: of being truth is taken away, the naturality of being
• 1:16:21
  Speaker 1: right is taken away, the naturalty of being fair is
• 1:16:26
  Speaker 1: taken away. You know, it's not fair to be the
• 1:16:32
  Speaker 1: richest person in the world. Why the people in the street.
• 1:16:37
  Speaker 1: You ask yourself, what did I do to deserve that?
• 1:16:43
  Speaker 1: It'll be you ask yourself that question, what rules did
• 1:16:50
  Speaker 1: you not apply? How did you buy a way to that?
• 1:16:54
  Speaker 1: Who suffered for that? It's just natural in the society
• 1:16:59
  Speaker 1: that if you see just dinosaurs and miss everybody else
• 1:17:09
  Speaker 1: is hiding and why they're hiding? What makes some people
• 1:17:16
  Speaker 1: do very successful and some people to be struggling? How
• 1:17:22
  Speaker 1: did they get it so right? What type of school
• 1:17:25
  Speaker 1: did they go to? What is their IQ? What makes
• 1:17:32
  Speaker 1: them so special? You can't ask those questions to that.
• 1:17:39
  Speaker 1: It therefore means there for that you hate wealth and
• 1:17:43
  Speaker 1: you hate that. That's where societifind itself, I whet the
• 1:17:48
  Speaker 1: person says that, therefore, since you're asking intelligent questions. But
• 1:17:53
  Speaker 1: since people are not taught to entertain intelligent questions, since
• 1:17:56
  Speaker 1: people are not taught to think down and ask questions,
• 1:17:59
  Speaker 1: that's the call of my philosophy. You must think, doubt
• 1:18:03
  Speaker 1: and ask questions on everything to get the sanity of
• 1:18:07
  Speaker 1: your mind, to purify your brain. You must seek the
• 1:18:13
  Speaker 1: truth and what is right? Not the right and truly
• 1:18:17
  Speaker 1: spoken to? And what is fair? You go back to John,
• 1:18:21
  Speaker 1: to John Locke, you make a simple example of what
• 1:18:24
  Speaker 1: is fair. I would like to go back to it.
• 1:18:29
  Speaker 1: If you build your house and I pass by. I'm
• 1:18:36
  Speaker 1: just paraphrase and I'm making I'm I'm just trying to
• 1:18:40
  Speaker 1: make sense out of it. You build your house, I
• 1:18:45
  Speaker 1: passed by. You build a house, and in labor, and
• 1:18:51
  Speaker 1: once the house is finished, and I can and I
• 1:18:56
  Speaker 1: say to you that whether I need to take the house,
• 1:19:00
  Speaker 1: now give me your house. You know it's not right,
• 1:19:07
  Speaker 1: and I know it's not right. It means I don't
• 1:19:11
  Speaker 1: need to go to Havard as an expert. Now we're
• 1:19:18
  Speaker 1: told to to ha betraate on what is right and around.
• 1:19:22
  Speaker 1: But what about their corrupt and their partisan? What about that?
• 1:19:27
  Speaker 1: Some people are there because of corruption and the partisan,
• 1:19:31
  Speaker 1: not because their IQ speaker, not because the high a
• 1:19:34
  Speaker 1: higher IQ, not because of some super intelligence. But they
• 1:19:37
  Speaker 1: just buy their ways to it. And then now they
• 1:19:39
  Speaker 1: become the expert to talk to us about news, to
• 1:19:41
  Speaker 1: teach and see their cast lighters, and they themselves they
• 1:19:44
  Speaker 1: don't now because they'll be so entitled. I'm victim to
• 1:19:48
  Speaker 1: not know that they don't. Now. I know you don't Noway,
• 1:19:52
  Speaker 1: don't seek information. You blindfold yourself to information. You believe,
• 1:19:58
  Speaker 1: you believe h what you're saying to yourself is true.
• 1:20:04
  Speaker 1: I do everything it means it's just monolithic. You live
• 1:20:09
  Speaker 1: in a pluralistic society. You know it's not fair to
• 1:20:14
  Speaker 1: hit somebody because they are short. You know, it's not
• 1:20:18
  Speaker 1: fair to hit somebody because they are tall. You know
• 1:20:21
  Speaker 1: it's not right, it's not true. Right, fair and true
• 1:20:29
  Speaker 1: work together. I'm being just. It's another caveac of being fair.
• 1:20:40
  Speaker 1: But fairness in itself goes alongside right and true. There's
• 1:20:48
  Speaker 1: the beginning of our being, the beginning in Genesis. Seeking
• 1:20:54
  Speaker 1: to know the beginning OF's philosophy, Gallant your questioning, you
• 1:20:59
  Speaker 1: go back to the ancient philosophers of Egypt, Mesopotamia, Babylon, Persian.
• 1:21:05
  Speaker 1: You move around the world Confucius to no question of faith,
• 1:21:19
  Speaker 1: thinking of doubting. Always remember I always say that between
• 1:21:28
  Speaker 1: the completely opposite and the completely obitrary, there is always
• 1:21:34
  Speaker 1: a why. Find a way when there is no why,
• 1:21:42
  Speaker 1: because there is always a why. I said a long
• 1:21:46
  Speaker 1: time ago, am I writing and my heart in triangulism,
• 1:21:51
  Speaker 1: that our numerical system is flawed when it starts from
• 1:21:57
  Speaker 1: zero and one. It's even super floor. Really, just start
• 1:22:03
  Speaker 1: of one zero one means just two positives. The binary
• 1:22:08
  Speaker 1: that we have today. That's part of our system. That
• 1:22:11
  Speaker 1: becomes part of the problem we in computing and technologies,
• 1:22:15
  Speaker 1: the binary either all. But you see even in the
• 1:22:21
  Speaker 1: binary in computing, it's two positives. Zero is a positive
• 1:22:29
  Speaker 1: and one is a positive and the worst in human
• 1:22:34
  Speaker 1: in numerical system, zero is not even mentioned. When teacher
• 1:22:40
  Speaker 1: kids to count. You start to teach a kid to
• 1:22:43
  Speaker 1: come from one to three, four, five six, and my system,
• 1:22:48
  Speaker 1: we don't do that. It was changed to teach a
• 1:22:52
  Speaker 1: kid to start coming from zero one to three four
• 1:22:55
  Speaker 1: five because zero was invented by India. Zero do not exist.
• 1:23:01
  Speaker 1: Imagine what a zero douben no one dono binary system
• 1:23:05
  Speaker 1: dubno competing. I teach my skids to start counting from
• 1:23:12
  Speaker 1: minus one zero one. See if what if you ask
• 1:23:19
  Speaker 1: my child to come from one to ten, My chilways
• 1:23:23
  Speaker 1: start counting from minus one zero, one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight,
• 1:23:30
  Speaker 1: nine ten. I teach my kid to now that within
• 1:23:41
  Speaker 1: every thigh, expect a negative as the minus one I
• 1:23:52
  Speaker 1: expect a positive. I'd exprest a neutral number. You can
• 1:24:03
  Speaker 1: must see things in three to get basic logic, right.
• 1:24:09
  Speaker 1: That's triangleism, I said, cough my philosophy, I said, the
• 1:24:13
  Speaker 1: human being must think doubt and ask questions. That's three things.
• 1:24:18
  Speaker 1: And then it's all about projection, perception, and perspective. That's
• 1:24:22
  Speaker 1: three things. And music, measurement, proportionality, and balance. That's three
• 1:24:26
  Speaker 1: things that way want to count. Start from minus one,
• 1:24:30
  Speaker 1: zero and one. That's three things. That binary cannot work
• 1:24:35
  Speaker 1: or binary that binary will be obsolete. If it's not
• 1:24:39
  Speaker 1: minus one, zero and one, there must be an impetuent.
• 1:24:50
  Speaker 1: I'll make this simple example. Follow this philosophy. There is
• 1:24:54
  Speaker 1: no conflict. It's just a flow of information. If, for example,
• 1:25:00
  Speaker 1: go back to Fox somebody said and liberal said, fuck news,
• 1:25:05
  Speaker 1: it's terrible. In my system, he say, yes, fox News
• 1:25:14
  Speaker 1: is terrible because that person says so that he yes
• 1:25:21
  Speaker 1: A in my system of logic. If you say fox
• 1:25:25
  Speaker 1: News is terrible, of which is not a yes, first
• 1:25:33
  Speaker 1: us is terrible, b No, firstness is not because there
• 1:25:39
  Speaker 1: are people who say Foxes is not. So that's the truth.
• 1:25:43
  Speaker 1: And then see fox News might be and fox News
• 1:25:48
  Speaker 1: might not be. That might be or might not be.
• 1:25:55
  Speaker 1: That's the beginning of information. It's for you not to
• 1:25:58
  Speaker 1: go seek the information. That's how we solve the media
• 1:26:08
  Speaker 1: information deficiencies that we have. That's why I can go
• 1:26:13
  Speaker 1: anywhere on the news. I can watch any channel on
• 1:26:16
  Speaker 1: the news. I follow the same principle if I go
• 1:26:21
  Speaker 1: on the website and the website it's ranting how terrible
• 1:26:27
  Speaker 1: Israel is, of which Israel nat. Don't confuse a people
• 1:26:35
  Speaker 1: for a politics. Don't judge a people to a politician,
• 1:26:43
  Speaker 1: and don't judge a people by course of action, because again,
• 1:26:50
  Speaker 1: based on my logic, you might be right, you might
• 1:26:54
  Speaker 1: not be right, and you might be both. Remember that
• 1:27:00
  Speaker 1: take this home very important today. Then America will be
• 1:27:03
  Speaker 1: a better place. It means you can get news anywhere
• 1:27:08
  Speaker 1: and don't be no problem. Don't make it personal this
• 1:27:12
  Speaker 1: time you listen to information. It's an opportunity to let
• 1:27:16
  Speaker 1: to learn something. So ort to take home with you today.
• 1:27:27
  Speaker 1: I should tell you forever when somebody says something, always
• 1:27:35
  Speaker 1: make that as a b negate what that person say
• 1:27:43
  Speaker 1: as a counter argument to what that person say. That's
• 1:27:47
  Speaker 1: b That's how it used to be. But I've added
• 1:27:53
  Speaker 1: it that layer negat the negative and positive. That's all
• 1:28:03
  Speaker 1: I've added. With disurben non violence, domin no conflict. You
• 1:28:09
  Speaker 1: will have the right to speak and not kill somebody
• 1:28:13
  Speaker 1: at somebody, I mean, they said you're intacted to what
• 1:28:17
  Speaker 1: you're saying, does not understand it. Speech is not physical.
• 1:28:26
  Speaker 1: It cannot be falset onto you. It cannot be falset
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 1: unto you. Again, because I said three things, you must
• 1:28:38
  Speaker 1: be open minded, open hearted, and open handed. Three things again,
• 1:28:45
  Speaker 1: open minded, open hearted, and open handed. Open mind. Information
• 1:28:53
  Speaker 1: you have ears, let it get in open heart, Assume
• 1:29:00
  Speaker 1: the best way the person saying it, open hand, reach
• 1:29:05
  Speaker 1: out to the person. I let you guys debate about it.
• 1:29:12
  Speaker 1: Remember open mind. They information don't get in open heart,
• 1:29:21
  Speaker 1: think the best way the person saying it, open hand,
• 1:29:26
  Speaker 1: reach out to the person, shake the person's eyes. I
• 1:29:29
  Speaker 1: let you guys debate about it. Why because of our
• 1:29:36
  Speaker 1: theory and principle that there are three sides to everything triangalism,
• 1:29:44
  Speaker 1: there are three sides to everything. There are three sides
• 1:29:49
  Speaker 1: to everything as triangalism. Take for example, I like America.
• 1:29:57
  Speaker 1: You have the right to say you don't like a America.
• 1:30:03
  Speaker 1: And what is true is that you might or you
• 1:30:09
  Speaker 1: might not. That is true? And if it because you
• 1:30:15
  Speaker 1: might say you don't like America when you're just lying
• 1:30:18
  Speaker 1: to yourself, are you might say you're like America when
• 1:30:22
  Speaker 1: you're just lying to yourself too. So the truth is
• 1:30:25
  Speaker 1: that you might like America or you might not like America.
• 1:30:30
  Speaker 1: That's the balance I talk about. And when you know
• 1:30:34
  Speaker 1: that you might, you might not, and there is no
• 1:30:37
  Speaker 1: reason to fight. And therefore it's not God's good truth.
• 1:30:43
  Speaker 1: It's left back on you to think. But the media
• 1:30:49
  Speaker 1: of today and the information system today, they want to
• 1:30:53
  Speaker 1: impose the world of thinking that's conflict, people hiding one another, violence, threats, shuldance.
• 1:31:07
  Speaker 1: The new way of information is a chamble way. And
• 1:31:10
  Speaker 1: I would like to start to see people say that
• 1:31:13
  Speaker 1: when I want to say something, give your speech and
• 1:31:21
  Speaker 1: always end by saying that I might be wrong. I
• 1:31:28
  Speaker 1: will go to upport somebody. Let people. Now that's based
• 1:31:38
  Speaker 1: on the fact that you have that's a gift. Open
• 1:31:47
  Speaker 1: channels for dialogue. But people speak to everything. Is God's
• 1:31:52
  Speaker 1: put truth? When even the Church is trying to tell
• 1:31:55
  Speaker 1: people that believe in yourself. On the contrary, today the
• 1:32:00
  Speaker 1: secular system is in believe in us. Isn't that Ironica
• 1:32:07
  Speaker 1: that the church to die is becoming a place of
• 1:32:12
  Speaker 1: freedom and the secular system is becoming the old Roman
• 1:32:20
  Speaker 1: Catholic Church and in its new Galileo, in its new
• 1:32:27
  Speaker 1: galileole us to come back and assure the people. And
• 1:32:33
  Speaker 1: there is no conflict unless we create a conflict. There
• 1:32:37
  Speaker 1: is a conflict because once I believe that they are
• 1:32:40
  Speaker 1: true and the other is not. If you guys have
• 1:32:47
  Speaker 1: a boundary dispute, A boundary dispute means ask claiming that
• 1:32:55
  Speaker 1: the land is mine, disclaimed that land is mine, right,
• 1:33:02
  Speaker 1: they cannot solve that. That's a most bounded displate dispute.
• 1:33:06
  Speaker 1: This war was then my ted element came in comes
• 1:33:10
  Speaker 1: in the country claiming that it's theirs. She said it
• 1:33:15
  Speaker 1: might not be theirs. And likewise, and if she said, oh,
• 1:33:20
  Speaker 1: the band might not be but this, and the other
• 1:33:24
  Speaker 1: said the band might not be this, then this, then
• 1:33:26
  Speaker 1: there is a workable compromise. Don't be no war there,
• 1:33:30
  Speaker 1: don't can't we can't reach in the middle. Then, based
• 1:33:39
  Speaker 1: on nationalism, our system of thought that we always try
• 1:33:42
  Speaker 1: about this is wrong. And now you need you need
• 1:33:45
  Speaker 1: not to readucate your people that we're thinking like this
• 1:33:50
  Speaker 1: our boundary. We did not create the earth, so we
• 1:33:54
  Speaker 1: might not be right people, and they might not be
• 1:33:59
  Speaker 1: right too. So therefore we might reach in the middle
• 1:34:04
  Speaker 1: and they will be peace forever. But today, no use
• 1:34:09
  Speaker 1: of media outlet on social media and propagate the right
• 1:34:16
  Speaker 1: and division. That's all they tell because they're blain the
• 1:34:20
  Speaker 1: blind people from the traitings that matters the most. Triangulism again,
• 1:34:28
  Speaker 1: truth right and fairness, Truth right and fairness is taken away.
• 1:34:40
  Speaker 1: A mind I supposed to think, doubt and ask questions
• 1:34:44
  Speaker 1: is taken away. A mind I supposed to have a projection, perception,
• 1:34:50
  Speaker 1: and perspective is taken away. A mind I supposed to
• 1:34:55
  Speaker 1: seek measurement, proportionality, and balance is taken away. A mine
• 1:35:03
  Speaker 1: I was supposed to calculate based on minus one, zero
• 1:35:07
  Speaker 1: and one and thereforeward. It's taken a why. A mine
• 1:35:13
  Speaker 1: I was supposed to see mathematical computation, our governums based
• 1:35:21
  Speaker 1: on zero one and in bettery, it's taken a why.
• 1:35:29
  Speaker 1: A mind I was supposed to see the opposite of
• 1:35:31
  Speaker 1: things to secret itself, it's taken a why and got
• 1:35:37
  Speaker 1: information age that there's so much information unless knowledge, I
• 1:35:47
  Speaker 1: cannot be The beauty is to learn something near, to
• 1:35:56
  Speaker 1: make a new friend, to get something new. The newness
• 1:36:03
  Speaker 1: of the information stage aspair the newness on the information
• 1:36:07
  Speaker 1: or on the information stage. It's not what create creates
• 1:36:12
  Speaker 1: it's that which creates a great society, an enlightened society,
• 1:36:19
  Speaker 1: a civilized society, a society that does not fight and
• 1:36:24
  Speaker 1: destroy itself, society that develop, heals, and flourishes itself. That's
• 1:36:34
  Speaker 1: my philosophy. Go to a podcast and an equal chamber.
• 1:36:44
  Speaker 1: Don't be scared of the news anymore. When listening to
• 1:36:49
  Speaker 1: what somebody say, do me a favor, counter that, and
• 1:36:58
  Speaker 1: look for the in between. M hm. That impty means
• 1:37:01
  Speaker 1: you have learned something. If somebody tells you Israel is bad,
• 1:37:12
  Speaker 1: take there as a and connect the b b. Israel
• 1:37:21
  Speaker 1: is not bad. That is, that is an equivalent to
• 1:37:25
  Speaker 1: what is said. So not all enough with a neutrality
• 1:37:30
  Speaker 1: a teed ran a triangulism factor. Israel might be good,
• 1:37:35
  Speaker 1: Israa might be bad. If you come to that conclusion,
• 1:37:40
  Speaker 1: then deferre may side is rest like everybody asks, and
• 1:37:45
  Speaker 1: miss Israel is like you. Therefore there is no reason
• 1:37:51
  Speaker 1: to hate. Therefore, therefore you attain a neutral stage your
• 1:37:58
  Speaker 1: balance m h. But now you'll learned information. If the
• 1:38:03
  Speaker 1: person say is Ras bad? Is Ray bad? Tell your
• 1:38:07
  Speaker 1: person that you want to work on something. Give me
• 1:38:11
  Speaker 1: the reasons why don't gas like me? Remember if somebody
• 1:38:18
  Speaker 1: said it is not, you must seek the reasons to
• 1:38:22
  Speaker 1: know why it is not. There must be an equivalence
• 1:38:29
  Speaker 1: to have something to walk with, it must be something
• 1:38:35
  Speaker 1: to walk with. So if I tell you there is
• 1:38:39
  Speaker 1: Ray bad, that's not information. The information that you're expecting
• 1:38:49
  Speaker 1: is the be part of that person's information. Why is
• 1:38:55
  Speaker 1: very bad? And by the person proven what is raised bad,
• 1:39:07
  Speaker 1: you can see within the pulse of what the person's
• 1:39:09
  Speaker 1: sign that Israel is not bad. I know the information
• 1:39:19
  Speaker 1: not about Israel and the fallacy in that person's statement.
• 1:39:25
  Speaker 1: You cannot not debate the person if it's not a debate,
• 1:39:29
  Speaker 1: know within yourself that even though Israel it's bad, based
• 1:39:34
  Speaker 1: on what that person's sign from the information I have,
• 1:39:37
  Speaker 1: it's verse not bad. That's when that's where academic ended
• 1:39:47
  Speaker 1: all write my writing. I'll ask Ai to look for
• 1:39:51
  Speaker 1: a counter argument to my writing. But if you see
• 1:39:55
  Speaker 1: the counter argument in itself is flawed, h I can't
• 1:40:00
  Speaker 1: the counter argument does that actually counter what I'm saying.
• 1:40:05
  Speaker 1: For me to learn from what I'm saying, it's just
• 1:40:08
  Speaker 1: opposing what I'm saying. So opposition is not a counter argument.
• 1:40:14
  Speaker 1: That's my new walth of thinking. I would like to
• 1:40:16
  Speaker 1: think that way. You can see Democrat opposing Republican. You're
• 1:40:24
  Speaker 1: not getting anything out of that. Out of that, the
• 1:40:28
  Speaker 1: opposition judgements that my side is wrong, my side is right,
• 1:40:31
  Speaker 1: my side is right. That's it. Nothing new. So you're
• 1:40:40
  Speaker 1: you're left with a. It means you go to the left,
• 1:40:44
  Speaker 1: you get a. You go to the right, you get a.
• 1:40:52
  Speaker 1: There is no pay. That's how far we've gotten. Remember
• 1:41:00
  Speaker 1: if somebody tells you that, because your mind must think,
• 1:41:05
  Speaker 1: doubt and ask questions, that question part gives you the
• 1:41:09
  Speaker 1: B part. If I tell the apples are not good
• 1:41:20
  Speaker 1: for you. For example, there is the debate that Tyler
• 1:41:25
  Speaker 1: now is not good for pregnant women. Y'all, storty debate.
• 1:41:35
  Speaker 1: That's a A Tyler Know is not good for pregnant women. Okay,
• 1:41:47
  Speaker 1: B Tyler Know is good for pregnant women. That's our
• 1:41:55
  Speaker 1: logic automatically based on my philosophy. You don't need the
• 1:42:00
  Speaker 1: person to prove that to them. It means you're trying
• 1:42:06
  Speaker 1: to equivicate what the person you just said to therefore
• 1:42:14
  Speaker 1: think to therefore, think down and ask questions. So you
• 1:42:20
  Speaker 1: have you have negated you have you have negated what
• 1:42:24
  Speaker 1: the person said with the equivalence of what the person said.
• 1:42:27
  Speaker 1: I'm trying to make my philosophy very clear. So you're
• 1:42:32
  Speaker 1: still maintaining your mental state. That's so I see when
• 1:42:37
  Speaker 1: people go to the midd that they cannot stand it
• 1:42:43
  Speaker 1: because they believe the air already, or to oppose the air,
• 1:42:47
  Speaker 1: but just negate the air it miss you got nothing
• 1:42:52
  Speaker 1: to do. That's a compartible negation. You want to have
• 1:42:57
  Speaker 1: room to therefore think that and ask questions. Because you
• 1:43:03
  Speaker 1: must think that and ask questions. That's the goal. And
• 1:43:10
  Speaker 1: that's the third part. So without any information, therefore, it
• 1:43:17
  Speaker 1: means tyler know is bad for you automatically in your brain.
• 1:43:27
  Speaker 1: The big part is it's from you, not the person.
• 1:43:30
  Speaker 1: Yet tyler noise is good for it's good for for
• 1:43:35
  Speaker 1: pregnant women. So you have equip You have equipated the
• 1:43:40
  Speaker 1: same information. So to keep your balance. Remember that that
• 1:43:45
  Speaker 1: that equivocation keeps your balance. It means it does not
• 1:43:49
  Speaker 1: affect your internalization. That's why I said, don't let the
• 1:43:53
  Speaker 1: externalization infiltrate and destabilize your externalization. HM. So once you
• 1:44:01
  Speaker 1: get the externalization, give an equivocal internalization of the opposite
• 1:44:09
  Speaker 1: of that which you said to keep your mental state.
• 1:44:16
  Speaker 1: Say if I tell you that Taylor noise bad for
• 1:44:21
  Speaker 1: pregnant women, don't say, oh my wow, am I arist?
• 1:44:26
  Speaker 1: Now don't do that. You get a heart attack, You
• 1:44:29
  Speaker 1: misinformed and gaslight it. Immediately say to yourself, Tyler is
• 1:44:35
  Speaker 1: good for pregnant women. That is a shield to that
• 1:44:39
  Speaker 1: information coming to you, so you can have space to think,
• 1:44:44
  Speaker 1: doubt and ask questions. So the A tyrann is good
• 1:44:53
  Speaker 1: for you is an automatic er A tylranno is not
• 1:44:56
  Speaker 1: good for pregnant women. Automatic b tayl I know it's
• 1:45:00
  Speaker 1: good for pregnant women. See, so you have two things now,
• 1:45:07
  Speaker 1: so see now is tell I no may be good
• 1:45:10
  Speaker 1: for pregnant women. Tell I no, man not a good
• 1:45:13
  Speaker 1: for pregnant women. You see now you're you're reasonable. Now
• 1:45:24
  Speaker 1: Now I can ask questions. They're not without it's hurting you.
• 1:45:27
  Speaker 1: Now you're trying to solve a problem. Now, don't make
• 1:45:30
  Speaker 1: yourself the problem. That's why somebody tell you giving you
• 1:45:33
  Speaker 1: for me, I said, you must be angry, you must
• 1:45:35
  Speaker 1: be sad, you must be worried, you must be traumatized. No,
• 1:45:40
  Speaker 1: you don't need to be just as a person said,
• 1:45:46
  Speaker 1: you must be worried automatically, I don't need to be worried,
• 1:45:54
  Speaker 1: and the Changlism effect. I might be worried. I might
• 1:45:59
  Speaker 1: not see and then type the person now tell me more.
• 1:46:11
  Speaker 1: We don't worry about what the person saying. I cannot
• 1:46:13
  Speaker 1: hurt you. I cannot give your heart attack. It's on
• 1:46:17
  Speaker 1: the person right now, because you already know that the
• 1:46:19
  Speaker 1: person may be right, the person I be wrong. And
• 1:46:22
  Speaker 1: when the person is giving you their facts now at
• 1:46:25
  Speaker 1: least in the fallacies and flaws in that now you're
• 1:46:32
  Speaker 1: being informed, I can still forgive the person then, because
• 1:46:39
  Speaker 1: you know even that person speaking three things is happening.
• 1:46:44
  Speaker 1: That person might think they're right automatically. It means if
• 1:46:48
  Speaker 1: you think they are a miss, they're not. That's what
• 1:46:53
  Speaker 1: said I teach humans on that. What's you think you are,
• 1:46:58
  Speaker 1: then you're not amiss. You might I might not be
• 1:47:04
  Speaker 1: to be or not to be. It's a choice. Therefore, remember,
• 1:47:18
  Speaker 1: but when the completely contrary a mister right, and the
• 1:47:25
  Speaker 1: completely abictuary the mister left, there is always away, a
• 1:47:37
  Speaker 1: mister meadow. Then he goes make away way. There is
• 1:47:45
  Speaker 1: no way a man not sad because we must seeking
• 1:47:57
  Speaker 1: for meself to know I try to to to do
• 1:48:00
  Speaker 1: my best to make you to be able to absorb information,
• 1:48:05
  Speaker 1: whether handing yourself, where hading others, and then the person speak,
• 1:48:13
  Speaker 1: Then the person speak. They don't kill somebody for speaking.
• 1:48:19
  Speaker 1: That's the problem, right that it means you took the
• 1:48:23
  Speaker 1: A to bed. When there's A, there is B, and
• 1:48:31
  Speaker 1: when there's B that is C. Even the most logic
• 1:48:38
  Speaker 1: you got a B and C. Or they go to
• 1:48:41
  Speaker 1: why the why is all known? There is why. There's
• 1:48:49
  Speaker 1: always always push the envelope of information on God. Right,
• 1:48:56
  Speaker 1: don't take things for God for truth because the truth
• 1:48:58
  Speaker 1: in itself truth and I has already been corrupted. We
• 1:49:01
  Speaker 1: live in a society. I've started by saying I want
• 1:49:04
  Speaker 1: to be psycle in mine am I am? I am
• 1:49:09
  Speaker 1: I speaking I aspect does I I speak. I try
• 1:49:12
  Speaker 1: to take a point. I go many ways to make
• 1:49:17
  Speaker 1: a point because my intent is not to hurt or anything.
• 1:49:21
  Speaker 1: I don't want to think. I don't want to take
• 1:49:24
  Speaker 1: an opinion then after hurt because I am I be wrong.
• 1:49:29
  Speaker 1: It's on my own philosophy. The miss everything I'm sighed
• 1:49:35
  Speaker 1: to be in a balanced that obey have the opposite
• 1:49:38
  Speaker 1: of what I'm saying and then I might be right
• 1:49:42
  Speaker 1: and I be wrong, and he's like I can listen
• 1:49:45
  Speaker 1: to something and are obliged to listen to that, and
• 1:49:48
  Speaker 1: I was forced to take any point. I must not
• 1:49:52
  Speaker 1: believe in anything. I can't believe in something if you
• 1:49:57
  Speaker 1: want to as a freedom. And my philosophy brings to
• 1:50:05
  Speaker 1: the world Philosopher, Prince, they are intelligence is philosopher. Prince
• 1:50:16
  Speaker 1: israe'sar from the Great City of Las Vegas, September twenty seven,
• 1:50:32
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty five. Thank you,