Latest / The Epstein Chronicles / Judge Rakoff Asks The USVI Why JP Morgan Can't Challenge Their Lawsuit

Transcript

Judge Rakoff Asks The USVI Why JP Morgan Can't Challenge Their Lawsuit · The Epstein Chronicles

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What's up everyone and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles.
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: The battle between the U.S. Virgin Islands and J.P. Morgan
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: is in full swing, folks. And now Judge Rakoff is
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: asking the U.S. Virgin Islands for specific reasons why Epstein's bank, J.P.
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: Morgan Chase, can't challenge their lawsuit. And I told you
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: from the very beginning that the U.S. Virgin Islands might
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: have bitten off more than they can chew here. They
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: should have been very happy and content with the $ 105
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: million they got from the estate. But they had to
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: have a little more. They had to be greedy. And
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: now they're going to face some serious challenges in court.
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: And not only that, they're being exposed as far as
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: people in their government for their alleged role in helping
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein set up this whole entire criminal enterprise on
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: the island. So all of this stuff that was just
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: rumor and innuendo before... that only people like us knew about, really, well,
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: now the whole wide world knows that the U.S. Virgin
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: Islands and the politicians on the islands during Jeffrey Epstein's
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: criminal run were all in his pocket. And Judge Rakoff, well,
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: he's going to want some answers about all of this stuff.
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: And if the U.S. Virgin Islands can't answer these questions satisfactorily,
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: then there's going to be a big problem for them
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: come October when this trial starts. And that problem leads
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: directly back to all of the politicians who were elected
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: at the time who were breaking bread with Jeffrey Epstein.
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: Now look, J.P. Morgan certainly shoulders their share of the responsibility.
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: We've talked about that a lot. But J.P. Morgan, they
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: didn't have subpoena power. They didn't have the power to
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: kick in somebody's door and arrest them the same way
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: the U.S. Virgin Islands did. So if JP Morgan is
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: liable for what happened down here, then obviously the U.S.
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: Virgin Islands as an entity and as a government, they're
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: responsible as well, right? That's how this has to work. Well,
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: according to the U.S. Virgin Islands, forget it. They have
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: set themselves up as an absolute martyr in this case
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: when the reality is they're in action directly led to
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: girls getting molested on that island. And that's a dark,
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: disgusting fact. That the USVI is going to have a
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: very hard time contending with. Because what it really comes
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: down to is evidence, right? And the evidence is there
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: that the US Virgin Islands and the politicians who were
• 2:31
  Speaker 1: elected at the time knew what Epstein was and they
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: didn't act. So how is it that they could sit
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: there and point their finger at JP Morgan like JP
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: Morgan could have just stepped in at any point and
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: just raid Jeffrey Epstein's island? The U.S. Virgin Islands could
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: do that, not J.P. Morgan. I mean, they were too
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: busy visiting the island and taking dips in the jacuzzi,
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: you know, Jess Daly and all. But the U.S. Virgin Islands,
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: they could have raided that place at any time. They
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: could have brought a grand jury indictment, a sealed indictment
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: at any time, and they never did it. So all
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: of the nonsense that they talk about how this is
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: about justice, how it's about making sure that the girls
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: end up being whole, That's all BS in my opinion.
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: And I've said that from the very minute Denise George
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: started her BS. Now look, I'm a big fan of
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: people being exposed, right? But the U.S. Virgin Islands, they're
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: not doing it because they want to expose the truth.
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: They're doing it because they want to secure another bag.
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: And it's rather obvious for anybody who's paying attention. But
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: sometimes being greedy will come back to bite you. And
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: that might be the case here. with the U.S. V.I.
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: biting off way more than they can chew. All right, folks,
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: today we have an article from the St. Thomas source
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: of the U.S. Virgin Islands and the headline, Federal Judge
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: Asks for Specific Reasons Why Epstein's Bank Can't Challenge V.I.
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: 's Lawsuit. This article was authored by Judy Schimmel, lawyers
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: for the V.I. Justice Department. have until Friday to tell
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: New York judge why JPMorgan Chase Bank, North America, must
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: explain whether or not they helped convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: Epstein hide years' worth of illegal acts in the territory.
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: The filing of detailed letter briefs was contained in an
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: order from District Court Judge Jed B. Rakoff earlier this week.
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: Rakoff's order spoke specifically to a motion filed in May
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: by Attorney General Ariel Smith. Smith is asking the court
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: to deny a set of affirmative defenses filed by lawyers
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: representing Chase Bank. In that filing, the bank's lawyers say
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: VI justice cannot invoke the Trafficking Victims Protection Act against them.
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: And just a quick refresher for those that might not remember,
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: the Trafficking Victim Protection Act, or the TVPA, sets out
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: to do several things in order to help people who
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: have been trafficked and to punish those who engage in
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: human trafficking. So one of those aims is prevention. The
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: TVPA aims to prevent human trafficking by addressing the root
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: causes and the contributing factors. It promotes public awareness campaigns,
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: education campaigns, and international cooperation to raise awareness about trafficking
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: and deter its occurrence. Two, prosecution. The TVPA strengthens the
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: legal framework for prosecuting traffickers by expanding the definition of
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: trafficking providing tools for law enforcement, and imposing severe penalties
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: for traffickers. It enables authorities to investigate, arrest, and prosecute
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: individuals involved in all forms of trafficking, including sex trafficking
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: and labor trafficking. 3. Protection The TVPA prioritizes the protection
• 5:58
  Speaker 1: of trafficking victims by ensuring their access to necessary services
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: and support. It establishes guidelines for the identification, protection, and
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: assistance of victims, including shelter, medical care, counseling, legal aid,
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: and immigration relief. It also promotes the non-punishment and safe
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: repatriation of victims who are foreign nationals. 4. Partnerships The
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: TVPA encourages collaborations and cooperation among various stakeholders, including federal, state,
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: and local government agencies, non-governmental organizations, and international partners. It
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: emphasizes the need for comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach to combat trafficking effectively.
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: Number five, reporting. The TVPA requires the U.S. Department of
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: State to publish an annual trafficking in persons report which
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: assesses the efforts of countries worldwide in combating trafficking. The
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: report categorizes countries as based on their level of compliance
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: with minimum standards outlined in the TVPA, and serves as
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: a tool to incentivize governments to take action against trafficking.
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: Number six, assistance to foreign countries. The TVPA provides resources
• 7:18
  Speaker 1: and assistance to other countries to enhance their capacity to
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: prevent trafficking, protect victims, and prosecute offenders. This includes funding
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: for programs aimed at combating trafficking, supporting victim services, and
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: promoting sustainable economic alternatives for at-risk populations. And number seven,
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: research and data collection. The TVPA emphasizes the importance of
• 7:44
  Speaker 1: research and data collection to better understand the scope and
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: nature of trafficking. It supports the efforts to gather and
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: analyze data on trafficking trends, victim demographics, and the effectiveness
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: of anti-trafficking initiatives. Alright, so that's the TVPA in a nutshell,
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: and that's what the law was put on the books for.
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: And JP Morgan, they're saying that they can't be hit
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: with those TVPA statutes, and that the Trafficking Victims Protection
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: Act has nothing to do with them. And in fact,
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: if anybody should be worried about the TVPA, it should
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: be the U.S. Virgin Islands themselves. That's what JPMorgan is asserting.
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: Epstein was a client of JPMorgan Chase for several years
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: until the bank terminated its business relationship with him in 2013.
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: Epstein died in a Manhattan detention center in 2019 following
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: his arrest in New Jersey on sex trafficking charges. In
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: a filing dated May 8th, Smith said, since the government
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: here is acting in its sovereign capacity to enforce public
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: rights under the TVPA, JPMorgan's equitable defenses are not recognizable
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: as a matter of law. As he issued his latest
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: order on July 7th, Rakoff said the court wanted specificity.
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: While the court expresses no view as to whether further
• 9:08
  Speaker 1: information on this point will ultimately factor in its decision
• 9:13
  Speaker 1: on the USVI's motion, the court believes that further detail
• 9:17
  Speaker 1: as to precisely what interests USVI is seeking to vindicate
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: and what damages USVI claims may be helpful to its
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: consideration of the nuanced legal issues raised in the party's briefing,
• 9:30
  Speaker 1: the judge said. In a civil lawsuit against the bank
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: in December, Justice claims JPMorgan Chase provided Epstein, a convicted
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: sex offender, the means to pay recruiters and victims of
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: his sex trafficking operation and failed to notify law enforcement
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: as required by the TVPA. JPMorgan says, had real-time information
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: on Epstein's activity that the government did not and had
• 9:56
  Speaker 1: specific legal duties to report this information to law enforcement.
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: enforcement authorities, which it intentionally decided not to do, Smith
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: said in a May 8th filing. Rakoff gave the bank's
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: attorneys until July 19th to file a detailed response to
• 10:12
  Speaker 1: arguments submitted by V.I. Justice. So this whole entire thing
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: is continuing to make its way through the courts. And
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: the USVI finds themselves in some deep water here. And
• 10:24
  Speaker 1: when all is said and done, I don't know if
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: they're going to see one single cent. And then you
• 10:28
  Speaker 1: add all the money that was spent on litigation. And
• 10:30
  Speaker 1: this could turn out to be something that they end
• 10:33
  Speaker 1: up losing money on. So this is certainly a gambit
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: that the USVI is on here. And I don't know
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: if it's going to pay off at the end. All right, folks,
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: that's going to do it for this one. All of
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: the information that goes with the episode can be found
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: in the description box.