Latest / UK Column Radio / UK Column News Extra 12th April 2024

Transcript

UK Column News Extra 12th April 2024 · UK Column Radio

0:00
Okay, welcome back for some extra Thank you Cheryl, Debbie and Ben for
0:05
being with us. I was just going to start off by saying, you
0:10
know, Cheryl, this business of refusal based on the idea of future publication.
0:15
This is not just the MHR. Does this excuse me? I have
0:19
an FOI or I've been pursuing the Foreign Comwealth Office for quite some time now
0:25
because they used to publish their spending records for every spend over twenty five thousand
0:31
pounds and they stopped doing it just before the Ukraine War started, and so
0:38
I put in an FOI asking for it, and they said, oh no,
0:41
that's schedule for future publications. So it's not within the it's not in
0:45
the public interest for it to give it to you and I when it's going
0:47
to be public, we'll wait for the official look. And of course they
0:50
said it would be in early twenty twenty four. Well early twenty twenty fours
0:56
come and gone and still hasn't been published. Yeah, I think the difference.
1:02
Yeah, the difference, Mic is this is in the last three years
1:04
since they had this information, a lot of babies have been born, a
1:07
lot of women have got pregnant and they've all been encouraged to have injections.
1:12
And I went with a friend to a guy inny outpatient clinic and the poster
1:19
was life size on the wall advising the pregnant people sat around me that they
1:23
should be vaccinated. It's going on still, Yes, have we forgotten the
1:30
Lidamite, you know? And what's even worse is that Dame June Rain you
1:37
know she was she was head of Farmer Covigilance, that was her role before
1:42
she was CEO. She was the one that presented the homage to Sir Alistair
1:47
Breckinridge where she reminded everybody of the disaster that was Thelladamite. This data,
1:55
this pregnant women should have seen this data three years ago. The fact that
2:00
it's being held onto and might never be seen again, as Professor Fenton said,
2:07
we might never get to see it. Pregnant women are today, tomorrow,
2:12
next week. They're still being jabbed in my day, and I'm sure
2:16
a lot of ladies that are watching of a similar age remember that as when
2:23
we were pregnant, we weren't allowed to drink, we weren't allowed to eat
2:27
soft cheese. We had to be really careful if we went to a you
2:31
know, to domestic animals and stuff listeria, it was you know, we
2:35
had to be we weren't allowed anything. And all of a sudden, solidamide
2:39
is being forgotten and now we are using an experimental injection that is known to
2:47
be very dangerous. We're still rolling it out on pregnant women when we don't
2:53
need to be. We don't need to be, and it's not being forgotten.
2:59
Debbie's not been forgotten. They know like this is you know, the
3:05
assertion has to be that they're deliberately ignoring its Sorry, Cheryl, they must
3:14
have shut the monitor down because they started seeing the results they didn't want exactly
3:19
you know. I mean, at the end of the day, it took
3:21
five years to get the philidamide recognition that it was doing what it was doing.
3:25
And that was before you had computers. That was when it was word
3:29
of mouth and doctors talking to each other. Now we've got a lot of
3:32
data that's showing this evidence, and they've probably stopped the data actually existed anymore
3:38
because they don't want to see it. And we now what three years along,
3:43
and my question would be, have they shut awed dine or are they
3:45
just saying they've shut a dine. But to come back to I want to
3:49
put this back on screen again from Ben's report because because my first question is
3:58
is that graft doing that because people have been moved from one benefit onto another?
4:03
Or is that graph like that because that's when vaccination began. I believe
4:12
it's because it's it's when vaccination began. I think that PIP is just is
4:15
a is just a rebranding of the disability allowance. So it's not a new
4:20
thing. It's just they chose, they chose the name of it, essentially,
4:25
you know, which is one of these things that they love to do.
4:27
Because what we don't have we can't possibly compare the data between this period
4:31
and that period because if we don't have that same thing anymore, you know,
4:34
it's just another another method of was it I called it governance by plausible
4:41
deniability? That's what we've got. Well, it seems to me. Look,
4:46
it seems to me that that graph, you know, that is a
4:49
smoking gun right there is how it looks to me. We've got Lord Bethel
4:54
saying that we've got what did you say, ten percent of the population,
4:59
working out three million people, more than three million people so I permanent stick.
5:06
I mean, aside from being a massive burden on the taxpayer, the
5:11
remaining taxpayer, it's a it's an absolute devastating travesty for the people that are
5:16
affected by this. And it's it's, it's, it's it's it's an absolute
5:23
catastrophe. It's a human catastrophe, like this entire process, and we just
5:28
yeah, we're seeing, you know, this is the delayed reaction of what
5:30
was going on two years ago, three years ago, and it's now,
5:32
it's now, this is the beginning really of us seeing the impact right right,
5:39
And I do not understand, Sorry, Cherild, just just just make
5:43
this point before it falls out, because things fall out my brains these days.
5:47
I do not understand why every single person watching this program, or every
5:53
single person has seen that graph isn't banging down the doors of their local constituent,
6:00
the officers banging down the doors of their local journalist, their local newspaper,
6:05
or whoever it happens to be and saying why aren't you looking at this,
6:09
Why aren't you covering it in detail? Why aren't you responding to it?
6:14
I find it absolutely outrageous that that graphic I find out rageous and everybody
6:19
should be absolutely I mean incandescent with rage about it is how I feel.
6:27
But anyway, yeah, I mean that absolutely so will Ego. I mean,
6:32
is that a doubt graph as far as I yes, doubt yeah,
6:38
I mean, and in America's got the same disability figures, you know,
6:43
they've got the same sort of increases as well, so disablement. And you're
6:46
talking about working age people. You're talking about people who are eighteen to sixty
6:50
four who shouldn't be getting ill like this. Quiet. Yeah, there's there's
6:59
there's the sorry they'll be gone, No no, no, you carry on,
7:01
b there's there's there's a human tragedy of it. But but but what
7:05
they're going to promote ultimately, because they've already be talking about it, right,
7:10
you know, like it this will be an excuse for for mass mass
7:14
immigration. Oh well, well everyone's sick so they can't work, so we
7:16
need to bring in, you know, several million migrants to do the work
7:20
that these people were supposed to be doing. The whole thing correlates, it's
7:25
all, it's all designed to deliver the outcome that they're looking for, you
7:28
know, and it's hideous really when you understand it so Ben's right, PIP
7:36
personal Independence Payment has taken over from Disability Living Allowance, and what happened when
7:44
the transfer of the benefit d LA went into PIP is that many actually lost
7:49
their benefits, so the numbers started to go down because they weren't accepted onto
7:56
the new PIP scheme. But beside that, it also links in very well.
8:01
All of this links in very well to what Alison Cave was saying at
8:07
the MHRA board meeting when she was talking about the Yellow Card biobank, because
8:13
last year adverse events, so injuries from pharmaceuticals resulted or contributed to sixteen point
8:24
five percent of hospital admissions. Now this costs the NHS two point two one
8:31
billion, so twenty to fifty percent of adverse reactions they think they can reduce
8:41
by everybody volunteering their adverse reactions to the biobank where they can be genomically sequenced,
8:48
which of course genomics sequence Yellow Card Biobank adverse reactions. That is all
8:54
linked in to Genomics England, which is John Bell and Sir John Bell is
9:01
attached to the hip to Lord Bethel. So you can see where the revolving
9:07
door is starting to go. And it was interesting listening to what Professor Fenton
9:11
was saying about the UKHSA, because we know that the UKHSA is basically spooks.
9:18
You know that they're basically spooks. It's where Public Health England have fused
9:22
with security. But there's also a common denominator with the MHRA as well and
9:28
the UKHSA in that Raj Long from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, who's
9:33
on the board of the MHRA, is also on the board of the UKHSA.
9:39
So all of these tracks you can follow, and it's quite intricate,
9:46
but it all comes back to the fact I'm afraid is that pregnant women are
9:52
getting jabbed as we are sitting here today and they should not be. Correct
9:58
Cheryl, Yeah, it's I mean, it's been known for some time that
10:01
it affects the percenter and therefore these problems will occur, and you know,
10:09
it's so disgusting because the whole thing was set up the nineteen sixty eight medicine
10:15
that was set up after the lidamid and one of the main thing was to
10:18
protect pregnancy and out of that came eventually the MHRA. And what they're doing,
10:26
they're not protecting pregnant ladies and they can how many cases, Cheryl,
10:33
how many cases of the llidamide was it before it was stopped. I can't
10:41
remember the exact It was five hundred, It was five hundred cases of phillidamide,
10:46
and then the whole lot was dropped and the yellow card system was brought
10:50
in. We are now looking where we don't know, do we, because
10:54
the MHRA aren't publishing the data anymore. But we know that there are hundreds
10:58
of thousands of serious adverse reactions and at the last time I was well over
11:05
two thousand deaths and we're still rolling it out and down the pipeline. And
11:11
everything in the past was always considered a problem if they've been less than fifty
11:16
deaths. So you've got a situation whereby all these things should have been stopped
11:22
some time ago. And all the ones that we keep saying it, all
11:26
the ones that are in the pipeline for whether there be infectious control or for
11:31
cancer, they're all based on the same technology that we know is a major
11:35
problem with Yeah. Yeah, I mean that it's the whole biotechnological industry that
11:41
they want to build on the back of RNA technology and genomics genetic engineering.
11:46
I mean, they've got the whole thing stitched up already. Basically, I
11:50
think the idea that it's so perverse and cynical and awful the way they talk
11:58
about this stuff. So the idea that they're going to they're building this biobank
12:03
so that they can predict whether you're likely to have an adverse reaction to the
12:09
experiment that they're going to put you in. Who that's it's completely one hundred
12:16
and eighty degrees in the wrong director, in the opposite direction to what's what
12:20
they're supposed to be doing. Yeah, climate change is down to humans,
12:26
and anybody gets a reaction to a drug, it's because there's something wrong with
12:31
you as a human, rather than something wrong with drug that's causing major problems
12:35
in lots of people. Yeah, and we've got we've got a pharmaceutical industrial
12:41
complex the thinks that it has the right to carry out mass experimentation. Like,
12:46
who the hell are these people? Where on earth do they think that
12:50
they get a license to do this? Is absolutely outrageous. No, no,
12:56
no, that's it's ridiculous. They paid for it, they've paid for
13:01
it, and they get it. That's that's that's that's it. They've paid
13:05
for it, it's theirs. So we are raw materials in their profit machine.
13:13
We are the raw The British population is the raw material in the pharmaceuty
13:18
is your DNA. It's not just data they're stealing. It's not just data,
13:24
it's DNA because the whole aim of this yellow card biobank is to identify
13:31
genomic markers that may put people at risk of certain adverse reactions. But you
13:39
know, when you were listening to Professor Norman Fenton, I don't know if
13:43
anybody else picked up, but I could see and I could hear the frustration,
13:50
the anger in his in his demeanor, in his voice at what is
13:54
going on because quite clearly, I mean I honestly thought that when they started
14:00
rolling out the JAB to pregnant women, I thought people would wake up.
14:03
I thought this is going to be the straw that breaks the camel's back.
14:07
Now we're going to start injecting pregnant women, unborn babies and children. People
14:11
are going to wake up. When they didn't, I was shocked, and
14:16
I literally feel shaking. I'm shaking with rage the fact that we know the
14:22
MHRA has got data and Cheryl for the last eighteen months has been banging on
14:30
their doors to get this data, and they are deliberately withholding it. And
14:35
the big question is, well, if they didn't have anything to hide,
14:39
they wouldn't be withholding it, would they would they? So, right,
14:52
Debbie, you just said that right, because I'm going to say, personalized
14:56
medicine would be a great idea if we were living in a benevolent uh society,
15:05
But the people behind this are malevolent, and then it is not a
15:11
good idea because what you're talking about if they're saying, if they're saying,
15:15
we can we want to do these studies so that we can prevent adverse reactions
15:20
in the people that have been getting adverse reactions. Well, actually, what
15:24
happens if they're identifying markers which which would allow a particular effect in a much
15:31
broader population. What happens if they want to choose, if they want to
15:35
choose black people, or people that have done syndrome, or people that have
15:41
a particular genetic issue for removal from the gene pool. These You know,
15:50
this is the issue as far as I'm concerned, because I haven't they eugenesis.
15:56
Yeah, you're absolutely right, you should be we could be we should
15:58
be concerned about it. But it's an interesting point you raised there, the
16:02
idea that in a benevolent society of your right to do this. I think
16:04
in a truly benevolent society that pharmaceuticals wouldn't be necessary. I honestly feel like
16:11
they wouldn't exist. So you know that fair point. I don't think we
16:18
have the capability And you listen to Headley rees of actually making these personalized medicines,
16:23
because you're talking about hospitals making very very delicate things that they don't have
16:27
the facilities to actually manufacture the things properly for each individual person. And the
16:33
other thing is you've got about nineteen thousand genes in a human and we've got
16:40
about two million proteins, and genes code for proteins, so you don't have
16:44
one gene coding for one protein. You might think that that gene is at
16:48
fault because that protein's at fault, But by doing something with that gene,
16:52
what else are you actually affecting? And that's the problem. So I mean
16:56
a basic example would be something like an nonsteroidal So a nonsteroidal was basically introduced
17:06
to reduce inflammation. So it's a prostaglandins they knew actually reduced inflammation, So
17:12
we'll reduce the we'll reduced prostaglandins and will stop the inflammation happening. But it
17:18
also was gastro protective, and therefore when you took your nonsteroid or you could
17:22
have a stomach problem because it's going to affect your lining of your gut that
17:27
the prostaglandin was trying to protect. So you've got to know all the effects
17:32
of all these proteins that you're trying to change, and all these genes and
17:36
all the proteins that it's affecting as to whether you're going to have the effect
17:40
that you want. And I suggest that they don't do that. They just
17:42
think, oh, it's that I will do something about that, and we
17:47
forget all the rest of the things, and that's why you get your side
17:48
effects. Sorry, it's one of my footbop moments. They're just they're like
17:57
mad scientists, like with some crazy experiment. You know, you couldn't make
18:02
it up, really can? I just can ask a quick question just to
18:04
clarify on one thing that you were talking about, because when you said it,
18:07
I couldn't quite believe it, which is I mean, there are a
18:11
number of things I couldn't quite believe, but one of them is that they're
18:14
saying that they need to peer review the data before its release. Is that
18:19
what they're saying, that's completely unprecedented, right, that you don't do that.
18:23
We just want to raw data set. You don't need to peer review
18:26
it, right. This is a nonsense. That's what I kept asking them
18:30
about because obviously the do you you've got a yellow card being produced on a
18:37
regular basis, or it was so that you had all that data. This
18:44
is just data that you know a little bit more about the people that are
18:47
providing that data. Why should it have to be peer reviewed? But you
18:52
have to be peer reviewed to put it in a scientific publication, and they
18:56
want to put it in a scientific publication, and it's just a starting tactic.
19:02
But you don't review the ditta that you peer review the interpretation, your
19:06
interpretation of the data exactly. It's gas lighting the gas It's like, what
19:17
you're just making stuff up at this point. It's nutty. I suppose the
19:22
bit slightly encouraging is that that is total outright last resort aspiration. If they
19:29
if they're at that point. Yeah, and as Professor Fenton says, you
19:33
know, we can keep saying we're going to publish, We're going to publish,
19:37
but when I mean, if it doesn't happen in three years time,
19:40
what do we do? Then you've got three more years the pregnant ladies getting
19:44
pregnant. You know, it's it's it's sacrilege, it's awful. By that
19:51
point, we wiped out. So it doesn't matter. Let's not forget pregnant
19:56
women were never included in any any of the trial work previously. There's been
20:02
no research data on pregnant women. There's no long term data on these injections
20:08
for anybody. There is no data. So I mean this whole week,
20:15
hey, oh sorry, they all died, didn't they They all died,
20:22
honestly. But what is We've gone from something called pharmocovigilance, which is is
20:32
looking out for medicines. That's the p E A G Groups, the pharmoc
20:37
Expert Advisory groups. We've gone from that field now to something called pharmocogenomics.
20:45
So pharmocogenetics, so we go on to a completely new field of pharmacology,
20:52
if you like, this is a whole new brand in industry, which has
20:56
been made up because it's brand. It's brand spanking right. This never existed
21:00
before? Can I Can I address the earth and in the room. There's
21:03
a big sort of gaping gap in what we're talking about here. We talked
21:07
a lot about pregnant women. But is there any data on the pregnant men
21:14
women get pregnant? Only women get pregnant? Two genders maybe four? No,
21:27
no, it could be twenty, it could be twenty one, twenty
21:32
four women get no no, no, no, hold on the second debby,
21:37
No, no, We've just been talking. We've just been talking for
21:40
the last twenty minutes about genetic engineering, and now we are trying to claim
21:44
that only women to get pregnant. This is this is one hundred years time.
21:48
It's going to be no problem. Stop it, mister Robinson. Stop
21:53
it. It's before the weekend. To chill feel the Yeah, the money
22:07
of thirty thousand intes, so presumably some of them have been men, women
22:11
and everybody else. Yeah, you'd be able to have a look, Cheryl.
22:22
Seriously, they're on a serious note. What next, Because you've been
22:26
banging the door down for nearly two years now, I mean, what happens
22:30
next. Norman's put his sub stack out, but is there any form of
22:36
a people. Yes, you can go and do a tribunal, you can
22:41
go and take it further with the ICO, but that's going to take another
22:48
ten years. Well, I mean Norman's already said, you know, is
22:52
there any point? But it's interesting if you look at his sub stack of
22:56
how people have responded to it, and there's a lot of information in there
23:00
that people have given and one in particular was saying, go forward with it,
23:06
keep taking it forward. But my view on this cherld is that you
23:08
don't stop. You have to be like the terminator. You never stop,
23:14
right, And I'll tell you. I'll tell you why you don't stop.
23:19
I'll tell you why you don't stop, because a good friend of ours told
23:23
us this years ago. If if you stop, if you've gone through a
23:27
freedom information process and it's it's and freedom information, let's not be being around
23:33
the bush. But it is a drag. It is an absolute drag because
23:37
you've got to wait twenty working days and then they don't give you what you
23:41
want. So you've got to wait and you got to wait, and it's
23:42
just a winning game, right And it's it's totally understandable that people would just
23:48
throw their hands up in the air and say bollocks to this, it's a
23:51
waste of time. But the problem is that this is this is part of
23:55
the game. And if if people drop the thing after a period of time
24:00
and give up on it, that sets a precedent and so whatever excuse they
24:07
give, they will then use the same mechanism the next time, or the
24:11
next time and the next time. So it's actually encumbered upon us to see
24:18
it through as absolutely as far as we can go with it and not let
24:22
a job. Yeah, they if they were actually if they were actually interested
24:29
in the things that they say that they're interested in around safety, then they
24:33
would be there would be a live feed publicly available to all of the data
24:40
coming out of the system that you could just go and look at right now,
24:45
that none of this bureaucracy would exist. The only reason it's there is
24:51
to provide cover for the people committing frankly primes inside the health system. There's
24:59
no there is no reason at all why we shouldn't be able to see all
25:03
of this information, and we should have been able to see it all the
25:04
way along through the process in fact, actually the AMHR ray should just be
25:08
a bunch of apish. She's be able to go and plug in pull data
25:12
outs coming into their system and have tital and full transparency. There shouldn't be
25:22
another way of doing it. Yeah, the thing that was awful was June
25:26
Rain in November twenty two actually spouting forth about this monitor as if it was
25:30
the best thing since size spread and that she got this pregnancy data from what
25:34
have you. And that was if they had stopped this after seven months,
25:38
that was way after, you know, it was when they'd actually presented to
25:41
the PAG and all that information had been presented in the report that they sent
25:48
to us. It's just ridiculous that she's lying. She's lying. She's standing
25:53
there in a presentation in front of a large group of people telling stories in
26:00
title Psychopaths. And don't forget the PEAG, the Pharmacovigilance Expert Advisory Group that
26:08
is part of the Commission for Human Medicines. And of course we go back
26:12
then to Professor Munair per Muhammad, and I haven't forgotten Professor Munir per Mohammad
26:19
because we all focus in on Dame June Rain quite rightly and Alison Cave and
26:25
Graham Cook and all the rest of them in the MHRA. But we really
26:29
mustn't forget the Commission for Human Medicines at the top of the pyramid because Professor
26:34
Munir per Mohammad, he's the one that advises ministers direct so let's not take
26:42
him off our radar either. Yeah. Yeah, does that bring us to
26:52
a natural end for this segment? Oh, I could go on forever if
26:56
you like. Where do you want me to start? Right? Let's start
27:03
with the where What is the physical address of the MHRA, isn't it?
27:11
Yeah, they moved into The European Medicines Agency was based at Canary Wharf.
27:18
But when we left the European Union, obviously the EMA moved out and the
27:25
MHRA moved in. And it's interesting location because Canary Wharf. I wrote an
27:32
article, it's on the website. It's called Canary in the coal Mine.
27:36
And the Canary Wharf is designated to be the Europe's biggest wet lab. And
27:41
also they're building accommodation for over two thousand scientists to be literally on site.
27:48
So Canary Wharf is an area to keep your eyes on. And of course
27:52
the MHR are right in the middle of it, So we should have five
27:57
hundred thousand people side that building. Yes, well I went, I actually
28:03
went, I went down there got When was it two years ago? I
28:07
can't remember the exact day, It's a couple of years ago. Now,
28:08
we went down there was a base and actually a bunch of people got into
28:12
the offices, right, and there was and there was a big ju Raine
28:17
underneath her desk. I was scared her. Yeah, I was down there,
28:22
yeah, yeah, yeah, hundred we almost got in the building.
28:25
But seriously, the police almost lost, seriously lost control of that situation,
28:30
right, I mean there was there were there was some it was it was
28:33
pretty for long. Yeah. And then so there was probably I don't know,
28:37
no, probably no more than probably not more than a thousand people maybe
28:41
even like five six, seven hundred something like that who went down there.
28:45
And yeah, June Roe resigning under a desk, and you know, like
28:51
we weren't going to do anything violent, but it was like we've got to
28:53
like, yeah, you know, we know where you live, right,
28:56
like, and and you know, there needs to be a process of of
29:03
of of direct action. And again it's not on exportation to violence at all,
29:07
Right, but people have got to start making the people who are behind
29:14
this feel the heat a little bit, right and because at the minute they're
29:18
just hiding behind their YouTube board meetings and being whisked around town in private cars
29:25
and you know they've got their ministerial passes, they getting into the bits of
29:29
s W one that no one else can access, and you know they're they're
29:33
not being held to account. So that the danger of not having a functioning
29:41
or or of having a co opted manstream media, because if you've got a
29:48
menstream, if there's no way for the for the public voice to be heard
29:52
through the mass media, and forget about the independent media or the alternative media,
29:59
but through the mass if there's no way, if they're excluding the public
30:02
voice, then the public are going to start taking action in their own hands.
30:06
And at this point in time that's being expressed through the likes of the
30:10
UK column and everybody else that's out there that's speaking out, and it's being
30:15
expressed through occasional public protests with relatively small numbers. But I've got to say
30:22
that at some point inevitably the frustration is going to boil over and there's going
30:27
to be no responsibility for that other than with the people that are pushing these
30:33
policies and that are and with the mainstream press and with the politicians and so
30:37
on. So this isn't This isn't that the public is becoming a bunch of
30:41
extremists. The extremists are in positions of authority at the moment, and the
30:48
public are becoming increasingly impatient with their voices not being heard. And so you
30:53
know, I chose the figure of five hundred thousand. I would prefer to
30:57
see five million people camped outside that building. I would I would love to
31:03
see half the half the population in this country camped outside the houses of Parliament
31:07
and those people not being told in no uncertain times, no, you will
31:11
listen to us. I was going to say something that I'm not like to
31:15
say on the UK. You will listen to us for once. This is
31:19
this is what's needed. And violence, I think is not the answer.
31:22
It's never the answer, but that kind of determination is. But if you
31:29
had five million people and you wouldn't need to be violent, you've got the
31:32
bulk of a number. But Dan Austin Gregory last night, if you remember,
31:38
Ben, he was promoting a rally that he's doing to get everybody to
31:45
go to the WHO building. So they're going to set off and have a
31:52
kind of chuckish thing for orderly people going off to the WHO. Right.
31:57
So yeah, the main thing, and I remember actually talking to someone on
32:02
the outside of the MHRA building about this exact topic two years ago, right,
32:07
is that I think that that's a good thing to do. I don't
32:12
know the detail of what Daniston Gregor is proposing to do, right, but
32:15
I certainly think, you know, having I just said it, right,
32:17
I think we need to start holding people to account more directly. But we've
32:22
got to expand on numbers, and we've got to get away from the same
32:27
old faces going on these marches around central London and no one knowing about it,
32:35
right, Like the actual at we've got. You've got to direct outreach
32:38
going into the counties, going into the towns, going into the estates.
32:45
Yeah, particularly in central London. You've got huge estates all over the place
32:49
which are full of people who are completely disconnected from from everything. Really.
32:52
I mean, they're not paying attention to mainstream media and they can very clearly
32:57
and obviously see what's going on. We're looking at, you know, rapidly
33:00
accelerating societal collapse, that it's been deliberately inflicted on us by the health system
33:07
and the people running all of the institutions, and most people know exactly what's
33:12
happening, they don't know what to do about it, and others providing them
33:16
a pressure valve, like a release valve for it, And actually, what
33:20
the what the what what? What the establishment would love to happen is for
33:24
things to descend into violence, and they're going to provoke us on an ongoing
33:29
basis to try to ratchet up the pressures to make that happen, because if
33:31
it descends into violence, then that will give them all the license that they
33:35
need to bring in greater restrictions, greater infringements on civil liberties, digitalized d
33:40
systems, stop people moving around the city, you know, if things start
33:45
to get violent, because they'll just be able to turn around to the mainstream
33:47
of the country and say, oh, look it's it's it's all breaking down
33:51
and it's nothing to do with us. Obviously, it's got to do with
33:52
you know, these awful people in London, and you know, we've got
33:55
to bring bring in all these new restrictions to deal with the situation. Should
34:00
without any admission of culpability on their own part. Right, So something that's
34:05
going to be going to be managed very carefully. But but but but but
34:10
thankfully, it feels like things are heading in the right direction. And actually,
34:14
as I was saying earlier on if they are, if they are at
34:17
the level where they are, they are telling us with a straight face that
34:22
they have to peer review a data set before they can release it. And
34:25
that's like they haven't got anything left. There's nothing left after that point.
34:30
Yeah, they're just making it up at right now, there's no there's no
34:34
there's no stage beyond that for the Yeah, a final suggestion there would need
34:40
to be the final, final suggestion. See what people think in the chat
34:45
box for this. So Dame June Rain, she's going to be going soon.
34:50
She's the rat that's leaving the sinking ship. Remember, So she's resigned
34:53
from the m h r A. And Tessa Laurie, you know, bringing
34:58
it back, excuse bring it back to Ben's segment in the news A.
35:04
Tessa has been doing an awful lot and she's also put a ten plate letter
35:07
up, a notice of liability, a liability order for Dame June Rain.
35:12
How about we all write a liability order to her, post it by royal
35:17
mail, snail mail on a yellow card, photograph it as you're putting it
35:22
through the post box or sending it, and let's deluge her with yellow cards
35:29
before she leaves the MHRA. I think that is an excellent idea. I
35:32
thought you were going to say, for a second though, that we should
35:35
put tesl Laurie instead of June rearing. Yes, I'd love to see Teslae
35:39
delivering sacks of yellow cards to Dame June Rain. What a lovely final leaving
35:46
present. Because you know what in the rewards scheme that we showed on the
35:51
main news that the staff are getting reward. They don't just get a virtual
35:54
bunch of flowers of fifty pounds or one hundred pound voucher. You know,
35:59
they a personal letter from Dame June Rain herself. So I think we need
36:07
to send June Rain off in style. What do you think? Everybody thinks
36:12
it's a great idea. So maybe we should get the cards. Maybe we
36:15
should get the cards made, yes cards with the notice on yes yes,
36:20
yes, right, okay, okay, well look we've got to leave that
36:23
there for today. With that idea, Thank you very much, Cheryl,
36:28
Thanks Debbie and Ben. Thanks for everybody that's been watching. It's much appreciated.
36:34
Have a great weekend. We'll see you on Monday. Thank you. Bye.