Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Feds don't want you to see this! Diverting Hate expansion drops! | Fed-pilled and moisturized 01

Transcript

Feds don't want you to see this! Diverting Hate expansion drops! | Fed-pilled and moisturized 01 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:01
  Hello everyone, and welcome to Honey Badger Radio. My name is Brian with
• 0:04
  Alison and I don't know. There's a weird like delay when Alison's camera pops
• 0:10
  up. It could be a video ninja problem, but you're there. No,
• 0:13
  no, it popped up as soon as you started waving. Maybe you
• 0:16
  did. And this is fed, pilled and moisturized zero one. I don't
• 0:24
  know if this is gonna be a new series of shows, but we're just
• 0:27
  a joke, a one off joke. Yeah, guess it depends on I
• 0:31
  guess it depends on the Department of Homeland Security. I guess we're being There
• 0:36
  is nothing funny about the Department of Homeland Security. Nothing. They never joke,
• 0:42
  just the facts. Man, serious people, absolutely, they are the
• 0:48
  most serious people. Are you kidding me? Yeah? Okay, all right,
• 0:53
  So I guess I could give you guys a background on this. I
• 0:57
  got an individual and I won't say his name. Is it one of our
• 1:02
  one of our members or supporters, because I don't know the story either,
• 1:06
  So I'll say S. I'll call him S. S sent me an email
• 1:12
  with this attached, and this is the latest Department of Homeland Security report.
• 1:19
  It is another one from Diverting Hate. I believe Diverting Hate is the organization
• 1:26
  that's being funded by the Department of Homeland Security. So this is the Diverting
• 1:30
  Hate is the authors of this Department of Homeland Security report, and it is
• 1:37
  misogyny, extremism, the manosphere and mainstream social media, which does have I
• 1:42
  suppose applicability to us, because we are often considered manosphere adjacent, shall we
• 1:49
  say, in so far as we talk about men's issues. And this is
• 1:52
  the bi annual report, so the two of these come out a year apparently
• 1:56
  from Diverting Hate, and this is the March twenty four report, Volume three,
• 2:01
  so I'm guessing that each volume has two and we're on the third volume.
• 2:07
  So this is this is definitely an ongoing issue, an ongoing concern,
• 2:10
  shall we say? This project is funded by the US Department of Homeland Securities
• 2:15
  Center for Prevention Programs and Partnerships Opportunity. All, Okay, that's just some
• 2:22
  bureaucrat ease. After that, we exist to create a world where all people
• 2:25
  can be safe from misogyny. Thank God. Are tax your tax dollars at
• 2:31
  work? Guys, taxpayer dollars aporized. Do you feel moisturized. I'm feeling
• 2:37
  moisturized. I'm very lubricated, lubricated by this. Ready to be diverged.
• 2:45
  Yeah, ready, ready to be diverged. Okay, so do you have
• 2:50
  the actual report up? So again, thank you, I'm displaying it right
• 2:53
  now. Thank you to S for sending this through s as in Satan.
• 3:00
  Oh, I'm just kiddings. Obviously it's the patriarchy, so it must be
• 3:04
  safely. Obviously it's some member of the patriarchy that sent us this. And
• 3:07
  if you guys want to send us stuff, you can do so at Badger
• 3:12
  at feed the Badger dot com. So, and if you want to send
• 3:15
  us a message through our super chow system, you can do so at Feedbadger
• 3:17
  dot com slash just the tip at anytime during the show. Best way to
• 3:22
  get your message to us and the best way to get funds for us.
• 3:25
  So feed the Badger dot com slash just the tip. Now that's out of
• 3:30
  the way. Where should we begin with this? Well, let's look at
• 3:34
  the table of contents. Shout out to the Rumble Gang. By the way,
• 3:37
  I gave a link to Becks. She's ban on YouTube, but she
• 3:39
  said she would be watching on Rumble so if you are there, I'm acknowledging
• 3:45
  you. All right, So let's look at the table of contents. I
• 3:50
  learned about this and grammar school. Table of contents is important. It's how
• 3:53
  you find where to go. Oh, so I think on accidentally on Safari.
• 4:00
  So if I have any issues, just tell me and I will move
• 4:03
  over to Are there issues with Safari and Video Ninja? Well maybe it's maybe
• 4:09
  it's Riverside's not video Ninja kiss? Oh yeah, so far no see.
• 4:14
  Video Ninja was made by a guy who really wanted to like give people a
• 4:18
  place where they can talk to each other during COVID, and so he did
• 4:21
  it for free, so it works. If you had to pay for it,
• 4:27
  there could be problems. But this was free and it works, so
• 4:30
  obviously, Like, yeah, it was a guy who just really wanted this
• 4:34
  to work. It's almost like when a man want sets his mind to doing
• 4:38
  something excellent, he doesn't mmm anyway, Kate, all right, So table
• 4:43
  of contents, we've got a we got like a a Schmorgasborg of exciting items.
• 4:48
  Yeah. Introduction Executive Summary, Section one, Growth Growth of Online male
• 4:55
  Supremacy, Male Supremacy Scale, a YouTube case study and review of three evolving
• 5:00
  trends. Stop simping, how misogynistic influencers humiliate women to discourage sympathy, Passport
• 5:08
  Bros Rise, the disparagement of the modern woman and the rise of tradwives hitting
• 5:14
  the Wall, and the pervasive sexualization of younger and underage women. More than
• 5:19
  Seasonal Solitude exploring the impact of the holiday season on in cells iss dehumanizing language
• 5:27
  on Getter, who the hell's on? Getter? Exploring an overlooked corner of
• 5:30
  the mano sphere. Okay, did you imagine if they actually turn this lens
• 5:36
  on that gigantic industry, ideological industry that's currently an entire academic sphere, you
• 5:46
  know, and influencing government and do do things like ignore the male victims of
• 5:54
  female rapists like you yeah, Like what have these guys done that in any
• 6:00
  way compares to marry Costs and her shenanigans. Well, these people are panicking
• 6:10
  because they're losing. Like I watched today, it was like a two and
• 6:15
  a half hour, I think discussion on Tenant Media, which I think is
• 6:21
  owned by Timpole or at least is like partly a founder of it. And
• 6:28
  they had four women who were all at least claimed to be non feminist women
• 6:33
  having a discussion about marriage and divorce and so on. It was like Pearl
• 6:39
  Davis, Lauren Chen, Rachel Wilson, and somebody else. I'm sorry,
• 6:44
  I don't remember your name. And it was a fascinating to watch because I
• 6:47
  mean, they had disagreements, Like Pearl was, you know, kind of
• 6:51
  like sparring with Lauren Chen a lot. But I thought it was good and
• 6:56
  necessary to see that. And meanwhile on the floor of the floor of the
• 7:02
  Congress, like it was like AOC and like two other Senate members were just
• 7:08
  hurling caddy insults at each other and calling each other names. Just look,
• 7:15
  this is the level of discourse when it comes to women in the political power
• 7:17
  versus women that are just interested in a particular topic. But I think the
• 7:23
  panic is is that even women are starting to come around on this and they're
• 7:28
  starting to talk about and I know people in the comments are gonna throw rage
• 7:31
  at me because they really want women to be completely irredeemable. But the whole
• 7:35
  purpose of Honey Badger Radio is to basically invite women to be a part of
• 7:41
  the solution. So if there are women that are participating in it. It
• 7:45
  is a win, full stop. Okay, it doesn't mean that it's over,
• 7:48
  it's I'm saying, yeah exactly, But I think it was because there
• 7:51
  are people, like I said, in that discussion, at least Pearl and
• 7:58
  Rachel Wilson were definitely like trying to hold women's feet to the fire. And
• 8:03
  at the end they were like, you know what, maybe what needs to
• 8:05
  happen is that women have to hold other women accountable and we have to stop
• 8:09
  blaming men. That was what they concluded. Now will it mean anything,
• 8:15
  I don't know, But the point is the discussion is happening. This is
• 8:18
  all I ever wanted from the moment I got involved, was for people outside
• 8:22
  of us to start talking about it. And it is starting to happen,
• 8:26
  and this is good. But it means that we can't stop. And it
• 8:28
  also means that if I know about it, just because I like, I'm
• 8:33
  on YouTube sometimes like watching I don't even watch Temple regularly, but I came
• 8:37
  across it. If I know about it, then the Department of Homeland Security
• 8:41
  definitely knows about it. So this but what they're doing is is what I
• 8:46
  think they're doing. So I'm speculating here, what they're doing is they know
• 8:50
  it's a problem that people are starting to question the cathedral, which is essentially
• 8:54
  what feminism is a part of. In fact, it's probably the foundation for
• 9:00
  or everything else that the cathedral symbolizes. And it begins with that questioning,
• 9:07
  like what is the situation between men and women? Why is it the way
• 9:11
  it is? Can what should be done about it? And this is what
• 9:15
  they fear the most. They fear people communicating with each other and sharing information.
• 9:20
  It would rather we be cheering for AOC or mergery Taylor Green hurling caddy
• 9:26
  insults at each other on the floor of Congress, rather than looking at what
• 9:30
  like for regular ask women that just make online content are discussing on like another
• 9:35
  you know, in another in alternatate media, so and I can see.
• 9:39
  And what they're doing is they're trying to direct your attention to what the men
• 9:45
  are doing. Because if we notice that women are having conversations with people like
• 9:48
  you, people like Karen, people like Hannah, it's too dangerous because it
• 9:52
  means that women are interested. And what we need to do is we need
• 9:56
  to focus on what men are doing. And you could tell how how absolutely
• 10:00
  flaccid their arguments are because when you look at what they're bringing up, the
• 10:03
  evolving trends, stop simping. So what does that? I mean, how
• 10:09
  is that bad? Like for you know what I mean, it's nothing wrong
• 10:13
  with men being able to essentially assert themselves, you know, state their boundaries,
• 10:20
  give things to women, Yeah, and decide not to just give things
• 10:24
  to women unilaterally with exactly exactly stop simping. But they're trying to make it
• 10:31
  into something more sinister when they say how misogynistic influencers humiliate women to discourage sympathy.
• 10:37
  No, that's not what it is. It's literally stop simping. Like
• 10:41
  you guys know, simping has to stop. It should be illegal, like
• 10:45
  there should be penalties, okay, because it is destroying men and women.
• 10:50
  Like it's like, simping is how we got to where we are now,
• 10:54
  Like you know what I mean, Passport bros. Rise Literally men decide I
• 11:00
  think I'm just gonna leave the country. They're trying to make this into something
• 11:03
  sinister. How the disparagement of the modern woman and the rise of tradwives.
• 11:09
  What does that even have to do with passport pros? See and again,
• 11:13
  you know they're trying to find anything that they can grasp onto. But the
• 11:18
  purpose of this is to terrify women and to inspire essentially white knights, white
• 11:24
  knight men with the one good man to step up and stop this from happening,
• 11:30
  because the only way that feminism can get anything done to stop the patriarchy
• 11:37
  is to appeal to patriarchy. And then there's hitting the wall and present pervasive
• 11:41
  sexualization of younger and underage women. Again, this is very gross and misleading
• 11:48
  because hitting the wall does not mean you're a pedophile, but that's what they're
• 11:52
  suggesting. So you have to look at what they're saying and then what they're
• 11:54
  suggesting, because what they want to do is correlate two things that are not
• 12:00
  the same. Passport bros and tradwives are not related. Passport bros are men
• 12:05
  saying women in the West are you know, their materialistic cunts. I'm gonna
• 12:09
  go to Thailand or the Philippines or fucking Russia and I'm gonna find myself a
• 12:16
  woman that is more like, it's gonna be nice to me. It's essentially
• 12:20
  what it is right. Whether or not that works out for them, that's
• 12:24
  another question. But the it's their business if they want to go to another
• 12:26
  country. But they're trying to problematize that. In fact, they're trying to
• 12:31
  pathologize that. So and the reason is because they are losing I think they're
• 12:37
  losing their grip on the narrative. I think that our talking points are getting
• 12:39
  out there. Okay, So the uh more than seasonal solitude during the impact
• 12:46
  from the holiday season on insuls, do I dehumanizing language? Okay, we
• 12:50
  already did that, so sectioned, Yeah, I don't who's on getter is?
• 12:54
  This wasn't the logo for that, like a torch or something. I
• 12:58
  don't even know what is that. I remember Getter was was a Twitter alternative.
• 13:01
  Basically all the Twitter alternatives are dead because Elon Musk bought Twitter and that
• 13:07
  was it Forgetter. I mean gab is probably I don't know, I don't
• 13:09
  use it, but gab is probably still doing. Okay. True social is
• 13:13
  basically dead. Yes, I know it's Trump's thing, but the only reason
• 13:16
  why anyone's on there is because he's on there. So Section two Real impact
• 13:22
  in the normalization of violent misogyny and harmful masculinity from hate online to violence offline
• 13:28
  gen z shift, How a younger generation is influenced by the menisphere, an
• 13:31
  empathy driven lens to online misogyny see again z the gen Z drift, the
• 13:39
  gen Z shift. They talked about that on the Timpoole thing, and Temple
• 13:43
  was trying to say, look, men are moving was it Zoomers are moving
• 13:46
  for the right and zoomer women are moving further left. No, zoomer men
• 13:52
  are moving slightly right, like they're just kind of coming towards the center more.
• 13:58
  But women women are going way Yeah, they're going way out there,
• 14:03
  like basically what they what they One of the things that they talked about was
• 14:07
  that younger men are more. Younger men are going back to Like what's interesting
• 14:16
  is that that that younger men are getting involved or getting interested in uh Christianity,
• 14:20
  Like it's making a comeback for younger men, and that there's like,
• 14:24
  especially in Catholic and Orthodox and Lutheran denominations, there's a lot of men coming
• 14:28
  back to the church, but women are going to Wicca and you know,
• 14:33
  Tarot and and and all this all this like feminists like you know, I
• 14:37
  am the Servant of Lilith type stuff. So and I'm not saying that's the
• 14:41
  cause, but it gives you an idea of like the diverging. There is
• 14:46
  a divergence, but men are basically like around the same level. Women are
• 14:52
  the ones that have gone like off the rails. So when when they say
• 14:56
  this, when they what is it the gen Z shift, they are basically
• 15:00
  problematizing the fact that men are becoming a little bit more reasonable. That's it,
• 15:05
  That's really it. I wouldn't even say that they're becoming conservative per se.
• 15:09
  I think that they're just like raining in the crazy from the millennial generation
• 15:15
  of men. Oh yeah, so Section three key actors and the holistic approached
• 15:20
  the manisphere. I think they missed. They think they're missing a verb.
• 15:24
  They're analyzing the complex role of very large online platforms and mitigating misogynist narratives.
• 15:30
  Our take ways to protecting, ways to protecting the people and the work,
• 15:35
  Oh the work. That is literally communist language. When you say doing the
• 15:39
  work is literally kami shit. But go ahead, it's to protecting this ways
• 15:45
  to protecting. Yeah, this is this is this is this is gobbledygook,
• 15:50
  this is commy gobbledygook. It's word craft, it's magic. These are serious
• 15:54
  people. How men's wellness orgs can meet men in the manisphere, Oh my
• 16:00
  god, interventions right, stop them, they're they're they're thinking about marrying women
• 16:07
  and having children and buying a house. That can't be allowed. In conversation
• 16:11
  with Will Adolphi, author of the upcoming book Beyond the Manisphere, Why I
• 16:15
  Took the Red Pill and How I Broke Free? This should that should be
• 16:19
  interesting because we could we could we could look at that. Yeah, we
• 16:22
  could look at that, and that's the end. Right judge whether or not
• 16:26
  he's being honest about him having taken it. Yeah, I have I have
• 16:30
  a feeling a fee that's a little bit exaggerated. Shall we say? All
• 16:34
  right, let's say, okay, do you want to we have some let's
• 16:38
  let's pick up something. But let's do we got like at least a super
• 16:41
  chow, and you should probably do the things. Oh I already did.
• 16:45
  I already did at least. Oh okay, I come again. All right,
• 16:48
  all right, So once again, if you want to send us a
• 16:49
  message at any point throughout the show, the very best way to send us
• 16:52
  that message so you avoid YouTube's comment enhancement system and we get the full benefit
• 16:56
  of whatever funds you send is feed the Badger dot slash just the tip and
• 17:00
  if you would like to support the show for the month, we do have
• 17:03
  our monthly fundraiser open at feed the Badger dot com slash support and every bit
• 17:07
  helps, so, you know, five dollars, ten dollars. It's great,
• 17:11
  great to see the support so that we can continue to be a counter
• 17:17
  voice to the US government, or at least a not insane voice the US
• 17:22
  government, academia media. You know. Uh, we are of course the
• 17:27
  face of the system. They're they they are the underdogs fighting fighting to be
• 17:37
  heard, whereas we are the face. That's right. Anyway, if you
• 17:41
  want to support us in our in our struggle, got that some common language
• 17:45
  there, Uh, feed the Badger dot com slash support and again support us
• 17:49
  in our comf Okay, I got some super chows So Sleepy Sleepy Aussie gave
• 17:57
  us five dollars and says five dollary dues like diggree dues for the Badgers.
• 18:03
  Hey, Brian, glad to hear that you're sounding better. And Alison,
• 18:07
  how's your book coming along? Well? Thank you? And Alis you should
• 18:11
  I answer that question? Okay, Yes, I have finally cracked the code
• 18:17
  of the first chapter because I was struggling. Oh no, yes, I
• 18:21
  was struggling. It's taken probably a year and a half to actually figure out
• 18:26
  how to approach starting the book now, that is actually one of the most
• 18:30
  difficult parts ending and starting actually starting is the most difficult part, followed by
• 18:36
  ending. So I mean it is actually substantial. Is a big leap forward.
• 18:41
  However, that's also necessitated some changes in the structure of the book going
• 18:45
  forward. But I'm getting there. I'm getting there, But it was it
• 18:48
  was a slog like there is a lot of things. People don't realize this,
• 18:52
  but writing is difficult, writing, especially writing fiction, which is why
• 18:59
  we have so many lovely journalists who basically write fiction in their articles because they
• 19:03
  can't make it as fiction writers. But yeah, so it's actually there's a
• 19:07
  lot of skills that you have to master and they're quite difficult, and there's
• 19:11
  it's almost all intuitive, so you just have to bang your head against the
• 19:15
  wall until you get it. Maybe some people are much better at it than
• 19:18
  I am right off the bat, But like I did need to get some
• 19:21
  skill set, so I've got more of them. I won't say I have
• 19:25
  them all, but I'm getting there. Thank you all again for helping me
• 19:29
  get the editor that has been a big help in improving my writing. Who
• 19:33
  knew, you know, like getting an editor helps your writing, somebody who
• 19:37
  can coach you along and to develop the skills necessary to write. But again,
• 19:42
  thank you all everybody who supported me in that I am making progress.
• 19:47
  I know there's not a lot to show now, but you know how it
• 19:49
  is with a big endeavor, often it's two steps back, three steps forward,
• 19:53
  and I feel like I've taken those three steps forward. I also,
• 19:56
  while on the topic of books, I just want to give a shout out
• 20:00
  to yul Qui who got me two books from my list that I have on
• 20:06
  Amazon. One is The Collapse of Complex Societies and the other is Questioning Collapse,
• 20:11
  which is a series of essays. So this is basically a dialogue.
• 20:17
  This is the original, this is the criticism of the original, and I'm
• 20:21
  very much looking forward to reading this and bringing you all whatever insights come from
• 20:26
  those books. So thank you yl Qui. Very much appreciated. And shall
• 20:32
  we go to the next one. Yeah, the next one is for five
• 20:34
  dollars excuse me four from small Token for Brian's voice. He says, the
• 20:41
  best software tools are made by a guy who has a singular vision. Yeah,
• 20:45
  I think smaller teams are tending to be better, and thank you.
• 20:48
  And then I got one more. I think that's the last one, super
• 20:52
  Chow. But this is a big one. This is fifty dollars. Thank
• 20:55
  you so much. Show from Macho Man Shark, America's handsomest virgin gives us
• 21:03
  fifty bucks. That says nothing interesting to say, so I'll just leave you
• 21:06
  with the N word thirty seven times, mostly lowercase, except for every prime
• 21:11
  numbered one, which is in all caps. Also, last time I sent
• 21:14
  one of these, you didn't read my subtitle, which is outrage. Please
• 21:18
  fix this error or I will cry. Well, let me look at your
• 21:21
  Maybe it didn't show up in my feed. No, I don't see it.
• 21:25
  Here. Is there a subtitle on the No, okay, well I
• 21:30
  don't see one I have, Macho man Shark. You are terrified me because
• 21:34
  I'm almost certain I did not put a subtitle field in the comment in the
• 21:41
  comment system, so I know that there is a place where you can put
• 21:44
  your name, which you have obviously used because macho man Shark, it's not
• 21:48
  exactly the default. And also there is a comment field. But I am
• 21:53
  almost certain there is absolutely no subtitle field. Okay, well, she says,
• 22:00
  so, so it must be true. We also too, Oh good,
• 22:03
  we got one from re r E. I so thank you, thank
• 22:08
  you. I just showed. I just showed that moved to Lindsay for the
• 22:18
  first time. Last night, we watched Wayne's World. She never seen it
• 22:22
  before, and I hadn't seen it in years. You know what, I
• 22:25
  haven't. She fell asleep right when the credits started, so she kind of
• 22:30
  missed the credits. It's like a little there's some extra scenes during the credits.
• 22:33
  I haven't asked her about it. I mean she's in the other room.
• 22:37
  I'll ask her or later at what she thought, but I mean she
• 22:38
  got she got some laughs out of it. I also showed her The Blues
• 22:41
  Brothers like a few days before, and I had seen The Blues Brothers in
• 22:45
  a long time, and she really liked that movie. She was like,
• 22:48
  oh, you know what, that's that movie is really cute. So uh
• 22:51
  yeah, I like I like. I like Wayne's World. You know the
• 22:56
  Philip No, the Mystery Nazis. No, No, No, Illinois Nazis.
• 23:00
  That's that's the that's the Illinois Nazis. That's that's from Louis Brothers.
• 23:04
  Yeah, that's so. It's so silly, but it's great. Lots of
• 23:11
  good cameos in that one too. All right. Anyway, Uh so you
• 23:14
  want to go to the up the beyond the Manisphere. Guy, I'm wondering
• 23:18
  if we should do be responsible and look at the introduction and the executive summary
• 23:23
  first. Oh fine, okay, yeah, so introduction. Do you want
• 23:30
  to read it? Because you got I mean, I'm I'm almost it.
• 23:33
  You make me feel bad, so maybe okay, all right, then you
• 23:37
  go ahead and read it. Yeah, it's not the best at reading,
• 23:38
  but I will do my best. In our vision, we seek to advance
• 23:45
  a world where all people can be safe from misogyny. Oh good grief,
• 23:51
  but not missing jury. That that's just that's I'm sorry, but that I
• 23:55
  gotta I gotta say this is an impossible goal. Like they're literally laying out
• 24:02
  the impossible like they might as well say. Our vision is to advance a
• 24:07
  world where everyone has access to infinite amounts of ice cream, whatever flavor you
• 24:14
  want, and you never get fat or get diabetes. And we're going to
• 24:18
  get there. It's right around the Connects Court and this is going to get
• 24:22
  funded by the fucking government. On top of that, something this retarded eating
• 24:26
  misogyny is like, this is whatever women think it is. Well, you
• 24:30
  know you eventually you will go through menopause and lose your fertility. Well,
• 24:33
  that will become misogyny. Yes, what men would prefer to have a partner
• 24:37
  who's younger and physically fit, that will become misogyny. Like literally, any
• 24:44
  any position of accepting the idea that men have preferences and the right to consent
• 24:52
  to sexual activity will become misogyny like that. I mean, look at look
• 24:56
  at look at this side's attitude to words literal rape when when women do it,
• 25:03
  like and they are part of the ideological side that basically said, well
• 25:08
  merry cosse, Well when women force men to have success sess I would surprise
• 25:15
  sex, we can't consider that to be rape. We will call it something
• 25:19
  else because we can't consider that to be an issue of a lack of consent
• 25:26
  on the part of the man. He just received pre uh preapproved no sex,
• 25:36
  he didn't know he wanted when he had it, And yeah, like
• 25:40
  that, that kind of rhetoric, that kind of logic is on their side.
• 25:44
  Now when that's on their side. When you're on a side that removes
• 25:48
  the idea of sexual consent of the other side, what the hell are you
• 25:52
  talking about when you talk about misogyny. I mean, when you're basically making
• 25:57
  it illegitimate for men have preferences, sexual preferences and say the word no,
• 26:04
  and you are talking about that being misogyny, Because this is where we're at,
• 26:08
  right they basically say, well, the only reason a man would say
• 26:11
  no to a woman was because he's a fat phobic, lookist, racist,
• 26:17
  agist, and the rhetic rhetoric is there. So when you're on the side
• 26:22
  that categorically removes consent from the other side, I don't think you have a
• 26:27
  you have really a position to talk about hatred, especially when hatred is apparently
• 26:34
  I don't want to have sex with fat women. You see what I'm getting
• 26:37
  at, Like, I have a preference, I have a sexual preference.
• 26:41
  I have the right to say yes or no. That is considered hatred by
• 26:45
  these people. And uh, I don't know that that's that's that's a fight.
• 26:52
  I don't know if they really want them to win anyway. Okay,
• 26:56
  through applied research and applied technolog God, that's just corporate speech. Why we
• 27:02
  exist. I'm just gonna skip over the corporate's beak. For vulnerable men struggling
• 27:07
  with loneliness, low self esteem, and a variety of other risk factors,
• 27:11
  finding an online space where their troubles are validated is a beacon of hope.
• 27:18
  God, these people are sinister. Often they are welcomed into a community of
• 27:21
  like minded men uniting under economy common enemy usually women, and giving a prescription
• 27:26
  for the successful realization for men of manhood. And it's okay to have entire
• 27:33
  academic sphere devoted to making men out to be the villains. You know,
• 27:41
  this should be read by someone either doing like a fake German accent like Klaus
• 27:47
  Schwab or Emperor Palpatine from Star Wars. I could see him giving a speech
• 27:52
  where he's like, for vulnerable men struggling with loneliness, low self esteem and
• 27:57
  a variety of other risk factors, is finding on online space where that troubles
• 28:03
  validated is a beacon of hope. I am God and deformed. I mean,
• 28:15
  so it's like, you know, like where you're trying to be charismatic,
• 28:18
  but the evil is just like bleeding through. But like, honestly,
• 28:23
  okay, so are uniting under a common enemy, usually women. Okay,
• 28:30
  so what is the whole narrative? Men oppressed women? We live in a
• 28:33
  patriarchy that privileges men over women. Men are complicit and constructing a rape culture
• 28:40
  in which they use rape to keep women in a state of fear in order
• 28:44
  to enact their diabolical ends. What's all that rhetoric? Hey, and how
• 28:49
  come we pay women to exist in little enclaves spouting these things back and forth
• 28:56
  like that's acceptable, that's fine, that's perfectly fine. Oh, because for
• 29:02
  some reason we think that it's true, even though it's never actually been proven.
• 29:07
  All of this men oppress women never actually been proven, never even been
• 29:12
  presented in such a way that it could be proven, which means that it
• 29:15
  was some kind of causal statement that could be proven true or false, never
• 29:19
  even presented in that we haven't even taken the first baby step towards proving this
• 29:25
  conjecture, this assumption about how men and women relate, the first baby step,
• 29:29
  And we have entire swaths of the academic landscape devoted to women and men
• 29:37
  who agree with them, whispering back and forth about how men are the enemy.
• 29:41
  But that's okay, that pressure that entire endeavor is being placing on society,
• 29:48
  like taking away any recognition of the value of masculinity. That that's okay,
• 29:52
  we don't have to look at that. But if in response some men
• 29:57
  form enclaves where they're like, hey, it sucks to be subject to this
• 30:03
  society wide threat narrative against us, then the government's like, Nope, you
• 30:07
  can't do that. That's evil, that's wrong. Oh good lord, And
• 30:14
  I was actually when you began here, I was gonna say that you talked
• 30:18
  about the cathedral and feminism being the basis of the cathedral. I think what's
• 30:22
  the basis of the cathedral is this idea. It's like a power narrative which
• 30:26
  grants power over men, over the identities that men have, their expectations for
• 30:33
  themselves, their willingness to adhere to self sacrifice in order to benefit the greater
• 30:41
  society. They want power over that, and feminism gives them power over that.
• 30:45
  It's as simple as that. It doesn't actually empower women. Its greatest
• 30:48
  effect is to grant control, grant institutional control over men. So yeah,
• 30:56
  this is why they're focused on this, This is why they're focused on and
• 31:00
  also why they're most concerned about women getting you know, shucking the oak,
• 31:03
  because if women stop doing this, the institutions that rely on men being submitting
• 31:11
  themselves morally to this narrative are screwed. And they know it. That's why
• 31:17
  they're calling all this terrorism when it's patently not. Like I know, I
• 31:22
  you know, I know I've been labeled a terrorists in the past, but
• 31:26
  I'm not a terrorist at least I don't think I am. I don't I
• 31:30
  actually have I actually have a dread fear of harming people, so you know,
• 31:38
  it's it. But but but people like me get labeled that because we
• 31:44
  question the power narrative of the cathedral. Did Do you get what I'm saying,
• 31:49
  Brian, Yeah, of course. Yeah. Well yeah, because it's
• 31:52
  useful because they always project, they always accuse you of the thing that they
• 31:56
  do or they would like to do. So they accuse you because they know
• 32:00
  that what they want to do is wrong, but they still want to do
• 32:04
  it. So instead they try to redirect attention by accusing you of being the
• 32:07
  terrorist or me or or us by association, which is really what they're doing
• 32:13
  here. That you find, like the worst actors, you exaggerate their crimes
• 32:19
  and then you paint a whole everyone that you disagree with with the same color
• 32:25
  of the strong man that you've created. So in this reality, the seemingly
• 32:30
  promising community known as the Manisphere pray on this demographic for the indoctrination of radical
• 32:37
  ideas, infusing hate and violence into their daily lives. Oh by the way,
• 32:42
  guys, yeah, I'm infusing radical. I think that there's like masculine,
• 32:45
  seemingly promising. We know really what they're doing. We can read their
• 32:50
  minds, we know exactly what they're doing. I think masculinity has value,
• 32:54
  and I don't believe that men oppress women. That's radical. Governments and businesses
• 33:00
  struggle with how to stop online misogyny. The government is hindered by political constraints
• 33:06
  and inconsistent resourcing, while businesses profit off of these engagement models. Despite their
• 33:12
  efforts to combat online hate, the opposition remains insufficient, and technology platforms continue
• 33:16
  to be fertile ground for such ideologies to take root and spread. Instead of
• 33:22
  merely addressing the symptoms of these issues, we believe it necessitates a text based
• 33:27
  solution to address this fundamentally technological issue. Our technology and applied research solutions have
• 33:32
  paved a healthier path for young men before it's too late. So you know
• 33:37
  why they say this is a take based solution to address a fundamentally technological issue.
• 33:43
  You know what that means. That means we no longer control information,
• 33:49
  and now this is a problem for us because we had a specific world that
• 33:53
  we were painting for you, you know, like the shadows in the cave,
• 33:59
  you know, like we were the shadows and now you're they're leaving because
• 34:02
  some people have said, hey, this is not really what's going on,
• 34:07
  and now we're like, oh, this is a technological problem. It's an
• 34:09
  obstacle. No, you're lying and we're exposing it. That's all it is.
• 34:15
  Yeah, like you're lying to us about reality. Your power narrative hasn't
• 34:21
  even gone through the first baby step of being proven correct. Right, you
• 34:27
  have applied it everywhere, like it is. Our entire culture, our entire
• 34:31
  civilization is drenched in the idea that men opress women, and yet again hasn't
• 34:37
  even done the first baby step of being proven true or false. We haven't
• 34:40
  even started. We haven't even started to investigate it as a legitimate concept.
• 34:45
  I mean, that's the thing. It's like a feminists will say, whoa
• 34:47
  could you prove it false? I'm like, well, I'm not even going
• 34:51
  to begin until you can tell me how you prove it true or false?
• 34:54
  How like do the first damn step, which you haven't even done, and
• 34:59
  I can't. I want to repeat this over and over and over again.
• 35:02
  This narrative is illegitimate. It is incorrect. Well, okay, actually it's
• 35:09
  not even incorrect because we haven't even got to the point of determining whether it's
• 35:15
  a correct or incorrect. Are determining how to do that, and for how
• 35:22
  many generations we've been laboring under effectively it Well, let me put it this
• 35:27
  way. When I create a causal statement to prove this conjecture of menipress women,
• 35:34
  it comes out false false false false false false false. I'm doing the
• 35:39
  work. I'm doing the work that should have been done before this was ever
• 35:44
  asserted by the first professor ever asserted ever a glimmer in anyone's mind. They
• 35:50
  should have done the work to turn this into a causal statement that could be
• 35:52
  tested. But they didn't. You know why, because they know if they
• 35:57
  test it false false false false false all the way down, So they just
• 36:04
  ignore that and they try to chuck and jive around it. And what really
• 36:08
  pisss me off is the lies. Okay, all right, oh listen,
• 36:15
  the next sections I think are really dumb. Okay, you want to go
• 36:20
  back to the table of contents, so executive summary, I'll go ahead.
• 36:24
  I'm the surfacing positive male influencers, so people know who to avoid, I
• 36:30
  mean obviously. Oh uh so you take yeah, yeah, yeah, well
• 36:35
  I mean whatever like that again. The photograph, this is TDS. Okay.
• 36:42
  The TDS is when someone mentions Trump's name and people's brains turn off and
• 36:46
  all they can think of is, like nothing matters except stopping the Orange man.
• 36:51
  Andrew Tait is being used in these exact same way. And this is
• 36:53
  the thing I'm trying to like get across the people. It's not about him,
• 36:59
  it's a He is a symbol. He is a symbol of what they
• 37:02
  hate. It is any man, any man who is comfortable with his masculinity,
• 37:07
  that does not apologize, that does not simp, that basically puts his
• 37:12
  needs first, that is okay with being a man. So this image is
• 37:16
  supposed to trigger you, Like they literally don't even have his name, they
• 37:21
  just have the picture. You're supposed to be emotionally affected by this. Do
• 37:24
  not allow yourself to be affected by this. Do not allow it. So
• 37:29
  just ignore this because this is used as a tool to make you react.
• 37:34
  Okay, let it go. It doesn't matter who that is, because if
• 37:37
  it wasn't him, it would be a picture of Ralloh, it'd be a
• 37:40
  picture of fucking like it could be Joe Rogan, Jordan Peterson. It wouldn't
• 37:46
  matter. It wouldn't matter. So's He's just a symbol. They don't really
• 37:51
  know the guy, just like they don't know Trump. They're just affected by
• 37:53
  him emotionally, and they think everyone else should be affected by him in the
• 37:57
  same way. And he stands for what they think. Like the way that
• 38:01
  they represent this guy is it image. Look at this image and imagine what
• 38:07
  he's hiding. So peel him back. I see who they really don't want
• 38:12
  you to listen to, right who they want you to listen to, which
• 38:16
  may actually be our voice might be there, Karen's Voice, a Voice for
• 38:21
  Men, the Center for Men and Families, all of the people who are
• 38:25
  trying to bring services for men and compassion for men. They really don't want
• 38:29
  you to see that people are actually trying to develop strategies for men to develop
• 38:35
  positive relationships in their lives. Warren Ferrell don't want you to see these people,
• 38:38
  Cassie j the red pill. They don't want you to see that beyond
• 38:43
  because this is exactly that they put this exactly. It's just TDS your eyes,
• 38:47
  it's just TDS under another name. It's it's Tate deringement syndrome. And
• 38:52
  then they have a tweet here. I can't see what it says. I
• 38:57
  can zoom in a little bit that'll help. No, no, no,
• 39:00
  no, no, no no no, let's not even mention that. Oh
• 39:02
  okay, okay, it's it's the unmentionable. But let's look at if you
• 39:07
  can zoom in on the positive male influencers. Yeah, I'm looking at it.
• 39:12
  So we actually kind of went over some of these the last time we
• 39:15
  covered this. Okay, So fishing, yeah, fishing the good fight.
• 39:21
  That's kind of weird. Should be fishing the good fish. The men's circle.
• 39:25
  I don't know what this little feather thing is. I can't see.
• 39:28
  It's small man enough, men living pensive. Maybe that's what this is.
• 39:35
  Maybe this is one thing mankind project visible man, every man, man alive
• 39:43
  and Mahogany. I think I think that's what it says. It's all like
• 39:50
  essentially, why is focus on like having man in the in the title?
• 39:54
  Yeah, they think, you know, it's funny because they think that men
• 39:57
  are like women in that way, like they can create. I wonder if
• 40:01
  these are not sort of like exact copies of similar women's groups and they actually
• 40:08
  use the same kind of tools and the same approaches that women's groups use,
• 40:15
  and and I think that they don't realize if this doesn't really attract men generally,
• 40:20
  I mean some men, but not generally. We should go and look
• 40:24
  at our competitors, because I believe the men enough people are supposedly the people
• 40:30
  are supposed to replace us. There are fetivers. Oh really, they're the
• 40:34
  They're the pultrip parallel universe evil twins. Yes, okay, all right,
• 40:39
  or we're the evil twin. They're the good twin according to this. You
• 40:44
  want you want to look them up? Are they on here? Or yeah?
• 40:46
  Yeah, I sent you a link to the podcast. It's in your
• 40:49
  DMS. Slid into your damns with did you just did you just send it?
• 40:53
  No, it's a little bit late. It's probably a few days ago.
• 40:58
  I could resend it, but I gotta scroll back. Bit scroll the
• 41:00
  buds, ye, scrolling, scrolling. Oh we are man enough. I
• 41:07
  see it is that we are man enough. Okay, yes, all right,
• 41:09
  I got it right here? You all right? And let me share
• 41:13
  this. Oh it's a YouTube channel too, Yeah, it's a YouTube channel.
• 41:17
  Look at how clean cut they are. Oh my god, look at
• 41:21
  how attractive. Oh you know what I think I've looked at I think I've
• 41:24
  looked at this before. They're straight up like intersectional feminist, uh content,
• 41:31
  It's like straight up intersectional because I remember like this, you know, the
• 41:37
  black guy constantly pulling like his race card on this guy because you know that's
• 41:40
  healthy, that's not defsive. I'm just and the woman pulling her card on
• 41:46
  both of them. Yeah, really really nice what I want to see,
• 41:50
  right, Yeah, that's exactly what I want to see playing games essentially a
• 41:54
  conversation but just playing just playing like identity Blackjack again to each other. That's
• 42:01
  definitely, I mean, that's what it is though, Like it's just you
• 42:07
  know, they're they're they're smiling and laughing, but they probably hate each other.
• 42:15
  Do you want I don't, I don't. We could you know what
• 42:16
  you want to go through the videos? Don't see what the titles I have.
• 42:20
  No, No, let's let's just leave that. Let's leave it for
• 42:22
  another day. We could we could do that another day. We could look
• 42:24
  at it. Yeah, day. I'm Matthew Hussey on nice Guys finishing last
• 42:30
  and who should pay on the first date? While really tackling the hard hitting,
• 42:34
  deep issues that men are really concerned with today, right right on the
• 42:37
  cutting edge of relationships. Who's paying for the dates? This is okay?
• 42:45
  I'm just oh my god, how many you have to have a really high
• 42:47
  IQ to appreciate that we are man enough channel like at least at least one
• 42:52
  hundred and forty IQ. You gotta pay, you gotta pass the mensis.
• 42:55
  If you want to get what they're coming from, you got to pick up
• 42:58
  what they're putting down. You gotta like just really, you know, crush
• 43:01
  it. I'm sorry, No, It's it's fine, it's it's it's a
• 43:07
  little aggravating. But I'm dying on the inside outs and I'm dying on the
• 43:10
  inside. That's why my voice is going her way dead. My soul is
• 43:15
  like slipping away, slipping right out of my asshole. Okay, or is
• 43:21
  that just the fart? I don't know, you know what, Let's get
• 43:27
  I feel like, where should I go. Let's get to the scale of
• 43:30
  online misogyny. The growth of online male supremacy. This one Section one.
• 43:37
  All right, here we go. All right, I'm gonna I'm gonna read
• 43:38
  it, folks, I'm gonna give your voice arrest. Section one, Growth
• 43:43
  of online male supremacy. This comprehensive analysis delves delves into the concerning influence of
• 43:50
  the Manisphere across different online platforms, focusing on YouTube in cells, Dot I
• 43:54
  s and get Her get Her again. No, okay, I need to
• 44:01
  a swish. It's just it's it's just a Twitter competitor that came out like
• 44:07
  a long time ago, like twenty seventeen or twenty eighteen. Well, because
• 44:13
  they don't have enough. No, I think it's because Getter probably has like
• 44:19
  a different concentration of people that better fits. Like if they knew Minds dot
• 44:23
  Com existed, they probably have Minds on the list, you know. But
• 44:28
  Getter was when Getter came into pruition, I think Twitter was still owned by
• 44:31
  Jack Dorsey, but Twitter was basically paused, like no one with any dissenting
• 44:38
  views could be on Twitter until Elon Musk bought it, and even then some
• 44:43
  people can make the argument that they're still not quite you know, enough voices
• 44:46
  on there. But Getter was competition, and then Gab came and then Trump
• 44:52
  made truth social. I'm not sure if it was in that order. It
• 44:54
  was something like that or no, Gab was first, then Getter than Truth.
• 44:59
  But now that Twitter is sort of like back in swing, all those
• 45:02
  other sites are losing. I think they're like less popular than they were.
• 45:07
  Maybe maybe Gav is still thinking. I don't know, I've been on there
• 45:10
  in a long, long term. All right, well, thank you for
• 45:14
  the for the history of just saying get Her is just another Twitter, that's
• 45:17
  all it is. The examination of YouTube reveals a lucrative trend where influencers profit
• 45:22
  from misogynistic content, flowing a strategic formula that includes I'm going to start a
• 45:29
  new challenge and it's just called get back in the kitchen. That's gonna be
• 45:31
  my new channel to disseminate anti feminist ideologies TikTok content. So I'm assuming they're
• 45:37
  talking about all of the rabbid misentry and TikTok. Oh my god, leveraging
• 45:44
  TikTok content the meals like one one recent video that I saw TikTok video this
• 45:51
  is This is one that's been doing the rounds. This woman invited a man
• 45:53
  over basically told him that he's not getting any sacks. When he didn't pursue
• 45:58
  her for sex, she got upset and called them gay. Is that is
• 46:01
  that the misogynist? Like is people responding to that to call her a freaking
• 46:07
  child? Misogynistic? All right? The Male Supremacy Scale case study on YouTube
• 46:12
  influencers demonstrates the scale's effectiveness and asserting and assessing and targeting diversion strategies. This
• 46:21
  exploration extends to off mainstream platforms like INCEL, dot i S and Getter,
• 46:25
  uncovering heightened lonelinesses during holidays and insell form and forums, and the prevalence of
• 46:30
  far right ideologies intertwined with menace your concepts on Getter. Overall, the research
• 46:36
  underscores the urgent need to address the propagation of misogynistic narratives and extremist viewpoints within
• 46:42
  the manisphere, emphasizing the importance of targeted interventions and understanding the dynamics across various
• 46:47
  platforms oh, good lord. Ideological problems with this. Yeah, this is
• 46:55
  a bunch of gobbledegook. M hm, this is the this is the attempt.
• 47:00
  Well, this is this is this is lazy ideologue speak forgive us money,
• 47:05
  but we're going to do nothing. I like how they're like talk Okay,
• 47:07
  they talk about uh insuls Is and Getter uncovering heightened loneliness during holidays and
• 47:15
  insol forums and the prevalence of far right ideologies intertwined with manisphere concepts on Getter.
• 47:22
  So is there is there nothing wrong? Is there? Like a problem
• 47:24
  with heightened loneliness during holidays causes men to be up in pain and then they
• 47:31
  go and they say, well, why do people not care about my pain?
• 47:37
  And then people are like, well, because you're a man, and
• 47:38
  then that now they're going down the rabbit hole of red. Men might have
• 47:45
  ish. So if people are telling them, well, fuck you, you're
• 47:46
  a man, isn't that the problem? Like not the Well I guess,
• 47:52
  I guess I'm gonna go where I'm going to get some understanding or sympathy or
• 47:58
  compassion, no or just yeah, because like I said at the beginning,
• 48:01
  before we even see this, when we were just in the back room.
• 48:06
  These people, these are is an ideologically possessed group that wants men to that
• 48:12
  wants men to continue to choose the box with nothing in it, no positive
• 48:16
  identity, nothing but shame and blame for the for the problems of society.
• 48:22
  The only identity these people have for men is the identity of garbage can.
• 48:28
  For all of the problems and flaws identified by in society, you can be
• 48:34
  a garbage can. That's that's what they're offering. And the fact is that
• 48:38
  they've promoted this so much that women are now turning away from relationships or men
• 48:44
  because they think that they're a poor choice. And the loneliness is on the
• 48:49
  increase, and men feel more and more alienated from society, from women,
• 48:52
  from their own families, and all of that is increasing because of these narratives.
• 48:57
  These are the people who want to push these narratives, but they don't
• 49:00
  have to deal with the consequences, and they're doing so in a landscape that
• 49:04
  they control less and less of. And that's what's it, all right.
• 49:08
  The Male Supremacy Scale, let me just go up here. The Male Supremacy
• 49:15
  Scale a YouTube case study together with a polarization and Extremist Extremism Research and Innovation
• 49:21
  Lab per Peril, peril we need. It sounds like a woman tied to
• 49:28
  the train tracks, like you know, yeah, do you remember the intro
• 49:31
  to Uh Dudley do Right the cartoon show where Dudley do Right's writing on the
• 49:37
  back of he's a mounty on the back of the He's like writing backwards.
• 49:40
  And the villain. I don't even remember the villain's name. It was just
• 49:44
  like a guy in a top hat with a flash No, that was from
• 49:46
  Wacky Races, unless it's the same guy, but he he's like the villain.
• 49:52
  He ties the girl to the train tracks. That's what I when I
• 49:54
  see the word peril, that's what I think of. I think of a
• 49:57
  woman on the train tracks. You guys, progressive guys, Yeah, really
• 50:00
  really American University, we conducted a case study to investigate the viability of executing
• 50:07
  effects. It was Dick Dastardly. I think it was Dick Dastardly, that
• 50:09
  was his name. I aimed at a range of male supremacist YouTube influencers who
• 50:15
  are prominent within the manisphere, the male supremacy scale. Okay, we're here's
• 50:19
  the money shot. Let's do it? Developed by Pasha Dashguard, the director
• 50:23
  of research at Peril. Okay, how do I take this seriously? These
• 50:32
  are the people with the finger on the nuke by the way, guys,
• 50:35
  that's that's yeah, seriously, they are clowns dressed in rainbow rigs with wigs
• 50:40
  with honky noses on the damn nuke button. Uh if naughty. If you're
• 50:46
  watching this, please make that the thumbnail. I want like a clown like
• 50:52
  at the behind the the like in some kind of like you know, what
• 50:57
  do you call it? Panic room with like buttons? Yeah, nuclear button?
• 51:00
  Yeah, with like a map of the world. Understand, define and
• 51:05
  quantify the phenomenon of contemporary male supremacy, specifically in the context of online platforms,
• 51:12
  employing a mixed methods research design Dashguard blah blah blah, who cares.
• 51:15
  The Male Supremacy Scale is a fifteen item scale to measure male supremacy, broken
• 51:21
  into three subscales. Anti feminism because feminism is equi of course, dishonesty and
• 51:29
  relationships and women like alphas. Wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait
• 51:32
  wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait. So anti feminism, which is
• 51:37
  not unique to men and feminism is essentially an unproven cult, and if you
• 51:45
  just don't subscribe to it, that's that's not just one of the subscales.
• 51:47
  That's like the first one. Then female dishonesty in relationships like that doesn't happen,
• 51:53
  like women never lie, and then women like alphas, like that's not
• 51:59
  true, like women don't have preferences, Like these are just anti reality categories.
• 52:06
  It's okay, I'm sorry, go ahead, do the reversal. Let
• 52:07
  me do the reversal. Okay, let's imagine we had the fetiverse targeting women
• 52:16
  with this shit. The Female Supremacy Scale is a fifteen item scale to measure
• 52:22
  female supremacy, broken into three sub scales patriarchy theory, male dishonesty, and
• 52:30
  relationships, and men like thin women, young women, yeah, young women,
• 52:36
  young thin women like literally this is oh no, how dare yeah?
• 52:39
  Yeah, like this is a joke. The idea that people are just pointing
• 52:44
  out that women have preferences is somehow misogyny. What about all this rhetoric like
• 52:51
  you could go on TikTok and just you can't swing a cat without finding some
• 52:55
  woman who's like, uh, I am the table. What do you bring
• 52:59
  to the yeah, well you got to bring you know, like, what
• 53:01
  do you think that I choose the bear? Yeah? Exactly, Oh god.
• 53:08
  Anti feminism explores how the participant feels about feminism and feminists in general,
• 53:15
  and more specific more specifically, the role feminism has in society. Well,
• 53:21
  I guess we're we're in the crosshairs here, Yeah, for sure. Honesty
• 53:23
  in relationships highlights the view that women are not able to be faithful in relationship
• 53:29
  and are by nature dishonest. No, no, but no, it means
• 53:34
  sometimes they are. And also it means that our society supports and incentivizes dishonestly.
• 53:40
  Right yeah, right, Here they're saying that the recognition that women are
• 53:45
  dishonest is somehow terrorism like that, you know, and that they're that's what
• 53:50
  they're groping for and that's why they have all this peril and terror and violent
• 53:54
  extremism. They're basically saying, well, if you think women can cheat,
• 53:59
  you cheat, lie, eat hot chip you know like that, that then
• 54:05
  you are a terrorist. So if you have the belief that there's anything negative,
• 54:09
  like, it's not even just that, okay, it is literally women
• 54:15
  are capable of doing bad things. Yeah, Paul, Believing that and recognizing
• 54:22
  that terrorism. That's what this is what's happening in this document. But women
• 54:30
  like alphas is based on hypergamy and the values that men of the manisphere project
• 54:35
  onto women and determinants of the participant feels that women are only interested in high
• 54:39
  status masculine men. I mean, if they're not, then let's wait.
• 54:46
  Let's see where the women are that are not proving this, Like I don't
• 54:52
  it's not even like it's hilarious, like none of them itself. It's so
• 54:55
  stupid. This is so stupid, Like look at none of this is prescript
• 55:00
  even it's just the manisphere literally men saying this is how it is. That's
• 55:05
  mostly what it is. Like even when they say here's how you should act,
• 55:08
  the most men are not going to be able to follow that advice through,
• 55:13
  right, So like when the I don't know, like say some of
• 55:16
  these like red Peel guys say you know, you should sleep with as many
• 55:19
  women as you can. I mean you could say that's bad advice, but
• 55:23
  most men, even if they were to follow the advice, would likely not
• 55:28
  be successful because of women, because women ultimately yet to say yes or no.
• 55:34
  So like when men know this is what women like are and they're telling
• 55:37
  you like when you when they rate themselves, attend, when they say what
• 55:42
  they want out of a man like that, they're just you don't even need
• 55:45
  a Manisphere guy to tell you this. You can just look on the internet
• 55:49
  at what women are saying. Yeah, you just look at what women are
• 55:52
  telling you. You know, really astounding is that this is you look at
• 55:57
  the sea of TikTok saying. Women's saying these things. They want masculine men,
• 56:01
  they want high status men. They want men they are the table.
• 56:05
  Therefore men have to bring things to the table, right. They want to
• 56:10
  be able to cheat, and men should just deal with it. You know,
• 56:14
  have children that aren't the mans, and the man just needs to deal
• 56:19
  with it. All of this. You can see TikTok presenting all of this
• 56:22
  content and they're saying that someone turning around and saying, hey, look at
• 56:28
  that is terrorism. Look at all the content that women are pretting out saying
• 56:34
  these things. That's terrorism. Recognizing what women are doing is terrorism. Application
• 56:42
  of the male supremacy scale. The manifestation of male supremacy online combines principles derived
• 56:47
  from a broad network of male supremacists. What the manifest what a male supremacists
• 56:54
  website, websites, blogs, forums, and communities commonly referred to as a
• 56:59
  manisphere. Are you suggesting that this is like an organized effort. Yeah,
• 57:05
  we're all working together this okay, So you are blaming the manisphere for being
• 57:10
  you a government taxpayer funded GROUPNGA NGO are pointing to the Manisphere and saying they're
• 57:21
  organized, are you? Oh? Currently, online platforms face a binary choice
• 57:28
  when dealing with content that offers potential pathways to online radicalization. Either shut down
• 57:34
  the offending account or ignore it. Diverting hate offers a third option to encourage
• 57:38
  lasting changes through platform infrastructure by instead exposing at risk users to alternative, positive
• 57:45
  content, positive by their determination. So, in other words, we're not
• 57:51
  going to focus on the loneliness, we're not going to focus on recognizing what
• 57:53
  women are. Actually we just we just want to continue to push you know,
• 57:59
  men, you get the empty box full of blame and shame. Yeah,
• 58:01
  it's basically we're going to maintain the status quo of who gives a shit
• 58:05
  about men? They don't have problems, move on, protect women, give
• 58:08
  money to women, keep women single so that they can do to vote for
• 58:12
  us that's it, like like like there cannot be a healthy, productive relationship
• 58:21
  and cooperative relationship between men and women. It just can't happen because then the
• 58:24
  NGOs they lose their money, Like they're doing this to validate themselves, and
• 58:30
  they're losing because they wouldn't need to do this otherwise they know this is having
• 58:35
  effect in order to test this methodology. We worked along blah blah blah.
• 58:38
  This is they're not testing this methodology. They're just they're creating a scale and
• 58:44
  then rating people on the It's the most absurd. This is the science.
• 58:50
  Can I read the next part? I want to look at this. Okay,
• 58:52
  the scale, I'm just going to jump to this part. Yeah,
• 58:53
  yeah, that part. The scale has fifteen items across the three sub scales.
• 58:59
  Anti feminine Number one. Feminism is about hating men, Yes it is.
• 59:02
  Number two, modern society prioritizes women over men, Yes it does.
• 59:07
  Feminists are number three. Feminists are unattractive, not always, but I mean
• 59:12
  sometimes that's yeah, that's not relevant. Is that like, is that like
• 59:15
  the more extreme? Because are you like scaling this because these are subscales,
• 59:21
  So if feminists are unattractive, more severe than feminism is about hating men in
• 59:25
  your mind, because sounds like you're taking that awfully personal. I mean,
• 59:31
  I mean number four, women use feminism to gain an unfair advantage over men.
• 59:36
  Yes they do. Actually they don't even really have to. Women can
• 59:39
  just like appeal to men without feminism to gain unfair advantage. But feminism is
• 59:45
  helpful to feminism helpful on an institutional level. Yeah, on an institutional level.
• 59:50
  Of course. What they would say is that it's not unfair advantage because
• 59:52
  it's correcting the inequalities that we've never really proven exist. Yes, not in
• 59:59
  uh, without corresponding responsibilities, so of a balance of rights and responsibilities versus
• 1:00:06
  just disenfranchisement for no reason. And feminists are seeking to control you are seeking
• 1:00:12
  to control men in this document. Well, I'm not doing this thing that
• 1:00:20
  I am currently doing. No, you are, indeed, so, yeah,
• 1:00:22
  feminists, I mean it is it's obvious. Then. The second category,
• 1:00:28
  the second scale is female dishonesty in relationships. Six. If a man
• 1:00:31
  commits to a woman in a romantic relationship, she gets the upper hand.
• 1:00:37
  Uh, that happens. I mean just yeah, just like pointing that out
• 1:00:40
  is not it's not a dig on women. It's just a fact. Number
• 1:00:45
  seven in a relation, Well, like people will if if he if he
• 1:00:49
  engages in domestic violence against her, they will, you know, she'll have
• 1:00:52
  more social support, more people intervening, more institutional support than the reverse.
• 1:00:58
  I mean, I want to say that domestic violence is on the upper hand,
• 1:01:01
  but there is a certain amount of concern the back of the hand.
• 1:01:06
  Yeah, I'm just kiddous. Concern that's given to women and not to men.
• 1:01:10
  And for example, just using one example, a man who is battered
• 1:01:15
  by a woman is more likely to go to jail than the woman who's battering
• 1:01:19
  him. And we have statistics to prove this. Like, what's really annoying
• 1:01:22
  is we got statistics to back up all of the assertions in opposition to what
• 1:01:25
  they're saying, and they just ignore it because it's not convenient to their power
• 1:01:30
  narrative. All right, let's keep this. Yeah, number seven in a
• 1:01:35
  relationship, women are less trustworthy than men. You know, these are like
• 1:01:39
  I mean maybe there women are more empowered to be less trustworthy. Yeah.
• 1:01:45
  Yeah, we're going to cape for them constantly, right exactly, And I
• 1:01:51
  mean among them are women, like what is how many videos are there of
• 1:01:54
  women telling other women how they could manipulate their men in their life and like
• 1:02:00
  get over on them, and that they had to see the relationship as as
• 1:02:04
  combative and competitive and about a power struggle. I mean, I've been sex
• 1:02:08
  to get pregnant men. Yeah, I've been in relationships where the women I
• 1:02:14
  was dating thought that relationships were a power struggle the whole time, and that
• 1:02:17
  they always had to feel like they had the upper hand, like that they
• 1:02:22
  were less emotionally invested than I was. And I didn't get it at the
• 1:02:25
  time. I thought it was strange, but when I look back, it
• 1:02:29
  was like, oh, obviously they were. They wanted to make sure that
• 1:02:31
  they always cared a little bit less than me because they didn't want to be
• 1:02:35
  heard. So like, what is what is that? It's not a problem
• 1:02:39
  with trust, you know? And maybe it's because not only are women less
• 1:02:44
  trustworthy themselves, but they're also less trusting they have less faith in men,
• 1:02:49
  So it makes them want to be more deceitful because they want to maintain a
• 1:02:53
  kind of like a degree of control over their own emotions, so they use
• 1:02:59
  it on men. And that happens because women are taught to see men as
• 1:03:04
  like something that they want to be close to, but also, yes,
• 1:03:07
  at any moment, their enemy. So like, why wouldn't it create like
• 1:03:12
  some serious cognitive dissonance in women and a desire for them to be combative.
• 1:03:16
  Men in romantic relationships need to be constantly on guard for cheating. Well,
• 1:03:21
  that's that's just seven reiterated in a different way. Women have a biological drive
• 1:03:25
  to cheat on their partners. Again, this is this is manipulative. Yeah,
• 1:03:30
  you're just reiterating it again, But you're also being a bit disingenuous.
• 1:03:34
  Women are hypergamus is all this really means. And that's generally true, and
• 1:03:40
  it doesn't have to be, but it is generally true. Number ten,
• 1:03:44
  you can't trust women to be faithful in relationships. You're just repeating yourself,
• 1:03:47
  Like that's like seven, eight, nine, and ten are all the same.
• 1:03:52
  Stupid, You're just creating categories because you got to get that check.
• 1:03:57
  Yet, are we gonna look at these the anti men narratives? How about
• 1:04:01
  men are more likely to rape, which is not true as far as I
• 1:04:05
  can tell. I'm slightly more maybe depending on the instrument you look at,
• 1:04:13
  But there's no reason to believe that rape is gendered. And yet we gender
• 1:04:16
  it. Men are more likely to abuse. There's absolutely no reason to believe
• 1:04:20
  that. Yet we do that too, We gender it. We put that
• 1:04:23
  on men. Men want to oppress their partners. They want to they want
• 1:04:28
  to cheat their partners somehow. They want to get more out of the relationship
• 1:04:31
  than the women give. That's constant, and it's everywhere, this idea that
• 1:04:34
  the men are constantly getting something from women when they're in romantic relationships with them.
• 1:04:40
  That's like a mainstream attitude. Is it going to be on this chart?
• 1:04:44
  No? And here's the other thing, Like, you can make the
• 1:04:46
  biological argument for women cheating, and you can make the biological argument for men
• 1:04:50
  cheating. But when it comes down to it, what matters is that people
• 1:04:57
  respect each other and care about each other in a relationship. Yeah, okay,
• 1:05:02
  I mean I've argued with guys who are like, oh, what,
• 1:05:05
  men should be able to cheat? I'm like, well, but well,
• 1:05:09
  well then you just made a biological argument for why women should be able to
• 1:05:13
  cheat. Because if you are saying that men should be able to cheat because
• 1:05:16
  men need variety, well then why shouldn't women be able to cheat because women
• 1:05:20
  want the best sperm? How about we all treat each other with respect.
• 1:05:26
  So, but you could have you could have seven, eight, nine,
• 1:05:28
  and ten and have it all relate to a feminist discourse. In a relationship,
• 1:05:32
  men are less trustworthy than women. Women in romantic relationships need to be
• 1:05:38
  constantly on guard for cheating. Men have a biological drive to cheat on their
• 1:05:42
  partners. You can't trust men to be faithful in relationships. You hear this
• 1:05:46
  constantly. Yep, if a man, if a woman commits to a man
• 1:05:53
  in a romantic relationship, he gets the upper hand. There's a huge amount
• 1:05:57
  of feminist discourse around that that men get. What is it a sex doll,
• 1:06:03
  a sandwich maker, a washing machine, and somebody who's gonna wait on
• 1:06:09
  him hand and first and foot? And what does she get? Nothing like?
• 1:06:13
  That's a constant refrain. Yep. But no, we're not gonna look
• 1:06:16
  at that. We're not gonna look at that. Why is that just a
• 1:06:21
  free action? All right? All right? Next one, next second?
• 1:06:26
  Women like Alpha's eleven women are biologically driven to seek out the highest status man
• 1:06:30
  possible. Again, this sounds like there is a relationship between that and the
• 1:06:33
  previous category. But I get it. You gotta like, you gotta come
• 1:06:36
  up with fifteen things. You know, It's sort of like when you were
• 1:06:40
  in high school and you got an assignment to do an essay and they were
• 1:06:44
  like, there has to be six hundred words, and so you just end
• 1:06:45
  up like putting in a bunch of filler words, so you meet the minimum,
• 1:06:49
  but you just you don't say a lot. That's what it seems like.
• 1:06:53
  This is so lame. By the way, guys, if you're watching
• 1:06:56
  this and you're wondering why it's in a vertical format, there is also a
• 1:07:01
  normal format. Just go to the channel. They're both going at the same
• 1:07:04
  time. I saw a couple of people in the comments saying, why does
• 1:07:08
  it look like that you're probably looking at the vertical format. But the vertical
• 1:07:12
  format is good for us because we do get people that have never seen our
• 1:07:15
  channel before that come across it because you know, people are doom scrolling on
• 1:07:19
  their phone and when you're done scrolling through YouTube videos, it'll just pop up
• 1:07:24
  and maybe you'll stick around. So yeah, if you're watching on the vertical
• 1:07:28
  and you're wondering why it's not like horizontal, just click on the channel.
• 1:07:30
  You'll see the live stream of the horizontal as well. You just go there,
• 1:07:33
  okay, And I'm actually considering just going directly to the vertical guys,
• 1:07:39
  just just to push everybody towards one stream. That could probably help with our
• 1:07:44
  numbers as well, because the more people who are watching one stream, the
• 1:07:46
  more likely it's to be boosted even more. So, yeah, that's that's
• 1:07:50
  something to consider, guys. So I know you'll have I all you'll have
• 1:07:55
  thoughts on that, but you can always do the You can always watch the
• 1:07:59
  vertical on X so although I guess that is the vertical on X. Oh,
• 1:08:03
  I don't horizontal on X. Oh. Yeah, you can watch the
• 1:08:06
  horizontal on X. But the thing is, well, never mine. Okay,
• 1:08:12
  So women like alphas number twelve. Women cannot help being attracted to rich
• 1:08:15
  men. Number thirteen. Women cannot help but be attracted to those who are
• 1:08:19
  higher status than they are. Again, these are stupid. Nobody says cannot
• 1:08:24
  help. Maybe some men will say that, but I think as a general
• 1:08:28
  rule, women are always looking for the best bang for their book, no
• 1:08:31
  pun intended, So that may mean that they will do that. I mean,
• 1:08:34
  how else could you explain somebody like Harvey Weinstein? Why, like,
• 1:08:40
  why are we lying to ourselves about this. We shouldn't be lying to ourselves.
• 1:08:43
  We should be looking at reality. Number fourteen, women are not attracted
• 1:08:46
  to men who have low social status. Yeah, those are those are the
• 1:08:49
  not people category. And we've we've also talked about that too. Like literally,
• 1:08:55
  when women complain about men, they complain, especially when they complain about
• 1:08:59
  the men that they've done, They complain about men who are equal or higher
• 1:09:01
  status than themselves, which means that the men that do not meet that centered
• 1:09:06
  do not exist. Those are not people. That is most men. So
• 1:09:11
  yes, that is exactly right, that is how it is. Number fifteen,
• 1:09:15
  women are attracted to high status men. You're just saying it again.
• 1:09:16
  This is so stupid, This is just redundant. Well, they're just I
• 1:09:21
  think they're just padding it out. Yeah, it's like I said, they're
• 1:09:25
  trying to complete the essay. They're just trying to get the assignment done.
• 1:09:29
  Numbered anti feminism number two though, I mean, statistically, people do prefer
• 1:09:33
  women, They do prefer to provide and protect for women, and they prefer
• 1:09:38
  to deliver instrumental harm on men versus women. So this is it. Yeah,
• 1:09:42
  I mean like we're literally if you believe this is true and you're a
• 1:09:46
  feminist and you care about women getting their way, we're literally giving you good
• 1:09:50
  news. It's solved. You know, Like there's a meme of a genie
• 1:09:56
  and there's a woman and the genie is saying, you know, what,
• 1:10:00
  what do you wish for? In the woman's like I'm wishing, I wish
• 1:10:01
  for equal rights, and he's like your wish is granted, and she's like
• 1:10:04
  nothing's changed, because yeah, yeah. So the summary of accounts in our
• 1:10:13
  study, we aim to capture a diverse spectrum of accounts within the menisphere,
• 1:10:16
  including representatives from men going their own way, pick up artists, men's rights
• 1:10:21
  activists, men's rights movement, red pill, and track con communities. To
• 1:10:25
  ensure a well rounded representation, we've deliberately and blah blah blah. So the
• 1:10:30
  thing is that they've chosen these these communities or these YouTube but I don't think
• 1:10:34
  they have any actual identified men's rights activists or men's rights movement. Well let's
• 1:10:41
  let's find out, because yeah, let's go to the channels. Go to
• 1:10:44
  the channels. So first of all, there what is a trad there's no
• 1:10:46
  trad con community. I don't know what that means. But anyway, Okay,
• 1:10:49
  so we're gonna jump down here. Oh look at that. A blow
• 1:10:54
  table shows the increase of subscribers from November twenty twenty third to March twenty twenty
• 1:10:58
  four. Counts highlighted in red were demonetized by YouTube, which I guess is
• 1:11:02
  their way of saying they're so evil that YouTube couldn't support them, so they
• 1:11:08
  were demonetized, all right. Number one Sandman definitely Micktow guy. Uh.
• 1:11:15
  He basically grew because he said I'm gonna make a pledge to make a video
• 1:11:19
  once a day, every day, and I think that he's for the most
• 1:11:21
  part, stayed on that. I haven't watched Sandman in a long time because,
• 1:11:26
  surprise, surprise. When you make one video every single day and the
• 1:11:29
  only thing you're talking about is women in Migtow, you start hearing the same
• 1:11:32
  thing over and over, so you're just like, yeah, I got it,
• 1:11:35
  I got it. So Sandman male supremacy Scale metric ninety three, so
• 1:11:43
  he's almost got the Is that the high score? Yeah for male supremacy?
• 1:11:46
  Okay, Okay. Of the activists though, no, I don't know one.
• 1:11:54
  Well, I don't know all these channels, the real mtr I don't
• 1:11:57
  know what that is. Legion of me. Then, I don't know what
• 1:12:00
  that is. The rational mail, that's Rollo what yeah, Rollo you know
• 1:12:05
  again, Russian Fit. They're they're just red Field guys. Rich Cooper Channels.
• 1:12:10
  I don't know who that is. Tutorials and well, I would say
• 1:12:14
  creator who engages the reaction videos to viral clips. Oh does he have description?
• 1:12:17
  Oh he has descriptions here? Okay, reaction videos. Yeah, that's
• 1:12:24
  real mediocre tutorials and reviews. Is a black male contents a men a white
• 1:12:29
  region of around the agent? Why are you telling us the race? Why
• 1:12:32
  does that matter? I know it matters to them because they that's all they
• 1:12:36
  see videos, you know, produced by others. Notably, his discussions revolve
• 1:12:43
  around the concept of passport bros. Okay, that's not Rollo Tamasi. Nope,
• 1:12:48
  he's red pill, fresh and fit. Like they just do don't they
• 1:12:53
  just do reaction Well, No, they podcast. They bring a bunch of
• 1:12:56
  women on, they dress them down. You know that there's a cars Rich
• 1:13:00
  Cooper, Oh, I remember entrepreneurs and cars. Okay, A long time.
• 1:13:08
  I'm gonna drop this here now because I wanted I was thinking about the
• 1:13:11
  difference between pigmies and simps. Simps, the what they're shaming is this idea
• 1:13:17
  that you are giving without reciprocation, like giving resources, so things that you
• 1:13:25
  have produced, like you know, on a monetary level. So men are
• 1:13:30
  giving things that they have created two women with no reciprocation, whereas a pick
• 1:13:36
  me apparently is someone who just has any kind of sympathy for men at all.
• 1:13:41
  Do you see the difference, Like, I mean, I I apparently
• 1:13:44
  I can be a pick me without ever dropping like a couple of grand on
• 1:13:48
  men for just random reasons. Well just because I'm like, you know,
• 1:13:54
  maybe we shouldn't take their kids away. That makes me a pick me.
• 1:13:59
  Yeah. Order to be a simp, you have to actually either engage in
• 1:14:05
  justifying women's bad behavior and really egregious ways, like oh yeah, what doesn't
• 1:14:12
  matter that she raped a toddler, what was done to her? You know,
• 1:14:15
  what happened to her, or you have to actually be dropping large amounts
• 1:14:18
  of funds on them, whereas if you're pick me, all you have to
• 1:14:23
  do is be like, yeah, maybe I would choose the band not the
• 1:14:26
  bear, because the bear is an apex predator that probably will eat me slowly
• 1:14:30
  then you're a pick me like you Just the difference is astounding, think about
• 1:14:34
  it. Yeah, I know pick me girls. Look, the label of
• 1:14:39
  pick me is only applied to women by other women. Men don't do that
• 1:14:44
  unless they're male feminists or game. But like, it's only it's something that
• 1:14:47
  women use on other women who they feel betray the sisterhood. That's all it
• 1:14:54
  is. It's about shaming women back in line. Men don't do that.
• 1:14:58
  Actually, pick me girls men men generally are well what women would call pick
• 1:15:02
  me girls men generally like because these are simply women that don't shit on men,
• 1:15:08
  Like that's all it is. They don't have to be like I'm gonna
• 1:15:11
  throw myself uh you know, no, no, they don't have to throw
• 1:15:14
  themselves in front of a bullet for men, they just have to not attack
• 1:15:16
  them. And so like it's they're not they're not. Yeah, these things
• 1:15:21
  are not even close to parallel. It's almost like pick me is the absence
• 1:15:26
  of an activity, the absence of going out of your way to be shitty
• 1:15:29
  to men. Yeah, are as simple is the presence of excessive servile behavior.
• 1:15:34
  Well, it's essentially like it's destructive though, because simps they they're not
• 1:15:41
  just like destroying themselves when they needlessly give their resources, their time, their
• 1:15:46
  their you know, their virtue, signaling bullshit, vinglorious attitude towards women.
• 1:15:53
  But they also destroy those women because they don't have the ability to tell them
• 1:15:58
  what is true and right for the honest because it would be a criticism and
• 1:16:02
  instead of like hurting their feelings with mean man words, they'd rather just support
• 1:16:06
  them unequivocally. So when men say this is why women are choosing the bear,
• 1:16:12
  men, that's simping. That's what he's doing. He's not like necessarily
• 1:16:15
  like keeping for women, but he's attacking men, and he's saying, look,
• 1:16:20
  men, why aren't you more like me? I'm okay with the fact
• 1:16:25
  that women find me scarier than bears in the woods. But a pickny doesn't
• 1:16:30
  like a pick me girl is just a girl that doesn't hate men. And
• 1:16:33
  what and refuse is to not like join in on the fucking, you know,
• 1:16:38
  dog pile. When women start attacking men, they just won't be a
• 1:16:41
  part of it. So when you didn't say I choose them, you know,
• 1:16:45
  I choose the bear, they called you a pick me because you should
• 1:16:47
  have done what they want you to do. It's a tool used by women
• 1:16:51
  to control other women. It's not men have nothing to do with it.
• 1:16:55
  Nothing. It just seems like there's a higher bar for Yeah, It's like
• 1:17:00
  it's like you don't, yeah, for sure, don't participate in the hate.
• 1:17:03
  Where is the sympasta. There's more steps to it and more effort put
• 1:17:06
  in. Yeah, but the there was something I was going to say about
• 1:17:14
  about this pick me thing, you know, I can't remember, So let's
• 1:17:18
  well, I'll say I would say that Pearl. I would say that Pearl
• 1:17:24
  is closer to a men's rights activist because she does talk about the law and
• 1:17:29
  and and she knows the stats. I wouldn't. She's not on the on
• 1:17:34
  par with Janis FIMNGO or something. But and I think there's a reason why
• 1:17:40
  Pearl makes the list and like Karen doesn't, for example, because for us,
• 1:17:45
  because I know that we're tiny, but they probably know that we exist.
• 1:17:48
  I'm sure they know about us. But yeah, yeah, So but
• 1:17:53
  the thing is is that like Pearl's won weakness. And so I watched her
• 1:17:59
  to discussion with Lauren Chen, Rachel Wilson and that other woman and Tim Poole
• 1:18:04
  was on there and with the only flaw I would say with Pearl is that
• 1:18:08
  she's not as good at like articulating, you know, her arguments and being
• 1:18:14
  like really clear, because she's kind of normy in that regard. I mean,
• 1:18:18
  I think she gets better at it. But she does understand the problems,
• 1:18:23
  and she does describe essentially like not prescribe, but she describes, like
• 1:18:30
  why are men not getting married? Well, this is why men are not
• 1:18:31
  getting married. Here's the data undivorced. Here's the data on child custody,
• 1:18:34
  here's the data on false allegations. Here's the data on domestic violence. I
• 1:18:39
  know about the Duluth model. So she is using the talking points. She
• 1:18:43
  knows them. She got them from Rachel Wilson, she got them from Karen,
• 1:18:45
  she got them from Kevin Samuels, et cetera. So she's got a
• 1:18:51
  bit of a blend of things. But I think generally she's closer to an
• 1:18:56
  MRA than maybe everyone else on the list, including I don't know, a
• 1:19:01
  Rocko TV but like or Steph as Cole, but including Essay Aaron Aeron Claary
• 1:19:06
  knows his stuff too, and twenty one Studios. So I would say that
• 1:19:12
  if of all of them, she's the closest to it. That's all I'm
• 1:19:15
  saying. And it's funny too. A lot of this is another thing these
• 1:19:18
  people ever mentioned. A disproportionate number of manisphered guys are non white guys,
• 1:19:25
  like probably a and I mean highly disproportionate, But they will not address that
• 1:19:30
  because they love to play race politics. They love to play race politics when
• 1:19:35
  it's convenient, but when it isn't. In the fact that the majority of
• 1:19:40
  in cels are non white, the majority of men in the manisphere are non
• 1:19:43
  white, and they are dealing with these problems because they want a woman of
• 1:19:46
  their own race, because they want someone who shares in the culture, and
• 1:19:51
  they're generally attracted like is attracted to like, and they can't address it.
• 1:19:56
  So instead they have to like either make them look like outliers like stephis cole
• 1:20:00
  is a black man in his thirties, Helly from Detroit. They're trying to
• 1:20:03
  say, look, all black men aren't like this. Most of them just
• 1:20:06
  do as they're told, and they're just like you know, in gangs or
• 1:20:10
  whatever wherever we think this should be. And they're not like doing the worst
• 1:20:14
  thing, which is I guess hating on women online, and I think that
• 1:20:18
  it's not convenient for them, because that's why I always get really angry when
• 1:20:23
  people try to play the race card in this, because that is the least
• 1:20:27
  relevant part of this whole conversation, the least relevant, and yet they continue
• 1:20:31
  to bring it up because they're trying to paint a specific picture. They're trying
• 1:20:35
  to frame this a certain way, and it does not work. Because there
• 1:20:40
  are men latinos Asians, black, white, fucking Mexican, Indian, it
• 1:20:45
  doesn't matter, Okay, Like the Indian men's movement is really big in South
• 1:20:49
  Korea, there's a men's movement. This race shit does not work, but
• 1:20:54
  they can't help it because they have to paint it a certain way, and
• 1:20:57
  so this cannot stand. I will not accept it. I can't stand it,
• 1:21:02
  and so I won't even let them use it. I won't even use
• 1:21:05
  it as a defense, but I will point out that they will do everything
• 1:21:09
  in their power to avoid confronting the truth about the fact that most of the
• 1:21:14
  men who are suffering are not white, and so like, they can't do
• 1:21:18
  it. They can't do it because they have to make a certain frame where
• 1:21:21
  white men are on top. So if non white men are suffering and they
• 1:21:27
  can't blame white men for it. Then they just have to not talk about
• 1:21:30
  it. You mean proportionately, because yeah, proportionately, proportionally probably more white
• 1:21:36
  people, but there are more white men period for example. These no but
• 1:21:41
  but like literally in the in cell movement, there is a majority of non
• 1:21:45
  white men, like the majority of not disproportionate majority of the men in the
• 1:21:51
  in cell forums, according to people who are spoken to in the Inzell forums,
• 1:21:56
  are non white. But they cannot address that, so instead they just
• 1:22:00
  say that they're white. They don't they don't necessarily make the claim, but
• 1:22:03
  they just pretend like they don't have a race. They just call them in
• 1:22:06
  cells, and they hope nobody looks too closely because if they find out they're
• 1:22:10
  non white, it shatters their whole race construction they built, and they can't
• 1:22:15
  have that. It's it's it's all. It's never about the truth, it's
• 1:22:18
  always about the framing. Okay, So moving on, I find I'm very
• 1:22:25
  disappointed with their distinct lack of actual men's rights activists, and of course,
• 1:22:29
  of course it's probably because they don't know how to actually deal with our content,
• 1:22:32
  which yeah, I mean the twenty one studios is, like, I
• 1:22:36
  guess they have like sometimes they have him ras on, like I know,
• 1:22:41
  I know they had Janis on once and they asked Paul but he kind of
• 1:22:44
  like he said, fuck you guys, I'm not going in that. Like
• 1:22:48
  do you remember, I don't I remember, ye, I don't know if
• 1:22:50
  they had Janis on, but they were on like she was a she was
• 1:22:55
  a she was a speaker on a show. Oh yeah, yeah, I
• 1:23:00
  remember that. It was up I think it was. I think it was
• 1:23:02
  Piers Morgan actually, and and I think it was the Studio twenty one guy.
• 1:23:08
  Actually, what I what I remember is that he he did his best,
• 1:23:13
  but Janis was just like, oh, Anthony Johnson is Anthony Johnson's pretty
• 1:23:18
  mid I'm sorry he is. He's on the on the discussions. Oh Janis
• 1:23:23
  knows the ship though, Yeah, yes she does. She's like a terminator
• 1:23:27
  when it comes to the Yeah. Yeah, fully gets fat out of the
• 1:23:30
  fire. That's right from what I from what I remember, well, yeah,
• 1:23:31
  because all he has is trolling Like he doesn't I'm saying, he's just
• 1:23:35
  like, oh, I'm gonna trigger the I'm gonna trigger the libs. Watch
• 1:23:38
  this and it's like it's so stupid. It's like, bring the fucking facts,
• 1:23:43
  like Janis has them. Why I feel like, I'm sorry. I'm
• 1:23:45
  not a fan of Anthony Johnson. I think he's a phony. But I
• 1:23:49
  want to get back to this because you know, this is fifty freaking pages.
• 1:23:55
  Yeah, and I don't know, are you doing the whole thing?
• 1:23:58
  I don't know, Like, let me see there, let me go back
• 1:24:00
  to the contents and see what they covered. Stop simping passport pros. I'm
• 1:24:06
  completely disinterested in passport pros. Who cares? Yeah, who cares? The
• 1:24:11
  disparagement of the modern the rise of men have the right to do whatever the
• 1:24:15
  fuck they want with their money. So I don't know why you have a
• 1:24:17
  problem with this hitting the wall in the pervasive sexualization of younger and underage women,
• 1:24:21
  Well, that's a real that's poisoning the well. Uh, I think
• 1:24:26
  we can look at the evolving trends and because the rest of this, the
• 1:24:30
  rest of this is just god damn navel gazing. Yeah, really impacted the
• 1:24:34
  normalization of very violent misogyny. Well, I actually, honestly, the section
• 1:24:40
  two, I'm sort of interested in the acrobatics, all right. I know.
• 1:24:45
  I know it's gonna be bullshit. Do we see any I'm gonna look
• 1:24:48
  for a graph. Oh look, ven diagram. That's it. Guys,
• 1:24:55
  we're done. Go home. We've lost. They got data looks like a
• 1:24:59
  ven diagram. Uh oh, it looks like we're in trouble. Oh no,
• 1:25:03
  they win. Oh my god. Okay, I got some super childs.
• 1:25:10
  I got some super childs. I want to read them really quick before
• 1:25:12
  they disappear. So five dollars from let me see here, Hold on a
• 1:25:17
  second, I put it on the screen. We put the bass, your
• 1:25:23
  feet on there. Okay, five dollars from Zapierre. So it's just an
• 1:25:29
  anonymous says, if the genie granted her equal rights, she would lose genitalia
• 1:25:32
  tissue. Also, you're welcome for the vertical stream tip. Thank you appreciate
• 1:25:36
  it. Then we got one from Richard Pierre for five bucks, and he
• 1:25:40
  says, these women who promote treating men badly repeatedly flick the bean, the
• 1:25:45
  idea of humiliating men. Possibly, And let me just double check to make
• 1:25:49
  sure there are any rumble rants. Sometimes those go through and I miss them.
• 1:25:55
  No they're not. There are lots of emojis. So keep the emojis
• 1:25:59
  coming, fam and I think that's it. Okay, So let's I'm looking
• 1:26:04
  at three evolving trends. Let's look at stop simping? Where is that?
• 1:26:13
  Wait? Wait? Where are we looking? You have to click, just
• 1:26:16
  have to click the go to the contents and click. An overview of three
• 1:26:20
  evolving trends will take you right there. Oh, stop simping? Yeah.
• 1:26:25
  Misogynistic influencers humiliate women to discourage sympathy. Okay, First of all, simping
• 1:26:30
  isn't humiliating women, right, it's men humiliated women most affected? Okay,
• 1:26:38
  stop okay. A disconcerting trend has surfaced within the manosphere on YouTube, characterized
• 1:26:43
  by a series of videos where men proudly proclaimed to stop simping through public humiliation
• 1:26:47
  of women. Straight How not sympathizing with, showing too much attention for,
• 1:26:54
  or otherwise being submissive to women can lead to actual harassment and bullying of women
• 1:27:00
  while providing them a false sense of power. But wouldn't giving women too much
• 1:27:06
  attention also be actual harassment and bullying? Like I thought they'd like what?
• 1:27:14
  Men are not supposed to clarify what they're saying in that sentence. I'm not
• 1:27:17
  even gonna try. Okay. The phenomenon is intricately rinked the link to the
• 1:27:20
  theory of ginocentrism, and fueled by the belief that men often prioritize women at
• 1:27:25
  the expense of their own well being. Yes, yes, they do.
• 1:27:30
  They do it. They do it every fucking day, and they do it
• 1:27:32
  every fucking day. Yes, batman, batman shooting in the guy. Oh
• 1:27:38
  yeah, I made a pull. I made a comic book about it,
• 1:27:42
  where where yeah, men are judged for not prioritizing women. Simp is sometimes
• 1:27:48
  used as a derogatory term toatrol men who extend any positive like here's the thing,
• 1:27:54
  right, if you are going to hold men to this standard, then
• 1:27:58
  acknowledge that you're doing it because we hold men to the standard that they sacrifice
• 1:28:01
  for women. Hell, this this report is doing that. It's this entire
• 1:28:08
  report only sees men through the lens of women's benefit. That's it. Simpus
• 1:28:14
  sometimes uses a derogatory term totrol men who extend any positive expression or behavior towards
• 1:28:18
  women, particularly kindness, in exchange for some action, usually romantic interest.
• 1:28:26
  So do feminists when they call out nice guys? Is that also uh?
• 1:28:30
  Terrorism? Simping can also be loosed used in lieu of standing, which is
• 1:28:34
  to say someone is an extreme fan of something. Ginocentrism, originally describing a
• 1:28:40
  dominant force on women in theory focus I'm going to focus on women in theory
• 1:28:45
  of practice, has been manipulated by some to be that, to be that
• 1:28:48
  societal chivalry and white night behavior prioritizes women over other groups. Statistically, any
• 1:28:54
  way, wha wha wha, whoa wha wha whoa whoa whoa. What do
• 1:28:56
  you mean over other groups like men? What other groups are there? There's
• 1:29:00
  no other groups. There's just men and women. No, that's that's just
• 1:29:03
  men. That's men and women. So prior no. So what you're saying
• 1:29:08
  is is that if we prioritize men over women, that would be preferable to
• 1:29:15
  acknowledge. But we don't. And it's because of you. You asked us
• 1:29:18
  to put women first. I mean we were doing it before you ask But
• 1:29:21
  like allegation that we put put men first, because these the individuals who wrote
• 1:29:27
  this report would say that society puts men first, full boint, full yes,
• 1:29:31
  in defiance of all evidence. You remember when I said patriarchy theory,
• 1:29:34
  if they actually tested, it would be false false false false false. That'd
• 1:29:38
  be another false society. People in our society and most societies around the world,
• 1:29:44
  do not put men first. They do not want to see harms befall
• 1:29:48
  women before those harms befall men. They prefer to see harms befall men.
• 1:29:53
  They prefer protective protection and provision to go to women. This is a statistical
• 1:29:58
  reality. It's not one of those false things. And that whole testing the
• 1:30:00
  patriarchal narrative, right, But they want to say, they want to say
• 1:30:05
  that we live in a society that benefits men over women. Therefore, overt
• 1:30:11
  institutionalized and set in stone benefits over women are necessary and deserved, and they
• 1:30:18
  get to adjudicate over them and get the extra money for doing them. Get
• 1:30:24
  what I'm saying, like, they basically get to be the ones who administrate
• 1:30:29
  the correction in inequality that favors women or men. They are the ones who
• 1:30:34
  get to manage how we correct all of that, which means they get the
• 1:30:39
  money, and then they get the control, and they get the power,
• 1:30:43
  and they get to write reports like this, and they get to engage in
• 1:30:45
  whatever diverting thing that they're doing. But the justification for it is because they're
• 1:30:53
  correcting an inequality that women face and men don't. And of course it just
• 1:30:57
  so happens that they're accused seeing people or society or institutions of the thing that
• 1:31:02
  people hate most. So, in other words, most people do not like
• 1:31:09
  the idea that men benefit at the expense of women. They are greatly motivated
• 1:31:14
  because they don't like the idea that men are benefit at the expensive women.
• 1:31:17
  They prefer that women be benefited. This is a statistical reality about people's attitudes
• 1:31:23
  about benefit going to men or benefit going to women, harm going to men,
• 1:31:27
  or harm going to women. So if you are a person who's interested
• 1:31:30
  in money and control, you might go out and say, hey, I
• 1:31:34
  see a way that men are benefited and women are harmed that you don't,
• 1:31:40
  and if you give me money, I can correct it, just like freaking
• 1:31:45
  thetans and like scientology. Now I see these invisionable forces that are doing bad
• 1:31:49
  things. If you give me money and control, I can correct it.
• 1:31:54
  So of course they don't want to recognize. They don't want the growth of
• 1:31:58
  the recognition that, oh, actually, people do care more about harms to
• 1:32:00
  women and benefit to men. You know, they do care about preventing benefit
• 1:32:05
  to men at the expense of women. Therefore, this thing that we're exploiting,
• 1:32:10
  you know, we might not be able to exploit it as well if
• 1:32:13
  everybody knew it existed. Do you see what I'm saying? Yep? Or
• 1:32:18
  just phased out there for a bit, okay? Men going their Own Way,
• 1:32:21
  for example, identifies itself as a reaction against the perceived mysgery of ginocentrism.
• 1:32:26
  This concern over ginocentric oh, ginocentrism in society pulls up this conspiratal mindset
• 1:32:32
  into a valuation of contemporary gender norms. I can patriarchy out, suggesting there
• 1:32:40
  is a grand conspiracy the center women and feminism Yep, the center women and
• 1:32:46
  feminism in our culture at the expense of men and the traditional gender binary.
• 1:32:51
  In a document that has spent how much time talking about the pain that men
• 1:32:58
  are in due to loneliness. They they can't, they have no there is
• 1:33:04
  there is no rational like argument against mctwe like, you literally can't. What
• 1:33:11
  do you want? No? Seriously, it's like passport pros. What do
• 1:33:15
  you like? What are you saying? I don't want men to not want
• 1:33:18
  to be around women? Well, but I don't want men to be around
• 1:33:21
  women. Like I said at the beginning, they do not want they do
• 1:33:26
  not regard men's preferences to be legitimate, right, They just don't. They
• 1:33:31
  have no position that they're in, They have no answer. They just don't
• 1:33:34
  like that men are making choices. They don't like it. They don't they
• 1:33:38
  don't recognize the rape of men. They don't recognize the coercion of men.
• 1:33:42
  They don't recognize the exploitation of men. And they do not want anyone else
• 1:33:45
  to recognize it, because then they would have to answer to what they're doing.
• 1:33:49
  Right. Yeah, In this very document, this tax funder, tax
• 1:33:58
  payer funded govern commissioned document, they are saying that society, that the men
• 1:34:08
  going over their own way are pointing out that society puts women's interests ahead of
• 1:34:16
  men's. I mean, they've already acknowledged that men are in pain, that
• 1:34:19
  men are suffering, that's why they're turning to these other groups. But this
• 1:34:23
  is not what's important. What's important that is that men we still see men
• 1:34:29
  in terms of how they affect women, the benefit to women. This entire
• 1:34:34
  document is a demonstration of what men going their own way say about kindocentrism,
• 1:34:43
  and of course they're not going to recognize that they are the thing. This
• 1:34:46
  is the thing, this is the thing. They are the thing. They
• 1:34:51
  are the guidocentrism, and of course they're not going to recognize it because they
• 1:34:57
  think of it as completely legitimate based on a narrative, a power narrative about
• 1:35:01
  society that has never been proven. Hasn't He hasn't even gotten to the first
• 1:35:06
  step of being proven. First baby step. The conspiracy may or may not.
• 1:35:13
  Oh God, I'm not even gonna go there. I'm want to read
• 1:35:15
  it. No, No, I'm going to read this. This conspiracy may
• 1:35:17
  or may not, depending on the influencer, dovetail with broader rhetoric around the
• 1:35:20
  Great Replacement and the ways in which Jews and other enemies of white people en
• 1:35:25
  list feminism to undermine the white race and Western culture. Well, this is
• 1:35:30
  this is the line they're trying to connect. And by the way, the
• 1:35:32
  Great Replacement. The left has been talking about this for years. You can
• 1:35:36
  find several clips of MSNBC, CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, fucking
• 1:35:45
  what's the public broadcasting Radio station PBS, NPR like ABC in fucking Australia.
• 1:35:54
  The BBC, the CBC, they have all talked about it. They all
• 1:35:59
  say it, demographics destiny, great replacement. White people are going to be
• 1:36:01
  minority. They've been saying it. They're the ones that have been saying it.
• 1:36:05
  And if we point out that they've been saying it, they call us
• 1:36:09
  a conspiracy theorist. Now, this has nothing to do with this migtou shit.
• 1:36:12
  They're just they're just drawing like they're making read it. Yeah, I
• 1:36:15
  know, but I gotta address it because it's a lie. They're trying to
• 1:36:18
  connect a lie to another lie and make a super lie. It's still a
• 1:36:23
  lie. It's still a lie, dude. And also, I think that
• 1:36:31
  I think that this has gone well beyond white people. I mean pretty much
• 1:36:34
  nobody is breeding anymore except for you know, the the African baby making slave
• 1:36:40
  stakes. Yeah, I know, but they don't care about that because they're
• 1:36:45
  they're trying to change the demographics so they stay in power forever. And at
• 1:36:48
  the same time, they're attacking the men like as a group to keep them,
• 1:36:54
  so they're they're just destroying society. Regardless of course they are having families,
• 1:37:00
  they are doing fine. They're not taking their own advice. But that
• 1:37:03
  I digress, So okay. The content of the stop Simping trend predominantly comprises
• 1:37:10
  videos source from various platforms, with the majority from TikTok, depicting instances where
• 1:37:14
  men humiliate or reject women, often response to perceived entitlement. How about actual
• 1:37:19
  entitlement? You mean like you mean like the girl who was taken to fucking
• 1:37:23
  cheesecake factory? You think that was like, well, she set up.
• 1:37:29
  These videos portray simping and kindes centrism as pervasive social issues and argue for the
• 1:37:33
  devaluation of women, showing them as inferior to men and advocating for their subservience.
• 1:37:38
  Wow, that escalated quickly. I mean, it's it's kind of it's
• 1:37:44
  base, but it's not happening guys. Woman being like I can't believe you
• 1:37:54
  took me to cheesecake cafe and the guy being like, get out, I'll
• 1:37:58
  take you there. Yeah, obviously he thinks he's superior and he's making your
• 1:38:01
  kiss the ring, like if he doesn't get like. The thing is that
• 1:38:04
  men think of themselves as superior if they just if they don't open their wallets
• 1:38:08
  for women, if they decide that they have preferences. You know, this
• 1:38:13
  is insane that this is like abuser talk. If you don't like me punching
• 1:38:17
  you in the face, that just means you think you're better than me.
• 1:38:20
  What mh, this is bullshit. You're right, this is a super lie.
• 1:38:26
  This dynamic is also meant to inverse the perceived power imbalance that women have
• 1:38:30
  over men in dating romantic contexts, like common agreements among male supremacists. Well,
• 1:38:36
  okay, so yes, I wonder what they think of the soft guy
• 1:38:41
  era? Like that that's basically men expecting women to pay for them? Is
• 1:38:47
  grizzle grizzly? Is that male supremacy? Well, in which case is the
• 1:38:53
  reverse female supremacy, wherein women are depicted as the sex and power to reject
• 1:38:58
  men's advances. No, no, like this is this is oh god,
• 1:39:02
  they're smearing a bunch of crap together to create a narrative. Near narrative.
• 1:39:08
  It has nothing to do with rejecting men's advances. How does humiliating women on
• 1:39:15
  TikTok in like a video give men power? Like when you watch one of
• 1:39:18
  those videos, do you feel yourself getting stronger? Like? What do I
• 1:39:23
  like to check my bank account? Shit? I got another thousand dollars,
• 1:39:26
  Like I mean, like this is so stupid, it's so f meryal.
• 1:39:30
  It's like it's WU. This is WU, ladies, it's actually really destructive.
• 1:39:36
  WU. Yeah, it's destructive. WU. They're growing towards men saying
• 1:39:41
  rejecting women's entitlement. So late, ladies, put put down the put down
• 1:39:45
  the sacrificial bat for a second and come join us. In reality, they're
• 1:39:49
  they're they're presenting men rejecting women who are expecting them to do things like pay
• 1:39:59
  for stuff like I don't know, they'll call them up and pay I want
• 1:40:02
  you to pay for my nail appointment before I go on a date with you,
• 1:40:04
  and stuff like that, and men saying no, I'm not sure,
• 1:40:09
  like what do you bring to the table, And they're they're presenting that as
• 1:40:15
  as them being salty, that women are rejecting men's advances. Mm hm,
• 1:40:20
  that's like, this is this is incoherent. You're right, it's wo.
• 1:40:24
  It's just nonsense. This is a nonsense paragraph. Stop simping content. Thus
• 1:40:29
  reverses the perceived power dynamic, depicting men as the rejectors instead of the rejected,
• 1:40:34
  playing into the fear and pain of rejection, restoring masculinity by humilitating women
• 1:40:40
  and giving men power. Yes, but men have every right to reject women.
• 1:40:45
  Like the premise of this paragraph is that men don't have a right to
• 1:40:49
  reject women, Like do you see that? And I began all of this,
• 1:40:54
  and I said, the problem with these people or that the ideological position
• 1:40:58
  that they take is men don't have the right to their own consent. They
• 1:41:01
  don't have the right to consent to what happens in a relationship. They don't
• 1:41:05
  have a right to consent to what happens in dating. They don't have a
• 1:41:09
  right to consent to what happens in sex. They don't have a right to
• 1:41:12
  their own preferences in any of those spheres. Right, And here we have
• 1:41:16
  this paragraph makes no sense unless you do not think men have the right to
• 1:41:21
  reject women. And because anything else diverting hate is rape, like this is
• 1:41:31
  this document is advocating rape. It is advocating removing a man's right to consent
• 1:41:42
  to the use of his money, the use of his time, and the
• 1:41:45
  use of his penis Like, I can't I want people to see this.
• 1:41:51
  This document is a rape manual. It's a justification for delegitimating men's right to
• 1:41:59
  consent. It's justification for saying mendo shouldn't have a right to consent. If
• 1:42:02
  they don't consent to you sexually, it's because he's a lookist. If he
• 1:42:05
  doesn't consent to you financially, it's because he feels like he's a supremacist.
• 1:42:11
  He's a male supremacist. He should be opening his wallet to you, or
• 1:42:14
  he's immoral if he doesn't consent to whatever you bring to a relationship. Again,
• 1:42:18
  male supremacist. He thinks that he's better than you. He's somebody.
• 1:42:23
  He's a man who doesn't want to benefit women. Go get him, kill
• 1:42:27
  the witch. You know, like this is this is crap. This entire
• 1:42:30
  document is morally bankrupt on such a fundamental level that I can't fucking believe that
• 1:42:36
  people aren't in the streets asking the freaking federal the irs, why are my
• 1:42:44
  tax money going to this shit? Why is my tax money going to justifying
• 1:42:48
  rape, sexual assault, and reproduct and relationship coercion, Because that's what this
• 1:42:56
  is. This is the justification of removing men's right to consent. Good lord,
• 1:43:02
  you know what I'm done? Fuck it, fuck it, I don't
• 1:43:06
  know this document that escalated quickly. I mean that really got out of hand
• 1:43:13
  fast. Oh come on, Brian, is it no? No, you're
• 1:43:17
  right, No, No, I mean I'm literally saying that men don't have
• 1:43:20
  the right to reject women. Yeah, I know, I don't disagree.
• 1:43:26
  It's just I mean, course of course, right, I mean, I
• 1:43:30
  guess we could see if it can No, no, we can. We
• 1:43:33
  can end it here. I mean it's almost two hours. The metrics reveals
• 1:43:38
  the truck. Oh look look, look, look, look this is great.
• 1:43:41
  Okay, I want to look at this. The humanizing language on Getter
• 1:43:45
  exploring an overlook corner of the manisphere. And they have like a list of
• 1:43:47
  terms. Okay, okay, look at it. Look at number one.
• 1:43:51
  Whamon is like violation, it's kind of violation scale and it's the top.
• 1:43:59
  Wham is number five, it's five points. Understand what times are changing.
• 1:44:06
  A glimpse of the metrics reveals the troubling growth Channel's promoting this trend in just
• 1:44:15
  one month. Now, now, I know, we got to use women.
• 1:44:18
  It's the top, it's the top word. Violet's scale five. Bringing
• 1:44:27
  you back to the simping thing, I'm sorry, I'm sorry. The growth
• 1:44:30
  of channels promoting men's right to reject women. Where what let what are we
• 1:44:36
  going back to? Here? We are? We are at the stage.
• 1:44:41
  We are at the stage of societal something I don't know what, do you
• 1:44:44
  want to call it? Collapse, corruption, rot We're at the stage where
• 1:44:48
  the government is putting out documents that explain how men rejecting women is illegitimate,
• 1:44:59
  is morally bank is morally wrong. Can you put the I need a scale,
• 1:45:04
  Brian, I like apply it to this document. I know now,
• 1:45:11
  I know I'm gonna use women at every opportunity because I didn't know it was.
• 1:45:15
  It was being flagged by the fucking government. If you say or famoids,
• 1:45:20
  which I don't. I don't like foids or femoids as much, and
• 1:45:25
  not not because I'm an insulted. I just don't think it's got the same
• 1:45:28
  zing to it that women has. Women is like it's it's perfect women because
• 1:45:32
  there's like a wham, which is like they're crying, and then you still
• 1:45:38
  get to say men at some point it's perfect women. I like it.
• 1:45:43
  Femoids and feminazis it's old school, I guess in cell I mean, I'm
• 1:45:48
  I'm you know, I don't find I don't know why that's offensive to anybody,
• 1:45:54
  but g N top G. Yeah, but look at the definition for
• 1:45:58
  women. We are all top g's, Alison, You're a top G.
• 1:46:00
  As far as i'm con thank you voids. It looks like a look at
• 1:46:11
  the like misspelling the word woman a derogatory term primarily used by insults that implies
• 1:46:16
  intelligent and lacking common sense. There's a direct violation of example, Facebook's hate
• 1:46:21
  speech policy. Oh really, wait, what women is a direct violation of
• 1:46:27
  the Facebook hate speech Probably it is. No, I used it all the
• 1:46:31
  time on Facebook. You know what. Maybe that's why I've been getting flat.
• 1:46:36
  I've gotten some warnings and they're like, you're you're postive. I'm like,
• 1:46:41
  what, Like, I don't, I don't understand, all right,
• 1:46:45
  but but this definition and somewhere else they also say that women means coldness.
• 1:46:50
  Women are cold. This is not correct. It's in the freaking word where
• 1:46:58
  men, yeah, whine and complain and that's the entirety of their personality.
• 1:47:05
  Women who play the damsel. Well, if femoid is feminoid, femoid is
• 1:47:11
  to use emmot emphasize a purportedly cold nature of women, and to humanizes them.
• 1:47:15
  Well, no women to humanize men, and then the men get mad
• 1:47:19
  because they've been humanized. Ye, well, I mean the whole narrative to
• 1:47:24
  humanizes them, the original narrative that's completely untested, like not even gotten to
• 1:47:27
  the point of being presented in a way that could be tested. Men oppress
• 1:47:31
  women, dehumanizes men. All right, and now we have all the knock
• 1:47:35
  on effects of that. Congratulations, And now we have a government document that
• 1:47:42
  basically justifies are basically explains why men rejecting women is invalid. Well, look,
• 1:47:47
  look, there's a there's a chart we have. We have charts,
• 1:47:50
  guys, we have data quantity of pose containing key term you want them knows
• 1:47:59
  look at and the is this on the in cell forums. Let me see
• 1:48:02
  getter or something. I think this is getter. So femoids is seventy one,
• 1:48:08
  feminazis eighty one. In cells to ninety seven, so in cell is
• 1:48:12
  actually the highest, which is actually a derogatory term for men, and it's
• 1:48:17
  the highest. Top g is one sixty one and whamen is at two ninety
• 1:48:21
  five. We gotta pump those numbers up. Those are rookie numbers. We
• 1:48:25
  gotta pump those numbers up. This is Oh it is shit. This is
• 1:48:32
  it's really stupid. This is where our money goes, guys, of actually
• 1:48:36
  solving problems. Somebody sat there and counted how many times Wamen was said they
• 1:48:42
  got paid for it. You know, like we could be doing We could
• 1:48:45
  we could be paying for a suicide helpline. We could be paying for legal
• 1:48:48
  help for men going through custody issues. We could be paying for resources for
• 1:48:54
  men who've experienced sexual abuse. That doesn't start right off the bat by minimizing
• 1:48:59
  it, be doing all of these things. Instead, we are constructing a
• 1:49:02
  document that explains why men can't consent to sex the fat women, or can't
• 1:49:10
  have to. I'm simplifying it, but this is what this is. Men
• 1:49:14
  don't have a right to their preferences. Men don't have the right to say
• 1:49:17
  no. Men don't have the right to reject women. That's what this is.
• 1:49:23
  And then also for some reason, if men like women who are thin
• 1:49:27
  and young, that means they're pedophiles. I have a serious suspicion that that
• 1:49:30
  is bullshit. I mean, we could take a look at that one,
• 1:49:33
  because I was a little bit which one. It's uh the uh go to
• 1:49:40
  the go to the cable contents go down a bit empathy driven. No,
• 1:49:47
  hitting the wall, hitting the wall, hitting the wall, it's overview of
• 1:49:56
  three. Yet there we go. I'm gonna I'm gonna read is it right
• 1:50:01
  here? Or is it that's it? That's it? You got it?
• 1:50:05
  Yeah, hitting the wall. Hitting the wall has persisted for several years and
• 1:50:10
  is rooted in the harmful notion that a woman's value is solely derived from her
• 1:50:13
  physical appearance. This troubling narrative centers around women who are judged as too old,
• 1:50:17
  divorced, or otherwise considered undtable. Yeah, well, but men have
• 1:50:23
  every right to not want to date them. The end. The entire premise
• 1:50:27
  of this paragraph is men don't have the right to their preferences. Again,
• 1:50:31
  like I can't believe at the beginning this, I said this at the very
• 1:50:35
  beginning, that this is what this document would be, and this is what
• 1:50:38
  this document would was. It's just men don't have a right to their preferences.
• 1:50:43
  Now, I want to see where it tries to say that while the
• 1:50:47
  hitting the wall I just went down to the final paragraph, while the hitting
• 1:50:50
  the wall trend purely perpetuates harmful stereotypes and actively contributes the egregious objectification to devaluation
• 1:50:59
  of women. We are seeing it beyond the confines of YouTube. All right,
• 1:51:02
  Okay, if you consider yourself to be the table as a woman,
• 1:51:10
  then you are constraining your value to your fertility, your youth, and your
• 1:51:15
  beauty the end. Like, if you want to talk about the things that
• 1:51:18
  you bring to the table, then you are not constraining your value to your
• 1:51:24
  youth, your beauty, and your fertility. You're actually saying I have other
• 1:51:28
  things to offer. Now, maybe men aren't interested in those other things.
• 1:51:32
  That's their decision. You know, that's their right, because men have a
• 1:51:36
  right to their preferences. And in cell communities, the notion of hitting the
• 1:51:41
  wall is burgeoning as a persistent in menacing ideology within male supremacist spheres, whereby
• 1:51:45
  they place a higher value on younger women and girls. This petiphiliac type mindset
• 1:51:51
  can be seen on sites like in cels that I Asked and I'm bashedly refer
• 1:51:56
  to girls as youngest twelve as objects of desire. They well get rid of
• 1:52:00
  old, But how how old are the men? How old are the guys
• 1:52:03
  that are on there? Though? How do we know they're not twelve?
• 1:52:06
  Or thirteen years old, like how do we? This concept is also used
• 1:52:10
  to undermine women's perceived power in sexual romantic relationship context is these male supremises ironically
• 1:52:15
  imdue women with supreme power authority over men by determining which men will be validated
• 1:52:20
  as masculine and success sexually sexually successful, and which ones will not. Yes,
• 1:52:28
  men, women also have preferences like yeah, I mean, like how
• 1:52:33
  how how rampant is like pedophilia in public schools. We're just gonna I'm just
• 1:52:40
  gonna call it pedophilia because that's what it is. Like, I feel like
• 1:52:43
  every couple of weeks I cover a story on the news show where a teacher
• 1:52:48
  was messing around with an underage boy almost like every every at least like every
• 1:52:53
  other week, so like, but nobody says they and they're still calling it,
• 1:53:00
  you know, an affair instead of what it is. But okay,
• 1:53:04
  so I mean like that's that's not news, that's you know, women.
• 1:53:10
  Women are allowed to have preferences like no matter what they are, no matter
• 1:53:14
  how you know, Yeah, how bizarre. Yeah, I mean it's women's
• 1:53:20
  preferences that apparently drive men's participation in society. So you'd understand why the institutions
• 1:53:28
  are trying to say, well, they'reifye, but men's preferences are bad.
• 1:53:31
  Okay, from I'm going to from hate online to violence offline. That's the
• 1:53:38
  one where just go to the the contents section two, hate to violence,
• 1:53:49
  hate online of volens online. Yes, okay. The Manisphere unbashedly thrives on
• 1:53:56
  the endorsement and glorification of violence. Really, the propagation of threats permeates online
• 1:54:01
  forums, comment sections, posts, resulting in a tangible real world concert Oh
• 1:54:05
  boy, here we go. Particularly alarming is the romanticize Elliott Roger a violence
• 1:54:12
  against women. Within these online spaces, numerous perpetrators of mass violence events that
• 1:54:17
  draw direct inspiration from extremist, misogynist ideologies, acquired online a decade ago.
• 1:54:24
  The most infamous of these events took place in East Islands Isla Vista, where
• 1:54:30
  Elliott Roger became an inceul deity in these online communities, an insult deity.
• 1:54:40
  Sure, I mean like you will, I mean you light about everything else,
• 1:54:45
  but I'm going to believe you now where we're gonna, we're gonna take
• 1:54:46
  your word for it. In twenty twenty three, the largest mass shooting within
• 1:54:51
  the US was out was in Allen, Texas. The shooters shared dozens of
• 1:54:56
  posts on a social media account celebrating radical misogynists, anti Semitic, and racist
• 1:55:00
  viewpoints. In his personal journal and forum posts, he used language commonly found
• 1:55:05
  within in cell communities when describing his interactions with women. Well, but that
• 1:55:11
  just means that he was experiencing the same thing that in cells did. The
• 1:55:16
  role of online creators and the radical content that the mass shooter consumed cannot be
• 1:55:20
  understated. His world view and personality had become shaped by the extremist content he
• 1:55:25
  found online the FBI, and not by the fact that he's dealing with a
• 1:55:30
  society that sees him solely in terms of women's benefit and just marginalizes his issues.
• 1:55:36
  That that can't be what's creating the destruction. No, the FBI and
• 1:55:42
  law enforcements, increased monitoring, you know what, Yeah, but do we
• 1:55:48
  even need to go through this? No? I think we know this is
• 1:55:54
  gonna be the same ship. It's always the same shit. Yeah, it's
• 1:55:57
  always the same ship. Here's here's the vend So you know, that's basically
• 1:56:01
  it. If you take if you take easy access to guns, misogyny and
• 1:56:08
  far right extremism, you get gun violence against women. It's that simple,
• 1:56:13
  guys, Just disarm, brainwash, and I guess, like make everyone into
• 1:56:18
  communists and it's all good. We'll be fine. That'll eliminate all three of
• 1:56:24
  those things, and all of a sudden, we'll live in the utopia for
• 1:56:27
  women. I mean, men will be suicidal and depressed and purposeless and directionless,
• 1:56:30
  but who gives a shit fuck them, they're not people. But women
• 1:56:33
  will be safe at last when men have become disarmed, bug eating, pod
• 1:56:42
  living communists that love women unconditionally but don't talk to them or look them in
• 1:56:49
  the eye or anything like that. Just like, you know, just keep
• 1:56:51
  them safe, but don't actually ask for anything or expect anything from them,
• 1:56:56
  and then we'll be good, because that's literally what this ven diagram asks.
• 1:57:00
  And they have no right to any of their own preferences at all. Like
• 1:57:03
  that's all of this is just poisoning the well. First of all, it's
• 1:57:09
  not a hell of a lot of stuff here. They also talk about a
• 1:57:13
  former student from the University of Waterloo. The attack took place during Pride Month
• 1:57:16
  and is believed by investigators we hate motivated incident related to gender expression and gender.
• 1:57:21
  We don't know that. But the other thing is that isn't that the
• 1:57:25
  one that was potentially gender fluid? I don't know. I mean there have
• 1:57:30
  been a number of incidents committed or perpetuated by trends. Act twenty twenty three
• 1:57:39
  the US. The United States again broke its record for mass shootings in a
• 1:57:43
  year. That's mass shootings, and there's no indication that twenty twenty four will
• 1:57:46
  be different. As individuals spend more time online and are continually exposed to increasingly
• 1:57:51
  radical and violent content, we can expect this trend of online to offline violence
• 1:57:56
  to continue to proliferate. So the increase in crime the last few years is
• 1:58:00
  not due to certain immigration policies or defunding the police or single moms. It's
• 1:58:11
  due to online misogyny. M of course. Yeah, It's the one thing
• 1:58:20
  that men are most primed to do is hate women. Oh women, women,
• 1:58:26
  I'm missfolk, hate women, all of that. Like that, That
• 1:58:31
  couple of paragraphs justifies this entire document about how men don't have a right to
• 1:58:36
  their sexual preferences. Gen z Shift, how a younger generation is influenced by
• 1:58:42
  the manisphere. Men and boys from the generation z are more prone to feminism
• 1:58:46
  at prone to view feminism is harmful compared to their counterparts in the baby room
• 1:58:50
  or generation. I'm just going to read the first sentence of each paragraph.
• 1:58:55
  A twenty twenty two report released in the UK highlighted that seventy percent of teachers
• 1:58:59
  are funding are reported experiencing misogyny from students in that year. Well, of
• 1:59:03
  course the students who are vulnerable, they're the teachers should be investigated for harming
• 1:59:11
  their teachers. What's hotly again? What the authority is sort of inversed here,
• 1:59:15
  Like teachers don't have to take responsibility for their authority over their students.
• 1:59:19
  Their students have to take responsibility for how they affect their teachers. In twenty
• 1:59:27
  twenty three, in Australian study found widespread evidence of sexual harassment, sexism and
• 1:59:30
  misogyny perpetuated Boy Bye Boys towards women teachers, and the ominous presence of Andrew
• 1:59:36
  Tate in shaping that behavior. Lou he was lumining over the students in spiritual
• 1:59:44
  form is when they struck when they put him in jail and struck him down,
• 1:59:48
  he became more powerful than they could possibly imagine. Again, how many
• 1:59:53
  of these female teachers are actually abusing these boys, loosing them. I know,
• 1:59:59
  I know. If these women can't handle boys getting lippy with them,
• 2:00:02
  they shouldn't be teachers. They should get male teachers in there. But you
• 2:00:06
  know, can't do that. Maybe they're raped boys too, however, Yeah,
• 2:00:12
  probably the countries like the UK and Australia. The US is far behind
• 2:00:18
  its contempor counterparts and the research the pervasive and growing effects of misogyny. All
• 2:00:24
  Right, so we've found things that like they female staff and juvenile detention facilities
• 2:00:32
  are basically praying it's basically open season on the male, the male, the
• 2:00:36
  young, the boys in those facilities. Right, we find a high degree
• 2:00:42
  of sexual abuse by female teachers towards male students in schools, and we're we're
• 2:00:48
  also like, statistically there's a large amount of boys in high schools and colleges
• 2:00:55
  who report sexual abuse, often by a women. Okay, that's not important.
• 2:01:03
  What's important is Andrew Tate, the looming shadow of Andrew Tate. If
• 2:01:10
  you want to get rid of, you know, men who are more misogynists,
• 2:01:17
  shall we say, often have been sexually abused by women. If we
• 2:01:25
  want to get rid of the one perhaps we should address the other instead of
• 2:01:29
  creating these retarded reports justifying why men shouldn't have the right to their sexual preferences,
• 2:01:36
  why women should be able to force men to make the decisions that they
• 2:01:41
  prefer, Like, I don't know, maybe I'm getting into the weeds.
• 2:01:48
  Well maybe we should if you're going for two hours and it's like nine o'clock.
• 2:01:53
  Just one last section, an empathy driven lens into online misogyny. Do
• 2:01:58
  you see that section for vulnerable, confused, and lonely men who we don't
• 2:02:05
  really care about except how they affect women. It's hard to resist the siren
• 2:02:10
  song of the manisphere. In the bosom of Silver Toung Manisphere influencers, these
• 2:02:15
  men find a space where their struggles are validated. Well are they not valid
• 2:02:21
  Like so basically what they're getting is a validation for their pain from these groups.
• 2:02:28
  But you can't validate their pain because if you were to validate it,
• 2:02:31
  if the ideologues who produce this document were to validate the struggles of men and
• 2:02:39
  the situation they're in, they would have to call into question their ideology.
• 2:02:45
  So they're not going to do it, So you're never going to have their
• 2:02:47
  struggles validated by these people, They're always going to consist on giving them the
• 2:02:51
  box of nothing. They're tormentors, women or themselves are identified in the path
• 2:02:58
  to the successful realization of manhood is laid plainly before them. So they actually
• 2:03:01
  have some manhood that they can attain as opposed to what you give them,
• 2:03:06
  which is a box full of Yeah, masculinity is worthless except for it's responsible
• 2:03:14
  for all the evil in the world. Few other alcoves of the Internet can
• 2:03:17
  compete from this narrative. We hold two takeaways that will be explored in this
• 2:03:21
  section. One, the brand of masculinity that the men Manisphere content creators sell
• 2:03:28
  is harmful to men and boys. So apparently the brand of masculinity that validates
• 2:03:32
  men's struggles is harmful to men. Two. To address the danger of his
• 2:03:39
  manisphere on all of us, we must take men's issues seriously and adopt an
• 2:03:43
  empathic approach. Empathetic empathetic, empathetic approach to countering online extremism the harm of
• 2:03:53
  problematic metrics of manhood. The manisphere has tactfully seized tactfully maybe they mean tactically
• 2:04:03
  like tactically tactfully. Excuse me, excuse me? Excuse me while I see
• 2:04:10
  sees the sees this identity really quick? Do you mind if I just get
• 2:04:15
  in there? Just kidding, don't mind my grasp precarious masculinity and offered exactly
• 2:04:28
  what men want? And why is masculinity precarious? Maybe it's because we all
• 2:04:31
  live under an ideology that says that there's nothing good about it. Yeah,
• 2:04:35
  maybe a successful manho While philosophies vary in their teachings, the Manosphere gospel seems
• 2:04:43
  to be generally propound masculinity archetype that elevates dangerous qualities like unrealistic male aesthetics,
• 2:04:49
  substance abuse, and unhealthy emotional coping mechanisms. Men and boys who consume this
• 2:04:55
  message actively or subconsciously are being hurt. Wrong, No, I don't think
• 2:05:02
  so what And also, like the liver king is not a manisphere guy,
• 2:05:08
  He's just he's just a guy that does bodybuilding. Like, but of course
• 2:05:13
  they're going to tell us that that like going to the gym, that's also
• 2:05:16
  toxically masculine. Right. One such consequence of this messaging, especially that related
• 2:05:26
  to physical prowess and masculine aesthetics, is a rise of self harm and unhealthy
• 2:05:30
  fitness habits and men. Okay, what what are the what does the role
• 2:05:34
  of romance covers novels have in in pushing? Yeah? Where men getting this
• 2:05:42
  crazy idea that they should be fit to attract women? Where does that crazy
• 2:05:45
  idea come from? For example? But of course it has to come from
• 2:05:49
  men. I mean, we can say that the beauty ideal that's inflicted on
• 2:05:53
  women allegedly comes from men, but we can't say that, actually women do
• 2:05:58
  want muscular Men can't say that maybe that's inflicted by women. For example.
• 2:06:02
  Mena sphere of fitness content departs from accepted training and health content because of its
• 2:06:09
  promotion of Okay, don't care. You mean like, yeah, you're gonna
• 2:06:13
  blame the men who are like, okay, this is how you get swool
• 2:06:16
  to attract the ladies. Where do you think the pressure is coming from?
• 2:06:20
  Do you think that that men just invented this? Well, why don't we
• 2:06:24
  take steroids for no reason? We just we just decided that muscularity is desirable,
• 2:06:30
  and we just made women want us to be muscular? Is that what
• 2:06:32
  happened? Okay? I mean I don't I think that this is another thing
• 2:06:38
  too, is that when it comes to performance enhancing drugs, like for like
• 2:06:43
  steroids and stuff. I don't think that it's like a one. I think
• 2:06:45
  that it's and it's and it's not exclusively to men because women use them too,
• 2:06:49
  But it's it's not like a one sided conversation. There's guys that are
• 2:06:55
  for it and there are guys that are against it. Just like everything else,
• 2:06:58
  there are people who are vegans or people who are carnival. There are
• 2:07:00
  people who you know, believe in fucking strength training, and there are people
• 2:07:04
  who believe in cardio. It's whatever, like this is not You're trying to
• 2:07:09
  make this into a thing, and it's not a thing, right, Okay,
• 2:07:13
  So all right, so this this document goes on to call out men
• 2:07:18
  who talk about the grindset, you know, like getting getting rich, getting
• 2:07:23
  a business. Yeah what And so the conclusion is this, so you go
• 2:07:28
  to the gym, you get a job, you have a business, you
• 2:07:30
  get wealth, and you get fit. What is most problematic about Menace of
• 2:07:33
  Your Content is the impact impact of superficial masculinity on men's mental health. As
• 2:07:40
  discussed, the frequently unattainable ideals of manhood that these speakers elevate, alienate,
• 2:07:47
  and marginalize the masculinity of a great deal of men who don't fit these ideals.
• 2:07:53
  All right, what version of masculinity are you offering men? Because from
• 2:07:58
  what I see, all you're offering them is a big box of nothing.
• 2:08:03
  And if they're if the alternatively, what's in that big box of nothing is
• 2:08:07
  a whole bunch of blame and shame. So masculinity has no worth except it
• 2:08:11
  is responsible for everything bad in the world, So it sort of has worth
• 2:08:15
  as escapegoat because what are and what does that have to do? Like they're
• 2:08:20
  saying telling men, get get fit, get a job, get wealthy.
• 2:08:26
  These are unobtainable ideas. Their share is hell more obtainable than the absolute nothing
• 2:08:31
  you want men to be like you get you offer men nothing. Yeah,
• 2:08:37
  you don't say this is how you become a man, you see, you
• 2:08:39
  don't even say that's desirable to have a male identity. You'll offer them fucking
• 2:08:46
  nothing, and you wonder why you know you have you have your booth and
• 2:08:52
  you're like, hey, dudes, how would you like a bunch of hot
• 2:08:54
  fried nothing? Give me your money? No thanks, I got called to
• 2:09:00
  one. And then you're confused why men are walking past your booth of nothing
• 2:09:07
  or even hey, we'll shame the hell out of you. We'll tell you
• 2:09:09
  that your gender identity is worthless and that if you take any kind of positive
• 2:09:15
  identity from it, you are an asshole who hates women and you feel superior
• 2:09:18
  to them. We'll give you some shame and blame. That's what we offer.
• 2:09:22
  And you're wondering why men and boys are walking past you, I mean,
• 2:09:28
  not even all of them, some are still like, yeah, here,
• 2:09:30
  I deserve that. You know, a lot of them are walking past
• 2:09:33
  you, or the ones who come to your booth leave your booth and then
• 2:09:37
  kill themselves, and then you don't have any customers because your customers are killing
• 2:09:43
  themselves. Well, you wonder why that's happening. Because an unobtainable ideal of
• 2:09:50
  manhood is better than no absolutely no worth to manhood whatsoever. And these guys
• 2:10:01
  do not understand that. They refuse to understand that because they don't want anything
• 2:10:05
  that excludes women. Yep, what's most problem at Okay, they are sent
• 2:10:15
  on a fool's errand becoming this mythical paragon of masculinity who consort with women like
• 2:10:20
  currency have tons of car smoke cigars all the time and have a steroid in
• 2:10:22
  deduced physique. Incidentally, that is the only thing that that stereotype is like
• 2:10:28
  the only thing feminists left to masculinity after they reduced the masculinity norms index to
• 2:10:33
  almost nothing. When he used to be being a provider, being a father,
• 2:10:37
  being a community minded, being responsible, upholding the expectations and all that,
• 2:10:43
  No, they got rid of all of that because that could also apply
• 2:10:46
  to women. And then they just left this playboy materialist as the only thing
• 2:10:52
  that men could be, could could aspire to, to be different, to
• 2:10:56
  differentiate them from women. And what a surprise, it's a playboy materialist that
• 2:11:01
  men aspire to. You Now, this was of course of No man will
• 2:11:11
  realize they're self worth from this path, no, so okay, I will
• 2:11:16
  stop assuming what they're gonna do. In fact, they will likely worsen their
• 2:11:20
  self esteem following this toxic dogma off a cliff manisphere. Disciples lack the tools
• 2:11:26
  to process these negative emotions in cells, encourage effusive, self deprecating whining.
• 2:11:33
  Jeez, that's not judgmental. Alpha males preaches pseudo stoicism that really involves bottling
• 2:11:39
  up your emotions and to it all with you have the most noxious content creator
• 2:11:45
  of all, denouncing therapy and pugning the legitimacy of mental of the mental health
• 2:11:48
  struggle. Okay, then they go off into the Andrew Tate. Okay,
• 2:11:52
  I'm gonta even pune it right. The Association say, the American Psychological Association
• 2:12:01
  is moving towards regarding masculinity as a mental health problem. Like right now,
• 2:12:09
  they're saying masculinity increases your likelihood of having mental health problems. So they're groping
• 2:12:16
  towards just calling masculinity a mental health problem. There's a little bit of a
• 2:12:22
  step. I don't know, there's a little bit of light between the two
• 2:12:24
  things at the moment, because they're saying masculinity or adherence to traditional masculinity increases
• 2:12:30
  your likelihood of having mental health issues, right, because men are more likely
• 2:12:35
  to commit suicide. Therefore, the problem is their gender identity. So people
• 2:12:41
  who are informed by nonsense like that are not the best people. And they
• 2:12:46
  also basically say that men adhere to their gender identity because they hate women.
• 2:12:50
  And what I mean by that is they just don't want to be They're femophobes.
• 2:12:54
  They think that women are lesser. Therefore, they want to keep that
• 2:12:58
  unique identity, unique value proposition that they feel like men have, and if
• 2:13:03
  they didn't just hate women, they would let go of that and avail themselves
• 2:13:09
  of all of the positive benefit of the feminine mindset when it comes to mental
• 2:13:13
  health. But because they don't, they kill themselves, and that's their own
• 2:13:16
  fault. Do you really think that that's a good message for men who are
• 2:13:20
  struggling with mental health issues? Because I don't. All right, So they
• 2:13:24
  finally get to their point, what is the point of acknowledging the struggles of
• 2:13:28
  men? There is a body of feminist scholarship that suggests over emphasis on men's
• 2:13:31
  mental health and the pity for me, Oh no, playing to the grieved
• 2:13:37
  entitlement delusion and enabling victimhood mentality. Oh so you recognize that on your side
• 2:13:46
  there is a whole bunch of contempt that is heaped on men for any kind
• 2:13:52
  for any kind of perceived vulnerability. Do you see that? They just recognize
• 2:13:56
  that. Yeah, but you don't go a step further and realize, hey,
• 2:14:01
  maybe our ideology is causing a lot of resentment because it heaps contempt on
• 2:14:07
  men for having any vulnerabilities. Maybe it's causing a lot of resentment in men.
• 2:14:11
  No, you don't take that step, because that resentment has to be
• 2:14:16
  completely illegitimate. While there's merit to mindfulness about the way we extend empathy to
• 2:14:22
  perpetrators of harm. Oh good, okay, here we go, here we
• 2:14:26
  go. Yeah, right off the bat. You're already wrong, Like,
• 2:14:28
  right off the bat. Men, it's no longer men, it's perpetrators of
• 2:14:33
  harm. The path forward is not paved with pointed fingers and blanket demonization,
• 2:14:39
  which you just did. Like, did you notice that men was replaced with
• 2:14:43
  perpetrators of harm? Yeah, of course. Yeah. They're saying they're saying
• 2:14:48
  that these men are in fact monsters, but obviously all men, because all
• 2:14:54
  men be vulnerable to these things. By neglecting campassion for those we do problematic
• 2:15:01
  and dangerous, we've engaged humanity's greatest folly forgetting to see ourselves and other people.
• 2:15:07
  God, you're disgusting. Oh my god, this is so gross.
• 2:15:11
  Man. This the empathetic reproach. And again, most of this stuff is
• 2:15:18
  calling out men for having preferences sexually, so calling out men for having the
• 2:15:22
  audacity of believing they have a right to say no. The empathetic approach doesn't
• 2:15:30
  forgive, enable, justify, or excuse men's right to say no. Like
• 2:15:35
  most of the again, most of this is just it's just a document about
• 2:15:39
  Yeah, men, you don't have a right to decide where and when you
• 2:15:41
  can sent to sex or relationships with. The empathetic approach doesn't forgive, enable,
• 2:15:50
  justifier, excuse. If you're listening to me and you're a man,
• 2:15:56
  you have every right to decide when and where you have sex with, whom
• 2:16:00
  you have sex with, whom you have a relationship with. You have every
• 2:16:03
  right to your preferences. And don't let this rapey bullshit tell you different,
• 2:16:07
  because it is rapey bullshit And it's unbelievable that they are framing the idea that
• 2:16:13
  men have the right to say no as toxic, abusive perpetration of harm.
• 2:16:24
  The emphatic approach just seeks to paint a complete picture. If the manisphere ran
• 2:16:30
  on pure malice and evil, it would have died a long time ago.
• 2:16:33
  The meat of toxic masculinity is lost men finding the wrong answers. Actually sure,
• 2:16:41
  if the manisphere ran on pure malice and evil, and you believe that
• 2:16:48
  men have the same thread or the same part of their body that would support
• 2:16:54
  this idea, because obviously you feel like the manisphere is dangerous enough that you
• 2:16:58
  have to intervene because men aren't going to step up. If it was true,
• 2:17:03
  you wouldn't be able to write this piece, like men would just run
• 2:17:05
  shit. If men wanted to run shit, they would just run shit.
• 2:17:09
  And six sixteen people that worked on this, and eleven of them were women.
• 2:17:13
  They would just not have jobs. They would just not have it.
• 2:17:16
  Like the fact that you can, they they shouldn't. But I'm saying the
• 2:17:20
  fact that they can write this piece and get money from the government is proof
• 2:17:26
  against the case they're trying to make, like it it exists that men are
• 2:17:31
  letting you do this is proof that they are not what you think they are.
• 2:17:37
  And when you say if the manscapt ran up pure mouse and evil like,
• 2:17:41
  you wouldn't be able to stop them, is what I'm saying, not
• 2:17:43
  without appealing to other men, Well, look at what they're choosing to spend
• 2:17:46
  money on. They're choosing to spend money on a document that essentially problematizes men's
• 2:17:52
  preferences for sex and relationship. You had of money on sexual service, like
• 2:17:58
  sexual abuse services for men and boys. They have money on intervening when these
• 2:18:03
  kind of things happen, money on men's issues, actually on men's issues.
• 2:18:07
  They're choosing to spend money on how to get men back into benefiting women rather
• 2:18:13
  than actually choosing to spend money on helping men. That is our society in
• 2:18:22
  a nutshell. The meat of toxic masculinity is lost men finding the wrong answers.
• 2:18:28
  What are but what are the answers that these people are offering? We
• 2:18:31
  won't help them find the right ones unless we see them as the vulnerable and
• 2:18:35
  flawed human beings that they are. By preserving rapport, trust, and respect
• 2:18:39
  for the human decency of all manosphere, countermeasures will be far more forthcoming,
• 2:18:45
  and the community of tolerance and kindness that we use to entice them back will
• 2:18:48
  be so much more warm and inviting. What was that one podcast? What
• 2:18:52
  are you calling it? Victimhood blackjack? Yeah, yeah, I forgot,
• 2:18:56
  I already closed the window. Victimhood research does not demand the vilification of violent
• 2:19:03
  perpetrators, but we should vilify violent poor portrators and we are men Enough was
• 2:19:09
  the name of the podcast? Nor just empathetic intersectional blackjack absolve past wrongs or
• 2:19:16
  diminish their harms. Above everything, we must fight to preserve the humanity and
• 2:19:20
  everyone, no matter how horrible their actions. Like aside from the terror,
• 2:19:26
  like the people who engaged in violent action, who presumably now behind bars,
• 2:19:30
  meaning that the system works. What else do you have a problem with?
• 2:19:33
  Men having opinions, men having preferences, men saying no to women, men
• 2:19:39
  rejecting women like these are things that you just have to live with, right,
• 2:19:48
  Yeah, okay, key actors, holistic approach the manisphere. Are we
• 2:19:52
  doing this now? Yeah? Two and a half hours? Okay, a
• 2:19:58
  half hour. It will require a whole of society approach to tackle the intricate
• 2:20:01
  landscape of countering and preventing violent extremism and the manosphere and misogynist narratives. This
• 2:20:07
  section underscores the strategic and ethical considerations for practitioners and disseminating research advocates for tailored
• 2:20:15
  approaches. Blah blah blah. So what's the ethical consideration? I mean,
• 2:20:18
  you're dealing with a vulnerable group of people. Do you not push things that
• 2:20:22
  make them feel like they're more likely to be burdens on others? Yeah?
• 2:20:28
  And complex rule of very large platforms now, but what is it? Okay,
• 2:20:31
  ultimately, this is a lot of shit. What are they offering men
• 2:20:39
  like right now, it's a big box of nothing maybe you know plus sham
• 2:20:43
  well it dude, this is just it's just downstream and TDS like look at
• 2:20:48
  this right here, Okay, trends very large online platforms so on okay,
• 2:20:54
  very so they have this stupid pyramid whatever, and it says very online,
• 2:20:58
  large on line platforms on X there is an increasing normalization around misogynist hate speech
• 2:21:07
  endorsed by its CEO. So basically Elon Musk again an avatar, a symbol
• 2:21:13
  that they hate because he's a man that was like, I think I'm going
• 2:21:16
  to do some free speech on this platform. I'm not even saying that I
• 2:21:20
  like Elon Musk or whatever. I like what he did with Twitter. Okay,
• 2:21:24
  but they're saying this is dangerous because again they want to control the framing.
• 2:21:28
  He disrupts that they hate that, they hate him. They probably own
• 2:21:33
  his cars because they're fucking rich coastal elites that probably owned Tesla's, but they
• 2:21:39
  hate him anyway, And again it says here, you know, let's just
• 2:21:45
  a reinstatement of accounts includes so he reinstated people. Oh, don't do that.
• 2:21:50
  No one figures such as conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, another avatar and former
• 2:21:56
  US President Donald Trump. I already mentioned that TDS is real. Seen it.
• 2:22:00
  It's completely irrational, And the same goes for Elon Musk, Andrew Tate,
• 2:22:05
  whoever, Alex Shones, Stefan Moulinu. It doesn't matter, fucking like
• 2:22:09
  all, it's just straight white man or straight man that's white adjacent, has
• 2:22:13
  opinions. He is the enemy and he reflects everything that we hate. So
• 2:22:18
  they're just gonna name names. That's all it is. I hate this guy.
• 2:22:20
  I hate anyone who likes this guy. I'm surprised Tucker Carlos is not
• 2:22:24
  on here too, because he's basically just as bad Joe Rogan, Jordan Peterson.
• 2:22:28
  It doesn't matter. I don't care what you think about those people.
• 2:22:31
  That's not the point. They have put him into a box. They're like,
• 2:22:35
  this is the bad man because he represents what we hate. It doesn't
• 2:22:39
  matter. It could be anyone, Okay, So this is what all they're
• 2:22:43
  doing is more of this. This is literally I don't is this like a
• 2:22:46
  woman thing? Is this a woman thing? Okay? Where is that discourse
• 2:22:50
  controlling this guy? Yeah, it's tone police in tone police in taking to
• 2:22:56
  the fucking federal level. All right, let's see improve terms and conditions.
• 2:23:01
  Okay, I just want to note that, so far as far as I
• 2:23:05
  can tell, they aren't actually offering anything for men. They aren't offering a
• 2:23:11
  positive identity, they are offering a route for excellence. They are offering anything
• 2:23:18
  nothing. They don't think that men have any kind of unique value proposition to
• 2:23:22
  give to the world. They think that men are avoid They're offering a big
• 2:23:26
  box of nothing. And alternatively, they offer you a role as a scapegoat
• 2:23:31
  for society. And when they offer nothing, they are con artists. Like
• 2:23:39
  they are attempting to con men. They're attempting to train it to to put
• 2:23:46
  their thumb on the scale so they can successfully con men into adopting their nothing,
• 2:23:52
  into getting nothing to pepressing nothing. Right, Okay, And this is
• 2:24:00
  what their plans are. So this is actually where it gets a little sinister.
• 2:24:03
  Well, it's already sinister. Improve terms and conditions. Large online platforms
• 2:24:11
  should explicitly include in cell ideology and hate speech or terrorism terms and conditions.
• 2:24:16
  Any post function should at least do a real increas yeah for problematic content before
• 2:24:22
  publication. Implement rigorous AI detection for high harmful content, increased censorship. It's
• 2:24:30
  AI should be used extensively to detect and flag harmful content. This includes the
• 2:24:33
  identification of in cell content, coupled with swift removal of content promoting Manisphere content
• 2:24:39
  that violates community guidelines. Again, a lot of their problem with this was
• 2:24:43
  men simply expressing a preference or rejecting women based on their behavior. So they
• 2:24:50
  don't want that, like, this is institutional rape. This is the first
• 2:24:56
  time in my life that I think I'm seeing rape culture. They don't want
• 2:25:01
  men to be able to publicly talk or validate their decisions about who they want
• 2:25:07
  in relationships or as sexual partners. Such mitigation measures will not only slowly on
• 2:25:13
  the growth of mana sphere influencer accounts, but also ensure that fan accounts do
• 2:25:16
  not have the opportunity to download and read use content more censorship, reduce amplifation.
• 2:25:22
  Can I make a point about meta. Meta is the Facebook project or
• 2:25:28
  whatever that Zuckerberg's putting together. It's dead in the water, and the reason
• 2:25:33
  is because it's anti free speech. Facebook is not a free speech platform at
• 2:25:39
  all by any stretch. They're in the pocket with the government, and these
• 2:25:41
  people are angry at Twitter because it's less like that, and so they want
• 2:25:46
  to bring it in line with meta. That's why they're using meta as a
• 2:25:50
  kind of what model example, But it's literally like no, it's terrible,
• 2:25:56
  terrible amplification of harmful narratives. Platforms need to do more to reduce the impact
• 2:26:01
  the echo chamber effect from algorithmic amplification of problematic narratives, more sensorship that don't
• 2:26:07
  promote their power narrative, their control, their big box, and nothing that
• 2:26:13
  they want to give men like you have Like this is what their message is.
• 2:26:16
  You have nothing of worth to give the world as a man, nothing
• 2:26:22
  of worth except despite the fact that you have nothing of worth to give it
• 2:26:26
  as a man, you are to blame for a society because you have patriarchal
• 2:26:31
  privilege. This is the message that they want to continue to push on men.
• 2:26:35
  And this is how they're going to do it through censorship, through putting
• 2:26:41
  their thumb on the scale, and through continuing to push their control. Their
• 2:26:46
  current control protect harmless content creators with content from non problematic content creators being used
• 2:26:52
  by Manisphere accounts to make points in support of their ideology. Better protection mechanisms
• 2:26:58
  need to be in place with the vast majority of content creators not to have
• 2:27:01
  the creations misused. So all the women saying I am the table are gonna
• 2:27:05
  have to be protected from men saying Look, women say that they are at
• 2:27:11
  the table. That means you have to be better than them to bring something
• 2:27:13
  to the table, whether it's cripple crip clipped from innocent street interviews or videos
• 2:27:20
  calling out disrespectful behavior at the gym, such as Joey's Swol. Manisphere influencers
• 2:27:24
  have used these content clips from the other creators to push mislogy in his viewpoints.
• 2:27:28
  For see for example, the red Pill Hub, Joey Swoll calls out
• 2:27:35
  women who are using false accusations to harm people, like what the so basically
• 2:27:45
  no, but what they're what they're saying is Joey Swol is okay because you
• 2:27:50
  know, no, he's not. They're not saying no, it says.
• 2:27:54
  Whether it's because or videos calling out disrespect behavior at the gym, usphere influencers,
• 2:28:01
  have you have used Yeah, so it's it's essentially saying to push oh
• 2:28:05
  so yeah, so it's using Joey Swoll to push misogynists. So they're trying
• 2:28:11
  to like side with him because he's not really a Manisphere creator and but but
• 2:28:18
  like Red Peel guys and Manispect people are like, oh, yeah, he's
• 2:28:20
  saying something that we agree with, and because we agree, they're saying that
• 2:28:26
  the people who like you shouldn't take out Joey Swoll. So basically because other
• 2:28:30
  people are using him, yeah, because Joey Swoll actually calls out the disrespectful
• 2:28:35
  behavior, and so Manisphere creators can't. Let's say, hey, this is
• 2:28:39
  the disrespectful behavior he's calling out. Yeah, but Joey Swall doesn't. He
• 2:28:43
  doesn't target women. He just goes up to toxic behavior at the gym.
• 2:28:46
  It just so happens that the stuff that goes viral and the stuff that he
• 2:28:50
  probably yeah, it's women, like, it's the stuff that becomes Here's really
• 2:28:52
  he's more likely to call out is the women is what women are doing.
• 2:28:56
  Face recognition and content moderation platforms should leverage further develop AI applications such as face
• 2:29:01
  recognition and alternative Yeah, of course crucial role in addressing the escalating challenge posed
• 2:29:09
  by the periferation of manasphre fan accounts, disemmoning content from band influencers. Oh
• 2:29:16
  so more censorship, more, more censorship, more control, more monitoring.
• 2:29:22
  This is basically just this is what happens when you This is feminine power like
• 2:29:28
  expressed like literally, like whenever you give women a little bit of power,
• 2:29:31
  they want to control men. And that's what's happening. I mean, that's
• 2:29:35
  all it is. I don't know how else to put it, like,
• 2:29:37
  I know it sounds I'm sorry to paint with a broad brush, but that's
• 2:29:41
  like what it looks like. What happens when crazy histrionic women are given a
• 2:29:46
  little bit of power. They want to monitor men. They want to control
• 2:29:48
  their preferences. They want to deny them like humanity because they're afraid of them.
• 2:29:56
  So they just go far but I won't, Yeah, our take protecting
• 2:30:01
  the people and the work, all right, So essentially they just want to
• 2:30:07
  use SA say, recognize that men are vulnerable. But instead of allowing men
• 2:30:15
  to go towards content creators that actually give them a sense of purpose and worthy,
• 2:30:22
  they they these again, what is what are these people offering men?
• 2:30:28
  Notice? How that's that is? That detailed? Nothing they want to monitor
• 2:30:31
  them, they want to control them. That's all. That's it. Yeah,
• 2:30:37
  our take protecting the people and the work. Of course, they mean
• 2:30:39
  themselves for Diverting Hate. Recent experiences have been a significant learning opportunity. We
• 2:30:45
  recognize that the research conducted has been co opted by the manosphere to portray themselves
• 2:30:50
  as martyrs. As a result, the Diverting Hate team has taken new approaches
• 2:30:56
  to publishing our research, acknowledging the potential risks associated with public access to the
• 2:31:01
  research and prioritizing the safety of the team and the integrity of the work.
• 2:31:05
  This shift and approach aims to mitigate the unintended consequences of the findings being misrepresented
• 2:31:11
  or weaponized, while still allowing Diverting Hate to continue our efforts in a more
• 2:31:16
  secure environment. You are a publicly funded NGO, tax money goes to you,
• 2:31:26
  What you do should be public. How practitioners can do the hard work
• 2:31:33
  and be safe, and the dynamic landscape of countering preventing violent extremism. The
• 2:31:37
  responsibility of violent extremism just giving men an idea that they have worth. The
• 2:31:43
  responsibility of practitioners extends beyond conducting rigorous research and to include the thoughtful and ethical
• 2:31:50
  dissemination of findings. Think strategically and ethically about what research actually needs to be
• 2:31:56
  public facing. For many organizations working in the count and preventing violent extremism space,
• 2:32:01
  bringing general awareness to the public is mission critical. However, serious consideration
• 2:32:05
  needs to go whether it interferes with other mission critical activities, such as in
• 2:32:11
  the keys of diverting hate working together with our partner organizations to stop people from
• 2:32:15
  falling further into the rabbit hole of the manisphere. Not only functional but also
• 2:32:20
  ethical considerations need to go into the decision of where and what to sell to
• 2:32:24
  share publicly, so they're basically gating their own content because they're worried about how
• 2:32:30
  it makes them look. Okay that podcast that they promote man enough. I
• 2:32:39
  want to know, does it offer anything any kind of unique value that men
• 2:32:45
  offer to society, unique to them any at all? Does it have any
• 2:32:50
  kind of recognition of what men are doing currently in society to sustain it?
• 2:32:58
  Does it do any of that? Does it offer any kind of path forward
• 2:33:03
  or does it just offer condemnation, victimhood, blackjack and more dehumanizing crap as
• 2:33:11
  well as being having being uniquely positioned by these powerful institutions to be advanced ahead
• 2:33:22
  of any other content, like we're not at seventy one thousand freaking subscribers,
• 2:33:28
  but they are happened. What is happening here is really simple. When you
• 2:33:37
  strip young men of a positive identity, they become violent, and extremism doesn't
• 2:33:45
  come necessarily into in celts. There's also extremism when it comes to Islamic extremism,
• 2:33:52
  ideological extremism of other kinds, and stripes male feminists, male feminist extremism.
• 2:34:00
  All of this, this extremism comes when you strip young men of an
• 2:34:03
  identity. That is what's happening. It is as simple as that. But
• 2:34:07
  you don't want to give them an identity because you find it beneficial to control
• 2:34:11
  them when they don't have one, because then you can make them work for
• 2:34:18
  it. Prepare for research to circulate in the community of intervention. There is
• 2:34:22
  a high likelihood that research will be interpreted as an attack or ideological smear.
• 2:34:28
  However, as researchers, we must be guided by the same ethical considerations granted
• 2:34:33
  to other research subjects. Concretely, this means respecting the individuals within the community
• 2:34:39
  by ensuring their voices are accurately represented and their privacy is protected. Avoiding sensationalism
• 2:34:46
  and presenting research findings and prioritizing dignity and well being of all. Consider multiple
• 2:34:52
  interpretations really define every term that's not straightforward standing behind our research and team is
• 2:35:03
  an organization, proper operational site security support US period, Like, don't question
• 2:35:09
  it? Yeah? Are you sure we shouldn't just keep going because this sounds
• 2:35:13
  like it's really critical to get out there. Yeah, but it's two and
• 2:35:18
  a half hours. It's nine thirty nine over here. I mean we started
• 2:35:22
  late. Okay, Okay, let's finish it. How men's wellness orgs can
• 2:35:28
  meet men in the manisphere speaking their language. When engaging individuals and groups within
• 2:35:33
  the manisphere, it is essential to exercise caution and aligning with the direct,
• 2:35:37
  distinct preferences of each groups. Utilizing language and themes that resonate with specific groups
• 2:35:43
  allows for a sense of belonging and interest among the positive male organizations that are
• 2:35:46
  promoted. However, it is imperative to avoid using language that is derogatory or
• 2:35:50
  hateful towards women, as this could further reinforce misogynist biases within these groups.
• 2:35:56
  So you can't actually recognize that men have preferences and women and can be bad
• 2:36:00
  actors. Likewise, it's essential to avoid using language that perpetrates victimhood or romanticizes
• 2:36:05
  individual lifestyle choices that acts as acts of martyrdom. Instead, we should strive
• 2:36:11
  to strike a balance that validates diverse perspectives without endorsing harmful believe you don't believe
• 2:36:16
  in diverse perspectives, Fuck off, Taylor, you don't. It's all fake
• 2:36:20
  news. It's phony stuff. It didn't happen. Tailoring messages to cater to
• 2:36:26
  specific groups of men is essential acknowledging the limitations of one size fits all approach.
• 2:36:33
  Okay, emphasizing the unique aspects and the male experience becomes crucial, validating
• 2:36:39
  and highlighting perspectives in a way that fosters connection. I'm curious. I feel
• 2:36:43
  like, ah, this is bullshit, Like they're they're not gonna do that.
• 2:36:46
  They're gonna they're gonna direct guys towards a certain kind of of a model
• 2:36:52
  of manhood that they believe. It's very narrow, it's very safe, none
• 2:36:56
  of then, I don't think they're being honest about any of this. I
• 2:37:01
  don't think. Well, yeah, but like that's what I'm saying. What
• 2:37:03
  they're it says, emphasize the unique aspects of the male experience. It's all
• 2:37:09
  just bullshit language. Man, it's amazing you said a whole truload of words
• 2:37:13
  that had no meaning. Okay, and and there. It's ultimately about like
• 2:37:18
  it's like talking to a child to get them to behave without like using like
• 2:37:22
  mean language. But you want you want them to behave a certain way,
• 2:37:26
  so you just say, oh, look, I'm just I'm just emphasizing your
• 2:37:28
  unique aspects of you. But at the end of the day, you're going
• 2:37:31
  to act like all the other men, which is essentially you're not allowed to
• 2:37:35
  have preferences, you're not allowed to have opinions, you're not allowed to be
• 2:37:39
  angry. All you can do is and you can't like hold it in,
• 2:37:43
  So all you can do is cry, be depressed and maybe suicidal. But
• 2:37:46
  that's not my fault, that's yours. That's what it's going to look like.
• 2:37:50
  Yep, there's no there's no conversation about men's issues. There's no conversation
• 2:37:54
  about recognizing unique things that men bring to society. Corporates beach developed bying advertisements
• 2:38:01
  that incorporate themes from different manisphere groups can stimulate interest and engagement. Segmentting themes
• 2:38:07
  into general manaspher categories and exclusive themes excuse me for specific groups allowed for a
• 2:38:13
  nuanced approach. Advertising questions related to dating and sex with pickup artist community or
• 2:38:18
  issues like divorce's fatherhood and suicide rates for MIGTEL and MRA MRM groups can be
• 2:38:22
  done using their own statistics and concerns without blaming women for systemic issues. Then
• 2:38:28
  who do we wait? Wha wha wha whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa?
• 2:38:31
  What workers is about? Blame men? Oh? I see? So we
• 2:38:33
  can use all the data that we have and then we blame patriarchy for it
• 2:38:37
  instead. Because they're saying without blaming women, but women can never do any
• 2:38:43
  wrong. They're angelic, they're perfect. If men suffer, even if a
• 2:38:48
  woman is like splashing with acid because she thought that like he had another woman
• 2:38:54
  on his phone, but it turned out it was just for when she was
• 2:38:56
  younger, that's just patriarchy. It's not women. Women can't do anything bad.
• 2:39:01
  That's impossible without blaming women for systemic issues. What the hell does that
• 2:39:05
  even mean? It's it's not only would you blame men for systemic issues like
• 2:39:13
  that's that's almost the entirety of the ideology. It's divorce from reality, Like
• 2:39:16
  this is just divorce from reality. They obviously they're criticizing something they don't even
• 2:39:22
  understand. Well, they're because they're making shit up. Is that there can
• 2:39:26
  be nothing negative that comes from the feminine. So because women would as a
• 2:39:31
  group might act in a certain way which might look like it's systemic, So
• 2:39:35
  you can't actually point that out. Well, there goes all of comedy.
• 2:39:41
  Well, I mean, what's what is the divorce courts and what are the
• 2:39:46
  family courts? That if not a system? Like I mean, you can't
• 2:39:50
  blame men for being simps, So we can't say, well, actually,
• 2:39:52
  a lot of the family court problem is men who don't recognize the importance of
• 2:39:56
  fathers in their in their children's lives. We can't do that because that's calling
• 2:40:01
  out simping. Okay, So we just basically can't blame women or men for
• 2:40:07
  a society that chooses to ignore men's issues in order to continue to benefit supposedly
• 2:40:13
  women. In targeting specific audience is associated with particular influencers, using the language
• 2:40:20
  employed by those influencers is essential. Okay, you know what, Okay,
• 2:40:26
  I'm going to tell you how to just easily slice through the crap that they're
• 2:40:30
  the fog that they're creating. Honesty is a fundamental aspect of a successful outreach.
• 2:40:35
  By appealing to those who can relate to personal experiences and perspectives, and
• 2:40:39
  an honest and relatable dialogue is established. Ironic promoting an uplifting version of manhood
• 2:40:46
  is advocating. Framing those efforts is an evolution towards higher ideals rather than deconstruction.
• 2:40:52
  Deconstructing traditional notions, but deconstructing traditional notions is the ultimate goal. Drawing
• 2:40:58
  inspiration from content creators who understand what empowers meant give me instrumental in developing effective
• 2:41:05
  community strategies. Losing terms like brotherhood, community support, and self empowerment conveys
• 2:41:11
  emotional vulnerability positively. Why so you can draw in the emotionally vulnerable in order
• 2:41:20
  to redirect them towards seeing how they could be potentially dangerous to women. Menosphere
• 2:41:26
  guys use those terms already, so they're pretending they're making this shut up,
• 2:41:31
  but they're just taking it. They just don't like that we actually and I
• 2:41:37
  say we they don't like that we actually have influence over men and we're not
• 2:41:41
  demonizing them, and they're walking away from this shit, and they're like,
• 2:41:45
  well, we can't have that because we want to control men. That's what
• 2:41:48
  it is. There's two options. Men continue to listen to these people,
• 2:41:54
  continue to see themselves as burdens and kill themselves or just die inside, or
• 2:42:03
  they get away from it and go towards people who actually present a positive view
• 2:42:07
  of manhood. I mean, like, that's it. Those are the two
• 2:42:13
  options. If you don't want to actually recognize man men as having a unique
• 2:42:18
  value, then you offer them nothing. Avoiding politically correct or overly academic jargon
• 2:42:24
  is imperative, as these terms may disengage the audience, regardless of whether they
• 2:42:28
  agree in principle. Okay, this is all bullshit. Like if you encounter
• 2:42:33
  these people, if you go down, you can see them. All you
• 2:42:37
  need to do is just ask yourself what do they offer? What do they
• 2:42:43
  offer? Do they offer recognition of your issues as a man? Do they
• 2:42:48
  offer you your ability to actually recognize that women are capable of being evil?
• 2:42:54
  Right? Do they offer you a recognition of your unique value as a man?
• 2:43:00
  If the answer is no. Then they offer nothing. Don't bother like
• 2:43:05
  what you're not getting anything from nothing. They're just they're just nothing. They
• 2:43:09
  got They give you a big box of nothing except for shame and blame,
• 2:43:16
  you know, like they're deconstructing the male identity. That's what they're doing.
• 2:43:22
  Say it. The one passingly positive thing they said was still at its core
• 2:43:26
  about deconstructing the male identity. And when they mean traditional masculinity, they mean
• 2:43:31
  anything that men bring to the table that is unique to them. That's what
• 2:43:37
  they mean, right, That's what they mean. Anything, Okay, and
• 2:43:45
  they that's it all right, So I think I know you want to get
• 2:43:48
  going. Well, the next section is a whole other show. I mean
• 2:43:54
  Will Adelphi interview about his book. Yes, it's like, I mean,
• 2:43:58
  it could be good, but it's the podcast are feti verse alternates fed versus
• 2:44:05
  evil clones that have been promoted to AISA. I'm pretty sure we're probably on
• 2:44:13
  some secret list somewhere. Oh good grief. So we've basically, as a
• 2:44:18
  society, we've decided to strip away men's identity based on a un proven conjecture,
• 2:44:26
  a conjecture that hasn't even gotten to the point of the first baby step
• 2:44:31
  of being proven right, then we've decided to do this, and then we
• 2:44:35
  have this government organization that's justifying it is trying to silence people because it doesn't
• 2:44:45
  want to deal with the knockdown, knock on effects of the destruction of the
• 2:44:50
  male identity, which also includes all this trans ideology. By the way,
• 2:44:54
  conservatives, we have superchoews. Else one, No, we have two,
• 2:45:03
  yes, two, so I have two superchows. One from anonymous. They
• 2:45:09
  say joke jokes enter language through introduction as redacted and reduced. That is a
• 2:45:18
  very sophisticated joke if that's a joke, because I don't get it. And
• 2:45:22
  then we got one for five dollars from feminist. Mid Wittery says feminists believe
• 2:45:26
  that men can both control the patriarchy just stop oppressing us, and cannot control
• 2:45:31
  the patriarchy. Patriarchy sometimes backfires and hurts men too. This is a contradiction,
• 2:45:37
  but when midwits encounter contradiction, they just pretend it does not exist and
• 2:45:41
  double down on the theory. When a scientist encounters a contradiction, such as
• 2:45:46
  the conflict between quantum mechanics and general relativity, the theories need to be fundamentally
• 2:45:52
  reworked. Midwits just feel that the theory is right and so ignore the contradiction
• 2:45:58
  and the cognitive dissonance that with it. Yeah, that's true. And something
• 2:46:03
  occurred to me when you were saying that patriarchy sometimes backfires and hurts men too.
• 2:46:07
  Well, then if patriarchy was about benefiting men predominantly, it would have
• 2:46:13
  fixed all of men's problems before it ever gave women the vote. Yep,
• 2:46:20
  Okay, all right, So once again, if you want to send us
• 2:46:24
  a message at any time, we'll get to it as soon as we can.
• 2:46:26
  At the most. Well, if we do this topic again, you
• 2:46:31
  can do so. I Feed the Badger dot Com slash just the tip really
• 2:46:33
  helps us out. And you also get to avoid YouTube's comment almost said censorship.
• 2:46:39
  You get to avoid having your comment go through these people because, let's
• 2:46:43
  face it, they probably already have a backdoor at YouTube. Yep. Feed
• 2:46:48
  the Badger dot com slash just the tip to send us a tip. Feed
• 2:46:50
  the Badger dot Com slash support to make sure that we can continue to keep
• 2:46:54
  doing this content. And feed the Badger dot Com slash subscribe if you want
• 2:46:58
  to get a subscription to us a direct subscription to us and gain access to
• 2:47:03
  our bonus content, which we do quite a bit of as well. All
• 2:47:09
  right, So those are the options to help us out. Fed the Badger
• 2:47:11
  dot com slash us the tip for comments, Feed the Badger dot comm slash
• 2:47:15
  support to just give us a give us a pledge, and feed the Badger
• 2:47:20
  dot colm slash subscribe to you know, start up more of a one on
• 2:47:26
  one kind of thing. All right, back to you, Brian, Uh,
• 2:47:30
  do you have any thank yous to give? Uh? No, I
• 2:47:33
  don't, but all right, thank you to huh to re with for that
• 2:47:39
  hundred bucks? Thank you? Was that from before? Did I not?
• 2:47:43
  No? No, we we've already done it. We've already done it.
• 2:47:45
  Oh okay, oh yeah, okay, cool cool? All right, Well,
• 2:47:48
  if you guys like this video, please hit like subscribe. If you're
• 2:47:50
  not already subscribed, hit the bell notifications, leave the comment, let us
• 2:47:54
  know what you guys think about what we discussed on the show today, and
• 2:47:58
  please please please share this video because sharing is caring. Thank you so much
• 2:48:01
  for coming on today's episode of What is This Again? Moist and moisturized,
• 2:48:07
  Yeah, moisturized and fat pilled, And we'll talk to you all in the
• 2:48:11
  next one. I don't know if that's gonna be out, but