Latest / Conversations: Special Guests with Preston Scott / Planned Parenthood Caught Admitting To Harvesting Baby Organs (Among Other Things)?

Transcript

Planned Parenthood Caught Admitting To Harvesting Baby Organs (Among Other Things)? · Conversations: Special Guests with Preston Scott

• 0:00
  The Morning Show with Preston Scott. The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was
• 0:05
  convincing the world he didn't exist. On news radio one hundred point SEVENBUFLA back
• 0:18
  with you on the Morning Show with Thrustin Scott, thirty five, almost thirty
• 0:22
  six minutes, now past the hour, Grand Allen running the radio program over
• 0:25
  there in Studio one A. I'm here in Studio one B, and I
• 0:29
  am joined friend of the program. He is the founder of the Liberty Council.
• 0:32
  And they do so much work that benefits us, whether we know it
• 0:37
  or not. And that's Matt Stave or Matt, good morning, welcome back,
• 0:39
  how are you, good morning, Good to be with you, Matt.
• 0:43
  Give everybody a kind of the cliff notes version. Who is Sandra Merritt
• 0:48
  and why should they care about what's happening in her case? Samra Merritt and
• 0:53
  David Deliden, back in twenty fifteen, begin to meet with planhead doctors,
• 1:00
  officials and representatives of orgon percumer companies over lunch in very public places in California,
• 1:08
  and those conversations were recorded, and it was about purchasing organs of these
• 1:15
  aboarded babies and What they covered was planned parenthood, a boarding babies intentionally so
• 1:21
  that they could harvest intact organs. They were altering the abortion procedure, taking
• 1:26
  intact hearts, lungs, livers, even brains, knees, and so forth,
• 1:30
  and then providing those two organ precumer companies which then sold those organs to
• 1:37
  research facilities funded by the National Institutes of Health with doctor Fauci for tens and
• 1:42
  thousands of dollars, and that's what then was released. The videos Planned Parenthood
• 1:48
  came after Sandra Merritt filed a multi billion dollar lawsuit in San Francisco and then
• 1:53
  the state of California, beginning with Kamala Harris who was the Attorney General then
• 1:57
  and then later Savior Beserah, both in the Vite administration. They came after
• 2:01
  Sandra and David with criminal charges, the first ever against a journalist in history.
• 2:07
  So those two cases are ongoing. The real issue is on the civil
• 2:12
  case. If Sandra can be held liable in civil damages for up to sixteen
• 2:16
  million dollars when there's no defamation, no false statements, and that's I think
• 2:23
  a really critical issue, then no media is safe. And that's why some
• 2:29
  other groups like pet to the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals even joined
• 2:35
  and filed in a methuscree in our favor at the Court of Appeals. So
• 2:39
  that's where we are with those two cases. The Supreme Court unfortunately declined to
• 2:44
  review the civil case, which they should have. It's a huge case.
• 2:47
  But it's not over. We're still back at the Court of Appeals with some
• 2:52
  major developments that have just occurred there regarding Project Veritas. Frankly about a law
• 2:58
  that was struck down that's very similar to the law in California. How it
• 3:01
  was struck down by the same Ninth Circuit. Yeah, I want to talk
• 3:04
  about that for a second. Here first, the law under which Sandra Merritt
• 3:08
  is been charged and was found guilty of violating. What is that law.
• 3:15
  There's a two party recording law in California, meaning that you have to have
• 3:19
  both parties consent to record a conversation. That's one of about five states in
• 3:23
  the country. Most states have a single party recording law. Just one person
• 3:28
  consents, that's it, and so the recording law has consequences, but there's
• 3:31
  exceptions to it, so you can record even if the other party doesn't consent.
• 3:37
  Or know about it if you believe that the person is engaged or about
• 3:40
  to engage in criminal activity, or there's no expectation of confidentiality. And in
• 3:45
  this case, both of those apply because they were done in very very public
• 3:50
  places with a lot of traffic around the people that we're talking. But that
• 3:55
  law is very similar to a law in the state of organ with progic veritas.
• 4:01
  When James o'keeith was then with Project Glass, they filed suit against a
• 4:06
  law that's almost identical, has the same kind of consequences two party content.
• 4:12
  If you don't get two party consent, then most criminal charges that law the
• 4:15
  Ninth Circuit Board of Appeals struck down as a violation of write of speech.
• 4:21
  That law is virtually identical to the law in California, and that's the law
• 4:28
  that is forming the basis for the criminal action in California. So we're asking
• 4:32
  the Ninth Circuit now to also issue the same ruling in this case as it
• 4:40
  did in the Oregon case on a very similar, almost identical law. And
• 4:46
  if that's the case, then there is no basis on which there should be
• 4:48
  any criminal prosecution whatsoever. There should be no question at that point because the
• 4:53
  law itself clearly violates the First Amendment. The Morning Show with Preston Scott,
• 4:57
  can you fly this plan and land it? You can't be serious. I
• 5:00
  am serious, and don't call me surely on News Radio one hundred point seven.
• 5:05
  Dousla Liberty Councils filed a motion to dismiss the Superior Court of San Francisco
• 5:15
  County regarding a criminal case and Sandra Merritt asking the court to dismiss all eight
• 5:24
  felony charges that were originally fifteen Matt, Matt, you said something about the
• 5:29
  law, even as it's constructed in California, has some exceptions. How is
• 5:32
  it not criminal conduct? What planned parenthood was engaging in? Well, frankly,
• 5:39
  it is, and especially we have a doctor, doctor Mikotola, for
• 5:42
  example, she intentionally altered the abortion procedure, which is illegal, especially when
• 5:48
  it is done to increase the risk to the mother. And what was she
• 5:54
  would do breach birth, and she would bring the baby out except for the
• 5:59
  head, and all the baby's head was still in so she could still consider
• 6:01
  to quote abortion. She would then extract the organs from the baby, and
• 6:09
  of course that causes additional risk to the mother. But it's also obviously brutal
• 6:12
  to the child. That's illegal, and she's bragging on tape about how she
• 6:16
  did that, she should be prosecuted. In fact, the US House and
• 6:20
  the US Senate referred these cases to the Department of Justice under the Obama administration
• 6:28
  for prosecution and consideration for prosecution, and of course the Obama administration did nothing
• 6:33
  to do anything on this issue. We do know that, for example,
• 6:38
  the Oregon procurement companies were sued by the Orange County District Attorney and they were
• 6:44
  fined seven point eight million dollars collectively. Some of those companies went on the
• 6:47
  business. Some of those companies, like stem Express are still in business.
• 6:51
  They were able to weather defined because they were engaging in the illegal trafficking of
• 6:57
  human baby body parts for profit, and so that was a conservative county.
• 7:02
  Orange County District Attorney went after those individuals and did it because they found out
• 7:08
  what was happening because of these videos. But the only ones who really haven't
• 7:12
  been punished is the planned parenthood operatives, the people who were involved, the
• 7:17
  affiliate entities that were engaging in these trafficking of human body parts. Some of
• 7:23
  those people wore two hats. They worked for Planned Parenthood or an affiliate of
• 7:28
  Plan Parenthood, and they also worked for the organ procurement company. So on
• 7:31
  the one hand, they're doing the abortions, on the other hand, they're
• 7:33
  profiting on the organ procurement company side. Those should have been and still should
• 7:39
  be the ones that should pay the penalty for what's going on here. What's
• 7:43
  gone on, and it's been going on for years and years. But what
• 7:46
  happened is you've got a politically motivated Kamala Harris and then Exavior Bisera who's now
• 7:51
  with the Department of Health and Human Services. They were the ages, they
• 7:56
  were getting contributions from plant parents. They went after Sandra and David. Even
• 8:03
  the Los Angeles Times Editorial Board issued an editorial blasting these criminal charges, saying
• 8:07
  it's never happened in history and it would ultimately undermine journalism and investigative journalism,
• 8:13
  which is true. So we have that going on at the same time that
• 8:16
  we're asking for the court to dismiss it based upon the unconstitutionality of this law,
• 8:22
  and also in the civil case, it's back at the Ninth Circuit,
• 8:26
  and we've asked the Ninth Circuit to do the same thing since the same Ninth
• 8:30
  Circuit, different panel, but the same circuit Court of Appeals struck down just
• 8:35
  this year a similar law that's virtually identical. Then how can that be a
• 8:39
  basis in the civil case that Plan aparently brought. It can't be. So
• 8:43
  we're moving on both fronts to push back on both of these situations. But
• 8:50
  you know, this has been going on since twenty fifteen. It's a long
• 8:54
  call and we're not done by any means. We were supposed to be going
• 8:58
  to trial this month, but that got moved because Sandra was not able to
• 9:03
  travel, but she will. You know, we have a trial scheduled for
• 9:07
  next year, but this month, just in a week or two, less
• 9:09
  than two weeks actually, middle of November, we'll be back in San Francisco
• 9:13
  in the criminal case Austin for the judges to dismiss all the remaining eight criminal
• 9:20
  charges. Any one of those charges. If Sandra's convicted of she could spend
• 9:24
  years in prison. As always, Matt, thank you for all you do
• 9:28
  and your team across the country on behalf of all of us. We appreciate
• 9:33
  very much. Thank you. Preston, good to be with you. Thank
• 9:35
  you, Sir Matt Staver, founder Senior Counsel. I mean, the list
• 9:41
  goes on and on. He's pastor. Liberty Council LC dot org is the
• 9:46
  website forty six past the Hour