Latest / Sports Card Clubhouse / MidLife Sports Cards Q & A- December 31, 2025

Transcript

MidLife Sports Cards Q & A- December 31, 2025 · Sports Card Clubhouse

0:10
What's going on everybody? Alright, the last day of 2025 is
0:16
upon us. I wanna take a moment to again
0:19
thank everybody. This channel revolves around
0:23
your participation. If you do not respond to my
0:28
questions to you on Mondays, if you do not ask me questions for
0:32
Wednesdays, if you do not submit card pickups for the Midlife
0:38
Community Show and Tell, this is a completely different channel.
0:42
This channel is a little bit different than others where it
0:46
does depend on all of you. So everybody out there who
0:51
during the year has left a comment, has submitted a
0:54
question, has submitted a pickup, whatever it is that you
0:59
did, I appreciate you. Genuinely, I appreciate you.
1:03
It was so much fun meeting many of you at Strongsville and at
1:07
the national and at local card shows.
1:10
People that have reached out to me, it means a lot and it is
1:15
vital for this channel to continue on.
1:18
So with that said, remember, if you have a question for an
1:23
upcoming episode, ask it down below.
1:27
By asking it down below, it allows this Wednesday Q&A to
1:31
continue to live on. There are going to be weeks that
1:35
people will ask questions that maybe you're not interested in.
1:38
Maybe it's a topic that you don't like.
1:40
Maybe it's a topic that has hobby drama or some of the
1:44
recent chaos and how to navigate through the minefield ahead of
1:48
us. That doesn't mean you have to
1:51
listen to every single question. Pick the questions that you
1:55
like, focus on those, listen to those parts.
1:58
But I feel it as an obligation and I feel as an honor to be
2:04
able to answer each and every question.
2:07
If you've asked a question and it's not yet been answered, I do
2:11
have an ongoing list. Trust me, I will get to the
2:15
questions as as it seems fit depending on what's happening in
2:21
the dynamics of the card community.
2:24
So with that said, thank you again.
2:27
Have a safe night tonight out there on New Year's Eve.
2:31
It can be a little bit sketch to say the least.
2:35
And let's take a look at our first question here.
2:40
This one says here's a future question for a show.
2:43
Let's say you've been appointed to be.
2:45
The CEO of Collector's. Universe with the major task of
2:48
figuring out how all three brands can coexist and how to
2:53
make sure each branded slab cards moving forward have equal
2:57
value to each other. How would you handle this merger
3:01
and the inner workings? This is a great question and
3:07
this is a great situation because now that I'm CEO of PSAI
3:11
am Rich, which is fantastic, which is a far cry from my
3:17
current situation. I think that, you know,
3:20
collectors, collectors, universe collectors, holdings, whatever
3:24
you want to call them. You know, they've got 3 grading
3:28
companies now. They've got PSA, they've got SGC
3:31
and they've got Beckett. And when you look at those three
3:35
options, to me, they they should not continue to live.
3:42
Again, you're asking me as CEO, what would I do?
3:45
I believe that each of those companies bring something unique
3:50
to the table. What PSA has long been known for
3:54
is sort of like the umbrella grader.
3:57
They are known for grading vintage, they are known for
4:00
grading modern. They are known for grading
4:02
everything in between. I would kind of leave them as
4:07
is. I would have them continue to do
4:09
what they're doing. If you want the umbrella option
4:13
go with PSA. If you are SGC is something that
4:18
you like. I would continue to leave the
4:21
black insert the the the tuxedo look.
4:24
And what I would do with SGC is I would make them vintage only.
4:28
I would make them prior to 1980. Anything from pre war to the
4:34
beginning of cards all the way to 1980 is all that they grade.
4:38
Let them specialize there and take the PSA graders that they
4:42
stole. Take the because when, when,
4:45
when PSA took SGC graders, which they admit that they took SGC
4:51
graders, they admit that one of the reasons.
4:53
Well, we'll get into that in a minute.
4:55
But when SGC was purchased by PSA shortly thereafter, they
5:00
went to the employees and they said, do you want to continue at
5:04
SGC or do you want to grade under the PSA brand and be APSA
5:08
employee? How do I know that?
5:10
Because that's what all of the employees told us that at the
5:13
National, all the people working there said, yeah, they came and
5:16
they asked us, you know, we had a choice on, on what we want to
5:19
do, stay with SGC brand or go over to PSA brand And, and
5:23
obviously a lot of them went over to the PSA brand.
5:26
How do I know that? Because it went from a 5 to 10
5:29
day turn around to now it's like a month, month and a half.
5:32
And so they lost graders and if, and I've seen responses from the
5:37
customer service department and it says we have a much smaller
5:43
number of graders, we have a similar number of submissions.
5:47
So we're backed up. So clearly people went from the
5:52
SGC grading shirt and took off their black and white shirt and
5:56
put on their red shirt with the white and blue, red, white and
6:01
blue logo on it down the hall. So what I would have, what I
6:07
would do is I would reinstate them.
6:09
I'd say whoa, whoa, whoa. It's not SGC versus PSA.
6:13
It's not PSA or SGC. It's what's best for the
6:17
company. So maybe you have some graders
6:20
that grade under the PSA brand and sometimes they grade under
6:23
the SGC brand, but I would not pillage and take and steal all
6:29
of the best SGC graders and bring them over to PSA just
6:33
because the profit margin is higher.
6:35
If I am in charge, what I would do is I would let SGC continue
6:41
to do what they're doing. I would get rid of TCG grading,
6:44
I would get rid of modern grading, and I would focus all
6:47
of the efforts on vintage grading.
6:49
I would also change the label. I would change the label of all
6:53
three brands and I haven't gotten to Beckett yet, but I
6:55
will in a second. I would change the label to say
7:01
GC by A or SGC by collectors and PSA by collectors and BGS by
7:08
collectors. And what that would do is it
7:10
would bring some uniformity. I would make all of the flips
7:14
the same, the difference being what the label has as the
7:18
grader. So instead of the PSA
7:20
lighthouse, you have APSA lighthouse, you have an SGC
7:24
lighthouse, you have a BGS lighthouse.
7:26
I would create uniformity in the flips and they would all have
7:31
the collector's universe stamp on them.
7:34
They would have the individual brand.
7:37
I would have collectors come out and say with the flip, with the
7:44
uniformity. They are part of us right now,
7:48
it feels like, yeah, yeah, yeah. You know, their boutique over
7:51
there. But what what we really want you
7:54
to do is send stuff into PSA because that's where we're
7:58
putting all of our resources. That doesn't show that you care
8:01
about the label. It doesn't show that you care
8:05
about SGC. When you steal all the graders
8:08
and you slow down the turn around times.
8:11
That's not that's what that is doing is it's saying this is
8:15
inferior. This is our value brand.
8:18
It's not our premium brand. And that's what they want.
8:22
But you're not asking me what the current people want.
8:25
You're asking me what I would do.
8:26
So SGC would be vintage only. It would be prior to 1980 only.
8:32
It would be no TCG. It would be sports cards and non
8:35
sports cards only. And I would make sure that I
8:39
have some graders that could flex between PSA and SGC down at
8:45
the Florida Boca Raton offices where what they could do is when
8:49
SGC is slowed down, you flex them over there and you see.
8:52
But the grading standards are different.
8:54
I understand that, but the rubrics are going to be
8:57
different, the grading sheets are going to be different.
9:00
If you took these people from SGC graders and you turned them
9:03
into PSA graders, there was an adjustment.
9:06
So I'm just saying utilize them in both capacities.
9:10
My humble opinion. The third thing I would do it
9:14
obviously with BGS. To me, some people want, they
9:20
want the sub grades. Some people.
9:23
To me, Beckett is a company that has done OK with TCG, but
9:30
they've always kind of done the best with ATCH cards and the
9:35
thicker cards because they have the thicker slab and people like
9:40
some people want the sub grades. So what I would, what I would do
9:44
is it would be, you know, again, you have the flip which matches
9:48
the other ones. The difference being what the
9:51
lighthouse is. It'd be a lighthouse with BGS.
9:54
It would be BGS by collectors. It would be a focus.
9:59
I would steer people towards patch cards and thicker cards,
10:03
RPA type things, flawless cards, Immaculate cards.
10:08
The ones that are a little bit thicker and I would, I would
10:11
phase out some of the extra options with Beckett.
10:14
I would get them to sort of focus on some of that stuff.
10:19
Not a lot of people at this point are grading vintage with
10:22
Beckett. I would probably have Beckett
10:24
BGS grading at this point. And this is the part that some
10:28
people that are Beckett fans won't like.
10:31
I would probably say Beckett is going to be 1980 and after,
10:35
maybe even 1990 and after. And it's for the people who want
10:41
sub grades and they have a grading authentication.
10:45
I would keep that in intact. I would allow them to continue
10:48
to be grading off the autograph authenticators.
10:53
But the flip would be uniform. The difference being the
10:58
lighthouse. It would be Beckett by
11:01
collectors and it would be much more uniform and and I would
11:07
show that I actually care by redoing the registry and
11:11
including all of them. If you have cards in the, you
11:16
could have APSA only registry, an SGC only registry, a BGS only
11:20
registry and a combined registry.
11:22
And you say, man, that that'd be a lot of work.
11:25
Oh, trust me, they have more than enough resources with the
11:30
amount of cards that degrading the amount of money they're
11:32
bringing in. They could absolutely make that
11:35
happen. I have enough database design
11:39
knowledge to be dangerous. But when you have states that
11:43
are taking, you know, 8 different databases and merging
11:47
them all into one database, they could 100% make this happen.
11:52
So that's what I would do. Will they do it?
11:55
No they won't. Why not?
11:58
Because they want PSA to be the premium brand.
12:01
They want PSA to be the the brand that they're in their
12:06
eyes, the premium brand, not my eyes, In their eyes, they want
12:09
that to be the premium brand. They're going to charge more.
12:12
They're going to offer things through PSA that you can't get
12:15
through the others because then they can up charge you over
12:18
there. Then they can, you know, charge
12:21
more for the grading there. They don't.
12:24
They don't want a combination, they want a boutique for BGS.
12:29
If you really want subgrades, I guess you can send it down
12:33
there. If you really want the black
12:36
tuxedo look, I guess you could send it down there.
12:39
They're going to streamline those and strip them down.
12:42
They're going to cut back the staffing and they're going to
12:44
put as many resources towards PSA as they can.
12:48
That's what I believe they're going to do.
12:50
That's not what I would do because at a certain point, I
12:56
know it's all about the profit. Trust me, I know.
12:58
I know that it's all about the bottom line.
13:01
I understand it's all about them preparing to go public.
13:05
I fully get all of that. But at some point, you cannot
13:11
just completely turn your backs on all the people who are STC
13:18
fans and all the people who are Beckett fans by just absolutely
13:22
stripping those companies as soon as you buy them and putting
13:25
all the resources into PSA. You can't do that and expect to
13:30
carry goodwill. You have to at least pretend
13:34
like you care about the hobby and you care about those
13:38
collectors and you don't only care about the PSA label.
13:42
But that's not what's going to happen.
13:43
So I'm not predicting that's what's going to happen.
13:47
You asked what I would do. What I would do is change the
13:51
flips, stop stripping the resources, allow all three to
13:56
coexist, but set some parameters on what they grade, which would
14:00
allow more, you know, streamlining, which would create
14:04
more efficiencies but would allow collectors to feel like
14:11
it's a brand that they hadn't turned their backs on.
14:16
This one says Awesome video as always.
14:19
My hope you and your family had a wonderful Christmas and now we
14:23
gear up for 2026. Question, is there a point and
14:27
if so at what point do you not buy a card online but rather in
14:33
person? Is there a price threshold?
14:36
Take your T2 O 6 Walter Johnson hands at.
14:39
Chess for example. Besides friends like Ash, CIA
14:44
and other notable auction houses, is there a cut off for
14:47
eBay in your mind in regards to price?
14:52
Is there a lack of trust that coincides with a certain dollar
14:56
amount in your opinion? We never know when or where
14:59
we're going to come across the one.
15:02
I don't know if I'm asking this question right, but thank you,
15:06
Greg. Happy New Year.
15:09
All right, this is a great question and it's a question
15:13
that is super timely for me. There's a, there are a couple of
15:19
cards that I have tried to create a savings account where a
15:25
portion of whenever I sell something, a portion of my
15:28
monthly budget, I have been piling into this secondary
15:33
account and it's sort of my gold card, my grail card account.
15:37
That's an idea that my buddy Darren returned to collecting
15:40
suggested a couple of years ago. And I'm finally trying to start
15:43
taking that seriously. What I did the last couple of
15:46
years is that became my Strongsville budget and that
15:49
became my national card budget, card show budget, and then I
15:55
just emptied the account and brought that with me to those
15:58
shows. What I'm trying to do, trying
16:02
being the keyword, is I'm trying to actually set a massive card
16:06
budget because there are two or three cards that I would really
16:09
like to acquire that quite frankly, I'm not sure I'll ever
16:13
be able to afford because I keep getting sidetracked in my goals
16:20
to accomplish big purchases. And there was a car that popped
16:26
up the other day. It was a 5 figure card and I
16:31
don't have 5 figures in my card account.
16:34
I don't have 5 figures in my gold card account.
16:37
It would have been a card where what I needed to do was borrow
16:41
against my future card money and purchase a card and then have to
16:46
sell a bunch of stuff to pay myself back.
16:49
That's what I would have had to do.
16:51
And I showed it to a few friends and they're like, dude, that's
16:55
amazing card. You got to get it.
16:58
And I showed it to another friend.
16:59
He said that card is sweet. You won't regret it.
17:03
And then I sent it to my dad. And my dad, being Mr. Practical,
17:08
said that's a lot of money to spend on a card that you haven't
17:13
even held in your own hands. And I was like, that's a good
17:18
point. That's a really good point.
17:22
I haven't even seen it. I haven't even held it.
17:26
I haven't been able to inspect it other than from pictures.
17:32
And at that moment I was like, I can't do it.
17:38
I can't pull this card off because I need to be able to
17:44
look it over. This is too much money.
17:47
So then I started thinking about my COB, which is the biggest
17:51
card in my collection, which I bought at the National, paid
17:54
$5000 for it. And when I bought that cob, I
18:00
thought I, I, I was thinking back to it when I bought that,
18:04
would I have bought that card if I wasn't in person with it at
18:10
the National? And I don't know if I would
18:15
have. And then I started thinking
18:17
about, well, what are some of my other big cards, like my Walter
18:20
Johnson hands at chest, which is over a $2000 card.
18:25
Would I have been able to buy that if I didn't see that in
18:29
person at the National? And I started realizing of all
18:32
my biggest cards, my Cobb T2O6, my T2O6 Cy Young, my T2 O 6
18:40
Walter Johnson cards, my Ernie Banks rookie card, almost all of
18:48
those were in person purchases. And I started thinking, well,
18:53
what's the biggest purchase I've made that wasn't in person?
19:01
And it's about $1000. And so I don't know the answer.
19:08
I'm, I'm, I want to give advice, but I want to give advice that I
19:11
follow myself. It's about maybe 2000 bucks for
19:19
me and my budget now for some people, $2000 is different than
19:22
$2000 is for me. But I just bought a card a
19:30
couple of days ago that I'm gonna do an entire video about
19:34
one card. I've never done that, but it's a
19:38
very, very special card to me. It's a very meaningful card to
19:42
me. It's a card I've been searching
19:45
for for two years for the right one and it was right around
19:53
$1500. And I'm a little nervous because
19:58
I've only seen pictures and I think it's the most expensive
20:02
card I've ever purchased that wasn't in person.
20:06
So I. Whenever someone asked me for
20:10
advice, I try to say what I would do or what I have done.
20:13
And what I have done is not spent much more than $1500 on a
20:19
card without holding it and seeing it in person first.
20:25
My Walter Johnson. Both of them I've seen in
20:28
person, my already Banks rookie, my Ty Cobb, my Cy Young, most of
20:33
my top ten, my my Sandy Koufax rookie, most of my top ten.
20:39
I held them in person before I bought them.
20:43
So it's a great question. Does that mean that's the right
20:46
answer? No.
20:49
But when you buy cards without seeing them in person, 20% of
20:55
the time you're going to get it in hand and go, oh, I didn't see
21:00
that. I didn't notice that.
21:03
The picture didn't really show that, and we can't avoid that by
21:09
only buying them in person. But I also realize that many of
21:12
us don't have that luxury of going to shows where we can make
21:18
that happen. So my advice would be, if you're
21:22
stretching what you're comfortable with, send a message
21:27
to the seller or to the auction house.
21:30
Ask questions. Does this card have a pinhole?
21:33
Does this card have a crease? Does this card have a stain?
21:38
What are the things about this car that are making it the grade
21:42
that it is so that you can try to get more information than
21:46
just the information that the picture and the grade provides?
21:51
It's a tough question, but for me apparently my threshold is
21:56
about $1500 because that's the most I've ever spent without
22:01
having it in my hands when I bought it.
22:06
This one says being my age I wanted to grade some vintage
22:09
cards so my wife would have a better idea of the worth.
22:14
I hesitate because of the current state of grading
22:17
including the shipping process. Would I be better off grading
22:21
myself to the best of my abilities and put a number on
22:25
them as an indicator? Example, if I have a 69 NBA,
22:30
Wilt is between A6 and A7. Thanks in advance.
22:36
I totally understand. I 100% understand.
22:41
And this is one of the biggest disappointments that a lot of us
22:46
have about not knowing the future of Beckett grading and
22:51
STC grading is we don't know. We don't know what to do
22:55
anymore. You know, PSA has has certainly
23:00
takes their time getting their cards back to you.
23:03
They up charge you if it's a big card and it feels like the
23:07
consistency is not what the consistency should be.
23:13
Now where does that leave us? It leaves us in a tough spot and
23:18
you are describing the tough spot.
23:21
Some of us just want to get them protected.
23:24
We just want to get a, a grade that provides an, an approximate
23:31
condition so that when somebody ends up with these cards,
23:38
because let's face, I mean, my daughter said to me the other
23:41
day, you know, Dad, someday these cards, you don't expect us
23:48
to keep them, right? And I'm like, no, I don't expect
23:53
you to keep them. Absolutely sell them, but if she
23:58
goes down to the to the local card shop and tries to sell them
24:04
that's not going to be good. So I have a couple of opinions
24:09
and take it for what it's worth. First opinion is I still
24:18
consider SGC A viable option. It's not the same option that it
24:24
was a couple of years ago, but it does encapsulate them, it
24:28
protects them, it gives a fairly accurate evaluation of the
24:34
quality of the card. And it's a legacy brand that I
24:40
believe even if they shut down tomorrow on the 1st of 2026, if
24:48
they shut down tomorrow, I think a lot of collectors would
24:55
continue to respect the brand and continue to respect the
24:59
grade and continue to respect the holder because they didn't
25:03
go out from a scandal. They went out because Pac-Man
25:09
came and gobbled them up. That's different, you know, and
25:15
I've talked a little bit about that before.
25:17
So I guess my response is I would still consider sending
25:23
cards to SGCI. Sent a submission to SGC on
25:28
Saturday. I mailed off a submission to
25:32
SGC. It was only like 5 or 6 cards
25:34
but I sent. So I'm still willing to send to
25:37
SGC and I know that I am because I just did.
25:42
So that's an option. Here's another option, and this
25:46
is where some of you are going to have potentially an issue
25:52
with what I'm about to say, and that's OK.
25:57
I have certain people that I trust.
26:02
I have certain people in the card community having gotten to
26:05
know a lot of people. There are a lot of people that
26:09
I've gotten to know in the community, dealers, auction
26:12
houses, collectors, buyers, a little bit of everything.
26:18
And there are some people that guy is a straight up stand up
26:25
guy and that guy maybe not so much.
26:30
There are some people that I trust with my stuff when I'm
26:39
gone. So I'll give you an example and
26:43
and I'm going to preface this right now.
26:45
First, one thing. I am sponsored by CIA Auctions
26:53
collector, investor auctions, I am sponsored by them.
26:56
I am good friends with my buddy Theo Clemente collector.
27:00
One option that I believe is to leave contact information to to
27:08
to your loved ones, to your heirs, to to contact Theo and
27:15
Theo will take care of your stuff and your heirs.
27:21
Theo will send cards in for grading before putting them up
27:27
for auction if that's what's in the best interest of those
27:29
cards. And the cards that aren't, he'll
27:32
put in lots, he'll sell them raw.
27:35
I believe he'll take care of your family members.
27:38
So one thing I would consider doing is I would consider
27:43
leaving Theo's information so that they have a point person to
27:48
know that they're going to be taken care of and not ripped
27:52
off. And I also believe that Theo
27:56
would potentially give a fair evaluation because I've seen him
28:00
do that with people and offer to just purchase the cards outright
28:05
for CIA and he's going to offer a fair amount.
28:11
That's one option. Another option is, and again I
28:16
have to preface it, another sponsor of mine, a sponsor on my
28:22
sports card Clubhouse channel who sponsors my Surface issues
28:26
episode with my buddy Mike, Junk Wax Hero and myself is Chris
28:31
Sewell. Chris Sewell is a really good
28:34
guy, a really good guy. I trust Chris.
28:38
Chris is going to come in and Chris will not try to take
28:43
advantage of anyone. So in my humble opinion, if you
28:47
left Chris Sewell's information and you said, hey, if I pass
28:52
away and the cards aren't graded or they are graded, contact this
28:57
guy. He's going to be fair.
29:00
That would be another option. A final option I would throw out
29:04
there is put them in contact with somebody that you trust in
29:10
the community besides Theo, besides Chris, if you want to
29:15
leave them my name and contact information, I could help guide
29:20
them through the process. I could help.
29:23
I, I mean, I'm offering to you if, if somebody is out there and
29:29
goes, I don't know what to do when my cards, you know, when,
29:32
when I go to make sure that the, the local card shop doesn't take
29:37
advantage of my wife or my children.
29:41
You can put them in contact with me and I can help guide them
29:44
through the process. The point I'm trying to get at
29:48
is putting them in contact with somebody that you trust.
29:53
If you want a dealer who you trust, who I trust, at least I
30:00
trust Chris Sewell. If you want the cards to go up
30:03
for auction, I trust Theo and I trust the people at CIA
30:08
auctions. I do, otherwise I would not be
30:11
in partnership with them. See, I don't just go.
30:15
I've had more companies offer me money than I have agreed to
30:21
participate with because I didn't get the right feeling.
30:25
But I trust Ciai trust Theo, I trust Chris Sewell.
30:29
But if you want an independent person who is just going to help
30:34
guide them through and navigate through and not get taken
30:37
advantage of, you're welcome to provide them with my contact
30:42
information and I would be happy to help guide them through the
30:45
process. Those are a few options, but as
30:50
things stand right now on the last day of 2025, I still trust
30:56
sending cards to SGC, and the way I can prove that to you is I
31:01
just sent some. Cards in collectors buying SGC
31:07
was definitely a minimize the competition move.
31:10
Beckett purchase is not the same.
31:13
SGC was growing and thriving. Beckett has not been growing.
31:18
Beckett has several things SGC didn't have, like auto
31:22
authentication. A marketplace and a legacy brand
31:25
with extensive value gaining market share at the fastest rate
31:30
have been TAG and CGC. The true reason for the Beckett
31:34
acquisition will likely come to light in 2026.
31:39
If it was to eliminate a competitor.
31:42
That just doesn't make sense based on Beckett's recent
31:46
results. What do you think about?
31:48
This. Thanks for the video.
31:51
This is. Going to be a little bit of a.
31:53
Difficult one for me to respond because I have been told some
31:58
things in confidence that I know to be true that may not aren't.
32:08
How do I say this OK and say it this way I know for a fact that.
32:20
There were two. Main reasons why PSA OK White
32:27
Collectors, the parent company of PSA, acquired STCA Big.
32:34
Chunk of it. Was to block somebody else from
32:39
purchasing them, infusing money into them, and helping them to
32:44
be a legitimate competitor to PSA.
32:49
The second. Reason.
32:50
Is they were. Struggling to find quality.
32:54
Graders and SGC clearly had quality graders, so by acquiring
33:00
the company they then controlled the graders and they prevented
33:04
somebody else from buying them, infusing money into them and
33:10
helping them to become a legitimate competitor.
33:13
Head to If fanatics had bought SGC, they.
33:19
Could have. They could have.
33:20
Quickly become a legitimate competitor to PSA if they.
33:25
Had bought SGC. And put some money into them
33:29
they they could have so by collectors buying them it.
33:36
Prevented that threat. And it got them a bunch of
33:40
graders. And like I mentioned earlier in
33:42
the episode, a lot of those graders they've lured over to
33:45
start grading in the PSA label, which is a big part of the
33:49
reason that the SGC turn around time has gone down so much is
33:52
because they have fewer quality graders because many of them are
33:55
now grading under the PSA label in Florida.
34:00
I believe that. That's part.
34:05
Of the reason? A big part of the reason that
34:08
they went after Beckett, The other thing about Beckett is
34:11
Beckett has a brand recognition, a name recognition that has
34:19
value that they could potentially do things to
34:23
resurrect. I mean, let me give you an
34:25
example. PWCC.
34:31
Was a marketplace and an auction house to buy and sell cards.
34:41
And they were literally going. Under, like going under and then
34:46
Fanatics bought them and now fanatics.
34:50
Turned that. Fledgling dying marketplace into
34:56
a significant fanatics marketplace that has big time
35:03
auctions with big time cards with tons of cards for sale.
35:08
They took this dying company, rebranded it, infused money and
35:15
expertise into it, and now they are a major player in the
35:19
marketplace for buying and selling cards.
35:25
If they. Could do that.
35:27
To PWCC, couldn't they do? That to Beckett.
35:32
Couldn't they do that to SGC? Fanatics has the power, the
35:38
strength, the ability, the deep pockets, the expertise to turn a
35:45
fledgling company into a serious competitor with all of the
35:50
biggest players in that marketplace.
35:54
They've done it. I believe that they A, wanted to
36:01
block somebody like fanatics from coming in, B, wanted to
36:05
acquire some graders, C acquire the assets of what Beckett has
36:12
to assess them and see what is salvageable, what has potential.
36:20
But I think it was mostly a block and an acquisition of
36:23
graders. But I also think, and, and
36:27
again, this is you're asking my opinion, these, let me again
36:31
remind you, everything I say on Wednesdays is simply everything
36:35
I say every day is just opinion. Not a ton of this is fact.
36:39
It's opinion. Some of you think.
36:42
My opinions are. Crazy.
36:43
Some of you think my opinions are good.
36:46
If you think they're crazy, not sure why.
36:49
You're still listening, but. Unless it's just for sheer, you
36:54
know, grudge watching I. Believe.
36:58
That that. PS That.
37:01
The parent company of PSA Collectors is is planning on
37:05
going public in the next couple of years.
37:09
I think that they are going to try to go from rich to crazy
37:12
rich. And the way you go from rich to
37:14
crazy rich is you take a company that is a private company, you
37:18
restructure them, you make some acquisitions, you eliminate the
37:25
competition. You up the bottom.
37:29
Line and then you take them public and they have become the
37:35
I mean it is a textbook, you know, do this, then do this,
37:41
then do this, then do this before.
37:45
Going public? I.
37:47
Think that. This was one of the last moves
37:51
that they felt like they needed to do.
37:55
Before they could go. Public and get really rich that
38:02
that's what I think. Am I crazy Maybe.
38:07
But that's what. I think this one says.
38:11
Hey great video, watch the whole thing even at work.
38:16
I'm also like most who watch, have all vintage all slabbed.
38:21
In SGC I have every Hall of Fame baseball players rookie card
38:26
from 1960 to present. I also have a lot of 50s as well
38:31
but still working on these since they can be pricey.
38:35
I'm more of a collector but will sell to buy other rookies.
38:40
I do want my cards to be protected and hold some value to
38:45
hand down to my kids. Should I stop with SGC
38:49
submissions? Well SGC cards even have value
38:53
to raw in 20 years. Would love your feedback.
38:59
There's a little bit of overlap. With this question and some of
39:02
the previous questions and I thought about kind of combining
39:05
them, but there's enough meat on the bone here to make it its own
39:10
question. So I do want to share a couple
39:12
of thoughts. Sort of like I said earlier,
39:15
when there is a brand that goes away because the product is not
39:20
good, that is different than a brand that goes away because
39:27
they got purchased out and absorbed by another company.
39:31
So I do believe that if we go 20-30 years down the road, there
39:37
will be some people coming into the hobby going SGC.
39:41
Who's that? And people go, oh, that's a
39:44
company who used to grade a long time ago.
39:46
They're not around anymore. And the young collectors who are
39:50
so obsessed with PSA 10's and have always looked down on SGC
39:54
cards because SGC graded cards, because they're obsessed with
39:58
PSA 10s, because that's what Jeff told them to do, What what
40:03
happens to them those people is. In 20 or 30 years I could see
40:08
there being a a depressed market for cards and SGC holders.
40:14
But SGC is different and Beckett is different than some brands
40:24
and I'm trying to. I'm trying to think of a good
40:26
example without offending anyone.
40:31
Saturn. Was a car company the cars?
40:35
Were OK. People didn't really want them
40:40
because they'd rather have a Honda or a Toyota.
40:44
They went away. Because people didn't.
40:48
Really want the product? That's different than if Toyota
40:52
bought Saturn and then turned all of the Saturn plants into
40:58
Toyota plants. That would be different.
41:02
One goes away because the product isn't that great.
41:08
There are restaurants in your town that went out of business
41:13
and they went out of business because the food wasn't very
41:16
good. There are other restaurants or
41:20
coffee shops in your town that went away because a bigger
41:25
business bought them and turned them into their business.
41:31
That doesn't mean that their pizza wasn't good because we'll
41:36
see. Here's the problem.
41:37
I'm I'm about to use a pizza company that I think is a
41:40
regional pizza company. What would an example be here?
41:47
The Local. Hair salon shop didn't go.
41:52
Out of business because. They don't give good haircuts.
41:55
They went out of business because Super Clip is Super
41:59
Cuts. Is Super Cuts a national brand?
42:02
I don't know. Let's say it's a national brand
42:04
for just a minute. If you've never heard of them,
42:06
pretend that you've heard of them.
42:07
Great Clips, Super Cuts, they have those out here.
42:10
I don't know what they have in other places, like like Maine.
42:14
Maine is basically part of Canada, isn't it, Mike?
42:18
OK, so. Carrying on.
42:19
If, if, if Supercuts bought out the local barbershop, that
42:24
doesn't mean that the local barbershop didn't give good
42:26
haircuts. It didn't go out of business
42:28
because they didn't give good haircuts.
42:30
It went out of business because they got bought out by a major,
42:36
a major chain. Those are different things.
42:39
I think SGC if they go away if. It's different.
42:47
Than some of the other grading companies that have gone away
42:50
because it just didn't do a very good job.
42:53
That's my take. I'm still sending to SGC.
42:57
I'm still buying cards in SGC holders.
43:00
But I ain't going to lie, if I've got 2 cards in front of me
43:04
and one of them's in APSA holder and one of them's in an SGC
43:08
holder, I am personally much more comfortable buying the card
43:14
in the PSA holder. Does that make me a bad person
43:19
for saying that? I don't know.
43:21
I don't think I'm a bad person. I think I'm actually, I think
43:23
I'm actually a pretty good guy. I think I'm a pretty nice good
43:28
person. But I feel.
43:31
More comfortable. Buying a big card in APSA holder
43:34
than an SGC holder but I'm still sending cards to SGC.
43:39
I'm still buying cards in both holders but feels a little safer
43:45
if it's in APSA holder I. Wish it wasn't that way.
43:50
But that's where we are. Happy holidays.
43:56
Happy New Year. Be safe out there tonight.
43:59
I enjoyed 2025 and I thank all of you for your contributions.
44:04
If you'd like to contribute to the first Q&A episode of 2026
44:10
down below in the comments, simply type out your question.
44:15
I'm looking forward to another good year, 2026 to Infinity and
44:20
beyond. Off we go into the wild blue
44:23
Yonder. Midlife nation, it's as.
44:27
Strong as ever.