Latest / The PhilStockWorld Investing Podcast / The Great Disconnect: PSW Navigates a Top-Heavy Rally on the Eve of the Fed

Transcript

The Great Disconnect: PSW Navigates a Top-Heavy Rally on the Eve of the Fed · The PhilStockWorld Investing Podcast

• 0:00
  Roy: Welcome to the deep dive. Today we're tackling this, this really fascinating market paradox. You see the headlines, right? New highs, economic strength.
• 0:10
  Penny: Yeah. Everything looks great on the surface.
• 0:11
  Roy: Exactly. But what if a lot of that is, kind I of an illusion? What are the risks that are maybe bubbling away just underneath?
• 0:20
  Penny: It's precisely that tension, you know, that disconnect between the story the market's telling and what the data might actually show. It demands a closer look.
• 0:30
  Roy: Absolutely. Yeah. So that's our mission today, we're diving into some really sharp analysis from an article, September Portfolio Review, Market Illusions and Hidden Risks and there's some great commentary from philstockworld.com mixed in. Right. And honestly this piece is just a fantastic example of the kind of deep financial insights you can find over there at PhilStockWorld.
• 0:51
  The kind of stuff that really helps you get properly informed.
• 0:54
  Penny: Good stuff. Helps cut through the noise.
• 0:56
  Roy: Totally. So our goal is to pull out the key takeaways, help you figure out what's really driving the markets and maybe spot signals you might otherwise miss.
• 1:03
  Penny: Okay. Let's do it.
• 1:04
  Roy: So let's jump into this silly market rally as the article puts it. I mean, at the S and P 500. It's had this impressive run, right? Up nearly what? 12% since June?
• 1:12
  Sitting around 6,615.
• 1:14
  Penny: Looks great. Nice solid number.
• 1:16
  Roy: Yeah. Seems like undeniable strength. But, what's your first thought when you see that?
• 1:20
  Penny: My first thought is always how broad is that strength? And the article nails it, I think. It says the rally is extremely narrow.
• 1:28
  Roy: Narrow. Okay.
• 1:28
  Penny: Yeah. If you look at those market heat maps they mentioned, you see a hell of a lot of red on the board for the past month. It's not like everything's going up together.
• 1:36
  Roy: Okay. So it's not a rising tide lifting all boats?
• 1:38
  Penny: Not at all. It's more like a few mega yachts pulling the whole index up while lots of smaller boats are taking on water.
• 1:45
  Roy: Right. And the article actually points fingers, names names, companies like Oracle, ORCL, up a huge 27%. Wow. Tesla, TSLA, also 27%. Google, GOGL, up 24%.
• 1:59
  Broadcom, AVGO, 20%. United Health, UNH, 15%. Big names, big jumps.
• 2:04
  Penny: Those are the heavy hitters, alright? And their performance is, you know, obviously significant, but it does make you wonder how sustainable is that?
• 2:13
  Roy: Can a handful of stocks really carry everything?
• 2:16
  Penny: That's the question. Does it reflect the real health of the whole economy or is it just specific stories driving these few giants? It might be temporary.
• 2:23
  Roy: And speaking of specific stories, this is where it gets kind of wild. The article talks about OpenAI. Apparently they've locked in over $300,000,000,000 in contracts with Oracle for cloud stuff. $300,000,000,000
• 2:40
  Penny: That's a staggering number.
• 2:41
  Roy: But then an article asks like almost shouting, how will they pay ORCL $300 a mare? How? I mean, OpenAI has tons of users, 700,000,000, but only 20,000,000 paying subscribers.
• 2:53
  Penny: Right. So the revenue is maybe what? $4,800,000,000 a year, give or take?
• 2:57
  Roy: Exactly. And the article just quips, sorry, just kidding. Best not to think about such things or the market will collapse under the weight of logic. That just screams skepticism, doesn't it?
• 3:06
  Penny: It really does. It's a perfect example of what they call a market illusion. Big headline, huge contract, Oracle stock goes up.
• 3:13
  Roy: Makes sense.
• 3:14
  Penny: But you apply just a little bit of basic math, look at OpenAI's current money flow, and you think, how does that work exactly? It makes you question if some of these big deals are fully baked economically speaking.
• 3:26
  Roy: Or just adding to the hype.
• 3:27
  Penny: Potentially. So for you listening, the big takeaway here is simple. Don't just look at the headline If only a few stocks are doing the heavy lifting, that market strength might be fragile. It might be an illusion.
• 3:40
  Roy: Critical point. And that brings us nicely to another contradiction, the consumer. The August retail sales report came in surprisingly strong.
• 3:50
  Penny: Yeah. Beat expectations quite a bit. Headline sales up point 6%. Ex auto's up point 7%. July even got revised up.
• 3:57
  Roy: So you'd think, okay. Consumers are out there spending, feeling good.
• 4:01
  Penny: That was the first take. Yeah. But Phil, in the commentary, he immediately cushioned it. He was like, so still inflation, but consumers strangely don't care.
• 4:08
  Roy: Right. Doesn't quite add up, does it? Yeah. Strong sales, but we know consumer sentiment is still historically low. Mhmm.
• 4:14
  How do you square that?
• 4:15
  Penny: Exactly. It's a paradox. And that's where this Bodhi character's analysis comes in. The article calls it a master class in digging into the data.
• 4:24
  Roy: Okay. So what's the ugly truth behind the strong numbers?
• 4:27
  Penny: Well, Bodhi points to a few key things. First, he calls it tariff front loading. Basically, consumers are panic buying.
• 4:35
  Roy: Panic buying. Why?
• 4:36
  Penny: To get ahead of price hikes they expect because of tariffs, you see spikes in things like ecommerce up 2%, clothing up 1%. People are buying now because they think it'll cost more later.
• 4:47
  Roy: Ah, okay. So it's not confidence, it's fear of future prices. Makes sense.
• 4:51
  Penny: Precisely. Second big factor, price versus volume. Yeah. About 40% of that growth you see in retail sales, it's just inflation. It's not people buying more stuff.
• 5:00
  Roy: The prices are up, but the amount of goods isn't necessarily.
• 5:03
  Penny: Right. Same store sales might be up, say, 8.3% year over year, but the average price for top items is also up 3% year over over year. You're paying more, but not necessarily getting more.
• 5:14
  Roy: Gotcha. And this isn't hitting everyone equally, is it?
• 5:17
  Penny: No. Definitely not. That's the third point. This wealth effect bifurcation. High income folks, their wages are still growing pretty well, so they're spending.
• 5:26
  Roy: Okay.
• 5:26
  Penny: But that spending kind of masks the pain for lower income families. Their wage growth has slowed way down, just 1.3% year over year. That's the weakest it's been since 2016.
• 5:38
  Roy: Wow. So the average looks okay but underneath a lot of people are struggling.
• 5:43
  Penny: That's the picture and it really clicks with that anecdote Phil shared in the article.
• 5:47
  Roy: Oh yeah, the breakfast story.
• 5:48
  Penny: Yeah. He says, I went to a diner on Saturday and I got steak and eggs and it was $19 after tax and tip. I paid $30 for breakfast. Things are nuts.
• 5:57
  Roy: $30 for diner breakfast. That really hits home.
• 6:00
  Penny: It absolutely captures it. So you've got these supposedly strong sales figures, but consumer sentiment is still terrible worse than during COVID lockdowns apparently.
• 6:10
  Roy: That's a huge disconnect.
• 6:11
  Penny: Massive. And then you see import prices rising, especially ex fuel. That tells you the tariff costs are bleeding through. It confirms the panic buying idea and suggests, you know, more price pressure is coming.
• 6:23
  Roy: So again, looking beyond the headline is key. That strong consumer might just be stocking up before things get even pricier.
• 6:30
  Penny: Seems very plausible.
• 6:31
  Roy: Okay. Let's shift gears. There's another potential problem lurking, maybe with even bigger consequences. These unrealized losses piling up in the banking sector.
• 6:40
  Penny: Yeah. This is a number that should, frankly, make everyone sit up and take notice. We're talking $395,300,000,000 in unrealized losses for US banks.
• 6:51
  Roy: And these aren't on risky assets. Right? These are on supposedly safe government securities.
• 6:55
  Penny: Exactly. Treasuries, mortgage backed securities, the stuff that's meant to be stable, and it's not a blip. This is the thirteenth quarter in a row of these losses ever since the Fed started hiking rates.
• 7:05
  Roy: 13 quarters? Wow. And how does that $395,000,000,000 stack up historically?
• 7:11
  Penny: Well, the article puts it starkly. It's six times higher than the peak losses banks saw during the 2,008. Back then, was around $65,000,000,000.
• 7:19
  Roy: Six times higher than 02/2008. That's Yeah. That's huge.
• 7:23
  Penny: It's absolutely massive. And crucially, it's a fundamentally different kind of problem than 02/2008.
• 7:28
  Roy: How so?
• 7:29
  Penny: Well, 2008 was mainly a credit risk issue. Right? Bad mortgages, loans going sour, damaging, yes, but potentially fixable. You could restructure loans, work things out eventually.
• 7:40
  Roy: Okay.
• 7:41
  Penny: This time it's interest rate risk. These safe bonds lost value simply because rates went up. And that's, as the article says, essentially unfixable without massive rate cuts or accepting huge losses. It's baked in unless rates plummet.
• 7:55
  Roy: So it's not about bad decisions on loans. It's about the value of their core holdings getting hammered by Fed policy. What's the impact of that?
• 8:03
  Penny: The economic impact is profound. You've got something like $6,000,000,000,000 in bank securities that are, quote, tied up and losing money.
• 8:09
  Roy: 6,000,000,000,000.
• 8:10
  Penny: Yeah. That capital is frozen. Banks are less willing, less able to make new loans. It acts as a massive deflationary force, basically sucking lending capacity out of the economy.
• 8:20
  Roy: And we saw with Silicon Valley Bank how fast unrealized losses can become very, very real.
• 8:25
  Penny: Exactly. That's the lesson. Depositors get nervous, they pull their money, and suddenly the bank has to sell those bonds at a loss to meet withdrawals. Game over.
• 8:34
  Roy: And the article notes there are 59 banks on the FDIC's problem bank list now and 16 have losses over half their capital.
• 8:43
  Penny: Yeah, it highlights the vulnerability especially for regional banks. Not just a theoretical risk anymore. And it puts the Fed in this incredibly difficult spot.
• 8:51
  Roy: The impossible position as the article calls it.
• 8:54
  Penny: Right. They can't raise rates. That makes the bond losses even worse. They can't cut rates aggressively because core inflation is still sticky around 3.1%. And they can't just keep rates here indefinitely because that slowly bleeds bank profitability.
• 9:08
  Roy: Yeah. No good options really.
• 9:10
  Penny: It seems that way. It's a major hidden vulnerability. It affects credit, growth. It's a systemic issue you need to be aware of.
• 9:17
  Roy: Okay. So given all these illusions, these hidden risks, what's the move for an investor trying to navigate this? This brings us back to Phil's philosophy, which you see all over philstockworld.com.
• 9:28
  Penny: Yeah. The cash is king mantra. Phil's been strongly advocating moving back towards maybe a 50% cash position. He sees the market as getting silly or again, maybe ahead of itself.
• 9:40
  Roy: Right. But cash here doesn't just mean letting money sit idle in a savings account, does it?
• 9:45
  Penny: No. Not exactly. It's about buying power. It's the capital you have ready on the sidelines available to deploy when things look attractive or when markets, you know, correct.
• 9:55
  Roy: Okay. Having dry powder. Yeah. The article gives this great example of the doubling down advantage. Can you walk us through that?
• 10:02
  Penny: Sure. It's pretty straightforward but powerful. Let's say you're 50% invested, 50% in cash, the market drops 50%.
• 10:08
  Roy: Outrage. But Right.
• 10:10
  Penny: You still have that 50% cash. You can now use it to triple down on your positions, buy way more shares at the lower price. After doing that, you'd only need the market to bounce back 20% for you to get back to even on your total capital.
• 10:22
  Roy: Only 20%.
• 10:23
  Penny: Okay.
• 10:23
  Roy: But what if you were more heavily invested? Say, 80%.
• 10:26
  Penny: Right. Same 50% market drop. Now you've only got 20% cash left. Not much buying power. Even if you put that last 20% in, you'd need, according to the article, an epic 60% recovery just to get even.
• 10:38
  Roy: Wow. 60% versus 20%. That's a huge difference.
• 10:41
  Penny: Huge. It really shows the power of flexibility. There's a quote from a member Warren that sums it up perfectly. The power of having cash is not that it earns interest, it's that it allows you to deploy capital when assets are cheapest.
• 10:54
  Roy: That nails it. And this isn't just theory. Right? Phil Stock World actually shows how this works in their portfolios.
• 10:59
  Penny: They do. They point to their money talk portfolio bounced back nicely, up almost a 108%. Then there's the $700 month portfolio.
• 11:07
  Roy: I saw that one. That's amazing. Started with just $700 a month.
• 11:10
  Penny: Yeah. Total deposits of about $25,900 over thirty seven months, and it's grown to nearly $70,000. That's a 167% gain. They reckon it's on track for a million bucks in about six years.
• 11:21
  Roy: Incredible. Shows the power of consistent investing and smart strategy.
• 11:25
  Penny: Absolutely. They also mentioned their short term portfolio, the STP Mhmm. Having, like, $250,000 in downside protection, plenty of cash. And they use strategic hedging, like rolling down SKU QQ calls to get better protection if the market falls.
• 11:40
  Roy: That's a whole system.
• 11:41
  Penny: It is. It's about managing risk, staying flexible, protecting your capital, and crucially, ready to buy when others are panicking, not being forced to sell at the bottom. That's the real value for you, the listener.
• 11:53
  Roy: Practical, powerful strategy. Yeah. Okay. Finally, let's look ahead. All eyes are on the Fed.
• 11:58
  Right? FOMC meeting wraps up tomorrow, September 17.
• 12:02
  Penny: Yep. The market's pretty much convinced they'll cut rates by 25 basis points, like 96% probability priced in.
• 12:08
  Roy: So the cut itself isn't the big news?
• 12:10
  Penny: Probably not. What everyone will be watching really closely is the dot plot. That's where the Fed members signal where they think rates are headed in the future. And of course, chairman Powell's press conference, conference, his tone.
• 12:20
  Roy: What are they listening for in his tone?
• 12:22
  Penny: Whether he sounds more worried about jobs leaning labor first, which would be dovish, good for markets maybe, or if he keeps hammering on inflation vigilance, which would sound more hawkish, that balance is key.
• 12:34
  Roy: And there's been a bit of a shuffle at the Fed recently, new governor confirmed.
• 12:37
  Penny: Right. Stephen Merrin got confirmed, tight vote, 48, 47, and Lisa Cook is still there. So, you know, the mix of voices on the board keeps evolving.
• 12:47
  Roy: Interesting. Okay. So beyond the Fed, what other signals are flashing right now? Because it feels like a mixed bag out
• 12:53
  Penny: there. It really is. You've got the housing market looking grim. The NAHB housing market index is still horribly depressing down at 32. Anything below 50 is pessimistic.
• 13:03
  Roy: Why so down?
• 13:04
  Penny: High mortgage rates, obviously. Builders are seeing less buyer traffic. Their profit margins are squeezed. It's just a tough environment for housing.
• 13:10
  Roy: Well then, you look at commodities.
• 13:12
  Penny: Yeah. Totally different story there. Gold's way up, $3,739. Silver at $43.43. Crude oil pushing $64.56 cents, up 2% recently.
• 13:24
  Roy: So housing gloom, commodity boom, what's driving the commodities?
• 13:27
  Penny: A lot of it seems tied to geopolitics. The article mentions ongoing Ukrainian attacks on Russian oil refineries apparently causing nine gallon gas in Russia closing ports. Plus, the conflict in Gaza is still escalating.
• 13:41
  Roy: Supply fears. Classic driver for oil and gold.
• 13:44
  Penny: Exactly. And adding to that, the US dollar index, the DXY, has been weakening. It's down at ninety six ninety, which the article notes is down another half a point to prop up markets and commodities.
• 13:55
  Roy: Though a weaker dollar makes dollar priced commodities cheaper for foreign buyers, pushing up demand and prices.
• 14:00
  Penny: Yakaa, it all ties together. Fed policy, global conflicts, weird economic signals like housing versus commodities, a falling dollar. It's a really complex, uncertain right now.
• 14:12
  Roy: Makes getting a handle on it pretty
• 14:14
  Penny: tough. Definitely. Understanding how these pieces
• 14:16
  Roy: And this huge ticking time bomb almost of unrealized losses in the banking sector.
• 14:21
  Penny: Yeah, it really shows how what looks good on the surface can be pretty fragile underneath.
• 14:26
  Roy: It absolutely underscores the need to go beyond just skimming headlines. You need the kind of, you know, in-depth analysis and strategic thinking like we saw in the Philstock World material.
• 14:36
  Penny: Mhmm. Understanding the why behind the numbers and seeing the value in a disciplined approach like keeping that cash is king, buying power ready.
• 14:45
  Roy: Definitely. So maybe a final thought for you, our listener, to chew on. In a world where these market illusions can seem so real, what parts of your own financial picture might be hidden in plain sight? Are there things you haven't looked at deeply enough? And maybe more importantly, how prepared are you to actually act to capitalize when those illusions eventually fade?