Latest / Elon Musk Podcast / ChatGPT Is Now Citing Elon Musk
Transcript
- 0:02Open AI's GPT 5.2 model has started setting Grokapedia, Elon
- 0:09Musk's AI generated encyclopedia, as a source of its
- 0:13responses. Now.
- 0:15The Guardian ran tests last week and found ChatGPT reference
- 0:18Grokapedia 9 times across more than a dozen user queries,
- 0:22including questions about Iranian political structures and
- 0:25a British historian who helped convict A Holocaust denier.
- 0:29The citations appeared selectively, surfacing an
- 0:32obscure topics while avoiding well documented misinformation
- 0:35subjects. Grocopedia launched just three
- 0:38months ago with 0 human. Editors and critics have already
- 0:41flagged it for promoting debunked claims, setting neo
- 0:44Nazi forums and whitewashing extremism.
- 0:47Now, how did an AI encyclopedia built by one of Open AI's
- 0:51biggest rivals end up feeding answers back into Open AI's most
- 0:58popular chatbot? Agracopedia now holds over 5.6
- 1:02million articles, roughly 80 the size of English Wikipedia, and
- 1:06it accomplished that scale in a fraction of the time Wikipedia
- 1:10needed. Now today we're going to cover
- 1:12what the Guardians testing revealed with specific false
- 1:15information chatt GPD pulled from Gakapedia, why other AI
- 1:18assistants like Claude Anthropics Bot are also setting
- 1:22the platform, and what this means for the integrity of AI
- 1:25generated knowledge. Open AI has responded with a
- 1:28statement about safety filters and source diversity, while XAI
- 1:32simply replied with three words. I'll tell you about those later,
- 1:37right after this short break now.
- 1:39Open AI marketed GPD 5.2 as its most advanced model for
- 1:43professional work when it launched in December, But the
- 1:46Guardian's investigation raises serious questions about where
- 1:49the professional grade information actually comes from.
- 1:52The tests revealed a clear pattern and how ChatGPT selects
- 1:56Grokapedia as a source, and the implications cut deeper than a
- 2:00simple citation problem. Users asking complex questions
- 2:04about geopolitics and history are receiving answers built on
- 2:08an AI generated foundation that has already been documented
- 2:12spreading false claims. Now the guardians were testing
- 2:15focused on a range of topics to see when ChatGPT would pull from
- 2:19Grokopedia versus other sources, and the chatbot did not say
- 2:22Grokopedia. When asked about widely known
- 2:25misinformation, such as false claims about media bias against
- 2:29Donald Trump or debunk theories about HIV and AIDS, ChatGPT
- 2:32avoided the obvious traps. The system instead cited
- 2:36Gracopedia on obscure geopolitical and historical
- 2:39questions. The kind of query is where users
- 2:41are less likely to catch errors. Specific topics included
- 2:45salaries of Iran's paramilitary force, ownership of the mastas,
- 2:51a fan fountain, and connections between the Iranian government
- 2:55and telecom company MTN Iran Cell.
- 2:59Now, Chachibti made bolder claims about those Iranian
- 3:02government links than Wikipedia does.
- 3:04Those claims came directly from Grokopedia, and the most
- 3:09troubling example involved Sir Richard Evans, a Cambridge
- 3:13historian who served as the key expert witness in the libel
- 3:16trial wrought by Holocaust denier David Irving.
- 3:20Evans personally examined his own Grokopedia entry and
- 3:23reported that it contained numerous false statements about
- 3:25his career and background. He told the Guardian that all
- 3:28the facts in his entry were wrong.
- 3:32The already runs pretty deep here.
- 3:34Evans spent years meticulously documenting how Irving falsified
- 3:38evidence about the Holocaust and manipulated historical records.
- 3:42The High Court judge ultimately branded Irving a racist, an anti
- 3:46semite and falsifier of history based largely on Evans expert
- 3:50testimony. ChatGPT cited that same
- 3:53Gracopedia page when responding to user questions about Evans
- 3:56effectively laundering debunked information through Open AI's
- 4:00flagship product. The historian who exposed the
- 4:02Holocaust deniers lies is now having lies spread about him
- 4:06through AI systems that treat machine generated content as the
- 4:10equivalent of peer reviewed scholarship.
- 4:14Now I've been going through all of our stats here at the show
- 4:17and 39% of you are following the channel and I'm so grateful for
- 4:23you. 61% of you have listened to the show before but haven't hit
- 4:29the subscribe or follow button. If that's you, if you listen to
- 4:32the show and you're into it, please take a second of your
- 4:35time. You can hit the follow button.
- 4:36I'm going to spend the next 10 years doing this.
- 4:39So that's what you get from me, better content over the next 10
- 4:42years. All I need is a second of your
- 4:44time. So thank you so much for doing
- 4:46that. Agrocopedia launched on October
- 4:4927th, 2025 as Elon Musk's answer to what he calls Woke Pedia.
- 4:54The platform uses XA is Grok large language model to generate
- 4:57articles rather than relying on human editors.
- 5:00Users can suggest corrections through a pop up form, but they
- 5:03can't directly edit content the way Wikipedia allows you to.
- 5:07Musk position the project as a bias free alternative that would
- 5:10purge propaganda from public knowledge.
- 5:13The reality has looked pretty different though.
- 5:17Analysis found Wikipedia articles aligned with Musk's
- 5:19personal views on topics like gender identity.
- 5:22Tesla Controversies and Neuralink and the Guardian doing
- 5:26their research here, and multiple other outlets
- 5:29documented pages that promote white nationalist talking
- 5:32points, praise neo Nazis, cast Holocaust deniers in positive
- 5:36terms, and frame far right figures as victims of
- 5:39institutional suppression. The scale of Rockopedia's growth
- 5:43presents its own problems too. Platform reached 5.6 million
- 5:47articles by early 2026, jumping from 800,000 at launch to nearly
- 5:5280% the volume of English Wikipedia in about 3 months.
- 5:55Human editors and Wikipedia spent over 2 decades building
- 5:59their corpus through careful research, citation and community
- 6:02debate. Grakopedia achieved similar
- 6:05volume by having an AI system scrape existing content, rewrite
- 6:09those articles, and generate new ones at machine speed.
- 6:13Symmetry is copied Wikipedia near the word for word under a
- 6:16Creative Commons license. While others introduced entirely
- 6:19new claims from questionable sources, researchers from
- 6:23Grokopedia cited neo Nazi forums and its reference lists.
- 6:27Problem that becomes exponentially worse when other
- 6:30AI systems start treating Grokopedia as a legit source.
- 6:35Now, Jet GBT was not the only AI assistant caught citing
- 6:39Grokopedia. The Guardians testing found the
- 6:41Anthropics. Claude, my favorite AI right
- 6:44now, also referenced the platform when using questions
- 6:47about global oil production and Scottish beer.
- 6:50Little bit different, though. Anthropic did not respond to
- 6:53requests for comment. Because that's what they usually
- 6:58do. Big corporations do not respond
- 6:59because they just wanted to blow over.
- 7:01And the fact that multiple leading AI systems are pulling
- 7:04from an encyclopedia built by a competitor and built by an AI
- 7:09raises questions about how these comanies curate and filter their
- 7:12web search sources. Open AI told the Guardian that
- 7:15Chat GT aims to draw from a broad range of ublicly available
- 7:19sources and viewpoints, adding that safety filters reduce the
- 7:22risk of servicing links associated with high severity
- 7:26harms.