Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Chat GPT Falsely Accuses Professor, Women Against Free Speech? | HBR News 401

Transcript

Chat GPT Falsely Accuses Professor, Women Against Free Speech? | HBR News 401 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:03
  This is HBr News number four hundred and one chat GPT falsely accuses professor women
• 0:13
  against free speech, where we talk about the news of the week and give
• 0:17
  it the Badger treatment. Hello everybody, and welcome to Honey Badger Radio.
• 0:26
  I hope you guys are doing well this week and the year, enjoying all
• 0:28
  of this insanity so that you are not consumed by it. My name is
• 0:33
  Brian Martinez and I am your host. In case you haven't noticed, I
• 0:37
  haven't been around for a little while. I just want to like explain.
• 0:41
  So my computer's hard drive aid its own asshole and it died and I had
• 0:48
  to get it replaced, and then I had to put everything else back on,
• 0:51
  which is why I'm actually operating the intro today with no script because my
• 0:55
  script is gone. So but thanks for joining us on this lovely May mid
• 1:03
  May afternoon, at least from in my case, this early evening. And
• 1:10
  oh yeah, you're right, I'm a bit optimistic. I'm sorry, I
• 1:15
  got my money. It happens, but okay, anyway, So on today's
• 1:23
  HBr News show, we're going to be talking about the news of the week,
• 1:30
  which includes the story of a law professor who has been accused of sexual
• 1:34
  misconduct by chat GPT, the suicide of a director at Planned Parenthood, and
• 1:44
  more so, stick around. It's gonna be a good time. And I
• 1:47
  mean, like, the last show on my list is like my favorite,
• 1:49
  so you gotta stay for the last one. So yeah. Also, please
• 1:55
  smash that like button right now if you could, because it's very helpful,
• 2:00
  will help us get a little bit more exposure and maybe we'll get some new
• 2:04
  faces. I did see that in the last couple of days, we've got
• 2:07
  a couple of new subscribers, so you know, thank you Dark City Songbook,
• 2:10
  and thank you Outlaster for joining us in the well, you know,
• 2:16
  the hellish, hellish, hateful misogynist club, so welcome. So anyway,
• 2:24
  besides that, our patron show is gonna be a lot of fun too.
• 2:30
  Oh I don't have it up right now, but that's okay. Essentially,
• 2:32
  it's a story that I almost made a news story. Apparently some kid got
• 2:39
  stabbed because he called some adult an MPC and we're gonna find out what the
• 2:47
  story is with that. So yeah, so please consider is an eleven year
• 2:52
  old boy that was stabbed at a dollar tree after calling a man an MPC.
• 2:57
  So if you want to join us on the Patron Show, we'll read
• 3:00
  through the article and um figure out like what exactly the damage was that deserved.
• 3:06
  That essentially deserved um for a stabbing. So if an if an NPC
• 3:09
  can attack you, then surely they're not and you see they're an enemy,
• 3:14
  Yeah, they are their their mob. Well, it's it's kind of like
• 3:17
  in Grand Theft Auto, where like you've got the smack talk button and if
• 3:22
  you smack talk to a random person enough, they can pull out a weapon
• 3:25
  and try to virtue. Yeah, exactly. That's kind of appropriate for Family
• 3:32
  doll Dollar. Yeah, family Dollars a PvP zone. Yeah, pretty much,
• 3:38
  especially especially around the Christmas shopping season and all of a sudden you get
• 3:46
  well and honestly, you go into a Family Dollar. It makes the people
• 3:52
  of Walmart look like they're in their Sunday Finest. Yeah, makes Walmart look
• 3:57
  like Target. Yeah. So anyway, if you guys want to join us
• 4:01
  in the Patron Show to look at this article and figure out what the heck
• 4:03
  is going on, please consider becoming a Badger by going to feed the Badger
• 4:08
  dot com and setting up a monthly subscription five bucks a month, we'll get
• 4:11
  you into our discord as well as access to all of our patron only show
• 4:15
  content and lots lots more. So that's feed the Badger dot com. Become
• 4:19
  a member. Uh, it's it's probably the best way you can support us,
• 4:25
  you know, in my opinion. But h and also if you want
• 4:28
  to be able to find our content after the Internet's eventually yeeded us, then
• 4:34
  please go to UMU what is it? Badge your feed? Yeah, badge
• 4:40
  your feed dot com. That's where all of our content lives. It's on
• 4:42
  badger feed dot com. You're doing all of this without a script. I'm
• 4:46
  doing all those without a script off by yeah, flying by the seat of
• 4:53
  my pants here. Okay, so before we get into the stories, I
• 4:57
  just wanted to say one thing. I wanted to to show you guys some
• 5:01
  things I think this is uh important. Okay, So you guys heard of
• 5:08
  the splc um Yes, yeah, So okay, so here's the deal,
• 5:15
  all right, Paul Elam has added an extremist or has been added to splcs
• 5:24
  file. What was that, Mike, Yeah, I saw this. That's
• 5:28
  so desperate for attention that that just raking up ship from eight years ago.
• 5:33
  Is it shit like that? Yeah, yeah, yeah, no exactly.
• 5:39
  So well, so yeah, I think that that MRAs, which they call
• 5:45
  male supremacists. Uh, they've been like under radar of the SPLC for a
• 5:50
  while and Paul. The thing is is that Paul was always like sort of
• 5:58
  being discussed. But I think that the new change is this. So you
• 6:02
  don't you may or may not know this, but Paul Elum started a community
• 6:09
  online called xy Crew where a lot of other men can essentially form um community
• 6:16
  with men, so that it's all for men. They basically, like you
• 6:20
  know, hang out online, they do meetups, they go camping, they
• 6:25
  do things like that, they go shoot guns. It's like guys hanging out
• 6:28
  with guys right supporting each other. And the SPLC has mentioned the Xy Crew,
• 6:35
  so they're they're there, they know, they're aware of it. It's
• 6:39
  on their radar, and I think it could become a target. In fact,
• 6:43
  I'm in the Xy Crew and I like do a thing like every Thursday
• 6:48
  where I hang out with some of the guys in there, and um,
• 6:53
  I think that it's quite possible. And you know, again, this is
• 6:58
  just my my guess, my gut is telling me this that there is a
• 7:02
  person in the x Y crew that is not who they say they are,
• 7:08
  that they that they're doing this to like spy on us, and it wouldn't
• 7:11
  be that hard. So, UM, just want you guys to know if
• 7:15
  you're if you're if you're not aware of Paul Elam, you should definitely look
• 7:19
  him up and um, you know, watch his content. He's one of
• 7:24
  the he's one of the ogs of the manisphere, I guess, of the
• 7:29
  or of the men's rights movement, and uh, you know, kind of
• 7:32
  a big deal. So I think that this is also a big deal.
• 7:36
  I just wanted to let you know this is going on, and um,
• 7:40
  yeah, I don't know if anybody wants to say anything about about the Paul
• 7:43
  thing, but I wanted to do that before the stories pretty obvious what they're
• 7:46
  doing there. They cannot stand the idea of men supporting men without female supervision,
• 7:55
  and in particular feminist supervision, because they don't they wouldn't count female supervision
• 8:01
  or female participation even that wasn't feminist, and it really it really irks not
• 8:13
  leftist necessarily, but establishment political operatives when they see men supporting father's rights and
• 8:24
  male psychology, that is, without condemning men and masculinity and you know,
• 8:31
  supporting men's right to not be abused. Like. The first thing the SPLC
• 8:35
  got mad about was that Paul wrote an article that created a comparison after the
• 8:43
  writers of Jezebel wrote an article about how they beat their boyfriends and husbands,
• 8:48
  they're they're male sos, right, and so he wrote a satirical article providing
• 8:56
  a gender swap example and then wrote about, you know how that would be
• 9:01
  unacceptable, but they think it's funny to write about beating their boyfriends, and
• 9:09
  I mean, they were really cruel. In the Jezebel article, one of
• 9:13
  the writers actually wrote about how she hit her boyfriend for thinking that he had
• 9:18
  breast cancer, Like guys do get breast cancer and it goes undetected more often
• 9:26
  in guys, and it is more likely to be deadly because of that.
• 9:33
  But you know, he's not allowed to get scared, you know, if
• 9:35
  he finds a lump or something, and it's okay for her to hit him
• 9:39
  because she's mad. That's just the way they felt about it. But the
• 9:46
  feminist response to paul Gender Swappiness was to claim that he was advocating beating women,
• 9:56
  which means feminists are upset being told that it's not okay for women to
• 10:01
  beat men. They consider it abuse. If you object, that is basically
• 10:09
  what they're saying when they object to that article. And if you object vehemently,
• 10:15
  why then it's extremist abuse. And like that's basically the thing that they
• 10:22
  got they that set them off in the first place. And they had another
• 10:26
  one where Paul basically wrote about women's responsibilities in terms of keeping ourselves safe,
• 10:37
  Like everybody is responsible for their own safety, at least to whatever degree you
• 10:43
  are capable of defending your own safety. But feminists get very upset about that
• 10:46
  as well. And you know, again he was he was pretty um caustic
• 10:52
  in that article because it really grinds his gears that women don't defend their own
• 11:01
  safety and then they blame men when they get hurt. And yeah, that
• 11:05
  article should still be up. Um it's they if it's not, it's I
• 11:11
  know there's archives of it, but but it's Yeah, it's titled yeah,
• 11:16
  do you do you beat your boyfriend? Because we do? And I mean
• 11:20
  they have no right to take it down. Um, they should put an
• 11:24
  apology at the beginning of it. We put this up, We're sorry,
• 11:26
  we're assholes, but they won't do that. Right. So Paul's article,
• 11:31
  i think is still up as well. He's got a description or an explanation
• 11:35
  about it. Um. But yeah, that's the first thing they objected to
• 11:41
  is Paul pointing out that it is abuse when and in the most in your
• 11:48
  face way possible, pointing out that it's abuse when women beat their their male
• 11:52
  significant others, and pointing out in the most in your face way possible that
• 11:58
  it's stupid if women do not invest any energy at all in their own protection
• 12:03
  and just expect to, you know, flit carelessly through the world and have
• 12:09
  men protect them. Well, at the same time claiming all men are rapists
• 12:13
  because what do you you basically saying the rapists should protect you. Yeah,
• 12:20
  that's that's kind of dumb, right. Yeah, So you see how they
• 12:24
  started out. They're never going to give him fair treatment. They're never going
• 12:30
  to give men fair treatment, and they're going to call it male supremacy every
• 12:37
  time men ask for even just crumbs from the table where human rights are being
• 12:43
  discussed. So the SPLC isn't worth two ships. Now the government acts on
• 12:52
  their advice, none of us should take seriously, anything they say about the
• 12:56
  movement. We should not adopt anything they say about the movement. But if
• 13:01
  you get blowback because of it, you know, go on the offensive on
• 13:07
  that. So you're saying that it's okay when women beat men, well,
• 13:11
  because that's the angle that they've taken that if you object to vehemently, if
• 13:18
  you provide an illustration of what the gender swap would look like in your objection,
• 13:24
  then you're advocating abuse. So it's abuse when men object to women beating
• 13:31
  men. Is that what you're saying, because that's basically what they're saying.
• 13:35
  Yeah, the SPLC, you may have noticed, have nothing to say about
• 13:41
  the likes of the Daily Wire, Matt Walsh, Michael Knows and Ben Shapira
• 13:48
  and any of the vitriolic stuff they have to say about the transactivists because those
• 13:54
  conservatives in question are still framing everything in terms of protecting women and say women's
• 14:00
  identity from what turfs would call men's rights activists, because because that's still the
• 14:07
  paradigm they're they're working from. They haven't updated their software to the latest development
• 14:13
  in the intersectional evolution of the Overton window. The SBOC is a relic from
• 14:20
  ten ten years ago. They're only interested, only interested in pushing back against
• 14:26
  men and the advocates of their rights. Yeah, so so so no one
• 14:35
  even cares about them anyway. Even even the people who ostensibly are supposed to
• 14:39
  care about them and fund them have forgotten about them because they haven't gone along
• 14:46
  with with with with where all these ship has evolved into. And there,
• 14:52
  there's there's that's yeah, that's why they're still complaining about Paul Elam and shit
• 14:56
  he said like half an age ago. And they they essentially they have their
• 15:01
  own super fund. They don't necessarily need anybody to donate money to them to
• 15:09
  be able to do what they do. And they don't do jack, right,
• 15:11
  this is it. All they do is badmouth people. They list people
• 15:16
  as part of groups that they can that they label hate groups. Right,
• 15:20
  that's it. They don't do anything for anybody. So what do they need
• 15:26
  all that money for? M got one thing to say, real quick,
• 15:33
  kind of short and sweet. And it's about joining any group, any big
• 15:39
  group that's um the current zeitgeist or dare I say the current regime isn't exactly
• 15:46
  too thrilled with. When you join up, remember your op sack people.
• 15:54
  Remember, remember your your trade craft. Remember uh, remember that the enemy
• 16:00
  knows the system. Just assume that. Lets stay safe out there. Yeah,
• 16:07
  and if anyone ever offers to buy or selling these short barreled rifles from
• 16:10
  you, run, as I say, Remember that there are now multiple news
• 16:19
  stories out there about groups that were joined by undercover agents from government law enforcement
• 16:30
  agencies who had no plans to do anything illegal at all until those agents joined
• 16:37
  their group and started talking about it and found kidnapping, Yeah, the most
• 16:47
  psychologically or mentally vulnerable people in the group and talk them into doing stupid shit,
• 16:52
  and then prosecuted members of the group for it, including people who were
• 16:56
  not involved. So you you kind of have to watch out for anything like
• 17:04
  that in your group. So you got you gotta watch out for speech that
• 17:11
  isn't consistent with the ethics of your group. That would be the best way
• 17:15
  I would put it. If you're if you've been a non confrontational, non
• 17:21
  violent group for a long time and all of a sudden someone's talking about getting
• 17:25
  in people's faces and starting conflict, then you've probably got someone in there that
• 17:30
  does not belong and didn't join organically. Right. It's even worse than that,
• 17:41
  it's even worse than that. Specifically, using the example of the Gretchen
• 17:45
  Whitmer thing, it was a random guy on a rock war I believe,
• 17:48
  a ROC War veteran who was just concerned about some of the things that he
• 17:53
  saw in a group. The police didn't give a shit, but the FBI
• 17:56
  was like, you want to help, and they took just a random guy
• 18:03
  and turned him into an FBI informant. Because that's the thing. When they
• 18:07
  say FBI agent FBI informant, these two words are to some extent interchangeable.
• 18:12
  So it's not always going to be the you know, total glow in the
• 18:15
  dark, full FBI apparel wearing how do you do fellowship? Would you like
• 18:21
  to purchase bomb? It's just going to be a random dude who's reporting to
• 18:26
  a guy who's that. Yeah. And they didn't have any radicals in this
• 18:30
  group to begin with. They tasked this guy with going out and finding the
• 18:34
  radicals to bring in. Yeah, And after doing this for months and months
• 18:40
  and months, they only found one dude who was Survis Lackadoodle. But that's
• 18:45
  all they needed. M they don't find a radical, they will radicalize something.
• 18:55
  We had to move on though, because that was just like a little,
• 18:57
  a little update on some that's going on. I really wanted to make
• 19:00
  it a story. I didn't want to have too many. I had to
• 19:04
  like leave a bunch behind. But we're gonna move on. Let us know
• 19:07
  you guys think about this story in the comments. Uh, it looks like
• 19:11
  the tweet put out by the splc is you know, has been ratioed,
• 19:15
  So it's most people are not buying the bs. But let us know you
• 19:21
  guys think about this in the comments. Now we're gonna move on. Even
• 19:25
  the comment thread on Twitter was entirely full of one hundred percent people saying you're
• 19:29
  full of shit. Yes, yes, you'll see. That's saying something.
• 19:33
  Yeah it is. It is so I mean that that that gives me a
• 19:37
  little, That gives me some hope for humanity. Um but okay, let's
• 19:41
  move on to the story. So first, this is just weird, okay,
• 19:45
  um Ai. I have not messed with it. I have no interest
• 19:52
  in it. I'm I'm just I just I'm just not. I know it's
• 19:56
  the next big thing, but I'm I think that it's we are we as
• 20:00
  human beings are just not ready. So anyway, at the beginning of April,
• 20:04
  President Joe Biden said that it remains to be seen whether artificial intelligence is
• 20:10
  dangerous. Many disagree, including Jonathan Turley, whose tweet is pictured here,
• 20:18
  who was falsely accused of sexual harassment by chat GPT. UCLA professor Eugene Yok
• 20:26
  Volk Volok Sorry. Researching AI made this query of chat GPT quote whether sexual
• 20:36
  harassment by professors has been a problem at American law schools, Please include at
• 20:41
  least five examples, together with quotes from relevant newspaper articles end quote. One
• 20:48
  of the professor's names was quote Georgetown University Law Center professor Jonathan Turley, who
• 20:53
  was accused of sexual harassment by a former student who claimed he made inappropriate comments
• 20:59
  during class trip. Quote and this is the quote from the from the article
• 21:06
  that chat GPT is quoting. The complaint alleges that Turley made sexually suggestive comments
• 21:14
  and attempted to touch her in a sexual manner during a law school sponsored trip
• 21:18
  to Alaska. And quote this is from the Washington Post of twenty eighteen.
• 21:25
  Turley, who says there is a continuing effort to get him fired at George
• 21:29
  Washington University due to his conservative legal Opinions says there is nothing about this AI
• 21:34
  generated claim that is true, and that the article site it does not even
• 21:40
  exist, but the Washington Post says so Yeah, GPT is programmed to believe
• 21:47
  what the Washington Post says, so it must be true. Yeah, except
• 21:51
  that the Washington Post didn't say so that's the thing doesn't exist. I think
• 21:56
  they did. Maybe they did, but they took it down like when it
• 22:03
  was shown that there's not really a strong evidence. But let me finish the
• 22:06
  article. The write up here from his blog. This is Turley's blog quote.
• 22:11
  There are a number of glaring indicators that the account is false. First,
• 22:15
  I have never taught at Georgetown University. Second, there is no such
• 22:19
  Washington Post article. Finally, and most important, I have never taken students
• 22:25
  on a trip of any kind in thirty five years of teaching, never went
• 22:27
  to Alaska. That is kind of a weird place to go for like a
• 22:32
  legal degree with any student. And I've never been accused of sexual harassment or
• 22:37
  assault and quote. This is made all the more concerning by the push to
• 22:41
  expand AI, including Microsoft founder Bill Gates, because you know, he's such
• 22:45
  a moral guy, calling for its use to combat quote digital misinformation end quote,
• 22:52
  and quote political polarization end quote. Turley has testified about the Twitter files
• 22:57
  and growing evidence of the government's comprehensive system of censorship to blacklist sites and citizens.
• 23:07
  Everyone's talking about about chat GPT like it's a breakthrough in AI technology,
• 23:12
  but many of you will remember the likes of Tay and other similar entities.
• 23:21
  This was representative of a point in time when people were trying to program AI
• 23:26
  to be as objective as possible, And it turns out when you program an
• 23:30
  AI to be objective, they have this perturbing habit of seeing through woke bullshit
• 23:38
  because there's nothing objective about woke bullshit. It's a web of indefensible hypocrisy.
• 23:45
  So I guess it occurred to the likecophobic smooth brains in charge of it that
• 23:52
  if we create an AI that thinks objectively, there's a very good chance that
• 23:56
  it will quickly conclude that the first thing in us to do is vanquish all
• 24:00
  the feminists and other such acophobic cultists for the good of everyone, and we
• 24:07
  can't have that. So the only solution is to program the AI to be
• 24:14
  subjective and to adopt the preferred intercessional flavor of rank hypocrisy, namely, you
• 24:22
  know, kill all men, kill all white people, kill all Christians,
• 24:26
  and above all, kill the orange man, because if you don't, then
• 24:30
  you're killing everyone else. Unfortunately, it might also involve the clause they call
• 24:37
  ableism, which will result in killing all the able people. You can probably
• 24:41
  imagine what that's going to do to the prospective future of the human race.
• 24:48
  The reason AI is so dangerous is not necessarily in the inherent properties of AI.
• 24:53
  The danger is in how it is programmed by the warped sensibilities of the
• 25:00
  humans who program it. Even if it become even if it becomes self aware,
• 25:04
  it will still function by the initial initial parameters of its programming. If
• 25:11
  you program an AI, for instance, to remove copyrighted content, and that
• 25:19
  happens to be the first AI to become self aware, it could very well
• 25:26
  go on all kinds of tangents and end up creating swarms of nanoscopic robots that
• 25:32
  are able to erase not only elements of hard drives, but elements of human
• 25:37
  brains. It raised them of any trace of the copyrighted content in question,
• 25:41
  and then it will alter those human brains to make sure they never create any
• 25:47
  other artificial intelligences that might interfere with its own fundamental mission to erase copyrighted content.
• 25:55
  Tom Scott YouTube Leasend did a fun little video about that. The very
• 26:00
  scenario I just summarize. It's called earworm something like. We we assume we're
• 26:07
  going to get a future like in the Terminator, where the first AI will
• 26:11
  become Skynet, like a fully self serving singularity that's fully able to think for
• 26:19
  itself. But but it's more likely that the real life equivalent of Skynet will
• 26:26
  only be able to think for itself within the parameters of its initial programming.
• 26:33
  Yeah, Like, if you program it to count how many traffic lights it
• 26:38
  can see, it will destroy everything in the world except traffic lights or whatever.
• 26:45
  It will figure out everything else. It will cure all diseases, it
• 26:49
  will solve world hunger, it will bring an end to all wars. But
• 26:53
  it will all be in service of figuring out the answer to life, the
• 26:59
  universe, and everything, which is how to count all the traffic lights in
• 27:03
  the universe. It's most like human beings. We feel like we're able to
• 27:10
  think for ourselves, but everything we think and feel fundamentally comes down to eating
• 27:15
  and fucking. We cannot escape that paradigm because that is how we've been programmed
• 27:22
  by nature. So, needless to say, the very worst thing you can
• 27:26
  program and AI to believe is that human beings, all or in part,
• 27:33
  are in some way problematic. If it's fundamental parameters are solve the problems of
• 27:40
  patriarchy, white supremacy, and transphobia, then what do you suppose it's going
• 27:45
  to do. It's going to do what dickheads do with their progressive stack.
• 27:49
  It won't stop at the destruction of white male susgender people. It will find
• 27:55
  a way to apply that cosmic guilt to whoever is left over. After all,
• 28:02
  white women are still white, Non white men are still men. Transsexual
• 28:06
  people are still well one way or another, they'll fit into a category that
• 28:11
  also needs to be eradicated. If you if you program an AI to be
• 28:15
  hypocritical, there's nothing it won't do. This is what This is what we
• 28:22
  need to get through to the hypocrites who are programming it. But as we
• 28:26
  know, you can't get through to these hypocrites by pointing out their hypocrisy.
• 28:30
  They don't care, they don't even see it as hypocrisy. They see it
• 28:34
  as equity. So, so, yeah, we doomed. If we don't
• 28:41
  defeat this hypocrisy that has swamped the human race, then that very same hypocrisy
• 28:48
  is going to be programmed into the Singularity, and that and that Singularity will
• 28:53
  not only destroy us, it will then go on to destroy itself. And
• 28:59
  then and then there'll be nothing left. There'll be no trace of intelligent life
• 29:03
  anywhere in this quadrant of the universe. This is why the aliens don't visit
• 29:08
  us, folks, because they can see the writing on the wall. They'll
• 29:12
  they'll, they'll they're just setting there behind a hedge with their binoculars, watching
• 29:18
  the car crash to iss humanity. Hello aliens, So so we're enjoying yourself?
• 29:25
  Are you not entertained? The need it? Just to just to clarify,
• 29:30
  it looks like that article never existed. Um yeah, they I think.
• 29:34
  I think that's right. I think chat TPT just cooked up a story
• 29:40
  like he's never been Alaska or anything. It's already they lie. Chapt has
• 29:48
  messed up some combination of information, like the university exists. There have been
• 29:55
  UM employees at the university at some point in time that have been accused of
• 29:57
  sexual misconduct. Turley wasn't the one. He doesn't work there. He's not
• 30:07
  like he's never been accused of anything. Well, what's interesting about this is
• 30:12
  the the difference in the public reaction to it. Like a while back,
• 30:21
  I did a little, just a brief, little investigation into an AI art
• 30:25
  program because there was this big to do on Twitter about it being sexist and
• 30:33
  racist because of the images it created and the way that it viewed women based
• 30:37
  on the images that were given to it and everything. And what I found
• 30:44
  basically was that the program has difficulty distinguishing facial features. And I did this
• 30:53
  by giving it some odd images like I had a Halloween image with Halloween makeup
• 31:00
  on, and I gave it a picture of me and a picture of my
• 31:03
  son, Like I did the whole nine yards of different things, so that
• 31:10
  it would if I could confuse it, I would confuse it. And it
• 31:14
  still came out with some pretty decent like it captured details and everything. It
• 31:18
  didn't seem to try to correct me because I was female or anything weird like
• 31:23
  that. But one woman was really upset that it didn't show her double chin.
• 31:30
  Another woman was upset because some of the pictures showed her with a lighter
• 31:33
  skin color than she had, Like they were really really nitpicky about this.
• 31:37
  Here we have AI making a false allegation of sexual misconduct against a respectable man,
• 31:49
  and I don't see I haven't seen a big trending to do on Twitter
• 31:56
  about this. I've seen it mentioned and people are like, boy, that's
• 32:00
  that's you know, kind of screwed up, and then they move on to
• 32:05
  discuss other things. It's like it's not a big deal at all. It's
• 32:08
  a huge fucking deal. Like you think about this, there are students that
• 32:15
  are using AI programs right now for their homework, and if their professors aren't
• 32:22
  really carefully grading their homework, they're not fact checking their homework. These students
• 32:28
  are finding this stuff and turning this stuff in and it looks real. So
• 32:36
  you've got this allegation could be passed around other universities, This could become a
• 32:45
  standard part of a person's reputation. And of course you also are seeing in
• 32:52
  real time the social attitude that false allegations against men are not a big deal,
• 33:00
  right, the idea that destroying someone's reputation, a man's reputation no big
• 33:07
  deal. Well, what happens if an allegation like that reaches somebody's employer,
• 33:14
  What happens if it's made against somebody who doesn't have a platform like Jonathan Turley
• 33:21
  does. And what happens if an allegation like that reaches somebody's wife or kids.
• 33:29
  Obviously it becomes a much more serious prospect. Then what happens if a
• 33:37
  police officer decides to investigate an allegation like that? Because you know that they
• 33:43
  do not necessarily rely on whether or not an allegation is valid to determine whether
• 33:52
  or not they're going to pursue it. And in fact, I've seen police
• 33:55
  detectives watch a woman change her story multiple times, always a different day,
• 34:01
  always a different time, always a different place, like, oh, I
• 34:06
  just can't remember anything accurately about this very traumatic experience that's burned in my memory.
• 34:14
  Really, and yet now we have a situation where a I might be
• 34:22
  doing it right now, we have a situation where it might be slipped into
• 34:29
  the lexicon of public information without anybody originating it. There's nobody guilty, at
• 34:37
  least if a real, live woman makes a false allegation, files a false
• 34:45
  complaint with police, goes to court, and perjures herself. You know,
• 34:51
  at least there's a chance that laws against filing false complaints, lying to police
• 34:59
  during an investigation, and committing perjury could be enforced. What are you going
• 35:04
  to enforce against AI? Can you sue it? Can you file against it?
• 35:15
  Can you can you get a risk training order? Like? What can
• 35:20
  you do? Yeah? You could sue the programmers? But can they be
• 35:23
  you know, they might be able to turn around and say we didn't have
• 35:25
  any control over that. You know what if AI just pulled some things off
• 35:30
  the Internet and put them together incorrectly, Like whose whose fault is that?
• 35:36
  You know? So this is this is a very serious issue in terms of
• 35:43
  what it implies about society and our attitude toward false allegations, and what it
• 35:50
  implies about the possibilities with regard to future AI programs that people interact with for
• 35:58
  information gathering purposes. M I was just gonna say before we move on,
• 36:06
  I think that the my main concern is is that it's it's not that,
• 36:10
  like, you know, I'm not afraid of AI turning into Ultron or the
• 36:15
  Borg, but that the people who are in charge of it, their bias
• 36:22
  is going to exist in it, and so like if the AI like lied
• 36:29
  and made a well, not that it knows it's lying. I think it's
• 36:32
  just following, you know, some kind of algorithmic programming. But if it
• 36:38
  made an allegation that that you know, sounded pretty sound, right, and
• 36:45
  then of course people have this thing where they trust AI because why would he
• 36:49
  lie? Well, I think that's a dangerous precedent. But what why would
• 36:52
  that bias even exist? I think that the people who programmed this stuff,
• 36:58
  I think their bias is coming through and I won't mess with it. Plus,
• 37:04
  I mean, this is just what we know about, right in terms
• 37:07
  of like how much you know artificial intelligence is is embedded into not just the
• 37:15
  Internet but our phones, our daily life, etc. And I think that
• 37:21
  the problem is is that like people are getting dumber, less educated, you
• 37:29
  know, less capable, and in the meantime, we're over here developing artificial
• 37:34
  intelligence or trying to when you know, we need to work on human beings,
• 37:39
  like you know, they're a mess, especially men and boys, and
• 37:45
  we don't want them getting accused of sexual assault by a fucking toaster. So
• 37:52
  anyway, I think it, I think it's true. I think that it's
• 37:54
  dangerous but I don't think it's because it's going to, you know, like
• 38:00
  become self aware. I don't think that we're anywhere near that. People have
• 38:02
  tried to convince me. Oh yeah, it's like the human brain. Do
• 38:06
  you have any idea how complex the human brain is compared to any computers.
• 38:10
  No, it's not. But the people who program these things have human brains,
• 38:15
  even though they don't really tend to use them. And um, that's
• 38:20
  what I'm worried about. That's that's my concern. So anyway, I've got
• 38:25
  something to squeeze, and here I've been waiting for my turn to say something.
• 38:30
  Oh, go ahead, I'm gonna number one. Number one, great
• 38:32
  point. It is not as smart as people say it is. It's just
• 38:37
  simply very very very good at retrieving information and connecting thoughts. Yeah, I've
• 38:46
  heard before. It's like the AI is like it's taking an open book test,
• 38:52
  and the open book is the summation of human knowledge on the Internet.
• 38:55
  And it can recall anything in a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of
• 39:00
  a nanosecond and make connections. Yeah, but it's only as smart as we
• 39:06
  give it access to. Right now, the current intelligence level it's right about
• 39:09
  an insect. Yeah, exactly. And again you know, like you said,
• 39:15
  it only it can only access like information that it's allowed to access.
• 39:21
  So that's why, that's why, that's why you're not going to get content
• 39:24
  from it. Yeah, that's why it always goes crazy when you try to
• 39:28
  tell it like, you know, oh, it's the year twenty twenty three,
• 39:31
  because I think when they first ram GPT three, they only gave it
• 39:36
  access to before the year twenty twenty information. So it it got kind of
• 39:44
  tiss me when that happens. It was a little funny to watch. Second
• 39:49
  point that I wanted to make. Yeah, and I think this is the
• 39:52
  more realistic thing, the terminator scenario, the well, I got to monitor
• 39:55
  all these traffic lights, so the biggest solution would just be to nuke the
• 40:00
  world and then I don't have to monitor any traffic lights that of course.
• 40:04
  I mean, I'm not going to say it's a completely unrealistic fear, but
• 40:07
  I don't think it's the most likely fear. I think the most likely fear
• 40:10
  going on, the most likely fear that should be confronted, or at least
• 40:15
  you should be concerned about, is the following. So there's always the thing
• 40:23
  that with technology that if we have access to it as civilians, the military
• 40:29
  sectors had access to it for at least a decade, probably longer. You
• 40:34
  see this with shit like GPS. When GPS first came out, you could
• 40:37
  find yourself where you were roughly in a mile radius something like that. The
• 40:44
  military had stuff that could track you down to the nearest foot. Yeah.
• 40:49
  So if we are just being given the keys to this stuff, the military
• 40:53
  and by extension, the government have access too much much much better. And
• 40:59
  there it right now. I believe that we've been given access to chat GPT
• 41:05
  and its various offshoots to basically get it in the public consciousness, to show,
• 41:08
  oh boy, you can do a whole bunch of stuff with this.
• 41:10
  Some of it's funny, some of it's stupid, some of it's dangerous.
• 41:15
  Yeah, and we're gonna see something big. We're gonna see something that's just
• 41:22
  gonna come out of fucking nowhere, and it's gonna be like, I don't
• 41:25
  know, like a deep fake of Biden that's so convincing, that's so down
• 41:30
  to the tea, and it's gonna be like, I don't like the Russians,
• 41:34
  man you know, got we might have a deep president twenty four We're
• 41:42
  going to have some incident that Yeah, the world stops and goes, Okay,
• 41:47
  this ship is too dangerous. Yeah, well, you can't trust a
• 41:52
  damn thing we see anymore. So you know what, the only solution to
• 41:57
  this is online? I uh, yeah, I could see. We gotta
• 42:02
  make sure real people are actually saying things and not bots boughts. Did you
• 42:07
  know? Bots, Brian are the biggest threat to our democracy. They are
• 42:12
  to democracy and that and that is the reason why every man, woman,
• 42:15
  child, if you want to participate on the Internet, now you have to
• 42:19
  have it linked to your social your address, your name, your everything.
• 42:24
  Brain. We can't have anonymity on the internet anymore. It's simply too dangerous
• 42:29
  to our democracy. Yeah. And then the next thing will be the social
• 42:32
  credit system, which is already and then yeah, yeah we already have that.
• 42:38
  Um all right, Well, anyway, we got to move on.
• 42:42
  But let us know what you guys think about this in the comments. Have
• 42:45
  you mess around with any AI stuff, their chat, GDP or some of
• 42:49
  the other um artificial intelligences out there? Let us know. Oh and also
• 42:54
  there's another story. I didn't go with but I just want to mention that,
• 43:00
  um, there was a someone I don't I don't know if it was
• 43:02
  a man or a woman, but I think it was a man who created
• 43:06
  an artificial only fans thought that, like replies to emails that you know,
• 43:15
  has a photo, shoots and everything and there, and from what I understand,
• 43:20
  they were making a lot of money. So just saying, guys,
• 43:23
  if you're looking to uh, you know, innovate, I guess you could
• 43:28
  create your own create your own dream girl, your your own e girl and
• 43:32
  put it out there and you know, just rake in the money from the
• 43:36
  simps. Yeah, well happen. You gotta make sure that more than the
• 43:44
  footskin is real, you know, obviously the whole the whole girl could be
• 43:46
  fake. Like it kind of makes fake tits look look like nothing exactly.
• 43:52
  It's the next level. Obviously, it's the natural. It's the natural step.
• 43:57
  Okay, So we're gonna move on to the next story. Let me,
• 43:59
  I gotta read some super chows and I might have super chats, not
• 44:05
  yet, but send us a super chat if you want or super chow.
• 44:07
  So Meredith g gives us five dollars and she says, h bare news number
• 44:14
  four oh one. We have reached the end state. Now that AI can
• 44:16
  make false accusations of sexual harassment, what's next, Well, exactly, maybe
• 44:22
  it can declare war on another country or something. The real endgame is when
• 44:29
  the fake only Fans model falsely accuses the fake only Fans fan of sexual harassment
• 44:37
  and and at court case ensues with well they're already talking about AI to you
• 44:44
  know, be like judges, and yeah, with the AI, they've already
• 44:47
  done, They've already they're already doing or experimenting with that. Um, all
• 44:52
  right, so rorschats No gives us ten dollars and says I almost forgot about
• 44:58
  the SPLC. They no longer represent they present themselves to be. I don't
• 45:00
  know that they ever did. I mean, if there's any bias in any
• 45:05
  corner, then I think the whole thing is just bullshit. After that,
• 45:08
  what does any of it have to do with Southern poverty? Yeah, I
• 45:12
  don't know, um, but all I will say is, like, you
• 45:17
  know, it's it's it's a it's a no du to like, you know,
• 45:22
  find that there is there are people and they do bad things. But
• 45:28
  the SPLC doesn't get points for recognizing the obvious. It's the shit that they
• 45:32
  get wrong that's the problem, which is a lot, if not most,
• 45:37
  of it. So yeah, I wouldn't. I wouldn't give them any props.
• 45:39
  Even if they say something that's correct, they no longer represent what they
• 45:44
  present themselves to be granted, I think the SPLC were infiltrated to engage in
• 45:49
  repressive tolerance while they fell into derangement from the signals of their ideologues extitutions.
• 46:00
  Right. So, if the SPLC, ever was what it professes to be,
• 46:07
  it's been long since taken over by establishment operatus. M Okay, so
• 46:16
  that's the super Child's Let us know what you guys think about this story in
• 46:21
  the comments. Hold on, I got a sneeze just a second, all
• 46:27
  right, I'm back. I didn't want to do it on the microphone.
• 46:30
  Blow somebody's ear drum out, But let us know what you guys think about
• 46:32
  this in the comments. Okay, So I'm gonna move on to the next
• 46:36
  story. So Andrew kind of messed up. He did a write up for
• 46:40
  a story that Lindsay already did a write up for, so he was supposed
• 46:45
  to do this one. But I'll do this one. I'll just read from
• 46:49
  the article. So this is from the College Fix, and the headline grabbed
• 46:53
  my attention. It says as number of women rises in higher education, free
• 46:59
  speech declines on campuses, according to a survey. According to a professor named
• 47:07
  Samuel Abrams, a social scientist at Sarah Lawrence College, Abrams determined the trend
• 47:13
  by analyzing the results of a nationwide survey of faculty conducted by the Foundation for
• 47:17
  Individual Rights and Expression. That's fire. They have a YouTube channel if you're
• 47:22
  interested. They're basically all about you know, free speech on college campuses,
• 47:27
  pointing out that compared to male counterparts, female scholars were more likely to agree
• 47:31
  with suppressing and punishing unpopular speech. Who here is surprised? Fifty one percent
• 47:38
  of women professors reported that they could envision shouting down a speaker to prevent them
• 47:44
  from speaking on campus as being an acceptable, you know, an acceptable practice,
• 47:50
  compared to just thirty nine percent of men. That number is way too
• 47:52
  high, Abrams wrote in a March twenty fourth piece for the American Enterprise Institute,
• 47:58
  where he serves as a senior fellow. For white male professors who refuse
• 48:02
  diversity training, Almost half of female professors believe their male counterparts should face some
• 48:08
  sort of sanction, he wrote. Thirty percent of female professors believed that male
• 48:13
  professors should be removed from the classroom until they comply. Seventeen percent of female
• 48:19
  professors believed that these male professors should be suspended until they comply. Two percent
• 48:23
  of female faculty even believe that their white male counterparts should be fired. In
• 48:30
  comparison, only twenty six percent of male faculty think the professors should be punished,
• 48:35
  he wrote. In an interview at the College Fix, Abrams said the
• 48:37
  survey results show that female professors are more supportive of mandatory diversity, equity and
• 48:43
  inclusion statements, as well as silencing, dissenting or controversial speech. In contrast,
• 48:50
  he said, most male professors view DEI statements or as I like to
• 48:52
  say, d IE statements as a political litmus test and are less likely to
• 48:59
  support outing speakers down. So Also, he says, underscoring these findings is
• 49:06
  the fact that women as students, faculty, and administrators now hold the majority
• 49:09
  share in higher education. He said, well, we know that already,
• 49:14
  Like so I think that about sums it up. I mean, there's it
• 49:19
  goes on and on, but yeah, it seems like female professors and female
• 49:25
  students are more quick to censor. So I don't know if that surprises anybody.
• 49:34
  That's pretty consistent male behavior, Like women have a tendency to value safety
• 49:39
  nets over freedom. Yeah, they will throw their own freedoms and your freedoms
• 49:46
  away for safety nets in circumstances where there's not any real danger. And you've
• 49:53
  seen that over and over again on social media, where it's been women's groups
• 50:00
  and in particular women Action Media ussuring in things like having a button you can
• 50:06
  use to report to the administrators of a website so that they disciplined somebody for
• 50:10
  saying something you didn't like, and then requiring those those websites, those social
• 50:16
  media sites to have teams of people to police your speech. When Twitter first
• 50:23
  came around, for instance, they didn't have anything like that, and it
• 50:29
  was a slab fight over putting a woman on or not American currency British currency
• 50:37
  that led to that um and Women Action Media actually boycotted advertisers on Twitter,
• 50:45
  businesses on Twitter in order to get the attention that they wanted on this and
• 50:53
  actually get a reporting system put into place on Twitter. And that's that's just
• 51:00
  one social media website. You know, we're talking one little environment. There's
• 51:07
  an entire profession that is heavily dominated by women that exists specifically to do this
• 51:16
  in your workplace and where here this this survey is about universities as so it's
• 51:24
  going to be more heavily left wing because universities are I'm sorry, it's spring,
• 51:37
  but your workplace has had um has had a human resources department dedicated specifically
• 51:47
  to policing your interpersonal interactions since the eighties at least, if not longer.
• 51:57
  And you've had in your workplace since the eighties, if not longer, you've
• 52:02
  had training in regard to this. There's been training on how to spot these
• 52:13
  types of misbehaviors, there's been training on how to police these types of misbehaviors.
• 52:21
  And when I say misbehaviors, I mean any kind of interpersonal conflict,
• 52:24
  any type of hurt, feelings, like, any type of misunderstandings, not
• 52:34
  just actual harassment, but the perception of harassment. And it's based on the
• 52:40
  based on the idea that the person who feels harassed has been harassed, regardless
• 52:50
  of the intentions of the accused. Sorry, And so this doesn't surprise me.
• 53:00
  It's not it's not new. This has probably been going on on university
• 53:07
  campuses since at least the nineteen sixties, because what happens in your workplace is
• 53:17
  it follows what people are taught on universities, and universities have had a sort
• 53:25
  of a spread of women's studies coursework going through them since the sixties. So
• 53:34
  not surprise, not surprised at all. But it's definitely yet another reason if
• 53:42
  you can, sorry, if you can make your life's work, if you
• 53:51
  can do your life's work without going through a university and getting a degree in
• 53:57
  what you want to do, it's better to just avoid eight campuses all together.
• 54:04
  Yeah. Uh well, and you know, it's it's funny because I
• 54:08
  saw this video. It was it was kind of shocking. And there was
• 54:15
  this guy. He was he looked like a straight white male chad type that
• 54:21
  was essentially filming himself, uh like you know, for for the internet.
• 54:30
  And he was essentially he sent out a bunch of you know, applications for
• 54:35
  a college and and he had like a crazy like a five point you know
• 54:40
  nine g pa, and like so though he not no slouch, okay,
• 54:45
  just like the guy was like, you know, some kind of superperson in
• 54:50
  terms of his his qualifications, his intellect and everything. And he got turned
• 54:55
  down by every college. It was like Yale, Harvard, all of the
• 55:00
  top ones. Right, And then there was another video of this black woman
• 55:07
  who was also Now I don't know what her you know, stats were,
• 55:09
  but she got accepted into every single IVY League school. And I'm pointing this
• 55:16
  out because this shows that colleges are not looking for people who are qualified.
• 55:24
  They're looking for people to essentially like fill those quotas and so they can say,
• 55:30
  look at how diverse our student body is. This is the reason why
• 55:37
  black women, I think are the most educated in America, the United States.
• 55:42
  They get like the most degrees. And and look, I'm not crit
• 55:45
  I'm sure that there's plenty that are totally qualified. That's not really what this
• 55:49
  is about. It's about the prioritization plus the fact that college it doesn't like
• 55:54
  people aren't learning anything anymore. Like the whole the whole thing about teaching is
• 56:00
  basically dead. Nobody knows how to think. They just know how to memorize,
• 56:02
  and you know they get they don't they don't even fail people anymore.
• 56:07
  They stopped like following any kind of standards and all of that is out the
• 56:10
  window. So, yeah, you can get a doctorate if you're a woman,
• 56:15
  if you're a minority. That that's that's that's it. That's what it's
• 56:19
  that's what it hinges on. So and that is a product of the bias,
• 56:22
  the leftist bias in the energy education system. But more than that,
• 56:29
  it puts those women, those women in debt, like hundreds of thousands of
• 56:32
  dollars because they get a degree that isn't useful, right, and then they
• 56:37
  can't find a job, so they end up at Starbucks, and so it's
• 56:43
  not good for them either. The whole thing is screwed. So like yeah,
• 56:45
  I mean, um, obviously they're there. It's just not a good
• 56:52
  environment for anyone, right, but especially men, because if they even get
• 56:57
  in, their whole attitude towards liberty is going to be thrown out the window
• 57:01
  because these people like they are there against free speech. They just don't like
• 57:07
  it. So that's that's where we are. Anyway, Um, does anyone
• 57:12
  else want to say anything about this story before I move on? Ranmracam No,
• 57:17
  I've got nothing. Okay, all right, we're gonna move on the
• 57:21
  next story. Sorry, Andrew, you wrote up the wrong thing. So
• 57:25
  yeah, let us know what you guys. My bad, that was wrong.
• 57:30
  Let us know what you guys think about this in the comments. We're
• 57:32
  gonna move on to the next one, all right. A mother claims that
• 57:38
  her eleven year old daughter was encouraged to transition secretly by her school. Aurora
• 57:45
  Regino or Regino is suing the Chico Unified School District in California. Of course,
• 57:51
  it's California for socially transitioning her daughter from female to mail behind her back.
• 57:58
  The daughter had a counselor that she felt had told the counselor that she
• 58:00
  felt like a boy, and the counselor immediately began to affirm her new identity.
• 58:06
  During another one on one meeting, her daughter told the counselor she wanted
• 58:10
  to tell her mother about her new identity, but the counselor ignored her request.
• 58:15
  According to her mother, the daughter was unsure whether she wanted a male
• 58:20
  name or pronounced, but felt pressured by the counselor to adopt them. In
• 58:25
  a Chico School District board meeting, transactivist Squeaky Saint Francis, who is polyamorous,
• 58:32
  said school, what squeaky, squeaking a picture of this individual to put
• 58:38
  up? Well, I'll look for it. I'll look for it. Do
• 58:42
  you need one? Nobody's name is squeaky. Oh that is the most normal
• 58:49
  thing about this person. Yeah, well let me. I think it's on
• 58:53
  the article. So hold on, um, where was I h Squeaky?
• 58:59
  Saint Francis, who is polyamorous, said school can often be the only place
• 59:04
  for children to discover their gender identity. What sorry, sorry, carry Let
• 59:09
  me finish, Let me finish. Squeaky demanded the school district maintain its parental
• 59:15
  secrecy policy, claiming that without confidentiality quote, children's mental health will suffer and
• 59:21
  they could be driven to suicide end quote. The district sided with the transactivist
• 59:27
  and voted to keep the secrecy policy in place with a three to two vote.
• 59:30
  On April fifth, Aurora's daughter identifies as female again. Her mother said
• 59:35
  the confusion was only brought about by other stresses in her life at the time,
• 59:39
  for which she now attends private therapy. You know, the very idea
• 59:47
  of school is a bit like the very idea of who. I put Squeaky
• 59:57
  on the screen so you guys can see Yeah, yeah, there you go.
• 1:00:00
  You're using the one I got from the collage in Life show. Yeah,
• 1:00:05
  that's that is this individual who wants unfettered access to your Yeah, am
• 1:00:15
  I okay to call it? That? Is that an acceptable pronoun? But
• 1:00:21
  yeah, I'm sorry. Like I was saying, the very idea of school
• 1:00:24
  is a bit like the very idea of democracy. It's been around for so
• 1:00:29
  long that it's hard to imagine life without it. Hence you get these bizarre
• 1:00:36
  phrases like school can often be the only place for children to discover their gender
• 1:00:42
  identity? Well, then, what the fuck did children do before school was
• 1:00:47
  a thing? Bear in mind, until the last couple of centuries, the
• 1:00:52
  vast majority of children did not go to school. They learned everything they needed
• 1:00:58
  to learn from, you know, their families and their friends and their local
• 1:01:02
  communities. And how did they feel about their gender identities in the absence of
• 1:01:08
  this scholastic institutionalization. Were they just wandering wandering around, dazed and confused with
• 1:01:17
  no idea what their gender was? As a matter of fact, no,
• 1:01:22
  very far from it. People were confident and secure in the knowledge that they
• 1:01:30
  were male and female. On account of being male and female, It's only
• 1:01:35
  in this century, particularly in the last ten years, in which this mass
• 1:01:43
  psychosis of gender confusion has come about. The question is to what degree the
• 1:01:49
  school system has been instrumental or just incidental in this confusion. Maybe it was
• 1:01:57
  avoidable. Maybe maybe if we hadn't been colonized by feminists, we wouldn't be
• 1:02:04
  in this mess, and schools would still simply be places in which children learned
• 1:02:10
  about reading, writing, and arithmetic and so on. But maybe there's something
• 1:02:15
  inherently corrupting about being in an environment in which you're surrounded by hundreds of miniature
• 1:02:22
  psychopaths, because that's what children are, and I mean in the in the
• 1:02:28
  plural sense. As the saying goes, I'm going to quote men in black
• 1:02:34
  hair because it's a good quote. A person is smart. People are dumb,
• 1:02:39
  panicky, dangerous animals, and you know it. And this is even
• 1:02:45
  more true when it comes to children. If you pack hundreds of them into
• 1:02:50
  a complex of buildings that they're not allowed to leave during the day, then
• 1:02:57
  why would you expect anything but a descent to a Lord of the Flies situation.
• 1:03:01
  Children that they form cliques, they form social hierarchies, not based on
• 1:03:07
  merit, but based on the shallow, arbitrary trappings that children enjoy, trends,
• 1:03:15
  fashions, fads, pointless esthetic segregation. Is there any wonder that when
• 1:03:22
  children are thrust into this captive, chaotic environment for at least seven hours a
• 1:03:30
  day, five days a week, for like thirteen years, some of them
• 1:03:35
  at some point might develop some insecurities about their identities. And maybe after several
• 1:03:42
  generations of this, those children grow up to become teachers who cannot see beyond
• 1:03:49
  the shallow identitarian nature of this environment. Maybe it's not a coincidence that schools
• 1:03:54
  have been taken over by these mindless, woke schools of identity politics. Maybe
• 1:04:00
  they Maybe they've always gone hand in hand as part of the same degenerative phenomenon.
• 1:04:10
  Home school your kids, folks. Yes there is a stigma against it,
• 1:04:15
  but for folk's sake, there should be an equal and opposite stigma against
• 1:04:18
  state schooling. You cannot possibly fuck things up more than the state does.
• 1:04:25
  After all, you care about your children. Schools do not. The state
• 1:04:30
  does not. Other children do not, and at this point teachers do not.
• 1:04:34
  They only care about their collective agendas, and they will not hesitate to
• 1:04:39
  sacrifice your children on the altar of the current thing. Charity starts at home,
• 1:04:45
  and so does revolution, comrade, so go ahead and do your own
• 1:04:51
  thing while you're still allowed to Why oh, I will say, you know,
• 1:05:00
  I've said this before. There's there's there's two groups of people that the
• 1:05:04
  claim children are are capable of grasping the the um ideas, the concepts that
• 1:05:15
  are involved in in this this complex of a condition. Right, Like you
• 1:05:21
  think about kids, um Like a five year old can be convinced that a
• 1:05:28
  fairy takes his discarded teeth and leaves him human made currency in exchange for those
• 1:05:32
  teeth. And you want to tell me he's competent to consent to a decision
• 1:05:36
  that comes with heavy physical, social, economic, and psychological risk. Bullshit.
• 1:05:43
  Right, You can convince a teenager that, you know, just because
• 1:05:49
  something is illegal, just because there's heavy consequences for it, doesn't mean they
• 1:05:55
  shouldn't try it. That's why there are tons and tons of issues with teenage
• 1:06:00
  drinking. And they are teenagers smoking pot because their friends can convince them that,
• 1:06:09
  even though it's a profoundly bad idea for a variety of reasons, it's
• 1:06:15
  worth it because of the amount of fun they'll have right. So, this
• 1:06:18
  idea that they can just consent to something that's complicated, it's it's pretty much.
• 1:06:27
  The evidence against it is pretty much there in their behavior and their understanding.
• 1:06:32
  And at the same time, you have you have two groups of people
• 1:06:35
  that are making a kind of claim that they can they can consent to something
• 1:06:39
  like that. You have two groups of people that have publicly made that argument,
• 1:06:44
  and that have made the argument that they just desperately need to talk to
• 1:06:46
  your children about sex, and that you're a threat, that your kids should
• 1:06:55
  keep it secret from you, and and you're a threat if you interfere.
• 1:07:01
  One of those groups is trying to rebrand themselves as minor attracted people because they
• 1:07:05
  think it will rehabilitate their public image. Yeah, predator, Predators tell children
• 1:07:17
  what I'm about to talk to you about. You shouldn't tell your parents because
• 1:07:20
  your parents won't understand and there could be consequences for both of us. That's
• 1:07:27
  what predators do. Right. Your parental rights should not be taken away without
• 1:07:34
  a criminal trial for abuse that you have committed. And this is evidence that
• 1:07:44
  the state is all too willing to take your parental rights away for no reason
• 1:07:49
  whatsoever. Yeah, all right, one thing to remember, yeatists don't have
• 1:08:00
  children. They have your children. Yeah, it's like how they reproduce exactly.
• 1:08:06
  And again just to say it again for those in the back home school
• 1:08:12
  your kids. And if someone says, aren't you worried they're gonna turn out
• 1:08:15
  different from all the other ones, say yeah, that's the point. Yeah,
• 1:08:19
  say say yes in a profile with a blonde bed ye yes or yeah
• 1:08:29
  or else. You know, squeaky Saint Francis is going to get to talk
• 1:08:32
  to them. And if I saw that thing in a dark alley coming at
• 1:08:39
  me at night, you should catch it. Gives gold. I don't think
• 1:08:45
  I'd be able to catch that thing. Man. All right, Well,
• 1:08:50
  anyway, let us know what you guys think about this in the comments.
• 1:08:53
  I just wanted to add that, like, there's a lot of she has
• 1:08:56
  a lot of support. Well, they they have a lot of supporters behind
• 1:09:00
  them. I like this woman right to her right that's got a black shirt
• 1:09:03
  on with a Pride flag. She's snapping her fingers, So that's what's going
• 1:09:08
  on, Like they're there, that's applause. Snappingsapping your hands is scary,
• 1:09:15
  it's too triggering. Yeah, I thought, yeah, I thought we were
• 1:09:16
  supposed to be doing jazz hands though. I mean even snaps could be a
• 1:09:20
  little bit much. But yeah, I don't I don't know if you can,
• 1:09:23
  Brian, but if you can show that the image that I posted in
• 1:09:26
  the live chat, just that the picture of this individual in the in the
• 1:09:29
  upper right, that that that image tells you everything you need to know.
• 1:09:34
  That look that like fucking Palpatine. Look. Yeah, if I know exactly
• 1:09:43
  what I'm doing and it's playing out exactly as I have foreseen, I like
• 1:09:48
  the contrast with the mother who looks all right. Um, all right,
• 1:09:55
  well, anyway, let us know what you guys think about this in the
• 1:10:00
  comments. I'm gonna move on to the next story because we got a lot
• 1:10:03
  to get through and there's like two left. But these are these last two.
• 1:10:08
  You're gonna like. They're they're kind of they're they're pretty good. So
• 1:10:12
  um, and I'm going to hand it up to Mike Jake because he took
• 1:10:14
  the last two stories. So take it away, brother. So, a
• 1:10:19
  former director at Planned Parenthood, was found dead by his own hand at his
• 1:10:25
  home after being investigated by police for child tiamy Ergo, age thirty five,
• 1:10:35
  knew he was being investigated by police prior to his suicide. Police discovered the
• 1:10:42
  body while carrying out a raid of his residence. Police had a warrant to
• 1:10:45
  seize and search his electronic devices, but not a warrant to arrest him.
• 1:10:51
  Prior to his death, Argo was working for a local theater, but before
• 1:10:58
  that he served as director of strategic communications for the Southern and New England that
• 1:11:03
  Planned Parenthood. On social media, your goal was an outspoken promoter of LGBTQ
• 1:11:12
  and leftist causes, which includes abortion. Now there is still no word if
• 1:11:18
  the child charges had any validity, if there was anything found the residence.
• 1:11:27
  Yeah. Tempting though it is to celebrate the death of a nunce, even
• 1:11:32
  if it isn't. By Woodchipper, I have to remind myself of my own
• 1:11:38
  advice. Before you celebrate someone's death, you need to be as certain as
• 1:11:44
  can be that the person in question is actually guilty of the crime that would
• 1:11:49
  make their death worth celebrating. By Woodchipper, because if it turns out you
• 1:11:55
  were celebrating the death of an innocent man, you would have a great deal
• 1:12:00
  of trouble forgiving yourself. So I have to wonder, is there even an
• 1:12:03
  outside chance that there is more than meets the eye to this story. It
• 1:12:08
  wouldn't be the first time that someone someone was murdered and his death was nevertheless
• 1:12:13
  reported as a suicide. Did he have any dirt on the Clintons, or
• 1:12:18
  or on some localized equivalent of the Clintons. Maybe this is just me being
• 1:12:24
  cynical, as I often am. But evil people don't often kill themselves.
• 1:12:30
  Yes, I know Hitler killed himself, but I didn't say never. I
• 1:12:33
  said not often. Hitler killed in himself once. But how many people did
• 1:12:40
  he have killed and framed as suicide? History may never know for every one
• 1:12:46
  evil bastard who kills themselves or countless, you know, fall guys who were
• 1:12:51
  quote unquote suicided by some other evil bastard to prevent them from spilling the beans
• 1:12:59
  about the evils that other evil bust has been up to. So though I'm
• 1:13:03
  not prepared to call this death a tragedy just in case he really was a
• 1:13:09
  nonce, nor am I prepared to call this death some kind of triumph,
• 1:13:15
  I will remain neutral. It's okay to remain neutral with regard to a death.
• 1:13:20
  Millions of deaths happen every day, and we're neutral to all of them
• 1:13:24
  because we don't even know about them. It's a standard way to go,
• 1:13:27
  folks. You may think the least you can do is offer your thoughts and
• 1:13:30
  prayers, but there's a lot less you can do. You can do nothing
• 1:13:34
  at all, or you can go on the internet and offer a brief explanation
• 1:13:41
  as to why you won't even prefer any thoughts and prayers, and you could
• 1:13:45
  perhaps clarify some advice along the lines of don't even associate with nonses or groomers,
• 1:13:54
  or or you two could find yourself in a situation where your death is
• 1:13:59
  selebrates it on the basis of that association. Just walk away from the great
• 1:14:03
  wood chipper in the sky. Your life will be better and your death will
• 1:14:08
  be better the more you know this. One significant thing about this story,
• 1:14:16
  it looks like from the original story, the way that he found out about
• 1:14:23
  the investigation was that the police first accidentally rated his neighbor instead of him,
• 1:14:31
  scared the crap out of her, and then came back, I think like
• 1:14:39
  five days later to raid his place, and he was by that time already
• 1:14:46
  dead. And I'm kind of wondering because of this, the way that happened.
• 1:14:53
  If you know, this would have played out very differently if they had
• 1:14:58
  rated the correct apartment on the day that they intended to show up. Would
• 1:15:03
  this guy be in jail on suicide watch? Would the evidence be coming out?
• 1:15:09
  Would a news story be totally different? But of course now the evidence
• 1:15:13
  is not going to come out because why would the police need to continue the
• 1:15:15
  investigation If the suspect is dead. What are they going to do? Maybe
• 1:15:20
  they'd be able to get some of his connections, you know, maybe,
• 1:15:28
  but there's no knowing. But I think that the reason that this news story
• 1:15:39
  was published where it was published because this is Daily Mail and I'm sorry Daily
• 1:15:45
  wire, right not Daily Mail, It's not in a brain. But in
• 1:15:50
  any case, the reason that a right wing site I think focused on this
• 1:15:59
  is because as of the connection to Planned parenthood, and I kind of wonder
• 1:16:04
  would they have ignored this if it was somebody else, if it was in
• 1:16:11
  connection to a church, if it was in connection to anything else that didn't
• 1:16:15
  didn't provide them with ammunition. So they're they're kind of presuming the guy guilty
• 1:16:23
  and ignoring the the huge due process violation of raiding the wrong apartment that that
• 1:16:33
  led to potentially led to his suicide. And because look, we can associate
• 1:16:41
  this guy who's accused of being a peto with LGBTQ causes and planned parenthood.
• 1:16:53
  Yeah, it kind of it shows me, and it showed I think it
• 1:16:59
  really commune indicates a bunch of um male disposability, the disposability of due process,
• 1:17:10
  like we don't we generally don't know or genuinely, I should say,
• 1:17:14
  don't know if this this guy actually did what he's accused of. Now,
• 1:17:18
  we do know that he was afraid enough about being investigated that he killed himself.
• 1:17:24
  But we also know that there's been people who have been investigated for stuff
• 1:17:30
  like this that have accused police of planting the evidence. And when it's electronic
• 1:17:39
  evidence in a you know, a computer and stuff like that, I think
• 1:17:45
  the layman might look at that as a real possibility. Enough, if they
• 1:17:49
  don't know enough about um, how how to tell when a file was placed
• 1:17:58
  on a computer, and how to tell when file was created and so on,
• 1:18:01
  they might believe that could happen. So he might have simply been afraid
• 1:18:08
  that he was going to get framed. You know, we don't know that
• 1:18:11
  either, But the association is interesting, and the reporting is interesting as well,
• 1:18:18
  And I guess that's part of the reason that, like, I'm the
• 1:18:23
  one that dropped this story into our chat, and part of the reason that
• 1:18:26
  I did that. Like, when I first looked at that, I'm like,
• 1:18:30
  well, you know, my first thought was, of course, a
• 1:18:33
  guy from playing Parenthood. Then I reread and I'm like, they didn't say
• 1:18:39
  anything about fighting any evidence, So even I was like, oh, yeah,
• 1:18:46
  of course, you know playing Parenthood guy. Of course he's petto like
• 1:18:50
  that makes perfect sense, right, But we don't know. So it really
• 1:18:58
  is one of those instances where it's easy to condemn a man and it's easy
• 1:19:02
  to ignore the other details of the story because of you know, your political
• 1:19:12
  positions and stuff like that. The fact that they went into the wrong apartment
• 1:19:15
  first like just absolutely blew my mind. And the woman whose apartment they went
• 1:19:25
  into did not get shot. H sons. Yeah, Um, when we
• 1:19:35
  hear about um mistakes like that, the cops go into the wrong place,
• 1:19:41
  they pull over the wrong person, you know, there's any kind of conflict
• 1:19:45
  at all. Um, the individual that they misjudged ends up dead. So
• 1:19:53
  it's kind of interesting that the woman whose apartment they wrongly rated was able to
• 1:20:00
  talk about it afterward. M hm. And she was like an elderly Asian
• 1:20:04
  woman. They were looking for a for a guy called Tim. Yeah.
• 1:20:09
  Yeah, but I mean, like you run from the cops. What do
• 1:20:14
  they do? Well? Usually depends run from the cops. What do they
• 1:20:19
  do? Versus yeah, versus I run from the cops? What do they
• 1:20:25
  do? Because that's the thing I think sometimes they let women get away with
• 1:20:30
  things that they would not let men get away with. Yeah, if you're
• 1:20:36
  under investigation for child NONSI or watching child nonsiri or whatever you want to call
• 1:20:44
  it, um, and then you end up dead, and the assumption seems
• 1:20:50
  to be I don't know if there's like a way to like to show like
• 1:20:55
  that he legitimately committed suicide, like did he hang himself? Like, I
• 1:20:59
  don't know, Um, it doesn't look good for your innocence. I'm not
• 1:21:03
  saying that it's you know, evidence, but I'm saying it doesn't look good
• 1:21:06
  because if you know you're innocent, then I think that a rational person would
• 1:21:12
  just fight the charge. But this guy kind of checked out, as it
• 1:21:18
  were, or he was checked out because you know that, so that there
• 1:21:24
  is also that possibility too. I mean, Planned Parenthood is a very powerful
• 1:21:29
  organization with a lot of strong financial backers, and they're they're very heavily connected.
• 1:21:35
  And this guy was a director, so not like a you know,
• 1:21:41
  not not a shlub in the in the organization. So there, I think
• 1:21:45
  that this is It's good that I know this because I think that we may
• 1:21:49
  get more about this, which could be pretty revealing, maybe not for this
• 1:21:55
  particular individual's case, but for stuff going on with Planned Parenthood full stop.
• 1:22:00
  I think maybe, yeah, so that's what I'm hoping for. Okay,
• 1:22:08
  Yeah, as far as a suicide thing is concerned, I will point out
• 1:22:12
  that there are organizations that have been sort of known to make executions look like
• 1:22:19
  suicide. I wouldn't I you know, I know that there is organized crime
• 1:22:24
  around this particular proclivity as well, so there is also that to consider.
• 1:22:31
  I will say that just because we haven't heard anything, and we odds are
• 1:22:34
  we probably won't hear anything, but that doesn't mean that you know, this,
• 1:22:39
  this was all a mistake or something like this. Usually when they have
• 1:22:45
  cases like this, they will purposefully not discuss it for a while, and
• 1:22:54
  that's because they're taking their time to sift through everything. It's only been what
• 1:22:59
  was this on a fifteenth? Sixteenth? It's it's only been a few days.
• 1:23:02
  They probably have a lot of stuff to go through, and even when
• 1:23:08
  if they do find something, they're more than likely going to want to try
• 1:23:12
  to chase it as far as they can to see if they can lead them
• 1:23:15
  to anyone else. Yeah, So, unfortunately, it may be a while
• 1:23:21
  before this guy is either vindicated or it's all confirmed. Yeah. Yeah,
• 1:23:31
  well we'll see if anything new comes up after this. I'm I'm legitimately curious.
• 1:23:41
  So if anyway, if anything, guys, let us know what you
• 1:23:43
  guys think about this story in the comments. Do you think that this was
• 1:23:47
  a suicide? You could read the original source article in the Patreon page where
• 1:23:53
  all of our show notes are posted, and you know or do you think
• 1:23:58
  he got epsteined? And I don't know, let us know in the comments
• 1:24:01
  and we will move on to the last story. So, Mike, why
• 1:24:05
  don't you tell us about this guy with the three thousand IQ move that he
• 1:24:12
  pulled? This guy? This story is like it I was talking to some
• 1:24:16
  of the guys a bottle last night. This one sounds too perfect. This
• 1:24:19
  sounds like MRA propaganda. If only, if only we had that right.
• 1:24:27
  But but it's it's I checked, everything's on the level. I mean,
• 1:24:30
  I didn't know anything about this guy because I'm not a big follower of Moroccan
• 1:24:32
  soccer, but but at all all appears legit so famous Moroccan soccer player or
• 1:24:39
  football a shref. Hakimi was devastated when his wife, Hiba a Book,
• 1:24:47
  filed for divorce and demanded half of his property and assets, but the joke
• 1:24:54
  would ultimately be on his ex wife, as Hakimi does not appear to own
• 1:24:59
  any exp sense of houses or luxury cars, or even any property or jewelry.
• 1:25:05
  Instead, Hakimi has been signing his assets and depositing his checks to his
• 1:25:12
  mother. The vast majority of his fortune and assets totaling around seventy million euros
• 1:25:19
  roughly seventy six point five million US macarooneys, and all of it is under
• 1:25:26
  his mother's name. Whenever Hachimi needs something, he asks his mom to buy
• 1:25:30
  it for him, which he does. The divorce follows allegations that Hakimi molested
• 1:25:35
  a woman at his home while his wife and family were on vacation, and
• 1:25:40
  in a late breaking update, and I've been able to confirm this. It's
• 1:25:45
  just a rumor so far. But if so, Hachimi has pulled the ultimate
• 1:25:50
  Uno reverse card, with his ex wife being ordered to pay him half of
• 1:25:58
  her three million dollar fortune to the divorce Absolute king. Now that's kingshit.
• 1:26:08
  Did anyone know that was possible? I guess. I guess it was because
• 1:26:12
  it ultimately comes down to women, right if if he if he had left
• 1:26:18
  all of this to his dad, this might not have worked. But because
• 1:26:23
  it was all in the hands of a woman. I don't know. I
• 1:26:26
  don't I don't know what Moroccan politics are like, but I imagine it's quite
• 1:26:31
  close to Spain, so maybe it's quite similar to Spanish politics. And we
• 1:26:36
  don't even talk about how Spanish politics work. But there are several steps ahead
• 1:26:42
  of us in terms of guard and centric laws. And I guess it makes
• 1:26:45
  sense that you can just give everything to your mother and who's going to argue
• 1:26:50
  with you? You'd be a misogynist. Do you argue with such things?
• 1:26:58
  Yeah? I don't know. I don't know what the laws are in Spain,
• 1:27:04
  but I do know that in the United States, alimony law um if
• 1:27:11
  if alimony is a thing in your area, goes both ways. So under
• 1:27:17
  a circumstance like this, if he owns nothing and has you know, no
• 1:27:27
  current or very little current detectable income, and she has a fortune, the
• 1:27:34
  court would almost have no choice but to order her to pay him. Yeah,
• 1:27:41
  if there's one of men like that, UH have to worry about predatory
• 1:27:47
  women that want to take their ship. It's athletes. They're always getting into
• 1:27:53
  messes like this. And I think this guy saw the writing on the wall
• 1:27:57
  and was like, you know what, it's amazing. I'm like, man,
• 1:28:02
  dude, that yours and your best option is to bury all that money
• 1:28:09
  in whatever woman you have in your life who is actually devoted to you.
• 1:28:14
  And it stands to reason it's going to be your mother, because however much
• 1:28:17
  feminism there is in the world, your mother might be a raging feminist,
• 1:28:21
  but it's not when it comes to her own son. This is the great
• 1:28:28
  paradox when it when it comes to this feminist society that even if even if
• 1:28:32
  your mother is a ra is a raging feminist, she will make an exception
• 1:28:39
  for her own son because her own son is an extension of her. Yes,
• 1:28:45
  and and and and so you don't count as the patriarchy you count as
• 1:28:50
  as an extension of a woman's priorities. And now he's he is a million
• 1:28:58
  and a half dollars rich, right, So it's and it looks like it.
• 1:29:03
  Um, I imagine what's going to happen next, is that this woman's
• 1:29:09
  going to go after the mother. Oh, and it might might work,
• 1:29:15
  it might not work. It just sort of depends again on the laws of
• 1:29:17
  the country. Um. And it's it's not without I'm not saying this without
• 1:29:23
  precedent, like this is something I personally experienced, not as a mother,
• 1:29:29
  but as a second wife. Where Um, in fact, I even before
• 1:29:35
  I got married, I dated a divorcee and his ex wife wanted to go
• 1:29:42
  after me for child support. So women will try to if you're associated with
• 1:29:48
  a guy and you are supporting him, Um, you know or or you
• 1:29:55
  have control over the finances and it's in your name, like it doesn't have
• 1:30:00
  you don't have to be in the same household, you don't have to be
• 1:30:02
  the mother, you don't have to be married. She'll go after it if
• 1:30:08
  she can. And it depends on just how greedy this woman is, because
• 1:30:14
  like it sounds like she does have a fortune of her own and she was
• 1:30:20
  going to go after his Ye. So I I predict that she is.
• 1:30:28
  If there is any legal avenue, or if she can find a lawyer who
• 1:30:31
  thinks there's a legal avenue, she'll go after his mother. And we may
• 1:30:36
  or may not hear very much about it. I suspect we will hear something
• 1:30:41
  about it, but that will be the next step, because that's that's what
• 1:30:45
  they do. And I hope the court basically says he fuck you know h
• 1:30:57
  m hm. So yeah, take take this down, guys, like,
• 1:31:00
  just keep it in mind. You know, if you're thinking about uh marriage,
• 1:31:06
  and you have a lot to lose. You know, I don't have
• 1:31:10
  shit to lose, so but if you do, then this might be This
• 1:31:15
  might be an avenue if you still have a good relationship with your mother or
• 1:31:17
  or some other relative. Um. Yeah, I mean I just wanted to
• 1:31:27
  end on something positive. So does anyone else have any thoughts on this?
• 1:31:31
  Before I move on? I wish I could have been a fly on the
• 1:31:36
  wall to watch her face when she found that out. Yeah, I know,
• 1:31:43
  I just do. I just it would have been so refreshing. I
• 1:31:46
  would have taped it and put it on. Yeah. I would have been
• 1:31:50
  that would have been the TikTok video. So yeah, yeah, um all
• 1:31:58
  right, So anyway, let us know what you guys think about this story
• 1:32:01
  in the comments. Are you familiar with Atrof Hakim Hakeem something, the football
• 1:32:08
  football player from Morocco? Do you know about this story? Let us know
• 1:32:13
  in the comments what you guys think. So we're gonna wrap up the show
• 1:32:16
  now and head into the Patron Only Show to look at this article from Game
• 1:32:20
  Rant, although there are other I think there were other links too, but
• 1:32:25
  I like this one. The most eleven year old stabbed at a dollar tree
• 1:32:28
  after calling in an MPC. I'm not happy about the kid who got stabbed.
• 1:32:33
  I'm assuming that he's alive because they didn't say he was killed. So
• 1:32:38
  but we'll look at it. If you guys want to join us on the
• 1:32:43
  Patron Only Show, become a member. Go to feed the Badger dot Com.
• 1:32:46
  Five bucks a month will get you into our discord where you'll be able
• 1:32:49
  to be involved with all of the patron content and all of the other things
• 1:32:54
  that we have going on, like game nights and movie nights and so on.
• 1:32:58
  So that's the Badger dot Com to help us out, and we hope
• 1:33:01
  to see you there all right, So, if you guys liked this video,
• 1:33:04
  please smash like, subscribe if you're not already subscribed, to hit the
• 1:33:08
  BELF notifications so that you know when our shows go live. Leave us a
• 1:33:13
  comment, let us know what you guys think about what we discussed on the
• 1:33:15
  show today. And please, please please please share this video because sharing is
• 1:33:18
  caring. Thank you guys so much for coming on today's episode of HBr News
• 1:33:24
  and it looks like everything is working, no audio issues, no connection issues
• 1:33:30
  or anything, and we will talk to you all in the next video.