Latest / The Lone Gunman Podcast : JFK Assassination / RRR W/ Rob - Chasing Ghosts

Transcript

RRR W/ Rob - Chasing Ghosts · The Lone Gunman Podcast : JFK Assassination

0:02
Speaker 1: What Random Research Tramblings with Robin.
0:12
Speaker 2: Digging through the details. That's his job done. Dallas days
0:18
Speaker 2: and no reports. He breaks hit down in friendly shorts
0:23
Speaker 2: Random Research Tramblems with Robin. What is up? Everyone? Welcome
0:33
Speaker 2: to another exciting edition of Random Research Ramblings with Rob.
0:39
Speaker 2: I am, of course Rob aka Big Bad Bob. And
0:47
Speaker 2: yes you can see the Texas Theater tickets hanging from
0:51
Speaker 2: where I said they were gonna hang. They are there
0:54
Speaker 2: and shall remain there. What's up everybody? Uh oh yeah,
1:00
Speaker 2: this episode, I wanted to get back in my time
1:05
Speaker 2: machine a little bit and take you back to a
1:07
Speaker 2: time pre podcast, if you will, when I was very
1:16
Speaker 2: active online and very vocal about things and fighting a
1:24
Speaker 2: number of inaccuracies and injustices and horses assery and scuffusery
1:32
Speaker 2: of the highest order. That is why this is called
1:37
Speaker 2: Chasing Ghosts, because I figured, you know, fifteen years, it's
1:42
Speaker 2: been a long time, and I wonder what these people
1:48
Speaker 2: are up to now, because back in the day, there
1:56
Speaker 2: was a bunch of horses asses out there saying all
1:59
Speaker 2: kinds of things muddy in the waters. And I'm not
2:02
Speaker 2: just talking about people like Judith Baker, who inserted themselves
2:10
Speaker 2: into history and and and continue to lie about it.
2:13
Speaker 2: That's one thing. But it's these other folks, these peddlers
2:19
Speaker 2: of diff disinformation, if you will, that I think jaded me,
2:27
Speaker 2: and that jaded ness has continued to this day, not
2:34
Speaker 2: to the same extent that it pissed me off back then.
2:42
Speaker 2: But I did my time. I fought my battles, and
2:49
Speaker 2: I did it with documentary evidence, not just pictures with
2:58
Speaker 2: computerized graphics overlaid on top of them, and the most
3:03
Speaker 2: as nine commentary to go along with it that you
3:06
Speaker 2: have ever seen in your life. And the people that
3:12
Speaker 2: I'm referring to here are folks like Ralphson Kay, Jim Fetzer,
3:20
Speaker 2: Richard Sharnon, mainly folks who were associated with the Oswald
3:31
Speaker 2: Innocence Campaign, which was this grassroots at the time thing movement,
3:43
Speaker 2: if you will, or attempting to be a movement, ragtag
3:48
Speaker 2: coalition of idiots and assholes and grifters who were dead
4:01
Speaker 2: set on pushing certain theories. And it was one theory
4:07
Speaker 2: after another, man, but it all goes back to Oswald
4:12
Speaker 2: in the doorway, and they thought it was the greatest
4:18
Speaker 2: revelation known to man, right that the guy in the
4:22
Speaker 2: doorway in the Alt and sixth picture is really Lee
4:26
Speaker 2: Harvey Oswald and not Billy Lovelady. Okay, they thought they
4:32
Speaker 2: were on some new shit, right, but in reality, when
4:37
Speaker 2: it was pointed out to them that many first generation
4:41
Speaker 2: researchers without the benefit of modern technology, actually we're saying
4:52
Speaker 2: the same thing. Now, it's understandable how folks back in
4:58
Speaker 2: the nineteen sixties who were first generation researchers who didn't
5:03
Speaker 2: really have very many resources, who weren't photographic specialists, who
5:08
Speaker 2: were mostly mostly lawyers, I mean, I'll just say it,
5:17
Speaker 2: mostly lawyers, doctors, people that were already firmly embedded in
5:24
Speaker 2: intelligence operations or or the or the way the government
5:32
Speaker 2: works things like this. And I'm talking about people like Weisberg, Cilandria,
5:37
Speaker 2: Mark Lane and and and people of that ilk. You know, now,
5:44
Speaker 2: it's understandable how they could get things wrong back then
5:47
Speaker 2: because they didn't have the benefit of again, computer aided
5:52
Speaker 2: activity as far as cleaning images up, clarifying images, magnified images,
6:00
Speaker 2: blowing things up. It was a very expensive and probably
6:09
Speaker 2: out of their reach tedious thing back in the sixties.
6:13
Speaker 2: So then come along Ralph sin Kay and the Oswald
6:17
Speaker 2: Innocence Campaign, and this stuff was such nonsense, and it
6:28
Speaker 2: literally was just pictures with photoshop images laid on top
6:34
Speaker 2: of them, you know, claiming extraordinary things. And they kept
6:45
Speaker 2: adding folks to their ranks. Anybody that would have Ralphson
6:50
Speaker 2: kay on or agreed with him became honorary members of
6:55
Speaker 2: the Oswald Innocence Campaign, folks like Jim Fetzer, Gary and
7:02
Speaker 2: we'll go through the list here in a minute. But
7:06
Speaker 2: I thought it'd be interesting to go back because after
7:09
Speaker 2: I was done debunking these idiots, and they're seriously like cockroaches,
7:15
Speaker 2: like you stomp them down, you think they're dead, and
7:17
Speaker 2: just when you think there's no coming back from what
7:20
Speaker 2: I just did to them, they pop up out of
7:25
Speaker 2: the pavement again with some other crazy theory that's just
7:30
Speaker 2: off the rails. So over time, I got tired of
7:39
Speaker 2: dealing with it because it just became too tedious for me,
7:49
Speaker 2: and I got to the point where I just didn't
7:51
Speaker 2: give a shit anymore. Like I'm trying to clean up
7:54
Speaker 2: the muddied waters here, you know, from all this goffosi
7:59
Speaker 2: and fakes and frauds that are out there. I mean,
8:01
Speaker 2: it's bad enough when you have to sort through everything
8:07
Speaker 2: to do with the case and what the official government
8:11
Speaker 2: has done in terms of covering things up to have
8:16
Speaker 2: to deal with people that believe in a conspiracy but
8:18
Speaker 2: are pushing these crazy batshit crazy ideas and making conspiracy
8:23
Speaker 2: theories look like lunatics, legit lunatics, you know, things like
8:30
Speaker 2: first glance, you're like, well, no wonder, no wonder, this
8:35
Speaker 2: is why they think of us as we are. But
8:42
Speaker 2: so over time I decided, you know, this is not
8:47
Speaker 2: the juice has not worked to squeeze anymore. I've said
8:49
Speaker 2: what I had to say. I've set up a blog
8:52
Speaker 2: spot out there that I put everything on and I
8:57
Speaker 2: maintained it, and I debunked everything these guys ever put out.
9:02
Speaker 2: And I wasn't alone. I had help. There were other
9:04
Speaker 2: people out there trying to do the same thing I was,
9:09
Speaker 2: people like be Pete one and I forget half their
9:17
Speaker 2: names honestly, but there is a ton of them out
9:21
Speaker 2: there would who would either work alongside us or share
9:25
Speaker 2: our work and try to get it out there over
9:28
Speaker 2: to you know, to let the people know that these
9:31
Speaker 2: guys do not represent the conspiracy community. These guys are outliers,
9:37
Speaker 2: these guys are idiots, these guys should be ignored. And
9:41
Speaker 2: these guys basically are bad shit crazy and you cannot
9:49
Speaker 2: believe a word they say. So there came a time
9:55
Speaker 2: when I got tired. I got real tired of dealing
10:01
Speaker 2: with them. So one day I just went on Facebook
10:05
Speaker 2: and I blocked all of them. I blocked them all,
10:10
Speaker 2: Richard charn and Ralph saying, Okay, Judy Baker, I mean,
10:13
Speaker 2: I just I blocked them all so I didn't have
10:16
Speaker 2: to see any more of their horseshit. And that was it.
10:23
Speaker 2: I'm done right. I don't see any of that bullshit
10:28
Speaker 2: online anymore. Now occasionally you see people reposting things, you know,
10:37
Speaker 2: and and you catch something here or there, I'm like, oh,
10:39
Speaker 2: they're still up to their dumb ass bullshit, you know,
10:42
Speaker 2: still uh still talking mess. But uh so, let's jump
10:49
Speaker 2: over here real quick and see what these guys are
10:53
Speaker 2: up to, because, like I said, it's been a while
10:55
Speaker 2: for me, and I'm just wondering, or is it anybody
11:00
Speaker 2: listening to them anymore? Are they relevant in the community anymore?
11:04
Speaker 2: Are they still spouting the same old bullshit anymore? I
11:08
Speaker 2: don't know. I don't pay attention to it. It's out
11:12
Speaker 2: of my purview. It's off my radar. I could give
11:15
Speaker 2: two shits about anything these guys have to say. I
11:19
Speaker 2: just thought it would be fun today just to go
11:22
Speaker 2: back and see, you know, chase some ghosts, see what's up.
11:27
Speaker 2: So let me shit share my screen here. This would
11:35
Speaker 2: be the main website of the Oswald Innocence campaign, and
11:41
Speaker 2: it says we are an organization of JFK researchers committed
11:45
Speaker 2: to spreading the truth that, in spite of ingenious efforts
11:48
Speaker 2: to conceal it, Lee Harvey Oswold was the man in
11:51
Speaker 2: the doorway in the famous Autin's photo, which thereby exonerates
11:55
Speaker 2: him of any and all guilt and the murder of
11:57
Speaker 2: President Kennedy. It is the smoking gun of the JFK assassination.
12:04
Speaker 2: And to support this, it says Oswald spoke, he gave
12:10
Speaker 2: his alibi out with Bill Shelley in front. Here are
12:14
Speaker 2: the facts, and it goes to an article out with
12:16
Speaker 2: Bill Shelley in front. We all know that this is
12:18
Speaker 2: from host these notes. And then the Pacific Coast Blues
12:28
Speaker 2: Band has recorded our anthem for JFK truth. The video
12:35
Speaker 2: is on YouTube. Oh boy, we have got to listen
12:38
Speaker 2: to this.
12:40
Speaker 3: We know that Oswald was an innocent man.
12:44
Speaker 2: And now everybody's gonna know.
12:48
Speaker 3: All right here it is live in the drum Lab
12:50
Speaker 3: Santa Barbara, California, Pacific Coast Blues performing for the Oswald's
12:55
Speaker 3: Innocence campaign, a new song written by Ralphson k he
12:59
Speaker 3: didn't do it.
13:00
Speaker 1: One two, one two three.
13:23
Speaker 3: He didn't do it.
13:25
Speaker 1: I was innocent man.
13:30
Speaker 2: He didn't do it.
13:32
Speaker 1: I was incent man.
13:37
Speaker 3: He wasn't just standing there.
13:40
Speaker 2: Lasting his hand. I had to deposits. I had to
13:47
Speaker 2: look in story that they told. It was like Kazzin
13:51
Speaker 2: do it.
13:53
Speaker 1: I was again decent man. He wasn't just.
13:59
Speaker 3: Standing there.
14:08
Speaker 2: Jesus. But you get the point, folks. Okay, wow, wow,
14:23
Speaker 2: and also read the Oswald Innocent's Campaign blog. To follow
14:26
Speaker 2: us on blog Spot, go to the Oice blog on
14:29
Speaker 2: blog Spot, which we'll go to in a minute once
14:32
Speaker 2: we're done shitting all over this page. The truth about
14:38
Speaker 2: Lee Harvey Oswald can be clearly seen above where he
14:41
Speaker 2: is standing in the door of the Texas school Book
14:42
Speaker 2: Depository during the assassination. Lee was watching the passing motorcade
14:47
Speaker 2: and it proves that he could not have been up
14:49
Speaker 2: on the sixth floor firing at President Kennedy, there was
14:52
Speaker 2: a conspiracy in the JFK assassination and Lee Harvey Oswald
14:55
Speaker 2: was innocent. Dammit. We provide abundant photographic evidence and many
14:59
Speaker 2: jaf K assassination facts and figures which prove conspiracy and
15:02
Speaker 2: cover up. Stop the lies, Lee Harvey Oswald outside, Stop
15:07
Speaker 2: the lies, Lee Harvey Olswold outside, Stop the lies, Lee
15:11
Speaker 2: Harvey Oswold outside, Stop the lies, Lee Harvey Olswood outside,
15:15
Speaker 2: Stop stop chanting that motto. That is horrible again, Gerald McKnight,
15:29
Speaker 2: Old as hell. The evidences that Oswald was in front
15:34
Speaker 2: of the building. There were people who saw him in
15:36
Speaker 2: front of the building. Who were they? Who were those people, Gerald,
15:39
Speaker 2: who saw him in front of the building. Please tell me.
15:44
Speaker 2: I am satisfied in my own mind from secret Service
15:46
Speaker 2: evidence and other evidence that Lee Harvey Oswold was the
15:49
Speaker 2: man in the doorway, Professor Jerald McKnight. Now again, when
15:58
Speaker 2: you're talking about the man in the doorway, Okay, it's
16:02
Speaker 2: a very innocuous phrase. And much like people thinking that
16:14
Speaker 2: Billy Lovelady was Lee Harvey Oswold back in the day.
16:20
Speaker 2: I mean, this was debunked plenty back in the day
16:25
Speaker 2: as well. But Again, it was a I won't say
16:30
Speaker 2: fairly prominent theory, but it was a theory back in
16:33
Speaker 2: the sixties with some of these first generation guys. But
16:37
Speaker 2: also when we talk about prayer Man image, and Bart
16:43
Speaker 2: will substantiate this, you know, this is not something new. Okay,
16:48
Speaker 2: there were people back in the sixties talking about this
16:53
Speaker 2: prayer Man image captured in the Weigman in Darnell film. Now,
16:59
Speaker 2: it was much harder back then, you know, to capture
17:04
Speaker 2: a clear image from a moving picture from news footage
17:10
Speaker 2: that wasn't readily available, but there were some blurry stills
17:17
Speaker 2: and it was talked about back then, the prayer Man
17:22
Speaker 2: figure in the sixties. You know, it's not a new thing.
17:27
Speaker 2: And the reason I'm saying that is because a lot
17:32
Speaker 2: of these quotes that you'll see attributed to Oswald being
17:36
Speaker 2: in the doorway is actually referring to prayer Man and
17:40
Speaker 2: not the figure, not Billy Lovelady in the Altins. Now
17:50
Speaker 2: right here these is a quote attributed to Wiseberg. The
17:54
Speaker 2: Autins photo holds proof that Oswald was on the outside
17:57
Speaker 2: of the building during the shooting, and it destroys the
17:59
Speaker 2: entire case against Oswald as the assassin. That quote is
18:07
Speaker 2: taken way out of context and probably uh misappropriated as well.
18:17
Speaker 2: I don't think Wiseberg ever definitively said these words, but
18:22
Speaker 2: when commenting on the Altin's photo, you know, he probably
18:30
Speaker 2: said something along the lines that if if that is
18:35
Speaker 2: Oswald in the Altin's photograph photographed outside the building during
18:40
Speaker 2: the shooting, that it destroys the entire case against Oswald
18:43
Speaker 2: as the assassin. Like, well, that's no, that's a no
18:46
Speaker 2: shit moment, right Wiseberg kind of stayed out of the
18:50
Speaker 2: fray when it came to certain things. And again, of
18:54
Speaker 2: course they debated the theory. They talked about the theory
18:59
Speaker 2: is this Oswald or is this love Lady? What it
19:04
Speaker 2: looks like Oswald? Some people say it looks like love Lady. Again,
19:08
Speaker 2: you're talking about the nineteen sixties. You're talking about a
19:14
Speaker 2: photograph that needed a lot of blown up, you know
19:18
Speaker 2: what I mean, to capture images. You know, when you're
19:22
Speaker 2: looking at a very small image of something out of
19:24
Speaker 2: a magazine, some details get lost, things get compressed. And
19:35
Speaker 2: again a lot of these guys were putting it out there.
19:37
Speaker 2: But again when it was firmly established that it was
19:40
Speaker 2: Billy Lovelady in the alt just six. A lot of
19:44
Speaker 2: these guys drop that, drop that tract that it's Oswald
19:50
Speaker 2: in the picture, and you know it, if it was Oswald,
19:54
Speaker 2: he would have been caught and a whole lot more
19:56
Speaker 2: photos than just that one. We don't have him. There
20:01
Speaker 2: was people all around him who would have said, hey, yeah,
20:04
Speaker 2: he was out here. You know, the whole premise on
20:11
Speaker 2: its face is ridiculous. Then he has a quote from
20:16
Speaker 2: Garrison Oswald was not involved in any way. As a
20:19
Speaker 2: matter of fact, he was standing on the first floor
20:21
Speaker 2: watching the parade. Okay, well, is that an attribution to
20:26
Speaker 2: the interview notes? Is that an attribution to witness testimony?
20:34
Speaker 2: Is that an attribution to his self given alibi? Or
20:39
Speaker 2: is this an attribution of Jim Garrison really thinking that
20:46
Speaker 2: it was Oswald in the doorway in the Alcians. I mean,
20:49
Speaker 2: come on, if it was that easy, he would have
20:53
Speaker 2: plastered that all through his case against clay Shaw, that
20:58
Speaker 2: Oswald is innocent. In the seventies, I spent many hours
21:03
Speaker 2: with Lee's mother, Marguerite, who repeatedly brought my attention back
21:07
Speaker 2: to the Altans. She continually asserted that the man in
21:09
Speaker 2: the doorway was her son Lee Harvey Oswald Jim Mars. Okay, Well,
21:14
Speaker 2: it's Jim Mars attributing a quote to Marguerite Oswald who
21:18
Speaker 2: not the sharpest knife from the drawer, not the keenest
21:22
Speaker 2: eye sight in the world to her. Doesn't mean Jim
21:26
Speaker 2: Mars believe that he's just saying what Marguerite said. Okay,
21:32
Speaker 2: Penn Jones. Oswald had on the same clothes as the
21:36
Speaker 2: man in the doorway of the Aultins photo. Again, this
21:39
Speaker 2: is allegedly a quote attributed to him, that his photo
21:44
Speaker 2: shopped on top of a photo of him here. Again,
21:48
Speaker 2: not the best eye sight in the world. And if
21:51
Speaker 2: it was that easy, he wouldn't have spent years and
21:54
Speaker 2: years and years and years investigating all kinds of stuff
22:00
Speaker 2: for the Kennedy assassination and his newspaper. Oswald was completely innocent,
22:07
Speaker 2: having been an intelligence agent both in his defection to
22:09
Speaker 2: rush In upon his return, and he was standing in
22:12
Speaker 2: the doorway of the depository during the murder. He appears
22:16
Speaker 2: in the famous Altins photo in that doorway. That quote
22:20
Speaker 2: is attributed to Harrison E. Livingston. Then there's Jerry Spence
22:28
Speaker 2: questioning Marion Baker at the mock trial, showing Marion Baker
22:32
Speaker 2: a picture of the figure in the doorway of the
22:35
Speaker 2: Altins photograph. Spence says, does he look like anyone you know,
22:38
Speaker 2: Officer Baker, he resembles Oswald? Okay, well he kind of does,
22:44
Speaker 2: kinda whatever. So again, let's look at some of these
22:49
Speaker 2: notable names of the Oswald Innocent campaign. David Rohan I believe, deceased,
22:59
Speaker 2: Jim Fetzer, Larry Rivera, Vince Solandria deceased, Jim Mar's deceased,
23:05
Speaker 2: Jack White deceased, Mark Lane deceased, Joe McKnight deceased, Jerome
23:10
Speaker 2: Corse I don't know, Abraham Bolton almost deceased, Pat Shannon deceased,
23:16
Speaker 2: Phil Nelson deceased, Ralph sin Kay we could only wish
23:21
Speaker 2: de ceased, Jim McGregor, Olie Damguard, Staffan Westerberg Douche, Donald Miller,
23:29
Speaker 2: couldn't tell you who he is. Ralph Thomas, I don't believe.
23:36
Speaker 2: I mean, if he is a part of this, I'd
23:37
Speaker 2: be surprised. Amy Joyce don't know her. Tyler Newcombe the
23:43
Speaker 2: son of somebody who wrote an unpublished book about the
23:47
Speaker 2: Kennedy assassination. Valerie Newcomb Woods. I'm guessing his sister Orlando
23:54
Speaker 2: Martin couldn't tell you. Jerry Croft note, Craig Roberts, he's
24:00
Speaker 2: the guy that wrote to kill Zone. Pete Malure of
24:05
Speaker 2: Deally Players the UK who I can't believe is a
24:08
Speaker 2: part of this. Richard sharn and douchebag Michael pen Show.
24:15
Speaker 2: I guess is Mary Pinchot Myers one of his kids,
24:19
Speaker 2: one of her kids. John Hankey, he's the Bush did
24:22
Speaker 2: it make a movie about it? Guy Tony Longo who
24:27
Speaker 2: you saw is the apparently the lead singer of the
24:30
Speaker 2: Pacific Blues Band who performed the song Oswald Didn't do
24:36
Speaker 2: It written by Ralph s and Kay. He's a part
24:38
Speaker 2: of this obviously. And you know, the list goes on
24:43
Speaker 2: and on and on with people you may have heard
24:46
Speaker 2: of before and people you haven't. There's Chris Milligan, publisher
24:50
Speaker 2: of Trion Day. Of course, he is Gary King Fetzer's
24:57
Speaker 2: buck buddy from New Orleans. Roy Schaeffer deceased, and on
25:04
Speaker 2: and on and on and on and on and on
25:09
Speaker 2: a bunch of people you've never heard of before. So
25:15
Speaker 2: this goes on and tell us a little bit about
25:17
Speaker 2: them all. Don't care who they are. We the members
25:20
Speaker 2: of the Oswald Innocent campaign maintained that at the time
25:22
Speaker 2: of the President Kennedy's assassination, Lee Harvey Oswald was standing
25:25
Speaker 2: in the doorway where he was photographed by James ike Alchins.
25:29
Speaker 2: This discovery category exonerates Oswald for having shot the president.
25:34
Speaker 2: Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. If you have
25:37
Speaker 2: any questions or comments, or if you would like to
25:40
Speaker 2: join the Oswalt Innocence Campaign, then contact Ralph at Oswald
25:45
Speaker 2: Innocent at yahoo dot com. And if you happen to
25:48
Speaker 2: be an author or researcher or just an average student
25:50
Speaker 2: of the assassination and you would like to become a
25:53
Speaker 2: senior member, please contact Ralph at the above email. We
25:57
Speaker 2: want to bring any in as many senior members from
25:59
Speaker 2: the JFK research community as we can. I bet you do,
26:05
Speaker 2: trust me, though, Ralph. They do not make your organization
26:09
Speaker 2: any more prestigious. It just makes it that more sad,
26:17
Speaker 2: that more sad. And again, so what what did did
26:24
Speaker 2: they say about this? Again? Did this fitzer? We don't
26:30
Speaker 2: know who these people are, and they have these little
26:35
Speaker 2: names and for everybody like black hole man, obfuscated man,
26:48
Speaker 2: blah blah blah, blah blah, who was Bill love Lady?
27:05
Speaker 2: And then they go on and on and on. Here
27:15
Speaker 2: we go. Now you starting to see how all of
27:19
Speaker 2: this gets a little wonky in the doorway. They'll image swap, flip, photoshop,
27:35
Speaker 2: anything they can do to manipulate photography, they will do it.
27:40
Speaker 2: They will do it. They photoshop images until it suits
27:47
Speaker 2: their narrative. I mean, it's just the craziest, the craziest
28:05
Speaker 2: stuff you've ever seen in your life. Like this. They
28:10
Speaker 2: purposely hid some guy's face with a baby, but it's
28:14
Speaker 2: just a baby wearing a hat. I mean, I don't
28:19
Speaker 2: know it just that it honestly, it makes my brain
28:25
Speaker 2: hurt to sit here and try to try to go back.
28:27
Speaker 2: And I mean I debunked all of their ship point
28:33
Speaker 2: by point by point by point by point by point
28:37
Speaker 2: by point, and to go back and look at this
28:44
Speaker 2: now makes my brain hurt. It makes my brain hurt.
28:57
Speaker 2: But to get back a little bit, you know, we
29:02
Speaker 2: know what they did him and Richard Hook. Richard Hook
29:08
Speaker 2: was the ban with the photo shop plan who would
29:14
Speaker 2: literally photoshop a gazillion images and just pull stuff out
29:21
Speaker 2: of the air, make shit up, and not for lack
29:30
Speaker 2: of trying at all. I mean, they had this small
29:35
Speaker 2: army of folks who would post this shit everywhere. I
29:39
Speaker 2: mean a lot of them got banned from the head
29:42
Speaker 2: forum and other forums and Facebook groups for consistently trying
29:47
Speaker 2: to post this horse shit everywhere. I mean, you couldn't
29:51
Speaker 2: get away from it back then. And most people we
29:54
Speaker 2: either praised them for being the greatest researchers known to
29:58
Speaker 2: man who are bringing this new thing to light, which
30:01
Speaker 2: honestly makes me sick to my stomach, or they ignored
30:06
Speaker 2: him or blocked him, just like I did ended up
30:08
Speaker 2: doing eventually, because like I said, it's like whack a mole,
30:12
Speaker 2: you know, you whack one, you whack two, and three
30:15
Speaker 2: more pop up, and you whack them, and then three
30:17
Speaker 2: more pop up, and it's just, oh why why? So
30:31
Speaker 2: let's see what old Ralfie and company. If there is
30:36
Speaker 2: any more company. I know Richard Hook passed away. I
30:42
Speaker 2: don't know if Jim Fetzer has anything to do with
30:45
Speaker 2: this group anymore. I don't know. I'm out of the
30:47
Speaker 2: Fetzer loop at some points. I know he doesn't Sometimes
30:54
Speaker 2: he dips his toe back into the things. So I
30:59
Speaker 2: don't actually know what Fetzer is doing other than being
31:03
Speaker 2: poor and owing millions, which, by the way, just as
31:11
Speaker 2: an aside, I don't agree with. I think in America,
31:20
Speaker 2: when you have freedom of speech, you should be able
31:22
Speaker 2: to question anything, and not that there is it's a
31:33
Speaker 2: fine line. It is. It's a fine line. You should
31:39
Speaker 2: be able to say what you want to say. You
31:43
Speaker 2: should be able to accuse who you want to accuse
31:46
Speaker 2: of whatever, and they have the right to defend themselves
31:51
Speaker 2: against accusations. There's also opportunity if things get out of hand,
31:58
Speaker 2: for things to go to a civil court where there
32:02
Speaker 2: is libel or slander or things of this nature, where
32:06
Speaker 2: legally you know, you can't just say anything. But I
32:13
Speaker 2: think it's fair to ask questions and question things. It
32:21
Speaker 2: is not right to harass victims families or even alleged
32:25
Speaker 2: victims families. But I think it's okay to ask questions.
32:33
Speaker 2: If you're a conspiracy theorist, that's what we do. Okay,
32:38
Speaker 2: you ask questions. Now, there are certain lines that probably
32:45
Speaker 2: shouldn't be crossed. I think you can take it to
32:53
Speaker 2: a point, and many did when it comes to the
33:02
Speaker 2: whole Connecticut thing back in twenty twelve. Look, the whole
33:12
Speaker 2: thing was weird. It's a tragedy, yes, but an event
33:21
Speaker 2: like that with so many surrounding elements of weirdness and strangeness,
33:30
Speaker 2: strange characters, strange events, actors, weird reactions, the lack of transparency,
33:43
Speaker 2: the odd videos, the lack of real life things. People
33:56
Speaker 2: will have questions, and it's okay to ask questions. Is
34:00
Speaker 2: it disrespectful to the families? That's where you want to say,
34:04
Speaker 2: That's where you want to draw the line. Is it
34:08
Speaker 2: illegal to be disrespectful? I don't know. It's not morally right,
34:17
Speaker 2: but it's not legally wrong. And it wouldn't be the
34:26
Speaker 2: first time that in these crazy instances where there's been
34:36
Speaker 2: either a cover up at play or a let it
34:41
Speaker 2: happen mentality or a make it happen mentality. You know,
34:52
Speaker 2: did Fetzer take it too far? I don't know. That's
34:55
Speaker 2: not my concern. That's not my job to say yes
35:00
Speaker 2: or no to Alex Jones take it too far? That's
35:04
Speaker 2: not again, that's not my job. I think these guys
35:07
Speaker 2: had questions, and again, is it disrespectful to the families?
35:13
Speaker 2: As being disrespectful to families illegal? I don't know. I
35:19
Speaker 2: honestly don't know. You know, there's very odd things and
35:25
Speaker 2: you know, I'm not going to get into all of
35:27
Speaker 2: them here, but there is a ton of them, a
35:32
Speaker 2: ton of them. There's a ton of them, you know,
35:35
Speaker 2: concerning the whole Tyler Robinson, Charlie Kirk, Kirk thing. There's
35:40
Speaker 2: a ton of them surrounding what happened in Las Vegas
35:42
Speaker 2: back in twenty seventeen. There's a ton of them surrounding
35:48
Speaker 2: nine to eleven, Waco, Ruby Ridge, the Kennedy assassination, the
35:54
Speaker 2: RFK assassination, John Lennon. There's been instances in history where
36:00
Speaker 2: things just don't smell right. Something is amiss here, and
36:12
Speaker 2: that perks up my uh hackles if you will a
36:15
Speaker 2: little bit, when you do see things like this occur
36:19
Speaker 2: and things just don't smell right, something seems off, things
36:28
Speaker 2: getting weird, things don't make sense. And if you're paying attention,
36:38
Speaker 2: then you're one of the real ones. You are not
36:40
Speaker 2: a sheeple. Sheeple are people who just believe whatever they
36:45
Speaker 2: tell you to believe. And if you're listening to this show,
36:49
Speaker 2: you're not one of those people. And I commend you
36:53
Speaker 2: for it. Not being ah people involves doing a little legwork,
37:03
Speaker 2: though you should do your due diligence. You shouldn't just
37:09
Speaker 2: believe whatever a Fetzer or Alex Jones or a big
37:14
Speaker 2: bad Bob tells you. You should do your own research,
37:23
Speaker 2: look into things yourself, see what you can find, See
37:27
Speaker 2: what makes sense to you, See what doesn't seem right
37:30
Speaker 2: to you, seem you know, see what you can find
37:35
Speaker 2: on your own. And like I always say, you know,
37:40
Speaker 2: I'm not here to give you all the answers. I'm
37:45
Speaker 2: here to shed light on some things and light a
37:47
Speaker 2: spark under your ass to go do your own research.
37:55
Speaker 2: I don't listen to podcasts or people speaking or read
38:00
Speaker 2: books in order to be spoon fed facts and beliefs.
38:12
Speaker 2: I listen to podcasts, I do podcasts. I read books
38:19
Speaker 2: in order to find an ember. And what that means
38:29
Speaker 2: is something that catches my attention that I can pick
38:35
Speaker 2: up ever so gently and blow on it a little
38:40
Speaker 2: bit and get it going, get it smoking, and see
38:48
Speaker 2: if I can grow that little ember into a flame
38:53
Speaker 2: on my own, like I can sit here and tell
38:56
Speaker 2: you all day Oswald was not in the doorway in
38:59
Speaker 2: the auto and six photograph. Okay, Now you can choose
39:03
Speaker 2: to believe me in going with your life and never
39:04
Speaker 2: word think about it again. Or you could think to yourself, well, well,
39:08
Speaker 2: if all these people are saying it, it must be
39:10
Speaker 2: true and that's fine too. Or you could take time
39:18
Speaker 2: to get on the internet to download a clear copy
39:20
Speaker 2: of the auction six photograph, blow it up and look
39:23
Speaker 2: for yourself. Is there evidence of photo shopping in nineteen
39:26
Speaker 2: sixty three? Does this really look like Oswald? Can we
39:32
Speaker 2: put Oswald on the steps? Does it make sense that
39:35
Speaker 2: he would be standing there and not be seen by
39:38
Speaker 2: anyone else and not be captured in any other photos?
39:43
Speaker 2: Does that make sense to you? Or does it make
39:47
Speaker 2: sense that this is Billy Lovely somebody? A lot of
39:50
Speaker 2: other people said that they that was out there. He
39:53
Speaker 2: also claimed that he was out there. He also identified
39:58
Speaker 2: himself in the photo. His wife identified himself in the photo,
40:04
Speaker 2: and his coworkers identified him in the photo. They could
40:08
Speaker 2: tell the difference between Oswald and love Lady. But you know,
40:15
Speaker 2: if you're Ralph sin Ka, it's a giant grand conspiracy. Okay,
40:22
Speaker 2: where you have now? You have ike autions in on it,
40:25
Speaker 2: you have wherever. He ran to back to his ap
40:30
Speaker 2: r UPI office and they had like ten or fifteen
40:36
Speaker 2: minutes to alter this photo to make it look like
40:38
Speaker 2: Oswald before they send it out on the wire to
40:41
Speaker 2: the entire world, and then individual newspapers would be reprinting
40:46
Speaker 2: this image of the auction six photograph on their front
40:50
Speaker 2: page and big glorious black and white glory, if you will,
40:59
Speaker 2: on the evening of the twenty second, and again on
41:02
Speaker 2: the morning of the twenty third. So if this was
41:06
Speaker 2: a giant conspiracy, you can see how many people that
41:12
Speaker 2: you're now wrapping into things just to cover up the
41:15
Speaker 2: fact that well, Oswald really was on the doorway, in
41:18
Speaker 2: the doorway, and if he was in the doorway, he
41:20
Speaker 2: couldn't be on the sixth floor shooting. No shit. That's
41:25
Speaker 2: the most convenient truth ever that if you can prove that,
41:31
Speaker 2: then by golly, you've solved the case. Well not really,
41:34
Speaker 2: but you have eliminated Oswald as being the prime suspect.
41:40
Speaker 2: But no matter how much you photo shop in the
41:46
Speaker 2: two thousands to manipulate images to serve your purpose in
41:56
Speaker 2: trying to recreate what they did in nineteen sixty three
41:59
Speaker 2: when they're were there was no computer photoshops. Okay, but
42:08
Speaker 2: you know they had very skilled artists and painters, So
42:11
Speaker 2: all of this is just blown up painted on reshrunk
42:17
Speaker 2: down into an image, and YadA YadA, YadA, YadA, YadA,
42:20
Speaker 2: YadA whatever. So again, ultimately, any and anything we do
42:28
Speaker 2: in the podcast and anything you see here or or
42:34
Speaker 2: take in when it comes to the Kennedy assassination that
42:37
Speaker 2: interests you, unless you're just a drive by follower, hobbyist,
42:44
Speaker 2: whatever you want to call it. If you're truly truly
42:46
Speaker 2: interested in this thing, then you take points of discernment
42:53
Speaker 2: and you drill down and you research them on your
42:56
Speaker 2: own and come to your own conclusions. I'm not claiming
43:01
Speaker 2: to be right about everything, although I think I am.
43:07
Speaker 2: I'm joking, but I digress. You know, if I'm wrong,
43:14
Speaker 2: I'm wrong, you know, and if somebody can, you know
43:18
Speaker 2: I've been wrong with a gazillion times on the show
43:20
Speaker 2: and been remanded by our lovely listeners and pointed in
43:25
Speaker 2: the right direction to which I humbly agree with and think.
43:33
Speaker 2: But let's see what mister sink. Well, obviously he's still alive,
43:38
Speaker 2: so that's something. Although by now, let's see, let's do
43:45
Speaker 2: the math. Born in fifty one, so fifty because in
43:58
Speaker 2: two thousand and one he was fifty in twenty twenty six,
44:04
Speaker 2: is twenty five years later, so he's seventy five years old. Now,
44:12
Speaker 2: seventy five years old and still at it. Here we
44:19
Speaker 2: have a post from August fifteenth, twenty twenty six, where
44:24
Speaker 2: he's saying chat GPT agrees with me that Roy Kellerman
44:28
Speaker 2: was atrocious in his lack of action and even in
44:30
Speaker 2: his verbiage. It was an emergency, and he's spoken conversational phrases. Yes,
44:37
Speaker 2: I think your point is stronger than I give it
44:39
Speaker 2: credit for. There are actually two separate verbal reactions in
44:42
Speaker 2: Kellerman's account. He says Kennedy supposedly said my god, I'm hit,
44:46
Speaker 2: though Jackie Connolly and Nelly all deny that JFK spoke.
44:50
Speaker 2: Kellerman himself says, let's get out of here. We are hit,
44:54
Speaker 2: and then Radio lass and we are hit. Get us
44:56
Speaker 2: to the hospital immediately. Now I'm pretty sure sure, uh uh,
45:07
Speaker 2: I'm pretty sure Connelly is the one who said my god,
45:10
Speaker 2: I'm hit and not JFK. But whatever. So he's writing
45:19
Speaker 2: a post about ai chat GPT agreeing with his assessment
45:24
Speaker 2: that Kellerman didn't speak right. Okay, you know he should
45:34
Speaker 2: have said let's get out of here or go go
45:36
Speaker 2: go instead, you know, he said, let's get out of here.
45:40
Speaker 2: Please get us to the hospital. We have been hit.
45:45
Speaker 2: This is what Ralph sink Is most recent post is about. Okay,
45:55
Speaker 2: you can't make this up, folks. Okay, now here's an
46:00
Speaker 2: interesting one. And this is from I'm not sure when
46:10
Speaker 2: the date is, but it's oh, I guess it was
46:12
Speaker 2: still August fourteenth or sixteenth or fifteenth. Al Mayoro just
46:19
Speaker 2: made a great find. Why in the Willis photo do
46:22
Speaker 2: we not see the little signs on the pole saying
46:25
Speaker 2: north in Texas seventy seven? There's no excuse for it.
46:29
Speaker 2: I can tell you that all that imagery around the
46:32
Speaker 2: sign in Willis is fake. All those weird short people
46:35
Speaker 2: beneath the sign in Willis are fake. They are not
46:39
Speaker 2: there in the Bronson what you need to realize that
46:43
Speaker 2: Willis photo was taken just a fraction of a second
46:45
Speaker 2: before JFK was shot in the throat. The official story
46:49
Speaker 2: that it was taken just to split second before the
46:51
Speaker 2: single bullet. All right, I don't know what the SB is.
46:56
Speaker 2: JFK was shot in the back high on the hill,
47:00
Speaker 2: and he rode down the hill that way reacting to it.
47:03
Speaker 2: Whatever noticed that none of the figures beneath the sign,
47:10
Speaker 2: and the Willis look photographic. They are all extremely blurred
47:13
Speaker 2: and with feature whatever that is featureless faces. It's art,
47:22
Speaker 2: crappy cia art, and it took a long time. Willis
47:26
Speaker 2: said that it took the government two months to return
47:28
Speaker 2: his photo to him. But right now, just observe the
47:31
Speaker 2: fact that they left out the little add ons to
47:33
Speaker 2: the sign. Thank you. Aw Okay, so let's take another
47:41
Speaker 2: look at this here now. Obviously there is an issue
48:00
Speaker 2: you right with the signs the north in the Texas
48:06
Speaker 2: seventy seven, the first one being aspect ratios. That's the
48:25
Speaker 2: word I'm looking for now. If you'll notice from the
48:30
Speaker 2: Willis photograph, these people aren't standing directly under the sign. Okay,
48:40
Speaker 2: they are in front of the sign. It's just a
48:43
Speaker 2: matter of aspect ratio. And the way it works is,
48:51
Speaker 2: you know, they're way in the foreground in front of
48:55
Speaker 2: the sign, which can make them appear to be small.
49:00
Speaker 2: But it appears to me that these folks are a
49:03
Speaker 2: couple of these boys here are from that local high school.
49:06
Speaker 2: They have on letterman jackets, right, and these couple of
49:12
Speaker 2: these kids after the shots you see up in the
49:14
Speaker 2: Pergolay area where they ran after the shots, and of
49:22
Speaker 2: course Ralph claims that this is all CIA posted in
49:27
Speaker 2: and posted out for whatever reason, and that they forgot
49:31
Speaker 2: to add these signs right now, I don't know if
49:37
Speaker 2: they did or they didn't. And this image rate here
49:41
Speaker 2: is not a pole for the sign, which it kind
49:45
Speaker 2: of appears to be. It's actually an antenna of the motorcycle.
49:50
Speaker 2: So if we kind of take that away, it's hard
49:54
Speaker 2: to see where the other pole comes. And if you
50:02
Speaker 2: look closely enough, if the other pole is back there,
50:11
Speaker 2: then the sign could be on there. You can kind
50:14
Speaker 2: of see something right here under the sign, you can't
50:17
Speaker 2: make out what it says. And then there's another image
50:20
Speaker 2: right here, right under that one. So they're just trying
50:27
Speaker 2: to lie about all this stuff. Now, again, this is
50:32
Speaker 2: not the pole. The pole is right here, or looks
50:40
Speaker 2: like it's about right under the k and it's gonna
50:43
Speaker 2: go down. And the reason you can't see it is
50:46
Speaker 2: behind this guy right here with the hat. And then
50:51
Speaker 2: you have the umbrella man back and to the left
50:57
Speaker 2: of the sign, the Stemens Freeway sign, and he may
51:04
Speaker 2: be standing in front of part of the where it's
51:10
Speaker 2: his north in Texas seventy seven, or at least his
51:13
Speaker 2: umbrella may be in front of a portion of it.
51:16
Speaker 2: It's very hard to tell with the way this Stemen's
51:19
Speaker 2: Freeway sign is because it's kind of slanted towards the roadway.
51:23
Speaker 2: It's not like perpendicular because you know, Elma Street is
51:28
Speaker 2: a curving road, so they kind of put the sign
51:33
Speaker 2: in at a diang diagonal. So the only thing that
51:38
Speaker 2: this is proof of at all is it's an aspect
51:43
Speaker 2: ratio thing that if you understand how photography worked with
51:47
Speaker 2: the cameras in the film that we had back then,
51:52
Speaker 2: when you're photographing moving images, okay, when you understand distance
52:00
Speaker 2: blur and photo aspect and how was developed and colorization
52:07
Speaker 2: process and da da da da da, you just don't
52:11
Speaker 2: have two idiots going well in this one. It's got
52:14
Speaker 2: signs and it's a short sign, but over here there
52:17
Speaker 2: ain't no signs and it's a tall sign. And then
52:20
Speaker 2: you got all these short people that are magically delicious
52:24
Speaker 2: right underneath of them. That can't that just cannot be.
52:28
Speaker 2: And that's proof that the CIA done did it. They
52:32
Speaker 2: done blew this uthing, painted it out for whatever reason
52:38
Speaker 2: that is still going on. In August of twenty twenty six. Folks,
52:46
Speaker 2: you can't make this up. You can't. And he says,
52:52
Speaker 2: this isn't real. If you can't see that and accept it,
52:55
Speaker 2: go away. He's saying it the Stemens Freeway sign is
53:00
Speaker 2: not real. Okay. Then he wants to talk about the bag,
53:10
Speaker 2: YadA YadA, YadA, YadA YadA, like nobody's ever talked about
53:14
Speaker 2: the bag before, and he's saying the shot from behind
53:22
Speaker 2: him from the second floor of the Dow Text Building,
53:26
Speaker 2: despite nobody saying any shots came from the down Text building. Again,
53:34
Speaker 2: it's uh, he's still up to the same old shit
53:39
Speaker 2: fifteen years later. I should have figured, should have figured.
53:49
Speaker 2: And again he's the purveyor of the FBI agent book out.
53:54
Speaker 2: Was really the Jack Ruby in the basement that shot Oswald? Again?
54:02
Speaker 2: For what reason? If you have the real Jack Ruby there,
54:09
Speaker 2: you have his car there, you have his dog there,
54:11
Speaker 2: you have eyewitnesses who put him at the Western Union,
54:13
Speaker 2: and then in the basement after he had supposedly shot Oswald,
54:20
Speaker 2: you have police officers that recognize him. Why would you
54:25
Speaker 2: need an FBI agent to dress up like Jack Ruby
54:30
Speaker 2: to kill Oswald and then have the real Jack Ruby
54:34
Speaker 2: be railroaded in a giant conspiracy to take the blame
54:38
Speaker 2: for it and bet on the fact that Jack Ruby
54:42
Speaker 2: won't open his mouth about it. It seems awfully odd
54:49
Speaker 2: to me, But all of this Oswald innocence campaign bullshit
54:55
Speaker 2: seems odd to me. But it gives me no pleasure.
55:00
Speaker 2: And seeing that they're still at it to this day,
55:05
Speaker 2: fifteen years later, I'm glad I blocked them when I did,
55:11
Speaker 2: because it's not even on my radar anymore. I pay
55:15
Speaker 2: zero attention to this dumb shit anymore. I'm more interested
55:19
Speaker 2: in what we can prove through documentation, through eyewitness testimony,
55:26
Speaker 2: and through looking at these things through a new lens.
55:30
Speaker 2: It's been sixty two, almost sixty three years since the assassination.
55:36
Speaker 2: It's been looked into by thousands of researchers. There have
55:40
Speaker 2: been a gazillion books written about this subject. Like I said,
55:46
Speaker 2: it's been looked at by thousands of researchers. And when
55:55
Speaker 2: you just take things on their face, you know, like
55:58
Speaker 2: we supposed a couple months ago, what if what if
56:03
Speaker 2: the Tippet shooting didn't happen the way we were told.
56:07
Speaker 2: What if the movements of tip It weren't right? What
56:11
Speaker 2: if we're relying on a false narrative, then what really happened?
56:15
Speaker 2: What really could have happened? What if Earleine Roberts can't
56:20
Speaker 2: be trusted or believed? What if she was just an old, mistaken,
56:24
Speaker 2: crazy lady. We take for granted that Oswald was staying
56:29
Speaker 2: at that rooming house? Was he was? He? Really? All
56:34
Speaker 2: these things need to be going back and looked through
56:36
Speaker 2: through a new lens. That's the only way we're ever
56:39
Speaker 2: going to get anywhere in this new age of JFK
56:45
Speaker 2: conspiracy research. But that's just my two cents, and that's
56:50
Speaker 2: just my ramblings. So do yourself a favor. Block the
56:57
Speaker 2: horse's assery out of your life. You don't need it.
57:02
Speaker 2: All you need is your own brain and some very humble,
57:11
Speaker 2: very good direction from some honest researchers out there who
57:20
Speaker 2: will let you know when they've made a mistake, who
57:23
Speaker 2: will let you in on their way of thinking or
57:29
Speaker 2: speculation when it comes to this case. As much as
57:34
Speaker 2: some people say they don't like to speculate, I love
57:36
Speaker 2: to speculate. It's brainstorming, its ideas, free flowing ideas. No
57:43
Speaker 2: ideas is dumb, you know, Like teachers always tell you
57:46
Speaker 2: when no questions dumb, Well, no idea is dumb either,
57:49
Speaker 2: the dumbest I mean, you know, the craziest things have
57:52
Speaker 2: come from the dumbest ideas, and most of the time
57:58
Speaker 2: they're just dumb ideas. But one in a thousand you
58:02
Speaker 2: might strike gold. And that's where we're at. We're trying
58:07
Speaker 2: to find the right pieces to the right puzzle, and
58:13
Speaker 2: hopefully someday we'll have a big, giant, beautiful picture that
58:18
Speaker 2: we can smear glue on the back of, put in
58:22
Speaker 2: a nice frame from Michael's, and hang up on the
58:25
Speaker 2: wall behind us and say we did it, We solved
58:29
Speaker 2: the case. We finally know what happened. Everybody can go
58:33
Speaker 2: home now, everybody can rest easy. Rip to those who
58:38
Speaker 2: came before us and laid the groundwork and all of
58:40
Speaker 2: that happiness and horseshit. It's but we're not there yet.
58:47
Speaker 2: We still have a long road to hoe. So if
58:50
Speaker 2: you're with me on this road, make sure to hit
58:53
Speaker 2: the like button. Check out my other podcast in the description.
59:00
Speaker 2: Check them out and subscribe if you want to give
59:01
Speaker 2: him a like. If you want to, I'd appreciate it,
59:04
Speaker 2: big bad Bye, would appreciate it. If you listen to
59:06
Speaker 2: some stranger things, but that's just me. Until next time, Folks,
59:14
Speaker 2: this has been random research ramblings with Rob. Until next time, Peace.
59:28
Speaker 1: Research, ramdase
59:31
Speaker 2: Research rama, question one talk,