Latest / Martin Animations / I taught my daughter to paint sunsets every evening for 3 years before learning she was colorblind

Transcript

I taught my daughter to paint sunsets every evening for 3 years before learning she was colorblind · Martin Animations

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: I taught my daughter to paint sunsets every evening for
• 0:02
  Speaker 1: three years before learning she was completely colorblind. The art
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: teacher's email arrived on a Wednesday afternoon with a subject
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: line that made my stomach drop. Concerns about Iris. Please
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: call ASAP. My daughter was seven years old and had
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: been painting with me every single evening since she was four,
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: creating sunset after sunset with a skill that amazed everyone
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: who saw her work. I called Mrs. Kellerman immediately from
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: my office, already defensive before she even answered. Mr. Cross,
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: thank you for calling back so quickly. she said, her
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: voice carefully neutral in that way teachers use when they're
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: about to deliver bad news. I wanted to discuss something
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: I noticed during today's art class. Iris completed a color
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: wheel assignment, and I'm concerned she might be having some
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: vision issues. She paused, and I heard papers rustling. She
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: labeled every single color incorrectly, not just mixing up similar
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: shades but completely wrong identifications. She called red gray, orange brown,
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: yellow light gray, green medium gray. Every color on the
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: wheel was mislabeled as some shade of gray. My first
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: reaction was to defend Iris. to say the teacher must
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: have misunderstood, or that Iris had been joking around, but
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: something about the systematic nature of the errors stopped me.
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: I asked Mrs. Kellerman to email me photos of the assignment,
• 1:08
  Speaker 1: and when they arrived five minutes later, I stared at
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: my computer screen feeling like the floor was dissolving beneath
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: my chair. The color wheel was technically perfect, each section
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: painted with smooth gradients and precise boundaries, but every label
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: was wrong in exactly the way the teacher had described.
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: Red labeled as dark gray, orange as medium dark gray,
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: yellow as light gray, and on through the spectrum with
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: Iris confidently identifying colors she clearly couldn't perceive. I immediately
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: thought about our painting sessions, the three years of evening
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: rituals where we'd painted hundreds of sunsets together, and suddenly,
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: I was seeing them differently. How many times had I said,
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: mix orange and pink for those clouds, and watched Iris
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: confidently select paints while I praised her color choices? How
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: many times had I told her, that's the perfect shade
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: of purple, without actually checking what color she was using?
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: I left work early and drove home in a daze,
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: calling Iris' pediatrician from the car to explain what the
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: art teacher had noticed. Dr. Scepter Patel squeezed us in
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: for an appointment the next morning and referred us to
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: a pediatric ophthalmologist named Dr. Vivian Leeds, who specialized in
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: color vision deficiencies. That evening, I watched Iris during our
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: painting session with new attention, really looking at what she
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: was doing instead of just enjoying our time together. We
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: were painting the sunset visible through our dining room window,
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: and I described it out loud the way I always did.
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: Look at those beautiful orange and pink clouds. I said,
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: pointing at the sky. Try mixing some cadmium orange with
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: a touch of titanium white and maybe a hint of
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: quinacridone magenta. Iris nodded seriously and reached for paints, confidently
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: squeezing colors onto her palette. But when I looked closely
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: at what she'd selected, my chest tightened with recognition of
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: what I'd been missing. The orange she'd chosen was actually
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: a brown. The pink was a gray. She was mixing
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: them together with complete confidence, creating a muddy brownish-gray mixture
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: that she then applied to her canvas in smooth, technically
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: perfect brushstrokes. I watched her paint for 20 minutes, describing
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: colors she couldn't see and selecting paints based on some
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: system I didn't understand, and the painting that emerged was
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: compositionally beautiful but chromatically wrong in ways I'd somehow never
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: noticed before. The sky was brown where it should have
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: been orange, gray where it should have been pink, muddy
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: green where it should have been purple. Everything was off.
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: And yet I'd been praising these paintings for three years,
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: hanging them all over our house, posting photos online where
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: friends commented about her incredible talent. How had I never
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: seen this? How had I looked at hundreds of sunset
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: paintings and never noticed they were the wrong colors? I
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: felt sick with guilt and confusion, but I forced myself
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: to smile at Iris and tell her how beautiful her
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: painting looked, not wanting to upset her before we knew
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: what was actually wrong. After she went to bed, I
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: pulled out every painting she'd ever created and examined them
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: under different lights throughout the house. In our dining room
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: with its warm evening lighting, they looked almost right. In
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: the kitchen under fluorescent bulbs, they looked wrong. In the
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: bathroom under LED lights, they looked completely wrong. Browns and
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: grays instead of oranges and pinks. Muddy greens instead of purples.
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: Three years of evidence that something was wrong, and I'd
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: been too blind myself to see it. The appointment with Dr. R.
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: Leeds was scheduled for Friday morning, and I spent Thursday
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: night researching colorblindness instead of sleeping. I learned that most
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: colorblindness was partial. People unable to distinguish between certain colors,
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: but still seeing others normally. Red-green colorblindness was the most common,
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: affecting about 8% of men, but less than 1% of women.
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: But there was another condition called acromatopsia, Complete color blindness,
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: where people saw the world entirely in grayscale. It was rare,
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: affecting only one in 30,000 people, but it matched what
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: I was seeing in Iris's work. People with acromatopsia learned
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: to associate brightness levels with color names, creating elaborate translation
• 4:36
  Speaker 1: systems that let them function in a color-centric world despite
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: seeing no hue at all. Reading about it felt like
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: someone was describing my daughter, explaining how she could confidently
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: call things by color names while clearly not perceiving what
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: those colors actually looked like. I found forums where colorblind
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: adults discussed their experiences, and one comment stuck with me.
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: I didn't know I was colorblind until I was 12
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: because I'd learned to fake it so well. I knew
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: grass was called green and sky was called blue, and
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: I could identify those things by context, even though I
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: was just seeing different shades of gray. It wasn't until
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: I failed a color vision test that anyone realized I'd
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: been translating the whole time. Dr. Leeds' office was designed
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: for children, with bright murals on the walls that now
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: seemed cruelly ironic. She was patient and kind with Iris.
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: explaining each test in simple terms before performing it. The
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: Ishihara plates came first, circles filled with colored dots that
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: formed numbers. People with normal color vision could see the
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: numbers clearly, but people with various types of color blindness
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: saw different numbers or no pattern at all. Iris couldn't
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: identify a single number correctly, seeing only random dots where
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: clear patterns existed. Dr. Leeds' expression grew more serious as
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: the testing continued. She showed Iris a box of colored
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: chips and asked her to arrange them in order from
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: light to dark. Iris organized them in a way that
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: would make perfect sense if they were all shades of gray,
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: but made no sense based on their actual hues and saturations.
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: She put a dark blue next to a dark red
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: next to a dark green, grouping them by brightness while
• 5:58
  Speaker 1: completely ignoring the color differences. Dr. Leeds pulled out a
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: device called an anomaloscope that tested color matching ability, but
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: Iris couldn't complete the task because she couldn't perceive the
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: color differences the test required. Every assessment pointed toward the
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: same conclusion, but Dr. Leeds wanted to be absolutely certain
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: before making a diagnosis. The final test was an electro-retinogram
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: that measured electrical activity in Iris' retina when exposed to
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: different wavelengths of light. They put electrode stickers around Iris'
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: eyes and had her look at flashing lights while a
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: computer recorded her retinal responses. I held her hand during
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: the test because the equipment looked scary even though it
• 6:32
  Speaker 1: didn't hurt, and I could feel her small fingers squeezing
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: mine tighter with each flash. After about 30 minutes, Dr.
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: Leeds removed the electrodes and asked us to wait in
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: her office while she analyzed the results. The 15 minutes
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: we sat there were among the longest of my life.
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: Iris swinging her legs from the big office chair and
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: asking if she'd done well on the tests. Me trying
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: to smile and say she'd done great, while my mind
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: spun through implications I didn't want to face. When Dr.
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: Leeds finally came in, she had printouts of test results
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: that meant nothing to me, but clearly meant everything to her.
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: She sat down across from us and took a breath
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: before speaking, and I knew from her expression that my
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: worst fear was about to be confirmed. I'm very sorry
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: to tell you this, Dr. Leeds began, looking at me
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: rather than Iris. The test results show that Iris has achromatopsia,
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: which is complete congenital color blindness. She has no functioning
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: cone cells in her retinas, which means she cannot perceive
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: color at all. She sees the world entirely in shades
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: of gray, black, and white. The words felt surreal, even
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: though I'd suspected them for two days. Dr. Leeds continued
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: explaining the genetic causes and the lack of treatment options,
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: but I was barely hearing her because I was thinking
• 7:33
  Speaker 1: about three years of painting sessions, hundreds of evenings where
• 7:36
  Speaker 1: I'd been teaching Iris about colors she couldn't see. Every
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: time I'd said, mix orange and pink, she'd been hearing
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: words that meant nothing to her actual perception. Every time
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: I'd praised her color choices, I'd been praising her ability
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: to fake something she couldn't experience. The paintings covering our walls,
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: the art I'd been so proud of, all of it
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: was based on a fundamental misunderstanding between us. Dr. Leeds
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: was saying something about how impressive it was that Iris
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: had learned to navigate a colorful world so successfully, but
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: I couldn't focus on anything except the crushing guilt of
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: not noticing sooner. I looked at Iris, who was processing
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: the doctor's words with a confused expression. that told me
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: she didn't fully understand what was being said. Dr. Leeds
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: pulled out visual aids, showing comparison images of how the
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: world looked with normal color vision, versus with a chromatopsia.
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: The difference was stark. One image filled with vibrant colors,
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: and the other showing the exact same scene in grayscale.
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: This is what most people see, Dr. Leeds said, pointing
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: at the colorful image. And this is what you see, Iris.
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: Everything in shades of gray. Iris stared at both images,
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: and I watched her face change as understanding slowly dawned.
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: You mean everyone else sees it like that? she asked,
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: pointing at the colorful version. All the time? Dr. Leeds
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: nodded gently. Yes, honey. Most people see colors the way
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: they're shown in that first picture. You see them the
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: way they're shown in the second picture, in grayscale. You've
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: been seeing that way your whole life, but you learn
• 8:54
  Speaker 1: to use color names by listening to what people told
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: you and remembering which gray tones were called which colors.
• 8:59
  Speaker 1: Iris turned to look at me with an expression of
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: betrayal that cut deeper than anything I'd ever felt. So,
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: when we paint sunsets? She said slowly. And you say
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: they're orange and pink? I'm not actually seeing orange and pink,
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: I tried to explain, but my throat was too tight,
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: so I just shook my head while Iris' eyes filled
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: with tears. All the paintings I made, she whispered. Are
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: they wrong? Are the colors wrong? I wanted to say no,
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: wanted to tell her they were beautiful regardless, but Dr.
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: Leeds spoke first with clinical honesty. The colors in your
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: paintings probably don't match what your dad sees when he
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: looks at real sunsets, she said carefully, because you're selecting
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: colors based on their brightness, not their hue, but that
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: doesn't mean your paintings are bad or wrong. They're just
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: different from what someone with typical color vision would create.
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: Iris wasn't listening anymore. She pulled her hand away from
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: mine and stared at the floor, and I could see
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: her mentally reviewing three years of painting sessions and realizing
• 9:48
  Speaker 1: that everything she'd thought she was good at was actually
• 9:51
  Speaker 1: just the elaborate system of memorization and guessing. The drive
• 9:54
  Speaker 1: home was silent except for occasional sniffles from the back
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: seat where Iris had curled up as small as possible.
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: When we got to the house, she ran straight to
• 10:02
  Speaker 1: her room and slammed the door, and I stood in
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: the hallway surrounded by her sunset paintings that I could
• 10:06
  Speaker 1: now see were all wrong, browns and grays and muddy
• 10:09
  Speaker 1: greens instead of the vibrant colors real sunsets contained. That
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: evening at 6.30 when we normally would have started painting,
• 10:16
  Speaker 1: I knocked on Iris' door and asked if she wanted
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: to do our sunset. She didn't answer for a long time,
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: and when she finally spoke, her voice was flat and defeated.
• 10:24
  Speaker 1: I don't want to paint anymore. There's no point if
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: I can't see what I'm doing. All those paintings I
• 10:28
  Speaker 1: made are wrong and stupid and I hate them. I
• 10:30
  Speaker 1: tried to tell her they weren't stupid, that they were
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: beautiful in their own way, but she cut me off.
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: You've been lying to me for three years, telling me
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: I was doing a good job when I was using
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: all the wrong colors. Everyone who sees my paintings probably
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: thinks I'm weird or bad at art, and you just
• 10:44
  Speaker 1: never told me. Her accusation hurt because there was truth
• 10:47
  Speaker 1: in it. I had been lying in a sense, praising
• 10:50
  Speaker 1: work without really seeing what she was creating, too caught
• 10:53
  Speaker 1: up in the ritual and the emotional meaning to notice
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: the technical problems. I sat outside her door trying to
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: find words that would help, but everything I thought to
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: say seemed inadequate. Finally, I just told her I loved her,
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: and that we'd figure this out together, even though I
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: had no idea how. For the next week, Iris refused
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: to paint. Our evening routine was broken for the first
• 11:11
  Speaker 1: time in three years, and the empty canvases in the
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: dining room felt like an accusation every time I walked
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: past them. I watched Iris withdraw into herself the same
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: way she had after her mother died, becoming quiet and isolated,
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: and I felt helpless to stop it. Her art teacher Mrs.
• 11:25
  Speaker 1: Kellerman called to ask how the doctor's appointment had gone,
• 11:28
  Speaker 1: and when I explained the diagnosis, she was sympathetic, but
• 11:31
  Speaker 1: also curious. I've been researching achromatopsia since I sent you
• 11:34
  Speaker 1: that email, she said. There are actually quite a few
• 11:37
  Speaker 1: successful artists who have the condition. They've developed techniques for
• 11:40
  Speaker 1: working with color despite not being able to perceive it directly.
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: Maybe knowing that would help Iris understand she doesn't have
• 11:45
  Speaker 1: to give up art completely. She sent me links to
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: articles about colorblind artists, and I spent that evening reading
• 11:50
  Speaker 1: about painters and designers who'd created stunning colorful work despite
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: seeing only in grayscale. One artist named Gregory Fisher had
• 11:58
  Speaker 1: become famous specifically for his landscape paintings that somehow captured
• 12:01
  Speaker 1: the emotional essence of color through careful understanding of value
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: relationships and color theory. I tried showing Iris the articles
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: about colorblind artists, but she wasn't ready to hear it.
• 12:11
  Speaker 1: She was stuck in the grief of realizing she'd been
• 12:13
  Speaker 1: perceiving the world differently without knowing it. that three years
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: of what she'd thought was shared experience with me had
• 12:19
  Speaker 1: actually been two people doing completely different things while using
• 12:22
  Speaker 1: the same words. I understood that grief, because I was
• 12:24
  Speaker 1: feeling it too, mourning the loss of what I'd thought
• 12:27
  Speaker 1: our painting sessions meant. But I also knew we couldn't
• 12:29
  Speaker 1: stay stuck there forever, so I started forming a plan.
• 12:32
  Speaker 1: If Iris couldn't see colors but had still managed to
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: create reasonably accurate paintings for three years, that meant she'd
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: developed some kind of system for translating her grayscale vision
• 12:41
  Speaker 1: into color vocabulary. If I could understand that system, Maybe
• 12:44
  Speaker 1: I could help her refine it into something more reliable.
• 12:47
  Speaker 1: I spent hours studying color theory, learning about how every
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: color had a corresponding gray tone at different brightness levels,
• 12:53
  Speaker 1: how value relationships were actually more important than hue in
• 12:56
  Speaker 1: creating depth and dimension. I bought books about painting for
• 12:58
  Speaker 1: the colorblind and tools that photographers used to check gray values,
• 13:02
  Speaker 1: and slowly a new approach to teaching Iris started forming
• 13:05
  Speaker 1: in my mind. Two weeks after the diagnosis, I knocked
• 13:07
  Speaker 1: on Iris' door with a proposition. I want to try
• 13:10
  Speaker 1: something different with our painting, I said. Not the same
• 13:12
  Speaker 1: way we used to do it. but a new way
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: that works better for how you actually see. Iris was
• 13:17
  Speaker 1: skeptical but curious enough to follow me to the dining
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: room where I'd set up a new kind of lesson.
• 13:21
  Speaker 1: Instead of just describing colors and expecting her to know
• 13:23
  Speaker 1: what paints to use, I'd created a reference chart showing
• 13:26
  Speaker 1: common sunset colors with their corresponding gray values. Orange was
• 13:29
  Speaker 1: a medium light gray, pink was a light gray, purple
• 13:32
  Speaker 1: was a medium dark gray, and so on. I'd also
• 13:34
  Speaker 1: bought a set of gray value cards that photographers used,
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: numbered from 1 to 10 representing different levels of brightness.
• 13:40
  Speaker 1: Here's what we're going to do, I explained. Instead of
• 13:42
  Speaker 1: me saying, use orange and pink, I'm going to help
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: you identify the actual brightness levels you're seeing. Then we'll
• 13:48
  Speaker 1: use this chart to figure out which colors match those
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: brightness levels. You're not guessing anymore. You're being systematic. Iris
• 13:54
  Speaker 1: looked at the materials skeptically, but picked up one of
• 13:57
  Speaker 1: the gray value cards and held it up next to
• 13:59
  Speaker 1: the real sunset visible through the window. The sky is
• 14:01
  Speaker 1: about a level three gray, she said, comparing the card
• 14:04
  Speaker 1: to what she saw. I checked the reference chart and
• 14:07
  Speaker 1: confirmed that level three gray in a sky context corresponded
• 14:09
  Speaker 1: to orange. So you'd use cadmium orange or a similar
• 14:12
  Speaker 1: warm light color, I explained. Not because you're seeing orange,
• 14:15
  Speaker 1: but because you understand that level 3 gray in the
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: sky at sunset translates to orange in color vocabulary. We
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: worked through the entire sunset that way, Iris identifying gray
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: values and me helping her translate them into color choices
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: using the chart. The process was slower and more analytical
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: than our previous intuitive approach, but the painting she created
• 14:34
  Speaker 1: was actually more accurate than anything she'd done before. When
• 14:37
  Speaker 1: we finished and compared it to the real sunset, The
• 14:39
  Speaker 1: colors matched in a way they never had previously. Iris
• 14:42
  Speaker 1: stared at both paintings, hers and mine, side by side,
• 14:45
  Speaker 1: and for the first time since the diagnosis, I saw
• 14:48
  Speaker 1: something like hope in her expression. So I can still paint,
• 14:51
  Speaker 1: she said slowly, just differently than I thought I was
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: doing it before. I nodded and explained that she'd actually
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: been doing something even more impressive than typical painting. Most
• 15:00
  Speaker 1: people paint by copying what they see. You're painting by
• 15:03
  Speaker 1: understanding a system of relationships between values and colors. That
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: takes more thinking and knowledge than just matching what's in
• 15:08
  Speaker 1: front of you. Iris considered this and picked up the
• 15:11
  Speaker 1: gray value cards again, studying them with new interest. Can
• 15:14
  Speaker 1: we try again tomorrow? She asked, and I felt relief
• 15:17
  Speaker 1: wash over me. Our painting routine was back, but transformed
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: into something more honest about what we were each actually perceiving.
• 15:23
  Speaker 1: Over the next few months, Iris threw herself into learning
• 15:26
  Speaker 1: color theory with an intensity that surprised me. She checked
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: out library books about color systems and light wavelengths, learning
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: the science behind why different colors appeared as different gray tones.
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: She practiced using the gray value cards constantly, holding them
• 15:38
  Speaker 1: up to everything she encountered and identifying the exact brightness level.
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: She memorized the reference chart so thoroughly that she could
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: translate values to colors automatically without needing to look anything up.
• 15:49
  Speaker 1: Her paintings evolved to reflect this new systematic approach, becoming
• 15:52
  Speaker 1: more technically accurate even as they maintained the emotional quality
• 15:56
  Speaker 1: that had always made her work special. The art teacher, Mrs. Kellerman,
• 15:59
  Speaker 1: noticed the improvement and asked what had changed, and Iris
• 16:02
  Speaker 1: proudly explained her new method of working with gray values
• 16:05
  Speaker 1: instead of trying to perceive colors directly. Mrs. A Kellerman
• 16:08
  Speaker 1: was fascinated and asked if Iris would be willing to
• 16:11
  Speaker 1: demonstrate her technique for the class, and I watched my
• 16:13
  Speaker 1: daughter teach her color-sighted peers about value relationships and why
• 16:17
  Speaker 1: they mattered more than hue for creating depth and dimension.
• 16:20
  Speaker 1: The other students were confused at first, not understanding why
• 16:23
  Speaker 1: anyone would work with gray values when they could see
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: colors directly, but Iris patiently explained that understanding values was
• 16:29
  Speaker 1: what made good painting possible. Color is just decoration, she
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: said with confidence. That surprised me. Value is structure. If
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: you get the values right, the colors almost don't matter.
• 16:38
  Speaker 1: It was something I'd read in one of the color
• 16:40
  Speaker 1: theory books, but hearing Iris articulate it showed how deeply
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: she'd internalized this new way of thinking about art. When
• 16:46
  Speaker 1: Iris turned eight, she asked if we could enter some
• 16:48
  Speaker 1: of her paintings in a regional student art competition. I
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: was nervous because I didn't know how judges would respond
• 16:53
  Speaker 1: to work created by someone with achromatopsia, but Iris insisted
• 16:56
  Speaker 1: she wanted to try. We selected three of her recent sunsets,
• 16:59
  Speaker 1: painted using the value-based method, and submitted them with an
• 17:02
  Speaker 1: artist's statement where Iris explained her condition and her technique.
• 17:06
  Speaker 1: The judging was blind, meaning judges didn't know anything about
• 17:09
  Speaker 1: the artists beyond what was in the statements, and I
• 17:11
  Speaker 1: tried to prepare Iris for possible rejection. But when the
• 17:14
  Speaker 1: results were announced, Iris had won second place in her
• 17:16
  Speaker 1: age category, and the judges' comments praised her exceptional understanding
• 17:20
  Speaker 1: of value relationships and sophisticated use of color harmony. At
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: the awards ceremony, one of the judges approached us and
• 17:27
  Speaker 1: said she'd been skeptical reading Iris' statement about being completely colorblind,
• 17:31
  Speaker 1: but the paintings themselves were so technically sound that she
• 17:34
  Speaker 1: had to accept the truth of it. Your daughter has
• 17:36
  Speaker 1: taught herself something that art students in college struggle with,
• 17:39
  Speaker 1: the judge said. She understands that successful painting is about
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: structure and relationships, not just copying local color. That's a
• 17:45
  Speaker 1: remarkably mature approach for someone so young. The recognition gave
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: Iris confidence to continue pushing her skills further. She started
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: experimenting with subjects beyond sunsets, painting portraits where she captured
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: emotional depth through value contrasts, landscapes where she conveyed atmosphere
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: through careful gradations of light and dark. The fact that
• 18:03
  Speaker 1: she couldn't see color became almost irrelevant to the quality
• 18:05
  Speaker 1: of her work because she'd mastered the underlying principles that
• 18:08
  Speaker 1: made visual art successful. By age nine, her paintings were
• 18:12
  Speaker 1: winning competitions regularly, and galleries started expressing interest in showing
• 18:15
  Speaker 1: her work. One curator from a contemporary art space downtown
• 18:19
  Speaker 1: contacted me after seeing Iris's paintings in a group show,
• 18:22
  Speaker 1: saying she wanted to feature Iris in a solo exhibition.
• 18:25
  Speaker 1: I was hesitant about putting that kind of pressure on
• 18:26
  Speaker 1: a nine-year-old, but the curator assured me it would be
• 18:29
  Speaker 1: low-pressure and educational. a chance to teach people about how
• 18:32
  Speaker 1: colorblind artists work. Iris was excited by the opportunity, so
• 18:35
  Speaker 1: we accepted. The exhibition was titled Value and Vision, Paintings
• 18:39
  Speaker 1: by Iris Cross, and it opened on a Saturday afternoon
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: when Iris was nine and a half. We displayed 15
• 18:45
  Speaker 1: of her paintings, including some from before the diagnosis alongside
• 18:48
  Speaker 1: recent work, letting viewers see the evolution of her technique.
• 18:51
  Speaker 1: Iris also created an interactive display where people could try
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: using gray value cards to identify colors, experiencing a simplified
• 18:58
  Speaker 1: version of what she did every time she painted. At
• 19:01
  Speaker 1: the opening reception, Iris gave a short talk about her
• 19:03
  Speaker 1: experience learning she was colorblind and developing a new approach
• 19:06
  Speaker 1: to art. She spoke clearly and confidently, explaining that her
• 19:09
  Speaker 1: achromatopsia wasn't a disability, but a different way of perceiving
• 19:12
  Speaker 1: that required different techniques. I see the world in gray,
• 19:15
  Speaker 1: she said, but I understand colors as a system of relationships.
• 19:19
  Speaker 1: I know that orange is brighter than purple, that yellow
• 19:21
  Speaker 1: is the lightest color, and dark blue is one of
• 19:24
  Speaker 1: the darkest. I know which colors go together to make
• 19:26
  Speaker 1: new colors, and I know which combinations create harmony or contrast.
• 19:30
  Speaker 1: I can't see the colors themselves, but I don't need to,
• 19:33
  Speaker 1: because I understand how they work. The audience was captivated,
• 19:36
  Speaker 1: and several people came up after to ask detailed questions
• 19:38
  Speaker 1: about her process. One woman introduced herself as Dr. Sophie
• 19:41
  Speaker 1: Hammond from the university's vision research department, saying she'd been
• 19:45
  Speaker 1: studying colorblind artists for years, but had never encountered a
• 19:48
  Speaker 1: child who'd developed such sophisticated strategies at such a young age.
• 19:51
  Speaker 1: She asked if she could interview Iris for a research paper,
• 19:54
  Speaker 1: and after discussing it with me, Iris agreed. The interviews
• 19:57
  Speaker 1: happened over several weeks, with Dr. Hammond asking detailed questions
• 20:00
  Speaker 1: about how Iris had learned to translate gray values into colors,
• 20:04
  Speaker 1: how she identified colors in contexts where she couldn't use
• 20:07
  Speaker 1: her reference charts, how she knew whether her color choices
• 20:09
  Speaker 1: were successful. Iris explained her entire mental framework, and Dr.
• 20:13
  Speaker 1: Hammond recorded everything with obvious excitement. The resulting research paper
• 20:16
  Speaker 1: was published in a journal about visual perception and art,
• 20:19
  Speaker 1: with Iris's paintings included as examples. The paper's argument was
• 20:22
  Speaker 1: that color perception wasn't necessary for color creation, that understanding
• 20:26
  Speaker 1: systematic relationships between colors was more important than subjectively experiencing
• 20:30
  Speaker 1: their qualities. The attention was overwhelming at first, with media
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: outlets wanting to interview Iris about being a colorblind artist.
• 20:37
  Speaker 1: We did a few local news segments where Iris demonstrated
• 20:40
  Speaker 1: her painting technique and talked about seeing in grayscale, but
• 20:43
  Speaker 1: I was careful not to let it become exploitative. Iris
• 20:45
  Speaker 1: was still a kid who needed normal childhood experiences, not
• 20:48
  Speaker 1: just a novelty act for people curious about disability. Her
• 20:51
  Speaker 1: school was supportive, with teachers incorporating discussions about different types
• 20:55
  Speaker 1: of perception into their lessons, helping classmates understand that people
• 20:58
  Speaker 1: could experience the same reality in fundamentally different ways. Iris
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: made friends with other kids who had various disabilities, forming
• 21:04
  Speaker 1: a group that advocated for accessibility and understanding. She started
• 21:07
  Speaker 1: speaking at schools about her experience, teaching younger kids that
• 21:10
  Speaker 1: differences in how people perceived or processed the world didn't
• 21:13
  Speaker 1: make anyone less capable, just required different approaches to the
• 21:16
  Speaker 1: same tasks. Our evening painting sessions continued through Iris's elementary
• 21:20
  Speaker 1: and middle school years, evolving as she grew more skilled
• 21:23
  Speaker 1: and independent. By age 11, she didn't need my guidance anymore.
• 21:26
  Speaker 1: She could analyze a scene, identify the value relationships, and
• 21:30
  Speaker 1: translate them into appropriate colors all on her own. But
• 21:33
  Speaker 1: we still painted together most evenings, because the ritual had
• 21:35
  Speaker 1: never really been about technique. It had been about connection.
• 21:38
  Speaker 1: Those hours were when we talked about school drama and
• 21:41
  Speaker 1: friend issues and her dreams for the future, when we
• 21:43
  Speaker 1: processed the normal challenges of growing up through the meditative
• 21:46
  Speaker 1: rhythm of brush on canvas. Sometimes we'd work on independent
• 21:49
  Speaker 1: projects in comfortable silence, just enjoying each other's presence. Other
• 21:53
  Speaker 1: times we'd collaborate on large pieces, combining our different ways
• 21:56
  Speaker 1: of seeing into single paintings that somehow incorporated both color,
• 22:00
  Speaker 1: and value-based approaches. Those collaborative works were my favorites because
• 22:03
  Speaker 1: they represented our relationship honestly, two people experiencing the world differently,
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: but creating something beautiful together. When Iris turned 13, she
• 22:11
  Speaker 1: made a decision that surprised me. She wanted to create
• 22:14
  Speaker 1: an exhibition specifically exploring her experience of colorblindness, not hiding
• 22:17
  Speaker 1: it or overcoming it, but examining what it meant to
• 22:20
  Speaker 1: navigate a colorful world in grayscale. She'd been painting for
• 22:23
  Speaker 1: nine years at that point and felt ready to do
• 22:25
  Speaker 1: something more conceptually ambitious. She started creating diptychs, where one
• 22:29
  Speaker 1: painting showed a scene in accurate colors and the other
• 22:31
  Speaker 1: showed the same scene in the grayscale values she actually perceived.
• 22:35
  Speaker 1: The paired images were striking, forcing viewers to see how
• 22:38
  Speaker 1: much visual information could be conveyed through value alone, while
• 22:41
  Speaker 1: also highlighting what was lost without hue perception. She also
• 22:44
  Speaker 1: created a series of abstract paintings based entirely on value patterns,
• 22:48
  Speaker 1: demonstrating that color wasn't necessary for visual interest or emotional impact.
• 22:52
  Speaker 1: In her artist's statement for the exhibition, Iris wrote that
• 22:54
  Speaker 1: she wanted people to understand that her vision wasn't broken
• 22:57
  Speaker 1: or inferior, just different. and that difference had taught her
• 23:00
  Speaker 1: to understand art in ways that might actually be more
• 23:02
  Speaker 1: fundamental than typical color sight. The exhibition was titled Seeing Gray,
• 23:06
  Speaker 1: and it opened at the same contemporary art space that
• 23:09
  Speaker 1: had shown her first solo show four years earlier. Critics
• 23:12
  Speaker 1: praised it as surprisingly sophisticated work from such a young artist,
• 23:15
  Speaker 1: and several pieces were acquired by museums interested in art
• 23:18
  Speaker 1: about disability and perception. One reviewer wrote that Iris had
• 23:22
  Speaker 1: transformed a supposed limitation into a rigorous artistic inquiry that
• 23:26
  Speaker 1: challenges viewers to reconsider their assumptions about vision and value.
• 23:30
  Speaker 1: Reading that review made me emotional because it validated everything
• 23:33
  Speaker 1: Iris had worked toward, acknowledging that her approach to art
• 23:36
  Speaker 1: wasn't just compensating for a disability, but exploring legitimate questions
• 23:40
  Speaker 1: about perception and representation. The exhibition traveled to two other cities,
• 23:44
  Speaker 1: and Iris gave artist talks at each venue, becoming more
• 23:46
  Speaker 1: confident and articulate with each presentation. She'd found her voice
• 23:50
  Speaker 1: not just as an artist, but as an advocate for
• 23:52
  Speaker 1: understanding different types of perception, as equally valid ways of
• 23:56
  Speaker 1: experiencing reality. Now Iris is 15, and we still paint
• 23:59
  Speaker 1: together several times a week, though our sessions have evolved
• 24:02
  Speaker 1: considerably from those early days of copying sunsets through the
• 24:05
  Speaker 1: dining room window. Sometimes we work on independent pieces, Iris
• 24:09
  Speaker 1: pursuing increasingly ambitious projects, while I dabble with techniques I'm
• 24:13
  Speaker 1: learning from online tutorials. Other times we collaborate on commissions,
• 24:16
  Speaker 1: because Iris's work has become sought after by collectors interested
• 24:19
  Speaker 1: in art, created through unusual perceptual frameworks. She's thinking about
• 24:23
  Speaker 1: art school for college, considering programs that would let her
• 24:26
  Speaker 1: continue developing her systematic approach to color while also exploring
• 24:29
  Speaker 1: other media. Whatever path she chooses, I know she'll approach
• 24:33
  Speaker 1: it with the same analytical rigor and creative courage she's
• 24:35
  Speaker 1: brought to everything since that devastating diagnosis, seven years ago.
• 24:39
  Speaker 1: That day in Dr. Leeds' office felt like the end
• 24:41
  Speaker 1: of our painting relationship, the revelation that destroyed three years
• 24:45
  Speaker 1: of what I'd thought we were sharing. But it turned
• 24:47
  Speaker 1: out to be a beginning instead, the start of a
• 24:49
  Speaker 1: more honest and ultimately richer way of creating art together.
• 24:52
  Speaker 1: Looking back at those first three years before we knew
• 24:54
  Speaker 1: about Iris' achromatopsia, I don't see them as wasted time
• 24:57
  Speaker 1: or misguided teaching anymore. Those years of painting sunsets together
• 25:01
  Speaker 1: gave Iris the foundation she needed to develop her sophisticated
• 25:04
  Speaker 1: understanding of color relationships. If I'd known from the start
• 25:07
  Speaker 1: that she couldn't see colors, I might have approached teaching
• 25:10
  Speaker 1: her differently in ways that would have been less effective. Instead,
• 25:13
  Speaker 1: by treating her as a typical color-sighted student, I accidentally
• 25:16
  Speaker 1: helped her build an intuitive understanding of color that she
• 25:19
  Speaker 1: could later translate into her own systematic framework. She'd learned
• 25:22
  Speaker 1: that sunsets involved certain combinations of colors, that clouds needed
• 25:26
  Speaker 1: highlights and shadows to look three-dimensional, that atmospheric perspective required
• 25:30
  Speaker 1: subtle value shifts. When she discovered she'd been working in
• 25:32
  Speaker 1: grayscale all along, she had years of painting experience to
• 25:35
  Speaker 1: draw on, making the transition to value-based methodology much easier
• 25:39
  Speaker 1: than starting from scratch would have been. The paintings from
• 25:42
  Speaker 1: those early years still hang in our house, browns and
• 25:45
  Speaker 1: grays that I once thought were oranges and pinks, muddy
• 25:48
  Speaker 1: greens that I'd believed were purples. They're reminders of how
• 25:51
  Speaker 1: two people can experience the same moment completely differently while
• 25:54
  Speaker 1: still creating something meaningful together. When Iris looks at those
• 25:58
  Speaker 1: old paintings now, she sees them the same way she
• 26:00
  Speaker 1: always has, as accurate representations of the sunsets she was perceiving.
• 26:04
  Speaker 1: When I look at them, I see evidence of how
• 26:06
  Speaker 1: wrong color can be and how right value can be simultaneously.
• 26:09
  Speaker 1: They're not failed attempts at typical sunset paintings. They're successful
• 26:13
  Speaker 1: representations of how Iris sees the world, and understanding that
• 26:16
  Speaker 1: difference has taught me more about art and perception than
• 26:19
  Speaker 1: any class could have. Our painting sessions were never really
• 26:22
  Speaker 1: about the colors anyway. They were about showing up for
• 26:24
  Speaker 1: each other every evening, about creating space for connection and creativity,
• 26:28
  Speaker 1: about building a ritual that could hold us both through
• 26:30
  Speaker 1: grief and discovery and growth. Last week, Iris came home
• 26:34
  Speaker 1: from school excited about an assignment her art teacher had given.
• 26:37
  Speaker 1: Students were supposed to create a painting that represented their
• 26:39
  Speaker 1: personal relationship with color, and Iris had decided to paint
• 26:42
  Speaker 1: our dining room during one of our evening sessions. She
• 26:45
  Speaker 1: set up her canvas and worked for three hours, occasionally
• 26:47
  Speaker 1: asking me to check specific value relationships, but mostly working independently.
• 26:51
  Speaker 1: When she finally showed me the finished piece, I was
• 26:53
  Speaker 1: moved nearly to tears. She'd painted me at the table
• 26:56
  Speaker 1: mixing paints on a palette, the colors vibrant and accurate,
• 26:59
  Speaker 1: oranges and pinks and purples. And she'd painted herself sitting
• 27:02
  Speaker 1: across from me, her canvas and palette rendered entirely in grayscale,
• 27:06
  Speaker 1: even though the rest of the painting was colorful. Between
• 27:09
  Speaker 1: us on the table, she'd painted her gray value cards
• 27:11
  Speaker 1: and color reference charts, the tools that bridged our different
• 27:14
  Speaker 1: ways of seeing. The painting was titled Translations, and her
• 27:18
  Speaker 1: artist's statement explained that this was what our painting sessions
• 27:21
  Speaker 1: actually looked like, two people experiencing the same moment in
• 27:24
  Speaker 1: completely different visual realities but using systematic translation to create
• 27:27
  Speaker 1: shared meaning. I asked Iris if she ever wished she
• 27:29
  Speaker 1: could see colors the way I do, and she thought
• 27:31
  Speaker 1: about it carefully before answering. Sometimes I'm curious what it's like,
• 27:35
  Speaker 1: she said slowly, but I think if I suddenly could
• 27:37
  Speaker 1: see colors, I'd lose something important about how I understand art.
• 27:41
  Speaker 1: Working around my achromatopsia forced me to really learn color
• 27:44
  Speaker 1: theory and value relationships, to understand painting at a deeper
• 27:48
  Speaker 1: level than just copying what I see. If that changed,
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: I might not paint the same way anymore. Her answer
• 27:53
  Speaker 1: showed remarkable self-acceptance for a 15-year-old. An understanding that her
• 27:57
  Speaker 1: difference wasn't a deficit, but a unique perspective that shaped
• 28:00
  Speaker 1: her work in valuable ways. I told her that learning
• 28:03
  Speaker 1: about her achromatopsia had changed how I understood art, too.
• 28:06
  Speaker 1: That she'd taught me to see beyond surface color to
• 28:08
  Speaker 1: the underlying structure that made images actually work. We'd both
• 28:12
  Speaker 1: grown through the process of adapting our painting practice to
• 28:14
  Speaker 1: accommodate her vision, and the art we created together now
• 28:18
  Speaker 1: was richer for that growth. Three years ago, getting that
• 28:20
  Speaker 1: email from Mrs. Kellerman felt like discovering a terrible truth
• 28:23
  Speaker 1: that would destroy something precious. But the truth didn't destroy
• 28:26
  Speaker 1: our painting ritual. It transformed it into something more honest
• 28:29
  Speaker 1: and ultimately more meaningful. Iris didn't stop being talented when
• 28:33
  Speaker 1: we learned she was colorblind. She just developed new techniques
• 28:35
  Speaker 1: for expressing that talent in ways that worked with her
• 28:38
  Speaker 1: perception rather than against it. And I didn't stop being
• 28:40
  Speaker 1: her teacher. I just learned to teach in a language
• 28:42
  Speaker 1: we could both understand. Our evening painting sessions are still
• 28:45
  Speaker 1: sacred time, still the hour each day when the world
• 28:48
  Speaker 1: narrows to just us and our canvases and the quiet
• 28:51
  Speaker 1: satisfaction of making something together. The colors Iris uses are
• 28:54
  Speaker 1: more accurate now, but what matters most hasn't changed. We're
• 28:58
  Speaker 1: still showing up for each other, still creating beauty out
• 29:00
  Speaker 1: of grief and challenge, still building connection through shared creative practice.
• 29:04
  Speaker 1: I taught my daughter to paint sunsets for three years
• 29:07
  Speaker 1: before learning she was completely colorblind and discovering that truth
• 29:10
  Speaker 1: was the best thing that ever happened to both of us.
• 29:12
  Speaker 1: Appreciate you watching this far. If you enjoyed it, drop
• 29:15
  Speaker 1: a like, leave a comment, and subscribe so you won't
• 29:18
  Speaker 1: miss the next story.