Latest / Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show! / Radio Baloney Live! News Review Hangout Stream-3

Transcript

Radio Baloney Live! News Review Hangout Stream-3 · Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show!

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What is best in life?
• 0:01
  Speaker 2: To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and
• 0:05
  Speaker 2: to hear the lamentation of the women.
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: All right, what is it? It's Friday night. It must
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: be the Friday night Radio Bologna Live. I am your host,
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: Richie Bologna. It's been a long week. It's been a
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: long week, folks, but I'm back. I'm here. My face
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: still hurts from this dental stuff.
• 0:29
  Speaker 3: Is he?
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: Says, hope your mouth is feeling better today, Richie. No. Well, look,
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: I don't know. I mean, it hurts. It still is
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: very painful to eat. And I avoided talking all day
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: long in the hopes that that would be good for tonight.
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: And as soon as I start talking, it immediately starts
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: hurting again. Everything is terrible. And I hate the universe.
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: Let's see. Izzy, Ottawa. What's going on with you guys
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: in the chat?
• 0:58
  Speaker 4: All right.
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: So I want to remind everybody that this is the
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: last week of six nights a week because the Rumble
• 1:08
  Speaker 1: Creator program is ending. They just let us know like yesterday.
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: They just put it out there. So no more begging
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: for unique chatters. That's over. I'm going to beg for money.
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: I'm going to beg for money, but I'm not going
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: to beg for unique chatters anymore. I promise, though, that
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: me begging for money will be even more annoying. And
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: what I was begging for you to just, I'm not
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: going to do that. I mean, maybe jokingly, you know,
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: not serious or half serious, you know, or three quarters
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: serious or something like that, or entirely serious. I don't know.
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: We'll find out. Where was I going with this? Yes. So,
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: so the rumble creator program is ending and they just
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: let us know. And so this is the last month
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: of it. So from here on out, No more metrics
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: I have to worry about. I don't have to worry
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: about meeting any particular goals. We could just go just
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: totally chill from now on, quite frankly. So, again, no
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: worrying about how many unique chatters do I have, how
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: many hours watched. Don't have to worry about it. The
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: new program, all you got to do is publish 10
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: videos in a month, and you're fine. And if you
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: get in. I've applied. Will I get in? I don't know.
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: I don't really care, actually. I'm just relieved, actually, that
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: the creative program is over. It was a good thing.
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: I'm glad that it happened, and I think it made
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: the channel better. But I'm relieved it's over. I'm relieved
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: because the reason I was doing six streams a week
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: was because of the creator program to try and hit
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: those metrics, which I didn't think I'd be able to do.
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: But we did every damn month. Thank you so much,
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: you guys, for all of your help. But that's over now.
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: So it's time to just relax. Get lazy. We're getting lazy, folks.
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: We're only doing Monday to Friday from now on. So
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: I've decided. We'll do Monday to Friday. Sunday is gone.
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: Monday to Friday. In terms of the premium hours streamed
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: on Rumble, I don't need to do premium hours anymore.
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: There should be a reward for being a channel member, though,
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: other than just knowing how much it pleases me to
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: get the money. But here's the thing. I mean, really,
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: it's the best way to support the channel because I
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: get 97% of that. Go straight into my pocket. Straight
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: into my pocket for all the awful things I spend
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: my money on. But maybe we'll do like, I don't know,
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: like a premium video, like clip video or something every week.
• 3:36
  Speaker 5: I don't know.
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: But we don't need to do the premium live streaming
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: hours anymore. We can just do normal live streaming where
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: everybody's welcome. All the riffraff is welcome. So anyway, so
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: things are changing up. Not that much, really. I mean,
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: just one less stream a week. And six is too much,
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: by the way. It's too much before you start saying, but, but, but. No,
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: six nights a week is way too fucking much for me.
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: I'm one person, for God's sakes. And I'm not even
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: that smart or talented. I've got constant problems with the fucking,
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: these dental things. Like one tooth will take up like
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: two years of my life dealing with one fucking tooth.
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: That's what's been happening. Anyway, and it's hurting. In case
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: you were wondering, yes, it still hurts. I had the
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: bone that fucking cut through the gums from the empty
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: socket where I had the tooth extracted three weeks ago.
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: Cut right through the gums. I had to have it
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: filed down. It just filed down. Imagine that. Imagine somebody
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: filing down bone that is poking through your gums. Think
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: about how horrible that is and how long it would
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: take you to recover from that. This just happened on Monday, folks.
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: It just happened on Monday. I'm here. I'm strong. I'm alive.
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: I'm working. I'm working for you guys. That's why I'm here.
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: But it does hurt a little bit. Maybe not as
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: much as yesterday, though, so maybe it's getting a little
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: bit better. G Flood says, socialized healthcare at its finest. Oh,
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: only if it were socialized. If only it were socialized.
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: It's socialized in Canada. If you got here five minutes
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: ago and you called yourself a refugee, then it's socialized.
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: Not for me. I think a lot of Americans think that,
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: like a lot of lefty Americans when they kind of
• 5:34
  Speaker 1: idealize Canada, They think that just everything's free, glasses, dental, no, no, no, no. Like,
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: that's stuff you got to pay for. You got to
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: pay for it. I spent thousands of dollars at the
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: dentist over the last, I don't know, year and a
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: half or something. Oh, no, you got to pay for
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: that yourself. All right. Izzy says, don't worry, your sex
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: bot will put you out of your misery soon enough.
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: If I only had... A sexy nurse android sex bot.
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: If I only had one that could give me just
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: a few good years before terminating me. But they don't
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: exist yet. They don't exist yet. Although with AI, like
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: AI engineering, I mean, maybe sooner than we thought. Maybe
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: sooner than we thought. Can they create one that is
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: incapable of calling a lawyer? If not, they're no better
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: than my goddamn ex-wives. So then I don't need them.
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: But I'm sure they can work that in there. I'm
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: sure that's just a couple lines of code, right? Ottawa
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: James says, only poor people get socialized until LOL, LOL. Yeah. Anyway. Bra, bra, bra.
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: Izzy says, as far as I know, the end of
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: the world hasn't happened yet, so I guess I still
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: have to move. I don't know. Where did that come from?
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: But I like it. I like where that's going. I
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: like where that's going, Izzy. All right. Everybody, I want
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: everybody thinking apocalyptically all the time from now on. If
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: I'm here for anything, it's for that.
• 7:15
  Speaker 4: All right.
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: Well, I guess we'll just, I guess we'll go over
• 7:18
  Speaker 1: the menu. I don't know if we're going to get
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: to all this stuff. My face is probably going to
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: start hurting again soon. But I want to reiterate, reiterate that.
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: starting this week, coming up, because the Rumble Creator program's over.
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: I don't need to do six nights a week anymore,
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: and it was too much, and it was making me
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: bitter and resentful. So we're going to do five, Monday
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: to Friday, like a normal human being, like a normal
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: group of people on the internet, for God's sakes. You know,
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: it couldn't last forever, folks. The good times couldn't last forever.
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: But we're just going to get, no more Sundays. No
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: more goddamn Sundays. I need two nights. I need two days, folks.
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: And I work on those days anyway, doing clip videos. So,
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: you know. But, okay, so starting next week, it's going
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: to be Monday to Friday. Monday to Friday. And that's
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: just going to have to be enough. And they're also
• 8:12
  Speaker 1: going to be four-minute-long streams, all of them. So it
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: will just be four minutes of me ranting inanely, and
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: it'll just cut off. And you'll wonder, where was that
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: rant going? What else was he complaining about? What other stupid, idiotic,
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: selfish thing was he complaining about? And you won't know,
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: because it'll just cut off. Three and a half minutes,
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: four minutes, just cut off. And it won't restart the
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: next one. Every one will be just a completely different
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: idiotic rant. So that's fun. I'm doing a lot of
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: planning for this show. I think some changes need to happen.
• 8:53
  Speaker 1: But anyway... Let's take a look at the menu. What
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: are we talking about? As much as this as I
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: can get through before the pain makes me stop. Scott
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: Jennings teased off on Ilhan Omar for a full minute
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: after Democrat strategist Adrian Elrod tried to portray her as
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: an example of the American dream. If the American dream
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: is just nonstop scamming for decades, I guess that is. Anyway,
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: that'll be fun. Scott Jennings is good and I'm going
• 9:22
  Speaker 1: to enjoy this. Let's see what else we got here.
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: CBS News Chief Barry Weiss faced significant resistance from staff
• 9:30
  Speaker 1: at the network's 9 a.m. meeting this morning while discussing
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: the growing Alaska ballot scandal as she urged reporters to
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: dig into the story, according to sources at the meeting. Well,
• 9:41
  Speaker 1: it seems like she, the Democrat, Senate candidate, like, went
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: out and, like, her people went out to find everybody
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: with the name of the Republican, This is pretty dirty. Very,
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: very dirty. Now when Barry Weiss took over, she's like
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: not some sort of hardcore Republican. I guess maybe kind
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: of a centrist. She's like reasonably sane on some things,
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: which makes her a fascist, obviously, for the left. So
• 10:12
  Speaker 1: there was a lot of fuss at CBS News when
• 10:14
  Speaker 1: she was handed the reins. And yeah, there's still, this
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: is a story. they don't want to cover. They don't
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: want to cover this story.
• 10:22
  Speaker 6: Why?
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: Uh, because they're not journalists. The people working there aren't journalists.
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: They are propagandists. They know their job and they want
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: to keep doing it. They don't want to inform people.
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: They want to manipulate them. I, it's just in front
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: of everybody's face and it has been for a very
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: long time. What's going on here? The government is not
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: a family run business. Who's that? John Broussard. Um, Yeah,
• 10:47
  Speaker 1: Diana Fox Carney, Mark Carney's wife, has been handed $ 1. 2
• 10:50
  Speaker 1: billion to run this ocean boondoggle. She's the ocean envoy.
• 10:58
  Speaker 1: She's getting $ 1. 2 billion to throw around. I wonder where. Now,
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: she's not getting paid herself, it has to be said.
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: But so what? $ 1. 2 billion. This just seems totally ripe
• 11:11
  Speaker 1: for conflict of interest. Who is she going to be
• 11:14
  Speaker 1: giving that money to? Is these Is Brookfield involved some way?
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: Are these people that they know? Are there favors that
• 11:22
  Speaker 1: are going to be done? These are obvious questions. I mean,
• 11:27
  Speaker 1: the media has zero interest, but these are obvious questions
• 11:31
  Speaker 1: for any reputable journalist in any country in the world, right?
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: Where exactly is this money going and to who? And
• 11:40
  Speaker 1: yet a real journalist would find out who these people are, right?
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: upon finding out who they are, research who they are,
• 11:49
  Speaker 1: and then follow and follow the money. See where the
• 11:52
  Speaker 1: money goes. None of that will happen with the Canadian
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: media because, of course, they're the same as the mainstream
• 11:58
  Speaker 1: media anywhere in the Western world right now. They don't care.
• 12:01
  Speaker 1: They have a story to tell. They're not interested in reality.
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: We're going to take a look at that. It really
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: is kind of shocking, isn't it, though? Shocking. I mean,
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: it's just such an obvious conflict of interest risk here.
• 12:15
  Speaker 1: It just The fraud, the possibilities for fraud are so obvious.
• 12:22
  Speaker 1: If this were a conservative government, of course the media
• 12:25
  Speaker 1: would be watching it. Of course they'd be talking about it.
• 12:30
  Speaker 1: I think Carney's worse than Trudeau. Let's see. Michelle Rempel-Garner,
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: anyone looking for an accountant job in Toronto? Don't worry.
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: The Carney government's going to give it to a foreigner.
• 12:42
  Speaker 1: KPMG is trying to hire 50 foreign accountants in downtown
• 12:45
  Speaker 1: Toronto at $ 80, 000 each. Well, it turns out that they
• 12:49
  Speaker 1: said Canadians wouldn't do low-paying jobs. Now they're saying they
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: won't do high-paying jobs. It sounds like they just don't
• 12:54
  Speaker 1: want Canadians doing jobs. Sounds like they want their new
• 12:57
  Speaker 1: voting base taking the jobs. Interesting, interesting, so interesting. Carney
• 13:03
  Speaker 1: is such a, he's a uber-patriot. Didn't you know that?
• 13:09
  Speaker 1: Then live stream. So the last tab of the evening.
• 13:12
  Speaker 1: We'll just talk quickly about Sir Patrick Stewart. And there's
• 13:16
  Speaker 1: a few things in here. And I apologize. I've not
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: gotten to... I mean, last time I checked, there was like... Yesterday,
• 13:23
  Speaker 1: there was like 140 new things that had been sent
• 13:27
  Speaker 1: in to X. And I just went, I can't... I'll
• 13:31
  Speaker 1: be lucky if I get through an hour of streaming tonight.
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: I'm in pain. I've got a bone sticking through my
• 13:35
  Speaker 1: fucking gum.
• 13:36
  Speaker 7: So.
• 13:38
  Speaker 1: I regret to say that I'm not doing any of those.
• 13:42
  Speaker 1: Like I'm not getting to any of them. We'll be
• 13:44
  Speaker 1: starting fresh. Cause they'll all be stale by the time
• 13:46
  Speaker 1: we get to Monday. Right. It's unfortunate. I want you
• 13:49
  Speaker 1: guys to send it. It's really, it's my apologies to
• 13:52
  Speaker 1: you because I want you guys to send in stuff.
• 13:54
  Speaker 1: And I like putting the stuff that you guys send
• 13:56
  Speaker 1: in on there. But sometimes the volume is so much.
• 14:00
  Speaker 1: And sometimes I just don't have time. And like this
• 14:02
  Speaker 1: week has been bad. You guys know the story. Do
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: you want me to rant about it? Do you want
• 14:06
  Speaker 1: me to, Going on an extended rant about dentistry? Because
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: I'll do it. You know that I'll do it. You
• 14:17
  Speaker 1: want me to go bunker mode? I'll do it.
• 14:19
  Speaker 5: Oh, right.
• 14:23
  Speaker 3: I should get off.
• 14:35
  Speaker 1: Oh, that's cute. I see Rosie in the chat. And
• 14:38
  Speaker 1: how you doing, Rosie, by the way? That's cute. Rosie's saying, yes,
• 14:42
  Speaker 1: please rant.
• 14:43
  Speaker 5: Not.
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: You know what? I think I've got some breaking news
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: for Rosie. Shut up. Get off my land. Well, now
• 15:00
  Speaker 1: I feel bad.
• 15:01
  Speaker 5: Who loves you, baby? You're beautiful. All right.
• 15:11
  Speaker 1: All right, all right, all right, all right. So anyway,
• 15:13
  Speaker 1: I didn't get to all the stuff you guys sent.
• 15:15
  Speaker 1: It was all totally in vain, and I imagine I
• 15:18
  Speaker 1: won't get to any of it. So by next week,
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: because the news world will have moved on. And also, too,
• 15:26
  Speaker 1: I don't have time to go over 150 things. There's
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: just no way. I'm not taking my newly free Sundays.
• 15:33
  Speaker 1: to do that. I do appreciate, keep, please keep sending
• 15:36
  Speaker 1: the stuff. Just understand. I ask for your understanding that, uh,
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: I'm just one guy and I have like other stuff
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: other than just being on, on, uh, doing streaming. All right.
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: But keep sending the stuff. That's all I'm saying. If
• 15:49
  Speaker 1: you're disappointed that you're not going to see it in
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: this stream or ever, uh, the stuff from the last
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: few days or last week or whatever, my apologies. Keep
• 15:58
  Speaker 1: sending it though. And I will do my best. I
• 16:00
  Speaker 1: will do my goddamn best. Meanwhile, I resent you, yes. Deeply,
• 16:07
  Speaker 1: deeply resent you. But I will not follow the instructions
• 16:14
  Speaker 1: of my inner monologue, though. I promise you that. Let's see.
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: So what are you guys talking about? Everybody knows that
• 16:26
  Speaker 1: we're streaming on Rumble. We're streaming on Kik, on Odyssey,
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: on X, and on Locals. And you ask yourself, Well,
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: wait a second. He didn't say YouTube. Did he skip YouTube?
• 16:35
  Speaker 1: Did he forget to say YouTube? Oh, no, I did not.
• 16:38
  Speaker 1: It's a Friday. Normally we do an hour on YouTube,
• 16:40
  Speaker 1: but I am in such a foul mood that I
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: said fuck it because I'm bitter, bitter and resentful towards
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: YouTube for fucking me over so much, which is the
• 16:50
  Speaker 1: reason we only do an hour once a week on
• 16:53
  Speaker 1: Fridays already because it's dangerous to do any more of
• 16:56
  Speaker 1: that because it seems like they've got a target on
• 16:59
  Speaker 1: my channel. So tonight I just said, fuck them. I said,
• 17:04
  Speaker 1: fuck them, right? Do you want to know what I said?
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: Do you want to know what I said? Get the
• 17:14
  Speaker 1: children out of the room.
• 17:16
  Speaker 3: You lousy corksuckers.
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: That's what I said. Well, I said it to myself.
• 17:23
  Speaker 1: I don't think YouTube heard me, unfortunately, but... I suppose
• 17:28
  Speaker 1: I could send them an X post, I guess. But
• 17:31
  Speaker 1: I don't know. What's the point, even? What's the point?
• 17:36
  Speaker 1: But as everybody knows, we'll go back next week. As
• 17:40
  Speaker 1: everybody knows, we're streaming on Rumble, Kik, Odyssey, XN Locals.
• 17:45
  Speaker 1: And when you like to stream, you get free good karma.
• 17:47
  Speaker 1: But when you're early, you get extra good karma. Extra
• 17:50
  Speaker 1: good karma. Izzy got like number two. That means he
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: got five good karmas and my The place where my
• 17:58
  Speaker 1: tooth used to be is hurting. Karma isn't helping me.
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: Ottawa James says, hey all, like number three, that's four
• 18:09
  Speaker 1: good commas for you, sir. Let's see. An Izzy. Here
• 18:20
  Speaker 1: it is. Here it is. I didn't want to go there.
• 18:24
  Speaker 1: I didn't want to go bunker mode on this stream.
• 18:27
  Speaker 1: It's meant Such a trying week. I just wanted to
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: get through this without losing my temper, without going bunker mode,
• 18:34
  Speaker 1: without feeling, without going through paroxysms of rage. That's all
• 18:40
  Speaker 1: I wanted. I just want to come out and do
• 18:41
  Speaker 1: a nice stream for all of you people that I love,
• 18:44
  Speaker 1: that I hold so precious. So precious indeed. And everything's
• 18:49
  Speaker 1: going just fine. Just fine until I see this. It's
• 18:53
  Speaker 1: right away. First thing in the chat. It's Izzy. Got
• 18:58
  Speaker 1: a goddamn comedy skit that he wants me to put up.
• 19:02
  Speaker 1: There's a link. There's a link, Runky Link, in the chat.
• 19:06
  Speaker 1: It's the sixth goddamn chat. I always say, God damn it.
• 19:10
  Speaker 1: Bunker mode.
• 19:12
  Speaker 3: God damn it, Steiner.
• 19:15
  Speaker 5: I mean, Izzy.
• 19:27
  Speaker 1: God damn it, Izzy. You know the rules. You know,
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: I like putting up your guys' links. I love putting
• 19:31
  Speaker 1: up your guys' links. You guys send me stuff in
• 19:33
  Speaker 1: and I love putting it up there. I got to
• 19:35
  Speaker 1: check it first to make sure that it's not something
• 19:37
  Speaker 1: super weird. But I love putting them up. It brings
• 19:39
  Speaker 1: me great joy. I hold all of you so precious.
• 19:41
  Speaker 1: You're more important to me than my own children. I
• 19:43
  Speaker 1: love putting those things up. But I just mention, I
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: just say, just give me one small concession in all
• 19:49
  Speaker 1: of this. Let's do it a little later in the stream.
• 19:54
  Speaker 1: A little later in the stream. Don't put it right
• 19:56
  Speaker 1: at the beginning of the chat, because when I see that,
• 20:01
  Speaker 1: it's like it's like hypodermic needles filled with sulfuric acid
• 20:06
  Speaker 1: being pushed into my eyeballs. That's how much it hurts me.
• 20:10
  Speaker 1: Why do you want to hurt me, Izzy? Why do
• 20:12
  Speaker 1: you want to hurt me? Why do you hate me?
• 20:14
  Speaker 1: This is just part of a coordinated plot by my
• 20:17
  Speaker 1: chat to break me psychologically. I know what's happening. They're
• 20:21
  Speaker 1: like in some discord or something planning it. Planning it
• 20:24
  Speaker 1: day and night, probably. This is their only joy. What
• 20:27
  Speaker 1: do they get out of it? Joy at breaking a
• 20:32
  Speaker 1: good man. I think that's what it is. I think
• 20:35
  Speaker 1: that's what it is. They say he's doing his best
• 20:37
  Speaker 1: out there. He doesn't make much money for doing this.
• 20:40
  Speaker 1: He's working hard. He puts a lot of hours into this.
• 20:42
  Speaker 1: He's trying to, he's, you know what he's doing? He's
• 20:45
  Speaker 1: following his conscience. Like every good man should be. And
• 20:49
  Speaker 1: they hate that. They want to destroy me for that.
• 20:52
  Speaker 1: I don't know why spite vitriol. I don't know where
• 20:55
  Speaker 1: it all comes from. I'm just a good man trying
• 20:58
  Speaker 1: to do his best in a damn difficult world. And
• 21:04
  Speaker 1: there I see it in the chest, the sixth message.
• 21:10
  Speaker 1: A link monkey link. First thing, not half an hour
• 21:14
  Speaker 1: into the stream, not an hour into the stream, not
• 21:15
  Speaker 1: an hour and a half into the stream. It's right there.
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: And they know it. They know how much it will
• 21:20
  Speaker 1: hurt me. Who put it? Did, did he do it
• 21:23
  Speaker 1: on his own? Did someone put it up to him? No,
• 21:24
  Speaker 1: I think there's a cabal in the chat. That's what
• 21:26
  Speaker 1: I think. A cabal, probably globalists. I'm guessing certainly globalists,
• 21:34
  Speaker 1: probably something to do with Davos. I'm going to guess. And, uh,
• 21:38
  Speaker 1: You know, probably it all started when Mark Carney was
• 21:42
  Speaker 1: named UN Climate Finance Envoy. I mean, that's my best guess.
• 21:53
  Speaker 1: In any case, Steiner, I mean, Izzy, I'm not going
• 21:55
  Speaker 1: to let you break me. I'm resilient and I'm strong.
• 22:01
  Speaker 1: And I guess we'll play the clip. It's not that
• 22:03
  Speaker 1: big of a deal, really. Let's take a look. Yuppie.
• 22:06
  Speaker 1: Let's take a look at the link. Link Bunker, fetch
• 22:09
  Speaker 1: me my link. Let's see if this breaks me psychologically.
• 22:20
  Speaker 1: Apparently this is funny.
• 22:24
  Speaker 3: You can legally name your kid Skitty Diddy Pop, and
• 22:27
  Speaker 3: then you can legally spell that like Steven. I met
• 22:32
  Speaker 3: this girl. She's like, my name's Sarah, but it's actually
• 22:35
  Speaker 3: with a Z and an O. I was like, no,
• 22:38
  Speaker 3: your name is Zorro.
• 22:57
  Speaker 3: I'm sick of
• 23:02
  Speaker 3: your shit. I'm on the bully side now. That's all
• 23:07
  Speaker 3: bullies were doing. You know, some kid was like, it's
• 23:10
  Speaker 3: Brandon with two N's. And the bully's like, how about
• 23:13
  Speaker 3: fucking Noel? Some kid's names are Garrett. That's hard enough.
• 23:19
  Speaker 3: Don't add three R's and four T's. This kid's going
• 23:22
  Speaker 3: to end up crying in the back with little Zorro.
• 23:26
  Speaker 3: You don't have to name your kid the victim. You
• 23:28
  Speaker 3: can name them the bully. Sometimes there's a really fine
• 23:30
  Speaker 3: line between the two. Like, Nathan is a good bully name,
• 23:33
  Speaker 3: but Nathaniel? Gonna feel an underwear stretch. You can legally.
• 23:40
  Speaker 1: Oh, that's not bad. That's not bad. Okay, that didn't
• 23:42
  Speaker 1: break me psychologically. I'm okay. Don't worry, guys. I'm fine.
• 23:54
  Speaker 1: All right. Let's just get to the goddamn news. Let's
• 23:57
  Speaker 1: just go to it. What's going on here? So Scott
• 24:01
  Speaker 1: Jennings is, I guess, really the only reason to watch CNN.
• 24:04
  Speaker 1: He's quite good. I find him quite funny. And his
• 24:07
  Speaker 1: level of incredulity at the people that he's sparring with,
• 24:12
  Speaker 1: with the Democrats that he's sparring with, I find quite amusing.
• 24:16
  Speaker 1: Who posted this? Overton posted this. So Scott Jennings tees
• 24:19
  Speaker 1: off on Ilhan Omar. For a full minute. Well, there's
• 24:23
  Speaker 1: lots of material there. Let's see, marrying her brother and
• 24:27
  Speaker 1: having a fake name. And there was like the $ 30
• 24:29
  Speaker 1: million winery that apparently isn't worth $ 30 million. There's a lot.
• 24:35
  Speaker 1: There's a lot. Let's watch.
• 24:38
  Speaker 6: Barack Obama and his administration are not MAGA right-wing extremists.
• 24:42
  Speaker 6: The whole genesis of this panel is that there's a
• 24:45
  Speaker 6: story in the New York Times saying that back during
• 24:47
  Speaker 6: the Obama years, they investigated and they found evidence that
• 24:50
  Speaker 6: in fact she had committed this fraud. In fact, it
• 24:52
  Speaker 6: was just the statute of limitations apparently that saved her.
• 24:55
  Speaker 6: You say it's the American dream.
• 24:57
  Speaker 1: That's interesting.
• 24:58
  Speaker 6: Then why does she go around crapping on America all
• 25:00
  Speaker 6: the time? There's not a single member of the U.S.
• 25:02
  Speaker 6: Congress who talks worse about our country than Ilhan Omar.
• 25:06
  Speaker 1: I agree with you.
• 25:07
  Speaker 6: It's an interesting story.
• 25:08
  Speaker 1: She came here.
• 25:09
  Speaker 6: I mean, you make it sound like it's a nice story.
• 25:11
  Speaker 6: Her father was a Soviet-trained colonel in a brutal communist
• 25:14
  Speaker 6: regime who probably committed a bunch of war crimes. That's
• 25:17
  Speaker 6: how she got here. How in the world we took
• 25:19
  Speaker 6: him in in the first place, I'll never know why
• 25:21
  Speaker 6: anybody thought that was a good idea.
• 25:23
  Speaker 1: So I want to reiterate, too. I mean, that was
• 25:25
  Speaker 1: a New York Times story. So if the New York
• 25:27
  Speaker 1: Times is writing a story about that there's Obama officials
• 25:31
  Speaker 1: found evidence that Omar's marriage was fraudulent, is that a
• 25:35
  Speaker 1: sign that the left is ready to turn on her
• 25:38
  Speaker 1: and maybe other you know, DSA types, other socialist or
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: commie types. Let's continue.
• 25:45
  Speaker 6: It's an interesting story. But then why does she tell
• 25:49
  Speaker 6: everybody at any chance that America is a terrible place?
• 25:52
  Speaker 9: She doesn't.
• 25:53
  Speaker 8: She does all the time.
• 25:54
  Speaker 6: No, she doesn't, Scott. And we'll roll the tape when
• 25:55
  Speaker 6: it's over. But the fact is she's here, and these
• 25:59
  Speaker 6: are legitimate questions raised by journalists at The New York
• 26:01
  Speaker 6: Times and raised by investigators in Barack Obama's administration.
• 26:06
  Speaker 2: And raised by Trump's DOJ within 30 days of the
• 26:07
  Speaker 2: election cycle.
• 26:11
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, he makes a great point there, right?
• 26:13
  Speaker 1: That's a tough one for them to fight back. If
• 26:16
  Speaker 1: the New York Times is doing it, well, that's their Bible, essentially,
• 26:20
  Speaker 1: the New York Times. So that's a toughie, a real toughie,
• 26:23
  Speaker 1: because they don't ever write anything that would damage Democrat narratives.
• 26:30
  Speaker 1: I mean, rarely does that happen. This is a very
• 26:33
  Speaker 1: anomalous case here. So it makes me wonder, because the
• 26:37
  Speaker 1: mainstream media... and leftist politicians across the Western world, I'm
• 26:42
  Speaker 1: talking about here, seem to just openly coordinate with each other, right?
• 26:46
  Speaker 1: I mean, I think there's evidence of the, certainly the
• 26:49
  Speaker 1: Obama administration coordinating with mainstream media. Certainly that's, you know,
• 26:58
  Speaker 1: there was definitely the appearance of that during Biden, for sure.
• 27:02
  Speaker 1: In Canada, it's the same. In the UK, it seems
• 27:05
  Speaker 1: to be the same. So, If they're writing a piece,
• 27:10
  Speaker 1: which they don't have to, because normally they wouldn't touch
• 27:13
  Speaker 1: something like this, but if the New York Times is
• 27:16
  Speaker 1: writing a piece about the Obama administration first launched a
• 27:19
  Speaker 1: probe into Omar's marriage, it makes me wonder. It makes
• 27:24
  Speaker 1: me wonder if the Democrats, the Democrat leadership, the establishment
• 27:28
  Speaker 1: has decided it's time to start getting rid, it's time
• 27:32
  Speaker 1: to start thinning the herd here, getting rid of the
• 27:35
  Speaker 1: socialists and just the outright communists like Bob Donnie. Makes
• 27:39
  Speaker 1: me wonder. What else did we have here? Eric Doherty.
• 27:46
  Speaker 1: Oh my God. President Trump just actually posted this. Let's
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: take a look. You're going to miss him when he's gone.
• 27:53
  Speaker 1: You really got to miss him when he's gone. Donald J. Trump.
• 27:56
  Speaker 1: Scam like, well, let's hold on. Uh, scam likely. It's
• 27:59
  Speaker 1: a likely scam call for a Boogadishu Somalia. Don't answer it.
• 28:04
  Speaker 1: Don't answer it. Oh dear. Uh, Scam likely, Mogadishu. Somalia,
• 28:12
  Speaker 1: he's the best man. He's the best man. There will
• 28:15
  Speaker 1: never be another president like this in our lifetimes. No,
• 28:18
  Speaker 1: there will not. I mean, maybe that's a good, maybe like, well,
• 28:21
  Speaker 1: there could only ever be one Donald Trump, right? So
• 28:26
  Speaker 1: trying to be like him, I don't think will work, right?
• 28:30
  Speaker 1: Maybe he was just what the United States and the
• 28:33
  Speaker 1: Western world needed at the time. And, you know, it's
• 28:36
  Speaker 1: not going to be emulated and it shouldn't be. I'm
• 28:41
  Speaker 1: talking about this stuff. I'm not talking about policy. I'm
• 28:43
  Speaker 1: talking about this stuff. And just to remind you of
• 28:48
  Speaker 1: who Ilhan Omar is, America the Beautiful posted this. So
• 28:53
  Speaker 1: this was after Charlie Kirk was murdered by a crazy leftist.
• 28:59
  Speaker 1: So just in case anybody was starting to feel a
• 29:00
  Speaker 1: bit sorry for her, let's take a listen here. Just
• 29:03
  Speaker 1: how nasty and vitriolic and immoral she is.
• 29:08
  Speaker 10: I just think it was the video where it called
• 29:11
  Speaker 10: him Dr. Frankenstein and said his monster shot him through
• 29:14
  Speaker 10: the neck. I mean, obviously, this is a person. And
• 29:16
  Speaker 10: looking at this, this is someone who was a husband
• 29:18
  Speaker 10: and a father. And in the days after his shocking death.
• 29:24
  Speaker 10: happened as a result of his views or happened as
• 29:27
  Speaker 10: a result as he was sharing his views publicly with people,
• 29:31
  Speaker 10: that people found it jarring to hear such criticism of
• 29:34
  Speaker 10: that in the immediate aftermath.
• 29:37
  Speaker 4: What I find jarring is that there are so many
• 29:40
  Speaker 4: people willing to excuse the most reprehensible things that he said,
• 29:45
  Speaker 4: that they agree with that.
• 29:46
  Speaker 1: Just lies. He didn't say, I've not seen one thing
• 29:49
  Speaker 1: that he said that was reprehensible. I've seen deceptively edited clips,
• 29:55
  Speaker 1: but that's it. I mean, this is how nasty this
• 29:58
  Speaker 1: woman is, right? This is what she brings to American
• 30:02
  Speaker 1: political discourse.
• 30:04
  Speaker 4: They're willing to have monuments for him, that they want
• 30:08
  Speaker 4: to create a day to honor him and that they
• 30:11
  Speaker 4: want to produce resolutions in the House of Congress honoring
• 30:16
  Speaker 4: his life and legacy.
• 30:18
  Speaker 1: Yes, because he was a good man, right? You can
• 30:21
  Speaker 1: lie about him. Again, you can play deceptively edited clips
• 30:24
  Speaker 1: all you like. He was a good man, and anybody
• 30:27
  Speaker 1: who's seen him in context can see that, can see
• 30:31
  Speaker 1: that he's simply being smeared by awful people like Ilhan Omar.
• 30:37
  Speaker 1: He was a good human being. He aspired to the
• 30:43
  Speaker 1: kind of goodness that Omar could not even imagine. She's nasty. Again,
• 30:49
  Speaker 1: this is her contribution to the political discourse in the
• 30:52
  Speaker 1: United States. This is her gratitude.
• 30:55
  Speaker 11: It is one thing to care about his life because
• 31:02
  Speaker 11: obviously so many people loved him, including his children and wife.
• 31:07
  Speaker 4: But I am not going to sit here and be sad.
• 31:12
  Speaker 4: judged for not wanting to honor any legacy this man
• 31:15
  Speaker 4: has left behind. That should be in the dustbin of history,
• 31:20
  Speaker 4: and we should hopefully move on and forget.
• 31:22
  Speaker 1: That's the way these people think. Just everybody who's not
• 31:26
  Speaker 1: them should be in the dustbin of history. Now, I
• 31:28
  Speaker 1: think she's just an opportunist. So just anybody who stands
• 31:32
  Speaker 1: in her way, stands in her way of power, should
• 31:35
  Speaker 1: be in the dustbin of history. Ottawa James says she
• 31:39
  Speaker 1: hates America. Yes, she does. That's just one of the
• 31:42
  Speaker 1: horrible things she said, right? I mean, what was the
• 31:45
  Speaker 1: clip about? She was talking about 9-11 too. Some people
• 31:49
  Speaker 1: did something. Just not a good person. I have no
• 31:55
  Speaker 1: pity for her whatsoever. No empathy whatsoever. And I don't
• 32:00
  Speaker 1: want anything, you know, like I don't want her to
• 32:02
  Speaker 1: get anything like what she would wish on her enemies.
• 32:06
  Speaker 1: I'm just saying she's a bad person. All right, based
• 32:11
  Speaker 1: on the things she's actually said, like that. G Flood says,
• 32:19
  Speaker 1: how you doing, G Flood? Celebrating murder and clutching pearls
• 32:22
  Speaker 1: about bad words. Yep, yep. All right, what are you
• 32:28
  Speaker 1: guys talking about? Let's see. Izzy says, that was a
• 32:34
  Speaker 1: great meme. The Omar one, it is pretty funny. Gotta
• 32:37
  Speaker 1: miss Trump. is he says, yeah, Trump will have his
• 32:39
  Speaker 1: own book in political history. Oh, yeah, there'll be lots
• 32:42
  Speaker 1: of books about Trump. Lots. He is a fascinating figure.
• 32:47
  Speaker 1: And then once, you know, once kind of time, once
• 32:51
  Speaker 1: his legacy is removed by time a little bit, given
• 32:56
  Speaker 1: a bit of distance by time, yeah, people will love
• 32:59
  Speaker 1: studying the Trump. In 50 years, 100 years, people will
• 33:02
  Speaker 1: love studying the Trump era, and they will laugh their
• 33:06
  Speaker 1: heads off while they're doing it. Let's see. What else
• 33:12
  Speaker 1: are you guys saying? Did I say hi to Ottawa James?
• 33:23
  Speaker 1: I did. I did. More applause, though. More applause. Let's see.
• 33:26
  Speaker 1: I wonder if I should try and do an ad read.
• 33:30
  Speaker 1: Let's see. What's going on? Is anything super fun for me?
• 33:32
  Speaker 11: Nah.
• 33:32
  Speaker 1: That's nothing.
• 33:33
  Speaker 5: Nothing.
• 33:35
  Speaker 11: All right.
• 33:37
  Speaker 1: Let's get on to the next thing, folks. So did
• 33:43
  Speaker 1: we want to, let's see, hold on. Yeah, I just
• 33:46
  Speaker 1: wanted to touch on this briefly. It's just an example
• 33:51
  Speaker 1: of the rot in mainstream media and how it truly
• 33:55
  Speaker 1: is no longer about informing the public. It is just,
• 34:00
  Speaker 1: it's propaganda. It's indoctrination at this point. And The journalists
• 34:04
  Speaker 1: themselves see themselves as propagandists. And they're angry when anybody
• 34:11
  Speaker 1: gets in the way of that. Now, when CBS News,
• 34:15
  Speaker 1: when Barry Weiss was named as new head of CBS News,
• 34:17
  Speaker 1: there was a lot of hand-wringing and pearl-clutching and freaking
• 34:21
  Speaker 1: out because even though she is hardly, I don't think
• 34:24
  Speaker 1: she's a conservative. I don't think she's ever really been.
• 34:27
  Speaker 1: She's not far right, that's for sure. But of course,
• 34:30
  Speaker 1: anybody who's not fully taken the woke Kool-Aid is, you know, Nazi, fascist, blah, blah, blah, blah.
• 34:37
  Speaker 1: So a lot of freaking out when she was given
• 34:39
  Speaker 1: that role. But she kept that position even so, because
• 34:47
  Speaker 1: I think that the cancel culture is not quite as
• 34:50
  Speaker 1: strong as it used to be. CBS News chief Barry
• 34:53
  Speaker 1: Weiss faced significant resistance from staff at the network's 9 a.m.
• 34:57
  Speaker 1: meeting this morning. while discussing the growing Alaska ballot scandal,
• 35:02
  Speaker 1: as she urged reporters to dig into the story, according
• 35:06
  Speaker 1: to sources at the media. So this is just, like,
• 35:09
  Speaker 1: it's in everybody's face, right? Like, they do not see
• 35:13
  Speaker 1: themselves as being objective. They don't want to be objective.
• 35:17
  Speaker 1: They want to be propagandists, right? They want to pursue power,
• 35:22
  Speaker 1: not truth. Let's see. Let's pull this up. Let's pull
• 35:27
  Speaker 1: this article up. I mean, it's not going to be
• 35:30
  Speaker 1: a big surprise to anybody, obviously. Let's see. Weiss addressed
• 35:38
  Speaker 1: the New York Times bombshell report at Thursday's network-wide morning meeting.
• 35:42
  Speaker 1: So this is the story of in Alaska where the
• 35:47
  Speaker 1: Democrats had actively searched out everybody with the name Dan
• 35:53
  Speaker 1: Sullivan and to then run him in the race, to
• 35:57
  Speaker 1: try and confuse voters, to basically try and cheat on election.
• 36:01
  Speaker 1: Whether or not it's actually illegal or not, it's very, very,
• 36:04
  Speaker 1: very dirty. It is a scandal. CBS News Editor-in-Chief Barry
• 36:12
  Speaker 1: Weiss faced a significant resistance, faced significant resistance from staff
• 36:18
  Speaker 1: at Thursday's 9 a.m. meeting about the growing Alaska ballot controversy.
• 36:23
  Speaker 1: This is a scandal, Weiss declared to staff. This is
• 36:27
  Speaker 1: from Network Insiders. According to multiple sources on the call,
• 36:33
  Speaker 1: several CBS news staffers pushed back at Weiss's enthusiasm over
• 36:38
  Speaker 1: the bombshell New York Times report alleging Democrats schemed to
• 36:42
  Speaker 1: find a Dan Sullivan to run against incumbent Republican Senator
• 36:47
  Speaker 1: Dan Sullivan in hopes of aiding Democratic opponent Mary Peltola. Very,
• 36:54
  Speaker 1: very dirty. In fact, let's see if we can just
• 36:57
  Speaker 1: watch this little clip here. It's Dan Sullivan. It turned
• 37:05
  Speaker 1: out it was a scheme by the Democrats. Hold on.
• 37:07
  Speaker 1: That's what they did. Dan Sullivan just ran against Dan Sullivan.
• 37:10
  Speaker 7: It turned out it was a scheme by the Democrats.
• 37:13
  Speaker 1: That's what they do best.
• 37:14
  Speaker 10: They cheat.
• 37:15
  Speaker 1: They have bad policy, but they cheat. It's true.
• 37:18
  Speaker 9: It's the sleaziest move of the election cycle for many
• 37:21
  Speaker 9: election cycles in my book. And now we know who's
• 37:23
  Speaker 9: behind it. The New York Times reporting that Donald Trump
• 37:27
  Speaker 9: was right. Democrats recruited a decoy, Dan Sullivan. This whole
• 37:31
  Speaker 9: thing started in 2025. Their effort was to trick Alaska
• 37:34
  Speaker 9: voters for voting for the wrong Dan Sullivan. And the
• 37:37
  Speaker 9: Papala Tola campaign was apparently caught red handed doing it,
• 37:41
  Speaker 9: even though they denied it. Fox News senior national correspondent
• 37:44
  Speaker 9: Kevin Cork is here with the details.
• 37:46
  Speaker 1: Kevin, the best you can.
• 37:47
  Speaker 6: This is a huge story.
• 37:49
  Speaker 1: What happened?
• 37:49
  Speaker 8: Just incredible.
• 37:50
  Speaker 7: You know what, Brian, in the hold your nose world
• 37:53
  Speaker 7: of political pugilism, this is one of, if not the
• 37:56
  Speaker 7: most malodorous, pungent, and downright putrid example of electoral chicanery
• 38:02
  Speaker 7: I have ever seen. And that's saying something. I've been
• 38:04
  Speaker 7: covering politics. An awful long time. And now the feds
• 38:07
  Speaker 7: are apparently taking a closer look at what the hell's
• 38:10
  Speaker 7: going on up in Alaska after new allegations that Democrat
• 38:14
  Speaker 7: Senate candidate Mary Peltola's campaign and National Democrats worked together
• 38:19
  Speaker 7: to recruit candidates in an effort to siphon votes from
• 38:22
  Speaker 7: the GOP incumbent, Dan Sullivan, in Alaska, including, by the way,
• 38:26
  Speaker 7: recruiting his namesake on the ballot. Peltola, of course, is
• 38:30
  Speaker 7: denying the Times report, which cites 12, count them, 12
• 38:34
  Speaker 7: sources and references text messages and other documents showing that
• 38:39
  Speaker 7: her campaign aides and the campaign's lawyers and, again, National
• 38:44
  Speaker 7: Democrats were all involved in pushing Daniel J. Sullivan to
• 38:49
  Speaker 7: run opposite the incumbent Daniel S.
• 38:51
  Speaker 12: Sullivan.
• 38:52
  Speaker 7: Charges, again, the campaign and the DSCC both denied. Now,
• 38:56
  Speaker 7: the report also comes just days after the DOJ sued
• 39:00
  Speaker 7: to block the Senate contest results from being certified if,
• 39:03
  Speaker 7: that's a big if, the incumbent loses, again, citing the
• 39:06
  Speaker 7: fact that there would be two Dan Sullivans on the ballot.
• 39:09
  Speaker 7: And in case you're wondering, no, this was not a
• 39:12
  Speaker 7: one-off effort. In fact, according to the Times, many of
• 39:15
  Speaker 7: the very operatives working in this effort have experience doing
• 39:20
  Speaker 7: exactly this sort of thing. In fact, in one example,
• 39:24
  Speaker 7: H from the campaign and others reportedly floated having a
• 39:27
  Speaker 7: so-called MAGA party in Africa. to, again, challenge Dan Sullivan,
• 39:31
  Speaker 7: the incumbent, from the right. They'll do anything, Brian, to win,
• 39:36
  Speaker 7: and that's borne out by the evidence here as the
• 39:38
  Speaker 7: investigation continues.
• 39:39
  Speaker 9: They had little confidence in Peltola head-to-head with Dan S. Sullivan,
• 39:44
  Speaker 9: the right one, so they got another one, and then
• 39:46
  Speaker 9: another candidate, to confuse the people of Alaska.
• 39:50
  Speaker 1: This is diabolical.
• 39:51
  Speaker 9: Kevin, thanks so much.
• 39:54
  Speaker 1: Well, I mean, the thing is, if you don't believe,
• 39:57
  Speaker 1: if you don't believe in, you know, the foundational principles
• 40:02
  Speaker 1: of your own country, right? I mean, you know, these are,
• 40:06
  Speaker 1: you know, half the Democrat party, apparently, you know, half
• 40:09
  Speaker 1: the Democrat party is apparently socialists now who want to,
• 40:12
  Speaker 1: you know, burn the constitution, right? Well, if you don't,
• 40:16
  Speaker 1: if you don't, if you don't even like your own civilization,
• 40:19
  Speaker 1: well then nothing's off the table, right? Nothing's, nothing's immoral.
• 40:23
  Speaker 1: You just, why, why even care? And, uh, I think
• 40:26
  Speaker 1: that's what you're seeing from these people from the left.
• 40:29
  Speaker 1: You know, the Democrats are not, you know, your father's
• 40:31
  Speaker 1: Democrat party anymore. Just the same way that the liberal
• 40:35
  Speaker 1: party is no longer a liberal party in Canada. Uh,
• 40:39
  Speaker 1: let's see. Uh, Hold on a second. Let's get rid
• 40:47
  Speaker 1: of that. Just wanted to hold on. Let's see. Okay.
• 40:58
  Speaker 1: Continue without supporting. All right. I'll get past this. Fuck it.
• 41:03
  Speaker 1: Let's just move on. I don't think we need anymore.
• 41:05
  Speaker 1: All right. What do we have? Oh, yeah. So this here,
• 41:08
  Speaker 1: this is a big deal. James O'Keefe. James O'Keefe on
• 41:12
  Speaker 1: the felony charges for exposing fraud in Minnesota. So this
• 41:17
  Speaker 1: is where he went to a polling station and where
• 41:21
  Speaker 1: apparently you're allowed to just vouch for people who don't. Oh, shit.
• 41:25
  Speaker 1: There we go. All right. So James O'Keefe on the
• 41:30
  Speaker 1: felony charges for exposing fraud in Minnesota. James O'Keefe. So
• 41:34
  Speaker 1: James O'Keefe was doing what James O'Keefe does, which is
• 41:37
  Speaker 1: real journalism, real investigative journalism. And, well, let's just watch. Now, obviously,
• 41:46
  Speaker 1: he's hated by the mainstream media because he does what
• 41:50
  Speaker 1: they're supposed to do, and it's embarrassing for them. But
• 41:54
  Speaker 1: here he is exposing electoral fraud, essentially electoral fraud. And
• 41:59
  Speaker 1: instead of going after the fraud, they go after him
• 42:03
  Speaker 1: for exposing it. This is very, very Stalin-esque. This is
• 42:08
  Speaker 1: very Soviet-ish. This is the sort of thing that happens in,
• 42:11
  Speaker 1: you know, banana republics. Let's take a look.
• 42:14
  Speaker 8: Minnesota has just charged both myself and fellow journalist Cam
• 42:18
  Speaker 8: Higby with two felony counts in retaliation for a bombshell
• 42:22
  Speaker 8: investigative report on voter vouching laws that we did August 11th.
• 42:26
  Speaker 8: We stand by our reporting. This is an attempt to
• 42:29
  Speaker 8: criminalize investigative journalism. The charges are an attempt to distract
• 42:33
  Speaker 8: from what we exposed as insecure elections in Minnesota. Now
• 42:37
  Speaker 8: this case has become a landmark First Amendment case where
• 42:41
  Speaker 8: everyone's right to speak truth to power has just been
• 42:45
  Speaker 8: put on the line. This from today's press conference featuring
• 42:48
  Speaker 8: the chief prosecutor for Hennepin County, Minnesota.
• 42:51
  Speaker 13: Today we are charging two individuals, James O'Keefe and Cameron Higbee,
• 42:57
  Speaker 13: with felony counts of unlawful voting and identity theft.
• 43:02
  Speaker 8: Mary Moriarty, the Hennepin County attorney, even says that we
• 43:05
  Speaker 8: could do jail time for our investigative reporting.
• 43:08
  Speaker 13: They could do some local jail time.
• 43:10
  Speaker 8: We've received a charging document that lists two felony counts.
• 43:14
  Speaker 8: Count one, identity theft, knowingly misrepresenting identity and applying for
• 43:19
  Speaker 8: a voting ballot. And count two, unlawful voting, knowingly misrepresenting
• 43:24
  Speaker 8: our identity and applying for a voting ballot. Two counts
• 43:27
  Speaker 8: with the exact same justification beneath each count. In the
• 43:30
  Speaker 8: report we did, we clearly stop and walk away before
• 43:34
  Speaker 8: any voting ballot is even touched. Thank you so much, ma'am.
• 43:37
  Speaker 1: I see you. Thank you.
• 43:38
  Speaker 8: You go get to Muhammad.
• 43:39
  Speaker 5: We come back.
• 43:40
  Speaker 8: Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty even admits that Mai and
• 43:44
  Speaker 8: Higby's intent was to act as reporters.
• 43:47
  Speaker 13: A group of people were attempting to cast doubt on
• 43:50
  Speaker 13: the state's vouching system. I think it's pretty clear they
• 43:53
  Speaker 13: did not intend to vote.
• 43:56
  Speaker 8: Hennepin County Attorney Moriarty even says there is no such
• 44:00
  Speaker 8: thing as undercover journalism when looking into election loopholes.
• 44:05
  Speaker 13: If you identify as a journalist, there is no such
• 44:08
  Speaker 13: thing as undercover investigation in the polling place. You have
• 44:12
  Speaker 13: to identify yourself as a journalist in the polling place,
• 44:15
  Speaker 13: which they did not do.
• 44:16
  Speaker 8: Wrong as a matter of constitutional law. The First Amendment
• 44:20
  Speaker 8: allows reporters to show up on election day and ask
• 44:23
  Speaker 8: questions in polling booths, but don't take my word for it.
• 44:27
  Speaker 8: Listen to former Attorney General of the United States, Eric Holder,
• 44:30
  Speaker 8: no friend of mine, talking about myself on an almost
• 44:34
  Speaker 8: identical investigation we did in Washington, D.C.
• 44:37
  Speaker 12: In 2012.
• 44:38
  Speaker 1: It was offered Holder's D.C.
• 44:40
  Speaker 8: Primary ballot to vote in that election.
• 44:42
  Speaker 13: Do you have an Eric Holder?
• 44:44
  Speaker 12: But I think what I drew from that video was
• 44:46
  Speaker 12: that that guy was very careful not to say he
• 44:50
  Speaker 12: was Eric Holder, not to actually get a ballot. He
• 44:53
  Speaker 12: didn't do the kinds of things that would have subjected
• 44:55
  Speaker 12: him to criminal.
• 44:57
  Speaker 8: The Minnesota prosecutor then says.
• 44:59
  Speaker 13: There's a difference between intent to vote and intent.
• 45:05
  Speaker 1: So, it seems like it's either one of those, the
• 45:08
  Speaker 1: process is the punishment things, because aside from all of
• 45:11
  Speaker 1: the time and the stress, it's very expensive to Defend
• 45:15
  Speaker 1: yourself from these kinds of charges. Or it's just she
• 45:19
  Speaker 1: is so confident in corruption and her ability to railroad
• 45:24
  Speaker 1: an innocent man that she's willing to go ahead with it.
• 45:29
  Speaker 13: And to apply for a ballot. The application of a
• 45:33
  Speaker 13: ballot in and of itself is a multi-step process. I
• 45:35
  Speaker 13: can't anticipate what their defense is. I'm sure we'll hear
• 45:38
  Speaker 13: from them.
• 45:39
  Speaker 8: Our defense is the shield of the First Amendment to
• 45:42
  Speaker 8: hold government accountable.
• 45:43
  Speaker 1: To the people.
• 45:44
  Speaker 8: We didn't apply for a ballot. We were there talking
• 45:47
  Speaker 8: to election clerks, posing hypotheticals. and getting answers so that
• 45:51
  Speaker 8: Americans could know what was happening in the elections. Many
• 45:54
  Speaker 8: people in the United States did not even know that
• 45:57
  Speaker 8: you could vouch for eight people, and this investigative report
• 46:00
  Speaker 8: educated them.
• 46:01
  Speaker 1: By the way, we.
• 46:02
  Speaker 8: Conducted training and specifically told each journalist never to sign
• 46:06
  Speaker 8: an affidavit, never to procure a ballot, never to apply
• 46:09
  Speaker 8: for a ballot, or even.
• 46:10
  Speaker 1: Being able to vouch for people who don't have ID,
• 46:13
  Speaker 1: never mind eight people, eight people, seems like an open
• 46:18
  Speaker 1: invitation to fraud, does it not? touch a ballot.
• 46:21
  Speaker 8: We even did exercises training our reporters to say the
• 46:25
  Speaker 8: name is rather than my name is.
• 46:28
  Speaker 14: But when you go in the ballot location, you cannot
• 46:30
  Speaker 14: say you are that person. So you guys are doing
• 46:32
  Speaker 14: this tomorrow. You cannot say you're them. You say, hey,
• 46:36
  Speaker 14: do you have whatever the name is?
• 46:38
  Speaker 15: Do you have this person?
• 46:40
  Speaker 1: It's a crime for you to say.
• 46:41
  Speaker 5: I am this person.
• 46:42
  Speaker 6: Hello, this is the vote.
• 46:44
  Speaker 8: The name is William.
• 46:46
  Speaker 14: The last name?
• 46:48
  Speaker 1: The last name is Shimizu.
• 46:50
  Speaker 8: We were very intentional about what we were there to do,
• 46:54
  Speaker 8: namely to inform the public. The prosecutor even says we
• 46:58
  Speaker 8: stopped short of signing any oath or carrying out any fraud.
• 47:02
  Speaker 13: Both men stopped short of signing the oath. we all
• 47:05
  Speaker 13: sign before receiving our ballot.
• 47:07
  Speaker 8: The reporters at the press conference even asked the prosecutor,
• 47:10
  Speaker 8: what exactly are we being prosecuted for?
• 47:13
  Speaker 2: Correct.
• 47:14
  Speaker 7: So what exactly are we being prosecuted for?
• 47:18
  Speaker 15: Well, it seems like at the very least, it's just intimidation.
• 47:33
  Speaker 1: To intimidate anybody from any independent journalist from doing investigative
• 47:41
  Speaker 1: journalists targeting them. Like you look at the Nick Shirley
• 47:44
  Speaker 1: law in California. And now this, right? It seems like
• 47:48
  Speaker 1: they want to make it very difficult. They want to
• 47:51
  Speaker 1: intimidate at the very least or criminalize, as in the
• 47:54
  Speaker 1: case of California, investigative journalism targeting them. Because it'll only
• 48:01
  Speaker 1: be applied one way, you know that.
• 48:04
  Speaker 8: What is this really about? Make no mistake, this is
• 48:07
  Speaker 8: about prosecuting the press. And this is not the first
• 48:10
  Speaker 8: time they have done this to me. In New Orleans, Louisiana,
• 48:13
  Speaker 8: they falsely accused me of a felony and later admitted
• 48:15
  Speaker 8: there was no felony.
• 48:16
  Speaker 1: The U.S.
• 48:17
  Speaker 8: Attorneys involved in that case eventually were disbarred. The federal
• 48:21
  Speaker 8: prosecutor was so furious about it, he even literally threw
• 48:24
  Speaker 8: my book at me.
• 48:26
  Speaker 15: You're a nasty little cowardly spud.
• 48:28
  Speaker 5: You are scum.
• 48:29
  Speaker 1: I recused. I recused.
• 48:31
  Speaker 11: Here.
• 48:31
  Speaker 1: I recused from your case.
• 48:33
  Speaker 8: Then there was the case when the FBI came a-knocking
• 48:36
  Speaker 8: at my house. To get into my cell phone, unlocking
• 48:44
  Speaker 8: my phone to get access to the contents of my
• 48:46
  Speaker 8: signal in order to intimidate me and to intimidate the
• 48:49
  Speaker 8: sources that come to me. It was such a landmark
• 48:52
  Speaker 8: First Amendment case that the American Civil Liberties Union filed amicus.
• 48:56
  Speaker 1: And the Reporters.
• 48:57
  Speaker 8: Committee for Freedom of the Press, even they came to
• 49:00
  Speaker 8: my defense. I've been to the Ninth Circuit Court of
• 49:03
  Speaker 8: Appeals challenging the constitutionality of Oregon's recording laws, got a
• 49:06
  Speaker 8: reversal there. Went up to the First Circuit Court of
• 49:09
  Speaker 8: Appeals in Massachusetts to challenge the constitutionality of the laws there.
• 49:13
  Speaker 8: We won a partial victory there. In another case I
• 49:16
  Speaker 8: won at directed verdict, the Shirley Teeter case, they had
• 49:19
  Speaker 8: six pro bono lawyers going after me. Federal judge pointed
• 49:24
  Speaker 8: that out and they ended up writing a check to me.
• 49:29
  Speaker 8: I have been sued so many times and had so
• 49:31
  Speaker 8: many criminal threats made against me that even the media
• 49:35
  Speaker 8: that hates me is forced to acknowledge that I have
• 49:39
  Speaker 8: established legal First Amendment precedent throughout the nation. We even
• 49:44
  Speaker 8: overturned a jury verdict against me in the D.C. Circuit
• 49:47
  Speaker 8: Court of Appeals last month before a panel of judges
• 49:51
  Speaker 8: appointed by Democrats. We convinced that panel to create a
• 49:55
  Speaker 8: new standard for undercover journalism across the board. It's now
• 49:58
  Speaker 8: called the O'Keefe Principle. The politics of fear... and weaponized
• 50:03
  Speaker 8: lawfare do not seem to work against me.
• 50:06
  Speaker 1: It never has.
• 50:07
  Speaker 8: Actually, it is always.
• 50:09
  Speaker 1: I mean, the guy really is fearless. And the vast
• 50:15
  Speaker 1: majority of people would have given up long ago. He's
• 50:18
  Speaker 1: been persecuted, a clearly politically motivated persecution for, well, forever,
• 50:23
  Speaker 1: since he started. Most people would have given up. You
• 50:27
  Speaker 1: got to admire it. Got to admire it. An enormous
• 50:31
  Speaker 1: amount of courage. All right. Let's move on. What do
• 50:38
  Speaker 1: we got here? Actually, hold on. Let's go back to
• 50:43
  Speaker 1: the chat for a second. Let's see. What are you
• 50:45
  Speaker 1: guys talking about? Uh... As he says, that's so slimy
• 51:13
  Speaker 1: and they got caught. It may actually see consequences for
• 51:15
  Speaker 1: a change. G flat says the vote is on the third.
• 51:23
  Speaker 1: We haven't done anything on the midterms yet. We haven't,
• 51:25
  Speaker 1: we need to, I guess we'll be live on the,
• 51:28
  Speaker 1: on the, during the, so I guess we'll be covering
• 51:29
  Speaker 1: the midterms on, on, on, on that night. Let's see. Yeah,
• 51:35
  Speaker 1: they're busted and lawyers will be facing court in Alaska,
• 51:38
  Speaker 1: not D.C., so may actually have consequences. Talking about the
• 51:43
  Speaker 1: Dan Sullivan, trying to find an additional, a new Dan
• 51:47
  Speaker 1: Sullivan they could put on the ballot to confuse voters.
• 51:49
  Speaker 1: And that's what Izzy was saying there about so slimy
• 51:53
  Speaker 1: as well. Izzy says, commies gonna commie. It's true. Ottawa
• 51:59
  Speaker 1: James says, liberals, Democrats, neither are good. Well, it's just every...
• 52:04
  Speaker 1: Every left wing party in the, in the West has been, uh,
• 52:07
  Speaker 1: parasitized by the mind virus, unfortunately. And they're very radically
• 52:12
  Speaker 1: different than they used to be. Uh, as he says, sadly,
• 52:18
  Speaker 1: liberals are worse than Democrats. Both are evil, but Canada
• 52:22
  Speaker 1: jumped off the cliff first. Uh, I don't see that
• 52:27
  Speaker 1: much difference. I gotta be honest. Let's say, uh, Izzy
• 52:34
  Speaker 1: says O'Keefe will have a chapter in history. G-Flood says
• 52:41
  Speaker 1: he never identified himself as anyone or asked for paperwork.
• 52:44
  Speaker 1: He handed it back unsigned. Let's see. We'll go down
• 52:49
  Speaker 1: as heroes in history, Izzy says. Nick Shirley rocks too.
• 52:52
  Speaker 1: Ottawa James says, yep. Well, it's amazing. See, the media
• 52:56
  Speaker 1: hates them because they're showing them up. It's embarrassing for
• 52:59
  Speaker 1: them when, you know, people can see, uh, Just regular people.
• 53:06
  Speaker 1: I mean, I wouldn't call James O'Keefe a regular person,
• 53:09
  Speaker 1: or Nick Shirley, actually, really. But, you know, independent media,
• 53:15
  Speaker 1: independent journalists doing their job in a high-profile way, it's
• 53:20
  Speaker 1: embarrassing for them because the question is, well, why did
• 53:23
  Speaker 1: they need to find this stuff out and you didn't?
• 53:25
  Speaker 1: You didn't even look. Let's see. What do you guys
• 53:33
  Speaker 1: think about the midterms, by the way? Let's see. It
• 53:36
  Speaker 1: sounds like the Republicans will probably lose the House, you know,
• 53:42
  Speaker 1: maybe by a slim margin, but it looks like that.
• 53:45
  Speaker 1: But the Senate is absolutely in question. That's still up
• 53:48
  Speaker 1: for grabs. Maybe we can get Grok to write songs
• 53:54
  Speaker 1: about the heroes in the story. Maybe we can one day. Oh,
• 54:01
  Speaker 1: what did we have here? All right, let's move on.
• 54:04
  Speaker 1: We're an hour in. My face is starting to hurt again.
• 54:07
  Speaker 1: So I don't know how much longer we're going to do.
• 54:09
  Speaker 1: But let's take a look at this. John Broussard. So
• 54:13
  Speaker 1: hold on. So John Broussard, member of parliament for Barrie
• 54:18
  Speaker 1: South Innisfil, chair of the Access to Information Privacy and
• 54:22
  Speaker 1: Ethics Committee. So conservative, conservative in Canada. Watch question period
• 54:28
  Speaker 1: October 27th, 2026. The government is not a family-run business.
• 54:33
  Speaker 1: What's he talking about? He's talking about Mark Carney's wife,
• 54:38
  Speaker 1: Diana Fox Carney, being handed $ 1. 2 billion in tax dollars. Well,
• 54:43
  Speaker 1: it's actually money that will have to be borrowed. Canada
• 54:46
  Speaker 1: doesn't have any cash handy. They don't have any spare cash.
• 54:49
  Speaker 1: So that will all have to be borrowed and interest
• 54:54
  Speaker 1: paid on that as well, by the way. So she's
• 54:57
  Speaker 1: not taking a fee to do it. She's not being
• 54:59
  Speaker 1: paid to do it. The prime minister's wife having her
• 55:03
  Speaker 1: mitts on $ 1. 2 billion feels like, well, it seems ripe
• 55:08
  Speaker 1: for conflict of interest, doesn't it? She'll know everything that
• 55:12
  Speaker 1: he's invested in, what his interests are. This seems like
• 55:16
  Speaker 1: a slap in the face of Canadians. It's almost like
• 55:19
  Speaker 1: rubbing it in, actually. Like, we have such control over
• 55:23
  Speaker 1: the media. We have such control over the narrative that
• 55:27
  Speaker 1: we can do anything. Even Trudeau wouldn't have done this.
• 55:31
  Speaker 1: I mean, this looks really bad, right? I mean, it's just,
• 55:36
  Speaker 1: it's such a perfect opportunity for Carney to enrich himself
• 55:40
  Speaker 1: and his friends in some way with this $ 1. 2 billion.
• 55:44
  Speaker 1: Of course, the mainstream media in Canada is completely, curiously,
• 55:51
  Speaker 1: incurious about this, as usual. Let's take a look.
• 55:56
  Speaker 15: Yesterday at the Fisheries and Oceans Committee, Liberals blocked a
• 55:59
  Speaker 15: motion to have the Prime Minister's wife, Diana Fox Carney,
• 56:02
  Speaker 15: appear to explain her appointment as Canada's new ocean envoy.
• 56:06
  Speaker 15: The request was straightforward. Explain her mandate, priorities, and how
• 56:09
  Speaker 15: she plans to oversee more than $ 1. 2 billion in taxpayer
• 56:14
  Speaker 15: funding tied to the role created by her husband, the
• 56:17
  Speaker 15: Prime Minister. If there's nothing to hide, why are the
• 56:20
  Speaker 15: Liberals preventing Mrs. Carney from appearing before the committee responsible
• 56:23
  Speaker 15: for fisheries and oceans and being accountable to Canadians for
• 56:27
  Speaker 15: this appointment and the taxpayer funds associated with it?
• 56:31
  Speaker 1: Because they have disdain for the Canadian people, I guess.
• 56:34
  Speaker 1: I guess that's why. They don't feel like they have to. Right?
• 56:39
  Speaker 1: Let's continue.
• 56:40
  Speaker 10: The Honourable Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans.
• 56:46
  Speaker 1: Mr.
• 56:47
  Speaker 2: Speaker, Madam Carney is an expert in climate policy, and
• 56:52
  Speaker 2: we thank her for stepping forward as Canada's ocean envoy.
• 56:58
  Speaker 1: She's also the prime minister's wife. And why is he
• 57:01
  Speaker 1: dressed like that? I mean, I keep calling the Liberals
• 57:04
  Speaker 1: a clown car party, but he's not. I guess he
• 57:09
  Speaker 1: wants to prove me right. Let's continue.
• 57:11
  Speaker 2: Conservatives are trying to score cheap political points, but we
• 57:16
  Speaker 2: are focused on the work. Our liberal government will protect
• 57:20
  Speaker 2: Canada's oceans and build our coastal economy.
• 57:25
  Speaker 1: She's not a climate expert. Ottawa James says climate experts, FFS.
• 57:30
  Speaker 1: And G-Flood says you mean true China. They call him
• 57:34
  Speaker 1: true China because he's half man, he's half vagina. It's
• 57:40
  Speaker 1: not nice. No, it's not nice. Nobody likes it. Nobody
• 57:43
  Speaker 1: likes it. Hold on a second. Let's find out, is
• 57:46
  Speaker 1: she a climate expert? Hold on a second. Let's do
• 57:49
  Speaker 1: a fact check. Hold on. Fact check!
• 57:54
  Speaker 5: Climate expert.
• 58:18
  Speaker 1: Well, let's see. She holds degrees in agricultural economics from
• 58:22
  Speaker 1: Oxford University and international relations from the University of Pennsylvania.
• 58:27
  Speaker 1: So not a climate expert then. I mean, she has
• 58:32
  Speaker 1: worked as an agricultural researcher in Africa. Not a climate
• 58:36
  Speaker 1: expert then. But, I mean, this is a liberal talking,
• 58:39
  Speaker 1: so what do you expect to happen when a liberal
• 58:44
  Speaker 1: party member in Canada speaks? Well, they just say things
• 58:47
  Speaker 1: like this.
• 58:49
  Speaker 12: The Honourable Member for Barrie South, Innisfil.
• 58:52
  Speaker 15: Diana Fox Carney has been given an official government role
• 58:55
  Speaker 15: that her husband, the Prime Minister, created, and she's been
• 58:58
  Speaker 15: given more than $ 1. 2 billion tax dollars to work with.
• 59:02
  Speaker 15: The government is not a family-run business. It's not the Sopranos,
• 59:06
  Speaker 15: but it's looking more and more like well-connected liberal insiders.
• 59:10
  Speaker 15: are taking care of themselves while the people they govern
• 59:13
  Speaker 15: over are suffering. If that's not the case, why not
• 59:17
  Speaker 15: allow Mrs. Carney to come to the committee responsible for
• 59:20
  Speaker 15: fisheries and oceans to explain her role and be accountable
• 59:23
  Speaker 15: to Canadians?
• 59:26
  Speaker 5: Mr.
• 59:27
  Speaker 16: Speaker, this is a particularly spurious attack coming from the
• 59:33
  Speaker 16: other side. Canada is a world leader in oceans protection
• 59:38
  Speaker 16: and oceans conservation.
• 59:40
  Speaker 1: So, for one thing, are we? Are we actually? If
• 59:44
  Speaker 1: we are, then why do we need to spend an
• 59:46
  Speaker 1: additional $ 1. 2 billion that we have to borrow?
• 59:51
  Speaker 7: Right?
• 59:53
  Speaker 1: Canada has $ 1. 4 trillion in debt. The deficit has been
• 59:59
  Speaker 1: doubled under Mark Carney from what Trudeau, of all people,
• 1:00:05
  Speaker 1: wanted to spend. I mean, we're going off a fiscal cliff,
• 1:00:08
  Speaker 1: to quote the former parliamentary budget officer. So why is
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 1: this necessary? It just seems like a slap in the
• 1:00:18
  Speaker 1: face for Canadians. And it's his wife. His wife, it
• 1:00:22
  Speaker 1: does not... look good to have the prime minister putting
• 1:00:27
  Speaker 1: his wife in charge of $ 1. 2 billion of taxpayer money.
• 1:00:32
  Speaker 1: It's actually just borrowed money that will have to be
• 1:00:35
  Speaker 1: paid back with interest. Ocean Envoy, of course, this is
• 1:00:40
  Speaker 1: all involved with green this and green that and climate,
• 1:00:42
  Speaker 1: which Mark Carney is deeply tied to financially. This stinks.
• 1:00:50
  Speaker 1: This stinks. Where's that money going? Who's it going to?
• 1:00:55
  Speaker 1: That's something we'd like to know because this seems very,
• 1:00:59
  Speaker 1: very suspicious to me. Let's let him finish here.
• 1:01:02
  Speaker 5: So we're working on whale population. We need $ 1.
• 1:01:05
  Speaker 14: 2 billion for that.
• 1:01:20
  Speaker 1: I just feel like there's other priorities in Canada right now, like,
• 1:01:24
  Speaker 1: I don't know, 4 million people using food banks and
• 1:01:28
  Speaker 1: housing and all of that, and people dying in emergency
• 1:01:31
  Speaker 1: rooms waiting to be seen, stuff like that.
• 1:01:34
  Speaker 16: We're world leaders in oceans protection, and we thank the
• 1:01:38
  Speaker 16: Prime Minister's wife for volunteering to spearhead our efforts.
• 1:01:42
  Speaker 1: Well, she volunteered. It's totally selfless. I mean, there is
• 1:01:45
  Speaker 1: a small matter of that $ 1. 2 billion that she's going
• 1:01:49
  Speaker 1: to be able to dole out to who? To who,
• 1:01:52
  Speaker 1: I wonder? Ah, so let's take a look. Minister Thompson
• 1:01:56
  Speaker 1: announces Ocean Envoy. Oh, a $ 1. 2 billion Ocean Envoy. We
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 1: can all just relax now. We can all relax. Everything's
• 1:02:06
  Speaker 1: well in hand. We've got our $ 1. 2 billion Ocean Envoy now.
• 1:02:11
  Speaker 1: and chair of our Ocean Conference. Wow. September 16, 2026.
• 1:02:18
  Speaker 1: Diana Fox Carney. That's Mark Carney's wife. Mark Carney's wife.
• 1:02:23
  Speaker 1: It just seems strange. She's a British-Canadian economist with experience
• 1:02:29
  Speaker 1: advising companies and investors. Advising companies and investors. navigating the
• 1:02:37
  Speaker 1: transition transition. And then, well, that reminds me of something
• 1:02:41
  Speaker 1: like global transition fund or something from Brookfield that there
• 1:02:44
  Speaker 1: was Mark Carney's, huh? To a more, uh, climate resilient economy. I, again,
• 1:02:51
  Speaker 1: this really stinks. This has a net zero finance all
• 1:02:56
  Speaker 1: over it, which we know that Mark Carney is deeply
• 1:02:59
  Speaker 1: tied to personally widely recognized for expertise in climate policy, uh,
• 1:03:06
  Speaker 1: Fox Carney has held leadership roles at prominent think tanks
• 1:03:09
  Speaker 1: and her work has spanned across Africa, Europe, and North America,
• 1:03:12
  Speaker 1: both in the private sector and in not-for-profit organizations. So what?
• 1:03:18
  Speaker 1: Why do we need to spend $ 1. 2 million? Why does
• 1:03:21
  Speaker 1: she need to be the one doling out the $ 1. 2 billion?
• 1:03:27
  Speaker 1: I think we have our suspicions, don't we, folks? quotes,
• 1:03:31
  Speaker 1: Canada has a strong, lasting relationship with oceans. I don't.
• 1:03:36
  Speaker 1: What is he? This is the entire Cardi government. Just platitudes.
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 1: These meaningless platitudes. I mean, how much time for all
• 1:03:45
  Speaker 1: the Canadians out there, how much time do you spend
• 1:03:47
  Speaker 1: pondering your relationship with oceans? All of them, by the way.
• 1:03:51
  Speaker 1: All the oceans. Which is your favorite ocean? Let's see.
• 1:04:00
  Speaker 1: Canada has an opportunity to showcase its leadership in ocean conservation,
• 1:04:04
  Speaker 1: sustainable fisheries, open science, and indigenous-led stewardship. Indigenous-led stewardship. Well,
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 1: I hope it's not this kind of indigenous-led stewardship. Unauthorized
• 1:04:15
  Speaker 1: landfill on Cowichan tribes. It's on the Vancouver Island Reserve.
• 1:04:18
  Speaker 1: Thought to be two decades in the making. Yeah, so...
• 1:04:24
  Speaker 1: And there's numerous cases of this where they just create
• 1:04:28
  Speaker 1: these big landfills they're not even landfills just these big
• 1:04:32
  Speaker 1: areas where they just dump garbage dump all their garbage
• 1:04:36
  Speaker 1: and uh you know what like you have chemicals leaking
• 1:04:38
  Speaker 1: into like nearby rivers and stuff ah let's see there
• 1:04:43
  Speaker 1: we go there's some stewardship for you there's some stewardship
• 1:04:47
  Speaker 1: for you and this isn't like this is not to
• 1:04:51
  Speaker 1: disparage indigenous people in canada uh Most of them don't
• 1:04:56
  Speaker 1: have any say in what happens in their communities, especially
• 1:04:59
  Speaker 1: if you have like hereditary chiefs. They don't have any
• 1:05:02
  Speaker 1: say in it. But this is the kind of stewardship
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 1: that we're seeing so far. So there you have it.
• 1:05:12
  Speaker 1: There's the stewardship. Thank goodness that stewardship is in place now.
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 1: Let's see. The position of ocean envoy and chair of
• 1:05:20
  Speaker 1: our ocean conference is volunteer and non-renumerated position. well, at
• 1:05:25
  Speaker 1: least directly, it's not directly remunerated, but again, the wife
• 1:05:31
  Speaker 1: of UN climate, UN net zero finance, sorry, the wife
• 1:05:38
  Speaker 1: of the UN, former UN net zero finance envoy, Mr.
• 1:05:43
  Speaker 1: Global Transition Fund, Mr. Net Zero Finance, the wife of him, well,
• 1:05:49
  Speaker 1: there might be some opportunities there, don't you think, to
• 1:05:52
  Speaker 1: be remunerated? That just might be. It's so obviously corrupt
• 1:06:00
  Speaker 1: or has such obvious potential for corruption. It's hard to
• 1:06:04
  Speaker 1: believe that Canada just will swallow this with all the
• 1:06:10
  Speaker 1: other currency slop. Another $ 1. 2 billion, folks. There you go.
• 1:06:18
  Speaker 1: Hard at work for you. Let's see. All right, I
• 1:06:25
  Speaker 1: think that's all we need on that one. What do
• 1:06:26
  Speaker 1: we have? Let's go back to the chat for a second.
• 1:06:28
  Speaker 1: I'm probably going to call it fairly soon because my
• 1:06:31
  Speaker 1: face is starting to hurt again from talking too much,
• 1:06:34
  Speaker 1: seeing as how there's a bone sticking out through my
• 1:06:36
  Speaker 1: fucking gums inside my mouth. God damn it. Izzy says,
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 1: focused on enriching themselves on the backs of generations of
• 1:06:49
  Speaker 1: future Canadians. I don't know what could be more obvious
• 1:06:51
  Speaker 1: at this point. Izzy is correct. Yes, he is correct.
• 1:06:57
  Speaker 1: Let's see. G-Flood says the diploma does not remove a
• 1:07:03
  Speaker 1: conflict of interest. Find another climatologist. Well, G-Flood is 100%
• 1:07:09
  Speaker 1: correct there. She's not even a climatologist. She said, apparently,
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 1: at best, she's an expert on climate policy. What kind?
• 1:07:21
  Speaker 1: Maybe the financialized kind that her husband specializes in. God
• 1:07:27
  Speaker 1: damn it. God damn it. Let's see. Rosie's got a link.
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 1: What's that link? It better be relevant, Rosie. I'm going
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 1: to go to the link, but it better goddamn be relevant.
• 1:07:39
  Speaker 1: What is this? If it's not, I'm going to be furious.
• 1:07:43
  Speaker 1: Rosie's got a link. I'm going to play it. I'm
• 1:07:44
  Speaker 1: going to trust her. I'm going to trust her with
• 1:07:46
  Speaker 1: this link. Let's take a look. Link Monkey, fetch me
• 1:07:51
  Speaker 1: my link. Okay, I'm liking this so far. Let's take
• 1:08:07
  Speaker 1: a look. Does it attack him? If it attacks him,
• 1:08:15
  Speaker 1: this is getting a huge applause.
• 1:08:20
  Speaker 17: There's still time for it to attack him.
• 1:08:32
  Speaker 1: Let's, you know, let's stay patient. What the hell is
• 1:08:45
  Speaker 1: going on? Wait a second. Now there's a giant... bird
• 1:08:50
  Speaker 1: was an albatross or something and then there's like uh
• 1:08:53
  Speaker 1: now there's a seal wait a second this is too
• 1:08:56
  Speaker 1: good to be true i think Okay, I'm not buying it.
• 1:09:17
  Speaker 1: I think this is another AI thing. Hold on. We're
• 1:09:19
  Speaker 1: going to check this out. I think this is some
• 1:09:24
  Speaker 1: more AI bullshit. That's what I think. Getting too old
• 1:09:28
  Speaker 1: for this shit. So what are you guys up to?
• 1:09:34
  Speaker 1: While we wait for the answer.
• 1:09:36
  Speaker 5: Hold on.
• 1:09:36
  Speaker 1: Wait a second. Here it comes.
• 1:09:39
  Speaker 5: Okay.
• 1:09:40
  Speaker 1: Hold on. Is it AI? Okay. All right, I'll bring
• 1:09:47
  Speaker 1: the screen back as soon as it answers. So anyway,
• 1:09:49
  Speaker 1: what are you guys doing this weekend? Yeah, no, I'm
• 1:09:51
  Speaker 1: just being chill. I'm going to watch some boxing tomorrow. Yeah,
• 1:09:53
  Speaker 1: I'm watching the Canelo Alvarez, Christian M. Billy fight tomorrow.
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 1: We're going to see how much Canelo Alvarez still has
• 1:10:00
  Speaker 1: left after, I don't know, what is it, like 69,
• 1:10:02
  Speaker 1: 70 fights now? Okay, let's go back to it. Let's see.
• 1:10:09
  Speaker 1: It is not AI. It is real footage. You could
• 1:10:12
  Speaker 1: have fooled me. You could have fooled me. I'm glad, though,
• 1:10:17
  Speaker 1: because that was fun and cool. And even though nobody
• 1:10:20
  Speaker 1: got attacked by those wild animals in the clip, it
• 1:10:23
  Speaker 1: was still fun. See, these days you can't trust anything.
• 1:10:27
  Speaker 1: Anything that seems too good to be true usually is.
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 1: So there's that.
• 1:10:34
  Speaker 12: All right.
• 1:10:38
  Speaker 1: What are you guys saying? Ottawa James says, Connie's wife
• 1:10:42
  Speaker 1: is a freakazoid. A freakazoid. A freakazoid. Yeah, she's kind
• 1:10:48
  Speaker 1: of a bit weird, isn't she? She's kind of skeletal, actually.
• 1:10:51
  Speaker 1: Let's see. Rosie says, raid Penguin Hunter 63. We'll do
• 1:10:55
  Speaker 1: that tonight when we leave. We're not going to be
• 1:10:57
  Speaker 1: going much longer. My face is starting to hurt. Izzy says,
• 1:11:03
  Speaker 1: the mind virus zombies won't see any of this. It
• 1:11:05
  Speaker 1: won't be in their new sources. And even if they
• 1:11:07
  Speaker 1: did see it, they wouldn't believe the obvious facts right
• 1:11:10
  Speaker 1: in front of their faces. Because they've been conditioned to
• 1:11:14
  Speaker 1: feel revulsion at reality. when confronted with reality. Wait, is
• 1:11:20
  Speaker 1: Noah on that joke, as he says? I think he
• 1:11:26
  Speaker 1: was right. Let's see. Let's see. Hold on a second.
• 1:11:43
  Speaker 1: G Flats, hold on a second. Hold on. G-Flood says,
• 1:11:48
  Speaker 1: I forgot. Canada only has one college graduate who studies environmentalism. Actually,
• 1:11:57
  Speaker 1: I'm surprised Carney didn't bring in a temporary foreign worker
• 1:12:01
  Speaker 1: to run that. But no, but he needs somebody that
• 1:12:03
  Speaker 1: he can trust to dole out the funds appropriately. Appropriately,
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 1: in quotes. Let's see. He needs somebody who knows what
• 1:12:15
  Speaker 1: the money's really for, I think. Uh, let's see. As
• 1:12:19
  Speaker 1: he says, volunteer to spend taxpayer money. Can I get 1.2
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 1: billion to spend? If I had it, I'd give it
• 1:12:26
  Speaker 1: to you. Uh, G flood says, because we all know
• 1:12:28
  Speaker 1: Canada is short on both college students and hippies. Yeah, it's, it's,
• 1:12:37
  Speaker 1: they're just rubbing our noses in it now. Let's see.
• 1:12:40
  Speaker 1: All right. Let's see. Can I do one more? before
• 1:12:49
  Speaker 1: I become so miserable. Rochelle Rempel-Garner posted this. Anyone looking
• 1:12:54
  Speaker 1: for an accountant job in Toronto? The continuing disaster, the
• 1:13:00
  Speaker 1: train wreck that is Canadian immigration, which is not under control.
• 1:13:04
  Speaker 1: It's not sustainable. It's not manageable. I just want to
• 1:13:07
  Speaker 1: quickly refer you back to this from the government's own website.
• 1:13:12
  Speaker 1: Temporary and permanent resident targets for 2026. These are just
• 1:13:16
  Speaker 1: their targets and I think it is fairly predictable that
• 1:13:21
  Speaker 1: they're going to overshoot that by a lot. So this is,
• 1:13:24
  Speaker 1: if you add these together, it's 765,000 people for 2026.
• 1:13:30
  Speaker 1: These are new people into the country, okay? Now, they
• 1:13:34
  Speaker 1: say here it's 49% fewer than last year's target for
• 1:13:37
  Speaker 1: new student arrivals. So what? When you have a massive,
• 1:13:42
  Speaker 1: totally ridiculous, reckless spike slowing it down, is not helping.
• 1:13:50
  Speaker 1: That's still hurting us. That's still causing more damage. These
• 1:13:54
  Speaker 1: are new student arrivals. It also doesn't include foreign students
• 1:14:01
  Speaker 1: that have renewed their applications or renewed their visas or whatever. 230,000
• 1:14:06
  Speaker 1: new temporary foreign arrivals. 230,000 new temporary worker arrivals. We
• 1:14:21
  Speaker 1: have too many already. We can't take more. Only 37%
• 1:14:25
  Speaker 1: fewer than last year's target. Again, this does not include
• 1:14:29
  Speaker 1: temporary workers who renew the contract or renew the agreement
• 1:14:36
  Speaker 1: with the Canadian government. So again, this is going off
• 1:14:41
  Speaker 1: the cliff at 100% instead of 110%. 380,000 new permanent residents.
• 1:14:49
  Speaker 1: When Trudeau took office, the average was between 200,000 and 250,000,
• 1:14:55
  Speaker 1: depending on the year. This is not sustainable. It's not
• 1:14:59
  Speaker 1: in control. This is still mass immigration. For some reason,
• 1:15:04
  Speaker 1: the mainstream media candidate never shows you this stuff, never
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 1: shows these numbers. Weird. Or never puts them in context,
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 1: which is really important if you're a corrupt news organization.
• 1:15:16
  Speaker 1: So Michelle Rempel-Garner asks, anyone looking for an accountant job
• 1:15:19
  Speaker 1: in Toronto? KPMG candidate in Toronto is claiming they cannot
• 1:15:24
  Speaker 1: find Canadian workers to fill 15 accounting jobs. Wow, do
• 1:15:29
  Speaker 1: you really think there aren't 15 out-of-work Canadian accountants in Toronto?
• 1:15:33
  Speaker 1: Mark Carney does. Yeah, it's pretty clear right now they're
• 1:15:37
  Speaker 1: not working for Canadians. Mark Carney is a self-described elitist globalist,
• 1:15:43
  Speaker 1: and he's acting like it. Not interested in you if
• 1:15:46
  Speaker 1: you're Canadian. KPMG is trying to hire 15 foreign accountants
• 1:15:51
  Speaker 1: in downtown Toronto at $ 80, 000 each. So at first it
• 1:15:56
  Speaker 1: was Canadians won't do low-paying jobs. Now they won't do
• 1:15:59
  Speaker 1: high-paying jobs either. It almost feels like their goals are
• 1:16:08
  Speaker 1: different than Canadians' goals. In four days, Mark Carney will
• 1:16:12
  Speaker 1: let corporations hire high-wage occupations from abroad without even trying
• 1:16:18
  Speaker 1: to hire a Canadian first. So that's something that's obviously
• 1:16:22
  Speaker 1: done willfully. That's obviously something that they've decided to do.
• 1:16:26
  Speaker 1: They've changed the legislation. They've changed the policy so that
• 1:16:33
  Speaker 1: for hype, they have changed the policy in Canada. The
• 1:16:37
  Speaker 1: government has changed the policy in Canada. So now companies
• 1:16:39
  Speaker 1: don't have to even pretend that they tried to hire
• 1:16:44
  Speaker 1: a Canadian first. Why would they do that? Why would,
• 1:16:49
  Speaker 1: you know, elbows up, a champion of Canada, super nationalist
• 1:16:54
  Speaker 1: Mark Carney do that? Because that's not something that somebody
• 1:16:57
  Speaker 1: that really loved their country or cared about the well-being
• 1:17:00
  Speaker 1: of Canadians would do. It's more like something like, I
• 1:17:03
  Speaker 1: don't know, what did Mark Carney say he was again?
• 1:17:06
  Speaker 1: Elitist globalist? Yeah, it's like something somebody like that would do.
• 1:17:11
  Speaker 1: Like some technocrat who sees everybody as just merely numbers
• 1:17:14
  Speaker 1: on a spreadsheet. Toronto's unemployment rate is sitting at 7%
• 1:17:18
  Speaker 1: with youth unemployment at 17%. KPMG should be hiring and
• 1:17:22
  Speaker 1: training Canadians, not getting a free pass if you bypass
• 1:17:26
  Speaker 1: local workers. There you go, 15 vacancies. All right. So
• 1:17:36
  Speaker 1: this is, yes, another Canadian MP. Conservative MP. It really
• 1:17:45
  Speaker 1: is remarkable. And it's only possible with the help of
• 1:17:51
  Speaker 1: the Canadian government. Sorry, it is only possible with the
• 1:17:55
  Speaker 1: help of the Canadian mainstream media, which is either outright
• 1:17:58
  Speaker 1: funded or subsidized by the Liberal Party of Canada, the
• 1:18:02
  Speaker 1: Canadian government. They're not incurious by accident. that's what they're
• 1:18:10
  Speaker 1: paid to be. So I think that's it. My face
• 1:18:16
  Speaker 1: is hurting you guys. Uh, I've come out tonight. I've
• 1:18:20
  Speaker 1: tried to do my best. I've worked as hard as
• 1:18:22
  Speaker 1: I can. I've done my best. Hope you guys appreciate it.
• 1:18:25
  Speaker 1: We got an hour and 20. So we've been doing
• 1:18:27
  Speaker 1: a little bit extra each night. I think we did
• 1:18:29
  Speaker 1: 45 minutes when I came back on Wednesday, which I
• 1:18:32
  Speaker 1: forgot to go and do, uh, do it right. Stringer games,
• 1:18:35
  Speaker 1: by the way, slinger games, but we'll do it next week. Uh,
• 1:18:39
  Speaker 1: Then we did an hour and then we did like
• 1:18:41
  Speaker 1: an hour 20 tonight. So I think that with the
• 1:18:44
  Speaker 1: next two nights off, I should be back to my
• 1:18:48
  Speaker 1: old self again on Monday. Hopefully, hopefully at least much better. Uh, yeah.
• 1:18:54
  Speaker 1: So to remind everyone, uh, because we no longer need
• 1:18:58
  Speaker 1: to fulfill any, you know, metrics, any minimums because the
• 1:19:04
  Speaker 1: rumble creator program is now gone. They just informed us yesterday.
• 1:19:09
  Speaker 1: It's gone. It's being replaced by the partner program, Rumble
• 1:19:12
  Speaker 1: Partner Program, which you just need to publish 10 things
• 1:19:16
  Speaker 1: in the last 30 days, which obviously we'll do very
• 1:19:19
  Speaker 1: quickly within a few days of the month. And the
• 1:19:22
  Speaker 1: rest of it doesn't matter. So there's no minimum amount
• 1:19:24
  Speaker 1: of premium streaming on Rumble. There's no unique chat, whatever.
• 1:19:30
  Speaker 1: It's a blessing. On one hand, from what I can
• 1:19:33
  Speaker 1: tell of the new program, which I've applied to and
• 1:19:35
  Speaker 1: I hope I get into, but what I've from what
• 1:19:37
  Speaker 1: I've seen from what they've shown so far, I don't
• 1:19:40
  Speaker 1: think it will in any way replace the greater program. So,
• 1:19:43
  Speaker 1: you know, with greater program, I was, again, I had
• 1:19:46
  Speaker 1: a hundred, 120, 150 bucks a month or something, not
• 1:19:49
  Speaker 1: life-changing money. It was really just more about the principle.
• 1:19:52
  Speaker 1: It was just a challenge that I wanted to see
• 1:19:54
  Speaker 1: if I could, and we did, we passed every single
• 1:19:56
  Speaker 1: month for 20 months. So that's something that I am, uh,
• 1:20:01
  Speaker 1: I'm pleased with. I'm glad we did that. And I
• 1:20:02
  Speaker 1: did that with your help. So thank you guys for that. Uh,
• 1:20:07
  Speaker 1: But I think that's just gone. But I can still
• 1:20:09
  Speaker 1: get money from Rumble Rants. My favorite way is through memberships,
• 1:20:14
  Speaker 1: gifted memberships. And there's the Rumble Wallet as well. And
• 1:20:19
  Speaker 1: maybe if I get into the new program, maybe there'll
• 1:20:23
  Speaker 1: be something in it that helps the channel grow or something.
• 1:20:25
  Speaker 1: I don't know. I don't really care. But I'm glad
• 1:20:29
  Speaker 1: that it ended because now I don't have to do
• 1:20:32
  Speaker 1: six nights a week. Because I had to do six
• 1:20:34
  Speaker 1: nights a week of streaming to stay in the program.
• 1:20:38
  Speaker 1: I don't need to do that anymore. So now we
• 1:20:39
  Speaker 1: can just kind of chill a little bit. And we're
• 1:20:41
  Speaker 1: going to do five nights a week. We're going to
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 1: do Monday to Friday. At some point, maybe we'll switch
• 1:20:45
  Speaker 1: it to Sunday to Thursday. But we're going to do
• 1:20:49
  Speaker 1: Monday to Friday. And I don't know if there's any
• 1:20:52
  Speaker 1: point in even doing Rumble Premium streams at this point.
• 1:20:55
  Speaker 1: Maybe instead of doing that, I'll just put out a
• 1:20:57
  Speaker 1: video or two, a clip video or two that's Rumble
• 1:21:01
  Speaker 1: Premium only.
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 14: Maybe.
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 1: I know, Rosie. I know. I'm not forgetting. All right.
• 1:21:08
  Speaker 1: But yeah, so the channel is changing and it's getting
• 1:21:10
  Speaker 1: a little more chill. And I actually, it's a weight
• 1:21:13
  Speaker 1: off my back, not having to be constantly checking those
• 1:21:17
  Speaker 1: metrics to see where I am. And it's worth it
• 1:21:20
  Speaker 1: for me. And maybe the partner program will end up
• 1:21:22
  Speaker 1: working out really great. Who knows? Maybe it'll be better.
• 1:21:25
  Speaker 1: I doubt it, but who cares? It's not like I'm
• 1:21:28
  Speaker 1: going to stop doing this, right? And I'm going to
• 1:21:33
  Speaker 1: beg you for your money. As well, constantly. It's going
• 1:21:36
  Speaker 1: to be an incessant thing. Pathetic, really pathetic. Shameless.