Latest / Financial Market Insights For Traders | Crystal Ball Markets / Election Cycles & Market Volatility — What History Reveals About Investor Behavior | Crystal Ball Markets

Transcript

Election Cycles & Market Volatility — What History Reveals About Investor Behavior | Crystal Ball Markets · Financial Market Insights For Traders | Crystal Ball Markets

• 0:00
  Hello and welcome to Financial Market Insights
• 0:02
  for Traders. I'm Sophia, and today we're exploring
• 0:05
  a topic that comes up every election cycle, but
• 0:08
  is often misunderstood. How elections impact
• 0:11
  financial markets. When election season arrives,
• 0:15
  financial headlines can become intense. We hear
• 0:18
  about polling numbers, political debates, proposed
• 0:21
  tax changes, government spending, trade policies,
• 0:25
  regulation, and international relations. At the
• 0:28
  same time, Markets are moving. Stock indexes
• 0:31
  may rise or fall. Bond yields can change. Currencies
• 0:35
  can become more volatile. Commodities can react
• 0:38
  to new policy expectations. And investors start
• 0:41
  asking a very important question. What does this
• 0:44
  election mean for my portfolio? The answer isn't
• 0:47
  always straightforward. An election doesn't automatically
• 0:50
  mean that markets will crash. It doesn't guarantee
• 0:53
  a rally either. In fact, one of the most important
• 0:56
  things to understand about elections and AMP
• 0:58
  Market volatility is that markets often respond
• 1:02
  more strongly to uncertainty and changing expectations
• 1:05
  than they do to the political result itself.
• 1:08
  So in today's episode, we'll look at why elections
• 1:10
  can move markets, how different asset classes
• 1:13
  respond, what history tells us about election
• 1:16
  -related volatility, and how traders and investors
• 1:19
  can think about political uncertainty without
• 1:21
  making decisions based purely on headlines. Let's
• 1:24
  get started. Why do elections affect financial
• 1:27
  markets? The first thing to understand is that
• 1:30
  financial markets are forward -looking. Investors
• 1:33
  aren't simply buying stocks based on what companies
• 1:35
  earned yesterday. They're trying to estimate
• 1:37
  what companies, economies and governments might
• 1:40
  look like months or years into the future. An
• 1:44
  election can change those expectations. Imagine,
• 1:47
  for example, that a candidate proposes a significant
• 1:50
  increase in corporate taxes. Investors may begin
• 1:53
  considering what that could mean for company
• 1:56
  earnings. If a company's tax bill rises, its
• 1:59
  future profits could potentially decline. Investors
• 2:02
  might then reassess what they're willing to pay
• 2:04
  for that company's shares. Now consider the opposite
• 2:07
  scenario. Suppose a candidate proposes corporate
• 2:10
  tax reductions, increased infrastructure spending,
• 2:13
  or incentives for investment. Investors might
• 2:16
  expect certain companies and industries to benefit.
• 2:20
  Construction companies could benefit from infrastructure
• 2:23
  spending. materials producers could see stronger
• 2:26
  demand. Defense companies could benefit from
• 2:28
  increased defense budgets. Meanwhile, companies
• 2:31
  exposed to higher taxes or tighter regulation
• 2:34
  could face greater uncertainty. This is why elections
• 2:38
  market volatility isn't simply about whether
• 2:40
  a candidate is popular or unpopular. It's about
• 2:44
  how political outcomes could change the economic
• 2:46
  environment. Elections create uncertainty. One
• 2:50
  of the biggest drivers of election -related volatility
• 2:52
  is uncertainty. Before an election, investors
• 2:56
  may not know who will win. Even if polling provides
• 2:59
  some indication, the final result can remain
• 3:02
  uncertain. And even after voters make their choice,
• 3:05
  there can be uncertainty about what happens next.
• 3:08
  Will the winning party control the legislature?
• 3:11
  Will proposed policies actually become law? How
• 3:15
  quickly can those policies be implemented? Could
• 3:17
  there be legal challenges? Will coalition negotiations
• 3:21
  delay government formation? All of these questions
• 3:24
  can affect financial expectations. As election
• 3:27
  day approaches, markets may react to polls, debates,
• 3:31
  campaign announcements, and unexpected political
• 3:34
  developments. A single headline can sometimes
• 3:36
  change the perceived probability of an election
• 3:39
  outcome. But here's the interesting part. Once
• 3:42
  the election result becomes clear, Volatility
• 3:45
  can actually decline because one major source
• 3:47
  of uncertainty has disappeared. That doesn't
• 3:50
  mean markets must rise. It means investors have
• 3:53
  more information. And that's a critical distinction.
• 3:56
  How elections affect stock markets. Let's take
• 3:59
  a closer look at equities. There are several
• 4:02
  major channels through which elections can affect
• 4:04
  stock prices. The first is tax policy. Changes
• 4:08
  to corporate taxation can directly influence
• 4:10
  earnings expectations. If investors expect companies
• 4:14
  to retain more of their profits, valuations may
• 4:17
  respond positively. If taxes are expected to
• 4:20
  increase, the opposite could happen. But tax
• 4:23
  policy doesn't exist in isolation. A tax cut
• 4:27
  might boost corporate earnings while also increasing
• 4:30
  government borrowing. That could potentially
• 4:32
  affect bond yields, inflation expectations, and
• 4:35
  interest rate expectations. The second major
• 4:38
  factor is government spending. Election campaigns
• 4:41
  often involve proposals for infrastructure, healthcare,
• 4:45
  defense, energy, technology, or social programs.
• 4:50
  Markets may therefore rotate between sectors
• 4:52
  as investors reassess which businesses could
• 4:55
  benefit. The third factor is regulation. Financial
• 4:58
  institutions, technology companies, healthcare
• 5:02
  businesses, energy producers, and other heavily
• 5:05
  regulated industries can be particularly sensitive
• 5:08
  to political changes. And then there's trade
• 5:11
  policy. Tariffs and trade agreements can affect
• 5:14
  companies that depend on international supply
• 5:16
  chains. Higher import costs can squeeze margins.
• 5:20
  Changes in export conditions can influence demand.
• 5:23
  Currency movements can amplify these effects.
• 5:26
  So when traders look at an election, they shouldn't
• 5:28
  simply ask, is this election bullish or bearish?
• 5:32
  A better question is, which policies could change,
• 5:35
  and which companies or sectors are most exposed
• 5:38
  to those changes? What happens to bond markets?
• 5:42
  Now let's move beyond stocks and talk about bonds.
• 5:45
  Government bond markets can be extremely sensitive
• 5:47
  to expectations about fiscal policy. Suppose
• 5:51
  investors believe a newly elected government
• 5:54
  will significantly increase spending without
• 5:56
  corresponding increases in revenue. That could
• 5:59
  mean larger budget deficits and potentially greater
• 6:03
  government borrowing. Bond investors may then
• 6:05
  reassess the supply of government debt. inflation
• 6:08
  expectations, and future interest rates. Government
• 6:11
  bond yields could respond. The IMF has highlighted
• 6:14
  the relationship between fiscal policy uncertainty
• 6:17
  and financial markets, including evidence that
• 6:20
  higher US fiscal policy uncertainty can be associated
• 6:23
  with higher sovereign borrowing spreads in other
• 6:26
  advanced and emerging economies. This matters
• 6:29
  because bond markets can influence the cost of
• 6:32
  borrowing throughout an economy. Mortgage rates,
• 6:34
  corporate borrowing costs and other financial
• 6:37
  conditions can all be affected by changes in
• 6:39
  government bond yields. So even if you're primarily
• 6:43
  a stock trader, understanding what happens in
• 6:45
  the bond market can provide useful context, elections
• 6:49
  and interest rate expectations. There's another
• 6:52
  important connection here, monetary policy. Central
• 6:55
  banks generally operate independently from elected
• 6:58
  governments, but government policy can still
• 7:01
  influence the economic conditions central banks
• 7:03
  have to respond to. Imagine an election produces
• 7:07
  expectations for substantial fiscal stimulus
• 7:09
  at a time when inflation is already elevated.
• 7:13
  Investors might conclude that additional government
• 7:15
  spending could keep demand strong and potentially
• 7:18
  contribute to inflationary pressure. That could
• 7:21
  influence expectations about interest rates.
• 7:24
  And interest rates matter enormously for financial
• 7:27
  markets. When rates rise, the present value of
• 7:30
  future corporate earnings can decline, which
• 7:33
  can put pressure on some equity valuations. When
• 7:36
  investors expect rates to fall, valuations can
• 7:39
  respond differently. This gives us an important
• 7:42
  chain to remember. Election outcome, fiscal policy
• 7:46
  expectations, inflation expectations, interest
• 7:49
  rate expectations, and ultimately asset valuations.
• 7:53
  The relationship isn't automatic, but it demonstrates
• 7:56
  how political developments can travel through
• 7:58
  the financial system. What about currency markets?
• 8:02
  Currency traders have another set of factors
• 8:04
  to consider. Foreign exchange markets are highly
• 8:07
  sensitive to interest rate expectations, economic
• 8:10
  growth, trade, and capital flows. An election
• 8:14
  that is expected to produce stronger fiscal expansion
• 8:16
  could change expectations about inflation and
• 8:19
  interest rates. That can influence the currency.
• 8:23
  Political instability can have the opposite effect
• 8:26
  if international investors become concerned about
• 8:28
  economic policy or institutional stability. This
• 8:32
  is particularly relevant in emerging markets.
• 8:35
  Research from the IMF examining 38 emerging market
• 8:38
  economies found that periods surrounding elections
• 8:40
  were associated with declining gross private
• 8:43
  capital inflows, with the impact becoming larger
• 8:46
  and more persistent when political uncertainty
• 8:48
  continued after the election. That highlights
• 8:51
  an important point. The impact of elections isn't
• 8:54
  necessarily limited to the election date. If
• 8:57
  uncertainty continues for weeks or months afterward,
• 9:01
  financial market effects can potentially continue
• 9:03
  as well. Elections and commodity markets. Let's
• 9:07
  also consider commodities. Energy markets can
• 9:10
  be particularly sensitive to elections because
• 9:12
  governments make decisions that affect oil and
• 9:15
  gas production, renewable energy, environmental
• 9:18
  regulations, energy infrastructure, and international
• 9:21
  relationships. A change in energy policy can
• 9:25
  influence expectations for future supply and
• 9:27
  demand. Gold is another asset that investors
• 9:30
  often watch during periods of uncertainty. Gold
• 9:34
  doesn't automatically rise during every election,
• 9:36
  but it can become more interesting to investors
• 9:38
  when concerns about inflation, currencies, geopolitical
• 9:42
  risk, or financial instability increase. Agricultural
• 9:46
  commodities can also be affected by government
• 9:48
  policy, particularly through subsidies, tariffs,
• 9:52
  and international trade agreements. So once again,
• 9:56
  the key lesson is that election -related policy
• 9:58
  can travel through several markets at once. Historical
• 10:02
  Patterns Explained Now let's talk about historical
• 10:05
  patterns explained through election cycles. This
• 10:08
  is where things become particularly interesting.
• 10:11
  Investors often search for historical patterns
• 10:14
  that might tell them what markets will do during
• 10:16
  an election year. For example, some analyses
• 10:20
  examine whether stocks tend to perform better
• 10:22
  under particular political parties or during
• 10:25
  specific parts of the presidential election cycle.
• 10:28
  But history needs to be interpreted carefully.
• 10:31
  The economy doesn't stop for an election. A presidential
• 10:34
  election can happen during a recession. It can
• 10:37
  happen during an economic boom. It can occur
• 10:40
  during a financial crisis, an inflation shock,
• 10:43
  or a technology -driven market rally. Consider
• 10:46
  the 2000 election. It occurred around the collapse
• 10:49
  of the dot -com bubble. Then consider the 2008
• 10:53
  election. That happened during the global financial
• 10:56
  crisis. The market movements associated with
• 10:59
  those periods cannot reasonably be explained
• 11:01
  by the election alone. Vanguard's analysis of
• 11:04
  U .S. presidential elections since 1972 has similarly
• 11:08
  found that election outcomes have generally had
• 11:10
  limited influence on long -term market returns.
• 11:13
  This is one of the most important lessons from
• 11:16
  historical patterns explained by market data.
• 11:19
  Correlation doesn't necessarily mean causation.
• 11:22
  If stocks rise during an election year, it doesn't
• 11:25
  automatically mean the election caused the rally.
• 11:28
  And if stocks fall, it doesn't necessarily mean
• 11:30
  the political outcome caused the decline. There
• 11:33
  may be a recession, an interest rate shock, a
• 11:37
  geopolitical crisis, or a change in corporate
• 11:39
  earnings happening at the same time. Does volatility
• 11:43
  increase around election day? Research does suggest
• 11:46
  that expected market volatility can change around
• 11:49
  elections. The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
• 11:52
  examined implied volatility around U .S. elections
• 11:55
  and found that the VIX has historically tended
• 11:57
  to decline after elections as uncertainty surrounding
• 12:01
  the immediate result disappears. Across presidential
• 12:04
  elections from 1988 through 2024, the average
• 12:07
  decline in the VIX from two days before to three
• 12:10
  days after the election was approximately 15%.
• 12:14
  That's a fascinating observation. It tells us
• 12:17
  something fundamental about markets. Markets
• 12:19
  don't necessarily fear bad news. They often fear
• 12:22
  uncertainty about what the news will be. Once
• 12:25
  investors know the result, they can begin incorporating
• 12:28
  that information into their forecasts. Of course,
• 12:32
  that doesn't always mean volatility immediately
• 12:34
  disappears. If the result is disputed, if no
• 12:37
  clear government can be formed, or if there are
• 12:40
  significant legal or constitutional questions,
• 12:43
  uncertainty can remain. So traders need to look
• 12:46
  at the quality and clarity of the election outcome,
• 12:49
  not just the headline result. Why markets can
• 12:52
  move in the opposite direction. Here's another
• 12:55
  common mistake investors make. They assume that
• 12:57
  if a particular candidate or political party
• 13:00
  wins, the market must move in the direction associated
• 13:03
  with that party's economic policies. But markets
• 13:06
  don't work that simply. Investors care about
• 13:09
  expectations. Let's say the market has spent
• 13:12
  six months expecting candidate A to win. Traders
• 13:15
  have already adjusted portfolios accordingly.
• 13:18
  Then candidate A wins exactly as expected. What
• 13:22
  happens? Possibly not much. The result was already
• 13:25
  priced in. Now imagine candidate B wins unexpectedly.
• 13:30
  Suddenly, investors have to reassess everything.
• 13:33
  Corporate earnings assumptions may change. Sector
• 13:37
  allocations may change. Bond yields may move.
• 13:40
  Currency expectations may shift. This is why
• 13:44
  unexpected outcomes can produce much larger market
• 13:47
  reactions. The difference between expectations
• 13:49
  and reality is often more important than the
• 13:52
  political label attached to the winner. Short
• 13:55
  -term traders versus long -term investors, election
• 13:58
  volatility also needs to be viewed through the
• 14:01
  lens of investment horizon. For short -term traders,
• 14:05
  election periods can provide significant catalysts.
• 14:08
  Polls, debates, policy announcements, and election
• 14:11
  results can create rapid price movements. A short
• 14:14
  -term trader may focus on volatility, liquidity,
• 14:18
  technical levels, and event risk. For a long
• 14:21
  -term investor, the perspective can be very different.
• 14:24
  A dramatic market move lasting several days may
• 14:27
  have relatively little impact on a diversified
• 14:30
  portfolio held for 10 or 20 years. Long -term
• 14:33
  returns are generally influenced by factors such
• 14:36
  as corporate earnings growth, productivity, economic
• 14:39
  expansion, innovation, demographics, and interest
• 14:43
  rates. This distinction is extremely important.
• 14:47
  The same election can be a major trading event
• 14:49
  for one person and a relatively small event in
• 14:52
  a long -term investment plan for another. How
• 14:55
  should traders and investors prepare? So, what
• 14:59
  should you actually do when an election approaches?
• 15:01
  First, avoid making decisions based solely on
• 15:04
  political headlines. Instead, identify the economic
• 15:08
  channels that matter. Ask yourself, what tax
• 15:12
  policies are being proposed? What spending changes
• 15:15
  are likely? Which sectors could benefit? Which
• 15:18
  industries could face additional regulation?
• 15:21
  Could trade policy change? Could fiscal policy
• 15:24
  influence inflation? Could interest rate expectations
• 15:27
  change? Is the election result already priced
• 15:30
  into markets? And what happens if the result
• 15:33
  is different from expectations? Risk management
• 15:36
  is also essential. Election periods can produce
• 15:39
  rapid price movements, so position sizing matters.
• 15:43
  Diversification matters. And having predefined
• 15:46
  risk parameters can help prevent emotional decisions
• 15:48
  when markets suddenly become volatile. Most importantly,
• 15:52
  don't treat historical election patterns as guaranteed
• 15:55
  trading signals. History provides context. It
• 15:59
  doesn't provide certainty. Using better tools
• 16:02
  and better information. Election analysis is
• 16:05
  most useful when it is combined with broader
• 16:07
  market research. Political developments are only
• 16:11
  one piece of the puzzle. Traders also need to
• 16:13
  monitor economic indicators, central bank policy,
• 16:17
  inflation, employment data, bond yields, currencies,
• 16:22
  commodities, corporate earnings, and market sentiment.
• 16:25
  If you're looking for a world -class, cutting
• 16:27
  -edge, user -friendly trading platform app, explore
• 16:31
  the Crystal Ball Markets trading platform at
• 16:33
  crystalballmarkets .com slash platform. The platform
• 16:37
  can be a useful destination for traders who want
• 16:40
  to engage more closely with financial markets
• 16:42
  and develop a structured approach to market analysis.
• 16:46
  Visit Crystal Ball Markets today and explore
• 16:48
  the trading platform for yourself. And if you're
• 16:51
  still developing your understanding of markets,
• 16:54
  don't underestimate the value of education. The
• 16:57
  Crystal Ball Markets podcast available at rss
• 17:00
  .com slash podcast slash Crystal Ball Markets
• 17:03
  provides beginner -friendly trading, investing,
• 17:06
  macro and financial markets podcasts, helping
• 17:09
  listeners understand complicated market concepts
• 17:12
  in a more accessible format. Listen to crystal
• 17:15
  ball markets on your next commute, workout or
• 17:18
  study session, and continue building your financial
• 17:20
  market knowledge one episode at a time. Final
• 17:23
  thoughts. So how do elections impact markets?
• 17:27
  The sure answer is that elections can influence
• 17:30
  markets by changing expectations about economic
• 17:33
  policy. Taxes can change. Government spending
• 17:36
  can change. Regulation can change. Trade policy
• 17:40
  can change. Those changes can influence inflation,
• 17:44
  interest rates, corporate earnings, bond yields,
• 17:47
  currencies, and commodities. But the most important
• 17:51
  lesson is that elections don't operate in a vacuum.
• 17:54
  Markets are constantly responding to multiple
• 17:57
  forces at the same time. That's why elections
• 18:00
  and AMP market volatility should be viewed as
• 18:03
  one component of a much bigger market framework.
• 18:06
  The election's market volatility story is ultimately
• 18:09
  about uncertainty, expectations, and repricing.
• 18:13
  And when we look at historical patterns explained
• 18:15
  through decades of market data, we find that
• 18:18
  election results alone don't reliably determine
• 18:21
  long -term investment returns. For short -term
• 18:24
  traders, elections can create important catalysts
• 18:27
  and volatility opportunities. For long -term
• 18:29
  investors, they may represent temporary uncertainty
• 18:32
  within a much longer investment journey. The
• 18:35
  goal isn't to predict every political outcome.
• 18:38
  The goal is to understand how political developments
• 18:40
  can affect economic expectations, recognize where
• 18:44
  the risks and opportunities may emerge, and make
• 18:47
  decisions based on evidence rather than emotion.
• 18:50
  I'm Sophia, and you've been listening to Financial
• 18:53
  Market Insights for Traders. Thanks for joining
• 18:55
  me for today's episode. If you found this discussion
• 18:58
  useful, continue learning, stay curious, and
• 19:01
  remember that successful market participation
• 19:04
  isn't just about knowing what happened today.
• 19:06
  It's about understanding the forces that could
• 19:08
  shape what happens next. Until next time, keep
• 19:12
  watching the markets, keep learning, and trade
• 19:15
  thoughtfully.