Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Do feminists always project? HBR Talk 292

Transcript

Do feminists always project? HBR Talk 292 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Hello, and welcome to HBr Talk two ninety two. Do feminists always project?
• 0:07
  I'm your host Hannah Wallen here with nonsense annihilator Lauren Brooks and the personification
• 0:12
  of perceptivity Mike Stevenson. Tonight we're diving into yet another feminine cesspool. This
• 0:20
  is this is gonna be a heck of a show, guys, our heck
• 0:23
  of a discussion at least, because this is a rough story and it's,
• 0:29
  uh, it's quite a quite a situation. So but first, before we
• 0:37
  get into that, we gotta do what we gotta do. As always,
• 0:41
  Honey Badger Radio dishes out a smorgasboard of thought provoking discussions, and as experiences
• 0:47
  both recent and long past have demonstrated, the provoked thoughts are fighting back.
• 0:53
  They've made it clear that for people like us, relying on third party payment
• 0:57
  platforms like Patreon to fund our work is treading on thin ice or building our
• 1:02
  house in the path of a rapidly growing wildfire. In light of this,
• 1:07
  we strongly encourage our supporters to switch at least their support for us to feed
• 1:11
  the Badger dot Com the most stable way to help us out, and if
• 1:15
  you want to tip us directly instead of relying on any social media platforms tip
• 1:19
  jar. The link for that is feed the Badger dot com slash just the
• 1:23
  tip And as always, the same risk applies to our social media platforms,
• 1:30
  which is why you should further provoke the thought police by tracking our thought provoking
• 1:34
  discussions on Honey Badger Brigade dot com, where you can find your way to
• 1:38
  all of our content, as well as a link to feed the Badger dot
• 1:42
  com in the drop down menu at the top of the page. So just
• 1:48
  just looking at this this this one's a little different in terms of, like,
• 1:53
  we don't usually just get into a news story and you go for article
• 2:00
  to article, but I'm going to do that tonight because at first glance,
• 2:04
  when I first saw there was a post about this on Facebook or on not
• 2:08
  Facebook, on Twitter, and it just looked like the the the woman in
• 2:15
  question had coincidentally posted on on this are we dating the same guide page?
• 2:24
  And uh, and there's actually quite a bit more than that going on here.
• 2:30
  So this is this is I originally saw a screenshot of this story and
• 2:38
  I had to research the headline and uh, the the author's name or the
• 2:46
  publication name one the other I can't remember which to actually find this story.
• 2:52
  So the police report says woman arrested over husband's murder appeared on are We Dating
• 2:58
  the Same Guide? Page? So for context, are we Dating the same
• 3:02
  guy? As a Facebook group? Uh? And in it, women who
• 3:09
  suspect they are being cheated on post the information of the guys they are dating
• 3:17
  on that page so that other women who suspect they're being cheated on might be
• 3:24
  able to find them on that page. So it is it's just a page
• 3:29
  that resulted in some guy getting muddered. Well it's not. It's it's it's
• 3:36
  worse than that. The page didn't result in it. But when you think
• 3:38
  about this, this is something Lauren brought up in the chat, So I'm
• 3:42
  gonna let Lauren go on this. But it's basically a database, even though
• 3:50
  it's a Facebook group, it's a database of cheating suspects, right, and
• 3:58
  just just just cheating sus So none of these guys are known for a fact
• 4:02
  to be cheating. It's women who suspect their male partner is cheating post their
• 4:11
  image on his page. That's it. That's that's the whole thing. To
• 4:16
  be clear, cheating is not illegal Okay, it's dirty, you know,
• 4:25
  but it's it's he's not breaking any law. He just he broke your little
• 4:30
  heart, you know. And as callous as that sounds, uh, look
• 4:36
  at what happens when this chick decides she wants to get revenge. Yeah,
• 4:43
  this guy ends up dead. Yeah. And then and then it gets worse.
• 4:47
  The whole thing, the whole story gets worse. So when women have
• 4:56
  multiple partners, they get stigmatized. But when men have multiple partners, they
• 5:01
  get murdered. Oh shit, Oh that goes the narrative. Yeah. I
• 5:06
  want to remind everybody back in the day and and this is this is old,
• 5:11
  Okay. A Voice for Men used to have a database of women whose
• 5:17
  allegations had been like, whose allegations to police had been deemed false by by
• 5:26
  either the police dropping the case or the woman dropping the case, or you
• 5:31
  know, the the court finding the guy innocent. The vexatious litigant from the
• 5:38
  seven Years in Hell story was on that database. I put her on that
• 5:41
  database, like, I did not see anything wrong with that. I don't
• 5:45
  think that maintaining a base database like that is necessarily a problem as long as
• 5:51
  there is some evidence like that where they've made an allegation to police and then
• 5:58
  they've you know, taken it back, or the police have said there's no
• 6:03
  evidence here, or the court has said, oh, that's not true,
• 6:11
  right, Because that's something that if a guy is, you know, convicted
• 6:16
  of an allegation, he goes on a list, and it doesn't matter if
• 6:23
  he goes to jail and he does his time and does his full time,
• 6:30
  gets out and is deemed rehabilitated, goes to therapy and is deemed rehabilitated,
• 6:38
  he's still on that list. That list is is not You don't get off
• 6:43
  that list by being no longer a criminal. You don't get off that list
• 6:47
  by graduating from the therapy that the state has for you to make you not
• 6:57
  a sex offender anymore. Right. So, if we're going to have that
• 7:02
  kind of lifelong condemnation for people, even though we demand that be they be
• 7:10
  capable of rehabilitation, uh, then then I don't see a problem with also
• 7:15
  tracking people who lie about somebody being that bad so that the next time they
• 7:24
  go to the police, the next time they try to file a case against
• 7:29
  another guy or even the same guy, you know, the cops have something
• 7:32
  they can look at and say, well, this this woman has lied about
• 7:35
  you know, four other guys, maybe we should question her a little harder
• 7:42
  than we would somebody else. Her credibility is lower than the standard, and
• 7:49
  I think that's fair. Same same thing as you know, if we're going
• 7:55
  to we're going to do that to sex offenders, why not fraudsters and why
• 8:01
  not have that Let's be public, right and you know what ends up happening.
• 8:05
  I came across this video on YouTube the other day. This guy goes
• 8:09
  to towns that have like interesting backstories, and so he went to this one
• 8:16
  town where like most, if not all, of the residents there were registered
• 8:22
  sex offenders. Some you know obviously did worse things and really didn't want to
• 8:28
  talk about it. But this is what this is what happens to them.
• 8:31
  You know, they have to go and live somewhere because they have this thing
• 8:37
  that they can't get rid of. You know, they can't get that monkey
• 8:39
  off their back. You know, this doesn't happen to women who lie about
• 8:46
  men. They get celebrated and applauded and you know, made excuses for by
• 8:52
  the other women around them, so you know, it makes them feel justified
• 8:56
  in what they do. And I want to point some other things out too.
• 9:00
  Being on a sex offender list, Uh, you don't just have your
• 9:03
  name on a list that is accessible to police and and authorities. People can
• 9:11
  find out like there's there's databases online that you can search to find out if
• 9:16
  there's a sex offender living in your neighborhood. There are some living in my
• 9:18
  neighborhood. Like I if I walked to the grocery store, I walked past
• 9:24
  a sex offender's house, and people generally warned about great sex in the neighborhood,
• 9:31
  especially if they're next door to them. What's really bad is I only
• 9:35
  know that I'm walking past the home of a misdemeanor sex offender. So I
• 9:39
  don't know if the guy flashed somebody, groped somebody, or got caught taken
• 9:46
  a leak after he uh got drunk one night and and decided to go in
• 9:50
  the alley behind the bar, and when when the bar was closed and he
• 9:54
  couldn't get back into their restroom. Because all three of these things are misdemeanors,
• 9:58
  and thing I I gotta I gotta make a comparison here, all right,
• 10:05
  right, misdemeanor if you get into a bar fight. Right, you
• 10:09
  go into a bar, you get too drunk and you slug somebody in the
• 10:13
  jaw and they hit you back, and it's definitely mutual. You don't damage
• 10:18
  anything. You just have this fight and somebody calls the cops, and by
• 10:22
  the time the cops get there, you're not fighting anymore. It's over.
• 10:26
  Nobody's gonna press charges against the other person. The cop will charge you with
• 10:31
  disorderly conduct because that's disorderly conduct, and uh, you will. You will
• 10:37
  be ordered to go to court. You don't actually go to jail for that.
• 10:43
  You just go to court unless you're still drunk, and then they might
• 10:46
  go drunk in disorderly But disorderly conduct is a misdemeanor, and if you get
• 10:52
  convicted, it still isn't permanent on your record. It's it's just you get
• 11:00
  you get a penalty, and then it just sort of drops after a period
• 11:05
  of time. But not if it's a sex offense, right, that stays
• 11:11
  on your record and you you go on that list and you you end up
• 11:18
  with people in your neighborhood knowing that you're on a sex offender list for a
• 11:26
  level of sex offense that could be a type of imposition on another person,
• 11:31
  or it could be something that nobody used to care about but now they do.
• 11:37
  Yeah, it's not good enough to shout law and order. Yes it
• 11:41
  should it should be just scream law and order as though it's good enough for
• 11:50
  law and order to be actually exacted on anything that we might call quote und
• 11:58
  quote equality. But more often than not, law and order is only exacted
• 12:07
  on those who the government wishes it to be exacted on, and it's completely
• 12:13
  ignored on the other side. Yeah, and this, yeah, this is
• 12:16
  this is why were this is why we do what we do. We we
• 12:20
  we try to uphold law and order. But if the law is only being
• 12:28
  upheld on one side, then it's not good enough. It's someone needs to
• 12:37
  be here to speak up for the people for whom law and order is not
• 12:39
  being enforced on the behalf of a how we however you rephrase that, so
• 12:52
  do not end up with a preposition. Well, but basically people who are
• 12:56
  not the beneficiaries of the enforcement of the law. Basically, Yeah, you
• 13:01
  know, when a man does something, it's enforced. When a woman does
• 13:05
  something, it's not always. And when a man does something and it's enforced,
• 13:09
  it's enforced. As much as it can be. When a woman does
• 13:13
  something, sometimes the man gets blamed, and often she doesn't. She doesn't
• 13:20
  get any kind of penalty, and nothing is done that would help him use
• 13:26
  the system that is set up for victims either. So there you go.
• 13:31
  We appreciate all of you who are lawful good, or lawful neutral, or
• 13:35
  even chaotic or lawful chaotic. That's chaotic good good. There's stuff you're missing
• 13:43
  out on, and that's sometimes the law is wrong. Sometimes the law is
• 13:48
  wrong. I know that's difficult to understand, but it is possible for the
• 13:54
  law to become chaotic or not even chaotic. It's just skewed in one particular
• 14:03
  direction, and that is men have to suffer for the sake of for the
• 14:09
  sake of women, and that at that point all of those uh D and
• 14:15
  D accumulations to make no sense whatever. Although and let's unletss you agree with
• 14:26
  certain interpretations of the law in which the women represent chaos and men represent order,
• 14:33
  and in that case you have to look into to what degree that those
• 14:39
  things are being imposed equally. And that's when we have to start talking about
• 14:46
  equality. I know, I know a lot of us are like Fluck.
• 14:48
  Equality it's a broken concept. But well, it's it's it's it's because the
• 15:01
  law and the and the politicians attempting to exact the law are themselves broken and
• 15:07
  none of this matters anymore. This is why we talk about men's rights versus
• 15:11
  women's rights, because when men's rights are broken and women's rights are iron clad,
• 15:20
  we have to go, Yeah, let's look into these things a little
• 15:24
  bit more deeply, because it's not just a lawful good and lawful evil.
• 15:33
  The system can be broken, and it is broken, and it has been
• 15:37
  broken for a long hour time. Yeah. The friend from northwest Ohio that
• 15:48
  I've talked about that was convicted of assault for stopping a woman's second attempt at
• 15:52
  stabbing him in the throat with a pencil was asked if he had anything to
• 15:58
  say to the court, and a judge threatened to hold him in contempt for
• 16:06
  saying the system was broken because a man could be convicted of a crime for
• 16:11
  stopping a woman from trying to kill him, and that hand, well,
• 16:18
  this that's a different guy. That's a different guy. And and actually that
• 16:23
  that's a sad story because after that situation, he completely lost his mind.
• 16:30
  Women have no hands, no women's hands aren't real, and if you say
• 16:36
  otherwise, it's misogyny. But yeah, if you if you want to go
• 16:40
  with like concepts of good and evil, people twist those. So I look
• 16:45
  at intentions instead, and I don't look at it in terms of moral judgments,
• 16:52
  good or evil. I look at it in terms of what whether you
• 16:57
  intend to do help to another person, whether your intentions are altruistic, whether
• 17:04
  you intend to do harm to another person so your intentions are malicious, whether
• 17:11
  your intention is just in regard to yourself without consideration or concern about others,
• 17:17
  So that's more selfishness. And I don't like the crossbar that. Like.
• 17:23
  The D and D concept is great for the game. It helps you decide
• 17:26
  your character's actions in the game, but a lot of comparisons to real life
• 17:33
  it gets screwed up because we really act on a three dimensional you'd have to
• 17:41
  have instead of just north south east and west, you'd have to have north
• 17:47
  south east, west, up and down and possibly some some other directions as
• 17:53
  well. Because you have that, you know, out from from altruism to
• 18:00
  malice, from I you know, like totally uh uh cooperative to totally selfish
• 18:11
  uh. And then you know, you also have between authoritarian and libertarian.
• 18:19
  So there's really six points of of contention between people where they're their moral outlook
• 18:27
  falls and you can't put that on a two dimensional graph. So you know,
• 18:36
  you know, for me, I'm I'm more much more libertarian, like
• 18:41
  to the point of being uh, you know, anarchist. So I guess
• 18:47
  it really would be from from uh communal to tow anarchist. I suppose from
• 18:53
  communal and and authoritarian to to uh anarchist. But but basically you see what
• 19:03
  I mean, it's it's a lot more complicated than you would want to try
• 19:07
  to keep track of in a game. You wouldn't want to spend your whole
• 19:11
  time in the game paying attention to just that. You'd never get to kill
• 19:18
  the dragon. You have to get pretty high level to even be able to
• 19:22
  fight dragons unless you go after Yeah, well some of them, some of
• 19:30
  them are good, so you know, if you fight them, you're you're
• 19:33
  nasty. But in any case, uh, when it comes down to law
• 19:41
  and law enforcement and the idea of equality, when you look at that spectrum,
• 19:48
  it it's easy for people to twist the meaning of the term equality.
• 19:53
  But for purposes of fairness within a civilization. There is only one thing that
• 20:00
  the government should be doing in regard to equality, and that is that the
• 20:06
  government shouldn't treat people differently depending on their demographic That's it. Not not trying
• 20:15
  to equalize things within society because people are born into different situations, not trying
• 20:22
  to write historical wrongs between groups of people, because there is not a single
• 20:27
  innocent group in the history of humankind, and there's not a single group in
• 20:33
  the history of humankind that is uniquely guilty. Right, there may be individuals
• 20:40
  who have done egregious things within different groups that are definitely more guilty than the
• 20:47
  rest of the individuals within their group or the group that they targeted at that
• 20:49
  time, and so on. But governments can't fix all of that by discriminating
• 20:59
  against people. So when feminists argue that women deserve a set of rights that
• 21:07
  comes at the expensive discriminating against men, now on the basis of allegations of
• 21:12
  historical discrimination against women by men, then what they're really arguing for isn't equality.
• 21:22
  It's revenge and right. And and here's the thing, right, why
• 21:29
  do we make fun of the hat Fields and the McCoy's. What's funny about
• 21:37
  a year's long feud in which multiple people died and the feud had to be
• 21:44
  ended by the execution of of, you know, individuals who were some of
• 21:52
  the last ones to make to commit crimes by the state. Right, what's
• 21:57
  funny about that, right? And the funny thing is the thing that people
• 22:00
  laugh about is the stupidity of getting revenge on someone who did nothing wrong because
• 22:10
  you're mad at somebody for something they did, and having that just continue back
• 22:15
  and forth and back and forth and back and forth for years and years.
• 22:21
  That's what people make fun of, Like you, idiot guy A did something
• 22:26
  stupid and wrong and you escalated, But you didn't just escalate. You escalated
• 22:32
  against somebody who wasn't involved just because they're related. And then they're escalating against
• 22:37
  somebody else who wasn't involved just because they're related to you. And that's essentially
• 22:41
  all of humanity doing that. With this discrimination within government, and so when
• 22:48
  we have laws that apply only to men, or that are enforced only against
• 22:56
  men, or mostly against men, or more against men than against women because
• 23:00
  of historical allegations of discrimination, what we are doing is turning our government into
• 23:07
  the hat fields and the McCoy's right using our government to turn men and women
• 23:11
  into the hat Fields and the McCoys, and so it is in this particular
• 23:22
  story. It is pertinent to the story in that when we look at the
• 23:29
  Facebook page that that's being talked about here, which we're not actually going to
• 23:33
  go to that Facebook page, because there are there, there's men's information published
• 23:37
  on that page, and it's not taken down, it's still there. But
• 23:42
  uh, and I'm not going to expose their information. I'm just going to
• 23:47
  talk about the page from what I've seen, and it's uh, women go
• 23:55
  there, it's all. It runs a lot like any other Facebook group where
• 23:57
  you're you know, your post bumped all the other posts before it down.
• 24:02
  But women will go there and they'll post a picture of the guy that that
• 24:07
  they're disparaging. They'll post his full name. Uh, they'll post his area
• 24:14
  of residence. They're not posting street addresses and stuff like that, but they
• 24:18
  are letting people know the the sphere of uh, social interaction where the guy
• 24:27
  might be dating and so on. And you might have multiple women post the
• 24:34
  same guy. You might not. You might have one woman post the guy
• 24:38
  and and then women just talk about him. And sometimes they're saying some some
• 24:42
  nasty shit about like nobody's gonna cheat on you with that guy because he's he
• 24:47
  looks like a piece of shit, or uh, you know, of course,
• 24:51
  of course guys that that do the kind of they'll they'll post what kind
• 24:55
  of job he does, they'll post that kind of course, this kind of
• 24:57
  profession. These guys cheat ah all the time, you know, or the
• 25:00
  guy's being arrogant, or who thinks he can get away with it because look
• 25:03
  at that car, you know, just totally unrelated, presuming him guilty and
• 25:11
  all that. It's it's a toxic, toxic place, just saying as much
• 25:18
  as I enjoy this emergent argument between the merits of democracy and the merits of
• 25:27
  monarchy, both both sides of this argument keep saying, well, at some
• 25:37
  point you might get a total tyrannical dictator who completely fucks up the country.
• 25:45
  And on both sides of this will say, well, at some point,
• 25:48
  you'll you'll you'll get you'll get a totally non non benevolent dictator who will ruin
• 25:57
  the country, and the democratists, if that's even a word, will say
• 26:06
  you can't have a monarchy because at some point you'll be under the thumb of
• 26:11
  a singular dictator, and demonarchists in the same breath will say, yeah,
• 26:19
  well, democracy will inevitably bring something even worse than a king, because a
• 26:30
  democratically elected government will will give itself license to do anything on account of they
• 26:37
  think they've been elected by the people, when really they haven't. We've seen
• 26:42
  more than enough evidence over the last few years that democracy can be even more
• 26:48
  corrupted than monarchy. And at the same time, yes, you can get
• 26:52
  a tyrannical king, and you kind of you kind of have to take that
• 26:56
  risk that you might get a benevolent king or a tyrannical king. But you're
• 27:02
  more likely to get a benevolent king than you are to get a benevolent democratically
• 27:08
  elected government. And that's very true. It seems the longer you you,
• 27:19
  the longer you will allow a democratic government to exist, the closer you get
• 27:26
  to the inevitability that you'll get a tyrannical government. And it's even greater risk
• 27:33
  than the idea of a monarchy. But in either case, if if you,
• 27:41
  if you let either a monarchistic government or a democratic government ah capitulate to
• 27:52
  the human nature of dare I say, kind of centrism. In either case
• 28:00
  likely to get someone who just doesn't doesn't give a shit about men's rights.
• 28:03
  And yes, I'm going to call it men's rights, because in either case
• 28:07
  it is the risk. Whether you're capitulating to human nature or democratic nature,
• 28:18
  you're likely to get someone who who just reverts back to their nature to protect
• 28:26
  women at the expense of men. And so in either case, someone needs
• 28:33
  to be there to say, hey, make sure you don't waste men's lives
• 28:38
  for the sake of women's protection. Like on either side of this argument,
• 28:42
  someone needs to be making this case. This is and this is why we
• 28:48
  make this case. Like I'm not sure which is better. Like I don't
• 28:53
  want to say we need a king or indeed an emperor who can do whatever
• 28:59
  they like, because there's a very good possibility that they will revert to their
• 29:03
  human nature to protect women at the expense of men. But it's it's not
• 29:10
  as though democracy is going to fix this problem. That's why I oppose all
• 29:14
  forms of government. Yeah, Like there isn't there isn't a form of government
• 29:18
  that lacks the flaw that it can become tyrannical when left unchecked by by the
• 29:29
  will of the people, and the will of the people can become tyrannical if
• 29:33
  a large number of people can be called conned into thinking of tyrannical ideas as
• 29:41
  benevolent and that has that has happened throughout history as well. So it's like
• 29:48
  it is a situation like this, like say there was no no authority in
• 29:55
  power, there was no law enforcement. It was just you. You protect
• 29:59
  yourself. Groups of people protect themselves, band together to protect themselves, and
• 30:03
  so on. It would be there would be no I'm not gonna say there
• 30:11
  would be no harm, but there would be no violation of anybody in having
• 30:18
  a site where people make allegations on the site, the site would have no
• 30:23
  credibility, and people who were on the site wouldn't be able to get in
• 30:30
  trouble for say, sabotaging it or maintaining a site of their own where they
• 30:34
  track the people who post to the other site. You would find out that
• 30:38
  people had equal capability of aiming their speech at each other in this manner.
• 30:48
  But in our situation in real life, in a world with governments where things
• 31:00
  that are considered bad when men do them under the law and by the people,
• 31:07
  upholding the policies that are written by agencies intending to enforce the law,
• 31:14
  like they don't see the same things as equally bad when women do them,
• 31:19
  because they're not viewed as an equal threat when women do them. Well,
• 31:23
  this woman kill the man, and she killed him for more than just her
• 31:33
  suspicion of cheating. There was some there was more wrong here than people realize.
• 31:40
  But before we go, we start reading the text of the story.
• 31:45
  I'm gonna there's two. There's a super chow I want to read from Meredith
• 31:48
  g She gave us five dollars and said, HBr talked two ninety two,
• 31:52
  Honey for the badgers. Do feminists project yes, give so many, exhibit
• 31:57
  what we can so it can be seen as aspects of NPD or narcissistic personality
• 32:02
  disorder. Projection is a given. And then Senior Stix gave us ten dollars
• 32:07
  in a super chat and said, the government will be fair when Western women
• 32:12
  collectively have to sign up for the draft and petition the government to do their
• 32:15
  job and stop screwing over the citizenship. Hannah and company. Yeah, that's
• 32:21
  the thing we keep having. People keep saying, Well, feminism just went
• 32:24
  overboard equality was achieved. No, equality has not been achieved. Feminists never
• 32:30
  fought for equality, okay. They looked at the spectrum of rights, obligations,
• 32:40
  limitations and restrictions and responsibilities that both sexes had, and they didn't like
• 32:50
  the limitations and restrictions that applied to women so that men could meet their obligations
• 32:55
  to women under the law and uphold their response disabilities for women under the law,
• 33:01
  and they demanded that those limitations and restrictions be lifted. They looked at
• 33:06
  the rights that men were given as a function of those responsibilities and those obligations.
• 33:12
  Yes, you have the right to do these things so that you can
• 33:15
  take care of your family, and they demanded those same rights without taking up
• 33:22
  the obligations that men are facing, that men have to meet in order to
• 33:30
  justify having those rights. And among those was men are under the obligation of
• 33:39
  their country to be prepared for their government to say we're going to yank you
• 33:45
  out of your whole life, your job, your family, all of your
• 33:51
  collective pastimes. If you've got a garden, well fuck it, you're not
• 33:53
  gonna be able to do anything about that now, right. If you've got
• 33:55
  a farm, you better hope somebody can take it over for you or it's
• 33:59
  going under, and then we're gonna send you overseas to fight in a foreign
• 34:04
  war. And if you die, well, sorry, you know not sorry,
• 34:08
  we might pay your family a little bit of money and you'll you'll have
• 34:12
  a nice headstone in a cemetery that people can look at and say, look
• 34:15
  at this great memorial to all the people who fought for our freedom by by
• 34:20
  killing people in another country who actually weren't coming here and attacking anybody. Right.
• 34:31
  That's that's basically men's men's obligation, and it is in trade for their
• 34:37
  voting rights. It is in trade for a whole host of things men had
• 34:45
  to Men had to in World War One, men had to fight in World
• 34:51
  War Two, men had to fight in order to expand those voting rights.
• 34:54
  And before feminists come out and say there's not a law that says men who
• 35:00
  don't sign up for the draft today can't vote, doesn't matter, because there
• 35:06
  have been multiple instances, even in the United States during history, where the
• 35:12
  government has said, okay, ethnic group A, you can win your people's
• 35:19
  right to vote by joining our country's war. They did it to Filipino men.
• 35:24
  They did it to Native American men. They did it to Chinese men
• 35:29
  right there. They've talked about doing it to immigrants, immigrants who have come
• 35:35
  across a southern border and are applying for amnesty now and before anybody goes those
• 35:40
  damn liberals repeat the same thing over and over again. It was Republicans who
• 35:45
  brought that up during the Obama administration. So this is this is not a
• 35:51
  one sided thing. Both both sides have done that. And yeah, equality
• 35:59
  has ever been achieved. Women have never been held equally accountable under the law
• 36:06
  in in Western law, women have not faced equal obligation to men under the
• 36:15
  law. Women are not viewed as equally culpable for their actions under the law.
• 36:22
  So uh and and women receive more compassion under the law as well.
• 36:28
  So if something somebody victimizes a woman versus victimizing a man, they will face
• 36:32
  a harsher punishment. And systems that are set up for victims to to help
• 36:37
  victims with financial problems or any other type of recovery from being a victim of
• 36:45
  a violent crime. Women are received benefits from those more than men do.
• 36:52
  They're more sympathetic to women. Poverty, in. It is another area are
• 36:57
  our system is set up to be more simple pathetic to women living in poverty
• 37:00
  than men living in poverty. So this is like even people who are looking
• 37:07
  from at feminism from the perspective that it was ever about equality, who say,
• 37:12
  well, equality was achieved and then feminism kept going. No, feminists
• 37:19
  never fought for equality. They only fought for advancement for women in ways that
• 37:25
  would continue the feminist grift. If you if you leave men to their own
• 37:34
  devices, they will defend their own homeland, no matter how big it is,
• 37:40
  no matter how small it is, whatever they consider to be their nation.
• 37:46
  They were fightful. It goes to show you that nations like Luxembourg and
• 37:54
  Lichtenstein and Andorra still exists. These micro names all across Europe still exists.
• 38:01
  Is a testament to the idea that it is perfectly possible for men to get
• 38:08
  together and defend their territory no matter how small it is. They can do
• 38:15
  it. Like even if Russia invades, they'll have to invade one nation and
• 38:22
  then another nation. But then when they come to a nation that exists on
• 38:25
  a mountaintop where they have the high ground, they'll they'll be able to defend
• 38:32
  it, and and and this is why so many micro nations have existed for
• 38:37
  so long. It it's a testament to how many micronations have existed for so
• 38:44
  long. We know we don't necessarily have to conglomerate into into one greater nation.
• 38:52
  And it's a testament that we don't need to become a globalist nation in
• 38:57
  order to in order to achieve peace. In fact, the more we try
• 39:01
  to to conglomerate into into a globalist nation, that the more will will descend
• 39:08
  into World War three, because because because nations will get together and and and
• 39:20
  and all be under the impression that that we can unite the world under one
• 39:25
  globalist government. And nothing could be further from the truth. Even if the
• 39:32
  world was one world government, there will still be fights among the regions of
• 39:38
  that government, but that they will all be murdered by these globalist governments.
• 39:53
  And and then the rest of the world will never know about it, because
• 39:58
  the first thing uh globalist powers control is the media. Yeah, and they'll
• 40:07
  and they'll suppress any information of how these what they call fascist nations needles needlessly
• 40:17
  pushing back on on on the struggle towards globalism. If you if you just
• 40:24
  let people be, if you just leave people to their own devices, they
• 40:30
  they can They're perfectly capable of handling their own localized communities. And I don't
• 40:38
  say this as some kind of nationalist, it's it's perfectly possible, possible for
• 40:47
  very small amounts of people to be independently in control of their own small amount
• 40:53
  of land. And and yes, that means it's pass for there to be
• 41:01
  there's only one hundred and ninety something nations at the moment, but yeah,
• 41:07
  if we break all that shit up, there could be thousands of different nations
• 41:10
  across the world. What exactly would be the problem with that? I mean,
• 41:15
  yeah, you all hate Russia because it's so massive, but if you
• 41:17
  break Russia up into a bunch of tiny nations, then they'll be fine,
• 41:22
  just as fine as all the tiny nations into which Europe has been broken up,
• 41:28
  all the tiny nations into which the USA has been broken up. We
• 41:31
  call them states. Yeah, and yeah, I guess the federal USA government
• 41:40
  is a lot more stable than the proposed federal government that the that we've some
• 41:49
  people like to call the EU. But that's that's not the same case at
• 41:53
  all, Because the Europe has has been a bunch of different nations for thousands
• 42:00
  of years at this point, and that's the reason the EU has not taken
• 42:04
  off as much as the federal United States has taken off. But they could.
• 42:07
  But even the US could could exist as independent states. All of these
• 42:16
  attempted conglomerates could exist as as as separate states, and that would not make
• 42:23
  war more likely. It would make war less likely because everyone is composed of
• 42:30
  smaller states. And yes, you could say that we'd be at the mercy
• 42:36
  of larger states. And this is why we're all in this case of uncertainty,
• 42:45
  because there are bigger nations. But the answer is not to conglomerate everything
• 42:52
  into one big state, because you're never going to conglomerate everything into one globalist
• 42:59
  state. It's China is always going to be there, certainly as long as
• 43:04
  it's under this particular thing. So if you if you, if you're gonna,
• 43:09
  if you're gonna do anything, it should be splitting up all of these
• 43:16
  conglomerate states into smaller states. That that would that would be far preferable to
• 43:23
  like I say, conglomerating everything into larger and larger states, because we we
• 43:30
  because that gets to the nineteen eighty four point where there's Oceania and East Asia
• 43:36
  and whatever the other one was. If there's nothing left but three massive states,
• 43:42
  then that's that's only going to involve a world war the likes of which
• 43:46
  you could not possibly imagine. Which not not only not only should we be
• 43:53
  breaking countries up into small all into smaller counties or whatever. That if everyone
• 44:07
  did that instantaneously, that would be the that would be the most efficient protection
• 44:16
  against world wars than they possibly could be. Well, you'd also you'd also
• 44:22
  have I say this about schools, all right. Nobody is more dedicated to
• 44:28
  your child's education than you are. No government, no neighbors, no nothing.
• 44:32
  Nobody is more dedicated to the overall education of the kids of a community
• 44:40
  than the local community, the businesses, the people who those kids are going
• 44:45
  to be serving as they get older and start their own businesses and so on.
• 44:50
  So when you federalize it, what you do is you put people who
• 44:53
  have less interest in the outcome of the people involved directly than their local community.
• 45:04
  Well, that's true with everything that government does. And but I'm going
• 45:08
  to cut that short because we'll never get to the story. And I do
• 45:12
  want to get to the story. The story itself is largely a result of
• 45:22
  a feminist narratives about men, and you know, it's this woman's behavior and
• 45:31
  who she is and what she is slipped through the cracks because of that.
• 45:37
  So something that is viewed as stalking and malicious and a warning sign a red
• 45:44
  flag when a man does it, didn't create a red flag, didn't lead
• 45:50
  to any you know, anybody saying, hey, you know something's wrong here
• 45:53
  when a woman did it. I will I will read. We have a
• 45:58
  super chow from Richard Bierre, who gave us five dollars and said, have
• 46:04
  you ever seen the Powerpuff Girls episode where they confront the feminist bank robber who
• 46:08
  demands that the bank handover only Susan b Anthony dollars and convinces the girls to
• 46:14
  keep letting her go because feminism slash whaman reasons. Miss Bellham sets them straight
• 46:19
  on the history, which leads the girls to bring the robber in. Yeah,
• 46:22
  I remember that episode, and yeah, I was kind of cheering for
• 46:27
  that. And we also got a super a rumble rant Nova fan twenty one
• 46:36
  gave us a dollar and said, I don't recall any wave of feminism ever
• 46:39
  saying we have enough equality, we can stop now. Was always more and
• 46:43
  more and more, and yeah that is true as well. So the Law
• 46:47
  Enforcement Today article police women arrested over husband's murder appeared on are We Dating the
• 46:53
  Same Guy? Page? And I have this because I want to point out
• 46:59
  about the entry. So this happened for Virginia Beach. Thirty old woman out
• 47:04
  of Virginia Beach was arrested in mid July after authorities said she fatally shot her
• 47:08
  husband following a domestic dismute dispute while the couple were in the midst of an
• 47:15
  ongoing divorce. Reports further show the suspect had recently posted about her now late
• 47:20
  husband in a Facebook group titled are we Dating the Same Guy? Mirror days
• 47:24
  before the killing, and then we end up with a description of the police
• 47:34
  experience there. It only took a couple It only took a couple of days
• 47:39
  for this whole thing to transpire. Yeah, only took a couple of days.
• 47:45
  And prior to that she hit him. According to the authorities, Wang
• 47:51
  and his wife. The guy's name was Calvin Wang. So Wang and his
• 47:57
  wife, Christina had allegedly gotten into some sort of herbal spat at the home
• 48:01
  on July fifteenth, during which Christina reportedly slapped Wang. Following the battery incident,
• 48:07
  Wang reportedly told Christina to leave the home, though police say Christina opted
• 48:12
  to retrieve a firearm instead and shoot her husband in the stomach in the head.
• 48:17
  So she got shot him and did she shoot him in the Wang?
• 48:23
  Sorry? Somebody, Well, she shot she shot the guy named Wang.
• 48:28
  Don't they keep saying Wang and expecting not to make his if you you know,
• 48:37
  if you really want to go there. But honestly that that was what
• 48:43
  she was obsessed with. Uh. Court documents assert the entire incident was caught
• 48:47
  on video, and Christina also allegedly confessed to the murder. So there's no
• 48:52
  doubt we're not talking about somebody who is might be guilty, but it might
• 49:00
  not be guilty. This is something that it's already known and proved. This
• 49:05
  is already but filing from the decedent's attorney regarding the divorce accused his wife of
• 49:13
  engaging in estromarital affairs, to which Christina's attorney at the time countered with a
• 49:16
  filing that claimed plaintiff has condoned defendants adulterous acts and thus plaintiff cannot use adultery
• 49:23
  as ground for divorce, which obviously he didn't. So that's that's real brief,
• 49:29
  right. Well, then you find out a man killed in Virginia Beach
• 49:36
  was an active duty sailor, and that this so we we look at this.
• 49:45
  We're looking at a story in which the wife is accusing the husband of
• 49:54
  cheating, but he filed divorce for her cheating, and she was cheating on
• 50:04
  an active duty soldier. He's a sailor, he's in the Navy. So
• 50:09
  officials with the US Navy confirmed Calvin Wang most recently served as chief Fire Controlman.
• 50:19
  They sent the following statement on Thursday. This news story is was published
• 50:28
  on July twentieth, so the Thursday prior to July twentieth, we're not watching
• 50:34
  the video all right. On July seventeenth, twenty twenty three, Chief Fire
• 50:40
  Controlman agus Calvin Wang, an active duty service member assigned to Surface Combat Systems
• 50:50
  Training Command, Detachment Middle Atlantic, was found deceased in Virginia Beach, Virginia.
• 50:55
  Our thoughts and prayers are with his family, friends, coworkers during this
• 50:59
  time. The loss is felt personally by the people who served with him and
• 51:04
  by our navy as a whole. Each sailor is a value, an invaluable
• 51:08
  part of our team. And he's sorely missed. Grief counseling services and support
• 51:12
  are available, and and and then it goes on to mention the police department,
• 51:21
  and and and that she is charged for his death. And then it
• 51:24
  mentions again, Uh, he had filed for divorce, he had cited his
• 51:30
  wife's affair with another man, and uh, paper papers, paperwork outlines conflicting
• 51:37
  accounts between attorneys. Christina's lawyer claims Calvin condoned the adults acts, which is
• 51:45
  a claim Calvin's lawyer denies. So what it sounds like is this woman is
• 51:51
  claiming claiming that they had an open marriage. She was allowed to sleep with
• 51:55
  another man, right, and then he filed for divorce, told her to
• 52:01
  get out, and she put him on are you are you? Are we
• 52:08
  dating the same guy? And then killed him. Does the story save whether
• 52:16
  or not she found out that he was cheating someone else or Nope, it's
• 52:22
  it's there's no nothing in the story that indicates that he actually did anything to
• 52:30
  anyone. So the progression of events is they were married, she cheated,
• 52:37
  he called her on it, he filed for divorce. She tells the court
• 52:46
  that they had an open relationship, that she he condoned her adultery, right,
• 52:53
  but he obviously didn't feel that way about it because he filed for divorce
• 53:00
  and cited adultery. So what is her excuse? Well, this headline Virginia
• 53:07
  Beach woman who admitted to killing her husband appears in court. Detective said she
• 53:14
  snapped. Mm hmm. She was so upset for apparently that he didn't condone
• 53:22
  her cheating, that she snapped in the heat of the moment of the however
• 53:30
  long it took for them to get from I do to her cheating, him
• 53:34
  filing for divorce and all this, uh, and at that that long,
• 53:39
  year's long moment, she snapped. When do you think about this story from
• 53:47
  a different perspective? Right? Imagine for a minute, imagine a marriage where
• 53:54
  the man is the one who was accused of cheating. The woman has filed
• 54:00
  for divorce on the grounds of adultery. He is telling the court, but
• 54:05
  we had an open marriage. I was allowed to sleep with other women.
• 54:08
  She was okay with it, And she's going, no, no, no,
• 54:12
  I wasn't your honor. I was not okay with that. He was
• 54:15
  cheating on me, right, and then he put her on a stalker page
• 54:21
  to let other guys know that she was his and they shouldn't touch her two
• 54:28
  days before killing her. Imagine what feminist would say about this story, just
• 54:31
  for a minute, if a man did this, if a man was that
• 54:37
  possessive after cheating, this would be bigger. This would be a bigger story
• 54:45
  than the all of the stuff that we've had thrown at us over the years.
• 54:51
  The Elliott Rogers story, the brock Turner story, the Steubenville story,
• 54:58
  all of the guys that are accused of quote unquote in cel killings, all
• 55:04
  of the incidents where they accuse husbands of having nefarious reasons for anything that they
• 55:13
  do to their wives. No, this, this guy would be the satan
• 55:19
  of men, right because he was obviously engaging in coercive control and then he
• 55:25
  killed her. And this is one of those situations where the same word snapped
• 55:34
  would be incriminating if a man did it, but an excuse a woman did
• 55:39
  it snapped he just snaps and killed her. Well, he doesn't get to
• 55:45
  snap and kill her. But if a woman does it, well, she
• 55:50
  just she just snapped. Well, when a woman does it, what they
• 55:53
  do is they make a TV series name Snap. It's called Snap, and
• 56:00
  it's all about when women just snap and kill someone. So that's what they
• 56:06
  that's what we do when when women do it, we put them on TV
• 56:12
  and make them famous. Yeah. Yeah, and and and at excuse everything
• 56:21
  they did too. Mm hmm. Well, well this is how it happened.
• 56:27
  And she was so stressed and the single mother of three, you know
• 56:30
  what I mean, it's it's always the woe is me. Sometimes you'll get
• 56:37
  one that's actually just you know, really psycho and they don't even try to
• 56:40
  hide it, but you know, just God, the disparity of of how
• 56:49
  we treat men versus women when they do these things is it's glaringly obvious.
• 56:57
  Yep. So now we have a little to add here, the bit about
• 57:02
  her snapping, And before we get there, I'm gonna I'm gonna look at
• 57:06
  a little more in this story. So it says Christina Wang's attorney, Roger
• 57:09
  Whitish, said she struggles with her mental health and snapped on July fifteenth,
• 57:16
  Which, again, let's consider that from another perspective. If we were told
• 57:24
  the demand with mental health struggles again, had made a possessive claim of ownership
• 57:32
  of his wife on a site that existed specifically for that purpose, because that
• 57:39
  is what are we dating the same guy? Is? Right? That would
• 57:45
  be a red flag right there. That would be considered a red flag,
• 57:51
  and people would be talking about how that red flag was overlooked. Let's see,
• 58:00
  they had two kids, by the way, so a six year old
• 58:04
  and oh okay, no, I thought they had a two year old and
• 58:07
  a six year old, but it's the two have a six year old son
• 58:09
  together. I read that wrong. So they have a child. There's a
• 58:13
  six year old kid, little boy who is out both parents now because his
• 58:19
  mom killed his father. But viewers sent thirteen news Now screenshots of Facebook posts
• 58:30
  written by Christina Wang. She wrote them on a local private group called are
• 58:35
  We Dating the Same Guy? Which, by the way, they they did
• 58:37
  figure out my alt Facebook alt was me and kicked me out a while back
• 58:46
  after I mentioned several of the posts and everything. They like, they id'd
• 58:55
  the I hadn't posted anybody in there. I was just end the groom and
• 59:00
  they're like, well, you know this, this obviously the mole. So
• 59:05
  they're paying attention guys. But anyway, she posted a photo of his dating
• 59:10
  app profile. So she was mad because, all right, the relationship's over.
• 59:15
  He has told her the relationships over. They are getting divorced. He
• 59:20
  has a dating app profile, and she posted that dating app profile and alerted
• 59:24
  other women he's married. Imagine again from from a feminist perspective, is a
• 59:34
  guy in the midst of a divorce whose wife is leaving him for cheating allowed
• 59:40
  to say to other guys, hands off, she's married. So the night
• 59:50
  before she shot him, she went back to his home after posting on Facebook
• 1:00:00
  you know that he was cheating on her by by having a dating app in
• 1:00:06
  the midst of their divorce. She went to his home with a peace offering.
• 1:00:09
  They were obviously separated, but the two began arguing about Calvin using that
• 1:00:15
  dating app. She admitted to slapping him, knocking his glasses off. So
• 1:00:20
  she didn't just slap him, She bitch slapped him. When he told her
• 1:00:23
  to leave, she shot him, and she gut shot him, and then
• 1:00:30
  after he fell to the ground in pain, then she shot him in the
• 1:00:34
  head. And I can't begin to emphasize how cruel it is to shoot somebody
• 1:00:39
  in the gut, even even just a moment of the level you've been punched
• 1:00:47
  in the gut. Everybody has been had something happened from a gunshot. It
• 1:00:53
  is the slowest, most painful way to die. Like anybody who's ever had
• 1:00:59
  the flu where you get cramping diarrhea should understand how painful, even even if
• 1:01:05
  that's not what kills you. Even if you get shot in the head a
• 1:01:07
  moment later, even if you die a moment later from something else, that
• 1:01:12
  you're going to die in pain. That is torture, Like that's your body
• 1:01:17
  has very sensitive, very loud nerves in that area because of the vulnerability of
• 1:01:28
  those organs that are in that area, because of the stomach acids. Yeah,
• 1:01:34
  because of the stomach acids. Yeah, God, but I mean getting
• 1:01:39
  having something puncture anywhere in your gut, besides being incredibly dangerous, is very
• 1:01:47
  painful. Appendix appendicitis pain can be crippling to where the person will have to
• 1:01:53
  be lifted and carried in order to get them into the hospital. When when
• 1:01:59
  my uncle's appendix burst, my dad carried him into the hospital. He couldn't
• 1:02:04
  get he couldn't get anywhere. He had to be carried out to the car,
• 1:02:08
  and he had to be carried into the hospital because his body wouldn't let
• 1:02:12
  him move his legs. It was too painful. He couldn't do it,
• 1:02:19
  and there's a reason for that. It's life threatening if you have an injury
• 1:02:24
  like that and you ignore it because you don't feel that level of pain or
• 1:02:30
  you don't think it's that bad. My husband has neuropathy, and in twenty
• 1:02:38
  twenty two, like when I talk about like the last three years have been
• 1:02:44
  a shit show in terms of every time I get done with an emergency,
• 1:02:50
  another one presents itself. I'm not kidding. So he had appendicitis and didn't
• 1:02:55
  know it because of the neuropathy, and it created a very danger your situation.
• 1:03:00
  He could not feel the level of pain he should have felt in that
• 1:03:02
  situation. So he went to work for three weeks with an infected and swelling
• 1:03:14
  appendix and it burst. And because the pain wasn't anywhere near approaching how bad
• 1:03:22
  it should have been for a burst appendix, he thought he just had some
• 1:03:27
  indigestion and it necritized and it wrapped around the intestine, and it necritized part
• 1:03:36
  of the intestine. It killed part of the intestine and it caused an illness
• 1:03:43
  called paronitis, which means you have an infection in your gut, your whole
• 1:03:46
  gut, the whole the area around all of the organs in your gut,
• 1:03:52
  and ended up having to have an extensive five hour surgery to remove little bits.
• 1:04:00
  The worst part is I was familiar with this because of what happened to
• 1:04:01
  my uncle. Was worse with my uncle because he he had to have his
• 1:04:05
  whole stomach removed, where my husband had a little bit of every organ removed.
• 1:04:13
  My uncle spent the rest of his life with his esophagus directly attached to
• 1:04:17
  the small intestine, so he ate like a bariatric patient and he couldn't eat
• 1:04:24
  and drink at the same time and had pain for the rest of his life
• 1:04:27
  from this, and it's terrible pain. And the reason I understand about gut
• 1:04:30
  pain is because of my uncle's experience, and this is the uncle that had
• 1:04:39
  that struggled with drug addiction also for the rest of his life. Well,
• 1:04:43
  he was in pain for his whole life and it was severe pain. It
• 1:04:47
  wasn't like, well, you can learn to live with this. It was
• 1:04:51
  like being punched in the gut over and over again, all day, every
• 1:04:55
  day for the rest of your life. And so on one hand, it's
• 1:05:00
  a blessing that my husband didn't feel everything that happened to him. But on
• 1:05:03
  the other hand, everything that happened to him happened because he couldn't feel it,
• 1:05:09
  and it almost killed him. So I almost lost my husband in twenty
• 1:05:12
  twenty two. That was again, you know, to explain why it's so
• 1:05:21
  painful. Your body needs you to have that level of pain if you have
• 1:05:27
  a gut injury. Your body needs you to feel like a deathly fear,
• 1:05:32
  a sense of dread and suffering and seek help immediately when there's that kind of
• 1:05:40
  injury to your gut. And that's what she did. She shot him where
• 1:05:44
  it was going to be the most painful place to be shot, the scariest,
• 1:05:48
  and the emotional suffering that he would have, and if he had survived,
• 1:05:56
  he would have been at risk for paronitis and sepsis and uh, you
• 1:06:00
  know, all all kinds of other health problems, including some permanent ones that
• 1:06:06
  that would interfere with, you know, his ability to take in nutrition and
• 1:06:11
  everything. So it wasn't just you know, she she shot cent her masks
• 1:06:16
  and she you know, did what you normally do with a gun. She
• 1:06:20
  wanted to hurt this man. Packs American is stand asking if you yes,
• 1:06:27
  we can see your messages. They're showing up and they're they're showing up and
• 1:06:33
  also going to restream. So that's that's an interesting thing because I I wasn't
• 1:06:41
  seeing Twitter messages X messages on restream previously and now we are, so we
• 1:06:49
  do have a relevant super chow. Richard Bierre says, I will have to
• 1:06:55
  do some research, but in many cases of military divorces, regardless of who
• 1:06:59
  file, the ex wife would often be eligible for a portion of the service
• 1:07:02
  member's pension. Yes, that's true, and him being a chief Petty officer
• 1:07:06
  would indicate that he had time in service to be approaching retirement. Yeah,
• 1:07:13
  twenty years if I remember right, is what you put in. So if
• 1:07:17
  you enlist right out of high school at eighteen years old, then some people
• 1:07:26
  are eligible for retirement then at forty eight. So there you go, that
• 1:07:33
  is a distinct possibility. What is this thing doing, Oh it's reloading the
• 1:07:38
  page. Okay, so I have to go back to where we were here.
• 1:07:43
  But yeah, I just wanted to emphasize that about the gut shot,
• 1:07:46
  because that's actually a much more major point than people might think. It really
• 1:07:53
  puts into perspective the difference between that and perhaps shooting your stepson in the side
• 1:08:00
  of the ear. Have you all seen that viral clip by now of that
• 1:08:05
  I forget which southern state it was, of that UHI sixty seventy something.
• 1:08:14
  You're a man shooting his steps and in the he pointed the gun. He
• 1:08:19
  pointed the gun at him and said, I'm going to blow this motherfucker's head
• 1:08:24
  off, and yes, yeah, yeah, anyway, if you and jail
• 1:08:34
  it's there's so many things to talk about where that clip, but a lot
• 1:08:41
  most people were saying, if someone points a gun at your head, like,
• 1:08:45
  don't taunt them into shooting you. Yeah, that is that is one
• 1:08:47
  point. You all saw that clip, right, yeah, yeah, results
• 1:08:54
  he pointed the gun, right he the kid walked out of his room and
• 1:09:00
  like, where the funk would you walk out of the room to continue to
• 1:09:03
  taunt the guy, like, yeah, you don't do that. But once
• 1:09:09
  he did that, the guy continued pointing the guy in his head and shut
• 1:09:13
  him and grazed and grazed it and you could see the blood sort of dripping
• 1:09:17
  out onto the floor, because because he did that, it's it's possible that
• 1:09:25
  there's context to that that would explain the like if that kid, that kid
• 1:09:31
  was cross dressing. Discord. No, No, that's not what I'm talking
• 1:09:40
  about. Like it would be normal to expect somebody to have a sense of
• 1:09:45
  self preservation in the moment, But it is possible that they've had this argument,
• 1:09:49
  uh, and and fighting and stuff, and the kid's been threatened over
• 1:09:55
  and over and over and no no threat has been carried out that would make
• 1:10:00
  you not view the threat or take the threat seriously. And there's other things
• 1:10:08
  a person can make themselves non intimidating, Like we live next door to a
• 1:10:11
  drug dealer when I lived up north who had throat cancer, and he was
• 1:10:19
  also a very unwise methodology type user. We'll just say, for example,
• 1:10:30
  he to signal that he had stuff available for sale, he would have a
• 1:10:38
  bonfire in his backyard. But he couldn't just have a bonfire because we were
• 1:10:41
  in town, so he would put it in a trash barrel, a big
• 1:10:44
  metal trash barrel. And according to the local statutes, if you are cooking
• 1:10:49
  over a fire, it doesn't have to be in a grill or something.
• 1:10:54
  It can be in a trash barrel like that, and the fire department can't
• 1:10:58
  do anything about it. So he decided to dispose of some linoleum floor tiles
• 1:11:03
  by by burning them in his trash pile, totally filled the whole neighborhood with
• 1:11:11
  this bizarrely toxic, stinky smoke and cooked over this fire and ate the things
• 1:11:17
  he was cooking over this fire in which the fuel was linoleum floor tiles.
• 1:11:24
  So I mean, I'm not shocked that the guy had throat cancer. He
• 1:11:28
  probably had twenty seven other types of cancer that nobody knew about. But in
• 1:11:32
  any case, he used to regularly threaten because we didn't we didn't stop having
• 1:11:41
  the family photography business and stop using the backyard as a portrait studio next door
• 1:11:46
  to his illegal business, and he was mad about the cameras, and he
• 1:11:51
  moved in next door to a family of photographers that had been there for a
• 1:11:56
  couple of decades as a family of photographers, and then got mad that we
• 1:12:00
  were photographers and it would would threaten to come into our house in the night
• 1:12:04
  and kill us all. But it's not scary when a short dime store,
• 1:12:12
  uh uh, got it. Kenny his name, the comedian that used to
• 1:12:15
  yell, oh that guy he was buddies with Rodney Dangerfield had the he always
• 1:12:25
  wore, uh, the type of hat that looked like a like a beret
• 1:12:30
  Bob. No. Sam Kennison, Yeah, why couldn't I think of his
• 1:12:39
  name? He was used to be one of my favorite guys because he he
• 1:12:43
  would tell you about women. But yes, he was like the dime store.
• 1:12:47
  Sam Kennison came up to my chest, would look up at you with
• 1:12:53
  his his little stoma and his his vocalizer and say, I'm going to come
• 1:12:59
  on to your house and kill you in the middle of the night. And
• 1:13:02
  we'd be like we'd we'd we'd fake it back at him. Okay, go
• 1:13:06
  ahead, you know and anyway get mad. You know, that is a
• 1:13:13
  you're you're in real trouble now, you know. And that's that he couldn't
• 1:13:17
  There's just it's not intimidating. I'm sorry, and we should have taken it
• 1:13:21
  seriously, because I mean, the man was a criminal, right he and
• 1:13:27
  he had people come to his house that looked very dangerous. But we just
• 1:13:35
  it's it's hard sometimes in that situation to separate the things that make you not
• 1:13:44
  take a threat seriously, especially when it's ongoing. And it's this This situation
• 1:13:50
  continued for years before it ended, and and to to the degree that we
• 1:14:01
  ended up so annoyed with them that we fucked with them in various ways and
• 1:14:09
  to try to annoy him into leaving. But in any case, so I
• 1:14:15
  don't necessarily want to suggest that the guy that didn't take the gun threat seriously
• 1:14:25
  was crazy or stupid for not taking it seriously. We don't know that that
• 1:14:29
  was the first time that a gun was pointed at him in that home by
• 1:14:32
  this guy with no consequence, or that he had been threatened, had his
• 1:14:38
  life threatened with no chance of it being carried out. It could be that
• 1:14:43
  they had they fought like that so often that he was just accustomed to it
• 1:14:47
  and wasn't expecting. And the reality is that at any time, when somebody
• 1:14:51
  is pointing a gun at you, they can intentionally shoot you, or it
• 1:14:56
  can go off because they're being careless and uh and crazy and you know,
• 1:15:02
  knowing through no intention of their own, it can go off, and that
• 1:15:08
  that's another possibility. But in any case, yeah, similarly, here,
• 1:15:16
  you know, the husband in this situation, he probably knew his wife was
• 1:15:21
  nuts for no apparent reason. At the beginning of the clip, no one's
• 1:15:27
  explained, I don't know. They might have just got done searching her.
• 1:15:33
  I was no in the viral clip. In the viral clips that I don't
• 1:15:38
  know. She had the hardest time trying to get those you like, three
• 1:15:47
  sizes too small. You have that problem, especially if you're trying to put
• 1:15:51
  them up in a hurry after you know you've been interrupted, or some ship
• 1:15:56
  like that. But but yeah, in any case, you know, in
• 1:16:00
  regard to the story at hand, a killing, that of the of the
• 1:16:08
  the husband here, that that situation, we don't know. You know,
• 1:16:15
  you would think on one hand that you know, you just don't. You
• 1:16:20
  just don't tolerate a crazy person coming to your house to yell at you.
• 1:16:29
  But in a lot of domestic situations, the husband bends over backwards to tolerate
• 1:16:34
  the wife's behavior until she hurts him, because the guys don't expect the woman
• 1:16:43
  to be able to hurt him, and they don't expect her to bring a
• 1:16:45
  gun over for for a maker. It's not even make up sex. It
• 1:16:51
  was just make up lunch. Like that's so but but yeah, according to
• 1:16:59
  the again it happened on camera. She confessed to it. It's definitely definitely
• 1:17:09
  proved that it happened. And and we are talking about a story in which
• 1:17:16
  the order of events was, you know, they get married, they're in
• 1:17:21
  their marriage. During their marriage, she had sex with another man. He
• 1:17:27
  filed for divorce on the grounds of adultrey. She tells the court that he
• 1:17:32
  condoned her sex with another man. So she's telling the court that either he
• 1:17:39
  was into it or they had an open marriage, right, And he's telling
• 1:17:43
  the court, no, no, no, that's not true. That is
• 1:17:46
  absolutely nothing to do with you know, why why she did that, and
• 1:17:51
  and is not real And while they're divorcing, not in the midst of reconciliation,
• 1:18:01
  doesn't look like there's any chance of reconciliation. Uh. He starts using
• 1:18:06
  a dating app and she puts his his profile in are are you? Are
• 1:18:13
  we dating the same guy? And then goes to his house allegedly to make
• 1:18:16
  up with him, hits him, and then shoots him, targeting an area
• 1:18:25
  that's that's going to be intensely painful, and and then kills him after he
• 1:18:30
  starts to experience the paint that's that's that's our sequence of events. And uh
• 1:18:39
  that that website is still on Facebook or website, that page is still on
• 1:18:43
  Facebook, that group is still on Facebook, it still exists. It's still
• 1:18:46
  okay for women to claim ownership of men on the are we dating the same
• 1:18:56
  guy? Page? They don't. They're not gonna confirm, by the way,
• 1:19:00
  whether you're actually dating the guy you post there. I could just find
• 1:19:03
  any dating profile on any any dating website, any dating app, and post
• 1:19:13
  it on there and say, don't date this guy, he's my boyfriend.
• 1:19:17
  The people, the women on that site would believe me, right, they
• 1:19:24
  would. They would just accept it at face value. You don't have to
• 1:19:27
  provide any evidence of your relationship. She didn't provide any evidence of her relationship.
• 1:19:31
  You don't have to provide any evidence of cheating. It's guilty by reason
• 1:19:35
  of allegation. How is that any less egregious than they were saying about register
• 1:19:47
  her, which was the website for registering known false accusers whose allegations had been
• 1:19:59
  either d invalid by the police, recanted by the accuser, or deemed false
• 1:20:10
  by the court. Like I got a wonder. I posted a clip on
• 1:20:19
  my Twitter recently someone on the London Tube, I mean subway, some white
• 1:20:29
  guy who said some things to a group of four black guys. He couldn't
• 1:20:36
  really hear what was being said. But while he was saying this, ship
• 1:20:41
  one of those four black guys sucker punched him and he fell over and lost
• 1:20:46
  consciousness because of the because of how hard the punch was, and before his
• 1:20:54
  body even hit the floor, the women, there were some women on that
• 1:21:00
  tube train who before, like I said, before his body even hit the
• 1:21:04
  floor, going yeah, yeah, that's what happens. You're a racist.
• 1:21:10
  That's what you get for being racist. And that's the most chilling thing about
• 1:21:16
  it. No, not the fact that a white man said something to a
• 1:21:23
  group of four black men that might have been racist. We don't know.
• 1:21:28
  We couldn't hear what he was saying. We have no idea what he was
• 1:21:30
  saying. But whatever the speech he was professing was met immediately with the sucker
• 1:21:41
  punch and then he fell to the ground, and some women on that train
• 1:21:47
  were cheering on this violence enthusiastically before his body even hit the floor. Yeah,
• 1:22:00
  and that's actually consistent with a female attitude that it's acceptable to escalate perceived
• 1:22:05
  verbal abuse to physical violence if if a man is the the person engaging in
• 1:22:15
  the perceived verbal abuse. Yeah, people are here saying, well, it's
• 1:22:19
  it's men who are responsible for violence. Well, it's it's a man getting
• 1:22:24
  violence exacted upon him by other men. So it doesn't matter that a man
• 1:22:30
  is the victim and that a man another man is the perpetrator. It's it's
• 1:22:36
  all men, isn't it. Meanwhile, there's men that there's women here going
• 1:22:42
  yeah, well that's what you get from, and no one's looking at that
• 1:22:46
  and going hmmm hmm. Maybe maybe women have something to do with this.
• 1:22:55
  Maybe women are stoking this interracial violence and so way, because because they're biased
• 1:23:01
  in some way, I can possably be a thing that's going on, right,
• 1:23:08
  the interracial violence is a thing being stoked by women because women have long
• 1:23:15
  since been at the top of that intersectional pyramid where they where they stoke violence
• 1:23:23
  again between black men and white men and any other kind of men. They're
• 1:23:30
  sat here going yeah, yeah, fucking beat the ship out of each other.
• 1:23:33
  Yeahhh, I'm what before before his body is even hit the floor,
• 1:23:42
  Like, at what point do we go? Maybe maybe women have something to
• 1:23:46
  do with with this, with with this interracial violence between men. Yeah,
• 1:23:54
  and it's always the case, not just between women, but between men.
• 1:24:01
  The men of various races hate other men of various races, but they don't
• 1:24:06
  hate women of various races. They don't even hate women of various cultures.
• 1:24:15
  It's men will be like half fucking fucking goth guys, fucking hate goth guys,
• 1:24:21
  fucking attention seeking wankers, fucking wearing all the ship all. But I
• 1:24:27
  fucking love goth girls. Oh there's nothing I wouldn't give for a fucking big
• 1:24:31
  tity goth girl. But I can't stand these fucking goth guys. And it's
• 1:24:35
  the same in everything they like. Hatred of men of any race or culture
• 1:24:45
  or anything is perfectly acceptable. But when when you translate it to how you
• 1:24:50
  feel about the women of any given culture or race, yeah, fine with
• 1:24:58
  that. It's just the men that don't like. It translates into history too,
• 1:25:02
  because if you look at the history of war between nations and war between
• 1:25:08
  tribes and so on, they kill all the men and then the women of
• 1:25:13
  the losing culture just morph into part of the winning culture. That's why we
• 1:25:20
  talk about this ship, folks, because it all starts with mysonry. It
• 1:25:27
  really does. If if it didn't start with the mysonry, it wouldn't developed
• 1:25:31
  to all of this ship that has has become the main argument between races and
• 1:25:40
  cultures and SHIP like we we we, we wouldn't have all of this xenophobia
• 1:25:46
  and icophobia if it didn't start with with with with how ready we are to
• 1:25:55
  hate men of any of any kind, to hate men of our own culture
• 1:26:00
  are men of other cultures? That's that's how it all starts. And we're
• 1:26:05
  here saying, well, don't do that, and people are fucking calling us
• 1:26:10
  misogynists and Ship no, yeah, and it and it does, it does,
• 1:26:19
  It does this over and over again in various ways, with various cultures,
• 1:26:26
  various groups of people, and in every individual situation. That's why I
• 1:26:30
  say there's no such thing as male violence. Like we hear the phrase male
• 1:26:33
  violence from feminists all the time, but in truth, there is no type
• 1:26:39
  of violence that is unique to men as perpetrators. Uh and and no type
• 1:26:45
  of violence men engage in that isn't somehow connected to women's interests or men's interest
• 1:26:55
  in women, whereas there are types of violence that are unique to women and
• 1:27:02
  for instance, you know, fet aside is a almost uniquely female crime.
• 1:27:12
  False allegations used to get other people to attack and kill an individual. They
• 1:27:21
  don't do that on behalf of male accusers. They do that on behalf of
• 1:27:26
  female accusers. So proxy violence as a response to false allegations of sexual assault
• 1:27:35
  or intimate partner violence, it's a uniquely female thing, or at least almost
• 1:27:42
  uniquely female. But there isn't anything like that that when you look at it,
• 1:27:47
  women don't do that, but men do, and feminists are going to
• 1:27:53
  be like, well, the ninety five percent are perpetrators of rape are men
• 1:27:57
  only if you define rape to exclude coitus being inflicted on a man by a
• 1:28:02
  woman, or a woman performing filatio on a man against his will. Right,
• 1:28:09
  if you exclude those two things, If you exclude two common sexual practices,
• 1:28:15
  one of which is that is used for reproductive sex like the the and
• 1:28:20
  and and is the one type that was defined as rape. If a man
• 1:28:27
  did it to a woman, then then you can maybe say that, but
• 1:28:31
  when you include every way in which you would call it rape if it was
• 1:28:38
  done to a woman, No, perpetrators are not men. Any any man
• 1:28:47
  listening to this, all right, what if a woman pranked you, If
• 1:28:54
  a woman performed a practical joke on you, would you feel the need to
• 1:29:01
  to at least give her a little punch to the abdomen or something in the
• 1:29:08
  event that she pranked you in that way? You you wouldn't because because you
• 1:29:14
  don't do that, your your conditioned to do that. But if your man
• 1:29:18
  pranked you as a woman, would you feel the need to at least like
• 1:29:25
  give him a light punch to any part of his body? Or even if
• 1:29:31
  if a man accidentally stepped on your toe, would you give him a light
• 1:29:38
  punch to some soft part of his body? You would. That's im And
• 1:29:45
  I know this is a this is this is a lower part of the example.
• 1:29:50
  But the idea that men are more prone to violence than women kind kind
• 1:29:57
  of really goes by the wayside. Like it, if you prank your your
• 1:30:02
  woman, or whatever, any woman who's close to you, she would immediately
• 1:30:08
  respond by lightly punching you in some soft part of your body. Or even
• 1:30:14
  if you said something unable, even if you said something unappreciable about someone else,
• 1:30:25
  like maybe your neighbor or whatever, she would go. Oh, for
• 1:30:28
  heaven's sake, I was going to say, ranking I've seen women slap the
• 1:30:32
  shit out of a guy to the point where he's shielding his face and his
• 1:30:36
  gut, and she's just slapping him over and over again around her arms and
• 1:30:40
  shoulders for a prank that she finds inappropriate. Can you imagine him doing that
• 1:30:45
  to a woman. Yeah, And I realized that's some that's a comparison that
• 1:30:54
  could be taken too far. But the idea that men are more prone to
• 1:30:59
  violence than women is really kind of thrown into into controversy when the idea that
• 1:31:08
  a man can say something to a woman like, oh, I fucking hate
• 1:31:13
  that bitch and I hate her kid as well, and the woman is is
• 1:31:16
  quite likely to go, oh she she'll, she'll give a slight punch in
• 1:31:25
  the direction of that man's soft parts and she and she feels it's fine.
• 1:31:30
  Yep, poke him in the ribs, slap him on the back of your
• 1:31:34
  hand, slap him in the chest, all kinds of things. It would
• 1:31:40
  never work in the opposite direction, like a man would not even a man
• 1:31:44
  would not even apply that kind of violence, even on a on a slight
• 1:31:48
  level. He wouldn't even go well like that, you try to silence her
• 1:31:58
  even if she's making a for of herself. You're the bad guy. You're
• 1:32:03
  you're you're trying to control her. Yeah. Uh. Women are quite accustomed
• 1:32:14
  to it to at least giving a short shock, a short shark shock to
• 1:32:19
  her man in the event that he says something wrong in a way a man
• 1:32:25
  would never do to his Yeah. I guess there's something evolutionary, evolutionary,
• 1:32:31
  not normal about it, because you can't really do any damage by giving a
• 1:32:39
  quick, short sh shock, like like at least like giving some tiny,
• 1:32:46
  short sharp shock to his shoulder or whatever, like, don't do that,
• 1:32:53
  don't do that. But they always accompany that. They're sort of don't do
• 1:32:58
  that message with a tiny little bit of violence, and it's not really violence.
• 1:33:04
  It doesn't really hurt. And and so you're like, well, it's
• 1:33:08
  fine, so because it doesn't really hurt. But m hum. If when
• 1:33:15
  you allow that, it then leads to allowing a slightly more effective level of
• 1:33:26
  violence, and that's and that's and that's why women are like, they're fine
• 1:33:32
  with with delivering that short sharp shock just to stop the men in their lives
• 1:33:41
  or indeed their own children from from from never saying that thing again. By
• 1:33:48
  delivering a short, sharp shark of violence. Men don't do that, certainly
• 1:33:54
  not with regard to women. They were they were never considering going, don't
• 1:33:59
  do that again to the women in their lives. And it seems like such
• 1:34:03
  a small thing, but when it's unchecked, it becomes the larger thing.
• 1:34:10
  And that's and that's why women do that to the men in their lives and
• 1:34:15
  even their sons, no matter how young they are. Jah mean, even
• 1:34:23
  even when the toddlers in their lives do something they don't like, they go,
• 1:34:29
  don't do that again, in a way that men never would. And
• 1:34:33
  like I say, it seems like such a small thing, but it's a
• 1:34:39
  form of violence, even the slightest form of violence the women are willing to
• 1:34:46
  do. It's a sign of weakness. Actually when you think about it,
• 1:34:50
  you know, you look at a group of family like or a group of
• 1:34:57
  friends, where an individual is obviously the strongest yalpa, the person with the
• 1:35:04
  personality and character and physical capabilities to back up what he's saying or doing,
• 1:35:12
  and it almost always is a male. Then that he won't have to do
• 1:35:18
  that to get people's attention. All he has to do is speak softly,
• 1:35:23
  and people hear him, They hear what he has to say, and uh
• 1:35:28
  an out comes. You know, hey, cut that out and that's it.
• 1:35:31
  The behavior ends. Whereas and it's this. You see this a lot
• 1:35:36
  of times with dads and moms, right when women have to get out the
• 1:35:42
  motorcycle, you know, when they when the child is misbehaving, no no,
• 1:35:49
  no, and you know that the dad's like, cut that out,
• 1:35:54
  and the kid quits the behavior because the kid knows that if the dad says
• 1:36:00
  cut that out and they don't, that it's going to be backed up with
• 1:36:03
  action. They don't. The dad never has to have done that for the
• 1:36:08
  kid to understand that. You can sense that about a person from a very
• 1:36:12
  early age, you know. Or the other one is the negation gun no
• 1:36:19
  no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no
• 1:36:21
  no no no. You know, I hate that. At the grocery store
• 1:36:25
  and here's the child opening some piece of merchandise. You know, Oh look,
• 1:36:30
  I'm eating a twinkie now in the middle of the grocery store aisle.
• 1:36:31
  Mommy hasn't paid for it yet, chomp, and Mom's like no no,
• 1:36:35
  no, no, no, no, no, no no no no no.
• 1:36:38
  You know not taking the box away from the child and putting it firmly
• 1:36:42
  back on the shelf and saying you cannot do that, you know, like
• 1:36:45
  where you see dads, you cut that out, put that back. That's
• 1:36:48
  not yours. And they've given the child the information they need. They have
• 1:36:54
  established the boundary. The child may be angry and throw a fit or whatever,
• 1:36:59
  but it's more likely to happen with the mom then with a dad.
• 1:37:01
  And it is a difference between men and women. Women have to like they'll
• 1:37:05
  they'll use hand signals and repetition, nagging, you know, throwing, throwing,
• 1:37:13
  their speech like that, and uh and and men are more matter of
• 1:37:18
  fact about things. So it is to me that's a sign of weakness that
• 1:37:24
  you have to whack somebody with your hand or poke them in their ribs,
• 1:37:30
  cut that out, you know, when when uh, you know, and
• 1:37:32
  and an alpha can just basically, you know, a strong person can just
• 1:37:36
  basically say don't do that. And that establishes the boundary. Is women apply
• 1:37:45
  minor violence even to their own children, and and and they and they think
• 1:37:51
  it's harmless because it's just minor violence, but when it comes to actually punishing
• 1:37:58
  the children, they go, wait, until your dad gets Yeah, they're
• 1:38:04
  like and they they they put it upon the man in their lives to apply
• 1:38:12
  actual violence as and when it actually applies. Most sets of parents don't do
• 1:38:19
  that anymore because because they are learning that violence is not necessarily the best way
• 1:38:27
  to teach their children not to do things they don't want, because that'll just
• 1:38:30
  teach them that they can apply violence whenever they don't. And that's I realized
• 1:38:35
  that's a controversial point even even at this point, and I don't I'm not.
• 1:38:42
  I'm not going to tell parents how to raise their children because I'm not
• 1:38:45
  a parent. Well as a parent, you're right, though, I mean,
• 1:38:48
  humor works way better, right. For instance, the pouting issue.
• 1:38:53
  You get kids a pout and a lot of parents will be like, you
• 1:38:56
  cut that out. You know. If you're you're you keep pouting at me
• 1:38:58
  like that, I'm gonna put you in a corner. Not my parents.
• 1:39:01
  I got told that if I stuck my lip out like that, big old
• 1:39:05
  Tom Turkey was going to come perch on it and poop. Not because they
• 1:39:10
  expected me to believe that, but because they knew that I would laugh at
• 1:39:14
  it and that would get rid of the pouting and I would associate that with
• 1:39:20
  every future pout, and all my parents would then have to do was act
• 1:39:28
  like they were going to reference that, and the pouting would end. And
• 1:39:31
  it made me incapable of pouting. It totally destroyed the behavior without a single
• 1:39:40
  finger being lifted. You make your kids see the humor in a situation,
• 1:39:46
  or see a situation, associate a situation with humor. You take away the
• 1:39:51
  power of I don't know, petty, childish, sulking behavior, temper behavior,
• 1:40:00
  and it works very well. It works a lot better than forcibly confining
• 1:40:05
  the child or striking the child. Those things should be reserved for extreme situations
• 1:40:15
  where it's the only way to get the child's attention, or it's the only
• 1:40:18
  way to prevent the child from self harming or harming another person. Right,
• 1:40:24
  that's that's it. Aside from that, it's not a useful form of punishment
• 1:40:29
  to enact violence on your child. It doesn't. It's not so much that
• 1:40:34
  it that it teaches them the wrong lesson. It doesn't teach them the right
• 1:40:40
  lesson. Like they don't learn to be accountable, and they don't learn to
• 1:40:44
  reset their mentality in a situation. They just learn if I make my parents
• 1:40:49
  angry, they will hit me so and in this situation, you know it,
• 1:40:58
  it can also acclimate them to violence and set them up for future abuse
• 1:41:05
  by a partner like Christina Wang. So I think we've talked about everything we
• 1:41:12
  need to talk talk about in regard to the Wang story I wanted to get
• 1:41:15
  across. There are a couple of the things I wanted to get across.
• 1:41:17
  Here are are And obviously you know this is a situation of domestic violence,
• 1:41:25
  that that the woman was entirely at fault and she blamed the man for her
• 1:41:31
  bad behavior. Right that if if the genders were reversed, this would have
• 1:41:39
  been a much bigger story and we would have been hearing about it as an
• 1:41:43
  example of male power and male abuse and a man getting away with abusing a
• 1:41:49
  woman until he killed her. Uh And and the possessiveness aspect of it.
• 1:41:57
  Narcissistic women who get possessive like this over a guy, even when the relationship
• 1:42:06
  is over, that they're they're particularly dangerous. Sorry, I'm over here fidgeting
• 1:42:15
  and I just caught my foot on my cord. But they're particularly particularly dangerous
• 1:42:20
  in that because our society has this attitude that minor violence by women is okay
• 1:42:28
  and that women are entitled to engage in violence because they're mad. They end
• 1:42:34
  up doing this thing of escalating violence in response to conflict between themselves and their
• 1:42:42
  partner. And when you're gonna hear stories about women who have killed their partners,
• 1:42:48
  it's almost always going to be a story like this, where she's trying
• 1:42:55
  to control his behavior. She's angry that she thinks he's doing that which she's
• 1:43:01
  guilty of. Uh, She's she's projecting her adultery onto him, and so
• 1:43:09
  on. Or it'll be a story of she wants his resources, but she
• 1:43:14
  doesn't want any anymore, so she's trying to get him out of the way.
• 1:43:16
  There's almost never another another type of story involved, where you know there's
• 1:43:25
  there's other conflicts or other things going on. Those are the two biggest reasons
• 1:43:30
  why women kill their partners uh and UH. And this is a prime example
• 1:43:36
  of that, And it's also a prime example of how the feminist bad man
• 1:43:44
  narrative plays into that, where she put this picture on this Facebook page on
• 1:43:51
  in this group for women who suspect their partners of cheating, even though he
• 1:43:57
  was no longer her partner and seeking another partner isn't cheating because they're not in
• 1:44:02
  a relationship anymore. They're getting divorced. They're just in the process of legally
• 1:44:08
  severing what is already socially severed. So she was allowed to be possessive,
• 1:44:15
  she was allowed to claim ownership. Nobody questioned that. Nobody questioned the stalking
• 1:44:24
  aspect of that. Nobody questioned the abusive nature of claiming ownership of another human
• 1:44:30
  being and telling other people of your gender to stay away from them. And
• 1:44:36
  when she went to his house, she felt entitled to a reconciliation, and
• 1:44:43
  she shot him twice and killed him. We have some super childs. There
• 1:44:49
  is one that I'm not gonna read, and I'm actually kind of pissed off
• 1:44:54
  about it. Not because I have an opinion on the opinions that we're expressed.
• 1:45:02
  I'm not going to say I disagree with this, or I agree with
• 1:45:05
  this, or disagree with some of it and agree with some of it.
• 1:45:10
  I'm going to say this is completely unrelated to the topic of the show.
• 1:45:15
  It has nothing to do with what we're talking about, and it is something
• 1:45:19
  that if I say it, it can get us banned from more than one
• 1:45:26
  of the sites on which we are streaming right now. It is not going
• 1:45:33
  to change anything in the world for you to say it. And the only
• 1:45:39
  purpose of sending something like this through our system to get me to try to
• 1:45:43
  say it, is to try to get us banned. None of us here
• 1:45:48
  at Honeybadger Radio are stupid, all right. We are here because we see
• 1:45:55
  problems in the world that need to be discussed in regards specifically to the rights
• 1:46:03
  and treatment of men in the world. Gender issues, things that are racial,
• 1:46:11
  things that are religious, things that are social political, international warfare,
• 1:46:15
  and so on. Sexual violence issues and so on are only pertinent to us
• 1:46:25
  insofar as they relate to men's rights, boys' rights, equal or unequal treatment
• 1:46:31
  under the law, how people are viewed in society, and how we see
• 1:46:38
  men being more acceptable targets of violence and less prevalent recipients of compassion in society.
• 1:46:51
  So when you put through something that is a description of your opinions regarding
• 1:47:01
  a conflict between two groups, and you say nothing about how it affects men,
• 1:47:09
  but you say several things that are are directly against terms of service of
• 1:47:15
  the websites that we're on, I'm not going to read it, and it
• 1:47:19
  doesn't matter if you put it through for five dollars or if you put it
• 1:47:24
  through for five hundred dollars. It's not going to get read. So don't
• 1:47:30
  do that. It's it's not And again, I'm not condemning what's said in
• 1:47:38
  this, and I'm not telling you that everything you said there is wrong.
• 1:47:43
  I'm also not condoning it, and I'm not telling you that everything that you
• 1:47:45
  said there is right right. I'm just telling you that I'm not going to
• 1:47:50
  read that. So apologies to anonymous, and also you have made me a
• 1:48:00
  little cranky, which is actually harder to do in a situation like this.
• 1:48:05
  I thank you for the five dollars. I'm not gonna read your comment,
• 1:48:11
  and and thank you for the second five dollars. It says, also subscribe
• 1:48:17
  to Ryan Dawson on Rumble. He covers geopolitical news, sometimes shits on feminism,
• 1:48:24
  woke retards, and anti white racists. I don't know who he is
• 1:48:30
  personally. That's not what it says there. That's me saying that. So
• 1:48:34
  I neither endorse nor condemn this person because I know nothing about them. So
• 1:48:39
  this is just an endorsement from the individual who's sent through something that I'm not
• 1:48:43
  going to read because like I said, it is it is could it can
• 1:48:47
  get his band, and it isn't necessarily about here's here's my issue with this,
• 1:48:53
  all right. I will say that the one thing you're right about is
• 1:48:59
  uh men getting sent to war in in outside of their own interest and outside
• 1:49:08
  of the interests that they would sign on for. And and in that that
• 1:49:14
  vein, I will say this, there should be no selective service, there
• 1:49:16
  should be no draft, but if there's going to be, it should be
• 1:49:19
  genderless. Uh And And that's as much as I will give you. It
• 1:49:25
  doesn't matter who is abusing that power. It matters that that power exists and
• 1:49:30
  can be abused. And that's the wrongdoing right there. And no group would
• 1:49:35
  be able to abuse that power if it didn't exist and couldn't be abused.
• 1:49:44
  Albert Ada Retro gave us a five dollars super chat five dollars Canadian and said,
• 1:49:48
  because register her is sexist, Hannah, the other way is just different.
• 1:49:55
  Re rere get with the program, lady sheesh and and yeah we go
• 1:50:00
  told that actually register her was a response to similar databases of not not are
• 1:50:10
  we dating the same guy, because that didn't exist back then, but there
• 1:50:12
  were other like there was a Shipreddit says was compiling lists of MRAs. I
• 1:50:18
  was on that list. In fact, when I started Twitter, somebody had
• 1:50:23
  used the shitreddit says shit list of m ras as a blocklist, and when
• 1:50:29
  I used the same at name on Twitter as my Reddit handle, it was
• 1:50:34
  already on that blocklist. So I was already instad blocked, auto blocked by
• 1:50:40
  everybody that used that blocklist, that shared blocklist on Twitter, and that was
• 1:50:46
  that was in I want to say two thousand and nine for being strong and
• 1:50:53
  independent. Yes, yes, uh so, yeah, it's it's sexist.
• 1:50:59
  It's sexist to to keep track of what women are doing, but not to
• 1:51:02
  to keep track of what women are doing that advocate for men right, or
• 1:51:08
  to keep track of what men are doing. Albert Nada retro gave us another
• 1:51:12
  five dollars Canadian and said, what would have happened if Chris Evans had reacted
• 1:51:15
  to Haley Atwell's unscripted peck grab the same way she'd have reacted to an unscripted
• 1:51:25
  boob grab. I don't know, I don't know what that's from. Is
• 1:51:30
  that in in the first Captain American movie. The lady who who was cast
• 1:51:40
  in role of the lady who was tasked with reacting to the moment when the
• 1:51:53
  the guy who was Captain America. He was originally skinny and then the serum
• 1:51:59
  made him bulk up. But buff uh. There was there was some lady
• 1:52:06
  who was who was tasked to act in in in reactings his reactions word whatever,
• 1:52:14
  but in her acting in in reactance to him becoming buff. So it's
• 1:52:21
  not in the midst of an affectionate moment where they're like engaging and petting and
• 1:52:27
  that kind of thing. The actress couldn't quite help but touch his pecks,
• 1:52:34
  and so she touched his packs and they kept it in the movie. Yeah.
• 1:52:40
  See, I honestly, I've talked about this before. Women will touch
• 1:52:45
  men's chest and then and and act like it's nothing, And some guys will
• 1:52:50
  say, well, it's it's not the same because we don't have boobs,
• 1:52:55
  right, And and I will say to you, if the nipples are an
• 1:53:00
  erogenous zone, it's the same, and in some guys they are, and
• 1:53:06
  a woman might not necessarily be able to predict which ones. And also,
• 1:53:13
  I think we look a lot at men's pecks in a similar manner to the
• 1:53:20
  way men look at boobs, or at least women who look at both boobs
• 1:53:29
  and pecks. We look at both in a similar manner. There, that's
• 1:53:33
  pretty parallel. That there's not. It's not. I won't say it's exactly
• 1:53:41
  the same, but both of them are similarly attractive. And I don't think
• 1:53:48
  that I would just reach out and touch a guy on the chest, especially
• 1:53:55
  in a moment of surprised attraction, like just with out any context and without
• 1:54:00
  any prior relationship like that where you know, like I will touch my husband's
• 1:54:09
  chest just like he touches my boobs because we're married and that's one of the
• 1:54:16
  things we do together. But if I was a old maid at this point
• 1:54:24
  and some guy walked up to me shirtless, I wouldn't be like, ooh
• 1:54:29
  pex and grab that. That would be rude as hell. But a lot
• 1:54:33
  of when we do needless to say, if some male actor had grabbed Calle
• 1:54:40
  Johansson's boobs, oh yeah, that would have been in the event that she
• 1:54:44
  developed her superpowers. Oh wait, her character didn't have any superpowers. Never
• 1:54:48
  the fucking mind, it would It would have been a moment, though feminists
• 1:54:54
  would have made a big deal out of it. We also have two dollars
• 1:54:58
  Canadian from albert Ada retro it says c MCU Captain America regarding unscripted grab.
• 1:55:05
  And then we have on Rumble Noba Fan gave us two dollars when we were
• 1:55:13
  talking about the the video of the woman who women who cheered on the black
• 1:55:18
  guys that beat up the guy for that the sucker punched the guy in the
• 1:55:23
  gut for for something that nobody knows what he said. He gave us two
• 1:55:27
  dollars and said, Devil Artemis Kermit, I don't know that reference. Sorry,
• 1:55:34
  Devil Artemis Kermit, do it? PU see no balls? Uh and
• 1:55:39
  and uh yeah, that's pretty common among women. Unfortunately, they will push
• 1:55:45
  a guide to violence and they'll celebrate that violence out of the context of how
• 1:55:50
  it happened because it's happening to a man. Women love it when men beat
• 1:55:57
  this ship out of it. Yeah, yeah, but war has nothing to
• 1:56:02
  do with women. Trust right. Nova Fan gave us a didn't give us
• 1:56:08
  a super chat, but gave us a little bit of context. Actually,
• 1:56:14
  the context was the guy with the gun. Okay, so that was oh,
• 1:56:18
  that's coming through on that's coming through on Okay, so that was typed
• 1:56:30
  into YouTube. That's why I was just saying, that's coming through on a
• 1:56:33
  restream, which Rumble doesn't. But it's I see the YouTube icon and then
• 1:56:41
  let's see night. Motorcyclist also pointed something out that I think we should mention
• 1:56:45
  in regard to the idea of the pecks. He says, Hell, the
• 1:56:49
  guy that played Gaston at Disneyland got backlashed when a woman grabbed him, and
• 1:56:54
  yeah, I remember that. Then. It wasn't just some people. Most
• 1:56:58
  people shamed him and blamed him. And here's here's here's the situation, right.
• 1:57:01
  He is a buff guy who is playing a Disney character who is supposed
• 1:57:08
  to be a big, strong guy who's kind of a dick, which he
• 1:57:11
  isn't really, he's trying to. Like A big part of his character is
• 1:57:16
  that here he cares about this woman, has a crush on this woman,
• 1:57:20
  whatever you want to say. He's a little arrogant about it. But when
• 1:57:26
  he thinks that she's in trouble, he goes to rescue her. When he
• 1:57:30
  thinks that there's a monster that has held her captive, he goes to get
• 1:57:34
  rid of the monster. And he's not doing it as a jealous man at
• 1:57:41
  that moment. He's doing that that as a man who is protecting the people
• 1:57:46
  of his community, and in particular a woman he has feelings for, even
• 1:57:53
  if she disagrees with him on that. So I don't like calling a villain,
• 1:58:00
  but he is. He's a big, strong guy. So he's going
• 1:58:02
  to be played by somebody like a bodybuilder or somebody with at least a degree
• 1:58:08
  of bodybuilding appearance. And some chick groped him. The guy at Disney that
• 1:58:17
  played Gaston during at least one shift, she groped him, and he called
• 1:58:26
  security and did exactly what they're supposed to do according to policy, in response
• 1:58:34
  to that kind of misconduct by a park visitor. And that is misconduct.
• 1:58:40
  Groping somebody is misconduct. It doesn't mean only men who grope people are engaging
• 1:58:47
  in misconduct. A woman who engages in groping is engaging in misconduct. That
• 1:58:54
  is misconduct. And so she was ejected, if I remember right from the
• 1:58:59
  park, because she grew him. She argued with him about it too,
• 1:59:01
  that's the other thing. She didn't just grope him, and then when he
• 1:59:04
  protested, say, oh, you know, I'm sorry, I thought you
• 1:59:06
  would be into it or something like that. She argued with him, and
• 1:59:11
  people acted like he went overboard and was the bad guy, when in fact,
• 1:59:16
  a woman with boundary issues groped him and then argued with him against his
• 1:59:24
  boundaries, as if he was wrong for enforcing them. The same goes with
• 1:59:31
  the Queen's gods. Yeah, the guys with the enormous best skin hats.
• 1:59:38
  Those guys will will walk through a child if a child happens to be stood
• 1:59:43
  in the wrong place. If a woman gropes them, they'll be like they'll
• 1:59:47
  point the fucking gun at you and saying, bock you. We're guarding the
• 1:59:51
  Queen. We are charged with guarding the Queen. If you have so much
• 1:59:56
  as touches, we will ruin your ass as as one of the last,
• 2:00:03
  as one of the last things that the British will do to actually fuck you
• 2:00:08
  up with guns. If you, if, if you even if you were
• 2:00:13
  even fuck with us. As another super chat from Men's Torso's Erotic, I
• 2:00:24
  thought women watching Magic Mike for the for the compelling story. I'm so disappointed.
• 2:00:31
  No, no, we all watched it. We all watched it for
• 2:00:36
  for the compelling story. It's it's totally for the compelling story, right,
• 2:00:40
  not not Actually I say this as somebody who has not even seen the whole
• 2:00:44
  movie, but like I've seen scenes from it, but it's definitely definitely a
• 2:00:53
  movie that exists strictly so that women can ogle well built men. It's a
• 2:01:00
  very cerebral movie. I wouldn't Alison and I sat through that entire movie,
• 2:01:08
  and I wish we didn't. I don't know the storyline. I just know
• 2:01:13
  it's about uh why, so like that's all you know. What's what's funny
• 2:01:19
  is women like to act like that's just a male behavior going to the strip
• 2:01:26
  club and everything, but women will go to see male strippers and they will
• 2:01:30
  go to see female strippers. I'm assuming it had a plot. I'm giving
• 2:01:36
  it credit for having a plot that that maybe I shouldn't because like I said,
• 2:01:41
  I don't, I don't know. I haven't seen it, not the
• 2:01:44
  whole thing anyway, But and my interest in it in it is not abnormal
• 2:01:53
  per se, but part of my interest in it was because it has fluff
• 2:02:00
  be in it. And he's one of my favorite comedians and and talked about
• 2:02:02
  it in one of his one of his interviews or one of his sketches,
• 2:02:08
  and then I'm like, oh, well, now I want to see it,
• 2:02:13
  because like, if to be honest, if I want to see UH
• 2:02:17
  men's torsos, you can find that online. You don't need a story plot
• 2:02:21
  for that, you just go looking for it. But in any case,
• 2:02:28
  yeah, definitely, uh, definitely, people don't recognize the behavior the same
• 2:02:39
  way when when when women do it as when men do it. And I
• 2:02:44
  will say this in terms of not just the torso thing, the the you
• 2:02:48
  know that that, Yeah, men's chests are sexy. You should see how
• 2:02:55
  women behave around a man in a kilt, especially in UH countries where it
• 2:03:01
  has not historically been the norm, Yes, Fluffy Gabriel Iglesias, Yes,
• 2:03:10
  where it has has, uh traditionally not been a norm for guys to wear
• 2:03:15
  kilts. When women see a guy in a kilt, especially a guy with
• 2:03:17
  good legs, right, that that exposes the complete and utter depravity of female
• 2:03:28
  nature. I've seen women walk up to a guy and reach under the kilt
• 2:03:31
  and grab without without asking. You know, are you a true scotsman?
• 2:03:38
  Let me check, let me check. Were like, what the hell are
• 2:03:41
  you doing? You are reaching for another human beings Genitalia without permission. They
• 2:03:45
  would never do that with male drag queens. How weird is that? No,
• 2:03:50
  only only crocodile Dundee is allowed to do that. Oh, that scene,
• 2:03:57
  That scene would not go well today. See year Sticks gave us two
• 2:04:00
  dollars and said, how are the New Year's resolutions holding up? My New
• 2:04:09
  Year's resolution is New Year's resolutions, and I'm giving up lent for lent.
• 2:04:16
  That's my joke. Actually, I always say, well, people ask me
• 2:04:20
  what I'm giving up for lent, I say, dryer sheets. Albert Nata
• 2:04:28
  Retro gave us two dollars Canadian and said, Hannah finished and turned the TV
• 2:04:31
  off. I don't think I've watched the DVD in years. Everything's online.
• 2:04:40
  Yeah, but but yeah, New Year's resolutions. I don't do New Year's
• 2:04:45
  resolutions. I used to sometimes start new things, new projects and New Year's
• 2:04:50
  but mostly I just I don't. It's I'm just not. Yeah, fuck
• 2:04:59
  it as all bollocks anyway. Yeah, I've learned my lessons from all the
• 2:05:04
  times I've tried and failed to keep a resolution. It's just not gonna happen.
• 2:05:11
  New Year's is one of two nights. Where I have a particular attitude
• 2:05:14
  about leaving the house. If I if I leave the house, it's for
• 2:05:23
  someplace real close in my neighborhood. I don't get excited about it so much
• 2:05:28
  as you know, somebody wants to spend time with me and my husband,
• 2:05:32
  then I'll go and socialize. So that's it. Though. The other one
• 2:05:39
  is Black Friday. You never Yeah, if I'm not at work, I'm
• 2:05:45
  at home. I won't go shopping. I won't leave the house because I
• 2:05:48
  hate Black Friday traffic. I hate the Black Friday shopping crowds. I hated
• 2:05:55
  working in retail on Black Friday, and I don't want anything to do with
• 2:06:00
  it. And you know, New Year's I don't like driving on New Year's
• 2:06:04
  and I don't like dealing with I don't go places where there's parties and stuff
• 2:06:10
  because I don't like crowds. So that's it. I you know, I
• 2:06:14
  Well, I went to a movie night at a friend's house this year on
• 2:06:18
  on New Year's and we we watched stuff and chit chatted and we we do
• 2:06:24
  uh uh the Mystery Science Theater two thousand version of watching movies at movie night
• 2:06:35
  at this friend's house, Like at the whole movie where we're all talking over
• 2:06:42
  the movie, about the movie the whole time, and it's all it's all
• 2:06:45
  making fun of the movie. So there you go, like that's I don't
• 2:06:50
  even drink on New Year's of course I don't really drink anymore anyway. But
• 2:06:56
  if you want to, it's not say for me. If you want to
• 2:06:59
  make could change in your life, it should be for your own sake because
• 2:07:04
  some numbers have changed, not because the first digit of those numbers happen to
• 2:07:10
  have arbitrarily changed. It's because you want to make change for once more.
• 2:07:20
  Gonna be real good. I'm gonna make it difference, gonna make it right.
• 2:07:28
  The only difference is in my case, the man in the mirror is
• 2:07:30
  usually standing behind me going you look nice, which you know, I don't
• 2:07:36
  know if I always agree with him or not, but I'll take it.
• 2:07:42
  It's you. You you get rose colored glasses on your wedding day. But
• 2:07:48
  but yeah, no, when you're gonna make a change, you just you
• 2:07:51
  decide what you're gonna do, and then you do it. Then you might
• 2:07:55
  go through a process, like you know, I've mentioned the quitting drinking thing.
• 2:08:00
  My process was started started actually in twenty nineteen because I had a suspicion
• 2:08:03
  that I was developing symptoms of gout related to alcohol, which would take all
• 2:08:09
  of the fun out of drinking, because if it hurts, it's not fun
• 2:08:11
  anymore. Right, So when I went to ICMI, I was not drinking,
• 2:08:18
  and I figured I would just not drink anything alcoholic for a few months
• 2:08:24
  and then have maybe two beers in the same night, which is a lot
• 2:08:28
  for me and compare and that year I had no problem. So I thought,
• 2:08:35
  Okay, well, this isn't a problem. I can. I can
• 2:08:37
  just you know, be the same social, rare, social drinker that I
• 2:08:41
  always was. And about twenty twenty one, I had another incident where I'd
• 2:08:52
  had a beer and the next day it felt like somebody beat me up with
• 2:08:56
  a baseball bat, and I'm just like, what the fuck? You know,
• 2:09:01
  that's the only change. So I I, uh, again, cut
• 2:09:07
  off all alcohol for a while. I had another beer and boom, you
• 2:09:13
  know, like again somebody's came in the middle of the night. The beat
• 2:09:18
  up faerry came in the middle of the night and attacked both of my hips.
• 2:09:20
  So I'm like, all right, well that is that is goutish symptoms.
• 2:09:24
  That's a that's liver or that's kidneys, that's something I don't want to
• 2:09:26
  have it identified. But obviously alcohol is not my friend anymore, and we're
• 2:09:31
  just gonna have to part ways. And so ever since then, I don't
• 2:09:35
  I don't drink because it's not fun anymore. And it's not something that you
• 2:09:41
  do like, Oh, I'm gonna I'm gonna change the way I'm doing things,
• 2:09:45
  and i'm gonna start on this day and it's gonna be really hard,
• 2:09:48
  and I'm gonna make this change. Uh. And and I have a twelve
• 2:09:52
  step plan and blah blah. No, you just I got rid of alcohol
• 2:09:56
  and I didn't buy anymore and I'm done, like the same thing would diet.
• 2:10:03
  And you're like, oh, well, carbs are not my friend anymore.
• 2:10:05
  Uh. They they do the same thing. They pack themselves on my
• 2:10:09
  ass. So I don't buy as many things that are high carb and buy
• 2:10:13
  more things that are low carb and a lot more vegetables, and just changed
• 2:10:18
  my habit. That's that's, that's it. You don't need New Year's Day,
• 2:10:24
  you don't need a birthday, you don't need this or that. You
• 2:10:26
  just do it. But I used to I used to take all the drugs
• 2:10:31
  you could possibly and I stopped taking them to you because when you get the
• 2:10:37
  message, you hang up the phone. Mm hmm. It's as simple as
• 2:10:41
  that. Yep. If it hurts, it's not fun anymore. So Yeah,
• 2:10:48
  basically that's it. But hey, that's that's my lecture on crutches.
• 2:10:54
  Right. You don't need somebody to uh decide for you, and you don't
• 2:10:58
  need a you don't need that kind of crutch. Just you're gonna make it
• 2:11:01
  change you just change, you change your habit and remember your reasons, which
• 2:11:09
  are far more important than anything else with regard to the change of habit.
• 2:11:15
  I know if I pick up a beer and drink it that the next day
• 2:11:18
  I'm going to feel thirty years older just around the hips. So I might
• 2:11:22
  as well not bother even if it tastes good. Other things taste good too.
• 2:11:28
  ZERANX gave us five dollars and said, my thinking on New Year's resolutions,
• 2:11:31
  start them two weeks before January first, at the latest, best three
• 2:11:35
  to four weeks or more before in New Year's Yeah, if you're going to
• 2:11:39
  schedule a change, I suppose feeling it out a little early is not gonna
• 2:11:46
  hurt anything, but I would still go with it. You don't have to
• 2:11:50
  schedule it and say this is when I'm gonna do it, just do it.
• 2:11:56
  So but that's it. And in terms of you know how how that
• 2:12:03
  kind of relates to the story at hand. Uh, if you break things
• 2:12:09
  off with somebody and they seem to have boundary issues about it, where they're
• 2:12:15
  constantly trying to draw you back into the relationship and you feel that the relationship
• 2:12:20
  is over and you're not coming back, don't don't let them drag it out,
• 2:12:26
  right, And it's not just a matter of self defense and stuff like
• 2:12:31
  that. There's an aspect of self torture. And also it's it's mean if
• 2:12:39
  you let somebody think that there might be a remote chance of getting back together
• 2:12:43
  when there is not, you're hurting them too. Not that that justifies in
• 2:12:50
  any way them hurting you back, but it's better to just cut ties.
• 2:13:00
  And obviously if you have a kid together, you know you have to be
• 2:13:03
  able to have communications and everything, but it should be something where you know
• 2:13:11
  there's a clear boundary. Now you are partners in parenting, not romantic partners.
• 2:13:20
  And I probably wouldn't have prevented anything in this situation directly, but it
• 2:13:26
  might have helped the guy spot red flags toward her violence, maybe a little
• 2:13:33
  earlier, and it would have at least given him a slight chance of protecting
• 2:13:41
  himself against that violence by either not being available for it or by alerting authorities,
• 2:13:48
  you know, by not letting her in, you know whatever. But
• 2:13:54
  master Roade give us two dollars and said, your man in the mirrors,
• 2:13:56
  right, Hannah, You're a sweetheart, and I'll take that too, thank
• 2:14:01
  you. But with that, I think we uh and we have said everything
• 2:14:09
  that we're gonna say about the issue. So thanks everybody for listening to the
• 2:14:15
  long sausage my co host, Do you guys have anything else to say?
• 2:14:20
  Good night? All right, Thanks to to co host for this was kind
• 2:14:24
  of a yucky sausage. I hate I hate stories like this because it's heartbreaking
• 2:14:28
  when somebody is killed in a situation like this. It's sad when relationships break
• 2:14:33
  up, but it's it's just gut wrenching when somebody commits a murder like this.
• 2:14:41
  But also the only way this could have had a happy ending would have
• 2:14:45
  been if she would have just turned around and emptied it. On herself,
• 2:14:48
  but and it still would have left this child without parents. It's just horrible
• 2:14:54
  all the way around, exactly. So thanks guys for sticking out the this
• 2:15:00
  particular sausage with me, and thanks to everybody who works in the background to
• 2:15:05
  help make HBr talk happen. Good Night all,