Latest / The Epstein Chronicles / Mega Edition: Judge Jed Rakoff And His Fingerprint On The Epstein/Maxwell Cases (5/10/26)

Transcript

Mega Edition: Judge Jed Rakoff And His Fingerprint On The Epstein/Maxwell Cases (5/10/26) · The Epstein Chronicles

0:00
Speaker 1: What's up everyone, and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles.
0:05
So JP Morgan finds themselves in some more hot water
0:08
now with Judge Rakoff as he's accusing them of slow
0:12
walking documents during the discovery phase and now he's also
0:17
threatening them with contempt of court. And it doesn't shock me.
0:21
JP Morgan and their lawyers, they're used to steamrolling people.
0:25
When you have the kind of lawyers that JP Morgan has,
0:28
a lot of times you'll just see brute force and intimidation.
0:32
We have more power than you, we have more pull
0:34
than you, and we have more backroom connections than you.
0:38
Because remember, when you're paying for these lawyers, you're not
0:41
just paying for what's happening in the courtroom. You're paying
0:44
for the kind of deals that they're going to work
0:47
on the golf course or at the restaurant. And then
0:51
those kind of deals, those kinds of relationships that translates
0:55
into victories inside of the courtroom. And a lot of
0:58
times those victories come without spending one single minute in
1:01
front of a jury because they work out plea deals,
1:05
They work out all kinds of payment options for people,
1:08
and they find a way to provide cover for scuzzbags
1:11
like JP Morgan, and don't get it confused. I'm not
1:15
even mad at the lawyers. I'm mad at the bs,
1:17
loopholes and the back doors that are put in most
1:20
of these laws so that the people who have all
1:23
this dough can escape if they ever get in trouble. Meanwhile,
1:26
you better hope and pray that you never get caught
1:28
up in the legal system, because normal folks don't catch
1:32
deals like Jeffrey Epstein caught. Today's article is from CNBC
1:37
and the headline judge warns JP Morgan Chase of contempt
1:41
finding for slow walking evidence in Jeffrey Epstein case. The
1:46
authors of this article are Emon Javers and Dan Mangen.
1:51
A New York federal judge Warren JP Morgan Chase that
1:55
he might find the bank in contempt of court if
1:58
it does not speed up and produce using evidence related
2:01
to the late sexual offender, pedophile and money manager Jeffrey
2:05
Epstein for lawsuits by an Epstein accuser and the government
2:10
of the US Virgin Islands. CNBC has learned Judge Jed
2:15
Raykoff suggested in a notice that JP Morgan and two
2:19
law firms representing the bank have been slow walking and
2:22
turning over documents and other evidence to plaintiffs in the
2:26
case under a process known as discovery. According to a
2:30
source familiar with the notice, and this is what I'm
2:34
talking about when we're talking about trials, the slow walking
2:38
of discovery evidence. This is gamesmanship. This is what they do.
2:42
And it's not just JP Morgan. The government does this
2:45
all the time as well. We're currently seeing something like
2:47
this in the Brian Koberger case where he feels like
2:51
his defense team like they have to compel the prosecution
2:55
to turn evidence over, so they have to go to
2:58
the judge and then the judge makes the ruling and
3:01
draws up an order telling one side or the other
3:04
that they have to turn over all of the evidence
3:07
in so many days or whatever the timeframe is worked
3:11
out by the judge. The notice comes two weeks before
3:15
JP Morgan CEO Jamie Diamond is scheduled to be questioned
3:19
under oath by plaintiff's lawyers for the civil suits which
3:23
accuses Bank of enabling and benefiting from Epstein's alleged sex
3:29
trafficking of young women alleged. What's alleged about it? Can
3:33
somebody please answer that for me? Why do these writers
3:36
insist on saying alleged all of these women who got
3:40
a payout of some sort that's not alleged anymore. That
3:43
means that the estate of Jeffrey Epstein have accepted that
3:47
these women were abused by Jeffrey Epstein. Therefore they're paying
3:52
out restitution for that abuse. That would seem to me
3:55
to be a bit more than alleged, wouldn't it. The
3:58
court also wishes to note that it is concerned that
4:02
JP Morgan is not moving more expeditiously to produce responsive documents,
4:08
Rakeoff wrote in the notice, which has yet to appear
4:11
on the public docket in the case in US District
4:14
Court in Manhattan. While the Court appreciates the large volume
4:19
of discovery that is to be completed in this case,
4:22
a company as large as JP Morgan and Council has
4:26
experienced as Wilmer, Hell and Massey and Gale should be
4:31
able to move with greater speed than what was revealed
4:34
by this incident, the judge wrote, referring to the banks
4:37
to law firms, what was Hamlin, Hamlin and McGill busy
4:42
or something? So JP Morgan is put on notice that
4:46
further expedition will be needed on pain of being put
4:50
in contempt of court, Rakeoff wrote. A JP Morgan spokesperson
4:55
had no comment on the notice. Oh I bet they didn't.
4:58
The last thing they're going to do talked to the
5:00
media about this situation here. They don't want to get
5:03
caught slipping. Epstein, who died from a jailhouse suicide in
5:07
twenty nineteen, shortly after being arrested on federal child sex
5:12
trafficking charges, was a longtime customer of the bank until
5:16
twenty thirteen. Well, are we sure that he died from
5:20
a jailhouse suicide. I mean, that's what the official narrative says,
5:23
but I don't know how much stock I put in that. Now.
5:26
Of course, you can take my opinion and a buck
5:28
fifty or two bucks down to the local bodega and
5:31
get yourself a cup of coffee for all it's worth.
5:34
But I haven't seen anything that convinces me here that
5:38
that's the truth. What Bill Barr is enough for you,
5:41
not for me. That guy's a proven liar. I don't
5:44
trust anything he has to say, and I feel like
5:47
a broken record at this point. Whenever this topic comes up,
5:51
I am more than willing to believe that Jeffrey Epstein
5:53
killed himself in that jail cell. But I need some
5:56
proof and not the I'm here from the government. You
5:59
have to trust me kind of proof either. I want
6:02
some proof that is tangible. Let's see those videos. What
6:05
did Bill Barci let us see that? How come there
6:08
was no report right after Epstein's death? Nobody followed protocol.
6:13
It was all a shit show. Why was it reported
6:15
on four Chan like thirty eight minutes before the legacy
6:19
media even picked it up. So there's still a million questions.
6:22
But until those are answered, I don't know how anyone's
6:25
out here stating definitively one way or the other what
6:28
happened in that jail cell. The lawsuits allege to the
6:31
bank allowed Epstein to remain a client despite evidence he
6:35
was using millions of dollars he kept on deposit to
6:38
facilitate his trafficking of girls and young women to his
6:41
private island in the Virgin Islands and elsewhere. Of course,
6:45
you got to have cash, right, Cash rules today, and
6:48
no criminal enterprise, no matter what the crime is, can
6:51
function if it's not using the actual banking system that
6:55
you and I use every day. You want an example,
6:59
of that, look at it quickly. The Kinahan cartel is
7:02
now being pressed from all edges, all corners, and all sides.
7:07
The reason well, they can't use the traditional banking system anymore.
7:11
They're sanctioned. And once you get sanctioned in the banking system,
7:15
forget it. It doesn't matter how much money you have.
7:18
That's why the money laundering operations for all of these
7:21
criminal enterprises are so crucial. If you don't have a
7:25
proper money washing operation, then all of your criminal activity
7:30
is going to go to waste. And that's why you
7:32
see all of these money men inside of these criminal
7:35
enterprises who are just making a ton of money because
7:39
they're crucial to the operation, no matter what the criminal
7:42
enterprise is. Five years before JP Morgan ended its customer
7:47
relationship with Epstein, he pleaded guilty in Florida State Court
7:51
to soliciting sex for money from an underage girl and
7:55
serve thirteen months in jail before his conviction. Epstein was
7:59
friends with former Presidents Donald Trump and Bill Clinton, as
8:03
well as Prince Andrew of Britain. Since we're talking about politicians,
8:07
I mean you can add Ehud Barock to that. You
8:10
can add Bill Richardson to that. You can add George
8:13
Mitchell to that, and there's a host of other folks
8:16
that can get thrown into that conversation as well. JP
8:19
Morgan denies any wrongdoing, and its own civil complaint. The
8:24
company has said former bank executive Jess Staley would be
8:28
legally responsible for any liability arising from its relationship with Epstein.
8:34
Staley spent three decades at JP Morgan and had close
8:38
contact with Epstein, whom he considered a friend over the
8:41
years when Epstein was a customer and not just a friend.
8:45
Go ahead and use Jess Staley's own words, my dear friend, Jeffrey,
8:50
thank you for letting me come and dunk mynards in
8:53
your jacuzzi as I sip on some wine and god
8:56
knows what else, Because you know, that's what I'm doing
8:59
with the local banker next weekend. I'm giving them the
9:02
keys to the townhouse so he can come over and
9:04
have a little dip in the jacuzzi, you know, because
9:06
we're so close. Who believes that shit, And the fact
9:10
that they'd pitch it and think that people are going
9:13
to believe it is just crazy to me. Aren't they
9:16
supposed to be the smartest, richest, best schooled people in
9:20
the world. Didn't they all go to like Wharton, Oxford
9:23
and all these other dumbass institutions that are a waste
9:26
of money. In my opinion, that's right, they all did.
9:29
But somehow there's not a lick of common sense amongst
9:32
the whole entire lot of them. Rakeoff, in a court
9:35
ruling published in early May, noted that plaintiffs alleged that
9:39
mister Staley had first hand knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's sex
9:43
trafficking operation. Mister Staley is alleged to have visited Epstein's
9:47
residences several times while that operation was ongoing, and during
9:53
these visits observed the Epstein accusers suing JP Morgan as
9:57
a sexual trafficking and abused victim. Raykoff noted, and again,
10:02
if plaintiff is who I think it is, it's going
10:05
to be a wrap for JP Morgan and everybody else
10:08
involved here, because this person for sure got treated absolutely monstrously,
10:13
not only by Epstein in his pals, but by the
10:15
financial system that should have been keeping an eye on
10:19
what Epstein was up to. Plaintiff's further alleged that mister
10:23
Staley himself abused some of Epstein's victims, including the woman
10:28
suing the bank. The judge wrote that woman claims that
10:31
one of Epstein's friends, whom she later identified as mister Staley,
10:36
used aggressive force in his sexual assault of her and
10:39
informs her that he had Epstein's permission to do what
10:43
he wanted to her. And remember, Leon Black is still
10:46
facing allegations from a woman who has some pretty similar
10:49
claims that Leon Black was abusing her at Jeffrey Epstein's
10:53
behest at Jeffrey Epstein's apartment. YadA, YadA, YadA. How many
10:57
times do we have to hear the same story? In
11:00
his own court filing, Staley called the accusations against him baseless,
11:04
and he has denied knowledge of Epstein sex trafficking. Staley
11:09
stepped down as CEO of British banking giant Barclays in
11:13
late twenty twenty one after an inquiry by a United
11:17
Kingdom regulator into how he had characterized his relationship with
11:21
Epstein to Barclays. And of course it's never the institution's fault, right,
11:26
It's always somebody like Jess Staley's fault. And I'm certainly
11:29
not saying Staley doesn't share a big portion of the
11:32
blame here, but to let the whole institution off and
11:35
all of his superiors off, I think that just lets
11:38
the cycle continue until there's some real repercussions for the
11:42
bullshit that the financial sector gets up to. We're gonna
11:46
keep seeing the same stuff over and over and over again.
11:50
How many times are we going to see one hundred
11:52
and fifty million, two hundred million dollars fines? And the
11:55
banks have no problem paying them because it's not their money, right,
11:58
the shareholders are going to pick up the bill, and
12:01
all of the people that were responsible for the bullshit,
12:03
they just keep it moving. They're onto the next one.
12:06
And I hate to say it, folks, Jeffrey Epstein is
12:09
just the tip of the iceberg. This kind of problem
12:12
here that we're talking about, as far as the financial
12:15
sector being involved with scumbags and helping these criminal enterprises
12:21
do what they do. Oh, that problem runs deep, and
12:24
it's never going to be something that gets exposed or
12:28
fixed unless there's penalties for people and their nonsense. And
12:32
up until now, we have not seen any sort of
12:35
real penalties for those in the financial sector, besides a
12:39
few sacrificial lambs. Have any of the big shots ever
12:42
been busted after the financial meltdown any of that? Of
12:46
course not. It's always one or two people that get
12:49
served up. And they're trying the same strategy here with
12:52
jess Day. And I don't think it's going to work
12:55
this time. I don't think the judge is buying it,
12:57
and I certainly don't think you're buying it. All right, folks,
13:01
that's going to do it for this one. All of
13:03
the information that goes with the episode can be found
13:06
in the description box. What's up everyone, and welcome back
13:09
to the Epstein Chronicles. So it looks like Judge Raykoff
13:14
is going to sign off or has signed off on
13:17
the settlement that sees the survivors divvy up more than
13:22
two hundred and ninety million dollars. Well, that's after the
13:26
eighty seven million or so go to the lawyers and
13:29
the other people who are involved as far as administrators.
13:32
But the survivors are certainly in line here to get
13:36
themselves a nice chunk of change, and they deserve it.
13:40
Imagine being abused by this sick bastard for all these
13:43
years and nobody believing you, Nobody in the media, nobody
13:47
in law enforcement. So when you look at their abuse
13:50
and then you can pound the interest for the years
13:53
that it was ignored, I would say a couple of
13:55
million dollars is a pretty decent starting point. And like
13:59
I've said a bunch of times before, the US Virgin
14:02
Islands is lucky that I'm not one of these survivors,
14:05
or that one of my loved ones isn't, because we'd
14:07
be exploring every possibility to sue the US Virgin Islands
14:11
for their enabling of Jeffrey Epstein, and they open that
14:15
door themselves with their lawsuit against JP Morgan. So if
14:19
it's good for the goose, it's certainly good for the gander.
14:23
Also in this episode, we're gonna talk about the Grand
14:27
Jerry documents from Palm Beach that are now in front
14:30
of a judge who will make the decision if those
14:33
Grand Jerry documents become public or not. So basically, all
14:38
that's standing in our way of getting a good look
14:41
at what happened down in Palm Beach the first time
14:44
around is this judge right now. So this judge better
14:48
do the right thing. And his name is Luis Delgado,
14:51
So we're gonna get into both of these articles, and
14:54
the first one we're going to look at is an
14:57
article from the Guardian headline AP Morgan to pay Jeffrey
15:01
Epstein victims survivors you mean two hundred and ninety million
15:05
dollars in a lawsuit settlement. District Judge Jed Raykoff agreed
15:10
to approve the very large amount in addition to a
15:13
seventy five million dollar payout agreement with Deutsche Bank. This
15:18
article was originally authored by Reuters. A US judge on
15:23
Monday granted preliminary approval to JP morgan chases two hundred
15:28
and ninety million dollars settlement with women who said Jeffrey
15:31
Epstein abused them and that the largest US bank ignored
15:36
the late financier. You mean pedophiles, sex trafficking, and they
15:40
most certainly did. I'll keep reiterating that every single time
15:44
we talk about this topic, because the financial sector is
15:48
dick deep in the nonsense that Jeffrey Epstein was up to.
15:51
And while everybody else is out here telling you about
15:54
the WEF and people who are gonna make you eat bugs,
15:57
who's been laser focused on these scumbags in the financial sector,
16:01
You know, the actual people in the world calling the shots,
16:04
the actual people who make your life miserable. Yeah, those people.
16:10
The approval was issued by US District Judge Jed Rakoff
16:14
at a hearing in Manhattan Federal Court. This is a
16:17
really fine settlement, Raykoff said. He said the accord and
16:21
a similar seventy five million dollar agreement with Deutsche Bank
16:25
he approved earlier this month, were very large settlements and
16:29
would compensate Epstein's victims, though not make up for the
16:32
abuses that they suffered. And that's where I am too.
16:36
There's no amount of money that can make up for
16:39
this kind of abuse, that weight that you carry for
16:42
the rest of your life, that anchor that you're dragging
16:45
around your neck. There's not enough money in the world
16:48
to make that go away. However, a few million dollars
16:52
is a nice starting point at trying to rebuild your life.
16:56
Epstein had been a JP Morgan client from nineteen ninety
16:59
eight eight through twenty thirteen, when the bank terminated his accounts. Victims,
17:05
led by a former ballet dancer known as Jane do One,
17:08
said JP Morgan missed red flags of Epstein's abuse and
17:13
stayed in touch with him long after his official departure.
17:17
Lawyers for the survivors said last week that the proposed
17:21
all cash settlement was fair, adequate, reasonable, given the risks
17:26
of further litigation and JP Morgan's denying involvement in Epstein's
17:31
sex trafficking. JP Morgan, in a statement this month, said,
17:35
any association it had with Epstein was a mistake and
17:39
we regret it. No, you regret that it was exposed.
17:42
If you regretted the actual relationship itself, then why were
17:46
you still doing business with him after he was already
17:49
a sex offender. Epstein remained a JP Morgan client for
17:53
five years after he pleaded guilty in two thousand and
17:57
eight to a Florida prostitution charge and registered as a
18:01
sex offender. Must be nice, huh. And none of these
18:04
articles ever mentioned that the New York Prosecutor's Office tried
18:07
to argue that Jeffrey Epstein should have only been a
18:10
Level one offender. Imagine that bullshit. And these are the
18:14
same people that get up there on a daily basis
18:16
on these news programs talking about how everybody else is
18:20
a failure at their job. Meanwhile, all of these clowns
18:24
who were working at the SDNY working in New York.
18:27
In general, let Jeffrey Epstein run around for decades diddling
18:31
little kids. So keep that in mind anytime you hear
18:35
somebody who has something to say that used to work
18:38
at a place like the SDNY. At Monday's hearing, Raykoff
18:42
asked Jane Doe's lawyer David Boyce, why there was no
18:45
minimum distribution for each victim, noting that the Deutsche Bank settlement,
18:50
which Boys also negotiated, guaranteed each at least seventy five
18:54
thousand dollars. Boy said many survivors in the Deutsche Bank
18:59
case were from Russia or Eastern Europe and difficult to contact,
19:04
making the guaranteed minimum an incentive to come forward. He
19:07
said that was not needed in the JP Morgan case.
19:11
And there's just another little clue from David Boyce about
19:14
what I've talked about here for so long. All of
19:17
the unnamed girls, especially from places like Eastern Europe, that
19:22
were abused by Epstein. Now we have heard from a
19:26
lot of the women here in America who were abused,
19:28
not all of them, but we have heard from a
19:30
lot of women who have been abused. But if you
19:32
think that's all of them, you haven't been following along
19:35
with the plot of the story because it most certainly
19:39
is not all of them. And he's saying it right
19:41
here in open court. How many women in Russia or
19:44
Ukraine or elsewhere were abused by Epstein and his buddies
19:49
and have no idea that this compensation is even available.
19:53
Raykoff appointed Simon Lelchuk, a lawyer who specializes in administering settlements,
20:00
to consider individual claims and determine payouts in the JP
20:04
Morgan and Deutsche Bank case. JP Morgan is also facing
20:09
a lawsuit over Epstein by the US Virgin Islands, where
20:12
the financier pedophile owned two neighboring islands. That case is
20:17
currently scheduled to go to trial on October twenty third.
20:21
Epstein died at age sixty six in a Manhattan jail
20:25
cell while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. New York
20:29
City's medical examiner called the death a suicide. All right,
20:34
So there we are on the settlement, with Judge Rakoff
20:37
given the go ahead, and the settlement looking like it's
20:40
about to kick in and begin distributing some of those funds,
20:45
all right, onto our second article. This article is from
20:49
the wpbf dot Com and the headline Palm Beach County
20:54
judge now deciding whether to release Jeffrey Epstein grand jury testimony.
21:00
Lewis Delgado will decide if public gets to finally see
21:03
if prosecutors downplayed Epstein's case to the grand jury in
21:08
two thousand and six. I mean, how can you not
21:11
release this? If you're this judge, how can you not
21:15
release these grand jury documents? When all of the politicians
21:18
down here in pom beachro okay with it. Everybody's okay
21:22
with it. So if this judge does not release these documents,
21:27
I'm gonna have some questions. In a highly unusual step,
21:30
a Palm Beach County judge is finally reviewing the secret
21:34
Jeffrey Epstein grand jury testimony and will decide if, after
21:38
seventeen years, the records will be released to the public.
21:42
Attorneys for Palm Beach County Clerk of Court deliver the
21:46
records to the chambers of Judge Lewis Delgado Monday morning,
21:50
as he ordered. It's a very big deal because there
21:54
has been a tremendous shadow of suspicion over the way
21:57
in which the grand jury proceedings were handled. In this matter,
22:01
said attorney Jack Scarolla, who represents ten Epstein's survivors, including
22:06
the sole witness who testified before the grand jury. One
22:10
witness was called up in front of that grand jury
22:13
with everything that they had, with all of those little
22:16
girls that came forward, these rotten sons of bitches down
22:19
in Palm Beach decided that only the testimony of one
22:22
girl would be used. Oh and by the way, they
22:25
panned her whole entire credibility, talking about how she had
22:30
pictures on MySpace of her kissing boys or drinking beer,
22:34
as if teenagers all over the world aren't doing that
22:37
on a daily basis. And that was what they used
22:40
to impugne her credibility. And I'm not even talking about
22:44
Dershowitz and the gang. I'm talking about the prosecutors themselves.
22:49
There has been mounting pressure for the past few years
22:51
to release the testimony because of accusations prosecutors sabotage the
22:56
case against Abstein, who walked away in two thousand and
22:59
eight with the sentence many described as a slap on
23:02
the wrist. I think everybody describes it as that, besides
23:06
Epstein and his legal team. I mean, just listen to
23:09
Alan Dershowitz prattle on and on about how Jeffrey Epstein
23:12
didn't get a sweetheart deal and how he was treated
23:16
like anyone else would have been treated. Imagine the audacity
23:20
of mister, I kept my underpants on to try and
23:23
pitch that bullshit? Do you? Following a request from Governor
23:27
Ron DeSantis's office and a lawsuit by the Palm Beach Post,
23:31
two different judges declined to unseal the testimony, citing Florida
23:35
law that does not allow grand jury proceedings to become public.
23:40
In May, the Fourth District Court of Appeals reversed the
23:44
latest refusal, saying the trial court could make that decision
23:48
if it determined unsealing would further justice. So you tell
23:52
me how it won't further justice. This is a national
23:55
security We're talking about a man who's been dead now
23:59
multiple years. We're talking about a case that has already
24:02
been tried, and there's not going to be any precedent
24:05
because they're making a special allowance for these transcripts. So
24:09
please tell me how it's not a good idea to
24:12
release this and make it public, unless, of course, you're
24:15
trying to hide something. The case was assigned to a
24:19
third judge, Delgado, who ordered the clerk's office to produce
24:22
the records by ten am on Monday. However, there wasn't
24:27
much to produce. Attorneys walked in with a manila envelope
24:31
and some pages on top labeled Grand Jury Clerk Court.
24:35
Joseph Abruzzo told w PBF twenty five news investigative reporter
24:41
Terry Parker the records did include audio recordings. Those recordings
24:46
should reveal whether or not the state presented all of
24:50
the evidence of Epstein's underage sex trafficking ring or for
24:54
some reason did not. Well, we know what the some
24:57
reason is. When you're powerful and you have a few bucks,
25:01
the laws are different for you. For the rest of us, well,
25:04
we have to dance to the tune that's being played
25:07
by these smarmy sons of bitches. But people like Jeffrey Epstein,
25:11
well he's the fucking maestro. Scrolla doesn't understand why the
25:15
many other victims police interviewed weren't allowed to testify, and
25:19
he says the state grilled is sixteen year old client
25:22
as though she was the one who was on trial.
25:25
It's outrageous. A child victim is a child victim. To
25:29
characterize this child as a prostitute is just so outrageous
25:33
and it's hard to believe that anyone could have thought inappropriate,
25:37
said Scrola. One hundred percent, this kid wasn't a prostitute.
25:43
Just because Epstein gave her a few bucks doesn't make
25:46
her a prostitute. And when you say it like that,
25:49
you're acting like she's out here on the blade working
25:52
for a pim. That wasn't what happened. She got sucked
25:55
in to this scene of opulence that was inhabited by
25:59
Sealy Uppercross people. And when you're a kid from the
26:03
other side of the tracks, that shit goes a long way.
26:06
So if it's normal to them, it has to be
26:08
normal to you, right, So don't call these girls prostitutes.
26:12
These were little kids who were manipulated and abused by
26:16
this sick fuck bag, Scrolla said. Prosecutors brought up the
26:20
teen's use of MySpace and a relationships with teen boys.
26:24
A grand jury indicted Epstein on a single misdemeanor charge
26:27
of soliciting an underage prostitute, a charge so minor itt
26:32
outraged police and Epstein's bewildered victims. A second minor charge
26:37
was later added, and Epstein was convicted and sentenced to
26:41
eighteen months, but spent only thirteen months, partly behind bars
26:45
in a work release program. It is now up to
26:48
Judge Delgado to privately review the Epstein grand jury testimony
26:53
and decide if its release would help further justice. Grand
26:58
jury testimony has never been released before in Palm Beach
27:01
County history, but now with Epstein dead and so much
27:05
worldwide interest in his case, Scarolla says he thinks there
27:09
should be an exception. I think it's very likely that
27:12
he is going to find that the interests of justice
27:15
will be served by releasing the grand jury proceedings, said Scrolla.
27:20
Delgado told Parker he was not sure how long it
27:23
will take him to review the case and issue his order,
27:26
but said he usually works fairly quickly. Both current State
27:31
Attorney Dave Ahrenberg, who was not in office during the
27:34
Epstein prosecution, and Clerk of Court Joseph Abruzzo said they
27:39
are in favor of releasing the testimony. So I've been
27:43
waiting for this for quite some time, as you're all aware,
27:46
and I really really hope that we get not only
27:49
a look at it, but hopefully they release this audio
27:53
that we hear about here as well, and according to
27:55
Judge Delgado, he works relatively quickly, so we'll keep our
27:59
ear to them, and as soon as we have any
28:03
kind of information one way or the other, we'll make
28:06
sure that we get it added to the catalog. All right, folks,
28:10
that's gonna do it for now. All of the information
28:13
that goes with the episode, including the Patreon page if
28:16
you don't want to deal with commercials anymore, can be
28:19
found in the description box. What's up, everyone, and welcome
28:23
back to the Epstein Chronicles. Jess Day and Jeffrey Epstein.
28:30
We're obviously a lot closer than Jess Daily wants to
28:34
let on, and as we learn more information from this
28:38
lawsuit as far as some of the details, as far
28:41
as those emails and the conversations that they were having,
28:45
it fills in a lot of the blanks and it
28:48
confirms a lot of the rumor out there about Jess
28:50
Daily and his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. And now we're
28:55
learning that not only were they having these weird ass
28:59
conversations using code word and all kinds of other goofy stuff,
29:04
Epstein allegedly sent Jess Staley a photo of a young
29:09
woman in a sexually suggestive pose. And that's according to
29:13
Judge Raykoff himself, And he also released a fifty four
29:17
page filing explaining why he made the rulings that he made.
29:21
And over the course of the next few days, we're
29:23
gonna dive a little deeper into those court rulings and
29:26
into some of those filings and pick out some of
29:29
the more interesting parts to talk about here on the podcast.
29:34
But before we get there, Long Crime has an article out,
29:38
and this article is talking about the photo that was
29:41
allegedly sent to Jess Day by Jeffrey Epstein. So let's
29:46
get this quick update and let's see where we're at. Headline,
29:50
Jeffrey Epstein sent ex senior JP Morgan exec photo of
29:55
young woman in sexually suggestive pose. The judge says this.
30:00
This article was authored by Adam Klassfeld, then top JP
30:06
Morgan Chase executive. Jess Staley allegedly abused some of Jeffrey
30:11
Epstein's victims and received a sexually suggestive photograph of one
30:15
young woman from the now deceased pedophile, a judge indicated
30:19
in a ruling, and again this isn't innuendo, This isn't
30:23
some knucklehead sitting on Twitter just talking nonsense. This is
30:27
what the judge who's overseeing this case had to say,
30:31
and this is all part of why he's letting this
30:33
ruling move forward. He finds merit in what these survivors,
30:37
what these victims have to say, and considering everything we
30:41
know about the relationship between Jess Staley and Jeffrey Epstein,
30:46
I don't know how, as a judge or anyone in
30:48
a position of power, how you wouldn't be interested in
30:52
learning more and having this progress to a point where
30:55
we're at discovery, where people are being deposed, and to
30:59
where things getting aired out in open court. Because we
31:03
all know that transparency is the best medicine here, and
31:06
we also know that that's the reason why nothing has
31:09
ever really been transparent when we're talking about Epstein. If
31:13
the false narrative surrounding Epstein ever broke down and the
31:17
regular old Joe found out the real story, forget it,
31:21
because people, for the most part, only know a part
31:24
of the story as far as Epstein's concerned. They only
31:27
know the little tidbits that have been on TV or
31:30
that have been in documentaries like Filthy Rich. The average
31:35
person doesn't understand the levels of the corruption surrounding this dude,
31:39
or how deeply he was entrenched at basically every level
31:44
of power, from the local municipality level all the way
31:47
up to the White House where he was visiting seventeen times.
31:53
Released on Monday afternoon, Senior US District Judge Jed Raycoff's
31:57
fifty four page opinion and order why he advanced claims
32:02
alleging that JP Morgan and Deutsche Bank knowingly profited from
32:06
Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking scheme. Raykoff revealed new details about
32:12
the bank and its former executives in explaining his reasoning.
32:17
And I have to tell you, I was on the
32:18
fence about Judge Rakoff and his decisions and if he
32:22
was gonna let this move forward. I'm honestly surprised that
32:25
we're at the point we're at, because it's very rare
32:28
that an institution like JP Morgan or people like Jess
32:33
Staley or Jamie Diamond are held accountable for anything. Usually
32:38
people like this will get a fine and they'll keep
32:40
it moving, and there's never any real accountability or anybody
32:44
really facing serious consequences. And that's because these institutions have
32:49
so much money that they're able to just pay their
32:52
way out of any trouble they ever find themselves in.
32:56
And this is how it's been historically for the banks forever.
33:00
The financial sector is able to do basically whatever they want.
33:04
Because who do you think is funding all of your
33:07
favorite politicians? Do you think they got to Washington, DC
33:11
on your twenty dollars donation? They absolutely did not. They
33:14
got there by all of their handlers and by all
33:17
of their bag boys working in the financial sector who
33:20
are giving them money hand over fist. And then when
33:24
they give them that money, well they expect something in return. Right.
33:28
This isn't charity, This isn't all truism. This is nothing
33:32
more than pay to play politics. We'll give you the
33:35
money to get elected, then you, as the lawmaker, will
33:38
make sure that we have favorable laws on the books
33:41
so that we can maneuver and continue to get rich
33:44
by pilfering the wealth of everybody else. The most prominent
33:47
among these bankers is Staley, who later moved on to
33:50
become the CEO of Barclay's Bank, before resigning amid scrutiny
33:55
of his Epstein ties. JP Morgan has tried to shift
33:58
the blame to Staley in a separate lawsuit, claiming that
34:02
their former executive disguised his Epstein ties for personal reasons.
34:07
Jane Doe, the anonymous woman suing JP Morgan in a
34:11
proposed class action, claimed in a deposition that Staley sexually
34:15
abused her. So, look, we're not talking about just financial
34:19
enabling here, right, because we all know that there's levels
34:22
to this. And while Staley has always been rumored to
34:26
be really close with Epstein, we had never really seen
34:29
any public accusations about Staley being involved in the actual abuse. Now,
34:35
behind the scenes, that's a whole different story. Rumors have
34:38
been rampant for a very long time that not only
34:41
Jeff Staley, but other people involved with Jeffrey Epstein financially
34:45
took part in this abuse. And we have had several names,
34:49
prominent names thrown out there by Virginia Roberts and others.
34:54
But how many girls, behind the scenes, women who have
34:56
never come forward, were abused by Jeffrey Epstein and his
35:00
gross ass pals, and still to this day having come
35:03
forward with those allegations. My guess is that's in the
35:07
hundreds and that's not even hyperbole. We're talking about decades
35:10
of abuse where this man continuously did what he was doing.
35:15
You don't take a break from this. This behavior was
35:18
Epstein's thing. It wasn't something he could turn on and off.
35:21
This is how he rolled all the time. So how
35:24
many hundreds thousands of women are out there that we
35:27
have never even heard from? Women in war torn countries,
35:30
women in places of great poverty. It's a wide known
35:34
fact that Jeffrey Epstein loved to use places like Eastern
35:38
Europe to find women to abuse. So how many are
35:42
out there that we have never heard from? Raykoff's ruling
35:45
suggests that she's not his only accuser. The judge noted
35:49
that the women in the class alleged that mister Staley
35:52
himself abused some of Epstein's survivors, including JPM Jane Doe
35:57
herself abbreviating JP Morgan. So that's what they're calling Jane
36:02
Doe in the JP Morgan suit, JP Jane Doe. So
36:07
that's what he's referring to her as in his ruling.
36:09
And as we go through these stories, these articles, I'm
36:13
sure that's what he's going to be referring to Jane
36:16
Doe as from here on out, And like I said
36:18
in the last episode, there are certainly some hints as
36:22
to who Jane Doe is, but until that name is announced,
36:25
if it's ever announced, I'm not going to jump in
36:28
here and really dive too deep and try and unfurl
36:31
who that person is. They filed this lawsuit in an
36:35
anonymous fashion for a reason, right, But I will say
36:39
that they didn't do a great job in masking the
36:42
person's identity. If you're following along with the story and
36:46
you're looking at the allegations in the lawsuit and certain
36:49
facts that they point out, JPM Jane Doe claims that
36:54
one of Epstein's friends, whom she later identified as mister Staley,
36:59
used aggressive four in his sexual assault of her and
37:02
informed JPM Jane Doe that he had Epstein's permission to
37:06
do what he wanted to her. The ruling states. In
37:09
a separate lawsuit, the Virgin Islands government unsealed eye opening
37:13
details about Staley and Epstein's relationship. The Attorney General's office
37:18
there claims that Epstein exchanged approximately one thousand, two hundred
37:22
emails with Staley's work email address, between two thousand and
37:26
eight and twenty twelve. They didn't even set up like
37:30
burner accounts or anything. They were so brazen and not
37:33
worried that they were ever going to face any kind
37:35
of scrutiny that they were like, we'll just have these
37:37
conversations out in the open on your work email account.
37:42
And thankfully they did, because if they didn't, we might
37:45
not have ever seen any of the contents of those emails.
37:49
These communications show a close personal relationship and profound friendship
37:54
between the two men, and even suggests that Staley may
37:58
have been involved in the Epstein sex trafficking operation. The
38:02
Virgin Islands lawsuit states heavy words, right, and again, we're
38:06
not talking about somebody making allegations from the peanut gallery.
38:10
This is the Attorney General's Office of the US Virgin Islands.
38:15
So these are serious accusations and the judge is certainly
38:19
treating them as such. In December two thousand and nine,
38:22
well after Epstein's conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor,
38:27
Epstein allegedly sends daily to emails, each showing a photograph
38:31
of a young woman. Those images are redacted entirely in
38:35
the Virgin Islands complaint, but Judge Raykoff describes one of
38:39
them in his ruling. One of them, dated December fifth,
38:43
two thousand and nine, attached a picture of a young
38:46
woman in a sexually suggestive pose, the judge said. The
38:50
ruling notes that another email from December twentieth, two thousand
38:54
and nine consisted entirely of a picture of a young woman.
38:58
So who are these young women and are they people
39:00
that have been previously known as accusers? We probably will
39:04
never know. I'm just asking that as a rhetorical question.
39:08
At this point. Staley's attorney didn't immediately respond to an
39:12
email requesting comment. I mean, what do you say to
39:15
something like that? As the attorney, No, Comment's probably the
39:19
right way to go. You have the judge coming out
39:21
here and making what can only be called inflammatory remarks
39:25
in his ruling, and certainly not remarks that are friendly
39:28
to Jeff Staley or to JP Morgan. So it's gonna
39:32
be very very interesting to watch this all unfold and
39:35
to see what happens come trial time in October. So
39:39
until then, we'll continue to add pieces to the puzzle
39:42
until a full HD picture appears. All right, everybody, that's
39:47
gonna do it for this one. All of the information
39:49
that goes with the episode can be found in the
39:52
description box. What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode
39:56
of the Epstein Chronicles. There's one thing about the Jeffrey
40:00
Epstein's story that cuts through all the noise, all the
40:03
pr spin, and all the eye had no idea excuses,
40:07
and that's the money. Because money doesn't care about image
40:10
or legacy or royal titles. It doesn't get nervous under oath.
40:14
It doesn't change its story. It doesn't vanish into the night,
40:17
no matter how many powerful hands try to bury it.
40:20
Money tells the truth even when everyone else is lying.
40:24
You can destroy emails, shred flight logs, buy silence, or
40:28
run pr campaigns until the end of time. But the
40:30
money trail that's permanent ink. That's the truth carved into ledgers,
40:35
transfers and transactions that never stop whispering who really pulled
40:40
the strings. And that's why it's the single most effective
40:43
weapon left to hold Epstein's enablers accountable, because, let's be honest,
40:48
we all know how this goes. The most horrific crimes
40:51
get tangled in power, influence, and corruption until they're unrecognizable.
40:55
The victims are dismissed, the lawyers are threatened, and the
40:59
institutions designed to protect justice suddenly develop a chronic case
41:03
of cowardice. So, yeah, we might not ever see half
41:06
the people face judgment for the things they actually did,
41:09
the human wreckage they left behind. But you start pulling
41:12
out the threat of money, and it doesn't matter how
41:14
many offshore accounts they've got. It all unravels. Wire transfers
41:18
don't lie, bank statements don't forget. Every dollar that moved
41:21
through Epstein's network was a footprint left and what cement
41:25
leading right back to the ones who made them untouchable
41:28
for so long. And when you really look at it,
41:30
you start to understand why so many people are terrified
41:33
of the financial side of the story. And that's because
41:36
it's not abstract. It's not a rumor or speculation. Its receipts,
41:42
hard data col proof. It's not just who flew on
41:45
his jet, it's who co mingled funds with them, who
41:48
invested into shell companies, who allowed them to move millions
41:51
while knowing damn well where the money came from. And
41:54
once those ledgers are laid bare, it becomes painfully obvious
41:57
that Epstein wasn't just some perverted billionaire with a secret island.
42:02
He was a financial hub, a central artery for the
42:04
powerful to move money, hide assets, and trade favors in
42:08
ways that blurred the line between crime and privilege. That's
42:12
why these lawsuits against Bank of Melon and Bank of
42:15
America aren't just procedural, they're seismic, because they force open
42:19
the vaults that have been sealed for years. These banks
42:23
weren't passive players or innocent bystanders. They were the quiet
42:26
custodians of corruption. The vaults that didn't just store money,
42:30
they stored secrets. They saw the suspicious activity reports, the
42:34
red flags, the cash flow that didn't add up, and
42:37
they looked the other way. Why because money that dirty
42:41
still spends. Because when you're dealing with someone like Epstein,
42:44
silence is profitable and wilful blindness is a business strategy.
42:48
But now the spotlight swinging their way, and the deeper
42:51
these lawsuits dig, the more uncomfortable names are going to surface. CEOs,
42:56
hedge fund managers, lawyers, royal friends are all in there,
43:00
tangled up in a web of wires and deposits, and
43:03
the beauty of it is they can't gaslight the numbers.
43:06
They can't spin a spreadsheet when the numbers don't lie,
43:09
neither can they look. We may never get the cinematic
43:13
version of justice, the one where the whole rotten elite
43:15
lineup gets frog marched into court, But this is how
43:18
it really happens in the real world, Quietly, methodically, with subpoenas, audits,
43:23
and financial forensics. This is how you burn down the
43:26
infrastructure that protected Epstein long after he should have been exposed.
43:31
You follow the dollars and you find the disease. You
43:34
pull on one transaction and suddenly the whole, ugly truth
43:37
starts pouring out. Follow the money and you don't just
43:40
find Epstein. You find the ecosystem that built them, the
43:44
bankers who banked them, the execs who backed them, the
43:46
institutions that made them legitimate. And once that light hits
43:50
the books, no one walks away clean. That's where accountability
43:54
lives now, not in courtroom speeches or press releases, but
43:58
in the raw, on, flinching vain of greed. Follow the
44:02
money and you'll find the rot. Follow the money and
44:05
you'll finally see who stood behind the monster when the
44:07
lights went out, and who made damn sure he never
44:11
had to stand alone. Today's article is from The Business
44:15
Insider and the headline judge puts epstein victim lawsuits against
44:18
Bank of America and bn Y on the fast track.
44:22
This article was authored by Jacob Shamsian. A pair of
44:27
lawsuits against banks from Jeffrey Epstein's victims is going on
44:31
the fast track. At a Monday hearing, US District Judge
44:35
Jed Rakoff ordered lawyers to comply with the quick turnaround
44:38
deadlines for the cases which were filed against Bank of
44:41
America and bn Why. And look, that's a good thing
44:44
in my opinion. The faster this gets under way, the
44:47
better off everyone's gonna be. And one thing we learned
44:49
from the banks the last time around is they like
44:52
to slow walk all this. They want a slow walk discovery.
44:55
They want to slow walk any kind of information being
44:58
handed over. The use everything in their power when it
45:02
comes to legal procedure to do so. The two lawsuits
45:06
filed in October alleged to the banks ignored red flags
45:09
related to Epstein's sex trafficking operation. Rakeoff set November deadlines
45:14
for motions to dismiss the cases, with an oral argument
45:17
for December fifteenth, the judge ordered that all discovery, including depositions,
45:22
must be completed by February twenty seventh. So that is
45:26
quite the timeline, and I can only imagine how many
45:28
depositions they're going to want to get through. Look how
45:31
many we saw with Virginia and Glenn Maxwell, and then
45:35
look at how many we saw when it came to
45:36
JP Morgan and the USVII lawsuit. So this is a
45:40
pretty ambitious timeline. But I'm guessing that Judge Rakeoff knows
45:45
what he's doing. Certainly not his first rodeo, if you will.
45:49
If the cases go to trial, they'll be back to
45:51
back in May and June of twenty twenty six, Racoff said.
45:55
The lawsuit against Bank of America alleges that one of
45:58
Epstein's employees instructed one of his victims to open an
46:01
account with the bank in her own name and then
46:04
used it to pay her rent while Epstein's sexually abused
46:07
her over the course of several years. The account was
46:10
also used for other purposes, which may have facilitated the
46:13
sex trafficking of other women. The lawsuit a ledges, well, look,
46:17
we all know that that's what was happening. Epstein would
46:20
bring these girls over, whether it was through Jean lu
46:23
Brunel or otherwise, set them up at the apartment building
46:27
at E sixty six, and then from there, well, the
46:30
abuse would begin, and the vast majority of these women
46:34
were then sent back to their home countries with no
46:37
sort of justice ever come in their way. And that
46:41
was all part of the plan, right. The women with
46:44
no names, that's what I call them. And while they
46:47
might not have voices, they're certainly not forgotten, not by
46:50
anybody who's following along, because that's a big part of
46:53
what went on here. One of the biggest reasons that
46:56
they did that, that they chose those women, is so
46:58
that when we got to this point where people were
47:00
looking into them, they had that plausible deniability, and that
47:05
was baked into it, right, And that was all part
47:07
of the plan, and for all these years it worked
47:10
out well. But now people are hip to it. Everybody
47:13
knows what Jean Luke Brunel was up to. Everybody knows
47:16
what Epstein was up to. The only question is can
47:19
we prove it when it comes to the banks, And
47:23
I still think that's gonna be a very, very very
47:26
large hill to cline. Now the banks might settle, but
47:29
getting them to admit fault, that's gonna be tough. The
47:33
lawsuit against BNY alleged the financial institution processed three hundred
47:37
and seventy eight million in payments to Epstein's victims while
47:40
failing to flag those transactions as suspicious. Three hundred and
47:45
seventy eight million dollars three hundred and seventy eight million
47:48
dollars paid out to victims. Sure, this is just one
47:52
guy with proclivities. I'm sure that there was nobody else involved,
47:56
nobody whatsoever. Imagine being that big of a more on
48:00
to actually believe that, like you must have CTE because
48:04
there's no other explanation for it. I wish somebody out
48:07
there would give me one plausible explanation as to what
48:11
Epstein was doing with all that money being sent to
48:13
women that were being abused or were co conspirators. My
48:18
email box is open. Please send me the explanation, because
48:22
nobody out there that tries to talk shit, that tries
48:25
to say that this is fake ever has an explanation
48:28
for where all the money was going. The biggest criticism
48:30
they have is against Virginia because she dropped the lawsuit
48:34
against Dershowitz, And we all know that she dropped that
48:37
lawsuit not because she misremembered. It was because she had enough.
48:41
How many lawsuits can somebody go through? And at what
48:44
point do you say to yourself? Enough is enough? No
48:47
matter how much I tell people, no matter what I do,
48:50
there's never any justice. So look, I didn't talk to
48:53
Virginia about that directly before she passed away, but I
48:56
think that's what was going on. You have to remember,
48:58
this is a woman that's been embroiled in these lawsuits
49:01
now for more than a decade, and that takes its toll.
49:05
It's expensive, she has kids, she's getting dragged in the mud.
49:09
You know, at some point you say to yourself is
49:11
it worth it? And for Virginia, the juice wasn't worth
49:15
the squeeze anymore. But of course that's what they cling onto. Well,
49:19
Virginia misremembered Alan Dershowitz, so she must have misremembered everything else. Well,
49:24
I guess if you're looking at it with just a
49:26
black and white view, I can see how you can
49:29
come away with that conclusion. But we know that it's
49:31
much deeper than that, much more nuanced, and there's many
49:34
more layers than just black and white. The claims in
49:39
the lawsuit are meritless and we will vigorously defend against it,
49:42
A BNY spokesperson Toll business insider, a Bank of America spokesperson,
49:47
said the bank will vigorously defend itself. Well good, if
49:50
you're not guilty, that's what you should do. But I
49:53
have a funny feeling this is all talk, Just like
49:56
with JP Morgan. We're not gonna settle with anybody. We're
49:59
gonna defend our name. What did they do? They settled?
50:03
Prince Andrew. I'm willing to talk to anybody, the authorities.
50:07
I want to clear my name. What did he do
50:09
he settled? I wonder why Epstein killed himself in jail
50:14
in twenty nineteen while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. Maxwell,
50:18
his former partner, you mean, co conspirator, general, all around scumbag, fellow,
50:22
child abuser, and bipudal Serpent, was convicted of trafficking girls
50:26
to him for sex in twenty twenty one and is
50:29
serving a twenty year prison sentence. Both lawsuits could help
50:33
shed light on how Epstein made and moved it around
50:36
his money. His estate was valued at about six hundred
50:39
and thirty million at the time of his death, and
50:42
we know that that's just a fraction of what he
50:44
actually had. We don't know what he had in the
50:46
art market or offshore or crypto or anything like that.
50:51
And that's because there's never been a true forensic look
50:54
at the money trail. Ask yourself why both lawsuits were
50:59
being brought by lawyers at Boys and Chiller and Flexner,
51:02
along with attorneys Brad Edwards and Britney Anderson, who have
51:06
collectively represented more than one hundred Epstein victims over the years.
51:10
The attorneys filed similar lawsuits in late twenty twenty two
51:14
against JP Morgan, Chase and Deutsche Bank. Rakoff, who also
51:18
oversaw those lawsuits, put them on the fast track as well.
51:22
JP Morgan agreed to settle the case for two hundred
51:25
and ninety million, Deutsche Bank agreed to settle for seventy
51:28
five million. Bn Y is represented by Wilmer Hill with
51:32
some of the same attorneys who represented JP Morgan in
51:35
the lawsuit against the bank. Bank of America is represented
51:39
by the big law firm Jones Day. At the end
51:43
of Monday's hearing, Raykoff said that he hoped that the
51:45
parties would not settle the lawsuits with lawyers of this
51:49
supreme quality. If this case settles, I will be extraordinarily
51:52
disappointed because I will be deprived of two fantastic trials
51:56
by excellent lawyers. Raykoff said, Now, I don't want to
51:59
discourage you from settling. There are some of my colleagues
52:02
that think settling is always a way to go. But
52:05
I'm much more selfish, and I would love to see
52:07
two very good trials. Boy, from your mouth to God's ears,
52:11
mister Raykoff, We're all on board with that. But unfortunately,
52:15
I just don't see it happening. They're gonna get discovery
52:19
and their lawyers are gonna vomit, and they're gonna say
52:21
to the banks, look, we better settle, because if not,
52:25
the pain train is on its way. So let's hope
52:28
that they don't settle. Let's hope they go to trial.
52:30
Let's hope that at the end of the day they're
52:33
Hubris gets the best of them. And while that's certainly
52:36
my hope, I'm not holding my breath because one thing
52:39
we know about the banks is they're not going to
52:41
expose themselves more than they have to. So if they
52:44
think that they're gonna be exposed. The last thing they're
52:47
gonna do is try and get into this prolonged, you know,
52:50
court case where they have to go through discovery, deposition,
52:53
the whole thing. So my guess is we're not gonna
52:56
see a trial here, but like usual, we'll keep an
52:59
eye on things and see how it all breaks. As
53:02
for this one, well that's going to do it. All
53:04
of the information that goes with this episode can be
53:07
found in the description box.