Latest / Sleepy Facts About History / Were the Americas' Earliest Cities Built on Cotton and Fish? - The Norte Chico Civilization and the Cotton-for-Fish Economy | Sleepy Facts About History

Transcript

Were the Americas' Earliest Cities Built on Cotton and Fish? - The Norte Chico Civilization and the Cotton-for-Fish Economy | Sleepy Facts About History · Sleepy Facts About History

• 0:00
  Welcome to Sleepy Facts About History. When we
• 0:13
  imagine the earliest cities, we usually picture
• 0:16
  grain fields, kings, and pottery. But in the
• 0:19
  3rd millennium BCE, communities on the coast
• 0:22
  of Peru broke every one of those rules. The Norte
• 0:27
  Chico civilization built monumental platform
• 0:29
  mounds and sunken plazas on a scale rivaling
• 0:33
  the first Egyptian pyramids. Yet they did so
• 0:36
  without pottery, without writing, without metal
• 0:39
  tools, and without the grain agriculture we usually
• 0:43
  consider essential for urban life. This episode
• 0:47
  explores how they achieved this. It examines
• 0:51
  the archaeological evidence from sites like Corral
• 0:53
  and Aspero, revealing how an integrated economic
• 0:56
  system linked inland irrigation agriculture with
• 1:00
  the rich marine resources of the Humboldt Current.
• 1:03
  By growing cotton to trade for fish, these ancient
• 1:06
  communities coordinated massive labor projects
• 1:09
  and sustained permanent settlements in a coastal
• 1:12
  desert. I wanted to understand why our assumptions
• 1:17
  about early human history are so narrow. While
• 1:20
  researching this episode, I kept returning to
• 1:23
  one question. Why do we assume civilization can
• 1:27
  only travel a single path? The Norte Chico offers
• 1:30
  a genuinely different route to complexity. showing
• 1:34
  that maritime resources and an industrial fiber
• 1:37
  crop could substitute for the grain surpluses
• 1:39
  of the old world. It is a calm, careful look
• 1:43
  at a society that challenges our basic definitions
• 1:46
  of what makes a city possible. In the third millennium
• 1:53
  BCE, while Egyptian laborers dragged limestone
• 1:56
  for the first pyramids, communities on the coast
• 1:59
  of Peru were filling woven bags with stone by
• 2:02
  hand to build ceremonial mounds on a comparable
• 2:05
  scale. They did this without pottery, without
• 2:09
  writing, without metal, and possibly without
• 2:12
  kings. They were sustained not by grain, but
• 2:17
  by an exchange between cotton grown in irrigated
• 2:20
  desert valleys and fish harvested from one of
• 2:23
  the richest marine ecosystems on Earth. When
• 2:27
  we think about the earliest cities, most of us
• 2:30
  carry a few assumptions we have never really
• 2:32
  examined. We imagine grain fields first. wheat
• 2:37
  or barley rice or maize surplus calories that
• 2:41
  let some people farm while others build walls
• 2:44
  temples and storehouses we picture kings or priest
• 2:50
  kings strong figures who could command labor
• 2:53
  and we place these beginnings in the river valleys
• 2:57
  of mesopotamia egypt the indus or china as if
• 3:02
  complexity had to travel a single path The Norte
• 3:06
  Chico region of Peru breaks every one of these
• 3:08
  assumptions. Along the north central coast, roughly
• 3:13
  200 kilometers north of Lima, communities without
• 3:17
  pottery, without writing, without metal tools,
• 3:21
  and possibly without any clear social hierarchy
• 3:24
  built monumental centers on a scale that rivals
• 3:27
  the early pyramids of Egypt. They did it in a
• 3:31
  coastal desert so dry it receives only a whisper
• 3:35
  of rain, fed by rivers that flow seasonally from
• 3:38
  the distant Andes. And they did it, we now believe,
• 3:42
  by combining the productivity of the Pacific
• 3:45
  Ocean with the cultivation of a single, remarkable
• 3:48
  crop, cotton. This is the story of how that happened,
• 3:54
  what the stones and bones actually tell us. and
• 3:57
  why the norte chico remains one of the most instructive
• 4:01
  puzzles in early human history to picture this
• 4:05
  landscape imagine standing on a low ridge above
• 4:08
  the supi river valley to your west the pacific
• 4:13
  ocean stretches gray and restless hidden half
• 4:16
  the time by a thick coastal fog the locals call
• 4:19
  garua the fog brings moisture to an otherwise
• 4:24
  hyper arid land but it does not bring rain What
• 4:28
  brings life are the rivers, narrow green ribbons
• 4:32
  cutting through tan desert hills, carrying meltwater
• 4:36
  from the Andes to the sea. The contrast is stark.
• 4:41
  One moment, you are in bare rock and sand. The
• 4:46
  next, you are among fields of cotton and squash,
• 4:50
  with the smell of fish drying somewhere on the
• 4:53
  coast below. The humble current, running cold
• 4:57
  and rich along this shore, creates one of the
• 4:59
  most productive marine ecosystems on Earth. Anchovies
• 5:03
  and sardines swarm in quantities that seem inexhaustible.
• 5:08
  Shellfish cluster on the rocks. Seabirds, pelicans,
• 5:14
  cormorants, condors wheel overhead in numbers
• 5:18
  that would have been unimaginable to anyone from
• 5:21
  the ancient Mediterranean. This ocean is not
• 5:25
  a barrier here. It is a larder. The third millennium
• 5:30
  BCE in Andean chronology, the late archaic or
• 5:34
  pre -ceramic period, corresponds roughly to the
• 5:37
  age of the first Egyptian dynasties and the early
• 5:40
  ziggurats of Mesopotamia. But in the Norte Chico,
• 5:44
  there was no bronze, no iron, no pottery for
• 5:48
  storage or cooking, no wheeled transport, no
• 5:52
  beasts of burden. People walked. They carried.
• 5:59
  They dug with wooden tools and reeds, and yet
• 6:03
  they built. To understand how this was possible,
• 6:07
  we need to look at what was actually built. The
• 6:11
  most extensively excavated site is Karau in the
• 6:15
  Super Valley. Spread across a desert terrace
• 6:18
  above the river floodplain, Karau covers roughly
• 6:22
  60 hectares. Its most visible features are the
• 6:26
  platform mounds. Terraced, stepped structures
• 6:30
  built of stone and earth, often with a central
• 6:33
  staircase leading to a flat summit. The largest
• 6:37
  of these, called the Great Pyramid or Pyramidae
• 6:40
  Mare, rises more than 20 meters and covers an
• 6:43
  area comparable to four football fields. It was
• 6:48
  not built in a single campaign. Radiocarbon dates
• 6:52
  from the site indicate construction beginning
• 6:54
  around 3600 BCE. and continuing for centuries
• 6:58
  with later phases remodeling and enlarging earlier
• 7:01
  work the scale is easy to see the method is harder
• 7:07
  to picture but it tells us more the builders
• 7:11
  used shikra bags woven mesh containers made of
• 7:15
  local plant fibers each filled with stones and
• 7:18
  carried by hand to the construction site stacked
• 7:22
  in layers these bags created stable fill for
• 7:26
  the terraced platforms The technique is not sophisticated
• 7:30
  in a technological sense. It requires no metal
• 7:34
  tools, no mortar, no draft animals. What it requires
• 7:39
  is coordination. Thousands of bags, carried by
• 7:44
  thousands of trips, over years or decades, directed
• 7:47
  toward a common plan. Someone decided where the
• 7:52
  mound would go. Someone organized the labor.
• 7:57
  Someone ensured that the work continued across
• 7:59
  seasons and generations. Alongside the platform
• 8:03
  mounds, Corral and other Norte Chico centers
• 8:06
  feature another distinctive architectural form,
• 8:09
  the Sunken Circular Plaza. These are precisely
• 8:14
  what the name suggests. Circular courtyards sunk
• 8:17
  below the surrounding ground level, often with
• 8:20
  stone -lined walls and a central floor. They
• 8:23
  appear at Corral, at Aspero on the coast. at
• 8:28
  Banduria in the Huara Valley, and at other sites
• 8:31
  across the region. Their function is not fully
• 8:35
  understood. They may have served ritual purposes,
• 8:39
  communal gatherings, or some combination of political
• 8:42
  and ceremonial activity. What matters for our
• 8:46
  understanding is that they are a deliberate,
• 8:49
  repeated architectural choice, part of a shared
• 8:52
  building tradition across multiple valleys. Karel
• 8:57
  also contains residential sectors, areas of small
• 9:01
  rooms and courtyards where people lived, worked,
• 9:04
  and stored food. This is crucial. The Norte Chico
• 9:09
  centers were not simply ceremonial precincts
• 9:12
  visited for festivals. They housed permanent
• 9:16
  or semi -permanent populations. Archaeologists
• 9:20
  have identified remains of dwellings, hearths,
• 9:23
  food preparation areas, and storage spaces. The
• 9:27
  people who built these mounds also lived among
• 9:30
  them. But Corral was not alone, and this point
• 9:34
  cannot be overstated. The seed of this episode,
• 9:38
  and the current archaeological consensus, demands
• 9:41
  that we see it as part of a network. Aspero,
• 9:45
  on the coast at the mouth of the Supe River,
• 9:48
  has platform mounds and sunken plazas that date
• 9:51
  to the same period or earlier. Bishama, further
• 9:55
  north, has produced remarkable relief sculptures
• 9:58
  of human and animal figures banduria in the huara
• 10:04
  valley has monumental architecture comparable
• 10:07
  in scale surveys by jonathan haas winifred creamer
• 10:12
  and their colleagues in the early 2000s identified
• 10:15
  more than 30 sites with monumental construction
• 10:19
  across the supe pativoka and fortaleza river
• 10:23
  valleys some centers were small A single mound
• 10:28
  and plaza. Others, like Karel, sprawled across
• 10:32
  dozens of hectares. They were not evenly spaced,
• 10:36
  but clustered where rivers met the desert, each
• 10:39
  valley supporting its own constellation of sites,
• 10:42
  with coastal settlements like Aspero paired with
• 10:45
  inland centres upriver. Radiocarbon dates from
• 10:49
  multiple locations confirmed that this was a
• 10:52
  regional phenomenon, not a single precocious
• 10:55
  settlement. The implications are significant.
• 10:59
  Whatever drove the construction of these centers,
• 11:02
  it was not the genius of one place or one leader.
• 11:06
  It was a social and economic system that operated
• 11:10
  across a considerable territory, linking coastal
• 11:13
  and inland communities in a pattern of repeated
• 11:16
  interaction. But buildings require food, labor,
• 11:20
  and organization. What sustained these communities?
• 11:25
  Here we reach the central debate in Norte Chico
• 11:28
  scholarship, and it is a debate that has evolved
• 11:31
  considerably over the past half century. In the
• 11:35
  1970s, the American archaeologist Michael Mosley
• 11:40
  proposed what became known as the Maritime Foundation
• 11:43
  hypothesis. Working at Aspero and other coastal
• 11:48
  sites, Mosley observed enormous quantities of
• 11:52
  fish bones and shellfish remains in the archaeological
• 11:54
  deposits. The ocean, he argued, was so productive
• 11:59
  that coastal communities could achieve population
• 12:02
  density and social complexity without relying
• 12:05
  heavily on agriculture. Marine resources provided
• 12:09
  the protein and calories. The social organization
• 12:13
  followed from that abundance. In this view, The
• 12:18
  Norte Chico represented a fundamentally different
• 12:21
  path to complexity, one that began with the sea,
• 12:24
  not the plough. This hypothesis was provocative
• 12:28
  and influential. It challenged the assumption
• 12:32
  that agriculture was always the necessary foundation
• 12:34
  for urban life. But it also raised questions.
• 12:39
  If marine resources alone were sufficient, why
• 12:43
  were the largest centers located inland, in the
• 12:46
  river valleys rather than on the coast? Why did
• 12:50
  the archaeological record show clear evidence
• 12:52
  of cultivated plants alongside the fish bones?
• 12:56
  The Peruvian archaeologist Ruth Shady, who began
• 13:00
  systematic excavation at Corral in 1994, argued
• 13:05
  for a different emphasis. Shady and her colleagues
• 13:09
  identified botanical remains at Corral that told
• 13:12
  a more complex story. Cotton seeds were present
• 13:16
  in significant quantities. So were remains of
• 13:20
  squash, beans guava and akira a root crop more
• 13:26
  importantly the team identified traces of irrigation
• 13:29
  canals channels that diverted river water onto
• 13:33
  fields in the desert valleys cotton in particular
• 13:37
  requires reliable water it cannot grow on fog
• 13:42
  alone the presence of irrigation infrastructure
• 13:46
  meant that people were deliberately altering
• 13:48
  the landscape to support inland agriculture Shady's
• 13:53
  work, combined with subsequent surveys and dating
• 13:56
  programs by Haas, Cremer and others, shifted
• 13:59
  the scholarly conversation. The current synthesis,
• 14:03
  supported by multiple lines of evidence, is that
• 14:06
  neither the maritime hypothesis nor a purely
• 14:09
  agricultural explanation is sufficient. Both
• 14:12
  coast and valley were necessary. Both were linked.
• 14:17
  The key to understanding this system is cotton,
• 14:20
  and what cotton could be exchanged for. Cotton
• 14:24
  is not a food crop. You cannot eat it. But in
• 14:30
  a coastal fishing economy, it is extraordinarily
• 14:32
  valuable. Cotton fibers, soft and durable, can
• 14:36
  be spun into thread and woven into nets. Fishing
• 14:40
  nets, in particular, are essential for exploiting
• 14:43
  the dense schools of anchovy and sardine that
• 14:46
  the Humboldt Current delivers. Without nets,
• 14:50
  the fish are visible but unreachable. With nets,
• 14:54
  the ocean becomes a reliable source of protein
• 14:57
  on a massive scale. The archaeological record
• 15:01
  shows this linkage clearly. Cotton seeds at inland
• 15:05
  sites like corral, fish bones and shellfish at
• 15:09
  those same sites, carried or exchanged from the
• 15:12
  coast. The coastal sites, in turn, show evidence
• 15:17
  of cotton textiles and fibers, presumably obtained
• 15:20
  from the valleys. The exchange was not occasional
• 15:24
  or accidental. It was systematic, repeated and
• 15:29
  essential to the functioning of both communities.
• 15:33
  Irrigation made this possible. The seasonal rivers
• 15:37
  of the Norte Chico could be diverted into canals
• 15:41
  that watered fields of cotton, squash, beans
• 15:44
  and other crops. The technology was not complex.
• 15:49
  Earth channels, wooden digging sticks, human
• 15:52
  labor. But its application required social coordination.
• 15:57
  Canals must be dug, maintained and protected
• 16:01
  from sediment. Water must be allocated. Fields
• 16:06
  must be planted and harvested according to a
• 16:09
  calendar tied to river flow and ocean temperature.
• 16:13
  The result was an integrated economic system
• 16:16
  in which the platform mounds and sunken plazas
• 16:19
  served as gathering points for a society that
• 16:22
  joined two distinct ecological zones. Inland
• 16:26
  communities grew cotton and food crops, supported
• 16:29
  by irrigation. Coastal communities harvested
• 16:33
  fish and shellfish, supported by the Humboldt
• 16:36
  Current. Between them, exchange moved cotton
• 16:40
  to the coast and marine products inland, season
• 16:43
  after season, with the monumental centers rising
• 16:47
  as places where this coordination could be enacted
• 16:49
  and renewed. This is the dominant understanding
• 16:53
  today. But it is worth noting what this synthesis
• 16:57
  does not claim. It does not say that the Norte
• 17:01
  Chico had kings or armies or a state in the Mesopotamian
• 17:05
  or Egyptian sense. It does not say that the society
• 17:09
  was peaceful or that it was warlike. It says
• 17:14
  that people organized labor, cultivated crops,
• 17:17
  fished the ocean, and built large ceremonial
• 17:20
  and residential centers through a combination
• 17:22
  of ecological opportunity and social coordination.
• 17:26
  The exact nature of that coordination, whether
• 17:30
  it was relatively egalitarian, whether some individuals
• 17:33
  or groups held more authority than others, whether
• 17:37
  religious or political institutions drove the
• 17:39
  construction, remains genuinely uncertain. The
• 17:44
  subsistence debate is only part of the picture.
• 17:47
  What do the objects and absences tell us about
• 17:51
  social life? At Carroll, in 2005, archaeologists
• 17:56
  found a bundle of knotted cotton cords in a residential
• 17:59
  context. The cords were twisted and tied in ways
• 18:04
  that resemble the quipus used by later Andean
• 18:07
  societies as recording devices. The discovery
• 18:13
  attracted considerable attention. Some reports
• 18:17
  suggested that the Norte Chico had invented writing
• 18:21
  thousands of years earlier than previously thought.
• 18:25
  This overstates what the evidence allows. The
• 18:29
  chorale chords are fragmentary. Their knots do
• 18:33
  not clearly match the numerical coding systems
• 18:35
  documented in later quipers. They were found
• 18:39
  in a domestic setting, not a temple or administrative
• 18:43
  center. They may have been mnemonic devices,
• 18:47
  tally chords, textile patterns, or something
• 18:51
  else entirely. What they demonstrate is that
• 18:54
  people in the third millennium BCE were using
• 18:57
  fiber technology in ways that would later develop
• 19:00
  into more complex recording systems. They do
• 19:04
  not demonstrate a fully formed writing system,
• 19:07
  or even a direct ancestor of the Inca Quipu.
• 19:11
  Their purpose remains open to interpretation,
• 19:14
  and what they recorded, if anything, is not preserved.
• 19:19
  The same caution applies to the musical instruments
• 19:22
  found at Corral. Excavators recovered 32 flutes
• 19:27
  made from the bones of pelicans and Andean condors,
• 19:30
  and 37 cornetas, horn -like instruments, made
• 19:35
  from the bones of deer and llamas. These are
• 19:39
  sophisticated objects. The flutes have multiple
• 19:43
  finger holes and appear capable of producing
• 19:45
  melodic scales. The cornetas would have produced
• 19:49
  resonant, carrying tones. They indicate that
• 19:53
  music played a role in ceremonial or social life,
• 19:57
  and they demonstrate considerable skill in working
• 19:59
  organic materials. But we do not know what the
• 20:03
  music sounded like or what occasions it accompanied,
• 20:07
  or whether it expressed religious devotion, political
• 20:10
  authority, communal solidarity, or something
• 20:14
  else. The instruments are evidence of cultural
• 20:17
  complexity. Not a transparent window into belief
• 20:21
  or social structure. The absence of certain things
• 20:25
  is equally instructive and equally treacherous
• 20:28
  to interpret. Archaeologists have found remarkably
• 20:32
  few weapons at Norte Chico sites. No battle scenes
• 20:37
  carved in stone. No defensive walls around the
• 20:41
  centers. No mass burials of casualties. Some
• 20:47
  popular accounts have called the society peaceful
• 20:50
  or even... Pacifist. This is an over -absence
• 20:56
  of evidence is not evidence of absence. Weapons
• 21:00
  made of perishable materials, wood, reed, fiber,
• 21:04
  would not survive in the archaeological record.
• 21:08
  Conflict might have been expressed in ways that
• 21:11
  leave no material trace. Or the society might
• 21:15
  indeed have been relatively peaceful. We simply
• 21:18
  cannot claim to know. The honest position is
• 21:22
  uncertainty. not romantic projection. Similarly,
• 21:27
  the absence of clear elite burials, palaces or
• 21:31
  hordes of luxury goods makes it difficult to
• 21:33
  assess social hierarchy. The platform mounds
• 21:37
  required organized labor, but organization does
• 21:41
  not necessarily imply coercion or hereditary
• 21:44
  rank. Communal religious obligation, competitive
• 21:48
  feasting, rotating leadership or other mechanisms
• 21:51
  might have motivated participation. The archaeological
• 21:55
  record does not currently resolve this question.
• 21:59
  Taken together, the evidence points to a distinctive
• 22:02
  form of early urbanism, one that challenges old
• 22:06
  assumptions and leaves important questions open.
• 22:10
  By the third millennium BCE, Norte Chico communities
• 22:14
  had created something remarkable, large ceremonial
• 22:18
  and residential centers built by coordinated
• 22:20
  labor. sustained by an exchange network linking
• 22:24
  irrigated cotton and inland crops to the productivity
• 22:27
  of the Pacific coast. They did this without pottery,
• 22:32
  without writing, without metal, without beasts
• 22:36
  of burden, and without the grain -based agriculture
• 22:40
  that supported early cities in other parts of
• 22:42
  the world. The scale of construction, the integration
• 22:47
  of multiple sites across several valleys, and
• 22:50
  the evidence for permanent settlement all justify
• 22:52
  describing this as urbanism, though it was urbanism
• 22:56
  of a particular, perhaps unique, kind. The sites
• 23:00
  were abandoned around 1800 BCE, after roughly
• 23:04
  a millennium of occupation and construction.
• 23:07
  The reasons remain unclear. Some scholars point
• 23:11
  to environmental changes, shifts in river flow,
• 23:14
  ocean temperature, or fork patterns that disrupted
• 23:18
  the delicate balance of irrigation and exchange.
• 23:22
  Evidence for this includes changes in mollusk
• 23:25
  species at coastal sites that track ocean temperature
• 23:28
  fluctuations and shifts in river sediment deposits
• 23:31
  that suggest altered flow patterns. Others suggest
• 23:35
  social transformations, perhaps the emergence
• 23:38
  of new centers or new forms of organization elsewhere
• 23:42
  in the Andes. The abandonment was not necessarily
• 23:46
  catastrophic. It may have been gradual, a dispersal
• 23:51
  rather than a collapse. What is clear is that
• 23:55
  the Norte Chico system did not continue in its
• 23:59
  third millennium form and that later Andean societies,
• 24:03
  Chavin, Moche, Nazca, Inca, developed along different
• 24:09
  though partially related paths. It is tempting,
• 24:13
  standing among the ruins of Corral, to see the
• 24:16
  Norte Chico as a precursor a first step toward
• 24:20
  the great civilizations that would follow. This
• 24:24
  temptation should be resisted. The Norte Chico
• 24:29
  was not a blueprint or a rehearsal. It was a
• 24:33
  specific response to a specific environment,
• 24:35
  created by people whose full intentions and understandings
• 24:39
  remain partially opaque to us. The sunken circular
• 24:44
  plazas, the shikra bags, the cotton and fish
• 24:47
  exchange, the bone flutes, These were not primitive
• 24:52
  versions of later Andean practices. They were
• 24:56
  fully realized elements of a society that made
• 24:59
  sense on its own terms. What we can say with
• 25:03
  confidence is this. The Naute Shiku expands our
• 25:08
  understanding of how human communities can organize
• 25:10
  themselves. It shows that monumental construction
• 25:15
  and permanent settlement do not require the particular
• 25:18
  package of technologies and institutions. grain
• 25:22
  agriculture, pottery, writing, metal, strong
• 25:27
  hierarchy that we associate with the early cities
• 25:30
  of the old world. It demonstrates that maritime
• 25:34
  resources, when combined with a specific industrial
• 25:37
  crop and the social infrastructure to move products
• 25:40
  between ecological zones, could support a level
• 25:44
  of complexity that archaeologists once thought
• 25:47
  impossible without agriculture as the primary
• 25:50
  caloric base. and it reminds us of how much remains
• 25:54
  unknown. The quipu -like chords wait in museum
• 25:58
  storage, their functions still debated. The sound
• 26:03
  of the bone flutes is lost. The voices of the
• 26:07
  people who carried shikrabags up the slopes of
• 26:10
  the Great Pyramid left no written record. We
• 26:13
  see the platforms they built, the plazas they
• 26:16
  gathered in, the food they ate, the fibers they
• 26:21
  spun. We can reconstruct with growing precision
• 26:25
  the economic system that sustained them. But
• 26:28
  the social negotiations, the religious beliefs,
• 26:31
  the political arrangements, the daily conversations,
• 26:34
  all of this remains beyond our reach and probably
• 26:38
  always will. This is not a failure of archaeology.
• 26:43
  It is a condition of studying deep human pasts.
• 26:47
  The Norte Chico offers us something rare. a genuinely
• 26:52
  different path to urban complexity, clearly evidenced,
• 26:56
  carefully studied, and still partially mysterious.
• 27:00
  The society that built these centers was not
• 27:03
  a lost civilization waiting to be rediscovered,
• 27:06
  nor a peaceful utopia, nor a simple ancestor
• 27:09
  of later glories. It was a complex, creative,
• 27:13
  imperfectly understood human community. that
• 27:17
  solved problems of survival and organization
• 27:20
  in a difficult environment through means that
• 27:23
  no one had previously thought to look for. When
• 27:26
  we stand in the fog above the Supu Valley, listening
• 27:30
  to the distant Pacific, we are not at the beginning
• 27:33
  of a single story that leads inevitably to the
• 27:37
  Inca. We are at one of many possible beginnings,
• 27:40
  one of many ways that people have found to live
• 27:43
  together at scale. The Norte Chico does not simplify
• 27:48
  our picture of early human history. It complicates
• 27:52
  it in the most productive way by showing us that
• 27:55
  the paths we know were not the only paths that
• 27:58
  existed, and that the people who walked other
• 28:00
  paths were as capable, as organized, and as worthy
• 28:04
  of careful attention as any society that left
• 28:07
  more familiar traces behind.