Latest / Murder Files Unsealed / Pregnant Teen Killed Because She Wouldn’t Have an Abortion

Transcript

Pregnant Teen Killed Because She Wouldn’t Have an Abortion · Murder Files Unsealed

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: I want you to think about the last time you
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: made a mistake on your phone. Right. Like maybe you
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: sent a text to the wrong person or, you know,
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: you posted a picture that you immediately just second guessed.
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: What did you do?
• 0:12
  Speaker 2: You deleted it?
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: Exactly. You probably held your thumb down on the screen
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: and hit unsend or you tap that little trash can
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: icon and poof, it's gone.
• 0:22
  Speaker 2: Yeah, completely gone.
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: You just rewrote history.
• 0:24
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: And I think we have completely wired our modern brains
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: around this luxury, you know. We honestly believe that our
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: personal narratives are entirely under our control.
• 0:34
  Speaker 2: I mean, we really do.
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: Right. Like if something doesn't fit the aesthetic or if
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: someone becomes a problem, we just we just delete them
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: from the feed.
• 0:41
  Speaker 2: Out of sight, out of mind.
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: Exactly. But I want you to consider a genuinely terrifying
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: scenario for our deep dive today. What happens when a
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: person's brain becomes so infected by that digital arrogance that
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: they try to apply it to the physical world?
• 0:56
  Speaker 2: That's the scariest part.
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: It really is. What happens when an individual decides that
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: a real living, breathing human being is just, you know,
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: a complication that can be deleted?
• 1:08
  Speaker 2: It's a really profound psychological shift we're seeing in criminal
• 1:12
  Speaker 2: behavior lately.
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: Oh, absolutely.
• 1:14
  Speaker 2: Because when an individual operates under this delusion that physical
• 1:18
  Speaker 2: reality can be curated and manipulated just as easily as
• 1:22
  Speaker 2: like an Instagram profile.
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 1:25
  Speaker 2: The collision between that digital fantasy and cold, hard physical
• 1:29
  Speaker 2: evidence is catastrophic.
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: Yeah, and they never see it coming.
• 1:32
  Speaker 2: They almost never see it coming because they fundamentally misunderstand
• 1:36
  Speaker 2: how the technology they rely on actually works.
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: Well, that collision between digital fantasy and physical reality is
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: the exact focus of our deep dive today. We're pulling
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: from this really extensive, honestly harrowing report by the Law
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: and Crime Network out of Sanford, Florida.
• 1:50
  Speaker 2: It's a tough one to read. It is.
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: We're going to look at the tragic murder of an
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: 18-year-old pregnant woman named Kaylin Fiango and the perpetrator who
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: genuinely believed he was, like, some mastermind capable of outsmarting
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: the modern technological grid.
• 2:04
  Speaker 2: Which is just wild to think about.
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: It's absurd. So we're going to break down how crimes
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: are actually solved today. Not the TV version, but the
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: grueling reality of digital forensic.
• 2:14
  Speaker 2: Right, the real work.
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: Yeah. And then we're going into the courtroom to examine
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: a highly controversial quirk in the justice system. That literally
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: dictates whether a person lives or dies.
• 2:24
  Speaker 2: Which is why this specific deep dive is so important
• 2:26
  Speaker 2: for you to understand. We aren't just looking at a
• 2:29
  Speaker 2: timeline of events here. No, not at all. We're unpacking
• 2:33
  Speaker 2: a master class in modern investigative forensics. We are going
• 2:36
  Speaker 2: to completely dismantle this myth of the clean digital slate.
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: I love that phrase, clean digital slate.
• 2:43
  Speaker 2: Right. And from a legal perspective, we have to examine
• 2:46
  Speaker 2: the complex mechanics of capital punishment. You're going to see
• 2:49
  Speaker 2: exactly how digital footprints become the ultimate trap.
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: OK, let's unpack this.
• 2:53
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: We need to start by grounding ourselves in the physical
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: reality of the crime scene before we even touch the
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: digital aspect.
• 3:01
  Speaker 2: That's the best place to start.
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: So it's November 11th, 2022, Sanford, Florida, a place called
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: Coastline Park.
• 3:08
  Speaker 2: Just a standard park.
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: Yeah, just a standard Friday. Sanford police are out doing
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: routine patrols. An officer is driving through the park slot
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: and spots a gray Nissan. And immediately, like without even
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: getting out of the cruiser, the officer knows something is
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: deeply wrong with the picture.
• 3:26
  Speaker 2: Because of the stillness.
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: Right. The car is still running, but it's just sitting
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: there like a ghost ship.
• 3:32
  Speaker 2: The initial visual assessment of a scene like this is
• 3:35
  Speaker 2: so vital. The officers approach the Nissan and they note
• 3:39
  Speaker 2: a very specific set of environmental clues.
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: What are they looking for?
• 3:42
  Speaker 2: Well, the engine is running. All the windows are rolled
• 3:45
  Speaker 2: completely up and sealed, except for the driver's side window.
• 3:48
  Speaker 2: which is rolled down.
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: Okay.
• 3:50
  Speaker 2: But the most crucial detail the officers note in their
• 3:53
  Speaker 2: initial report is that there is heavy condensation built up
• 3:56
  Speaker 2: on the front windshield.
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: Okay, see, I was reading through the source material, and
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: that detail about the condensation stopped me.
• 4:02
  Speaker 2: It's fascinating, right?
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: It is, because if I'm an officer walking up to
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: a car, I'm looking for weapons, I'm looking for suspects.
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: Why is the moisture on the glass so important?
• 4:11
  Speaker 2: Because that moisture on the glass acts as a natural
• 4:14
  Speaker 2: environmental clock.
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: Oh, wow.
• 4:16
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it establishes a timeline. before a forensic technician even
• 4:20
  Speaker 2: opens their kit.
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: How so?
• 4:22
  Speaker 2: Think about the basic thermodynamics of a vehicle in Florida
• 4:25
  Speaker 2: in November. You have the external temperature and humidity interacting
• 4:30
  Speaker 2: with the climate control system operating inside that running car.
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: Right. Florida is super humid.
• 4:35
  Speaker 2: Exactly. So for heavy, opaque condensation to form on the
• 4:39
  Speaker 2: windshield while the engine is running, that vehicle has had
• 4:43
  Speaker 2: to be sitting in that exact spot, totally undisturbed, for
• 4:47
  Speaker 2: a significant duration.
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: So it wasn't a fresh crime scene.
• 4:50
  Speaker 2: Exactly. It immediately tells the investigators this is not a
• 4:53
  Speaker 2: fresh scene. The violence didn't happen two minutes ago. The
• 4:56
  Speaker 2: suspect is not hiding in the bushes nearby.
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: That's wild that water on a windshield can tell you
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: all that.
• 5:01
  Speaker 2: It's environmental forensics. The event is over. The stillness is
• 5:04
  Speaker 2: what dictates the next steps of the investigation.
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: So they know they're walking into a static scene. And
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: when they look through that open driver's side window, they
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: find the horror. Inside this running car is 18-year-old Kaylin Fiango.
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: She's been shot once in the head. She is deceased.
• 5:21
  Speaker 2: It's just awful.
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: It is. But there are a few very specific physical
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: details about how she's found. Her seat is leaned back,
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: and there is blood not just inside but on the ground,
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: right next to the rear driver's side passenger door, and
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: blood on the exterior of the driver's side door.
• 5:38
  Speaker 2: That physical posture is incredibly telling to an investigator.
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: Because she was relaxed.
• 5:43
  Speaker 2: Yes. A seat being reclined, combined with an open window...
• 5:47
  Speaker 2: tells a behavioral story of the victim's final moments. It
• 5:51
  Speaker 2: heavily implies a lack of immediate perceived threat.
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: So she wasn't terrified right before it happened.
• 5:56
  Speaker 2: Right. She was relaxed enough to recline the seat. She
• 5:58
  Speaker 2: rolled the window down specifically to interact with whoever approached
• 6:01
  Speaker 2: her vehicle.
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: Which means she probably knew them.
• 6:04
  Speaker 2: Precisely. This wasn't a sudden carjacking where someone smashed the glass.
• 6:08
  Speaker 2: This wasn't a frantic attempt to throw the car into
• 6:10
  Speaker 2: drive and escape. This was an ambush that occurred during
• 6:13
  Speaker 2: a moment of relative, albeit perhaps tense, Right.
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: And they find a single nine millimeter shell casing on
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: the ground outside the car. But here is where the
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: investigation immediately diverges from what you might expect.
• 6:28
  Speaker 2: Because of the motive or lack thereof.
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: Exactly. When you hear about a young woman shot in
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: a park, the first assumption is often a random attack.
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: You know, a mugging, a robbery, a carjack and gone
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: terribly wrong.
• 6:41
  Speaker 2: That's the statistical baseline most people jump to.
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: But the police look inside the cabin. Kaylin's purse is
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: sitting right there on the passenger floorboard. It hasn't been
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: rummaged through. Her smartphone is still in the car.
• 6:53
  Speaker 2: Which instantly eliminates the most common motives for random violence.
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: Because if it was a mugging, they would have taken
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: the phone. Right.
• 6:59
  Speaker 2: In victimology, if valuables are left behind at a scene
• 7:02
  Speaker 2: of lethal violence, the entire psychological profile of the perpetrator shifts.
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: Oh, that makes sense.
• 7:08
  Speaker 2: The goal of this interaction was clearly not financial gain
• 7:11
  Speaker 2: or property theft. The sole objective was the termination of
• 7:15
  Speaker 2: the victim's life.
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: Which is terrifying. It is.
• 7:18
  Speaker 2: When investigators see an untouched purse and phone, they stop
• 7:22
  Speaker 2: looking for a random opportunist and immediately begin looking for
• 7:26
  Speaker 2: someone who had a deeply personal reason to want the
• 7:29
  Speaker 2: victim dead.
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: If you're an investigator walking up to a scene where
• 7:33
  Speaker 1: the victim's valuables are untouched, how quickly does your mind
• 7:36
  Speaker 1: shift to the people closest to her?
• 7:38
  Speaker 2: Instantly. Within seconds.
• 7:40
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 7:40
  Speaker 2: You look at the inner circle immediately.
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: And as they search the interior of that Nissan, they
• 7:44
  Speaker 1: find two items that elevate this from a tragic homicide
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: to something completely devastating. They find a sonogram photo and
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: they find a child's car seat in the back. Yeah.
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: Kaylin wasn't just an 18-year-old girl. She was already a
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: mother to one child and she was three months pregnant
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: with her second.
• 8:01
  Speaker 2: The presence of that sonogram completely alters the trajectory of
• 8:04
  Speaker 2: the investigation.
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: It has to, right?
• 8:06
  Speaker 2: It narrows the suspect pool with alarming speed. Statistically speaking,
• 8:11
  Speaker 2: homicide is one of the leading causes of death for
• 8:13
  Speaker 2: pregnant women in the United States.
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: Which is just a horrific statistic.
• 8:17
  Speaker 2: It is a grim reality. Yeah. So when law enforcement
• 8:21
  Speaker 2: finds a pregnant victim, the very first place they direct
• 8:24
  Speaker 2: their intense scrutiny is toward the biological father of the
• 8:27
  Speaker 2: unborn child.
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: That makes sense.
• 8:29
  Speaker 2: The emotional stakes are raised, but from a purely analytical standpoint,
• 8:34
  Speaker 2: it provides a glaring neon arrow pointing toward a specific
• 8:37
  Speaker 2: interpersonal conflict.
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: So let's put ourselves in the shoes of the Sanford police.
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: They have a victim, a running car, a shell casing,
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: an untouched phone, and a sonogram. I'm assuming that the
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: untouched phone is the golden ticket here, right? Because it
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: holds her entire life.
• 8:53
  Speaker 2: It is the single most valuable piece of evidence at
• 8:55
  Speaker 2: the scene, yes. But it's not just valuable for what
• 8:58
  Speaker 2: is stored inside its memory banks.
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: What do you mean?
• 9:00
  Speaker 2: It's valuable because of what it's actively doing in real time.
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: Oh, right.
• 9:04
  Speaker 2: A modern smartphone is constantly communicating with a network of
• 9:08
  Speaker 2: satellites and cell towers. And in this case, that device
• 9:12
  Speaker 2: wasn't just waiting to be analyzed in a lab. It
• 9:14
  Speaker 2: was actively broadcasting a distress beacon that was about to
• 9:18
  Speaker 2: bring the investigation's first major breakthrough directly to the crime tape.
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: Exactly. Because while the crime scene technicians are out there
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: taking photos and bagging the shell casing, a young woman
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: named Simone physically arrives at Coastline Park.
• 9:33
  Speaker 2: Right at the scene.
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: Simone is Kaylin's friend. She had been trying to get
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: a hold of Kaylin. She was getting worried. And she
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: didn't just drive around Sanford hoping to spot a gray Nissan.
• 9:42
  Speaker 1: She used technology.
• 9:44
  Speaker 2: She used the tools available to her.
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: She opened the Find My iPhone app, pinged Kaylin's device,
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: and drove straight to the GPS coordinates right up to
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: the police blockade.
• 9:53
  Speaker 2: This is a perfect example of how the civilian use
• 9:55
  Speaker 2: of technology often outpaces traditional law enforcement timelines. in the
• 10:00
  Speaker 2: initial hours of a crisis.
• 10:02
  Speaker 1: Oh, totally.
• 10:02
  Speaker 2: Before the digital age, police would have to identify the victim,
• 10:06
  Speaker 2: locate the next of kin, and slowly begin the arduous
• 10:10
  Speaker 2: process of interviewing friends and family just to piece together
• 10:13
  Speaker 2: where the victim was supposed to be that day.
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: That could take days.
• 10:16
  Speaker 2: It could take a week just to build a basic timeline.
• 10:18
  Speaker 2: But here, within hours of the discovery, a concerned friend
• 10:22
  Speaker 2: uses commercial GPS mapping to walk right into the active
• 10:25
  Speaker 2: crime scene.
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: And Simone brings a lot more than just her presence.
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: She brings a name. She tells the police that Kaylin
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: was at Coastline Park for one very specific reason. She
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: was supposed to be meeting up with her second baby daddy.
• 10:38
  Speaker 2: And she has proof.
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Simone even pulls out her own phone and shows
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: the officers a photo. She says, this is who you're
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: looking for, 21-year-old Donovan Faison.
• 10:48
  Speaker 2: In an instant, the police transition from having a mystery
• 10:51
  Speaker 2: victim at a park to having a prime suspect, a face,
• 10:54
  Speaker 2: a name, and a direct link to the victim's current
• 10:58
  Speaker 2: physical condition, the pregnancy.
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: Now we have our who. But to get an arrest warrant,
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: you need the why and the how. And that requires
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: police to look at the digital trail leading up to
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: that Friday in November.
• 11:09
  Speaker 2: And that trail is a mess.
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: Oh, it really is. We know Kaylin was three months pregnant.
• 11:14
  Speaker 1: That puts her right at the end of her first trimester. Now...
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: According to the Law and Crime Report, Donovan Fizon had
• 11:20
  Speaker 1: a girlfriend. And that girlfriend was not Kaylin.
• 11:23
  Speaker 2: Which introduces the classic volatile motive of concealment.
• 11:27
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 11:28
  Speaker 2: Donovan is attempting to manage a double life. He has
• 11:32
  Speaker 2: a curated reality with his official girlfriend. And he has
• 11:36
  Speaker 2: a biological reality growing with Kaylin.
• 11:38
  Speaker 1: And those two worlds are about to collide.
• 11:40
  Speaker 2: Exactly. And the breaking point in these dynamics almost always occurs...
• 11:44
  Speaker 2: when the concealed reality threatens to expose itself to the
• 11:48
  Speaker 2: curated reality.
• 11:49
  Speaker 1: The secret gets out. Yes.
• 11:50
  Speaker 2: The source material reveals that in the days immediately preceding
• 11:53
  Speaker 2: the murder, Kalen took a definitive step. She reached out
• 11:57
  Speaker 2: to Donovan's girlfriend on Instagram and informed her about the pregnancy.
• 12:00
  Speaker 1: You can just imagine the absolute panic that sets in
• 12:03
  Speaker 1: for Donovan when he realizes the two worlds have collided.
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: His control is just evaporated.
• 12:08
  Speaker 2: He's losing his grip.
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: So he tries to do damage control. He tries to
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: reach out to Kaylin via a video call, but she
• 12:15
  Speaker 1: blocks him. He is forced to find alternative digital avenues
• 12:19
  Speaker 1: to get a message through. Investigators know this because they
• 12:22
  Speaker 1: found a group chat from just a couple of days prior.
• 12:25
  Speaker 1: Kaylin sent her friends a screenshot from Donovan's Instagram where
• 12:29
  Speaker 1: he essentially pleaded, you know, we can talk, I'm just
• 12:32
  Speaker 1: not arguing with you.
• 12:34
  Speaker 2: When investigators got Simone's consent to extract data from her phone,
• 12:38
  Speaker 2: they found an absolute treasure trove of these screenshots.
• 12:41
  Speaker 1: It's sitting there in the chat.
• 12:43
  Speaker 2: These weren't just passing conversations. They were evidentiary gold. They proved, unequivocally,
• 12:48
  Speaker 2: that Donovan was fully aware of the pregnancy.
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: He couldn't play dumb.
• 12:51
  Speaker 2: He could never walk into a courtroom and claim ignorance.
• 12:55
  Speaker 2: The messages also documented his clear stance on the issue.
• 12:59
  Speaker 2: He had previously offered to buy her Plan B. He
• 13:02
  Speaker 2: explicitly did not want to have another baby.
• 13:04
  Speaker 1: But there is a specific piece of information from Kaylin's
• 13:07
  Speaker 1: messages to her friends that really disturbed me. She told
• 13:10
  Speaker 1: her friends she was incredibly apprehensive about meeting up with Donovan.
• 13:14
  Speaker 2: She knew something was off.
• 13:15
  Speaker 1: She wrote, and this is a direct quote from the source,
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: but I'm skeptical because I feel like his plan A,
• 13:21
  Speaker 1: texting himself, failed. So WTF he trying to do now?
• 13:25
  Speaker 2: Texting himself. We really need to break down what that means.
• 13:28
  Speaker 2: Because when Simone explained the context of that phrase to
• 13:31
  Speaker 2: the police, it revealed a highly manipulative, deeply concerning behavioral pattern.
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: Yeah, explain that, because it's so weird.
• 13:39
  Speaker 2: About a week before the murder, Kalen and Donovan had
• 13:43
  Speaker 2: met up. During that encounter, Donovan physically took Kalen's phone
• 13:48
  Speaker 2: from her.
• 13:48
  Speaker 1: Just snatched it.
• 13:49
  Speaker 2: Right. He went into her messaging app, deleted the text
• 13:53
  Speaker 2: threads between them, and then opened her Instagram account. He
• 13:56
  Speaker 2: used her account to send a message to his account,
• 13:59
  Speaker 2: posing as Kalen, claiming that the baby wasn't his.
• 14:02
  Speaker 1: This goes back to exactly what I was talking about
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: at the very beginning of the deep dive. He is
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: literally trying to unsend his reality.
• 14:08
  Speaker 2: What's fascinating here is the illusion of control in these
• 14:11
  Speaker 2: toxic dynamics.
• 14:12
  Speaker 1: He thinks if he can just delete the digital record
• 14:14
  Speaker 1: on her physical device and manufacture a fake digital record
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: on his device, that the biological truth will somehow just
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: cease to exist.
• 14:22
  Speaker 2: It's a profound manifestation of the illusion of control. And
• 14:26
  Speaker 2: for domestic violence experts, it is a massive, blaring red flag.
• 14:30
  Speaker 1: I bet.
• 14:31
  Speaker 2: Hijacking a partner's digital identity to manufacture a false narrative
• 14:35
  Speaker 2: is not merely a lie. It is an aggressive exertion
• 14:38
  Speaker 2: of control. He wasn't just trying to trick his girlfriend
• 14:42
  Speaker 2: with a fake screenshot. He was attempting to overwrite Kalen's autonomy.
• 14:46
  Speaker 1: That's so dark.
• 14:48
  Speaker 2: When an abuser feels they are losing their grip on
• 14:50
  Speaker 2: the narrative, as Donovan did when Kalen messaged his girlfriend,
• 14:53
  Speaker 2: their attempts to regain that control escalate. The leap from
• 14:57
  Speaker 2: digital manipulation and psychological gaslighting to physical violence is a
• 15:02
  Speaker 2: tragically common escalation pathway.
• 15:04
  Speaker 1: And it seems like Kalen, on some level, recognized that
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: the escalation was happening. Investigators spoke with the father of
• 15:10
  Speaker 1: Kalen's first child. He told police that on the day
• 15:12
  Speaker 1: of the murder, November 11th, Kalen dropped off their son
• 15:15
  Speaker 1: at his apartment.
• 15:16
  Speaker 2: Right before the meetup. Right.
• 15:18
  Speaker 1: He said she seemed rushed, like she had somewhere to be.
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: But before she walked out the door, she made this
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: statement to him.
• 15:23
  Speaker 2: She said, That is a devastating piece of collateral evidence.
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: It's haunting.
• 15:30
  Speaker 2: She didn't say, I hope we don't argue. She didn't say,
• 15:33
  Speaker 2: I hope he isn't mad. She specifically anticipated targeted physical
• 15:38
  Speaker 2: violence directed at her abdomen at the unborn child.
• 15:41
  Speaker 1: She knew exactly what he was capable of.
• 15:43
  Speaker 2: The father of her first child had no idea who
• 15:46
  Speaker 2: she was meeting or what the context was at that moment,
• 15:48
  Speaker 2: but her baseline expectation for this encounter was a physical
• 15:52
  Speaker 2: assault designed to terminate the pregnancy. She knew the danger,
• 15:56
  Speaker 2: but perhaps underestimated the absolute lethality of it. Hours later,
• 16:01
  Speaker 2: she was dead in the park.
• 16:03
  Speaker 1: All right, so let's look at what the Sanford police
• 16:05
  Speaker 1: have at this point. They have a victim found executed
• 16:07
  Speaker 1: in a car. They have digital messages proving a fierce
• 16:11
  Speaker 1: dispute over an unwanted pregnancy.
• 16:13
  Speaker 2: They have Simone tracking the phone.
• 16:14
  Speaker 1: Right. They have a friend who tracked the victim to
• 16:17
  Speaker 1: a planned meeting with the suspect. They have a name,
• 16:20
  Speaker 1: they have a motive, and they have a documented history
• 16:22
  Speaker 1: of escalating manipulative behavior. So they go to Donovan Faison's home,
• 16:27
  Speaker 1: they knock on his door.
• 16:28
  Speaker 2: And this is where it gets really interesting.
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: It really does. You might think, backed into a corner
• 16:33
  Speaker 1: like this, a suspect might crack. But his interrogation is
• 16:37
  Speaker 1: fascinating for all the wrong reasons. It is a master
• 16:41
  Speaker 1: class in clumsy, arrogant cover-ups.
• 16:44
  Speaker 2: It is entirely predictable if you understand the ego of
• 16:47
  Speaker 2: a perpetrator who thinks they can outsmart this system.
• 16:50
  Speaker 1: Oh, he really thought he was smarter than the cops.
• 16:52
  Speaker 2: Definitely. When investigators bring him in and begin questioning him,
• 16:56
  Speaker 2: Donovan's initial strategy is aggressive denial and distancing. He attempts
• 17:01
  Speaker 2: to minimize the entire relationship, telling them it was just sexual.
• 17:05
  Speaker 1: Just casually brushing it off. Right.
• 17:07
  Speaker 2: He claims he hasn't even seen Kaylin since early October
• 17:10
  Speaker 2: or maybe September. He explicitly, repeatedly denies having any plans
• 17:15
  Speaker 2: whatsoever to meet up with her on the day of
• 17:17
  Speaker 2: the murder.
• 17:17
  Speaker 1: He obviously tells the detectives, I wasn't supposed to meet up.
• 17:20
  Speaker 1: I was supposed to do nothing with her. Now, he
• 17:22
  Speaker 1: does acknowledge that he knew she was pregnant, but he
• 17:25
  Speaker 1: tries to spin it. He claims he didn't believe the
• 17:28
  Speaker 1: baby was his. He admits to mentioning abortion to her,
• 17:31
  Speaker 1: but frames it as just a suggestion because he didn't
• 17:34
  Speaker 1: want another child. And he confirms that Kalen did, in fact,
• 17:39
  Speaker 1: message his current girlfriend.
• 17:41
  Speaker 2: He has to admit that part because there's proof.
• 17:43
  Speaker 1: Exactly. He uses that as his excuse for the deleted messages,
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: telling police he deleted them out of respect for his girlfriend.
• 17:51
  Speaker 2: Notice what he's doing here. He is taking the fragments
• 17:54
  Speaker 2: of truth... that he knows the police probably already have
• 17:59
  Speaker 2: the pregnancy, the message to the girlfriend, the fact that
• 18:02
  Speaker 2: texts were deleted, and he is desperately trying to weave
• 18:05
  Speaker 2: them into a narrative where he is just an annoyed
• 18:08
  Speaker 2: guy trying to distance himself from drama.
• 18:10
  Speaker 1: He's curating the story.
• 18:12
  Speaker 2: He is trying to control the flow of information. As
• 18:15
  Speaker 2: for his whereabouts during the time of the murder, he
• 18:18
  Speaker 2: constructs a very specific alibi. He claims he went to work.
• 18:21
  Speaker 2: then went to his mother's house and was back at
• 18:23
  Speaker 2: his own home by 8.30 p.m. watching his one-month-old baby
• 18:27
  Speaker 2: while his girlfriend went out clubbing in Orlando.
• 18:29
  Speaker 1: He also throws in that he hasn't been to Coastline
• 18:31
  Speaker 1: Park since he was a kid, even though he admits
• 18:33
  Speaker 1: his mom lives near there.
• 18:35
  Speaker 2: He's over-explaining.
• 18:36
  Speaker 1: Yeah, but the detectives aren't buying it. They start pressing him.
• 18:39
  Speaker 1: They ask him, if you haven't seen this girl in months,
• 18:43
  Speaker 1: why does your name keep coming up as the person
• 18:45
  Speaker 1: she was meeting right when she was killed? And instead
• 18:48
  Speaker 1: of explaining, he just shuts down.
• 18:51
  Speaker 2: This is the pivot point in the interrogation. He realizes
• 18:54
  Speaker 2: his carefully constructed narrative isn't working. So he refuses to
• 18:59
  Speaker 2: answer any more questions.
• 19:00
  Speaker 1: He just completely stonewalls them.
• 19:02
  Speaker 2: He flat out refuses to give the officers the passcode
• 19:05
  Speaker 2: to his cell phone. He even refuses to give them
• 19:08
  Speaker 2: his mother's address to verify his alibi. In his mind,
• 19:12
  Speaker 2: the interrogation is a game. And by refusing to play
• 19:16
  Speaker 2: or withholding his phone and his words... He believes he
• 19:19
  Speaker 2: has successfully stonewalled the entire homicide investigation.
• 19:22
  Speaker 1: I just can't get over the arrogance of it. It's
• 19:23
  Speaker 1: like a toddler covering their eyes and thinking you can't
• 19:26
  Speaker 1: see them.
• 19:27
  Speaker 2: That's a perfect analogy.
• 19:28
  Speaker 1: He thinks his silence is an impenetrable shield, completely ignoring
• 19:31
  Speaker 1: the fact that his digital actions are screaming his guilt.
• 19:35
  Speaker 1: Because the police don't need his permission.
• 19:37
  Speaker 2: No, they just get a warrant.
• 19:38
  Speaker 1: Exactly. They get a search warrant for his phone. And
• 19:41
  Speaker 1: when they finally get inside, they see the lengths he
• 19:43
  Speaker 1: went to in order to cover this up. And frankly,
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: his attempts are comically inept.
• 19:48
  Speaker 2: Let's talk about the phone being off during the murder.
• 19:50
  Speaker 1: Yes. We have to remember that technology does not merely
• 19:54
  Speaker 1: record our presence. It meticulously records our absences and our
• 19:59
  Speaker 1: attempts to hide.
• 20:00
  Speaker 2: Okay, that's interesting.
• 20:01
  Speaker 1: During the estimated window of the murder, Donovan actually powered
• 20:05
  Speaker 1: his cell phone completely down. We know this wasn't a
• 20:09
  Speaker 1: dead battery. because his girlfriend, the one who was supposedly
• 20:12
  Speaker 1: out clubbing, was actively messaging him on Instagram, and her
• 20:15
  Speaker 1: messages tell the story.
• 20:17
  Speaker 2: The source courts her messages directly. She is texting him,
• 20:20
  Speaker 2: why isn't your location working? Oh, because your phone's off
• 20:23
  Speaker 2: El Mao weird bro WTF. Where the F are you?
• 20:27
  Speaker 1: His own girlfriend is calling him out in real time.
• 20:29
  Speaker 2: Yes. She knows it is highly suspicious for him to
• 20:32
  Speaker 2: intentionally go dark at that exact moment.
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: Turning off a mobile device is a layman's rudimentary attempt
• 20:37
  Speaker 1: at evading surveillance. People think if it's off, it can't
• 20:40
  Speaker 1: be tracked. But from a forensic standpoint, the network tells
• 20:43
  Speaker 1: a different story. Wait, can you explain that? If my
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: phone is off, it's off, right? How does that prove
• 20:49
  Speaker 1: anything other than I didn't want to be disturbed?
• 20:51
  Speaker 2: Think of your cell phone as a beacon that is
• 20:54
  Speaker 2: constantly checking in with a lighthouse. Okay. Even when you
• 20:58
  Speaker 2: aren't making a call, your phone is silently pinging the
• 21:01
  Speaker 2: nearest cell towers every few seconds, saying, I'm here, I'm
• 21:05
  Speaker 2: ready to receive data. This is how your carrier knows
• 21:08
  Speaker 2: which tower to route a call to when someone dials
• 21:11
  Speaker 2: your number. Got it. The cellular provider logs these check-ins.
• 21:15
  Speaker 2: When a forensic analyst pulls the records, they don't just
• 21:18
  Speaker 2: see where you were. They see your pattern of life.
• 21:21
  Speaker 1: Ah, so they see the baseline.
• 21:23
  Speaker 2: Exactly. If you have a phone that pings a tower
• 21:25
  Speaker 2: every five minutes for three years, and suddenly, on the
• 21:29
  Speaker 2: exact night a murder occurs in your vicinity, that phone
• 21:32
  Speaker 2: abruptly drops off the network for a two-hour window and
• 21:35
  Speaker 2: powers back on miles away. That absence of data is
• 21:38
  Speaker 2: an anomaly.
• 21:39
  Speaker 1: That's incredible.
• 21:40
  Speaker 2: It demonstrates consciousness of guilt. It shows premeditation to avoid
• 21:44
  Speaker 2: location tracking during a specific event.
• 21:47
  Speaker 1: Wow. So by trying to become invisible, he essentially highlighted
• 21:50
  Speaker 1: himself with a giant red marker.
• 21:52
  Speaker 2: Pretty much.
• 21:53
  Speaker 1: But his attempts to outsmart the digital grid get so
• 21:56
  Speaker 1: much more elaborate and so much more foolish the very
• 21:59
  Speaker 1: next day. On November 12th, the day after Kalen is
• 22:02
  Speaker 1: found shot in the head... Donovan tries to establish a
• 22:05
  Speaker 1: fake retroactive alibi on social media.
• 22:08
  Speaker 2: This part is just, it's hard to believe.
• 22:11
  Speaker 1: He posts a photo on Instagram and he tags the
• 22:13
  Speaker 1: location as being in Virginia. He is trying to say, look,
• 22:17
  Speaker 1: I couldn't have killed her in Florida. I was states away.
• 22:20
  Speaker 1: But the police easily discover that the photo is actually
• 22:23
  Speaker 1: from February.
• 22:24
  Speaker 2: This highlights the immense gap between user knowledge and technical reality.
• 22:28
  Speaker 1: Yeah, he thought it was a genius.
• 22:30
  Speaker 2: The average person understands the surface level interface of an app.
• 22:34
  Speaker 2: You select a photo, you type a caption, you add
• 22:36
  Speaker 2: a location tag, and you hit post. Donovan thought that
• 22:40
  Speaker 2: user-generated location tag was irrefutable proof. But he completely ignored,
• 22:45
  Speaker 2: or was ignorant of, the underlying architecture of digital files.
• 22:49
  Speaker 1: I always hear about metadata on crime shows, but what
• 22:51
  Speaker 1: does that actually mean in this context? How did they
• 22:53
  Speaker 1: prove he wasn't in Virginia?
• 22:55
  Speaker 2: When you take a photograph with a modern smartphone, you
• 22:58
  Speaker 2: aren't just capturing an image. You are generating a kind
• 23:01
  Speaker 2: of database.
• 23:02
  Speaker 1: Like a file of information.
• 23:03
  Speaker 2: Yes. This is called EXIF, Data Exchangeable Image File Format.
• 23:09
  Speaker 2: The camera sensor automatically embeds invisible information right into the
• 23:14
  Speaker 2: file of the photo.
• 23:15
  Speaker 1: What kind of information?
• 23:16
  Speaker 2: It records the exact make and model of the phone,
• 23:19
  Speaker 2: the aperture, the shutter speed, whether the flash fired, the
• 23:23
  Speaker 2: exact date and time down to the second, and crucially,
• 23:26
  Speaker 2: the exact GPS coordinates of the phone at the moment
• 23:29
  Speaker 2: the shutter was pressed.
• 23:30
  Speaker 1: Oh, wow. So you can't just trick it.
• 23:32
  Speaker 2: You cannot overwrite that by flapping a Virginia sticker on
• 23:35
  Speaker 2: an Instagram post. When the forensic analysts pull that original file,
• 23:39
  Speaker 2: the EXIF data acts as an unblinking digital witness that
• 23:42
  Speaker 2: says this photo was taken nine months ago. His attempt
• 23:46
  Speaker 2: at an alibi actually became documented proof of his deception.
• 23:49
  Speaker 1: That is incredible. It's like a nutritional label stamped on
• 23:52
  Speaker 1: the back of the photo that you can't see unless
• 23:54
  Speaker 1: you have the right tools.
• 23:55
  Speaker 2: That's a great way to put it.
• 23:56
  Speaker 1: But it gets even worse for him. In the days
• 23:59
  Speaker 1: following the murder, Donovan realizes the heat is on. And
• 24:02
  Speaker 1: he turns to the most reliable source for criminal defense advice, Google.
• 24:07
  Speaker 2: Oh, the Google searches.
• 24:08
  Speaker 1: He starts making searches like how to clear your location
• 24:11
  Speaker 1: history on settings and how to clear your history on
• 24:13
  Speaker 1: settings IP address on iPhone. On November 15th, he literally
• 24:18
  Speaker 1: types in, if your phone is turned off, can you
• 24:21
  Speaker 1: IP address be tracked?
• 24:23
  Speaker 2: It's astounding.
• 24:24
  Speaker 1: I have to ask, if he is so terrified of
• 24:26
  Speaker 1: his phone being tracked, why is he using that exact
• 24:29
  Speaker 1: same phone to ask Google how to hide?
• 24:32
  Speaker 2: It is the ultimate paradox of modern criminal behavior. The
• 24:36
  Speaker 2: smartphone is the weapon they use to coordinate the crime,
• 24:39
  Speaker 2: the tool they use to attempt the cover-up, and ultimately,
• 24:42
  Speaker 2: the star witness for the prosecution. Let's break down why
• 24:45
  Speaker 2: those specific Google searches are so damning. He is asking
• 24:47
  Speaker 2: about his IP address.
• 24:48
  Speaker 1: Right. What even is an IP address in this context?
• 24:51
  Speaker 1: Why is he suddenly worried about that?
• 24:52
  Speaker 2: IP stands for Internet Protocol. Think of it as a
• 24:55
  Speaker 2: digital return address for your specific device on a network.
• 24:58
  Speaker 1: Okay, like a mailing address for data.
• 25:00
  Speaker 2: Exactly. Whenever you send a request to a server, like
• 25:03
  Speaker 2: asking Google a question, your device sends a packet of data,
• 25:07
  Speaker 2: and that packet must contain your IP address so Google
• 25:10
  Speaker 2: knows exactly where to send the search results back to.
• 25:13
  Speaker 1: Otherwise, Google wouldn't know where to send the answer. Right.
• 25:15
  Speaker 2: Your internet service provider assigns this address, and they keep
• 25:19
  Speaker 2: logs of which customer had which IP address at any
• 25:23
  Speaker 2: given second. When Donovan searches how to hide my IP,
• 25:27
  Speaker 2: he isn't hiding anything. He is actively generating a brand
• 25:31
  Speaker 2: new digital footprint.
• 25:32
  Speaker 1: He's making it worse.
• 25:33
  Speaker 2: Yes. He is sending a request to Google servers, which
• 25:37
  Speaker 2: logs his IP address, ties it to his account, and
• 25:40
  Speaker 2: timestamps it.
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: It's like trying to sweep away your footprints while wearing
• 25:43
  Speaker 1: shoes covered in wet paint. He is literally creating evidence
• 25:46
  Speaker 1: of a cover-up while researching how to cover it up.
• 25:49
  Speaker 2: Exactly. From a legal standpoint, this is called consciousness of guilt.
• 25:53
  Speaker 2: Innocent people who haven't seen their ex-girlfriend in two months
• 25:56
  Speaker 2: do not spend their Tuesday nights Googling how to permanently
• 25:59
  Speaker 2: erase their location history and mask their IP addresses from
• 26:03
  Speaker 2: law enforcement.
• 26:04
  Speaker 1: OK, so his attempts to hide his tracks after the
• 26:06
  Speaker 1: fact prove that he knew he did something wrong. But
• 26:10
  Speaker 1: the police need more than a cover up to get
• 26:12
  Speaker 1: the charges they want.
• 26:13
  Speaker 2: They need premeditation.
• 26:15
  Speaker 1: Right. They need to prove premeditation. They need to prove
• 26:18
  Speaker 1: the intent to kill prior to the act. And remarkably,
• 26:21
  Speaker 1: his digital communications provided that exact proof wrapped in some
• 26:25
  Speaker 1: of the most horrifying vocabulary imaginable.
• 26:27
  Speaker 2: Yes. To secure a first-degree murder charge, prosecutors cannot just
• 26:33
  Speaker 2: show that an altercation happened and someone died. They have
• 26:37
  Speaker 2: to prove that the suspect formed a conscious intent to
• 26:40
  Speaker 2: kill before the physical act took place.
• 26:42
  Speaker 1: It couldn't just be an accident.
• 26:44
  Speaker 2: Right. They have to prove it wasn't a sudden crime
• 26:46
  Speaker 2: of passion. And Donovan handed them that proof three days
• 26:49
  Speaker 2: before the murder.
• 26:50
  Speaker 1: Let's look at the motive. It is crystal clear from
• 26:52
  Speaker 1: the testimonies. He wanted her to get an abortion, he
• 26:55
  Speaker 1: didn't want another child, and he desperately wanted to protect
• 26:58
  Speaker 1: the life he had built with his current girlfriend.
• 27:00
  Speaker 2: That was his driving force.
• 27:01
  Speaker 1: Kaelin's other friends corroborated everything Simone told the police. They
• 27:05
  Speaker 1: confirmed that whenever the pregnancy was brought up, Donovan's only
• 27:08
  Speaker 1: response was abortion. They were actively, fiercely fighting about it.
• 27:13
  Speaker 1: But the nail in the coffin came from a text
• 27:15
  Speaker 1: message sent on November 8th.
• 27:17
  Speaker 2: By December 7th, nearly a month after the murder, detectives
• 27:21
  Speaker 2: finally received the digital extraction reports back from Donovan's cell phone.
• 27:25
  Speaker 2: And buried in those logs, they found a text exchange
• 27:28
  Speaker 2: with a friend of his named Woody.
• 27:31
  Speaker 1: Donovan receives a black and white sonogram photo from Kalen,
• 27:34
  Speaker 1: and he forwards it or mentions it to Woody. And
• 27:37
  Speaker 1: his response is this, and I'm quoting directly from the
• 27:39
  Speaker 1: source here. Bro, this just sent me a photo of
• 27:42
  Speaker 1: black and white at the doctor's. Wait till I get
• 27:44
  Speaker 1: that drop. It's for her, I'm telling you. Just got
• 27:47
  Speaker 1: me heated on my brother grave. I'm trying to crop
• 27:50
  Speaker 1: her out. I'm not sparing.
• 27:51
  Speaker 2: I'm trying to crop her out. We need to pause
• 27:54
  Speaker 2: and deeply analyze the semantics of that phrase.
• 27:56
  Speaker 1: It's just so modern and so cold.
• 27:58
  Speaker 2: Sonny Slaughter, a law enforcement instructor interviewed in the Law
• 28:01
  Speaker 2: and Crime Report, highlighted this specifically. It is a terrifying
• 28:06
  Speaker 2: reflection of how our digital vernacular is being weaponized to
• 28:09
  Speaker 2: describe lethal violence.
• 28:11
  Speaker 1: So what does this all mean? It's so casual. When
• 28:13
  Speaker 1: you crop a photo, you just drag a box and
• 28:16
  Speaker 1: eliminate the parts you don't want. It takes zero effort.
• 28:19
  Speaker 2: Precisely. Cropping implies a clean, effortless removal of an unwanted
• 28:25
  Speaker 2: element from a picture without any mess or consequence.
• 28:28
  Speaker 1: Like editing her out of his life. Yes.
• 28:31
  Speaker 2: You are reducing a human being to an unwanted cluster
• 28:34
  Speaker 2: of pixels that is ruining the aesthetic of your life.
• 28:37
  Speaker 2: To use that specific terminology to describe the premeditated execution
• 28:41
  Speaker 2: of an 18-year-old mother is chilling.
• 28:43
  Speaker 1: It really is.
• 28:44
  Speaker 2: It signifies absolute depersonalization. He does not view her as
• 28:47
  Speaker 2: a human. He views her as an obstacle.
• 28:50
  Speaker 1: And he reinforces it by swearing on his brother's grave.
• 28:53
  Speaker 1: He says, I'm not sparing. There is no ambiguity there.
• 28:56
  Speaker 1: He is explicitly telling his friend his plan.
• 28:59
  Speaker 2: So what does it tell us about the psychology of
• 29:00
  Speaker 2: the crime? It tells us this is a textbook escalation
• 29:03
  Speaker 2: of domestic violence. Slaughter noted the grim irony that October,
• 29:08
  Speaker 2: the month leading up to the murder when the tension
• 29:10
  Speaker 2: over the pregnancy was reaching a boiling point, is National
• 29:13
  Speaker 2: Domestic Violence Awareness Month.
• 29:15
  Speaker 1: Oh, wow. I didn't realize that.
• 29:17
  Speaker 2: This case... perfectly illustrates the most dangerous period in an
• 29:21
  Speaker 2: abusive dynamic, which is when the abuser feels they have
• 29:24
  Speaker 2: lost control of the victim and they calculate that lethal
• 29:27
  Speaker 2: force is the only way to permanently solve their inconvenience.
• 29:30
  Speaker 1: That's a terrifying way to view a person.
• 29:33
  Speaker 2: He said the quiet part out loud to his friend.
• 29:35
  Speaker 2: It is pure, unadulterated premeditation.
• 29:38
  Speaker 1: So let me get this straight. The police have the
• 29:41
  Speaker 1: victim found dead in a car. They have a digital
• 29:43
  Speaker 1: trail of fierce domestic disputes over a pregnancy. They have
• 29:47
  Speaker 1: a friend who used GPS to track the victim to
• 29:50
  Speaker 1: a meeting with the suspect.
• 29:51
  Speaker 2: They have a mountain of evidence.
• 29:53
  Speaker 1: Right. They have a suspect who lies about his alibi,
• 29:57
  Speaker 1: turns his phone off during the murder... fabricates Instagram posts
• 30:00
  Speaker 1: to create a fake location, and literally Googles how to
• 30:04
  Speaker 1: hide from the cops. And they have a task message
• 30:07
  Speaker 1: sent three days prior where he swears on a grave
• 30:10
  Speaker 1: that he's going to.
• 30:11
  Speaker 2: Crop her out. It sounds like an open and shut case.
• 30:13
  Speaker 1: Exactly. If I'm reading this, I'm expecting the SWAT team
• 30:16
  Speaker 1: to kick down his door the very next morning. But
• 30:19
  Speaker 1: that brings us to a part of the story that
• 30:21
  Speaker 1: makes me incredibly frustrated. How long did it take for
• 30:24
  Speaker 1: the police to actually arrest him?
• 30:27
  Speaker 2: Despite the overwhelming mountain of circumstantial and digital evidence, the
• 30:31
  Speaker 2: timeline of the justice system rarely aligns with our expectations.
• 30:36
  Speaker 2: It took investigators a staggering 10 months to finally arrest
• 30:38
  Speaker 2: Donovan Faison and officially charge him with a homicide.
• 30:41
  Speaker 1: 10 months? Are you kidding me?
• 30:42
  Speaker 2: 10 months.
• 30:43
  Speaker 1: He executes an 18-year-old in a park in November 2022,
• 30:47
  Speaker 1: and he is just walking around free until late 2023.
• 30:52
  Speaker 1: I have to push back on this. If I'm Kalen's family,
• 30:54
  Speaker 1: I am losing my mind. That sounds like massive police
• 30:58
  Speaker 1: incompetence or bureaucratic laziness. Why on earth would it take
• 31:01
  Speaker 1: almost a year when you practically confessed via text message?
• 31:05
  Speaker 2: I completely understand the frustration. And it is the exact
• 31:08
  Speaker 2: reaction most of the public has. We are deeply conditioned
• 31:12
  Speaker 2: by television.
• 31:13
  Speaker 1: Like a CSI effect.
• 31:14
  Speaker 2: Exactly. The CSI effect.
• 31:16
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 31:16
  Speaker 2: Where a crime happens at 8 p.m., the forensic results
• 31:19
  Speaker 2: come back by 8.15, and the suspect is in handcuffs
• 31:22
  Speaker 2: confessing in an interrogation room by 8.50.
• 31:24
  Speaker 1: Right. It wraps up neatly.
• 31:25
  Speaker 2: But the experts in the source material, including former state
• 31:28
  Speaker 2: attorney Dave Ehrenberg, explicitly defend this delay as an absolute
• 31:33
  Speaker 2: uncompromising legal necessity.
• 31:35
  Speaker 1: How is leaving a murderer on the street a legal necessity?
• 31:38
  Speaker 2: This raises an important question about public patience versus legal necessity.
• 31:42
  Speaker 2: Because law enforcement's goal is not merely to make an arrest.
• 31:46
  Speaker 2: Their goal is to secure an airtight conviction that will
• 31:48
  Speaker 2: survive a brutal appellate process.
• 31:50
  Speaker 1: OK. I guess that makes sense.
• 31:51
  Speaker 2: If you rush an arrest... based on circumstantial evidence, even
• 31:56
  Speaker 2: very strong circumstantial evidence, you are handing the defense attorney
• 32:00
  Speaker 2: a loaded gun.
• 32:01
  Speaker 1: Okay, walk me through that. I mean, it's like building
• 32:03
  Speaker 1: a skyscraper, right? TV shows want you to throw up
• 32:06
  Speaker 1: the walls in 44 minutes. But if you don't spend
• 32:08
  Speaker 1: months pouring a flawless concrete foundation, the defense attorney will
• 32:12
  Speaker 1: blow the whole thing over in court. What are the
• 32:15
  Speaker 1: police actually doing for those 10 months?
• 32:17
  Speaker 2: They're fighting through the labyrinth of the Stored Communications Act
• 32:20
  Speaker 2: and corporate legal departments. Let's look at the digital evidence.
• 32:24
  Speaker 2: You can't just call up Apple or Instagram and say, hey,
• 32:26
  Speaker 2: we have a murder. Send us this guy's data.
• 32:28
  Speaker 1: Right. They won't just hand it over.
• 32:30
  Speaker 2: Tech companies have massive legal obligations to protect user privacy.
• 32:34
  Speaker 2: To get that data, a detective has to write a
• 32:37
  Speaker 2: highly detailed, legally bulletproof affidavit establishing probable cause. A judge
• 32:43
  Speaker 2: has to review it and sign a search warrant. That
• 32:46
  Speaker 2: warrant is served to the tech company. The tech company's
• 32:49
  Speaker 2: lawyers review it. to ensure it isn't overly broad.
• 32:53
  Speaker 1: And that all takes time.
• 32:54
  Speaker 2: Then you're placed in a queue with thousands of other
• 32:57
  Speaker 2: law enforcement requests nationwide.
• 32:59
  Speaker 1: Wow. And when they finally hand it over, I'm assuming
• 33:02
  Speaker 1: it's not just a neat PDF file of his text messages.
• 33:05
  Speaker 2: Exactly. You receive a massive data dump, terabytes of raw
• 33:10
  Speaker 2: hexadecimal code and server logs. A certified digital forensic examiner
• 33:15
  Speaker 2: has to use specialized software, like Celebrate, to parse through
• 33:18
  Speaker 2: that data, authenticate it, and extract the readable messages, the
• 33:22
  Speaker 2: EXIF data, the IP logs.
• 33:24
  Speaker 1: That sounds incredibly tedious.
• 33:26
  Speaker 2: It takes months of meticulous labor. As Sonny Slaughter emphasized,
• 33:31
  Speaker 2: doing due diligence means connecting every single dot so firmly
• 33:35
  Speaker 2: that no defense attorney can break the chain of evidence.
• 33:37
  Speaker 1: So they are building a fortress, but why couldn't they
• 33:39
  Speaker 1: arrest him on the physical evidence first and add the
• 33:42
  Speaker 1: digital stuff later, like lock him up while they process
• 33:45
  Speaker 1: the phone?
• 33:45
  Speaker 2: Because of the Fifth Amendment principle of double jeopardy, Ehrenberg
• 33:48
  Speaker 2: made a crucial point here. The state only gets one
• 33:50
  Speaker 2: shot at a trial. If they arrest him prematurely on
• 33:53
  Speaker 2: a weaker charge, take him to trial, and a slick
• 33:56
  Speaker 2: defense attorney manages to introduce reasonable doubt because the digital
• 34:00
  Speaker 2: evidence wasn't fully processed or a witness wasn't properly vetted,
• 34:04
  Speaker 2: Donovan could be acquitted.
• 34:05
  Speaker 1: And if he's acquitted?
• 34:06
  Speaker 2: If a jury acquits him, the state can never, ever
• 34:09
  Speaker 2: try him for that crime again, even if they find
• 34:11
  Speaker 2: a 4K video of him pulling the trigger the very
• 34:14
  Speaker 2: next day.
• 34:15
  Speaker 1: Wow.
• 34:15
  Speaker 2: Okay.
• 34:15
  Speaker 1: You have one bullet in the chamber you better make
• 34:17
  Speaker 1: sure you don't miss.
• 34:18
  Speaker 2: Precisely. They were aiming for the absolute maximum charges. First
• 34:22
  Speaker 2: degree premeditated murder for Kalen, first degree murder of an
• 34:26
  Speaker 2: unborn child and burglary of a conveyance. They wanted a
• 34:29
  Speaker 2: capital conviction. They had to ensure they had him dead
• 34:32
  Speaker 2: to rights.
• 34:33
  Speaker 1: So the agonizing 10 month wait finally pays off. They
• 34:36
  Speaker 1: have the digital fortress built. They arrest him. The trial
• 34:39
  Speaker 1: begins in Seminole County. But moving from the investigation to
• 34:42
  Speaker 1: the courtroom introduces a whole new set of challenges, and
• 34:45
  Speaker 1: it relies on a very controversial legal structure in Florida.
• 34:49
  Speaker 2: The courtroom is a completely different battlefield.
• 34:51
  Speaker 1: Let's talk about the defense's strategy first, because even with
• 34:54
  Speaker 1: all that tech evidence, it's still circumstantial, right? There's no
• 34:57
  Speaker 1: video of the murder.
• 34:58
  Speaker 2: Correct. The defense's argument at trial leaned heavily into the
• 35:02
  Speaker 2: absence of physical smoking gun evidence, linking him directly to
• 35:07
  Speaker 2: the act of the murder itself.
• 35:09
  Speaker 1: What was their narrative?
• 35:10
  Speaker 2: Their narrative was essentially, yes, the digital evidence looks bad.
• 35:14
  Speaker 2: My client is a terrible boyfriend. He's a cheater. He
• 35:18
  Speaker 2: said horrific things in text messages because he was angry
• 35:20
  Speaker 2: about an unwanted pregnancy. But being a bad person is
• 35:25
  Speaker 2: not a crime.
• 35:25
  Speaker 1: That's a bold strategy.
• 35:27
  Speaker 2: They argued that the state has no video of him
• 35:29
  Speaker 2: in that gray Nissan. They have no eyewitnesses placing him
• 35:32
  Speaker 2: at Coastline Park. They have no DNA on the shell casing.
• 35:36
  Speaker 2: They cannot prove he physically pulled the trigger.
• 35:38
  Speaker 1: They're trying to create a canyon of doubt between his
• 35:40
  Speaker 1: digital intent and the physical execution. Like I said, I
• 35:43
  Speaker 1: wanted to crop her out, but I didn't actually do it.
• 35:46
  Speaker 1: But the jury in Seminole County didn't buy it. On
• 35:48
  Speaker 1: October 27th, the jury came back with a guilty verdict
• 35:51
  Speaker 1: for Donovan Faison.
• 35:52
  Speaker 2: A decisive verdict.
• 35:53
  Speaker 1: Guilty of first-degree premeditated murder with a firearm, guilty of
• 35:57
  Speaker 1: killing an unborn child by injury to the mother, and
• 36:00
  Speaker 1: guilty of burglary of a conveyance with an assault or battery.
• 36:04
  Speaker 2: And we should clarify that last charge for context because
• 36:06
  Speaker 2: it can be confusing.
• 36:08
  Speaker 1: Yeah, how is it a burglary if he didn't steal
• 36:10
  Speaker 1: anything from the car?
• 36:11
  Speaker 2: In Florida statutes, you do not have to break into
• 36:13
  Speaker 2: a home to commit burglary. Physically reaching into or entering
• 36:17
  Speaker 2: a vehicle a conveyance with the intent to commit a
• 36:20
  Speaker 2: crime inside constitutes burglary. When he shot her through that
• 36:24
  Speaker 2: open driver's side window, he fulfilled that statutory requirement.
• 36:28
  Speaker 1: Oh, that makes sense. But the guilty verdict is only
• 36:30
  Speaker 1: the end of the first act because this is a
• 36:32
  Speaker 1: capital case. Once he's found guilty, the trial moves immediately
• 36:36
  Speaker 1: into the penalty phase. where the state of Florida is
• 36:39
  Speaker 1: actively seeking the death penalty.
• 36:41
  Speaker 2: And this is where things get legally fascinating.
• 36:43
  Speaker 1: And here is where we encounter a structural anomaly in
• 36:46
  Speaker 1: the Florida justice system that completely changes the map of
• 36:49
  Speaker 1: life and death. In Florida, a jury does not need
• 36:52
  Speaker 1: to be unanimous to sentence someone to death.
• 36:54
  Speaker 2: This is a profound point of divergence from almost every
• 36:58
  Speaker 2: other capital punishment jurisdiction in the United States.
• 37:01
  Speaker 1: It's so unique to Florida.
• 37:03
  Speaker 2: Following a legislative change in 2023... Florida now operates under
• 37:07
  Speaker 2: a supermajority rule for the death penalty. Out of 12 jurors,
• 37:12
  Speaker 2: the prosecution only needs eight of them to recommend death.
• 37:15
  Speaker 1: Just eight out of 12?
• 37:16
  Speaker 2: Right. If the final vote is eight to four in
• 37:19
  Speaker 2: favor of execution, the recommendation stands and the judge can
• 37:23
  Speaker 2: impose the death penalty. It is currently the lowest threshold
• 37:26
  Speaker 2: for implementing capital punishment in the country.
• 37:29
  Speaker 1: I really have to pause here because I'm confused. I
• 37:31
  Speaker 1: thought the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects against
• 37:35
  Speaker 1: cruel and unusual punishment. And historically, a unanimous jury of
• 37:39
  Speaker 1: your peers was the ultimate safeguard for that. How did
• 37:43
  Speaker 1: Florida legally lower the bar to eight to four?
• 37:46
  Speaker 2: To understand the mechanics of the law, you have to
• 37:48
  Speaker 2: understand the history that birthed it. The Law and Crime Report,
• 37:52
  Speaker 2: specifically the commentary from Dave Ehrenberg, details exactly why this
• 37:56
  Speaker 2: change occurred.
• 37:57
  Speaker 1: What happened?
• 37:57
  Speaker 2: The 8-4 rule was instituted directly as a legislative response
• 38:01
  Speaker 2: to a massive localized public trauma, the Parkland School Massacre trial.
• 38:06
  Speaker 1: Ah, okay. The school shooting in 2018. Yes.
• 38:10
  Speaker 2: During the penalty phase of the Parkland shooter's trial, the
• 38:13
  Speaker 2: jury deliberated on whether he should receive the death penalty.
• 38:17
  Speaker 2: Under the laws at that time, a death recommendation had
• 38:20
  Speaker 2: to be a unanimous 12-0 vote. Right, right. The jury
• 38:24
  Speaker 2: ultimately voted 9-3 in favor of death. Because of those
• 38:29
  Speaker 2: three dissenting jurors, the unanimous threshold was not met, and
• 38:32
  Speaker 2: the shooter automatically received a sentence of life in prison
• 38:35
  Speaker 2: without parole.
• 38:36
  Speaker 1: I remember the public reaction to that. People were absolutely furious.
• 38:40
  Speaker 1: Families of the victims were devastated.
• 38:42
  Speaker 2: The outrage was immense. The public sentiment was essentially, if
• 38:45
  Speaker 2: this perpetrator who committed one of those documented heinous mass
• 38:49
  Speaker 2: murders in state history cannot get the death penalty because
• 38:52
  Speaker 2: of three holdouts, then the system is broken.
• 38:54
  Speaker 1: So they changed the law.
• 38:55
  Speaker 2: Yes. In response to that intense public pressure, the Florida
• 38:59
  Speaker 2: legislature changed the law, lowering the requirement from unanimity to
• 39:04
  Speaker 2: a simple supermajority of eight.
• 39:06
  Speaker 1: OK, we are not here to debate the morality of
• 39:08
  Speaker 1: the death penalty or whether the eight to four rule
• 39:11
  Speaker 1: is ethically right or wrong. But we do need to
• 39:14
  Speaker 1: analyze how that rule drastically changes the strategy inside that
• 39:18
  Speaker 1: courtroom during Donovan Faison's penalty phase. Because the prosecution and
• 39:22
  Speaker 1: the defense are playing two entirely different games now.
• 39:25
  Speaker 2: The tactical shift is massive. The prosecution is bound by
• 39:28
  Speaker 2: statutory requirements. They must prove aggravating factors beyond a reasonable
• 39:33
  Speaker 2: doubt to justify a death sentence.
• 39:35
  Speaker 1: So they have to show why the crime was exceptionally bad.
• 39:38
  Speaker 2: Exactly. They can't just say he's evil. They have to
• 39:40
  Speaker 2: check specific legal boxes. In Faison's case, they have very
• 39:43
  Speaker 2: strong aggravators. The murder was cold, calculated, and premeditated. He
• 39:48
  Speaker 2: murdered an unborn child. And the murder was committed during
• 39:50
  Speaker 2: the course of another felony, the burglary of the conveyance.
• 39:54
  Speaker 1: But the defense's job in the penalty phase isn't to
• 39:56
  Speaker 1: prove innocence he's already guilty. Their job is to throw
• 39:59
  Speaker 1: a wide net and find mitigating factors. And Ehrenberg pointed
• 40:03
  Speaker 1: out that they can bring up almost anything, right?
• 40:05
  Speaker 2: Anything that might elicit sympathy or explain a defect in character.
• 40:10
  Speaker 1: Like what?
• 40:10
  Speaker 2: They will dive into his childhood, his mental health history,
• 40:13
  Speaker 2: any trauma he suffered, his age. The fact that he
• 40:16
  Speaker 2: has another infant child.
• 40:18
  Speaker 1: Just throwing things at the wall.
• 40:20
  Speaker 2: Ehrenberg even referenced the Parkland case again, noting that the
• 40:23
  Speaker 2: defense in that trial brought up the fact that the
• 40:25
  Speaker 2: shooter's biological mother smoked and drank while pregnant, arguing that
• 40:30
  Speaker 2: he had fetal brain damage that mitigated his culpability. The
• 40:34
  Speaker 2: defense is desperately searching for anything that justifies giving the
• 40:38
  Speaker 2: defendant a pass on the ultimate penalty.
• 40:40
  Speaker 1: And here's where the 8-4 rule makes the defense's job
• 40:43
  Speaker 1: exponentially harder. Under the old unanimous system, the defense attorney
• 40:47
  Speaker 1: only had to find one juror whose heartstrings they could tug.
• 40:51
  Speaker 2: Just one person.
• 40:52
  Speaker 1: They just needed one person out of 12 to hold out,
• 40:54
  Speaker 1: and they saved their client's life. But now, under the
• 40:58
  Speaker 1: 8-4 rule, the defense has to convince at least five
• 41:01
  Speaker 1: jurors that those mitigating factors outweigh the brutal reality of
• 41:05
  Speaker 1: an executed pregnant teenager.
• 41:07
  Speaker 2: It changes the psychological weight in the jury room entirely.
• 41:11
  Speaker 1: Let's talk about that psychological weight. Imagine the weight of
• 41:15
  Speaker 1: that room. You don't just have to decide if someone
• 41:17
  Speaker 1: did it. You have to weigh an unborn child against
• 41:20
  Speaker 1: whatever mitigating childhood trauma that defense throws at you. Put
• 41:24
  Speaker 1: yourself in the shoes of juror number 12.
• 41:26
  Speaker 2: It's an incredibly heavy burden.
• 41:27
  Speaker 1: You have sat through weeks of grueling testimony. You have
• 41:31
  Speaker 1: seen the crime scene photos of Kaylin. You have read
• 41:34
  Speaker 1: the texts about cropping her out. You voted guilty. But
• 41:37
  Speaker 1: now you are deliberating on life or death. Let's say
• 41:40
  Speaker 1: you and three other jurors believe that life in prison
• 41:43
  Speaker 1: is the appropriate punishment. You believe the mitigating factors hold weight.
• 41:47
  Speaker 1: Under the old system, you had a voice. Your vote
• 41:50
  Speaker 1: stopped the execution. But under this new 8-4 system, you
• 41:55
  Speaker 1: are sitting in that room. You are casting a vote
• 41:57
  Speaker 1: to spare a man's life. And you know that mathematically,
• 42:01
  Speaker 1: your vote is completely meaningless. The eight others have already
• 42:05
  Speaker 1: decided he dies.
• 42:07
  Speaker 2: It is an agonizing civic burden. To be a dissenting
• 42:10
  Speaker 2: juror in a capital case where your dissent is legally
• 42:14
  Speaker 2: acknowledged but functionally ignored is a profound psychological weight.
• 42:18
  Speaker 1: Oh, it's got to feel terrible.
• 42:19
  Speaker 2: And as Ehrenberg pointed out, this legal structure guarantees a
• 42:23
  Speaker 2: massive protracted appeals process. Because Florida's standard is an outlier,
• 42:27
  Speaker 2: every eight to four death sentence is essentially a test
• 42:30
  Speaker 2: case that defense attorneys will try to push all the
• 42:32
  Speaker 2: way to the United States Supreme Court.
• 42:34
  Speaker 1: Because it's so different from the rest of the country. Right.
• 42:37
  Speaker 2: They will argue that it violates the Eighth Amendment's protection
• 42:39
  Speaker 2: against cruel and unusual punishment. The legal ripples of the
• 42:43
  Speaker 2: Donovan Faison case will last for years, if not decades.
• 42:47
  Speaker 1: It is truly staggering to step back and look at
• 42:49
  Speaker 1: the entirety of this journey. We started this deep dive
• 42:52
  Speaker 1: looking at a tragically still, quiet, gray car sitting in
• 42:57
  Speaker 1: a park with condensation on the windows.
• 43:00
  Speaker 2: A very localized, tragic moment.
• 43:02
  Speaker 1: From that one physical anchor point, we fell down this
• 43:05
  Speaker 1: massive digital rabbit hole, a labyrinth of deleted Instagram messages,
• 43:10
  Speaker 1: fake location tags, panicked Google searches about IP addresses, and
• 43:15
  Speaker 1: horrifying text messages about cropping a human being out of existence.
• 43:19
  Speaker 2: It's a very modern tragedy.
• 43:20
  Speaker 1: And it all culminates in a highly charged Florida courtroom,
• 43:24
  Speaker 1: where the grand concepts of life, death, and constitutional law
• 43:28
  Speaker 1: hang on the shifting votes of just eight people in
• 43:30
  Speaker 1: a jury box.
• 43:31
  Speaker 2: If there's one concept to take away from this case,
• 43:33
  Speaker 2: one thought to really mull over long after we finish
• 43:36
  Speaker 2: speaking today, it is the profound, dangerous illusion of the
• 43:40
  Speaker 2: digital slate.
• 43:40
  Speaker 1: The clean slate.
• 43:41
  Speaker 2: We spend so much of our daily lives curating our
• 43:44
  Speaker 2: digital identities. We unsend a text, we untag a bad photo,
• 43:47
  Speaker 2: we construct a fake location, and it gives us this
• 43:50
  Speaker 2: intoxicating false sense of omnipotence.
• 43:52
  Speaker 1: We feel like we're in total control.
• 43:54
  Speaker 2: We genuinely start to believe that we can bend reality
• 43:57
  Speaker 2: to our will. that we can edit our lives like
• 43:59
  Speaker 2: a movie. But the tragic irony is that the very
• 44:03
  Speaker 2: devices that allow us to crop out reality online are
• 44:06
  Speaker 2: the exact, unblinking, meticulous witnesses that trap us in the
• 44:11
  Speaker 2: physical world.
• 44:12
  Speaker 1: They never sleep.
• 44:13
  Speaker 2: Every search you make, every text you try to delete,
• 44:16
  Speaker 2: every single second your phone drops off a cellular network,
• 44:19
  Speaker 2: it is all permanently etched into a server somewhere, waiting
• 44:22
  Speaker 2: to be pulled by a warrant. You can never truly
• 44:26
  Speaker 2: clear your history.
• 44:27
  Speaker 1: You really can't. The digital ghosts are always watching, logging
• 44:30
  Speaker 1: every move you make long after you think the screen
• 44:32
  Speaker 1: has gone dark. I want to thank you for joining
• 44:35
  Speaker 1: us on this deep dive today. We always strive to
• 44:37
  Speaker 1: look past the sensationalized headlines to understand the complex mechanics
• 44:41
  Speaker 1: of the systems that govern our world, from the thermodynamics
• 44:44
  Speaker 1: of a crime scene to the digital architecture of our
• 44:46
  Speaker 1: phones to the deepest complexities of the courtroom. Until next time,
• 44:50
  Speaker 1: keep questioning the narrative and remember that reality doesn't have
• 44:54
  Speaker 1: an undo button.