Latest / Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show! / Queer Science Yale Goes Full Woke
Transcript
- 0:03Speaker 1: So it turns out that science isn't queer enough. Yes,
- 0:09Speaker 1: apparently science isn't quite queer enough. Yale, Yale Queer science
- 0:15Speaker 1: class researches if facial recognition technology can tell if you're queer?
- 0:21Speaker 1: Obsessions over gay penguins, gay penguins so Yale, Yale. Wow,
- 0:27Speaker 1: it seems like the ivy leagues are just trying to
- 0:29Speaker 1: destroy themselves, right, I mean, if you're a foreign at
- 0:33Speaker 1: some point, they're going to discredit themselves to the point
- 0:36Speaker 1: where like they're not going to get all those foreign
- 0:38Speaker 1: students anymore. It won't be prestigious, right, Like, it'll actually
- 0:41Speaker 1: be an impediment to you getting an elite positioned somewhere.
- 0:45Speaker 1: If they see like Yale or Harvard, they're going to go, Oh,
- 0:49Speaker 1: so they learned a bunch of crazy bullshit. And also
- 0:52Speaker 1: they were taught to be awful people and to actually
- 0:55Speaker 1: hate the company that they're going to work for. Right,
- 0:58Speaker 1: Queer science, queer science, Queer science looks like nothing works anymore.
- 1:04Speaker 1: Queer science looks like a plane falling out of the sky.
- 1:08Speaker 1: Queer science, what is even what is queer now? Anyway? Right?
- 1:12Speaker 1: So you know it's lgbt Q blah, blah blah. So
- 1:16Speaker 1: they're all different things apparently. So queer isn't isn't being
- 1:20Speaker 1: gay anymore, I guess, or lesbian or what. So queer
- 1:23Speaker 1: is the new it's all the new stuff, I think, Right,
- 1:26Speaker 1: So it's like the non binary or if you just
- 1:29Speaker 1: like throw a pink wig on your head or something
- 1:32Speaker 1: and now you're a woman, but maybe just for the afternoon,
- 1:35Speaker 1: maybe you're fluid or something, or any one of the
- 1:39Speaker 1: infinite number of you know, abstractions, gender abstractions, queer. Ivy
- 1:46Speaker 1: League students have the opportunity to learn the science behind
- 1:50Speaker 1: being queer and whether or not science can be made queer.
- 1:54Speaker 1: What does that mean exactly? Science made queer? They site
- 2:01Speaker 1: the queering of science just simply means. The only thing
- 2:05Speaker 1: it can mean is that it's made dysfunctional and it
- 2:08Speaker 1: doesn't work anymore. That's the only thing it could possibly mean. Right,
- 2:12Speaker 1: what else could it mean? Like, it's not you know,
- 2:15Speaker 1: more objective or more precise. It's the opposite of that, right,
- 2:19Speaker 1: the left doesn't even believe in objective reality. Right, So
- 2:22Speaker 1: it means, I guess queer, you know, if it can
- 2:24Speaker 1: be to make science queer means to make it not work.
- 2:28Speaker 1: It means to ruin it, to make it dysfunctional. Introductory
- 2:32Speaker 1: questions to gauge student interest featured in the course description
- 2:35Speaker 1: include can facier recognition technology really tell if you're queer? Well,
- 2:41Speaker 1: the word queer itself is not even defined. Again, it's
- 2:44Speaker 1: just one of an infinite number of abstractions. Just it's metaphysics, right,
- 2:49Speaker 1: What is the name frog gender? So queer means your
- 2:52Speaker 1: frog gender or omnigender or gender fluid or something. Why
- 2:59Speaker 1: is everyone so obsessed with gay penguins? And so? First off,
- 3:03Speaker 1: nobody is obsessed with gay penguins, I guess, except the
- 3:07Speaker 1: person teaching a course on people being obsessed with gay penguins.
- 3:12Speaker 1: Nobody's obsessed with gay penguins. It's not a thing. And
- 3:15Speaker 1: how did science come to be the right tool for
- 3:18Speaker 1: defining and knowing sex, gender, and sexuality at all? So?
- 3:25Speaker 1: I guess what you're asking there? So they're saying, and
- 3:27Speaker 1: how did science come to be the right tool for
- 3:30Speaker 1: defining and knowing sex, gender, and sexuality at all? How
- 3:35Speaker 1: did science come to be the right tool? So I
- 3:38Speaker 1: guess in this case, we'll be talking about biology. How
- 3:41Speaker 1: did biology come to be the right too for defining
- 3:45Speaker 1: and knowing sex and gender and sexuality at all. Geez,
- 3:49Speaker 1: I don't know. Maybe because obviously, like we're animals, we're biological.
- 3:56Speaker 1: Maybe because we're a sexually reproducing species, sexually dimorphic, dimorphic
- 4:03Speaker 1: maybe that maybe that's why. How did science get to
- 4:07Speaker 1: be the right tool for knowing what people are? For
- 4:10Speaker 1: knowing about human biology? How did science? How did biology
- 4:14Speaker 1: get to be the tool for that? Should we use
- 4:17Speaker 1: alternate ways of knowing? That makes more sense? Right, Let's
- 4:21Speaker 1: choose like that, alternate ways of knowing. Let's use indigenous
- 4:27Speaker 1: ways of knowing to figure it all out. Let's not
- 4:30Speaker 1: use science. How did science get to be the right
- 4:33Speaker 1: tool for building aeroplanes, you know? Or how did science
- 4:37Speaker 1: get to be like the right tool for you know,
- 4:39Speaker 1: launching and employing satellite technology? How did science? Should we
- 4:44Speaker 1: be using alternate ways of knowing for that? Doesn't that
- 4:48Speaker 1: make sense? How did science come to be the right
- 4:51Speaker 1: tool for treating cancer? Science? I mean, that's so that's colonialism.
- 4:57Speaker 1: Didn't you know? And aren't you obsessed with gay pag wins?
- 5:00Speaker 1: Everybody is Yale Yale? How did science come to be
- 5:05Speaker 1: the right tool for defining and knowing sex, gender, and
- 5:08Speaker 1: sexuality at all, because I guess it's the only way
- 5:13Speaker 1: you can know about those things. I guess, I mean,
- 5:16Speaker 1: I guess you could. Why not mythology? How did science
- 5:19Speaker 1: come to be the right tool for defining and knowing
- 5:21Speaker 1: what sex and gender? Why aren't we using mythology? Everybody's retarded?
- 5:26Speaker 1: You went full retard? Man, never go full retard. Yale
- 5:31Speaker 1: went full retard. What the fuck is happening? What the
- 5:35Speaker 1: fuck is happening to the world? All right? Does it give?
- 5:39Speaker 1: Does maybe this links us to their to the web
- 5:42Speaker 1: page for this let's see Yale college programs will study
- 5:45Speaker 1: how does that history? Well, for that matter, how did
- 5:48Speaker 1: science come to be the right tool for defining and
- 5:51Speaker 1: knowing sex, gender, and sexuality at all? How does it?
- 5:55Speaker 1: How does that history influence our collective lives in the present?
- 5:58Speaker 1: And what are some alternative yet? What are the alternatives? Exactly?
- 6:02Speaker 1: What are the alternative? Get? What was it mythology or
- 6:06Speaker 1: lived experience? This is Yale? What an an incredible waste
- 6:11Speaker 1: of time? Let's see? This course gives students a background
- 6:15Speaker 1: in the development of sex science from evolutionary arguments that
- 6:18Speaker 1: racialized sexual dimorphism. We're as sexually reproducing species, you fucking
- 6:24Speaker 1: Yale retards. Again. How much money, how much time, how
- 6:31Speaker 1: much potential human potential is wasted on this nonsense, This
- 6:37Speaker 1: utterly ridiculous nonsense. You don't need to have gotten a
- 6:41Speaker 1: degree from Yale to read this sentence and go, what
- 6:45Speaker 1: the fuck is wrong with these people? This is dysfunction,
- 6:48Speaker 1: This is woke dysfunction. This is a waste of time, money,
- 6:53Speaker 1: and human potential. Maybe that's the point of it anyway,
- 6:57Speaker 1: That's all I'm gonna say about that. Please like, share,
- 7:00Speaker 1: and subscribe. Subscribing really helps me out. I thank you
- 7:03Speaker 1: for that. I will see you next time.