Latest / Daniel and Kelly’s Extraordinary Universe / Could quantum clocks detect dark matter?
Transcript
- 0:08Speaker 1: Hey, Daniel, if you were dark Matter, where would you hide?
- 0:12Speaker 2: I wouldn't hide. If I was dark matter, I would
- 0:14Speaker 2: totally parade myself in front of all the scientists in
- 0:17Speaker 2: the galaxy.
- 0:18Speaker 1: Ooh, a parade. You mean like a pageant.
- 0:20Speaker 2: Queen, Yeah, something like that. You know, just don't be
- 0:24Speaker 2: so shy.
- 0:26Speaker 1: Well, if it turns out you are dark matter, we'll
- 0:28Speaker 1: definitely throw you a parade. But so far, it seems
- 0:31Speaker 1: like dark matter is kind of reclusive, right, It's kind
- 0:33Speaker 1: of shy, So maybe it is hiding. What would be
- 0:36Speaker 1: some good spots for it to hide it?
- 0:38Speaker 2: Well, if dark matter doesn't want a tiara and it's
- 0:41Speaker 2: hiding somewhere, then I don't know where it would hide.
- 0:43Speaker 2: I mean, if I knew, I would go and look
- 0:45Speaker 2: for it there.
- 0:46Speaker 1: What if it's somewhere kind of.
- 0:47Speaker 2: Obvious, like what like right behind me?
- 0:50Speaker 1: Yeah, or right in front of you, or right on
- 0:53Speaker 1: TV and the Matter universe contest, that.
- 0:56Speaker 2: Would be a great twist ending for the m Knight
- 0:58Speaker 2: Shamanlan version of this story.
- 1:01Speaker 1: Well, man, do you think he knows I see dark Matter?
- 1:19Speaker 3: Hi?
- 1:20Speaker 1: I'm Jorge Mack, cartoonists and the author of Ollor's Great
- 1:22Speaker 1: Big Universe.
- 1:23Speaker 4: Hi.
- 1:23Speaker 2: I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist, and I wish I
- 1:26Speaker 2: had a dark matter Tiara.
- 1:28Speaker 1: Oh, but it wouldn't be very shiny or bright. It
- 1:30Speaker 1: would be dark, So what's the point. Also, when it
- 1:33Speaker 1: had just fall through your head, it.
- 1:36Speaker 2: Would be hard to wear, but it'd be like the greatest,
- 1:39Speaker 2: most amazing piece of jewelry.
- 1:41Speaker 1: Ever, how would you even keep it in your house?
- 1:46Speaker 2: These are just like engineering details, you know. Once I've
- 1:48Speaker 2: solved the physics of a dark matter Tiara, I'll just
- 1:51Speaker 2: pass that off to the engineers.
- 1:52Speaker 1: This is just all part of your dream to be
- 1:54Speaker 1: the universe's doctor Universe.
- 1:59Speaker 2: I would like a little bit of bling. Yeah, you know,
- 2:01Speaker 2: physics blining would be nice. I'm not going to win
- 2:03Speaker 2: a Nobel Prize anytime soon, So dark matter Tira sounds good.
- 2:06Speaker 1: I see. I see. You could just say you have
- 2:08Speaker 1: a dark matter Tierra, and they nobody would be able
- 2:11Speaker 1: to see it, or feel it or detect it. They
- 2:14Speaker 1: would just have to believe you.
- 2:15Speaker 2: I need evidence, man, That's what science is all about.
- 2:18Speaker 2: You got to have data.
- 2:20Speaker 1: I don't think those beauty contests depend on data very much.
- 2:22Speaker 2: But I'm trying to win a science contest.
- 2:24Speaker 1: But anyway's welcome. Dark podcast Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe,
- 2:28Speaker 1: a production of iHeartRadio in which.
- 2:30Speaker 2: We enter you in the greatest science contest of all time,
- 2:34Speaker 2: the quest to understand the nature of the universe. What
- 2:38Speaker 2: is it, what's in it, what's it made out of?
- 2:41Speaker 2: How does it all work. We think these questions are
- 2:43Speaker 2: deep and fundamental parts of being a human being in
- 2:46Speaker 2: this cosmos, and unraveling these questions is a joy that
- 2:50Speaker 2: everybody should share. So on this podcast we take those
- 2:54Speaker 2: questions apart and try to share our answers and our
- 2:56Speaker 2: ignorance with you.
- 2:58Speaker 1: That's right, because science is the greatest beauty contest in
- 3:01Speaker 1: the universe, where the goal is to discover the beauty
- 3:03Speaker 1: of how this universe is put together, how it works,
- 3:06Speaker 1: and what is our place in it.
- 3:07Speaker 2: Over the last fifty one hundred years, we've developed a
- 3:09Speaker 2: pretty good sense for what's in the universe. We know
- 3:12Speaker 2: about stars and galaxies and all the bright and shiny
- 3:16Speaker 2: stuff that's out there in the universe, and we've also
- 3:19Speaker 2: figured out that there's a lot of the universe that
- 3:21Speaker 2: we can't see directly using our senses or any of
- 3:24Speaker 2: the forces that we've discovered except for gravity. We know
- 3:28Speaker 2: that a huge chunk of the stuff that's out there
- 3:31Speaker 2: in the universe is invisible. It's intangible, which makes it
- 3:35Speaker 2: very hard to discover and to figure out how to
- 3:38Speaker 2: make it into a tiara.
- 3:39Speaker 1: Yeah, because it turns out that a pretty good understanding
- 3:41Speaker 1: of the universe only covers about uh five percent of
- 3:45Speaker 1: what we know is out there. The rest, the ninety
- 3:47Speaker 1: five percent of the universe that we know is there,
- 3:49Speaker 1: we have no idea what it is or how it works.
- 3:54Speaker 2: That sounds like a good title for a book.
- 3:56Speaker 1: Yeah, I think we rode One Daniel, which is available
- 3:59Speaker 1: for a sale everywhere.
- 4:00Speaker 2: That's right. The kind of stuff that you and I
- 4:03Speaker 2: are made out of, atoms specifically, or what physicists called baryons,
- 4:08Speaker 2: only makes up five percent of the energy budget in
- 4:11Speaker 2: the universe. There's another twenty five twenty seven percent that's
- 4:15Speaker 2: dark matter, some kind of stuff that we know is matter.
- 4:18Speaker 2: We know it's out there, but we don't know what
- 4:21Speaker 2: it is, and we only have a very rough sense
- 4:23Speaker 2: of even where it is around us. The rest of
- 4:26Speaker 2: the universe is something we call dark energy, which is
- 4:28Speaker 2: contributing to the accelerating expansion of the universe and we
- 4:31Speaker 2: have even less clue about what makes that up.
- 4:35Speaker 1: Yeah, there's a lot we don't know, and it seems
- 4:37Speaker 1: like these are maybe the defining mysteries of our times
- 4:41Speaker 1: is to figure out what the universe is actually made
- 4:44Speaker 1: out of, given that what we're made out of counts
- 4:47Speaker 1: is so little of it.
- 4:48Speaker 2: Yeah, you're right. And in the last few decades there's
- 4:50Speaker 2: been a huge program of people looking for dark matter.
- 4:54Speaker 2: We've talked on the podcast about trying to make dark
- 4:57Speaker 2: matter in the laboratory by smashing particles together. We're searching
- 5:00Speaker 2: for the dark matter wind. We might be floating through
- 5:03Speaker 2: with very sensitive underground facilities looking for an individual piece
- 5:07Speaker 2: of dark matter to bump into liquid xenon, for example,
- 5:11Speaker 2: or maybe evidence of dark matter annihilating itself in the
- 5:14Speaker 2: center of the galaxy. But so far, none of these
- 5:16Speaker 2: experiments have found dark matter, which means we've got to
- 5:19Speaker 2: get creative about other ways to maybe detect this most
- 5:23Speaker 2: important or at least most common kind of matter in
- 5:26Speaker 2: the universe.
- 5:27Speaker 1: So to be on the podcast, we'll be tackling the
- 5:29Speaker 1: question could quantum clocks detect dark matter and how many
- 5:40Speaker 1: jargon words can we fit into one podcast title.
- 5:44Speaker 2: I know it does sound like buzzword sound, you know, like,
- 5:48Speaker 2: could we use AI generated crypto bitcoin to detect dark matter?
- 5:52Speaker 1: You mean quantum nanomtter Yes, exactly, quantum nanomtter tierras.
- 5:58Speaker 2: Wow, I like quantum nano matter. I go use that
- 6:00Speaker 2: in a proposal.
- 6:01Speaker 1: That's good, I said it first, I said at first, Daniel. Also,
- 6:05Speaker 1: it's probably already on sale on Amazon. There's probably some
- 6:08Speaker 1: product out there with that name.
- 6:09Speaker 2: So yeah, but you didn't say ching tm after it,
- 6:13Speaker 2: so I can use it.
- 6:14Speaker 1: No, you don't have to.
- 6:15Speaker 2: What I gotta brush up on my podcast property law.
- 6:19Speaker 1: Yeah, you better or else I'm gonna see you for
- 6:22Speaker 1: nano dollars for nano bitcoins, you know what?
- 6:26Speaker 2: Or hey, you can have all of my nano bitcoins.
- 6:31Speaker 1: What's the price of bitcoins these days?
- 6:33Speaker 2: Nano bitcoins zero? Yeah, doesn't exist.
- 6:37Speaker 1: But anyways, it's kind of an intriguing title. Could quantum
- 6:40Speaker 1: clocks detect dark matter? And quantum clocks sounds like it
- 6:44Speaker 1: does sound like something you could buy an off of Amazon.
- 6:47Speaker 1: Did you check to see if it's something you can
- 6:49Speaker 1: just get next day?
- 6:50Speaker 3: Oh?
- 6:51Speaker 2: Yeah, it turns out Amazon will sell you something. It
- 6:53Speaker 2: calls a quantum clock, like a quantum entanglement led wall clock,
- 6:59Speaker 2: but none of these things are actually quantum clocks the
- 7:02Speaker 2: way that we understand them.
- 7:04Speaker 1: Well, technically, isn't everything a quantum something? Well, I mean
- 7:08Speaker 1: not everything, but you know, the five percent that we
- 7:09Speaker 1: know about in the universe is in it all quantum technically,
- 7:14Speaker 1: like this is a quantum podcast.
- 7:17Speaker 2: I mean, that's a really interesting philosophical question and not
- 7:20Speaker 2: one that we really have an answer to, because on
- 7:22Speaker 2: one hand, you're right that everything is made out of
- 7:24Speaker 2: quantum particle, so isn't the whole universe quantum? On the
- 7:27Speaker 2: other hand, we know that when you zoom out things
- 7:30Speaker 2: behave by different rules. We call that classical. We don't
- 7:32Speaker 2: really understand why there is that transition, but there definitely
- 7:35Speaker 2: is a transition. So to call everything quantum is either
- 7:39Speaker 2: to say that look classical is just big zoomed out quantum,
- 7:43Speaker 2: or is to say that clackical doesn't really matter, which
- 7:45Speaker 2: doesn't really sit well with me. Or what if I
- 7:47Speaker 2: have no class, then you probably have a lot of
- 7:51Speaker 2: big coin.
- 7:53Speaker 1: Then I'm not going to win any beauty contest. I
- 7:56Speaker 1: have poise, but just no class.
- 7:58Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly, But you know, for example, a clock that
- 8:02Speaker 2: just works on mechanical parts would also work in the
- 8:05Speaker 2: universe where quantum mechanics didn't rule the microscopic because it's
- 8:08Speaker 2: not sensitive to those microscopic details, and so that wouldn't
- 8:12Speaker 2: be a quantum clock, for example, like a pendulum clock
- 8:15Speaker 2: or an old fashioned Swiss gear based clock.
- 8:18Speaker 1: A discussion about new mankla Sure that's my favorite.
- 8:22Speaker 2: Hey, you brought it up, But.
- 8:23Speaker 1: Anyways, it's a kind of an interesting question and so
- 8:25Speaker 1: we'll dig into it. But as usually, we were wondering
- 8:28Speaker 1: how many people out there had thought about putting the
- 8:30Speaker 1: concepts of dark matter and quantum and clocks all together
- 8:34Speaker 1: in one sentence.
- 8:35Speaker 2: So thanks very much to everybody who participates in this
- 8:38Speaker 2: segment of the podcast. We love that you volunteer, We
- 8:40Speaker 2: love hearing your thoughts, and we love sharing your voice
- 8:43Speaker 2: with all of the other listeners. Please chime in if
- 8:47Speaker 2: you'd like, writeing me two questions at Danielanjorge dot com
- 8:50Speaker 2: and you can't participate.
- 8:51Speaker 1: So think about it for a second. Do you think
- 8:54Speaker 1: quantum clocks can use to detect dark matter? Here's what
- 8:58Speaker 1: people had to say.
- 9:00Speaker 4: I've heard of a quantum clock, but I'm not sure
- 9:02Speaker 4: how it would be able to detect dark matter anymore
- 9:04Speaker 4: than a regular clock could. I guess maybe even with
- 9:08Speaker 4: a regular clock, you could send it out into space,
- 9:10Speaker 4: and if it hits a huge clump of dark matter
- 9:12Speaker 4: and therefore gravity, maybe we could learn that there's a
- 9:15Speaker 4: big well of gravity out in some location that we
- 9:18Speaker 4: otherwise couldn't detect.
- 9:20Speaker 1: So sure, I suppose it's possible, but I have no
- 9:22Speaker 1: clue how it would Maybe something to do with entanglement.
- 9:26Speaker 3: Since you're asking, the answer is probably yes, but maybe
- 9:29Speaker 3: still theoretical. I would think you'd have to use the
- 9:33Speaker 3: idea of measuring light passing through an area of more
- 9:37Speaker 3: density that's possibly dark matter that causes curvature of space
- 9:42Speaker 3: and also time dilation. How to do that, I'm not sure.
- 9:46Speaker 2: Since we don't possess a quantum clock, it doesn't seem
- 9:49Speaker 2: unreasonable to suggest that a non existent clock cannot detect
- 9:52Speaker 2: dark matter.
- 9:53Speaker 1: All right, it's pretty uh intense answers here. I feel
- 9:57Speaker 1: like it's something that some of the listeners have I
- 10:00Speaker 1: heard about before. Did you pull your professor colleagues this time?
- 10:05Speaker 2: No, these are our listeners online. You know there's some
- 10:08Speaker 2: good answers here about entanglement and light passing through areas
- 10:14Speaker 2: with dark matter density in them, and just in general
- 10:16Speaker 2: sense that this is a hard problem.
- 10:18Speaker 1: Maybe you should ask a bunch of beauty queens next
- 10:21Speaker 1: time we're making one of the standard questions in a
- 10:23Speaker 1: beauty pageant. Forget howdy, how would you save the world
- 10:27Speaker 1: or how would you know make things better? What do
- 10:30Speaker 1: you think about quantum plock?
- 10:33Speaker 2: Well, where is the dark matter? Yeah, I'd love to
- 10:35Speaker 2: hear that answer in the beauty pageant.
- 10:38Speaker 1: Not that it couldn't happen, of course, no, absolutely. All right, Well,
- 10:41Speaker 1: let's dig into this intriguing question of whether dark matter
- 10:45Speaker 1: can be detected by quantum clocks, and let's start with
- 10:48Speaker 1: the basics, Daniel, what do we know about dark matter?
- 10:51Speaker 2: So there's a lot that we do and do not
- 10:53Speaker 2: know about dark matter. So let's start with what we
- 10:57Speaker 2: do know. We know that it's out there, and we
- 10:59Speaker 2: know that it's here as well. We know that dark
- 11:02Speaker 2: matter is something that exists in the universe. And then
- 11:05Speaker 2: it's matter. We know that because we see its gravity.
- 11:08Speaker 2: We see it holding galaxies together as they spin. There
- 11:11Speaker 2: isn't enough gravity from the stars and the gas and
- 11:14Speaker 2: dust that make up those galaxies to keep the stars
- 11:17Speaker 2: in place as they swirl around the center of the
- 11:19Speaker 2: galaxy at very high speeds, and yet they do stay
- 11:23Speaker 2: in place. Galaxies are mostly not throwing stars out into
- 11:27Speaker 2: intergalactic space, and so we infer that there must be
- 11:29Speaker 2: some matter there to hold that galaxy together. But it's
- 11:33Speaker 2: more than just that one inference, that one fudge factor
- 11:36Speaker 2: to make that particular equation work. We see evidence for
- 11:39Speaker 2: dark matter all over the history of the universe, from
- 11:42Speaker 2: the very first few moments when the early universe plasma
- 11:45Speaker 2: is slashing around and you have dark matter and normal
- 11:48Speaker 2: matter and photons all acting very differently and creating different
- 11:52Speaker 2: slashing patterns. From looking at that slashing in the cosmic
- 11:56Speaker 2: microwave background radiation, we can figure out that there was
- 11:59Speaker 2: dark matter, even measure how much of it there is,
- 12:02Speaker 2: and we can trace the history of dark matter's gravity
- 12:04Speaker 2: as it shapes the structure formation of the whole universe.
- 12:07Speaker 2: Why we have galaxies at all this early in the
- 12:10Speaker 2: history of the universe, and so dark matter is definitely
- 12:13Speaker 2: out there as a kind of matter, but we don't
- 12:15Speaker 2: know really what it is or very specifically where it
- 12:18Speaker 2: is because it's so hard to see since it only
- 12:22Speaker 2: feels gravity. It doesn't feel any of the other forces
- 12:24Speaker 2: that we've discovered.
- 12:26Speaker 1: And we can also sort of see dark matter right like,
- 12:28Speaker 1: we can see it in the same way that you
- 12:30Speaker 1: can see a lens or glass lens or example. You
- 12:32Speaker 1: can see how it distorts the light behind it.
- 12:35Speaker 2: Right, Yeah, exactly, we can see dark matter through gravity,
- 12:38Speaker 2: and so that means we can see stuff bending around
- 12:41Speaker 2: dark matter. We can see it holding galaxies together, and
- 12:44Speaker 2: that even impacts how light moves in the vicinity of
- 12:47Speaker 2: dark matter. If you have a big blob of dark
- 12:50Speaker 2: matter between you and some distant galaxy, for example, the
- 12:53Speaker 2: photons from that distant galaxy will bend as they move
- 12:56Speaker 2: through that dark matter, creating apparent distortions in your image.
- 13:00Speaker 2: You can even sometimes see the same galaxy twice in
- 13:03Speaker 2: the sky because of this gravitational lensing, and so we
- 13:07Speaker 2: know that it's out there, and we can use some
- 13:08Speaker 2: techniques like that to sometimes tell roughly where it is.
- 13:12Speaker 2: But because dark matter is so weak it's particles only
- 13:15Speaker 2: feel gravity, we think it's very difficult to figure out
- 13:18Speaker 2: what exactly is made out of To isolate one piece
- 13:21Speaker 2: of dark matter, because gravity is so weak that essentially
- 13:25Speaker 2: a particle's gravity is almost impossible to measure.
- 13:28Speaker 1: Yeah, and dark matter is also something that's not just
- 13:31Speaker 1: out there in space. It's sort of like all around us,
- 13:34Speaker 1: right like it's floating through us right now, sort of
- 13:36Speaker 1: like the fourth you know, it flows through us, binds
- 13:39Speaker 1: us all together. It's made out of meti chlorians.
- 13:42Speaker 2: Perhaps, perhaps, yeah, exactly, you'll only really understand it after
- 13:47Speaker 2: nine hundred years of study. That's a really good question,
- 13:49Speaker 2: and that's sort of the central question of this episode
- 13:52Speaker 2: is exactly where is the dark matter and can we
- 13:56Speaker 2: find like concentrations of it? Can we map it out?
- 14:00Speaker 2: Because dark matter is so weakly interacting like only gravity,
- 14:03Speaker 2: it takes huge amounts of it to feel anything, and
- 14:06Speaker 2: so that makes it very hard to tell exactly where
- 14:09Speaker 2: the dark matter is. It might be that it's mostly
- 14:11Speaker 2: spread out evenly through the galaxy. It might be more
- 14:14Speaker 2: clumpy than that depends a lot on your particular theory
- 14:17Speaker 2: of dark matter. Where it exactly is. So it could
- 14:21Speaker 2: be that we are in a dark matter wind as
- 14:23Speaker 2: the Earth orbits the Sun and the Sun moves through
- 14:25Speaker 2: the galaxy. We could also be in a dark matter
- 14:28Speaker 2: Liss bubble, a bubble of space in which there's comparatively
- 14:31Speaker 2: little dark matter, or it could be that dark matter
- 14:34Speaker 2: is fairly dense in our area.
- 14:36Speaker 1: You know, I have to say every time you say
- 14:37Speaker 1: dark matter wind, it makes me think of dark.
- 14:40Speaker 2: Part elevating the discourse every week.
- 14:48Speaker 1: That's my job. That's why I'm here. Smells all grounded
- 14:51Speaker 1: or grounded or you know, flat as in fletch winds.
- 14:56Speaker 1: But anyways, so it's sort of all around this, and
- 14:58Speaker 1: I guess I'm wondering, like, if it is all around us,
- 15:00Speaker 1: would we be able to tell, Like, you know, if
- 15:03Speaker 1: let's say dark matter is floating through the Earth right now,
- 15:06Speaker 1: or let's say it wasn't, would you be able to
- 15:07Speaker 1: tell the difference.
- 15:08Speaker 2: That's exactly what these experiments are trying to measure. And
- 15:11Speaker 2: to give you a sense of the difficulty the challenge
- 15:14Speaker 2: of this, think about like why we didn't discover dark
- 15:17Speaker 2: matter earlier. Just in studying how our Solar system moves.
- 15:21Speaker 2: We have now very precise measurements of the orbit of
- 15:24Speaker 2: Jupiter and Mars and all the planets and all the
- 15:27Speaker 2: little pieces of the Solar System as they orbit the Sun.
- 15:30Speaker 2: You might think, hey, if dark matter is here in
- 15:32Speaker 2: our Solar system and it has gravity, wouldn't it change
- 15:35Speaker 2: the way those things orbit? Shouldn't we be able to
- 15:37Speaker 2: detect it? But because we think dark matter might be
- 15:40Speaker 2: spread very thin, probably there isn't that much dark matter
- 15:44Speaker 2: in the vicinity of our solar system. So even those
- 15:46Speaker 2: very very precise measurements, you know, like knowing the motion
- 15:50Speaker 2: of Jupiter to meters or centimeters, can't detect dark matter
- 15:54Speaker 2: because it would be very thin and very spread out,
- 15:56Speaker 2: and mostly we think homogeneous, which in the end doesn't
- 15:59Speaker 2: give much much gravitational pull on the objects in the
- 16:02Speaker 2: solar system. So it takes a very specialized, highly sensitive
- 16:05Speaker 2: device to be able to detect this dark matter.
- 16:08Speaker 1: Yeah, and then don't we say once like, if you
- 16:10Speaker 1: take all the dark matter that is potentially floating through
- 16:13Speaker 1: the Earth right now, it would only weigh about as
- 16:15Speaker 1: much as a squirrel or something like that.
- 16:18Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly, though that's very speculative, right. That assumes that
- 16:21Speaker 2: dark matter is essentially equally spread out in our galaxy,
- 16:24Speaker 2: which we don't believe is true. But if you assume
- 16:27Speaker 2: that there is, then we know our galaxy, for example,
- 16:31Speaker 2: is ninety five percent dark matter. That means for every
- 16:35Speaker 2: kilogram of matter made out of atoms like hydrogen and
- 16:38Speaker 2: helium or whatever, there's nineteen kilograms of matter made out
- 16:41Speaker 2: of whatever dark matter is made out of, And so
- 16:44Speaker 2: it's like nineteen to one in our galaxy.
- 16:47Speaker 1: Which sounds like a lot, but I guess also galaxies
- 16:50Speaker 1: kind of very empty mostly, right, Like it's probably like
- 16:53Speaker 1: ninety nine percent empty.
- 16:55Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly. Now, normal matter clumps up a lot, right
- 16:58Speaker 2: like the Sun is an extraord ordinarily dense collection of
- 17:01Speaker 2: normal matter. Normal matter is not spread evenly through the galaxy.
- 17:05Speaker 2: But if you take dark matter and spread it evenly
- 17:07Speaker 2: through the galaxy, you get a pretty small density. It's
- 17:11Speaker 2: like ten to the twenty six kilograms per cubic light year,
- 17:15Speaker 2: which is a huge volume, which means it's like ten
- 17:18Speaker 2: to the negative twenty two kilograms per cubic meter. So
- 17:22Speaker 2: then if you add up all the cubic meters in
- 17:24Speaker 2: the Earth, that adds up to about two thirds of
- 17:27Speaker 2: a kilogram of dark matter inside the volume of the Earth. Again,
- 17:30Speaker 2: assuming that dark matter is evenly spread throughout the galaxy,
- 17:34Speaker 2: which it probably isn't, but it might be.
- 17:36Speaker 1: Roughly, which is about the size or mass of a squirrel.
- 17:40Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly, so one squirrel of dark matter inside the
- 17:43Speaker 2: volume of the Earth compared to you know, the many,
- 17:45Speaker 2: many millions and billions of kilograms of normal matter inside
- 17:48Speaker 2: the volume of the Earth. That sounds the importance of clumping, right,
- 17:51Speaker 2: Because normal matter clumps together, its gravity is much more
- 17:54Speaker 2: powerful in our local neighborhood than dark matter. Even though
- 17:58Speaker 2: dark matter outweighs normal matter by nineteen to one, if
- 18:01Speaker 2: it's much more thinly spread out, the local effects of
- 18:04Speaker 2: its gravity are much harder to detect.
- 18:06Speaker 1: I think maybe what you're saying is that dark matter,
- 18:09Speaker 1: in terms of the universe scale, it mostly hangs out
- 18:12Speaker 1: in galaxies. Like you don't see a lot of dark
- 18:14Speaker 1: matter floating out there on its own between galaxies.
- 18:17Speaker 2: Yeah, we can do really precise measurements of where dark
- 18:19Speaker 2: matter is on the galaxy scale, because galaxies are really
- 18:21Speaker 2: really big. If you can tell how galaxies are orbiting
- 18:24Speaker 2: around each other, just the way we can tell how
- 18:26Speaker 2: stars are moving through the galaxy, so enormous clumps of
- 18:30Speaker 2: dark matter, absolutely we can measure their gravity. But when
- 18:33Speaker 2: you zoom in in a really fine grained way and
- 18:35Speaker 2: want to say, hey, is there a moon sized blob
- 18:37Speaker 2: of dark matter anywhere in our solar system. That's a
- 18:40Speaker 2: tough question to answer.
- 18:41Speaker 1: So then within the galaxy, you're saying, like, there's a
- 18:44Speaker 1: lot of dark matter within our galaxy. Ninety five percent
- 18:46Speaker 1: of the mass of our galaxy is dark matter. And
- 18:48Speaker 1: what does it look like. Does it look like, you know,
- 18:50Speaker 1: an intense, dense ball of dark matter in the middle.
- 18:54Speaker 1: Is it evenly distributed? And also like our galaxy looks
- 18:57Speaker 1: like a disc, sort of like a flat disk. Is
- 18:59Speaker 1: dark matter also shaped like a flat disk?
- 19:01Speaker 2: So we have the best answers the more we zoom out,
- 19:03Speaker 2: and then as we zoom in, things get literally fuzzy.
- 19:06Speaker 2: But on the scale of the galaxy, we have some ideas.
- 19:09Speaker 2: We think that dark matter is like a big halo.
- 19:11Speaker 2: So imagine the visible galaxy right at the edge of
- 19:14Speaker 2: the stars. Dark matter is a big halo that goes
- 19:17Speaker 2: out beyond the visible stars, and it's bigger and fuzzier.
- 19:21Speaker 2: It hasn't collapsed the way normal matter has because it
- 19:23Speaker 2: just doesn't clump right. In order to clump, things need
- 19:26Speaker 2: other kinds of interaction other than gravity. Like if you
- 19:29Speaker 2: have two dark matter particles, they attract each other gravitationally
- 19:32Speaker 2: and then just pass right through each other. They're just
- 19:34Speaker 2: gonna zig and zag back and forth, oscillate forever. They're
- 19:37Speaker 2: not going to clump together. To do that. You need
- 19:38Speaker 2: like electromagnetism or the strong force or something that wants
- 19:42Speaker 2: to grab onto each other. So dark matter stays a
- 19:44Speaker 2: big puffy halo, and the galaxy is sort of embedded
- 19:48Speaker 2: in that halo. And that's not a coincidence. Right. The
- 19:51Speaker 2: reason the galaxy exists is because of a big dark
- 19:54Speaker 2: matter blob there that's gathered together all the hydrogen helium
- 19:58Speaker 2: gravitationally and may it into a galaxy. It's the reason
- 20:01Speaker 2: we have stars, et cetera.
- 20:03Speaker 1: Now, when you say like halo, you don't actually mean
- 20:06Speaker 1: like an angel's halo that looks like a ring. You
- 20:08Speaker 1: actually mean just like a blob, right.
- 20:10Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly, like a big fuzzy blob that extends out
- 20:13Speaker 2: further along the disc and then further above and below
- 20:16Speaker 2: the disc. But even that we know already is not
- 20:19Speaker 2: evenly distributed.
- 20:20Speaker 1: Is it like football shaped? Is it you? Is it
- 20:22Speaker 1: kind of flat or is it a perfect sphere?
- 20:24Speaker 2: It's more like a hockey puck, right, It's flat, but
- 20:27Speaker 2: not as flat as the galaxy. Itself.
- 20:29Speaker 1: What made it flat?
- 20:30Speaker 2: Yeah, maybe a hockey puck is the wrong analogy. It's
- 20:32Speaker 2: not quite that flat. It's more like a big ellipsoid.
- 20:35Speaker 1: You mean like a slightly squished ball.
- 20:37Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly, It's like a big basketball that somebody's sitting
- 20:42Speaker 2: on or something.
- 20:42Speaker 1: All right, Well, let's get a little bit more into
- 20:45Speaker 1: the details of what we know about dark matter. How
- 20:47Speaker 1: much of it can we see? How much can we
- 20:49Speaker 1: discern about what it's doing in our universe? And we'll
- 20:54Speaker 1: answer the question of whether you can use a quantum
- 20:56Speaker 1: clock from Amazon dot com to detect it. So we'll
- 21:00Speaker 1: get to those questions, but first's take at a quick break.
- 21:16Speaker 1: All right, we're asking the question can you use quantum
- 21:18Speaker 1: clocks to detect dark matter? And we've been recapping a
- 21:22Speaker 1: little bit about what we know about dark matter, Daniel.
- 21:25Speaker 1: How much of the details of it can we see?
- 21:27Speaker 2: Not really very much. We have this sense of a big,
- 21:31Speaker 2: fuzzy halo that surrounds the galaxy, and we can also
- 21:36Speaker 2: measure the density as a function of distance from the center.
- 21:39Speaker 2: So if you're a star, for example, orbiting the center
- 21:41Speaker 2: of the galaxy, the speed at which you orbit depends
- 21:45Speaker 2: on the force that's holding you in that orbit. So
- 21:48Speaker 2: the stronger the force, the faster you can go, or
- 21:51Speaker 2: the faster you can go, the stronger the force that's
- 21:53Speaker 2: needed to hold you in that orbit. So by measuring
- 21:56Speaker 2: the speed of a given star, we can essentially measure
- 21:59Speaker 2: the mass of all all that stuff that's holding on
- 22:01Speaker 2: to that star. So then if you look at stars
- 22:03Speaker 2: at different distances from the center, you can basically map
- 22:07Speaker 2: out the density of stuff in the galaxy as you
- 22:10Speaker 2: go further and closer to the center of the galaxy.
- 22:13Speaker 1: Like if dark matter was super condensed in the middle
- 22:16Speaker 1: of the galaxy, then the stars in the galaxy would
- 22:19Speaker 1: be rotating a certain way. Or if the dark matter
- 22:22Speaker 1: was more spread out, then the stars in the galaxy
- 22:25Speaker 1: would be rotating in a different way.
- 22:27Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly, if all the dark matter in the galaxy
- 22:29Speaker 2: was at the center, then everything would act in a
- 22:32Speaker 2: certain way, would just go like one over are squared.
- 22:34Speaker 2: It's sort of like the way the Solar system orbits
- 22:36Speaker 2: the Sun. But if you take some of that mass
- 22:38Speaker 2: and you spread it out through the galaxy instead, then
- 22:40Speaker 2: the dark matter that's further out than a given star
- 22:43Speaker 2: doesn't affect its orbit because its gravity all cancels out,
- 22:46Speaker 2: so that changes the rotation speed of those stars. And
- 22:49Speaker 2: that's in fact how we first discover dark matter was
- 22:52Speaker 2: by looking at these rotation speeds of stars around the
- 22:55Speaker 2: center of the galaxy and seeing that we couldn't explain
- 22:58Speaker 2: it by mapping all the mass from the stars and
- 23:00Speaker 2: the gas and the dust. And that's exactly how you
- 23:02Speaker 2: can tell where you need to add more mass to
- 23:05Speaker 2: explain these rotation speeds. It's not just like, hey, add
- 23:08Speaker 2: a big blob at the center. You need to add
- 23:09Speaker 2: some of the center and also some further out and
- 23:12Speaker 2: some further out, and so precise measurements of those velocities
- 23:15Speaker 2: give you a fairly accurate picture of where the dark
- 23:18Speaker 2: matter is in the galaxy. And it's not evenly spread out.
- 23:21Speaker 2: It's more densely clumped at the center, which is something you'd.
- 23:24Speaker 1: Expect because it is affected by gravity, right, It.
- 23:27Speaker 2: Is, in the end affected by gravity, and so it's
- 23:29Speaker 2: pulled itself together. And the whole reason that this exists
- 23:33Speaker 2: is because of some like early universe perturbation where you
- 23:37Speaker 2: had a denser blob of dark matter that created this
- 23:40Speaker 2: whole well gathered together the other dark matter and created
- 23:43Speaker 2: this over density which then pulled in hydrogen, helium and
- 23:46Speaker 2: whatever was around to make a galaxy. So it's a
- 23:49Speaker 2: little bit denser at the center. Though it's not very
- 23:52Speaker 2: well understood, like if we do calculations simulations to describe
- 23:56Speaker 2: what we think should happen. If you have a bunch
- 23:58Speaker 2: of dark matter and you'll give it a few billion
- 24:00Speaker 2: years to fall together and to form some structure. It
- 24:03Speaker 2: describes what astronomers call a cusp, which means like a
- 24:06Speaker 2: point of high density of the center and then very
- 24:08Speaker 2: steeply falling, should like drop off quickly. But if you
- 24:10Speaker 2: go out and measure the actual distributions of stars velocities,
- 24:15Speaker 2: you see something that looks like a bigger core. It's
- 24:17Speaker 2: not like it's pointing near the center. It's more spread
- 24:20Speaker 2: out in the inner galaxy. It's like flatter, and so
- 24:23Speaker 2: this is not something we understand very well. And it
- 24:25Speaker 2: also gives you a sense of like the scale of
- 24:27Speaker 2: which we can figure this stuff out. We're talking about
- 24:30Speaker 2: over light years distances, right, we're not resolving dark matter
- 24:33Speaker 2: in meters or even in aus with very very coarse
- 24:37Speaker 2: ways to measure where the dark matter is. Again, because
- 24:40Speaker 2: its gravity is so weak.
- 24:41Speaker 1: Are you saying, like the beginning of the universe, dark
- 24:44Speaker 1: matter was more evenly spread out, Like you know, all
- 24:46Speaker 1: those light years of empty space between us and Andromeda
- 24:49Speaker 1: and other galaxies was all filled with dark matter, and
- 24:52Speaker 1: then it all collapsed into certain clusters.
- 24:54Speaker 2: Yeah, it definitely gathered itself together. The early universe had
- 24:57Speaker 2: initial density fluctuations, and that's a whole big question about
- 25:01Speaker 2: where exactly that came from. And then those seated gravity
- 25:05Speaker 2: to pull things together. So gravity does form structure, but
- 25:08Speaker 2: it takes time. And so yeah, dark matter was more
- 25:11Speaker 2: spread out and now it's less spread out.
- 25:13Speaker 1: Why would dark matter stay stuck together?
- 25:15Speaker 2: Well, it's not that dark matter is sticking together. It's
- 25:17Speaker 2: not like it's bonded to itself. And again we don't
- 25:19Speaker 2: really know because we don't have a microscopic picture of
- 25:22Speaker 2: the dark matter. But I think you're asking, like why
- 25:24Speaker 2: does dark matter form even gravitational structures? Like why does
- 25:28Speaker 2: it get more dense in some places and then in others?
- 25:30Speaker 2: Is that what you're asking?
- 25:31Speaker 1: Yeah, Like I'm imagining at the beginning of the universe
- 25:33Speaker 1: there's a bit of dark matter that was you know,
- 25:36Speaker 1: let's say ten light years away, and then it got
- 25:38Speaker 1: attracted to our galaxy, so it flew over here. But
- 25:41Speaker 1: then why didn't it just keep flying to the other side.
- 25:44Speaker 2: Yeah, so as that distant piece of dark matter approaches
- 25:46Speaker 2: the galaxy, it gains velocity. Right, it's exchanging gravitational potential
- 25:51Speaker 2: energy for kinetic energy. And then you're imagining, like the
- 25:54Speaker 2: way a ball rolls down a valley, why doesn't it
- 25:56Speaker 2: roll back up the other side? And it will, yes,
- 25:58Speaker 2: but then it comes back right, And so gravity in
- 26:01Speaker 2: the end is organizing something. There's the second piece to that,
- 26:05Speaker 2: which is that it doesn't completely grow back up the
- 26:08Speaker 2: other side. You know, anything that's accelerating is emitting gravitational
- 26:12Speaker 2: radiation for example. So the reason, for example, two black
- 26:16Speaker 2: holes orbiting each other will eventually spiral in and collapse
- 26:20Speaker 2: is that they're emitting gravitational energy. So none of these
- 26:23Speaker 2: things are really stable. So over long periods of time,
- 26:26Speaker 2: even without inelastic interactions like electromagnetism or whatever, these things
- 26:30Speaker 2: will form very large structures and they will gradually collapse
- 26:34Speaker 2: due to gravitational radiation.
- 26:36Speaker 1: All right, so we kind of have a fuzzy picture
- 26:38Speaker 1: of where it is in the universe. So now the
- 26:41Speaker 1: question of the episode is can we use quantum clocks
- 26:44Speaker 1: to detect dark matter? How do quantum clocks fit into this?
- 26:48Speaker 2: So quantum clocks might give us a sense for where
- 26:51Speaker 2: the dark matter is if we can find a place
- 26:53Speaker 2: where it's like clumpy, if we can find a place
- 26:56Speaker 2: in our solar system where it's like gathered together for
- 26:59Speaker 2: some reason. And that would be really cool because not
- 27:02Speaker 2: only would it help us detect what dark matter is,
- 27:05Speaker 2: but it would help us understand where it is. It's
- 27:07Speaker 2: a really deep mystery, I think, not just because we
- 27:10Speaker 2: want to understand dark matter, but because we want like
- 27:12Speaker 2: a map. You know, humans are visual creatures. We want
- 27:15Speaker 2: to know like where the stuff is, and just not
- 27:17Speaker 2: knowing where dark matter is in the universe really bugs me.
- 27:20Speaker 2: So I would love to know where it is and
- 27:23Speaker 2: understanding its map on a finer scale would be really helpful.
- 27:27Speaker 2: And quantum clocks might be able to help us map
- 27:29Speaker 2: where dark matter is if we can send them out
- 27:31Speaker 2: into space and if they're sensitive to dark matter, if
- 27:35Speaker 2: their operation changes as they pass through dark matter.
- 27:38Speaker 1: Okay, I think you're saying that you know, at the
- 27:40Speaker 1: galaxy level, we know that it looks like a big blob.
- 27:43Speaker 1: It's sort of like a switchball. It's sort of more
- 27:45Speaker 1: intense or more dense in the center of the galaxy.
- 27:48Speaker 1: But I think maybe you're saying, can we know in
- 27:50Speaker 1: finer detail what it looks like between stars within the galaxy,
- 27:55Speaker 1: like is it clumpy, is it chunky, or is it
- 27:58Speaker 1: like peanut butter or smooth exactly?
- 28:01Speaker 2: And people have tackled this problem in the past, Like
- 28:04Speaker 2: people use the technique you mentioned gravitation lensing to look
- 28:06Speaker 2: for blobs of dark matter, and that works and it's powerful,
- 28:10Speaker 2: but only if you have like a really nice galaxy
- 28:13Speaker 2: behind the blob of dark matter that can show you
- 28:16Speaker 2: that it's there, So that tells us a little bit
- 28:18Speaker 2: about the dark matter density. But there aren't like galaxies
- 28:21Speaker 2: in all the right places to like X ray the
- 28:23Speaker 2: whole Solar system and figure out where it is, And
- 28:25Speaker 2: that technique isn't always powerful enough. You need like a
- 28:27Speaker 2: really big blob of dark matter. Another technique people have
- 28:30Speaker 2: used is to look for dwarf galaxies. Essentially, our galaxy
- 28:33Speaker 2: is formed by the combination of lots of galaxies, right,
- 28:36Speaker 2: we think galaxies formed kind of small and then grew
- 28:39Speaker 2: together with all sorts of absorptions and collisions. That means
- 28:42Speaker 2: that our galaxy has other, like many galaxies embedded within it.
- 28:46Speaker 2: Some of these we call dwarf galaxies because they're small
- 28:49Speaker 2: and we think they're like very high dark matter density.
- 28:52Speaker 2: They're very few stars, and so we can look at
- 28:55Speaker 2: the motion of the stars inside those little galaxies to
- 28:58Speaker 2: get sensors for like where those blobs are. But we
- 29:00Speaker 2: don't have a great way to like X ray the
- 29:02Speaker 2: Solar System and figure out like where is the dark
- 29:05Speaker 2: matter in our Solar system? Is it hanging out by Jupiter?
- 29:08Speaker 2: Is it spread evenly like peanut butter? What's going on?
- 29:11Speaker 1: You want to know it's distribution at the Solar system
- 29:14Speaker 1: scale exactly.
- 29:15Speaker 2: That's what I want to do. And I read a
- 29:16Speaker 2: recent paper which was very clever, which is looking at
- 29:19Speaker 2: asteroids and trying to track asteroid trajectories and see if
- 29:22Speaker 2: like tiny little deviations in the trajectory of asteroids or
- 29:26Speaker 2: comets as they move through the Solar System could reveal
- 29:29Speaker 2: the presence of dark matter. It's very difficult to do
- 29:32Speaker 2: because if dark matter is evenly spread out or only
- 29:34Speaker 2: a little bit clumpy, that be basically no effect on
- 29:37Speaker 2: those asteroids. But it's the kind of thing that we're
- 29:40Speaker 2: just on the verge of being able to potentially do
- 29:42Speaker 2: now that we have better measurements and better computational tools
- 29:45Speaker 2: to try to like infer this information from really specific measurements.
- 29:49Speaker 1: All right, So then how would you use a quantum
- 29:51Speaker 1: clock to de teg dark matter?
- 29:53Speaker 2: So when we talk about a quantum clock, really what
- 29:55Speaker 2: we mean is something which is based on fundamental quantum
- 29:59Speaker 2: mechanical principles. And you know, it sounds fancy, but even
- 30:01Speaker 2: just like an atomic clock is a quantum clock. An
- 30:04Speaker 2: atomic clock is something that looks at like the oscillation
- 30:07Speaker 2: of electron between two energy levels and a caesium atom,
- 30:10Speaker 2: which is a very precise, very very regular process that
- 30:15Speaker 2: we can use essentially to tell how time has passed.
- 30:18Speaker 2: And so on Earth, we have extraordinarily precise atomic clocks
- 30:22Speaker 2: which now set the standard and in fact define what
- 30:25Speaker 2: we mean by a second. A second used to have
- 30:27Speaker 2: a different definition, but now a second is defined as
- 30:30Speaker 2: like a certain number of cycles of a specific kind
- 30:32Speaker 2: of atom. That's literally how we measure time now, and
- 30:37Speaker 2: so it's the standard.
- 30:39Speaker 1: But it's like the minute, like it used to be
- 30:41Speaker 1: like a minute with sixty seconds, but now people say, oh,
- 30:43Speaker 1: it's been a minute to really mean something totally different.
- 30:50Speaker 2: Yes, it's just like that exactly. And we call it
- 30:55Speaker 2: a quantum clock because this really is a quantum process.
- 30:58Speaker 2: We're talking about quantum particles, an electron, there's an atom.
- 31:01Speaker 2: The electron is moving in the potential well of the atom,
- 31:04Speaker 2: so it's interacting electromagnetically with the nucleus, and the way
- 31:08Speaker 2: that it's moving, the way it oscillates between energy levels,
- 31:11Speaker 2: is completely controlled by quantum processes. This is not a
- 31:14Speaker 2: clock that you could have in a perfectly classical universe.
- 31:17Speaker 2: You know, if we lived in a universe where electrons
- 31:19Speaker 2: really were tiny little balls that went to orbits and
- 31:21Speaker 2: had smooth classical paths the way planets do, then this
- 31:25Speaker 2: clock could not exist. And so that's when we meet
- 31:27Speaker 2: by quantum clock.
- 31:29Speaker 1: But I guess, if it's a quantum clock, doesn't it
- 31:31Speaker 1: have a certain amount of uncertainty to it or unknowability?
- 31:34Speaker 1: How can it be precise? If there's the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
- 31:39Speaker 2: Yeah, you're right, there's no absolutely precise quantum clock. But
- 31:43Speaker 2: this is about as regular as it gets. And amazingly,
- 31:45Speaker 2: these quantum clocks are more precise than mechanical clocks, which
- 31:49Speaker 2: of course also have uncertainty in them, because no mechanical
- 31:52Speaker 2: device is perfectly created, right, And so this is as
- 31:55Speaker 2: accurate as they've been able to make them, and recently
- 31:57Speaker 2: they've been even able to make them small and transportable.
- 32:01Speaker 2: You might think of an atomic clock as like some
- 32:03Speaker 2: huge device in the basement of a laboratory in Colorado
- 32:07Speaker 2: that weighs like ten tons and fills a room. But
- 32:09Speaker 2: actually these things can be made quite small.
- 32:12Speaker 1: So a quantum clock is really just an atomic clock,
- 32:14Speaker 1: or is there another kind that doesn't use atoms?
- 32:17Speaker 2: There's no atomic clock that's not a quantum clock. So
- 32:19Speaker 2: quantum clock is just a fancier sounding name for atomic clock.
- 32:22Speaker 1: Yes, can you have a quantum clock that maybe doesn't
- 32:24Speaker 1: use an atom, that maybe just relies on electrons or
- 32:28Speaker 1: quarks or something.
- 32:29Speaker 2: Yeah, sure, you're not limited to atoms. You can imagine
- 32:32Speaker 2: quantum clocks made out of like photons interacting or splitting
- 32:35Speaker 2: or bouncing or something like that. In some sense, lego
- 32:39Speaker 2: is a clock because it's measuring the time for photons
- 32:42Speaker 2: to travel along its legs, right, It's just converting that
- 32:45Speaker 2: to a distance measurement, and so you could have other
- 32:48Speaker 2: quantum clocks that are not based on atoms. Yes, And
- 32:51Speaker 2: one day, when we discover dark matter, maybe we could
- 32:53Speaker 2: build a clock.
- 32:53Speaker 1: Out of dark matter, which may or may not tell
- 32:56Speaker 1: you the time.
- 32:58Speaker 2: And may or may not smell like flatulin.
- 33:00Speaker 1: Well, I guess, maybe give us an example of like,
- 33:02Speaker 1: what's a typical or popular or a commonly used quantum
- 33:05Speaker 1: clock and how does it work.
- 33:07Speaker 2: Well, the most precise quantum clock is based on the
- 33:10Speaker 2: caesium one thirty three atom. That's the one that's actually
- 33:13Speaker 2: used to define what a second is. And so here
- 33:16Speaker 2: we have two states of electrons. There's a small splitting
- 33:19Speaker 2: in an energy state here. It's called a hyper fine
- 33:22Speaker 2: splitting because the difference is very very small, and when
- 33:24Speaker 2: the electron sits in there, it sort of goes back
- 33:26Speaker 2: and forth between the two different states.
- 33:29Speaker 1: Meaning like, this is an electron that's orbiting around the
- 33:32Speaker 1: caesium atom.
- 33:33Speaker 2: Yeah, I wouldn't say orbiting if we want to be
- 33:35Speaker 2: really really technical. But it's captured by the caesium atom.
- 33:38Speaker 1: And you're saying it's switching energy levels. Why would it
- 33:40Speaker 1: switch energy levels?
- 33:42Speaker 2: So you have this caesium atom and you embed the
- 33:44Speaker 2: whole thing in some microwave radiation that can lift those
- 33:46Speaker 2: electrons up from the lower state to the higher state.
- 33:50Speaker 1: Meaning you like put it in a microwave or you
- 33:52Speaker 1: shoot it with this like a light gun.
- 33:54Speaker 2: There's not a difference, right, that's what a microwave is.
- 33:56Speaker 2: A microwave is shooting microwave radiation at your food, and
- 34:00Speaker 2: microwaves are lights. Though basically a microwave is a light gun.
- 34:03Speaker 1: Sounds hot. So then you have this atom and you
- 34:06Speaker 1: you stick it in the microwave.
- 34:07Speaker 2: Uh huh, yeah, So you stick in the microwave and
- 34:09Speaker 2: you measure how often it jumps up and then down
- 34:12Speaker 2: and then up and then down.
- 34:13Speaker 1: Because the light, as the light passes through it, it
- 34:16Speaker 1: knocks the electron up and down or what.
- 34:18Speaker 2: Yeah, the light is tuned to exactly the frequency for
- 34:21Speaker 2: the electron to jump up into the higher energy level. Remember,
- 34:24Speaker 2: electrons can go from a lower to a higher energy
- 34:27Speaker 2: level if a photon of the right energy comes along.
- 34:29Speaker 2: So they've tuned this microwave to exactly that energy level.
- 34:33Speaker 2: So electrons and the lower level can absorb these photons
- 34:36Speaker 2: jump up to the higher level, but then they'll naturally
- 34:38Speaker 2: decay down because the universe likes to spread energy out,
- 34:42Speaker 2: and so the time of these oscillations turns out to
- 34:45Speaker 2: be very very regular, Like an electron will do this
- 34:48Speaker 2: nine point one nine to two billion times per second.
- 34:52Speaker 1: And it doesn't depend on the frequency of the light,
- 34:54Speaker 1: or it does.
- 34:55Speaker 2: It definitely depends on the frequency of the light. If
- 34:57Speaker 2: the frequency of the light is not correct, then it
- 34:59Speaker 2: won't even abso, right, it won't happen.
- 35:01Speaker 1: Oh but then don't you need to make that frequency
- 35:04Speaker 1: super precise?
- 35:05Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly, And this is one source of uncertainty in
- 35:07Speaker 2: these clocks, right, making those accurate. And you can measure
- 35:11Speaker 2: these things, like you build two independent ones, you can
- 35:13Speaker 2: see how their counts drift relative to each other. And
- 35:16Speaker 2: that's how you measure the accuracy of clocks. In general.
- 35:19Speaker 2: There's no absolute standard by which you can tell like, oh,
- 35:21Speaker 2: this clock is off or that clock is off. You
- 35:23Speaker 2: just build a few of them and you measure them
- 35:24Speaker 2: relative to each other. And this is something that we
- 35:27Speaker 2: know well enough. We know how to design the middle
- 35:29Speaker 2: of the physics and the engineering that you can build
- 35:32Speaker 2: these things so that atomic clocks in independent locations agree
- 35:36Speaker 2: to like zero point three nanoseconds per day. It's really
- 35:39Speaker 2: very incredibly precise.
- 35:41Speaker 1: WHOA, so what are you measuring? How are you measuring
- 35:44Speaker 1: whether these electrons are going up and down?
- 35:46Speaker 2: When the electron goes back down, it emits radiation, right,
- 35:49Speaker 2: and so you can gather that as.
- 35:50Speaker 1: Well, like it shoots off light, like it will blink.
- 35:52Speaker 2: Basically exactly little flash.
- 35:55Speaker 1: All right. So then, and you're saying you can build
- 35:57Speaker 1: these things now to be the size of a toaster
- 35:59Speaker 1: or or a microwave oven.
- 36:02Speaker 2: A quantum toaster. They have them now and they've deployed
- 36:05Speaker 2: them out in space. They actually built the Deep Space
- 36:08Speaker 2: Atomic Clock Mission and they sent an atomic clock out
- 36:11Speaker 2: into space to see, like, hey, can we operate one
- 36:13Speaker 2: of these things out in space? And you might wonder
- 36:16Speaker 2: like is this just a bunch of nerds trying to
- 36:18Speaker 2: do something that seems cool?
- 36:20Speaker 1: Yes? Is always the answer, Like can we shoot a
- 36:22Speaker 1: microwave into space and will it still heat up my burrito?
- 36:26Speaker 1: My seizing Burritoah? Is that the challenge?
- 36:29Speaker 2: That's the challenge. But also if we want to do
- 36:31Speaker 2: things like navigate in space, navigation needs timing. You need
- 36:35Speaker 2: to know like how long you're going in one direction.
- 36:37Speaker 2: If you want to do dead reckoning, you want to
- 36:39Speaker 2: know where you are. Timing is absolutely crucial. Or if
- 36:42Speaker 2: you want to use like nearby pulsars to triangulate your position,
- 36:46Speaker 2: my whole episode about how that works, you also need
- 36:49Speaker 2: very accurate timing so you can measure the time between
- 36:51Speaker 2: the pulses. So this was like a technological challenge that's
- 36:54Speaker 2: going to lay the groundwork for all sorts of cool innovations.
- 36:58Speaker 2: And this was totally successful, this deep space atomic clock mission.
- 37:01Speaker 1: Well, let's get into how you would actually use these
- 37:04Speaker 1: and how the timing might tell you where dark matter
- 37:07Speaker 1: is within our Solar system and maybe even within the Earth.
- 37:11Speaker 1: So let's dig into that. But first let's take another
- 37:14Speaker 1: quick break. All right, we're talking about using a microwave
- 37:30Speaker 1: stuck inside of a microwave to detect dark matter so
- 37:33Speaker 1: you can win a Tierra for being the prettiest scientist.
- 37:37Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly. Does it take longer to heat up your
- 37:39Speaker 2: burrito when there's dark matter around?
- 37:41Speaker 1: So the idea is that you take these atomic or
- 37:44Speaker 1: basically an atomic clock, which is a quantum clock, but
- 37:48Speaker 1: it seems like the most popular ones use atoms, and
- 37:50Speaker 1: so you shrink them down to the size of a
- 37:52Speaker 1: toaster or microwave and then you shoot them in space,
- 37:54Speaker 1: and then how does that help you measure dark matter?
- 37:57Speaker 2: Well, there were a bunch of physicists who thought, okay,
- 37:59Speaker 2: this is that's cool because now we not only have
- 38:02Speaker 2: all some super precise atomic clocks, but now we have
- 38:05Speaker 2: them spread out through the Solar System, like in principle
- 38:08Speaker 2: the way we like scent devices near the Sun with
- 38:10Speaker 2: a Parker solar probe. People are, what if we built
- 38:12Speaker 2: a bunch of these things and we spread them out
- 38:14Speaker 2: in the Solar system, could they give us a picture
- 38:17Speaker 2: of where the dark matter is in the Solar system
- 38:20Speaker 2: if they operate differently when there's dark matter around, like
- 38:23Speaker 2: if they're sensitive to the dark matter density, Like if
- 38:26Speaker 2: your atomic clock gets off if it drifts when there's
- 38:29Speaker 2: more or less dark matter around, than having a bunch
- 38:32Speaker 2: of these atomic clocks spread out through the Solar system
- 38:35Speaker 2: could give you a picture for where in the Solar
- 38:37Speaker 2: System the dark matter is.
- 38:39Speaker 1: But I guess what's the mechanism by which dark matter
- 38:42Speaker 1: would affect the timing of these clocks.
- 38:45Speaker 2: Yeah, so mostly it wouldn't. For many theories of dark matter,
- 38:48Speaker 2: dark matter is just some wimp. It's a massive particle
- 38:51Speaker 2: that only interacts gravitationally, and so it has essentially no
- 38:54Speaker 2: effect on these clocks except for gravitational time dilation. We
- 38:58Speaker 2: know the areas with greater mass more curvature, and a
- 39:01Speaker 2: curvature causes time dilation, but that would be very, very
- 39:04Speaker 2: difficult to measure even with these quantum clocks.
- 39:06Speaker 1: But wait, wait, why would it be difficult.
- 39:08Speaker 2: You can measure gravitational time dilation with quantum clocks, and
- 39:11Speaker 2: we've done that. You can do it on the surface
- 39:13Speaker 2: of the Earth, for example, and you could put a
- 39:15Speaker 2: quantum clock one meter above another one and you can
- 39:18Speaker 2: see the difference between them because one of them is
- 39:21Speaker 2: deeper in the curvature than the other. Super duper awesome,
- 39:24Speaker 2: but that's because the Earth has a huge amount of
- 39:26Speaker 2: gravity and this significant curvature. Here. Dark matter doesn't contribute
- 39:30Speaker 2: significantly to the curvature because it's pretty spread out, and
- 39:34Speaker 2: we would already know if dark matter wasn't pretty spread out,
- 39:37Speaker 2: because we would have seen deviations and like Jupiter's orbit
- 39:39Speaker 2: and whatever. So in principle you can, but we don't
- 39:42Speaker 2: think it's going to be very sensitive. If you had
- 39:44Speaker 2: a lot of quantum clocks and there were much more sensitive,
- 39:46Speaker 2: then you could probably detect dark matter local density variations
- 39:50Speaker 2: using that.
- 39:51Speaker 1: Principle, meaning these clocks would take at a different frequency
- 39:55Speaker 1: depending on how close it was to big sources of
- 39:58Speaker 1: mass or even sources of mass, because that's just how
- 40:02Speaker 1: relativity works.
- 40:03Speaker 2: Yeah, that's how relativity works. Remember, in relativity, it is
- 40:05Speaker 2: two kinds of time dilation. One is based on speed.
- 40:08Speaker 2: If you see a clock moving quickly, then you see
- 40:10Speaker 2: it ticking slowly, and that's very confusing because it's relative,
- 40:14Speaker 2: and so it depends on two observers. But there's another
- 40:16Speaker 2: kind of time dilation, gravitational, which is absolute. It just
- 40:20Speaker 2: says anybody in curvature their clock is going to tick slowly,
- 40:23Speaker 2: no matter who's looking at it, and everybody's going to
- 40:25Speaker 2: agree about whose clock is ticking slowly. So that's very powerful,
- 40:29Speaker 2: and that's something you can use to measure just like
- 40:32Speaker 2: how much stuff is there in general, because clocks tick
- 40:35Speaker 2: slower near stuff. Really kind of an awesome feature of
- 40:38Speaker 2: the universe.
- 40:39Speaker 1: Meaning like if I had two of these atomic clocks
- 40:41Speaker 1: and one of them is out there in the middle
- 40:42Speaker 1: of empty space, and the other one is near a
- 40:45Speaker 1: big blob of dark matter. The one near the blob
- 40:47Speaker 1: of dark matter would take slower.
- 40:50Speaker 2: Right, Yeah, that's exactly right.
- 40:52Speaker 1: And so you might like start them out in the
- 40:54Speaker 1: same spot. But then after being for a while and
- 40:57Speaker 1: two different spots, one near the dark matter, and you
- 40:59Speaker 1: run a back, you would see that one of them
- 41:02Speaker 1: take more ticks than the other.
- 41:03Speaker 3: Yeah.
- 41:03Speaker 2: So now imagine like a grid, you have a quantum
- 41:06Speaker 2: clock every ten meters in the solar system, right, you
- 41:09Speaker 2: start them all out at the same time, and then
- 41:11Speaker 2: you monitor it, and by measuring the difference in that
- 41:13Speaker 2: number of ticks after a year on your reference clock,
- 41:16Speaker 2: the one that's hanging out with you, you can tell where
- 41:19Speaker 2: stuff is in the solar system.
- 41:21Speaker 1: Like which spots in the solar system have slower time.
- 41:24Speaker 2: Yes, exactly, because slower time means more matter, more curvature,
- 41:28Speaker 2: more energy density.
- 41:29Speaker 1: Really, I guess, on top of what you already know
- 41:32Speaker 1: about the Solar system right like right now, even if
- 41:35Speaker 1: we didn't have dark matter, a clock near the Sun
- 41:38Speaker 1: would take slower than a clock here exactly.
- 41:40Speaker 2: And we've done some basic version of this, as I
- 41:43Speaker 2: said earlier, If a few clocks on Earth at different altitudes,
- 41:46Speaker 2: those are different distances from the matter of the Earth
- 41:48Speaker 2: and the ones closer do ticks more slowly, and satellites
- 41:52Speaker 2: up in space their clocks tick faster than atomic clocks
- 41:55Speaker 2: here on the surface of the Earth. And you've got
- 41:57Speaker 2: to take that new account famously when you're doing GPS,
- 42:00Speaker 2: et cetera.
- 42:00Speaker 1: But you're saying, we're not going to be using this effect,
- 42:03Speaker 1: this time dilation from relativity to measure dark matter. Dark
- 42:07Speaker 1: matter is just too weak.
- 42:08Speaker 2: Dark matter is too weak, and we think it's not
- 42:10Speaker 2: cluppy enough to really detect that, though it would be
- 42:12Speaker 2: super awesome. There's a special kind of dark matter which
- 42:15Speaker 2: might give much larger effects, which would be much easier
- 42:18Speaker 2: to discover. And this is a theory called fuzzy dark matter.
- 42:22Speaker 1: Sounds fuzzy. But wait, so you're saying, like this idea
- 42:27Speaker 1: of using atomic clocks to measure dark matter would only
- 42:30Speaker 1: work for a certain theoretical meaning guessie type of dark matter,
- 42:37Speaker 1: which we don't know whether it's true or not or
- 42:39Speaker 1: exists or not. M So this is a huge sources
- 42:42Speaker 1: in white scheme that you don't really know if it's
- 42:45Speaker 1: going to work.
- 42:46Speaker 2: You know, you were talking about nomenclature and now you're
- 42:48Speaker 2: using the words guess and scheme. You know, really kind
- 42:51Speaker 2: of undermine the credibility of science, but you know, this
- 42:53Speaker 2: is good faith stuff. This is like, hey, what if
- 42:55Speaker 2: dark matter is this other weird particular thing. How could
- 42:58Speaker 2: we see that and yet be best if we had experiments
- 43:01Speaker 2: which could detect any kind of dark matter. But you know,
- 43:03Speaker 2: there might be kinds of dark matter which we could
- 43:05Speaker 2: only detect in certain ways or easier to spot in
- 43:08Speaker 2: some ways. And so it's good to be creative and
- 43:10Speaker 2: think about how we could detect specific kinds of dark
- 43:13Speaker 2: matter as well, even though we don't know what dark
- 43:15Speaker 2: matter is. And if this theory is at.
- 43:17Speaker 1: All correct, well, I'm just trying to understand the scheme.
- 43:22Speaker 1: So are you saying there's a theoretical kind of dark
- 43:24Speaker 1: matter called fuzzy dark matter? So what is it? So?
- 43:27Speaker 2: Fuzzy dark matter suggests that maybe dark matter isn't very massive,
- 43:31Speaker 2: like some people suggest that dark matter could be like
- 43:33Speaker 2: one hundred GeV like the mass of a w or
- 43:36Speaker 2: a z boson, like one hundred times the mass of
- 43:39Speaker 2: a proton, a pretty hefty particle, almost as massive as
- 43:42Speaker 2: a Higgs. That's sort of the classic strategy, and there's
- 43:45Speaker 2: reasons for that. There's something called the wimp miracle check
- 43:48Speaker 2: in our podcast about that, which argues strongly that dark
- 43:51Speaker 2: matter should be around one hundred gv based on how
- 43:54Speaker 2: much of it there is in the universe. But people
- 43:56Speaker 2: are like, well, maybe that's all wrong, and there's an
- 43:58Speaker 2: assumption there that's wrong. What if dark matter super duper light,
- 44:01Speaker 2: like a trilliance the mass of an electron. So now
- 44:04Speaker 2: there's an enormous number of these dark matter particles, so
- 44:08Speaker 2: many more than you could even imagine, because you have
- 44:10Speaker 2: to somehow make like a big fraction of the mass
- 44:13Speaker 2: of the universe out of particles that are a tiny
- 44:16Speaker 2: fraction of the mass of the electron, which is already
- 44:19Speaker 2: very very light.
- 44:20Speaker 1: Well, first of all, I think this whole podcast is
- 44:22Speaker 1: a wimp miracle, Daniel. But I think you're saying, like
- 44:26Speaker 1: this version of dark matter, instead of being maybe marble
- 44:29Speaker 1: sized particles, they're like super tiny bb sized particles. And
- 44:33Speaker 1: some of that makes it fuzzier.
- 44:35Speaker 2: Yeah, it makes it fuzzier because if they're very very
- 44:37Speaker 2: low mass, then their wavelengths are more spread out. Some
- 44:40Speaker 2: of these things can have a wavelength like the size
- 44:43Speaker 2: of the galaxy.
- 44:44Speaker 1: What do you mean a wavelength?
- 44:45Speaker 2: The wavelength of a particle is like the distance on
- 44:47Speaker 2: which these quantum interference effects appear, and so you can
- 44:51Speaker 2: calculate this quantity. It's called the Debrogely wavelength. You'll see
- 44:54Speaker 2: wave like effects for a particle when you interact over
- 44:58Speaker 2: these kinds of distances, and that's the wavelength of a particle.
- 45:01Speaker 1: Meaning sort of like the size of it kind of right.
- 45:03Speaker 2: Sort of, Yeah, it's when it stops acting like a
- 45:05Speaker 2: blob like a particle and starts acting more like a wave.
- 45:09Speaker 2: Things that have wavelike behaviors. Really, it's always acting like
- 45:12Speaker 2: a wave. It's just that when you zoom out you
- 45:14Speaker 2: can approximate it as a particle.
- 45:15Speaker 1: Because they have low mass. What's the relationship between having
- 45:18Speaker 1: low mass and being having big wavelengths.
- 45:21Speaker 2: Well, the wavelength depends on your momentum and your mass,
- 45:24Speaker 2: So lower mass just means a larger wavelength because it's
- 45:28Speaker 2: really like a ratio between the momentum and the mass.
- 45:31Speaker 2: When things have a lot of kinetic energy relative to
- 45:33Speaker 2: their mass, they act more like light because light is
- 45:35Speaker 2: pure kinetic energy. When things have very small amounts of
- 45:38Speaker 2: energy relative to their mass, they're stationary, so they act
- 45:41Speaker 2: more like bits of sand, like particles, and so it's
- 45:44Speaker 2: just sort of a rough way to understand where that
- 45:47Speaker 2: transition happens.
- 45:48Speaker 1: Okay, So, then if dark matter is this kind of
- 45:50Speaker 1: fuzzy kind of dark matter, you're saying that each particle
- 45:53Speaker 1: would be super duper light, and it would also have
- 45:56Speaker 1: huge variations in their size. That's what you mean by fuzzy.
- 46:00Speaker 1: It's like they might be some of them might be
- 46:01Speaker 1: super big and somewhere might be super small.
- 46:03Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, the wavelengths could be very very large, which
- 46:06Speaker 2: means they can interact over long distances. But the fascinating
- 46:09Speaker 2: thing is that in simulations of this dark matter, it
- 46:11Speaker 2: predicts like a mini halo of dark matter in our
- 46:14Speaker 2: Solar system, essentially that this stuff would be clumped up
- 46:17Speaker 2: in and near the Sun. That most of the dark
- 46:20Speaker 2: matter in the Solar System might be like clumped up
- 46:23Speaker 2: near the Sun. It might be like hiding in the Sun.
- 46:26Speaker 1: And if it wasn't this kind of fuzzy dark matter,
- 46:28Speaker 1: it wouldn't.
- 46:29Speaker 2: Now, this kind of fuzzy dark matter is the kind
- 46:31Speaker 2: we think would clump up like a.
- 46:33Speaker 1: Halo near the Sun, and the other kinds wouldn't.
- 46:35Speaker 2: Yeah, the other kinds wouldn't necessarily, I mean, I've heard
- 46:38Speaker 2: of other theories of dark matter clumping in the Sun.
- 46:40Speaker 2: There's all sorts of theories, but this particular one tends
- 46:44Speaker 2: to make a halo near the Sun and would affect
- 46:47Speaker 2: the operation of quantum clocks because of its special fuzziness.
- 46:50Speaker 2: It can also slightly interact with electrons through sort of
- 46:54Speaker 2: like a back door in quantum mechanics, which would change
- 46:56Speaker 2: the way a quantum clock operates. It's like it changes
- 46:59Speaker 2: the electrons math and how it responds to photons because
- 47:02Speaker 2: of oscillations in this fuzzy dark matter field, and so
- 47:06Speaker 2: effectively it changes the frequency of these clocks. And so
- 47:10Speaker 2: you can detect in principle whether you're near a dense
- 47:13Speaker 2: blob of this ultra light dark matter by looking at
- 47:16Speaker 2: a quantum clock and counting its ticks very carefully. And
- 47:19Speaker 2: this would be a bigger effect than the effect we
- 47:21Speaker 2: talked about earlier, the gravitational curvature.
- 47:24Speaker 1: But I thought that dark matter couldn't interact with regular
- 47:26Speaker 1: matter only through it could only do it through gravity.
- 47:29Speaker 2: Yeah, it could only do it through gravity in general,
- 47:31Speaker 2: But this one takes a back door through the Higgs field.
- 47:34Speaker 2: It like interacts with the Higgs field and it changes
- 47:36Speaker 2: how the Higgs field works, and so near the presence
- 47:39Speaker 2: of this ultra light dark matter, electrons effectively have a
- 47:42Speaker 2: different mass.
- 47:43Speaker 1: But I guess if that was true, wouldn't we see
- 47:46Speaker 1: it effect regular matter on a larger scale.
- 47:49Speaker 2: You would see it happen, but it's a subtle effect,
- 47:51Speaker 2: and so you need to be near a dense clump
- 47:53Speaker 2: of it. So the idea is, take something that's very
- 47:56Speaker 2: very sensitive to the electron mass, like a quantum clock,
- 47:59Speaker 2: and try to put it near a dense clump of
- 48:01Speaker 2: this special ultra light dark matter, maybe near the Sun.
- 48:04Speaker 2: So that's the idea is, like launch a bunch of
- 48:06Speaker 2: quantum clocks, have them orbit near the Sun, and look
- 48:09Speaker 2: for deviations in their timekeeping, and see if that's evidence
- 48:12Speaker 2: for ultra light dark matter interfering with the masses of
- 48:15Speaker 2: the electrons in these quantum clocks.
- 48:18Speaker 1: We mean that you would maybe like throw a bunch
- 48:19Speaker 1: of the sun, have them kind of form a half
- 48:22Speaker 1: ring around the Sun to see if time changes there,
- 48:25Speaker 1: sort of like a giant tirra, like.
- 48:28Speaker 2: A giant tr a quantum cosmic tira.
- 48:31Speaker 1: All right, But I guess which one would you be proving?
- 48:33Speaker 1: Would you be proving that dark matter is fuzzy, or
- 48:36Speaker 1: would you be proving that it's there? Or are they
- 48:39Speaker 1: both related?
- 48:40Speaker 2: They're both related.
- 48:41Speaker 4: Though.
- 48:41Speaker 2: You know, if we saw this thing, there would instantly
- 48:43Speaker 2: be like fifty other theories to explain it as well.
- 48:47Speaker 2: It probably wouldn't be a unique prediction of this kind
- 48:49Speaker 2: of dark matter. Theories are very very clever people, and
- 48:52Speaker 2: they'll always come up with another way to explain the
- 48:54Speaker 2: data that we were seeing. But it's cool because it's
- 48:57Speaker 2: a prediction that this theory makes and we go out
- 48:59Speaker 2: and we see it. That's really fascinating, and then we
- 49:02Speaker 2: can think about ways to distinguish all the different ideas
- 49:04Speaker 2: that might also explain this kind of observation. It would
- 49:08Speaker 2: just be cool to see something different. Currently, all of
- 49:10Speaker 2: our dark matter experiments basically see nothing. It would be
- 49:14Speaker 2: cool to have a signal somewhere.
- 49:16Speaker 1: So you're thinking, hey, let's put a bunch of microways
- 49:18Speaker 1: in space and see if it sticks exactly.
- 49:21Speaker 2: Let's see if one burrito is a little bit colder
- 49:23Speaker 2: than another.
- 49:24Speaker 1: All right, Well, an interesting idea for how we could
- 49:26Speaker 1: maybe possibly crack sort of a theoretical version of one
- 49:31Speaker 1: of the biggest mysteries in the universe.
- 49:33Speaker 2: That's right. Physicists are being very creative and trying to
- 49:35Speaker 2: come up with new theories of dark matter and new
- 49:38Speaker 2: ways to discover them, including using super duper sets in
- 49:42Speaker 2: quantum clocks distributed through the solar system, which also would
- 49:46Speaker 2: just be fun to do.
- 49:47Speaker 1: You just want to parade, Daniel, I just want a Tiara?
- 49:50Speaker 2: Is that too much to ask?
- 49:53Speaker 1: How about we just buy you a Tiara?
- 49:55Speaker 2: Is it made of dark matter? Are you using your bitcoin?
- 49:57Speaker 1: It can be, but in any way that you want.
- 50:00Speaker 1: But if it's saves tax dollars billions of dollars, you know,
- 50:03Speaker 1: it would be a pretty good investment.
- 50:05Speaker 2: Yeah, there we go. That was my scheme the whole time.
- 50:07Speaker 1: Yeah, to get us to buy you at tiara without
- 50:10Speaker 1: actually having to run in a beauty contest.
- 50:13Speaker 2: I'm busted.
- 50:15Speaker 1: Well, you are the most beautiful podcaster with a show
- 50:19Speaker 1: called Daniel Jorge Explaining the Universe. So whose name is Daniels?
- 50:23Speaker 2: I'll take very highly qualified compliments, thank you.
- 50:26Speaker 1: It's a very specific tiara based on a very theoretical
- 50:31Speaker 1: model of the universe.
- 50:33Speaker 2: Fuzzy compliments from Morehey, all.
- 50:34Speaker 1: Right, well we hope you enjoyed that. Thanks for joining us.
- 50:37Speaker 1: See you next time.
- 50:43Speaker 2: For more science and curiosity, come find us on social media,
- 50:46Speaker 2: where we answer questions and post videos. We're on Twitter, Discord, Instant,
- 50:51Speaker 2: and now TikTok. Thanks for listening, and remember that Daniel
- 50:55Speaker 2: and Jorge Explain the Universe is a production of Iheartworting.
- 50:59Speaker 2: For more podcast from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,
- 51:04Speaker 2: or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.