Latest / Murder Files Unsealed / How a Homecoming Queen’s Journal Helped Solve Her Shocking Murder

Transcript

How a Homecoming Queen’s Journal Helped Solve Her Shocking Murder · Murder Files Unsealed

0:00
Speaker 1: You know, you've probably got a smartphone sitting in your
0:01
pocket right now.
0:02
Speaker 2: Right, Oh, yeah, definitely, I mean most of us do, right, And.
0:05
Speaker 1: If it is anything like the devices that most of
0:08
us carry, it is essentially a military grade digital fortress.
0:14
I mean, we are talking about AES two fifty six encryption.
0:17
Speaker 2: Here, oh absolutely, it's while we're talking about a dedicated
0:20
hardware subsystem too, what tech companies call a secure enclave.
0:24
Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly. It stores your biometric data, your cryptographic keys,
0:28
and it's on a totally separate microchip entirely. So if
0:32
someone finds your phone and tries to, you know, brute
0:35
force their way in by guessing passwords, the device is
0:38
programmed to systematically throttle their attempts.
0:40
Speaker 2: Right. It slows you down, like it makes you wait
0:43
one minute than five minutes exactly.
0:44
Speaker 1: And eventually it will just wipe its own memory. I mean,
0:47
it is a titanium vole. Even the manufacturer couldn't crack
0:50
it if they wanted to.
0:51
Speaker 2: It really is the pinnacle of consumer privacy engineering. Like
0:54
law enforcement agencies can literally possess a suspects device, have
0:59
a judge's signal, sure on a search warrant, and still
1:01
be completely hopelessly locked.
1:03
Speaker 1: Out because the date is mathematically sealed.
1:05
Speaker 2: Right, mathematically sealed. It's a wall they just can't climb.
1:08
Speaker 1: Which brings us to the paradox at the core of
1:11
our deep dive today. Well, welcome you to the deep dive.
1:14
By the way, our mission today is to unpack a
1:17
really harrowing case from DeKalb County, Georgia that sits right
1:21
at the intersection of analog teenage innocence and the well
1:26
the fatal consequences of digital age jealousies.
1:28
Speaker 2: It's a heavy one, yeah, it is.
1:30
Speaker 1: So just a quick overview of our sources today, we
1:33
are pulling from a stack of detailed case excerpts, official
1:37
statements from the DeKalb County District Attorney's Office, and some
1:40
really excellent contemporaneous reporting from Oxygen's true crime series The
1:45
Real Murders of Atlanta.
1:47
Speaker 2: Right, we're looking at all those angles.
1:48
Speaker 1: And we're using all of that to examine the November
1:50
twenty twenty two murder of a seventeen year old girl
1:53
named Jane Salazarschavez. And the hook here the incredible paradox
1:58
is this, how does a highlight disciplined seventeen year old
2:01
high school homecoming queen with serious military aspirations end up
2:06
the victim of a sniperlike ambush outside her own home.
2:09
Speaker 2: It's just jarring, it really is.
2:12
Speaker 1: And maybe even more bafflingly, how did investigators finally crack
2:16
that impenetrable titanium digital vault of an iPhone?
2:20
Speaker 2: Well, spoiler alert, they didn't use a supercomputer, No they didn't.
2:24
They didn't use some multimillion dollar software exploit either. They
2:29
use the most old school tool imaginable, a teenager's handwritten diary.
2:32
Speaker 1: A paper notebook. It is just a wild, tragic collision.
2:37
So could you give us a quick thesis on what
2:39
we're looking at today?
2:39
Speaker 2: Yeah? Absolutely. I mean, this case is a really stark
2:42
illustration of how quickly private, seemingly mundane teenage conflicts can
2:47
escalate into irreversible violence the second firearms are involved, right,
2:51
And you know it also highlights how modern detective work,
2:54
for all of its high tech cell tower trilateration and
2:57
metadate analysis, so often balances on azer's edge of pure
3:01
luck and like you said, analog artifacts.
3:03
Speaker 1: Okay, let's unpack this, yeah, to really grasp the shockwaves
3:06
this case sent through to Coald County. I think we
3:09
have to start by analyzing the two worlds Jane was
3:11
operating in.
3:11
Speaker 2: Yeah, we need to look at Jane herself. She was
3:13
a junior at Towers High School in Decatur, Georgia, And she.
3:16
Speaker 1: Wasn't just participating in high school, right, she was leading it.
3:19
Speaker 2: Exactly just weeks before her death, she had been crowned homecoming.
3:23
Speaker 1: Queen, which I mean, from a sociological standpoint, that requires
3:26
an immense amount of social capital. To win homecoming queen,
3:30
you have to successfully navigate all these multiple, often conflicting
3:35
social strata within a high school.
3:37
Speaker 2: Oh, for sure, you have to be liked by the athletes,
3:39
the academics, the arts kids.
3:41
Speaker 1: Yeah, you need a level of charisma and diplomacy that
3:44
is pretty rare for a seventeen year old.
3:46
Speaker 2: And that charisma was anchored by some really intense discipline. Like,
3:50
she wasn't just socially successful. She was a group commander
3:53
in the school's Air Force Junior ROTC program.
3:56
Speaker 1: Wow group commander as a junior.
3:58
Speaker 2: Yeah, she was earning medals. She had developed serious leadership
4:02
skills and had these really clear defined plans to join
4:06
the US Army after she graduated.
4:08
Speaker 1: Let's look at the mechanics of that. For a second.
4:10
Being a JROTC group commander means you are wearing a uniform. Yeah,
4:14
you are responsible for the drill proficiency, the uniform inspections,
4:18
the behavioral standards of literally dozens of your peers.
4:21
Speaker 2: It's a lot of responsibility for a teenager.
4:23
Speaker 1: It is, and her mother, Amparo Salazar, and her principal,
4:27
Tiffany M. Sims, both spoke at length about how grounded
4:31
she was. The descriptors across all our sources are completely uniform.
4:35
She was sweet, she was down to earth and inspiration
4:38
and seemingly had absolutely zero enemies.
4:41
Speaker 2: But and this is crucial, that public persona, the uniform,
4:45
the metals, the crown, It's a highly structured, outward facing identity, right,
4:51
And this is where we have to look at the
4:52
duality of teenage life. In cybersecurity, there is this concept
4:56
called sandboxing and boxing Okay, yeah, it's a security mechanism
4:59
where programs are run in separate, isolated environments. That way,
5:03
if there's a failure or a virus in one program,
5:06
it doesn't bleed over and crash the rest of the system.
5:08
Speaker 1: I really like that analogy it's infinitely better than the
5:11
old tip of the iceberg cliche. So you're saying a
5:13
teenager's life operates like a series of sandboxed applications precisely.
5:18
Speaker 2: I mean, think back to your own teenage years for
5:20
a second. How much of your private world was completely
5:23
invisible to the adults around you?
5:25
Speaker 1: Oh? Almost all of it? I mean, parents and teachers
5:28
only see the ten percent shining above the surface, the crown,
5:31
the metals.
5:32
Speaker 2: Exactly, while this massive, complex and sometimes really dangerous web
5:36
of social dynamics is hiding entirely underwater. Teenagers naturally build
5:41
these private worlds that are distinct from their family life
5:44
and distinct again from their academic lives.
5:46
Speaker 1: They manage multiple, non intersecting social graphs, right.
5:50
Speaker 2: But the huge problem with sandboxing your social life is
5:53
that when an exploit or a crisis finally breaches that isolation,
5:57
the collision of those worlds is catastrophic because the different
6:00
spheres have literally no context for one another.
6:03
Speaker 1: And in Jane's case, the data inside that private sandbox
6:07
involved relationships that were remarkably complex. Our sources outlined that
6:11
she was navigating relationships with two different men.
6:14
Speaker 2: And here is the variable that really complicates the equation.
6:17
Jane is seventeen. The two men involved were both in
6:20
their early twenties.
6:21
Speaker 1: Right. One is Brandon Wilson, who is serving in the
6:23
US Army. The other is not Kiah Dorsey, who is
6:26
twenty three years old.
6:27
Speaker 2: Which creates a massive age gap dynamic. It's an asymmetrical
6:31
power dynamic, whether it's intentional or not.
6:33
Speaker 1: Because a seventeen year old high school junior is still
6:36
operating within this highly regulated ecosystem right, Bell's hall passes parental.
6:42
Speaker 2: Curfuse, Yeah, exactly, while the twenty three year old is
6:45
operating out in the adult world. They have a car,
6:48
independent housing, and adult income and entirely different emotional expectations
6:53
for a relationship.
6:54
Speaker 1: And according to prosecutors, both of these adult men believe
6:58
they were her exclusive boyfriend. They both felt they had
7:01
a legitimate exclusive claim to her time.
7:04
Speaker 2: And affection, which is a powder keg.
7:06
Speaker 1: It is now, if you think back to high school,
7:08
a lot of people attempt to juggle overlapping romantic interests.
7:12
You think you're smart enough to manage it, that these
7:14
two sandboxes will never touch.
7:15
Speaker 2: But the disparity in life experience acts as an accelerant here.
7:19
A seventeen year old might view an overlapping relationship as
7:22
a stressful but manageable bit of.
7:24
Speaker 1: High school drama, right, just trauma.
7:26
Speaker 2: But a twenty three year old adult doesn't view it
7:28
as high school drama. They view it as a profound betrayal.
7:33
It's a challenge to their ego and an infringement on
7:35
their territory.
7:36
Speaker 1: Which brings us to the catalyst. The exact moment the
7:39
sandbox shatters, it's Veterans Day weekend, November tenth, twenty twenty two.
7:45
Brandon Wilson, the young man swerving in the Army, decides
7:48
to return home to Decatur to surprise Jane.
7:51
Speaker 2: The surprise visit.
7:52
Speaker 1: Yeah, and I've always argued that the surprise visit is
7:54
inherently risky. It's ranticized in movies all the time, but
7:58
in reality, it completely the other person of their agency
8:01
to control their environment or prepare for the interaction.
8:04
Speaker 2: It forces a totally spontaneous reaction. So Wilson arrives at
8:08
Jane's residence near Glenwood Road. He asks her to come
8:11
outside and she gets into his car.
8:13
Speaker 1: But immediately the atmospheric pressure in the vehicle drops.
8:16
Speaker 2: Yeah. According to the investigation. She seems withdrawn. She is
8:19
definitely not reacting with the elation you would expect from
8:21
a romantic homecoming surprise.
8:23
Speaker 1: And Wilson, who is trained by the military to observe
8:26
baseline behaviors and anomalies, instantly registers that shift. He suspects
8:31
she might be seeing someone.
8:32
Speaker 2: Else, so he confronts her.
8:34
Speaker 1: He does, and then he does something that completely violates
8:37
her privacy but is simultaneously the most common mundane relationship
8:41
conflict of the modern era. He demands to see her
8:45
cell phone. He snoops on her phone.
8:47
Speaker 2: Right, And I think we should really break down the
8:49
mechanics of this because it dictates everything that follows. We
8:52
live in an era of push notification.
8:54
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, the glowing screen Exactly.
8:56
Speaker 2: When you get a text unless you have specifically configured
9:00
your device's lock screen privacy settings to hide the content,
9:03
that message flashes briefly on the glass. It is a
9:06
highly visible, immediate intrusion of the digital world right into
9:10
the physical space of that car, which.
9:12
Speaker 1: Makes this so relatable in a grim way. I mean,
9:15
snooping on a phone is toxic, yes, but it happens
9:18
a thousands of times a day all over the world,
9:21
couples argue over glowing streams.
9:23
Speaker 2: It's just a guy looking at a text message.
9:24
Speaker 1: Exactly. Nobody sitting in that car could have possibly predicted
9:29
that looking at a text message would be the first
9:31
domino in a chain leading to a tactical ambush.
9:35
Speaker 2: I mean, I want to actively push back on the
9:37
idea that this was some predictable escalation. It's a totally
9:41
mundane modern dispute, it really is.
9:44
Speaker 1: But it is the specific content of that notification that
9:48
lights the fuse. Wilson sees a suggestive text message from
9:52
an unidentified phone number.
9:54
Speaker 2: And rather than just arguing with Jane about it, Wilson
9:57
decides to take the confrontation directly to the source.
10:00
Speaker 1: Right he calls the number, which is.
10:01
Speaker 2: Such an aggressive escalation.
10:02
Speaker 1: It is the sequence of calls here is so important.
10:05
He calls the number, the person on the other end
10:07
picks up the connection, but then quickly hangs up without speaking.
10:11
Speaker 2: Think about the psychology of that dial tone. The silence
10:14
from the unknown number validates every single piece of paranoia
10:17
Wilson is feeling in that moment. Oh.
10:19
Speaker 1: Absolutely, if it were just a misunderstanding, the person would
10:22
explain hanging up is basically an admission of guilt in
10:25
Wilson's mind.
10:26
Speaker 2: Right, So what happens next? Well, a short time later,
10:29
that same unidentified number calls Jane's phone back, but this
10:33
time Wilson intercepts the call. He answers it, and the
10:37
voice on the other end belongs to twenty three year
10:39
old Nakia Dorsi.
10:41
Speaker 1: And suddenly the two separate sandboxes crash into each other violently.
10:45
You have these two men sitting miles apart, connected by
10:49
invisible cellular frequencies, both utterly convinced they are the rightful boyfriend.
10:54
Speaker 2: It's a fascinating study in digital territoriality. I mean, think
10:58
about it. When two men can on each other physically,
11:01
there are biological mechanisms at play, like posturing right right, posturing,
11:05
assessing physical size, the immediate threat of bodily harm, and
11:09
that often leads to one party backing down to avoid
11:11
getting injured. But over a cellular connection.
11:14
Speaker 1: Those biological breaks are totally removed.
11:16
Speaker 2: Exactly, you are insulated by distance. The argument can escalate
11:20
to a fever pitch of verbal aggression because the immediate
11:23
physical consequences just aren't there.
11:25
Speaker 1: They're literally fighting overlapping claims via cellular towers. Dorsey is
11:30
arguing with Wilson, and the sources note that Dorsey eventually
11:33
demands that Jane Ratuna's personal belongings, which.
11:36
Speaker 2: Is such a classic move.
11:37
Speaker 1: It is the universal, absolute marker of a relationship territorial dispute,
11:42
give me my stuff back. It's a mechanism to force
11:46
a physical interaction when you feel you are losing control
11:49
of the digital one.
11:50
Speaker 2: So let's establish the timeline and the geography here, because
11:53
the window of time is terrifyingly narrow. Wilson and Jane
11:57
are in the car near Glenwood Road. My own argument
12:00
reaches its peak and ends. The call disconnects right and.
12:04
Speaker 1: They actually leave the area for a bit, presumably driving
12:07
around to talk through the fallout of this massive revelation.
12:11
Speaker 2: Yeah, and they return to her home on Burgess Drive
12:13
around eleven PM.
12:15
Speaker 1: They park the car. They're sitting there in the dark.
12:17
As far as they are concerned, the conflict is over.
12:20
It was an ugly intense phone call, but it's done.
12:23
They think the dispute is contained within the digital architecture
12:26
of the cell.
12:26
Speaker 2: Phone, but they don't realize that the digital dispute has
12:29
just crossed the threshold into the physical world.
12:31
Speaker 1: Okay, let's map this out. It's eleven pm. Burgess Drive
12:36
is a quiet suburban residential street into Kalb County. The
12:40
nGy is idling, it's dark outside the windows, and as
12:44
they're sitting there, Wilson notices something cut through the darkness.
12:48
Speaker 2: A red laser.
12:49
Speaker 1: A red laser is shining directly on his face.
12:51
Speaker 2: And the introduction of a red laser site fundamentally shifts
12:54
the paradigm of this entire crime. We really need to
12:58
look at the mechanics of why a laser site, as
12:59
you used.
13:00
Speaker 1: Yeah, why is that so tactically important?
13:02
Speaker 2: Well, a red dot or a laser diode is attached
13:04
to the rail of a firearm, typically underneath the barrel.
13:07
It projects a collimated beam of light that runs perfectly
13:10
parallel to the barrel's trajectory. Okay, and this completely removes
13:14
the need to aim down the iron sights of the weapon.
13:17
Think about a low light environment, like a dark suburban
13:19
street at eleven pm. Aligning the front and rear sights
13:22
of a dark handgun is incredibly difficult.
13:25
Speaker 1: You can't even see them exactly.
13:27
Speaker 2: But a laser allows the shooter to keep both eyes open,
13:31
maintaining full peripheral vision and situational awareness while guaranteeing that
13:36
wherever that dot rests, the bullet is going to strike.
13:40
It is an accessory explicitly designed for precision targeting and
13:44
rapid target acquisition in the dark.
13:46
Speaker 1: Wow. I have to say I had a visceral reaction
13:50
reading that detail in the case files. It is an
13:53
image straight out of a thriller, like a Born movie.
13:56
You are sitting in your own driveway and suddenly a
13:59
red dot apeers on your skin.
14:00
Speaker 2: It's terrifying.
14:01
Speaker 1: It changes the entire narrative from a quote unquote crime
14:04
of passion or someone just loses their temper and throws
14:07
a punch into a premeditated tactical strike. It implies that
14:10
someone was actively hunting them.
14:12
Speaker 2: Right, because the psychological shift required to execute this is massive.
14:15
The shooter didn't just grab a weapon in a blind rage.
14:17
They had to consciously retrieve a firearm, ensure the laser
14:20
accessory was activated, travel to a specific geographic location, use
14:24
the darkness for concealment, wait for the vehicle to arrive,
14:27
approach without being heard, and then actively acquire a target
14:31
with the laser.
14:32
Speaker 1: Wilson looks out the window following the beam of light,
14:34
and he sees a man dressed entirely in black clothing,
14:37
pointing this laser equipped handgun directly at the vehicle. And
14:42
then the man opens fire.
14:43
Speaker 2: And we are not talking about one or two panic
14:45
shots here. The shooter unloads approximately twenty rounds, strike the car.
14:50
Speaker 1: Twenty rounds. Let's break down the ballistics of that for
14:53
a second. Yeah, to fire twenty rounds assuming a standard
14:56
semi automatic handgun, you were pulling the trigger twenty individual time,
15:00
or you're using a weapon equipped with an autoseer or
15:03
a switch to render it fully automatic.
15:06
Speaker 2: Either way, it requires an extended high capacity magazine.
15:09
Speaker 1: Which means the weapon was specifically configured for overwhelming firepower.
15:13
Speaker 2: And firing into a vehicle is also a specific type
15:16
of ballistics problem. Automotive safety glass is actually designed to
15:20
deflect and chatter. When bullets strike a windshield or door
15:23
panel at an angle, they deform, they tumble, and their
15:27
trajectories become completely unpredictable.
15:29
Speaker 1: Inside the cabin, they just bounce around.
15:31
Speaker 2: Yeah, So firing twenty rounds into a confined metal box
15:35
basically guarantees catastrophic, indiscriminate damage to anyone inside. It is
15:40
an overwhelming application of legal force.
15:43
Speaker 1: Wilson is an Army soldier, and the human body has
15:47
this incredible mechanism for bypassing the conscious brain. When under
15:52
extreme threat, his military training kicks in. He doesn't freeze right.
15:56
Speaker 2: He acts.
15:57
Speaker 1: He throws the car into reverse, floors the exit and
16:00
tries to speed backward out of the kill zone to
16:03
escape the neighborhood.
16:04
Speaker 2: But the sheer volume of fire was just too much.
16:07
As he is executing this evasive maneuver, he hears Jane's scream.
16:11
Speaker 1: He later told police, and this details is devastating that
16:14
he could hear she was choking on her own blood.
16:17
Speaker 2: God, and Wilson himself had been struck by a bullet
16:19
in the leg, but the adrenaline allows him to push
16:21
through the trauma. He manages to drive the riddled car
16:25
away from the dark residential street and navigate to a
16:27
brightly lit gas station on Glenwood Drive, where he immediately
16:30
calls nine one one.
16:31
Speaker 1: The police and paramedics arrive at this chaotic scene under
16:35
the fluorescent canopy of the gas station. They pulled Jane
16:38
from the vehicle. She had been struck multiple times wounds
16:42
to her arm, her torso, her back, and her abdomen,
16:45
and despite the paramedics doing everything modern trauma medicine allows,
16:49
she dies within about five minutes, so fair five minutes
16:52
from sitting in a car talking to being gone.
16:55
Speaker 2: And our sources note this chilling piece of digital evidence
16:58
from the scene of the shooting itself. A neighbor's doorbell
17:02
camera on Burgess Drive actually captured the audio of the ambush.
17:05
Speaker 1: Wow.
17:06
Speaker 2: Yeah, you don't see the muzzle flashes on the video,
17:09
but you hear the audio signature. It's the rapid, deafening,
17:12
sequential popping of twenty gunshots echoing through this normally quiet
17:17
residential neighborhood.
17:19
Speaker 1: It creates this horrific split screen reality. You have Burgess
17:22
Drive suddenly transformed into a tactical combat zone, and then
17:26
you have the bloody, chaotic aftermath a few miles away
17:29
at a gas station, and as Wilson is rushed to
17:32
the hospital to treat the gunshot wound to his leg,
17:35
the DeKalb County police arrive. They spring the yellow tape,
17:38
they secure both scenes, They look at the shell casings.
17:41
Speaker 2: And they realize pretty quickly that they have almost absolutely
17:44
nothing to go on.
17:46
Speaker 1: So put yourself in the shoes of a homicide detective
17:48
for a minute. You have a dead seventeen year old
17:51
girl and a wounded soldier. That's step one. You look
17:54
at the survivor, you look at the boyfriend. Detectives immediately
17:58
interview Brandon Wilson.
18:00
Speaker 2: And this is where physical forensics actually work really efficiently,
18:03
because they quickly and definitively rule Wilson out as a suspect.
18:07
Speaker 1: Wait, how exactly do they do that so fast because
18:10
the quote unquote boyfriend is almost always suspect number one
18:13
in the domestic commicide.
18:14
Speaker 2: They do it through crime scene reconstruction and medical evidence.
18:17
Wilson's account is that a man stood outside the car
18:20
and fired inward, so the physical evidence must corroborate that narrative.
18:24
Speaker 1: Okay, So they look at the car exactly.
18:27
Speaker 2: Detectives look at the bullet holes in the exterior of
18:29
the car. The metal is pushed inward, which confirms the
18:32
shots originated from the exterior. They look at the glass
18:35
frax patterns, which also show an inward trajectory.
18:38
Speaker 1: And what about Wilson's wound? Does that line up perfectly?
18:41
Speaker 2: Wilson was shot in the leg while sitting in the
18:44
driver's seat. The eNTRI angle of the bullet into his
18:47
tissue perfectly aligns with a projectile traveling from outside the
18:51
driver's side window or door, passing through the barrier and
18:54
striking his leg.
18:55
Speaker 1: That makes sense.
18:56
Speaker 2: Furthermore, they would test Wilson's hands for gunshots residue or GSR.
19:01
If he had fired a weapon inside the enclosed cabin
19:04
of that car, he would be covered in microscopic particles
19:07
of barium, antimony, and lead.
19:09
Speaker 1: I'm assuming he wasn't.
19:11
Speaker 2: He wasn't. The forensics perfectly match his terrifying story of
19:14
an ambush.
19:15
Speaker 1: Plus they look at motive right, m he was the
19:18
boyfriend who came home to surprise her. There was zero
19:20
history or evidence suggesting he wanted to harm her. So
19:24
Wilson is cleared and the detective's attention immediately pivots to
19:27
the only other piece of the puzzle, the massive argument
19:30
that happened just hours before.
19:32
Speaker 2: Right de Kalb County Police Master Officer Irving Hun stated
19:37
the investigative theory really clearly. He said, the motive lies
19:41
with whoever was arguing on that phone. That territorial dispute
19:45
over the cellular network is the genesis of the murder.
19:48
Speaker 1: But there's a massive roadblock. They don't know who the
19:50
guy on the phone is. The shooter was wearing all black,
19:53
hiding in the dark behind a laser sight. He didn't
19:56
exactly introduce himself, No, he didn't.
19:58
Speaker 2: So the entire investigation hinges entirely on identifying the unknown caller,
20:03
and the only blueprint for finding that identity is locked
20:06
inside Jane's cell phone.
20:08
Speaker 1: Which brings us back to that titanium digital vault we
20:11
talked about in the intro. Jane's iPhone was locked, and
20:14
this isn't the early two thousands where you can just
20:16
plug a phone into a computer and pull the files
20:18
off the hard drive, not at all.
20:20
Speaker 2: To understand the frustration of the detectives here, we really
20:23
need to explain how modern smartphone encryption works.
20:26
Speaker 1: Yeah, lay it out for us.
20:27
Speaker 2: When you set a passcode on a modern device, the
20:30
phone doesn't just put a digital padlock on your photos
20:33
and texts. It uses that passcode to mathematically encrypt the
20:37
entire file system. The data is scrambled into an unreadable cipher.
20:41
Speaker 1: So it's just gibberish without the code.
20:43
Speaker 2: Total gibberish. The only way to decrypt it is to
20:46
feed the correct passcode into that secure enclave chip we
20:49
mentioned earlier, which then generates the cryptographic key to unscramble
20:53
the data on the fly.
20:55
Speaker 1: So if you don't have the passcode, the data is
20:56
essentially shredded coffetti. It's useless, and no one close to Jane,
21:01
not her mother and Perro, not her friends, not Wilson,
21:05
knew her passcode.
21:07
Speaker 2: De Kalb County Patrol Officer Anthony Little described the gravity
21:10
of this obstacle. He said that accessing that specific phone
21:13
was the one thing that could make or break the case.
21:16
Speaker 1: I mean, think about holding a treasure chest with a
21:18
glass lid. You can see the answers right inside, but
21:21
the digital lock is made of titanium. They possessed the
21:24
murder weapons digital equivalent. They were holding the device that
21:27
contained the killer's identity in their hands, and it was
21:30
a useless brick.
21:31
Speaker 2: It really highlights how reliant we all are on digital security,
21:35
to the point where our own families couldn't even access
21:38
our devices in an emergency.
21:39
Speaker 1: That's a scary thought. So what is the procedural workaround
21:44
when the physical phone won't yield? What did the police do.
21:47
Speaker 2: You have to bypass the phone and go to the network.
21:49
You have to rely on the legal bureaucracy of telecom data.
21:52
Speaker 1: Which means search warrants.
21:54
Speaker 2: YEP, investigators immediately draft search warrants for Jane's cellular carrier,
21:59
demanding her call detail records and SMS logs to identify
22:02
the incoming number. This is all governed by the Stored
22:05
Communications Act.
22:06
Speaker 1: But getting records from a telecom giant like AT and
22:09
T or Verizon isn't like an episode of CSI where
22:12
the hacker types furiously for ten seconds and a map
22:15
pops up on a giant screen.
22:17
Speaker 2: I wish it were that easy, but no, it is
22:18
an agonizingly slow, manual process. The detective has to draft
22:23
an affidavit explaining probable cause, a judge has to review
22:26
and sign the warrant, and then what then the warrant
22:28
is facts are submitted through a web portal to the
22:31
legal compliance department of a massive corporation. That department, which
22:35
is handling thousands of similar request nationwide, places it in
22:38
a queue. A technician eventually pulls the data, packages it
22:43
securely and sends it back to.
22:45
Speaker 1: The detectives and in a homicide investigation time is the
22:49
ultimate enemy. The first forty eight hours are the most
22:52
critical window. Every hour that ticks by while a warrant
22:56
sits in a corporate inbox is an hour the killer
22:59
is using to destroy the murder weapon, burn their clothing,
23:02
intimidate witnesses, or flee the jurisdiction.
23:05
Speaker 2: The trail isn't just going cold, it is actively being erased.
23:08
Speaker 1: So while they are trapped in this agonizing holding pattern
23:11
waiting for the digital slow wheels of warrants to turn,
23:14
the detectives fall back on traditional analog police work. They
23:18
canvass the neighborhood for more security cameras, they process the shellcasings,
23:22
and crucially, they execute a physical search warrant on Jane's residence,
23:25
including her bedroom.
23:26
Speaker 2: And this search leads to what has to be one
23:29
of the most incredible paradoxical strokes of luck in modern
23:32
forensic history.
23:33
Speaker 1: It is the fulcrum on which the entire case pivots.
23:36
Picture the scene, you have crime scene technicians in latex
23:39
gloves carefully sweeping through a seventeen year old girl's bedroom.
23:44
They are looking at the detritus of a high school
23:46
life textbooks. JROTC. Uniform parts makeup, and among her personal
23:51
belongings they find a journal.
23:54
Speaker 2: A traditional paper, handwritten diary.
23:56
Speaker 1: The ultimate analog artifact of teenage compartmental is a exactly.
24:00
Speaker 2: They open the journal and written down on one of
24:03
the paper pages is a short string of numbers.
24:05
Speaker 1: Officer Hun and the team realize what they're looking at.
24:09
They take that handwritten number. They power up Jane's locked
24:12
iPhone and they type it into the log.
24:14
Speaker 2: Screen and the Titanium vault clicks open.
24:16
Speaker 1: It's just wild. The pass code works, the encryption instantly
24:19
decrypts the file system.
24:20
Speaker 2: Officer Hunt was incredibly blunt about it in the source material.
24:23
He said, that's luck. That's a big break in the case.
24:26
Speaker 1: The irony is just staggering. Tech companies spend billions of
24:30
dollars employing the brightest cryptographic mathematicians in the world to
24:34
create encryption algorithms that can withstand brewd force attacks from
24:38
state sponsored intelligence agencies. But cryptography has one fundamental flaw,
24:43
the human being operating it right. Human memory is fallible.
24:47
We have too many passcos to remember, so we write
24:49
them down on sticky notes or in diaries, and that
24:52
purely human desire for convenience entirely defeated the encryption.
24:57
Speaker 2: It is a perfect example of a side channel attack.
25:00
The detectives didn't break the encryption, They found the key
25:03
lying under the proverbial welcome.
25:04
Speaker 1: Mat so the glass lid on the treasure chest flies open.
25:08
They suddenly have unrestricted access to her entire digital footprint.
25:12
They bypass the telecom wait time completely. They can look
25:15
directly at her call logs, her eye messages, her social
25:17
media dms, and her camera roll.
25:19
Speaker 2: And it is in that camera roll that they find
25:21
the next massive piece of the puzzle. They find a photograph,
25:25
specifically a selfie taken just days before the ambush.
25:29
Speaker 1: But it's not just a standard teenage selfie. Here's where
25:32
it gets really interesting. There is an unidentified young man
25:36
in the photo, and tuck between the driver's seat and
25:39
the center console of the vehicle he is sitting in
25:42
is a highly visible handgun.
25:43
Speaker 2: Detectives immediately recognize the evidentiary value of this image. They
25:47
take the photo and show it to Jane's inner circle,
25:50
her mother, her friends, Brandon Wilson. They ask who is this?
25:55
Speaker 1: Let me guess, No one knows exactly.
25:57
Speaker 2: In a testament to how tightly sealed. Jane's social sandboxes
26:01
were no one recognizes him. He was completely invisible to
26:05
her daily public facing life.
26:07
Speaker 1: Wow. But even without a name, the police have fundamentally
26:11
shifted their position. They now have a high resolution image
26:14
of a face, and they have visual confirmation that this
26:17
face has immediate access to firearms. I want to pause
26:20
and speculate on the psychology of the killer here because
26:23
the cognitive dissonance is baffling.
26:25
Speaker 2: You mean the contradiction between the physical crime and the
26:27
digital footprint.
26:28
Speaker 1: Yes, physically, this killer was a ghost. He executed a dark, anonymous,
26:33
highly tactical ambush. He dressed in all black to minimize visibility.
26:38
He used a laser site to acquire his target without
26:40
exposing himself. He struck in the dead of night, achieved
26:44
his objective, and vanished without leaving a trace of physical
26:46
DNA or a fingerprint on the car. It is a calculated,
26:50
stealthy physical crime.
26:52
Speaker 2: But digitally he is incredibly sloppy. I mean, he allows
26:55
himself to be photographed with a weapon by the very
26:57
person he is going to murder just days prior.
27:00
Speaker 1: Why does a criminal brain compartmentalize like that? How could
27:03
you be Jason Born in the physical world and completely
27:05
oblivious in the digital one.
27:07
Speaker 2: It really comes down to cognitive load and human evolution.
27:10
For millions of years, human survival depended on mastering physical stealth,
27:14
hiding in the shadows, moving quietly, wearing camouflage. Our brains
27:18
are hardwired to understand physical threats and physical evidence a gun,
27:23
a bloody footprint, a witness. We intuitively understand that these
27:26
will get us caught.
27:27
Speaker 1: But digital evidence is invisible right.
27:30
Speaker 2: Digital permanence is a concept that is only about twenty
27:33
years old. It goes entirely against our evolutionary instincts. When
27:37
a criminal is planning in ambush, their cognitive load is
27:40
entirely consumed by the physical logistics like how do I
27:43
get there? How do I see in the dark, how
27:45
do I escape?
27:46
Speaker 1: They aren't thinking about a server in California exactly.
27:49
Speaker 2: They fundamentally fail to view a selfie sitting on a
27:53
server farm as a piece of tangible evidence until the
27:56
police are kicking down their door. They just don't conceptualize
27:59
metadata as a threat.
28:01
Speaker 1: So the detectives are sitting in his bedroom staring at
28:04
this decrypted phone. They went from a completely cold trail
28:07
to holding a photograph of their prime suspect. But a
28:11
photograph is just pixels. A face isn't a name, and
28:14
you can't submit a search warrant for guy in a car.
28:16
You need a legal identity, right.
28:18
Speaker 2: They need to attach a name to the pixels, and
28:20
to do that, the DeKalb County Police release the image
28:23
to the public. They push it to the local news stations,
28:25
the crime stopper networks, and social media. They basically cast
28:29
a wide net hoping someone in the community recognizes the face.
28:33
Speaker 1: And the networks. An anonymous tipster, following the news coverage
28:36
of the tragic Homecoming Queen murder, contacts investigators. This person
28:41
looks at the selfie and provides a specific name, Nokia Dorsey.
28:45
Speaker 2: And the moment that name is entered into the police database,
28:48
the dam breaks. The cascade of modern digital evidence is unleashed.
28:53
Detectives pull Nokia Dorsey's official state driver's license photograph and
28:57
run a facial comparison against the self be found on
29:00
Jane's phone, and.
29:01
Speaker 1: It's a perfect match. Right. The biometric markers align.
29:04
Speaker 2: Yep, so now the face equals the name. Next, they
29:08
use that name to execute targeted search warrants on social
29:10
media platforms, they serve warrants to Meta or Snapchat, pulling
29:14
the direct messages between Dorsey's accounts and Jane's accounts. This
29:18
completely establishes the digital trail of their relationship and the
29:21
escalating conflict.
29:23
Speaker 1: So name equals motive, but they still need to place
29:26
him at the scene of the crime like they have
29:27
a motive, but they need to prove he was the
29:29
man holding the laser site outside that car.
29:32
Speaker 2: Which brings us to the most damning piece of modern
29:35
forensic evidence, cell tower triangulation, or more accurately, historical cell
29:39
site analysis. Investigator subpoena the historical location data for the
29:43
phone number associated with Dorsey.
29:45
Speaker 1: Let's explain exactly how this works, because it's not just
29:47
a magic GPS dot on a map like they show
29:49
on TV.
29:50
Speaker 2: No, it relies on the fundamental architecture of how a
29:53
cellular network functions. For your cell phone to receive a
29:57
call or a text, the network has to know exactly
30:00
where you are at all times, So your phone is
30:03
constantly pinging or sending out a radio signal to the
30:05
nearest cell tower saying I am here, route data.
30:08
Speaker 1: To me, and the cell tower isn't just one giant
30:10
antenna that blasts the signal in a circle.
30:13
Speaker 2: Right correct, towers are sectored. They typically have three directional antennas,
30:17
each covering one hundred and twenty degree pie slice of
30:19
the area around the tower. When Dorsey's phone connected to
30:23
the network, the telecom company logged exactly which tower he
30:26
hit and which specific one hundred and twenty degree sector
30:29
of that tower received his signal.
30:31
Speaker 1: So they have a cone of probability.
30:32
Speaker 2: But they can get even more precise than a cone.
30:35
The network also logs the time of flight, or the
30:38
signal strength. It calculates exactly how many milliseconds it took
30:42
for the radio wave to travel from the phone to
30:44
the tower.
30:44
Speaker 1: Oh wow.
30:45
Speaker 2: Yeah. So by combining the directional sector with the distance
30:48
calculated from the signal delay, investigators can map a highly
30:52
accurate geographical polygon of where that phone was standing.
30:55
Speaker 1: And when they apply this analysis to Dorsey's phone number
30:58
on the night of November.
30:59
Speaker 2: Tenth, the data places his phone squarely inside the geographical
31:04
sector covering Jane's home on Burgess Drive during the exact
31:08
narrow window of time when the twenty rounds were fired.
31:10
Speaker 1: He wasn't just talking to her, His physical device, and
31:13
therefore Dorsey himself was present at the scene of the ambush.
31:17
I mean, think about it. Face to name to social
31:20
media motive to cell tower proximity. It is an inescapable
31:23
web of data. Once the dam broke via the journal,
31:26
the closure of the loop was basically inevitable.
31:28
Speaker 2: Yeah, digital footprints are inescapable. Once they know where to look.
31:32
Armed with this mountain of digital correlation, investigators easily obtain
31:36
a physical search warrant for Dorsey's last known address. They
31:40
assemble a tactical team and breach the residence, and.
31:43
Speaker 1: When they execute that search, the physical evidence they find
31:46
perfectly mirrors the digital breadcrumbs. Inside the home, they recover
31:52
multiple firearms.
31:53
Speaker 2: Now, to be clear, our sources note that forensic ballistics
31:56
testing did not definitively match these specific guns to the
32:00
shell casings found on Burgess Drive.
32:02
Speaker 1: Okay, that's an important distinction.
32:03
Speaker 2: However, the presence of the firearms establishes a crucial profile.
32:08
It proves to a jury that Dorsey is an active
32:10
gun owner with immediate access to lethal weapons, which corroborates
32:14
the visual evidence of the selfie.
32:16
Speaker 1: More importantly, for the detectives, they find three separate cell
32:19
phones in the residence.
32:20
Speaker 2: And through Imei numbers and simcard analysis, one of those
32:24
devices is identified as the exact phone used to make
32:27
the hostile calls to Jane and Wilson on the night
32:29
she was killed. It was the physical hardware that transmitted
32:32
the territorial dispute, the digital weapon.
32:35
Speaker 1: Basically. Now, Dorsey was not at the residence when they
32:38
rated it. He had gone to ground, but with his
32:40
identity confirmed, his phone seized, and his location data mapped,
32:44
it was only a matter of time. In early twenty
32:46
twenty three reports placed around late January or early February,
32:50
Decald County authorities, working in tandem with the Fugitive Unit
32:54
and the US Marshal Service track him down.
32:56
Speaker 2: And the US Marshals are absolute specialists in hunting future.
33:00
They utilize electronic surveillance, financial tracking, and human intelligence. They
33:05
locate Naqia Dorsey hiding out at an apartment complex on
33:08
Mount Zion Road in Marrow, Georgia, which is south of Atlanta.
33:11
He is surrounded and taken into custody without incident.
33:14
Speaker 1: So what does this all mean? He is initially charged
33:17
with malice, murder and two counts of aggravated assault and
33:20
here at a really fascinating procedural detail. Upon his arrest,
33:25
Dorsey exercises his constitutional right. He declines to speak with police.
33:29
He demands an attorney and remains entirely silent. He refuses
33:33
to give a confession or explain his side of the story.
33:35
Speaker 2: Which fifty years ago would have been a massive hurdle
33:38
for the prosecution. Oh yeah, Before the digital age, a
33:41
suspect's confession was the absolute gold standard of a homicide case.
33:46
If you didn't have eyewitnesses and you didn't have a confession,
33:50
proving premeditated murder beyond a reasonable doubt was incredibly difficult.
33:54
Jurys wanted a narrative, and usually only the suspect could
33:57
provide the internal logic of the crime.
34:00
Speaker 1: But the landscape of prosecution has undergone a tectonic shift. Today,
34:04
a data speaks for the suspect. The digital footprint provides
34:07
the narrative. Does his silence even matter when his cell
34:11
phone pinged off the tower next to the victim's house?
34:13
Speaker 2: Not really. The Kalk County District Attorney Investigator Ariel Lynch
34:17
demonstrated this perfectly. She was able to summarize the entire
34:21
fatal love triangle without Dorsey ever uttering a single syllable
34:25
on tape. The data painted the picture.
34:27
Speaker 1: She laid out the narrative in court. She said, these
34:30
two men are both baiting in their minds Jane. They
34:33
ended up fighting, arguing and getting riled up on the
34:35
phone in the car, to the point where Nakia Dorsey,
34:38
an avid gun owner, went out to her house.
34:40
Speaker 2: The prosecution didn't need a tearful confession. They synthesized the
34:44
argument witnessed by Wilson, the tactical premeditation evidenced by the
34:48
laser site, the selfie extracted via the paper journal, the
34:52
anonymous tip connecting the face, and the cell tower location
34:55
data mapping his movements.
34:57
Speaker 1: It created an airtight, undeniable timeline of a jealous confrontation
35:02
that turned lethal. The overwhelming weight of this digital and
35:06
physical evidence leads directly to a courtroom into Kalb County
35:10
in August twenty twenty three. Nakia Dorsey stands trial, and.
35:14
Speaker 2: The trial moves relatively swiftly. The defense is faced with
35:17
a mountain of insurmountable technical data. Over the course of
35:20
the trial in early August, the jury hears the timeline,
35:23
They see the data points, and they review the ballistics.
35:26
Speaker 1: And they return a decisive verdict. They find Dorsey guilty
35:29
of felony murder, guilty of possession of a firearm during
35:32
the commission of a felony, and guilty of two counts
35:34
of aggravated assault, one count for Jane and one count
35:38
for the wounding of Brandon Wilson.
35:39
Speaker 2: I want to clarify a legal distinction here that often
35:42
confuses people. He was convicted of felony murder rather than
35:46
malice murder. In Georgia law, malice murder requires the prosecution
35:50
to prove the explicit premeditated intent to kill.
35:54
Speaker 1: They have to prove what was literally in his.
35:56
Speaker 2: Head right, But felony murder is different to secure. If
36:00
you're a felony murder conviction, the prosecution only has to
36:02
prove that the defendant committed a dangerous felony, in this case,
36:06
aggravated assault by firing twenty rounds into a car, and
36:10
that a death resulted during the commission of that felony.
36:14
I see, yeah, It completely removes the burden of proving
36:17
specific premeditated intent to murder a specific person. If you
36:22
commit a violent felony and someone dies, you are guilty
36:24
of murder, the punishment is effectively the same.
36:27
Speaker 1: And the punishment handed down by Judge Letitia dear Jackson
36:31
was massive. She sentenced Dorsey to life in prison plus
36:35
an additional twenty five years to run consecutively.
36:37
Speaker 2: Let's analyze the severity of that sentence, because it is
36:40
designed to send a very specific message. A standard life
36:43
sentence in Georgia does carry the possibility of parole after
36:46
a certain number of decades. However, by adding the twenty
36:49
five years for the firearm and the salt charges to
36:51
run consecutively, meaning the twenty five year clock does not
36:54
even begin to tick until the parameters of the life
36:57
sentence are fully satisfied, the Judd effectively ensured that Dorsey
37:00
will spend the vast majority, if not the entirety, of
37:04
his adult life locked in a cage. He was twenty
37:06
three years old at the time of the shooting.
37:08
Speaker 1: It reflects the court's view on the sheer, reckless gravity
37:12
of the ambush. This wasn't a stray bullet in a
37:14
chaotic street brawl. It was a targeted ambush using specialized
37:18
equipment against an unarmed seventeen year old girl and a
37:21
young soldier sitting in a parked car.
37:24
Speaker 2: It also reflects a judicial attempt to address the devastating
37:27
impact on the community. The verdict brought a measure of
37:29
legal accountability, certainly, but the disparity between a swift courtroom
37:34
conviction and the permanent void left in Towers High School
37:37
is vast.
37:38
Speaker 1: It's an unbridgable chasm. A Pao Salazar, Jane's mother spoke
37:42
publicly about her grief following the trial, and she described
37:46
the nightmare in the most simple, devastating terms imaginable for
37:49
a parent. Her daughter walked outside her own house to
37:52
talk to someone, and she never came back. The absolute
37:56
finality of that is hard to comprehend.
37:59
Speaker 2: The principles remember and really captured the collective sense of waste.
38:03
Jane had direction in a demographic where teenagers often struggle
38:06
to find purpose. She had extreme discipline, She had ambition.
38:09
All of that potential, all of that leadership was violently
38:12
severed before she could even begin the adult life she'd
38:15
been working so hard to prepare for.
38:16
Speaker 1: You step back and look at the whole board, and
38:18
you just see the tragic futility of it all. Two
38:21
young lives thrown away. One life is violently tragically ended.
38:25
The other life will now be spent staring at cinderblock
38:27
walls for decades, and why over a momentary dispute. An
38:32
argument over cellular frequency is a conflict that, in any healthy,
38:35
regulated scenario, could have ended by simply pressing a button
38:38
and blocking a phone number.
38:39
Speaker 2: It demands that we consider the sheer fragility of life
38:42
when every day inevitable emotional conflicts intersect with readily available,
38:48
highly lethal firearms. Jealousy is a universal human emotion. Breakups
38:53
and territorial disputes happen millions of.
38:55
Speaker 1: Times a day, right everybody goes through it.
38:57
Speaker 2: But when a twenty three year old adult in the
38:59
grip of unshe jealousy has immediate access to a firearm
39:02
equipped with a laser sight, the margin for error drops
39:05
to absolute zero. A verbal dispute over a glowing screen
39:09
transforms into a lethal ballistic reality in seconds.
39:12
Speaker 1: The sequence of events was not inevitable, That is the
39:15
core tragedy here. It was a cascading series of choices.
39:19
A decision to make a surprise visit, a decision to
39:22
violate privacy and snoop on a phone, a decision to
39:25
call an unknown number and escalate an argument, and then
39:28
the final fatal choice to arm oneself, travel to a
39:31
location and pull a trigger twenty times in the dark.
39:33
Speaker 2: And through it all, the paper journal remains this quiet,
39:36
unassuming emblem of the entire case. It wasn't a dramatic,
39:39
cinematic confession. It didn't contain a detailed manifesto or a
39:43
record of fears and threats.
39:45
Speaker 1: It was just a teenager being a teenager, writing down
39:48
a string of numbers on paper so she wouldn't forget them,
39:51
completely unaware that those digits would become the key to
39:54
solving her own murder.
39:55
Speaker 2: And that single piece of analog convenience allowed detectives to
39:58
pierce the digital veil. It moved them from a locked,
40:02
encrypted titanium vault and a blurry, nameless photograph straight to
40:06
a name suspect whose digital footprint placed him inextricably at
40:10
the scene of the crime.
40:11
Speaker 1: It is an incredible, sobering story of how the analog
40:15
saved the digital.
40:16
Speaker 2: It really highlights the fragile bridge between two eras of evidence.
40:19
Speaker 1: So to bring this deep dive to a close, we
40:22
have traced a truly tragic arc.
40:24
Speaker 2: Today.
40:25
Speaker 1: We started with a young woman Jane sells our chaves
40:27
full of promise, a homecoming queen, a JROTC commander. We
40:31
broke down how the hidden sandbox complexities of her teenage
40:35
life violently crashed into the physical world on a dark
40:38
November night.
40:39
Speaker 2: We analyzed how a seemingly mundane argument over a text
40:42
message escalated into a tactical laser sighted ambush that utilized
40:46
overwhelming firepower.
40:48
Speaker 1: And we explored the mechanics of how the investigation, completely
40:51
stalled by the impenetrable mathematics of modern digital encryption, was
40:56
rescued by a simple paper diary, a diary that served
40:59
as the ultimate silent witness to the truth.
41:02
Speaker 2: It's a case that reminds us that ordinary physical human
41:05
artifacts still hold immense structural power, even in our hyper connected,
41:10
mathematically encrypted world.
41:12
Speaker 1: But I want to leave you with a final thought
41:14
to mull over something we haven't touched on yet, but
41:16
that this case makes incredibly urgent as we look to
41:19
the future. This investigation was saved by an analog artifact,
41:22
a physical paper journal.
41:23
Speaker 2: Sitting on a desk, a tangible piece of evidence exactly.
41:27
Speaker 1: But as we move further and further into a purely
41:29
digital future, the habits of teenagers and all of us
41:33
really are changing. People don't keep paper diaries tucked under
41:36
their mattresses anymore. They don't write passcodes on sticky notes
41:39
as often. Their notes, their journals, their most private thoughts,
41:43
and their security keys are all migrating to the cloud.
41:46
They're locked securely behind biometric screens, face ID and end
41:50
to end encrypted messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal, where
41:53
even the telecom companies don't have the data to hand
41:56
over to a judge.
41:57
Speaker 2: The physical paper trail is rapidly going extinct.
41:59
Speaker 1: So what happens to the truth a decade from now
42:02
when the analog generation completely fades away and there are
42:06
no more paper journals left to find in a suburban
42:08
bedroom sweep, will the locked encrypted phones of tomorrow's victims
42:12
take their stories and the identities of their killers to
42:15
the grave forever.
42:16
Speaker 2: It is a profound and deeply unsettling question about the
42:19
future mechanics of justice, It really is.
42:22
Speaker 1: Thank you so much for joining us on this deep dive.
42:24
We appreciate you taking the time to explore this complex, technical,
42:28
and heartbreaking story with us. Stay curious, keep asking questions,
42:32
and we will catch you next time