Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Ross Kemp experiences a record scratch moment | HBR News 543

Transcript

Ross Kemp experiences a record scratch moment | HBR News 543 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:04
  Speaker 1: This is HBr News number five forty three. Lost Kemp
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: experiences a record scratch moment where we discuss the news
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: of the week and give it the Badger treatment. Hello everybody,
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: and welcome back to Honey Badger Radio because they're doing
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: well this week and that you're laughing at all of
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: this absurdity so that you're not consumed by it. I
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: am your host, Brian. I'm joined by, as always, my
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: lovely co hosts, Hannah Wallen and doctor Randamerkam. On this
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: week's h who So it's good? What happy? What munted?
• 0:37
  Speaker 2: So what you said?
• 0:39
  Speaker 3: I just said hello in an enthusiastic way.
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, like me?
• 0:44
  Speaker 2: It is what it is, No.
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: I appreciate it. On this week's show, we're gonna be
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: talking about a there's like another MP that is looking
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: to start in ministry for men and Boys in the UK.
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: Ross Kemp has a new documentary about in Cells and
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: there's a scene that was going viral that I thought
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: we could have some fun reacting to and more so,
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: stick around. It's going to be a good time and
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: be sure to join us afterwards for the patron only show.
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: So I had this article from the Rap apparently If
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: you are someone who's been looking at stuff that's been
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: going on in the film industry lately, you you may
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: know that Hollywood's been in a lot of trouble. They're
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: losing money hand over fist because they're making movies for
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: nobody for themselves, but that's not enough people to justify
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: their studios existing. So they fired a bunch of men
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: during the Me Too movement, which we talked about on
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: the show that you know, if you're wondering what happened
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: to your media, it's because the me too movement went
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: through like a title wave, a red wave as it were,
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: and I don't mean like in the voting sense. The
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: crimson time came in and it washed all the men out,
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: and then the film went to shit. And now they're
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: desperately trying to get their bearings. And so there have
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: been like studios that have been shut down and bought
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: by other ones. And there was recently a sort of
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: a bidding war for the property rights of Warner Brothers
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: between Netflix and Paramount, and Paramount bought Warner Brothers. So
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: now Paramount owns Warner Brothers studios. And one of the
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: first things that Paramount is doing is hiring a bunch
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: of the dudes that got fired during Me Too, or
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: at least lost work. And so here's an article from
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: the What is this the rap entitled why is Paramount
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: hiring so many men with troubled pasts? The hirings of
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: Max Landis is just the latest example Paramount betting on
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: men who have been accused of sexual misconduct. So we're
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: gonna go through this article. But it looks like white
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: men are back in filmmaking at least, and they're not
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: happy about it. The modern audience, what do you mean, Jews? Well,
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: their definition of why which is a moving target. Let's
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: just say a certain kind of man. Hm. So we're
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: gonna be reading this in the Patron Show. If you
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: guys want to join us for that, go to feed
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: the Badger dot com forward slash subscribe to start a
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: membership subscription for only five dollars a month. You'll have
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: access to the community and all kinds of extra goodies
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: like Patron shows and lots of events like they do
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: game nights on Tuesdays if I remember correctly, and there
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: are movie nights, and you know a lot of great
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: people there, including all of us. If you give a
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: higher levels, you'll be able to join in the conversation itself,
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: that is, like inside of the actual discord chat room
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: with us. So you can add your two cents if
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: you wish, so consider doing that. And if you don't
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: want to wake up one morning to find that our
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: content's been yeeded from the Internet, go to badgerfeed dot com.
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: That's badgerfeed dot com. I'm sorry about that animated thing
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: on the loop. It doesn't stop and I can't stop it,
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: so even though this is an archive link, it still
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: does that. I don't get it. But anyway, badgerfeed dot
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: com to find where all of our other content lives. Now,
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: with all that said, let us get into today's stories,
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: all right, and a spoiler alert for just to get
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: ahead of everything. I am not gonna be talking about
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: the terrorist attack in New York City just I just
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: didn't really see the point. I found it predictable.
• 4:38
  Speaker 3: Any of the rand shit, it's already fucking boring.
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, that the Iran stuff is boring. Some people
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: just have it under a microscope and they're just constantly
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: tagging me in things, and I'm just like, let's just
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: wait until something definitive happens. You can look too closely
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: at something and get lost in that without like looking
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: at other things. Besides, it's not like there aren't more
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: interesting things happening that are more, let's say, in line
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: with what we discuss on the show. Usually I only
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: talk about geopolitical things when there's a lack of you know,
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: like specific men's things. But when there's more men's things,
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: I focus on that. So we have men's things today,
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: we have men's things. Oh and by the way, Happy
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: Women's Month, everybody. It's gonna speare that in mind as
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: we go through the stories. It's Women's Month. Do you
• 5:27
  Speaker 1: guys know Women's History Month? Sunday Sunday was Women's History
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: Women's Day, International Women's Day.
• 5:34
  Speaker 3: It's my way to avoid it and not mention it
• 5:36
  Speaker 3: to anyone. Oh, I know, like I did with Valentine's Day.
• 5:40
  Speaker 4: Well, here's what I like about talking about International Women's
• 5:43
  Speaker 4: Day on HBr talk this this this week. By the way, my.
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: Favorite thing about International Women's Day was it was also
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: daylight savings, which means women only got twenty three hours
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: when all the men got twenty four.
• 5:56
  Speaker 4: There you go, that's fitting since they claim no only
• 6:00
  Speaker 4: get since the feminists claimed only get it now, it's
• 6:04
  Speaker 4: the day gap seventy some sense for Yeah, yeah, it's
• 6:08
  Speaker 4: the day gap.
• 6:10
  Speaker 3: Every day is International Men's Day.
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: Yes, of course, every day is.
• 6:14
  Speaker 2: One day that no one notices or celebrates.
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: Yeah, we don't have to. It's just it's always around.
• 6:22
  Speaker 4: Okay, So because it's because they only have twenty twenty
• 6:26
  Speaker 4: three brain cells for every twenty four brain cells and Manhattan,
• 6:29
  Speaker 4: that's what it is.
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, first let's talk about doctor Luke Evans.
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: So doctor Luke Evans is the forty year old Conservative
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: MP for Hinckley and Bosworth who was called for the
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: UK government to appoint a dedicated minister for men and Boys.
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: He opened a Westminster Hall debate on February twenty fifth,
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty six, arguing that men and boys face pacific
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: challenges that receive insufficient focused attention from government or national institutions.
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: These include high male suicide rates, which of course men
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: account for the majority of suicides in the UK, issues
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: related to mental health, social media pressures on young men, loneliness,
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: and evolving societal expectations of masculinity. Uh oh. Evans emphasized
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: that such a role would complement existing initiatives like the
• 7:18
  Speaker 1: government's Men's Health Strategy, and would benefit society overall by
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: addressing gender specific problems without pitting men against women. The
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: proposal has sparked discussion in media outlets, including appearances by
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: Evans on programs like Good Morning Britain. That's when I
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: learned about it. I saw this clip of him debating
• 7:36
  Speaker 1: a feminist on whether or not there should even be
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: of Ministry for Men and Boys, where he debated the
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: idea with others. Supporters highlight statistics showing men's disproportionate struggles
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: in areas like suicide and argue for coordinated policy focus
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: similar to roles for women's issues. While the Prime Minister
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: has acknowledged and shared concerns about men's health and suicide
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: prevention in prior responses, no commitment to creating the new
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: ministerial position has been made. The debate reflects broader conversations
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: about gender equity in policymaking, with Evans framing it as
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: a step toward balance support for both genders. Now, before
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: I hand us off, I will say generally, when we
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: talk about solutions for men's problems and the government says
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: we're going to do this or that thing. I'm very suspicious.
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: I don't think the state can help men outside of
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: basically stop being an obstacle to men. But and I
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: saw that Mike Buchanan. This is another thing too when
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: I looked into this. Mike Buchanan of Justice for Men
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: and Boys put out an article on that website about
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: this as well. I think he also shares some concerns
• 8:47
  Speaker 1: because the thing is is that I think that the
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: bluepill solution is just going to do more harm. And
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: I think this guy is not a red pill guy.
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: I think he's basically like, oh, men have problem, let's
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: we should and then they still have this idea of
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: equality in their mind. Oh, we'll just treat them. We're
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: given the same thing we're giving the women. It's like, yeah,
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: but what you're giving the women isn't actually helping the
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: women much either, So like why are we like why
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: are we spreading the damage here? And but yeah, I
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: mean that's my concern. I also think he's probably informed
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: by things like adolescents, because that seems to be what
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: a lot of what's happening in the UK with regards
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: to addressing men's and boys issues is coming out of
• 9:28
  Speaker 1: is the not necessarily the show itself, but rather the
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: message or the central message of the show has become
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: like a default mainstream message around the troubles and challenges
• 9:41
  Speaker 1: that boys have. And so if you're operating from that
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: as like your diagnosis, then your cure or whatever your
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: solutions are probably not going to work out because they're
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: based on a poor diagnosis, on a bad diagnosis, a
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: kind of malpractice. But with that said, I guess it's
• 9:59
  Speaker 1: interesting that there is a conversation going on around that
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: and that it hasn't like, you know, like sort of
• 10:06
  Speaker 1: gone by the wayside. I don't know if Phil Davies
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: has still been active, but he used to be the
• 10:10
  Speaker 1: guy when it came to this stuff. But anyway, with
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: all that out of the way, I give you guys
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: the floor.
• 10:15
  Speaker 3: Yeah you said, you said the thing you said basically
• 10:19
  Speaker 3: the things, and yeah, I did listen to to doctor
• 10:23
  Speaker 3: Evans's speech, and yeah, he did indeed raise some important
• 10:29
  Speaker 3: issues and he did it did a pretty good job
• 10:32
  Speaker 3: of that. But his conclusion was along the lines of
• 10:36
  Speaker 3: we have a minister for women, so we should also
• 10:39
  Speaker 3: have a minister for men, and then things will be equal.
• 10:44
  Speaker 3: And as I'm sure I've explained before this is rather
• 10:47
  Speaker 3: a naive outlook on how the modern British government works.
• 10:51
  Speaker 2: It doesn't matter what.
• 10:52
  Speaker 3: Office you have, you will be bullied into towing the
• 10:55
  Speaker 3: party line. You'll notice we have a Foreign Secretary and
• 11:00
  Speaker 3: the Home Secretary. You might think this would balance everything
• 11:03
  Speaker 3: out so that things are equal, but we've nevertheless found
• 11:07
  Speaker 3: ourselves with a government hell bent on fucking the Home
• 11:11
  Speaker 3: team with a sandpaper dildo made of foreigners. And it's
• 11:17
  Speaker 3: the same with men and women. It doesn't matter what
• 11:19
  Speaker 3: you're in charge of. The Minister for Health only gives
• 11:24
  Speaker 3: a shit about women. The Minister for Transport only gives
• 11:27
  Speaker 3: a shit about women. They could create the Office of
• 11:30
  Speaker 3: the Minister for Biscuits, and they too would have to
• 11:33
  Speaker 3: focus their efforts entirely on what women look for in
• 11:36
  Speaker 3: their biscuits. The office of the Minister for Women, it's
• 11:41
  Speaker 3: fundamentally irrelevant, because that minister's job is to steal from
• 11:46
  Speaker 3: men and to psychologically torture boys in the fake, virtuous
• 11:51
  Speaker 3: hope of making life ever so slightly more convenient for
• 11:54
  Speaker 3: women and girls. And it's, as I said, that is
• 12:00
  Speaker 3: an intrinsic duty of every office of government, from the
• 12:04
  Speaker 3: Prime Minister all the way down to Larry the Downing
• 12:08
  Speaker 3: Street Cat. The whole fucking institution has been long slow
• 12:14
  Speaker 3: marched into this feminist tyranny, and at this point it's
• 12:17
  Speaker 3: the only direction in which they can move. If you
• 12:19
  Speaker 3: appoint a Minister for men, they will be in charge
• 12:24
  Speaker 3: of teaching men not to be toxic or matcho or
• 12:29
  Speaker 3: laddish or masculine in any way. It will be exactly
• 12:32
  Speaker 3: the same as the Minister for women. You can appoint
• 12:36
  Speaker 3: a minister for anti feminism and that minister will be
• 12:39
  Speaker 3: in charge of enforcing feminism. It sounds all weelliam, because
• 12:44
  Speaker 3: that's where we are right now. So yeah, respectfully, Dr Evans,
• 12:50
  Speaker 3: the solution is not to appoint a Minister for men.
• 12:53
  Speaker 3: The solution is to dismantle the office of the Minister
• 12:58
  Speaker 3: for Women.
• 13:01
  Speaker 1: Well, by that logic, also dismantle basically all the ministries.
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: They're all prioritizing women.
• 13:09
  Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, until there's no office left except Larry the
• 13:15
  Speaker 3: Downing Street Cat. Let's just let's just leave Larry in
• 13:18
  Speaker 3: charge of everything. And when Larry usurps the throne of
• 13:23
  Speaker 3: the kingdom itself, only then will we have any chance
• 13:26
  Speaker 3: of beginning to undo the missandric tyranny that has descended
• 13:32
  Speaker 3: upon this one's glorious nation. But you know, telling a
• 13:37
  Speaker 3: government representative to diminish the power of the government is
• 13:41
  Speaker 3: like it's is like telling a wolf to stop wolfing.
• 13:44
  Speaker 3: It's like telling a predator to stop predating. You're going
• 13:48
  Speaker 3: to need.
• 13:48
  Speaker 2: More than words, a great deal more than words.
• 13:52
  Speaker 3: And Alas, I am not at liberty to complete that
• 13:56
  Speaker 3: thought without getting arrested for the thoughts that I have articulated,
• 14:02
  Speaker 3: So I will simply arrest my thoughts.
• 14:06
  Speaker 2: Good luck everyone, and rule Britannia.
• 14:11
  Speaker 4: I'm I'm going to shorten the statement altogether that the
• 14:14
  Speaker 4: government just can't do this right period. Pretty much anything
• 14:20
  Speaker 4: that you name outside of having a national military, enforcing borders,
• 14:29
  Speaker 4: organizing national elections, and law and order, well no, not
• 14:36
  Speaker 4: even maintaining law and order, just just enforcing the borders.
• 14:40
  Speaker 4: Law and order should be maintained locally, but facilitating trade
• 14:46
  Speaker 4: in in in between segments of a country that are
• 14:50
  Speaker 4: that are separate, like states or provincess provinces and stuff
• 14:54
  Speaker 4: like that that have different rules. That's that's pretty much
• 14:57
  Speaker 4: all a federal government is good for, and it should
• 15:01
  Speaker 4: be limited to doing the least necessary stuff the or
• 15:08
  Speaker 4: the least amount of necessary stuff, and the rest should
• 15:12
  Speaker 4: be left up to states, provinces and other names for
• 15:17
  Speaker 4: different segments of a nation. Because this kind of stuff.
• 15:23
  Speaker 4: All that you get with something like this is a
• 15:28
  Speaker 4: an office for the enforcement of male disposability, which kind
• 15:34
  Speaker 4: of doubles up on the military in all honesty and
• 15:38
  Speaker 4: is unnecessary, superfluous. And the reason for that isn't just
• 15:43
  Speaker 4: because federalizing itself causes the problem. Is because when people
• 15:54
  Speaker 4: offload responsibility for their own vigilance and their own alertness,
• 16:03
  Speaker 4: their own consideration for the people around them, and so
• 16:08
  Speaker 4: on their own welfare to a federal system of any kind,
• 16:14
  Speaker 4: a federal or national system of any kind, it ends
• 16:21
  Speaker 4: up becoming corrupt. When they offload that and they don't
• 16:25
  Speaker 4: monitor it like obsessively for corruption, it will become corrupt.
• 16:34
  Speaker 4: It doesn't matter whether we're talking about a system for
• 16:40
  Speaker 4: showing consideration for a particular demographic. It doesn't matter where
• 16:45
  Speaker 4: whether we're talking about a system that has a job
• 16:49
  Speaker 4: of preventing discrimination, a system for handling a safety nets,
• 16:55
  Speaker 4: system for handling any any kind of educational issues. Let's
• 17:04
  Speaker 4: see what else we get environmental issues, none of that.
• 17:08
  Speaker 4: It doesn't it's not going to matter which type of
• 17:10
  Speaker 4: system we're typing. Disability doesn't matter you name it outside
• 17:17
  Speaker 4: of well, there really isn't anything like you name it.
• 17:22
  Speaker 4: And if the public isn't consistently monitoring for corruption and uh,
• 17:30
  Speaker 4: sounding off about it, taking measures against it, monitoring their
• 17:36
  Speaker 4: politicians and taking measures against corruption among their politicians, that
• 17:42
  Speaker 4: being voting them out of office if they suck. You know,
• 17:47
  Speaker 4: that leads to corruption. And in this instance, like I
• 17:51
  Speaker 4: think a lot of people feel like if they just
• 17:54
  Speaker 4: create some sort of office to monitor the issues faced
• 18:01
  Speaker 4: by men and boys monitor it in government. Uh and
• 18:05
  Speaker 4: and and just you know, here, you guys take care
• 18:09
  Speaker 4: of this, that the issues will be addressed and the
• 18:14
  Speaker 4: problems will be handled and the public won't have to
• 18:17
  Speaker 4: think about it. But that's not what will happen. What
• 18:21
  Speaker 4: will happen is the vultures will come in, feminist or
• 18:25
  Speaker 4: not and start grabbing money whatever money is to be
• 18:31
  Speaker 4: had from from that office or the uh. Like I said,
• 18:38
  Speaker 4: the male disposability enforcers will come in and start using
• 18:43
  Speaker 4: that office to impose male disposability harder and faster and wider. Basically,
• 18:56
  Speaker 4: and that's that's all you get. That's all you get
• 18:58
  Speaker 4: from government offices. You don't get beneficial responses, you don't
• 19:03
  Speaker 4: get help, you don't even systems that you would think
• 19:10
  Speaker 4: would would be helpful to people like I'll go back
• 19:14
  Speaker 4: to the disability system. Right in the US, we have
• 19:18
  Speaker 4: our our disability system is folded in with our social
• 19:23
  Speaker 4: security retirement quote retirement system. Nobody can retire on social Security.
• 19:29
  Speaker 4: It's not it's it's really not designed for that, unless
• 19:34
  Speaker 4: you know, you want to throw your butt into the
• 19:38
  Speaker 4: county nursing home and live and live in poverty during
• 19:42
  Speaker 4: your old age. But the the social Security disability system
• 19:48
  Speaker 4: is not much better. And you you literally have to
• 19:53
  Speaker 4: have the resources that you don't have if you're disabled
• 20:00
  Speaker 4: to hire somebody to help you prove that you are disabled.
• 20:07
  Speaker 4: You have to to do the thing you shouldn't be
• 20:09
  Speaker 4: able to do if you're disabled, that being fight for
• 20:12
  Speaker 4: your benefits that you paid into the system to fund
• 20:17
  Speaker 4: for however many years. And I'm seeing that happen with
• 20:24
  Speaker 4: friends and family who are legitimately disabled and have like
• 20:31
  Speaker 4: have had to have surgeries because of it, can't stand
• 20:34
  Speaker 4: up because of it, you know, have continuing ongoing medical
• 20:41
  Speaker 4: issues because of it. Like when you relegate your your welfare,
• 20:48
  Speaker 4: your upkeep your your safety nets and everything the federal government,
• 20:52
  Speaker 4: as the American population has done with so many issues,
• 20:57
  Speaker 4: you basically ask for the worst post possible way to
• 21:02
  Speaker 4: get things done, or a system that pretends to get
• 21:06
  Speaker 4: things done but actually does jack and shit for for
• 21:09
  Speaker 4: for most people. And that's that's what will happen. I
• 21:15
  Speaker 4: think if if there is a ministry for for men
• 21:22
  Speaker 4: and boys or an office for men and boys in
• 21:26
  Speaker 4: a national government, you will end up with the same
• 21:30
  Speaker 4: level of service that the people of the US get
• 21:34
  Speaker 4: from our disability system. And then then every time the
• 21:39
  Speaker 4: government shuts down because they can't agree on anything, will
• 21:44
  Speaker 4: have this panic. Is there going to be funding for
• 21:48
  Speaker 4: whatever things are now dependent on funding from that office?
• 21:52
  Speaker 4: And people who have jobs that rely on that funding,
• 21:58
  Speaker 4: are they going to get paid? People who need services
• 22:01
  Speaker 4: that rely on that funding, are their services suddenly going
• 22:06
  Speaker 4: to disappear for a few months and it'll just be
• 22:10
  Speaker 4: one more needle in your arm. And as a citizen
• 22:17
  Speaker 4: of your country that you'll you'll have to be dependent
• 22:22
  Speaker 4: on that government agency for things. It's it's not the
• 22:29
  Speaker 4: way to go and I understand why people think, well,
• 22:35
  Speaker 4: if women have one, men should have one too. But
• 22:39
  Speaker 4: I ask you to consider women in Western culture, in
• 22:46
  Speaker 4: nations that have offices that are supposed to oversee the
• 22:50
  Speaker 4: welfare and considerations of women, have become profoundly stupid over
• 23:00
  Speaker 4: the last couple of generations. Even women one hundred years
• 23:05
  Speaker 4: ago that were considered stupid by one hundred years ago
• 23:12
  Speaker 4: standards would look at these women today who are reliant
• 23:16
  Speaker 4: on these offices or work with these offices and just
• 23:22
  Speaker 4: shake their heads. What is wrong with them? Well, they've
• 23:26
  Speaker 4: become profoundly stupid. They can't think for themselves, and they
• 23:31
  Speaker 4: can't do for themselves, and they're victims of everything. Right.
• 23:37
  Speaker 4: If you don't want that for men, then consider maybe
• 23:45
  Speaker 4: that equality isn't all it's cracked up to be, because
• 23:50
  Speaker 4: I really, I really don't think it is. Let men
• 23:57
  Speaker 4: and boys in the men's rights movement work on men
• 24:01
  Speaker 4: and boys and leave the government out of it, because
• 24:06
  Speaker 4: you will, in my opinion, you will regret relying on
• 24:10
  Speaker 4: the government for anything.
• 24:14
  Speaker 1: Yep, that's exactly my feeling on it. So all right,
• 24:19
  Speaker 1: let's don't you guys think about this one. In the comments.
• 24:22
  Speaker 1: I mean again, I think, you know, heart probably in
• 24:24
  Speaker 1: the right place at least in terms of the sentiment
• 24:27
  Speaker 1: getting out there. It's getting people thinking about these things.
• 24:30
  Speaker 1: I appreciate that. It's better than pretending like it's not
• 24:33
  Speaker 1: a problem that needs to be addressed. I just don't
• 24:36
  Speaker 1: think the government can solve that problem. And that's that's
• 24:38
  Speaker 1: always been my primary contention with people like the ten Men,
• 24:43
  Speaker 1: who is much more popular you know, Men's Issues advocate online,
• 24:48
  Speaker 1: but he's very much like a pro state guy. Oh,
• 24:51
  Speaker 1: we'll just have the government do this or that. It's like, no,
• 24:53
  Speaker 1: that's not going to work out the way you think,
• 24:55
  Speaker 1: but anyway, And I think that another thing about that
• 24:59
  Speaker 1: too is that when you believe that the government should
• 25:04
  Speaker 1: be the gateway for solutions, it means that you end
• 25:07
  Speaker 1: up having to compromise your message because you try you're
• 25:11
  Speaker 1: trying to get help from the government, and the government
• 25:14
  Speaker 1: has to talk to it a certain way. You have
• 25:16
  Speaker 1: to care about optics, you have to care about language,
• 25:18
  Speaker 1: you have the you can't criticize certain ideologies that are
• 25:22
  Speaker 1: in power. So you have to do this thing about well,
• 25:25
  Speaker 1: if we have feminism, then we got to have something
• 25:27
  Speaker 1: like it. It's like, oh, can we please not? But uh yeah,
• 25:31
  Speaker 1: so this is my problem with it again. Yeah, I'm
• 25:34
  Speaker 1: happy that he's saying something, and I hope more people
• 25:37
  Speaker 1: speak out, But I just don't think the state is
• 25:39
  Speaker 1: the solution. But maybe the.
• 25:41
  Speaker 4: Only thing the government bureaucracy exists to do is grow government.
• 25:45
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that's what it does. It serves itself, right. Uh Okay,
• 25:49
  Speaker 1: So we got a couple of super child's and then
• 25:51
  Speaker 1: we're gonna move on to the next story. So Great
• 25:52
  Speaker 1: Indoors gave us five dollars, Thank you, Great Indoors and
• 25:55
  Speaker 1: says it's that time of the month where we march
• 25:57
  Speaker 1: through the institutions and let it free bleed.
• 26:01
  Speaker 2: That's right.
• 26:01
  Speaker 1: It is Women's History Month, her story month. And then
• 26:06
  Speaker 1: we got one from Meredith g for five dollars, and
• 26:09
  Speaker 1: she says, HBr News five forty three, honey for the
• 26:12
  Speaker 1: Badger's always assumed that creating a government agency for something
• 26:15
  Speaker 1: is only ever going to lead to corruption and authoritarian controls. Yeah,
• 26:19
  Speaker 1: and I mean, like you would think after COVID we
• 26:22
  Speaker 1: would have learned this by now, but some people it's
• 26:24
  Speaker 1: just not that easy.
• 26:26
  Speaker 4: So all right, you know what we should have learned
• 26:28
  Speaker 4: it from title nine.
• 26:29
  Speaker 1: Well, yeah, but a lot of people don't even know
• 26:31
  Speaker 1: about Title nine and they don't have that.
• 26:33
  Speaker 4: In the UK, but in any US, Americans should have
• 26:36
  Speaker 4: learned it from Title nine. Simply put it. It existed
• 26:41
  Speaker 4: for very few years before it began to cost Americans
• 26:46
  Speaker 4: millions and then billions of dollars. Yeah, it just became
• 26:50
  Speaker 4: incredibly expensive, and it's it's ridiculous if we can't learn
• 26:58
  Speaker 4: from that. And the mission creep Holy shit, the mission
• 27:03
  Speaker 4: creep like. And it went from doing sort of what
• 27:08
  Speaker 4: it was supposed to originally be intended to do to
• 27:13
  Speaker 4: exactly the polar opposite of what it was originally intended
• 27:17
  Speaker 4: to do. It was originally intended to the the to
• 27:24
  Speaker 4: its creation. It was originally intended to stop discrimination by
• 27:30
  Speaker 4: eliminating quotas in the in the university system, and it
• 27:38
  Speaker 4: then began creating quotas as soon as it went from
• 27:43
  Speaker 4: academia to sports, and now it is used for discrimination
• 27:50
  Speaker 4: against men in various areas of education, including whether or
• 27:57
  Speaker 4: not they're treated equal in the system that it forced
• 28:03
  Speaker 4: schools to create as a substitute for the real court
• 28:08
  Speaker 4: system where interpersonal misconduct is concerned. It became the human
• 28:15
  Speaker 4: resources for students of universities and immediately began discriminating against
• 28:22
  Speaker 4: male students. It is absolute shit. And everything the government
• 28:28
  Speaker 4: touches does that. I think that it's because the bureaucracy
• 28:32
  Speaker 4: exists only to perpetuate itself. And that is the prime example,
• 28:38
  Speaker 4: A prime example, I should say, because there are several. Yeah,
• 28:43
  Speaker 4: that one is just more recent.
• 28:46
  Speaker 1: All right, well, thank you for that. Let us know
• 28:48
  Speaker 1: what you guys think about this one in the comments.
• 28:50
  Speaker 1: We're gonna move on to the next story. So let's
• 28:53
  Speaker 1: talk a little bit about Ross Kemp. We're gonna stay
• 28:56
  Speaker 1: in the UK for another story here. So Ross, a
• 29:01
  Speaker 1: veteran British presenter and former east Enders actor known for
• 29:05
  Speaker 1: his hard hitting investigations, is fronting a new five part
• 29:08
  Speaker 1: documentary series titled Ross Camp, Lost Boys, Deadly Men on
• 29:12
  Speaker 1: Crime Plus Investigation UK, also available on Amazon, Apple TV
• 29:17
  Speaker 1: and now I'm gonna have to look that up on
• 29:18
  Speaker 1: Amazon because I'm curious about it. Inspired by the massive
• 29:21
  Speaker 1: popularity and impact of Netflix's Emmy Award winning mini series Adolescents,
• 29:26
  Speaker 1: which dramatized themes of youth radicalization, misogyny, and violence against women,
• 29:32
  Speaker 1: the project sees Camp delving into the world of in
• 29:34
  Speaker 1: Cells involt Involuntary celibates, an online subculture which is basically
• 29:41
  Speaker 1: said to have been linked to isolate, anger, misogyny, and
• 29:44
  Speaker 1: extreme views of masculinity. The series examines whether in cells
• 29:48
  Speaker 1: are driving a perceived wave of violence against women in
• 29:51
  Speaker 1: the UK, or if deeper, broader societal issues around young
• 29:54
  Speaker 1: men's disenchantment, mental health, and cultural shifts are at play Camp,
• 29:58
  Speaker 1: Who's a father himself, confronts common media portrayals and myths,
• 30:01
  Speaker 1: such as the idea of in cells as an organized
• 30:04
  Speaker 1: terrorist group, while he interviewed experts, community members, and those affected.
• 30:09
  Speaker 1: So what I thought was really great was this clip.
• 30:12
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna show you guys the clip. First of all,
• 30:14
  Speaker 1: let me show you this he he created. He constructed
• 30:17
  Speaker 1: a room that he imagined an in cell room to
• 30:20
  Speaker 1: look like this. I'm not done yet, but but I
• 30:30
  Speaker 1: think it's it's interesting because it's a case study.
• 30:32
  Speaker 3: On describe for anyone who's just listening.
• 30:36
  Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, it's.
• 30:39
  Speaker 1: Like it's like, go ahead.
• 30:42
  Speaker 3: It's like it's like a series of horror faces, screaming
• 30:47
  Speaker 3: faces in that low light, turquoise green sort of yeah,
• 30:57
  Speaker 3: scream screaming, streaming in anger and Melone colleague.
• 31:01
  Speaker 4: You can see there there's occasional bits of color in
• 31:06
  Speaker 4: in that room on some things that indicate that it's
• 31:09
  Speaker 4: not in black and white, but almost everything in that
• 31:13
  Speaker 4: room is in shades of gray that are tinted with
• 31:18
  Speaker 4: with cyan for anybody that uses like photoshop or or camp.
• 31:27
  Speaker 4: But so all the all the faces look like.
• 31:33
  Speaker 1: Marilyn Manson, Maryland Manson, very stream, Marilyn Manson faces.
• 31:39
  Speaker 4: Being forced to listen to to to a happy nineteen
• 31:42
  Speaker 4: fifties rock and roll.
• 31:44
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 31:46
  Speaker 1: So okay, So the thing I thought was interesting about
• 31:48
  Speaker 1: this is that this is he is trying to visualize
• 31:52
  Speaker 1: the in cell existence based on what the media has
• 31:55
  Speaker 1: told him. This is what he landed on. Okay, so
• 31:58
  Speaker 1: but here's the best and we're gonna watch the whole thing.
• 32:01
  Speaker 1: It's very short. It's like a minute and a half.
• 32:03
  Speaker 1: He does an interview or he's sitting down with a
• 32:05
  Speaker 1: guy and he's basically telling him what he believes in
• 32:10
  Speaker 1: cells are as though it's a stated fact. I hope
• 32:12
  Speaker 1: the audio is working because I have that.
• 32:14
  Speaker 4: We are, by the way, planning and going over this
• 32:17
  Speaker 4: and more in Oh, it's.
• 32:18
  Speaker 1: It's gold, It's gold.
• 32:21
  Speaker 2: Yeah, In cells.
• 32:24
  Speaker 5: Are a misogynistic group. Effectively, they hate women. How many
• 32:30
  Speaker 5: in cells have become killers.
• 32:33
  Speaker 6: We'd say roughly between seven to fifteen.
• 32:36
  Speaker 7: Around the world, sorry, how many.
• 32:40
  Speaker 6: Estimates typically range from between seven to fifteen in cell killers,
• 32:46
  Speaker 6: and roughly fifty nine people have been killed in ideologically
• 32:50
  Speaker 6: motivated in cell killings in the United Kingdom around the world.
• 33:01
  Speaker 5: There's too many, of course, but in seldom doesn't appear
• 33:04
  Speaker 5: to be the phenomenon I thought it was. It's clear
• 33:09
  Speaker 5: that this documentary needs to take a different direction. So effectively,
• 33:15
  Speaker 5: I have got everything wrong about in cells.
• 33:18
  Speaker 7: I think that they.
• 33:19
  Speaker 5: Kill lots of girls globally and in the United Kingdom.
• 33:25
  Speaker 7: I think there.
• 33:26
  Speaker 5: Are a threat, a permanent threat to the security of
• 33:30
  Speaker 5: this country. I think there are hundreds of thousands of them.
• 33:35
  Speaker 5: I think that they are generally white and right leaning.
• 33:39
  Speaker 5: So all those preconceptions that I have.
• 33:44
  Speaker 6: Are wrong, many of them. Yes, And it's not your fault, Ras,
• 33:49
  Speaker 6: because if you were to just pay attention to the
• 33:51
  Speaker 6: media that is most often put out there about in cells,
• 33:54
  Speaker 6: it often aspell as it is exactly the stereotypical depiction
• 33:58
  Speaker 6: that you bought into it beginning. So don't don't be
• 34:02
  Speaker 6: too hard on yourself. But there is a lot of
• 34:04
  Speaker 6: misinformation there about this topic that it's really good to
• 34:08
  Speaker 6: appeal to the research.
• 34:10
  Speaker 1: Okay, so attack God. Sorry about that. Okay, that was
• 34:17
  Speaker 1: an accident. I didn't mean to click on that.
• 34:19
  Speaker 2: So the Obamas are gorillas.
• 34:32
  Speaker 1: So but look, I will say before I give you
• 34:34
  Speaker 1: as the floor on this. So he is putting out
• 34:36
  Speaker 1: this series, he went in with a bunch of preconceived notions.
• 34:41
  Speaker 1: Turned out he was wrong, And obviously it's because of
• 34:43
  Speaker 1: the media that the way that they portrayed, you know,
• 34:47
  Speaker 1: in cells and I would say that anyone else in
• 34:52
  Speaker 1: this media space, anyone else would have just edited that
• 34:57
  Speaker 1: out and just pushed the narrative anyway. They wouldn't like
• 35:00
  Speaker 1: acknowledged that that conversation went in that direction. It would
• 35:03
  Speaker 1: have been on the cutting room floor, and the narrative
• 35:05
  Speaker 1: would have continued on unabated, and it would have just
• 35:08
  Speaker 1: been about white supremacy and like mass murder, misogyny and
• 35:11
  Speaker 1: all that. So I'm going to give him credit for
• 35:14
  Speaker 1: leaving it in so that everyone can see his reaction.
• 35:17
  Speaker 3: What telling you that's just to get a slot to
• 35:20
  Speaker 3: watch it.
• 35:21
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it's probably to get people watching, but like he's
• 35:24
  Speaker 1: and there's probably still But the point is though that
• 35:28
  Speaker 1: those corrections and him like to see someone eat crow,
• 35:34
  Speaker 1: I'll take it like that was all I'm saying. I'm like,
• 35:37
  Speaker 1: no one wants to do that. Everyone's got way too
• 35:39
  Speaker 1: much pride, way too much invested in these beliefs. And
• 35:42
  Speaker 1: to see somebody eat crow and then put it on
• 35:45
  Speaker 1: a video, even if it's just to get you to
• 35:47
  Speaker 1: tune in or whatever, I have to, I gotta give
• 35:50
  Speaker 1: credit where credit is.
• 35:51
  Speaker 3: They did it to Russ Kemp because Ross Kemp is
• 35:53
  Speaker 3: a soap opera actor.
• 35:55
  Speaker 2: I don't know, do you all know?
• 35:57
  Speaker 1: No, I don't know what he senders is, but no.
• 36:00
  Speaker 2: It's it's a soap opera that's set in the East
• 36:02
  Speaker 2: end of London. Is it's like.
• 36:03
  Speaker 3: The worst of the worst, terribly written, terribly acting.
• 36:08
  Speaker 2: You' all have soap operas in the US.
• 36:10
  Speaker 4: Yeah, so typical soap opera.
• 36:12
  Speaker 3: Yeah, it's it's that sort of thing. And he he
• 36:14
  Speaker 3: was he was a big character and that and everything,
• 36:19
  Speaker 3: like a heavy yeah. Yeah, he's like a big sort
• 36:22
  Speaker 3: of fucking Eastern wide boy sort of thing.
• 36:26
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 36:26
  Speaker 3: And he's fancied himself as a hard man ever since then,
• 36:31
  Speaker 3: and he's been playing that.
• 36:32
  Speaker 1: Well, you gotta you know it's not He's not a
• 36:34
  Speaker 1: hard man. He's an odd man. You just say odd, right, Yeah.
• 36:38
  Speaker 3: He If you ever saw the episode of extras he
• 36:42
  Speaker 3: was in, oh no, not that one. Ricky Tebase did
• 36:46
  Speaker 3: this sitcom about I.
• 36:48
  Speaker 1: Know, I've seen a couple of clips, but not that one.
• 36:51
  Speaker 3: And there was one with Russ Kemp and they really
• 36:53
  Speaker 3: played on him how he tries to play on his
• 36:55
  Speaker 3: hard man image. But he's absolutely not a hard man.
• 36:59
  Speaker 3: He's just an actor who happens to be quite sort
• 37:02
  Speaker 3: of steroid bulky. Yeah, and he's and and he's he's
• 37:09
  Speaker 3: tried to do a few documents. It's funny that y'all
• 37:12
  Speaker 3: now think of him as a documentarian. He's done like,
• 37:16
  Speaker 3: he's done a couple of things where he's tried to
• 37:19
  Speaker 3: present himself as a serious person, but no one in
• 37:22
  Speaker 3: Britain thinks of him as a serious person. He's a
• 37:24
  Speaker 3: soap opera actor. Yeah, finished the write up.
• 37:30
  Speaker 4: Oh yeaheah sure, some kind of typical among documentarians.
• 37:34
  Speaker 1: Yeah, so okay. Early promotions, Highlight has surprised at learning
• 37:38
  Speaker 1: facts that challenge initial assumptions, including low numbers of actual
• 37:42
  Speaker 1: in Selt killers estimated seven to fifteen, and the community's
• 37:46
  Speaker 1: potential vulnerability to violence rather than perpetration. Yes, that's also true.
• 37:50
  Speaker 1: The documentary blends the true crime elements with the exploration
• 37:53
  Speaker 1: of masculinity and crisis, aiming to separate sensationalism from reality
• 37:57
  Speaker 1: amid rising concerns over violence against and girls declared a
• 38:01
  Speaker 1: national emergency in the UK. It has spark discussion for
• 38:04
  Speaker 1: its attempt at nuanced, fact based coverage rather than pure dramatization.
• 38:09
  Speaker 1: So that's the write up.
• 38:11
  Speaker 3: So yeah, that that that clip that we saw with
• 38:14
  Speaker 3: the Irish guy laying down the seven to fifteen statistics,
• 38:18
  Speaker 3: which apparently gave mister Kemp some pause for thought. Up.
• 38:23
  Speaker 3: But just like when it comes to the Louis Throux
• 38:26
  Speaker 3: documentary that's out soon only on Netflix, this thing is
• 38:31
  Speaker 3: out on a similar cross section of feminist captured platforms.
• 38:38
  Speaker 3: There's there's no way in hell they're going to soften
• 38:40
  Speaker 3: the message to which they've long since been married. They're
• 38:45
  Speaker 3: gonna they're gonna take that, and then they're gonna run
• 38:47
  Speaker 3: in the opposite direction. They go, oh no, no, we
• 38:49
  Speaker 3: were right, let's let's not go resting on our laurels
• 38:53
  Speaker 3: and pretending that there are any breaks on this on
• 38:56
  Speaker 3: this train, let alone any hope of these bustards admitting
• 39:00
  Speaker 3: they were wrong about anything, let alone everything, which is
• 39:07
  Speaker 3: what they were always wrong about. In any case, this
• 39:11
  Speaker 3: statistic that only seven to fifteen in cells have been murderers,
• 39:16
  Speaker 3: I'd bet the farm that that number includes Elliot. I
• 39:21
  Speaker 3: shouldn't complete his full name, because that might earn us
• 39:24
  Speaker 3: a community strike if I did so.
• 39:27
  Speaker 2: And yeah, Elliot, what's his name? Existed?
• 39:30
  Speaker 3: In the time before in cells were a thing, he
• 39:33
  Speaker 3: had never heard of the term in cell or even
• 39:35
  Speaker 3: the concept in the days when young men had found
• 39:39
  Speaker 3: themselves rejected by the women in their lives every which way,
• 39:44
  Speaker 3: and this was just normal. Arguably it has always been normal,
• 39:50
  Speaker 3: even since before the Stone Age, like sixty percent of
• 39:55
  Speaker 3: men were effectively of this stock who didn't get to appropriate.
• 40:02
  Speaker 3: Eighty percent of women were reproductively active, while only forty
• 40:06
  Speaker 3: percent of men were. This phenomenon currently demonized as in
• 40:12
  Speaker 3: cells has been the majority of men throughout history, or
• 40:16
  Speaker 3: at least until we developed a pair bonding nature that
• 40:19
  Speaker 3: we could culturally, you.
• 40:21
  Speaker 2: Know, nurture.
• 40:22
  Speaker 3: And now it's I mean it's probably skewed even further
• 40:27
  Speaker 3: into this polygynist tournament hookup culture. At this point, eighty
• 40:33
  Speaker 3: percent of the women are sharing ten percent of the
• 40:37
  Speaker 3: top men, and the other ninety percent of the men
• 40:40
  Speaker 3: are left with the scraps, and they are referred to
• 40:44
  Speaker 3: as in cells wheresoever they happen to have been left behind,
• 40:51
  Speaker 3: which even normies have taken to mean a misogynist terrorist
• 40:56
  Speaker 3: insurgent group called in cells. Meanwhile, in Britain, at least
• 41:04
  Speaker 3: quite a lot of women and girls are actually getting
• 41:07
  Speaker 3: raped by actual terrorist insurgents, and the aforementioned normies don't
• 41:13
  Speaker 3: give a shit because they watch the mainstream media and
• 41:17
  Speaker 3: so they're far more concerned with the thirteen year old
• 41:19
  Speaker 3: boys who have spent the first few weeks of their
• 41:24
  Speaker 3: puberty not getting ravenously fucked by their female teachers. And
• 41:32
  Speaker 3: pardon my shattered pelvis, but I don't think mister Kemp's
• 41:36
  Speaker 3: documentary is going to challenge that paradigm in any expedient sense,
• 41:41
  Speaker 3: because in order to do so, you would need to
• 41:44
  Speaker 3: start the series by laying out the blatant truth that
• 41:48
  Speaker 3: in cell is a term that was made up to
• 41:52
  Speaker 3: demonize any man or boy who is not presently and
• 41:57
  Speaker 3: at all times receiving the cardinal approval of and devoting
• 42:04
  Speaker 3: his every cardinal action to at least one woman. Not
• 42:08
  Speaker 3: just any man who has left the plantation i e.
• 42:11
  Speaker 3: A magtaile, but any man who has not yet been
• 42:15
  Speaker 3: bought to work on the plantation i e.
• 42:19
  Speaker 2: An insult.
• 42:21
  Speaker 3: Any documentary about quote unquote in cells should be entirely
• 42:25
  Speaker 3: focused on the slave driving ultra cunts who are tormenting
• 42:31
  Speaker 3: these men and boys. But you're not gonna see that
• 42:34
  Speaker 3: on Apple TV or Amazon because these companies are being
• 42:37
  Speaker 3: run by the ultra cunts in question. So, yeah, we've
• 42:42
  Speaker 3: got a busy month ahead of us, folks. We've got
• 42:45
  Speaker 3: at least two extended missandric hit pieces to get through
• 42:48
  Speaker 3: this one, and louis the US. Whatever content is content,
• 42:53
  Speaker 3: watch this space. It's going to be fun and infuriating,
• 42:57
  Speaker 3: at times oscillating and at times at the same time.
• 43:00
  Speaker 3: We do this so you don't have to. It ain't much,
• 43:04
  Speaker 3: but it's honest work.
• 43:05
  Speaker 1: Hey, my cartoon it fits that rant.
• 43:11
  Speaker 4: Yeah, it's it's it's the same thing every time, all right.
• 43:16
  Speaker 4: You see people who have been I don't I don't
• 43:20
  Speaker 4: know if brain brainwashed is the right word, but just lazy,
• 43:25
  Speaker 4: I think that's probably more the right word. Lazy enough
• 43:29
  Speaker 4: to let the establishment media tell them what to think
• 43:33
  Speaker 4: about something. When they run into information that contradicts the
• 43:41
  Speaker 4: narrative that the establishment media has put out there, they
• 43:49
  Speaker 4: react one of two ways. Either they give consideration to
• 43:56
  Speaker 4: the new information and evaluate it on its merits, or
• 44:03
  Speaker 4: they they freak the fuck out and start making accusations
• 44:09
  Speaker 4: against the the the establishment media, or not the establishment media,
• 44:14
  Speaker 4: but the the source of the new information and so on.
• 44:19
  Speaker 4: This guy looks like he's gonna at least give it
• 44:21
  Speaker 4: some consideration and it maybe it'll be good, Maybe the
• 44:27
  Speaker 4: documentary will be good, maybe it'll look at things. And
• 44:30
  Speaker 4: he won't. He won't do what feminists do when they
• 44:33
  Speaker 4: see this, this information about about in cells, which when
• 44:40
  Speaker 4: confronted with the fact that you know, it's it's been
• 44:45
  Speaker 4: less than a dozen, regardless of of who's on the list,
• 44:50
  Speaker 4: and whether actually they were an in cell or not,
• 44:53
  Speaker 4: and whether actually they participated in in cell forms or not,
• 44:57
  Speaker 4: and whether actually there's an ideology in the forums. When
• 45:03
  Speaker 4: confronted with the fact that it's an extremely rare phenomenon
• 45:07
  Speaker 4: among in cells, that anybody self destructing does so outward
• 45:13
  Speaker 4: instead of inward. Feminists will turn around every single time
• 45:20
  Speaker 4: and claim that, well, there have been no feminist mass killers,
• 45:27
  Speaker 4: and that's bullshit. Feminism itself, the ideology itself, kills men
• 45:37
  Speaker 4: every day. There are men all around the world committing
• 45:42
  Speaker 4: suicide in response to conditions that have been created in
• 45:48
  Speaker 4: their lives by custody laws that take their children away
• 45:53
  Speaker 4: from them, do process violations that take their freedom away
• 45:59
  Speaker 4: from them, and their reputation, their relationships with friends and
• 46:03
  Speaker 4: family members and the rest of their community. By human
• 46:10
  Speaker 4: resources type laws that take their jobs away from them,
• 46:15
  Speaker 4: and their sense of purpose away from them, by materials
• 46:19
  Speaker 4: that they are forced to digest in the school systems
• 46:24
  Speaker 4: that they grew up in, and in the workplaces that
• 46:27
  Speaker 4: they work in now that demonize them for being men.
• 46:33
  Speaker 4: They're dying. Men are dying all over the world because
• 46:38
  Speaker 4: of feminism, directly because of feminism. Feminists agitate directly for
• 46:48
  Speaker 4: discriminatory law and policy to throw men under the bus,
• 46:52
  Speaker 4: and it is crushing them. And all we hear about
• 46:57
  Speaker 4: from the establishment media is that men who do not
• 47:02
  Speaker 4: have women's vaginal seal of approval are demons. Half of
• 47:10
  Speaker 4: the men in the world at least are in cells.
• 47:15
  Speaker 4: I guarantee you that number is probably higher. If eighty
• 47:21
  Speaker 4: percent of women are competing for twenty percent or ten
• 47:27
  Speaker 4: percent or five percent, depending on who you talk to,
• 47:30
  Speaker 4: of men, that means they are ignoring most men. And
• 47:36
  Speaker 4: even even the you know, the scraps, the ones that
• 47:41
  Speaker 4: just can't get the attention of the men that they're
• 47:44
  Speaker 4: competing for, like they're they're still not going for the
• 47:49
  Speaker 4: bottom of fifty percent. They're still going to be going
• 47:54
  Speaker 4: for the few that the other women aren't competing for,
• 48:00
  Speaker 4: at the top of the group that the other women
• 48:03
  Speaker 4: aren't competing for. Even women who call themselves in cells
• 48:10
  Speaker 4: are in that position only because they are competing for
• 48:15
  Speaker 4: the top twenty percent of men, and if they settle,
• 48:19
  Speaker 4: they're settling for the next ten percent down, not men
• 48:24
  Speaker 4: who are at their level. Right. That is just a fact.
• 48:31
  Speaker 4: And so when you look around the world and you
• 48:35
  Speaker 4: see all of the military violence that is taking place,
• 48:40
  Speaker 4: the wars, in terrorism, gang violence, which has become increasingly
• 48:47
  Speaker 4: militant and organized over the years, that's a result of
• 48:57
  Speaker 4: the imposition of males ability by female rejection. You're not
• 49:06
  Speaker 4: one of the top top twenty percent. You're not one
• 49:09
  Speaker 4: of the top ten percent, you're not one of the
• 49:11
  Speaker 4: top five percent, you might as well go die. That
• 49:14
  Speaker 4: is essentially the message that women, especially feminists, are sending,
• 49:20
  Speaker 4: and if you reject that message, they will call you
• 49:23
  Speaker 4: a terrorist for not dying, not for doing anything else,
• 49:27
  Speaker 4: for not dying. They're wrong. Men are vital to the
• 49:34
  Speaker 4: survival of civilization more so than women. Women are in
• 49:37
  Speaker 4: the process of destroying it right now. But that is
• 49:43
  Speaker 4: the situation. If anybody is guilty of mass murder, it
• 49:50
  Speaker 4: is feminists, and they will never admit that. They will
• 49:56
  Speaker 4: always tell you it doesn't count because we're not using guns.
• 50:01
  Speaker 4: It doesn't count because we're not stabbing people to death.
• 50:05
  Speaker 4: It doesn't count because we're not going into a specific
• 50:08
  Speaker 4: area and one individual from the movement directly murdering. It's
• 50:17
  Speaker 4: just the government. It's the government's fault. It's the men
• 50:20
  Speaker 4: who passed the laws that feminists demanded, right, don't buy
• 50:25
  Speaker 4: that bullshit from them. Hold them accountable. Why did you
• 50:31
  Speaker 4: demand those laws? Why did you decide that men shouldn't
• 50:37
  Speaker 4: be able to raise their own children, Why did you
• 50:40
  Speaker 4: decide that men should be imprisoned for decades? For crimes
• 50:45
  Speaker 4: they didn't commit in order to avoid embarrassing liars who
• 50:50
  Speaker 4: falsely accused them. And why did you decide that men
• 50:57
  Speaker 4: should not have any place in the world where they
• 51:00
  Speaker 4: and go to get away from the haranguing of crazy
• 51:04
  Speaker 4: bitches that want to control their environment and their behavior
• 51:07
  Speaker 4: and the way they think and the way they talk
• 51:10
  Speaker 4: and the way they look and the way they sit.
• 51:15
  Speaker 4: You know, if if not to kill them, why did
• 51:17
  Speaker 4: you do that? And feminists aren't going to be able
• 51:21
  Speaker 4: to answer that question. They will make up lies, they
• 51:25
  Speaker 4: will claim that men are murdering them. They will say
• 51:28
  Speaker 4: anything they can to avoid accountability because they are allergic
• 51:32
  Speaker 4: to it. You will see them have a reaction that
• 51:36
  Speaker 4: is the psychological equivalent of anaphylactic shock. Then they'll start
• 51:41
  Speaker 4: falsely accusing you and they will block but at no
• 51:45
  Speaker 4: point will they take accountability for it. But they should
• 51:50
  Speaker 4: still be held to account. They should still be asked,
• 51:54
  Speaker 4: and they should hear it from every angle until it
• 51:58
  Speaker 4: can no longer be ignored. And again, it's that vigilance
• 52:03
  Speaker 4: and that pushing back against corruption that makes the difference.
• 52:08
  Speaker 4: And I'm going to take this right back to the
• 52:10
  Speaker 4: whole ministry thing. This is why a government office, a
• 52:14
  Speaker 4: federal or national government office for the welfare of men
• 52:19
  Speaker 4: and boys isn't going to be the solution to any problems.
• 52:25
  Speaker 4: It's going to take every guy out there rejecting the
• 52:30
  Speaker 4: feminist message, turning it around on feminists and holding them
• 52:36
  Speaker 4: to account, and holding the government to account. Why are
• 52:40
  Speaker 4: you listening to these stupid bitches. They are killing men
• 52:46
  Speaker 4: and that is the only way to fix this. Yeah, yeah,
• 52:52
  Speaker 4: murder of Crow said, you forgot breathing. Yes, I've heard it.
• 52:55
  Speaker 4: Why do you breathe like that? I am not surprised.
• 52:58
  Speaker 4: They probably call it man breathing since they put man
• 53:03
  Speaker 4: in front of everything else. Oh, you're sucking up all
• 53:06
  Speaker 4: the oxygen in the room, and it is typical. So
• 53:12
  Speaker 4: that's that's it.
• 53:13
  Speaker 1: Okay, all right, well, thank you for your commentary, and
• 53:18
  Speaker 1: thank you guys again. If you wanna send us a message,
• 53:21
  Speaker 1: go to feedbadgel dot com forard slash just a tip
• 53:24
  Speaker 1: and send us a message you can like add to
• 53:26
  Speaker 1: the conversation. I will generally prioritize reading those before I
• 53:30
  Speaker 1: read super chats or rumble rants, so please consider that.
• 53:33
  Speaker 1: And if you're watching us on mobile, I see a
• 53:35
  Speaker 1: couple of people there and you're wondering, like where is everybody?
• 53:39
  Speaker 1: Move it on over to our main channel. Click on
• 53:42
  Speaker 1: the on the link to our channel and you'll see
• 53:45
  Speaker 1: that we have a horizontal going out and that's where
• 53:47
  Speaker 1: the party is. So hopefully I'll see you guys over
• 53:50
  Speaker 1: there in the horizontal as well, or you can just
• 53:52
  Speaker 1: stay in the vertical. That's okay too, all right, So
• 53:54
  Speaker 1: with that said, we're gonna move on to the next story.
• 53:56
  Speaker 1: Let us know what you guys think about this one
• 53:58
  Speaker 1: in the comments below. All right, this is not Gangnam Style.
• 54:02
  Speaker 1: This is a parody. It's from like a little bit
• 54:04
  Speaker 1: of a PSA or ad for NASA, and we're talking
• 54:09
  Speaker 1: about the man in the bottom there, Eric sim So.
• 54:13
  Speaker 1: Eric sim is a thirty nine year old former NASA
• 54:15
  Speaker 1: engineer who filed the federal lawsuit in the US District
• 54:19
  Speaker 1: Court for the Southern District of Texas against the City
• 54:22
  Speaker 1: of Houston, two Houston Police Department detectives, and four women
• 54:26
  Speaker 1: who accused him of sexual assault. So he is fighting back.
• 54:31
  Speaker 1: The fifty seven page complaint, filed on February twenty fifth,
• 54:34
  Speaker 1: alleges that sim was the target of a coordinated smear
• 54:37
  Speaker 1: campaign and malicious prosecution after the women whom he claims
• 54:42
  Speaker 1: conspired via group chats following the end of casual dating relationships,
• 54:46
  Speaker 1: made false allegations of sexual assault against him in twenty
• 54:50
  Speaker 1: twenty four. Sim asserts that the detectives fabricated probable cause affidavits,
• 54:55
  Speaker 1: ignored inconsistencies and statements withheld exculpatory digital evidence, such as
• 55:00
  Speaker 1: messages proving encounters were consensual, and tampered with or deleted
• 55:03
  Speaker 1: data from his seised devices, leading to his arrest on
• 55:06
  Speaker 1: multiple counts and the subsequent dismissal of all charges by
• 55:10
  Speaker 1: prosecutors before trial. The lawsuit claims the ordeal violated sims
• 55:14
  Speaker 1: constitutional rights caused by the destruction of his career, including
• 55:18
  Speaker 1: his termination from NASA, and amounted to an abuse of
• 55:21
  Speaker 1: the criminal justice system driven by revenge motives. Sims seeks
• 55:26
  Speaker 1: a jury trial and damages for malicious prosecution, civil rights violations,
• 55:31
  Speaker 1: and related claims. The case has drawn local media attention
• 55:34
  Speaker 1: in Houston, with reports highlighting the drop charges and Sim's
• 55:37
  Speaker 1: accusations of police misconduct and weaponized allegations, though no responses
• 55:42
  Speaker 1: from the defendants or further developments were detailed in the
• 55:46
  Speaker 1: initial coverage, get it. Get those bitches, and I want
• 55:51
  Speaker 1: to see them sued from here to Kingdom coming back.
• 55:55
  Speaker 1: But anyway, and I see that this, this is actually
• 55:58
  Speaker 1: a thing I've noticed. I've seen a few instances of
• 56:00
  Speaker 1: this where men are fighting back litigiously against false allegations
• 56:06
  Speaker 1: that women are making. And look, it's not like everyone
• 56:09
  Speaker 1: can do this stuff, but I think it's important that
• 56:12
  Speaker 1: you don't stay silent on this and you fight back.
• 56:14
  Speaker 1: But anyway, I will leave it to you guys a comment.
• 56:19
  Speaker 4: This is the way. This is exactly the way that
• 56:22
  Speaker 4: it needs to be handled every time that it is possible,
• 56:27
  Speaker 4: every time there's a legal avenue for this. When a
• 56:31
  Speaker 4: false accuser targets a man with allegations of intimate partner
• 56:38
  Speaker 4: violence or sexual misconduct of any kind, his response needs
• 56:44
  Speaker 4: to be consultant attorney, find out if it's feasible for
• 56:49
  Speaker 4: him to sue and sue every individual and every government
• 56:56
  Speaker 4: agency involved in wrongdoing. If the if the accuser is
• 57:03
  Speaker 4: the only person that lied, sue the shit out of
• 57:06
  Speaker 4: the accuser. If the police mishandle or the human resources
• 57:11
  Speaker 4: department of your workplace mishandles the allegation, sue them as well,
• 57:17
  Speaker 4: if the prosecutor mishandles things, if the prosecutor commits any
• 57:23
  Speaker 4: process crimes or or violates your rights, sue them as
• 57:28
  Speaker 4: well you can. There isn't any illegitimate target as long
• 57:34
  Speaker 4: as they are involved and participated in the wrongdoing. If
• 57:39
  Speaker 4: somebody comes in and lies on behalf of the accuser,
• 57:44
  Speaker 4: sue that individual if there is a legal avenue for
• 57:48
  Speaker 4: suing them, any individual who has done that, because that
• 57:54
  Speaker 4: is the only way to get these people held accountable,
• 57:57
  Speaker 4: especially in Western nation where you have laws like the
• 58:02
  Speaker 4: Violence Against Women Act, and I think it's called Violence
• 58:06
  Speaker 4: against Women and Girls something or another in the UK,
• 58:09
  Speaker 4: and there's a similar law in Canada that protects liars
• 58:18
  Speaker 4: against being held accountable for process crimes for which they
• 58:22
  Speaker 4: would be prosecuted if they engaged in say, homeowner's insurance
• 58:28
  Speaker 4: fraud instead of sexual violence insurance fraud. You know, sexual
• 58:36
  Speaker 4: violence protection fraud, which is essentially what lying about this
• 58:41
  Speaker 4: stuff is. It's it's fraud. And until consequences are are
• 58:49
  Speaker 4: brought to their doorstep, these behaviors will continue, and at
• 58:53
  Speaker 4: some point, at some point in the near future, men
• 59:01
  Speaker 4: start need to start getting together, particularly men who can
• 59:05
  Speaker 4: can get with men's rights. Attorneys need to get together
• 59:10
  Speaker 4: and look at these laws see if they are discriminatory.
• 59:15
  Speaker 4: For instance, the Violence Against Women Act has gendered language
• 59:22
  Speaker 4: throughout the law that predisposes the judiciary, the prosecutorial offices,
• 59:32
  Speaker 4: and the police to view these types of violence as
• 59:38
  Speaker 4: male perpetrated victimizing female victims only, and any accuser that
• 59:47
  Speaker 4: is female as infallible. And then the policies that are
• 59:52
  Speaker 4: encouraged by these laws are discriminatory. They especially the policies
• 1:00:01
  Speaker 4: that relate to let's not embarrass the accuser, let's not
• 1:00:05
  Speaker 4: make the accuser uncomfortable making the accusation. These policies are
• 1:00:10
  Speaker 4: specifically designed to prevent due process and there needs to
• 1:00:17
  Speaker 4: be class action lawsuits against the federal government, the national
• 1:00:24
  Speaker 4: government for having these discriminatory laws. They need to be
• 1:00:28
  Speaker 4: brought down and replaced with gender neutral, very sparse, very
• 1:00:41
  Speaker 4: direct and upfront, easy to understand, and limited laws that
• 1:00:48
  Speaker 4: do not attack due process rights for the accused and
• 1:00:52
  Speaker 4: do not limit assistance for accusers to only female accusers.
• 1:01:01
  Speaker 4: That's what needs to happen. So, yeah, sue the ship
• 1:01:04
  Speaker 4: out of him, Sue everything that moves when when you
• 1:01:07
  Speaker 4: go through something like this, if you have an opening
• 1:01:11
  Speaker 4: to do it, do it because it's the only way
• 1:01:14
  Speaker 4: they'll learn.
• 1:01:20
  Speaker 3: All right, Mike, Yeah, No, I've got nothing for this one.
• 1:01:24
  Speaker 3: I'm like, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, you're you're.
• 1:01:27
  Speaker 2: Doing it right.
• 1:01:27
  Speaker 3: I've got nothing to get pissed off about, as you were, gentlemen.
• 1:01:33
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I think it's just good news. It's it's good
• 1:01:36
  Speaker 1: to see, you know. I mean, obviously the guy is
• 1:01:39
  Speaker 1: smart enough to do it. He was in NASA, you know,
• 1:01:41
  Speaker 1: one would hope. But yeah, I think it's good and
• 1:01:45
  Speaker 1: I hope he takes some of the cleaners. We'll follow
• 1:01:47
  Speaker 1: up when we learn more. And yeah, let's not Let's
• 1:01:53
  Speaker 1: let us know what you guys think about this one
• 1:01:55
  Speaker 1: in the comments. It's time to move on to the
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 1: next story, all right. So here's another one that might
• 1:02:02
  Speaker 1: be a bit of good news. So you guys remember
• 1:02:04
  Speaker 1: we covered this in October of twenty twenty four, so
• 1:02:08
  Speaker 1: a while ago. Hmnz's Mana Juani, a Royal New Zealand
• 1:02:16
  Speaker 1: Navy dive and hydrographic vessel commanded by Commander Yvonne Gray,
• 1:02:21
  Speaker 1: pictured here, ran aground on a reef off the coasts
• 1:02:24
  Speaker 1: of Samoa during a hydrographic survey operation. The ship struck
• 1:02:28
  Speaker 1: a known navigational hazard southwest of Tafitowala village on Upolu
• 1:02:34
  Speaker 1: Island on the evening of October fifth. This is in
• 1:02:37
  Speaker 1: New Zealand, or as I like to call it, Middle Earth.
• 1:02:41
  Speaker 1: So on the evening of October fifth, caught fire after
• 1:02:44
  Speaker 1: grounding and ultimately sank. The following day, All seventy five
• 1:02:48
  Speaker 1: people aboard the ship were safely evacuated with no injuries
• 1:02:51
  Speaker 1: or fatalities. Though the incident caused an oil and diesel
• 1:02:54
  Speaker 1: spill and drew international attention, particularly online trolling directed at Gray.
• 1:03:01
  Speaker 1: As a female commanding officer, New Zealand's Defense minister and
• 1:03:06
  Speaker 1: others probably defended her against such a tax, emphasizing that
• 1:03:09
  Speaker 1: the focus you remain on operational facts rather than her gender.
• 1:03:13
  Speaker 3: Yeah, but the front fell off. The front's not supposed
• 1:03:16
  Speaker 3: to fall off. Yeah, how many people know that?
• 1:03:20
  Speaker 1: Meme?
• 1:03:20
  Speaker 2: You don't know that?
• 1:03:22
  Speaker 1: No, I don't remember that.
• 1:03:23
  Speaker 3: I mean, well, the front fell off and ten thousand
• 1:03:28
  Speaker 3: tons of crude oil. I mean, the front st not
• 1:03:30
  Speaker 3: supposed to fall off, and no, there's a ten thousand
• 1:03:34
  Speaker 3: tons of crude oil. But at the end of the day,
• 1:03:36
  Speaker 3: the front fell off. Look up the front fell off.
• 1:03:40
  Speaker 1: I'll look it up in early March twenty twenty six,
• 1:03:44
  Speaker 1: so this is why I'm following up. I shared this
• 1:03:46
  Speaker 1: on my in the discord group that we get our
• 1:03:49
  Speaker 1: st where I grab the stories, and Mike J said, well,
• 1:03:53
  Speaker 1: this story is old because it wasn't like the follow up,
• 1:03:55
  Speaker 1: but in early this earlier this week, it was like
• 1:03:58
  Speaker 1: last week or something. The New Zealand Defense Force announced
• 1:04:02
  Speaker 1: that charges have been laid under the Armed Forces Discipline
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 1: Act of nineteen seventy one against Gray and two other
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 1: senior officers. The allegations stem from a prior court of
• 1:04:13
  Speaker 1: inquiry and center on negligence, failure to disengage autopilot in time,
• 1:04:18
  Speaker 1: poor risk management for hydrographic work near reefs, absence from
• 1:04:21
  Speaker 1: the bridge in a hazardous area, inadequate supervision, and decisions
• 1:04:25
  Speaker 1: that contributed to the ship being lost. Gray faces alternate
• 1:04:28
  Speaker 1: charges of neglcent, wait, negligente, negligently permitting the vessel to
• 1:04:37
  Speaker 1: be lost by being absent or failing to attend to
• 1:04:41
  Speaker 1: her duties, and could face up to two years of
• 1:04:43
  Speaker 1: imprisonment if convicted at the upcoming court martial. This is
• 1:04:48
  Speaker 1: a military trial. No date has been set yet, although
• 1:04:51
  Speaker 1: her lawyer Gray has denied the charges and plans to
• 1:04:54
  Speaker 1: defend them vigorously, while noting she has endured significantly unjustified criticism.
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 1: The case has been revived has revived media coverage, including
• 1:05:04
  Speaker 1: renewed discussions of sexism in the initial backlash, though the
• 1:05:08
  Speaker 1: proceedings remain focused on alleged bridge and command errors, and
• 1:05:12
  Speaker 1: it was also worth pointing out that when we covered
• 1:05:13
  Speaker 1: the story originally, I think that the New Zealand or
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 1: Middle Earth's government was basically celebrating the fact that it
• 1:05:21
  Speaker 1: was like she was, I think, like a first in
• 1:05:23
  Speaker 1: terms of like women in charge. So I just thought
• 1:05:26
  Speaker 1: it was funny, like the nobody was hurt. But I
• 1:05:30
  Speaker 1: think New Zealand lost like, you know, half their GDP
• 1:05:33
  Speaker 1: from that crash. It was like billions of dollars or
• 1:05:37
  Speaker 1: whatever New Zealanders have, like gold coins, I don't know
• 1:05:41
  Speaker 1: what do they have.
• 1:05:42
  Speaker 3: The tiny complement of their fleet. It's quite it's a
• 1:05:46
  Speaker 3: significant loss. Yeah, I'm not saying men have never done this.
• 1:05:51
  Speaker 3: I'm sure there are numerous examples of male navy commanders
• 1:05:55
  Speaker 3: losing vessels in similar instances of you know, Darwin of
• 1:06:00
  Speaker 3: wars like this, but it's a matter of frequency, it's
• 1:06:04
  Speaker 3: a matter of proportion. This woman sank ten of the
• 1:06:09
  Speaker 3: New Zealand fleet through pure negligence. I don't think any
• 1:06:16
  Speaker 3: man has ever done that. Maybe it's a coincidence, I
• 1:06:19
  Speaker 3: don't know. It's a question of how big your fleet
• 1:06:22
  Speaker 3: can be before you endeavor to put a woman in
• 1:06:26
  Speaker 3: charge of one of the vessels. And more importantly, if
• 1:06:30
  Speaker 3: you're gonna put a woman in charge of a million
• 1:06:32
  Speaker 3: tons of metal, it ought to be because she is
• 1:06:35
  Speaker 3: more qualified than all of the other candidates, not because
• 1:06:40
  Speaker 3: she's a she. You could say the same about any demographic.
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 3: You could put a fucking penguin in charge of a
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 3: vessel and that vessel gets disintegrated. Then it is not
• 1:06:54
  Speaker 3: necessarily penguinphobic to conclude that you probably shouldn't have put
• 1:06:59
  Speaker 3: a penguin charge just because it's a penguin. And that's
• 1:07:03
  Speaker 3: what you did, isn't it. You put a woman in
• 1:07:05
  Speaker 3: charge just because she's a woman. And yes, you could
• 1:07:09
  Speaker 3: wax lyrical all day that no one died. Sure, this
• 1:07:14
  Speaker 3: penguin destroyed a billion dollar vessel, but at least no
• 1:07:17
  Speaker 3: one died. Yes, that speaks well to the men who
• 1:07:22
  Speaker 3: were in charge of the evacuation process. It doesn't speak
• 1:07:27
  Speaker 3: well to the penguin who was in charge of keeping
• 1:07:30
  Speaker 3: the vessel afloat in the first fucking place. And it
• 1:07:34
  Speaker 3: will do you no good to cry. You just hate penguins.
• 1:07:39
  Speaker 3: You're just trolling this poor penguin because you're a misspenguinist. No, dickhead,
• 1:07:47
  Speaker 3: you are an anti humanist because you're denying humans the
• 1:07:51
  Speaker 3: opportunity to command a ship because you're so fucking preoccupied
• 1:07:55
  Speaker 3: with being inclusive to penguins.
• 1:07:59
  Speaker 2: Fuck languids.
• 1:08:01
  Speaker 3: They should all fuck off to the mountains and we'll
• 1:08:04
  Speaker 3: see who comes back stronger Narrasi's voice. Yes, he is
• 1:08:09
  Speaker 3: still talking about women. Women should do what men do.
• 1:08:13
  Speaker 3: Women should do what the top one percent of male
• 1:08:16
  Speaker 3: risk takers do. Many may die, but that's the sacrifice
• 1:08:22
  Speaker 3: I'm willing to make.
• 1:08:26
  Speaker 1: But why there you go.
• 1:08:32
  Speaker 4: The thing that really struck me about this is the
• 1:08:35
  Speaker 4: whole old misogyny. The trolling is misogyny. Blah blah blah
• 1:08:38
  Speaker 4: blah blah. Is she aware that instances and it doesn't
• 1:08:44
  Speaker 4: necessarily have to be military, Like oil companies have had
• 1:08:50
  Speaker 4: some pretty catastrophic accidents, and every single time, you know
• 1:08:57
  Speaker 4: that the man in charge gets mercilessly ridiculed, and uh,
• 1:09:05
  Speaker 4: the one that comes to mind first is old. Actually,
• 1:09:08
  Speaker 4: Exxon Mobil had an oil spill. I want to say
• 1:09:12
  Speaker 4: in New York. It might have been one of the Carolinas,
• 1:09:14
  Speaker 4: but it's was one of the East East Coast harbors,
• 1:09:18
  Speaker 4: and it was it was pretty big, and it was
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 4: considered a pretty big disaster at the time, and uh,
• 1:09:26
  Speaker 4: you know it was we heard all about the cleanup.
• 1:09:28
  Speaker 4: BP had the same thing with not with a ship,
• 1:09:32
  Speaker 4: but with a with drilling and uh, you know when
• 1:09:39
  Speaker 4: that happened, You're right, Vell does not yep yep, uh
• 1:09:45
  Speaker 4: murder of crows and and of course there was I
• 1:09:49
  Speaker 4: can't remember which comedian it was, came out and and
• 1:09:52
  Speaker 4: like really sexualized it, you know, jokes like I'm only
• 1:09:56
  Speaker 4: gonna come halfway into your harbor and and and all that.
• 1:10:02
  Speaker 4: I think the captain was accused of being drunk. I
• 1:10:05
  Speaker 4: don't know if that ever panned out to he was
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 4: actually drunk or not. But the the uh out, the
• 1:10:15
  Speaker 4: upshot of it was the captain was, like I said,
• 1:10:18
  Speaker 4: mercilessly ridiculed. And if the sexes had been reversed, it
• 1:10:26
  Speaker 4: would have been referred to as all kinds of sexual harassment, misogyny,
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 4: whatever else as an excuse to try to silence criticism
• 1:10:37
  Speaker 4: of the captain's behavior. But because the captain is a
• 1:10:41
  Speaker 4: man and the fact that you know, men's reputations are
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 4: as disposable as men themselves in society, instead of suggesting
• 1:10:52
  Speaker 4: that maybe it was mean to criticize and make fun
• 1:10:58
  Speaker 4: of the end of vidual with the prestigious and highly
• 1:11:03
  Speaker 4: responsible office to wreck a ship and create a huge mess,
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 4: well they just escalated the ridicule and the criticism because
• 1:11:19
  Speaker 4: it was a dude. And of course you saw how
• 1:11:23
  Speaker 4: the officials, the male officials at BP were ridiculed as well.
• 1:11:29
  Speaker 4: And not only were they ridiculed, but the then President
• 1:11:36
  Speaker 4: Obama actually used it as an excuse to reimpose the
• 1:11:45
  Speaker 4: moratorium on offshore oil drilling in the US for at
• 1:11:50
  Speaker 4: least some time period. So, yeah, it's a totally different
• 1:11:56
  Speaker 4: story when the person being criticized as female, All of
• 1:12:00
  Speaker 4: a sudden, you're not allowed to talk about that thing
• 1:12:04
  Speaker 4: she did. All of a sudden, you're not allowed to
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 4: get bad. All of a sudden, you're not allowed to
• 1:12:10
  Speaker 4: think she did anything wrong. All of a sudden, if
• 1:12:12
  Speaker 4: you do criticize the things that she did and get
• 1:12:17
  Speaker 4: mad and think she did something wrong and want to
• 1:12:20
  Speaker 4: talk about it, You're not allowed to be sarcastic, right.
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 4: You're not allowed to do any of the things you
• 1:12:26
  Speaker 4: would do if the individual was male. You're not allowed
• 1:12:31
  Speaker 4: to gender your criticisms. You're not allowed to use any
• 1:12:36
  Speaker 4: stereotyping or any such thing that might go along with
• 1:12:41
  Speaker 4: those criticisms because it's a woman this time, and women
• 1:12:45
  Speaker 4: are supposed to be exempt, right, which is one of
• 1:12:49
  Speaker 4: the reasons why women don't belong in positions of power
• 1:12:56
  Speaker 4: and authority, because they can't take their responsibility. They can't
• 1:13:02
  Speaker 4: have the accountability to recognize that when they do something wrong,
• 1:13:09
  Speaker 4: when they fuck up, they're going to get criticized and
• 1:13:14
  Speaker 4: is going to be mean, especially when they fuck up
• 1:13:20
  Speaker 4: big time and the whole world knows about it, sees
• 1:13:25
  Speaker 4: it happening, and has every reason in the world to
• 1:13:29
  Speaker 4: ridicule what they did or get angry about what they
• 1:13:33
  Speaker 4: did and discuss the damage that they did. It's just
• 1:13:39
  Speaker 4: absolutely an indictment of female accountability when there's every reason
• 1:13:48
  Speaker 4: in the world to suggest that maybe this woman shouldn't
• 1:13:54
  Speaker 4: have been piloting driving, captaining whatever, and uh and then
• 1:14:03
  Speaker 4: the response is, oh, how dare you don't you know
• 1:14:06
  Speaker 4: this is a woman, she's accept you misogynist. Sorry, that
• 1:14:12
  Speaker 4: is just it's not valid. It wasn't valid when it
• 1:14:16
  Speaker 4: was accepted, it's not valid now and it's becoming less accepted.
• 1:14:22
  Speaker 4: And if you don't want women to start getting excluded
• 1:14:26
  Speaker 4: from these types of positions on the basis of their unaccountability,
• 1:14:32
  Speaker 4: should stop using the word misogyny to respond to every
• 1:14:35
  Speaker 4: criticism that is made of them.
• 1:14:40
  Speaker 1: All right, so we're gonna move on to the next
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 1: story in a bit, but first we're gonna look at this.
• 1:14:47
  Speaker 1: So because Mike said we should, Oh there's no audio. Wait,
• 1:14:52
  Speaker 1: hold on, I gotta I gotta let me stop sharing,
• 1:14:56
  Speaker 1: and then I gotta share it again because now I'm
• 1:14:58
  Speaker 1: now I really want to know. So here we go.
• 1:15:04
  Speaker 2: All right, measure, thank you.
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 7: This ship that was involved in the incidentt off Western
• 1:15:09
  Speaker 7: Australia this week, Yeah.
• 1:15:10
  Speaker 8: The one the front fell up. Yeah, yeah, that's not
• 1:15:12
  Speaker 8: very typical. I'd like to make that point.
• 1:15:14
  Speaker 7: Well, how is it done typical?
• 1:15:15
  Speaker 8: Well, there are a lot of these ships going around
• 1:15:16
  Speaker 8: the world all the time and very seldom does anything
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 8: like this happened. I just don't want people thinking that
• 1:15:20
  Speaker 8: tankers aren't safe.
• 1:15:21
  Speaker 7: Was this tanker safe?
• 1:15:22
  Speaker 8: Well, I was thinking more about the other ones, the
• 1:15:24
  Speaker 8: ones that are safe. Yeah, the ones the front doesn't
• 1:15:26
  Speaker 8: fall off.
• 1:15:26
  Speaker 7: Well, if this wasn't safe, why did it have eighty
• 1:15:29
  Speaker 7: thousand tons of oil on it?
• 1:15:30
  Speaker 8: But I'm not saying it wasn't safe. It's just perhaps
• 1:15:31
  Speaker 8: not quite as safe as some of the other ones.
• 1:15:33
  Speaker 2: Why or some of them are built over?
• 1:15:34
  Speaker 8: The front doesn't fall.
• 1:15:35
  Speaker 7: Out at all? It wasn't his filt so didn't fall.
• 1:15:37
  Speaker 2: Off, obviously not. How do you know?
• 1:15:39
  Speaker 8: Because the front fell off and twenty thousand tons of
• 1:15:41
  Speaker 8: crude oils built into the sea caught fire. It's a
• 1:15:43
  Speaker 8: bit of a giveaway. I just like to make the
• 1:15:45
  Speaker 8: point that that is not normal.
• 1:15:46
  Speaker 7: Well, what sort of standard did these oil tankers built?
• 1:15:49
  Speaker 8: All very rigorous maritime engineering standards, what sort of thing? Well,
• 1:15:52
  Speaker 8: the front's not supposed to fall off for a start.
• 1:15:54
  Speaker 7: Whatever, thing?
• 1:15:55
  Speaker 1: Okay, I got the bit. It's extra funny when it
• 1:16:04
  Speaker 1: has an Australian accent attached to it. But it's pretty funny.
• 1:16:11
  Speaker 1: I mean, does it keep going like that? Mic for it's.
• 1:16:14
  Speaker 3: Likely yeah, yeah, Okay, get on that feet.
• 1:16:22
  Speaker 1: It's good, it's good, all right. So anyway, I got
• 1:16:25
  Speaker 1: a super chow and uh, we're going to hold on
• 1:16:31
  Speaker 1: a second here, let me make sure that this is
• 1:16:33
  Speaker 1: still sharing for you guys. Okay, I got a super chow,
• 1:16:36
  Speaker 1: and then we're gonna move on to the final story.
• 1:16:38
  Speaker 1: So Richard Bierre gives us five dollars and says, outside
• 1:16:43
  Speaker 1: of the sexual encounters, this sounds eerily similar to the
• 1:16:46
  Speaker 1: Seneca Ville Valley High School incident. He's lucky that a
• 1:16:50
  Speaker 1: group of nights in leather didn't show up to his
• 1:16:52
  Speaker 1: residence and decides to just take care of business. Yeah,
• 1:16:56
  Speaker 1: he's talking about the previous story with the NASA guy
• 1:16:59
  Speaker 1: fighting back against the Yeah. Well that's the thing. Like,
• 1:17:02
  Speaker 1: these these allegations they are like I don't know, man,
• 1:17:06
  Speaker 1: these these people don't realize how serious they can be.
• 1:17:09
  Speaker 1: Like there was one made against Andrew Wilson, just like
• 1:17:13
  Speaker 1: casually thrown out by some podcaster who basically called him
• 1:17:16
  Speaker 1: a rapist. And it's like, do you not you just
• 1:17:18
  Speaker 1: say that shit because you're mad at him, Dude, don't
• 1:17:21
  Speaker 1: you think that like this is really really dangerous. You're
• 1:17:25
  Speaker 1: playing with fire basically, Anyway, Uh, thank you Richard for
• 1:17:29
  Speaker 1: the super chow. Okay, So we're gonna move on to
• 1:17:32
  Speaker 1: the next story, and I gotta set it up first,
• 1:17:35
  Speaker 1: because this one it's amazing. Okay. So in Brooklyn Park,
• 1:17:41
  Speaker 1: which is a historic district inside of Richmond, Virginia, a
• 1:17:44
  Speaker 1: pro Palestine mural is creating controversy, but not for the
• 1:17:49
  Speaker 1: reason you may suspect. So the mural created by Lauren
• 1:17:54
  Speaker 1: East of Los Angeles, well, let's let's just let's just
• 1:17:57
  Speaker 1: look at the mural and you tell me if there's
• 1:18:01
  Speaker 1: anything weird about it. All right, So historically you might
• 1:18:13
  Speaker 1: not know this, but the Free Palestine has always been
• 1:18:18
  Speaker 1: a watermelon. They use the watermelon because it has the
• 1:18:21
  Speaker 1: colors of the flag, and this is a way of
• 1:18:24
  Speaker 1: sort of signaling to people who are pro Palestine without
• 1:18:29
  Speaker 1: like exposing what they're actually showing, which is the flag
• 1:18:31
  Speaker 1: of Palestine. Now it seems a little I don't know,
• 1:18:38
  Speaker 1: it's a little I mean, it's very well painted, but
• 1:18:43
  Speaker 1: not everybody was happy with this.
• 1:18:45
  Speaker 3: So funny because I might not know what they're doing,
• 1:18:49
  Speaker 3: but it's funnier because they just know what they're doing.
• 1:18:53
  Speaker 1: Okay, okay, Okay, So the mural, created by Lauren Yes
• 1:18:57
  Speaker 1: of Los Angeles, depicts a brown skinned woman holding up
• 1:18:59
  Speaker 1: a water melon who seed spell out the phrase free Palestine.
• 1:19:03
  Speaker 1: And while the woman is clearly meant to be a
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 1: Palestinian and the watermelon has long been associated as a
• 1:19:08
  Speaker 1: symbol of Palestine, not everyone knows this. Certain members of
• 1:19:14
  Speaker 1: Richmond's community, which, by the way, this is in a
• 1:19:17
  Speaker 1: black neighborhood where this mural was played pace but you
• 1:19:20
  Speaker 1: know where it was set up. They it drew some
• 1:19:24
  Speaker 1: concern with the mural. President of the Richmond chapter of
• 1:19:27
  Speaker 1: the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, William F. McGee, stated, quote,
• 1:19:32
  Speaker 1: graphic illustrations such as this have been used to denigrate
• 1:19:35
  Speaker 1: African American people, to make us feel like we're less than,
• 1:19:38
  Speaker 1: to make us feel smaller, to make us feel unintellectual, lazy,
• 1:19:42
  Speaker 1: shiftless end quote. Local civil rights activist Gary Flowers acknowledged
• 1:19:46
  Speaker 1: the meaning of the mural, but still took issue with it, stating, quote,
• 1:19:50
  Speaker 1: We've come fully aware of the Palestinian movement and its symbolism,
• 1:19:55
  Speaker 1: but in Downtown north Side, a historically black neighborhood, the
• 1:19:59
  Speaker 1: site of the watermelon and that is painted behind me
• 1:20:01
  Speaker 1: is offensive when asked for comment, the murals artist Lauren
• 1:20:05
  Speaker 1: E said, I, as an activist, would never intentionally put
• 1:20:09
  Speaker 1: my time, money and energy into creating something racist or
• 1:20:12
  Speaker 1: harmful to any community. Rather the opposite. I don't know
• 1:20:16
  Speaker 1: what the problem with that. I like watermelon. Don't you
• 1:20:18
  Speaker 1: guys like watermelon? Kill me? Aren't you? Anyway? You like watermelon?
• 1:20:27
  Speaker 2: Is the question?
• 1:20:28
  Speaker 3: And if the answer is yes, then what the fuck
• 1:20:31
  Speaker 3: is the problem? If you like? If you showed a
• 1:20:34
  Speaker 3: picture of an Englishman enjoying a cup of tea, I
• 1:20:39
  Speaker 3: would not be offended, even though and I'm risking my
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 3: reputation as an Englishman when I say this. I don't
• 1:20:46
  Speaker 3: much care for tea. I'm a coffee drinker. As far
• 1:20:50
  Speaker 3: as I'm concerned, tea is coffee's weaker runt of a
• 1:20:53
  Speaker 3: younger sibling. And even when I do fancy a cup
• 1:20:56
  Speaker 3: of tea, I prefer green tea. Yes sorry or well
• 1:21:02
  Speaker 3: sorry Churchill, sorry, Royal family. I find Indian tea to
• 1:21:06
  Speaker 3: be a mediocre middle ground of underwhelming nothing. No amount
• 1:21:10
  Speaker 3: of milk or sugar will change that, and nothing is
• 1:21:14
  Speaker 3: precisely for what I apologize.
• 1:21:17
  Speaker 2: And this story.
• 1:21:18
  Speaker 3: That we're looking at here is like me seeing a
• 1:21:23
  Speaker 3: picture of an Italian enjoying tea, a North Italian, an
• 1:21:29
  Speaker 3: Italian who looks right, It's like me looking at such
• 1:21:34
  Speaker 3: a picture and thinking.
• 1:21:35
  Speaker 2: How dare you?
• 1:21:37
  Speaker 3: Don't you know that countless of my ancestors were slaughtered
• 1:21:41
  Speaker 3: in a war that was started over the destruction of
• 1:21:45
  Speaker 3: several crates of tea?
• 1:21:47
  Speaker 2: How very are you?
• 1:21:49
  Speaker 3: It's the joke that a lot of us will tell
• 1:21:52
  Speaker 3: because we pretend to give all that much of a
• 1:21:55
  Speaker 3: shit about tea. And I'm not even going to pretend
• 1:21:58
  Speaker 3: fuck tea and Italians. It's that easy, you see. It's
• 1:22:03
  Speaker 3: as easy as saying fuck watermelons and fuck Palestinians. I
• 1:22:09
  Speaker 3: realized it might be difficult to say fuck watermelons if
• 1:22:11
  Speaker 3: you really like watermelons. It's difficult to say fuck fried chicken,
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 3: no matter who you are. Everyone likes fried chicken. It's
• 1:22:21
  Speaker 3: delicious and it's infinitely versatile, and it's not against anyone's religion.
• 1:22:29
  Speaker 3: But have you ever even met a Palestinian?
• 1:22:34
  Speaker 7: No?
• 1:22:35
  Speaker 3: Then no wonder you can't tell when you're looking at
• 1:22:38
  Speaker 3: a mural depicting a Palestinian painted by someone who didn't
• 1:22:42
  Speaker 3: have access to that light oak brown paint paint they
• 1:22:49
  Speaker 3: only had the requisite buckets of dark mahogany brown available
• 1:22:54
  Speaker 3: at the time. Presumably it's just it's just cheaper, and
• 1:22:59
  Speaker 3: you took that. Personally, whoever you are, well, sorry, but
• 1:23:04
  Speaker 3: you don't own that shade of brown. You don't own
• 1:23:07
  Speaker 3: any shade of brown when you consider when you consider
• 1:23:13
  Speaker 3: most mammals, and most tree bark, and most dirt and
• 1:23:18
  Speaker 3: quite a lot of rocks, that shade of brown seems
• 1:23:22
  Speaker 3: to be the shade and hue most common in terrestrial nature.
• 1:23:27
  Speaker 3: It's going to your pair all over the place, and
• 1:23:29
  Speaker 3: maybe you should see your way to dealing with it.
• 1:23:32
  Speaker 3: And maybe that's why coffee is better than tea. Coffee
• 1:23:38
  Speaker 3: maintains its dark brown ambience even when you add a
• 1:23:42
  Speaker 3: cup of cream, whereas tea becomes positively Caucasian at the
• 1:23:48
  Speaker 3: slightest drop of semi skimmed piss milk. All hail coffee,
• 1:23:54
  Speaker 3: all hail watermelon, and all hail fried chicken. I have
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 3: forgotten where up where I was going with this and
• 1:24:01
  Speaker 3: what I was talking about. Why anyone is even pissed off?
• 1:24:04
  Speaker 3: And that's probably for the best. Let us eat, drink
• 1:24:08
  Speaker 3: and be merry, and let us draw racist murals. Just
• 1:24:13
  Speaker 3: to piss off the niggas. It's funny so long everyone
• 1:24:16
  Speaker 3: is just knowing you.
• 1:24:18
  Speaker 4: Oh sorry, guys, I'm I can't breathe. Oh Hannah had Wow,
• 1:24:30
  Speaker 4: there might be anything I need to say.
• 1:24:33
  Speaker 1: Bruh.
• 1:24:35
  Speaker 4: Anyway, this is sad, this is and and the only
• 1:24:40
  Speaker 4: other thing I'm going to point out about this is
• 1:24:43
  Speaker 4: was it was it just last week?
• 1:24:45
  Speaker 1: Yeah? No, it was last thursday. Your fire your fire alarm.
• 1:24:49
  Speaker 4: Was oh yes, oh yes, the church. Yeah, that that
• 1:24:53
  Speaker 4: hack that had nothing to do with this. It was
• 1:24:55
  Speaker 4: not foreshadowing. We weren't trying to know. I think I
• 1:25:01
  Speaker 4: could hear it and it was driving me fucking nuts,
• 1:25:03
  Speaker 4: and I couldn't concentrate because of it, because I'm another
• 1:25:09
  Speaker 4: stereotype there. Those loud, loud, beepy noises that don't have
• 1:25:14
  Speaker 4: anything to do with what I'm doing in the moment
• 1:25:17
  Speaker 4: just completely fucked me up. But in any case, now,
• 1:25:24
  Speaker 4: just just last week, I think there was a guy
• 1:25:28
  Speaker 4: who got canceled for having carets, And now we have
• 1:25:34
  Speaker 4: this woman who did something overtly deliberately. She claims it
• 1:25:39
  Speaker 4: wasn't deliberately racist, but she could have put a light
• 1:25:43
  Speaker 4: skinned person. Since this is the United States and a
• 1:25:47
  Speaker 4: huge portion of the Free Palestine movement are light skinned
• 1:25:52
  Speaker 4: women with blue hair or various other colors of hair
• 1:25:57
  Speaker 4: that are not natural and nose rings and and ship
• 1:26:02
  Speaker 4: like that, or or trans women. She could have she
• 1:26:08
  Speaker 4: could have put a light skinned trans woman and watermelon,
• 1:26:12
  Speaker 4: but she didn't do that. She was trying to maximize
• 1:26:17
  Speaker 4: the progressive stack material that you could put on there
• 1:26:21
  Speaker 4: and ended up tripping up on the progressive stack instead
• 1:26:27
  Speaker 4: tripped over it and is not getting nearly as canceled like.
• 1:26:35
  Speaker 4: I didn't see anything about this. I didn't see any
• 1:26:38
  Speaker 4: discussion about this on X. I didn't see any anything.
• 1:26:40
  Speaker 4: It didn't appear to have trended. Maybe it will as
• 1:26:44
  Speaker 4: more people start covering it, but it didn't trend the
• 1:26:49
  Speaker 4: day that it happened. And there isn't some movement to
• 1:26:54
  Speaker 4: get artists of this ILK put into separate but equal
• 1:27:05
  Speaker 4: systems like there was with people with turets. I literally
• 1:27:12
  Speaker 4: watched people argue on on X that people with turets
• 1:27:21
  Speaker 4: should have separate but equal accommodations or be put in
• 1:27:26
  Speaker 4: camps because they can't control what they say. And it's
• 1:27:32
  Speaker 4: not even a majority among people with turets. It's it's
• 1:27:36
  Speaker 4: that particular type of tick is rare. It's just the
• 1:27:41
  Speaker 4: most famous one because everybody thinks it's funny, except for
• 1:27:45
  Speaker 4: the individual that it's happening to, who is often mortified
• 1:27:50
  Speaker 4: because it happens at the most embarrassing of times, most
• 1:27:55
  Speaker 4: inappropriate times. Right, this individual had control over her actions.
• 1:28:02
  Speaker 4: She she could have done some research into what might uh,
• 1:28:08
  Speaker 4: what might fly in the neighborhood, what might be appropriate
• 1:28:14
  Speaker 4: in the neighborhood, what people might identify with in the neighborhood,
• 1:28:19
  Speaker 4: and didn't do that. She didn't do that. She she
• 1:28:22
  Speaker 4: just decided to stuff as much progressive stack into this
• 1:28:29
  Speaker 4: mural as she possibly could, and like I said, she
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 4: tripped over it and fell flat on her face. And
• 1:28:36
  Speaker 4: uh has has not received anywhere near the backlash for
• 1:28:44
  Speaker 4: actions that are fully under her control that a man
• 1:28:49
  Speaker 4: received for having a disability in public. Like that. That's
• 1:28:56
  Speaker 4: that's the underlying that's the bottom line. And yeah, this
• 1:28:59
  Speaker 4: is this is a whole arius. The way that she
• 1:29:01
  Speaker 4: fucked up is hilarious. By the way, guys, is it
• 1:29:04
  Speaker 4: is it racist to be allergic to watermelon? Because I'm
• 1:29:07
  Speaker 4: asking for a friend.
• 1:29:10
  Speaker 1: But in any case, they just gotta change the change
• 1:29:17
  Speaker 1: the free the free Palestine logoment. Don't make it a watermelon.
• 1:29:20
  Speaker 1: Try something else, like maybe like I don't know, like
• 1:29:23
  Speaker 1: a bucket of wings or basketball, or maybe like the US.
• 1:29:27
  Speaker 4: What are they going to do if you use the flag,
• 1:29:29
  Speaker 4: the Palestinian flag. The reason they chose.
• 1:29:32
  Speaker 1: Water it's the colors, the red.
• 1:29:36
  Speaker 4: There is no law against creating a mural with the
• 1:29:42
  Speaker 4: actual Palestinian flag on it. Here, there's no you're not
• 1:29:45
  Speaker 4: going to get accused of hate speech and and prosecuted.
• 1:29:51
  Speaker 4: People might argue more against a mural. It might not
• 1:29:57
  Speaker 4: be as easy to defend.
• 1:30:01
  Speaker 5: That.
• 1:30:02
  Speaker 4: You know, people people might say, hey, you know we
• 1:30:05
  Speaker 4: we disagree with the message and be more likely to
• 1:30:09
  Speaker 4: criticize the message as opposed to, you know, you idiot,
• 1:30:14
  Speaker 4: you put a racist stereotype up on a mural that
• 1:30:19
  Speaker 4: that that's like what two stories high, three stories high,
• 1:30:25
  Speaker 4: without considering how it was going to look to the neighborhood.
• 1:30:30
  Speaker 4: But what they don't want to do that they don't
• 1:30:32
  Speaker 4: want people to.
• 1:30:33
  Speaker 1: Be able to let them fight.
• 1:30:39
  Speaker 4: The more that the woke community eats itself the better, honestly,
• 1:30:44
  Speaker 4: But I don't it doesn't seem to be doing at
• 1:30:47
  Speaker 4: this time no, I think the main difference that I'm
• 1:30:50
  Speaker 4: seeing here is that the individual who had the faux
• 1:30:55
  Speaker 4: pas is a woman.
• 1:30:58
  Speaker 1: Yeah, well, they're just gonna but I mean, if anything,
• 1:31:01
  Speaker 1: they're just gonna demand like money or something, reparations, reparations
• 1:31:05
  Speaker 1: for the pain and suffering and the generational trauma that this.
• 1:31:09
  Speaker 4: Oh maybe they'll demand it be.
• 1:31:10
  Speaker 1: Thirty foot long watermelon. It's fucking art. Okay, well, I
• 1:31:20
  Speaker 1: gotta we're gonna stop it there. I'm gonna wrap it up.
• 1:31:24
  Speaker 1: So thanks guys, or coming on the show. We're gonna
• 1:31:28
  Speaker 1: check out this article. Why is Paramount hiring so many
• 1:31:32
  Speaker 1: men with troubled pasts. We're gonna be looking at all
• 1:31:35
  Speaker 1: of the talent they're bringing back because the uh, basically,
• 1:31:40
  Speaker 1: the people who kick these guys out with the me
• 1:31:42
  Speaker 1: Too movement, they don't know how to make movies, so
• 1:31:45
  Speaker 1: they're gonna try and course correct by bringing back problematic dudes. So,
• 1:31:51
  Speaker 1: if you're gonna join us for the Patron Show, become
• 1:31:54
  Speaker 1: a badger yourself by going to feed the Badger dot
• 1:31:56
  Speaker 1: com five bucks a month, we'll get you into the
• 1:31:58
  Speaker 1: Discord server. It's basically like the less than a cup
• 1:32:01
  Speaker 1: of coffee these days you know, while prices fluctuate, our
• 1:32:06
  Speaker 1: membership stay the same if we can help it, and
• 1:32:09
  Speaker 1: hopefully we will see you guys there. I want to
• 1:32:12
  Speaker 1: thank Mike and Hannah for their commentary on the stories today.
• 1:32:16
  Speaker 1: I want to thank Mike Jay for helping me with
• 1:32:18
  Speaker 1: that last write up for that story that I thought
• 1:32:21
  Speaker 1: was hilarious. I want to thank the artist for painting
• 1:32:24
  Speaker 1: that mural and making my day. But I want to
• 1:32:26
  Speaker 1: thank you guys most of all for watching the show.
• 1:32:28
  Speaker 1: So if you guys like this video, please hit like, subscribe.
• 1:32:32
  Speaker 1: If you're not already subscribe, hit the bell flidifications, leave
• 1:32:34
  Speaker 1: us a comment and let us know what you guys
• 1:32:35
  Speaker 1: think about what we talked about on the show today.
• 1:32:38
  Speaker 1: And please please please share this video because sharing is caring.
• 1:32:41
  Speaker 1: Thank you guys so much for coming on today's episode
• 1:32:43
  Speaker 1: of HBr News and we will see you next Tuesday.