Latest / How Canadian Markets Work / Episode 17: Deposit Insurance and the Shared Charter Trap

Transcript

Episode 17: Deposit Insurance and the Shared Charter Trap · How Canadian Markets Work

0:00
I think most people believe that deposit insurance
0:02
is just this strict unbending limit. They hear
0:07
the number, $100 ,000, and they just logically
0:11
assume that is the absolute lifetime maximum
0:14
safety net available to any one person. Right,
0:18
yeah. It's a very common belief. But the truth
0:20
of the matter is actually, well, it's far, far
0:22
more generous than that. So today, we're custom
0:25
tailoring this deep dive specifically for you,
0:27
our listener. to completely demystify the Canada
0:31
Deposit Insurance Corporation. Or as you'll often
0:34
hear it called in financial circles, CDIC. Exactly,
0:38
CDIC. We're going to use some excellent insights
0:41
today from episode 17 of the audio series, How
0:43
Canadian Markets Work, which focused heavily
0:45
on deposit insurance. Yeah, we're going to take
0:47
our time today and explore the quiet, deliberate
0:50
machinery that actually protects your money.
0:53
But we are also going to reveal a deeply hidden
0:56
trap in that machinery. Oh, yes. The trap. Yeah.
1:00
It's this specific scenario where doing this
1:03
supposedly responsible thing to protect your
1:05
life savings might actually leave you completely
1:08
unexpectedly uninsured. It's a paradox of good
1:12
intentions that we see quite often, honestly.
1:15
It really is. OK, let's unpack this. Before we
1:18
get into the specific numbers and the corporate
1:20
traps we found in the sources, we first need
1:22
to understand why this insurance even exists
1:25
at all. We do, because there is a very persistent,
1:28
comforting illusion about banking. Right. Like,
1:31
when you deposit your hard -earned money into
1:33
an account, it doesn't just sit there in a subterranean
1:36
vault. neatly stacked on a palette with your
1:39
name etched on a little brass plaque. I mean,
1:41
that is a beautiful illusion, but no, the reality
1:44
is what financial professionals call the indirect
1:46
route of capital. OK, I want to make sure I fully
1:48
grasp this indirect route because it really sounds
1:51
like the engine of the entire economy. It is,
1:53
yeah. So slowly, when I hand over my paycheck,
1:56
what is the bank physically doing with that capital?
1:59
Well, they're immediately putting it to work.
2:00
When you hand your money to the bank, they turn
2:02
around and... Lend it out to someone else my
2:06
deposits are essentially transformed exactly
2:08
Yeah, they become the 30 -year mortgages that
2:11
by your neighbor's houses They become the massive
2:13
business loans that fund wind farms build factories
2:15
and you know Finance inventory for the grocery
2:19
store down the street. Mm -hmm. So your money
2:21
is out in the world distributed and tied up in
2:25
these long -term projects. Yes. Which is wonderfully
2:27
productive for society. It builds cities. Yeah.
2:31
But it introduces a very specific glaring vulnerability.
2:35
It absolutely does. It makes me think of a very
2:37
specific scenario. Imagine a coat check at a
2:41
grand, beautiful winter gala. Okay, I'm picturing
2:44
it. You walk in from the snow, you hand the attendant
2:47
your heavy winter coat, and they give you a little
2:49
numbered paper ticket in return. But the venue
2:52
is actually secretly renting out all those coats
2:55
to other people who need to step outside for
2:57
a while. Right, while you're inside enjoying
2:59
the warm party. That is a remarkably accurate
3:02
way to visualize the concept of fractional reserve
3:06
banking. Right. Because while you're inside,
3:09
you know, dancing and talking, you feel perfectly
3:11
secure holding your little paper ticket. Mm -hmm.
3:14
You believe your coat is right there on the hanger.
3:16
Exactly. And the system actually works perfectly.
3:19
Night after night. The venue makes a profit.
3:23
renting the coats, you get to enjoy the party
3:25
without carrying a heavy jacket around right
3:28
up until the exact moment the fire alarm gets
3:30
pulled. Oh wow. The music stops and every single
3:34
guest rushes the coat check at the exact same
3:37
minute. And that collective sudden rush that
3:40
is the anatomy of a bank run. A bank run. Right.
3:43
Yeah. If all the depositors get nervous if a
3:46
rumor starts and they lose faith in the system
3:49
They all queue up to withdraw their money simultaneously.
3:52
And the problem isn't that the bank is a scam,
3:54
right? No, not at all. The problem is purely
3:56
liquidity. Even a perfectly healthy, highly profitable
4:00
bank will collapse under that pressure simply
4:03
because it doesn't hold enough liquid cash in
4:05
the vault for everyone all at once. Because their
4:07
wealth is tied up in those 30 -year mortgages.
4:10
The coats are out in the cold. Precisely. It's
4:13
a disaster born entirely of panic rather than
4:16
underlying financial ruin. And if we connect
4:20
this to the bigger picture, that is the fundamental
4:22
reason C .D .I .C. exists. Okay, the Canada Deposit
4:26
Insurance Corporation. Yes, a federal crown corporation
4:30
backed by the government. But its most profound
4:33
everyday function isn't financial reimbursement.
4:36
It's not. No, it is psychological stabilization.
4:40
Psychological. I always thought of it strictly
4:41
as an accounting mechanism, you know, just an
4:43
insurance policy. Well, it is an insurance policy,
4:46
but it's one designed to never actually be used.
4:48
Oh, see. Yeah. C .D .I .C. doesn't merely exist
4:51
to write checks to angry people after a disaster.
4:54
It is a psychological tool designed to maintain
4:56
systemic trust. So the guarantee works simply
4:59
by existing. Exactly. Because you, the listener,
5:02
know your money is covered by the government,
5:04
you don't feel the terrifying urge to queue up
5:06
in the rain to withdraw your cash when a negative
5:09
news headline drops. Right. And because you don't
5:11
queue up, the bank doesn't experience the liquid
5:13
The insurance prevents the very panic that causes
5:18
the failure in the first place. That is incredibly
5:21
elegant. The safety net stops you from jumping.
5:23
It really is a beautiful piece of financial engineering.
5:26
So now that we understand deposit insurance exists
5:29
primarily to keep us collectively calm and keep
5:33
the capital working, let's look at the actual
5:35
limit that provides that comfort. Yes, let's
5:38
look at the numbers. Because as we teased earlier,
5:41
Almost everyone completely misunderstands how
5:43
the $100 ,000 cap actually functions. They really
5:47
do. It is perhaps the most pervasive myth in
5:50
Canadian personal finance. So what are people
5:52
getting wrong? Well, people hear the phrase $100
5:54
,000 and they logically assume it is an absolute
5:58
lifetime cap per human being. They think, you
6:01
know, once I say $100 ,001, I am suddenly exposed
6:04
to rumen. But the sources are crystal clear on
6:07
this. That is simply not true. It is not true
6:09
at all. The most critical rule to internalize
6:11
today is this, the $100 ,000 limit is not per
6:15
person. It is per insured category, per member
6:18
institution. Per category. This is where the
6:20
magic happens for a saver. Let's walk our listener
6:24
through these specific categories slowly. Yeah,
6:26
we should because they possess an incredible,
6:29
almost hidden multiplying power. So what's the
6:32
first one? Let's examine them. The most common
6:34
category is deposits held in one name. Your own
6:38
name. Okay, just a solo account. Right. This
6:40
includes your standard daily checking account
6:42
or a basic personal savings account. That is
6:46
category number one. You have up to $100 ,000
6:49
of coverage sitting right there. But what if
6:51
I'm married or sharing finances and we have a
6:55
joint account to pay the household bills? Does
6:57
that eat into my personal limit? Not at all.
7:00
That is a completely separate category. Wait,
7:02
really? Yeah. Joint deposits are covered as a
7:04
single unit up to $100 ,000 entirely separate
7:08
from your individual accounts. Wow. And what
7:11
about the money we set aside for the future,
7:12
like registered accounts? also entirely separate.
7:15
Your registered retirement savings plan, your
7:19
RRSP, is its own distinct category with its own
7:22
$100 ,000 limit. And the TFSA. Your tax -free
7:26
savings account is yet another completely separate
7:29
category. So that's four buckets right there.
7:31
And it continues from there. Trust deposits are
7:34
separate. Registered education savings plans
7:36
for your children, or RESPs, are separate. Registered
7:40
disability savings plans, or RDSPs, are separate.
7:44
Every single one of these counts as an isolated
7:46
bucket, each holding up to $100 ,000 of protection.
7:50
OK, let's ground this with a very specific, quiet
7:54
mathematical example from our sources just to
7:56
see how powerful this is in practice. Let's do
7:58
that. Let's imagine a single person. They're
8:01
sitting at home looking at their online banking
8:03
dashboard and they see a total wealth of $280
8:07
,000 sitting at one single banking institution.
8:10
Which is, you know, a very healthy sum. And naturally,
8:13
looking at that single big number, they might
8:15
feel a knot of anxiety thinking they are $180
8:17
,000 over the legal limit. Exactly. Yeah. But
8:21
let's look at how that money is actually distributed
8:23
across the architecture of the bank. OK. How
8:25
is it split up? Let's say they have $60 ,000
8:30
in a daily checking and savings account in their
8:32
own name. They have $120 ,000 locked into GICs
8:37
nestled safely inside their RRSP. Right. And
8:41
they have exactly $100 ,000 sitting in a TFSA
8:45
savings account. OK. Let's calculate that outcome
8:47
together nice and deliberately. Please. We start
8:50
with the $60 ,000 in the checking account. That
8:53
sits in the own name category. The limit is $100
8:56
,000. So that entire $60 ,000 is fully unconditionally
9:00
covered. That makes perfect sense. What about
9:02
the TFSA? Well, the $100 ,000 in the TFSA sits
9:06
in its own category. It is exactly at the ceiling
9:09
of the limit. Therefore, every single dollar
9:11
of that is also fully covered. Now for the tricky
9:14
part, the retirement money. The $120 ,000 in
9:18
the RRSP. Right, so the RRSP is a separate category
9:22
with its own $100 ,000 limit. Because there is
9:26
$120 ,000 inside it, the first $100 ,000 is perfectly
9:30
safe. It is only the remaining $20 ,000 that
9:33
exceeds the category limit. Wait, I have to pause
9:35
you there. because this completely flips the
9:37
conventional wisdom on its head. It really does.
9:40
Are you saying that out of a massive sum of $280
9:43
,000, only $20 ,000 is actually exposed to risk?
9:47
That is exactly right. So the instinct people
9:50
have to frantically open new accounts at five
9:54
different banks Just to stay under $100 ,000
9:57
is that often completely unnecessary? It is often
9:59
completely unnecessary. Understanding these categories
10:02
gives you far more room to protect your money
10:05
safely in one single place. That's amazing. Yeah,
10:07
it saves you the administrative headache of managing
10:10
a dozen different passwords, shuffling money
10:13
back and forth between institutions, and unnecessarily
10:16
fragmenting your financial life. But let me gently
10:19
push back on that $20 ,000 that is over the limit.
10:23
Yeah. What actually happens to that money if
10:26
the bank fails today? Does it just evaporate
10:29
into thin air? That is a very valid question.
10:32
It raises an important point about the reality
10:35
of bankruptcies. It doesn't instantly evaporate,
10:37
no. OK, good. But it does lose its absolute guarantee
10:40
that $20 ,000 becomes an unsecured claim against
10:44
the estate of the failed bank. I see. During
10:47
the liquidation process, which can take years,
10:50
you might eventually recover a portion of it,
10:52
perhaps 80 cents on the dollar, perhaps 50, perhaps
10:55
nothing at all. The guarantee is gone. and you
10:58
just stand in line with the rest of the bank's
11:00
creditors. Which is exactly why understanding
11:02
the limits is so crucial. You don't want to be
11:04
standing in that line. You really don't. So what
11:07
does this all mean for the types of money we
11:10
hold? We know how much money you can protect
11:13
by using these categorical buckets, but our sources
11:15
are very firm that we have to be extremely careful
11:18
about what kind of money we are talking about.
11:20
Yes, absolutely. Just because your money physically
11:22
sits within the four walls of a bank doesn't
11:25
mean CDIC covers it. This is a vital distinction
11:28
that causes immense confusion. We need to clearly
11:32
define what an eligible deposit actually is under
11:35
the law. Let's walk through them. What is definitely
11:38
inside the safety net? Well, savings accounts,
11:41
checking accounts, guaranteed investment certificates,
11:44
commonly known as GICs, other term deposits,
11:48
money orders and bank drafts. These are true
11:50
traditional deposits. And I noticed in our notes
11:53
that there have been some recent very quiet expansions
11:56
to this protected list. Yes, there have been
11:58
some really thoughtful updates to modernize the
12:01
system. Previously, if you held a foreign currency
12:03
deposit, like a U .S. dollar savings account
12:05
for your travels, it was not covered. Oh, wow.
12:08
But now? Now foreign currencies are covered.
12:10
Additionally, there used to be a rule that excluded
12:12
term deposits lasting longer than five years.
12:15
That restriction has also been removed. That
12:17
is wonderful news for long -term savers. It is.
12:20
But we also need to illuminate the shadows here.
12:22
What is strictly absolutely not covered by this
12:25
federal safety net. The list is just as important.
12:28
Stocks, bonds, mutual funds, exchange traded
12:32
funds or ETFs, cryptocurrency. And interestingly
12:36
enough, the physical contents of a safety deposit
12:39
box. None of these fall under C .D .I .C. protection.
12:42
I really need to challenge this on behalf of
12:43
our listener because the optics of this can be
12:46
incredibly deceiving. How so? Well, imagine you
12:49
walk into your beautiful marble -floored bank
12:51
branch. You sit down at a mahogany desk with
12:53
a friendly bank employee. They sell you a mutual
12:56
fund. OK. It has the bank's familiar trusted
12:58
logo right there on the glossy brochure. But
13:01
then a global recession hits. the market dips,
13:05
and that mutual fund drops significantly in value.
13:07
Right. Since I bought it physically at the bank
13:10
from a bank employee using money from my bank
13:13
account, shouldn't the bank's insurance cover
13:15
my loss? What's fascinating here is that lack
13:17
of coverage is a deliberate structural design
13:20
choice of our economy. It is not a flaw and it's
13:23
not an oversight in the system. A deliberate
13:26
choice. It feels like a betrayal to the consumer.
13:28
I understand why it feels that way, but it comes
13:31
down to the fundamental difference between lending
13:33
and risking. Lending and risking. Okay, go on.
13:36
C .D .I .C. protects deposits against institutional
13:39
failure. It is protecting you from the bank's
13:42
management making terrible decisions and going
13:44
bankrupt. It does absolutely not protect investments
13:47
against market losses. When you purchase a mutual
13:51
fund or a stock, you are knowingly taking a risk
13:54
in the global markets in exchange for a higher
13:57
potential return. Right. No insurance scheme
14:00
in the world protects you from simply being wrong
14:02
about an investment. Because if it did, the entire
14:05
concept of risk and reward would break down completely.
14:08
Exactly. A deposit is fundamentally a loan you
14:10
make to the bank with a guaranteed low return.
14:13
An investment is a risk you take in the wild
14:16
open market. Precisely. You cannot privatize
14:18
the gains of an investment while asking the public
14:20
insurance system to subsidize your losses. That
14:23
makes a lot of sense when you frame it calmly
14:24
like that. And speaking of the boundaries of
14:27
this system, we should briefly touch on provincial
14:29
credit unions. Yes, we should. Because many of
14:32
our listeners do their daily banking at local
14:34
credit unions, not the massive federal banks.
14:37
Right. So how does the safety network for them?
14:39
Well, credit unions has a different historical
14:41
route. They were often started by local farming
14:43
communities or local labor unions pooling their
14:46
resources. Because of this, they are provincially
14:50
regulated. Therefore, they are covered by provincial
14:53
insurance schemes, not by the federal CDIC we've
14:56
been discussing. And are those provincial limits
14:58
different from the federal ones? They vary wildly
15:01
province by province. In some jurisdictions,
15:04
the coverage limits can be much higher than the
15:06
federal CDIC limits. Really? Yeah. Historically,
15:09
some provinces have even offered unlimited coverage
15:12
on certain specific types of deposits to encourage
15:15
local lending. Oh, wow. But the crucial takeaway
15:18
is that you must look up the specific rules for
15:21
your own province as they operate under entirely
15:23
separate legislation from the federal machinery.
15:27
Here's where it gets really interesting. We have
15:30
established that if you put an eligible true
15:33
deposit into a federal CDIC member institution,
15:37
it is covered up to those generous category limits.
15:42
But our sources reveal a massive pitfall, a quiet
15:46
administrative trap lying in wait for the incredibly
15:50
diligent saver. The Shared Charter Trap. It is
15:53
one of the most dangerous blind spots in modern
15:55
banking. Yes. Let's build a scenario for our
15:58
listener to really visualize this. OK. Imagine
16:01
a very careful, very responsible person. They
16:04
have $180 ,000 in cash from selling a small business.
16:07
Right. They don't want to use different categories
16:08
like RRSPs or TFSAs. They just want the money
16:12
in simple liquid savings accounts. So they do
16:14
what they think is the absolute smartest thing.
16:16
They split it evenly to stay under the limit.
16:17
Exactly. They put $90 ,000 at one sleek online
16:20
bank and $90 ,000 at another completely different
16:24
online bank. And, you know, to their eyes, they
16:27
are dealing with two entirely separate entities,
16:29
two different names, two different colorful logos,
16:33
two completely different websites and mobile
16:35
apps. Exactly. You do the responsible thing.
16:37
You split your money to be safe and you step
16:38
right into a trap entirely because of corporate
16:41
branding. Why do banks even set it up this way?
16:44
It is primarily about market segmentation. market
16:48
segmentation. A massive parent bank might want
16:50
to attract younger, tech -savvy customers. So
16:54
they launch a sleek, mobile -only brand with
16:57
a fun name. Simultaneously, they maintain their
17:00
legacy brand for older wealth management. But
17:03
underneath the marketing facades, the sleek online
17:06
brand doesn't actually possess its own separate
17:08
banking license. It operates under the Massive
17:11
Parent Institution's single banking charter.
17:13
And for deposit insurance purposes, what does
17:15
that practically mean? Well, for deposit insurance
17:17
purposes, the government only looks at the legal
17:19
charter. That means those two seemingly different
17:22
brands share a single CDIC limit per category.
17:26
Oh, no. So our careful saver, who spent all afternoon
17:30
setting up different accounts, who thought they
17:32
had two safely insured buckets of $90 ,000, they
17:36
actually just have one giant bucket of $180 ,000
17:40
sitting at a single legal institution. Exactly.
17:43
And because the limit for a single category is
17:45
$100 ,000, That person suddenly has $80 ,000,
17:50
completely, totally uninsured. And the worst
17:53
part is they have absolutely no idea until it
17:56
is too late. They have no idea. That is genuinely
17:59
chilling. The illusion of safety. How on earth
18:02
does our listener protect themselves from this
18:04
corporate mirroring? You cannot rely on marketing,
18:07
and you cannot rely on the logo on the website.
18:09
You must check the CDIC public member list. OK,
18:12
the public member list. Yeah. It is a registry
18:14
freely available online. It clearly maps out
18:17
the corporate architecture, showing exactly which
18:19
trade names, digital branches, and online brands
18:21
belong to which parent member institution. That
18:25
is such a vital piece of homework. And this raises
18:28
an important question. What about foreign banks?
18:31
We see so many international banks offering high
18:34
-interest savings accounts online here now. That
18:36
is another excellent detail you must verify.
18:39
You need to investigate how that foreign bank
18:41
is legally operating within our borders. Okay.
18:43
Are they operating as a full Canadian subsidiary?
18:46
If so, they often hold CDIC membership. or are
18:50
they operating merely as a foreign branch? Does
18:52
that matter? It matters deeply. Branches often
18:55
do not hold membership. Never assume the safety
18:58
net is there simply because they accept Canadian
19:00
dollars. Always verify their CDIC membership
19:03
status directly. Let's soothe the anxiety a little
19:06
bit here at the end. I see that. We spent a lot
19:08
of time talking about limits, uninsured overlaps,
19:10
and what happens if a bank fails. And I think
19:13
in our minds, informed by old movies, we picture
19:16
padlocked glass doors, yellow caution tape, screaming
19:19
crowds on the sidewalk and waiting months for
19:22
a paper government check in the mail just to
19:24
buy groceries. Right. The classic movie bank
19:27
run. Exactly. What actually physically happens
19:30
when a bank fails today? Well, that Hollywood
19:32
version of a bank failure is exactly what the
19:35
modern system is engineered to prevent. The reality
19:37
is handled by CDIC's resolution powers and the
19:41
mechanism behind it. is far more graceful and
19:43
honestly quite fascinating. Graceful. How can
19:47
a corporate bankruptcy be graceful? Because it
19:49
doesn't happen by surprise. Regulators monitor
19:52
the capital levels of these institutions months
19:55
in advance. I see. If a member bank is failing
19:57
and hits a critical threshold, CDIC's primary
20:01
goal is continuity, not liquidation. They have
20:04
the extraordinary legal power to step in, take
20:07
control, and essentially restructure the failing
20:09
institution over a single weekend. Over a weekend.
20:11
Walk me through that timeline. Typically, regulators
20:14
will wait until the markets close on a Friday
20:16
evening, they step in and take control of the
20:18
failing bank. Behind the scenes, massive IT systems
20:21
are either merged or mirrored. CDIC might create
20:25
a temporary bridge institution, or they might
20:28
arrange for a healthy, stable bank to immediately
20:31
assume all the deposits and healthy assets of
20:33
the failed one. They work with the national clearinghouses
20:37
so that the plumbing of the financial system
20:39
isn't disrupted at all. So what is the customer
20:41
experience on Monday morning? Ideally, nothing.
20:45
Nothing. Nothing. You might log out of your banking
20:48
app on a Friday evening with the failing bank.
20:51
By Monday morning, your accounts, your historical
20:53
balances, your scheduled direct deposits for
20:56
your paycheck, your debit card, they just seamlessly
20:59
continue functioning, often under the umbrella
21:01
of a new stable parent bank. That is incredible.
21:04
The expected case of a modern bank failure is
21:07
a quiet administrative transition behind closed
21:09
doors, not a catastrophic loss of access for
21:11
the everyday citizen. That is profoundly comforting.
21:14
Knowing the quiet mechanics behind it makes the
21:16
fear just dissipate. It is designed to be invisible.
21:19
The best safety systems are the ones you never
21:21
notice are actually working. So what does this
21:23
all mean? To synthesize this beautiful, dense
21:26
information for you, our listener? Yes. Let's
21:29
bring it all together. Deposit insurance is a
21:31
powerful, incredibly generous tool provided you
21:34
understand the mechanics. It requires you to
21:36
know how the separate categories can multiply
21:38
your coverage, allowing you to keep your wealth
21:40
safely consolidated. But it also demands mindfulness.
21:45
You have to clearly distinguish between a true
21:47
safe deposit and a risky market investment. And
21:50
you have to look past the glossy marketing logos
21:52
to understand who actually holds the legal charter
21:55
of the bank you're using. It simply asks for
21:58
a small investment of your attention to grant
22:00
you a great deal of long -term peace. It really
22:03
does. As we draw this deep dive to a close, we
22:06
want to leave you with a final provocative thought
22:09
to mull over in the quiet moments of your day.
22:11
I want you to consider the very concept of risk
22:14
in our financial architecture. We spend so much
22:17
of our lives and so much of this session talking
22:20
about how to eliminate risk, but the system purposefully
22:23
leaves some risk on the table. Like the deliberate
22:26
lack of insurance for investment losses we discussed
22:28
earlier. Right. Think about it. If every single
22:32
financial decision you ever made, every stock
22:35
you bought, every business venture you funded,
22:37
were perfectly insured and guaranteed against
22:40
loss by the government, what would actually happen?
22:42
I mean, investors would never act carefully.
22:44
No, they wouldn't. We wouldn't do any research.
22:46
We would throw money blindly at the wildest,
22:48
most reckless ideas, knowing the safety net would
22:51
always catch us regardless of our foolishness.
22:54
Exactly. Risk is not a flaw in the system. Risk
22:57
is the necessary friction that forces us to make
23:00
thoughtful, considered decisions. It is the price
23:03
we pay for a functioning, growing economy that
23:06
allocates capital to good ideas instead of bad
23:09
ones. Without the possibility of loss, the engine
23:12
of economic growth simply stops. We return to
23:15
the code check at the Winter Gala. Yes. The system
23:17
only works because we trust the underlying mechanics,
23:20
but we also must take personal responsibility
23:22
for holding on to our own little paper tickets
23:25
and knowing exactly what they represent. Beautifully
23:28
articulated. The balance between institutional
23:30
safety and personal responsibility is where true
23:33
financial security lies. Thank you so much for
23:37
spending this deliberate, careful time with us
23:39
today. It has been a true pleasure exploring
23:41
the quiet machinery of this system with you.
23:44
May your financial life remain calm, clear, and
23:47
perfectly understood. Until next time, take care
23:50
of yourselves and take care of each other.