Latest / Honey Badger Radio / 70,000 Government Jobs are AFUERA! Charlotte Proudman Faces Suspension | HBR News 450

Transcript

70,000 Government Jobs are AFUERA! Charlotte Proudman Faces Suspension | HBR News 450 · Honey Badger Radio

0:03
This is HBr News Number four fifty seventy thousand government jobs are afoida. Charlotte
0:10
K. Kroudman faces suspension, where we talk about the news of the week
0:15
and give it the Badger treatment. Hello everybody, and welcome to Honey Badger
0:23
Radio. I hope you guys are doing well this week and that you're laughing
0:26
and all of this absurdity so that you are not consumed by it. My
0:30
name is Brian. I'm joined by my lovely co host as always, Mike
0:34
and Hannah Wallin. We have a great show line up for you guys today,
0:38
so please be sure to continue the conversations both in the chat as well
0:42
as the comments section. On this week's HBr News, We're going to be
0:46
talking about the gains, the recent gains made by Argentinian President Javier Milier Trudeau
0:53
on the other side of the of the conversation passes a new bill that sound's
1:00
a little anti free speechee and ber heard stand. Charlotte Proudman faces a potential
1:04
suspension. Suspension and more so, stick around, It's going to be a
1:08
good time and be sure to join us afterwards or the patron only show.
1:14
On this week's Patreon only show. I have this article from Business Insider entitled
1:19
the death of the Nuclear Family. The typical American family was always a blip.
1:23
It's time to rethink it where they put their anti natalism on full display.
1:30
Potentially we will find out what they have to say about that in the
1:34
Patron Show. So if you want to join us on the Patron Show,
1:37
you have to become a badgery yourself. Are going to feed thebadgeer dot com
1:41
and starting a monthly subscription five bucks a month will get you into our discord
1:45
where you'll be able to enjoy all of the additional content like our extra shows
1:51
and whatnot. And there's also lots of stuff going on in the community as
1:55
well, so please consider doing that. And also if you want to send
1:59
us a message and we will endeavor to read it on the show, by
2:04
going to eat the Badger dot com for slash, just the tip and we
2:09
will read your message. And you know, like when you send it,
2:14
I don't know why I'm like doing not well today. I don't know what's
2:16
going on in my head anyway, And if you don't want to, does
2:21
it not count as a threat to say death to the Nuclear Family? Does
2:23
it not even count as hate speech. The nuclear family, Oh yeah,
2:28
it's a concept. It's it's a physical thing that you can actually kill.
2:32
You can actually kill a nuclear family. But apparently you can say death to
2:38
the nuclear family. It's a good thing and it should happen, and apparently,
2:40
yeah, it's fine, it's fine. Well, there there are ways
2:46
to do it without admitting that you're actually doing it. Like if you redefine
2:52
the meaning of the word of the term nuclear family in a really small and
2:55
subtle ways, people will be like, oh, yeah, I guess,
2:58
I guess to some degree that sense. And next thing, I know,
3:00
we're extinct. So you know, this is why you have to like be
3:05
vigilant and call it out whenever you see it. We'll see what they're argument
3:08
that maybe they're going to make a really good case or getting rid of them,
3:14
and we could go back to what existed historically before the nuclear family,
3:17
where people would have, you know, like eight to ten kids because the
3:23
chances were some of them were going to die. That's that seems to be
3:29
what they were referring to so far as I could tell, Because there wasn't
3:34
really a time when it was normal for parents to be single, right,
3:38
So obviously it's it's they must be wanting people to have more kids. Yeah,
3:46
well that's the thing though a white people are there are still families where
3:50
there are like eight or nine kids. Oh yeah, So I mean this
3:53
is unless you're going to make it illegal to have kids, which they could
3:57
do. I mean, they did it in China. Why wouldn't they do
4:00
it here? I mean, this is the thing that is if they're if
4:06
they're saying it was a blip on the radar, if it was just an
4:10
abnormal thing. You know, they can't be talking about people having kids because
4:15
people have been in history. Yeah, I think I think people having kids
4:19
was a kind of big, kind of a big thing. So I don't
4:23
I don't. I don't know, but we will find out. So consider
4:27
joining us in the Patron Show to learn more. And if you don't want
4:30
to wake up one morning to find that we have been yeeded by the legacy
4:32
Internet, then first of all, get on alternate internet like rumble dot com
4:38
and follow us there. But if you don't want to avoid if you want
4:42
to avoid that, or if you want to be sure to be able to
4:45
watch our content, go to badger Feed dot com. That's badgerfeed dot com
4:48
or Honey Badger Radio dot com. All right, with all that out of
4:51
the way, I personally look forward to the death of illegal immigration. And
4:57
I can't go to Scotland now having said that, because they'll arrest me.
5:01
Oh yeah, yeah, I didn't. I didn't make Scotland one of the
5:04
stories, although I thought about it. Maybe I should have. You can
5:08
always bring it up. It's unavoidable. Really yeah. All right, Well,
5:14
anyway, let's let us get into today's stories. So we're going to
5:18
start by talking about Xavier Millie and his this whole thing. You're gonna say
5:32
it back, man, who's gotta say it back? It's like a prayer.
5:40
Argentine President Javier Milier slashes seventy thousand governments jobs as he continues massive reforms
5:47
for Argentina after being elected as a libertarian candidate Millia Chance campaigned heavily to cut
5:55
needless spending and purge corruption that comes out of much of Argentina's government workforce.
6:00
Millie announced the cuts during his closing speech at the International Economic Forum of the
6:05
Americas in Buenos Aires this week. So far, five thousand jobs have already
6:12
been cut, but more on the way. Seventy thousand will proceed in stages,
6:16
with at least fourteen thousand expected by the end of March. The Association
6:20
of State Workers is one of the unions representing public employees in Argentina. Ate
6:27
leader Rodolfo Aguilar called the layoffs illegal and unjustified. Says the says the guy
6:33
with the government job. Milai has described his process as a combination of chainsaw
6:40
and blender. Why not wood chipper or he's saving that for a different department.
6:46
Maybe the women's combination of chainsaw and blender right there. Yeah. He
6:51
claims that this approach is necessary to transform Argentina's economy. He also said that
6:58
anticipates a v shaped recover for the economy with short term hardships now before things
7:02
get better in the long run. Yeah. He has addressed critics saying that
7:08
quote there is a lot of talk that this is not sustainable. We did
7:13
what we had to do and that implies doses of courage that others do not
7:16
have and quote. Melie Is has pointed towards positive signs of his short term
7:21
and policies, showing that the peso's futures are aligning with the Central banks incremental
7:28
adjustment strategy and that the Central Bank is moving toward net neutral reserves. Do
7:33
do do do do do do do do do do do do do. People
7:42
are calling Malay the Argentinian Trump, But frankly that does him a disservice.
7:46
He's way better than Trump. Yeah. Trump tried to work with the swamp.
7:53
That was That was his biggest mistake. Yeah, there is no working
7:57
with these crooks. They are an org organized crime syndicate, not just in
8:01
Argentina but everywhere. They They're raison gesta is to shake you down as much
8:07
as they can, as often as they can, and in return they promise
8:11
to keep you safe from all the other mobs. But they don't. On
8:16
the contrary, they're in coats with all the other mobs, working together to
8:20
steal from you as efficiently as possible. Now they're at the point where they're
8:26
importing the other mobs and paying them to rob you through through squats, what
8:31
rights or just by giving you giving them your tax payer money to live their
8:41
high life in hotels and what. I don't know how bad it got in
8:45
Argentina, but over here north of my own border, i e. Scotland,
8:52
the government has already given up trying to solve or prevent crimes committed against
8:56
scotsmen. All they do is arrest innocent Scotsman for saying things the government doesn't
9:03
like, anywhere, at any time, for any reason. The law came
9:07
into effect on Monday, everyone's talking about and no JK. Rowling. They're
9:13
not going to charge you with these hate crimes. After all, you represent
9:18
one of the mobs with whom they are in cahoots, namely the feminists.
9:24
You can spew all the hateful bile you like against men and all they'll give
9:31
you is a pat on the head for doing their work for them. This
9:35
is how it got so bad. People will proclaim that they don't trust the
9:39
government even though they're on the exact same page as them at all times.
9:43
Miss andric Bycophobia. As far as the eye can see, they're lazy,
9:50
incompetent thugs who follow the at least resistance, So they go around kicking over
9:56
all the sand castles because it's a shitload easier than actually building them. The
10:01
first step is to stop feeding their missandric orcophobic ideology. The next step after
10:09
that is stop funding them, or at least give them less funding. We
10:16
we we can never altogether rid the world of criminals. It's you know,
10:22
it's it's it's an unfortunate element of of of of humans, especially as they
10:28
accrue in such numbers. The best we can do is diminish their organized stronghold.
10:37
And as long as we're forced to conform to the scam that is democracy,
10:41
the only way to do that is by voting foreign anarcho capitalists like the
10:46
Amlas. As soon as you have such an option, are and and yeah,
10:54
and give these criminals no quarter while they dream and lie and reathe their
11:01
way into the dustbin of history where they have always belonged. God Save Malay,
11:07
Long Live Malay. Where that was like that was the only good.
11:13
That's like the best story. I should have opened with something darker and ended
11:18
on this, but it's sometimes good to get get a happy start. And
11:24
that this is and I expect to see people pointing to the early hardships as
11:31
evidence that it doesn't work right, that it that it's a complete failure and
11:37
he needs to go back to big government, despite the fact that he is
11:41
predicting the early failures, the early hardships, that that they're going to be
11:50
sighting they won't, they won't stop people. Right. Oh, look,
11:54
look this is going on. Obviously you need more government, but you don't.
12:01
And in fact, it's it'd be very much like pointing to symptoms of
12:07
withdrawal as evidence that you need more heroin. And and unfortunately, government programs
12:13
are a lot like heroin. Once you start adding systems and agencies and departments
12:24
and regulations and benefits for the public that come at the expense of members of
12:33
the public, you end up with people who are so dependent on government that
12:41
they don't know what to do without it. And so we will have growing
12:46
pains, you know, we will see growing pains with that. And I'm
12:50
hoping that as the success of it starts to show that other nations will follow
13:01
instead of the world government that doesn't exist except for the fact that it does,
13:09
doesn't close in and and try to put a stop to what's going on
13:15
there, because that is a possibility, and it is a It is a
13:22
good story, is a happy story, and is also one that like kind
13:26
of makes you want to hold your breath a little bit and hope and be
13:31
worried. Yeah, it's it is good news. I'm overall mostly I'm happy
13:41
that he's like eliminating I think, uh, well, he's liminitting the gender,
13:46
women's and gender ministry. I mean that's that, like, that's that
13:52
is just incredible. I wonder what's like. I think what's going to happen,
13:58
what's going to have to happen, is that the people of Argentina are
14:01
gonna have to come together and support each other, because if it's true that
14:05
this is going to cause a lot of pain and suffering for in the short
14:09
term, it just means that the government was essentially standing in for a bunch
14:13
of stuff that individuals could have been doing, and now those individuals are going
14:18
to have to start doing And that's okay. I think that I think that
14:22
it will work out in the long run if they're willing to endure some short
14:28
term, you know, suffering. But I think that's how it's gonna have
14:31
to be, and then you'll see. I think that it'll take some time,
14:35
but as long as they stick to it, adapt and support each other
14:37
as citizens, we'll see a recovery and they may bounce back faster than we
14:43
think. Who knows, I think a lot of people really want this,
14:48
maybe not the unions and the people who depend on the state. But you
14:52
know what, they gotta go. So any other thoughts on this? Usually
14:58
the good news is short. One more time, all right, Well,
15:03
let us know what you guys think about this in the comments. I'm gonna
15:07
look at your superchows and we'll move on to the next door. So got
15:11
this one from my mini rant who gives us five dollars and says, I
15:15
wish people would understand the concept of opportunity costs. Every dollar taken to fund
15:18
a government job is a dollar taken away from the rest of the economy to
15:22
fund anything else. It's just funding. No no, no nose loan they
15:26
wait, let me finish, Let me finish, such as funding a small
15:31
business loan, to pay someone's paycheck, to sit in someone's savings account,
15:35
to mitigate risk as part of a rainy day fund, et cetera. The
15:37
government does not compete on the market. It can only use violence to abstract
15:41
resources to fund itself. It's not just taken away from from funding for something
15:48
else. It is stolen from members of the public. Every dollar that goes
15:54
to fund anything the government funds is taken under threat of force and forced incarceration
16:04
from members of the public. Mostly men. It's not taken from some other
16:11
part of the government that that isn't you know, being funded the same because
16:17
some other part of the government isn't getting the money. It's taken from you.
16:22
It's taken from your neighbors, it's taken from your boss. Your boss
16:27
can't give you a pay raise because he's paying for the welfare programs that support
16:33
the people that don't work, you know, or support the people who aren't
16:37
getting paid enough because their bosses can't afford to give them a raise because they're
16:41
paying for the welfare programs that support their employees less than a paycheck. Would
16:48
That's that's how the government is funded. Yeah, yeah, I'm triggered Michael.
16:55
When we hear government funding of one thing is bad because it means the
17:00
government can't fund something else. That's no. No, it's bad because it
17:06
means you got ripped off for nothing. You got ripped off to pay for
17:12
something that you could buy for yourself better and more easily if the government wasn't
17:18
stealing money from you and spending it on their way of doing that. All
17:25
right, Well, thank you for the superchow my mini rant, and next
17:30
I got one from Meredith Jigue is his five bucks and says HBr News for
17:33
fifty. The question about JK. Rowlings is will she make people feel a
17:37
false sense of security to citizens because of police refusal to arrest her, or
17:41
will she cross the turf line too many times to the point where her feminism
17:45
can't protect her any longer. The only thing I'll say about that is that
17:52
you are only a feminist until the feminist lobbies and the feminists that matter decide
17:57
you are no longer a feminist, and then you are the enemy of feminism.
18:00
This is what happened to Aaron Pitsy. Aaron Pittsy will tell you herself
18:03
that when she built the first shelter, she was a feminist. She believes
18:08
strongly in what they were doing. She probably agreed with most of their you
18:12
know, talking points and philosophy. And then when she was like, oh,
18:15
you know what, turns out women are just as violent in many cases
18:18
as the men are, all of a sudden she lost her cred as a
18:22
feminist. So Jickiy Rowling will likely inevitably cross a line if she hasn't already,
18:27
and she'll become the enemy of feminists. That our intersectionality will take over,
18:33
and I think it is taking over. That's right. She's never going
18:37
to do what Aaron Pitsy did, which is admit that women can be perpetrators
18:41
and men can be victed. Jicki Rowling's never going to do that. That's
18:45
what I was on about. It's like she's delivering the exact same message that
18:52
the Scottish government wants wants her to put out there. Women are victims and
18:56
men are oppressors. She's never deviated from from from that line. So of
19:03
course she'll never be arrested. It's not even because she's a billionaire. Like
19:07
if if if she was a billionaire saying hey, women can be cunts as
19:11
well, yeah, then she'd get arrested. But she's not good. She's
19:15
not gonna do that. It's just gonna be the little guys you know there,
19:18
and and not just because they're poor, but because they have anything to
19:26
say pushing back on on the feminist narrative or the eucophobic narrative. It's,
19:33
you know, that's that's always. That's all it's ever gonna be, just
19:37
just like hums of Us is never going to be arrested, no matter how
19:40
much he how much bile he spews about white people because that doesn't count as
19:48
hate. Hating white people doesn't count as hate. Hating men doesn't count as
19:52
hate. All hums of use have does is hate white people. All JK.
19:56
Rowling does is hate men. It's always gonna be fine. It is
20:00
always going to be this, this tooted justice system. Yeah. As long
20:03
as they hate, it's going in the right direction. Yeah, all right,
20:07
well, thank you, Oh go ahead. Okay. The really bad
20:11
thing about these laws is, you know, people don't really realize what's going
20:17
on with them. This isn't really about the subjects of speech that they're trying
20:23
to control. It's about creating a complicated web of laws that allow for the
20:32
arrest of anyone at any time, for any reason, with very little explanation.
20:37
Uh and and basically, if they continue and it's not just one place,
20:44
as we'll see in our later news news stories, this is happening in
20:51
multiple countries. But if they continue doing this, it'll it'll make it so
20:56
that you don't know when you're breaking the law. And then, I think
21:02
is the goal. If you don't know when you're breaking the law, then
21:04
you don't know when you're not breaking the law. And if you're inconvenient in
21:10
any way, whether it's you are opposing something that the government doesn't want you
21:15
to pose, or your home that you own is in the way of something
21:19
that they want to do, it doesn't matter. They'll find a reason to
21:23
arrest you, throw you in jail, take all your shit, and make
21:27
you persona on gratis and people will say, well, it wouldn't have happened
21:30
if you hadn't broken the law because they won't understand. But that's what's really
21:37
being done here, and that's going to continue until people get wise to it
21:44
and put a stop to it. Yep, thank you for that. And
21:51
next super chow, Richard Bierre gives us five dollars and said, I'll just
21:56
play you the soundby for that, since that's what you gave. And then
21:59
I got another one from Richard Beer for five dollars and he says, how
22:02
many ads have you seen for government subsidies this year? I heard about a
22:06
company that was given a government grant build a vehicle wash bay that they don't
22:11
use because of additional government requirements in order to operate it in compliance with regulations.
22:15
Ah the government, you have to for those ads, though, because
22:21
a lot of them are actually scams. There are now so many instances of
22:27
senseless and ridiculous free money that it's to the point now where you can't tell
22:38
what the scams are and what are not scams until you start investigating it.
22:42
And nothing is too ridiculous to sound realistic. So kind of watch off,
22:49
especially if you've got aging parents, you know, boomer parents that are actually
22:55
boomers. They may be looking at stuff on mine and think that they can
23:00
get paid for something that actually they're going to end up giving their financial information
23:07
to a scammer. So just another fun thing to be alert to. Yep.
23:15
And last I got a super chat from Zara ANX and he says all
23:19
of that pain you're feeling as you lift weight, says you should stop and
23:22
go back to your sedentary lifestyle because it's good for you. L M A
23:26
O. Thank you, Matt. Okay, well that Oh I think I
23:32
just got another one, another super chow Pierre. He says, you are
23:38
in compliance with the law as long as you weigh more than a duck.
23:44
Right, thank you for that. Okay, now, sorry about that sound
23:45
effect. Oh no, well we okay, So Hannah's getting tornado warnings.
23:56
So if she suddenly like drops out pretty a watch, that is that worse?
24:04
Yeah, well, hopefully nothing bad happens. We'll see let us know
24:12
if she drops out suddenly, that's why. But yeah, actually might to
24:17
the bathroom right now. Okay, it's a computer. Yeah, No,
24:23
it's a computer because it'll be easier than where. Yeah, we're in in
24:30
the in the area for it. So sorry, I'm gonna mute for a
24:33
few a few minutes and then when I get set up in there, then
24:37
I'll unmute. Okay, sounds good. All right, We're gonna move on
24:41
to the next story. Let us know you guys think about this one in
24:44
the comments section. All right, So the article that I have here might
24:48
be a tad hyperbolic. I will I will clarify after it's over. But
24:55
this is coming from the website is called the People's Voice dot TV and it
25:03
goes as follows. The Trudeau government, so this is in Canada has introduced
25:07
Bill C three sixty seven, which critics argue could criminalize expressions of traditional Christian
25:14
beliefs under the guise of combating hate speech. They specifically refer to anti Semitism.
25:19
The bill aims to redefine hate speech boundaries and could lead to penalties for
25:25
public expressions of Christian teachings, particularly on controversial topics like transgenderism. Past examples
25:32
such as the classification of Bible based criticism of homosexuality as a hate crime and
25:37
the imprisonment of a father for referring to his biologically female child as his daughter,
25:41
highlight a trend of anti Christian bias in Canada. These legislative changes pose
25:48
a significant threat to religious freedom and have sparked concerns about broader societal and legal
25:52
implications. And I say it might be hyperbolic because I shared this and somebody
26:00
who's a friend of mine that is like, you know, an NMRA,
26:04
but is definitely like a lefty MRA. He sees this as hyperbolic lie.
26:11
And he shows, honestly shows like a fact check that says Bill three C
26:18
three sixty seven is a private member's bill. Private members' bills don't often become
26:22
law. Bringing in public and reading aloud from the Bible are not mentioned,
26:26
all right, But let's specifically though, And I think this is worth pointing
26:30
out because I know that they frame it in a Christian context. But let's
26:37
back off of that for just a moment, let's just look at bill Okay,
26:45
summary this enactment and men's a criminal code to eliminate as a defense against
26:49
willful promotion of hatred or anti semitism, the fact that a person in good
26:55
faith expressed or attempted to establish by an argument and opinion on a religious subject,
26:59
or an opinion based on a belief in a religious text. So this
27:06
is not specifically about Christianity, although the person who is you know, wrote
27:12
the article is framing it in that regard. But if you just look at
27:17
it as a hate speech law, it almost doesn't matter. It's called an
27:23
act to amend the criminal co promotion or of hatred or anti semitism, So
27:30
like without we don't even basically that's the write up. If you guys want
27:33
to give your opinions on if it's fine, Yeah, yeah, go ahead
27:38
already. You can see a theme developing in tonight's show, folks, and
27:44
it's it's not even as simple as your government hates you. I mean it
27:48
does, but it's the hatred your government has for you is proportional to how
27:52
familiar you are, how much of a majority you are, and how male
27:59
you are, obviously, but missonry is static, as static as biological reality
28:07
actually is in reality, whereas oilcophobia is fluid gratically gaseous. Actually it changes
28:17
with the tides and with and with the ever expanding Overton window of progress.
28:26
Right now, they're cracking down on Christianity, despite how feeble and anemic the
28:32
Church has become as unfortunate as you may find that, and they're letting Islam
28:37
get away with anything and everything, despite how vividly homophobic it is not to
28:42
mention anti Semitic, not just in its texts, but in its practice,
28:52
which goes to show you it's nothing to do with protecting the Gaze or the
28:56
Jews. It's about destroying the majority in favor of the minority, along whatever
29:03
lines they can draw it. And what do you suppose is going to happen
29:06
when Muslims outnumber Christians. You might think that's when Sharia law takes over and
29:12
we magically flip from hating the majority to loving the majority. But you underestimate
29:21
the ruthless evil of the state. It is. It is greater even than
29:25
the ruthless evil of any other ideology. The state is even more evil,
29:30
even more totalitarian, than Islam. When you are the majority, they were
29:37
cracked down on you as well, because at that point you are a threat
29:41
to a big brother. You are necessarily the greatest threat to a big brother,
29:45
because you're anything that resembles a majority. What do you think will happen
29:49
if the gays outnumbered the straits? See It sounds implausible, I know,
29:56
but with enough sexual abuse, it could happen. With enough state sponsored euthanasia
30:03
targeted at the majority, it could happen. And that's exactly what's happening in
30:07
Canada. But you can already see what's going to happen to the gays as
30:11
they drift out of the minority class. Then next on the chopping block,
30:17
because compared to the trans people, the gay people are practically already a majority.
30:22
You may have noticed the pattern. The state is already far more interested
30:27
in pandering to the truons than pandering to the gays. The gays are so
30:33
nineties, man, we're sick of playing with that toy. Everyone has it
30:38
now. We want the new thing at all times. Yeah. It's I
30:45
don't know how telling it is that the government machine is so analogous to a
30:51
child, because it's allowed to be. It's allowed to be as immature as
30:56
it possibly can be because there's no one to hold it accountable for anything.
31:00
And what happens when even trans is the old thing? What happens when you've
31:07
euthanized so many, says people, that you're left with mostly trans. That's
31:12
right, same thing. Now you're the familiar thing, My triuney friends,
31:18
You're now in the in the crosshairs of the eucophobes. The state will not
31:23
stop until there is no majority left anywhere in the populace over which it rules,
31:30
and everyone is splintered and balkanized and assimized, and there is nothing left
31:36
to revere, let alone worship, accept the state itself, big brother itself.
31:44
Needless to say, we should be imploring the Christians to fight back,
31:51
and we should be imploring the straight people to fight back, but it doesn't
31:53
end there. We should be imploring the Muslims and the Gates to fight back
31:59
against what the state is inevitably going to do to you as well. Even
32:04
if you consider each other to be enemies in one way or another, please
32:08
understand you all, we all have a mutual enemy who is far more threatening
32:15
to your cohesion, your way of life and everything you hold it, no
32:20
matter who you are, and it's it is that, the cold, relentless
32:25
machine we call the state. It can't be bargained with, It can't be
32:34
reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity or remorse or fear, and it absolutely
32:39
will not stop ever until you are dead. This public service announcement concludes as
32:47
home, this is what're talking about for a while, And I've actually gotten
32:55
in trouble for talking about a YouTube memory hold some of my work over discussing
33:00
this, so I hope I don't memory hold this in this episode. But
33:08
in episode one of HBr Talk, I went over how political correctness is used
33:15
as a means of escalating tribalism and preventing rigorous political debate by using the intimidating
33:22
threat of being perceived as backward, bigoted, and ignorant to course the public
33:29
to speak and act as if the preferred realities of the elitist correct population are
33:36
real. And then I went on to discuss in the dystopian quandary, the
33:42
steps that sort of go from zero to political mass murder by a government or
33:52
genocide, depending on whether you're looking at a group that's based around Pauloitics or
34:00
a group that's based around, you know, their race. They do this
34:04
to religious groups. This is something that's happened throughout history over and over again.
34:10
It's not there's not just one example that can be cited. Although there's
34:16
just one example that sticks in everybody's minds, and that it's actually quite sad
34:23
that that one example sticks in everybody's minds because there were genocides and political mass
34:30
murders that were bigger and crueler. And so when you start by dehumanizing a
34:40
group and making them the bad guys in a war of political correctness, that's
34:47
that's that pretty much sets the stage for people to accept atrocities against them,
34:55
people to accept abuses, and then uh denials of of them being able to
35:02
participate in society on the same level as everybody else, and denials of them
35:08
having the same rights and freedoms as everybody else. And then it gets worse
35:15
as the stages go to where they're getting attacked in the streets by people,
35:20
to where uh, their businesses are being boycotted, to where they're their their
35:28
humanity is being discounted by their neighbors. And that's when it gets to the
35:35
point where a government can actually start imprisoning and you know, killing people,
35:43
and people will let it happen, and they'll they'll do nothing. They've already
35:50
seen the group being defined as having a common characteristic right. They all have
35:55
a set of beliefs, they've we've already seen them being defamed as having unacceptable
36:02
traits of character. Oh, they're all bigots because they have this set of
36:07
beliefs and collective guilt, historical guilt. And there are people that demonize Christians
36:15
as having inferior qualities as well. Oh, you must be crazy to believe
36:20
in that evil Skydaddy. You shouldn't be allowed to vote because you believe in
36:23
a sky Daddy. Like That's that's pretty much, and it usually targets Christians
36:30
too. It doesn't when I hear this stuff from people, it doesn't.
36:32
It's not about all religions. It's specifically targeted to Christians. These traits aren't
36:40
treated as just common problems within the group, but as like natural or defining
36:45
characteristics and therefore inevitable right. You can't do anything about it, And in
36:54
treating it that way, you set the stage, you create the mentality for
37:01
people to accept These people just need to be, you know, shuffled off
37:07
into special places where they can be taken care of because there's something wrong with
37:13
them. And that's where we are now, that's where people are talking.
37:19
Now. That's basically the reason why Trudeau wants to do this. It's basically
37:24
the reason why you're seeing various nations outlining types of criticism of human behavior.
37:35
That what they're outlying, generally speaking, targets people with certain religious beliefs.
37:43
That's the first group they go after because it's easy. You're allowed to be
37:49
prejudiced against people with certain religious beliefs as long as it's not certain other religious
37:53
beliefs, right, and you're allowed to be you're allowed to be prejudice against
38:00
people with certain skin colors as long as it's not people with lighter shades of
38:05
certain unskinned other skin colors. And uh so, yeah, we've we've we've
38:10
hit the villain stage. That's that's actually pretty far down the scale, pretty
38:17
far along toward uh government mass violence, government sponsored mass violence. So you
38:29
know, if you're celebrating this because you're atheist, you're part of the problem.
38:36
And if you're if you don't care because you're not Christian, you're part
38:40
of the problem. You're basically creating a pathway for you to be next mm
38:47
hmm. And and nobody should be subject to this. Christianity is the only
38:57
Abrahamic religion that it's completely okay to deep there is there is no there is
39:01
no lobby group that will slander you. There is no media institution that will
39:09
come forward and slander you or you know, stepping out like I don't know
39:15
for for criticism. It just won't happen. They're the only ones. And
39:21
frankly, in certain parts of the world you might not know, but there
39:23
are you know, parts of the Middle East and Africa where there is a
39:30
large Christian population and they are tact I mean in Ukraine, for example,
39:37
Zelensky banned the Orthodox Church there and his claim was that it was like connected
39:44
to Russia, and he used it to eliminate the only religious institution they had
39:50
there and instead he replaced it with a state religion. State is now the
39:54
religion in Ukraine. But we're not supposed to criticize that because putin bad in
40:01
Israel, the Israel Gaza or Israel Hamas situation, Israel bombed a an Orthodox
40:10
church that was there that there were twelve Orthodox Christians, including the priest that
40:15
died. They claimed that is because you know, Hamas was hiding behind human
40:22
shields in an Orthodox Christian church. Oh and again, nobody can get upset
40:30
about that. Nobody can say anything because they're either going to be called an
40:31
anti semi or they're going to be called Islamophobic because we have those weapons.
40:37
But there is nothing for the Christians. So and again, yeah, go
40:39
ahead, Mike, Well, we learned since October the seventh's it's not that
40:44
Christianity is the only Abrahamic religion. They can be attacked. You can attack
40:47
Judaism as long as you do it on behalf of Islam. You can attack
40:53
Islam as long as you do it on behalf of even Judaism, but specifically
40:59
Israel ills fucking weird. It's women women. You can attack anyone you like
41:06
as long as you are a protected group. It's that Christians aren't allowed to
41:13
criticize anyone else, let alone attack anyone else, you know, Yeah,
41:21
and uh, well, and again the broader point is this, though,
41:23
because I think that the that the if you look at the bill, doesn't
41:29
specify Christianity. It just says anti Semitism. So it's possible that it was
41:35
put into place because of pro Palestine protests happening in Canada, because I know
41:42
that was happening in the States in all of the major cities, and it
41:45
was because of the you know, the woke activists that the state created,
41:51
and they ended up criticizing Israel because they saw them, they did. All
41:54
they see is that it is what they perceive as the power dynamics. And
41:59
I think the same thing may have happened in Canada and there this is damage
42:02
control. But the thing is, I think it's Christianity that will be targeted
42:07
even though they're not involved, I mean largely. And I think that the
42:14
really important thing is because I know that they are atheists that wash and I
42:17
know that they have their you know, their beliefs and everything. But the
42:22
thing is that is that this bill can't apply to anyone and if it's like
42:25
Canada doesn't have free speech, they don't have a First Amendment. So it's
42:30
just a matter of time before it gets I mean, like right now in
42:32
Canada, if you if you address, like if you have a child and
42:37
the child is convinced by their teacher that they're transgender and you say no,
42:43
I'm sorry, honey, you're not you're not actually a boy or a girl,
42:46
then the state can just come in and call it hate speech and take
42:50
your children from you. And they have done this. So like you know
42:52
this, remember Bill C sixteen. Remember farn Meyer was speaking and saying,
42:59
you know, this is a bad idea. Jordan Peterson was speaking. It
43:01
passed through anyway, and as soon as it did, the transactivists were like,
43:06
it's the law now. They were telling you to your face, we're
43:07
going to use the state against you. You don't give us what we want,
43:12
we will terrify you until we get what we want. And that's what's
43:15
happening. And this is just another step down that same path. So you
43:19
know, if you're focused on the fact that the person who wrote this is
43:22
a Christian concerned about it targeting Christians, you're looking at it in the completely
43:27
the wrong way, especially if it bothers you. Here's the thing about the
43:30
guy who responded to me that was like scoffing at the idea because he was
43:35
an atheist and he thought that this was like some Fedora tipping moment that he
43:38
could take. And it's like dude, it doesn't matter what you believe,
43:42
Like if you live in a Muslim country. Let's say, let's say you
43:45
live in Iran and you're an atheist. Guess what. Your atheism doesn't mean
43:50
shit there. You can call him Skydaddy all you want. You are now
43:53
living under an Islamic state, so you're going to follow their rules or else.
43:58
So like your beliefs or lack thereof don't matter depending on the context you're
44:01
in if the people around you believe it. And guess what is basically real?
44:07
So you know, and yeah, I mean you should be. You
44:10
should be against this kind of thing on principle. That's it. We'll stop
44:15
on principle. Anyway. With that said, listen to you guys think about
44:20
this one in the comments, and we will you see if I got any
44:23
superchows or anything. Yes, I got one from Richard Again. Richard Pierre
44:30
gives us five dollars and says a thing that is that all of the mentioned
44:36
factions are all competing to be the government authority and excluding all other factions from
44:42
the seats of powers. So good luck try and get competing factions to work
44:45
together for any purpose when they are all after the top seat of authority.
44:51
Yep, thank you for that. And then I got one from the One
44:53
good Man. Oh, welcome, do we have the one good Man in
44:55
our chat? I was hoping he would come along. I meybe we can
44:59
convince to stop simping. The One good Man gives us five dollars and says,
45:02
have you trued put a diverse chick in it and make it gay?
45:07
And I want it lame? Have you tried? I think it's what you
45:10
wanted to say. Put a diverse checken it maker gay and lame. Thank
45:15
you so much for the super child. Appreciate it. Let's get to get
45:20
a little bit of levity in here. Oh and I got one more from
45:22
Richard again, who gives us five dollars and says Canada is trying to make
45:27
up for applauding in parliament. A World War II veteran from Ukraine who turned
45:31
out to be a not see. I don't think I think he could see
45:37
just fine and see that everyone was cheering for him. He was. He
45:42
fought the Soviets. He fought the Soviets right in World War two? Pretty
45:46
sure? Yeah, Yeah, that's totally it, That's totally it, right,
45:52
let us know what you guys think about this one in the comments.
45:55
We're gonna move on to the next story. All right, So, a
46:00
social media influencer who sexually assaulted a fourteen year old boy twice in one night
46:07
has claimed to have no sexual interest in children, a court has been told.
46:13
A forty six year old woman who cannot be identified for legal reasons,
46:16
was jailed earlier this month for two counts of aggravated a sexual intercourse with a
46:21
child under sixteen years old. A jury found that she had climbed into bed
46:24
with the teenager on an evening in mid twenty twenty one and kissed him.
46:30
Don't tell your father about this, the woman told her victim, before taking
46:34
off his clothes and undressing herself. She then forced the team to engage in
46:37
oral and penetrative sex. On March first, Judge Sarah Hopkins sentenced the influencer
46:44
to at least eighteen months in jail, with a maximum of three years behind
46:46
bars. However, the judge told an NSW district court on Tuesday she had
46:52
omitted part of her judgment during sentencing proceedings. She amended the record by clarifying
46:58
that she had relied on expert opinions, and the influencer had a low risk
47:02
of reoffending. Judge Hopkins highlighted the conclusion of forensic psychologist Stephen Woods that there
47:09
was no evidence the forty six year old woman had pedophilic tendencies. No evidence.
47:16
Professor Woods found she had no sexual interest in children. She said the
47:21
influencer was three times older than her victim when she snuck into a bed and
47:24
raped him in the middle of the night. Judge Hopkins determined the woman had
47:29
quote good prospects of rehabilitation end quote because quote the offenses were isolated end quote,
47:36
and she had committed to abstaining from drugs and alcohol. During the sentencing,
47:40
the judge accepted the sexual assailant had been experiencing a quote complex combination of
47:46
comorbid mental disorders end quote at the time of the grape. She said,
47:52
also quote in all probability it was symptomatically acute at the time of the offending
47:59
end quote. Court heard the woman who had previously sought treatment for an eating
48:04
disorder, anxiety disorder, and adjustment disorder. In light of my failings as
48:07
to the connection between the offending and the offender's mental issues, I accept the
48:13
offender's moral culpability is reduced, Judge Hopkins said on Tuesday. She also found
48:17
that there was justification for a longer parole period due to the onerous conditions of
48:22
custody for the influencer, who had been subjected to quote threats and harassment behind
48:28
bars. The forty six year old is likely to remain in protective custody for
48:32
the remaining length of her sentence due to her profile and the offenses that she
48:37
committed. She will be eligible for release in less than a year on February
48:40
twenty six, twenty twenty five. Earlier this month, her lawyer confirmed the
48:45
forty six year old woman will appear will appeal her conviction. The influencer has
48:50
denied engaging in sexual activity with the teen beyond a kiss, which she said
48:54
she stopped before it went any further. However, the jury found her guilty
48:59
of engaging in oral sex with the teen before having penal vaginal sex with him
49:04
in three different positions. Merely two hours earlier, the influencer was filmed performing
49:08
a sexually suggestive dance for the fourteen year old boy. In the video shown
49:14
in to the court, she can be seen caressing her bum. This is
49:17
in English article, so lifting her skirt to reveal her stomach, and twerking
49:23
in front of the victim. Judge Hopkins previously said the forty six year old
49:28
appeared to be very intoxicated in the video. The woman claimed she had drunk
49:32
one and a half bottles of wine on the night of the rape, while
49:36
the victim estimated she had consumed twice that amount. A few days after sexually
49:40
assaulting him, the court heard, the influencer told the teen to quote just
49:45
keep this quiet for a bit end quote. Yet, in a lawfully tapped
49:50
phone call a year later, the forty six year old laughingly admitted her attraction
49:53
towards a fourteen year old boy. I started loving you so much that it
49:58
got confused, like I started getting attracted to you. She told him,
50:00
you're a man. Now, you're not a boy. You're obviously a man.
50:05
She said during the call, the influencer, you urge the victim several
50:08
times not to tell his father about the late night sexual assault. I'm hearing
50:14
a great deal of excuses from this woman along the lines of it's something something
50:22
drugs and alcohol, something, something mental disorders, something something anorexian shit like
50:29
this, anxiety eating the story, anxiety and stuff that happens to normal people
50:34
all the time. I wonder how paradoxical it is to notice there's no greater
50:38
predictor for victimizing behavior than victim mentality. This is this is often expressed when
50:50
it comes to male feminists. They adopt the feminist mindset as a cover for
50:55
their sex pesting, or indeed, great if you want to call it,
51:00
as a mechanism for automatic forgiveness for the transgressions to which they are so inclined.
51:08
It's annoying the way people ascribe this specifically to male feminists, as though
51:15
it doesn't apply to female ones. If anything, it applies more to female
51:20
ones, and for even more sinister reasons. Women adopt this victim mentality not
51:27
as a rectoactive cover for any atrocities that they that they might commit, but
51:30
as a prescribed proactive reason for getting away with anything. They're not even putting
51:38
the cart before the horse. First, they decide that they are victims,
51:45
and they are victimized just by virtue of being female, and then by some
51:51
mad coincidence, they conclude nothing they do to any male bodied individuals can possibly
51:58
constitute victimization of those male bodied individuals, or even any female bodied individuals for
52:04
that matter. If you've decided ahead of time that you are necessarily a victim
52:12
just because you're a woman, then you can justify any action you take as
52:15
being not victimizing. You can rape a man and it's not rape. You
52:22
can rape a woman and it's not rape. You're rape but child, and
52:24
it's not rape. You can do anything that takes your fancy, no matter
52:28
how exploitative, no matter how sadistic, and you never have to burden yourself
52:35
with any remorse because you do not possess the appendage or indeed, the identity
52:43
that you have decided by foregone conclusion is by definition necessary for rape to have
52:47
even taken place. This is only compounded when such a mindset is enshrined by
52:54
law. When the system put in place to prevent rape doesn't even acknowledge it's
53:00
that anything you do could ever be rape. Of course you're going to indulge
53:06
every whim safe in the knowledge that you can never be called a rapist.
53:12
Just try and think about this, folks, whenever you're saying something something male
53:16
feminist, as though it's somehow the maleness that makes male feminists so very rapey,
53:24
it's not. It's the feminism. Female feminists are, if anything,
53:30
even more rapey. Male predators use feminism to pretend they care about other people
53:37
as a smoke screen, whereas female predators use feminism so that they genuinely don't
53:45
have to even bother pretending to care about other people. It's not even a
53:50
smoke screen. It's a sword and a shield. And when you deflect the
53:58
evils of feminism onto men, then I'm sorry to tell you, but you
54:06
hashtag are their shield and their sword. I imagine the good we could do
54:12
for society if we made some effort to stop women from raping quite so very
54:17
much. Women aren't inherently any more rape than men, as far as I
54:23
can tell. But when you give them an ideological excuse to get away with
54:29
anything, you make them a great deal rapier. And that goes for any
54:35
other demographic for whom so many excuses are made. No demographic is inherently evil.
54:44
It's only when you overlook the possibility that anyone among them even can be
54:50
evil that you that's when you make all things possible. This has been done
54:57
along racial lines. Has been done along religious lines, but they're all just
55:01
secondary and tertiary symptoms of what has been done along the lines of gender for
55:07
a very bloody long time. If you don't like where it's going, then
55:15
start where it started. It started with this unfounded, knee jerk assumption that
55:21
women as a demographic are victims and that men as a demographic are the perpetrators
55:28
of that victim. It's not true, it's never been true. That's the
55:32
head vampire, and as long as it continues to walk this earth, this
55:38
shit will keep happening. Else to tell you public service announcement. Conclude,
55:46
something that Peter Wright highlighted on Twitter a while back was there's and this is
55:54
from a book about female sexual aggression, but there was a study on women's
56:07
motives for sexual aggression and sexual initiation, which obviously you can't really lump those
56:15
together, but they did for the study. So it ranged the answers ranged
56:23
from things like mutually consenting contact, which obviously is a motivation for sexual initiation,
56:31
and then as you get to the bottom of the list, you get
56:37
methods instead of motives, and some of them were violent, and it is
56:43
not uncommon. In fact, you know feminists made this big deal about a
56:49
study in which, in a feminism course, one in three of the male
56:59
students answered questions in a way that the researchers were able to interpret to say
57:06
that if nobody would know about it, they would engage in a whole set
57:09
of rape behaviors. But they interpreted that basically by taking answers that were anything
57:20
from probably not too yes and lumping them all in as yes answers. This
57:27
wasn't like that. This This was was women actually answering yes to things that
57:32
they did. And on this list you had by using the other person's age
57:45
when he was a miner and you were not. Twenty nine point three percent
57:52
of the women answered yes to that when he was a minor and you were
57:55
not, and then twenty six point five by using a position of power and
58:04
authority. So this isn't something that like, yes, this kid was a
58:09
minor, and I think that was a factor in this. I don't believe
58:15
the claim that she was not attracted to him because he was a minor,
58:22
that there was some other reason, because otherwise she would have done this with
58:25
an adult, right. But I will bet this woman was also in a
58:31
position of power here besides her age, being in a position of power like
58:37
a babysitter or a stepmother, or you know another situation, a tutor,
58:45
something where this kid had to interact with her and was regularly exposed to her.
58:55
And this, this predatory behavior isn't anymore rare with women than it is
59:00
with men, and in fact, it might be more common. The thing
59:04
is that the crap that she says about being abnormal in various ways, the
59:08
anxiety, the various mental health conditions, the being too drunk and all that,
59:15
those things are factors. In cases of male perpetrators. They're considered to
59:21
be things that the court can look at in terms of, all right,
59:27
how do we how do we direct this guy's treatment program so that we can
59:35
prevent him or discourage him from recidivism meaning perpetration again, that's where that goes.
59:44
It's not are we going to convict him or not. It's all right,
59:49
we know all these things we're contributing factors. How do we get him
59:53
into a better mentality so that he will not perpetrate Again, Women shouldn't have
1:00:00
any different than men either. You totally change the system for everybody, and
1:00:07
these extenuating circumstances become a reason to change the whole incarceration system so that you're
1:00:19
not treating people as if they are just out of the blue with no extenuating
1:00:24
circumstances, willfully committing crimes, or you change the system so that women are
1:00:32
treated like men, and they do get convicted, and they do get incarcerated,
1:00:37
and then you figure out how to engage in treatment so that you can
1:00:43
change their mentality so that they will not commit the crime again. And it's
1:00:50
really important too, because when boys are sexually abused like this, they become
1:00:59
up to eight times more likely to commit suicide. They become up to forty
1:01:04
four times more likely to engage in abuse of substances, which can be a
1:01:10
slow suicide. Forty four times more likely. This kid has just been put
1:01:17
on a path that can lead to self destruction on many levels. He is
1:01:27
now more likely to have difficulties in his relationships with women. So if he's
1:01:32
heterosexual, that's going to affect his ability to find a partner, create a
1:01:39
partnership, an intimate relationship, and start a family. And if that's something
1:01:45
that he wants to do, and she just fucked it up for him,
1:01:50
She just ruined his life. Right, he's in a set of victims that
1:01:59
are more more likely to question their sexuality, so they're they're basically experience experiencing
1:02:06
a type of dysphoria. Uh. And he's in a set of victims that
1:02:12
are more likely to engage in a whole range of potentially self destructive behaviors,
1:02:17
to not do as well in school because of the stress of their situation,
1:02:22
to have their career path affected by that. Right, this isn't just a
1:02:28
minor thing that she did, and him being a boy doesn't just make it
1:02:32
a minor thing. And this is something that we have talked about over and
1:02:37
over again every time we see one of these stories. And if people didn't
1:02:42
care about anything else to do with this story, all of the bad things
1:02:47
that she has just inflicted on this boy, he's also more likely, or
1:02:53
at least he's in a group of victims that are more likely to be perpetrators
1:03:00
than non victims in their later life. So if people can't be compassionate,
1:03:08
at least maybe they could be mercenary enough to care about this because of how
1:03:14
she could have warped them. But chances are she'll probably get more lenient treatment
1:03:22
because she's a woman and she won't be treated like a man. Now,
1:03:30
the part of this is the worst part about this is people who are in
1:03:43
prison for sexual crimes. The overwhelming majority of them, over ninety percent,
1:03:51
have experienced sexual assault themselves. So what is going to happen. I'm going
1:03:58
to make a prediction, although I may not be around to see the conclusion
1:04:00
of it. This fourteen year old boy who was sexually assaulted by this woman
1:04:08
who did not really like suffer, you know, massive consequences, is now
1:04:14
at a much higher risk of going on and sexually assaulting somebody himself unless he
1:04:19
gets like a lot of help and sort And if he does, that will
1:04:24
make the news. That person will see like real jail time, and the
1:04:29
narrative will continue. It will become a story about patriarchy and men because the
1:04:36
abusive boys is ignored. And the reason why is because it benefits these people
1:04:43
in the long run, because the abused boy goes on to abuse, and
1:04:45
then when they abuse, they become That becomes the story and not where it
1:04:50
came from. And if you look over ninety five percent of criminals of felons
1:04:56
that are in prisons for violent crimes where themselves abused as children, and they
1:05:01
don't have mothers or they don't have fathers I'm sorry, in the home,
1:05:05
and they go on to do these things. And what do these people do?
1:05:10
What do the intellectuals do? What do the politicians do? What do
1:05:13
the media people do? What do the podcasters do? They look at that
1:05:16
and they say, oh, that's just men like they treat it like it's
1:05:20
in a vacuum. So this is what is gonna happen. This is like
1:05:27
this boy, if he goes on to offend, that will be the story,
1:05:30
not the woman who did this to him. Oh anyway, those are
1:05:38
my thoughts on that. I don't know if you guys have anything else to
1:05:41
add, but and move on to the next story. I got a super
1:05:45
chow from Richard Bierre, thank you, and he gives the five bucks and
1:05:49
says her being intoxicated at the same at the time of the incident would make
1:05:53
the underage boy the perpetrator. I'm surprised that she didn't try that angle for
1:05:57
her defense and claim victimhood. Well, she only kissed them. Something that
1:06:02
needs to be enacted, actually is perpetrators need to have to pay for the
1:06:09
victim's therapy. If that's not already a thing, it needs to be,
1:06:15
and the victim's therapy needs to you know, include efforts at re establishing their
1:06:23
confidence in themselves and their own sexuality and uh their goodness as a person so
1:06:31
that they don't end up, you know, becoming self destructive or becoming uh
1:06:39
destructive toward other people. She caused this, she should pay for it,
1:06:47
agreed, at the very least, right, yeah, at the very least.
1:06:57
I'm just I'm just saying Woodchipper, I mean, oh, yeah,
1:07:02
she should pay for his therapy, and then Woodchipper is a compromise. Well,
1:07:09
let us know what you guys think in the comments section. We're gonna
1:07:14
move on to the next story. Our last story of day is about Charlotte
1:07:20
Proudman. We are finishing on some good news after all. Yeah, yeah,
1:07:26
I guess it is good news. Yeah, Doctor Charlotte Proudman, a
1:07:30
barrister, faces disciplinary action for criticizing a family court judgment by Sir Jonathan Cohen
1:07:36
on Twitter. She accused the judgment of reflecting a quote boys Club end quote
1:07:42
attitude and demanded recusal of Philip Hayers, another judge and Garrick Club member from
1:07:47
her proceedings. Proudman's tweets could result in suspension or even a fine, with
1:07:54
charges of misleading information and offensive language. She denies all charges, arguing that
1:08:00
for her right to freedom of expression, suddenly the feminist cares about freaneddom of
1:08:03
speech. The case highlights concerns over judicial membership in exclusive clubs like the Garrick,
1:08:11
with implications for perceived bias and judicial conduct conduct. And by the way,
1:08:15
Charlotte Prodman was a staunch supporter of Amber Heard during the Amber Heard and
1:08:20
Gihin Depp and she probably still is actually so anyway, that's the in brief
1:08:29
so so basically it wasn't her family court case. She just commented on this
1:08:34
random case and insisted that this guy shouldn't have been on the case. That's
1:08:44
kind of with who is she to do that. She's not She's not anybody
1:08:51
special, She's not He's Charlotte Prodman. I mean, like we criticize all
1:08:59
the time, but it's interesting that that she called for a specific action against
1:09:08
this this Uh yeah, I mean you want me to go in into some
1:09:15
more detail. I'm kind of looking at the detail here. After considering her
1:09:21
request, he did review remove himself from the case. That's interesting. Yeah,
1:09:30
Oh that's the judge handling her disciplinary proceedings. Okay, so I don't.
1:09:38
Oh it's the men only Garrett Club over remarks he made in a family
1:09:43
case two years ago. So she just went after this this guy over his
1:09:56
reasoning and case. It says here there is no suggestion that Cohen and Haber
1:10:04
discussed this case, or any or any work matters or ever met at the
1:10:09
Central London Club. So she's like making allegations, but it highlights some of
1:10:13
the issues around public perception raised by the membership of significant numbers of Britain's most
1:10:16
senior judges of a club that has resisted calls to allow female members since the
1:10:21
nineteen sixties. So she's trying to enter in or use this as a way.
1:10:26
Traubman could face a twelve month suspension of her license or fine if found
1:10:30
in breach for posting a fourteen part thread on x holy crap that's muspurgy shit
1:10:35
then called Twitter in April of twenty twenty two. It expressed her concerns at
1:10:41
the tone of a judgment handed down by Cohen in relation to a family court
1:10:45
case. Three person disciplinary panel will consider the five professional misconduct charges against her.
1:10:50
Later this year, she is accused by the Bar Standards Board of tweeting
1:10:55
misleading information that inaccurately reflected the findings of the judge in a case in which
1:11:00
she was instructed. Interesting. I suspect then that she probably promoted the story
1:11:13
of the wife in that case with the mother of the kids. If it
1:11:16
was a custody case. Family court indicates maybe divorce and custody, but that
1:11:25
that would be what I would like. I don't pay a lot of attention
1:11:28
to her, but that kind of yeah, and made a long yeah,
1:11:36
she made a long thread about it, and she said things that are not
1:11:42
factual. I'll bet it's something along those lines. And that's an issue that's
1:11:46
that's kind of more widespread than just her. So it is nice to see,
1:11:54
uh, that that being done, although I still I don't know.
1:12:00
I'm it's interesting. It's interesting, you know that she felt entitled to call
1:12:08
for action and stuff. Other than her being a vocal support of Amber heard,
1:12:12
what else is Charlotte Prowman. I feel I know that name doctors not
1:12:15
involved in a case in the United States, and it helped to deny due
1:12:21
process to three young men who had had been accused of a crime. So
1:12:29
that's probably the most flattering picture of her, and she still looks really smugging
1:12:32
it. Yeah, it's amazing because I've seen her look as seen her with
1:12:39
her her hair really really short, like head shaved short. But yeah,
1:12:46
yikes, Mike, do you have anything. I didn't even know what she
1:12:51
looked like until you showed me that picture. None of that is important,
1:12:55
But the important thing is she's a massive hosebast and a cunt and I hope
1:13:01
that she gets recused all the way down to the botwels of hell where she
1:13:08
belongs. Okay, well, let us know what you guys think about the
1:13:17
story. Oh, mister O three or three says she was the professor at
1:13:20
Cambridge who organized the mob against Mike Buchanan and Elizabeth Hobson. That's where I
1:13:25
knew her from. Here we go, there we go. That's where I
1:13:27
knew her from. Thank you, mister O three oh three. Yes,
1:13:32
that's right. And I got a super chow from Richard Viere who gives us
1:13:39
five dollars and says, uh w Leaf in Canada is a bunch of legal
1:13:44
bloggers who sit on a court proceedings and then write about the judges in order
1:13:48
to nudge the outcome in a certain way. Next time you have Diana Davidson
1:13:51
on, ask her about that organization. I know that she mentioned it at
1:13:56
ICM nineteen. The majority of the cases, if I remember correctly, we're
1:14:00
those involving SA sexual assault, if not family court. Christine, is that
1:14:03
what the essay stands for? I assume, thank you Richard for that super
1:14:09
child. You know what? Actually I need to reach out. I found
1:14:11
something. I found something. Actually, Okay, it's another article, a
1:14:16
guest post and it Yeah, this is a guest post from doctor Charlotte Proudman,
1:14:28
family law barrister at Goldsmith Chambers, specializing in violence against women and girls.
1:14:34
She tweets as doctor Proudman, and then the article goes on it's a
1:14:42
it's criticizing a June twenty first, twenty nineteen Ministry of Justice announcement panel professionals
1:14:50
that will be reviewing evidence on how the family courts can better protect children and
1:14:56
parents in cases of domestic abuse and serious offenses. And so I think,
1:15:06
if that's her specialty, this has to have been a situation where abuse was
1:15:12
alleged and she didn't believe the evidence against it. Uh huh, and that's
1:15:25
probably what she went on her rant about. Yeah, well, or fourteen
1:15:32
posts. That does seem a bit excessive, she's basically saying. So,
1:15:40
she's basically saying that because this judge belongs to a club that doesn't allow women
1:15:45
in, that that makes him automatically prejudice against alleged victims of domestic violence.
1:15:53
And that's the factor that would do it. Nothing else, just the fact
1:15:59
that he is in a male only space. The feminists tell you that women
1:16:05
are not attacking male only spaces. There you go, there you go.
1:16:14
Well, let's see what happens. Hopefully there is some consequences. I mean,
1:16:18
I'm generally like or free speech, but I don't think Charlotte prowdman it.
1:16:24
Maybe she feels a thing. She'd be like, oh, I should
1:16:27
probably fight for that. The whole free speech thing seems kind of important.
1:16:30
All right. Well, with all that said, let us go into the
1:16:34
Patron Show where we're gonna be looking at this article that is about how the
1:16:40
typical American family was always just a blip. It's time to rethink it,
1:16:44
which is sounds like code for eliminate it. And let's all just I guess
1:16:48
go extinct for the planet. And I'm wondering if the person who wrote this
1:16:54
actually has a family, because most of the time I find that the people
1:16:57
who are the most anti natalists have families of their own. They just don't
1:17:01
want it for you, you know. So anyway, I hopefully I'll see
1:17:08
you guys in the Patron show chat and you could join us there by going
1:17:12
to feed the bachel dot com and starting a monthly subscription five bucks a month.
1:17:15
We'll get into our discord. Well you'll be able to watch all the
1:17:17
additional content are taking the chat and all of the community stuff, so please
1:17:21
consider doing that. Oh. Also, by the way, I'm gonna throw
1:17:25
this out there a quick little plug. There's a game called Content Warning on
1:17:30
Steam. It is free right only for only today, So like, go
1:17:34
look on Steam, see if it's there, see if you can get it
1:17:36
for free. It's an indie title. It's a four player co op horror
1:17:41
title. Okay, so call Content Warning, go check it out. I've
1:17:45
downloaded it. It was recommended to me by John, who is a gamer
1:17:51
gay two guy that was like, is trying to push people in, you
1:17:56
know, in the direction towards indies, so go check it out. Content
1:17:59
warning on Steam it's free. Why not only today though? Today? Is
1:18:03
it like? It might even not be available. I'm not really sure what
1:18:06
it's a twenty four hour period, it might be passed, but go check
1:18:10
it out anyway. Hopefully I'll see you guys in the Actor show chat,
1:18:15
but we're gonna head there now. So if you like this video, please
1:18:17
hit like subscribe. If you're not already subscribed to the bellfal notifications, leave
1:18:20
as a comment let us know what you guys think about what we discussed on
1:18:25
the show. There are links to all of the sources in the description or
1:18:28
yeah in the description of this video. And please please please share this video
1:18:30
because sharing is caring. Thank you so much for coming on today's episode of
1:18:34
HBr News and we will see you next Tuesday.