Latest / Speaking of Supply Chain / Automation Will Not Fix a Broken Process
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: Is putting some data around it, it's not getting distracted
- 0:03Speaker 1: by kind of all the shiny options out there, which
- 0:05Speaker 1: is very easy to do. And then it's saying, what
- 0:08Speaker 1: is the problem that we're actually trying to solve with
- 0:11Speaker 1: this automation? So are we trying to reduce headcam? Are
- 0:15Speaker 1: we trying to increase service level? Are we trying to
- 0:19Speaker 1: increase capacity so that we can acquire additional business?
- 0:25Speaker 2: Hello and welcome to Speaking of Supply Chain, where meboch
- 0:27Speaker 2: experts from around the world unpack the real stories, strategies,
- 0:31Speaker 2: insights and innovations shaping the future of supply chain. I'm
- 0:35Speaker 2: your host, Ellen Wood. Automation is one of the biggest
- 0:38Speaker 2: topics in warehousing right now. Everywhere you look there's talk
- 0:42Speaker 2: of robotics AI fully automated sites, especially across the UK.
- 0:47Speaker 2: It feels like we're on the edge of a major transformation.
- 0:51Speaker 2: But here's the question we want to explore today. How
- 0:54Speaker 2: much of it is real and how much is hype?
- 0:57Speaker 2: Because while the technology is moving fast, the reality of
- 1:00Speaker 2: the ground can look very different. The investments are huge,
- 1:04Speaker 2: the expectations are even bigger, and the outcomes are not
- 1:08Speaker 2: always what people expect. So today We're going to cut
- 1:11Speaker 2: through some of that noise and we're talking about where
- 1:14Speaker 2: automation is genuinely delivering value, where it's falling short, and
- 1:18Speaker 2: what businesses should be really thinking about before they take
- 1:21Speaker 2: the leap. Joining me today is Sophie James from our
- 1:26Speaker 2: UK office. Welcome, Sophie, hi Ellen. It's great to have
- 1:31Speaker 2: you back on the podcast.
- 1:32Speaker 1: Thanks for having me. It has been a while.
- 1:35Speaker 2: It has been a while. I was checking it was
- 1:38Speaker 2: episode number three, so it's it's been a while, far
- 1:42Speaker 2: too long since you've been across the microphone.
- 1:46Speaker 1: That's a hint to both of us, isn't it really so?
- 1:49Speaker 2: From your perspective, what's actually happening with automation in UK
- 1:54Speaker 2: warehousing right now?
- 1:55Speaker 1: I think a lot of this perception is that everybody
- 1:59Speaker 1: is automated, and everybody's going full hal gone automation right
- 2:02Speaker 1: and you know, you don't even need lights on in
- 2:05Speaker 1: the site because it's so automated it's dust or But
- 2:08Speaker 1: I don't think the reality is really quite as dramatic
- 2:12Speaker 1: as that. I think a lot more people are looking
- 2:15Speaker 1: at automation automation as a real short term venture, but
- 2:20Speaker 1: it's not kind of necessarily big bang, it's more okay,
- 2:25Speaker 1: what things could we automate within the site and small
- 2:30Speaker 1: introductions of automation, tasters of it in terms of maybe
- 2:34Speaker 1: packing or goods to person's solutions, rather than kind of
- 2:37Speaker 1: let's automate everything and kind of a full change. I
- 2:41Speaker 1: don't think people are quite doing it as big as
- 2:44Speaker 1: maybe the assumption maybe is.
- 2:47Speaker 2: I agree. I think that the media tends to really
- 2:51Speaker 2: dramatize the use of automation, and I think a lot
- 2:55Speaker 2: of that's that's driven by the vendors that are out
- 2:58Speaker 2: there trying to put out content. But it seems like
- 3:02Speaker 2: there's so much more hype about it and that it's
- 3:05Speaker 2: bigger than it actually is. So why do you think
- 3:09Speaker 2: that it's accelerating now?
- 3:12Speaker 1: Yes, it's a good question. I mean, I think previously
- 3:17Speaker 1: people have had automation on their kind of future plan,
- 3:22Speaker 1: and at some point we will automate if we know
- 3:24Speaker 1: we find the right topic. But there's some real problems
- 3:28Speaker 1: and real constraints that are happening in the world. You know,
- 3:32Speaker 1: labor being availability and cost being one of them, but
- 3:37Speaker 1: also the pressure from customers to accept perfection essentially and
- 3:41Speaker 1: the threshold for how long it takes me to get
- 3:45Speaker 1: something is a lot lower now than it used to be.
- 3:49Speaker 1: So these kind of ah, we'll look at automation in
- 3:52Speaker 1: the future at some point is actually now becoming let's
- 3:56Speaker 1: look at it now. And it's also more affordable. I
- 3:59Speaker 1: think not in every case, because we're still talking about
- 4:02Speaker 1: some big ticket items, but I think there's ways now
- 4:06Speaker 1: that there's different financing options and for automation, which makes
- 4:11Speaker 1: it a little bit more accessible for people. So I
- 4:13Speaker 1: think there's probably an element to that now about why
- 4:16Speaker 1: that's kind of accelerating the the want to look at it.
- 4:21Speaker 2: So when you speak to clients, what results are they
- 4:25Speaker 2: looking to actually deliver? You talked for a moment about,
- 4:29Speaker 2: you know, customer service and the demand for you know,
- 4:32Speaker 2: I want my I want my products, and I want
- 4:34Speaker 2: it now and perfection is the baseline. And I think
- 4:38Speaker 2: that there's there's a degree of truth to that that,
- 4:41Speaker 2: you know, we do have customer service standards that that
- 4:45Speaker 2: companies have to meet, But is that what their expectation
- 4:51Speaker 2: is perfection?
- 4:53Speaker 1: Yeah? I think yeah, it's a bold expectation to have, really,
- 4:58Speaker 1: isn't it. I think that the expectation is that there
- 5:00Speaker 1: will be a return on their investment. Ultimately, I think
- 5:04Speaker 1: the main point is to understand what that return on
- 5:08Speaker 1: investment really looks like. So typically the expectation would be
- 5:13Speaker 1: that it's I get some financial payback within a certain window,
- 5:17Speaker 1: but actually there's other benefits to automation that's not solely financial.
- 5:23Speaker 1: So that is that kind of service level offering, and
- 5:26Speaker 1: there should be the expectation that that will enable growth,
- 5:30Speaker 1: for example, into businesses or enable increased services to their
- 5:35Speaker 1: customers as well as potentially there will be a labor
- 5:39Speaker 1: saving as well as a business resilience piece, So that
- 5:43Speaker 1: kind of aspect of regardless of what labor force we've got,
- 5:48Speaker 1: we can do what we need to do for our customers.
- 5:51Speaker 2: And I know that when we talk about labor savings
- 5:54Speaker 2: it's always a touchy subject because you know, people need
- 5:58Speaker 2: to be employed. But if if people are not looking
- 6:02Speaker 2: for these jobs and these are tasks that can be automated,
- 6:07Speaker 2: there's always that fear around job loss that when a
- 6:10Speaker 2: company is going to put automation or automated material handling
- 6:14Speaker 2: into a facility, that it's going to take away jobs.
- 6:17Speaker 2: Is that what we're actually still seeing is that fear realistic.
- 6:22Speaker 1: It would be naive to not expect automation to replace
- 6:27Speaker 1: tasks that are manually done, because we would be assessing
- 6:30Speaker 1: a manual solution versus an automated solution. Automated solutions still
- 6:36Speaker 1: need some minding and care and maintenance by people. So
- 6:41Speaker 1: it's not necessarily that workforce is being eliminated, but the
- 6:45Speaker 1: nature of the work that is being done is changing
- 6:48Speaker 1: in reaction to what the automation is or what has
- 6:51Speaker 1: been implemented. And there are more technical skills that are
- 6:56Speaker 1: required to manage automation than potentially some manual tasks, which
- 7:00Speaker 1: are typically the ones being automated.
- 7:03Speaker 2: I can see that, and and I imagine when it
- 7:07Speaker 2: comes to you know, when these companies are looking at
- 7:10Speaker 2: these decisions that they have to make, you know, are
- 7:13Speaker 2: is there going to be a reduction in force or
- 7:15Speaker 2: is it simply repurposing that employee into a role that
- 7:18Speaker 2: is necessary that does require a human brain that cannot
- 7:22Speaker 2: be automated because there are so many there are so
- 7:26Speaker 2: many tasks and processes and things within within a business,
- 7:29Speaker 2: within a facility that that do require a human I mean,
- 7:33Speaker 2: even a dark store is going to have humans in
- 7:37Speaker 2: it at some point doing something. It's not we're not
- 7:41Speaker 2: living in the matrix exactly.
- 7:43Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, we're in the future, but not that far.
- 7:48Speaker 2: Where do these go wrong? Then? If it's if it's
- 7:50Speaker 2: not you know, the labor issue that you know they're
- 7:53Speaker 2: they're clearly able to find some return on their investment
- 7:56Speaker 2: by by repurposing the workforce that they have, and they're
- 8:00Speaker 2: going to be able to maybe achieve greater service levels
- 8:04Speaker 2: or enable growth within their company. Where do the projects
- 8:09Speaker 2: go wrong? Because that all sounds like it's win win
- 8:12Speaker 2: win exactly.
- 8:13Speaker 1: But I mean, we've all heard the phrase two get
- 8:15Speaker 1: to be true, right. I think the mistake that people
- 8:18Speaker 1: can make is that if you put bad information in,
- 8:22Speaker 1: you'll get bad information out. So if you are just
- 8:26Speaker 1: putting automation in without thinking about the process itself as
- 8:30Speaker 1: a bare bones process, there's likely to be some mistakes made.
- 8:34Speaker 1: So the kind of thing that we see is we
- 8:37Speaker 1: don't want to automate a bad process because then we're
- 8:40Speaker 1: still automating waste. What we really want to do, and
- 8:43Speaker 1: the advice that we would always give is, let's make
- 8:46Speaker 1: sure that the process makes sense first, and we optimize
- 8:49Speaker 1: what makes sense, and then we apply the appropriate automation
- 8:53Speaker 1: for the optimized process. Rather than let's just supersede everything
- 8:57Speaker 1: that we do now with something that does it a
- 9:00Speaker 1: little bit quicker and in a more technical way. So
- 9:03Speaker 1: that would be the kind of thing I would say
- 9:05Speaker 1: is one of the biggest parts. And the other part
- 9:09Speaker 1: is actually the acceptance of automation. So as I said
- 9:12Speaker 1: at the start, it's kind of not always just this
- 9:15Speaker 1: big bang solution of let's just wipe clean and automate everything.
- 9:20Speaker 1: Automation is now being introduced in stages into operations that
- 9:23Speaker 1: are already running alongside people who have been there for
- 9:27Speaker 1: maybe a quite long time. So there's also an acceptance
- 9:31Speaker 1: of the automation into the operation that needs to be
- 9:35Speaker 1: thought about and introduced carefully, because ultimately you need the
- 9:41Speaker 1: people that are still working in the operation to adopt it,
- 9:45Speaker 1: work with it, make sure that it is maintained, and
- 9:49Speaker 1: cooperate with it. And if they don't do that, then
- 9:51Speaker 1: that ultimately the process doesn't work. So there's a kind
- 9:54Speaker 1: of two main things. One is making sure the process
- 9:56Speaker 1: is optimal, and then the second is making sure that
- 9:59Speaker 1: it's in introduced and managed and implemented in the right
- 10:03Speaker 1: way with the right people on board.
- 10:06Speaker 2: I can imagine that that could actually be a benefit
- 10:10Speaker 2: when looking at automation when a potential solution is on
- 10:14Speaker 2: the table and we're looking at to your point, you know,
- 10:18Speaker 2: making sure that the process itself is first optimized, the
- 10:22Speaker 2: people or the knowledge about that process, what it entails,
- 10:26Speaker 2: you know, all the effort that's being produced, any exceptions
- 10:29Speaker 2: to that process. That is all information intellectual capital that
- 10:34Speaker 2: exists and resides in those people who have been doing
- 10:37Speaker 2: the process for so long, so they're integral to the
- 10:41Speaker 2: decision in order to figure out, you know, what that
- 10:44Speaker 2: process is and where automation is going to be helpful
- 10:48Speaker 2: or useful or valid even I think.
- 10:52Speaker 1: Are you finding those conversations, Yeah, absolutely, I mean it's
- 10:55Speaker 1: really it's not just a few parties that need to
- 10:59Speaker 1: be prevented to these conversations around what makes sense. It's
- 11:04Speaker 1: it's a wider view. It's not only operations, but it's
- 11:07Speaker 1: it it's hr it's all of the kind of departments
- 11:10Speaker 1: that have a play. But it's also okay, we optimize
- 11:14Speaker 1: the process, but we also need a view on what
- 11:16Speaker 1: is our ambition because there's change, you know, maybe we're
- 11:21Speaker 1: acquiring new product, maybe we're going to change the whole
- 11:24Speaker 1: size of our product. In the next few years. So
- 11:28Speaker 1: we need to also be looking at what things do
- 11:30Speaker 1: you want to achieve and what things are you planning
- 11:33Speaker 1: to change or what might change to make sure that
- 11:37Speaker 1: whatever the solution is is the right one, that's adaptable
- 11:40Speaker 1: and flexible enough to be able to cope with that.
- 11:44Speaker 1: And the best people to get involved in that other
- 11:46Speaker 1: people that are doing to do because they know it,
- 11:48Speaker 1: and they know it better than anybody else because they're
- 11:51Speaker 1: doing it day to day. So it would be really
- 11:52Speaker 1: foolish not to get some input from operations team when
- 11:56Speaker 1: assessing anything like any kind of operational change.
- 12:00Speaker 2: When it works well, the entire organization is involved, the
- 12:05Speaker 2: entire business is present and represented in the decision, and
- 12:11Speaker 2: everyone understands how this change is going to affect their
- 12:14Speaker 2: area of the business. That's what that's the ideal situation
- 12:18Speaker 2: for an automation transformation like this. On the other side,
- 12:23Speaker 2: when they're not aligned or when an automation project does
- 12:28Speaker 2: not get off the ground, is there some thread that
- 12:32Speaker 2: is of similarity between those? Is it lack of understanding
- 12:37Speaker 2: of what the organization needs? Is it those poorly executed
- 12:42Speaker 2: processes in the first place? What's causing these ambitions for
- 12:48Speaker 2: automation to fail.
- 12:50Speaker 1: I think it's really important that there's a clear objective
- 12:54Speaker 1: as to why automation is being introduced, so that it's
- 12:59Speaker 1: very alluring and very exciting to have something that's kind
- 13:02Speaker 1: of shiny and new in a sight. But there has
- 13:04Speaker 1: to be a reason for it. And I think if
- 13:07Speaker 1: there's a reason for it that's built by fact and data,
- 13:11Speaker 1: and everybody has agreed to the facts and data which
- 13:14Speaker 1: drive that decision, then it's easier for people to get
- 13:17Speaker 1: on board, and therefore that kind of discrepancy and disagreement
- 13:23Speaker 1: is maybe not there because we've actually we've all gone
- 13:25Speaker 1: through the relevant steps and we've all agreed to all
- 13:28Speaker 1: of the assumptions and the data that is feeding this decision.
- 13:32Speaker 1: It's a lot easier to make a decision when it's
- 13:35Speaker 1: based on fact, because it's really hard to disagree with
- 13:40Speaker 1: black and white or hard numbers.
- 13:43Speaker 2: Yeah, that's true, although you know so much in supply
- 13:46Speaker 2: chain is not black and white. It's different shades of
- 13:50Speaker 2: in between. You know, not every solution is the right solution,
- 13:54Speaker 2: and not every application is the right application, so there's
- 13:58Speaker 2: a lot of ambiguity there. And yes, I think having
- 14:01Speaker 2: that clear black and white yes, no binary of should
- 14:06Speaker 2: this happen or should this not?
- 14:07Speaker 1: Is it not ready? This is why it's so important
- 14:10Speaker 1: to have so many parties involved, because they bring different
- 14:13Speaker 1: viewpoints and can you know, if you have one person
- 14:16Speaker 1: trying to make such a large decision, they only have
- 14:19Speaker 1: their viewpoint and they're only looking at it one dimensionally,
- 14:22Speaker 1: Whereas if you've got lots of parties involved, they bring
- 14:25Speaker 1: different experiences, different requirements, different thoughts to the process. Which
- 14:30Speaker 1: then even if you are making a decision on one criteria,
- 14:35Speaker 1: you've had the time to consider all of the other
- 14:37Speaker 1: characteristics in criteria which should be considered whether ultimately they
- 14:42Speaker 1: enforce the decision or not. They've been discussed and talked about,
- 14:47Speaker 1: which is equally as important on that journey of implementation.
- 14:51Speaker 2: You know what, that's a really interesting perspective on that,
- 14:55Speaker 2: because I know from our point of view. You know,
- 14:58Speaker 2: when we work with these copanies on their projects and
- 15:02Speaker 2: we come to them and they say i'd like a
- 15:05Speaker 2: concept design or i'd like you to help me figure
- 15:07Speaker 2: out what we should do here, and then the decision
- 15:10Speaker 2: is ultimately nothing, We're not going to do this. This
- 15:12Speaker 2: project is canceled. This is tabled. We're not doing that.
- 15:16Speaker 1: It's a no.
- 15:17Speaker 2: That's not a bad thing.
- 15:19Speaker 3: No.
- 15:20Speaker 1: No.
- 15:20Speaker 2: In a lot of cases, no.
- 15:22Speaker 1: And there'll be a reason for why it's a no,
- 15:25Speaker 1: because you know, something might have been discovered and it
- 15:28Speaker 1: may be that actually automation is not the answer, and
- 15:32Speaker 1: it may be that a manual solution or a hybrid
- 15:35Speaker 1: solution is actually the best way to optimize the process,
- 15:41Speaker 1: because like I said earlier, you know, when you've got
- 15:44Speaker 1: a process with fat in it, once you've stripped that away,
- 15:47Speaker 1: you're then comparing your return in whichever criteria you compare
- 15:51Speaker 1: it to this new, revised baseline rather than where you were.
- 15:56Speaker 1: And I think when people kind of strip that away,
- 15:58Speaker 1: then they realize, actually, maybe there isn't quite a case
- 16:02Speaker 1: for it than we thought. So exactly, do nothing can
- 16:06Speaker 1: equally be as good an option as any other.
- 16:09Speaker 2: And and that knowledge is something that they can walk
- 16:11Speaker 2: away with and really better understand their business and their
- 16:14Speaker 2: operation for sure.
- 16:16Speaker 1: For sure. I mean, if something comes up from one
- 16:19Speaker 1: party which kind of throws a spanner in the works,
- 16:21Speaker 1: if you like, but it's an it's a go or
- 16:24Speaker 1: no go, then that's a valuable piece of input.
- 16:28Speaker 2: One hundred yeah, absolutely. So for any companies or individuals
- 16:33Speaker 2: out there right now that are considering automation, they're they're
- 16:36Speaker 2: exploring their options, they're looking at where it could fit
- 16:40Speaker 2: into their operation. Where should they start? Should they should
- 16:44Speaker 2: they start with that that process mapping and really understanding
- 16:49Speaker 2: what's happening or you know, is is that something that
- 16:53Speaker 2: happens further down?
- 16:56Speaker 1: It's I would definitely say to start with the process.
- 16:58Speaker 1: So start with what your process is and then look
- 17:02Speaker 1: at how it's going to develop for the future. So
- 17:06Speaker 1: we're looking and we need to be looking really at
- 17:08Speaker 1: kind of five ten year window or bigger things that
- 17:13Speaker 1: have a window that has a bigger impact on what
- 17:16Speaker 1: might change. So it's looking at the process, is putting
- 17:21Speaker 1: some data around it, it's not getting distracted by kind
- 17:25Speaker 1: of all the shiny options out there, which is very
- 17:27Speaker 1: easy to do. And then it's saying what is the
- 17:30Speaker 1: problem that we're actually trying to solve with this automation.
- 17:34Speaker 1: So are we trying to reduce headcount? Are we trying
- 17:38Speaker 1: to increase service level? Are we trying to increase capacity
- 17:43Speaker 1: so that we can then take on additional we can
- 17:47Speaker 1: acquire additional business for example. So first is definitely to
- 17:51Speaker 1: start with the process, and then it's to think about, actually,
- 17:54Speaker 1: this is the future state we want to get to,
- 17:56Speaker 1: and then thinking about how do we get there? So
- 17:59Speaker 1: what are our steps that we need to enable this
- 18:04Speaker 1: kind of implementation roadmap, So it's not kind of now
- 18:07Speaker 1: until ten years, it's now ten years and then all
- 18:11Speaker 1: of the kind of steps in between that give us
- 18:13Speaker 1: those kind of building blocks to get to where we
- 18:16Speaker 1: want to be, and considering in that as well, things
- 18:20Speaker 1: like flexibility, scalability. What if what I thought at the
- 18:24Speaker 1: start is actually not happening. What if we're not going
- 18:27Speaker 1: to acquire that amount of business, what if we grow
- 18:31Speaker 1: twice as much as we thought, what is our what
- 18:35Speaker 1: options do we have? And also kind of bearing that
- 18:38Speaker 1: in mind as well when you're picking the automation that
- 18:41Speaker 1: you want to use, is what is that flexibility and
- 18:43Speaker 1: scalability element of it and how does that impact the
- 18:48Speaker 1: solution that you're looking to implement.
- 18:51Speaker 2: That's one reason why we push our involvement, and I
- 18:56Speaker 2: know it seems it seems counterinto it to hire a
- 19:01Speaker 2: middleman a consultant to just to come up with the
- 19:04Speaker 2: concept for an automation project because all of these companies.
- 19:08Speaker 2: You know, they have an integrator, they have a salesperson
- 19:10Speaker 2: who can explain what what capabilities this this particular technology has,
- 19:15Speaker 2: or you know, what the return on investment can be,
- 19:18Speaker 2: and they they have calculators for all of that and
- 19:20Speaker 2: they can figure that out. But they're they're trying to
- 19:23Speaker 2: sell their product and they're doing a great job of it.
- 19:26Speaker 2: But they're not going to sit down with you and
- 19:29Speaker 2: look at that process in depth. They're not going to
- 19:32Speaker 2: do the time studies, they're not going to do the
- 19:34Speaker 2: labor studies. They're not going to to you know, sit
- 19:37Speaker 2: and walk through a plant with you know, on the
- 19:40Speaker 2: floor individuals and say, you know, are you following this
- 19:43Speaker 2: process exactly or are you making exceptions throughout throughout your shift?
- 19:49Speaker 2: And and that's where having that level of let's take
- 19:55Speaker 2: a very granular look at your operation is so valuable
- 19:59Speaker 2: before or you start talking you know, dollars and and
- 20:04Speaker 2: actual you know sizing, does this fit, will this work here?
- 20:07Speaker 2: Can we put this here? Do we go AGV or
- 20:09Speaker 2: do we do something else? You know, those decisions are
- 20:12Speaker 2: so much further down the line that that company, that
- 20:16Speaker 2: that technology company actually can't help you figure that out.
- 20:19Speaker 2: And organizations often don't have the bandwidth internally to to
- 20:24Speaker 2: do all of that work and still operate as normal.
- 20:28Speaker 1: Yeah. Absolutely, And also it's it's there's a catalog of product,
- 20:34Speaker 1: so sometimes a solution has to then be shoehorned into
- 20:37Speaker 1: that catalog of you know, I have this, so therefore
- 20:42Speaker 1: that's what we'll do. But actually, our clients deserve better
- 20:45Speaker 1: than that, and they should have the they should have
- 20:50Speaker 1: the option to have what is right for them, what's
- 20:53Speaker 1: the optimal thing for them, rather than just kind of
- 20:56Speaker 1: something that somebody can provide. Doesn't mean they should.
- 21:01Speaker 2: Well, or it doesn't mean that it's the right fit
- 21:02Speaker 2: for them, because, as you said, there are so many
- 21:05Speaker 2: vendors out there and so many products and variations of
- 21:09Speaker 2: those products offered by different companies. So you know, finding
- 21:12Speaker 2: that right fit is kind of a needle in a haystack,
- 21:15Speaker 2: especially for someone who already has a job to do.
- 21:17Speaker 2: They've got their functions, they've got their responsibilities. Sometimes you know,
- 21:22Speaker 2: you have a department, a procurement department that can look
- 21:25Speaker 2: at those things more closely. But again to your point,
- 21:29Speaker 2: looking across the entire organization, getting all of those business
- 21:32Speaker 2: units involved to understand the implications of changing something this
- 21:37Speaker 2: drastically is a lot more than a lot of companies
- 21:41Speaker 2: have the internal bandwidth to take on.
- 21:44Speaker 1: The Other part of it is that you know, these
- 21:47Speaker 1: projects that are being implemented when whether they're kind of
- 21:50Speaker 1: big or smaller in between, they're not projects that come
- 21:54Speaker 1: along all the time. They're projects that you wouldn't do
- 21:57Speaker 1: every day. So there's a lot of trust that is
- 22:00Speaker 1: being put in to a supplier or a vendor to
- 22:03Speaker 1: tell the client or the occupier what is the right solution.
- 22:08Speaker 1: And I think that's the benefit of having an impartial
- 22:11Speaker 1: party is actually that you know, we want to find
- 22:15Speaker 1: the right solution for the client. It's not it doesn't
- 22:19Speaker 1: matter to us where they source the product from. What
- 22:22Speaker 1: matters to us is that the solution is correct, and
- 22:26Speaker 1: then we can support the client. Because they're not doing
- 22:29Speaker 1: it every day, there's some questions that maybe they wouldn't ask,
- 22:32Speaker 1: that maybe they should ask, and that's something that we
- 22:36Speaker 1: would be able to help with in terms of kind
- 22:38Speaker 1: of advocating for them and being that technical person to say, well,
- 22:42Speaker 1: actually that won't work, or I don't believe you know
- 22:46Speaker 1: that throughput is achievable based on X, Y and z
- 22:48Speaker 1: And it's really important to be able to challenge suppliers
- 22:52Speaker 1: as well as have a good conversation with them about
- 22:55Speaker 1: what you need. So I think that's also the difference
- 22:59Speaker 1: with when you're looking at it through with consultants rather
- 23:03Speaker 1: than directly to vendors.
- 23:05Speaker 2: You mentioned something a minute ago talking about the customer
- 23:09Speaker 2: or the occupier, and so it made me wonder, because
- 23:12Speaker 2: I'm not a consultant, I'm not out there doing the
- 23:15Speaker 2: project work. Is this different when it is for an
- 23:19Speaker 2: owned property or an owned situation versus the three pls,
- 23:24Speaker 2: the logistics, the warehousing. You know, companies that rent out
- 23:30Speaker 2: the space and they're looking for automation because a client
- 23:34Speaker 2: is either asking for it or demands it or is
- 23:36Speaker 2: part of their contract. Does this conversation change when it's
- 23:41Speaker 2: a third party? Yeah?
- 23:43Speaker 1: I mean for us, we work on both sides, right,
- 23:46Speaker 1: So we would work with clients who occupy three PR sites,
- 23:50Speaker 1: but we also support three pls in their responses to occupiers. So,
- 23:57Speaker 1: and there's different criteria depending on which side of the
- 24:00Speaker 1: table that you're sat on in the kind of occupy
- 24:03Speaker 1: a sense, maybe your or the kind of end client
- 24:06Speaker 1: sense if you like, there may be an assessment of
- 24:09Speaker 1: should we should we use a three PL at all
- 24:13Speaker 1: or should we do it ourselves in some kind of way.
- 24:17Speaker 1: So there's that question, and in which case your level
- 24:20Speaker 1: of automation may be different because you're it's your business
- 24:25Speaker 1: and it's under kind of your financial sheets. But the
- 24:31Speaker 1: kind of from a three PL side, it would then be, well,
- 24:33Speaker 1: how long are we looking to have this client in
- 24:36Speaker 1: for and how long are they going to commit to?
- 24:38Speaker 1: And therefore, if they commit to longer, we would likely
- 24:41Speaker 1: implement a higher degree of automation if appropriate. Right, But
- 24:47Speaker 1: if it's a short term contract, the likelihood would be
- 24:50Speaker 1: that it wouldn't. It wouldn't be a kind of a
- 24:52Speaker 1: fully automated solution unless they had space in an existing
- 24:55Speaker 1: site to put somebody in. But it all has to
- 24:59Speaker 1: be the has to be right for the scenario, which
- 25:02Speaker 1: is why it's not a kind of clear cut yes,
- 25:04Speaker 1: do it, don't do it. It's more of a what
- 25:07Speaker 1: do you need? What's the longer term goal? Does it
- 25:10Speaker 1: make sense?
- 25:12Speaker 2: Now? That's interesting that it's it's a very different perspective,
- 25:16Speaker 2: even from that technical aspect, depending on who that end
- 25:21Speaker 2: user really is. Yeah, exactly do we see these automated
- 25:26Speaker 2: solutions mainly in the distribution and warehousing or are we
- 25:29Speaker 2: seeing a lot of automation creeping into manufacturing sites too.
- 25:33Speaker 1: There's definitely a lot of manufacturing automation out there. I
- 25:37Speaker 1: think for us, predominantly, our focus is on kind of
- 25:40Speaker 1: logistics automation and finished goods handling or feeding to and
- 25:45Speaker 1: from the line, so kind of raw materials handling, receiving
- 25:49Speaker 1: finished goods and storing that in a certain way. But definitely,
- 25:53Speaker 1: I would say the kind of experiences that the on
- 25:58Speaker 1: the logistics side, it's very rare. I mean, there's a
- 26:01Speaker 1: perception that everyone's going for automation, but actually that's where
- 26:04Speaker 1: we're seeing this kind of drip feed of implement implementing
- 26:09Speaker 1: bits of automation, testing the waters, and it's kind of
- 26:14Speaker 1: implementing partial automation and then seeing what the future could
- 26:18Speaker 1: look like if there was more to be implemented.
- 26:21Speaker 2: So, if there's one thing you want listeners to take
- 26:23Speaker 2: away from our conversation today, what would that be?
- 26:26Speaker 1: It's a good question. I think the thing for me
- 26:30Speaker 1: would be to think about the bigger picture. So think
- 26:32Speaker 1: about before automating anything, think about what the process should
- 26:37Speaker 1: look like and what changes are expected, and from there
- 26:40Speaker 1: you'll you'll open up all kinds of conversations which then
- 26:43Speaker 1: allow the solution to kind of become clearer and clearer.
- 26:47Speaker 1: It will be muddy, it'll get muddier before it gets clearer.
- 26:51Speaker 1: But I think it's not just it's not just automating.
- 26:55Speaker 1: It has to have it has to have a purpose,
- 26:57Speaker 1: has to be part of a strategy, and it has
- 26:59Speaker 1: to make Okay.
- 27:01Speaker 2: I like that. So listeners, you need to be you
- 27:04Speaker 2: need to have your zoom ready. You need to be
- 27:06Speaker 2: able to zoom out to see the whole picture, and
- 27:08Speaker 2: then you need to be able to zoom really far
- 27:10Speaker 2: in to look at those processes very closely and ensure
- 27:13Speaker 2: that they are ideal at the beginning, before any actual
- 27:18Speaker 2: conversation about what solution makes sense can be had. Absolutely,
- 27:24Speaker 2: automation is absolutely transforming warehousing, but not always in the
- 27:28Speaker 2: ways that people expect. It's not just about the technology.
- 27:32Speaker 2: It's about making the right decisions at the right time
- 27:35Speaker 2: for the right parts of your operation. Because the goal
- 27:38Speaker 2: isn't to automate everything, it's to build a supply chain
- 27:41Speaker 2: that actually works today and in the future. Thank you
- 27:45Speaker 2: so much, Sophie for bringing some clarity to this topic
- 27:48Speaker 2: that's often oversimplified.
- 27:51Speaker 1: Thanks for having me. It's been a pleasure and we
- 27:53Speaker 1: must not wait another seventy seven episodes to do this again.
- 27:58Speaker 2: Absolutely, as always to our listeners. If you found this valuable,
- 28:02Speaker 2: share it with someone in your network who's navigating these
- 28:04Speaker 2: same types of decisions, and hit that subscribe button so
- 28:07Speaker 2: you don't miss out on future insights. Thanks for tuning
- 28:10Speaker 2: in to Speaking of Supply Chain.
- 28:16Speaker 3: You've been listening to Speaking of Supply Chain a meboch podcast.
- 28:20Speaker 3: Keep connected with us by subscribing to the show in
- 28:22Speaker 3: your favorite podcast player. If you like what you've heard,
- 28:25Speaker 3: please rate the show that helps us to keep delivering
- 28:27Speaker 3: the latest in supply chain information. Thanks for listening. Until
- 28:31Speaker 3: next time,