Latest / Ryder Lee / Were Gifted Kids Being Recruited? | Lyn Buchanan

Transcript

Were Gifted Kids Being Recruited? | Lyn Buchanan · Ryder Lee

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What year did the majority of this take place in
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: your remote viewing of it?
• 0:07
  Speaker 2: The killing off of people around 2030 to 2040, somewhere
• 0:12
  Speaker 2: around there. Because what I saw was that the big
• 0:16
  Speaker 2: kill off of people was going to be through man-made
• 0:22
  Speaker 2: natural disasters. And, you know, at some point, They're firing
• 0:28
  Speaker 2: thousands of missiles a day and all that. At some point,
• 0:32
  Speaker 2: they're going to run out of war resources. And the
• 0:37
  Speaker 2: Russians have earthquake weapons. We have atmospheric weapons. The different countries,
• 0:43
  Speaker 2: the Chinese, the, uh, uh, Israelis and all that have
• 0:47
  Speaker 2: different weapons that will control natural facilities. Uh, uh, you know,
• 0:55
  Speaker 2: dry out a country, uh, flood the country, do things
• 1:04
  Speaker 2: like that, you know, earthquakes and things like that. And
• 1:07
  Speaker 2: I hope it doesn't get to the point where we start,
• 1:10
  Speaker 2: where they start using those man-made natural disasters because every
• 1:19
  Speaker 2: one of them is a big thing that will affect
• 1:24
  Speaker 2: millions of people.
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: Many people claim, and many others question, the existence of ESP.
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: CIA Director Stansfield Turner had disclosed the CIA chief said
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: that the agency found a man who could see what
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: was going on anywhere in the world through his psychic powers.
• 1:45
  Speaker 2: An individual can sit down and describe a scene 10,000
• 1:48
  Speaker 2: miles away. What does that really mean? We provided information
• 1:52
  Speaker 2: to the military, the CIA, the DIA, are the three-letter organizations,
• 1:58
  Speaker 2: three letters that we've never heard of. We had a success.
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: We found that airplane.
• 2:04
  Speaker 3: Surely, that's not going to end there.
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: What more could this be used for? Could one get
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: inside of someone else's head?
• 2:12
  Speaker 2: The Russians were doing psychic spying, but they were also
• 2:16
  Speaker 2: doing a program called adonig hypnos, and that is hypnosis
• 2:22
  Speaker 2: at a distance. Can they handle this topic? We don't
• 2:25
  Speaker 2: know yet. becoming overly emotional one way or another. I thought,
• 2:29
  Speaker 2: the Army doesn't use psychics? Come on, that's crazy.
• 2:33
  Speaker 4: If a person's belief system does not believe in remote viewing,
• 2:38
  Speaker 4: nothing you do is going to change their mind.
• 2:41
  Speaker 2: At that time, it was politically profitable to somebody to
• 2:48
  Speaker 2: not find him. People with pre-cognitive disabilities have been around
• 2:51
  Speaker 2: for centuries. I have a lot of information in my
• 2:55
  Speaker 2: head that is gonna die with me, yeah. I can
• 2:59
  Speaker 2: happily say I'm the one that created the word Stargate.
• 3:02
  Speaker 4: There were several reasons why the program closed down.
• 3:05
  Speaker 2: And what about today? Are there any operational groups right
• 3:08
  Speaker 2: now ongoing somewhere within the government?
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: Is it possible that after Stargate was shut down, a
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: new program opened, way more sophisticated and invasive?
• 3:20
  Speaker 4: Such a program were to exist, I think it would
• 3:23
  Speaker 4: be so compartmentalized and so buried so deep.
• 3:27
  Speaker 2: But nobody really ever talks about that unit.
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: And I won't either.
• 3:33
  Speaker 2: You can get to a person at the subconscious level
• 3:37
  Speaker 2: and persuade them.
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: To do things.
• 3:41
  Speaker 2: I had one of the highest security clearances in the government.
• 3:46
  Speaker 2: From what I was told, there were only 17 people
• 3:48
  Speaker 2: who ever had that high security clearance.
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: Is it possible to psychically assassinate someone?
• 3:55
  Speaker 2: I won't really go into that. There's some things you
• 3:58
  Speaker 2: don't want to know.
• 3:59
  Speaker 5: You're finally starting to remember.
• 4:12
  Speaker 2: You should be hearing my voice. You should be hearing
• 4:14
  Speaker 2: my voice.
• 4:15
  Speaker 4: You should be hearing my voice and you're right here.
• 4:25
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm glad you got Bob in there too, Bob Monroe.
• 4:30
  Speaker 2: By the way, the security clearance that was the highest,
• 4:35
  Speaker 2: I got that after I got out of the military.
• 4:41
  Speaker 2: And so that was not, you'll hear people say this
• 4:45
  Speaker 2: is a top secret unit. Our security clearance was secret.
• 4:51
  Speaker 2: It was never top secret that I knew of.
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: A lot of these people within the gifted and talented
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: education system and public school remember hearing the Bob Monroe
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: Gateway tapes in public school. And that was to, you know,
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: essentially get into an out-of-body, have an out-of-body experience. And so,
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: you know, according to the Gateway tapes, experience documents it's
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: to essentially being outside of your body can unlock psychic
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: abilities so if they were doing this on children then
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: it means that they were trying to create psychic well
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: develop the psychic abilities within children from a very young
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: age by getting them outside of their body what do
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: you think.
• 5:37
  Speaker 2: Of that I think that's been a program that's been
• 5:41
  Speaker 2: developing developed finally into the military but was outside the
• 5:48
  Speaker 2: military beyond then in order to get the general public
• 5:52
  Speaker 2: uh population uh more and more psychic more and more
• 5:58
  Speaker 2: aware and uh you know there's been a big push
• 6:04
  Speaker 2: over the last decades to dumb people down but the
• 6:08
  Speaker 2: um people who are in touch with their subconscious mind
• 6:13
  Speaker 2: they uh They don't dumb down all that easily. And
• 6:19
  Speaker 2: I was asked after the military to do some research papers.
• 6:27
  Speaker 2: And I think I found out, well, I have connected dots.
• 6:33
  Speaker 2: I haven't found proof. You will never find proof. I
• 6:37
  Speaker 2: have connected the dots that this has been a long
• 6:44
  Speaker 2: ongoing thing. ending with what we're doing now, and right
• 6:51
  Speaker 2: before this, it was, everybody noticed that anytime they had
• 6:56
  Speaker 2: the UFO abduction, the person would be psychic after that. And, listen,
• 7:03
  Speaker 2: when we get into space, and we're going into space,
• 7:08
  Speaker 2: when we get into space, we'd better have that ability.
• 7:15
  Speaker 2: It's going to be Absolutely necessary. And I think they've
• 7:20
  Speaker 2: known this for decades. And, you know, the UFO contact
• 7:26
  Speaker 2: isn't new. And I think they've known this for decades
• 7:30
  Speaker 2: and they've been been working on it.
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: Well, are you familiar with a person named Danny Sheehan?
• 7:40
  Speaker 1: He's like the UFO lawyer guy. He's really popular in
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: the UFO community, and he does a bunch of speaking
• 7:50
  Speaker 1: gigs and giving lectures and stuff. Are you familiar with him?
• 7:53
  Speaker 2: I've heard the name. That's about it.
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: Okay, so there's a video of him that he's claiming
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: that Northrop Grumman, right outside of Northrop Grumman military base,
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: there was a gate program for children of military personnel.
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: And that they were essentially drugging these children and then
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: teaching them how to connect with UFOs and UAPs to
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: be able to control the UFOs and UAPs with their mind.
• 8:35
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: Do you know anything about that? Have you heard of
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: that before?
• 8:42
  Speaker 2: I've heard about it before from many of the people
• 8:46
  Speaker 2: who say that they were involved in it. I don't
• 8:49
  Speaker 2: have any proof that they don't either.
• 8:51
  Speaker 6: But, you know, I know one of the things about
• 8:57
  Speaker 6: something like that, you're best at something when you're in
• 9:02
  Speaker 6: the state that you learned it in.
• 9:05
  Speaker 2: Okay? And that's been, that research has been done by psychiatrists, psychologists,
• 9:11
  Speaker 2: and all that. And it's a definite thing. So if
• 9:14
  Speaker 2: you have to drug kids to teach them to be
• 9:21
  Speaker 2: psychic then later when you want them to do the
• 9:26
  Speaker 2: best job you're going to have to give them drugs
• 9:28
  Speaker 2: and get them high you know and so that's a
• 9:31
  Speaker 2: self-defeating thing you know get the kids teach them just
• 9:38
  Speaker 2: uh teach them how to do things that's what we
• 9:41
  Speaker 2: do uh we don't we don't i don't take kids
• 9:48
  Speaker 2: many of the teachers do I don't personally, but I
• 9:52
  Speaker 2: teach adults and it's something you can learn. So I
• 9:58
  Speaker 2: think at the first they were just trying everything they
• 10:01
  Speaker 2: knew how to try. Found out that the Monroe tapes
• 10:06
  Speaker 2: work a whole lot better than drugs and torture and
• 10:10
  Speaker 2: things like that. And so I think it was sort
• 10:16
  Speaker 2: of an evolving thing.
• 10:19
  Speaker 1: I mean, we know that there's some documentation that talks about,
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: you know, adult, psychic adults being in control, like connecting
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: with UFOs and UAPs to control them with their mind.
• 10:30
  Speaker 1: So it's not out of the realm of possibility that
• 10:33
  Speaker 1: they were also doing this with kids. But I think
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: that it's really interesting that you bring up that because
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: that's an important fact is that. The familiarity of doing something,
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: the way that you've done it before, then you have
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: to essentially kind of recreate that exact same experience as
• 10:53
  Speaker 1: the first way that you did it in order to
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: get them to that point. And that's what I think
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: was going on because that's what I think that the
• 10:59
  Speaker 1: pink drink was. I think that was talked about in
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: the movie. Many people claim that they had to take
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: the substance. I believe that that was a hallucinogenic, some
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: form of hallucinogenic substance. And if you can get that
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: with the Monroe Institute gateway tapes, putting goggles over your eyes,
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: or even the Gansfeld experiment, the Gansfeld experiment, which I
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: think that you might be familiar with too, is where
• 11:25
  Speaker 1: Dean Radin was involved with doing the Gansfeld experiment where
• 11:32
  Speaker 1: you can do it yourself, but there's a way that
• 11:34
  Speaker 1: you do it with like goggles and everything, but you
• 11:37
  Speaker 1: can just cut a ping pong ball in half and
• 11:39
  Speaker 1: tape them to your eyeballs and then kind of red
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: light on your face and then you'll essentially it's to
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: unlock your your psychic ability so if you combine that
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: with you know everything that was going on in public
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: you you're you're essentially developing and creating uh you're giving
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: children a psychic experience and sometimes disassociating them from their
• 12:03
  Speaker 1: uh their their body and and that's where i think
• 12:07
  Speaker 1: where i believe that mk ultra is also involved is
• 12:10
  Speaker 1: because that's the disassociation factor is, you know, separating, they're
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: making this pocket consciousness that's been separated through trauma. And
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: some of them can go into a psychosis as well.
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: I mean, if you're unknowingly drugged with a hallucinogenic substance,
• 12:28
  Speaker 1: you could probably think that you're losing your mind. Like
• 12:32
  Speaker 1: you go into a psychosis.
• 12:35
  Speaker 2: And, you know, one of the problems with almost any,
• 12:40
  Speaker 2: research in the scientific community the medical community the government
• 12:45
  Speaker 2: and all that is that uh they either hire a
• 12:51
  Speaker 2: committee and things you've done by committees which never work
• 12:56
  Speaker 2: and uh or else they hire someone who says that
• 12:59
  Speaker 2: they're an expert who has their attack on it you
• 13:02
  Speaker 2: know oh i think if we torture these kids they're
• 13:07
  Speaker 2: going to be psychic you know and so they Nobody
• 13:11
  Speaker 2: else speaks up, so the government says, well, let's try it.
• 13:16
  Speaker 2: And I think one of the big problems with many
• 13:20
  Speaker 2: of these projects the government takes on is they depend
• 13:29
  Speaker 2: too much on the opinions of the researcher or of
• 13:34
  Speaker 2: the person who's in charge and says, I want to
• 13:38
  Speaker 2: do things my way. I don't know anything about what
• 13:41
  Speaker 2: you're doing, but I want it done my way. The
• 13:45
  Speaker 2: government's full of those people.
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: That's another issue with the DIA Army Intelligence remote viewing
• 13:56
  Speaker 1: unit in a whole was that it was supposed to
• 13:59
  Speaker 1: go to the CIA and the CIA never really did
• 14:02
  Speaker 1: any investigation into figuring out if it actually worked or not.
• 14:06
  Speaker 1: Angela Ford talked about that in the movie where they
• 14:09
  Speaker 1: transferred all the boxes over to Langley and then none
• 14:12
  Speaker 1: of the boxes were open. They were just all still sealed.
• 14:15
  Speaker 1: So it's like, but that just blows my mind though, Lynn,
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: because The CIA knew that it worked. They'd been funding
• 14:24
  Speaker 1: it at SRI since the early 70s.
• 14:27
  Speaker 2: Well, it was still a case of, you know, we
• 14:32
  Speaker 2: have to depend on psychics, and they're not going to
• 14:36
  Speaker 2: admit that under any circumstance. And the fact is that
• 14:41
  Speaker 2: our information was put into the pot with spy in
• 14:47
  Speaker 2: the sky satellites, ground agents, ELINT, SIGINT, HUMANT and all
• 14:54
  Speaker 2: those other intelligences, human intelligence, signal intelligence, electric intelligence and
• 15:00
  Speaker 2: all that. And so we had tremendous influence on many
• 15:15
  Speaker 2: of the decisions but never the complete thing. I don't
• 15:20
  Speaker 2: think they ever sent the troops out on the word
• 15:24
  Speaker 2: of a remote viewer.
• 15:27
  Speaker 1: Alone.
• 15:28
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 15:32
  Speaker 5: Right.
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: They had to have many other Intel things to actually
• 15:37
  Speaker 1: go out and figure out exactly what's going on. Yeah.
• 15:41
  Speaker 2: That's what analysts do. They take bits from here and
• 15:44
  Speaker 2: there and piece them together themselves.
• 15:46
  Speaker 3: Yeah.
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: Before I made this movie, did you have any kind
• 15:54
  Speaker 1: of inkling at all that maybe some of this psyche
• 15:59
  Speaker 1: testing stuff was going on with children? Because, I mean,
• 16:03
  Speaker 1: we know that SRI went to China and China was
• 16:09
  Speaker 1: doing experiments on children.
• 16:13
  Speaker 2: Yeah, and there are remote viewers in China. I don't
• 16:16
  Speaker 2: know how it is now. but they've had a rule
• 16:19
  Speaker 2: all along. When you get to be about 13 or 14,
• 16:23
  Speaker 2: no matter how good you are, you're out of the program. Yeah.
• 16:27
  Speaker 2: And that's, it's China. Different countries have the different rules.
• 16:33
  Speaker 2: And yeah, the process has been going on in all
• 16:43
  Speaker 2: the different countries for ages. for decades at least, you know.
• 16:51
  Speaker 2: And it's a worldwide effort because they found that it works.
• 16:58
  Speaker 2: That's why the U.S. developed its psychic spying program officially
• 17:04
  Speaker 2: because we found out that the Russians were getting all
• 17:08
  Speaker 2: of our information with their psychics. So, you know, hey,
• 17:12
  Speaker 2: if they're going to do that to us, let's do
• 17:14
  Speaker 2: it right back at them. Yeah.
• 17:21
  Speaker 1: Well, by watching the movie, what do you think? Because
• 17:25
  Speaker 1: there's some hints and there's some things that you kind
• 17:27
  Speaker 1: of got to put the two and two together on
• 17:29
  Speaker 1: your own and, you know, pay attention to the movie
• 17:33
  Speaker 1: to really figure out what's going on. But what... do
• 17:37
  Speaker 1: you personally believe the reasoning for testing these children for
• 17:46
  Speaker 1: psychic abilities would be? Do you think that it would be,
• 17:49
  Speaker 1: because a lot of, a lot of it really happened,
• 17:52
  Speaker 1: I believe personally in like the nineties, in the late
• 17:56
  Speaker 1: nineties and late eighties into the early nineties. So the
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: people that were in Stargate and the other name changes
• 18:05
  Speaker 1: had nothing to do with the psychic testing in public school,
• 18:09
  Speaker 1: probably not, unless someone comes out and says that, yeah,
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: I was involved in, but I don't think you were,
• 18:16
  Speaker 1: I don't think Angela was, I don't think Dale was,
• 18:19
  Speaker 1: and I don't think very many people were, like none
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: of them were. So there's really no connection in that aspect.
• 18:24
  Speaker 1: But the thing that can be connecting is that if,
• 18:29
  Speaker 1: the government decided to open up another unit or they
• 18:33
  Speaker 1: already had a unit, uh, that was available that was
• 18:36
  Speaker 1: using psychics for a different reason other than, you know, uh,
• 18:41
  Speaker 1: foreign on foreign targets. Yeah. Uh, it could be some
• 18:46
  Speaker 1: of these children when they're, they are adults, uh, and
• 18:51
  Speaker 1: then they've been put into a actual government psychic program.
• 18:55
  Speaker 2: Could be, uh, you know, Almost anything you come up
• 19:00
  Speaker 2: with could be. And people ask me if there's still
• 19:08
  Speaker 2: a unit going. And I have two answers for that.
• 19:13
  Speaker 2: One is when you retire, they quit telling you secrets.
• 19:17
  Speaker 2: And so I don't know. And the other is it
• 19:21
  Speaker 2: would be stupid for the government not to have a
• 19:24
  Speaker 2: program like this because it works so well. So that
• 19:30
  Speaker 2: changes the question. Does our government ever do anything stupid?
• 19:36
  Speaker 2: So the answer again, I don't know.
• 19:42
  Speaker 1: Well, by deductive reasoning, it only makes sense that they would. Now,
• 19:48
  Speaker 1: it's impossible to find out. out where or who is,
• 19:52
  Speaker 1: what agency is doing it, but it's, you know, by
• 19:56
  Speaker 1: common sense and critical thinking, you know that they do. Now,
• 20:01
  Speaker 1: what that is and the abilities of that program and
• 20:04
  Speaker 1: what that program is actually doing is completely up for debate,
• 20:08
  Speaker 1: but I've I'm willing to bet, I mean, if it's
• 20:12
  Speaker 1: not going on right now, then it had been going
• 20:15
  Speaker 1: on at least past when the DIA Army Intelligence Unit
• 20:19
  Speaker 1: was shut down. And if I was a betting man,
• 20:22
  Speaker 1: I would say that some of the personnel within that
• 20:25
  Speaker 1: unit would have been some of the GATE program, Gifted
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: and Talented Education kids that were found. Because that was
• 20:33
  Speaker 1: a really big thing within the documents. I'm not 100%
• 20:36
  Speaker 1: sure if I.
• 20:39
  Speaker 1: Or not in the movie, but there's a Stargate document
• 20:42
  Speaker 1: from 1992 that's a Stargate five-year plan. And essentially, they
• 20:47
  Speaker 1: talk about how they're having a really big issue within
• 20:52
  Speaker 1: DIA with finding psychics. There, there, there's a shortage of
• 20:59
  Speaker 1: psychics and they say that within the document, that's what
• 21:03
  Speaker 1: I'm saying. And it says it within the document. I'm not,
• 21:06
  Speaker 1: I don't believe that there is a shortage of psychics.
• 21:08
  Speaker 1: I believe that everyone is psychic, right. To a certain degree,
• 21:11
  Speaker 1: but within the document, it says that, uh, later on
• 21:15
  Speaker 1: after it says that we're having trouble finding psychics, because
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: I think that there was only two or three people
• 21:20
  Speaker 1: that were still in the unit at the very end
• 21:22
  Speaker 1: of it. One of those was Angela Ford, but, uh,
• 21:25
  Speaker 1: It says at the end of it that... Oh, go ahead.
• 21:29
  Speaker 2: If I could explain something about wording and intel wording, okay?
• 21:36
  Speaker 2: When they say we have a hard time finding psychics,
• 21:42
  Speaker 2: what it means is we have a hard time finding
• 21:45
  Speaker 2: psychics who meet the standards that we are asking. One
• 21:51
  Speaker 2: standard being Can they do it in a regulated style
• 21:57
  Speaker 2: because that's what the government has to have or they
• 22:01
  Speaker 2: just woo-woo all over the place? And woo-woo all over
• 22:04
  Speaker 2: the place, then forget it. You know, you have to
• 22:07
  Speaker 2: be able to write reports. You have to document things,
• 22:11
  Speaker 2: database and all that. And so that's the kind of
• 22:15
  Speaker 2: psychics they need. And those are the ones that are
• 22:20
  Speaker 2: hard to fight.
• 22:24
  Speaker 1: Yes, I would definitely agree. And then later on in
• 22:27
  Speaker 1: the document, it says that, you know, everyone is psychic
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: to a certain degree, but the people that can perform
• 22:32
  Speaker 1: it the way that they want it performed is less
• 22:36
  Speaker 1: than 1% of the population.
• 22:38
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 22:39
  Speaker 5: Yeah.
• 22:42
  Speaker 2: And, you know, we've met many valid, really good psychics
• 22:51
  Speaker 2: who have no control over what they just do. lean
• 22:55
  Speaker 2: back and, you know, ramble or visionize or whatever, and
• 23:03
  Speaker 2: there's no structure to it. Well, the government has to,
• 23:06
  Speaker 2: the intelligence service has to have everything in a structured,
• 23:12
  Speaker 2: logical format that they can just put into the pot
• 23:15
  Speaker 2: and use as an extra, as an adjunct source of information.
• 23:21
  Speaker 2: And so finding good psychics who are also extremely logical
• 23:30
  Speaker 2: and oriented people, that's difficult.
• 23:40
  Speaker 1: Yeah, they abbreviate some of that as, I think they
• 23:44
  Speaker 1: say AC, which is anomalous cognition. They have different names
• 23:48
  Speaker 1: for a bunch of the different abilities and the military
• 23:54
  Speaker 1: terms for them and everything. But yeah, what... Not to
• 24:03
  Speaker 1: switch gears, but on the same topic, a lot of
• 24:06
  Speaker 1: people were talking about how we discussed Pat Price in
• 24:12
  Speaker 1: the movie and the possibility of him not actually dying
• 24:18
  Speaker 1: and the possibility again of him, that being a fake
• 24:25
  Speaker 1: CIA death, essentially, and him being taken into a blacker
• 24:31
  Speaker 1: budget program.
• 24:33
  Speaker 2: Yeah. And, you know, anytime someone disappears like that without
• 24:40
  Speaker 2: a trace, the questions are many and the answers are zero. Well,
• 24:51
  Speaker 2: the answers are the one or two or ten. I mean,
• 24:55
  Speaker 2: how many lies did they tell us about Roswell? So
• 25:02
  Speaker 2: you get plenty. You can get plenty of answers, but
• 25:05
  Speaker 2: true answers, that's very seldom.
• 25:11
  Speaker 1: What made you originally believe that something more had happened
• 25:18
  Speaker 1: to him? Because I'll tell you what got me originally
• 25:22
  Speaker 1: thinking that something happened to him was watching the Third
• 25:27
  Speaker 1: Eye Spies remote viewing documentary, and Yuri Geller said, talking
• 25:33
  Speaker 1: to Russell Targ and saying that, you know, they don't
• 25:37
  Speaker 1: kill people. You know, he's like, the CIA is not
• 25:40
  Speaker 1: in the business of killing people there. You don't kill.
• 25:45
  Speaker 2: You don't kill your best assets.
• 25:50
  Speaker 1: That kind of Russell Targ's head. He didn't really understand
• 25:54
  Speaker 1: that because he was on this track of the CIA
• 25:58
  Speaker 1: killing him.
• 25:59
  Speaker 2: Well, what got me The belief that they didn't kill
• 26:07
  Speaker 2: him was that someone whose word I trust implicitly, because
• 26:13
  Speaker 2: I know they're honest, told me that they saw him
• 26:18
  Speaker 2: a couple of years later in a department store in D.C.
• 26:24
  Speaker 2: And when they tried to reach him, he had turned run, run.
• 26:29
  Speaker 5: So.
• 26:31
  Speaker 2: Now, whether that's true or not, I don't know. And
• 26:34
  Speaker 2: it could have been a mistaken identity. I have no idea.
• 26:38
  Speaker 2: But that's what got me to believing that he was
• 26:43
  Speaker 2: moved into a different project. Yeah.
• 26:48
  Speaker 1: Were you ever privy to any, because what I think
• 26:54
  Speaker 1: the possibility is if someone really was a CIA fake death,
• 26:58
  Speaker 1: that they would take him to a deep underground military base. Like,
• 27:05
  Speaker 1: would that not be a more of a safe and
• 27:07
  Speaker 1: secure area for someone that you fake their death on
• 27:11
  Speaker 1: and to just, and then you could work for them
• 27:13
  Speaker 1: like unimpeded, like no one thinks that you're alive. So
• 27:16
  Speaker 1: no one's looking for you. I mean, I guess you
• 27:18
  Speaker 1: could still walk around on the surface because if you're
• 27:21
  Speaker 1: out of sight, then you're kind of out of mind.
• 27:22
  Speaker 1: And if people think that you're dead, then you're not,
• 27:25
  Speaker 1: no one's going to be looking for you.
• 27:27
  Speaker 5: Right.
• 27:27
  Speaker 1: But that would take some time afterwards. I would imagine that.
• 27:31
  Speaker 1: they would want to keep him secure in some kind
• 27:35
  Speaker 1: of deep underground facility. I mean, Bob Lazar, regardless if
• 27:41
  Speaker 1: you believe Bob Lazar story or not, but with the
• 27:44
  Speaker 1: way that he talks about area 51, he's mentioned it
• 27:46
  Speaker 1: a couple of times. He's like, you know, when I
• 27:48
  Speaker 1: worked at area 51, I, he says that he had
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: the impression that some of the people that were working
• 27:53
  Speaker 1: in those top secret facilities never left those facilities. Like,
• 27:58
  Speaker 1: They lived at those facilities and they did not leave
• 28:02
  Speaker 1: until they died.
• 28:03
  Speaker 2: Bob bought one of the underground facilities out from under me.
• 28:08
  Speaker 2: I was going to make it an institute and a
• 28:13
  Speaker 2: huge place. And he got to it first and really
• 28:18
  Speaker 2: took me off. But, you know, the thing is that
• 28:24
  Speaker 2: all of these suppositions and all that, get an answer
• 28:31
  Speaker 2: of a definite could be. So, you know, what would
• 28:42
  Speaker 2: you do with the answer if you had? I don't know.
• 28:46
  Speaker 2: I don't worry about it.
• 28:49
  Speaker 1: Let me ask you more of a direct question. Are
• 28:52
  Speaker 1: you familiar personally of people that live out the rest
• 28:58
  Speaker 1: of their life and work in an underground facility and
• 29:03
  Speaker 1: die there and never return back to the service.
• 29:08
  Speaker 2: Well, if so, they probably wouldn't have any reason to
• 29:14
  Speaker 2: have anything for our paths to cross. Even on the
• 29:25
  Speaker 2: projects where Uh, I had a need to know and, uh,
• 29:30
  Speaker 2: and got some stuff that will go to the grave
• 29:35
  Speaker 2: with me. Um, um, Do you understand the term need
• 29:41
  Speaker 2: to know?
• 29:44
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it's not that you need to know. It's that
• 29:48
  Speaker 1: you're only getting the information that the government needs you
• 29:51
  Speaker 1: to know.
• 29:52
  Speaker 2: The government needs you to know, yeah. And so you
• 29:55
  Speaker 2: may have a need noun to know verb. But if
• 30:00
  Speaker 2: you don't have a need to know, all of it
• 30:04
  Speaker 2: being a noun, then you haven't been granted a need
• 30:08
  Speaker 2: to know, then you don't have a need to know.
• 30:18
  Speaker 1: Do you believe in clones, Lynn? Do you think that
• 30:23
  Speaker 1: there's like cloned human beings out there running around?
• 30:28
  Speaker 2: I know that there have been attempts at that. I
• 30:33
  Speaker 2: don't know whether they're successes or not. I hear that
• 30:43
  Speaker 2: there was an organization that has had successes. I don't know.
• 30:50
  Speaker 1: What about cyborg human beings? Do you believe that we
• 30:54
  Speaker 1: have some form of automatic, autonomous, human, realistic-looking cyborg?
• 31:04
  Speaker 2: Beijing is getting full of them now. I was in Austin,
• 31:09
  Speaker 2: Texas not long ago, and every cab that was there
• 31:16
  Speaker 2: was driverless. The cabs were driving themselves. and uh the
• 31:21
  Speaker 2: uh accident rate was down uh below normal cab services
• 31:27
  Speaker 2: uh uh the rides were supposedly smoother cheaper uh uh
• 31:35
  Speaker 2: faster because instead of going a long route to run
• 31:40
  Speaker 2: the meter up they would go to the place they
• 31:43
  Speaker 2: were supposed to go so uh yeah but we've got
• 31:46
  Speaker 2: uh and there's the uh there's the rumor going around
• 31:52
  Speaker 2: now that Elon Musk is putting AI into robots. And
• 31:58
  Speaker 2: so they will be absolutely self-controlled and all that, whether
• 32:05
  Speaker 2: that's true or not, I don't know.
• 32:11
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I was just curious because if you had, if
• 32:14
  Speaker 1: you essentially had a, you know, a clone or something
• 32:19
  Speaker 1: that was, wouldn't be considered human, you could essentially do
• 32:25
  Speaker 1: a bunch of inhumane things toward that thing because it's
• 32:30
  Speaker 1: not considered a human being, right? So that's how you
• 32:33
  Speaker 1: get away with having, you know, people working in an
• 32:37
  Speaker 1: underground facility is if they're not actually fully human, like
• 32:41
  Speaker 1: if they're more of a machine than a human or
• 32:44
  Speaker 1: if they're like a cloned machine Sounds crazy. Sounds completely
• 32:50
  Speaker 1: nuts and completely bonkers. But, you know, I mean, look
• 32:53
  Speaker 1: at George Lucas in the Star Wars, the Clone Wars.
• 32:56
  Speaker 1: I mean, that kind of where he has an entire
• 32:59
  Speaker 1: army of nothing but cloned people. That's not really humans.
• 33:04
  Speaker 1: So they're disposable, right?
• 33:06
  Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, the E.T. base in Queensland, Australia, they have
• 33:13
  Speaker 2: humans there. you know, as workers.
• 33:26
  Speaker 1: Like actual humans or like humans that they have created?
• 33:33
  Speaker 2: I wasn't sure about that. I tried to check and
• 33:38
  Speaker 2: from snippets and things that I got, some are humans
• 33:46
  Speaker 2: from the earth. Others seem to be humans, real honest
• 33:53
  Speaker 2: humans that were taken as slaves when the Anunnaki or
• 33:58
  Speaker 2: whatever you want to call them left the planet. And
• 34:02
  Speaker 2: that have had generation after generation after generation on other
• 34:07
  Speaker 2: planets with different atmospheres, different gravities and all that. And
• 34:12
  Speaker 2: now if they come back as servants to those bases,
• 34:20
  Speaker 2: the ET bases, some are escaping and getting back into
• 34:26
  Speaker 2: the human, uh, uh, everyday, everyday humans are escaping the
• 34:33
  Speaker 2: ETS and getting, getting free. And, uh, from what I've
• 34:37
  Speaker 2: found out, they don't want political power. They don't want,
• 34:42
  Speaker 2: they don't want any other agenda except just to be free. Um,
• 34:50
  Speaker 2: You know, they've been slaves for umpteen generations. And now
• 34:55
  Speaker 2: then they just want to be free, get married, have kids,
• 34:59
  Speaker 2: have a white picket fence, you know, things like that.
• 35:03
  Speaker 2: And they're very happy to do that. And so, and
• 35:06
  Speaker 2: so those, uh, you won't find any, uh, ulterior motives
• 35:15
  Speaker 2: or anything. They just want to be left alone. They
• 35:18
  Speaker 2: just want to be free. And so from what I've
• 35:25
  Speaker 2: been able to find out, those are the two types
• 35:28
  Speaker 2: of humans, you know, the hired ones and the ones
• 35:31
  Speaker 2: that were brought here as slaves and most of whom
• 35:37
  Speaker 2: are still working in the facilities, but some of whom
• 35:40
  Speaker 2: have escaped.
• 35:44
  Speaker 1: Was this one of the bases that Pat Price had
• 35:48
  Speaker 1: also viewed on the four bases?
• 35:51
  Speaker 2: Yeah, and we've all viewed that.
• 35:58
  Speaker 1: Have you ever looked at Antarctica?
• 36:03
  Speaker 2: I have, yeah. What I found out was that there
• 36:08
  Speaker 2: at Mount Hayes, the facility is still there, but it's
• 36:12
  Speaker 2: become automated. Now, from what I seem to find out,
• 36:20
  Speaker 2: and what multiple ones of us to find out. The
• 36:26
  Speaker 2: equipment is alien and US and all that, mostly alien,
• 36:34
  Speaker 2: but it was originally run almost completely by the aliens.
• 36:38
  Speaker 2: And now that it's automated, and so the equipment is
• 36:42
  Speaker 2: there still working, but it's not manned anymore.
• 36:49
  Speaker 1: And Mount Hayes is in Antarctica?
• 36:52
  Speaker 2: In Antarctica, yeah. In Alaska.
• 36:57
  Speaker 1: Oh, in Alaska. Oh, I was talking about Antarctica. Have
• 37:00
  Speaker 1: you ever looked at South Pole, Antarctica? Because there's so
• 37:04
  Speaker 1: many different theories of what's going on in Antarctica, you know,
• 37:07
  Speaker 1: alien bases and extraterrestrial stuff going on at the South
• 37:12
  Speaker 1: Pole in Antarctica.
• 37:14
  Speaker 2: Yeah. No, I've never been tasked with that. And so
• 37:18
  Speaker 2: I've never looked at it. I I spend my time
• 37:23
  Speaker 2: doing services, teaching, writing, and all that. So I've never
• 37:31
  Speaker 2: been specifically tasked with it. And when I take tasks,
• 37:37
  Speaker 2: this is a personal thing. I would rather spend 10
• 37:43
  Speaker 2: hours helping bring home a missing kid than 10 minutes
• 37:50
  Speaker 2: helping somebody make money just you know it's just a personal.
• 37:56
  Speaker 1: Thing absolutely I agree with that 100% I mean your
• 38:02
  Speaker 1: talents and your abilities should be used for something way
• 38:08
  Speaker 1: more useful than just satisfying the curiosity of other.
• 38:12
  Speaker 2: People yeah people write to me and say well prove
• 38:17
  Speaker 2: it to me you know okay, 8 billion people on
• 38:22
  Speaker 2: the planet and I'm going to spend the rest of
• 38:23
  Speaker 2: my life trying to prove it one by one by one.
• 38:27
  Speaker 2: Not going to happen. Those emails, I just delete them.
• 38:37
  Speaker 1: Yeah, you never reply to those people because they're never
• 38:40
  Speaker 1: going to be satisfied with whatever it is that you
• 38:42
  Speaker 1: say or whatever it is that you do.
• 38:45
  Speaker 2: It's called the juggler's effect. You show them that you
• 38:49
  Speaker 2: can juggle two balls. Oh, can you juggle three? You
• 38:53
  Speaker 2: juggle three. Can you juggle four? Then when you finally
• 38:56
  Speaker 2: drop a ball, oh, yeah, you're no good. And that's
• 39:03
  Speaker 2: the juggler effect. Oh, do a session for me. Oh,
• 39:08
  Speaker 2: can you do a different session? Oh, yeah. They're just
• 39:10
  Speaker 2: waiting for you to fail.
• 39:14
  Speaker 1: Yeah, but when I do that, I told you so
• 39:16
  Speaker 1: that I knew that you weren't really psychic because one
• 39:20
  Speaker 1: out of the 20 things that you've done was wrong
• 39:23
  Speaker 1: and said something wrong. And that's then we just jump
• 39:26
  Speaker 1: on that. I've experienced that so much.
• 39:29
  Speaker 2: So.
• 39:30
  Speaker 3: Much.
• 39:31
  Speaker 1: Uh, I just experienced it yesterday where a guy was like, Oh,
• 39:35
  Speaker 1: I made this a minute and 20 minutes. uh, second
• 39:39
  Speaker 1: short video about, you know, the snakes and symbolism and,
• 39:44
  Speaker 1: you know, how Rome basically fell and then was kind
• 39:47
  Speaker 1: of reconstituted in America. And I had said that in Ireland, uh,
• 39:53
  Speaker 1: you know, the original St. Patrick, he, uh, the, the
• 39:57
  Speaker 1: whole thing was, is that he was getting rid of
• 39:59
  Speaker 1: the snakes in Ireland during his time. Like that was
• 40:03
  Speaker 1: the whole thing of, of that. And I put that
• 40:06
  Speaker 1: into the video along with all this other, uh, real
• 40:09
  Speaker 1: stuff that I was talking about. And then this person
• 40:12
  Speaker 1: was like, you're an idiot. You don't know what you're
• 40:16
  Speaker 1: talking about. You're low educated person. It wasn't a, it's
• 40:19
  Speaker 1: not history that St. Patrick got rid of the snakes
• 40:23
  Speaker 1: out of Ireland. That was a legend. And I was like, Oh,
• 40:26
  Speaker 1: excuse me. I'm very sorry that, you know, I said
• 40:31
  Speaker 1: history and not that the legend of St. Patrick was
• 40:34
  Speaker 1: that he got rid of the snakes and there wasn't
• 40:36
  Speaker 1: any snakes. My bad, bro.
• 40:39
  Speaker 2: Yeah, there are those who just want to pick a fight.
• 40:44
  Speaker 3: They'll just take away everything that I said because of
• 40:56
  Speaker 3: that one thing that they didn't agree with.
• 40:59
  Speaker 1: But if it wouldn't have been that one, that's the
• 41:01
  Speaker 1: whole thing about it is that if it wouldn't have
• 41:03
  Speaker 1: been that thing, Linh, Then it would have been something
• 41:06
  Speaker 1: else that I said in the video. It's unbelievable this
• 41:16
  Speaker 1: type of dialogue that we get between people. He literally
• 41:22
  Speaker 1: could have solved it if he would have just said, yeah,
• 41:25
  Speaker 1: that's not historical. That's just a legend. Then I would
• 41:28
  Speaker 1: have said, yeah, you're right. It's just a legend.
• 41:30
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 41:31
  Speaker 5: Yeah.
• 41:35
  Speaker 1: It's that simple. I don't know what it is. It's
• 41:39
  Speaker 1: like this superiority type of complex with people.
• 41:43
  Speaker 2: There's the key word, people.
• 41:50
  Speaker 1: When people, people. Um, is there anything in the movie that, um,
• 41:57
  Speaker 1: I mean, I guess it's kind of a strange question,
• 42:00
  Speaker 1: but is there anything that you thought that you would,
• 42:06
  Speaker 1: that you would change if you would go back or
• 42:09
  Speaker 1: that you would add, if you could do it again,
• 42:12
  Speaker 1: it's kind of a weird question, but I thought that
• 42:14
  Speaker 1: I would ask if there's anything that you would wanted
• 42:17
  Speaker 1: me to do or that you wish that you would
• 42:19
  Speaker 1: have added or wish that you would have said.
• 42:22
  Speaker 2: Actually, there was one movie, one part of the movie
• 42:25
  Speaker 2: where I felt that I didn't record what it was
• 42:27
  Speaker 2: and I forget now. But I remember thinking at the time,
• 42:32
  Speaker 2: I wish he hadn't said that. But it's true. So, yeah,
• 42:38
  Speaker 2: go ahead and say it. I'm all for the truth.
• 42:43
  Speaker 2: We're getting the truth out there, really.
• 42:49
  Speaker 1: It's interesting I'd like to know what that was I
• 42:53
  Speaker 1: mean you said a lot of really great things in
• 42:56
  Speaker 1: there lots of nuggets of truth like with Saddam Hussein
• 43:02
  Speaker 1: as well you guys knowing where he was and you
• 43:04
  Speaker 1: know people like the political power at that time didn't
• 43:08
  Speaker 1: want the military to find him I thought that was
• 43:10
  Speaker 1: really fascinating.
• 43:13
  Speaker 2: They say in the government there are two answers to
• 43:16
  Speaker 2: Any question you can ask in the government. One answer
• 43:20
  Speaker 2: is politics. The other answer is money. So why? Why
• 43:26
  Speaker 2: didn't they want him? I don't know. Was it politics
• 43:29
  Speaker 2: or was it money? I don't know.
• 43:32
  Speaker 1: No. Yeah, that would have been before 9-11, too, and
• 43:38
  Speaker 1: that feud between us and them in the early 90s
• 43:43
  Speaker 1: or the mid-90s. So they would have had to have
• 43:46
  Speaker 1: waited a long time of knowing where he was until
• 43:51
  Speaker 1: after 9-11, until after 2001. They did, yeah.
• 43:54
  Speaker 2: Mm-hmm.
• 43:59
  Speaker 1: And that would mean that that's like a coordinated plan.
• 44:06
  Speaker 1: Someone had a coordinated plan. Oh, yeah.
• 44:10
  Speaker 2: Yeah, that didn't just happen by accident.
• 44:17
  Speaker 1: Almost like they knew that 9-11 was going to happen, Lim.
• 44:22
  Speaker 2: There is a story about five of the intelligence officers
• 44:28
  Speaker 2: who had predicted it could not get anyone to listen
• 44:33
  Speaker 2: to them. And so they went to a civilian lawyer
• 44:39
  Speaker 2: and had the papers written out and put the papers stamped,
• 44:45
  Speaker 2: you know, and sealed and all that so that even
• 44:49
  Speaker 2: the lawyer didn't know what it said. But after it
• 44:53
  Speaker 2: happened and they started blaming the intelligence community, these guys
• 44:58
  Speaker 2: wanted that thing back. And from what I hear, they
• 45:03
  Speaker 2: finally got prosecuted for giving classified information to an unclassified person,
• 45:11
  Speaker 2: even though it was sealed and never opened. So, I
• 45:16
  Speaker 2: don't know. Politics. I don't mess with politics, though.
• 45:26
  Speaker 1: Well, there were having you do, uh, oh, there's another
• 45:29
  Speaker 1: thing that I wanted to ask you about that several
• 45:31
  Speaker 1: times that you've been on in the past. We didn't
• 45:33
  Speaker 1: get into it in the interview for the movie or anything, but, um,
• 45:37
  Speaker 1: you know, about the predictions that you, uh, had for,
• 45:44
  Speaker 1: I think that it was like 2030 or 2035 about, uh, 2040, uh,
• 45:51
  Speaker 1: Do you still think we're on track for that? Do
• 45:56
  Speaker 1: you think it's been averted?
• 45:57
  Speaker 2: I did not see this whole US-Iran thing going. That's
• 46:07
  Speaker 2: the one deviation from the whole thing that I saw. However,
• 46:16
  Speaker 2: and this is a fear of mine because what I
• 46:18
  Speaker 2: saw was that the big kill off of people was
• 46:22
  Speaker 2: going to be, uh, through manmade natural disasters. And, you know,
• 46:30
  Speaker 2: at some point they're firing thousands of missiles a day
• 46:34
  Speaker 2: and all that. At some point they're going to run
• 46:37
  Speaker 2: out of war resources. And the Russians have earthquake weapons.
• 46:44
  Speaker 2: We have atmospheric weapons, the different countries, the Chinese, the, uh,
• 46:50
  Speaker 2: Israelis and all that have different weapons that will control
• 46:56
  Speaker 2: natural facilities, uh, uh, you know, dry out a country, uh,
• 47:02
  Speaker 2: flood the country, um, um, do things like that, you know,
• 47:10
  Speaker 2: earthquakes and things like that. And I hope it doesn't
• 47:13
  Speaker 2: get to the point where we start, where they start using, uh,
• 47:20
  Speaker 2: those man-made natural disasters, because every one of them is
• 47:25
  Speaker 2: a big thing that will affect millions of people.
• 47:33
  Speaker 1: What year did the majority of this take place in
• 47:37
  Speaker 1: your remote viewing of it?
• 47:39
  Speaker 2: The killing off of people around 2030 to 2040, somewhere
• 47:44
  Speaker 2: around there. And, you know, but it started. All along,
• 47:51
  Speaker 2: COVID was a manmade natural disaster. Many of the other things,
• 48:00
  Speaker 2: the drying out of the central U.S. is a manmade
• 48:03
  Speaker 2: natural disaster. We have created that ourselves, the weather changes
• 48:11
  Speaker 2: within the U.S. We have sold basically a thousand gallons
• 48:19
  Speaker 2: an hour water out of the central U.S. basin to
• 48:28
  Speaker 2: Dubai for growing crops. And that's been going on 24
• 48:34
  Speaker 2: hours a day for about 10 years now. And the
• 48:39
  Speaker 2: central U.S. is getting soaked dry. And that's a man-made
• 48:45
  Speaker 2: natural disaster.
• 48:51
  Speaker 1: And where does this lead? Does this lead to a
• 48:55
  Speaker 1: one world order, one world government eventually, like everyone has
• 49:00
  Speaker 1: been saying? Or where does this go after this big
• 49:04
  Speaker 1: die off of lots of people?
• 49:08
  Speaker 2: Oh, the remnants, the remainders, the survivors, it leads to
• 49:16
  Speaker 2: them just standing up and taking everything away from all
• 49:21
  Speaker 2: the powers that be and saying no more. And what
• 49:25
  Speaker 2: it results in is by 2060, according to what I found, uh,
• 49:33
  Speaker 2: the survivors are going to have a great world to
• 49:35
  Speaker 2: live in. But up until then, it's, uh.
• 49:46
  Speaker 1: Did you see AI in your remote viewing of the future?
• 49:51
  Speaker 1: Did you see this emergence of artificial intelligence and how
• 49:55
  Speaker 1: that may or may not play a role in the future?
• 49:58
  Speaker 2: I got a small glimpse of it, but not big.
• 50:04
  Speaker 2: I didn't see that it was that big a thing.
• 50:07
  Speaker 2: And of course, now AI has become a very big thing.
• 50:11
  Speaker 2: And so, you know, nobody's perfect. And the kill off
• 50:22
  Speaker 2: of the 75% of the human race, I will give
• 50:28
  Speaker 2: anything to be wrong about that.
• 50:34
  Speaker 1: The emergence of one thing could possibly change the outcome, right?
• 50:40
  Speaker 1: If AI wasn't as big of a thing before when
• 50:45
  Speaker 1: you viewed it before and it was like a little
• 50:48
  Speaker 1: thing kind of in the background and now it's a
• 50:50
  Speaker 1: really big deal. I don't know if that's a symptom
• 50:53
  Speaker 1: of us being in it right now, because everything is
• 50:56
  Speaker 1: kind of a big deal when you're currently in it.
• 50:59
  Speaker 1: It's not really a big deal when you're looking back
• 51:02
  Speaker 1: on it, or if you're trying to look into the
• 51:03
  Speaker 1: future to see it, it's more of a deal when
• 51:06
  Speaker 1: you're actually in the trenches on it. Um, do you
• 51:11
  Speaker 1: think that something like the, the emergence of something that
• 51:16
  Speaker 1: you didn't believe was going to, could possibly change.
• 51:21
  Speaker 2: The timeline of, Oh, yeah, the future is definitely changeable.
• 51:28
  Speaker 2: We can change the future. The normal pattern of our
• 51:33
  Speaker 2: society is that we don't. We don't take action. We
• 51:38
  Speaker 2: complain about it and duck our heads and do nothing.
• 51:51
  Speaker 1: Yeah, well, we can hope for a, I would like
• 51:54
  Speaker 1: for the people to rise up and without the destruction.
• 51:57
  Speaker 1: I think we should do that without the destruction, you know,
• 52:00
  Speaker 1: and then it would be a better reality for everyone
• 52:03
  Speaker 1: to live in a lot sooner.
• 52:04
  Speaker 2: Yeah, that is, violence and all that is the absolute
• 52:09
  Speaker 2: worst and least productive way to rise up.
• 52:13
  Speaker 1: Yeah, but unfortunately, that's all the people seem to really
• 52:17
  Speaker 1: understand is bomb them. Bomb them, kill them.
• 52:21
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 52:22
  Speaker 1: Fight them. It's sad that Lin knows so much and
• 52:28
  Speaker 1: he's going to end up, you know, going to the
• 52:31
  Speaker 1: grave with a lot of the things that he knows. And, well,
• 52:34
  Speaker 1: my rebuttal is like, well, I think he's writing a book.
• 52:36
  Speaker 1: You're writing a book currently that's going to have a
• 52:38
  Speaker 1: lot of that information in it, correct?
• 52:41
  Speaker 2: I think it's up to four volumes now and still
• 52:44
  Speaker 2: got plenty to go.
• 52:45
  Speaker 1: Yeah. And you're going to reveal some of the information
• 52:50
  Speaker 1: that you haven't previously talked about inside of that book.
• 52:54
  Speaker 2: We don't talk, we don't tell everything and teach everything
• 52:58
  Speaker 2: to the public, you know? And, uh, so a lot
• 53:03
  Speaker 2: of that stuff is valuable, could be good archive material
• 53:08
  Speaker 2: and all that, and could be a spark for applications
• 53:15
  Speaker 2: in the future. So, uh, So yeah, I'm trying to
• 53:18
  Speaker 2: get it all down.
• 53:22
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that's really important because I try and explain to people,
• 53:25
  Speaker 1: I'm like, he had a really high, you know, ranking
• 53:28
  Speaker 1: security clearance and some of the things that he knows
• 53:30
  Speaker 1: isn't even about remote viewing. It's about other national security matters.
• 53:38
  Speaker 1: If you could give your recommendation for the movie, do
• 53:41
  Speaker 1: you think that, where would you rate it on a scale?
• 53:44
  Speaker 1: I know that you're in it and it's probably kind
• 53:46
  Speaker 1: of unfair to, Have you rated, because you're in it,
• 53:49
  Speaker 1: where would you rate it on a scale of 1
• 53:52
  Speaker 1: to 10? And would you recommend people to watch it?
• 53:54
  Speaker 2: Personally, I see myself 85 pounds heavier than I am now.
• 53:58
  Speaker 2: I'm ashamed to be at it almost. And no, I
• 54:01
  Speaker 2: thought it was a good movie. I think you did
• 54:05
  Speaker 2: a really great job on it. And it seemed to
• 54:08
  Speaker 2: me like you had two movies in one. The first
• 54:12
  Speaker 2: one was about the remote gun and all that. The
• 54:14
  Speaker 2: second one was about the kids, you know. And I
• 54:19
  Speaker 2: think that the two are definitely tied together in real
• 54:26
  Speaker 2: life and in your show. But I was thinking, man,
• 54:31
  Speaker 2: this will make two good movies.
• 54:33
  Speaker 5: Yeah.
• 54:38
  Speaker 1: Thank you. I appreciate that. And yeah, that's where I
• 54:41
  Speaker 1: was kind of at with it, because it was really
• 54:43
  Speaker 1: important for me to get a really detailed history of
• 54:45
  Speaker 1: the DIA Army Intelligence Remote Viewing Unit, because to my knowledge,
• 54:50
  Speaker 1: none has ever been done like that. There's never been a,
• 54:54
  Speaker 1: you know, conclusive history of the unit. And that was
• 54:58
  Speaker 1: really important for me to be able to do with
• 55:01
  Speaker 1: you guys. And I felt like that was really needed
• 55:06
  Speaker 1: because there's so much confusion. Just from talking with the
• 55:10
  Speaker 1: people that are from the unit, like yourself and other people,
• 55:13
  Speaker 1: no one can really agree on any of it. You
• 55:15
  Speaker 1: know what I mean? It seems like it's like, well,
• 55:18
  Speaker 1: this is what happened this day. That happened that day.
• 55:20
  Speaker 1: And then no one can ever come to any conclusion. Yeah.
• 55:23
  Speaker 2: One of the reasons for that is that Ingo kept
• 55:26
  Speaker 2: changing things. He never finished the polished stuff. in the
• 55:32
  Speaker 2: result of remote viewing, of controlled remote viewing. And he
• 55:35
  Speaker 2: would train different people at different times. And so, you know,
• 55:41
  Speaker 2: we would all, we would come in one at a
• 55:43
  Speaker 2: time and get the latest version. Well, the other people said, no,
• 55:50
  Speaker 2: Ingo didn't tell us that. Yeah, but he told me that.
• 55:55
  Speaker 2: And so, so there's always been that, confusion simply because
• 56:00
  Speaker 2: it was never a standardized thing. He kept changing everything.
• 56:09
  Speaker 1: Yeah, and I was like, well, people can disagree and
• 56:13
  Speaker 1: argue about, you know, the things that were put in there,
• 56:19
  Speaker 1: but I literally just went off of all the declassified
• 56:23
  Speaker 1: documents I could find.
• 56:25
  Speaker 4: Yeah.
• 56:26
  Speaker 2: Yeah, you can say hello to somebody and they'll start
• 56:29
  Speaker 2: an argument. Excuse me.
• 56:37
  Speaker 1: That's about how it goes. That's about how our reality
• 56:39
  Speaker 1: is right now. Anybody will do anything just to stir
• 56:44
  Speaker 1: something up. Yeah.
• 56:47
  Speaker 2: And I also like the fact that you covered the
• 56:51
  Speaker 2: fact that there were actually two units One, the Stargate unit,
• 56:59
  Speaker 2: where we were collecting intelligence, doing spying work. And the
• 57:04
  Speaker 2: other was the Delta unit, which was used for psychic
• 57:09
  Speaker 2: work out in the field, you know, among the troops.
• 57:13
  Speaker 2: So I like that you covered that because nobody else
• 57:16
  Speaker 2: covers that.
• 57:21
  Speaker 1: Well, I don't think that a lot of people even
• 57:23
  Speaker 1: know about that other unit. And I was fortunate that
• 57:28
  Speaker 1: I had you in the movie because you had received
• 57:30
  Speaker 1: an invitation for that unit, correct?
• 57:34
  Speaker 2: Yeah. I just didn't want to go out and get
• 57:38
  Speaker 2: shot at. You guys going out in the field.
• 57:46
  Speaker 1: And where was that unit supposedly supposed to be? What
• 57:51
  Speaker 1: state do you remember?
• 57:52
  Speaker 2: I know pretty well, but I'm not sure whether that
• 57:59
  Speaker 2: location is declassified or not. So it was in the U.S.
• 58:14
  Speaker 1: Well, I tried to do a little bit of research
• 58:16
  Speaker 1: and some people said Texas, some people said Northern California,
• 58:19
  Speaker 1: and then some other people said the Carolinas. So it's
• 58:22
  Speaker 1: one of those three, I believe. Is that right? Is
• 58:26
  Speaker 1: it one of those three?
• 58:27
  Speaker 2: Either that or you got those three because it's not
• 58:30
  Speaker 2: one of those. That's the way it goes in the
• 58:36
  Speaker 2: Intel organizations. Extremely well planned, extremely well executed, and oh
• 58:45
  Speaker 2: yeah i'm gonna recommend this to everybody.
• 58:49
  Speaker 1: Thank you very much lynn really appreciate it i appreciate
• 58:52
  Speaker 1: your participation in the movie uh people really much enjoyed
• 58:57
  Speaker 1: it and uh i really enjoyed it and it was
• 59:00
  Speaker 1: an amazing process of meeting everybody in person and going
• 59:04
  Speaker 1: through the editing and finding all the documents and everything
• 59:07
  Speaker 1: so i appreciate you being in it and i appreciate
• 59:10
  Speaker 1: you coming on the show to help promote it and
• 59:13
  Speaker 1: letting people know about it can you let people know
• 59:16
  Speaker 1: where to find you online if you have a website
• 59:18
  Speaker 1: if you would like to get in contact with you.
• 59:22
  Speaker 7: I have a website C-R-V-I-E-W-E-R C-R-V-E-W-E-R dot com tick tock uh,
• 59:31
  Speaker 7: Instagram and YouTube, I have a channel called Inside Remote
• 59:37
  Speaker 7: Viewing where we have like three minute videos and each
• 59:45
  Speaker 7: one of those videos is about one aspect of CRB
• 59:49
  Speaker 7: and one aspect of its applications.
• 59:53
  Speaker 2: How it works, its ethics, uh, theory behind it, everything else. So, uh,
• 59:59
  Speaker 2: On those three channels, it's inside remote viewing. My website
• 1:00:07
  Speaker 2: is crviewer.com. And thank you for that. And as for
• 1:00:15
  Speaker 2: the movie, I'll go back to my Texan roots and
• 1:00:18
  Speaker 2: I'll have three words for you. You done good.
• 1:00:27
  Speaker 1: Thanks so much, Lynn. Really appreciate it. Uh, the links
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 1: to Lynn's information will be in the description of this
• 1:00:32
  Speaker 1: video and please go to Amazon prime to check out
• 1:00:35
  Speaker 1: the movie psychic agent, the gate program. You can rent
• 1:00:37
  Speaker 1: it or buy it on there. And if you're interested
• 1:00:39
  Speaker 1: in getting a physical DVD copy of the movie, you
• 1:00:42
  Speaker 1: can email me at raised by giants at outlook.com or
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 1: see the link in the description. Thanks so much for
• 1:00:48
  Speaker 1: being here, everyone. Please be sure to hit the thumbs
• 1:00:50
  Speaker 1: up button, hit the channel and the algorithm share, subscribe
• 1:00:53
  Speaker 1: at the bell icon as well for notifications. And we'll
• 1:00:55
  Speaker 1: see you guys next time.
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 5: Bye-bye.
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 2: Bye-bye.