Latest / The Vault: The Epstein Files / Joe Rogan And His Comments About Jeffrey Epstein And The Intelligence Community

Transcript

Joe Rogan And His Comments About Jeffrey Epstein And The Intelligence Community · The Vault: The Epstein Files

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What's up everyone and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles. So,
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: Joe Rogan on his podcast was talking about Epstein and
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: he says that he also believes that Epstein was a
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: CIA or Mossad spy. Well, welcome to the party Joe Rogan.
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: We've been saying this for how long here on this
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: podcast and elsewhere, right? Not just us here, but it's obvious,
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: at least to me, that Epstein was some sort of asset.
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: Now the question is, who was he being run by?
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: For me, I think the most logical answer to that is,
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: he was being run by both of them. My guess
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: is that it was the CIA who okayed the operation,
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: and then of course there were some Mossad elements as well.
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: But the people who believe that it was a full-on
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: Mossad operation, I can't get down with that. Because as
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: strong and as powerful as the Mossad is, they'll always
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: be the little brother to the CIA. And there's nothing
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: that goes on in this country or the world that
• 1:08
  Speaker 1: the CIA is not aware of. These dudes know what's up.
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: Especially if you think you're going to run an operation
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: like this in America using somebody like Epstein who's already
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: known to them. Let's not forget the FBI. Let's not
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: forget all of his other run-ins with the law that
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: saw Epstein come out unscathed. What can explain all of that?
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: Is it just good luck? Is he just the Teflon Don?
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: Or is there something else going on behind the scenes? Today,
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: we have an article from the New York Post. The
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: author is Ariel Zilber. Headline, Joe Rogan, Jeffrey Epstein may
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: have been CIA or Mossad spy. Yeah, no shit. But
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: I'll take a different approach than most people. I think
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: it's a good thing Rogan's talking about this. With his
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: reach and his audience, the more people who know what
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: really went on here, the better off we are. And
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: I've saw some people come out and accuse him of
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: being a conspiracy theorist for this. I mean, really? Considering
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: what Alexander Acosta had to say about Epstein being owned
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: by intelligence, considering what we have heard from so many
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: other sources, is it really that far of a stretch
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: to believe that this guy was being run as an asset?
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: And remember, being run as an asset doesn't mean the
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: government itself is condoning what you're doing. You're being run
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: as an asset by some black group, right? Some black
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: operation that's off the books. So people try, they conflate
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: it sometimes and act like you're saying, well, the whole
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: government was in on it. That's certainly not what I'm saying.
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: But there certainly are people within the government who are
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: running these black ops who have zero care in the
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: world about using a child molester or pedophile like Epstein
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: to get compromise on people. And that's certainly what Epstein
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: was up to, folks. Joe Rogan thinks that convicted pedophile
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein may have been an agent of either the
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: CIA or Israel's Mossad, who was part of a plot
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: to collect sensitive information about the rich and powerful. We
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: all know that that's what was going on. The girls
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: all told us, all of his survivors, how many of
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: them have told us about the house being wired? How
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: many of them have told us about the dossiers? You see,
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: I don't worry about all the white noise. I listen
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: to what the actual survivors have to say, and then
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: what we see in court documents. Because there's a treasure
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: trove of information in all of those leaks. And when
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: you start putting the pieces together, there's no way that
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: you can come to any other destination besides one that
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: has Epstein being protected by somebody. Rogan broached the topic
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: of Epstein and his connection to Harvard University on last
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: Friday's episode of his popular podcast, The Joe Rogan Experience,
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: which is available on the Spotify streaming service. It's funny
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: he's talking about Harvard here, considering Mr. Steven Pinker, Professor Pinker,
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: blocked me on Twitter, and I've never even had a
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: back and forth with the guy. I was looking at
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: something else, and I happened to run across his Twitter feed,
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: and it says, you're blocked. And let me tell you what,
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: I had a great chuckle at that. Imagine being some
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: Harvard trained dude, all that money, some big shot, and
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: getting your lunch eaten by a guy who's barely functional,
• 4:36
  Speaker 1: a guy who barely made it through state school. Talk
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: about wasted money, huh? But Harvard is just a bed-stuy,
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: a sore of disgustingness when we're talking about Epstein. You
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: want to talk about an open wound? It's Harvard and
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: everybody who was involved with Epstein on that campus. And
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: with Pinker blocking me, I hope the rest of them
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: do the same. Then my next goal will be to
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: have the Taliban put a fatwa out on me. The
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: podcaster and his guest, comedian Whitney Cummings, began talking about Epstein.
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: His comments were cited on Monday by Mediate. Well, he
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: definitely donated some money to science, Rogan said. You know,
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: but I had a conversation with a scientist who didn't
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: buy into the Epstein stuff and wouldn't go to the
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: meetings and stuff like that. Now, why would you? If
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: you were some scientist and this dorky-ass dude who has
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: no credentials, no anything, and has all of these rumors
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: swirling around him, This guy comes and contacts you, you're
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: going to take money from him? Oh yeah, that's a
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: good idea. And he said he was really shocked at
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: how little money he actually donated. Interesting, Cummings said. He goes,
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: it wasn't that much money. He goes, it was really
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: like he was more than that, Rogan said. He was.
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: He was somebody who provided them something that they were
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: incapable of getting themselves. Pretty young women. It's not that
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: hard to figure out, folks. It's not this unsolvable puzzle.
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: These dudes had proclivities, grew up, you know, bookworms, nerds,
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: never had hot girls, I'm sure. Then this disgusting pedophile
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: shows up, says to them, I have access to all
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: these young girls. Why don't you come to my island
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: for a vacation? And if Epstein tells them they're underage
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: or doesn't tell them they're underage, who knows? But the
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: fact is, once you're on that island and they're engaging in,
• 6:32
  Speaker 1: you know, relations with these girls, now they're part of
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: what went on, right? And if you build a file
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: on somebody and say to them, look, you were sleeping
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: with an underage girl and I have documented proof. You
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: don't think that that person is going to become more malleable?
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: Somebody who's going to be more willing to give you
• 6:49
  Speaker 1: information that you're looking for? Of course they are. He
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: was bringing them to parties like it was an intelligence operation,
• 6:57
  Speaker 1: Rogan said. Whoever was running it, whether it was the
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: Mossad or whether it was the CIA or whether it
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: was a combination of both, it was an intelligence operation.
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: They were bringing in people and compromising them. Look, this
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: is Joe Rogan saying it as well. And you can
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: like Rogan or not like Rogan, whatever. But if you're
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: somebody who is interested in justice in this case, having
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: him talk about this to his wider range of audience
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: is a good thing. And I hope that people who
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: are listening say to themselves, what the hell? What do
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: you mean he was an intelligence operative? And they start
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: digging deeper because we all know that you can't just
• 7:33
  Speaker 1: scratch the surface of this one. You got to dive
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: right into the deep end. And when they would compromise them,
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: they would use, you know, whatever they had on them
• 7:44
  Speaker 1: to influence their opinions and the way they express those opinions,
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: Rogan added. And I don't know why they would want
• 7:50
  Speaker 1: to do that with scientists, which is really strange to me. Well,
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: who knows what those scientists were working on? I think
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: we would have to go back and look at every
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: single scientist and look at the projects they were working
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: on and then try and draw the comparisons and the
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: parallels from there. Cummings then joked, Epstein's like, I need
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: you to do a study about how 15-year-old girls are adults.
• 8:12
  Speaker 1: They're more mature than we thought. But if a scientist donates,
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: I'm sorry, if a rich person donates to a scientist,
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: do they have any ability to weigh in Or are
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: they just like, I get no decisions about how this
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: money is spent, she said. That's an interesting point, but
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: really with Epstein it was more. It wasn't like he
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: was just some kind of philanthropist who's trying to help
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: people out. He was doing this to manipulate the situation
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: and give him more power over things. Rogan replied, I
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: don't know, I mean, I would imagine the money goes... Like,
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: if you have a research grant and say, like, you're
• 8:47
  Speaker 1: working on a cure for leukemia or something like that,
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: you know, you find established scientists that are working on
• 8:53
  Speaker 1: this thing. And then you allocate money so that they
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: can work on the projects. Whether or not the person
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: who donates the money has any influence on how that
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: money is spent, I doubt it. I highly doubt legitimate
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: scientists would adhere to that, Rogan added. Epstein killed himself, allegedly,
• 9:11
  Speaker 1: while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges in 2019. He
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: allegedly assaulted dozens of girls, some as young as 14
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: years old. Allegedly? No, he did. Okay? And it was
• 9:24
  Speaker 1: over 100 who got a payout. So the base number
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: should be the girls who got paid out at the
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: very least. So, I mean, dozens? Really? How about hundreds?
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: His madam, you mean co-conspirator and fellow child abuser, Ghislaine Maxwell, 60,
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: was sentenced last month to 20 years in federal prison
• 9:41
  Speaker 1: for procuring young girls in Epstein's sex trafficking operation. Maxwell's
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: late father, Robert Maxwell, was rumored to have ties with
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: the Israeli intelligence service, the Mossad. Not rumored, it's fact.
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: You see, don't try and muddy the waters. Facts are facts,
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: and what aren't facts are rumors. But it's a fact
• 10:01
  Speaker 1: that Robert Maxwell had ties to the Mossad and to
• 10:06
  Speaker 1: Israeli intelligence. In 2020, Harvard found that the university accepted
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: more than $ 9 million from Epstein during the decade leading
• 10:16
  Speaker 1: up to his 2008 sex crimes conviction in Florida State Court,
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: but barred him from making further donations after that point.
• 10:25
  Speaker 1: It concluded that Epstein visited the Cambridge, Massachusetts campus more
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: than 40 times after his conviction, including as recently as 2018.
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: Martin Nowak, a Harvard professor who had close ties to
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: Epstein and who allegedly gave him an office on campus,
• 10:41
  Speaker 1: was disciplined by the school. The visits by Epstein stopped
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: after other researchers complained to Nowak about Epstein's presence. Investigators said,
• 10:50
  Speaker 1: Imagine being that daft and saying to yourself, Oh, it's
• 10:53
  Speaker 1: okay if Epstein comes. Nobody's going to have any issue
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: with that. Imagine being that ridiculous? The report cleared Harvard's
• 11:04
  Speaker 1: senior leaders of wrongdoing, saying they acted appropriately in their
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: dealings with Epstein. Of course it did. Every single one
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: of these internal reports, same thing. Oh, you did a
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: little something wrong, but you didn't do it knowingly. Although
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: most of the funding from Epstein had been spent by
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: last year, the school said it donated the remaining $ 200, 000
• 11:24
  Speaker 1: to groups that support victims of sex trafficking and assault.
• 11:29
  Speaker 1: Other universities have also faced scrutiny over their ties to Epstein,
• 11:33
  Speaker 1: including MIT. And the former director of MIT's famous media lab,
• 11:38
  Speaker 1: Joy Ito, resigned in 2019 amid uproar over his financial
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: connections to Epstein. He issued a public apology and vowed
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: to raise money for victims of trafficking. And that's what
• 11:50
  Speaker 1: they all try and do, right? To assuage people's feelings. Oh, well,
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: I'll just raise some money and that's going to fix everything. No,
• 11:56
  Speaker 1: it's not. Why did you take money from Epstein? Why
• 11:59
  Speaker 1: was Harvard involved? And why has Harvard, for the most part,
• 12:03
  Speaker 1: avoided any real scrutiny here? I'll tell you why, because
• 12:07
  Speaker 1: once again, the institutions are all broken, and there is
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: no equitable justice. If you'd like to contact me, you
• 12:17
  Speaker 1: can do that at bobbycapucci at protonmail.com. That's B-O-B-B-Y-C-A-P-U-C-C-I at protonmail.com.
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: You can also find me on Twitter at B-O-B-B-Y underscore C-A-P-U-C-C-I.
• 12:33
  Speaker 1: The link that I discussed can be found in the
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: description box. All right, everybody, I'll be back later on
• 12:39
  Speaker 1: with a little more. Hope you're all having a good one.