Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Red Pill Women Are Trashy and Childish! | Rantzerker 189

Transcript

Red Pill Women Are Trashy and Childish! | Rantzerker 189 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:01
  Did wasteland. We are the survivors of the alt right kick apocalypse, the
• 0:06
  few, the brave, the bitchy, once more wading into battle against the
• 0:11
  hmm, the horse, the horse hair, her horse hide, mongol hordes
• 0:17
  with rant Zerker number one eighty nine. Red pill women are trashy and childish.
• 0:25
  You know, I want to be offended, but she has a point.
• 0:29
  I think, you know, trashy and childish. I'll take it.
• 0:34
  At least we're not well. I guess we're also cunty too, Okay,
• 0:39
  Define red pill women. Yeah, that's that's a good question. Like,
• 0:43
  what what do you mean? Define your terms, madam, Define your terms.
• 0:48
  We can. I don't consider Pearl Pearl Davis to be trashy and childish.
• 0:56
  I I don't even consider Roma Army to be trashy and childish. Right,
• 1:06
  I don't consider most Suzanne Wenker, Helen Smith, Jenice Bia Mango right,
• 1:12
  Like, I don't consider any of them to be trashy or or childish.
• 1:19
  Maybe she's just directing it at us like I do have. I do
• 1:23
  have the sense of humor and musical taste of a fourteen year old boy,
• 1:26
  But I don't consider myself to be trashy or childish. I mean, my
• 1:36
  hat does look like a trash heap, but it's not because I'm trashy.
• 1:42
  I just don't really care. Like, honestly, this is trashy and childish,
• 1:47
  so okay, but what if we're right that trashy and childish but honest
• 1:53
  and correct. I mean, who gives a crap about trashy and childish?
• 1:57
  It's just yeah, no, I just like playground insult slinging. Well,
• 2:00
  I've got a salty tongue. I've always had a salty tongue. Right,
• 2:07
  F word, C word, you know, like those were even when I
• 2:10
  was writing dirty books for women. I was like, yeah, no language.
• 2:16
  I'm sorry, but the P word is anachronistic. Nobody was calling it
• 2:24
  that back in the fourteen hundreds, right, they were calling it the C
• 2:29
  word. Actually, back then it was the Q word q u e y
• 2:34
  nte. Yeah, this is just gonna be wall to wall vulva jokes.
• 2:38
  Friends. Yeah no, And I'm sorry, but you can you could just
• 2:45
  like you can get mad at me for my butt, well, you can
• 2:52
  lick my sweaty butt crack. If you don't like me to tell you that,
• 2:57
  I'll see you next Tuesday. M I don't even know what's gonna happen
• 3:02
  next Tuesday. See you. Oh oh oh it's freaking visual pun. Okay,
• 3:10
  no, all right, you know you're so lame, you're so old,
• 3:16
  and I'm older than you, and you didn't even know that you know?
• 3:21
  Yeah, No, I didn't. I didn't. I didn't get the
• 3:24
  reference until just now, when you've spelled it. Outs are not my fourteen
• 3:30
  ten years ago, I was working in a Tony romas and I had this
• 3:35
  fifty five year old veteran waitress. She was just like, she was awesome,
• 3:39
  She was wonderful, She could handle anything. She was so super energetic
• 3:45
  and had a sense of humor that really jibed with mine. She also had
• 3:50
  short hair like me, and so whenever someone would say, you know,
• 3:54
  oh, what's your name? Whenever customer would say what's your name? And
• 3:57
  I was like, it depends if you like the service. My name's Karen.
• 4:01
  If you didn't like it, I'm the tall, short haired blonde named
• 4:06
  Vanessa. But she used to sometimes when she had a really bad table,
• 4:15
  really obnoxious table, she'd be like, oh, see you next time,
• 4:21
  and then she'd elbow me in wink see you next time. Yeah, yeah,
• 4:30
  I was laughing. I was laughing. I was just muted, that's
• 4:32
  all. Okay. So I just want to remind everyone. I want to
• 4:36
  remind everyone that if you want to send us a message at any time during
• 4:40
  the show, you can do so it feedbbadger dot com slash just the tip.
• 4:43
  That's feed Thebadger dot com slash just the tip. We get the full
• 4:46
  benefit of whatever funds you send our way, and you get the full benefit
• 4:49
  of evading YouTube's comment enhancement system, shall we say, at least until next
• 4:56
  Tuesday. At least until next Tuesday, which okay you and we'll see,
• 5:03
  okay, all right, So feed the Badger dot com slash just the tip
• 5:08
  to send in those comments, and we will read them on air and respond
• 5:12
  to them. And if you want to send us a comment after the show
• 5:15
  is over, we do still get them and we can read them at the
• 5:18
  next relevant show. And I've also opened up my fundraiser for supporting the editing
• 5:27
  of my novel The Captive I Game of Thrones Meets Alice in Wonderland. And
• 5:34
  if that sounds good, that sounds like something you'd like to help bring into
• 5:39
  the world, please go to feed the Badger dot com slash support help me
• 5:41
  out there. All right, let's get this started, because I imagine,
• 5:46
  I imagine this this, this will go one of two ways. It'll either
• 5:49
  be infuriating or hilarious. Oh no, it could or hilarious infuriating, or
• 5:57
  it could be insightful. You never know. I mean sometime yeah, maybe
• 6:00
  maybe maybe she's got some maybe she's got a finger on the pulse of the
• 6:04
  psychology of the average woman like us. Well, I just I just I
• 6:09
  just recall that there were lots of videos that I titled ironically where I'd have
• 6:15
  people dropping by, you know, look, look out, it's a nice
• 6:19
  guy, destroy him? Or men not marrying? How deep does the problem
• 6:25
  go? Or uh uh, just basically titles that were counterintuitive, attention grabbing,
• 6:40
  right, And I used to get drop in comments, like drive by
• 6:44
  comments from people who just read the title, looked at the thumbnail of this
• 6:49
  woman with like no makeup and short hair who looks like a lesbian separatist,
• 6:59
  and they'd just be like, yeah, it sucks and you're some stupid lesbo
• 7:04
  blah blah blah, right and uh and then someone would say, did you
• 7:12
  actually watch the video? Like you might want to watch the video before you
• 7:15
  comment. Yeah, sometimes they actually do and they're like, oh sorry,
• 7:20
  but ask always always always apologies from people who you know who got the wrong
• 7:28
  impression from the title in the thumbnail. Is this ironic? Brian? I
• 7:34
  wish it was. I wish it was. Okay, maybe I shouldn't have
• 7:41
  disillusioned her so early in the process. I'm going to have a nap now,
• 7:46
  you know. This is from a YouTuber called the Authentic Observer. I
• 7:54
  think she's the authentic observer. Authentic Observer said, maybe she has maybe she
• 8:03
  has her finger on the pulse of women like no, no, no,
• 8:07
  nobody, nobody who names themselves the authentic observer, the truth teller galore,
• 8:16
  you know, like, yeah, no, no, Like that is the
• 8:20
  ironic title, right, the title would they give themselves. She's not observant.
• 8:30
  She she will not have observed anything authentic and she will not be This
• 8:35
  is a prediction. That prediction is a prediction. You can't you can't say
• 8:39
  for sure because we haven't watched this yet. Okay, yeah, but we
• 8:43
  only have crazy. We need to know if you had told me before I
• 8:52
  made that suggestion that maybe it would be insightful. If you had told me
• 8:56
  her user name, I would be like, oh fuck, this is just
• 9:03
  gonna be fucking full of shit, because nobody with any amount of intellectual humility
• 9:13
  would name themselves the authentic observer. They might describe themselves as authentic. They
• 9:22
  might describe themselves that just means you mean what you say, right, and
• 9:31
  authenticity. Yeah, But and you might you might describe yourself as an observant,
• 9:39
  you know, in context, you know, I'm I'm just an observer.
• 9:45
  I'm just somebody who's observing what's going on, and I'm just somebody who
• 9:48
  speaks what's really on my mind. Right, And therefore, you would never
• 9:54
  name yourself. You would never give yourself that title if that's who you were,
• 10:00
  you know, be like, well, what kind of gigantic, fucking
• 10:03
  ego do I have to have you basically say not that I am an authentic
• 10:11
  observer, but the authentic observer, and not just that, like it's not
• 10:18
  just egotistical, it's also sort of moralizing, like I am the one who
• 10:24
  is right in the conversation and you are wrong. Uh well that that that,
• 10:30
  well we shall find out, and also is tasteless and what is it
• 10:33
  trashy or trashy and what was the other word that she use, childish?
• 10:39
  Childish? Are those those genuine observations? Are they just insults? Because what
• 10:45
  objection, what matters is integrity and honesty. Like, you can be as
• 10:50
  childish as you want, but if you're telling the truth and you have integrity,
• 10:54
  you know, well, go forth with all of your fart jokes.
• 10:58
  Yeah, all right, make them politically relevant. All right. So there's
• 11:05
  two sections of this that I think are probably the juwsiest cuts of meat.
• 11:11
  One this one which is called female competition disguised as concern for men. I
• 11:16
  think you guys would probably like like that. And then at the end there's
• 11:20
  a section called the red pill does not understand femininity? Now, okay,
• 11:26
  yeah, go ahead, go ahead. Well, I was just going to
• 11:30
  say, just based on that whole idea of female competition disguised as concern for
• 11:33
  men, does this person even allow does does she think that concern for men
• 11:41
  in any context is acceptable? I'm just putting that out there. I just
• 11:48
  would like, I'm going to watch this with that question in mind. Does
• 11:52
  this individual give any indication that she regards concern for men as extable acceptable in
• 11:56
  any context. Oh no, this is just this is just instead of saying,
• 12:01
  uh, red pill women are picknies. Yeah, it's it's the same
• 12:07
  thing. She just changing a little more academically. Yeah, she's calling it
• 12:13
  female instead of a pick me. But she's also saying that our concern Yeah,
• 12:22
  no, our concern for men is false because we're crying out pick me,
• 12:28
  pick me, Chad, pick me? Oh what the pickmy thing is?
• 12:35
  Most of the so called red pill women are already married. Yeah,
• 12:39
  I'm honestly, yeahnestly happy like Jesus Christ. Yeah, you want to be
• 12:48
  picked again? Right? We can't just be out there concerned about the legal
• 12:52
  realities that men face, including the men in our lives. We have to
• 12:56
  want to be picked multiple times. We're already picked and locked down. Friend,
• 13:01
  That's why. That's why I so yeah, Janice, I don't think
• 13:09
  Pearl is, but I think Roma is. She's in a relationship. Well
• 13:13
  yeah, but okay, look look at Pearl, look at you, right,
• 13:18
  look at me, look at Janice. Okay, Janice, I will
• 13:24
  grant you she is a snappy dresser, right, but she's not. She's
• 13:30
  not a sexy dresser. And she does do her hair, but that's because
• 13:35
  she's got a lion's main full of hair. Yeah, big big hair,
• 13:43
  angels angels hair, right hair, Yeah no, And so she didn't do
• 13:48
  it and turned into a sphere. If she didn't use product right, it
• 13:54
  would be out of control. Okay, that's why I buzz my head because
• 14:00
  that's what my hair would be like, right, Yea, Allison, When
• 14:03
  was the last time you brushed your hair? Do you even remember? No?
• 14:07
  I brushed my hair. Okay, look, I take care of my
• 14:11
  hair, but the problem was my hair has gotten a lot better because I
• 14:13
  figured out the issues that I had with it. Okay, anyway, every
• 14:18
  morning, but you've never really cared about your hair. When was the last
• 14:22
  time you wore makeup? Was it in the New York at The Red Pill?
• 14:28
  I don't think I was wearing much makeup there. I think maybe maybe
• 14:31
  I wasn't wearing much. You never wear much? Maybe some masscarro that's it?
• 14:37
  Yeah? That. No, I don't wear makeup very often. I
• 14:39
  don't wear much. Like. Yeah, I haven't worn makeup in since The
• 14:46
  Red Pill? Uh premiere, I have not put any makeup on at all.
• 14:56
  Right, I buzz my head. I wear pants. I wear them
• 15:01
  because they fit and they're long enough, not because they make my ass look
• 15:05
  great. I wear tank tops because they're comfortable, right, and they don't
• 15:13
  constrict my shoulders, and they cost fourteen dollars each, right, I don't.
• 15:18
  I wear comfortable shoes. Right. People mistake me for a lesbian for
• 15:22
  a reason. Okay, this is this is just an I'm sorry. If
• 15:31
  you think that I am in this, I can do one better. I've
• 15:37
  been mistaken for a man. Oh really, You've been mistaken for a man.
• 15:43
  In the liquor store the other day, I was wearing I was wearing.
• 15:46
  Admittedly, I was wearing a trench coat and was from behind, Okay,
• 15:48
  I was wearing a really short man. I was wearing a plaid hoodie
• 15:54
  okay, with the hood down. But that just means they're seeing my short
• 15:58
  hair. And I'm looking at the wine selection and she says, excuse me,
• 16:03
  sir, can I help you? And I turn around She's like,
• 16:07
  oh no, sorry, and I'm like, okay, wow, actually no,
• 16:11
  you got you got super common, super common. Yeah, people from
• 16:18
  behind from behind, if you're wearing a yeah, they see a short bite
• 16:23
  and broad shoulders and comfortable shoes and they assume man. Yeah. Well,
• 16:30
  I mean I was also like wearing a jacket that was fairly bulky to so
• 16:36
  and it sort of hung off my shoulders. So I mean, I I
• 16:40
  you probably wouldn't mistake me for a man if I wasn't wearing like yeah,
• 16:47
  with your hair probably on the inside of it or whatever, right, But
• 16:49
  no, I had I had a short hair for a long time. Oh
• 16:52
  there you go, yeah, and there you go. So it's like,
• 16:56
  yeah, no, I you my first eight like I wore. I wore
• 17:03
  steel toed army boots and a plaid jacket and jeans. And if my husband,
• 17:07
  my husband, my now husband saw that, and who was like,
• 17:11
  oh she was dressed like a man. Intriguing and uh you know that this
• 17:15
  is I'm not sure what she's going with a female competition because most of us
• 17:19
  have parents, have husband's significant other significant others. Many of us don't bother
• 17:26
  with a lot of makeup like I think Roma does. But I don't think
• 17:30
  Pearl does. Aside from probably what's necessary for being I don't even think Roma
• 17:36
  bothers so much with makeup. It's it's tattoos and piercings with her. Yeah,
• 17:40
  yeah, that's the Okay, but let's let's get started, because we're
• 17:42
  guessing on what she said. All I will say is that this does the
• 17:48
  first section is all about Pearl. So if you're wondering if this, if
• 17:52
  Pearl's existence is the inspiration for this, at least in part, yes,
• 17:56
  although not limited to that. But I'm not going to go into that because
• 17:59
  I just seems like petty shit. You know, it's actually called I do
• 18:04
  not like just pearly things. So that's kind of how she like gets into
• 18:07
  this. But I think she's using Pearl as an example. Does she does
• 18:11
  she actually make any salient points about what Pearl says that she disagrees with?
• 18:19
  Well, yeah, well she's section. She's using this to get into what
• 18:25
  she really wants to talk about. So all right, I need clarity before
• 18:27
  we continue the section we're going into she talks about Pearl or the section we're
• 18:33
  skating, I think I think it's it. There is some of that in
• 18:34
  this as well. She's using as the impetus. But I think the first
• 18:38
  part is just her insulting her. I think she does bring up the fact
• 18:42
  that, well, at least like what she believes, that Pearl is single,
• 18:45
  and this is like the reason she's doing any of this stuff apparently,
• 18:51
  But yeah, I don't. I don't think so. I think that I
• 18:52
  think that Pearl is like a brand of Tarth and she just understands how things
• 18:57
  work. Yeah, I think so. I'm inclined to. But anyway,
• 19:00
  you guys in the show chat, I'm gonna play it. Yep, Okay,
• 19:06
  let's do it. So there is another issue I have with some of
• 19:11
  the red Pill ladies, and I think so many men don't see this because
• 19:15
  no offense. But a lot of men are just really bad at spotting women
• 19:19
  who are acting from self interest. If those women are just saying things that
• 19:22
  they want to hear, Okaya, lipstick, rouge, eyeliner, mascara,
• 19:33
  prune to eyebrows, giant ear rings, giant earrings, right, very ill,
• 19:41
  fin face. She would be beautiful with makeup or without, and she's
• 19:48
  like, but she still feels like she has to try. Right, she
• 19:52
  would be beautiful without any of that makeup. I guarantee you she's got a
• 19:57
  base of foundation there too. Right, should be gorgeous without any of the
• 20:03
  makeup, but she still puts on the full face and uh, Pearl,
• 20:11
  Pearl, the freckly Ginger is the one who's just doing it to get male
• 20:18
  attention. Well, you don't understand she's putting this makeup on for herself.
• 20:23
  You say, oh, yes, yes, and Pearl, you know,
• 20:27
  like Pearl could be quite stunning. Pearl is not wearing makeup for men.
• 20:36
  Yeah, no, she's not wearing makeup for men. Instead of makeup,
• 20:38
  she's putting on a false persona is what she's doing, right, Yeah,
• 20:48
  but everything about this is a false persona. This is this is all false
• 20:52
  advertising. Yeah, you know, and like you're saying, she's probably attractive
• 20:59
  without it, at least, you know, in a in in the video,
• 21:03
  she's got beautiful symmetrical features. She's got a chisel jaw, she's got
• 21:07
  nice cheekbones even without the enhancement. She's she's got nice, wide set eyes.
• 21:17
  She's she's a very attractive woman, except for that weird thing in the
• 21:22
  center of her hairline. That's weird. It is weird. I didn't even
• 21:26
  notice that. That's what. That almost looks like a really really petty she's
• 21:37
  asking for it, she's asking for it. Well, this is the battle
• 21:41
  ground, this is this is the territory that she wants to fight over.
• 21:45
  You have chosen. Yeah, yeah, she chose these terms, so saying
• 21:51
  to men are having sympathy for men because she's not really qualifying what kind of
• 21:56
  concern is incorrect and phony. So all I can assume from this so far
• 22:02
  is that it's just any concern. But let's continue, Brian, let's I
• 22:06
  got a super chat from Anemic Royalty. Thank you, Aniemik. He gives
• 22:10
  us four ninety nine and he says one slash two FTR. This girl is
• 22:15
  a trad con. I don't know what FTR stands for, like an internet
• 22:18
  thing for the record, for the record, okay, I'm not a big
• 22:22
  fan of her, but I believe she actually gives some of the substantive critique
• 22:26
  of these types people miss and an out of two out of two which he
• 22:30
  did not send a super chat with with, but I will read it.
• 22:33
  Do you a favor. She called out Pearl for not taking a man's sexual
• 22:37
  assault claim. Seriously, I don't remember when it is all right, thank
• 22:41
  you for the super chat. I think I think this is a feminist though,
• 22:45
  but we'll we'll keep playing. I mean, not that there's a big
• 22:48
  difference between the two, but the way I've been doing this forever. Let's
• 22:52
  be a little more discerning, please. Yeah. So there's this really bratty
• 22:56
  and superior attitude amongst some of the red pill women that I find women have
• 23:00
  been expressing concern for men forever. Are you kidding me? I don't know.
• 23:11
  Go ahead, she reminds me. You know who she reminds me of?
• 23:15
  Bizarro World, Elizabeth Hobson. Yes, you know, is this Bizarrow
• 23:21
  Elizabeth Hobson. Okay, we go ahead, Hobson. Elizabeth Hobson is also
• 23:26
  very gorgeous in this exact same style. Yeah. And uh and but she's
• 23:34
  at least kind of thoughtful. Yeah, okay, all right. So let's
• 23:41
  like, I'm not exactly sure why saying that she has traditional values makes anything
• 23:47
  she's going to say better. I don't think they're saying that. I don't
• 23:51
  think that anyone, all right, But I mean, if she did call
• 23:53
  out Pearl on not recognizing the sexual abuse of a man, that's that's good,
• 23:57
  you know, props to her. If yeah, if that's true,
• 24:00
  unless that's just a tool to give her, like, you know, leverage
• 24:06
  against Pearl, and she really wouldn't care otherwise, in which case it doesn't
• 24:08
  really matter. Unless that is itself toxic competition showing that concern. I don't
• 24:14
  know. Yeah, keep common, Okay, the things that constantly accusing other
• 24:18
  women of being so some of the first videos that I ever saw of Pearl
• 24:22
  were these shorts she did with her friend who I believe. Okay, just
• 24:23
  a second, I want to say one last thing. Okay, if women
• 24:27
  commonly expressed concern for men, this idea of blaming men for the world's problems
• 24:34
  without I mean, if if men are one hundred percent responsible for society,
• 24:37
  or even majority responsible for society, then they're also responsible for the boons of
• 24:42
  society. But no, we isolate the problems and put them on men,
• 24:47
  and we just don't talk about the boons. If women had this kind of
• 24:51
  universal concern for men, would that have ever be gotten? Traction? If
• 24:56
  this was a common behavior in women expressing concern for men, stint this whole
• 25:00
  omna to blame came out. Women will be like, but what that's that
• 25:04
  would have a bad fact on men? Stop it and that would be the
• 25:07
  end of it, don't you think? Yeah? I yeah, I agree.
• 25:15
  Sorry, I'm chewing double bubble again. Okay, that's fine, but
• 25:21
  uh two away as Halloween, I can't feed it to the dogs. Well,
• 25:26
  I can't let it go to waste and it won't last until next year.
• 25:29
  Well you could, and then they could blow bubbles from out one end.
• 25:33
  Hm hmmm, the wrong end. Yeah. But but the idea that
• 25:41
  I like, I do believe there are grifters in this movement, but like
• 25:56
  women who are tag alonging tag alongs and they're just kind of basically it's it's
• 26:03
  it's a new fashion, right, it's kind of like being punk, right,
• 26:11
  and their heart's not really in it. But okay, I gotta spit
• 26:18
  this gum out, all right. Well I will watch a little bit more
• 26:22
  and you compose your thought. All right, I got a super chow.
• 26:26
  I should put it up, yester, just do it? Do it?
• 26:30
  Do what? Do what? I got a super chow? No, I
• 26:33
  got a super chow. Okay, So from an anonymous person, we got
• 26:37
  to give them priority so that they send more through. Gives us ten dollars
• 26:41
  thank you, and says does she allow concern for men? Yes, I've
• 26:45
  watched all of her long form videos on the likes of Tate and Waller,
• 26:49
  and the answer is unequivocally yes. She said that Tate has positive things to
• 26:53
  say to men. Also does she make salient points in response to Pearl.
• 26:57
  I did appreciate the segments on Tait's application of the lover boy method and Pearl's
• 27:03
  dismissal of the concept. If I thought it was a bit uncharitable, I'm
• 27:07
  assuming malice over incompetence, among other bits. Thank you for the super child.
• 27:11
  I don't really know who this person is, so you you might be
• 27:15
  right. I don't know, but I think that when you What I have
• 27:19
  noticed though, is that there are women in this circle or this part of
• 27:26
  the internet that appear to be supportive, sympathetic, or adjacent to men's issues.
• 27:33
  And they were probably really involved at some point, but they have since
• 27:37
  backed away and you know, hurled criticism or whatever. And I'm you know,
• 27:44
  it's your business do it. Support whatever you want or don't support whatever
• 27:47
  you want. But I think that sometimes it's a bit annoying because they will
• 27:53
  It's like they come here and they want to say the nice things and be,
• 27:57
  oh, I care about you guys, you know, I understand your
• 28:00
  struggles blah blah blah, and then they like get really into it and they
• 28:04
  realize how much pain and anger and rage there is and and after a while
• 28:11
  they go, you know what, these people are misogynistic or this is a
• 28:15
  bad movement or comfortable. Yeah, it makes them uncomfortable, and then they
• 28:19
  just sort of like throw shade, you know, a nice raft. Yeah.
• 28:25
  Like I give you an example, Uh, Sidney Watson. So Sidney
• 28:30
  Watson she hosted or or had like a men's march in Australia years ago.
• 28:37
  I thought it was great. I had her on the show. We talked
• 28:41
  and and you know, and I still think that she's like she's been on
• 28:45
  a bunch of Jubilee stuff. Yeah, she's been on Jubilee stuff, et
• 28:48
  cetera. But but she she I saw her recently on Triggerometry and when she
• 28:56
  was on there, she was basically saying that she's moved away from the red
• 29:00
  pill stuff because you know, and she mentions like, oh this it's like
• 29:06
  Andrew Tate now and like this or this or that, you know, like
• 29:08
  misogynistic dude, and oh you know it used to be something, but now
• 29:12
  it's this other thing. And it's like, Sidney, you are on our
• 29:17
  show. We've been here for a long time. You know that we exist,
• 29:21
  and you're and you're basically just like oh man, there's just like it's
• 29:25
  it's it's just the flip side of feminism. It's just the other side.
• 29:27
  It's the same shit I heard it from. And I think I still would,
• 29:33
  you know, be charitable to Sydney and say, I know that you're
• 29:37
  well meaning, but you're you are letting your emotions about certain aspects affect your
• 29:44
  view of the whole, and you're not actually like telling these guys like,
• 29:47
  oh, look, you know the cause because the Triggernometry guys, they're looking,
• 29:49
  they're always looking for some excuse to be like, we are in the
• 29:53
  perfect position of moderate and if you're not right here, then you're obviously too
• 29:59
  low IQ to understand how great this specific spot on the fence is. And
• 30:03
  it irritates me to no end because this is not an issue of right,
• 30:07
  well, this is not an issue of like, how do you feel about
• 30:11
  you know, like this particular I don't know, like these guys in the
• 30:15
  manisphere and do you want to be associated with that or not? I don't
• 30:19
  give a shit, Like I'm doing what we're doing. Like what matters to
• 30:22
  me are the principles, the concepts and the ideas. And I think that
• 30:26
  and I don't know why it is, but it's mostly with women that are
• 30:30
  in this they get to a point where they become uncomfortable and they want to
• 30:34
  back away, and they want to backtrack and say, look, I don't
• 30:37
  support any of that shit. And the thing that really bothers me is that
• 30:41
  they don't seem to get is the only reason why you now have Andrew Tate
• 30:47
  as the face of the manisphere is because you have ignored so many more moderate
• 30:51
  people that came before and try to talk about this stuff because their audience wasn't
• 30:55
  big enough. And now he's got like millions of views and everybody's upset and
• 31:02
  it's like, yeah, but there are people who have been here for a
• 31:03
  long time. And I'm not just talking about myself, just so you know,
• 31:07
  I'm not just talking about this channel. I'm saying that there are people
• 31:11
  that have been involved in this conversation for years and years and we are still
• 31:15
  like, you know, like you're not even gonna get I don't know,
• 31:19
  Mike Buchanan, Janis FIAMENNGO, fucking Paul like, no, you won't do
• 31:26
  that. And also some of those people are too far. I saw what
• 31:29
  happened with Shoe on head, getting into it with Paul Elam online and you
• 31:33
  know, on Twitter or whatever, because again she was like, well,
• 31:37
  look, I'm all down with you guys, but if you like cross this
• 31:41
  line, if you cross this line, if you're too angry, you know,
• 31:44
  if you if you like, I don't know, insult women that are
• 31:47
  thoughts or whatever, then I'm gonna block you. I'm gonna call you the
• 31:49
  same. You're the mirror image of this other institution that runs everything, that
• 31:56
  runs everything. You're the same as that because you have a few angry guys
• 32:00
  on the internet. And it's like no, so okay. So what I'm
• 32:04
  saying is and I'm sorry for like monopolizing the time. But what I'm getting
• 32:07
  at is this woman might be fine, but her her premise I don't like
• 32:16
  because it is in its nature it appears to be exclusionary, like Pearl is
• 32:24
  not real and she's not like really somebody that we should be. It's like
• 32:29
  what Roma does, where Roma constantly attacks Pearl and then Roma says, this
• 32:32
  is my men's rights community. She basically takes ownership of it. I don't.
• 32:37
  I don't think, well, yeah that's what she does. Yeah,
• 32:40
  she says this men's right community meant so it's like, you know, you
• 32:45
  have to do this my way and everyone else should be excluded. And I'm
• 32:50
  of the opinion that I don't care what perspective or what angle people have.
• 32:54
  If they're out there talking about this stuff, then that's good enough for me.
• 32:58
  And I give props to Pearl because she did the thing that Sydney wouldn't
• 33:02
  do. That Lauren Southern wouldn't do that, Shoe on head wouldn't do until
• 33:07
  like she got some pressure to do something and then she threw us a bone,
• 33:09
  thank you shoe And who else am I thinking of? And yeah,
• 33:15
  those are like the main ones, right They because they don't want this to
• 33:20
  harm their reputation or their image or whatever, so they back away. But
• 33:23
  Pearl doesn't care. So she gets Paul on, she gets Janis on,
• 33:27
  she gets you on, she gets Mike Buchanan on, And I'm like props
• 33:30
  to her. That mean like that, like you know, if you're if
• 33:35
  you want to be successful, one of the best things is to be a
• 33:37
  good middleman, and that's what Pearl is doing. Then I will support that,
• 33:42
  period, That's what I'm saying. So I well, I mean it
• 33:45
  depends. I think it depends on what you mean by success, right,
• 33:50
  success in terms of the movement, or success in terms of the revenue you
• 33:55
  pull. Well, I guess for me it's more about the re but like,
• 34:00
  yeah, I see what you mean. Yeah no, And it's like
• 34:04
  so I I kind of I've always looked at it like or success in terms
• 34:08
  of understanding what's going on, and I've always kind of looked at that as
• 34:14
  the primary success that I wanted. I want to understand what's going on,
• 34:17
  and then I want to I want to say it, say what I think
• 34:22
  is going on, and and that's not just in terms of you know,
• 34:28
  feminism and men's rights, also in terms of race relations and even the vaccines.
• 34:37
  Yeah yeah, and uh and yeah no if if Brian, if you
• 34:44
  want to do a show on those, I can give you a show on
• 34:47
  those and it'll be but okay, but okay, My my issue is so
• 34:55
  like I interviewed Rushbik, I interview this can't well. I interviewed James Demore,
• 35:02
  I've interviewed Sasha Day game right, and every single and then I freaking
• 35:12
  nuked somebody from Orbit whose name shall not be mentioned, but starts with m
• 35:19
  and I every single time I had loyal people in you know who, loyal
• 35:28
  followers or subscribers to my channel, right say oh, I can't believe you
• 35:34
  did this. I'm like, so fucking they'll watch it. Don't watch it.
• 35:38
  Then if you don't want to watch it, then it's not for you.
• 35:44
  I'm not making this content for you, right, I'm making this content
• 35:50
  for me, and I'm not making this content to make money or get clicks.
• 35:53
  I'm making this content to put the truth out there, or put what
• 36:00
  I believe is the truth out there, right, or other people's perspectives or
• 36:07
  you know, different points of view on controversial topics. That's what I'm doing
• 36:12
  it for. And so I don't care, like I don't want to get
• 36:16
  canceled. That's why I demonetized my channel. I demonetized the whole channel,
• 36:22
  set all of it to over eighteen. Right the moment my older videos started
• 36:29
  to be demonetized, and the moment that they said, oh you have to
• 36:34
  you have to guess correctly whether you're your content is suitable for under eighteens,
• 36:39
  and I was just like, fuck it, fuck it, right, I
• 36:45
  don't need the money and I don't want all of my videos to go down
• 36:52
  because I guessed wrong, right ye, or I monetized the wrong video you
• 37:00
  and because that's that's that's my work, it's my that's ten years worth of
• 37:06
  work there. I don't want it to disappear just because I guessed wrong and
• 37:13
  YouTube or some idiot at YouTube, some blue haired booby that YouTube decided I
• 37:19
  don't like her, So three strikes, she's out delete channel. Yeah,
• 37:27
  so I'm just like, but you like, there are people who are really,
• 37:34
  really really raking in a ton of money right on these issues, and
• 37:43
  they have to look at their channel like a business. They have to,
• 37:50
  and so Roma Army. If she's depending on that income, she has to,
• 37:55
  like, she has to consider it her men's rights. Can county she
• 38:00
  ass do? Yeah, it's not, but it's her pay check. Yeah,
• 38:07
  I get it. I get it. Okay, I got a super
• 38:10
  chow. I got two, but only one of them came up on my
• 38:15
  interactive chat saying I saw to read the other one out without displaying it from
• 38:20
  anonymous, the same guy who sent us that last one. He says,
• 38:23
  I for five dollars, I appreciate and agree with almost everything you're saying.
• 38:28
  But having watched this particular woman. While being a big fan of HBr,
• 38:30
  I do believe she's well earned the benefit of the doubt. I didn't mean
• 38:34
  to mark as anonymous. It's okay. I mean, like I said,
• 38:37
  I'm open to hearing her out. Maybe maybe she will have something constructive to
• 38:43
  say. Let's see, would be lovely to hear her out. Yeah,
• 38:45
  let's listen more, Let's listen more. All right. I tell you,
• 38:49
  the pure amount of cringe from these videos made my organs die inside my body.
• 38:57
  When I tell you to prepare yourselves, I don't want to thing that
• 39:00
  I'm joking. Maybe get into the brace position because this is bad. So
• 39:02
  they made a few of these shorts together, and okay, I'll play them
• 39:07
  and tell me if they don't fit this scenario. So this series of videos
• 39:10
  they made when they were hanging out together, this reminds me. So you
• 39:14
  know when you were at school, Okay, you were at school, and
• 39:15
  then a group of girls would get in a fight, and then two of
• 39:19
  the girls involved This sounds really specific, but tell me if I'm wrong,
• 39:23
  two of the girls involved would have a sleepover and then they'd go on Facebook
• 39:28
  and post like passive aggressive pictures showing how much of a good time they were
• 39:30
  having, or post status updates that were like snide digs at the girls they
• 39:34
  were in a fight with and get all like uppity and bratty and post all
• 39:37
  online. It was utterly embarrassing but also kind of forgivable because they're twelve.
• 39:40
  Yeah, so imagine two adult women being childish enough to do that. And
• 39:44
  also their fight is with all of the women on the internet. All right,
• 39:51
  And so there's a meme. Oh this is uh oh, what's her
• 39:54
  name? Fame the woman on the left, Her name is fem sapiens.
• 39:58
  She's a Puerto Rican girl from shitar I don't know why I never met her
• 40:02
  anyway, And yeah, she is anti feminist as well, so I know
• 40:08
  that much. The caption is we don't care in capitals, which I personally
• 40:17
  find very convincing. Katie and Lucy got in a fight with Yeah, well,
• 40:24
  personally, I find it really I don't find it helpful. All of
• 40:29
  this battling groups of women are doing over how they structure their lives, like
• 40:36
  whether or not they submit to a man, whether or not they stay at
• 40:37
  home, whether or not they work, whether or not they have children,
• 40:40
  whether or not they have a frickin dog. You know, it seems like
• 40:44
  this is this is a behavior that women engage in, and they do a
• 40:46
  lot of it. They take some of the most ridiculous ways of judging each
• 40:52
  other, like whether or not they've eaten sugar during pregnancy, and they put
• 40:57
  people on other women on blast for it, and they completely ignore things like
• 41:00
  are you beating your husband? You know? Are do you recognize the fact
• 41:06
  that your son could possibly be sexually abused in some context? Do you?
• 41:10
  Or do you tell him? Oh? You you have to take the responsibility
• 41:14
  for rape because you're a man like you. Do you care about the things
• 41:16
  that you say to your sons? Do you care about the things that men
• 41:21
  and your family have to endure when they walk out the door? Do you
• 41:23
  care about any of that? Do you care for your male relatives? And
• 41:27
  a real genuine can care like something that extends out to understand their point of
• 41:31
  view and the pressures in their lives, like are you going to walk away
• 41:36
  if your husband loses his job? Right? All of these things, these
• 41:40
  are the things. These are ethical and morac moral considerations, and instead they
• 41:45
  play stupid games about did you eat I don't know coffeine? During pregnancy and
• 41:52
  other stuff like that. It's like, is that really that important versus are
• 41:59
  you having a kid who's know their father? You see what I'm saying.
• 42:02
  Yeah, well yeah, but I think that the idea of the traditional wife,
• 42:13
  right, submitting to a man, Okay, yeah, but that's my
• 42:21
  point. It's like, yes, if that's what you want, go for
• 42:23
  it, right, yeah, but but there are things that it's not necessary,
• 42:30
  Like I wish, I wish this soul submitting to a man thing would
• 42:36
  just go away, because that's never been the case. Women have never really
• 42:42
  truly and really, what it is trusting your male partner. There you go
• 42:46
  and you're trusting him. You're trusting him to drive, you're trusting him to
• 42:51
  make decisions, you're trusting him to have understanding within his sphere of expertise,
• 42:57
  right, and you're trusting him. That's what it is. It means trust,
• 43:00
  That's what it means. And yeah, I can see what she's saying.
• 43:05
  They've sort of turned this idea of submission into a way of well maybe
• 43:09
  not, because what they're saying is that this is the way I want to
• 43:13
  structure my life, you know, and if it pisss you off, I
• 43:16
  don't care. That seems to be what they're saying. And they're also like
• 43:20
  in their twenties, right, so yeah, they're gonna be a little bit
• 43:23
  selfish or like shallow and caddy. But my overall point is I don't think
• 43:30
  that it's relevant like if a woman wants to have a career like Ben Shapiro's
• 43:35
  wife, or if she wants to stay at home like somebody else's wife.
• 43:38
  I can't name it the moment, but I'm sure exists. You know me.
• 43:43
  What matters is that you care about the men in your life. You
• 43:47
  try to make their life easier. You trust them, you know, you
• 43:52
  listen to them, You make sure that their concerns are part of the equation,
• 43:57
  regardless of how that that falls out in a shallow way. And I
• 44:01
  think the reason why women compete over oh stay at home oh versus career is
• 44:07
  it really is a competition almost over like a like a who is the correct
• 44:15
  way of arranging your life? It's like there is no correct way. Once
• 44:19
  you're within the rubric of ethics and compassion. You get what I'm saying,
• 44:24
  As long as you're dealing with people around you with concern and compassion and you're
• 44:30
  trying to support them and be a good person, then it doesn't matter that
• 44:34
  this just shallow stuff. And I think that that competition is really about resource
• 44:40
  garding for women in a way, because you know, a lot of the
• 44:45
  advancement for career women comes from this belief that women are discriminated against in the
• 44:53
  career sphere. So if it's recognized that women actually have this other option,
• 44:58
  it's legitimate. A out of that, the the accuracy to the or the
• 45:04
  understand or the veracity that's the word I was going for, veracity to the
• 45:08
  claims of oppression of women in the workforce disappear, so they lose the resources
• 45:15
  that those claims give them access to, like preferential hiring, scholarship, first
• 45:22
  freeze, you know, like all of this other stuff in the workplace.
• 45:23
  They lose access to that, and so stay at homes threaten that narrative and
• 45:30
  then stay and then women who with a career threatens stay at homes because they
• 45:34
  sort of, you know, because it sort of shows that when you're staying
• 45:37
  at home and you're not a homesteader, you actually really have a very a
• 45:42
  much easier life in some way, lay very light work day, so it's
• 45:46
  sort of. It's sort of it goes to the heart of that that that
• 45:52
  that that threatens the narrative of the self sacrificing stay at home right, and
• 45:59
  it threatens the narrative of the oppressed career woman. So they each of these
• 46:02
  two groups of women threaten each other's narratives. So they're constantly at odds.
• 46:07
  And it's like, no, you don't have to be. If you're a
• 46:10
  woman who prefers to go out and support her family, there's a biblical model
• 46:15
  for that. If you're a woman whos to stay at home and support her
• 46:17
  family, there's a biblical model for that. I'm not just saying that you
• 46:21
  only have to use biblical models, but whatever. But I'm just saying that
• 46:24
  the point is to care about the people in your life. It's not to
• 46:32
  expect everyone to adhere to your particular narrative that allows you to grab resources if
• 46:37
  you're a career woman, or grab resources if you're a stare at home.
• 46:42
  It's about caring for the people around you and the men and trusting them and
• 46:47
  caring for them and recognizing that masculinity has its own virtues and that you should
• 46:52
  listen to it because you know, it's a point of view that you don't
• 46:57
  have and can inform your own in a positive way. So you see what
• 47:00
  I'm saying, You don't need this. This entire competition is ridiculous and wrongheaded
• 47:06
  in my opinion, And that's my conclusion of that. Well, shut up.
• 47:12
  I will say that I think it was Warren Ferrell who mentioned that,
• 47:17
  you know, the the most virulent anti feminists in when he was involved with
• 47:25
  the National Organization for Women were women married to successful men, stay at home
• 47:36
  women married, stay at home wives married to successful men, because they viewed
• 47:45
  women in the workplace as direct competition against their husbands and well their husband potential
• 47:52
  sources of threat to their relationship. Yeah, their husband, their husband's success
• 48:00
  in the workplace was threatened by the influx of all of these highly educated career
• 48:06
  women blah blah blah, not just highly educated with an empowering narrative that allowed
• 48:10
  them to these resources that they didn't get through merit. Yeah, And I'm
• 48:17
  like, they weren't wrong, right, And it's like, well, I
• 48:22
  stay at home and yes, I do things right. I like, not
• 48:28
  me in particular, I'm talking to like the general me, as you know,
• 48:32
  a stay at home person of a successful man. I stay home.
• 48:38
  I do things. I help organize his life. I you know, set
• 48:44
  up social gatherings. I you know, do his correspondence. I may fill
• 48:51
  out his Christmas cards that you know, grease. The social wheels of his
• 48:55
  is network of bosses and underlings and coworkers and clients and potential clients and all
• 49:07
  of that, right, And I manage all of that, And I manage
• 49:12
  the money, and I manage the household, and I arranged for dinner parties
• 49:15
  and things like that and where we entertain his boss and the new partner at
• 49:22
  the law firm or whatever. Right, and I do all those things right.
• 49:29
  And that even if you have a housekeeper slash cook on staff, right,
• 49:37
  even just doing that managing that kind of man's career, right, being
• 49:43
  the wife of someone who's highly successful, can be a very taxing and busy
• 49:49
  job. And they were extremely threatened by the idea of quotas on boards,
• 50:00
  directors, quotas in the c suite, quotas in the executive office. No
• 50:06
  ship yeah oh yeah, And well you know that's like if if and it's
• 50:13
  how they were doing nothing just because they weren't scrubbing floors. Yeah, no,
• 50:19
  I'm not. I'm not saying they were necessarily doing nothing, but it
• 50:22
  honestly, it is still about a resource being threatened, essentially both camps on
• 50:29
  both camps. Yeah, this is this is the whole thing. Men compete
• 50:32
  over the vedge and women compete over the money. Yep, that's competing over
• 50:40
  access to resources. Yeah, that's that's how intersexual competition works. Men compete
• 50:46
  for sex, women compete for resources. That's that's how it works with all
• 50:52
  mammals, social mammals. Did I I got some super chats and superchows and
• 50:59
  then we're gonna get No, probably not, but I mean, like,
• 51:04
  how long have you been here? All right? So I got a super
• 51:07
  chow from Richard. It didn't come up on the screen for some reason,
• 51:13
  just this one, but I'm gonna read it for five dollars. And he
• 51:15
  says an issue with Roma is that she will cherry pick about who she deems
• 51:20
  worthy of her advocacy. Still can't get her take on Kyle Rittenhouse out of
• 51:24
  my head. There is a purity spiral going on, just like with a
• 51:29
  particular demographic right where there is only one correct way to be a part of
• 51:32
  the cause. If you don't vote for me, then you aren't blank.
• 51:37
  Just like there is only one correct way to be particular demographic, and anything
• 51:43
  else is an inauthentic impersonation of that particular demographic, whether it's you know,
• 51:47
  women, trans people, whatever. Yeah, of course that's how intersectionality really
• 51:53
  works. What was her take on Kyle Rittenhills. Oh Roma thought that he
• 52:00
  was a terrible, terrible white supremacist racist that crossed the state lines to kill
• 52:05
  black people, even though he ended up having to defend himself against three white
• 52:08
  dudes or three not black people. I don't know if they were white,
• 52:14
  but I think one of them might have been like partly Hispanic. Yeah,
• 52:19
  another one was like, well, he had a Jewish name, so he
• 52:22
  knows, but doesn't matter. Point is, she had the usual mainstream media
• 52:28
  tape, you know, and people called her out on it, and you
• 52:34
  know, I don't know how. Yeah, I guess she did at first,
• 52:39
  but I don't know she's you know, she's from she lives in BC,
• 52:45
  and I think people who live in like these really nice parts of Canada,
• 52:49
  they just don't know how the world works. So I don't know.
• 52:52
  Yeah, no, no, if you're if you're gonna live in BC and
• 52:59
  you actually want to know how the world works. There's you have to live
• 53:05
  in rural BC, but only certain types of rural because there are hippie enclaves
• 53:13
  in rural areas. It's just like washing Spring Island and stuff like that.
• 53:19
  Yeah, but you you have to like Alberta has it mostly has its head
• 53:28
  on its shoulders. But my mom's riding her federal district. Electoral district is
• 53:40
  a bunch of commis, right, but that's where the university is, right,
• 53:45
  So yeah, I think Saskatchewan has its head on its shoulders even better
• 53:52
  than Alberta. Now, well, yes, although we did elect Daniel el
• 54:00
  Smith yeah fops to you guys. Yeah, and as premier. And not
• 54:07
  only is she a smart lady and a very independent minded lady, but she
• 54:16
  was very sweet when we met her in Calgary. I've actually met the Premier
• 54:22
  of Saskatchewan too. He he went to our small town after the debacle shall
• 54:30
  we call it, not the not specifically the debacle of the Saskatchewan government,
• 54:37
  just been the Canadian government entirely. And yeah, he the sound system wasn't
• 54:44
  working, so he was he was actually trying to help get it working.
• 54:46
  Which was interesting to watch. Well, you know, like uh, conservatives
• 54:54
  tend to be like handyman. Yeah, well it was you. I gave
• 55:00
  props to him to go out into the constituency because he got a lot of
• 55:04
  ship. I said when when he when he was talking, after he'd finished,
• 55:08
  I thanked him for coming, and I said, well, you know,
• 55:12
  you've been getting a lot of pushback, but at least you didn't.
• 55:15
  You didn't call the call a state of emergency, call the war measures acts
• 55:21
  on us. Yeah, okay, let's go go. Okay, okay,
• 55:27
  wait, you gotta let me read the people give us money. I should
• 55:30
  read their chats. So, oh okay, giving us money? People will
• 55:36
  supers and super chess. Well apparently yes, but as Run gives us five
• 55:43
  dollars and says it would be wonderful if these women could climb the Social Matter
• 55:46
  and Matt Ladder and create a matriarchal following without putting men in the crossfire.
• 55:52
  All right, and then I don't think you. I think I don't think
• 55:57
  something about you know, I think he is well Ashton, please clarify.
• 56:02
  Do you mean me and Karen or do you mean somebody else? I think
• 56:06
  he's talking about the word guys, we're talking to the subject. Yeah,
• 56:09
  okay, probably, I mean I can't speak for him, but and I
• 56:14
  got a super chat chat I'm sorry from good thing. I clicked on this
• 56:22
  fang Yuan who gives us four hundred Indian rupees which is about four like almost
• 56:31
  five dollars in US money, and says love from His name is Yuan,
• 56:39
  but he pays in rupees, yes, Indian rupees from India and he says
• 56:45
  love from India. We love you genuine MRAs. Could you please interview mister
• 56:51
  Anil Murthy from SIFF India. We would love to hear it. Yeah,
• 56:55
  I've I've responded to the email I said I would have him on a problem.
• 57:02
  Yeah, did you respond to Justin Trotier. I have not responded to
• 57:07
  Justin Trotier yet, but I will after the show is over. So yes,
• 57:13
  I but like I said, I am more than open to talking with
• 57:17
  O'Neil because yeah, I mean, I totally do it. So anyway,
• 57:25
  all right, let's play some more of the video. I don't think there's
• 57:28
  anything else. And by the way, D Live is being sold today,
• 57:30
  do you guys know that? So it might not be worth it for us
• 57:34
  to be on D live. I think I think D live is being sold,
• 57:38
  yeah, or I've got it mixed up with the other one, but
• 57:42
  I think it's D live okay anyway, because they were invited to Sophie's party
• 57:45
  and they really want those girls to know they don't care. They're having their
• 57:49
  own sleepover and it's way more fun. And also James doesn't even fancy Tarror
• 57:52
  probably anyway, because he was snogging Angy behind the bike shed. So who's
• 57:55
  the loser? Now take a picture? Okay, Okay, it's belaboring the
• 58:06
  point here the hand and listening. Okay, No, we need to plan.
• 58:15
  Do you guys realize how much shit is happening, is rolling downhill towards
• 58:20
  our civilization? Could we just knock this off entirely like shut out? I
• 58:27
  will? I will agree that this complaint does hold some merit, okay,
• 58:35
  but there are times when there is among both men and women where there is
• 58:45
  within ranks conflict that needs to be dealt with, and the way men tend
• 58:54
  to deal with it, at least in the old workplace before women infiltrated it
• 59:01
  and like colonized hr and set all the rules because they've done studies, and
• 59:08
  they've found that relational aggression is this what she's describing here, right, is
• 59:15
  how women aggress against other women. And they have found that men don't cut,
• 59:27
  males don't come by it naturally, but by the time they are in
• 59:30
  the working world, because the entire structure of society up until their adults is
• 59:38
  a matriarchy effectively, you know, daycare, ka twelve, right, college,
• 59:45
  all of that is now a matriarchy with female values and female ways of
• 59:51
  being within those environments. Right. They have learned to mimic that, and
• 59:58
  they do pretty much just as well with the passive aggression as opposed to the
• 1:00:07
  aggressive aggression. Right. And I've always just gone for the aggressive aggression.
• 1:00:17
  I prefer that because then nobody actually is You don't say nobody has to read
• 1:00:23
  between the law. Nobody has to read between my lines, Allison. They
• 1:00:30
  know, yeah, right, And reading between the lines is a dangerous fucking
• 1:00:37
  game because sometimes somebody's being an asshole, or sometimes somebody's being passive aggressive to
• 1:00:45
  be an asshole because they're trying to be passive aggressive and fuck with you.
• 1:00:51
  But sometimes it's just because they're autistic, yep, right, or they're not
• 1:00:57
  paying attention, and then you retaliate with reputational destruction and annihilation and and then
• 1:01:06
  boom, someone's out of a job. James Demore gone gone from Google.
• 1:01:12
  Mm hmmm because he tried to be honest when asked to give feedback. Yeah,
• 1:01:20
  honest in a world where nobody wants you to actually tell the truth,
• 1:01:22
  but act like you do. Oh, I mean, it's fine, call
• 1:01:28
  call her out for for relational aggression right now, Well, she's actually,
• 1:01:34
  she's actually kind of she's escalating. Yes, now we now at least know
• 1:01:40
  there's a real genuine conflict. She has read between their lines, right and
• 1:01:49
  and said, Okay, they're targeting people like me. Right this this message
• 1:01:53
  was broadcast, but it was specifically meant so that I would hear it.
• 1:02:00
  Okay, yes, what she's inferred and and so now she's giving a direct
• 1:02:06
  message back at them. So I will give her credit for that. But
• 1:02:13
  yeah, but it's still you know, like, does she really know who
• 1:02:19
  these ladies were? I guess maybe if there was some cat fight going on
• 1:02:24
  behind the scenes right in this group of women who claim that they're for men.
• 1:02:32
  I I don't know, Like I don't keep track of them. I
• 1:02:38
  will speculate as to what the conflict is. So I'm gonna take what that
• 1:02:45
  one supporter that said that this person is like genuinely like well intentioned when it
• 1:02:54
  comes to men. I will take that to heart and then say, then
• 1:02:58
  what she probably seems to take issue with are the tactics or the outcomes,
• 1:03:07
  like the the optics of Pearl's content. So I think that Pearl goes on
• 1:03:12
  TikTok and she does these short videos and so first of all, let's let's
• 1:03:17
  let's try to be try to understand. Okay, So she's on TikTok.
• 1:03:21
  Now, to me, that's a mistake. But in general, I wouldn't
• 1:03:24
  go on TikTok for anything because it's basically Chinese spyware. But if you're on
• 1:03:30
  there, and this is how Roma grew her following, and probably a lot
• 1:03:35
  of other folks that had their own little things they wanted to like, you
• 1:03:38
  know, people they wanted to reach. I think that because the nature of
• 1:03:45
  the format is very short videos, some music, some words, whatever,
• 1:03:51
  or maybe you can like go on a little rant or whatever it is.
• 1:03:54
  I think that she and fem Sapien were like, let's just make some videos
• 1:03:59
  making fun of you know, feminists or just women three or four's whatever it
• 1:04:03
  is. And I don't think that's a big deal personally, because like the
• 1:04:10
  shit that we do and say about men is way worse. But it'sunny really
• 1:04:14
  about that. I think that what she's doing is saying, look, if
• 1:04:16
  I if I do if I put the message out this way kind of like
• 1:04:20
  Paul's Bang of Violent, you know, Bang of Violent Bitch Month or whatever
• 1:04:25
  it was, if I put it out this way, then it's gonna get
• 1:04:28
  more attention and y'all'll get outraged, I'll get people that are triggered by it
• 1:04:32
  or whatever. But then they're gonna come here and they're gonna talk to me,
• 1:04:36
  and then they'll see more of my content. And so it's like,
• 1:04:40
  I think she sees it as a way to reach people, and sometimes you
• 1:04:43
  have to reach them, or at least that's what she believes, is they
• 1:04:45
  have to reach them by infuriating them. It's how she got the Daily Wire
• 1:04:48
  to make a bunch of videos responding to her, you know, because she
• 1:04:53
  said something about marriage not being a good deal for men, and of course
• 1:04:56
  the Daily Wire guys being that they're all like, you know, very pro
• 1:05:00
  marriage, family tradition stuff. They had to respond, and so by responding
• 1:05:05
  they lose because now people that watch them are gonna go look at Pearl's content
• 1:05:10
  and they're gonna see what she's really got to say. So it's effective now,
• 1:05:15
  you mus and people have gotten you know, I've gotten shipped from guys
• 1:05:19
  in the in the men's rights space because I have. I'm I'm trying to
• 1:05:25
  remember what it was about. I think it was. It might have been
• 1:05:29
  something to a Pearl, but I can't remember, but I remember saying that
• 1:05:35
  it wasn't it was, Yeah, I can't remember exactly. I think it
• 1:05:39
  might have been. It was maybe about Russell Brand or something, and I
• 1:05:44
  defended him. It might have been him, it might have been one of
• 1:05:46
  the other men that have been like lcq's or whatever. And this guy who
• 1:05:50
  was an MRA and he was following me on Facebook. He yelled at me
• 1:05:54
  because he thought it didn't matter that I what I believed about the K but
• 1:06:00
  what mattered was how bad it would make us look if I supported that person.
• 1:06:05
  And so this is the thing that we always have to deal with people.
• 1:06:10
  This is what I'm saying when I talked about how Lauren Southern and Sidney
• 1:06:15
  Watson and others have sort of backed away. It's because they're concerned about the
• 1:06:19
  optics and how it will reflect on them. And and I'm like, Okay,
• 1:06:24
  that's fine if you can't handle it, but just like give us,
• 1:06:28
  give us some room to just do this ourselves, like people who don't care
• 1:06:31
  about the optics. But the truth is that if you're concerned with the optics,
• 1:06:35
  someone, well you do, but you do need somebody doesn't care.
• 1:06:40
  Yeah, you need somebody to take for you. You definitely do. But
• 1:06:43
  also like it's not gonna matter. Like this is another thing I try to
• 1:06:46
  tell people, like you keep trying to like get these people to like you
• 1:06:50
  that hate you, And you think that if you do it the right way,
• 1:06:54
  if you use the right tone, if you make the right kinds of
• 1:06:57
  arguments, you're gonna get more support from these people. No, you're not.
• 1:07:00
  They're gonna hate you anyway, just by virtue of what you support.
• 1:07:03
  It doesn't matter how you present it. Like I support helping men with their
• 1:07:11
  issues with essentially that are brought upon them by the state through women and through
• 1:07:15
  bitter women, and the stuff that feminists have done to the system. There
• 1:07:19
  is the only thing that can be done is that that has to be criticized
• 1:07:26
  and dismantled, and there has to be like stuff, you know, to
• 1:07:30
  take the weight off of men, Like we have to stop doing that and
• 1:07:33
  we have to treat them like human beings. And that's it, right,
• 1:07:35
  It seems really simple. But the thing is that no matter how I present
• 1:07:41
  that, it will be treated like a zero sum game, like I'm trying
• 1:07:45
  to take something away. It doesn't matter how well I put it. It
• 1:07:47
  doesn't matter. Like nobody is kinder than Warren Ferrell, okay on these issues.
• 1:07:53
  He's been talking about this shit since the seventies and their state. They
• 1:07:56
  accuse him of being like you know, in set supporting pedophile because they don't
• 1:08:01
  care. That's what I'm saying, Like I don't know if you like,
• 1:08:04
  if you guys get it, it doesn't matter, Like it doesn't even get
• 1:08:08
  any more contentious than trying to like get these issues addressed, Like there's nothing
• 1:08:14
  more contentious. Yeah no. And and so you need people who are like
• 1:08:18
  actually cocking their hips and basically sticking their chests out, and you know,
• 1:08:29
  uh being the Paul Elams being the yeah no, because those are the ones
• 1:08:36
  who Actually I said this very very early on when I was when I was
• 1:08:44
  in this movement, right that, well, why did people accept Martin Luther
• 1:08:49
  King's proposition? Because there was a Malcolm X waiting in the wings, and
• 1:08:59
  the people were willing to say, you know what, we might not love
• 1:09:05
  Martin Luther King yet, but I know we're gonna like him more than we
• 1:09:11
  like Malcolm X. Yeah, exactly. You you have an Andrew Tate now
• 1:09:17
  because you ignored Warren Ferrell in the seventies, well, and you've ignored everyone
• 1:09:23
  in between. This is what's infuriating to me about you know, like,
• 1:09:27
  oh, stop defending Andrew Tate. Don't defend Andrew Tate. You you're defending
• 1:09:30
  Andrew Tate. No, no, okay, yes i am. I'm defending
• 1:09:34
  his right to exist, Okay, to be a human being living on the
• 1:09:40
  planet. Okay. I defend that. I defend his right to act within
• 1:09:45
  the legal bounds of what is permissible, right, even if he's a dick,
• 1:09:51
  even if he's an asshole, Okay, if the law allows permits him
• 1:09:58
  to be that, right, then he's perfectly entitled to do those things.
• 1:10:03
  Right. And three, if an army of young disaffected men are listening to
• 1:10:15
  him. You can you can make one of two choices. You can put
• 1:10:21
  Andrew Tape in prison and make a murder of him, or you can listen,
• 1:10:27
  because you know what, not everything he says is wrong, not everything
• 1:10:31
  he says is evil, Not everything he says is untrue. Yeah, if
• 1:10:43
  you get rid of him, the next guy is gonna be like more extreme.
• 1:10:48
  And it's like yeah, no, no, you need to stop.
• 1:10:53
  You need to listen. You need to ask yourself, why are these young
• 1:10:57
  men fixated on Andrews? Why? Right? Because I don't like Andrew Tate,
• 1:11:03
  right, I don't like personally, Like I don't even find him physically
• 1:11:12
  attractive, Okay, And if I liked men who drive bugattis, I would
• 1:11:18
  not have married a man who drove a twenty year old minivan, Okay,
• 1:11:24
  Like I'm sorry, Like it's it doesn't appeal to me, that whole thing,
• 1:11:30
  that whole yesh lifestyle, the mansion sports are all of that, right,
• 1:11:35
  It's never appealed to me. I've always been like a homesteader at heart,
• 1:11:41
  and so it's just cozy. I just want things that are cozy,
• 1:11:47
  and so he he doesn't appeal to me at all, not sexually, not
• 1:11:55
  in any kind of romantic sense, not in any kind of ethical sense.
• 1:11:59
  Right, So if there is something that he is doing for young men that
• 1:12:02
  the society is not doing for them, and you know what, if what
• 1:12:06
  he's doing for them is making them feel good about themselves, Yeah, that's
• 1:12:15
  not Andrew Tate's fault. No, exactly, exactly. That is about everybody
• 1:12:20
  else's failure to be able to do that. Yep. Or will point something
• 1:12:27
  out. I want to point something out to this, to the whole agitate
• 1:12:30
  thing. Andrew Tate is proposing some kind of positive identity in the context of
• 1:12:38
  our society. Now people don't think it's positive, but when the next thing
• 1:12:45
  comes, it will definitely seem a lot more positive in retrospect. He is
• 1:12:51
  focusing on this idea that young men can illicit sexual desire in women so that
• 1:12:57
  they can have that kind of a positive sense of them through interactions with women
• 1:13:00
  and interactions with society, getting wealthy whatever. That's still a relationship with our
• 1:13:08
  society. Like Andrew Tate is still proposing a relationship with society and with women
• 1:13:15
  that it involves actual consent. Like I know that they say, oh,
• 1:13:17
  he used the lover boy method he got them in his thrall or whatever else.
• 1:13:21
  But putting aside anything criminal that he ends up being charged with, what
• 1:13:28
  he's proposing for young men is to have at least something of a pro social
• 1:13:34
  relationship with their greater society and with women. All Right. If you can't
• 1:13:40
  see that, if you honestly look at that and say that is not the
• 1:13:43
  case, then I invite you to realize that eventually there will be a figure
• 1:13:49
  that appeals to young men who says there's no reason to have any kind of
• 1:13:55
  relationship with Western women, there's no comm reason to have any kind of relationship
• 1:14:00
  with Western society. And I've actually, like I've been going back and forth
• 1:14:04
  on where that's going to come from, and at the risk of I don't
• 1:14:09
  know, getting a strike, I think it actually may end up being Islam
• 1:14:15
  yea, and it made It may be that Islam starts to appropriate all of
• 1:14:19
  these disaffected young men, Western men who have nothing else, and they and
• 1:14:26
  they start to give them an identity of something a positive relationship to something positive
• 1:14:32
  relationship to something that has nothing to do with Western cultural values. And then
• 1:14:36
  you're going to see that Andrew Tate was, you know, you could have
• 1:14:41
  stopped the train with Warren Ferrell. You could have stopped the train with Jordan
• 1:14:45
  Peterson, you could have stopped the train with Andrew. And now there is
• 1:14:50
  no there's no after this. There is nothing. There's nothing left. There's
• 1:14:56
  nothing left. And the reason why I say that is because the last thing
• 1:14:59
  that the feminists gave men as a way to differentiate themselves as men and still
• 1:15:03
  have something of a positive identity with society and women was as a playboy,
• 1:15:09
  which is exactly what Andrew Tate is. This is he is the end of
• 1:15:12
  the line of folks. Yeah, no, he's the last before the cliff.
• 1:15:15
  He's literally men described by feminism maholiic. Yes, it is an inventory
• 1:15:26
  of masculine norms. You know, what's what feminism has done. It's basically
• 1:15:30
  narrowed the relationship, the positive relationship between society and masculinity. So before before
• 1:15:38
  feminism, it's basically said, there is nothing for Gilgamesh. There is nothing
• 1:15:45
  for Gilgamesh other than what he was at the start of the epic. Yeah,
• 1:15:55
  there's nothing for Gilgamesh to be. There's nothing for young men to contribute
• 1:15:59
  positively to society as men. The one thing left to them was Playboy,
• 1:16:02
  and that's Andrew Tate. Now we're getting rid of that. We're basically we're
• 1:16:08
  basically saying to young men, there is no way for you to participate positively
• 1:16:13
  in society. There is no positive identity for you in our society. You
• 1:16:16
  think that young men are just gonna what what do you expect from them?
• 1:16:19
  Well, first of all, they're going to stop participating in society, and
• 1:16:24
  they may just if they're not people when you playboys, and we're going to
• 1:16:30
  get simps and that's it, and the play we're not even going to get
• 1:16:33
  that. We're not even going to get that, Karen, because we are
• 1:16:39
  now in the process of destroying the last thing that feminists said was at all
• 1:16:44
  pro social, a pro social masculine identity, and it was only one percent
• 1:16:46
  of men who identified with Playboy. So every man is now landing, every
• 1:16:51
  young man is now landing on that as the only pro social identity available to
• 1:16:56
  him, and we're in the process of destroying that as well. So what's
• 1:17:00
  gonna happen is we're going to eject all young men into this place where there
• 1:17:04
  is no pro social way to engage with society. Feminism doesn't offer any kind
• 1:17:11
  of pro social way to recognize your unique value as a man and engage with
• 1:17:16
  society. And what I mean by that is ask a feminist, we're positive
• 1:17:20
  masculine traits that you define as masculine in the same way you define negative traits
• 1:17:25
  toxic traits. They can't answer, and if they do, they give you
• 1:17:29
  meadium mouthed answers like wow, traditional math. Well, I'm not talking about
• 1:17:31
  traditional masculinity, talking about your masculinity. There's nothing positive in it. The
• 1:17:36
  feminist perception of masculinity offers absolutely no way for a young man to identify as
• 1:17:45
  a man and participate positively in society. I want you to just think about
• 1:17:48
  that. And the last thing was Playboy. Andrew Tate is the last stop
• 1:17:54
  on this train. And then men, young men will have absolutely no way
• 1:17:58
  to identify as men and participate positively and be recognized as participating positively in our
• 1:18:03
  society. That means you're going to have a generation of young men after we
• 1:18:09
  successfully destroy Andrew Tate and throw them into the wolves or whatever neo Andrew Tate
• 1:18:14
  comes after him, you know, after we successfully destroy young men's ability to
• 1:18:18
  identify with Playboy, which incidentally, most men wouldn't normally, but that's the
• 1:18:23
  last thing left to them. They're going to be gone from our society.
• 1:18:27
  We are going to recognize no way that a young man participates positively wen society
• 1:18:31
  as a young man, as a man, and they are going to be
• 1:18:35
  left to drift. They are no longer going to be recognized as part of
• 1:18:39
  our society, and we will have done that to them and to ourselves.
• 1:18:43
  You think that generation of young men with absolutely no identity, no positive identity,
• 1:18:48
  who do you think is going to pick those guys up? When it's
• 1:18:51
  not Andrew Tate. No connection now to the Western culture, no connection between
• 1:18:58
  their masculinity and some kind of positive contribution to Western culture. They're completely cut
• 1:19:03
  off. Now, we've completely cut off an entire generation from men from our
• 1:19:08
  own culture, and we have chosen that deliberately, and we have said it
• 1:19:12
  to them. We have said that we cannot as a culture recognize the unique
• 1:19:18
  value of men to our culture because that means women are excluded from something and
• 1:19:23
  we can't do that. So we cut them off. And where we're going
• 1:19:27
  to go. What's the biggest complaint about Andrew Tait? He exploits women?
• 1:19:32
  Okay, well, he seduces young women. Apparently they really like bugattis and
• 1:19:40
  abs and mansions, and at least these ones do, and then he brings
• 1:19:48
  them into the business of scamming men out of money. Right. They're cam
• 1:19:58
  girls, but they're not just any can girls. They do the camgirls do
• 1:20:04
  the performance in front of the camera, right, and they pretend to type
• 1:20:11
  right on camera. But who's actually typing is one of Andrew Tate's male employees,
• 1:20:18
  workers whatever, right, And that's the person who's actually telling this man
• 1:20:26
  in Britain that, oh, my Romanian mother is so sick. She's so
• 1:20:34
  sick, she needs hospital, she needs operation. Send me twenty five thousand
• 1:20:42
  pounds or she die. Right, Okay, So that's what you get that,
• 1:20:50
  that's what the eighty twenty rule gets you, right, is it's not
• 1:20:56
  just women being exploited, it's man too, Yeah, of course. And
• 1:21:01
  it's and it's the well meaning men. It's the men who do think,
• 1:21:06
  oh this this cam girl, right, you know, Yeah, I looked
• 1:21:12
  at a cam girl and I interacted with her, and once I got to
• 1:21:15
  know her, she seemed so lovely and she says she wants to come and
• 1:21:21
  visit me in person, and oh, no, her mother needs an operation
• 1:21:27
  and she needs twenty five thousand pounds, and you know she shouldn't have to
• 1:21:35
  deal with that, and she shouldn't have to be performing in front of a
• 1:21:40
  camera. I could, I could make an honest woman out of her if
• 1:21:45
  I just sent her twenty five thousand dollars to get her mom that surgery and
• 1:21:49
  then fly her over here and we can get married. So all of these
• 1:21:55
  well intentioned men, all these men that the feminists say, oh, men
• 1:22:02
  should be this way, men should be this way, right, they're being
• 1:22:05
  screwed by men like Andrew Tait and his fucking harem of freakin' horse, Yeah
• 1:22:15
  right, who are also in it for the money. They weren't complaining,
• 1:22:20
  no, of course not. But of course they're also the biggest victims.
• 1:22:26
  But let me I got a super chat and we should like play some more
• 1:22:30
  of the video. So okay, so I got a super chat for two
• 1:22:32
  dollars from Senior Sticks. And he says pro keeping saying this is it true
• 1:22:38
  or not? Okay, thank you, Senior Sticks. I'm sorry I don't
• 1:22:41
  quite understand, but that's ok yeah, I appreciate it. Can I just
• 1:22:45
  say one thing, okay, using your Gilgamesh. Example, it'd be like
• 1:22:48
  Sumer saying to Gilgamesh, yeah, you have nothing, We don't need you
• 1:22:53
  for a damn thing. Go go into the wild with inky Doo and stay
• 1:22:57
  there because you have nothing positive to contribut to society. And I guess then
• 1:23:01
  Gilgamesh goes into the wild with then can do and they form a raiding tribe,
• 1:23:05
  and just yeah, well or or or Gilgamesh just remains as he was
• 1:23:13
  at the start of the story, claiming the brides of men newly married,
• 1:23:19
  and fucking them on the wedding night, and treating everybody like shit, and
• 1:23:28
  and running rough shot over everybody, uh, sending the young men out to
• 1:23:33
  war, raping women, all of those things. Right, that's that's what
• 1:23:41
  he did, right, Well, you know, because that that's masculinity before
• 1:23:49
  it goes through the process. Okay, Well, and regardless, I don't
• 1:23:56
  think that's quite what I'm trying to get at. It's the total rejection of
• 1:24:00
  men from society. When you totally reject men, you can't become something better.
• 1:24:05
  You can't. There's nothing that you can do, right, Because if
• 1:24:09
  you're a breadwinner, you're stealing a job from a woman. Right. If
• 1:24:13
  you're a husband, you're you're enslaving a woman in matrimony. If you're a
• 1:24:17
  father, you're probably abusive, right, if you're if you're anything, no
• 1:24:24
  positive traits, no positive masculine traits, nothing that men can provide for society
• 1:24:29
  that's positive. You've essentially severed men's identity from society completely. Like, I
• 1:24:34
  don't know if this is confusing, but it's like, there's no way for
• 1:24:39
  men to be in our society as a man and contribute positively to it.
• 1:24:43
  There's no way to recognize that he does. And this is this is peak.
• 1:24:47
  There's nothing unique to him. Yes, as a man. Yeah,
• 1:24:50
  as a man, women will will always have the uniqueness of being able to
• 1:24:57
  give birth, right, even if they choose not to, Right, they
• 1:25:00
  always have that right. Men, right, what do they have? Fatherhood?
• 1:25:05
  That's oppression and legally tenuous right. And they have their penis, which
• 1:25:15
  is a weapon of gender war. Okay, let's look at it this way.
• 1:25:19
  Let's imagine we're in a walled city, all right, and this waled
• 1:25:24
  city has got a hair up its ass about young men, and it's decided
• 1:25:27
  that there's no way for a young man to exist within the waled city in
• 1:25:30
  a positive manner. So the young they say to all the young men,
• 1:25:33
  well, you can either just recognize that there's nothing for you to contribute as
• 1:25:39
  a young man, so there's no way for you to feel like you have
• 1:25:44
  a unique contribution being a man in our society, or you can leave and
• 1:25:48
  essentially are Actually we don't even give you the choice. Just leave. So
• 1:25:54
  that this waled city is pushing out all of its young men, what position
• 1:26:00
  that then it's like the powers out, Who's gonna happen? What position?
• 1:26:04
  What position does that put the walled city in when it's removed all of its
• 1:26:09
  young men? But what's what do you think is gonna happen? What?
• 1:26:13
  What? What's the future for this waled city with all of its young men
• 1:26:15
  exiled? Right? Just think about that? What's likely to happen? It
• 1:26:26
  would be so easy, right, because it's like, it wasn't hard for
• 1:26:29
  me to teach my boys to value themselves, right, taught my daughter to
• 1:26:36
  value herself too, Right. But it's like it's it's not hard. It's
• 1:26:43
  it's not hard, and it's not hard as a parent who recognizes what's going
• 1:26:48
  on and what's being kind of bounced around in the culture to counteract that and
• 1:26:58
  and to basically just prepare them, like and bolster them and say, okay,
• 1:27:05
  well, you can't listen to this and you can't listen to that because
• 1:27:09
  it's bullshit. It's it's total bullshit. But we need somebody to actually stop
• 1:27:17
  the Greek chorus, right that, the Greek chorus of women's victimhood and men's
• 1:27:26
  perpetration of women's virtue and men's vice. Right, We need to we need
• 1:27:32
  to silence that chorus because that is really what is happening within the culture,
• 1:27:42
  and not all parents are even really aware of it, and a lot of
• 1:27:46
  parents who are aware of it believe it. There are so many parents out
• 1:27:51
  there who actually believe their boys are bad. Yeah yeah, And let's look
• 1:27:57
  at it this way. Andrew Tait, maybe one of the times that many
• 1:28:00
  of these young men that looked up to him have ever heard a positive word
• 1:28:03
  about themselves as young men. Yeah, that that is the first time somebody
• 1:28:11
  has said it's okay to be a young man. Yeah, you want Andrew
• 1:28:14
  take to be your son's role model? Yeah yeah, yeah, And let
• 1:28:17
  yeah keep going, keep going with that Greek course, keep exiling young young
• 1:28:21
  men. See how what a wonderful future that's going to create for you.
• 1:28:27
  And and the thing is that the conservatives have no solution to this. The
• 1:28:31
  liberals have no solution to this. Everybody I taught a lot of people I
• 1:28:34
  talk to seem to blame socialism, and it's like, well, where do
• 1:28:38
  you think socialism comes from. It's from a female intersexual competition. Yeah,
• 1:28:45
  well, let's be honest. It doesn't even matter that the main thinkers were
• 1:28:48
  men, because usually main thinkers are The main thinker of feminism was a man.
• 1:28:53
  Okay, they're really going to say that feminism has nothing to do with
• 1:28:56
  women. So this idea, yeah that it really does all come down to
• 1:29:02
  the messaging that we're giving young men, and we are exiling them from our
• 1:29:08
  society. We're saying we have no role for you. Well, they're not
• 1:29:11
  going to sit on their ass. If the last person who says that there
• 1:29:15
  is something good to being a man, as Andrew Tate, of course they're
• 1:29:18
  going to listen to him. What's the alternative blowing the brains out and then
• 1:29:24
  being blamed for it by their parents. My son, Jesus christ my son,
• 1:29:29
  showed me a video the other day when we were driving to the store.
• 1:29:32
  It was this guy. It was on Instagram or something. He's like,
• 1:29:36
  oh, this was pretty funny. And it's like a video of some
• 1:29:41
  guy saying okay, So here's here's some dating advice that I've taken from the
• 1:29:46
  comments under my videos, women's comments under my videos. Always text her,
• 1:29:54
  never text her, call, make sure you call, don't text her call.
• 1:29:59
  Oh, don't call. That's creepy, right, And he just goes
• 1:30:02
  through all of the contradictions. Take her out for a couple of drinks.
• 1:30:06
  Oh no, no, no, no, never drinks right, And it's
• 1:30:13
  just like and and if you do all that, you'll get a girlfriend.
• 1:30:18
  And it's it's like, yeah no, and this is what young men like
• 1:30:25
  My son, this is what he watches. He thinks it's apropos, right,
• 1:30:31
  this is my youngest son. And he's just like, yeah no,
• 1:30:34
  this is what it feels like. This is what it feels like, because
• 1:30:39
  no matter what you do, you've done wrong. If you text her yeah
• 1:30:45
  wrong, if you don't text her wrong, if you call her wrong,
• 1:30:48
  if you don't call her wrong, if you take her out for drinks wrong,
• 1:30:53
  if you don't take her out for drinks wrong, if you say,
• 1:30:57
  oh, let's just hang out and chill. Wrong right, if you if
• 1:31:01
  you do, say you know, let's hang out and chill. Wrong right.
• 1:31:08
  Never say oh, you just want to hang out and chill, but
• 1:31:12
  say you just want to hang out and chill. Right. And it's just
• 1:31:15
  like this, there's no rules anymore because women threw away the rule book.
• 1:31:21
  That's what feminists did. Feminists and women with women's connivance threw away the rule
• 1:31:29
  book. And now there's nothing. There's no roadmap for young men, there's
• 1:31:34
  no there's no way for them to even navigate the dating world. Well you
• 1:31:44
  cannick up culture, all right. Before we continue, I just want to
• 1:31:46
  remind everyone to send those messages to feed the badgery dot com slash just the
• 1:31:50
  tip, and do consider putting that through because it really helps the show helps
• 1:31:56
  us be able to afford to continue to do this work each month. So
• 1:32:00
  once again, that's feed the badger dot com slash just the tip. And
• 1:32:01
  I just want to do a shout out again for editing my book thousand.
• 1:32:14
  I'm sorry you muted. When did I mute? You're editing your book?
• 1:32:20
  For editing your book? Yeah, and if you like to help me out
• 1:32:25
  with that, it's a Feedbadger dot Com, slash support at this moment,
• 1:32:28
  and I just want to say a few words on why this is important to
• 1:32:30
  me, this this particular project. I feel like the way that we analyze
• 1:32:36
  things, the way that we analyze how societies work and how they function,
• 1:32:42
  is it's more than just an important point of view to really understand where we're
• 1:32:45
  going as a society and what we need to change in order to affect a
• 1:32:49
  better outcome. But I also think that it's a groundwork for returning to a
• 1:32:55
  greater understanding of character and being able to write and depict character in a way
• 1:33:00
  that I personally like. I've read a lot of books lately, read a
• 1:33:03
  lot of books in history. We lost something somewhere and I don't know,
• 1:33:08
  maybe it was the nineties in terms of our ability to depict character and really
• 1:33:13
  understand how people work. And I wanted to get back to that. And
• 1:33:17
  so that's one reason why I think that this is a really important project.
• 1:33:21
  And I think there needs to be more depiction of men and women working together
• 1:33:27
  in relationships of respect and affection, and I don't see a lot of that
• 1:33:32
  in fiction today, and I want to bring that back as well as well
• 1:33:36
  as a recognition of women's particular ability to have power over of the world around
• 1:33:44
  them. So anyway that sounds of interest to you. And it just occurred
• 1:33:46
  to me because I was in an argument recently with Michael Flood. You know
• 1:33:51
  Michael Flood a Karen. He is a feminist professor, and he gets me
• 1:33:58
  so frustrated because I get to the point where we're talking. We're talking and
• 1:34:02
  I asked him a question in this case, I said, I told him,
• 1:34:06
  you guys are killing love, You're destroying love. And he's like,
• 1:34:10
  he laughed at me. He said, I'm laughing at you. And I
• 1:34:14
  said, the reason why I say you're doing that is because you're presenting the
• 1:34:18
  relationship between men and women as one of more defined by violence. That men
• 1:34:24
  are more defined in their relationship and their attitude towards women by violence than love,
• 1:34:31
  and that's destroying the relationship between men and women. And he he he
• 1:34:39
  blathered, and he said, well, you know, if men are if
• 1:34:42
  men are defined by violence, it's because a minority of men are violent,
• 1:34:45
  and they need to men need to realize that as long as a minority of
• 1:34:48
  men are violent, it's right to judge men as all men as is complicit
• 1:34:54
  in that violence. And I'm like, would you say the same thing about
• 1:34:58
  trans women, that they should be judged by a violent minority, or Muslim
• 1:35:01
  men or black men? And he refused to answer that question or even engage
• 1:35:09
  with it. No. Actually, what he said is, oh, well,
• 1:35:12
  that's different. We need to we need to look at that with nuance.
• 1:35:15
  And I'm like, he just answered my question one you will, bald.
• 1:35:18
  They say that men should endure the pain of being a subject to a
• 1:35:25
  broad brush based on the violence of a minority of men, but if we
• 1:35:29
  want to do the same to any other group, it needs nuance. And
• 1:35:32
  then he went into this long tirade about how I was disingenuous, and then
• 1:35:39
  you know, he didn't want to engage with that question because I was being
• 1:35:42
  disingenuous because of blah blah blah, because of a previous thing that we had
• 1:35:45
  exchanged. And I'm like, these individuals like Michael Flood, they have a
• 1:35:51
  stranglehold on how we perceive the relationship between men and women and the value of
• 1:35:57
  men in society. They have a strangle it and it's horrible and I want
• 1:36:01
  to do something to change it. And I know that many cases, just
• 1:36:05
  let me finish that. I know that in many cases people understand this stuff
• 1:36:10
  better through characters than they do through abstractions or even events. So that's what
• 1:36:15
  I want to present. I want to present this thesis, what we talk
• 1:36:17
  about here in a story, and if you want to see that happen,
• 1:36:23
  feed the Badger dot com slash support. Really important to me that that happens.
• 1:36:28
  Okay, back to you, Karen, go ahead. I was just
• 1:36:31
  I was just wondering, Okay. So I kind of stepped into the middle
• 1:36:35
  of a conversation between you and Michael Flood where he was asking about a self
• 1:36:43
  described proclivity towards rape for women or sexual aggression for women. He wanted to
• 1:36:51
  study of women's predictions of how likely they would be too sexually coerce men and
• 1:37:03
  you, and I was just like, why, well he proposted this study
• 1:37:12
  that Okay, oh god, I've been in it with him for like months
• 1:37:16
  now, and finally I just muted him because I just couldn't stand it anymore.
• 1:37:20
  But I had said that feminists present these studies in which they say,
• 1:37:26
  you know, X amount of college men would rape, and I say that
• 1:37:30
  they lump in all kinds of behaviors like giving her a glass of wine at
• 1:37:34
  dinner, and even in the study itself, that isn't considered to be rape.
• 1:37:39
  It's considered to be coercive, which I think is really stretching it.
• 1:37:45
  Or alternatively, are making an argument why they not not a threat, but
• 1:37:49
  just you know, giving you giving a woman an argument, not like a
• 1:37:55
  verbal disagreement, but just like a present. This is why this is my
• 1:37:59
  bullet point list of why you should sleep with me? Okay. And they
• 1:38:02
  presented that version, right, and I'm like, no, there's a difference
• 1:38:06
  between trying to get a woman's consent and invalidating her ability to say no,
• 1:38:13
  you know what I meaning it? Yeah, contravenient, Like you can do
• 1:38:16
  that with threats, you can do that with physical violence, you can do
• 1:38:19
  that with drugging to the point of unconsciousness. Well okay, but arguably if
• 1:38:27
  you say, well, I'm not I'm not interested in having a romantic relationship,
• 1:38:35
  in being a boyfriend to you if there's no sex involved, right,
• 1:38:44
  and they would consider that to be coercive, right, And it's just like,
• 1:38:47
  yeah, well no, take it or leave it, right, Like
• 1:38:50
  these are the terms for what I expected in a relationship and if you are
• 1:38:58
  not willing to provide that, then we can go our separate ways. That's
• 1:39:02
  coercion according to these people. But how useful are these fucking studies, these
• 1:39:13
  self assessed proclivity studies? Niceless basically useless, right, because you could say,
• 1:39:20
  well, you know, oh god, you could say, would you
• 1:39:27
  ever? Would you ever do this? Number one? You never might be
• 1:39:33
  in an opportunity to do it. Would I like to have a million dollars?
• 1:39:45
  Yes? Would I do this? Would I do that? Would I
• 1:39:53
  do this other thing? Would I blah blah blah? Right? No,
• 1:39:58
  all you have right that is in any way reliable. He's talking about oh
• 1:40:03
  you know, uh, twenty five percent of men in college say they would
• 1:40:10
  rape or sexually aggress against women. Right, And then he's like, well,
• 1:40:15
  it show me the studies that say the same where women say the same
• 1:40:19
  things. They wouldn't They wouldn't say that about themselves sometimes even if they've done
• 1:40:27
  it. Well, actually, I was thinking about studies in which women self
• 1:40:30
  report sexual coercion, and yes, sexual self report, they self report at
• 1:40:38
  extremely high levels. Right, Yeah, that's what I was trying to get
• 1:40:42
  at. And it's like that they've done it, right, And he's saying,
• 1:40:46
  well, but that's not the same as women assessing their proclivity to do
• 1:40:51
  it in the future, and it's like that's meaningless. Right. You can
• 1:40:58
  say, well, yeah, I would do that if I presented with the
• 1:41:01
  opportunity, You sure I would do it. I have said repeatedly I would
• 1:41:05
  kill somebody if necessary and not freaking lose a moment of sleep. Right.
• 1:41:11
  If I was kyle rittenhouse that night, yeah, I would have shot all
• 1:41:15
  those fucking three guys. I wouldn't have fucking lost a moment of sleep.
• 1:41:18
  I wouldn't have felt a moment of guilt about it. Right. Okay,
• 1:41:24
  does that mean that I'm gonna go out and shoot someone? No? Am
• 1:41:29
  I ever a kid in that position? No? Right? Put in that
• 1:41:33
  position, would I try something different? Yes? Okay, Well, let
• 1:41:39
  me put it this way. When I talk to people like Michael Flood who
• 1:41:43
  are just this sheer amount of reckless hate. And it's not just this this
• 1:41:48
  parent hatred towards men, it's this kind of disgusting hatred towards seeing men and
• 1:41:56
  women together. Yeah, he's gay, Allison, I think he was said
• 1:42:01
  he was in a loving relationship with a woman, but regardless, even if
• 1:42:04
  he is gay, not all gay men act like that. Okay, So
• 1:42:09
  it's it's like this this hatred of seeing men and women love each other.
• 1:42:15
  There must be some kind of word for this kind of pathology. And when
• 1:42:18
  I encounter it and I know that it has such a freaking voice in the
• 1:42:23
  world, you know, like it's it's everywhere. It's in academia, it's
• 1:42:27
  in media, you know, it's in the government. Well it's and it's
• 1:42:30
  this academia. Academia spread its tentacles everywhere because academia is what populates every freaking
• 1:42:38
  idea, every institution, right, But I see this everywhere, and it's
• 1:42:43
  so government, law, the legal system, everything, everything. There's feminist
• 1:42:53
  tentacles in everything. It is like a freaking it's like a noxious weed that
• 1:43:00
  they cultivated in academia. Like my neighbor waters his freaking creeping bellflowers and they're
• 1:43:06
  just popping up all across my lawn. They're anxious weed. And you know,
• 1:43:13
  the city by law officers they can see them all over my front yard,
• 1:43:17
  but they can't see past his fence to his flower bed full of them
• 1:43:23
  in his backyard. Okay, So my point is that when I engage with
• 1:43:28
  these people, it just it feels exhausting and silencing. Gross, It's gross,
• 1:43:32
  and like that you need to you need to prove it. Prove it,
• 1:43:36
  prove it, prove it, prove it, prove it. Like open
• 1:43:40
  your fucking eyes, ye know, well open your eyes to what you're actually
• 1:43:45
  doing. Open he wasn't actually happening out there. And the only thing I
• 1:43:50
  can think of is maybe to offer like an alternative view of something that's less
• 1:43:57
  nihilistic, less misanthropic, because ultimately, when you say this about men and
• 1:44:00
  women, but the relationship between men and women, that it's defined by hate,
• 1:44:03
  basically the hate of the oppressor for the oppressed and the hatred of the
• 1:44:08
  oppressed for the oppressor. It's like this, you end up basically defining all
• 1:44:13
  human relationships and the most degraded, destructive, and disturbing terms. It's an
• 1:44:20
  unbelievably misanthropic approach to reckon to everything, and it's so exhausting to see and
• 1:44:30
  to not be able to say anything, you know, like not be able
• 1:44:32
  to present a counter argument to I mean, we can present a counter argument,
• 1:44:38
  but that just seems to gloss over people. So ultimately, I guess
• 1:44:43
  this project like honey, like I feed the Badger dot com. Slash support
• 1:44:47
  is my way of approaching it from another another front. Warren Ferrell. Actually,
• 1:44:57
  the first time I talked to him, which by email, was when
• 1:45:02
  I put up my very first blog post and then my husband sent it the
• 1:45:11
  link to him to Warren Ferrell, he was my boyfriend at the time,
• 1:45:17
  and asked what he thought of it. And then I got home from work
• 1:45:23
  and he said, you're going to be really mad at me. And I
• 1:45:26
  was like, what did you do? And he told me, and I
• 1:45:29
  was so mad, so mad at him, And then like an hour later,
• 1:45:34
  Warren fairly emails back and I was like, oh, well, now
• 1:45:38
  I'm not so mad. But he said that given my background of like writing
• 1:45:46
  novels, I should I should write novels with men's rights themes. And that's
• 1:45:55
  not precisely how I construct fiction, right, Like I can't. I just
• 1:46:00
  can't do it. I can't pick like a cause and like construct a note.
• 1:46:04
  I don't think anybody who's read the story, I mean it's going to
• 1:46:09
  be. It's now in a developmental edit stage, so it's going to change
• 1:46:12
  somewhat. But I don't think anybody's read the story has really identified the theme.
• 1:46:17
  It's there, it's there, it's not there, And yeah, but
• 1:46:21
  I do. That's it's not the way I write books. I write books.
• 1:46:27
  I start with a scene and some characters with backstories, and then I
• 1:46:31
  just write. And I don't storyboard, I don't outline. I don't know
• 1:46:36
  the plot. The plot comes to me as I go. Right, So
• 1:46:41
  I'm very chaotic in that way. And so I there's no way, there
• 1:46:45
  was no way I could. When I write essays, right, that's totally
• 1:46:50
  different. I can construct a good essay, but like very very detailed and
• 1:46:57
  orderly and explanatory and surrounding a theme and all of that blog posts and stuff
• 1:47:02
  like that. But but I can't do that with fiction. I just can't.
• 1:47:09
  And so but I'm glad that you can't, because he actually said that
• 1:47:14
  that would be like a something that would present the themes and the ideas.
• 1:47:23
  Well, let me put it this way. In fiction, the theme the
• 1:47:27
  theme is there. I did not, like, I didn't do the usual
• 1:47:31
  thing where, oh, you know, like the way the feminist is presented
• 1:47:34
  dystopia and basically a woman living in a world. That's that kind of thing.
• 1:47:39
  I didn't do it that way. I did it in a way that
• 1:47:43
  you know, it comes out of the story, It comes out of the
• 1:47:45
  characters, it comes out of the resolution of the climax. But it's not
• 1:47:49
  something that you necessarily read and be able to put your finger on saying,
• 1:47:55
  oh, yeah, this is this is this is based on men's rights.
• 1:48:00
  Like my editor is a is a normy. She's even aware, Yeah no,
• 1:48:05
  she's work. Yeah. Well, I mean it's it's like you're not
• 1:48:11
  you're not being obvious, Like you know that you remember that Star Trek Next
• 1:48:15
  Generation episode where Commander Riker falls in love with that androgynist person who has gender
• 1:48:27
  Okay, she identifies as female even though there is no gender in her society,
• 1:48:32
  and then she gets reprogrammed and you know, supposed to really make you
• 1:48:36
  think and yeah and all of that, right, Like it's I'm I'm sure
• 1:48:41
  it's not going to be anything remotely as obvious as that. But yeah,
• 1:48:46
  no, But in fact, I wrote a story. If I had tried,
• 1:48:51
  if I had tried to do something men's rights right of men's rights novel,
• 1:48:57
  it would have been that obvious that the way that I approach my writing,
• 1:49:01
  it's a little similar to yours as chaotic too. I just think about
• 1:49:05
  the things I want to say, and then I forget about them and write
• 1:49:10
  a story, and then somehow it just comes out. I don't know,
• 1:49:15
  I'm a little bit weird. But anyway, if you want to support that
• 1:49:17
  kind of a project, I mean, I don't know if it's gonna work,
• 1:49:21
  but it might be a bit of a hail Mary. But I really
• 1:49:26
  want to bring something like something that recognizes the beauty of humanity and the relationship
• 1:49:32
  between men and women into the world. If you want to see that too,
• 1:49:36
  Feed the Badger dont comm slash support. I really appreciate it because it's
• 1:49:41
  it's sort of my it's sort of my salvation whenever I have to deal with
• 1:49:44
  the Michael Floods of the world who seem to be hell bent on destroying anything
• 1:49:47
  good in it. So anyway, once again, feed the Badger doult comm
• 1:49:51
  slash support, and we should we should watch a little bit more. I
• 1:49:55
  think is Yeah, I know, Brian has a hard limit for when he
• 1:49:58
  can stay. I have to pick Lindsay up at seven and it's six o'clock
• 1:50:02
  almost. But I did get more super Child's and stuff, so I should
• 1:50:06
  read through them, so sleepy Ausy bot or I'm sorry, just sleepy Auzzy,
• 1:50:14
  I don't mean to read the bot part gives us twenty dollars and says,
• 1:50:16
  hey, badgers, here's a tip to help help you keep up get
• 1:50:21
  the good work. So thank you Sleepy Azzy for that. I really appreciate
• 1:50:28
  it. And then I got another one from Richard Bierre, and this is
• 1:50:34
  kind of a mouthful, he says. When the Calhoun mouse Utopia habitat experiment
• 1:50:40
  went into its final die off stage, the researchers found that there was nothing
• 1:50:44
  they could do to reverse the decline at all. The beautiful ones, when
• 1:50:47
  placed in a new habitat, wouldn't even attempt mating behavior. So if a
• 1:50:51
  tipping point does get crossed, then it will be highly likely that there will
• 1:50:56
  be no reversal or recovery because the psychological facts won't be overcome. Thanks for
• 1:51:02
  that white pill. What was that? No? No, no, no,
• 1:51:10
  Alison, Briefly, briefly, I just want to say one to allow
• 1:51:14
  me to digest my black pill. Okay, because that is only one of
• 1:51:19
  the two pills. What's the other one? Boil? Yes, yeah,
• 1:51:27
  if we we need this is our shot. We got to take it.
• 1:51:30
  Otherwise we're just gonna We're gonna be an extinct. We need to achieve escape
• 1:51:35
  velocity this time. We need to achieve escape velocity. And the fundamental truth
• 1:51:41
  of it is either Earth is just insatient matter and which case it doesn't fucking
• 1:51:45
  matter if it's preserved, or it does have its own will in a kind
• 1:51:50
  of way like the Gaiat hypothesis, in which case Earth created us, Earth
• 1:51:55
  wants us, and Earth wants us to escape Earth because we are of Earth,
• 1:52:01
  like, we don't get away from that, and our destiny is Earth's
• 1:52:04
  destiny. Okay, So anyway, I just wanted to say that. But
• 1:52:08
  the other thing is that I think we can still stop it. We are
• 1:52:15
  still at the Andrew Tate stage. So we are entering the final stop before
• 1:52:19
  the cliff. I mean, the Michael Floods of the world seem to be
• 1:52:24
  held bent on kicking out the breaks and opening the throttle towards the cliff.
• 1:52:29
  But who knows, maybe there we can appeal to a critical mass of women
• 1:52:35
  to challenge this and do so in a way that doesn't necessarily involve this highly
• 1:52:42
  toxic competition between women. But anyway, do you see how I did that,
• 1:52:46
  Brian, Let's watch some more. Wait, I got I'm not done.
• 1:52:50
  I have to read all the super chats and stuff. So Senior Stakes
• 1:52:54
  gives us two dollars and says, can your book be VR and digital for
• 1:52:58
  Oculus Rift. I don't know how that works? But I don't know.
• 1:53:04
  I mean, maybe my dog is wooing, but no, I don't even
• 1:53:11
  understand what that is. Just just explain it and maybe I can. He
• 1:53:15
  wants to make it into like basically a hollow novel for VR, so a
• 1:53:21
  novel he can read in VR. I mean, novel he can watch in
• 1:53:28
  VR. I don't know how, and maybe even participated. Yeah, well,
• 1:53:33
  I think we need a slightly bigger budget than the one we have to
• 1:53:38
  do that, so I I I cannot answer that question with there's some app
• 1:53:45
  that takes like a kindle uh and makes it into a VR kindle where you're
• 1:53:53
  in VR looking at the kindle in the virtual space, in which case get
• 1:53:59
  the I think I think he wants to experience it. Yeah, well,
• 1:54:03
  okay, when I have we sell like ten million copies and we have a
• 1:54:10
  movie, then I'm pretty sure the video game and VR adaptation will come so,
• 1:54:20
  yeah, we'll see huh will Day. Yeah, there's a lot of
• 1:54:27
  pressure here. Yeah, I know. Make sure it's a make sure it's
• 1:54:30
  a best seller. Otherwise, you know you're not getting any more support,
• 1:54:34
  Sleepy. He gets another five dollars and says, Alison, how do I
• 1:54:38
  support your book? Feed the Badger says, the fundraiser for the book is
• 1:54:42
  closed. Yes, because I didn't. I didn't. I didn't update the
• 1:54:47
  the time. I I just updated the time. So if you want to
• 1:54:51
  help out, sorry, by guys, you're trying to help out. I
• 1:54:55
  was wondering why nobody was putting anything through. I changed the d so that
• 1:55:00
  there's another week on it because I've been just doing it. I've been opening
• 1:55:02
  it up monthly because I know it's a it's a it's a bit of a
• 1:55:06
  marathon to get this thing edited properly. So if you can go to Feed
• 1:55:11
  the Badger dot com slash support and throw a few shekels in the hat for
• 1:55:15
  that, that very much appreciated. Thank you, Sleepy Auzie for pointing that
• 1:55:19
  out. I'm guessing that if you hadn't, I would have gone the whole
• 1:55:23
  week and wondered why no one, no one cares it would have been because
• 1:55:29
  I hadn't opened up the fundraiser. A. Yeah, like me at the
• 1:55:34
  grocery store, tapping right and it's like declined, and I'm like, what
• 1:55:40
  the fuck? And then I'm like, I come home and I realized,
• 1:55:43
  Oh, I sent myself an email money transfer from my other bank account.
• 1:55:49
  I just forgot to deposit it. Yeah, pretty much. Okay, So
• 1:55:58
  anyway it is, it is live now feed the Badger dot com slash support
• 1:56:00
  and again if you want to help me bite back against the Michael Floods of
• 1:56:04
  the world who seem to be hell bent and creating this narrative that human beings
• 1:56:12
  are awful, and men in particular, I mean. And the other thing
• 1:56:15
  is that even even if you I know what it does with men, presenting
• 1:56:19
  them as as oppressors, but ultimately it's such a contemptuous view of women that
• 1:56:26
  it's hard not to encourage people's contempt towards women on almost like a subconscious level.
• 1:56:32
  Yeah, okay, all right, let's let's keep let's let's do a
• 1:56:36
  little bit more. I did the segue Brian yea to school tomorrow because they're
• 1:56:42
  gonna be They're gonna be so Tatara and biology, but much longer. We
• 1:56:48
  have to go in earlier and well until what until the end of the whole
• 1:56:54
  segment segment? Well, I mean, okay, let's just watch it.
• 1:56:57
  Maybe maybe an no, we'll talk about how great well lives match. Let's
• 1:57:01
  match yeah, yeah, let's wear all le's match jackets. Okay, well
• 1:57:05
  match jackets. Oh we know where the same hat? Almost done? I
• 1:57:10
  think? Okay, how high do the levels of cringe have to be before
• 1:57:15
  you die of toxic shock? Asking for a friend? The thing is outside
• 1:57:20
  of the odd feminist? Does anyone actually care what you do in your personal
• 1:57:25
  life? I mean, I have questions, arguments and disagreements with women should
• 1:57:30
  submit to men as a general statement, But if you want to do that
• 1:57:31
  in your own personal relationship, it's none of my business and I don't care.
• 1:57:34
  Do what makes you happy. This just feels like you're looking for a
• 1:57:38
  reaction and some attention, wanting to provoke people into either getting mad or praising
• 1:57:42
  you. I feel like if you really didn't care, you would just get
• 1:57:45
  on with it and not make passive, aggressive videos about it. But okay.
• 1:57:48
  Also, I find it weird that you address your statement to single women
• 1:57:53
  implying that other women's lack of submission is the reason they're single, when he's
• 1:57:59
  at Pearl single. If you're going to be childish and trash enough to flex
• 1:58:02
  your own desirability over other women on the internet, maybe like back it up,
• 1:58:08
  produce a man to prove that you've won over these feminists that no one
• 1:58:12
  wants. What the hell like? Men is not winning? Okay? Yeah,
• 1:58:18
  I think that men are not a win condition. They're a companion.
• 1:58:24
  Good lord? Yeah no, but it's it it. I will say that
• 1:58:34
  the little TikTok thing was kind of cringeing. Okay, is it? Is
• 1:58:45
  it just the selection bias here? Because I feel like we've not attended to
• 1:58:47
  anything substantive aside from me and you going off there, Karen, I think
• 1:58:53
  we were talking about this basically is a Michael Flood episode suddenly yeah, well
• 1:59:00
  you know, well there's nothing particularly this is just a cat fight. It
• 1:59:05
  is I I'm uh, you want me to go to the the Red Pill
• 1:59:12
  does not Understand Femininity part? Maybe yes, okay, I'll jump to that.
• 1:59:17
  Maybe there was more the section that's like a little bit it's it is
• 1:59:24
  it's kind of petty, I know, but in a way. This is
• 1:59:27
  useful because this is exactly the kind of ship that we can avoid. So
• 1:59:33
  something in this large middle that like, if you guys are watching, character
• 1:59:40
  doesn't understand sex trafficking, and it goes on for a pretty long while.
• 1:59:45
  Let's just do what. Let's go to the big the big lump there,
• 1:59:50
  the big sugar lump. Yeah, the biggest sugar lump sort of in the
• 1:59:54
  middle. Yeah, there you go. No, no, no, no,
• 1:59:56
  the sex trafficking one. Just let's get a little sampler there, make
• 2:00:00
  sugar lump. Yeah, right there, big sugar all right, all right,
• 2:00:01
  I don't know what this is, so I haven't seen it, all
• 2:00:04
  right, and then he springs it on him with who his moodom so Andrew
• 2:00:08
  Tate says, you're not stupid, and he's talking to one of the victims.
• 2:00:11
  You're not stupid, and you can probably guess how I make so much
• 2:00:14
  money. I have to hide what I'm really doing. And the victim says
• 2:00:16
  webcam and he says, I've been doing this for a long time with a
• 2:00:19
  team of girls working on video chat. The company was fake, but this
• 2:00:24
  is how I laundered my dirty money. Some of the girls who worked for
• 2:00:28
  me, I use them to do other things, to move money or illegal
• 2:00:32
  things documents, and I will never do that with you. Basically titled the
• 2:00:36
  girl You're different from the others. I make them do the really illegal stuff.
• 2:00:41
  Again, they have it right good. He's been framed. Maybe the
• 2:00:46
  chat locks are fake and the matrix faked it and set him up. Maybe,
• 2:00:51
  but that's really hard to believe when all over various podcasts and in that
• 2:00:56
  video he constantly talks about how he lies to women to get to do what
• 2:01:00
  he wants, So why would that be any different. What's also fucking hilarious
• 2:01:04
  is how people say, how truthfully is a man of integrity? Oh he's
• 2:01:09
  always so honest. Oh god, this is about Andrew Taate. Okay,
• 2:01:13
  yeah, he's a flineball, he's a pimp. He I don't think he's
• 2:01:15
  a sex trafficker because I don't believe in women being in men's thrall. And
• 2:01:19
  also I have read some of the freakin' logs that have been submitted. That
• 2:01:25
  woman he's with, I think her name is Gabriella, Gabriel, Gabrielina or
• 2:01:30
  something. Holy shit, she's a psycho like I that that even just through
• 2:01:36
  the text logs of her Tate Tristan or sorry, Andrew Tristan and the other
• 2:01:45
  chick that Gabriel, Gabriel Gabriel. I think it's Gabriella or something something like
• 2:01:50
  that she is actually facing more charges than the Tate brothers, and having read
• 2:01:56
  the logs, I am not surprised because she sounds like these two dudes got
• 2:02:04
  a lot of very sketchy woman women and then they found one who was a
• 2:02:09
  bit too hot to handle because she is violent. Well, and anyway,
• 2:02:15
  I just put that out there. I don't I don't know anything in particular
• 2:02:19
  about Andrew Tate other than the fact that he was charged under the lover boy
• 2:02:25
  laws, right, which are basically seduction laws, and uh, and so
• 2:02:33
  I believe that those laws should probably not exist because if you're a woman of
• 2:02:43
  character, if you if you're not a sketchy woman, if you're not an
• 2:02:47
  if you're not a freaking gold digging hoore, you wouldn't fall for an Andrew
• 2:02:54
  Taate. Well, I don't think they should exist because they take like they
• 2:03:00
  essentially take away women's moral autonomy, or the recognition of women is morally autonomous.
• 2:03:06
  Yeah. No, if you if you were if you were not,
• 2:03:10
  if you had any kind of character, if you had any kind of morality,
• 2:03:14
  if you've had any kind of ethical center, if if you were not
• 2:03:16
  a gold dig and whore, you would not fall for someone like Andrew Tate.
• 2:03:23
  You wouldn't. Right, Increasingly women are becoming the type of women who
• 2:03:32
  would fall for an Andrew Tate. What what is the difference between Andrew Tate
• 2:03:40
  and Christian Gray Other than Andrew Tate rented out his bitch. Christian Gray is
• 2:03:48
  and so unbelievably creepily and violent and abusive. I guess maybe Andrew Tate is
• 2:03:56
  like that. I don't know anyway, this is talking about not even accusing
• 2:04:00
  Andrew Tate of being violent and abusive. I'm just saying, like brawl being
• 2:04:10
  incredibly wealthy, incredibly good looking, incredibly successful, looks absolutely stunning in a
• 2:04:18
  suit, super great, freaking nine dollars shoes. Okay, that that is
• 2:04:24
  those two men, right, very dominant. Okay, Yeah, I don't
• 2:04:31
  want to talk about You can't. You can't say Andrew Tait is not a
• 2:04:38
  product of the women around him when that fucking book Fifty Shades of Gray is
• 2:04:45
  more popular than Harry Potter. Okay, I got another super chow. I'm
• 2:04:51
  gonna read it and then we'll like maybe like, let you want to go
• 2:04:56
  to another hump in here. So Richard Bierre gives us ten dollars and says
• 2:05:02
  the vr Holo novel would be like the walking Tour of the Philippian Tubes as
• 2:05:06
  a walkthrough of women's slash feminist history that you did a while back. I
• 2:05:12
  think you're referring to, can we do like a virtual tour of some likes?
• 2:05:17
  Sort of insulting to be honest, Okay, I think he's trusting.
• 2:05:23
  I think he's just trying to be funny, Alison. Allow them to spur
• 2:05:25
  out, you know how they are. There's we need to do a hard
• 2:05:30
  stop at some point. Yeah. My bogs are going nuts, both of
• 2:05:35
  them. Yeah, okay, all right, I have satisfied myself with this.
• 2:05:40
  I don't want to go over Andrew Tate again as a topic. Red
• 2:05:44
  pill does not understand femininity. How about I just jumped in there and see
• 2:05:46
  what he said, Just do it. This is where I think red pillars
• 2:05:53
  are just dead wrong, Like pal Too, they just seemed to have the
• 2:05:58
  most shallow understanding of feminine Like from what I can see it's oh sweet,
• 2:06:01
  compliant submissive smells and keens. Are you dumb? Actually, don't answer that.
• 2:06:09
  I am sick of the constant, fucking flawed assumption of a starting point
• 2:06:13
  that femininity is submission that now seems to be taken for granted with red pillars,
• 2:06:17
  as if the conversation is over, it's decided. There's just no no.
• 2:06:21
  I think you have a flawed premise and that's why this is such a
• 2:06:26
  mess. I'm not going to go over it now. I've kind of talked
• 2:06:28
  about this quite a lot in quite a lot of other videos, and I
• 2:06:30
  plan to talk about it more in the future on what I think femininity is
• 2:06:34
  all means. But so my dad said something interesting during that conversation we had
• 2:06:39
  where I interviewed him for the Rider video, and this didn't make it in
• 2:06:41
  there, but we were talking about I asked him, we're talking about masculinity
• 2:06:47
  and femininity as like deeper forces from a spiritual perspective, and I ask him
• 2:06:54
  how he would sum up what he would boil the essence of femininity down to,
• 2:06:58
  and he immediately described as absorbent was kind of what he said, and
• 2:07:02
  I was immediately like, oh, that's interesting. I could have time to
• 2:07:08
  go to a now congress now probably video for an all the time. But
• 2:07:11
  yeah, I don't think I don't think he's I don't think he's wrong.
• 2:07:13
  And there's you know anyway. So though, so her father says that femininity
• 2:07:19
  is absorbent, I'm mostly just pausing for the banana, but I wanted to
• 2:07:24
  set that next bit up. I don't know she's gonna go into that little
• 2:07:27
  bit. You know why. You know why I think that femininity is absorbent,
• 2:07:33
  It's because of the young o Mommy, what the ommmy? Oh?
• 2:07:48
  Okay, So the description of the the was a Brazilian girl who was kidnapped
• 2:07:57
  by the Mommy tribe and she was raised by them and then rescued eventually as
• 2:08:07
  an adult, and she told her story and she described an attack on her
• 2:08:13
  tribe by the Karrotary, which was a rival tribe, and the Charroitary men
• 2:08:24
  basically killed all of the boys and all of the girls under maybe age eight
• 2:08:37
  or nine and all of the men and took all of the women and the
• 2:08:43
  eight plus girls hostage right, took them into their tribe right, and then
• 2:08:52
  they became Piotary. Well why did why did the carohitary, kill all of
• 2:09:03
  the all of the non productive dependent yan O mummy girls and all of the
• 2:09:13
  males because they're not absorbent. Right, well, the girls, the girls,
• 2:09:22
  they would be absorbent, but they are too much resource. They're resource
• 2:09:28
  hungry and they can't work, right, So they kill the girls. They
• 2:09:35
  kill all the males because the males are not absorbent. Yeah, they would
• 2:09:41
  not assimilate. They would remain Yano mummy and make trouble mm hm oh.
• 2:09:58
  And the and the and the young a mommy. They took refuge in a
• 2:10:01
  grotto right in a in a cave with water at the bottom of it,
• 2:10:07
  right, yeah, And they were hiding and the kiah Terry spotted one of
• 2:10:16
  them who was closest to the mouth of the cave, and he pointed his
• 2:10:22
  arrow at her and told her to come out. And she didn't just come
• 2:10:28
  out. She told them that there were other women and girls and children,
• 2:10:35
  right, women and girls and boys hiding in the cave. So then there's
• 2:10:41
  also I mean aunt that because that that makes that ingratiates you to the people
• 2:10:48
  who are now in charge of you, Okay, But as a counter to
• 2:10:52
  that, there's also the effect where women are radicalizing men, for example,
• 2:11:00
  in Islam's not sure and then but then the women will the women will often
• 2:11:05
  they'll radicalize their men. Their men will go off, they'll get killed,
• 2:11:09
  and then the women will be like, oh, I guess I was fucking
• 2:11:13
  wrong. Gotta survive now, yeah, yeah, to or got to be
• 2:11:20
  absorbent. That's being absorbed. Isn't it more than absorbent? It's absorbing?
• 2:11:28
  Okay? But anyway, uh okay, So I guess that's a that's an
• 2:11:33
  interesting point by this individual that women femininity dyes and so femininity is absorbent.
• 2:11:39
  We I mean, I'd have my own opinion on that, but well,
• 2:11:41
  we can wait. We can see if she expands on it. I got
• 2:11:46
  a super child from Zaranks. He gives us five dollars, but he doesn't
• 2:11:48
  say anything. So thank you for the for the five and I'm gonna make
• 2:11:54
  that go away. All right, Let's play some more. Let's say I
• 2:11:56
  want to see if she goes into it a bit but not submissive. And
• 2:12:01
  there is a distinction there, a subtle but very important one. You know,
• 2:12:05
  if you want to label its submission, then that's a conversation. You
• 2:12:09
  know, that's a conversation of the deeper sense of the word, but this
• 2:12:11
  shallow view submit, it's so annoying. I don't think that submission is about
• 2:12:18
  Also, if you are going to talk about it femininity, I don't think
• 2:12:22
  that it's in regards to the relationship with masculinity. If you're going to talk
• 2:12:26
  about feminy in those terms, femininity can exist on its own as a force,
• 2:12:30
  which necessarily makes it something other than its essence being defined by being dominated
• 2:12:35
  by the masculine. It's so stupid. If there was ever any deeper truth
• 2:12:39
  in that in any way, shape or form, I'm no longer even interested
• 2:12:43
  in having that conversation because, as far as I can tell, a big
• 2:12:46
  chunk of red pill people use the word submissive synonymously with inferior, less intelligent,
• 2:12:52
  less complex, and less human, and they throw it out there as
• 2:12:54
  a conversation, and then that means women should just shut up and know our
• 2:12:58
  place and do what we're told. It's just become a way to crap on
• 2:13:00
  women and use here. They should have everything their way and have to compromise
• 2:13:03
  on anything, because oh women submit. Okay, wait wait wait wait,
• 2:13:09
  I I on a one level, I agree with her and on other weather
• 2:13:13
  a level, I think she's going off in a very strange direction. This
• 2:13:18
  is something that I saw Andrew Tates say that women, this is women's nature.
• 2:13:24
  They can't be any other way. And I pointed out that that absolves
• 2:13:28
  women from moral responsibility. And yes, excuse me, I had to sneeze,
• 2:13:35
  I'm sorry I should have muted. But what the problem I have is
• 2:13:43
  when it isn't recognized that women have moral agents, like they have agency,
• 2:13:50
  and in the fact that we need to recognize it because there are certain aspects
• 2:13:54
  of power that women have that men don't have control over. So if women
• 2:13:58
  don't take responsibility for it, those will be the hooks that destroy our society
• 2:14:03
  because there's no one else to take responsibility for it. And the dialogue and
• 2:14:09
  the thing is, but the problem for me is that, yes, there
• 2:14:13
  are Andrew Tates to say that, you know, women, they have this
• 2:14:16
  kind of selfishness or focus on resources or whatever else, and they can't change
• 2:14:20
  that about themselves or they can't rise above it. There's that, but then
• 2:14:26
  there's also the attitude that women are not moral agents because all they do is
• 2:14:31
  good and if they do any bad, it's because they were in the thrall
• 2:14:35
  of a Man, which is interesting if you think about it, because on
• 2:14:39
  the one hand, you say you attribute it to women's nature and you say
• 2:14:43
  that they can't overcome their nature because that's just the way they are. And
• 2:14:46
  then the other way, you attribute it to men's nature and you say,
• 2:14:50
  well, women can't overcome it because men are so much more powerful than them.
• 2:14:54
  And in both ways you're actually taking away recognition of women as moral agents,
• 2:15:00
  as the having the ability to make these choices. You know, maybe
• 2:15:03
  there is a natural inclination to X, Y and z, but nature isn't
• 2:15:07
  destiny for humans anyway. That's what I wanted to point out. I don't
• 2:15:11
  think that's what she's getting at though, And I'd also like to point out
• 2:15:15
  that submission really the real word that it means is trust. Yeah, I
• 2:15:20
  think I think that. I was gonna say, I think it's like faith.
• 2:15:24
  You could put it that way, like if we're gonna put let's put
• 2:15:26
  it in religious context, I guess, or Christian context. Again an idea,
• 2:15:31
  because when what I think they're pulling from when they say women should submit,
• 2:15:37
  and I'm not talking about Andrew Tate's perspective per se but it's like,
• 2:15:41
  it's like it's it's like if you let's put it in a broader context,
• 2:15:48
  because I think that when people talk about that, they're speaking from a spiritual
• 2:15:56
  perspective. Okay, let's put it that, And she herself is saying that
• 2:16:00
  you asked her dad about this what women's nature is from a spiritual perspective.
• 2:16:05
  So we'll have to start with men. So I think that men are asked
• 2:16:09
  to you could say, submit to the to the transcendent, to the infinite,
• 2:16:16
  to God, okay, And what that means is to have faith in
• 2:16:20
  that. To have faith in that, it's like a blind faith. But
• 2:16:24
  the expectation is that why Why is that? Because the idea I think is
• 2:16:28
  is that if you run into problems or obstacles that you can control or affect
• 2:16:35
  the outcome on, then you do that. But if you run into things
• 2:16:37
  that you cannot control, then you have to be able to say, Okay,
• 2:16:45
  this isn't for me to do something about, because then you run the
• 2:16:48
  risk of behaving in a like selfish or unethical or even evil fashion because you're
• 2:16:54
  trying to change something that you don't have control over, like human nature.
• 2:17:00
  What, Yeah, you need to cope, and so like what is asked
• 2:17:03
  is that men have faith in that so that they don't try to rest it.
• 2:17:07
  And I think that again, this is just putting it purely in this
• 2:17:11
  sort of context. Women should have faith in men, So it's it's like
• 2:17:16
  having faith in them and supporting them. But that that but that also means,
• 2:17:22
  you know, working with them. I think someone said, and again
• 2:17:26
  I'm I'm sorry, but I'm using like sort of like biblical language, but
• 2:17:31
  that the reason why Eve was made from Adam's side so that she could stand
• 2:17:37
  by his side, right, So it's like symbolic in that way. So
• 2:17:41
  I think that she sees submission as something like close to slavery maybe or or
• 2:17:48
  some other way. But I don't think it's that. I think it's like
• 2:17:50
  you said, I think it's it's having faith or it's uh, you know
• 2:17:56
  what I mean. I'm looking at synonyms for the word submission, right,
• 2:18:03
  agreement, acceptance, consent, accession, compliance, presenting, proffering, tendering,
• 2:18:13
  proposing, introducing, suggesting, venturing, broaching, aiming, lodging,
• 2:18:22
  positing. Yeah, so, like I said, I think you submit,
• 2:18:31
  Okay, you submit when you accept the things that you can't change, you
• 2:18:37
  submit to reality, right, or you submit a job application or a report,
• 2:18:46
  Yeah, sure, right, or your opinion. Well, I mean
• 2:18:52
  it does make sense in the context of society. The outer shell of society
• 2:18:58
  is usually comprised of men because in many cases they're treated as more expendable,
• 2:19:01
  So men have to put their trust in any greater world cases. In every
• 2:19:11
  case, men are expendable relative to women, so they occupy the outer layer
• 2:19:16
  that protects the inner layer from the outer world. So men have to submit
• 2:19:20
  to the vagarities of the outer world, and women have to trust that men
• 2:19:26
  will form that shield between them and the outer world. That's necessarily And if
• 2:19:31
  you want to change that, ladies, then then take up arms for conception,
• 2:19:35
  take up arms ring the woman, the other women, the outer fucking
• 2:19:45
  rank b Brianna of Tarth, you know, Oh, don't even be Brian
• 2:19:50
  of Tarth, because you know, not everybody got to be a knight.
• 2:19:54
  Yeah. Most we're just foot soldiers with freaking leather jerkins. Yeah, put
• 2:20:01
  your money where your mouth is if you don't want Well, honestly, the
• 2:20:05
  thing is that men still occupy that position. They still are the guard that
• 2:20:11
  keeps society safe, and there's still the ones, and there's still the ones
• 2:20:16
  who keep the lights on, so they're still in that position. The only
• 2:20:20
  thing that's changed is that women are convinced themselves that they're doing it out of
• 2:20:24
  oppression of women, and that not being part of that is is somehow some
• 2:20:31
  exclusionary act of women. It's like it's most do you remember the speech that
• 2:20:41
  what's his name gives in a few good men right on the stand? Right,
• 2:20:48
  you know you can't handle the truth. The truth is that the world
• 2:20:54
  needs walls, and those walls need men, and those men need guns,
• 2:21:01
  right and whatever? Right, Okay, now that is true. The world
• 2:21:05
  needs walls, those walls need men. Okay, women, Okay. Feminists
• 2:21:13
  have basically said those walls, they've redefined them. Those are not walls to
• 2:21:20
  keep bad things out and away from the women. Those are walls to keep
• 2:21:28
  the women in. And all of the men with all of their guns standing
• 2:21:31
  on the wall on those walls are pointing their guns inward at the way.
• 2:21:37
  That's what they're saying. That's what they've redefined society as, because society is
• 2:21:43
  patriarchy. Society is ghinocentrism. Ghinocentrism is the women inside the walls. Patriarchy
• 2:21:50
  is the men on the outside of it and the man in the freaking tower
• 2:21:56
  giving the orders and sending men to die. That's what that's what society is.
• 2:22:03
  Right. Women have managed to convince everybody that this situation in which women
• 2:22:09
  are in the tower or in buildings in the inner bailey, right, you
• 2:22:18
  know they're protected. They're behind the walls, right, and they are safe
• 2:22:22
  from all of the cannon fire and all of the bullets and all of the
• 2:22:26
  freaking spears coming from the outside. Right. Their men are not protecting them.
• 2:22:33
  Their men are enslaving them, keeping them captive, and not allowing them
• 2:22:41
  to be free to just go out into the world, the perfectly safe world.
• 2:22:46
  Right. And the only reason they can actually translate it, redefine how
• 2:22:52
  things work in that way is because men did make the outside world safe.
• 2:22:58
  They make it safe for the most part. Yeah, once it becomes less
• 2:23:03
  safe, I think you're gonna see a resurgence of the Oh yeah, it's
• 2:23:07
  gonna be like zombie apocalypse. All the gender roles will be back and forth.
• 2:23:11
  Oh well, if you want to go forage for food, I'll stay
• 2:23:15
  a woman like boil some water. Oh, I'm just a delicate little woman.
• 2:23:22
  Yeah, let me watch your clothes. There, set of clothes need
• 2:23:30
  washing. Why don't you go hunt down the zombies and I'll get this laundry
• 2:23:35
  done. Yeah, that's what's gonna happen. Well, okay, women and
• 2:23:48
  women like me are honest enough to admit that, and that we will be.
• 2:23:52
  We would probably be. We would maybe be not on the outer ring,
• 2:23:58
  but on one of the inner rings. We wouldn't necessarily be hiding in
• 2:24:03
  the back in our bowers, right. We would be working. We'd be
• 2:24:07
  helping. We'd be like making food and keeping people fed, and like we'd
• 2:24:13
  be like even making armaments, maybe mending things, fixing things, all of
• 2:24:18
  that stuff. We'd be doing what it takes. Right. But I don't
• 2:24:22
  think i'd be on that outer wall unless I had to be making sandwiches.
• 2:24:28
  I would totally make so many need we need sandwiches on the front lines.
• 2:24:35
  Oh, and they'd be so good, I think I probably personally, I'd
• 2:24:41
  probably just be doing like compounding of herbs and stuff. Yeah, stuff like
• 2:24:46
  that necessarily not really the greatest physical ship. We'd be running the infirmary.
• 2:24:52
  We'd be, like we'd be we'd be doing all kinds of administrative tasks right
• 2:24:58
  to keep our soldiers fed and warm and uh and strong and healthy and all
• 2:25:05
  of that would be working as a team again. Right. It's just a
• 2:25:09
  shame that if it ever gets to that point again, it's all over because
• 2:25:16
  there won't be any more easy oil or coal. So yeah, I want
• 2:25:22
  to get to that point. I want to fix this ship. And the
• 2:25:24
  thing is that this is a very costly this is a very costly narrative to
• 2:25:28
  our society. But Brian has to go, So we should do the final
• 2:25:31
  superchowse. Let's do the final super childs and then new to your thank you,
• 2:25:35
  But first let's do the superchild. So this is from playing Dane,
• 2:25:41
  I think, uh yeah, and he USUS five dollars thank you playing Dane
• 2:25:45
  and says another example that supports my claim that loyalty is a masculine trade.
• 2:25:50
  New tribes, new language, new culture. This is why women are better
• 2:25:52
  at learning new languages. Disloyalty and wacophobia is more well, I guess he
• 2:25:58
  meant to say more feminine orgophobia. Sure, because it's like I can see
• 2:26:03
  that. I think that's honestly, I think that we're living in a culture
• 2:26:05
  that has almost completely excluded the masculine perspective and everything is feminized and it doesn't
• 2:26:11
  matter if there are men saying it or whatever. But I that's what I
• 2:26:15
  believe. I believe that the way, oh yeah, the way that we
• 2:26:18
  communicate has become like it's not masculine at all. So if a guy talks
• 2:26:24
  like guys do, they're going to get in trouble. I want to point
• 2:26:28
  something out to this. I want to point something out to this. What
• 2:26:31
  be it as it may. From my study of history, the source of
• 2:26:35
  any kind of new social cohesion seems to come as a result of women being
• 2:26:41
  loyal and sacrificing. So you have the Sabine women, you have the Christian
• 2:26:48
  martyrs forming this kind of cohesive force to a new concept of how men and
• 2:26:54
  women relate. Really, and so there's that, there is the general women.
• 2:27:01
  But you also have to consider that it's not like men really have an
• 2:27:07
  option when it comes to loyalty because if they aren't uh, and you know,
• 2:27:13
  if if they if they're there, there's their social system fails, they're
• 2:27:18
  dead, They're going to be killed. So they have to remain loyal to
• 2:27:24
  it because that's their only option. Really, if women have another option,
• 2:27:30
  often they'll take it. But then there are these points in history where women
• 2:27:33
  have actually themselves sacrificed themselves to express loyalty to something greater than themselves. And
• 2:27:41
  then what's interesting is some kind of social movement seems to form around that,
• 2:27:48
  and it's something that's recognized among like Islamist terrorists too, Like women who devote
• 2:27:54
  themselves up to the point of self sacrifice to the cause, motivate and provide
• 2:28:00
  a great deal more cohesion than male martyrs. It's like like female martyrs are
• 2:28:05
  worth ten male martyrs or something. So anyway, there's that's that's something to
• 2:28:11
  consider as well. Yes, it seems like the general mass of women have
• 2:28:16
  a different concept when it comes to loyalty, but there are some outliers who
• 2:28:20
  don't express that that same thing anyway, Go ahead, okay, next one,
• 2:28:26
  that's O great U. So Zara Anks, who gave us five dollars
• 2:28:30
  earlier and didn't say anything, said that he did send a message but didn't
• 2:28:33
  go through. So he tagged me in a post on the chat and says
• 2:28:37
  it's so convenient that what she'd have to say to contribute either exists elsewhere or
• 2:28:41
  doesn't make it into whatever discussion it's pertinent to sounds like Patreon material I roll
• 2:28:46
  emoji. Thank you for that. Yeah, I mean it would have been
• 2:28:52
  nice if she had like planned to talk about this stuff. I think what
• 2:28:56
  happened was that she had something in mind and didn't, like, you know,
• 2:29:01
  realize he was going to bring this other thing up, and was like,
• 2:29:03
  oh, I should probably go into that more later. I don't know,
• 2:29:07
  so, but thank you for the super Child. And then sleep auzsi
• 2:29:11
  bot Oops or sleep Ozzy rather gives us five dollars and says I can't wait
• 2:29:16
  to read your book. Last good fantasy book I read was Shad's Shadow of
• 2:29:20
  the Conqueror, but that was still not flattering in its views on men.
• 2:29:24
  I like Shad, but he is a conservative Christian. Well he's like part
• 2:29:28
  of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter day Saints. I think. So
• 2:29:31
  okay, so kind of an out there thing, but okay, go ahead,
• 2:29:35
  all right. Yeah, I wanted to thank you because sleep Bossy put
• 2:29:39
  through two hundred dollars, So thank you, sleep Ozzy. I have another
• 2:29:43
  for this particular sub goal, five hundred and fifty dollars to go. So
• 2:29:46
  if you want to help out, it's feed the Badger dot com. You
• 2:29:48
  want to join are very gen well. The people who are helping me make
• 2:29:52
  this happen. Feed the Badger dot Com slash support this being getting my book
• 2:29:58
  to a reason state of finishing through the process of editing, which is quite
• 2:30:03
  expensive but so far has been worth it. I wanted to say that I
• 2:30:07
  also enjoyed Shad's Shadow of the Conqueror. I think that it could have I
• 2:30:13
  think it could have used more editing. However, I will say that he
• 2:30:20
  is He's a good enough writer. He's one of the few YouTubers who've written
• 2:30:24
  something that I actually enjoyed. Uh And he's good enough that it was readable
• 2:30:31
  even without I think a developmental editor. So it was a good yarn.
• 2:30:37
  And like I said, I think there are some places where it could have
• 2:30:39
  been improved. Maybe the discussion of the magic system was a little bit excessive.
• 2:30:45
  I found it a bit excessive, but yeah, it was It held
• 2:30:50
  my interest to the end, which is about what I want a book to
• 2:30:52
  do. And no, I agree it wasn't didn't really have a flattering view
• 2:30:56
  of men, and that was really unfortunate. I think that he he glossed
• 2:31:03
  over some depth for his main male character that I saw would have been very
• 2:31:09
  interesting to explore. Hopefully you enjoy my book as well. It's probably gonna
• 2:31:13
  be quite a bit different than Shadow of the Conqueror a little bit, you
• 2:31:20
  know, a little bit not quite as Christian, shall we say? Yeah?
• 2:31:26
  Probably? Okay, all right, yeah, we gotta go. All
• 2:31:31
  right, So once again, if you want to send us message feed the
• 2:31:33
  Badger dot com slash just the tip. If you want to tell us that
• 2:31:35
  you enjoyed this content, you want to tell us we're not screaming into the
• 2:31:39
  void, that there's somebody out here out there who's listening to us and saying,
• 2:31:43
  yeah, that's actually a really good point. Maybe don't agree with everything,
• 2:31:46
  but I do agree with that. Please send your comments to feed the
• 2:31:48
  Badger dot com slash just the tip. And if you would like to help
• 2:31:52
  me do this project of bringing some more pro human writing into the world to
• 2:31:58
  defeat the forces of misanthropy and nihilistic hatred of humanity, please go to feed
• 2:32:05
  the Badger dot com slash support and help me out with the novel that I'm
• 2:32:09
  writing and trying to get edited. So feed the Badger dot com slash just
• 2:32:13
  the tip if you want to send us a message and feed the Badger dot
• 2:32:16
  com slash support at least for now. If you want to support the show
• 2:32:18
  or my current project, which is getting my novel edited and out to print,
• 2:32:24
  all right back to you, Brian. Okay, well I did get
• 2:32:28
  one more suit like Rumble rant. So from the Nova Fan twenty one shout
• 2:32:33
  out to the Rumble Gang gives us a dollar and he says, if she
• 2:32:35
  doesn't want men to think women submitting to men as being a slave to her
• 2:32:37
  husband, maybe she should direct her ire more with with women who play the
• 2:32:43
  damsel on distress trope when things get tough. Thank you for that, Nova
• 2:32:48
  Fan appreciate it all right. So with that said, if you guys like
• 2:32:52
  this video, please smash like, subscribe. If you're not already subscribed,
• 2:32:56
  hit the belof notifications, leave us a comment, let us know what you
• 2:32:58
  guys think about what we discussed on the show, and please please please share
• 2:33:01
  this video because sharing is caring. Thanks guys for coming on today's episode of
• 2:33:07
  The Rant Sircer and we will talk to you all in the next video.