Latest / Reformed Thinking / Introduction to the Psalms | John Peter Lange

Transcript

Introduction to the Psalms | John Peter Lange · Reformed Thinking

0:00
Welcome to the Dee Dive, brought to you by Reformed Thinking.
0:02
We take complex stacks of source material, distill the key
0:05
insights, and hand you the knowledge necessary to
0:08
understand topics with speed and clarity.
0:11
Today we're diving into a book that's probably familiar to
0:15
almost everyone, but maybe not in the way we'll look at it
0:18
today. The book of Psalms.
0:20
Most of us, I think, approach the Psalms devotionally.
0:22
We pick out verses, maybe a whole Psalm for comfort or
0:25
worship. But what happens if we step back
0:27
and look at the whole collection?
0:28
Not just, as you know, a random grab bag of songs, but as a book
0:32
with a deliberate design, a structure.
0:34
Yeah. And that structural view that's
0:36
really central to what we're doing today, it's key we're
0:39
trying to move beyond, sing it as just individual songs,
0:43
however powerful they are, and examine the Psalter as well,
0:47
carefully compiled sacred collection.
0:49
Our sources really dig into its canonical position, the
0:53
theological architecture underneath it all, how it
0:55
connects to the rest of Scripture, and also the meaning
0:59
that's kind of hidden in plain sight within those often quite
1:02
obscure liturgical superscriptions you see at the
1:05
top of many Psalms. When you start seeing that
1:08
architectural perspective, you begin to get a sense of what the
1:10
source is called, a throbbing heart of the Israelites life of
1:14
faith. It's quite something.
1:16
OK, let's unpack this. And I guess the logical place to
1:18
start is how does this book even identify itself?
1:20
What are its names? Because it does have a few
1:22
different titles floating around, doesn't it?
1:24
Depending on the language, the tradition.
1:26
It does, and each name actually highlights a slightly different
1:29
facet of its purpose. You've got the Hebrew name, a
1:31
liturgical name, and the one most of us probably use, which
1:35
comes via the Greek. So let's start with Hebrew to
1:38
Hillam. Exactly.
1:39
The primary Hebrew name is to Hillam, sometimes shortened to
1:42
just Tillam, and it means, quite simply the Book of hymns.
1:47
Now that designation is really revealing.
1:50
You know, it tells you the original primary design.
1:53
These weren't just private poems.
1:55
They were songs intended to glorify God, meant for the
1:58
corporate worship of the congregation of Israel.
2:01
So right away, that name to Hillam shifts the focus.
2:05
It's not just David's diary, it's a community resource.
2:08
Precisely. It was, in effect, their hymn
2:10
book, designed for public use for everyone together, not
2:13
solely for private reflection. And then there's another term
2:16
used within the Psalms themselves, Tefaloth.
2:18
Yes, Tefaloth, which means prayers.
2:20
And significantly, it's used collectively in Psalm 72, verse
2:23
20. That verse designates all the
2:26
preceding Psalms. So Psalms 1 all the way through
2:28
72 as the prayers of David. OK, so hymns and prayers,
2:33
adoration and supplication. Right.
2:35
It speaks directly to the content.
2:37
It's a manual, you could say, for both personal and communal
2:39
prayer, showing Israel how to talk to God in all
2:41
circumstances. The name we usually use Psalter.
2:44
Where does that come from? It sounds Greek.
2:46
It is Greek Psalter or Sultarium in the original Greek comes to
2:51
us through the Septuagint, the ancient Greek translation of the
2:54
Hebrew scriptures made in Alexandria, and the word itself
2:58
actually went through a bit of an evolution in meaning.
3:01
Originally, Soltarian referred to a stringed instrument,
3:04
specifically a plucked one, kind of like a harp or lyre.
3:07
OK, so the instrument itself. Then it shifted to mean the
3:10
music played on that instrument makes sense, and finally, by
3:13
extension, it came to mean the whole collection of songs that
3:17
were intended to be played or chanted, likely with that kind
3:20
of instrumental accompaniment. So even that name ties the words
3:24
directly to musical performance right from the start.
3:26
Absolutely. It shows that the words and the
3:28
music to performance were seen as inseparable from the very
3:32
beginning. All right, so we have it's
3:34
names. Now where does it sit within the
3:36
bigger picture of the Hebrew scriptures?
3:38
It's canonical position? Good question.
3:41
In many important Hebrew manuscripts, especially those
3:44
from the German tradition, the Psalter stands right at the
3:47
beginning of the Kathubim. The Kathubim.
3:50
That's the third section of the Hebrew Bible, after the Law and
3:53
the Prophets, what we often call the Writings or Hague Rafa in
3:56
Greek. Exactly the writings, though
3:58
it's worth noting other manuscripts sometimes placed
4:01
Chronicles or Ruth or Job first in that section.
4:04
The order wasn't universally fixed.
4:06
But its placement in the Kathubum is significant, isn't
4:09
it, because there was some debate or maybe a
4:12
misunderstanding about the status of that section?
4:14
There was. Our sources mention what they
4:17
call an unhistorical theory, apparently held by a few rabbis,
4:20
suggesting that the kathubum, the Hagiographa, were somehow,
4:25
well, less inspired or inferior to the books of the prophets.
4:29
Hold on, why would they think that?
4:30
That seems strange, suggesting different levels of inspiration
4:33
within scripture itself. It likely stemmed from how the
4:36
books were categorized and may be transmitted.
4:38
The writings were seen as distinct from the Law Porah and
4:42
the prophets Niveum. But the Psalter's position there
4:46
isn't about lesser authority. It's due to its unique
4:49
character, lyrical, historical, wisdom oriented, and our sources
4:54
strongly push back against that idea of inferiority.
4:57
They state very clearly that the Holy Spirit was expressly
5:01
represented as inspiring the Psalmist.
5:03
Like David himself. Yes, David himself.
5:06
As First Chronicles 25 records, David and other musicians were
5:09
often numbered among the prophets and seers.
5:11
They prophesied with liars, harps and symbols.
5:14
So, from a reformed perspective, adhering to the full authority
5:17
of Scripture. It's all stamped with what the
5:19
theologians call atheo newistic origin.
5:21
It's all equally God breathed, useful for teaching, rebuking,
5:25
correcting, training in righteousness.
5:27
No hierarchy of inspiration. OK, that clarifies its position.
5:31
Now let's get into the internal structure, because this is where
5:33
it gets fascinating. It's not just one book, is it?
5:35
No it's not, and this is a huge point.
5:37
The Psalter is actually divided into 5 distinct books.
5:40
Five books within the one book. That's right, you have Book 1 is
5:44
Psalms 1 to 41, Book 2 is Psalms 42 to 72, Book 3 covers 73 to
5:49
89, book four runs from 90 to one O 6, and book 5 is one O 7
5:55
all the way to the end 150. And this isn't just something
5:57
scholars impose on it later. It's marked in the text.
6:00
It's explicitly marked at the end of each of those first 4
6:04
sections, Psalm 41, Psalm 72, Psalm 89, and Psalm one O 6.
6:08
You find these short statements of praise, these doxologies like
6:12
Blessed be the Lord, the God of Israel, from everlasting to
6:15
everlasting, Amen and Amen. I recognize those.
6:18
Those doxologies were likely added later, perhaps for
6:21
liturgical use in the temple or synagogues to signal the end of
6:24
a section, but they clearly mark out this five fold division.
6:27
OK, five books. Why 5?
6:29
Is there a significance to that number?
6:30
Oh absolutely. This is probably the key insight
6:33
into the Psalters architecture. The arrangement into five books
6:36
was almost certainly made in conscious reference to the five
6:38
books of the Tour of the Pentateuch.
6:39
Genesis. Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers.
6:42
Deuteronomy. Exactly.
6:43
Here's where it gets really interesting.
6:44
So the suggestion is that the Psalter is structured to mirror
6:47
the law, like Israel's response to God's law.
6:50
That's the compelling idea. France de Lich, a great
6:53
commentator, put it beautifully, he said.
6:55
The Psalter is also a Pentateuch, the echo of the
6:58
Books of Moses from the heart of Israel.
7:01
An echo from the heart I like. That it frames the Psalter
7:04
perfectly. If the Torah is God's
7:06
foundational revelation to his people, then the Psalter is the
7:09
divinely inspired manual showing how that people should live,
7:13
worship, pray, and respond to that revelation.
7:16
Can we see thematic links between the specific books of
7:19
Psalms and the books of the Torah?
7:21
We can, yes. Well, you don't want to push it
7:24
too rigidly. There are some strong thematic
7:26
residences that scholars have pointed out.
7:28
Book 1, Psalms 1 to 41, often focuses on themes of humanity,
7:32
creation, the righteous versus the wicked, blessing and curse,
7:35
which echoes themes you find prominently in Genesis.
7:39
It sort of sets the stage for the human condition in relation
7:42
to God's law. OK, Genesis and book one.
7:44
What about book 2? Book 2, Psalms 42 to 72, seems
7:47
to focus more on the nation, on Israel as God's redeemed people,
7:51
often facing conflict, enemies, and deliverance.
7:54
There's a strong sense of corporate identity and struggle,
7:57
which aligns well with the themes of redemption and
7:59
wilderness trials in Exodus. Exodus the great redemption
8:02
story makes sense and book 3. Book 3, Psalm 73 to 89 delves
8:06
deeply into matters of the sanctuary, worship, God's
8:09
holiness, and also wrestles with difficult theological questions
8:13
like the prosperity of the wicked, Psalm 73, or God's
8:17
apparent abandonment of His covenant promises, Psalm 89.
8:20
This focus on worship, holiness, and grappling with God's justice
8:24
resonates strongly with Leviticus.
8:26
Right, Leviticus being the heart of the cultic and purity laws.
8:29
Precisely. Then, Book 4, Psalms 90 to One O
8:32
6, actually begins with the prayer of Moses, Psalm 90.
8:36
It covers themes of Israel's journey, their history of
8:38
rebellion in the wilderness, God's enduring faithfulness
8:41
despite their sin, and the establishment of His Kingdom.
8:45
This mirrors the narrative and themes found in the Book of
8:47
Numbers. The wilderness wanderings, yes.
8:50
And finally, Book 5, Psalms One O 7 to 150, brings things to a
8:54
grand conclusion. It emphasizes God's Word, His
8:58
steadfast love has said, gathering his people praise and
9:02
the future hope, often looking back at the covenant and forward
9:05
to its fulfillment. This aligns nicely with
9:07
Deuteronomy, which renews the covenant and looks towards
9:10
Israel's future in the land. So it's like the Psalter
9:13
provides the prayer book and songbook that corresponds to the
9:17
foundational instructions of the Torah.
9:19
Exactly. It suggests the Psalter isn't
9:20
just a collection, but a complete theological guide for
9:23
Israel's faith life, structured intentionally to reflect God's
9:27
primary revelation in the law. Are there other architectural
9:30
clues within this five book structure?
9:32
I remember reading something about the names used for God.
9:35
That's another fascinating layer, Yes, If you analyze which
9:38
name for God is used most frequently in each book, a
9:40
pattern emerges. In book one, book four, and book
9:43
5, the predominant divine name used is Jehovah or Yahweh, the
9:47
personal covenant name of God. OK, Jehovah in 1/4 and five.
9:51
But in Book 2 and Book 3, the name Elohim, the more general
9:54
term for God, prevails significantly.
9:56
Why the shift? Is that just random?
9:59
It's almost certainly not random.
10:00
This variation in divine names is generally seen as strong
10:03
evidence that the final compilers of the Psalter were
10:06
incorporating older pre-existing collections of Psalms.
10:10
These earlier collections likely had their own distinct
10:13
traditions or preferences for using either Jehovah or Elohim.
10:17
For example, Book 2 is often called the Elohistic Psalter
10:20
because of this preference. So preserving those different
10:23
naming patterns actually tells us something about how the book
10:26
was put together over time. Exactly.
10:28
It's like seeing the seams where different pieces were joined.
10:31
It provides concrete evidence of the Psalter's composite origin,
10:35
drawing from various streams of tradition.
10:37
And to round off this section on structure, the collection has
10:40
very distinct beginning and ending points, doesn't.
10:43
It it does, it starts with Psalms one and two.
10:45
Both are anonymous. Interestingly, Psalm 1 is
10:48
didactic, focusing on the law and the path of wisdom versus
10:51
wickedness. Psalm 2 is prophetic, focusing
10:54
on God's anointed King and his universal reign.
10:57
So wisdom and kingship right at the outset.
10:59
Setting the stage perfectly. And then the entire collection
11:03
builds towards this incredible crescendo of praise at the end.
11:06
The final five psalms, 146 through 150, are all Hallelujah
11:11
psalms, beginning and order, ending with Praise the Lord.
11:15
Psalm 150 in particular serves as this massive amplified
11:18
doxology, calling on everything that has breath to praise God
11:22
with every kind of instrument. From instruction on the law to
11:25
this universal explosion of praise.
11:27
It frames the entire journey of the Psalter.
11:29
You start with learning God's way, you journey through all the
11:32
ups and downs of life and faith expressed in the middle books,
11:35
and you end in pure, unadulterated corporate
11:38
adoration. It's a powerful structure, and
11:41
that final count of 150 Psalms seems to have been fixed and
11:44
recognized as canonical relatively early, distinguishing
11:47
it from later apocryphal psalms. OK, let's talk about who
11:50
actually wrote these Psalms. When most people think of the
11:53
psalms, one name immediately comes to mind.
11:55
David. King David?
11:56
Yeah, he looms large over the Psalter, and rightly so.
11:59
The New Testament itself often quotes Psalms and attributes
12:02
them directly to David. But the idea that he wrote all
12:05
in 150 psalms, that's not quite accurate.
12:08
Is it even based on the Psalms themselves?
12:10
No, that assumption, while understandable given his
12:13
prominence, is historically and textually inaccurate.
12:17
Yeah. Our sources point out that the
12:19
superscriptions, those little titles we mentioned, only
12:22
attribute about 72 Psalms directly to David. 72 out of
12:25
150. That's still a lot.
12:27
Almost half, but definitely not all.
12:29
Right. However, the sources also
12:31
explain why the entire collection often came to be
12:34
known as Davidic. They invoke a Latin maxim.
12:37
Oh boy, more Latin. Hit me with it.
12:39
A potiari fit denominatio. A potiari fit denominatio.
12:42
OK, translation please. It basically means the
12:44
denomination is derived from the more important part.
12:48
OK. So because David was the most
12:50
significant, the most influential, the foundational
12:53
figure. Exactly.
12:54
He was recognized as the master psalmist, the one who really
12:56
established and patronized this form of sacred song for Israel's
13:00
worship. His contribution was so central,
13:03
so defining, that his name became associated with the whole
13:06
genre, even the parts written by others who followed in his
13:08
tradition. Like calling a whole school of
13:10
thought platonic, even if Plato didn't write every single
13:13
related text. Precisely, David set the
13:15
standard, provided the core and inspiring the tradition.
13:18
And those 72 Psalms actually attributed to him?
13:21
They give us an incredible window into his life, don't
13:24
they? They really do.
13:26
They paint this vivid picture of his incredibly dramatic and
13:30
frankly agitated life. You see the anguish of when he
13:33
was fleeing from Saul, the joy of military victories, the deep,
13:38
raw penitential prayer after his sin with Bathsheba.
13:41
Like Psalm 51, the wisdom gained through suffering and even
13:45
prophetic insights about the future king.
13:47
Many of them seem directly linked to specific events
13:49
recorded in First and Second Samuel.
13:51
Yes, the superscriptions often provide those historical hooks,
13:54
like a Psalm of David when he fled from Absalom, his son Psalm
13:58
3, or when Nathan the prophet went to him after he'd gone into
14:01
Bathsheba, Psalm 51. These connections are crucial
14:04
for understanding both David's life and the meaning of the
14:07
Psalms themselves. Now there's a really interesting
14:10
sentence right at the end of Book 2, after Psalm 72, verse 20
14:14
says the prayers of David, the son of Jesse, are ended.
14:19
What's the significance of that? That line is incredibly
14:23
significant for understanding how the Psalter was compiled.
14:26
It acts like a concluding note or a boundary marker for an
14:30
earlier distinct collection. So it suggests there was an
14:33
original book of David's prayers that finished right there at
14:36
Psalm 72. That's the strong implication.
14:39
It points back to an ancient recognized collection of Davidic
14:42
compositions that was considered complete at that point.
14:45
This collection likely existed before the final 150 Psalm
14:48
Psalter was put together. But wait, there are more Psalms
14:51
attributed to David later in the Psalter, aren't there in books
14:53
3-4 and five? There are, yes.
14:55
And that's what makes Psalm 72.2 so fascinating.
14:58
The final editor or read actor who compiled the entire five
15:01
books. Alter kept that concluding
15:02
sentence from the older collection, even though he went
15:04
on to include more Davidic Psalms later on.
15:06
Why would he do that? It suggests a respect for the
15:09
integrity of the earlier collection.
15:11
Perhaps these later Davidic Psalms were discovered or
15:14
collected separately. By keeping the original closing
15:17
line, the editor acknowledges the history of the book's
15:20
formation, showing us that it was assembled by integrating
15:23
pre-existing closed collections into the larger final structure.
15:27
OK, so David is central, but not the only author, and not even
15:31
the first, because there's one Psalm that's explicitly older
15:35
than David's time. That's right, we have Psalm 90.
15:37
It stands unique. And it's superscription
15:39
attributes it to. A prayer of mode.
15:41
Moses, the man of God. Moses.
15:44
So this Psalm potentially dates back centuries before David.
15:48
Yes, it's considered the oldest composition in the Psalter, both
15:51
its language and its themes. The brevity of human life
15:54
contrasted with God's eternity, reflecting on the wilderness
15:57
experience, bear marks of great antiquity, as the sources put.
16:01
It and its placement is significant too, isn't it?
16:03
Opens book 4. It does, and remember, Book 4 is
16:06
the one we link thematically to the Book of Numbers, the
16:08
Wilderness journey. Placing the prayer of Moses the
16:11
leader through the wilderness right at the start of that
16:13
section seems like a very deliberate editorial choice by
16:17
the compilers. What about David's son Solomon?
16:19
He was known for his wisdom and songs.
16:21
How many Psalms did he contribute?
16:23
Surprisingly few given his reputation.
16:26
King Solomon, famous for composing according to First
16:28
Kings 3000 proverbs and 1005 songs, is only credited with two
16:34
songs in the entire Psalter. Only two?
16:36
Which ones? Psalm 72, which is a prayer for
16:38
the king, fittingly placed right before that prayers of David or
16:42
ended note, and Psalm 127 which talks about building a house and
16:46
guarding a city. Themes related to wisdom and
16:48
reliance on God. Why so few from such a prolific
16:51
writer? The sources suggest Solomon's
16:54
main focus was different from David's.
16:57
While David excelled in sacred lyric poetry for worship,
17:00
Solomon's compositions tended more towards chokma, proverbial
17:04
wisdom, observations about nature, human life, and perhaps
17:09
more philosophical or didactic themes.
17:11
His style just didn't align as frequently with the specific
17:14
needs and character of the Psalter as a book of worship.
17:18
OK. So beyond David, Moses and
17:20
Solomon, who else contributed? You mentioned the Levites
17:23
earlier. Yes, a significant number of the
17:25
remaining authored Psalms come from the great Levitical
17:27
families, the musicians appointed for temple worship.
17:30
These are like schools of song, preserving and continuing the
17:32
tradition. Like the Psalms of Asaph.
17:34
Exactly. There are 12 psalms bearing the
17:36
name Asaph. Now we know Asaph was a
17:39
prominent Levite musician, appointed by David himself.
17:41
But some of those Asaph psalms seem to describe events much
17:44
later than David's time, right? Like the destruction of
17:47
Jerusalem. Correct.
17:48
Psalms like 74 and 79 clearly reflect the Babylonian exile.
17:53
So while the tradition started with Asaph the individual, the
17:56
name Asaph in the superscriptions likely functions
17:59
as a family or Guild name, referring to the sons of Asaph
18:02
or the Asaphites who continued composing in his style over
18:05
generations. And what?
18:06
Characterizes the esophyte style.
18:09
The sources note they often display a certain family
18:11
likeness. They tend to be more didactic,
18:13
sometimes prophetic, often reflecting on Israel's history
18:16
and drawing theological lessons from it.
18:18
Think of Psalm 78, that long historical recital.
18:21
OK. And the other major group?
18:23
The sons of Korra there are 11 psalms ascribed to them the.
18:26
Korra Heights Wasn't Korra the one who led a rebellion against
18:29
Moses in the wilderness? He was, yes, which makes their
18:33
later prominence quite remarkable.
18:34
A story of redemption, perhaps. His descendants became key
18:38
singers and musicians dedicated to the sanctuary service.
18:41
And their psalms have a distinct character too.
18:43
They do. They are often noted for their
18:45
lofty style, expressing a deep longing for God's presence,
18:48
particularly in the temple in Jerusalem.
18:51
They frequently praise Elohim as the great King enthroned in
18:54
Zion. Psalms 42 and 43 with a refrain
18:59
Why are you cast down? Oh my Soul are classic examples
19:02
of their style. So putting it all together, the
19:04
Psalter wasn't written all at once, it was compiled over a
19:06
long period. Absolutely.
19:08
It was a gradual process of collection and editing, likely
19:11
spanning centuries. It probably began relatively
19:14
soon after David's death with collections of his work.
19:17
Then. Significant boost to the
19:18
collection likely happened during periods of religious
19:20
reform or renewal. Like under King Hezekiah.
19:23
Yes, Hezekiah famously restored Temple worship and the use of
19:26
Davidic and Asaphic psalms as recorded in Two Chronicles.
19:30
It's logical he would have commissioned efforts to collect
19:32
and preserve these vital texts. And later after the exile.
19:36
Leader compilations likely occurred during the time of post
19:39
exilic leaders like Ezra and Nehemiah who are focused on
19:43
rebuilding the community around the law and Temple worship.
19:46
Some traditions even mentioned Judas Maccabeus much later
19:50
playing a role in finalizing the collection, possibly gathering
19:54
texts scattered during periods of persecution.
19:57
This suggests the final shape of the 150 Psalm Book probably
20:01
solidified sometime in the Second Temple period.
20:03
Which leaves us with the Psalms that have no author listed at
20:06
all. Right, the anonymous Psalms.
20:07
There are 50 of them in total in the Hebrew text.
20:10
Out of those, 5034 have absolutely no superscription
20:13
whatsoever. No author, no musical direction,
20:16
nothing. What did the tradition make of
20:18
those? The Talmud colorfully referred
20:20
to them as the orphaned Psalms. Their anonymity highlights the
20:24
limits of tradition. Interestingly, the Septuagint
20:27
translators, perhaps uncomfortable with the
20:29
anonymity, actually added attributions to some of these
20:32
based purely on conjecture, assigning some to Jeremiah or
20:35
Ezekiel, for instance, just because the theme seemed to fit
20:38
their times. But the Hebrew text preserves
20:41
the original anonymity. Yes, which speaks to a certain
20:45
honesty in the compilation process.
20:48
When the tradition didn't preserve an author, the
20:50
compilers didn't invent one. They included the Inspire song,
20:54
but left the human authorship blank.
20:57
All right, let's pivot back to those superscriptions, the
20:59
titles and notes above. Many of the Psalms we've talked
21:02
about authorship, but they contain other information too,
21:05
musical and liturgical terms. How reliable are these?
21:09
That's a big question, and honestly the scholarly value of
21:12
the superscriptions is heavily debated.
21:15
Some scholars tend to dismiss them as unreliable late
21:18
editions, maybe just conjectures by later editors.
21:21
But others see them as valuable. Yes, and I think the more
21:24
favorable view is probably the more defensible one, especially
21:26
when you consider their consistency in technical nature.
21:30
The prevailing view among many careful scholars is that, while
21:33
maybe not infallible in every detail, they are largely drawn
21:37
from genuinely ancient and reliable tradition.
21:40
So they offer a real window into how these psalms were actually
21:42
used. Exactly.
21:44
They're pretty much our only textual clues about the
21:46
performance practice, the musical direction, the
21:49
liturgical settings in the 1st and 2nd temples.
21:52
They seem to be instructions for the singers, the musicians, the
21:56
choir leaders, telling them how to use the text and worship.
22:00
OK, let's break some of them down.
22:01
What about the basic terms for the songs themselves, like Ms.
22:05
Moore and SHR? Right sheer is the more general
22:07
term. It simly means song.
22:08
It highlights the lyrical character of the IECE.
22:10
It's. Pretty straightforward.
22:11
Ms. Moore is more specific, more technical.
22:14
It appears in the titles of 57 psalms.
22:16
It's usually translated as a Psalm.
22:18
But what does Miss Moore itself imply?
22:20
It's root meaning seems to encompass both to sing and to
22:24
play an instrument. So it's a technical term for a
22:27
song specifically intended for musical accompaniment.
22:30
It signals that instruments were integral to his performance.
22:34
So a Miz Moore wasn't just meant to be read silently or spoken.
22:38
It demanded music. That seems to be the core idea.
22:42
Interpretations vary slightly on the nuance.
22:44
Some emphasize rhythm, others praise, others ornate artistic
22:48
performance. But the link to musical, likely
22:52
instrumental performance is central to Miz Moore.
22:55
OK, now for the really mysterious 1 Salah.
22:59
It appears so often just standing there in the middle or
23:01
at the end of verses Ah. Salah Yes, it's the great
23:04
musical enigma of the Psalter. It occurs 71 times in the
23:07
Psalms, plus three times in the Book of Habakkuk.
23:10
And it almost always stands alone, often marking the end of
23:14
a strophy or a section within the Psalm.
23:16
Theories about its meaning abound.
23:18
Right endlessly for centuries people have guessed some older
23:21
traditions, based perhaps on similar sounding words, thought
23:24
it meant something like forever or eternally, but that's almost
23:27
certainly incorrect. So what's the more likely
23:28
meaning? We could be reasonably confident
23:30
it's a technical, musical, or liturgical term.
23:33
The most widely accepted derivation connects it to the
23:35
Hebrew root Salah, which means to lift up or to exalt.
23:39
Lift up. Lift up What?
23:41
Voices. Instruments.
23:42
Thoughts. Most likely it indicates A
23:45
lifting up of the music itself. The sources suggest it was
23:48
probably a signal for a Forte, a moment where the musical forces
23:52
were meant to be stronger, more emphatic, more prominent.
23:56
So like a musical interlude or accent?
23:58
Possibly it could have been the cue for the Levitical orchestra,
24:01
the harps, liars, scissors to play more loudly, or perhaps for
24:05
the Priestly choir to sound their silver trumpets, creating
24:08
a powerful instrumental interjection.
24:11
It seems to signal an elevation, a musical intensification,
24:15
emphasizing the preceding thought or preparing for the
24:18
next one. So not a pause for silent
24:20
reflection, but an actual musical event.
24:23
That seems much more likely based on the probable root
24:25
meaning and the context of temple worship.
24:28
It demanded an auditory response, a lifting up of sound.
24:31
Interesting. What about terms that seem to
24:33
give instructions about the Psalms purpose like Mesquiel?
24:37
Yes, Mesquiel appears in the title of 13 songs, including
24:39
Psalm 32. For example, the root means to
24:42
make wise or to give insight. So it's generally understood as
24:45
meaning instruction or a didactic poem.
24:48
Meaning the main point of this Psalm is to teach something.
24:51
That's the idea. Scholars interpret it slightly
24:54
differently. Maybe a song designed
24:57
specifically to produce insight, wisdom, and piety?
25:00
Or perhaps a reflective contemplation be a meditatio in
25:05
Latin, meant to lead the worshipper to deeper
25:07
understanding. But the core concept is
25:10
definitely about instruction and wisdom.
25:12
OK. And then there's a very common
25:14
term apparently related to performance direction.
25:16
Lehman, Nazak. Muhammad Nazak.
25:18
Yes, this one is crucial. It appears on 55 Psalms plus
25:22
Habakkuk 3. Again, it's almost universally
25:25
understood by Hebrew scholars to mean for the leader or to the
25:29
choirmaster. So it's dedicating the Psalm to
25:32
or directing it to the person in charge of the temple music.
25:34
Exactly. It indicates this Psalm was part
25:36
of the official Temple repertoire under the direction
25:39
of the professional Levitical musicians.
25:41
It's a practical performance instruction.
25:43
But it didn't the Greek translation, the Septuagint
25:45
translate that term differently. It did, and this caused
25:47
centuries of interpretive consequences.
25:50
The Septuagint translated Lemnosic as E guys to Telos,
25:54
which means to the end. To the end, that sounds
25:57
completely different from to the choirmaster.
26:00
How did they get that? It's unclear exactly why they
26:02
chose that translation. Perhaps they misunderstood the
26:05
musical term, or perhaps they interpreted it theologically
26:08
from the start. And what was the effect of that
26:11
to the end translation? It led many later interpreters,
26:14
including Talmudic scholars and early church fathers like
26:17
Hilarious, to see these Laminazic psalms as specifically
26:21
prophetic. They interpreted to the end as
26:24
meaning. These songs pointed towards the
26:26
end times or were intended to be sung when their predictions
26:30
reached their ultimate fulfillment, particularly
26:32
Messianic fulfillment. Wow, so one word leads down to
26:36
completely different paths, a practical musical direction, and
26:39
a profound theological interpretation about prophecy.
26:42
Precisely, it shows how translation choices can
26:44
dramatically shape understanding over time.
26:46
Are there other terms linked to specific liturgical actions?
26:49
I think I saw Lehesker mentioned.
26:50
Yes, Lehesker. It appears in the titles of
26:52
Psalm 38 and Psalm 70. The root means to bring to
26:56
remembrance or to make mention. So maybe a prayer asking God to
27:00
remember the psalmist? That's one possibility, but a
27:04
more specific technical interpretation, strongly argued
27:07
by scholars like the Lich, links it to a particular temple
27:12
ritual. Which ritual?
27:13
The presentation of the Ascara, which was the memorial portion
27:17
of the grain offering mincha that was burned on the altar as
27:20
a pleasing aroma to the Lord, bringing the offer to God's
27:23
remembrance. So Lehasker might indicate that
27:26
these psalms were specifically designated to be sung or recited
27:30
during that part of the sacrificial service.
27:32
That's the compelling argument. It ties these Psalms directly
27:36
into the tangible actions of the sacrificial system, reminding us
27:40
how integrated this music was with the entire worship life of
27:43
Israel. All these technical terms really
27:46
drive home the point that the Psalms weren't just poetry, they
27:48
were the functional hymn book and prayer book of the Temple.
27:51
Absolutely. They form the very framework of
27:54
Israel's corporate worship. We have external evidence for
27:56
this too. The Mishnah, for instance,
27:58
records that specific psalms were assigned to be sung by the
28:01
Levites each day of the week during the daily morning
28:04
sacrifice. Like Psalm 92 for the Sabbath.
28:06
Exactly. Psalm 92 is explicitly titled a
28:09
Psalm, a song for the Sabbath day and beyond the daily use,
28:13
certain groups of psalms were required for the major
28:16
festivals. The halal songs, yes, the
28:18
Egyptian Halal psalms 113 through 118 were mandatory
28:22
singing during Passover, Pentecost, the Feast of
28:25
Tabernacles, and dedication, Hanukkah.
28:28
And critically, these weren't just performed to the people,
28:31
they were often sung responsibly, meaning the choir
28:34
or leader sang a line in the congregation, responded yes, or
28:38
alternating choirs. Call and response was likely a
28:40
common feature. The structure of many psalms
28:43
suggested with refrains or repeated lines.
28:45
The congregation was actively involved in the singing,
28:48
particularly with responses like His Steadfast Love Endures
28:51
Forever in Psalm 136. And that responsive journeying
28:54
feel must connect to the psalms of degrees to sure Hamaloth.
28:58
The 15 psalms of a sense or degrees Psalms 120 through 134.
29:01
Yes. While there are a few theories
29:04
about what a sense Malloth refers to, the most widely
29:07
accepted view connects them to the pilgrimages up to Jerusalem
29:10
for the major feasts. So songs sung literally as
29:14
people were ascending or going up to the city in the Temple
29:18
Mount. That's the likely context.
29:20
You can imagine groups of pilgrims singing these psalms
29:23
together as they journeyed, perhaps marking different stages
29:26
of the ascent. The express themes of reliance
29:28
on God for the journey, longing for Zion, blessings on
29:31
Jerusalem, and family and community life under God's care
29:35
all fitting for pilgrims. And the performance style
29:38
overall wasn't like reading poetry as we might today.
29:41
No, definitely not. It was musical.
29:43
The sources describe it generally as an Oriental style
29:46
of declamation, which likely means a form of heightened
29:49
speech, chanting or singing, rather than simple recitation.
29:53
And as we've seen, instruments and structured singing like
29:56
antiphonal choruses were clearly involved.
29:58
The whole Sonic experience was central to the act of worship.
30:02
OK, we've looked at the name names, the structure, the
30:03
authors, the musical directions. Now we need to get to the
30:06
theological core. What makes the Psalms more than
30:08
just ancient songs? Their prophetic dimension.
30:11
Yes, this is absolutely crucial. The ultimate reason the songs
30:14
have their place in the Canon of scripture isn't just their
30:16
beauty or historical interest, but their divine origin.
30:20
They're Theo ministic quality. As we said earlier, they are God
30:24
breathed, and their content consistently aligns with God's
30:28
revealed will in the law. They constantly refer back to
30:30
the holiness of God, His righteous judgments, His
30:33
covenant faithfulness. This provided the spiritual and
30:37
theological fuel for Israel's identity as God's people, their
30:40
theocratic energy. And woven throughout this is a
30:43
forward look and expectation. Definitely a messianic
30:46
expectation. Our sources are clear.
30:48
We cannot properly understand the Psalter if we dispense with
30:51
recognizing its prophetic messianic features.
30:54
And importantly, this wasn't just some vague, fuzzy hope for
30:57
a better future. It was a specific hope of faith
31:00
grounded in God's definite, explicit promises.
31:03
Promises made particularly to David concerning an everlasting
31:06
dynasty and an anointed king who would rule righteously.
31:09
The reading these messianic prophecies can be tricky, can't
31:12
it? How do we know when the psalmist
31:13
is talking about himself or his current king versus the future
31:16
Messiah? That's the critical question,
31:19
and to navigate it properly, the sources make a very helpful
31:22
distinction between two types or modes of messianic prophecy
31:26
found in the Psalms. OK, what are the two types?
31:28
They distinguish between typical messianic passages and
31:31
prophetico messianic passages. Typical messianic and prophetico
31:36
messianic. Let's break those down.
31:37
What's typical messianic? In a typical messianic passage,
31:41
the immediate subject is often a historical event or person,
31:44
usually David himself, his experiences, his suffering, his
31:47
kingship. However, the language used to
31:50
describe the historical reality is elevated, intensified in such
31:55
a way that the event or person becomes a type, A divinely
31:58
ordained pattern before shadowing of a future greater
32:01
reality concerning the Messiah. So the historical situation is
32:05
real, but it points beyond itself.
32:06
Exactly. The historical event serves as
32:08
the vessel, the groundwork divinely designed to prefigure
32:11
something larger and more ultimate in God's plan.
32:14
Can you give an example of a typical messianic Psalm or
32:17
passage? Psalm 22 is a classic example.
32:20
David cries out in deep anguish, describing intense physical
32:23
suffering. My bones are at a joint mockery.
32:26
He trusts in the Lord. Let him deliver him and even the
32:29
dividing of his garments and casting lots.
32:31
Things that sound incredibly like the crucifixion of Jesus.
32:34
Precisely now did David experience some intense
32:37
suffering, a betrayal that prompted this Psalm?
32:40
Almost certainly. But the specific details and the
32:43
depth of the agony described seem to go far beyond even
32:46
David's worst moments. The language finds its truest,
32:50
fullest, most literal fulfillment only in the
32:52
sufferings of Christ. David, his experience, becomes a
32:55
type of foreshadowing of the Messiah's unique suffering.
32:59
Psalm 69, with the mention of being given vinegar to drink is
33:02
another similar case. OK, so the historical experience
33:05
is the launchpad for a deeper future reality.
33:08
How does that differ from Prophetico messianic passages?
33:11
In prophetico messianic passages, the prophecy is
33:14
messianic. As such, while it might still
33:17
arise out of a historical situation, maybe a coronation or
33:21
a reflection on God's promises, the words themselves seem to
33:25
break free entirely from the limitations of that immediate
33:28
historical context. They're speaking directly about
33:31
the future Messiah, not just through the lens of a current
33:33
event. That's the idea.
33:35
The language used simply cannot be adequately applied to David
33:39
or any other merely human king or figure of that time.
33:42
The description transcends the historical individual.
33:45
So in these cases, the psalmist under inspiration is saying
33:49
things that perhaps even he didn't fully grasp the
33:51
implications of. Exactly.
33:53
We have to remember David wasn't just a king and musician, he was
33:57
explicitly called a prophet. Acts 2.30 quotes to Samuel 23.2.
34:03
The Holy Spirit worked prophetically through the
34:05
psalmist, causing their words to reach far beyond their own
34:09
personal circumstances or conscious understanding.
34:12
The grammatical and historical sense of the words themselves in
34:15
these passages is structured in such a way that it demands a
34:18
future, greater fulfillment. If you try to limit these
34:21
descriptions solely to the historical David or Solomon, the
34:24
sources say, you're forced to interpret the language as
34:26
unnatural obscurity, exaggeration and hyperbole.
34:31
So the most natural reading is the one that sees it pointing
34:33
forward. It's the reading that does
34:35
justice to the inspired text. The primary meaning intended by
34:39
the divine author is the Messianic 1, even if a human
34:41
author had a more limited perspective.
34:43
What are some clear examples of these directly prophetico
34:46
messianic psalms? Psalm 2 and Psalm 110 are prime
34:49
examples. Psalm 2 speaks of God setting
34:52
his king on Zion, who will inherit the nations and rule
34:55
them with a rod of iron. Can that really just be about
34:59
David or Solomon, whose kingdoms were relatively limited?
35:02
The scope is universal. In Psalm 110.
35:04
Psalm 110 is perhaps even clearer.
35:06
It begins, The Lord says to my Lord, sit at my right hand until
35:12
I make your enemies your footstool.
35:14
David is speaking, yet he calls this future king my Lord Adoni,
35:18
who is David's Lord, who sits at God's right hand.
35:21
Jesus himself used that verse to confound the Pharisees about the
35:24
Messiah's identity. He did, and later in Psalm 110
35:27
this figure is declared a priest forever after the order of
35:30
Melchizede. This is astounding.
35:32
A priest king. No king in David's line could
35:34
ever be a priest under the Mosaic Law.
35:36
The roles were separate kings from Judah, priest from Levi.
35:40
This was directly to a unique figure who transcends the Old
35:42
Covenant structures. A figure identified in the New
35:45
Testament, specifically in Hebrews, as Jesus Christ.
35:48
Unquestionably, these Psalms are directly predictive of Christ's
35:52
person and work. And this prophetic depth isn't
35:54
limited to the Psalms about the King's glory.
35:57
It applies to the suffering Psalms too.
35:59
Absolutely. The prophetic significance of
36:02
Psalms like 22 isn't just that they predict the Messiah's
36:05
suffering, but that they reveal A profound theological truth.
36:09
The path to the highest triumph in universal reign goes through
36:12
suffering. The righteous sufferer, the
36:14
servant king, becomes the foundation for the ultimate
36:17
victory, leading to the conversion and instruction of
36:20
all nations. As Psalm 22 itself concludes,
36:23
the suffering is the necessary prerequisite for the exultation.
36:27
It's a pattern fully revealed only in the Gospel of Christ,
36:29
death and resurrection. Here's where it gets really
36:32
interesting. This means the final compiler
36:34
wasn't just organizing songs thematically or historically.
36:37
He was, in a sense, structuring a book of prophecy pointing
36:40
towards Christ. That seems to be the inescapable
36:43
conclusion. The structure itself, moving
36:46
from law, consciousness, Book One, Genesis, through struggle
36:49
and worship to universal praise, anticipates the work of the
36:52
Messiah. As the early church father.
36:54
Hilarious, aptly put it the true key of David, the key that
36:58
unlocks the Psalter's deepest meaning, is the theanthropic
37:02
person of Jesus Christ, the God Man.
37:04
He is the lens through which the whole book comes into focus.
37:06
Yes, David, whether lamenting his sin or celebrating his
37:10
throne, was often operating as a type of Christ, speaking by the
37:14
Holy Spirit words that found their ultimate reference point
37:17
in his greater Son. The Psalter is, from beginning
37:20
to end, fundamentally Christological.
37:23
It's an incredible convergence of history, poetry, music,
37:26
liturgy and prophecy. The Psalter really is an
37:28
architectural and theological marvel.
37:30
It truly is. It encompasses the whole sweep
37:33
of God's dealings with his people and the entire range of
37:36
human experience in response to God.
37:38
It really does function like a mirror for the soul, as it's
37:41
often called, but as Luther observed, it shows us something
37:44
more than just our own reflection, he said.
37:46
It shows us not the poor commonplace discourse of the
37:49
Saints, but their best inspired words spoken directly to God
37:55
Himself. That's a great quote from
37:56
Luther. The Reformers deeply value the
37:58
Psalms. Luther also called it a little
38:00
Bible, arguing it contained the essence of the entire Scriptures
38:04
in miniature. And Calvin?
38:05
Calvin famously styled it an anatomy of all parts of the
38:08
soul. He saw it as a book where every
38:11
human emotion, all the griefs, sorrows, fears, doubts, hopes
38:14
and joys, our lead bear not just as human feelings, but as
38:18
feelings examined and expressed in the very presence of the Holy
38:21
Spirit. So reading the Psalms isn't just
38:24
about relating to the emotions, but about seeing them brought
38:27
before God under the Spirit's influence, leading towards
38:29
cleansing, correction and stronger faith.
38:32
Exactly. It's meant to draw the reader
38:34
into that same process. You see the depths of human
38:36
struggle, but also the heights of faith and the unwavering
38:39
promises of God, all pointing ultimately towards Christ.
38:43
It forces us to confront our own sin and limitations, like David
38:47
in Psalm 51, but then immediately directs our gaze to
38:50
the true king and the true sufferer who is the fulfillment
38:53
of all these ancient hopes and prayers.
38:55
Well said. And the fact that the Psalter
38:58
contains these words, words whose grammatical and historical
39:01
sense clearly reached far beyond the Psalmist's own time and
39:06
conscious understanding, leaves us with a really important
39:09
question to ponder. What's that?
39:10
If those ancient singers compose these songs under the direct
39:13
influence of the Holy Spirit, with a meaning that often
39:16
surpassed their own grasp, well, how does the continuing work of
39:20
that same Holy Spirit equip us today to understand the depth of
39:25
that revelation now that it has been fulfilled in Christ?
39:29
How does he help us grasp it fully and apply it rightly in
39:31
our own lives, our own prayers, our own worship?
39:35
That's a profound thought to end on.
39:36
How does the spirit illuminate these Angel inspired words for
39:39
us now? Something for all of us to
39:41
reflect on.