Latest / Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show! / Trudeau Liberal Gaslights About Harm Reduction

Transcript

Trudeau Liberal Gaslights About Harm Reduction · Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show!

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: Addictions Minister Yara Sex defends the harm reduction approach to
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: the drug crisis, which includes drug injection sites, arguing that
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: this approach saves lives. Uh oh, turns out, I've got
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: some statistics here from the government.
• 0:19
  Speaker 4: Uh Oh.
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: I wonder if this is all going to turn out
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: to be bullshit and she's just a woke lunatic who
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: refuses to admit it, refuses to admit that she's just
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: purely an ideologue who doesn't actually care about any of this,
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: doesn't care about anything other than pushing her woke agenda.
• 0:38
  Speaker 2: He talks about what you're hearing from stakeholders in terms
• 0:41
  Speaker 2: of the harm reduction you talked about, drug testing you
• 0:43
  Speaker 2: talked about in the lock zone. Do you think Canada
• 0:46
  Speaker 2: needs to expand its pharmaceutical alternative programs and or expand
• 0:53
  Speaker 2: the number of supervised drug consumption sites, which are other
• 0:57
  Speaker 2: harm reduction tools? Do you think the country fan kind
• 1:00
  Speaker 2: of those two latter ones.
• 1:02
  Speaker 3: So I am a firm believer that harm reduction is healthcare.
• 1:06
  Speaker 3: Harm reduction does include safe consumption sites.
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: It's always the opposite of reality harm reduction. It turns out,
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: by the numbers, the data tells us harm reduction is
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: death care. That's a much more appropriate name. The left,
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: the modern left, the woke left, just deals in euphemisms
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: now euphemism to try and hide hide the damage that
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: their programs do, like Gender Affirming Care.
• 1:31
  Speaker 3: Say, it is concerning to me that this is becoming
• 1:37
  Speaker 3: part of a polarized debate when we know that safe
• 1:40
  Speaker 3: conception sites just alone here have reversed fifty eight thousand
• 1:45
  Speaker 3: overdoses since twenty sixteen. We know the evidence shows that
• 1:50
  Speaker 3: safe consumption sites work in community.
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: The evidence, the evidence has she looked at the evidence?
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: I wonder, I wonder if she cherry picked things, because
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: I mean, the what is the most cogin, what is
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: the most salient evidence? Maybe it's how many people die?
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: Maybe it's stuff like that. Let's see go back to
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: twenty sixteen. Here observed and projected opioid related deaths Canada,
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: January twenty sixteen to December twenty twenty four. So let's
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: see now if it's life saving, as she says, if
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: it really works, she's such a firm believer in it,
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: and of course you know it's safe injection sites also
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: free drugs. It's decriminalizing if that all works that's all
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: harm reduction right there. It's multi tiered, it's multi pillared
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: harm reduction. If that all works, she should see reduction
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: in deaths. Right we don't. That's not what we see
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: at all. Here we go. I mean you can see.
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: You can see for yourself. Twenty sixteen, what about six
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: hundred in a year. Actually, that's six hundred, sorry, just
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: from January to March. Let's take a look now, twenty
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: twenty three, January to March. That's almost two thousand. I
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: would say that's more people. I would say that's not
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: working on the only metric that really actually matters. It's
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: obviously a catastrophic failure it has caused. I mean, how
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: many more people have to die? How many more families
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: have to be destroyed? All the attendant crime that comes
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: along with it, all the attendant misery. I mean, I
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: know people like her don't care as they step over
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: that person od ing on the sidewalk because they're on
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: their way to Starbucks to get their oat milk skim
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: oat milk chi latte. But how can they get you wonder,
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: how can they get out in public and just flat
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: out lie, just flat out lie. She must have seen
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: this information. Maybe because she's a leftist, a far leftist,
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: she just doesn't want to see it. So she's banned statistics,
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: her own statistics because it causes too much cognitive dissonance.
• 3:55
  Speaker 4: I don't know.
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: Let's take a look British Columbia now, British Columbia. I've
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: made videos on British Columbia before, and the catastrophe of
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: harm management or harm reduction, and once you can find those.
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: If you're not subscribed to my channel, please subscribe, you
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: can find those videos. They started in around two about
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: two thousand and five, they started with this this program,
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: this multi pillared program. Right, this only goes back to
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: twenty fourteen, but it was less than this back in
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: twenty five, two thousand and five, obviously, So you had
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: three hundred and seventy deaths, unregulated deaths, unregulated drug deaths
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: twenty fourteen, twenty twenty three, two thy five hundred and
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: seventy two. This is all directly related to government policy
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: harm reduction twenty twenty four Already it's thirteen one thousand,
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: three hundred and sixty five compared to three hundred and
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: seventy and twenty fourteen. Clearly it's not working right. These
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: are the only metrics that matter. This is the only
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: thing that matters, right, clearly clearly she'sy lying, or she's
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: an idealogue, or she's an idealogue and she's lying, or
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: she's delusional.
• 5:07
  Speaker 4: I don't know, but she's wrong, clearly wrong.
• 5:11
  Speaker 3: They not only save lives, they are the access door
• 5:15
  Speaker 3: for individuals who struggle substance used to get primary healthcare,
• 5:20
  Speaker 3: to begin to contemplate treatment and access to other tools
• 5:23
  Speaker 3: and resources to get them to a better place in
• 5:26
  Speaker 3: managing their addiction, but also being able to get into programs.
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: Okay, but why does not of that happen? And why
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: why do we have this? Why do we have these
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: numbers here? Like that's almost from twenty fourteen to twenty
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: twenty three is almost an order of magnitude more deaths
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: in Canada, you can say, just in just from January
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: to March twenty sixteen, an increase of what about six
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: hundred to twenty twenty three January to March almost two thousand,
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: more than a threefold increase there. Why do we see that?
• 5:58
  Speaker 1: If what she's saying is true, why do we see that?
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: Why am I doing this? Why aren't the journalists pulling
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: this up and asking her about it.
• 6:06
  Speaker 3: When you close that door, we lose lives, We lose
• 6:10
  Speaker 3: people because the truth is that if we don't have
• 6:14
  Speaker 3: a harm reduction piece to our strategy, then people will dialogue.
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: The truth is, she says, The truth is. I mean,
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: I'm speechless, right, The truth is, The truth is, she says.
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: That's the truth. She says as usual, And what they
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: say is the opposite of the truth. Whatever they say,
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: it's the opposite of what they say harm reduction.
• 6:37
  Speaker 4: It should be called life reduction.
• 6:39
  Speaker 1: This is insane, like how we've gotten to this way,
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: And it's not just in the I mean, this is
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: all spent all of the United States as well all
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: over Europe. Well, people are asleep. These people took over
• 6:51
  Speaker 1: and they're just out gaslighting everybody and they don't care.
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: If this person cares, she must have access to the
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: same numbers that I have and that I'm sharing with you.
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: She must have access to those numbers. She must know
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: that it's a catastrophe. She must know. She must know
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: that she is killing people that don't need to die.
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: Her policies are killing people that don't need to die.
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: And yet she still gets out and says this, what
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: explains that exactly?
• 7:17
  Speaker 3: We know that these are the facts, and we also
• 7:19
  Speaker 3: know that when they come to save conception sites, there
• 7:21
  Speaker 3: is a reduce in criminality. There is a reduce. There
• 7:25
  Speaker 3: are reductions in.
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: Really because criminality is up up quite a bit in Canada.
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: So that's also a lie, a lot of it. Obviously,
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: A lot of the increase in criminality in Canada, obviously
• 7:36
  Speaker 1: is going to be driven by addiction, by drug use.
• 7:40
  Speaker 1: People finding ways to get money, whatever way they can
• 7:44
  Speaker 1: to get money so they can buy drugs. It's unbelievable
• 7:50
  Speaker 1: that this passes. Why isn't she being grilled by the reporters, Kenny?
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: Journalists not find this, This is provided, This is government websites,
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: These are government statistics. Anybody can find these in a
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: couple of minutes. Why are the journalists not grabbing this
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: data and grilling them, grilling them, saying no, no, it's
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: not good enough for you to say these are the facts.
• 8:11
  Speaker 4: They're not the facts. You're either stupid or you're lying.
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: Why Why does it fall to somebody like me to
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: spend the two minutes that it takes to find this
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: data to tell all of.
• 8:23
  Speaker 4: You it really is it really does? Does?
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: It really does expose how the media is no longer
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: what it used to be.
• 8:31
  Speaker 4: It's been changed.
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: It's been like everything that's infiltrated by wokeness, by progressivism,
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: it's been changed from its original purpose into something else.
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: And the purpose is always further left whatever. It is,
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: just further left, support left whatever. It is an order
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: of magnitude. More people die from drug overdose is fine.
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: It just means that it's not left left enough yet.
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: We just need to be more left, I guess is
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: that the rationale behind it? It doesn't matter to them,
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: they're not Again, these aren't journalists anymore. Why do we
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: call them journalists? Straight up propagandas or craven or cowardly whatever.
• 9:09
  Speaker 4: Again, it shouldn't be up to me.
• 9:11
  Speaker 1: It shouldn't be up to me to come up with this,
• 9:13
  Speaker 1: to show this easily found information that the government provides
• 9:17
  Speaker 1: to us. It's genuinely shocking, is it not?
• 9:21
  Speaker 4: All right? You know? It just it drives you.
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: It's enough to drive you insane when you see shit
• 9:28
  Speaker 1: like this, People like this who will just get up
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: and they're either totally incompetent or ignorant, or their liars I.
• 9:35
  Speaker 4: Mean for her.
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: Obviously, she can never admit that she's wrong, that her
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: ideology is wrong, that progressivism is wrong, that harm reduction
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: is wrong. It doesn't work the policiesn't. I mean, maybe
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: you could keep you could keep the name harm reduction
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: and then actually have policies that would reduce harm instead
• 9:54
  Speaker 1: of reducing life, which is what it obviously is happening here. Anyway,
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: That's all I'm gonna say about that. Please like, share,
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: and subscribe. Subscribing really helps me out. I thank you
• 10:06
  Speaker 1: for that. I will see you next time.