Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Trevor Bauer Exonerated, Soft Guy Era Begins, Title IX Trouble | HBR News 453

Transcript

Trevor Bauer Exonerated, Soft Guy Era Begins, Title IX Trouble | HBR News 453 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:03
  This is HBr News number four fifty three. Trevor Bauer exonerated soft guy era
• 0:08
  begins title nine Trouble, where we discussed the news of the week and give
• 0:13
  it the badger treatment. Hello, and welcome that HBr news where we talk
• 0:23
  about the news of the week and we're laughing and why am I getting that
• 0:27
  wrong? What did I normally say? I forget? Anyway, we're laughing
• 0:30
  at the absurdity so that we're not consumed by I'm your host, Brian Martinez.
• 0:33
  I'm joined by my lovely co hosts, doctor Rene mcam and Hannah Wallen,
• 0:38
  and we have a great showlin up for you guys this week, so
• 0:41
  please be sure to continue the conversations both in the chat as well as the
• 0:44
  comment section on this week's HBr News. We're gonna be talking about the latest
• 0:49
  with the MLB All Star Trevor Bauer and the woman who tried to destroy him.
• 0:55
  Title nine has changed in ways that women don't apparently like, even though
• 1:00
  it also regressed, but we'll get to that. Another man self immolates in
• 1:06
  protests and more so, stick around is gonna be a good time and be
• 1:10
  sure to join us afterwards for the patron only show, so we kind of
• 1:14
  like, at first, I was talking to Alison about having the patrons help
• 1:19
  us with doing some you know, like editing, like clips from streams,
• 1:26
  but Alison was late to meet up with the folks over at Riverside because of
• 1:30
  course she was, and it didn't happen. So in the meantime, we're
• 1:34
  gonna be doing a response video to our favorite Absolutely I don't even know what
• 1:38
  to call her, but let's say our favorite person to talk to or respond
• 1:44
  to Manifestell. I don't know if you guys, do you guys know who
• 1:47
  Manifestel is? Nay, Hannah mate, Nope, I said, nay,
• 1:55
  nay. Oh oh, well, Manifestell is a woman that makes content for
• 2:02
  other women that oh it is. I mean, like basically all of her
• 2:10
  content is essentially how women can live the princess life and like the it's it's
• 2:17
  all about like female empowerment slash entitlement. And she made a video called men
• 2:24
  with an asterisk. I don't know what that means, but maybe she's saying
• 2:28
  they're not really men, you know, because she knows what a real man
• 2:30
  is. Men date out of their league then ruin women's lives the paradoxical cycle.
• 2:37
  I mean, Kate Middleton lived the princess life and whether she's dead or
• 2:44
  why the Princess she talked by the Princess. Yeah, so Richard Bierre put
• 2:51
  this through, I believe as a request. So we're making it an after
• 2:53
  show topic. So if you want to join us, I'll tell you what.
• 2:59
  I've responded to a couple of Manifestel videos with Alison and I don't I
• 3:04
  mean, she's like the Grinch of women, like I think that she's the
• 3:08
  most hateful bidder. Actually, though the Grinch has a redemption arc. I'm
• 3:14
  sorry this is not fair to him, but this this woman, there's a
• 3:19
  lot of hatred in her, in her heart, and so we're gonna find
• 3:22
  out about that. What is it she's gonna say about men this time?
• 3:27
  And be sure to join us in the Patron show. So to do that,
• 3:30
  you have to become a Badger yourself. Go to feed thebadgler dot com
• 3:32
  and set up a monthly subscription that's feedbadger dot com forward slash subscribe and there
• 3:38
  is a link to it in the description. Five bucks a month will get
• 3:42
  you into our discord where you'll be able to watch all of the additional content,
• 3:45
  including responding to this video request. And there's also lots of other things
• 3:50
  going on in there. There's a game, there's game nights, there's movie
• 3:53
  nights, there's writers rooms, there's lots of community stuff. People have said
• 3:58
  a lot of nice things about her, and I think that you would also
• 4:01
  enjoy that as well. So please consider becoming a Badger. And if you
• 4:05
  don't want to wake up a more to find that we have been yeeded from
• 4:09
  the Internet, go to badger Feed dot com or Honey Badger Radio dot com.
• 4:13
  That's Badgerfeed dot com or Honey Badger Radio dot com. All right,
• 4:17
  with all that out of the way, let us get into today's stories.
• 4:20
  First, we have a follow up for Trevor Bauer. So Major League Baseball
• 4:28
  Star All Star, that is, Trevor Bauer has not only been exonerated in
• 4:32
  an ongoing sexual assault lawsuit, but is now taking his false accuser to court
• 4:39
  in twenty twenty two, Darcy Adonna as SMU. That's I'm sorry if I'm
• 4:45
  butchering your name. I'm not trying to butcher your name, Darcy, but
• 4:50
  it's just really weird looking. Accused Bauer of sexual assault that resulted in an
• 4:55
  unwanted pregnancy. Bauer's legal team insisted that the act was consensual and a one
• 5:01
  time event. Bauer would later counter sue, claiming that this was an attempt
• 5:05
  to extort him for money as he was facing similar allegations from several different women
• 5:11
  at the time. Bear in mind, this guy was a professional athlete and
• 5:15
  probably had a lot of money. Smonu further claimed that Bauer forced her to
• 5:21
  undergo an abortion, and when he refused to pay her three point six million
• 5:27
  dollars in hush money, she amended her claim to include allegations of sexual assault.
• 5:32
  Simonu's story fell apart when questioned by a detective. She had first referred
• 5:39
  to the event as a miscarriage, which happened on the way to receive an
• 5:43
  out of state abortion. This change up in story was later met with the
• 5:46
  fact that medical records she had provided do not show that she was ever pregnant.
• 5:51
  As of March nineteenth, Simonu has been indicted on the Superior Court of
• 5:56
  Arizona in Maricopa County, which finds that quote she knowingly did obtain a benefit
• 6:01
  from Trevor Anthony Bauer by means of fraudulent pretenses, representation, promises, or
• 6:09
  material or missions end quote, aside from anything else, How exactly does a
• 6:15
  man force a woman to get an abortion? I mean some kind of unspeakable
• 6:23
  act with a coat hanger or perhaps slipping and are you for eighty six billion
• 6:29
  into her pumpkin spice latte away? If we're talking the traditional route of an
• 6:33
  abortion clinic. Again, barring the possibility of walking her in there with a
• 6:39
  gun to a head, which I think is also somewhat frowned upon to some
• 6:43
  degree, what was she even claiming amounted to force in such a medical context?
• 6:51
  Could he not allow her to work or travel without an abortion? Could
• 6:57
  he ban her from even going into a Donald's without an abortion passport? That
• 7:01
  sort of thing. I think you'll, yeah, you'll get what I'm doing
• 7:04
  there. It's I know, it's just it's just one of the vertices in
• 7:08
  this story. I just I just want to know how the lawyers even dealt
• 7:12
  with that. I get how a woman could enter the lawyer's office with that
• 7:15
  claim. I just don't get how that claim made it out the other side
• 7:19
  of the lawyer's office, and in what form the lawyers really think they can
• 7:24
  present the case along the lines of a man forced a woman to get an
• 7:28
  abortion, and actually have a case that will stand up doingy scrutiny. Is
• 7:32
  it because there's any precedent for it has been any number of cases where it
• 7:40
  actually worked, Because you'd think that would have wider implications, such as the
• 7:45
  ones I've alluded to earlier in this rant. If anything a man can do
• 7:49
  in such a situation counts as force, then consider that when a woman elects
• 7:56
  to have an abortion, she is forcing the the living of a man's baby.
• 8:01
  Oh and also let us consider I don't know the baby. I realize
• 8:07
  a man has next to zero rights regarding his own children, even when they're
• 8:11
  long since born. But you know, the baby also has its own life.
• 8:18
  And if we're extending legal logic to the point at which an abortion is
• 8:24
  somehow entirely the fault of a man by force, can we not extend it
• 8:28
  to the point where a baby is a life form before nine months anytime before,
• 8:37
  depending on quite where the Overton window is. At this point, we're
• 8:41
  currently teetering on the edge of being allowed to kill them, even post natally,
• 8:48
  as long as the woman demands it. And I suppose that doesn't count
• 8:52
  as false either. It's simply a medical decision made between a woman and her
• 8:58
  doctor and the rich celebrities who need dead baby parts for their exfoliating face cream.
• 9:05
  Best no think about it. And yeah, well, a woman claims
• 9:11
  to be the victim of one kind of force and waits until that claim is
• 9:16
  debunked before she thinks to mention a different kind of force. That's something of
• 9:22
  a red flag. He forced me to have an abortion. Oh what that
• 9:26
  that's that's that's not a thing. Okay, Well he he forced me to
• 9:31
  eat my greens. He forced me to look both ways before crossing the street.
• 9:35
  No, he he forced me to believe in God, forced me to
• 9:41
  revere divine intervention, forced me to change coke to PEPSI, forced me to
• 9:43
  find my fucking car keys anything? No, all right? Then he raped
• 9:48
  me? You what? Yeah you didn't. I just want to You didn't
• 9:54
  think to mention that earlier? Well, No, there's there's this whole rovi
• 10:00
  wed thing which was expedient at the time, and I couldn't help. But
• 10:01
  notice how many judges or a bunch of died in the walled Managina's who will
• 10:05
  do anything to boost whatever the current cause azure is at the time, so
• 10:09
  I figured that was my best option. But times change. It's now all
• 10:13
  about Stormy Daniels and Eat and Carol, so I thought I'd go with rape
• 10:16
  instead. Inted me to tell the truth. Were you? I thought you
• 10:20
  were lawyers? Come on, man, do your job. I'm doing this
• 10:24
  bit for the sake of satire, obviously, but you have to wonder what
• 10:28
  kinds of conversations actually take place between these opportunistic hobags and their sworn to secrecy
• 10:35
  lawyers. You have to wonder, if I know, lawyers have a bad
• 10:39
  reputation when it comes to ethics, but some of them must go home in
• 10:43
  the evening thinking what have we done? What are we still doing? I
• 10:48
  mean, I want to simp for women as much as the next man,
• 10:52
  but good god, y'all, I didn't expect this much goddamn gratuity. There
• 10:58
  isn't enough boot in the world to make me forget what we're doing it.
• 11:01
  Oh well, it's another pint of baby blood for me. Hey, I
• 11:09
  just want to say, before Hannah jumps in rumble died. I don't know
• 11:13
  why I was connected to it. I saw some people commenting right at the
• 11:18
  beginning and then it went four four. But I don't know what it is.
• 11:20
  It's not me. It's running fine, everything else is working, So
• 11:24
  there seems to be an issue on Rumble's end, and I apologize. Hopefully
• 11:28
  you guys on Rumble will either come over to our twitch, go to Twitter,
• 11:31
  or come to YouTube. Just today. I know, I get it.
• 11:35
  We'll figure this out. But it's not me, all right, Hannah,
• 11:37
  go ahead. Yeah, women can get away with it making allegations of
• 11:43
  force over the littlest things. Now, once upon a time, you used
• 11:50
  to have to actually use physical violence or overpowering or threat of physical violence,
• 11:58
  like a compelling threat, where the individual knows that, yeah, you're you're
• 12:03
  actually going to do that to them if they resist, and that was that
• 12:09
  was the standard, and feminists got mad about that and then basically insisted that
• 12:18
  society was demanding that women resist at the risk of their lives or be told
• 12:24
  that the crime didn't happen. And I don't know, maybe maybe sometime in
• 12:30
  our history when when women weren't terrible whimps, that was a standard, and
• 12:37
  then women got wimpier and that standard died, right, But then they then
• 12:43
  they went from well, we shouldn't have to risk our lives to defend ourselves
• 12:48
  against against violence, and and and uh, then be told that the crime
• 12:56
  didn't happen because we complied out of out of fear. Right, that that
• 13:01
  was the first change. Then it comes, oh, we shouldn't actually have
• 13:07
  to say no in order to accuse somebody of forcing us against our will.
• 13:16
  If they didn't receive our consent, that's that's enough. Right. If they
• 13:22
  proceeded to do something that we were actively engaged in doing with them and didn't
• 13:28
  get yes, then gosh, we were forced. It was violent. We're
• 13:35
  terrified. And then then all of a sudden, now it's well, even
• 13:39
  if I said yes, if my inner self was saying no, Even if
• 13:46
  you've got enthusiastic consent and no force was used and no intimidation was engaged in
• 13:56
  or nothing, but in inside that wasn't really enthusiastic, it's still still forced.
• 14:03
  You still forced me. You can still go to jail. Because women
• 14:07
  are now such whimps that they cannot actually be expected to say what they're thinking
• 14:16
  or what they're feeling when there is zero threat of violence, and the guy
• 14:22
  would actually stop if they just didn't say yes. They don't even have to
• 14:30
  say no, They just have to not say yes, to not take an
• 14:33
  action, to be passive. So women can actively engage in something that they
• 14:39
  want to do for themselves and then blame you for it. So it's no
• 14:43
  surprise that this woman would accuse him of forcing her to have an abortion.
• 14:50
  She expected to be believed. It wouldn't matter if there was any force involved,
• 14:54
  It wouldn't matter if there was any truth to what she said. Women
• 14:58
  have been taught by the sexual violence narrative that there doesn't have to be any
• 15:05
  validity to the allegation for it to be perceived as true and acted upon by
• 15:11
  the courts. And I know the difference between forced and not forced. And
• 15:20
  I'm not talking about my story. I have a friend from where I grew
• 15:26
  up whose mother actually forced her to have an abortion, like physically wrestled her
• 15:33
  into the car, drove her down to Hear to Dayton, and went to
• 15:39
  an abortion clinic where the people at the clinic were complicit, knowing that this
• 15:46
  girl was being forced against her will in there, told her that they would
• 15:52
  tie her down if she didn't comply, and that they could do it because
• 15:56
  of Ohio's parental consent laws, which do not say that parents can force their
• 16:02
  children to have abortions, they certainly say that clinics cannot do an abortion without
• 16:10
  parental consent m hm. And nothing was done for her, you know,
• 16:21
  Child Protective Services basically said this is a family matter, this is a healthcare
• 16:25
  matter, and there was no So maybe when when a woman is forcing a
• 16:32
  woman to get an abortion, then like all of a sudden, you know,
• 16:36
  it's not a problem. But of a man talks to a woman and
• 16:41
  tries to coerce her or convince her of getting an abortion, the whole internet
• 16:45
  blows up. And I'm not referring to Trevor Bauer came back battered and bruised,
• 16:52
  Like that's man's force. That is actual physical force. I don't even
• 17:00
  know if she still talks to her mother at this But and and the next
• 17:07
  closest thing I know of to it our gals who are underage who have abortions
• 17:12
  because their parents tell them we'll do this, or we're going to kick you
• 17:15
  out of the house. And that's not really force. There are actually laws
• 17:22
  about that. You can't kick an underage kid out of your house. You
• 17:27
  can you can put the child up for adoption. You can put the child
• 17:32
  up for foster care. That you cannot just kick them out onto the street.
• 17:37
  Legally, that's considered child abuse. But apparently wrestling your child into the
• 17:44
  car, driving down to Dayton, going to a local abortion clinic here,
• 17:49
  and then having several people help you force the child into the clinic to to
• 17:56
  kill the baby is not. That's not child abuse, even though mm hmm.
• 18:03
  This kid was kicking and screaming the whole time, and apparently nobody thought
• 18:10
  saw anything wrong with that, right, So I don't have any sympathy for
• 18:12
  this woman. Yeah, dited, isn't she like? That's what she deserves.
• 18:21
  She deserves to be indicted for this. If you claim that a man
• 18:25
  forced you to do something that you can legally refuse, that he cannot legally
• 18:33
  use force to make you do that. The people of the clinic would have
• 18:37
  to be complicit in order to facilitate that force, and I don't think they're
• 18:42
  going to do that if some guy is dragging a woman in there, mm
• 18:47
  hmm. But uh, yeah, I like you deserve to be indicted for
• 18:52
  that. I hope she goes to jail. Yeah for sure, Well,
• 18:59
  I agree and also, you know, it doesn't really like I don't think
• 19:03
  it's enough because I think Trevor Bauer like his career was destroyed by this.
• 19:07
  Like he's not he's got a work. I think he's like playing for a
• 19:10
  Mexican team now or something. He can't even play in the States professional baseball,
• 19:15
  so or I thought he went to Japan. It was one of those,
• 19:18
  might have been both. Anyway, let us know you guys think about
• 19:22
  this. In the comments, I think Mike and Hannah basically said what I
• 19:25
  was gonna say. I'll read your superchows and we'll go on to the next
• 19:30
  story. So Meredith g is the first one up. Thank you. Meredith
• 19:34
  gives us five bucks and says HBI News four or five three. As much
• 19:38
  as I appreciate that Bauer has been cleared of the accusations by both false accusers,
• 19:44
  I still feel it's not enough. He will not get his career back.
• 19:47
  The MLB will never hire him again. All of the evidence to clear
• 19:49
  him was available to the MLB when they suspended Bauer. Yeah, because they're
• 19:55
  got no centric pricks. And I mean, like, isn't this the guy
• 19:59
  that had all the risks. He's like he had video evidence. He made
• 20:00
  a video on his YouTube channel or something where he laid it all out and
• 20:04
  we covered it a while back. You know, well, thank you Meredith.
• 20:11
  All right. Richard Bierre gives us five bucks and says, unrelated news
• 20:14
  items, the Chad of the r WE dating the same guy lawsuit had his
• 20:18
  claim denied slash dismissed by the court too. There was a young man in
• 20:22
  Humble, Texas, had a grand jury refusing to indict him for him allegedly
• 20:29
  shooting a store clerk who pursued him off the store property over the theft of
• 20:33
  a bag of chips. My guess this bureaucratic reason same reasoning applies to the
• 20:38
  woman losing her Planet Fitness membership because she took pictures in a locker room,
• 20:42
  which was the greater offense. Thank you for that. And then Richard Bierre
• 20:48
  gives us five bucks and says, have you seen the ad that Gavin Newsom
• 20:52
  is running in Alabama making claims that the state will be arresting women who attempt
• 20:55
  to cross the state line to seek an abortion. Yeah, I mean,
• 21:00
  like you want to look, if you want to convince women to vote like
• 21:03
  for your party, make them make them feel like the other party is gonna
• 21:07
  like attack them. It's amazing how effective this is. You know. Lauren
• 21:11
  Chen put out a tweet. I want to read it because I think this
• 21:14
  is great. Okay, this sums it up, Lauren Chen said in this
• 21:18
  tweet or posts on x liberal women will literally get punched in the face by
• 21:25
  random criminals and leftist cities and still never dream of voting anything but Democrat,
• 21:30
  while conservative women will get told to get back in the kitchen by some annan
• 21:34
  on Twitter and never vote Republican again. I hate it here, and this
• 21:40
  is literally what happened. Like I saw. I know, I'm getting like
• 21:44
  on a sidetrack here, but there was a I saw this. There were
• 21:47
  people on Twitter joking about repeating the nineteenth or like meming about it or talking
• 21:52
  about it, and the women got so angry that they were basically like,
• 21:57
  we're gonna vote for Joe Biden in twenty twenty four, just despite you and
• 22:02
  I and I said, I reposted the one that showed like a graphic or
• 22:04
  an image or something, and I said, so you would literally vote to
• 22:08
  destroy this country because you're angry and you think you have the you should have
• 22:14
  the right to vote that, like, I mean, like, what the
• 22:18
  fuck ladies like, there's no and I just said that sounds really emotional to
• 22:22
  me for her any vote for him. Well, I don't know, maybe,
• 22:26
  but like I I think that Lauren Chan's got a point. I think
• 22:30
  that that, like maybe sometimes I think that the women's drive to vote against
• 22:38
  the interests of men just for spite or to vote or to virtue signal themselves,
• 22:44
  which is what the leftist women do, is more important than making like
• 22:48
  rational decisions about what is best for the country. I think they do,
• 22:52
  I think, And that's why Gavin Newsom can do that. He can say,
• 22:55
  you know, if you don't, like I don't know, do something
• 22:57
  about this this governor in this other state that I have no involvement with,
• 23:02
  If you don't do something about that, he's gonna like arrest you at the
• 23:04
  border if you try to get an abortion. You know, it's it's insane
• 23:08
  and it works. It works. That's the truth of it is. It
• 23:12
  works. This makes the case for why for why voting or politics in general
• 23:19
  should should be held along the same lines as jury duty, as it's been
• 23:25
  in the news recently because of the ninety six jurors in the Trump case being
• 23:27
  whittled down twelve to the one to the ones who aren't going to be biased.
• 23:32
  They ask a few questions and find out how exactly how vindictive they're going
• 23:37
  to be in this case. And it sort of makes sense that you should
• 23:41
  do that along the lines of voting, like you should be asked a questionnaire
• 23:45
  as to what your your political leanings are, and if it's I'm just going
• 23:48
  to do this in order to ruin the lives of people I don't like,
• 23:52
  then you shouldn't get to vote. But that's obviously there's problems with that because
• 23:57
  kids, that all needs to be overseen by in vigilators of some sort who
• 24:03
  can also be biased. So there's yeah, well all kinds of layers of
• 24:08
  problems over that is the whole system as fuck. You just need a king.
• 24:12
  Bruh uh, they were we might we might be getting that point solute
• 24:15
  monarch. I mean, yeah, you could. You could get a dickhead
• 24:21
  for a king, but you could get a benevolent king. If if if
• 24:25
  you're just if you're just leaving it to people who are only interested in getting
• 24:30
  votes for whatever reason, including spite, then you're gonna get nothing but evil
• 24:36
  kings in the form of evil machines made of made of evil parts of evil
• 24:41
  humans, of lizard people that drink baby's blood. But he continued, Yeah,
• 24:48
  well, it's bad either way. It doesn't matter whether it's a president
• 24:52
  or king or a whole set of people, a three executive panel, uh
• 25:00
  board of executives that's answerable to you know, two other committees of of other
• 25:07
  executives, like, it doesn't matter. As long as it's a set of
• 25:11
  people that feels entitled to make moral decisions about the lives of other people and
• 25:18
  enforce them. It's it's going to result in people being wronged. There's deeming
• 25:26
  the use of government to make these types of decisions. And uh, well,
• 25:33
  I've well, I've said before. You know that situation I described before
• 25:37
  with the uh the uh forced abortion, the actual forced abortion. We have
• 25:45
  all kinds of systems in place right now today and back then, this this
• 25:52
  was many years ago, that that have been there for decades, that are
• 26:00
  supposed to be protecting children, they're supposed to be protecting anybody under age from
• 26:07
  this type of abuse, and they didn't work. None of the systems worked.
• 26:12
  Medical personnel have been obligated to report signs of potential abuse for decades,
• 26:22
  nobody did right. Child Protective Services didn't care, the police said it was
• 26:26
  a family matter. The kid didn't have anybody in government to help her.
• 26:34
  Yeah, so it wouldn't have made a difference, you know, like you
• 26:40
  could have a dictator, you could have the strictest government in existence. If
• 26:51
  you don't get rid of guynescentrism, if it's still going to cater to women,
• 26:56
  and particularly to the women who claim to speak for all women and make
• 27:02
  moral decisions on behalf of all women, then it's going to result in situations
• 27:07
  like that there is no good government. Yeah, all right, well let
• 27:15
  us know you guys think about this. One of the comments I did get
• 27:17
  one more super child the last second from Richard Bierre and he says for five
• 27:21
  bucks. So my so, my boyfriend said something about my weight gains,
• 27:25
  So despite him, I ate an entire pizza. Yeah. I mean,
• 27:29
  I don't know, man, It's it's all it's like a gig We're living
• 27:32
  through a gigantic woman moment. That's where I'm settling right now. And Lindsay.
• 27:36
  Lindsay is the one who said it first. And I was just like,
• 27:38
  okay, so you know, don't take it out on me, take
• 27:41
  it out on her anyway. Let us know what you guys think about this
• 27:45
  one of the comments. We got to move on to the next story.
• 27:45
  Let's talk about Title nine because this one is being talked about in all the
• 27:49
  wrong ways in my opinion. So, the Biden administration has finalized a significant
• 27:56
  overhaul of Title nine in their claim that they were aiming to reverse Trump era
• 28:02
  policies that were criticized for favoring the rights of those accused of sexual assault on
• 28:07
  school campuses. Yes, this might surprise you because what everyone else is talking
• 28:11
  about with regards to Title nine is how it's like essentially, you know,
• 28:15
  protecting trans women in women's sports, and that is the big deal. Even
• 28:21
  though I think that this, like what Trump did to Title nine, or
• 28:23
  really tried to do, was probably like as significant or more significant because the
• 28:29
  instances will be higher, but whatever. Under the new rules, colleges will
• 28:33
  use a lower standard to find someone guilty of sexual misconduct and respond more swiftly
• 28:38
  to all types of sex based discrimination, not just sexual harassment. Controversial requirements
• 28:45
  for live hearings, including potentially traumatic cross examinations, will be eliminated. This
• 28:52
  is according to them, So no cross examinations essentially, is what that means.
• 28:56
  The regulations also expand protections for lgbt Q students and staff, as well
• 29:00
  as pregnant students. Pregnant students Okay. Despite delays and frustrations over the pace
• 29:07
  of change, the administration views the reforms as the most comprehensive since Title nine
• 29:12
  was enacted. While praised by opponents of the Trump era rules, the Biden
• 29:17
  administration faces pressure to ensure swift implementation by colleges. The issue of transgender students
• 29:22
  participating in school sports remains politically charged, with the administration's plans for related regulations
• 29:30
  still unclear. Yeah, like you said, I didn't even hear about all
• 29:36
  that sexual assault surfew. I heard about the Title nine overhaul, but even
• 29:42
  in the so called alternative media, the only detail anyone was talking about was
• 29:49
  the transgender students in sports thing. That was the only conversation exactly, and
• 29:56
  it was all from a fucking tough perspective. The emphasis on the f in
• 30:02
  tough. Even those who are ostensibly not aligned with feminism, we're all screaming,
• 30:08
  what from the rafters? Women are being erased. Why Because the privileges
• 30:17
  once granted to women and only women when it comes to sports, are now
• 30:22
  being extended to men who have agreed to have their male identities erased. There's
• 30:32
  no incentive for women to have their female identities erased. It's very much men
• 30:38
  being raised, or at least male identities being erased. For all the long,
• 30:44
  slow marching feminism has done through the institutions insisting all the while that men
• 30:49
  have all the rights and all the privileges and women have none, it's never
• 30:55
  occurred to them that women should be more like men behavioral let alone, literally,
• 31:03
  as far as literally can be called literally, it doesn't even apply to
• 31:07
  what people figuratively call quote unquote being a real man, namely, what is
• 31:15
  it taking responsibility at looking out for others as a protector and a provider,
• 31:22
  and being accountable for your own agency as you do so, leading by example
• 31:30
  and not just by top down fiat. Should women do any of that?
• 31:34
  Should they consider doing any of that? Of course not heaven fucking forfend that
• 31:41
  we should expect women to live up to the standards we expect from other adults,
• 31:48
  namely men. No, no, no, young Bucky, We're going
• 31:52
  to work it from the other angle, men should follow women's example and be
• 31:59
  given anything they demand as in when they want it as and when they feel
• 32:04
  like it, but only if they identify as women and they officially denounce their
• 32:12
  masculinity. It's it's like the toilet thing. Yeah, once upon a time
• 32:19
  in America, blacks and whites had to use different toilets. Yeah, imagine
• 32:25
  if instead of simply desegregating the toilets altogether, instead the rule was that black
• 32:35
  people can only use the white toilets if they identify as white people, like
• 32:40
  if they want if they wore white face, and yeah, there's a stereotypical
• 32:45
  and was like, hey there, buddy, watch it there something you have
• 32:50
  to talk like that. To do Eddie Murphy impression right twenty three can do
• 32:54
  it would be up ludicrous. It would make dense through any lens other than
• 33:01
  the blatant attempt to erase black identity from the public conscience in the event that
• 33:07
  we can't just raise the biological distinction itself. But that's what's going on with
• 33:14
  regard to the sexual distinction. Men who will sacrifice their identity as men can
• 33:21
  get all the privileges of not being men. This might upset some women who
• 33:28
  remain unconvinced by all of this, but it's a small price to pay for
• 33:34
  the sake of at least telling ourselves that we've successfully erased male identity from the
• 33:39
  public discourse. Meanwhile, men who still don't mind being men, men who
• 33:46
  are ready and willing to admit that they are men, can still be discriminated
• 33:52
  against, right up the ass and yeah and out the mouth in one swift
• 33:58
  motion. As reflect as is reflected in these rollbacks on sexual assaults accusations,
• 34:07
  they were always meant to target men, not just to protect women, but
• 34:12
  to target men, to target not just male bodied individuals, but male minded
• 34:17
  individuals, and anyone who still has the audacity to admit that they are male
• 34:22
  in any capacity in the fucking current year, No led and to hear,
• 34:29
  to hear all this bullshit about this is an attack on women. This is
• 34:34
  an erasure of women from people who really ought to know better. Is disappointed
• 34:42
  to say the least. Yes, I understand that you think you're appealing to
• 34:47
  optics. If you want to get shit done, if you want if you
• 34:52
  want to emotionally manipulate people into doing what you want, then yeah, the
• 34:55
  easiest way is to pander to women and their potential victimization. But all you're
• 35:01
  doing is pushing on the same open the door as the people you're supposed to
• 35:07
  be criticizing. You're you're just yelling you should be helping women. You're not
• 35:13
  helping women. And the nutjobs you're yelling at, we'll just go we are
• 35:19
  helping women or this is all we do, and you're the ones not helping
• 35:22
  women. You hate women, know you hate women? Know you like my
• 35:28
  dudes, my brothers and sisters in Christ. This is a pissing contest.
• 35:36
  I understand you want to win. One of you wants to piss out the
• 35:39
  window on the left and the other wants to piss out the window on the
• 35:43
  right, and you both think you're doing what's best for society. But seriously,
• 35:49
  you might consider that it's in everyone's best interest if you just piss in
• 35:53
  the toilet as quickly and officially as possible, wipe the excess it's from your
• 36:00
  vagina, and then leave the toilet in an orderly single file, and consider
• 36:05
  addressing an issue that concerns something other than vaginas. Okay, now you know,
• 36:12
  well, no, I wasn't expecting this many bathroom references. This is
• 36:16
  why they can't do that. Oh my gosh. Oh, by the way,
• 36:22
  so I can't smell all the fishy piss. We we did a series
• 36:30
  when Trump's Title nine regulations took effect. And I've said this before. First
• 36:37
  thing Title nine you need to know about Title nine is that it was outdated.
• 36:42
  By the time it was enacted. Universities were already correcting the thing because
• 36:49
  of the market. Basically, they were already correcting the thing that the government
• 36:54
  reported to need to make them correct. Yeah, so there was no there
• 37:01
  was no need for Title nine. Ever, it was never valid. It
• 37:07
  was never It wasn't that it was there was never a problem. It was
• 37:13
  that it was never a problem that wasn't going to solve itself without government interference,
• 37:20
  all right, So that's the first thing. The second thing is Title
• 37:22
  nine has never been used to benefit people, right, It hasn't been used
• 37:29
  to benefit women. It has only ever been used to punish men. And
• 37:34
  by that I mean Title nine. As soon as it's administration discovered that they
• 37:43
  didn't need to force colleges to let women in, just that the administration decided
• 37:51
  they needed to force colleges to equalize the participation in sports so that women had
• 38:00
  as many sports opportunities as men, and colleges did this at first by just
• 38:07
  making those opportunities available, and the administration decided that because you can't, you
• 38:15
  can't necessarily get the result that they were trying to get, which was an
• 38:21
  equal number of men's sports and women's sports. Naturally, because there are not
• 38:27
  an equal number of men and women who are interested in being athletic, there
• 38:32
  are many more men interested in being athletic than women, that they would set
• 38:38
  up a quota system. Will you have to get women to participate in sports.
• 38:43
  This resulted in men's sports, particularly men's Olympic gymnastics and wrestling, being
• 38:50
  attacked, and football, which didn't go anywhere because football makes money for universities,
• 39:00
  and I'm talking for the people overseas, not talking about soccer. Soccer
• 39:04
  is actually a huge money sinkhole, or at least it has been traditionally.
• 39:08
  I'm talking about American football. But in any case, because women lacked participation
• 39:19
  even when they had equal opportunity, male athletes were punished by having their opportunities
• 39:25
  taken away. Similarly, funding was taken away from male students to ensure an
• 39:35
  increase in female students, and the result has been an imbalance in a number
• 39:39
  of students at universities based on sex throughout the history of Title nine. So
• 39:46
  we have this history. Title nine has never been used to benefit anybody.
• 39:51
  It has always been used to punish male students and to limit male students,
• 39:58
  right and and yeah, now they're getting women involved in tackle football, which
• 40:02
  is a really dumb idea, by the way, because modern women do not
• 40:07
  have thick bones. They have thin bones, because they do not have a
• 40:13
  history growing up of the types of nutrition that boys prefer. They do not
• 40:19
  have the history of mechanical loading that boys put their bodies through, and they
• 40:25
  don't have the genetic history that boys have where successful mating for women relied on
• 40:35
  being big and strong. In any way, it didn't, So you have
• 40:38
  women that are that are fine boned and compared to men, and when you
• 40:44
  end up at the bottom of a dog pile and you are fine boned,
• 40:47
  you get broken bones. That's just the way it works, right, So
• 40:53
  it's it's really dumb to have girls playing football with boys over the age of
• 41:00
  say thirteen, when they really start changing to the degree that the boys are
• 41:06
  significantly bigger and heavier than the girls, and they move faster too, And
• 41:10
  we all know that force equels mass times acceleration, so it makes a difference.
• 41:16
  But now we have this issue of the sexual assault thing, and that
• 41:22
  again really was just this administration for Title nin trying to justify their own existence
• 41:30
  because they had pretty much decimated men's sports. They couldn't really do anything else
• 41:38
  with regard to monitoring that and enforcing policy, and they were getting flack for
• 41:45
  the way they were enforcing it anyway, So they get into this in the
• 41:49
  eighties, they start getting into this area of sexual misconduct, and they make
• 41:54
  it a one way thing. And the whole time it has been a out
• 42:00
  giving girls, giving women the power to kick men out of school because they're
• 42:05
  mad. It hasn't been about protecting anybody from sexual misconduct, and it hasn't
• 42:10
  been about protecting campuses from sexual misconduct. Doesn't have to be true, the
• 42:19
  allegation doesn't have to be true for the individual to get punished and kicked out
• 42:24
  right. So along comes the Trump era and Trump enacts reforms. Why because
• 42:35
  there were six hundred lawsuits Title nine had resulted in six hundred lawsuits at that
• 42:42
  time from students whose due process rights were violated by these government mandated tribunals,
• 42:50
  and they were winning. The courts had set precedent that obligated the universities to
• 42:58
  uphold certain standards in those states were written into the Trump reforms. So when
• 43:04
  Biden rolls those reforms back, what he is doing is telling the federal courts
• 43:12
  that have set precedent that guided the creation of those reforms, fuck you now
• 43:22
  ya do what I want. It doesn't matter whether it's legal or not,
• 43:25
  doesn't matter whether the courts consider it to be a violation of the constitutional rights
• 43:31
  of the students or not. I'm the president. I will do what I
• 43:36
  want. Right He thinks he is a king, checks and balances out the
• 43:43
  window. So that's going to be a legal nightmare because now the universities have
• 43:50
  the executive branch of the federal government obligating them to violate the standards that the
• 44:00
  judicial branch of the federal government imposed on them. And by the way,
• 44:07
  according to title nine for all dot Com, which is Jonathan Taylor's website,
• 44:13
  Jonathan Taylor has was formerly a voice for male students on a voice formen dot
• 44:19
  com. There are now eight hundred and fifty six lawsuits. So the women
• 44:25
  at universities, the university human resources departments are still getting the universities in trouble.
• 44:36
  It's just that now that the federal government is telling the universities that they
• 44:43
  have to disobey the federal government, and I don't see how they're going to
• 44:46
  not be fucked. I have no sympathy. I mean, I've been kind
• 44:52
  of railing against the scam that universities have made themselves. You have a handful
• 44:59
  of waste to get through university with some licensing and that that makes you able
• 45:05
  to earn more money, and a shitload of ways to just get scammed out
• 45:09
  of hundreds of thousands of dollars or in two hundreds of thousands of dollars of
• 45:15
  debt that you're never going to get out from underneath because you can't earn it
• 45:20
  back with a degree that you got from the university, and in fact,
• 45:24
  you know you may end up working as a barista instead. So all of
• 45:30
  this, like in my opinion, whether it's intentional or not, is just
• 45:38
  a means of destroying the university system even further and making it even more of
• 45:44
  a scam where men are concerned, and this is just yet another reason why
• 45:51
  UH unions that are that are more mail dominated need to fight tooth and nail
• 45:59
  to stop the catering to women in the trades, right, because they're making
• 46:10
  the professional end of things unfriendly toward men, which is a mistake for everybody
• 46:17
  because that means there's going to be less gastro entrologists, there's going to be
• 46:22
  less infectious disease specialists, there's gonna be less mechanical engineers, and there's gonna
• 46:30
  be less of a whole host of other professions that are far from equally equally
• 46:40
  sought by women. Yeah, but if you allow the trades to also be
• 46:50
  treated this way, they're basically making it so that men can't get jobs at
• 46:54
  all. And that's dangerous because men do work that women won't do. Yep.
• 47:07
  Men doing work that women won't do has been a thing for centuries centuries.
• 47:15
  And it's not that women can't do, it's that women won't do.
• 47:21
  M hm. Right, There is work that women are as good at men,
• 47:25
  that women are as good at as men, But there's a lot more
• 47:30
  work that women could do just fine, but they won't. And yet women
• 47:37
  are ending up taking over those areas, and when women lose interest in those
• 47:44
  areas, when feminists decide it's not financially lucrative for them to try to get
• 47:49
  women into those areas anymore, to support women in those areas, and so
• 47:52
  on, we're going to end up with a crisis like you have never seen
• 47:58
  because there will not be enough people doing those jobs, and the services won't
• 48:02
  be getting provided, things will not be built right, your utilities will not
• 48:08
  be managed, and you're going to wonder what the hell happened. Well,
• 48:15
  my answer to that is Title nine. Yep. And if you are so
• 48:22
  short sighted that the only thing you're worried about in either direction, whether you're
• 48:30
  mad about it or glad about it, is whether male students can dress up
• 48:37
  as women and take sports trophies and stuff away from female students, you are
• 48:46
  really missing the boat. Yeah. Well, I think they took the bait
• 48:52
  on this because, like I think that mote, there's a lot of people
• 48:55
  reacting one way or the other to this Title nine thing, and the only
• 49:00
  thing they know is that, like it was essentially going to protect you know,
• 49:05
  trans women in women's sports. So it's like that, let's I know
• 49:07
  it says LGBTQ students. But come on, that's not really and pregnant students,
• 49:13
  those things are not like a discussion. It's the it's men, biological
• 49:17
  men playing in women's sports, and that's the only takeaway, and that's what
• 49:21
  everyone's talking about. And what that tells me is is that they were baited
• 49:23
  into it. They're now discussing it, and they didn't look at what the
• 49:28
  full you know, what Title nine is actually defined as and the other changes
• 49:32
  that are going to be affecting men in universities. And I think that that's
• 49:37
  just a matter of the people not doing due diligence. There's like a hot
• 49:40
  topic right now. It's like women and you know, men and women's sports.
• 49:44
  That's got to be the thing we go after. And they're not.
• 49:46
  They're they're worrying blinders and they're just going after that. So, you know,
• 49:50
  if if you know somebody that's talking about this issue, make sure that
• 49:53
  they understand that the Title nine thing. The real issue to me is that
• 49:59
  it is essentially opening up the field for more allegations. No, no,
• 50:05
  what is it like They're going to lower the standards of guilt, which is
• 50:09
  undermines the courts and the right to a you know, a fair trial.
• 50:15
  They're going to respond more swiftly to sex faced discrimination, a really broad term
• 50:22
  that we know is only going to apply to women. It's not gonna apply
• 50:24
  to men. And you know, on top of that, like it couldn't
• 50:28
  even though because of the LGBTQ thing, not just sexual harassment. And they're
• 50:35
  gonna have a requirements for live hearings, which potentially removes cross examinations. They
• 50:45
  will eliminate cross examinations. So that means that if a female student accuses a
• 50:50
  man of something, he can't face his accuser if she thinks it's because it's
• 50:55
  saying that if it's traumatic, she shouldn't have to do it. But that
• 50:59
  means if she decides it's traumatic. I mean, we just caught last story.
• 51:02
  Is Trevor Bauer like literally that This is why I put these two together
• 51:07
  so you can see the contrast. So anyway, that's the thing about title
• 51:10
  nine. I mean, I don't know what else to say. It's a
• 51:14
  mess. So let's look at the Superchows and we're gonna move on to the
• 51:17
  next story. Richard Pierre gives us five bucks and says the new so the
• 51:22
  new standard of investigation will be to determine whether or not the accused weighs more
• 51:27
  than a duck. Yes, And then he gives us another five bucks and
• 51:31
  says, does anyone miss dealing with Big Red yet? Uh? Thank you
• 51:37
  for that. Yeah, I mean Big Red was a boon. If anything,
• 51:40
  Big Red was a boon because like it was, like she is the
• 51:45
  face of feminism, still the face of Feminism's be honest, they're still yelling
• 51:49
  the same thing. Pete triarchy. We don't hate, Yeah, we just
• 51:53
  hate pete triarchy. They're still doing the same shit. Yeah, I know,
• 51:58
  and it works. It still makes them billions of dollars. It still
• 52:00
  works. There might be something to it. Albert Nata retro gives a two
• 52:06
  dollars Canadian in a super chat and says feminism is modern day lead aqueducts.
• 52:10
  Thank you for that. I think that's it by women. Yeah. So
• 52:19
  we're gonna move on to the next story. Let us know you guys think
• 52:21
  about this one in the comments. All Right, here we go. This
• 52:25
  one's a little rough. So last week, a Florida man in New York
• 52:31
  set himself on fire in an apparent act of protest, using the backdrop of
• 52:37
  former President Donald Trump's trial as the setting. I didn't reme it was a
• 52:40
  Florida man. Good lord, yeah, I know. The man, later
• 52:45
  identified as Maxwell as a Rello, walked to collect Pond Park and began taking
• 52:52
  flyers out of his backpack and spreading them around. Once they were dispersed,
• 52:57
  he produced a cannisterer of accelerant from his backpack, covered himself in it,
• 53:01
  and then lit himself on fire. Police as well as locals attempted to extinguish
• 53:07
  the man with coats and fire extinguishers, but Azello was only fully put out
• 53:12
  when firefighters arrived on the scene. He was immediately taken to a local hospital,
• 53:16
  where he later died due to his injuries. Naturally, after such an
• 53:22
  extreme event, people wanted to know the reasoning behind Azarello's actions, and for
• 53:25
  them, he left plenty behind. Azarello was spotted earlier outside the Manhattan Courthouse
• 53:30
  holding up a protest sign that said Trump is with Biden and then they're about
• 53:36
  to fascist coop us end quote. His flyers, as well as his online
• 53:40
  substack, were riddled with conspiracy theories about everything ranging from COVID to cryptocurrency to
• 53:46
  Bill Clinton. He boils down his main theory as the start of his substack,
• 53:51
  stating quote, this extreme act of protests is to draw attention to an
• 53:54
  urgent and important discovery. We are victims of a totalitarian and our own government,
• 54:00
  along with many of their allies, is about to hit us with an
• 54:04
  apocalyptic fascist world coup end quote. According to him, the choice of venue
• 54:09
  was not done for political reasons, but because President Trump's current trial had a
• 54:15
  large media presence. Az Arellos Descent into Madness. This is written by Mike
• 54:20
  J. By the way, appears that have happened around the same around the
• 54:24
  time in which COVID hysteria was in full swing. Although it is not known
• 54:29
  exactly what set him off, this is when he began calling himself an investigative
• 54:34
  researcher and immerse himself in the world of conspiracy theories. The next few years
• 54:38
  culminated with him launching a lawsuit with over one hundred defendants. Some of the
• 54:43
  more notable ones included Bill Clinton, a Texas billionaire, Sir Richard Branson,
• 54:49
  Mark Cuban, the entire country of Saudi Arabia, and Ross Perrot, who
• 54:52
  at the time of filing had been dead for four years. The suit claimed
• 54:57
  that there was an elaborate time of I'm sorry. There was an elaborate network
• 55:01
  of Ponzi schemes ran by celebrities, billionaires, politicians, and tech industry insiders
• 55:07
  that started somewhere sometime in the nineteen nineties. The lawsuit was filed by Azarello
• 55:12
  himself, using no lawyer. It was promptly tossed out later the same year
• 55:15
  when Azarello failed to show up with court filings. More information was later filled
• 55:22
  in by his friends and family. Daniel Carlton, a lifelong friend of Azarello,
• 55:28
  stated quote, there may have been a chemical imbalance there that was made
• 55:31
  worse by substance abuse, but there was no specific diagnosis. He's always been
• 55:37
  very smart since middle school. He was a good guy, and he was
• 55:40
  always political. He was alone for a long time, and I think it
• 55:44
  was a major contributor to his decline. His family is great. They knew
• 55:47
  he had issues, and they had him checked into a mental health facility last
• 55:52
  year, but they couldn't keep him past a three day hold. Max was
• 55:55
  smart enough to gain the system and fool the system. Mental health system actually
• 56:00
  failed him end quote. It was revealed by sources close to him that when
• 56:06
  he was younger, he was prescribed antidepressants and adderall and that later in his
• 56:10
  life he had began using amphetamines. It was around this time that Azarello's mother
• 56:15
  died and he quit his well paying tech consultant job. Then, in March
• 56:20
  of twenty twenty three, when Silicon Valley Bank collapsed, Azarello became obsessed.
• 56:24
  As his drug use skyrocketed, he began to craft his own conspiracy theories.
• 56:29
  Azarello would go on to the arrested to be arrested three times in Florida,
• 56:34
  including one arrest for throwing wine at a framed autograph featuring Bill Clinton. Azzarella
• 56:38
  was also publicly posted on social media showing his admiration for Aaron Bushnell, a
• 56:45
  man who self immolated outside of the Israeli Embassy in Washington, DC earlier this
• 56:49
  year, which we covered on this show. Yeah we did. I'm I'm
• 56:54
  gonna this is going to take like seven minutes, so I think so strap
• 57:00
  in. I I recall the state of my Twitter feed on the day this
• 57:06
  happened. The weirdest thing went on. For the first few hours. People
• 57:14
  were scrambling to find out what his political leanings were and in the meantime they
• 57:21
  were just sort of speculating, is he a Trump supporter? Is he another
• 57:25
  Palestine supporter? Maybe it's an Israel supporter this time. The point is is
• 57:30
  he a leftist or a rightist? I need to know if his views aligned
• 57:36
  with mine before I can figure out how I should be reacting. Oh,
• 57:39
  okay, it turns out he's an an archo communist. Good, brilliant.
• 57:45
  Okay, he's a twap. What a twat? Hey, everyone get a
• 57:49
  load of this twat. That's that's that's that's just what I saw on my
• 57:53
  own Twitter feed. I'm I mean, I'm not following any lefties, let
• 57:59
  a lone anarcho economists, but I would assume those folks went through the same
• 58:05
  period of Schrodinger's Catharsis being in a moral superposition of reactivity before the box could
• 58:15
  be opened. The lefties, too, were keeping their fingers crossed and hoping
• 58:21
  he was a Trump supporter so that they could call him a twat, and
• 58:24
  in the end they did anyway, because he turned out to be a whole
• 58:29
  different kind of conspiracy theorist who believed that Trump and Biden are on the same
• 58:36
  side, a very bizarre thing to his spouse, especially outside the courthouse in
• 58:40
  which Biden's cronies are politically persecuting Crump. So yeah, it seems everyone has
• 58:49
  landed squarely on the conclusion that this guy is a twat, a pathetic loser
• 58:54
  at whom we should all laugh. And I was sat here the whole time
• 59:00
  contemplating the only thing about this man that has been identified since the very beginning,
• 59:08
  that he is a man. Now, maybe I'm weird, maybe I'm
• 59:14
  one of those ideologically possessed MRA type things, but I heard a man has
• 59:21
  set himself on fire, and my initial reaction was, oh, no,
• 59:27
  not again. No man deserves to find themselves in the kind of mindset where
• 59:34
  they resort to the most painful death that can befall anyone. And now that
• 59:40
  we know what his politics were, my reaction is believe it or not,
• 59:46
  still the same. I would be just as horrified if it was a woman,
• 59:52
  by the way, but it wasn't, nor was the last one or
• 59:57
  the one before that, and so on. For all the embellished stories we
• 1:00:02
  hear about women being burned at the stakes during witch hunts in the dark Ages,
• 1:00:08
  it seems they are not inclined to volunteer for such a treatment. So
• 1:00:16
  far, it's only men who seem to think they deserve such a treatment,
• 1:00:22
  so much so that they will inflict it upon themselves, which, if anything,
• 1:00:27
  is even more horrifying. It's everything that's horrific about witch burning, plus
• 1:00:34
  on top of that a mental health crisis that amounts to men pointing the finger
• 1:00:42
  at themselves and calling themselves witches. And I really, I really didn't want
• 1:00:49
  to give this guy any attention because it's not it's not like the school shooter
• 1:00:55
  thing. Desperate people will commit acts of extreme violence and destruction, very often
• 1:01:04
  for the explicit sake of posthumous fame. They don't want to live anymore,
• 1:01:12
  but they do want to be remembered after they die. And sure enough they
• 1:01:16
  get their wish because people rush in and clamber to grant that wish by making
• 1:01:22
  them the most famous person in the world, if only for fifteen minutes.
• 1:01:28
  And just like with school shooters, this is likely to encourage copycat killers or
• 1:01:37
  in this case, copycat suiciders. You have to wonder if this guy is
• 1:01:43
  just a copycat of the last guy. He's like, fuck it, fifteen
• 1:01:47
  minutes will do. I'd rather be a footnote in history than nothing at all.
• 1:01:53
  So I understand why the general reaction and is to mock this guy,
• 1:02:01
  to call him a tact and a loser who died for nothing. I get
• 1:02:06
  it. It's it kind of It discourages any copycats who think they're going to
• 1:02:10
  go down in history as a noble, self sacrificial martyr. And we're like,
• 1:02:15
  nah, nah, fuck you. We're just gonna laugh at you for
• 1:02:20
  a day and then forget about you. But like I said, very often,
• 1:02:25
  that's that's good enough. People who are that screwed up would rather achieve
• 1:02:31
  temporary herostratic fame than no fame at all. If we really want to discourage
• 1:02:40
  copycats, we need to not talk about this ship whatsoever. But yeah,
• 1:02:46
  yeah, I don't see how that's possible. In this information age, we
• 1:02:53
  have eyes on every street corner, constantly scanning the world for something interesting to
• 1:02:59
  talk about. We all feed on tragedy. It's like blood to a vampire.
• 1:03:05
  Vicariously, I live while the whole world die. Is much better you
• 1:03:08
  than I, As the song goes, the real question, the core of
• 1:03:15
  the problem, as I see it, is why men have such desolate disregard
• 1:03:22
  for their own lives in the first place. It's a question that might be
• 1:03:27
  begged by the observation that women aren't doing this, not now in the West,
• 1:03:32
  not in Vietnam in the sixties, not apparently. Ever, why not.
• 1:03:38
  Maybe it's because people by and large actually give a shit whether women live
• 1:03:45
  or die. Go ahead and see what happens if and when a woman self
• 1:03:52
  immolates in a public space. For those first few hours of new cycle uncertainty,
• 1:04:00
  I think people will experience that same Schrodinger's catharsis. I don't think so.
• 1:04:06
  I think they'll just decry the tragedy of a woman's painful death, and
• 1:04:13
  they wouldn't call her a tact they'd call her a victim, and they wouldn't
• 1:04:17
  laugh at her, even if she turned out to have political beliefs that don't
• 1:04:23
  align with our own. You know, for years we've been talking about the
• 1:04:29
  escalating issue of suicide and the issue of disproportionate males suicide. When men kill
• 1:04:36
  themselves for a cause, it is still an issue of mental health regardless of
• 1:04:42
  the cause in question. But when it's men's mental health for some reason,
• 1:04:48
  people will still mock those men for committing suicide even in the most drastic of
• 1:04:55
  ways, or indeed they just ignore it when when Earl Silverman killed himself,
• 1:05:03
  he did it partially for the sake of those fifteen minutes of fame, to
• 1:05:10
  bring awareness to the men's issues and the lack of men's services, indeed,
• 1:05:17
  the broad hostility towards such services even existing, and no one gave a shit
• 1:05:27
  except us scattered handful of MRAs and Manisphere adjacent internet commentators, and even some
• 1:05:35
  of them could only muster a reaction along the lines of fuck Earl Silverman.
• 1:05:42
  He's not a victim, He's just a sad twat who didn't get what he
• 1:05:45
  wanted. It's now eleven years later, almost exactly, and we're now at
• 1:05:55
  the point where it's not enough for men to simply hang themselves in their garage.
• 1:06:03
  Men hang themselves all the time, and no one gives a shit,
• 1:06:09
  And so they've started burning themselves to death and dying in screaming agony. And
• 1:06:16
  they're probably gonna keep doing it until the time comes when no one gives a
• 1:06:21
  shit about that either. It'll just be easily another everyday occurrence. Oh look,
• 1:06:27
  another man on fire, screaming in agony. That's that's toxic masculinity for
• 1:06:32
  you. Let's let's let him get on with it. Let's have a barbecue
• 1:06:35
  on the embers. Let's nonchalantly sweep the smoldering remains into the compost heap and
• 1:06:42
  carry on complaining on behalf of the poor womons who have to share their locker
• 1:06:46
  rooms with castrated, demoralized men who are also going to kill themselves. What
• 1:06:53
  a bunch of twats am? All right? Hohan, another day, another
• 1:06:57
  dollar, and so on and so far off to the end of time,
• 1:07:01
  which will be quite soon past the white pills. Brother, we are so
• 1:07:09
  back, We're so winning. Oh sorry. It's interesting that it takes a
• 1:07:17
  guy setting himself on fire and making national news for it to be even talked
• 1:07:25
  about that not necessarily that the medical system, that the mental health system is
• 1:07:32
  failing men, but that it failed him personally. There are hundreds of thousands
• 1:07:41
  of men in the United States every day who are profoundly failed by the mental
• 1:07:49
  health system because their flow chart for treating a guy starts with can we call
• 1:08:00
  all this toxic masculinity? Yes, okay, treatment, Demonize the man,
• 1:08:08
  beat him into submission, demoralize him, and Uh. You know, the
• 1:08:15
  answer then is success, Like once he stops being so manly, then then
• 1:08:21
  the system feels that it has had a success. And those men go on
• 1:08:27
  and continue to self harm and uh, you know, continue to suffer anxiety,
• 1:08:33
  depression, grief about their their situation. Uh, and and a failure
• 1:08:41
  to find fulfillment in their own lives or you have no, we can't call
• 1:08:45
  this toxic toxic masculinity. Oh you know, then he must be dangerous right
• 1:08:51
  to himself and others because he's delusional or you know, some other such thing
• 1:08:58
  is wrong, or if he doesn't have anything going on that can be considered
• 1:09:05
  threatening to the public. Oh, he's fine, let him go. We're
• 1:09:11
  not gonna help him. And that seems to be it now for the mental
• 1:09:15
  health system. Nothing about actually dealing with the problems that men bring to them,
• 1:09:21
  you know, nothing about actually helping men find a way to survive in
• 1:09:30
  this the guynescentric world that they're forced to live in because there isn't someplace else
• 1:09:35
  to go and they can't change it. And they've been told all their lives
• 1:09:44
  that if they fail to change something that's bad, it's their fault. So
• 1:09:53
  I don't know, just bouncing off of what Mike said. This is a
• 1:09:59
  symptom of an issue that we're never going to solve unless we start viewing men
• 1:10:06
  as human beings and stop designating toxicity as belonging to their gender, and start
• 1:10:15
  actually looking at the causes of their mental health problems, and stop trying to
• 1:10:24
  treat everything by just throwing mood altering drugs at it. I mean, the
• 1:10:30
  same system that labels reliance on mood altering drugs as a means of feeling human
• 1:10:45
  a mental health crisis in and of itself. Right, Addiction also uses mood
• 1:10:53
  altering drugs to treat conditions that are situational conditions that are maybe not related to
• 1:11:04
  the moods that those drugs are designed to treat, or conditions that are not
• 1:11:11
  alleviated other conditions that are not alleviated by those drugs, and instead of doing
• 1:11:15
  anything further to help the individual, they just throw a bottle of pills at
• 1:11:19
  him and send him on his way, and when he sets himself on fire,
• 1:11:25
  they call him a twat. Yeah, pretty messed up. Well,
• 1:11:32
  let us know you guys think about this. One of the comments I think
• 1:11:34
  Mike and Hannah basically said everything I was gonna say, so I won't repeat
• 1:11:39
  myself or repeat them through me. Well, I will not be the cipher
• 1:11:44
  through which you just watch that. But again, okay, all right,
• 1:11:48
  superchows. And then we got the last story. So I got one from
• 1:11:51
  Richard Bierre who gives us five bucks and says, what else was in his
• 1:11:57
  briefcase? Perhaps there was some information that could have to the arrest of HRC.
• 1:12:00
  After all, we all know what happens when people with people who happen
• 1:12:04
  to possess such information. Somehow, they're still a concerted effort to still keep
• 1:12:09
  up the manifesto from the Nashville mass casualty event creator from being released to public
• 1:12:15
  view. I believe there's a fight to get that release, but I could
• 1:12:18
  be wrong. There's a current case, but thank you for that. And
• 1:12:23
  then I got two super chats, one from Albert Nata Retro, who gives
• 1:12:27
  us five dollars Canadian and says in simple doc it's because the media exploits female
• 1:12:31
  victims while ignoring male victims. By the way, a short time ago,
• 1:12:34
  the view panel said we're useless. We mean like men or MRAs. Who's
• 1:12:40
  we Yeah, well, the view panel, I don't really give a shit.
• 1:12:44
  Yeah, I know they're speaking of useless, right, and then Albert
• 1:12:48
  Data Retro gives us two dollars Canadian says Barbara Walters would turn in her grave
• 1:12:53
  over that. All right, thank you guys for the super chat and super
• 1:13:00
  chats, and now we're gonna move on to the next story. Let us
• 1:13:04
  know you guys what you guys think about this one in the comments. Oh
• 1:13:06
  and I just wanted to say one other thing too, is that we are
• 1:13:11
  doing a monthly fundraiser. Any help that you guys could supply would be appreciated.
• 1:13:15
  Go to feed the Badger dot Com forward slash support so that we can
• 1:13:18
  keep on bringing you this content. I mean, I've been doing it for
• 1:13:20
  ten years. I might as well just do ten more, you know,
• 1:13:24
  I mean whatever, But yeah, thank you so much for keeping us keeping
• 1:13:30
  this thing going. So all right, last story, So have you guys,
• 1:13:36
  Hannah, Mike, have you guys heard of this thing called soft Guy
• 1:13:41
  Era the soft Guy Ara? Not until today did you look into it at
• 1:13:45
  all? No? All right, so I didn't know about it until today.
• 1:13:49
  All right. It's kind of funny. I like to end on something
• 1:13:54
  a little bit lighter, especially after that last story. So, the soft
• 1:13:58
  guy era is a term coin by certain online influencers, particularly on platforms like
• 1:14:02
  TikTok, to describe a perceived shift a male behavior and desires. According to
• 1:14:08
  this trend, a man in his soft guy era seeks a woman who will
• 1:14:12
  care for him in extravagant or exaggerated ways. However, the concept is seen
• 1:14:16
  as reactionary and dishonest by women on TikTok, driven by misogyny and profit.
• 1:14:24
  So I'll show you guys, of course it is. Let me show you,
• 1:14:27
  guys some examples of the soft guy era of twiktok video. So there's
• 1:14:31
  this thing. It was like women on TikTok basically having all kinds of insane
• 1:14:38
  demands on men, okay, and because of course they do, which is
• 1:14:43
  kind of related to the after show topic, which is manifestel And so George,
• 1:14:47
  go to your bed, Go to your bed. Here's some examples of
• 1:14:51
  the soft guy are So, if you didn't know, me and my brother
• 1:14:55
  Goodie started the soft guy era a few weeks ago, and it's going viral.
• 1:14:59
  We have wreaking habit on the internet, and so have the rest of
• 1:15:01
  y'all. We love to support keep dropping y'all videos just keep making them mad.
• 1:15:05
  So now we're going into detail on what this is. The idea men
• 1:15:11
  in the soft guy era want to find high value women who can take care
• 1:15:15
  of them in ridiculous ways. Yes we do. They want us to have
• 1:15:18
  money. I want my woman to have money as well. It's only right.
• 1:15:21
  Drizzle drizzle. The soft guy era is a response to the soft girl
• 1:15:26
  era of twenty twenty three. It mocks videos in which women demand ridiculous things
• 1:15:30
  from men. The drizzled drizzle trend finds its roots in the sprinkle sprinkle phrase
• 1:15:36
  popularized by Laticia Padua. Also, so, just like I've a short summary
• 1:15:45
  of this, this is a male it Manisphere Highlights daily is like the the
• 1:15:49
  YouTube channel that covered this explain how what how drizzled drizzle? What is it
• 1:15:56
  something to do with trickle down politics? Or is that I don't know.
• 1:16:00
  Oh I'm not sure, I'll read. Let me finish the write up,
• 1:16:02
  and then people in the comments do know drizzle drizzle. So the trend emerged
• 1:16:10
  as a response to the soft girl era, which gained popularity amongst young black
• 1:16:14
  women in twenty twenty three. The soft girl trend focused on self care and
• 1:16:18
  living a life free from struggle, which for some women included seeking traditional generals
• 1:16:23
  where the man provides financially and the woman maintains the home. Although the truth
• 1:16:28
  is is that they were extremely over the top expectations and entitlements coming from these
• 1:16:32
  women on TikTok, So they were really saying, you know, I want
• 1:16:35
  this this, you know you got to have this much money and blah blah
• 1:16:39
  blah. And what the men did was they just satirized it, like you
• 1:16:44
  know, in the world of online misogyny for profit, this is according to
• 1:16:48
  life Hacker, the soft girl trend it was seen as an affront to men.
• 1:16:54
  Despite perpetuating patriarchal ideas that often align with online male influencers, off guy
• 1:17:00
  era emerges backlash, with influencers using it to generate engagement, sell merchandise,
• 1:17:05
  and promote their online presence. While content under the soft girl era hashtag often
• 1:17:10
  includes romantic and peaceful themes, content under the soft guy era hashtag tends to
• 1:17:15
  be unfunny comedy videos made by individuals portraying themselves as wealthy alpha males rejecting supermodels.
• 1:17:21
  However, this portrayals often seen as transparent and it sesere appealing primarily to
• 1:17:26
  younger audiences. Literally is literally just taking the piss out of these pk So
• 1:17:32
  I mean, the idea of soft people of any kind can never take off
• 1:17:38
  as long as there are difficult physical jobs that need to be done, like
• 1:17:43
  like plumbing, like electrical maintenance, like environmental maintenance, like transport, like
• 1:17:48
  farming, like trash collecting, like working in the fucking sewer, And it's
• 1:17:56
  gonna be a while before we have robots that can do all that. There
• 1:18:00
  are some alarmingly intelligent robots out there, but the kryptonite of any robot is
• 1:18:08
  water. A single drop of water can fuck up any robot, and there
• 1:18:14
  is rather a lot of it on this planet. So in the meantime,
• 1:18:19
  there are billions of jobs that need to be performed by people who are willing
• 1:18:25
  to get their hands thirty and the d two break their backs for twelve hours
• 1:18:30
  a day, and the vast majority of those people are men. That's not
• 1:18:33
  going to change as long as self important narcissism is being actively encouraged in women
• 1:18:42
  in ever increasing magnitudes. We live in an age in which women are being
• 1:18:48
  given executive jobs and middle management jobs just because they're women DEI, and so
• 1:18:56
  on and so forth. They're even being given the important tasks of assembling the
• 1:19:00
  working parts of aeroplanes and indeed flying them, qualifications being a mere afterthought.
• 1:19:08
  So maybe maybe we could envision the future in which women have all the high
• 1:19:14
  paying jobs, but the low functioning jobs are given to their husbands, relegated
• 1:19:25
  as they are to dogs bodies. But it's not going to work. Why
• 1:19:29
  because women, for the most part, are highly averse to committing to long
• 1:19:33
  term relationships with men who earn less than them. Again, because women are
• 1:19:40
  continually having their narcissism not just encouraged but pandeed to. This idea of the
• 1:19:46
  career orientated women is a delusional fantasy. It doesn't make them happy. It
• 1:19:54
  doesn't make men particularly happy either, to live in that dynamic. But the
• 1:20:00
  history shows that men are far more ready and willing to sacrifice their happiness for
• 1:20:08
  the sake of their loved ones in the ways women are. It's difficult to
• 1:20:14
  say to what degree this is natural and to what degree this is an affectation
• 1:20:18
  of modern kind of centrism, but it does seem there is a grain of
• 1:20:24
  truth to it, as small as that grain might be it does seem to
• 1:20:28
  indicate that men have some inclination to act in the interests of women in a
• 1:20:34
  way that women do not have a comparable inclination to act in the interests of
• 1:20:40
  men. The moral of the story is women don't need to be encouraged to
• 1:20:46
  be soft, it appears to be in their nature. And men don't need
• 1:20:51
  to be encouraged to be hard, it's in their nature. If you leave
• 1:20:57
  men and women to their own devices, they will gravitate into these slightly different
• 1:21:04
  natures. Men will hunt in the wilderness and women will gather in the domestics
• 1:21:11
  space, and they will appreciate each other. You to quote Alan Watts,
• 1:21:16
  you cannot have the firm without the yielding. It's like you kind of have
• 1:21:21
  the light without the darkness. You cannot have the yin without the yang.
• 1:21:27
  I mean, everyone should be encouraged to be strong and compassionate. That's that's
• 1:21:32
  a no brainer, and it's and it's ungendered. It's it's something children need
• 1:21:36
  to learn, boys and girls alike from their own otherwise selfish perspectives. But
• 1:21:43
  at the same time, you can't pretend that males and females respond to exactly
• 1:21:47
  the same stimulus across the board. They don't. It's not even a case
• 1:21:51
  of should, It's a case of is. It's not a case of aught
• 1:21:58
  but is. Chidately, we're surrounded by a ruthless cult of of of gy
• 1:22:04
  nos antric maniacs that insists that we can indeed get an aught from an is.
• 1:22:12
  You know, the religious and the non religious really need to come together
• 1:22:15
  on this because this is an issue that transcends religion. The basic obvious nature
• 1:22:24
  of of of reality, of human biological reality, men and women are different.
• 1:22:31
  Sorry, sue me, fucking shoot me if you must. So it
• 1:22:39
  sounds like this trend is actually like the the original trend, not the men's
• 1:22:45
  response to it, but the original trend is actually just the same thing that
• 1:22:54
  we're going to be talking about this week on HBr Talk, and that is
• 1:23:00
  the female aristocracy attitude, like the female aristocracy mentality, and that goes all
• 1:23:08
  the way back to medieval aristocratic women. This is this is actually kind of
• 1:23:15
  amusing the response they're getting in the anger they're showing over it. So I
• 1:23:23
  like, I'm gonna briefly lay out what I think of it, But if
• 1:23:28
  you really want to hear, do you want to hear some examples. I
• 1:23:32
  think I have clips here that I could play of what the soft girl era
• 1:23:36
  thing was, but like the soft guy era, simply it's simply making fun
• 1:23:43
  of that. They're not They don't actually expect any of the ship that they're
• 1:23:45
  saying. They're just showing women like how ridiculous they sound. It's not new,
• 1:23:51
  right, No, if you want to play clips, go ahead and
• 1:23:54
  play clips. Let me let me see if there's if this is something all
• 1:23:58
  right, okay, because a lot of times people are like, what did
• 1:24:00
  you bring to the table with something? A lot of people throw in that
• 1:24:04
  sex because they automatically think that they're going to get six. I don't bring
• 1:24:08
  nothing to the table. What you bring? Well? If you if I
• 1:24:12
  were a waitress, I bring your order and I know you better have my
• 1:24:15
  tip. But I'm not a waitress, so I bring nothing to the table.
• 1:24:18
  The guest of honor, you bring me something? Okay? Givers half.
• 1:24:24
  Oh, yeah, that's an example. Thought it was going to be.
• 1:24:27
  It's yeah, I am I am the table. Yeah. I've heard
• 1:24:31
  this before. I've seen it before. They didn't have a label for it
• 1:24:35
  before. It's basically just entitled bitchy women being entitled bitchy women and expecting that
• 1:24:44
  to bring them clout and a bunch of yaz queens right, encouraging the entitled
• 1:24:49
  bitchy women to continue to be entitled in bitchy, And of course it's going
• 1:24:55
  to piss men off because what they are advocating for is a system of slavery
• 1:25:01
  in relationships where the relationship consists of lord female and her vassal the man.
• 1:25:13
  Right. That is that is that, That's all this is, and that's
• 1:25:16
  that's not what love is. It's not what relationships were intended to be.
• 1:25:20
  It's how you end up divorced in five to seven years and complaining that somehow
• 1:25:29
  after you you married a guy who made more money than you did, and
• 1:25:32
  then you divorced the guy that you ended up with less money than you had
• 1:25:38
  when you were married to him, which is which is kind of how it
• 1:25:41
  works, right, And you you abandon the person that is paying your bills.
• 1:25:46
  Suddenly he's not paying your bills anymore. Oh wait, I knew a
• 1:25:49
  guy that went to jail for being beaten by a woman in his own home
• 1:25:57
  that she didn't live in for because because she was mad that he stopped paying
• 1:26:00
  her bills in the nineties, the early nineties, right after the Violence and
• 1:26:08
  Violence Against Women Act pacts. This is nothing new. This is female entitlement
• 1:26:13
  and it is something that men need to just stop put up with a ship.
• 1:26:17
  It's it's bullshit. The whole concept of love was I want to say
• 1:26:26
  money. It was corrupted by the idea of romance and chivalry, which are
• 1:26:33
  different sides of the same coin, which which, as I said in an
• 1:26:40
  earlier video, we're just contemporary interpretations of the idea that women are better than
• 1:26:45
  men, that love should be conducted around the whole idea that women are better
• 1:26:50
  than men. The Greeks had a good way of dividing it. The Greeks
• 1:26:56
  had Ancient Greeks had three different words for what we in the modern age called
• 1:27:01
  love. They had eros, philia, and a garpey. Eros was physical
• 1:27:11
  with sex. Basically, philia was which I guess it translates friendship. It's
• 1:27:19
  just like it's just loving anything. It could be the love you have for
• 1:27:25
  any hobby or whatever. And a garpey, which is a spiritual kind of
• 1:27:30
  love, which is a lot more difficult to translate. It's something that doesn't
• 1:27:36
  that doesn't exist physically, it's sort of an abstract thing. And I think
• 1:27:41
  it was always important to have those to have those concepts delineated, because nowadays
• 1:27:47
  we call all of it love like you just you just have to say I
• 1:27:54
  love you, and that's supposed to encompass everything, whereas whereas, yeah,
• 1:27:59
  the there are three different things. There's sex and friendship and spiritual connection,
• 1:28:04
  and and you shouldn't just have to say I love you as though that means
• 1:28:11
  all all three things. If you, if you really want to be in
• 1:28:16
  a meaningful relationship, it needs to involve all three things, and you need
• 1:28:20
  to need to be able to establish all three things. And it certainly shouldn't
• 1:28:27
  be encompassed by some chivalric code where all it means is is I kneel before
• 1:28:33
  you my darling. Yeah, it's it's it's all. It's all very difficult
• 1:28:40
  to translate now that it's been filtered through like three different languages. Oh that's
• 1:28:45
  sad, I might. The sad thing is that we've had centuries now of
• 1:28:53
  love being being treated like it means women demand things and men give them,
• 1:29:00
  and I don't know if these women know how to love. And there's all
• 1:29:08
  there's a large contingent of women that don't know how to love. They know
• 1:29:13
  how to seek love from other people, they know how to want to be
• 1:29:17
  loved, but they don't know how to give love, how to how to
• 1:29:24
  uh have love for another individual, and how to act on it. They
• 1:29:30
  don't get invested in their partner's welfare. They don't have a sense of companionship,
• 1:29:38
  you know. They they don't maybe even have a full on sexual desire
• 1:29:42
  for their partner. They just want sex and the partner is there, so
• 1:29:46
  they'll use him for it, and the result ends up being I bring nothing
• 1:29:54
  to the table, and I expect you to bring everything, because I am
• 1:29:58
  the table. Women get mad as hell when men compare them to inanimate objects,
• 1:30:06
  but they will say, I am the table. If you liked it,
• 1:30:13
  then you should have put a ring on it. I don't know how
• 1:30:16
  he's supposed to put a ring on your ass, but fine, right.
• 1:30:20
  They will not refer to themselves as human beings because human beings have agency and
• 1:30:27
  they interact with other human beings on a human level with intent and consideration and
• 1:30:33
  mindfulness. But if you're just a table, you expect to be decorated and
• 1:30:41
  taken care of cleaned up after right, but not have anything expected of you?
• 1:30:47
  What a sad, sorry, pathetic existence. That is gross. Yeah,
• 1:30:57
  I think I have some clips of the soft guy era. See if
• 1:31:00
  there. If this is it, I'm gonna play a little bit and then
• 1:31:01
  we'll all to be provided for it in the same equality. The soft guy
• 1:31:05
  era may appear as a humorous STrenD on the surface, but beneath the left
• 1:31:09
  there last a profound commentary on the complexities of modern dating. By holding up
• 1:31:14
  a mirror to society, we're reminded that true connection requires understanding, empathy,
• 1:31:19
  and perhaps a drizzle of humor. Drizzle. Drizzle means I already bought these
• 1:31:24
  hundred thousand dollars gie ods, so I know I'm good. I need you
• 1:31:27
  to drizzle to step up to show me your equal drizzle drizzle means I'm in
• 1:31:30
  my soft guy era. I'm taking my nine thousand dollars Fujifilm camera and traveling
• 1:31:34
  the world to do photography. And if you can't fund that, help me
• 1:31:39
  start my art gallery, then you're not a good person. Drizzle drizzle,
• 1:31:45
  that's what I still don't understanding what it's just as you're just turning I don't
• 1:31:53
  know why they are saying drizzle drizzle either, but all right, so I'm
• 1:31:57
  going to end the show there because I got to do a Patron show and
• 1:31:59
  then I gotta go pick up Lindsay, so I can't go any longer.
• 1:32:02
  But I did get a super child, and I just want you all to
• 1:32:04
  know that we're gonna be doing this in the Patron Show. Why not a
• 1:32:09
  super chow, It was a super chat. I'm sorry, we're gonna be
• 1:32:12
  looking at speaking of entitled bitches, we're gonna be looking at Manifestel in the
• 1:32:17
  Patron Show and her video entitled men date out of their League and then ruin
• 1:32:21
  women's lives, the paradoxical cycle this, I mean, like, how popular
• 1:32:28
  is this? She's one hundred and seventy one thousand subs, way bigger than
• 1:32:30
  us. Okay, so we're gonna be looking at that in the Patron Show.
• 1:32:34
  But I got a super chat from Zara Anx who says agape or a
• 1:32:40
  gape. I don't know which one. A goape. Agape would be selfless
• 1:32:44
  love if I'm not mistaken, basically wanting the best for the other. It's
• 1:32:46
  basically cultivated and stronger than eros or philia. It requires that certain theory of
• 1:32:54
  mind that can only come from a love between one human mind and another human
• 1:33:00
  mind, and hence it doesn't apply to too sex or right or even the
• 1:33:05
  enjoyment of of a worldly thing. So yeah, that makes sense. Yeah,
• 1:33:13
  man. He gives another two dollars super chow chat sorry and says,
• 1:33:16
  they say drizzle drizzle because of b f of sprinkle sprinkle. So the women
• 1:33:25
  the woman who started as a sprinkle sprinkle like I don't know, like fairy
• 1:33:29
  dust, and then like her entitlement, and so drizzle drizzles like I don't
• 1:33:32
  know, is it like recome like is it a little bit of p at
• 1:33:36
  the end of your pe? Like? What is that? Like? I
• 1:33:40
  don't know. I'm guessing the sprinkle sprinkle thing is about, you know,
• 1:33:44
  money. Think of it as you know women, You know, women always
• 1:33:46
  make that stupid fish face when they're when they're getting their picture taken and ship
• 1:33:50
  all right, and you know how you feed fish, you you you sprinkle
• 1:33:56
  fish flakes over the water. So these women are are making their fish face
• 1:34:00
  over that man's money and demanding that he feed them his wealth same way that
• 1:34:08
  you would feed fish in a fish tank. And you can just picture the
• 1:34:13
  way that fish in a fish tank eat their fish flakes, and that's basically
• 1:34:17
  you know, women, women are promising to hoover up those money flakes and
• 1:34:25
  these guys are making fun of it, and their answer to that is grizzle.
• 1:34:30
  Yeah, fair enough. All right, well thank you for that,
• 1:34:33
  Zaranks. All right now we're going to head into the Patron show, so
• 1:34:38
  thank you guys for joining us again. If you want to be a part
• 1:34:41
  of that, go to feed Thebagel dot com, forward slash subscribe and start
• 1:34:45
  a monthly subscription. Hopefully we'll see you all there. So without further ado,
• 1:34:49
  if you guys liked this video, please smash like, subscribe. If
• 1:34:51
  you're not already subscribed, hit the beltf notifications, leave us a comment,
• 1:34:55
  let us know you guys think about what we discussed on the show today,
• 1:34:58
  and please please please share this video because sharing is caring. Thank you all
• 1:35:02
  so much for coming on today's episode of HBr News and we will see you
• 1:35:08
  next Tuesday. Word