Latest / UK Column Radio / UK Column News - 29th September 2025

Transcript

UK Column News - 29th September 2025 · UK Column Radio

0:08
Good afternoon. Today is Monday the 29th of
0:11
September 2025, just after 1:00. Welcome to UK Column News.
0:17
I'm your host, Brian Garish, delighted to have Ben Rubin with
0:20
me in the studio. And we have Sandy Adams joining
0:23
us by Live link now. My goodness, what a busy, busy
0:29
time. And Ben, you and I having a
0:32
little bit of a chat about the weekend and we had discussions
0:37
with people completely independently, but many people
0:40
saying just what is going on in this country.
0:43
So there's a there's definitely And what, how do we describe it?
0:49
An undertow of people seeing chaos and confusion.
0:55
I would say that that is certainly the case, yes.
0:57
They seem to have somehow miraculously united the country
1:02
in utter disgust at the Labour government over the past few
1:05
days. It's been quite a thing to
1:06
watch. Well, that's absolutely true.
1:09
So the Labour conference started in Liverpool.
1:13
Today's news, we're going to be having a look at that.
1:15
We'll be having a look at the Labour Party itself and we'll
1:20
also be having a look at what is clearly the the global system of
1:24
government coming in on the back of uni party politics.
1:29
We're going to be having a little look at forming and how
1:32
forming is being affected by policy in UK.
1:35
And we're also going to be looking at what Ben's chosen as
1:40
subversion, but how change agents are being used
1:44
politically in order to create the new utopian society.
1:49
And the good news is we're going to end on what people can
1:53
actually do and have an effect in challenging this system.
1:56
And you can make a difference if you do the right thing in the
2:00
right way. So let's get started with a
2:03
little look at the Labour Party conference.
2:06
And I thought this was a striking image of how it looked.
2:10
And we need to put some labels on this because of course the
2:14
key bit of it about the lady's hat is that it's got the latest
2:19
Labour slogan, which is build baby, build.
2:23
Not build back better, but build, baby, build.
2:27
And of course many people just looking at the baseball caps and
2:32
the red hats and saying what we've really got is Labour's
2:35
Trump Conference. So utterly bizarre that of
2:39
course everybody led to believe that it's the Tories sort of
2:43
LinkedIn with the razzmatazz of the Trump style.
2:46
And here we've got the Labour Party seemingly adopting the
2:51
same style. Is this to confuse voters, Ben?
2:56
I could well believe it is. But certainly we've got Uniparty
3:00
being stamped large on New Labour.
3:04
Let's have a look at how the party chairman Ellie Reeves
3:09
spoke to the audience. And the MPs call to put a
3:15
Hillsborough law on the statute book, a landmark step to end the
3:19
culture of cover up, hold public officials and authorities
3:23
accountable for their actions and to close the chapter on one
3:27
of the darkest days in British history.
3:30
My values, your values, Labour values.
3:39
That is why our members voices are so important.
3:44
That is why the MPF is so important.
3:47
And that is why it matters so deeply that we have a Labour
3:51
government. Because when we win, our ideas,
3:55
our policies and our values are turned into action.
3:59
But when we lose, it's our opponents that set the agenda
4:03
and their policy making process is anything but democratic.
4:08
With the Tories it's top down, dictated by whoever happens to
4:12
be party Labour. And with Reform, it's even
4:15
worse. Until recently, their party was
4:18
literally owned by one individual, Nigel Farage, a man
4:23
who when asked about his policies, said, And I quote, if
4:28
you ask me how you're going to do this, I can't really give you
4:31
an answer. So how do they solve that
4:34
problem? By importing failed Tories to
4:37
help them write their policies. If the answer is Nadine Dorries,
4:41
then you're asking the wrong question.
4:46
Well there, there you have it, quite some rhetoric.
4:50
My values, your values, Labour values.
4:53
And apparently if we adopt all of those values together, then
4:58
the country is going to achieve the change that we want, the
5:01
electorate wants. I don't believe it works that
5:04
way at all. And I think what we're going to
5:07
get is something very different. We're going to pull that apart
5:10
in today's news, but let's watch what what they're talking about.
5:15
And of course, in the backdrop there, it said Renew Britain.
5:18
Britain's going to be renewed, but not really declaring what
5:22
form that's going to take. And then we've got the statement
5:26
that that terrible Reform Party is owned by Nigel Farage, to
5:30
which I say, well, at least we can see who's driving it.
5:34
But as we look deeper into Labour and the Conservative
5:37
Party, it seems to become ever more difficult to understand
5:41
really where the power base is coming from.
5:44
But we can be sure the power base is coming through the
5:47
funders. Now, what didn't the Labour
5:50
Party want to talk about so far in their conference?
5:54
Of course, the conference is ongoing as we speak, so possibly
5:57
this subject is going to come in and come onto the table for
6:02
debate. But somehow I don't think so.
6:05
Let's just have a a little listen and watch this Sky News
6:10
clip talking about what the public is really concerned
6:14
about. Here is why Sky News is holding
6:18
a debate on immigration. It's because public opinion is
6:21
changing and fast. I want you to look at this.
6:24
Here are the most important issues facing the country over
6:27
the last five years. Two of them have dominated the
6:29
economy and the health service. But now look at this back since
6:34
Britain left the European Union, immigration sun be pretty low
6:36
compared to the two big issues, but it overtook the other two in
6:40
May and you can see now immigration and asylum is top
6:44
and is extending its lead in terms of issues that the public
6:47
think are important. And what do the public think of
6:49
it? Well, a clear majority think
6:52
that migration is too high, 70% which is 18% saying it's about
6:57
right and 3% think it's too low. And what do they think of that?
7:00
Well, for generations we've had Prime ministers and particularly
7:04
chancellors saying that migration is a good thing.
7:07
But 50% of the public disagree. They think it's a negative, with
7:11
just two 22% thinking that it's positive and 22% thinking it's
7:14
even Stevens. How big a political problem is
7:17
this for a Labour government? Well, we asked whether or not
7:19
they thought the Tories would be doing better if they were in
7:22
power. Just 18% said that they would.
7:25
55% said that they pretty much thought it would be the same.
7:28
But look at this, This is why it's a challenge.
7:29
We also have asked whether Reform UK doing better and their
7:32
hardline message actually has landed better. 40% of the public
7:36
think that Reform UK would be doing better on migration, 19%
7:39
worse, 26% the same. So there you can see why it's a
7:43
political challenge, you can see why the public are concerned and
7:46
you can see why this week there was a clear out at the Home
7:50
Office and Sky News are holding their debate.
7:55
So I think we have to say well done to Sky News for that
7:58
report. And also they've done another,
8:00
I'll call it a documentary clip giving the statistics on
8:05
migration and really explaining what's going on.
8:09
And they're bold enough to have done it in a detached way.
8:11
We haven't got that clip in today's news.
8:13
We will focus on it because I think it's important, but if 70%
8:18
of the people in this country are concerned about not illegal
8:22
migration but actually migration numbers within the wider policy,
8:28
Keir Starmer very dismissive. Let's have a look at this clip.
8:34
You said that. Proposal is immoral to deport
8:36
people who are already here if they don't pass more stringent
8:39
rules. Do you think it's a racist
8:40
policy? Well, I do think that it is a
8:43
racist policy. I do think it's immoral.
8:46
It needs to be called out for what it is.
8:48
And do you think that Reform UK is trying to appeal to racist?
8:53
No, I think that there are plenty of people who either vote
8:56
reform or are thinking of voting reform who are frustrated.
9:01
They had 14 years of failure under the Conservatives.
9:04
They want us to change things. They may have voted Labour a
9:07
year ago and they want the change to come more quickly.
9:12
So brilliant bit of spin doctoring there because
9:16
basically 70% of the country are really concerned at this issue.
9:21
Then he's asked whether the bulk of the people in reform are
9:23
concerned and that's spun away. He deflects that and but
9:29
essentially the policy is racist and that is saying that if you
9:32
dare to challenge the migration policies, Stalmer at least is is
9:38
saying that you're racist. You will you will smiling Ben
9:41
while that clip was playing. I don't know whether you want to
9:43
add. Anything.
9:44
I mean, I don't know why she's even bothering to ask him.
9:46
To be honest with you. I think he's the least popular
9:48
Prime Minister in history. He's in the office, so why are
9:51
you asking him what the country thinks?
9:53
He clearly has no idea. Because the BBC's job is
9:55
possibly to continue to sell this man to the public as a
9:59
viable Prime Minister. But let's come back to the
10:02
Labour policy. And this is something which the
10:06
papers have called BBC. In particular, building of three
10:09
new towns will start before the election.
10:12
This is part of Labour talking about building 1.5 million new
10:17
homes, but what is Build Baby Build really about?
10:21
We're going to put some meat on the bones here because part of
10:24
this has got to be to absorb and conceal the population pressure
10:29
on UK. You cannot continue to bring in
10:33
hundreds of thousands, hundreds and hundreds of thousands of
10:36
people without having somewhere for those people to live.
10:41
And of course the way it works is the people who are in
10:45
existing areas who get concerned with migration and increases in
10:49
local migrant population, then move areas into a better area
10:56
where they feel more comfortable.
10:57
Maybe they head towards more country areas or maybe they seek
11:03
accommodation in new sites. So what's going on here is a
11:08
policy to absorb migration. But the second thing, if we pop
11:13
that back on screen is this. And thank you very much, Ben,
11:16
for the discussion we had very early this morning.
11:20
It's about restructuring the very fabric of society.
11:24
And I know that, Ben, you're going to be having a look at
11:26
this in more detail in your own segment to the news.
11:30
So there we are. Build, baby, build.
11:33
Presented in a Trump style with baseball caps and red hats at
11:39
the Labour Conference. But something else was going on
11:42
under the surface and that is the control of the way people
11:47
inside labour can produce policy.
11:50
And we need to go to this document, which Ellie did
11:53
mention herself several times in her talk.
11:56
This is Labour's National Policy Forum and here we see what they
12:01
call the annual consultation 2025.
12:04
I'll just put some meat on the bones here with the contents.
12:08
People can have a look at this after the news if you want some
12:12
more detail. But let's bring in Keir Starmer
12:15
again because he says in the forward that our Labour
12:18
government was elected on the promise of change to deliver a
12:22
decade of national renewal and put the country back in the
12:25
services of working people. The hard work of the National
12:29
Policy Forum in the years before the 2024 election census.
12:33
On the path to an election winning manifesto.
12:36
Manifesto at the heart of our historic election win.
12:40
Security and renewal are our twin tasks.
12:44
And now we're getting on and delivering that change for the
12:47
working people. But we need to remember that
12:49
change is absolutely defined by Stormer and his spin doctors and
12:55
will be controlled by them. And of course, change is not
12:59
fully described to the public, so the public doesn't know
13:03
actually what's coming. If we dig into this document a
13:07
bit more, we've got this fixing the foundations to deliver
13:10
change. They're going to look at
13:12
economic growth, they're going to make Britain a clean energy
13:15
superpower. They're going to be breaking
13:17
down barriers to opportunity and NHS fit for the future, safer
13:22
streets, Britain reconnected. So there's six policy areas.
13:26
But of course what they don't do is actually talk about the key
13:30
issue which people want them to talk about, which is migration.
13:35
So we'll just end by having a look at the style of Labour.
13:39
It's Labour. Is it Trump?
13:41
It's very hard to tell, but we were fascinated with this
13:45
picture because sitting grinning in the middle is none other than
13:49
local Plymouth City Council lead leader Tudor Evans.
13:53
He's now become a sort of mega, mega labour, if that's the right
13:58
way of putting it. And this is the maturity of
14:01
what's going on, particularly around the conference and Tudor
14:05
Evans. You can see we've taken a
14:07
general picture from the web, but if we blow this up, we're
14:11
into selfies with the Prime Minister.
14:14
So I think this is pretty damning really of these very
14:20
dangerous, politically dangerous individuals.
14:23
But one hand, they are I, in my opinion, destroying the country
14:28
and the other hand, they're acting in a very immature and
14:31
puerile way. Let's leave it there.
14:34
As far as the conference goes. I'm going to welcome you, Sandy,
14:37
because you've been digging deeper into how the Labour Party
14:42
itself works and who are some of the key policy movers and
14:47
shakers. Welcome to the News.
14:50
Thank you very much, Brian. Well, it's interesting because
14:54
Ben's going to be expanding on this a bit bit bit more because
14:58
we we found that we were just covering the same kind of
15:00
things, which is brilliant. We're all on the same page, but
15:03
that very interesting seeing the red hats and how it aligns with
15:08
with the whole Trump thing that's going on over the pond.
15:11
So I'm looking at the moment into Morgan McSweeney this most
15:18
people in Britain have never heard of him really.
15:20
He's he's the unelected strategist who now wields more
15:23
power than most ministers. He's Keir Starmer's chief of
15:26
staff and he's a man who decides who gets close to the Prime
15:30
Minister and who gets elected as MPs.
15:33
He's the most powerful man in Westminster, yet remains very
15:36
much in the shadows. He's never been interviewed.
15:39
You'll never find a quote from him on social media.
15:42
He was born in Cork in Ireland. McSweeney moved to London as a
15:46
teenager. He flunked out of university.
15:49
He did odd jobs on building sites and spent three months on
15:53
a kibbutz in Israel in the 1990s and eventually embedded himself
15:58
in Labour Party politics. His big break came in 2017 when
16:03
he became company secretary of the think tank Labour Together.
16:07
From there he built a machine to pull Labour away from Corbynism
16:11
and engineer Starmer's ascent and Jeremy Corbyn's decline.
16:15
Now this is very interesting. In 2020, McSweeney was running
16:20
Starmer's leadership campaign. By 2024 he was in Downing St.
16:24
and today he's the chief gatekeeper of government
16:26
strategy. While Mcsteen Sweeney was a
16:29
company secretary of Labour Together, the group accepted
16:32
over £700,000 in donations that were not declared on time.
16:38
And that's a serious breach of political finance law.
16:42
In September 2021, the Electoral Commission fined Labour Together
16:46
14,250 lbs for more than 20 reporting failures, stressing
16:52
that there was an administrative error and it wasn't a reason, a
16:56
reasonable excuse. So he, he just failed to, to say
17:00
where these donations were coming from.
17:02
Well, it turns out that these, these, these, some of these
17:06
donations were coming from a chap called Sir Trevor Chin.
17:10
I think we've got a slide of him.
17:13
He's he's, he's one of the significant backers of of Labour
17:17
Together and he's a pro Israel philanthropist who's vice
17:22
president of the Jewish Leadership Council, former chair
17:25
of the Joint Israel Appeal and now president of the Jewish
17:29
Israel Appeal, which we've got another slide off.
17:33
And also he's on the executive committee of BICOM Britain,
17:37
Israel Communications and Research Centre EU KS leading
17:41
pro Israel advocacy organization.
17:44
Chin has long donated across party lines, but in 2017 onward
17:48
he's directed serious money into Labour together.
17:51
He directed a serious amount of money to help building the
17:55
machine of McSweeney has used to sideline the Corbyn left and and
18:00
prepare Starmer's leadership. So it was he he was really
18:03
instrumental in in bringing Corbyn down with the
18:06
anti-Semitism stuff. And one wonders how this
18:10
affiliate affiliation may have affected any Gaza ceasefire
18:12
talks. I mean, this is a really
18:14
interesting point. He also gave 50,000 lbs directly
18:18
to Starmer's 2020 leadership campaign.
18:20
And when you connect these dots, you see how foreign policy
18:24
sympathies, wealthy donors and party strategy intertwine all of
18:28
the radar of the average Labour member or vote.
18:31
This may have kind of, you know, gone over their heads.
18:35
Alongside McSweeney, we have Lord Peter Mandelson, the
18:37
original Blairite Prince of Darkness, re emerging as an
18:41
informal advisor and confidante. Starmer So Manderson's presence
18:47
symbolizes a wider project that Labour has of returning to the
18:50
Blair like pro market, pro US stance with strategists like
18:54
McSweeney and donors like Shin and the left never gains control
19:00
again. So anyway, I think if we can
19:03
look at this, this, this little video that just kind of sums it
19:08
all up really, if we could just run this video.
19:14
Symbol crowd of a Labour great and good telling them about how
19:17
Labour together was trying to seek unity in the party.
19:20
It's a network of people from across the party, from different
19:24
traditions that look to what are the long term challenges facing
19:29
the party and the country and how we overcome them.
19:32
Nothing could be further from the truth because at that time
19:35
Morgan Mcsweeney's plan to burn down the Labour Party, to
19:38
undermine it from within, to capture the Labour Party from
19:41
the ashes, to install their own chosen leader and then eradicate
19:45
the left wing from the Labour Party was well advanced.
19:48
What we can now reveal is that Morgan McSweeney was and is very
19:52
close to Peter Mandelson, the best pal of a notorious sex pest
19:55
and paedophile, Jeffrey Epstein. In fact, one of the Mcsweeney's
19:58
first jobs at Labour was inputting data into Peter
20:00
Manderson's much feared Excalibur computer system.
20:03
Peter Mandelson has said of Morgan McSweeney.
20:05
I don't know who and how and when he was invented, but
20:08
whoever it was, they will find their place in heaven.
20:11
In many ways, they share the same political methodology.
20:14
They're very comfortable meeting behind closed doors, making
20:17
important decisions about your life, important decisions they
20:20
make out side of transparency. Like for example forgetting to
20:24
report 730,000 lbs of donations to the Electoral Commission.
20:28
So what was almost 3/4 of the millions of pounds and lawfully
20:31
not declared to the Electoral Commission used for?
20:33
One of the most consequent use of the money was to get Keir
20:36
Starmer elected leader on the Labour Party.
20:38
What we now know is that Keir Starmer had leadership
20:40
ambitions. From as early as 2018.
20:42
He attended a series of meetings with his good friend and MP
20:45
Jenny Chapman, hosted at Jenny Chapman's home in Camden in
20:48
London on Arlington Street. As a result, the group that met
20:52
was called the Arlington Group. One of the earliest attendees of
20:54
those meetings was Steve Reed MP, one of Morgan Mcsweeney's
20:58
closest allies. In July 2019, Morgan McSweeney
21:01
was invited by Steve Reed to attend one of the Arlington
21:03
Group meetings. What McSweeney did was produce a
21:06
detailed presentation of what the Labour Party membership
21:09
wanted and who they would vote for.
21:11
That information was based on hundreds of thousands of pounds
21:14
of unpublished polling the Morgan McSweeney had undertaken
21:17
to understand what made Labour Party members take what they
21:21
wanted from our potential Labour Party leader.
21:26
Well, that's really interesting because the man speaking was a
21:30
chap called Paul Holden and he's just written a book.
21:33
It's about to come out and it's called The Fraud and it promises
21:37
to lift the lid on Mcsweeney's role in transforming Labour and
21:41
that £700,000 scandal. Now this could actually really
21:44
break Starmer, you'd think. But whether you like like Corbyn
21:50
or not, questions remain. How democratic is a democracy
21:53
where unelected strategists and wealthy donors, old Blairite
21:57
power brokers set the course for government?
22:01
Sandy, thank. Thank you very much and a big
22:04
thank you from UK column News to double down news that that clip
22:08
about Matt who produced the clip about Mandelson very important.
22:12
Now we're, we, we're going to move on to the subject of the,
22:18
of the more global nature of the change that we're seeing being
22:22
driven through the Labour Party. No difference really in the
22:28
policies of Labour or the Conservatives.
22:30
The colours change, but the policies don't.
22:33
And of course, the real power for both parties is not through
22:37
the party itself, it's through those powerful donors and
22:41
controllers. So, Ben, over to you.
22:43
Absolutely. Thank you, Brian.
22:44
Yes, we're going to look specifically at the ID card
22:48
scheme that was announced last week.
22:49
Mike talked about it on Friday on the news, and we're going to
22:52
expand a little bit about where it's come from, what it
22:55
potentially hooks us into and how it aligns with World
23:00
Economic Forum globalist policy through and through.
23:04
Before we get into that, I'll just direct your attention to
23:06
this report that we did last year on the 14th of October.
23:10
I talked specifically about this fella.
23:12
That's Daniel Sachs, who is George Soros, investment chief
23:16
at the Open Societies amongst other things, and he was at
23:20
Global Progress Action in Montreal talking to the top tier
23:24
of liberal progressive political leaders like Trudeau, Ardern,
23:28
etcetera, basically on how to divide and rule their
23:31
populations. He was drawing attention to this
23:33
phenomenon that he had identified, showing a divergent
23:37
between male and female, conservative and progressive,
23:40
left and right political views and essentially warning about
23:43
this. But actually reading between the
23:45
lines was saying that this is something that can be
23:48
capitalized on. These two competing energy
23:51
fields can be used to divide and rule the population.
23:53
And what we've seen in our society over the past 12 months,
23:57
division, left, right, men, women, conservative,
24:00
progressive, fighting against each other, sometimes literally
24:04
in the street so that the agenda can be floated in in the
24:07
background without people paying proper attention.
24:09
And what do we have last week, 12 months on from that?
24:12
Well, we have Jacinda Ardern on stage in London at Global
24:18
Progress Action 2025 speaking to on stage there on the left, John
24:22
Podesta, as well as Pedro Sanchez, the Prime Minister of
24:25
Spain, who's they're talking about how fantastic the energy
24:28
transition is going to be for the his, the Spanish economy.
24:31
As well as JB Pritzker on the right hand side there, Governor
24:35
of Illinois who was promoting state control of childcare,
24:39
especially state control of everything.
24:40
That's what they're after. And then Anas Sarwar, the leader
24:44
of Scottish Labour, you can see they're fawning over Mark
24:47
Carney, who's now currently the Prime Minister of Canada.
24:51
And the slap bang in the middle, Keir Starmer, who decided that
24:57
this was the appropriate forum to make the big announcement
25:00
about the ID card scheme. Let's have a little listen to
25:02
what he had to say. Today I am announcing this
25:07
government will make a new free of charge digital ID mandatory
25:13
for the right to work by the end of this Parliament.
25:17
Let me spell that out. You will not be able to work in
25:20
the United Kingdom if you do not have digital ID.
25:25
It's as simple as that. Sorry, but but he's not going to
25:32
charge us. I know exactly.
25:34
Yeah, yeah, yeah, it's mandatory and I sound like a a total
25:38
fascist, but it's free of charge, don't worry.
25:41
And he's decided to do that not in parliament, not Downing St.
25:45
not to the to even to the press. Like this is a invitation only
25:51
elite liberal globalist progressive think tank event.
25:56
And astonishingly he's he's managed to unite the entire
25:59
country. I think as I said at the start
26:01
in absolute discussed at this. So I think the petitions up to
26:05
2, two and a half million, somebody's just claimed on our
26:08
chat box and this is what we need.
26:12
Then we need the numbers, but then we also need people to act
26:16
and we'll come on to that towards the end of the news.
26:18
Yeah, indeed. And he and various others have
26:22
been out on heavily on social media.
26:25
Starmer himself was on the BBC yesterday doing an appalling job
26:28
of trying to defend this. I mean, he's trying to defend
26:30
the completely indefensible. So I don't know what's happened
26:34
here, but the execution of this has been extremely poor.
26:38
Because I would suggest Ben, it's because the time frame for
26:42
this to come in is not within Starmer's local political UK
26:48
time frame. When he feels comfortable that
26:50
the population in the UK is ready for it, the time frame is
26:54
going to be set externally, yes, at globalist level, yes, when
26:59
they think the time is right. So Starmer will simply be told,
27:03
tough luck, Sunny, you need to get the ID policy in now.
27:07
That's why he's he's squirming. I think, I think that's probably
27:11
a really good point actually. We've heard the fact you know,
27:13
that we're behind on the SDG's, we're behind on the agenda.
27:16
So maybe this is just a function of, of that, you know, and, and,
27:20
and taking the lead, as Mike said on Friday from people like
27:23
the Tony Blair Foundation who've come in and said, Hey, 63% of
27:26
the country really want this. And then in reality, when they
27:29
announce it, no, we we really don't want this.
27:32
They've been amazing to see all of the kind of talking heads
27:35
come out, a bunch of the politicians, bunch of civil
27:37
servants. Paul Mason has been going just
27:40
straight into bat for star. But all weekend it's been
27:43
amazing. And actually what he highlighted
27:45
as Lisa Nandy from DCMS also mentioned in in the video that
27:50
Mike shared on Fridays, that a lot of this is rooted in the
27:54
Estonian E identity scheme. You know, Estonia, a tiny
27:58
country in Northern Europe, 1.3 million people, but it hasn't
28:02
set the template for digital government over the past 20
28:04
years. They talk about the E identity,
28:07
the Eid, as the cornerstone of a seamless digital society.
28:11
Every Estonian, no matter where they live, has a state issued
28:14
digital identity known as an Eid.
28:17
Been in news for over 20 years. It's the cornerstone of our E
28:19
state, enabling secure digital digital transactions in both the
28:23
public and the private sectors. Doesn't that just sound
28:26
fantastic? And Estonia.
28:29
But you know what? What could possibly be bad about
28:31
Estonia? And most people have never even
28:33
heard about it, you know, And they're not like they're
28:35
involved in any wars or anything like that, are they?
28:37
So that's, that's the soft sell. People are being told, don't
28:41
worry, they're Estonians, they're all lovely people,
28:43
they've got our best interests at heart.
28:46
This is how globalist policy is sold locally.
28:50
Indeed it is, because what's behind that?
28:53
Let's go and have a little look here at the profile from
28:58
LinkedIn and Valeria Ionian, who is the Deputy Minister of
29:02
Digital Transformation of Ukraine.
29:03
Well, she was sorry, between October 2019 and May this year,
29:07
she's now been bumped up to advising the Deputy Prime
29:09
Minister on the same issue. So this is the top digital
29:12
transformation person in the Ukrainian government and she was
29:16
in the UK back in May Pause that if you're watching back and have
29:21
a full read of the post. I'll go through some of this
29:23
now, but the most important bit for the purposes of what we're
29:25
talking about this second or this statement right at the end,
29:28
where she talks about this visit being part of the trilateral
29:31
cooperation between Ukraine, Estonia and the UK, so.
29:36
The plot thickens. Indeed.
29:38
And now we're to believe we can just trust all those Ukrainians.
29:42
Forget all the right wing extremists and the Nazi groups
29:46
closely aligned to the Ukrainian government.
29:49
Forget all that, they're more nice people who are going to
29:52
help UK implement a digital ID system.
29:55
Yes, and the money laundering and a whole bunch of other
29:59
things. So this young lady, she's come,
30:01
I don't know she what does she look like?
30:03
30s, something like that, mid 30s maybe, you know, so like
30:06
young lady over in the UK, full access, full top tier access to
30:13
all of the people running digitization of the British
30:15
state, including David Knott, who's the CTO, chief technology
30:19
officer of the whole of the UK government.
30:21
So you're there hanging around. Also, we've got Annette
30:23
Southgate, who's the head of the accelerated capability
30:26
environment ACE at the Home Office.
30:30
So apparently there's huge potential for partnership there.
30:32
Also, Emily Middleton, Director General for the digital center
30:36
of the Cabinet Office. So she's redesigning the whole
30:39
of the center of government. So our Ukrainian friend straight
30:42
in there, big meeting, big hug with Anita friend who's the head
30:47
of the defence and security accelerator at the MOD and
30:52
they're talking about Brave One, which is the Ukrainian defence
30:56
accelerator and partnership there.
30:57
You can see where this is all going.
30:59
Also Christine Bellamy, who's the chief executive of
31:01
government digital services. And there's a lot of ladies
31:04
here, this chap on the right. I think he accidentally wandered
31:07
into frame. He's got nothing to do with it
31:09
really. It's all about the ladies on the
31:10
left hand side there in the senior positions.
31:13
And and there was one other bloke, this guy Benedict Macon
31:16
Cooney, who's the chief policy strategist at the Tony Bear
31:19
Institute for Global Change, who are completely up to their necks
31:22
in what's going on in Ukraine. And actually I've shared this
31:24
quote last year, but I'll share it again.
31:27
They're talking about hiring talent into Kiev so that you can
31:30
have the chance to make a direct impact on the single most
31:33
important geopolitical event in the world since the end of the
31:36
Cold War, right. That's what the the
31:39
reconstruction of Ukraine is, and that's what the identity
31:43
card scheme is directly linked to through these partnerships.
31:47
Yeah, that's what's going on here.
31:49
Let's head back to the to the, to the trip to London.
31:53
And it was wrapped up at the end of the day at Deloitte, who are
31:57
helping to facilitate this whole program.
31:59
And they are a World Economic Forum strategic partner.
32:02
And they're also helping to run the World Economic Forum Global
32:07
Government Technology Centre in Kiev as part of the Great Reset
32:12
and the Build Back Better agenda.
32:14
And that's what those hats meant.
32:16
Build baby, build means build back better.
32:19
It's the same thing. It is becoming a bit obvious.
32:21
It is as you as you run through this and and we put the pieces
32:25
together, it is obvious that UK as a nation state is being
32:31
dissolved in front of our very eyes.
32:34
This is being done by the Conservatives under big society
32:38
with David Cameron. And now we've got a similar
32:40
policy underway with Keir Starmer.
32:44
Many people man on the Clapham omnibus would consider this to
32:48
be treason. And I think that there's there's
32:51
a lot of validity in that, that line of questioning.
32:54
But more on that in future UK column news programmes.
32:59
Absolutely. So this World Economic Forum
33:01
initiative, how does that manifest?
33:03
We'll give you a couple of examples, right?
33:05
So here's one. This is the AI Centre of
33:07
Excellence. That's Mikhailo Federov on
33:10
stage, by the way. He is the top man for digital
33:12
transformation in Ukraine. And this concept, this was
33:18
developed, as you can see in the bottom there with the support of
33:22
the UK Foreign Office, so FCDEO and then that's implemented by
33:26
Deloitte. So again, public private
33:28
partnership, World Economic Forum, strategic partners, hand
33:31
in glove with the the British establishment, whether that's
33:34
Cabinet Office or Foreign Office, wherever it might be,
33:37
working with Ukraine to build these new systems.
33:40
And it's not just digital ideas, a whole bunch of other stuff
33:42
too. Let's actually have a little
33:44
listen to what the Win Win Global Innovation initiative are
33:47
up to in Ukraine. What is the future of Ukraine
33:51
like? Is it a hope for happy tomorrow,
33:54
for breakthroughs and battle throughs?
33:56
This is not a hope. This is a will.
34:01
The will to do more than we thought we could.
34:04
The will to create technologies that make enemies shout my Lord.
34:08
The will to improve lives, provide jobs, to be the rare for
34:14
those who fight against all odds.
34:16
A partner to developers, scientists, entrepreneurs, to
34:23
those who choose their own reward.
34:26
Ours is to be the state of free people.
34:30
So instead of hoping we act because we cannot afford to
34:36
lose, Win, win. Ukrainian global innovation
34:42
vision. Winning the peace.
34:59
So Ben, win, win to win the peace.
35:01
Meanwhile, according to Kiev Independent, the Kiev posts some
35:06
1.16 million Russians killed and wounded on the battlefield.
35:13
If we accept that figure, and we know that since the start of the
35:16
war Ukrainian casualties have been higher, we've got at least
35:21
a million dead Ukrainians. But not to worry, we need to
35:24
kill these people in order to win the peace.
35:28
Or am I being sick? No, I think you're pretty much
35:32
going on the money there, Brian. Yes.
35:34
Would it's a win, win to win the war and then win the peace.
35:37
And what are they? What does winning the peace look
35:39
like? It's innovation across every
35:41
single area of society with Foreign Office money and World
35:46
Economic foreign money and the total transformation of
35:50
everything. And it's not new.
35:52
Crisis has been going on for a long time.
35:54
We've talked a bit about the agreement that's currently
35:57
playing out between Estonia, Ukraine and the UK and how
36:01
that's working on the ground in in London earlier this year.
36:06
But actually we can look back to this document.
36:09
This is the D5 charter. This was signed back in 2014, a
36:15
digital cooperation charter between Estonia, Israel, New
36:20
Zealand, South Korea, and then signed in the bottom right hand
36:24
corner by Francis Maude at the Cabinet Office, who is a great
36:27
old friend of UK column. Because we talked about this
36:30
back then, didn't you? Well, you should say you did,
36:32
Brian. Absolutely, because we pointed
36:35
out that Francis Maude was boasting of a memorandum of
36:38
understanding with the with Israel, which included all of
36:41
our security agencies, GCHQ, MI6MI5.
36:47
It brought in many of the top universities and all of a sudden
36:52
we were going to be working in partnership with Israel.
36:56
None of it explained in Parliament to the to the members
37:00
of the Parliament, none of it explained to the British
37:04
electorate. We were simply told that from
37:07
then on we were in partnership with Israel.
37:10
And meanwhile Unit 8200, the intelligence agency, was let
37:16
loose with a lot of data about individuals and organisations in
37:21
UK. And many people say yes, this
37:24
was the same organization whose experts began to bury into the
37:29
NHS data mountain. Let's remember that Francis
37:33
Maude, of course, as a Conservative MP, was also the
37:37
Minister for Transparency. And what a brilliant job he did
37:42
of making sure his Conservative transparency was about as opaque
37:46
as you can get. Yeah, so.
37:49
That's what all of these clandestine operations are
37:53
about, isn't it? It's transparency.
37:55
Yes, and let's just remind the audience that here's the report
37:58
from March 2014. We had to draw a diagram to make
38:02
this simple to understand, but Francis Maude central to the
38:08
fact that very, very important strategic aspects of UK such as
38:13
the intelligence services but also health were being drawn
38:17
into this web controlled by Israel.
38:21
So a lot of questions to be asked, not only of Keir Starmer
38:25
and Labour's connections, but also the Conservative Party as
38:29
well. Yes, absolutely.
38:31
And, and what that supposedly innocuous digital identity
38:36
scheme is actually really about and what is it all connecting to
38:40
now? I'll just very quickly whip us
38:41
back to where I started, Global Progress Action Summit.
38:45
And, and as Sandy said, we should be talking about Morgan
38:50
McSweeney and this organization, Labour Together, which actually
38:53
ran that event. All right.
38:55
So Labour Together, we're running this alongside IPPR, the
38:57
Institute of Public Policy Research and the American
39:00
organization Centre of American Progress.
39:03
But the the London job was done by Labour Together.
39:06
And this is a think tank introducing bold ideas for the
39:11
Labour government. It was brought through in what
39:13
they call Labour's wilderness years and it's currently run by
39:19
a bunch of people. We'll put a link and have a look
39:21
at the team. It's interesting, Matthew Upton,
39:23
who spent quite a number of years at the Citizens Advice
39:26
Bureau, this guy, Ben Sarita, who was actually most recently
39:30
the chief of staff to David Halpern at the Behavioural
39:32
Insights team. So it gives you a sense of the
39:34
the whole kind of philosophy here.
39:37
And then also on the Advisory Board, some real big hitters,
39:40
including Jeff Morgan, former CEO of Nestor, former CEO of the
39:44
Young Foundation, policy advisor to Blair, the founding director
39:46
Demos. And then also Anand Menon, who
39:49
is a trustee at Full Fact and also a council member of the
39:53
European Council on Foreign Relations, which was founded by
39:56
George Soros and Daniel Sachs, who I mentioned he's also a
39:59
member of there. And also this guy meant Menon is
40:02
a, is a fellow of Chatham House as well.
40:04
So these are the people we're actually putting the strings
40:06
behind. His policy agenda and Morgan
40:09
Sweeney absolutely sits at the centre of it.
40:12
This is Starmer's chief of staff playing dirty tricks.
40:17
He got Corbyn ousted from the Labour Party by funnelling money
40:23
that had been brought into Labour together by people like
40:26
Martin Taylor, who's a hedge fund manager who is actually
40:29
given five and a half £1,000,000 to Labour over the past few
40:32
years. And importantly Trevor Chinn,
40:35
again who Sandy mentioned you can you see in this picture, my
40:38
fave picks this on the left hand side there, that's Trevor Chene
40:41
alongside Tony Blair, another bunch of deplorables and slap
40:45
bang in the middle, the late Lord Jacob Rothschild.
40:47
And interestingly, the operation that Sweeney was running inside
40:51
Labour together to get rid of Corbyn was called Operation Red
40:55
Shield, which is actually what Rothschild means.
40:59
That's pure. Coincidence, which I'm sure,
41:01
yes, I'm sure it's pure coincidence.
41:03
And then just to reiterate, a lot of that information came
41:05
from this excellent film, um, from Double Down news journalist
41:10
Paul Holden, the scandal that could bring down Keir Starmer
41:13
government if we lived in a sane and decent world.
41:16
But I'm not entirely sure based on what I've just said, that we
41:19
do anyway. Okay.
41:21
Lots to think about there, Ben. Thank you for that excellent
41:24
analysis. Now we're just going to say UK
41:28
column only can only operate with the financial support that
41:32
we get from people who are members and pay us on a monthly
41:35
or annual basis or take out a live subscription or people who
41:39
are kind enough to donate or people who are purchasing from
41:44
our shop. So if you want UK to column to
41:46
continue, then get onto the website.
41:49
Click here to go to support our work and please join us with a
41:55
monthly membership, for example, to keep UK column not only going
42:00
but expanding because that is exactly what we want to do now.
42:04
I'm also just going to highlight Saturday 18th of October for our
42:09
UK on Location event in York. All the tickets for the actual
42:14
event are sold out, but you do have the opportunity to still
42:18
watch this online. So if you want to be there in
42:22
spirit and see what's happening and we'll be treating you as if
42:26
you are with us at the event, then get on to the UK column
42:30
shop and you can buy an online ticket to join us.
42:35
OK Sandy, let's welcome you back into the news.
42:38
And of course farming is an area of society at the moment that's
42:44
getting a very rough deal. Food and security of food
42:48
supplies for the nation are strategic.
42:50
That's a strategic requirement. But it's very clear to us that
42:56
things are not going well as far as the ordinary farmers
42:59
concerned. No, it's, I mean, it is in a
43:03
sorry state, British farming. And I'll, we'll be listening in
43:08
a minute to a, a video where the the farmer is, he's remaining
43:13
anonymous. He's being interviewed by a
43:16
fantastic bloke who lives locally, Clive Edwards, who is
43:20
is doing his own, his own thing. He's a Blogger.
43:23
Anyway, this this particular farmer, I know him well, he's
43:27
already gone from a 400 acres right down to 160 because of all
43:33
the restrictions that have been going on.
43:35
And so if we just run this this video and there's two clips, we
43:40
could do them back-to-back about the state of of what the
43:44
Environment Agency are doing with slurry.
43:47
They're basically using the slurry regulations to shut down
43:51
farms. So if you listen to what he has
43:54
to say. But what happens is they all
43:57
come around, the woman or the bloke comes around all nicely
44:00
nicely does the inspection goes away or everyone is all happy.
44:03
And then shortly after you get this, there's a letter coming
44:07
through stating various acts of Parliament and and your
44:12
so-called breaches of the acts of Parliament giving you
44:15
potentially 28 days to bring your farmer to scratch.
44:20
The issue really is majorly heavily in regards to dairy
44:24
farmers or, or farmers with silage clamps, slurry pits or,
44:29
or or anything. If you've got silage bales
44:31
within a certain distance away from the ditch and it goes on
44:36
and on. Most farmers know roughly what
44:39
these regulations apply to. But the problem you've got is
44:43
they're giving farmers 28 days notice to bring their farms up
44:46
to scratch. 1 dairy farmer locally to us here, it was half
44:50
£1,000,000 to bring his farm up to so-called these regulations.
44:55
Well, they're shutting down overnight, pretty much.
45:00
Yeah, this is this is what we're finding.
45:02
And unfortunately they they they're they're using this to to
45:06
again put the nail in the coffin to to the farming industry.
45:10
If we could hit hit, listen to the next one where he actually
45:13
goes through the the reasons why why he feels that that farming
45:18
is being destroyed. Seems to be like a, a massive
45:25
attack against farming in general.
45:27
So you've got the inheritance tax as one aspect, you've got
45:30
the environment agencies another aspect, you've got the loss of
45:33
all these subsidies, another aspect and then bringing in the
45:35
what you call the SFI, sustainable farming incentives.
45:38
So you're really getting paid now, not for growing food.
45:40
We're only getting paid now to maintain hedgerows soil
45:43
management. So you're getting paid really
45:45
not to grow food? Or was that?
45:49
Yeah, in a roundabout ways. They're not.
45:51
They're not publicly stating that.
45:53
But you're getting paid to do herbalays.
45:56
You're getting paid for wildflower meadows.
45:58
You're getting paid to plant trees.
46:00
There's all stuff you can't really eat.
46:02
I know some farmers will say and some land agents will say, yeah,
46:05
but you can still graze around this.
46:07
You can still do, you know, you can still operate on a
46:10
regenerative aspect. But no disrespect.
46:13
We're only we're not even 55% food secure in this country and
46:17
what people aren't realising is food security is actually within
46:22
our 13 aspects of national security.
46:28
Yes, so that, that that farmer he's you know that he's one of
46:32
many, many that are just finding it difficult and there's 5000
46:36
farms already this year that have been closed down because
46:42
they they can't cope. They, they've either sold up or
46:44
they've just, they, they jumped ship.
46:48
And he did say actually, when that when the Environment Agency
46:51
woman was phoning him, he said to the Environment Agency woman,
46:55
listen, if I hear of any farmers that have committed suicide over
47:00
this, you will have blood on your hands.
47:02
And it's, it really is as serious as that.
47:05
Farmers have no way out at the moment.
47:07
They really don't. And I think it's appalling.
47:10
And on top of that, you've got the PCR testing for blue tongue
47:14
and avian flu, which we know that PCR testing doesn't
47:18
indicate disease. Now, Roger Meacock has done a
47:20
lot of a lot of research into this and a lot of forensic work
47:25
on the inefficacy of PCR testing.
47:27
And I've actually put his website in the show notes.
47:31
He's got a company called solutions and he really
47:35
understands and lays it out of, of how PCR testing doesn't work.
47:39
We, we know it doesn't work, but you know, it's it, that's one of
47:42
the reasons they're using to close farms down.
47:45
And, and we've got also the, uh, the fact that the, the, the
47:49
farmer did go on to say that he felt that this was a, a way of
47:53
shutting down beef and, and dairy production before 2049.
47:58
Now this, the whole slurry thing is, is, is, is daft because the,
48:03
you know, the slurry has been there for years and years and
48:06
it's never been a problem. So I I'd also like to just draw
48:12
your attention to the, the, the absolute 0 document, which is
48:20
yeah, the record farms are closing through the inheritance
48:24
tax as well, which is appalling. And the, the whole thing with
48:31
with this whole programme is that it is a plan.
48:34
It's a plan to shut down beef and dairy and and sheep farming
48:38
by 2049. Now this was brought forward in
48:41
the absolute 0 document in 20. It was, it was actually put
48:46
together in 2019 and it was a, a white paper by the University of
48:51
Cambridge, Bath, Nottingham, Strathclyde and Oxford.
48:55
And, and you probably can't see this very well, but on the green
49:00
one, which is food, it actually states now this was, this was
49:04
debated in the House of Lords in 2020 by Lord Brown of Laderton
49:11
and he initiated the debate to take note of the report and to
49:16
put it into immediate action. So they say there that you that
49:22
meat and dairy is to be phased out between 2030, between now
49:27
and 2030 and it, 50% will be phased out.
49:32
And then from 2030 to 2049, no beef and dairy or any meat at
49:37
all. And this lines up with the C40
49:40
cities planetary diet that we all know about.
49:43
And they're, they're really looking for, for doing that.
49:46
And he feels that actually they're, they're going to phase
49:48
it out before then. So that, that was his thoughts
49:51
on it. So it's a it's a pretty
49:53
diabolical situation for our British farmers.
49:57
Thank you very much, Sandy. Diabolical, I think absolute
50:01
perfect word to describe this. But of course the policy isn't
50:05
simply going to come in top down.
50:07
The governments going to tell us and it's going to be enacted.
50:10
The government needs to get the population at large to install
50:16
that policy itself. And how is the government going
50:19
to do it? It's going to manipulate people.
50:22
Ben, over to you. Absolutely.
50:23
It's going to manipulate people. They're creating an army of
50:26
change agents across the whole of the country.
50:29
And we talked a lot about ID cards today.
50:32
It's been the buzz in the country over the past few days
50:36
since they announced it on Thursday 25th of September.
50:39
But actually I think that is at least in part a cover for
50:44
something else which was announced on the same day, which
50:47
is the this report from what's his name again, Steve Reed OBE,
50:57
who is backing true Patriots to lead UK renewal apparently with
51:03
a £5 billion investment. And they want to give new powers
51:08
to let residents was, they say, reclaim beloved assets and drive
51:12
Patriotic Renewal Street by St. Live delivering on the plan for
51:18
change. Let's have a little listen to
51:20
Keir Starmer talking about it. Everybody has private place in
51:24
where they live. They want the very best for
51:29
where they live and real ambition.
51:32
What they really want is a government that comes up
51:34
alongside that understands that pride and that ambition and
51:39
that's what we're doing. Funding is significant and it's
51:42
really important, but the way in which the money will be used is
51:45
hugely important because it's not Whitehall dictating what's
51:48
going to be done, it's people with skin in the game, local
51:52
panels and they will know their patch, they will know the thing
51:57
that will make a real difference in their community and we're
51:59
empowering them to take those decisions.
52:05
So people, local communities have pride in the places where
52:09
they live and apparently what they want is for government to
52:13
sneak up alongside that and latch onto it and inject a load
52:19
of money into it. And essentially what this is,
52:21
this is social engineering, right?
52:24
So you've got £5 billion of taxpayer money that we've all
52:28
contributed to. The government is then going to
52:31
redirect back out into local communities, but not to
52:35
everybody, because they could do that through a tax cut.
52:37
And they're not going to give us a tax cut, are they, because
52:39
they need to be in charge of everything.
52:41
And they're going to direct it to panels, keeping in local
52:44
communities that are aligned ultimately to their
52:47
transformation agenda. And it all hinges around this
52:49
report. Pride in place, like I say, came
52:51
out on 25th of September. And from the introduction to the
52:56
report we can see here from Steve Reed.
52:59
Make no mistake, this is a pilot in a new way of governing and it
53:04
dwarfs anything that has come before.
53:08
That's quite a statement, isn't it?
53:09
Steve Reed OBE, who Sandy said earlier on in her report was
53:16
actually a key McSweeney ally. So I wasn't aware of that,
53:19
right. So this guy needs needs to be
53:21
looked at in more detail. And I'll probably do another
53:24
longer report on this next week because it taps into a whole
53:27
network of these organizations who are facilitating this.
53:30
But just to give you a little pricey right now, this
53:32
programme, this Pride in place programme, it touches on
53:36
community spaces, public spaces, High Street and town centre
53:40
revitalization, neighborhood policing, new types of anti
53:43
social behaviour orders, what they call digital inclusion,
53:47
litter picking a bunch of money to go into something called the
53:51
I Will campaign, which is a Rothschild slash Chatham House
53:55
slash Blair aligned social transformation program, green
53:59
infrastructure, an expansion of the blue plaque scheme.
54:03
So they're going to be sort of elevating new and different
54:06
types of people into positions of kind of canonical relevance
54:12
in the country. Giving an award of a Blue Plat.
54:15
Remember, of course, that when when we were fully inside the
54:19
European Union, instead of half in and half out as we are today,
54:24
that anytime EU regeneration money came into the country to
54:28
control regeneration in cities, up went the plaque to say that
54:34
the money had come from the European Union.
54:37
So this is this is all tactics. But what's in my head, Ben, is
54:41
big society. David Cameron back in 2010, I
54:45
think it was talking about having an army.
54:48
That was the word, an army of activists, mainly young people
54:53
in order to change society. So David Cameron was talking
54:57
about what was coming. Now we're seeing the Labour
55:00
Party putting this into, into, into full.
55:03
Yeah, absolutely. It's exactly the same thing.
55:06
And this is all aligned to the Solinsky Community Organiser
55:09
approach to communist revolution.
55:12
That's what we're looking at here.
55:14
As I said, I'll come back to this next week or do more
55:16
thorough reports. There's loads in it, but just a
55:18
couple of things to pull out from from the report.
55:22
This is propaganda. What do we see in front of us?
55:25
Well, what I see is a white man sitting alone, looking away from
55:29
the camera on the left hand side.
55:31
And then the diverse chatting, the friendly, upbeat new world.
55:36
The power people. They're exactly, they're on the
55:38
right hand side. And then also, what was the
55:40
first case study that they bring in?
55:42
This was an interesting one. It's the Cornwall Libraries
55:45
Partnership Program where they've been working with the
55:48
Cornwall Council resettlement team to create safe spaces for
55:51
Afghan families to integrate into Cornish communities.
55:56
And since this is what's happening and while the the big
55:59
for Aurora over the the ID cards is is playing out in the press
56:03
is. Going on in the background,
56:04
boats, ID cards and rubber boats.
56:06
Exactly. Ben, thank you very much for
56:08
that. Sandy, let's bring you back in.
56:11
We promised our viewers today that we talk about a positive
56:14
aspect of what people can do. The first thing is people have
56:18
to understand what is happening, how it's being done, what the
56:21
policy really means. Don't think that you shouldn't
56:25
pay attention to Starmer. You should listen to every
56:28
single word the man says because he means what he says.
56:32
So don't dismiss it as nonsense, Nonsense.
56:35
We have to understand what's being said to us.
56:38
But if we do understand what the policy is, then when local
56:42
people act in a calculated, measured and intelligent way,
56:47
they can achieve results. Sandy, what have you got?
56:52
Well, a historic seaside town of Weston Super Mare has scrapped
56:58
its plans to become a council of sanctuary this last week.
57:03
It's a, it's a, it came after a significant backlash of, of, of
57:08
people in the community who actually saw, saw reason.
57:13
And these people are not that they voted unanimously on the
57:17
council, but to, to, to rescind what, what what had been put in
57:22
place. Now is it is interesting.
57:26
More than 100 protesters gathered outside.
57:29
You know, there's a lot of pro, you know, people pro the, the,
57:34
the Council of sanctuary, but more people were against it.
57:38
And unfortunately, it, it, it, it did.
57:42
There were some people chanting outside, but it's, you know,
57:45
you, you're always going to get that.
57:47
Now it's, it's not what I want to get across really is that
57:50
this is this has all been brought in to our communities,
57:54
as Ben was talking about with almost infiltration, open
57:57
infiltration of really subversive propaganda.
58:02
And there's been a lot of of, of pubs popping up in Weston Super
58:08
Mare and a lot of sort of, I think they're sort of like NGOs
58:12
really that have been brought into place.
58:14
You've got, let's have a look at some of these.
58:17
They're talking towns and all this is under something called
58:22
Rens, which is the racial equality North Somerset.
58:26
And underneath Rens is these different, different kind of
58:32
organisations and these organisations are all part of
58:36
the communitarian agenda. It is, it's all about inclusion,
58:40
diversity, equity and inclusion. And all of this has been
58:44
subjected on, on Weston Super Mare residents and they've seen
58:50
through it. And it's not nobody's racist
58:53
there. They're all very inclusive of
58:55
all the people that have been brought in and integrated over a
58:58
long period of time. It's not racism.
59:01
What they've done is, is it's really made a decision based on
59:03
common sense. And I, I think that it to give
59:08
people some sort of hope really that you can look at this and
59:12
look at it really, really subjectively and understand that
59:17
you don't have to go along with it.
59:18
You can, you can, you know, campaign against it.
59:23
And they managed to, to, to, to pull it, pull it out really.
59:27
And I think it was now just trying to remember the.
59:30
Yeah, it was the majority of residents expressed their
59:32
opposition against the plan, with 339 in opposition compared
59:36
to just 92 supporting the process.
59:39
So, you know, they obviously the committee called to the council
59:42
to further pursue harmony with people without becoming part of
59:46
the Council of sanctuary. And I think there's a lovely
59:49
quote at the end here from, I think his name's James.
59:55
Oh yeah, they've got a couple of Yeah, here he is.
59:57
James. James Clayton.
59:59
And he says I'm, I'm against. What I'm against is for external
1:00:04
organisations to dictate to Western Supermare how we should
1:00:08
behave or how we should show compassion.
1:00:11
We already know how to look at one another and be good
1:00:14
neighbors or look after one another and be good neighbors.
1:00:17
Just signing up to a scheme is replacing a general local
1:00:21
goodwill. With ticking boxes and
1:00:23
bureaucracy. And he, he also said he, he
1:00:26
didn't need, uh, an external organization to actually show
1:00:30
the community how to be compassionate.
1:00:32
They don't need that. They can be compassionate on
1:00:34
their own. You don't need these community
1:00:36
organisers coming in with their sort of Saul Alinsky RA rules
1:00:41
for radicals ideologies, umm, trying to really tip the balance
1:00:46
and bring, bring in what I think is the biggest driver of of
1:00:51
change, which is communitarianism, which is big
1:00:55
society, which is the third way that Tony Blair talked about.
1:01:00
But the big bad C word communitarianism isn't really
1:01:03
known in this country very much. I mean, not many people know it
1:01:07
is actually communitarian EU law.
1:01:11
So I will it later on in the week that I have done a, a, a
1:01:16
talk with Lark in Texas on this, on communitarianism.
1:01:20
So do, do look, do look at that, because you'll understand that
1:01:24
communitarianism is tyranny with a :), it's being brought into
1:01:28
your community now, and we need to see it for what it is.
1:01:33
Sandy, thank you very much for that and well done.
1:01:35
The people in Weston Super Mare. Of course you can't fight what
1:01:40
you don't, what you can't see or you don't understand.
1:01:43
So understanding the policies that the government, Keir
1:01:46
Starmer, the global organisations are trying to
1:01:49
bring in, the understanding, properly understanding these is
1:01:54
vital because once you understand the policies, you can
1:01:57
argue against it in a measured way that's capable of winning
1:02:02
over the hearts and minds of your local councillors.
1:02:06
And those local councillors, as Sandy has demonstrated, are the
1:02:09
very people who are capable of stopping powerful government
1:02:14
policy in its tracks. So it's learning how to fight
1:02:18
and the start is to understand what is being done.
1:02:21
And of course, UK column working extremely hard to bring out the
1:02:26
information and the detail of the attack against us.
1:02:30
But I'm going to end today's news by saying in my opinion and
1:02:34
I'm sure the opinion of the man on the Clapham omnibus, we are
1:02:37
watching absolute treason as our nation state is dismantled in
1:02:43
front of our very eyes. But you can do something about
1:02:46
that. We must end there.
1:02:48
Sandy. Ben, thank you very much for
1:02:50
joining me today. We will be having UK Column
1:02:55
EXTRA in a few minutes time and of course, UK Column news.
1:02:59
We'll be back at 1:00 on Wednesday.
1:03:02
See you then. Bye bye.