Latest / The Epstein Chronicles / Mega Edition: Joe Rogan And His Jeffrey Epstein Commentary (5/11/26)

Transcript

Mega Edition: Joe Rogan And His Jeffrey Epstein Commentary (5/11/26) · The Epstein Chronicles

0:00
Speaker 1: What's up everyone, and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles.
0:05
So Joe Rogan once again is saying the quiet part
0:08
out loud about Bill Clinton and his pal Jeffrey Epstein. Now,
0:12
I know a lot of people don't like to talk
0:14
about this because you know, he's one of the faves
0:17
and all. But the fact is, Bill Clinton and Jeffrey
0:20
Epstein we're way closer than a lot of people want
0:23
to admit. And I'm old enough to remember how crazy
0:26
everybody went over alex Acosta. Meanwhile, those same people have
0:31
nothing to say about Bill Clinton. Makes you wonder, doesn't it.
0:35
But I'll leave the hypocrites up to their own devices here.
0:38
We'll continue doing what we've always done, eviscerated anybody who
0:42
was paling around with Jeffrey Epstein, and I don't care
0:46
what political party they rock with. Today's article is from
0:50
the Deli Mail headline Joe Rogan suggests Bill Clinton was
0:54
blackmail by Jeffrey Epstein over twenty six trips on pedophile's
0:58
private plane and claims infamous painting of President in blue
1:03
dress is billionaire saying I got you, bitch. This article
1:08
was authored by Andrea Cavalier, podcaster Joe Rogan has suggested
1:14
that Jeffrey Epstein was blackmailing Bill Clinton by displaying a
1:18
massive painting of the former president wearing a dress in
1:22
his New York home. In a recent episode of The
1:25
Joe Rogan Experience, Rogan brought up the painting, first revealed
1:29
by Daily Mail dot Com in twenty eighteen, that hung
1:33
in the foyer of Epstein's Manhattan apartment before he was
1:37
found dead by suicide, allegedly in a jail cell after
1:40
being accused of running a sex trafficking ring for underage girls.
1:45
And let's not even talk about the flights on the plane. Okay, Fine,
1:49
he was on the plane. Great. You know what really
1:52
gets me going the fact that Jeffrey Epstein went to
1:55
the White House over seventeen times. We're gonna talk about that. Ever,
2:00
What the hell was he doing at the White House
2:01
seventeen times? Why was Jeffrey Epstein paling around with the
2:05
President of the United States seventeen different times at the
2:10
White House? Anybody going to explain that. Flight logs have
2:13
shown that Clinton was aboard the financiers Pedophiles Boeing seven
2:18
to twenty seven jet a total of twenty six times
2:21
between two thousand and one and two thousand and three,
2:25
Clinton has denied being on Epstein's pedophile island Little Saint James,
2:29
and this spokesperson angel Arena, said the former president knows
2:34
nothing about Epstein's terrible crimes. The problem with all of
2:37
that is everything angel Urana said in that KANDAZ statement
2:42
back in the day that they haven't updated, by the way,
2:45
is basically a lie. How many more times do we
2:48
need to hear people in court or under oath say
2:51
that Bill Clinton was on the plane or on the island,
2:54
because you know, Bill Clinton is the pinnacle of truth, right,
2:58
old salt and Earth kind of guy that's never told
3:00
the lie in his life. The painting depicting Clinton lounging
3:04
on a chair in the Oval office, wearing red heels
3:07
and posing suggestively in a blue dress redolent of Monica Lewinsky,
3:13
was in a room off the stairway of the Upper
3:15
east Side townhouse. That painting is like I got you, bitch,
3:20
Rogan said about Epstein keeping that painting in his home, adding,
3:24
you know he knows about it. And let's not forget
3:28
how much money Jeffrey Epstein gave to Bill Clinton to
3:31
get Bill Clinton's foundation off the ground. And I know
3:35
some people out there are like, yeah, right, that never happened. Well,
3:38
like usual, I show up with receipts. From an article
3:41
in Yahoo that was originally published in twenty nineteen, author
3:46
Jack Crow writes mister Epstein was part of the original
3:50
group that conceived the Clinton Global Initiative, which is described
3:54
as a project bringing together a community of global leaders
3:58
to devise and implement in a solutions to some of
4:01
the world's most pressing challenges. Attorneys Alan Dershowitz and Gerald
4:06
Lefcourt wrote in the letter, which was first reported by
4:09
Fox News in twenty sixteen. So that's not me telling
4:14
you that. That's his own lawyer's telling you that, Alan
4:16
Dershowitz telling you that. But please tell me a little
4:19
bit more about middle manager alex Acosta. Rogan continued, Imagine
4:25
if I knew some horrible, dark secrets about you, and
4:28
you came over to my house and I have a
4:30
giant painting of you right when you walk into the
4:32
front door, of you in address, and I'm like, hey, buddy,
4:36
and I've said that from the beginning. What's the purpose
4:39
of having that sort of painting on the wall. I
4:41
know people want to joke about it, and you know
4:44
that's fine. There are a million jokes to be made.
4:47
But the implications of what it really means it's pretty
4:50
serious and not for nothing. But flip the script real quick.
4:53
Imagine if that was Trump in address on Jeffrey Epstein's wall,
4:57
do you think the legacy media would be giving him
4:59
a pass? That's all I'm asking for here, folks, a
5:01
little consistency. It doesn't matter who you are. If you
5:05
were hanging around Epstein, you were helping him refurbish his image,
5:09
you were taking part in his crimes. You need to
5:12
be eviscerated. And all of these so called advocates out here,
5:15
all of these people who say that they care about
5:18
what happened in the Epstein case, who completely ignore Bill Clinton,
5:22
well they don't care. All they're looking to do is
5:25
score some political points in hopes that they're shitty elected
5:28
politicians can hold onto power. Clinton spokesperson confirmed that in
5:33
two thousand and two and two thousand and three, the
5:36
former president took four trips on the pedophile's private plane
5:41
with multiple stops, and that staff end to Secret Service
5:45
detail traveled on every leg and It's amazing to me
5:48
that the legacy media lets Angel Arena get away with
5:52
this shit. This dude's telling you lies, straight up, point
5:55
blank period lies that has been documented in the trial
5:59
of Glen Maxwell and in all of these different depositions
6:03
that have been unsealed. And on the flip side of that,
6:06
all we have is the word of Bill Clinton and
6:09
Angel Arena really, and that's what people are going to believe.
6:13
Oh yeah, Well, Angel Lorena said that Bill Clinton was
6:16
never there, So he was never there, talk about cognitive dissonance.
6:22
One of Epstein's survivors, Virginia Roberts, claimed she saw Clinton
6:26
on the island for a dinner held in his honor
6:28
shortly after he left office, and she stood by that
6:31
claim when questioned under oath. So has Angel Arena been
6:35
questioned under oath? How about Bill Clinton? Okay, I'm going
6:38
to go with the people who were questioned under oath.
6:42
The original painting is called Parsing Bill and is by
6:46
Australian American artist Patrina Ryan Clyde. Although it is unclear
6:51
if Epstein had bought the canvas or had a print mounted,
6:55
Ryan Clyde had the picture as an exhibit for her
6:59
degree show when she graduated with an MFA in twenty
7:03
twelve from the New York Academy of Art. And we've
7:06
talked about the New York Academy of Art before at length,
7:10
and how they helped out with Epstein, the whole Maria
7:13
Farmer story. And it's crazy how many connections Epstein had
7:17
to the New York Academy of Art, another topic hardly
7:21
explored by the legacy media. By the way, the painting
7:25
was secretly snapped inside his lavish, fifty six million dollar
7:29
home in October twenty twelve, four years after Epstein completed
7:34
his sweetheart deal for prostitution of a minor and seven
7:37
years before he was accused of running a sex trafficking
7:40
ring of underage girls. The source, who asked to remain anonymous,
7:45
was visiting Epstein to present a business proposal. Imagine showing
7:49
up to somebody's house and seeing that picture on the
7:52
wall and all of the other weird ass decor. I'd
7:55
be turning right around and walking out of that house.
7:58
Business proposal be damned. I don't want to be in
8:00
business with somebody like this, ever, she told Deli Mail
8:04
TV at the time. It was absolutely Bill Clinton. It
8:08
was shocking. It was definitely a painting of him. It
8:11
was very provocative sexual picture. He was wearing heels, a
8:15
blue dress, and his hand was in a weird position.
8:18
The color of the dress seemed to be pointed reference
8:21
to Clinton's former intern Monica Lewinsky, who had a blue
8:25
dress during their infamous sexual encounter in the White House.
8:29
The dress is also strikingly similar to one worn by
8:32
Hillary Clinton at the two thousand and nine Kennedy Center Honors.
8:37
And it looks way more like the Clinton dress to
8:39
me than the Monica Lewinsky one, And that too, in
8:43
my opinion, was by design some people. Just as his
8:46
legs crossed over the arm of a chair with blood
8:48
red heels, hovering over a rug that seems to bear
8:52
the presidential seal, The shoulder of the blue dress hangs
8:56
off to the side as Clinton seems to point a
8:59
finger towards Ward's the viewer. That image is apparently inspired
9:03
by the famous image of Uncle Sam used in James
9:06
Montgomery Flag's World War One recruiting poster boy That's Nice. Hunh.
9:12
The source that spotted the painting said she saw it
9:15
while being led from the office to his personal quarters.
9:18
When we saw the portrait, it was through the door
9:21
that had been left temporarily opened by his housekeeper or
9:24
his butler. I thought, why in the world would Epstein
9:28
have that up. I didn't even know that they knew
9:30
each other. Although she was stunned by the painting, her
9:34
business partner managed to take a snap of the painting.
9:37
She said, he took a picture. I was mortified because
9:40
there were cameras everywhere, again another person confirming that Epstein's
9:45
pad was wired up for surveillance. The source added that
9:49
she was inside Epstein's home for around an hour and
9:52
a half for the meeting, which had been arranged by
9:55
his then assistant Leslie Groff. The blonde was named as
9:59
a possible a pomplice and granted immunity in Epstein's controversial
10:04
plea deal in two thousand and eight. She's part of
10:06
the Corps four and how leslie Groff was able to
10:09
avoid all of this is pretty amazing. But like they
10:12
said here, the non prosecution deal that Epstein scored protected
10:16
the whole entire Core four from prosecution. It also protected
10:20
Endyke and Cohn. Epstein committed suicide allegedly at age sixty six,
10:26
in August of twenty nineteen in a Manhattan jail cell
10:30
while awaiting trial for sex trafficking. Last month, the US
10:34
government urged an appeals court the uphold Glenn Maxwell's conviction
10:38
and twenty year prison sentence for helping the disgraced pedophile
10:42
sexually abused teenage girls. Maxwell, sixty one, is behind bars
10:47
in Tallahassee, Florida, after a Manhattan jerry convicted her in
10:51
December twenty twenty one on five charges for recruiting and
10:55
grooming four girls for Epstein to abuse between nineteen ninety
10:59
four and two thousand and four. Her accusers have said
11:03
she and Epstein at first made them feel welcome in
11:07
their orbit, before Epstein began demanding sexualized massages. Hundreds of
11:12
women have said he abused them. In her appeal, Maxwell,
11:16
daughter of late British medio mogul Robert Maxwell, accused prosecutors
11:21
of making her a scapegoat because Epstein was dead and
11:24
public outrage demanded that someone else absorbed the blame. So ridiculous.
11:29
All she did was get what she deserved. She played
11:32
her part, and now she's getting her just deserts. Prosecutors
11:36
rejected her claims that they waited too long to bring charges,
11:40
and that Epstein's two thousand and seven non prosecution agreement
11:43
arising from alleged abuse at his Palm Beach, Florida mansion
11:47
also immunized her. They also said the trial judge had
11:51
discretion to conclude that Maxwell's jury was fair and impartial,
11:56
though one juror failed to disclose during pre trial questioning
12:00
that he had been sexually abused as a child. Maxwell
12:04
is eligible for release in July of twenty thirty seven,
12:07
with credit for good behavior and the two years she
12:10
spent in jail before being imprisoned. She should be in
12:14
prison for the rest of her life for what she did.
12:17
She got off light. I know she doesn't believe that,
12:20
but she got off light. Others who were friendly with
12:23
Epstein have seen their reputations tarred or ruined. Among them
12:28
Britain's Prince Andrew and former JP Morgan, Chase executive and
12:32
Barclay's chief executive Jess Staley. JP Morgan and Deutsche Bank,
12:37
which both had Epstein as a client, are paying a
12:40
combined three hundred and sixty five million dollars to Epstein's
12:44
accusers over their work for him. The US Virgin Islands,
12:48
where Epstein had a home, is also suing JP Morgan.
12:51
And that's not even the half of it. There's so
12:53
many people that were tied to this guy that should
12:56
be having their reputations blown up that aren't even being
12:59
talked about that it would make your head spin. But
13:02
here we are, all these years later, and the legacy
13:04
media is still providing cover for all of Jeffrey Epstein's buddies.
13:09
All right, folks, that's gonna do it for this one.
13:11
All of the information that goes with this episode can
13:14
be found in the description box article today from uprocks
13:18
dot com, and it is about Adam. About Adam Perry
13:25
Lang's appearance on The Joe Rogan Experience, the headline Joe
13:31
Rogan's most recent podcast guest, and the lack of questions
13:35
about his past have raised some eyebrows. The author of
13:38
this piece from uprocks is Zach Johnston. If you follow
13:43
the Joe Rogan Experience, even in a passive way, you'll
13:47
know how often the mysterious death of Jeffrey Epstein comes up.
13:50
For sure, I pretty much religiously listened to Joe Rogan's
13:54
podcast while I'm hiking and climbing and on adventures, and
13:58
he talks about Epstein all the time. And for the
14:01
most part, Rogan's awesome. I would say ninety nine point
14:05
five percent of the time. Rogan is just incredible with
14:08
the way he formats a show and how he goes
14:11
about his business. But in this case, I really think
14:14
that he missed a solid chance here to really really
14:19
dig in and get some answers from the chef. You
14:24
can simply google Joe Rogan Experience Jeffrey Epstein, and pages
14:28
of clips of Rogan and different guests spanning dozens of
14:32
episodes will pop up. If you listen to Rogan a
14:35
little more closely, you'll also know whenever Epstein does come up,
14:39
the infamous Lolita Express comes up too, Epstein's private plane.
14:44
Rogan usually brings up brings it up in relation to
14:47
former President Bill Clinton by saying, while emphasizing every single
14:51
syllable Bill Clinton wrote on the Lolita Express no less
14:55
than twenty six times, Well, yeah, why shouldn't he bring
14:58
that up. It's like the author of this this article
15:00
is mad that he would bring up Bill Clinton. I
15:02
don't understand. I just don't understand what the whole rallying
15:06
around Bill Clinton is these days. I mean, the guy's
15:09
been credibly accused of by how many women, and still
15:12
he's like somebody that people are rallying around to defend.
15:15
And really, what that comes down to, folks, is tribalism, right,
15:18
it comes down to our side versus their side. We're
15:21
going to protect our side so it doesn't look like
15:24
we're all bad. It's so stupid, and you know what,
15:27
not to digress and jump off topic for a second. Well,
15:30
kind of the same topic. But lately on Twitter, on
15:33
a bunch of threads that I've been tagged in, I've
15:35
been seeing a lot of partisan tribalism and it's a
15:39
bunch of bullshit. If you tag me in one of
15:42
those posts, you, with your tribalism and your nonsense, do
15:45
not accept, do not expect a response from men. I'm
15:48
not gonna talk about any of that. Bs. There is
15:51
plenty of scumbags to go around on both sides of
15:54
the aisle, all right, there's no good guys here. Everybody
15:56
is a great character, folks, Come on now. Worth noting
16:01
Rogan rarely brings up how many times current President Donald
16:04
Trump was on that very same plane, So you have
16:08
to engage in what about ism? Right, so if you
16:10
bring up one person, you have to bring up the other. No,
16:12
that's not how this works. Okay, we talk about each
16:15
person and we move forward and then talk about the
16:19
next person. We don't have to use what aboutism? Okay,
16:21
just because you bring up Clinton, you don't have to
16:24
bring up Trump. And just because you bring up Trump,
16:26
you don't have to bring up Clinton. Okay. There are
16:29
plenty scummy on their own folks, which makes this week's
16:33
guest a curious pick for the podcast. Host Rogan welcomed
16:37
famed Los Angeles steakhouse chef Adam Perry Lang apl restaurant,
16:42
to talk about steak and how Lang's ultra high end
16:45
restaurant is faring during the lockdown. Lang is a renowned
16:50
chef and Rogan loves meat, So that bit holds water. Okay, Well, yeah,
16:54
he is a renowned chef, no doubt about it. And
16:56
Rogan not only loves meat, he's a prolific hunter. He
16:59
does a lot of bowhunt. If you're not familiar with
17:01
Joe Rogan, so yeah, I could see why he won't look.
17:04
I could understand why Rogan would have a chef on
17:06
the show, and I could even understand why he'd have
17:08
Adam perry Lang on the show. But what I don't
17:11
understand is the lack of hard questions that is so Unrogan,
17:15
like that I don't even know what's going on there,
17:17
Like did he have a new strain of weed that
17:20
he was blasting before the show or during the show,
17:22
and it made him forget I mean, I want to
17:24
give Joe Rogan the benefit of the doubt more than anybody, honestly,
17:27
because all kidding aside, you know, his podcast is something
17:32
that is it's an incredible resource for the most part.
17:37
So it's just disappointing when you see stuff like this
17:39
and you see that Adam perry Lang was on there
17:42
and he wasn't really quiz the way he should be.
17:47
But Adam perry Lang worked for Epstein and Rogan somehow
17:50
didn't bring this up a single time during the two
17:53
hour interview. Instead, they talked about steak and that's pretty
17:57
much it. Look I get it again, I get it.
18:00
Rogan wanted to have Adam perry Lang on the show
18:03
Steaks blah blah blah. I understand, but come on, Joe,
18:06
there was nobody else that you could have picked to
18:07
be on the podcast. It had to be Adam Perry Lang.
18:10
There's nobody else that cooks a mean steak. I mean,
18:14
especially considering just recently. Adam Perry Lang was brought up
18:20
in the Papers from the Sun and the Documents from
18:23
the Sun, one of the seventy people. So you would
18:26
think Rogan would at the very least have a couple
18:29
of questions. Right, Look, I have to tell you, a
18:32
friend or not, if you come on to my podcast
18:34
or my show and you had anything to do with
18:37
Jeffrey Epstein, you can expect I Am talking the most hardball,
18:42
digging questions you can possibly imagine, and it won't be
18:46
done in a nice way to be honest with you, Right,
18:49
friend or not, you have to answer for your transgressions.
18:52
You have to answer for your time with Jeffrey Epstein.
18:55
I mean, has anybody asked this guy about it? Has
18:58
this guy really has he ever come out and done
18:59
a full on interview about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein
19:03
or what he saw while he was Epstein chef. Look,
19:07
there's a lot there. I mean, look, the end of
19:09
the day, he can end it all. Adam Perry Lankin
19:13
ended all by coming out and doing an interview and
19:15
explaining his role. Go to the FBI and tell them, look,
19:18
this is what I saw. Let's get me, let's get
19:20
on record. Let's go on record. I know that's what
19:22
I would do if I was in issues. But no,
19:25
none of these people seem to care enough about the
19:27
survivors to do that. All of these people want. All
19:30
these people want is for this to go away. They
19:32
don't want it to ruin their public image and affect
19:35
their ability to earn. That's all they care about. They
19:37
don't care about these survivors, and it's sickening to me.
19:42
It was confirmed that Lang spent considerable time traveling with
19:45
Epstein and his crew to all the spots where Epstein
19:47
was allegedly flying in underage girls to attend lavish parties
19:51
he threw for celebrities, politicians, billionaires, and royalty. Lang himself
19:56
admitted he was on some of the flights and worked
19:59
in Epstein's home, but told Eedter in twenty nineteen that
20:03
he was unaware of any wrongdoing going on all around him.
20:06
Oh yeah, I'm sure that's what they all said, right
20:08
and eater. That was the publication that chased him down.
20:12
None of these legacy media outlets thought it was appropriate
20:15
to try and get an interview with Jeffrey Epstein's private
20:18
chef who was flying all over the world with them
20:20
on the plane doing lord knows what. Nobody thought that
20:23
would be an interesting interview. Huh. Nobody thought that some
20:26
hard questions should be asked. Boy, that legacy media sure
20:29
cares about us. What an absolute joke. The legacy media
20:32
is an absolute dumpster fire. My role was limited to
20:38
meal preparation. Lang told ter, I was unaware of the
20:41
depraved behavior and have great sympathy and admiration for the
20:45
brave women who have come forward. Well, have you come forward,
20:49
mister Lang? Have you shown great courage by coming forward?
20:54
Mister Lang? The answer is no, of course not. None
20:57
of these guys have come forward because guess what, all
21:00
of these people have something to hide. In my opinion,
21:02
every single one of these people was an enabler. Every
21:05
single one of these people that was paling around with
21:07
Jeffrey Epstein is under the microscope. At this point, Lang
21:13
hasn't offered any more information since the conversation. In the
21:17
years after Lang worked for Epstein at his new Mexico ranch,
21:20
Palm Beach compound, New York penthouse, and private Caribbean island.
21:25
He's become the toast of the Los Angeles food scene,
21:27
working for Oprah, Mario Batali and Jimmy Kimmel. The latter
21:33
is such a close friend that Kimo let Lang live
21:35
in his beach house after his recent separation and divorce.
21:38
Oh isn't that nice. Wasn't Jimmy Kimmel up there screaming
21:41
down from his ivory tower about the rest of us
21:44
and Cavanaugh and all these other people who were accused
21:48
of sexual assault. Yet he has this Jeffrey Epstein associate
21:53
living with them at his house. This is what I
21:55
mean about these hypocrites, folks, all right, all of these
21:57
hypocrites are ridiculous. I am so against a hero worshiping
22:03
that I can't even begin to explain to you how
22:06
detrimental to people I think it is. You should not
22:09
be worshiping any of these famous people as heroes. They
22:11
are all gray characters, and they are all capable of
22:14
incredible evil like any other human being. Nobody. None of
22:18
these people should be put on a pedestal, especially a
22:20
guy like Jimmy Kimmel, give me a break with this guy.
22:24
While Joe Rogan, a man fairly obsessed with Jeffrey Epstein
22:27
up to this point, choose not to sit and excuse me,
22:31
chose not to ask a single question about Epstein while
22:34
sitting across from one of his former personal chefs who
22:37
was regularly on the Lolita Express, leaves a pretty big
22:40
question mark. And he's receiving a lot of ir from
22:43
Rogan's fans in and on social media and the comments
22:47
section of the episode's YouTube page. So there's a couple
22:51
of comments from people that they posted. One is from
22:54
pure Optics. Shout out to pure Optics from Twitter. H Yeah,
23:00
So these are you know, people that are asking questions
23:03
of why these questions weren't asked to the chef, Adam
23:07
Perry Lang. And they're good questions, right. It's legit to
23:12
ask why Joe Rogan did not ask him anything about
23:15
Jeffrey Epstein, all right, that is a legit question to ask.
23:19
It's a legit criticism, and that's coming from one of
23:22
Joe Rogan's biggest fans. I'll just straight up honest with you.
23:27
The guy is an incredible story as far as a
23:31
podcaster goes and his show is just amazing. So it's
23:34
disappointing to see stuff like this, right, So the criticism
23:39
is warranted, and I think that going forward, if anybody
23:44
has this Adam Perry Lang sitting down in front of them,
23:48
you have to ask these questions, right, You have to
23:50
ask this guy what he knows, what he was involved in.
23:53
Even if he just gives you a canned answer and
23:56
you know, one of those prepared responses, at the very least,
23:59
you did your job as the host of the show
24:02
by trying to dig a little deeper. Instead, they just
24:05
talk about stake, et cetera, et cetera. I don't you know.
24:08
It's one of the word honestly. Honestly, there's one of
24:11
the worst episodes that I've ever listened to on the
24:14
Joe Rogan Experience. And what are their fourteen hundred and
24:18
seventy episodes or something like that, So you know, I
24:21
understand that it doesn't You don't always get it right
24:24
as a podcast host or a content creator. Not everything
24:26
is a home run. Sometimes the content is eh. But
24:30
when it comes to situations like this and the fact
24:32
that Epstein has i mean, Rogan has been so interested
24:35
in the Epstein case. It's just mind boggling to think
24:37
that he didn't have any questions for Adam Perry Lying
24:41
laying in regards to his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Obviously,
24:47
no one has to be fully accountable for their associates
24:49
or employers, but this topic seems like a pretty large
24:52
elephant to leave standing in the room. Of course, nobody
24:56
is responsible for all of their friends or their boss
24:59
or anything like that. Nobody's saying that. Okay, what I'm
25:02
saying is this man was obviously around, he was on
25:04
the planes, he had first hand knowledge, he witnessed things firsthand.
25:09
To say he saw nothing, that's you'd have to be
25:11
real naive to believe that, in my opinion, So it's
25:15
warranted to ask this man, what have you seen? What
25:19
do you know? But Joe Rogan took a different approach
25:23
in this podcast, and it's a disappointing situation because usually
25:28
Rogan be all over it, right, so you can understand
25:31
why people are disappointed, and you can understand why people
25:34
have questions. I would hope that in the future, if
25:38
Perry Lang ever comes back onto the show, that Rogan
25:41
would ask him some harder questions and really, you know,
25:46
travel down that road because the audience wants to know.
25:50
Everybody wants to know what Adam perry Lang saw and
25:54
what he can add to the case. So he should
25:57
really come forward, talk to the investigation and clear his
26:01
name if he wasn't involved. But again, the only outlet
26:05
that has chased him down is eater in twenty nineteen.
26:08
This isn't a story for the legacy media. Nobody in
26:11
the legacy media wants to talk to this guy. I mean,
26:15
think about the resources that the legacy media wastes on
26:17
dumb shit on a regular basis. But this guy who
26:20
was a personal chef on the planes named in the documents,
26:23
nobody wants to talk to him. Rogan doesn't even ask
26:26
him any questions. In my opinion, none of that is okay.
26:31
Adam perry Lang must be questioned, and he must answer
26:38
why he was around Epstein for so long and how
26:42
he can possibly say he did not see anything out
26:45
of the ordinary. I am sorry, but I do not
26:48
believe that, and I don't think anybody who was following
26:53
this case believes that. We know that all of these
26:55
people have the same excuse. Oh, I didn't see anything
26:59
I wasn't around anything, blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.
27:02
And they've been allowed to get away with that. No
27:04
hard questions, nobody's challenged that. Everybody's just been like, oh, okay,
27:07
he said he wasn't he didn't know anything, so he's good.
27:10
He's good to go. It's like the Biden campaign coming
27:13
out and saying, well, the Times investigated this and then
27:15
then they gave us a pass. No, that's not good enough.
27:18
Hard questions need to be asked. And unfortunately, on this
27:22
episode of the Joe Rogan Experience, that was not accomplished.
27:27
Let's hope going forward that Adam Perry Lang is questioned
27:33
in the proper manner by authorities or the legacy media,
27:38
and let's see just exactly what Adam Perry Lang knows.
27:44
If you'd like to contact me, you can do that
27:46
at Bobby Kapuci at protonmeil dot com. That's bo b
27:49
b y c ap U c c I at Protonmeil
27:52
dot com. You can also find me on Twitter at
27:55
bo bby Underscore c ap U c c I. All Right,
28:00
what's up everyone, and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles.
28:04
So Joe Rogan on his podcast was talking about Epstein
28:09
and he says that he also believes that Epstein was
28:13
a CIA or Massad spy. Well, welcome to the party,
28:17
Joe Rogan. We've been saying this for how long here
28:20
on this podcast and elsewhere, right, not just us here,
28:24
But it's obvious, at least to me that Epstein was
28:28
some sort of asset. Now the question is who is
28:32
he being run by? For me, I think the most
28:36
logical answer to that is he was being run by
28:40
both of them. My guess is that it was the
28:44
CIA who okay the operation, and then of course there
28:49
were some Masad elements as well. But the people who
28:53
believe that it was a full on Massad operation, I
28:56
can't get down with that because as strong and as
28:59
powerful as the Masade is, they'll always be the little
29:02
brother to the CIA. And there's nothing that goes on
29:06
in this country or the world that the CIA is
29:09
not aware of. These dudes know what's up, especially if
29:13
you think you're gonna run an operation like this in
29:16
America using somebody like Epstein who's already known to them.
29:20
Let's not forget the FBI, Let's not forget all of
29:23
his other run ins with the law that saw Epstein
29:26
come out unscathed. What can explain all of that? Is
29:29
it just good luck? Is he just the teflon don
29:32
or is there something else going on behind the scenes.
29:37
Today we have an article from the New York Post.
29:40
The author is Ariel Zilbert. Headline Joe Rogan Jeffrey Epstein
29:46
may have been CIA or MASSAD spy. Yeah, no shit,
29:52
But I'll take a different approach than most people. I
29:55
think it's a good thing Rogan's talking about this with
29:58
his reach and his audience. The more people who know
30:01
what really went on here, the better off we are.
30:04
And I've saw some people come out and accuse him
30:07
of being a conspiracy theorist for this. I mean, really,
30:11
considering what Alexander Acosta had to say about Epstein being
30:16
owned by intelligence, considering what we have heard from so
30:19
many other sources, is it really that far of a
30:22
stretch to believe that this guy was being run as
30:25
an asset? And remember, being run as an asset doesn't
30:29
mean the government itself is condoning what you're doing. You're
30:32
being run as an asset by some black group, right,
30:36
some black operation that's off the books. So people try
30:41
that they conflated sometimes and act like you're saying, well,
30:44
the whole government was in on it. That's certainly not
30:47
what I'm saying. But there certainly are people within the
30:50
government who are running these black ops who have zero
30:54
care in the world about using a child molester or
30:58
pedophile like Epstein compromant on people. And that's certainly what
31:04
Epstein was up to, folks. Joe Rogan thinks that convicted
31:09
pedophile Jeffrey Epstein may have been an agent of either
31:12
the CIA or Israel's Masad who is part of a
31:16
plot to collect sensitive information about the rich and powerful.
31:20
We all know that that's what was going on. The
31:22
girls all told us. All of his survivors, how many
31:25
of them have told us about the house being wired?
31:28
How many of us have how many of them have
31:29
told us about the dossiers. You see, I don't worry
31:33
about all the white noise. I listen to what the
31:35
actual survivors have to say, and then what we see
31:38
in court documents, because there's a treasure trove of information
31:42
in all of those leaks, and when you start putting
31:44
the pieces together, there's no way that you can come
31:47
to any other destination besides one that has Epstein being
31:51
protected from by somebody. Rogan broached the topic of Epstein
31:58
and his connection to Harvard University on last Friday's episode
32:01
of his popular podcast, The Joe Rogan Experience, which is
32:05
available on the Spotify streaming service. It's funny he's talking
32:09
about Harvard here, considering mister Steven Pinker, Professor Pinker blocked
32:13
me on Twitter and I've never even had a back
32:16
and forth with the guy. I was looking at something
32:19
else and I happened to run across his Twitter feed
32:22
and it says you're blocked. And let me tell you what.
32:25
I had a great chuckle at that. Imagine being some
32:28
Harvard trained dude, all that money, some big shot and
32:32
getting your lunch eating by a guy who's barely functional,
32:36
a guy who barely made it through state school. Talk
32:39
about wasted money. Huh. But Harvard is just a bedsty,
32:44
a sore of disgustingness. When we're talking about Epstein. You
32:48
want to talk about an open wound. It's Harvard and
32:52
everybody who was involved with Epstein on that campus, and
32:57
with Pinker blocking me, I hope the rest of them
32:59
do the same. Then my next goal will be to
33:01
have the Taliban put a fatwa out on me. The
33:06
podcaster and his guest, comedian Whitney Cummings, began talking about Epstein.
33:10
His comments were cited on Monday by Media eight. Well,
33:14
he definitely donated some money to science, Rogan said. You know,
33:18
but I had a conversation with a scientist who didn't
33:21
buy into the Epstein stuff and wouldn't go to the
33:23
meetings and stuff like that. Now, why would you if
33:26
you were some scientists and this dorky ass dude who
33:29
has no credentials, no anything, and has all of these
33:33
rumors swirling around them. This guy comes and contacts you,
33:36
You're going to take money from him? Oh yeah, that's
33:38
a good idea. And he said he was really shocked
33:42
at how little money he actually donated. Interesting, Cummings said,
33:47
he goes, it wasn't that much money. He goes, it
33:50
was really like he was more than that, Rogan said,
33:53
he was. He was somebody who provided them something that
33:57
they were incapable of getting themselves. Pretty young women, It's
34:03
not that hard to figure out, folks. It's not this
34:06
unsolvable puzzle. These dudes had proclivities. Grew up. You know,
34:12
bookworms nerds never had hot girls, I'm sure. Then this
34:16
disgusting pedophile shows up says to them, I have access
34:20
to all these young girls. Why don't you come to
34:21
my island for a vacation. And if Epstein tells them
34:25
they're underage, or doesn't tell them they're underage, who knows.
34:28
But the fact is, once you're on that island and
34:31
they're engaging in, you know, relations with these girls, now
34:35
they're part of what went on, right, And if you
34:37
build a file on somebody and say to him, look,
34:39
you were sleeping with an underage girl, and I have
34:42
documented proof. You don't think that that person is going
34:45
to become more malleable, somebody who's going to be more
34:48
willing to give you information that you're looking for. Of
34:51
course they are. He was bringing them to parties like
34:55
it was an intelligence operation, Rogan said. Whoever was running it,
34:59
whether it was Masade or whether it was the CIA,
35:02
or whether it was a combination of both, it was
35:05
an intelligence operation. They were bringing in people and compromising them. Look,
35:10
this is Joe Rogan saying it as well. And you
35:13
can like Rogan or not like Rogan, whatever, But if
35:16
you're somebody who is interested in justice in this case.
35:19
Having him talk about this to his wider range of
35:22
audience is a good thing. And I hope that people
35:25
who are listening say to themselves, what the hell, what
35:28
do you mean he was an intelligence operative and they
35:30
start digging deeper, because we all know that you can't
35:33
just scratch the surface of this one. You got to
35:35
dive right into the deep end. And when they would
35:41
compromise them, they would use, you know, whatever they had
35:44
on them to influence their opinions and the way they
35:46
expressed those opinions. Rogan added, and I don't know why
35:49
they would want to do that with scientists, which is
35:52
really strange to me. Well, who knows what those scientists
35:54
were working on. I think we would have to go
35:57
back and look at every single scientist and look at
35:59
the project that were working on, and then try and
36:02
draw the comparisons and the parallels from there. Cummings then
36:08
joked Epstein's like, I need you to do a study
36:10
about how fifteen year old girls are adults. They're more
36:13
mature than we thought. But if a scientist donates, I'm sorry,
36:17
if a rich person donates to a scientist, do they
36:20
have any ability to weigh in, or are they just
36:23
like I get no decisions about how this money is spent.
36:26
She said, that's an interesting point, but really with Epstein
36:29
it was more it wasn't like he was just some
36:31
kind of philanthropist who's trying to help people out. He
36:35
was doing this to manipulate the situation and give him
36:38
more power over things. Rogan replied, I don't know. I mean,
36:43
I would imagine the money goes like if you have
36:46
a research grant and say, like you're working on a
36:48
cure for leukemia or something like that. You know, you
36:51
find established scientists that are working on this thing, and
36:54
then you allocate money so that they can work on
36:56
the projects. Whether or not the person who donates the
36:59
money has any influence on how that money is spent,
37:02
I doubt it. I highly doubt legitimate scientists would adhere
37:07
to that, Rogan added. Epstein killed himself allegedly while awaiting
37:12
trial on sex trafficking charges. In twenty and nineteen. He
37:17
allegedly assaulted dozens of girls, some as young as fourteen
37:20
years old. Allegedly, no, he did, okay, and it was
37:24
over one hundred who got to payout, So the base
37:26
numbers should be the girls who got paid out at
37:29
the very least. So I mean dozens? Really? How about hundreds?
37:33
His madam, you mean co conspirator and fellow child abuser,
37:37
Glen Maxwell, sixty, was sentenced last month to twenty years
37:40
in federal prison for procuring young girls in epstein sex
37:44
trafficking operation. Maxwell's late father, Robert Maxwell, was rumored to
37:49
have ties with the Israeli intelligence service the Macade. Not rumored,
37:54
it's fact, you see. Don't try and muddy the waters
37:57
facts or facts, and what are in facts are rumors.
38:00
But it's a fact that Robert Maxwell had tied to
38:04
ties to the Massade and to Israeli intelligence. In twenty twenty,
38:11
Harvard found that the university accepted more than nine million
38:14
dollars from Epstein during the decade leading up to his
38:17
two thousand and eight sex crimes conviction in Florida State court,
38:21
but barred him from making further donations after that point.
38:25
It concluded that Epstein visited the Cambridge, Massachusetts campus more
38:29
than forty times after his conviction, including as recently as
38:33
twenty eighteen. Martin Noak, a Harvard professor who had close
38:37
ties to Epstein and who allegedly gave him an office
38:40
on campus was disciplined by the school. The visits by
38:44
Epstein stopped after other researchers conplayed to Noak about Epstein's presence.
38:49
Investigators said, imagine being that daft and saying to yourself, Oh,
38:53
it's okay if Epstein comes, nobody's gonna have any issue
38:56
with that. Imagine being that ridiculous. The report cleared Harvard's
39:04
senior leaders of wrongdoings, saying they acted appropriately in their
39:07
dealings with Epstein. Of course it did. Every single one
39:10
of these internal reports, same thing. Oh you did a
39:13
little something wrong, but you didn't do it knowingly. Although
39:19
most of the funding from Epstein had been spent by
39:21
last year, the school said it donated the remaining two
39:24
hundred thousand to groups that support victims of sex trafficking
39:27
and assault. Other universities have also faced scrutiny over their
39:32
ties to Epstein, including MIT and the former director of
39:36
MIT's famous media lab, Joieto, resigned in twenty nineteen amid
39:41
uproar over his financial connections to Epstein. He issued a
39:46
public apology and vowed to raise money for victims of trafficking,
39:50
and that's what they all try and do right to
39:52
assuge people's feelings. Oh well, I'll just raise some money
39:55
and that's going to fix everything. No, it's not. Why
39:58
did you take money from Epstein? Why was Harvard involved?
40:01
And why is Harvard for the most part, avoided any
40:04
real scrutiny. Here I'll tell you why, because once again,
40:08
the institutions are all broken and there is no equitable justice.
40:16
If you'd like to contact me, you can do that
40:17
at Bobby Kopuchi at ProtonMail dot com. That's b O
40:21
b b y c A. P u Cci at ProtonMail
40:25
dot com. You can also find me on Twitter at
40:28
Bobby Underscore c ap U c c I. The link
40:34
that I discussed can be found in the description box.
40:37
All right, everybody, I'll be back later on with a
40:39
little more hope. You're all having a good one.