Latest / Logic Library / 01 Part 2 - The Present Dilemma in Philosophy - Pragmatism - William James

Transcript

01 Part 2 - The Present Dilemma in Philosophy - Pragmatism - William James · Logic Library

0:00
In point of fact, it is far less an account of this actual world
0:05
than a clear addition built upon it, a classic sanctuary in which the rationalist
0:11
fancy may take refuge from the intolerably confused and gothic character which mere facts present.
0:19
It is no explanation of our concrete universe. It is another thing altogether,
0:26
a substitute for it, a remedy, a way of escape. Its
0:32
temperament, if I may use the word temperament here, is utterly alien to
0:37
the temperament of existence in the concrete Refinement is what characterizes our intellectualist philosophies.
0:46
They exquisitely satisfy that craving for a refined object of contemplation, which is so
0:52
powerful an appetite of the mind. But I ask you, in all seriousness
0:57
to look abroad on this colossal universe of concrete facts, on their awful bewilderments,
1:03
their surprises and cruelties, on the wildness which they show, and then
1:08
to tell me whether refined is the one inevitable descriptive adjective that springs to your
1:15
lips. Refinement has its place in things, true enough, But a philosophy
1:23
that breathes out nothing but refinement will never satisfy the empiricist temper of mind.
1:30
It will seem rather a monument of artificiality. So we find men of science
1:38
preferring to turn their backs on metaphysics as on something altogether cloistered and spectral and
1:45
practical, men shaking philosophers dust off their feet and following the call of the
1:49
wild. Truly, there's something a little ghastly in the satisfaction with which a
1:57
pure but unreal system will fill them rationalist mind. Leibniz was a rationalist mind,
2:05
with infinitely more interest in facts than most rationalist minds can show. Yet,
2:10
if you wish for superficiality incarnate, we have only to read that charmingly
2:16
written Theodicy of his, in which he sought to justify the ways of God
2:22
to man and to prove that the world we live in is the best of
2:25
possible worlds. Let me quote a specimen of what I mean. Among other
2:31
obstacles to his optimistic philosophy, it falls to Leibniz to consider the number of
2:37
the eternally damned, that it is infinitely greater in our human case than that
2:43
of those saved. He assumes, as a premise from the theologians, and
2:47
then proceeds to argue this way. Even then, he says, the evil
2:53
will appear as almost nothing in comparison with the good if we once consider the
2:58
real magnitude of the city of God. Quelius Secundos Courio has written a little
3:04
book De Amplitudine Reigni Celestis, which was reprinted not long ago, but he
3:10
failed to compose the extent of the Kingdom of the heavens. The ancients had
3:16
small ideas of the works of God. It seemed to them that only our
3:22
earth had inhabitants, and even the notion of our antipodes gave them pause.
3:29
The rest of the world, for them consisted of some shining globes and a
3:32
few crystalline spheres. But today, whatever be the limits that we may grant
3:38
refuse to the universe, we must recognize in it a countless number of globes
3:45
as big as ours or bigger, which have just as much right as it
3:49
has to support rational inhabitants. Though it does not follow that these need all
3:54
be men. Our Earth is only one among the sixes principal satellites of our
4:01
son, as all the fixed stars are suns. One sees how small a
4:06
place among visible things our Earth takes up, since it is only a satellite
4:12
of one among them. Now, all these suns may be inhabited by no
4:17
one but happy creatures, And nothing obliges to believe that the number of damned
4:26
persons is very great, for a very few instances and samples suffice for the
4:31
utility which good draws from evil. Moreover, since there is no reason to
4:38
suppose that there are stars everywhere, may there not be a great space beyond
4:43
the region of the stars, And this immense space surrounding all this region may
4:49
be replete with happiness and glory? What now becomes of the consideration of our
4:56
earth and of its denizens? Does it not dwindle to something incomparably less than
5:02
a physical point? Since our Earth is but a point compared with the distance
5:08
of the fixed stars. Thus, the part of the universe which we know
5:13
being almost lost in nothingness compared with that which is unknown to us, but
5:17
which we are yet obliged to admit, and all the evils that we know
5:23
lying in this almost nothing. It follows that the evils may be almost nothing
5:28
in comparison with the goods that the universe contains. Leibniz continues elsewhere, there
5:36
is a kind of justice which aims neither at the amendment of the criminal,
5:42
nor at furnishing an example to others, nor at the reparation of the injury.
5:47
This justice is founded in pure fitness, which finds a certain satisfaction in
5:53
the expiation of a wicked deed. The Sucinians and Hobbes objected to this punitive
5:59
justice, which is properly vindictive justice, and which God has reserved for himself
6:03
at many junctures. It is always founded in the fitness of things, and
6:09
satisfies not only the offended party, but all wise lookers on, even as
6:15
beautiful music or a fine piece of architecture satisfies a well constituted mind. It
6:21
is thus that the torments of the damned continue even though they serve no longer
6:27
to turn any one away from sin, and that the rewards of the blessed
6:30
continue even though they confirm no one in good ways. The damned draw to
6:38
themselves ever new penalties by their continuing sins, and the blessed attract every fresh
6:44
joice by their unceasing progress in good Both facts are founded on the principle of
6:50
fitness, for God has made all things harmonious in perfection, as I have
6:57
already said, and its feeble grasp of reality is too obvious to need comment
7:02
from me. It is evident that no realistic image of the experience of a
7:09
damned soul had ever approached the portals of his mind, nor had it occurred
7:15
to him that the smaller is the number of samples of the genus lost soul,
7:20
whom God throws as a sop to the eternal fitness, the more unequitably
7:27
grounded is the glory of the blessed. What it gives us is a cold
7:33
literary exercise whose cheerful substance, even health fire, does not warm. And
7:41
do not tell me that to show the shallowness of rationalist philosophizing, I have
7:46
had to go back to a shallow, wigpited age. The optimism of present
7:51
day irrationalism sounds just as shallow to the fact loving mind. The actual universe
8:00
is a thing wide open, but rationalism makes systems, and systems must be
8:07
closed for men in practical life. Perfection is something far off and still in
8:13
process of achievement. This, for rationalism is but the illusion of the finite
8:20
and relative the absolute ground of things is a perfection, eternally complete. I
8:26
find a fine example of revolt against this airy and shallow optimism of current religious
8:33
philosophy in a publication of that valiant anarchistic writer, Morrison I Swift. Mister
8:41
Swift's anarchism goes a little farther than mind us, But I confess that I
8:46
sympathize a good deal, and some of you I know will sympathize heartily.
8:50
With his dissatisfaction with the idealistic optimisms now in vogue, he begins his pamphlet
8:58
on Human Submission with a series of city reporters items from newspapers, suicides,
9:05
deaths from starvation and the like as specimens of our civilized regime. For instance,
9:13
after trudging through the snow from one end of the city to the other
9:18
in the vain hope of securing employment, and with his wife and six children
9:22
without food, and ordered to leave their home in an upper East side tenement
9:28
house because of non payment of rent, John Krkoran, a clerk to day,
9:33
ended his life by drinking carbolic acid. Corcoran lost his position three weeks
9:39
ago through illness, and during the period of idleness, his scanty savings disappeared.
9:46
Yesterday, he obtained work with a gang of city snow shovelers, but
9:52
he was too weak from illness and was forced to quit after an hour's trial
9:56
with a shovel. Then the weary tas ask of looking for employment was again
10:01
resumed. Thoroughly discouraged, Corcoran returned to his home last night to find his
10:07
wife and children without food and the notice of dispossession on the door. On
10:13
the following morning, he drank the poison. The records of many more such
10:18
cases lie before me. Mister Swift goes on. An encyclopedia might easily be
10:22
filled with her kind. These few I cite as an interpretation of the universe.
10:30
We are aware of the presence of God in his world, says a
10:33
writer in a recent English review. The very presence of ill in the temporal
10:37
order is the condition of the perfection of the eternal order, writes Professor Royce
10:45
The World and the Individual, Part two, page three hundred and eighty five.
10:50
The absolute is the richer for every discord and for all diversity which it
10:54
embraces, says F. H. Bradley Appearance and Reality, page two hundred
11:01
four. He means that these slain men make the universe richer, and that
11:07
is philosophy. But while Professes Royson, Bradley and a whole host of guileless,
11:15
thoroughfed thinkers are unveeling reality and the absolute and explaining away evil and pain.
11:24
This is the condition of the only beings known to us anywhere in the
11:28
universe with a developed consciousness of what the universe is. What these people experience
11:37
is reality. It gives us an absolute phase of the universe. It is
11:43
the personal experience of those most qualified in all our circle of knowledge to have
11:50
experience to tell us what is now? What us thinking about the experience of
11:58
these persons, to compared with directly personally feeling it as they feel it,
12:07
The philosophers are dealing in shades, while those who live and feel no truth,
12:15
and the mind of mankind, not yet the mind of philosophers and of
12:20
the propriety class, but of the great mass of the silently thinking and feeling
12:26
men, is coming to this view. They are judging the universe as they
12:33
have heretofore permitted the hero fans of religion and learning to judge them. This
12:39
cleveland working man killing his children and himself another of the cited cases is one
12:46
of the elemental, stupendous facts of this modern world and of this universe.
12:54
It cannot be glossed over or minimized away by all the treatises on God and
12:58
love and being helplessly existing in their haughty monumental vacuity. This is one of
13:07
the simple, irreducible elements of this world's life, after millions of years of
13:13
divine opportunity and twenty centuries of christ. It is in the moral world,
13:20
like atoms or subatoms in the physical, primary, indestructible, and what it
13:26
blazons to man is the imposture of all philosophy which does not see in such
13:33
events the consummate factor of conscious experience. These facts invincibly prove religion annullity.
13:43
Man will not give religion two thousand centuries or twenty centuries more to try itself
13:50
and waste human time. Its time is up, its probation is ended,
13:58
its own record ends it. Mankind has not sons and eternities to spare for
14:05
trying out discredited systems. Footnote Morrison I Swift Human Submission, Part second,
14:15
Philadelphia Liberty Press, nineteen hundred and five, pages four to ten. Such
14:22
is the reaction of an empiricist mind upon the rationalist bill of fare. It
14:28
is an absolute no, I thank you. Religion, says missus Swift,
14:33
is like a sleep walker, to whom actual things are blank. And such,
14:39
though possibly less tensely charged with feeling, is the verdict of every seriously
14:45
inquiring amateur in philosophy to day who turns to the philosophy professors for the wherewithal
14:52
to satisfy the fullness of his nature's needs. Empiricist writers give him a met
15:00
materialism. Rationalists give him something religious, but to that religion, actual things
15:07
are blank. He becomes thus the judge of us philosophers, tender or tough
15:13
he finds us wanting. None of us may treat his verdicts disdainfully, for
15:18
after all, he is the typically perfect mind, the mind the sum of
15:24
whose demands is greatest, the mind whose criticisms and dissatisfactions are fatal in the
15:30
long run. It is at this point that my own solution begins to appear.
15:37
I offer the oddly named thing pragmatism, as a philosophy that can satisfy
15:41
both kinds of demand. It can remain religious like the rationalisms, but at
15:48
the same time, like the empiricisms, it can preserve the richest intimacy with
15:54
facts. I hope I may be able to leave many of you with as
16:00
favorable an opinion of it as I preserve myself. Yet, as I am
16:04
near the end of my hour, I will not introduce pragmatism bodily. Now.
16:10
I will begin with it on the stroke of the clock next time.
16:12
I prefer at the present moment to return a little on what I have said.
16:18
If any of you here are professional philosophers, and some of you I
16:21
know to be such, you will doubtless have felt my discourse so far to
16:26
have been crude in an unpardonable, nay, in an almost incredible degree,
16:33
tender minded and tough minded. What a barbaric disjunction? And in general,
16:38
when philosophy is all compacted of delicate intellectualities and subtleties and scrupulosities, and when
16:47
every possible sort of combination and transition obtains within its bounds, what a brutal
16:53
caricature and reduction of highest things to the lowest possible expression is it to represent
17:00
and its field of conflict as a sort of rough and tumble fight between two
17:04
hostile temperaments. What a childishly external view. And again, how stupid it
17:12
is to treat the abstractness of rationalist systems as a crime, and to damn
17:19
them because they offer themselves as sanctuaries and places of escape rather than as prolongations
17:26
of the world of facts. Are not all our theories just remedies and places
17:33
of escape? And if philosophy is to be religious, how can she be
17:37
anything else than a place of escape from the crassness of reality surface? What
17:44
better thing can she do than raises out of our animal senses and show us
17:48
another and a nobler home for our minds in that great framework of ideal principles,
17:56
subtending all reality which the intellect divine. How can principles and general views
18:03
ever be anything but abstract outlines? Was Colon Cathedral built without an architect's plan
18:11
on paper? Its refinement in itself an abomination, is concrete rudeness the only
18:19
thing that's true. Believe me, I feel the full force of the indictment.
18:26
The picture I have given is indeed monstrously oversimplified and rude, But like
18:32
all abstractions, it will prove to have its use. If philosophers can treat
18:36
the life of the universe abstractly, they must not complain of an abstract treatment
18:41
of the life of philosophy itself. In point of fact, the picture I
18:45
have given is, however coarse and sketchy, literally true. Temperaments, with
18:52
their cravings and refusals, do determine men in their philosophies, and always will.
19:00
The details of systems may be reasoned out piecemeal, and when the student
19:03
is working at a system, he may often forget the forest for the single
19:08
tree. But when labor is accomplished, the mind always performs its big summarizing
19:15
act, and the system forthwith stands over against one like a living thing,
19:21
with that strange, simple note of individuality which haunts our memory like the wraith
19:26
of the man when a friend or enemy of ours is dead. Not only
19:32
Walt Whitman could write, who touches this book touches a man? The books
19:38
of all the great philosophers are like so many men. Our sense of an
19:42
essential personal flavor in each one of them, typical but indescribable, is the
19:48
finest fruit of our own accomplished philosophic education. What the system pretends to be
19:55
is a picture of the great universe of God what it is, and also
20:00
flagrantly is the revelation of how intensely odd the personal flavor of some fellow creature
20:07
is once reduced to these terms, and all our philosophies get reduced to them.
20:14
In minds made critical by learning, our commerce with the systems reverted to
20:18
the informal, to the instinctive human reaction of satisfaction or dislike. We grow
20:26
as peremptory in our rejection or admission, as when a person presents himself as
20:32
a candidate for our favor. Our verdicts are couched in as simple adjectives of
20:37
praise or dispraise. We measure the total character of the universe as we feel
20:42
it against the flavor of the philosophy profit us. And one word is enough
20:49
Stadt der leib digen Natur. We say, da got dimension schuf henain that
20:56
nebulous concoction, that wooden, that straight laced thing, that crabbed artificiality,
21:03
that musty schoolroom product, that sick man's dream, Our way with it,
21:11
our way with all of them impossible impossible. Our work over the details of
21:18
his system is indeed what gives us our resultant impression of the philosopher, but
21:25
it is on the resultant impression itself that we react. Expertness in philosophy is
21:30
measured by the definiteness of our summarizing reactions by the immediate perceptive epithet with which
21:40
the expert hits such complex objects off. But great expertness is not necessary for
21:47
the epithet to come. Few people have definitely articulated philosophies of their own,
21:55
but almost everyone has his own peculiar sense of a certain total character in the
21:59
union, and of the inadequacy fully to match it of the peculiar system that
22:04
he knows. They don't just cover his world. One will be too dapper,
22:11
another to pedantic, a third too much of a job, lot of
22:15
opinions, a fourth to morbid, and a fifth to artificial or what not.
22:21
At any rate, he and we know offhand that such philosophers are out
22:26
of plumb and out of key and out of whack, and have no business
22:30
speak up in the universe's name. Plato, Locke, Spinoza, Mill cared
22:37
Hegel. I prudently avoid names nearer home. I am sure that to many
22:45
of you, my hearers, these names are little more than reminders of as
22:49
many curious personal ways of falling short. It would be an obvious absurdity if
22:56
such ways of taking the universe were actually true. We philosophers have to reckon
23:02
with such feelings on our part. In the last resort, I repeat,
23:07
it will be by them that all our philosophers shall ultimately be judged. The
23:12
finally victorious way of looking at things will be the most completely impressive way to
23:18
the normal run of minds. One word more, namely about philosophers necessarily being
23:26
abstract outlines. There are outlines and outlines. Outlines of buildings that are fat
23:33
conceived in the cube by their planner, and outlines of buildings invented flat on
23:38
paper with the aid of rule and compass. These remain skinny and emaciated even
23:45
when set up in stone and mortar, and the outline already suggests that results.
23:52
An outline in itself is meager, truly, but it does not necessarily
23:56
suggest a meager thing. It is the essential meagerness of what is suggested by
24:03
the usual rationalistic philosophies that moves empiricists to their gesture of rejection. The case
24:11
of Herbert Spencer's system is much to the point here rationalists feel his fearful array
24:18
of insufficiencies, his dry schoolmaster temperament, the hurdy gurdy monotony of him,
24:25
his presence for cheap makeshifts in argument, his lack of education even in mechanical
24:30
principles, and in general, the vagueness of all his fundamental ideas, his
24:36
whole system wooden as if knocked together out of cracked hemlock boards. And yet
24:44
the half of England wants to bury him in Westminster Abbey? Why why does
24:51
Spencer call out so much reverence in spite of his weakness in rationalistic eyes?
24:57
Why should so many educated men who feel that weakness? You and I perhaps
25:04
wish to see him in the abbey, notwithstanding, simply because we feel his
25:11
heart to be in the right place Philosophically, his principles may be all skin
25:18
and bone, but at any rate, his books try to mold themselves upon
25:22
the particular shape of this particular world's carcass. The noise of facts resounds through
25:32
all his chapters. The citations of fact never sees. He emphasizes facts,
25:38
turns his face towards their quarter, and that is enough. It means the
25:45
right kind of thing for the empiricist mind. The pragmatistic philosophy of which I
25:52
hope to begin talking in my next lecture, preserves as cordial a relation with
25:56
facts, and unlike Spencer's philosophy, it neither begins nor ends by turning positive
26:03
religious constructions out of doors. It treats them cordially as well. I hope
26:11
I may lead you to find it just the mediating way of thinking that you
26:15
require. End of Lecture one